Sky Annual Review 2006 British Sky Broadcasting Group Plc Whatever, Wherever, Whenever
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Statement: Ofcom's Plan of Work 2021/22
Ofcom’s plan of work 2021/22 Making communications work for everyone Ofcom’s plan of work 2021/22 – Welsh translation STATEMENT: Publication Date: 26 March 2021 Contents Section 1. Chief Executive’s foreword 1 2. Overview 3 3. Our goals and priorities for 2021/22 9 4. Delivering good outcomes for consumers across the UK 31 Annex A1. What we do 37 A2. Project work for 2021/2022 39 Plan of Work 2021/22 1. Chief Executive’s foreword Ofcom is the UK’s communications regulator, with a mission to make communications work for everyone. We serve the interests of consumers and businesses across the UK’s nations and regions, through our work in mobile and fixed telecoms, broadcasting, spectrum, post and online services. Over the past year we have learned that being connected is everything. High-quality, reliable communications services have never mattered more to people’s lives. But as consumers shift their habits increasingly online, our communications sectors are transforming fast. It is an exciting moment for our industries and for Ofcom as a regulator - it requires long-term focus alongside speed and agility in response to change. Against this backdrop our statement sets out our detailed goals for the coming financial year, and how we plan to achieve them. On telecoms, Ofcom has just confirmed a new long-term framework for investment in gigabit- capable fixed networks. In the coming year, we will shift our focus to support delivery against this programme, alongside investment and innovation in 5G and new mobile infrastructure. Following legislation in Parliament, we will put in place new rules to hold operators to account for the security and resilience of their networks. -
Abstract a Case Study of Cross-Ownership Waivers
ABSTRACT A CASE STUDY OF CROSS-OWNERSHIP WAIVERS: FRAMING NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF RUPERT MURDOCH’S REQUESTS TO KEEP THE NEW YORK POST by Rachel L. Seeman Media ownership is an important regulatory issue that is enforced by the Federal Communications Commission. The FCC, Congress, court and public interest groups share varying viewpoints concerning what the ownership limits should be and whether companies should be granted a waiver to be excused from the rules. News Corporation is one media firm that has a history of seeking these waivers, particularly for the New York Post and television stations in same community. This study conducted a qualitative framing analysis of news articles from the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal to determine if the viewpoints expressed by the editorial boards were reflected in reports on News Corp.’s attempt to receive cross-ownership waivers. The analysis uncovered ten frames the newspapers used to assist in reporting the events and found that 80% of these frames did parallel the positions the paper’s editorial boards took concerning ownership waivers. A CASE STUDY OF CROSS-OWNERSHIP WAIVERS: FRAMING NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF RUPERT MURDOCH’S REQUESTS TO KEEP THE NEW YORK POST A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Communications by Rachel Leianne Seeman Miami University Oxford, OH 2009 Advisor: __________________________________ (Dr. Bruce Drushel) Reader: __________________________________ (Dr. Howard -
Press Freedom Under Attack
LEVESON’S ILLIBERAL LEGACY AUTHORS HELEN ANTHONY MIKE HARRIS BREAKING SASHY NATHAN PADRAIG REIDY NEWS FOREWORD BY PROFESSOR TIM LUCKHURST PRESS FREEDOM UNDER ATTACK , LEVESON S ILLIBERAL LEGACY FOREWORD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. WHY IS THE FREE PRESS IMPORTANT? 2. THE LEVESON INQUIRY, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 A background to Leveson: previous inquiries and press complaints bodies 2.2 The Leveson Inquiry’s Limits • Skewed analysis • Participatory blind spots 2.3 Arbitration 2.4 Exemplary Damages 2.5 Police whistleblowers and press contact 2.6 Data Protection 2.7 Online Press 2.8 Public Interest 3. THE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK – A LEGAL ANALYSIS 3.1 A rushed and unconstitutional regime 3.2 The use of statute to regulate the press 3.3 The Royal Charter and the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 • The use of a Royal Charter • Reporting to Parliament • Arbitration • Apologies • Fines 3.4 The Crime and Courts Act 2013 • Freedom of expression • ‘Provided for by law’ • ‘Outrageous’ • ‘Relevant publisher’ • Exemplary damages and proportionality • Punitive costs and the chilling effect • Right to a fair trial • Right to not be discriminated against 3.5 The Press Recognition Panel 4. THE WIDER IMPACT 4.1 Self-regulation: the international norm 4.2 International response 4.3 The international impact on press freedom 5. RECOMMENDATIONS 6. CONCLUSION 3 , LEVESON S ILLIBERAL LEGACY 4 , LEVESON S ILLIBERAL LEGACY FOREWORD BY TIM LUCKHURST PRESS FREEDOM: RESTORING BRITAIN’S REPUTATION n January 2014 I felt honour bound to participate in a meeting, the very ‘Our liberty cannot existence of which left me saddened be guarded but by the and ashamed. -
In Re Ford Motor Company Securities Litigation 00-CV-74233
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Master C e No. 00-74233 In re FORD MOTOR CO. CLASS A TION SECURITIES LITIGATION The Honorable Avern Cohn DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 l r" CJ'^ zti ^ OVERVIEW 1. This is an action on behalf of all purchasers of the common stock of Ford Motor Company, Inc. ("Ford") between March 31, 1998 and August 31, 2000 (the "Class Period"). This action arises out of the conduct of Ford to conceal from the investment community defects in Ford's Explorer sport-utility vehicles equipped with steel-belted radial ATX tires manufactured by Bridgestone Corp.'s U.S. subsidiary, Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. ("Bridgestone/Firestone"). The Explorer is Ford's most important product and its largest selling vehicle, which has accounted for 25% of Ford's profits during the 1990s. Due to the success of the Explorer, Ford became Bridgestone/ Firestone's largest customer and sales of ATX tires have been the largest source of revenues and profits for Bridgestone/Firestone during the 1990s. During the Class Period, Ford and Bridgestone had knowledge ofthousands ofclaims for and complaints concerning ATX tire failures, especially ATX tires manufactured at Bridgestone/Firestone's Decatur, Illinois plant during and after a bitter 1994-1996 strike, due to design and manufacturing defects in, and under-inflation of, the tires, which, when combined with the unreasonably dangerous and unstable nature of the Explorer, resulted in over 2,200 rollover accidents, 400 serious injuries and 174 fatalities by 2000. -
UVA-BC-0145 FORD's E-BUSINESS STRATEGY in the Fall of 1999, Jacques Nasser, Ford Motor Company President and Chief Executive O
Graduate School of Business Administration UVA-BC-0145 University of Virginia FORD’S E-BUSINESS STRATEGY In the fall of 1999, Jacques Nasser, Ford Motor Company president and chief executive officer, announced a grand new vision for the firm: to become the “world’s leading consumer company providing automotive products and services.” Key to that dream was the transformation of the business using Web technologies. The company that taught the world how to mass- produce cars for the consumer market was going to become the leading e-business firm. Brian P. Kelly, Ford’s e-business vice president, described Ford’s plan to rebuild itself as a move to “consumercentric” from “dealercentric,” and stated that Ford would transform itself from being a “manufacturer to dealers” into a “marketer to consumers.” Our consumer-connect business has a totally integrated strategy to reach the consumer in conjunction with our dealers at every touch point. Ford continues to be at the forefront, integrating our global e-commerce activity from the consumer back through the entire supply chain, including linking our Customer Assistance Centers and in-vehicle communications.1 New Web sites were launched for buyers and owners. In-car computer and communications services were announced that would bring travel, security, entertainment, and Web access to the motorist and an electronic connection between consumers and the Ford Motor Company. In February, the company announced it was purchasing Internet PCs for all employees, “to reach its vision of being on the leading edge of technology and connect more closely with its customers.” In March 2000, the company announced the creation of a business- to-business integrated supplier exchange through a single global portal, a joint venture with GM and DaimlerChrysler to create the world’s largest virtual marketplace. -
Important Notice
IMPORTANT NOTICE THIS OFFERING IS AVAILABLE ONLY TO INVESTORS WHO ARE NON-U.S. PERSONS (AS DEFINED IN REGULATION S UNDER THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 (THE “SECURITIES ACT”) (“REGULATION S”)) LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES. IMPORTANT: You must read the following before continuing. The following applies to the attached document (the “document”) and you are therefore advised to read this carefully before reading, accessing or making any other use of the document. In accessing the document, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions, including any modifications to them any time you receive any information from Sky plc (formerly known as British Sky Broadcasting Group plc) (the “Issuer”), Sky Group Finance plc (formerly known as BSkyB Finance UK plc), Sky UK Limited (formerly known as British Sky Broadcasting Limited), Sky Subscribers Services Limited or Sky Telecommunications Services Limited (formerly known as BSkyB Telecommunications Services Limited) (together, the “Guarantors”) or Barclays Bank PLC or Société Générale (together, the “Joint Lead Managers”) as a result of such access. NOTHING IN THIS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES AN OFFER OF SECURITIES FOR SALE IN THE UNITED STATES OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION WHERE IT IS UNLAWFUL TO DO SO. THE SECURITIES AND THE GUARANTEES HAVE NOT BEEN, AND WILL NOT BE, REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT, OR THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE OF THE UNITED STATES OR OTHER JURISDICTION AND THE SECURITIES AND THE GUARANTEES MAY NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, WITHIN THE UNITED STATES OR TO, OR FOR THE ACCOUNT OR BENEFIT OF, U.S. -
Public Citizen Copyright © 2016 by Public Citizen Foundation All Rights Reserved
Public Citizen Copyright © 2016 by Public Citizen Foundation All rights reserved. Public Citizen Foundation 1600 20th St. NW Washington, D.C. 20009 www.citizen.org ISBN: 978-1-58231-099-2 Doyle Printing, 2016 Printed in the United States of America PUBLIC CITIZEN THE SENTINEL OF DEMOCRACY CONTENTS Preface: The Biggest Get ...................................................................7 Introduction ....................................................................................11 1 Nader’s Raiders for the Lost Democracy....................................... 15 2 Tools for Attack on All Fronts.......................................................29 3 Creating a Healthy Democracy .....................................................43 4 Seeking Justice, Setting Precedents ..............................................61 5 The Race for Auto Safety ..............................................................89 6 Money and Politics: Making Government Accountable ..............113 7 Citizen Safeguards Under Siege: Regulatory Backlash ................155 8 The Phony “Lawsuit Crisis” .........................................................173 9 Saving Your Energy .................................................................... 197 10 Going Global ...............................................................................231 11 The Fifth Branch of Government................................................ 261 Appendix ......................................................................................271 Acknowledgments ........................................................................289 -
Vote Summary Report Reporting Period: 10/01/2017 to 12/31/2017
Vote Summary Report Reporting Period: 10/01/2017 to 12/31/2017 PhosAgro PJSC Meeting Date: 10/02/2017 Country: Russia Meeting Type: Special Proposal Vote Number Proposal Text Mgmt Rec Instruction 1 Approve Early Termination of Powers of For For Board of Directors 2.1 Elect Igor Antoshin as Director None Against 2.2 Elect Andrey A. Guryev as Director None For 2.3 Elect Andrey G. Guryev as Director None Against 2.4 Elect Yury Krugovykh as Director None For 2.5 Elect Sven Ombudstvedt as Director None For 2.6 Elect Roman Osipov as Director None For 2.7 Elect Natalya Pashkevich as Director None For 2.8 Elect James Beeland Rogers, Jr. as Director None For 2.9 Elect Ivan Rodionov as Director None Against 2.10 Elect Marcus J. Rhodes as Director None For 2.11 Elect Mikhail Rybnikov as Director None For 2.12 Elect Aleksandr Sharabayko as Director None For 2.13 Elect Andrey Sharonov as Director None For 3 Approve Remuneration of Directors For For 4 Amend Charter For For 5 Amend Regulations on General Meetings For For 6 Approve Dividends For For PhosAgro PJSC Meeting Date: 10/02/2017 Country: Russia Meeting Type: Special Proposal Vote Number Proposal Text Mgmt Rec Instruction 1 Approve Early Termination of Powers of For For Board of Directors Page 1 of 767 Vote Summary Report Reporting Period: 10/01/2017 to 12/31/2017 PhosAgro PJSC Proposal Vote Number Proposal Text Mgmt Rec Instruction 2.1 Elect Igor Antoshin as Director None Against 2.2 Elect Andrey A. -
2010 BHP Billiton Summary Review
In this Summary Review People and Safety Our results at a glance Karen Wood describes our commitment to our people A snapshot of our results and five-year financial summary and safety, including our approach to leadership See page 2 See page 24 Chairman’s Review – Environment and Communities Our strategy delivers The way we manage our responsibilities to the An overview of the year by Jacques Nasser AO environment and communities in which we operate See page 4 is explained by J Michael Yeager See page 26 Chief Executive Officer’s Report – An unchanged strategy Board of Directors The year in review, by Marius Kloppers The profiles of BHP Billiton’s Directors See page 6 See page 28 Customer Sector Groups Group Management Committee An update from each of our Customer Sector Groups, Profiles of the senior management team at BHP Billiton providing a snapshot of BHP Billiton’s operational performance See page 31 See page 13 Corporate Governance Summary Finance and Marketing overview A summary of BHP Billiton governance An outline of our financial position from Alex Vanselow and See page 32 an update on our marketing operations by Alberto Calderon Remuneration Summary See page 20 Key policy principles and information about Performance update of our operations our remuneration Details of key achievements in Ferrous and Coal See page 34 by Marcus Randolph and highlights of the year Shareholder information in Non-Ferrous by Andrew Mackenzie Key dates and information relevant for shareholders, See page 22 including our dividend policy and payments See page 36 Corporate Directory A list of major BHP Billiton offices and share registries See Inside Back Cover This Summary Review is designed to provide you with an update on This Summary Review is not a substitute for the Annual Report 2010 the operations and performance of BHP Billiton over the year ended and does not contain all the information needed to give as full an 30 June 2010 in a concise and easy-to-read format. -
Bad News for Disabled People: How the Newspapers Are Reporting Disability
Strathclyde Centre for Disability Research and Glasgow Media Unit Bad News for Disabled People: How the newspapers are reporting disability In association with: Contents PAGE 1. Acknowledgements 2 2. Author details 3 3. Main findings 4 4. Summary 6 Part 2 5. Introduction 16 6. Methodology and Design 18 6.1 Content analysis 18 6.2 Audience reception analysis 20 7. Content analysis:Results 22 7.1 Political discussion and critiques of policy 22 7.2 Changes in the profile of disability coverage and ‘sympathetic’ portrayals 32 7.3 Changes in the profile of representations of the ‘undeserving’ disability claimant 38 8. Audience reception analysis 59 8.1 How is disability reported in the media 59 8.2 Views on disabled people 62 8.3 Views on benefits and benefit claimants 64 8.4 Views on government policy 67 9. Conclusion 69 10. References 73 Appendix 1. Coding schedule 80 Appendix 2. Detailed descriptors for coding and analysis 85 1 Acknowledgements This research was commissioned by Inclusion London and their financial sponsorship and administrative backing is gratefully recognised. In particular we would like to acknowledge the help and collaborative support of Anne Kane who provided us with very valuable and helpful advice throughout the research and had a significant input in the drafting of the final report. We would also like to thank the following researchers who worked in the Glasgow Media Group and who tirelessly, carefully and painstakingly undertook the content analysis of the media: Stevie Docherty, Louise Gaw, Daniela Latina, Colin Macpherson, Hannah Millar and Sarah Watson. We are grateful to Allan Sutherland and Jo Ferrie for their contributions to the data collection. -
Annex 12 Models for Nations and Regions PSB Television
Ofcom Public Service Broadcasting Review Models for Nations and Regions PSB Television: A Focus on Scotland An Overview by Oliver & Ohlbaum Associates Ltd September 2008 DISCLAIMER This report has been produced by Oliver & Ohlbaum Associates Limited (“O&O”) for Ofcom as part of the ongoing Review of Public Service Broadcasting (the “PSB Review”, ”the Project”). While the information provided herein is believed to be accurate, O&O makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. The information contained herein was prepared expressly for use herein and is based on certain assumptions and information available at the time this report was prepared. There is no representation, warranty or other assurance that any of the projections or estimates will be realised, and nothing contained within this report is or should be relied upon as a promise or representation as to the future. In furnishing this report, O&O reserves the right to amend or replace the report at any time and undertakes no obligation to provide the users with access to any additional information. O&O’s principal task has been to collect, analyse and present data on the market and its prospects under a number of potential scenarios. O&O has not been asked to verify the accuracy of the information it has received from whatever source. Although O&O has been asked to express its opinion on the market and business prospects, it has never been the users’ intention that O&O should be held legally liable for its judgements in this regard. -
New Newscorp LLC (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 20, 2012 File No. 001- UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10 GENERAL FORM FOR REGISTRATION OF SECURITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 New Newscorp LLC (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 00-0000000 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 212-852-7000 Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which to be so registered each class is to be registered Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share [·] Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☒ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ☐ NEW NEWSCORP LLC INFORMATION REQUIRED IN REGISTRATION STATEMENT CROSS-REFERENCE SHEET BETWEEN INFORMATION STATEMENT AND ITEMS OF FORM 10 Cross-Reference Sheet Between Information Statement and Items of Form 10 Certain information required to be included in this Form 10 is incorporated by reference to specifically-identified portions of the body of the information statement filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 (the “Information Statement”).