Stratigraphy of Lake Michigan Lobe Deposits in Van Buren County, Michigan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stratigraphy of Lake Michigan Lobe Deposits in Van Buren County, Michigan Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 6-2003 Stratigraphy of Lake Michigan Lobe Deposits in Van Buren County, Michigan Steven P. Beukema Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Beukema, Steven P., "Stratigraphy of Lake Michigan Lobe Deposits in Van Buren County, Michigan" (2003). Master's Theses. 4445. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/4445 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. f STRATIGRAPHY OF LAKE MICiflGANLOBE DEPOSITS IN VAN BUREN COUNTY, MICiflGAN by Steven P. Beukema A Thesis Submitted to the Facultyof The Graduate College in partial fulfillmentof the requirements forthe Degree of Master of Science Departmentof Geosciences WesternMichigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June 2003 Copyright by Steven P. Beukema 2003 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS There are several people who deserve recognition for their generous support. I would first like to thank Bill Bush forsuggesting the idea of doing graduate work in geology at WMU. Two of my cohorts in the department, Andrew Kozlowski and Brian Bird, deserve special recognition for endless hours of ruminating with me about many things, in particular about the last 20,000 years in southwest Michigan. I wish also to thank Andrew forstepping out of his pessimistic outlook to offerme continual encouragement to pursue science and academia. Brian was always willing to spend time making figures and answering my constant questions about GIS, Canvas, and a host of other programs. I would also like to thank Brian for motivating me and for helping me stay close to my desired schedule when it came time to start writing. I would like to thank the USGS STATEMAP program for two years of funding while working on this project. My committee members, Dr. David Barnes and Dr. William Sauck, deserve recognition for their helpful comments and advice. My main advisor, Dr. Alan Kehew, deserves my gratitude and recognition for his guidance, insight, advice, and for being a great guy to work with. Finally, I would like to thank my family for being supportive of me during these endless years as a professional student. Steven P. Beukema ii STRATIGRAPHY OF LAKE MICID GAN LOBE DEPOSITS INVAN BUREN COUNTY, MICIDGAN Steven P. Beukema, M.S. WesternMichigan University, 2003 The surficial glacial deposits and landforms of Van Buren County were recently mapped at a 1:24,000 scale as part of a STATEMAP project. Several borings were drilled to supplement the surface data. Six of these borings were characterized in detail by means of gamma ray logging, textural analysis, and X-ray diffractionof the clay-sized fractionof the diamicton units. Results from this study reveal two diamicton units at stratigraphicallydistinct positions that can be correlated across the county and that are separated by a thick sequence of lacustrine sediments. Correlation of diamicton and lacustrine units was accomplished by analyzing several factors, including topography, stratigraphic position, texture, and clay mineralogy. The diamicton units in this study correlate to an upper and lower diamicton at the bluffs of Lake Michigan as well as to inland surface diamictons that Monaghan et al. (1986) characterize and informally name the Saugatuck and Ganges tills. This stratigraphy also correlates with other regional studies (Wong, 2002; Bird, in preparation) and suggests an advance of the Lake Michigan Lobe at least as far as the Kalamazoo Moraine, a subsequent retreat of the lobe with a significantperiod of a lacustrinedeposition, followedby a readvance. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................... n LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................. vi LIST OF FIGURES................................................................................................. Vil LIST OF EQUATIONS .......................................................................................... X LIST OF PLATES................................................................................................... XI CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................... 1 Scope of Research andObjectives ...... .............. ......... ... ... .... ... ...... .. .... 1 Location andRegional Glacial Geologic Setting .. .............................. 3 Bedrock Geology................................................................................. 6 Glacial Geology................................................................................... 8 Regional Glacial Geology............................................................ 8 Glacial Geology of the Study Area ...... .............. ...... ............ ........ 11 Glacial History / PreviousWork.................................................. 14 II. METHODS ................................................................................................. 25 Field Methods...................................................................................... 25 Laboratory Analysis............................................................................. 25 Textural Analysis Procedure........................................................ 25 X-ray Diffractionof Clay Minerals.............................................. 28 Computer Analysis.............................................................................. 32 Processing of Gamma Ray Logs.................................................. 32 iii Table of Contents-continued Processing of Sieve Data ........................................................... 33 Processing of XRDData........... ................................................. 34 Postprocessing of Data............................................................... 35 III. RESULTS.......................................................... :...................................... 36 Individual Core Descriptions............................................................. 36 VB-99-03 .................. ........ ......... .. ............... ........ ........ ........... .... 36 VB-0 l-07................................................................................... 43 VB-01-09 .............. .................... .................................. ............... 46 VB-02-01................................................................................... 57 VB-02-02 ........... ..................... .......................... ........ ......... ..... ... 61 VB-02-03 .. .......... .. ........... ...... ... ....... ........ ......... ....... ......... ....... 69 IV. DISCUSSION.......................................................................................... 78 Correlation of Diamicton Units......................................................... 78 Stratigraphic Position................................................................. 78 TopographicConsiderations ...................................................... 80 Textural Comparisons................................................................ 85 Insights from Clay Mineralogy ............ .. .. ................................ .. 89 VB-02-03.. ............. ................. ................................................... 93 Correlation of Lacustrine Units......................................................... 97 Stratigraphic Position................................................................. 98 Topographic Considerations ...................................................... 98 Textural Comparisons................................................................ 100 iv Table of Contents-continued Insights from Clay Mineralogy ..... ...... ..... ... ......... ... .. .. ... ... .. ....... 102 Correlation with Other Data................................................................ 103 Grain Size Statistical Parameters..... .. .... .. ...... .. .................. ........ .. ... ... 104 V. CONCLUSIONS......................................................................................... 108 APPENDICES A. Textural Analysis Results........................................................................... 112 B. X-ray DiffiactionResults............................................................................ 127 C. Stokes's Law............................................................................................... 130 D. Student's t-test ............................................................................................ 133 BIBLIOGRAPHY................................................................................................... 136 V LIST OFTABLES 1. X-ray diffractionproperties of select clay minerals..................................... 29 2. X-ray Diffractometer settings································'.·················"·················· 33 3. Average texture by unit for VB-99-03 ......................................................... 39 4. Average texture by unit forVB-01-07 ......................................................... 45 5. Average texture by unit for VB-01-09 . ........ .................................. .......... .... 51 6. Average texture by unit forVB-02-01 . .................... .......
Recommended publications
  • Lexicon of Pleistocene Stratigraphic Units of Wisconsin
    Lexicon of Pleistocene Stratigraphic Units of Wisconsin ON ATI RM FO K CREE MILLER 0 20 40 mi Douglas Member 0 50 km Lake ? Crab Member EDITORS C O Kent M. Syverson P P Florence Member E R Lee Clayton F Wildcat A Lake ? L L Member Nashville Member John W. Attig M S r ik be a F m n O r e R e TRADE RIVER M a M A T b David M. Mickelson e I O N FM k Pokegama m a e L r Creek Mbr M n e M b f a e f lv m m i Sy e l M Prairie b C e in Farm r r sk er e o emb lv P Member M i S ill S L rr L e A M Middle F Edgar ER M Inlet HOLY HILL V F Mbr RI Member FM Bakerville MARATHON Liberty Grove M Member FM F r Member e E b m E e PIERCE N M Two Rivers Member FM Keene U re PIERCE A o nm Hersey Member W le FM G Member E Branch River Member Kinnickinnic K H HOLY HILL Member r B Chilton e FM O Kirby Lake b IG Mbr Boundaries Member m L F e L M A Y Formation T s S F r M e H d l Member H a I o V r L i c Explanation o L n M Area of sediment deposited F e m during last part of Wisconsin O b er Glaciation, between about R 35,000 and 11,000 years M A Ozaukee before present.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Resources Inventory Map Document for Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore
    U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Directorate Geologic Resources Division Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore GRI Ancillary Map Information Document Produced to accompany the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) Digital Geologic Data for Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore indu_geology.pdf Version: 3/4/2014 I Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Geologic Resources Inventory Map Document for Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Table of Contents Geologic R.e..s.o..u..r.c..e..s.. .I.n..v.e..n..t.o..r..y. .M...a..p.. .D..o..c..u..m...e..n..t....................................................................... 1 About the N..P..S.. .G...e..o..l.o..g..i.c. .R...e..s.o..u..r.c..e..s.. .I.n..v.e..n..t.o..r..y. .P...r.o..g..r.a..m........................................................... 2 GRI Digital .M...a..p.. .a..n..d.. .S..o..u..r.c..e.. .M...a..p.. .C..i.t.a..t.i.o..n............................................................................... 4 Map Unit Li.s..t.......................................................................................................................... 5 Map Unit De..s..c..r.i.p..t.i.o..n..s............................................................................................................. 7 Qlmm - Fille..d.. .a..n..d.. .m..o..d..i.f.i.e..d../.d..i.s..t.u..r.b..e..d.. .l.a..n..d.. .(.H..o..l.o..c..e..n..e..).................................................................................................. 7 Qlma1 - Ch.a..n..n..e..l. .a..n..d.. .f.l.o..o..d..p..l.a..in.. .(..H..o..l.o..c..e..n..e..)................................................................................................................. 7 Qlma2 - Ch.a..n..n..e..l. .a..n..d.. .f.l.o..o..d..p..l.a..in.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of an Interlobate Boundary in the Wisconsinan Drift of Kalamazoo County and Adjacent Areas in Southwestern Michigan
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-1977 Analysis of an Interlobate Boundary in the Wisconsinan Drift of Kalamazoo County and Adjacent Areas in Southwestern Michigan Norman A. Lovan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Lovan, Norman A., "Analysis of an Interlobate Boundary in the Wisconsinan Drift of Kalamazoo County and Adjacent Areas in Southwestern Michigan" (1977). Master's Theses. 2207. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/2207 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANALYSIS OF AN INTERLOBATE BOUNDARY IN THE WISCONSINAN DRIFT OF KALAMAZOO COUNTY AND ADJACENT AREAS IN SOUTHWESTERN MICHIGAN by Norman A. Lovan A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Science Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 19 77 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ANALYSIS OF AN INTERLOBATE BOUNDARY IN THE WISCONSINAN DRIFT OF KALAMAZOO COUNTY AND ADJACENT AREAS IN SOUTHWESTERN MICHIGAN Norman A. Lovan, M.S. Western Michigan University, 1977 ABSTRACT A detailed investigation of selected textural and mineralogical aspects of tills in southwestern Michigan is used to define an interlobate boundary relationship be­ tween the Wisconsinan ice of the Lake Michigan and Saginaw lobes. Bedrock underlying the study area contributed lit­ tle to the bulk composition of the tills investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Analysis of Diamicton Units in Southern Allegan County, Michigan
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 4-2002 Stratigraphic Analysis of Diamicton Units in Southern Allegan County, Michigan Shannon A. Wong Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Wong, Shannon A., "Stratigraphic Analysis of Diamicton Units in Southern Allegan County, Michigan" (2002). Master's Theses. 4417. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/4417 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STRATIGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF DIAMICTON UNITS IN SOUTHERN ALLEGAN COUNTY, MICHIGAN by Shannon A. Wong A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillmentof the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Department of Geosciences WesternMichigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan April 2002 Copyright by Shannon A. Wong 2002 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gratefullyacknowledge some of the geology graduate students at Western Michigan University and friendswho have accompanied me in the field. Their assistance is greatly appreciated. I would like to thank John Grace, Andrew Kozlowski, and Brian Bird for their advice and support at the onset of my laboratory work. Getting started is the hardest part, especially when learning a new technique. I would like to acknowledge the US Army Research Officefor one year of sup­ port. I would also like to acknowledge my main advisor, Alan Kehew, forhis tremen­ dous help on my thesis and Ron Chase forintroducing me to his research site in Allegan County.
    [Show full text]
  • PLEISTOCENE STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS of Wisconsin
    MISCELLANEOUS PAPER 84-1 PLEISTOCENE STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS OF WISCONSiN by David M. Mickelson, Lee Clayton, Robert W. Baker, William N. Mode and Allan F. Schneider available from Geological and Natural History Survey University of Wisconsin-Extension 1815 University Avenue Madison, Wisconsin 53705 MISCELLANEOUS PAPER 84-1 PLEISTOCENE STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS OF WISCONSIN by David M. Mickelson, Lee Clayton, Robert W. Baker, William N. Mode and Allan F. Schneider available from Geological and Natural History Survey University of Wisconsin�Extension 1815 University Avenue Madison, Wisconsin 53705 JUL 1984 CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................... ..............It ................................................It .................. iv Abstract ............................................................................................................................ I Introduction It .. .. ........ .. .... .. ................ .. ........ .. .. .. ........ .. .. .. .. .. .... ........ .. .... .. .. ............ .. ........ I Principles of Lithostratigraphic Classification in Wisconsin •• •••••••• 2 Summary of Lithostratigraphic Units Defined in this Paper ••••••••••••• 5 Units of Probable Pre-Wisconsinan and Early Wisconsinan Age •••••••• 5 Units of Late Wisconsinan Age ............................................................................ 7 References Cited ............................................................................................................ 12 Appendix 1. Walworth Formation .. ................ ......It .... ....It
    [Show full text]
  • Glacial Lakes Around Michigan
    The Glacial Lakes around Michigan By William R. Farrand, University of Michigan Bulletin 4, revised 1988 Geological Survey Division Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Bulletin 4 - Glacial Lakes Around Michigan By William R. Farrand, University of Michigan, 1967 revised 1998 Illustrated by Kathline Clahassey, University of Michigan Published by Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. Geological Survey Division Contents Preface............................................................................................................................................ 3 Abstract........................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Was There A Glacier?..................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 1: The modem Great Lakes have a water surface area greater than 95,000 square miles, a total drainage area of about 295,000 square miles, and a shore line 8,300 miles long. ................................................................................................4 Figure 2: Features originating at a glacier front occur in a definite order. ...................................................................................5 Figure 3: Landforms of continental glaciation are unmistakable. Compare with figure 2 ............................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Chicago Region
    STATE OF ILLINOIS WILLIAM G. STRATTON, GoHntor DEPARTMENT OP REGISTRATION AND EDUCA'l'ION VERA M. BINKS, Dj,«UJr DIVISION OP THE STATE GEOLOG ICAL SURVEY M. M. LEIGHTON, Cbl;J URBANA B U L L E T I N N 0 . 65, P A 1t T I I GEOLOGY OF THE CHICAGO REGION PART II-IBEPLEISTOCENE BY J llARLBN BRETZ Pll.INTED BYUTHOlllTY A OF THE STATE O"l' lLLlNOlS URBANA, ILLINOIS 1955 STATE OF ILLINOIS WILLIAM G. STRATTON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION VERA M. BINKS, Director DIVISION OF THE STATE GEOLOG IC AL SURVEY M. M. LEIGHTON, Chief URBANA B u L L E T I N N 0 . 65, p A RT I I GEOLOGY OF THE CHICAGO REGION PART II - THE PLEISTOCEN E BY J HARLEN BRETZ PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS URBANA, ILLINOIS 1955 ORGANIZATION ST ATE OF ILLINOIS HON. WILLIAM G. STRATTON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION HON. VERA M. BINKS, Director BOARD OF NATURAL RESOURC ES AND CONS ERVAT IO N HON. VERA M. BINKS, Chairman W. H. NEWHOUSE, PH.D., Geology ROGER ADAMS, PH.D., D.Sc., Chemistry R. H. ANDERSON, B.S., Engineering 0 A. E. EMERSO�. PH.D., Biology LEWIS H. TIFFANY, PH.D., Po.D., Forestry W. L. EVERITT, E.E., PH.D., Representing the President of the University of Illinois DELYTE W. MORRIS, PH.D. President of Southern Illinois University GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVIS IO N M. M. LEIGHTON, PH.D., Chief STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION Natural Resources Building, Urbana M. M. LEIGHTON, PH.D., Chief Esm TOWNLEY, M.S., Geologist and Assistant to the Chief VELDA A.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaciotectonic Deformation Along the Valparaiso Upland in Southwest Michigan, USA
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 6-2010 Glaciotectonic Deformation along the Valparaiso Upland in Southwest Michigan, USA Brian C. Bird Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations Part of the Geology Commons, Geomorphology Commons, and the Glaciology Commons Recommended Citation Bird, Brian C., "Glaciotectonic Deformation along the Valparaiso Upland in Southwest Michigan, USA" (2010). Dissertations. 349. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/349 This Dissertation-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GLACIOTECTONIC DEFORMATION ALONG THE VALPARAISO UPLAND IN SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN, USA by Brian C. Bird A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Geoscience Advisor: Alan E. Kehew, Ph.D. Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June 2010 UMI Number: 3470399 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI' Dissertation Publishing UMI 3470399 Copyright 2010 by ProQuest LLC, All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Framework and Glaciation of the Eastern Area Christopher L
    Boise State University ScholarWorks Anthropology Faculty Publications and Department of Anthropology Presentations 1-1-2006 Geologic Framework and Glaciation of the Eastern Area Christopher L. Hill Boise State University This document was originally published in Handbook of North American Indians. Geological Framework and Glaciation of the Eastern Area CHRISTOPHER L. HILL Late Pleistocene landscapes in glaciated eastern North In the Great Lakes region, the Wisconsin stage has been America included changing ice margins, fluctuating lake divided into a series of chronostratigraphic units (W.H. and sea levels, and deglaciated physical settings that were Johnson et al. 1997; Karrow, Driemanis, and Barnett inhabited by a variety of extinct (Rancholabrean) fauna. 2000). The Altonian substage dates to before 30,500 B.C. , The glaciated East of North America consists of the mid­ while the Farmdalian substage ranges in age from about continent from Hudson Bay to south of the Great Lakes 30,500 to 28,000 B.C. The Woodfordian substage ranges in and extends eastward to the Atlantic coast. Glaciers were age from about 28,000 to about 12,800 B.C.; it is associated present along the Atlantic coast from southern New York with extensive glacial activity and subsumes previously north to Labrador. used terminology such as Tazewell, Cary, and Mankato Some of this region appears to have been ice-free during (Willman and Frye 1970). The Twocreekan substage is parts of the Middle Wisconsin; the interstadial ice margin a short interval after the Woodfordian and before the around 33,400-29,400 B.C. may have been situated within the Greatlakean, generally ranging 12,800-11,800 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • (Jijl()F Ll Fl Ii
    . State of Illinois De,attment of Registration and Education STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION Morris M. :te·i.ghton;. ·chief (JIJl()f ll�fl Ii GEOLOGICAL SCIENCE FIELD TRIP Sponsored by ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Lake County Waukegan Quadrangle Leader Gilbert O. Raasch Urbana, Illinois October 7, 1950 GUIDE LEAFLET NO. 1950-D HOST: Waukegan High School Waukegan Geological Science Fieid Trip Part I Itinerary o.o 0. 0 Caravan assembles on south side of Waukegan Township High School, headed,, southwest. on north siae of Glenrock.Avenue. O.O 0. 0 Turn left, south, on Jackson Street. 0.2 0.2 Traffic light. Continue ahead, turn immediately half-right, southwest, on blacktop road (Dugdale Avenue), and cross railroad. 0. 7 0.9 Stop sign. Continue ahead, southwest, on Dugdale Road. Route traverses rolling glacial topography of the Highland Park Moraine. 2.0 2. 9 Stop sign. Turn diagonal left, southeast, on Route 131. 0.8 3. 7 CAUTION. Entrance to Great Lakes '.Na'l-al Training Center. Co.ntinue.ahead on Route 131. 1. 7 5.4 Stop 1. Crest of the Highland Park Moraine. Remain in ears. This stop is on narrow crest of the Highland Park Moraine which runs in a general north-south direction and here slopes steeply on both its east and west sides. When the rate of melting of the glacial ice balances the rate of a glacier's movement, the ice front remains stationary. Here the rock and earth pushed in front of the ice, and freed by the melting of the ice, accumulate. When the glacier finally melts away, a ridge remains to mark the line of this ancient stalemate.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of the Geologic History of the Grand Traverse
    M ic h ig a n ? D e p a r t m e n t or C onservation ^ ^ ,l ; •;• i k i < ' ■ : r '• %)• ^¥ji\ • Geological Survey Division 'S ' th • - tIIh | J- ■ " / ;V \’ ’V. •■ ' ' ' . ■ ;' ■' : : "• '' ' '' : -pv- W W - S t ¥ . , I ■ OUTLINE K 'fc RffiAf;: : " w : ', ■ i': ' h ; . :& V t ; • •• . ;*-•:• .1 . I.1 ;. r 0F T H E U f e l i l l GEOLOGIC HISTORY .- -I . ■:- ’■. * "I! ' •' •; : ■■ . .|i A:v;if; 0F T H E ' GRAND T R A V E RSE REGION OUTLINE of the GEOLOGIC HISTORY of the GRAND TRAVERSE REGION By Helen M. Martin AN OUTLINE OF THE GEOLOGY OF THE (21 AND TRAVERSE REGION The four counties bordering Grand Traverse Bay with Kalkaska and Benzie counties form a unit sharing the same geologic history. The founda­ tion of the region is a segment of the western rim of the nest of rock bowls that are the bedrock of the Southern Peninsula. The Foundation Through millions of years Michigan was a-building. After the iron formations and the copper bearing lavas were piled on the northern rim of the granitic bowl we call the Michigan Basin, after earth movements had lift­ ed, compressed, folded, metamorphosed or changed, the sediments of the Huronian iron-forming age and had broken and uplifted the copper bearing lava flows of Keweenawan time, then came a time of quiet and of early life known as the Paleozoic, (primitive plants, algae, fungi, bacteria were in existence during the Huronian). During the Paleozoic, six major ocean-encroachments were made over North America, seas entered and retreated from the Michigan Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Linkchapter
    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abbott Formation, Illinois, 251 Michigan, 287 beetle borrows, Nebraska, 11 Acadian belt, 429 Archean rocks beetles, Manitoba, 45 Acadian orogeny Michigan, 273, 275 Belfast Member, Brassfield Illinois, 243 Minnesota, 47, 49, 53 Formation, Ohio, 420, 421 Indiana, 359 Wisconsin, 189 Bellepoint Member, Columbus Acrophyllum oneidaense, 287 Arikaree Group, Nebraska, 13, 14, Limestone, Ohio, 396 Adams County, Ohio, 420, 431 15, 25, 28 Belleview Valley, Missouri, 160 Adams County, Wisconsin, 183 Arikareean age, Nebraska, 3 Bellevue Limestone, Indiana, 366, Admire Group, Nebraska, 37 arthropods 367 Aglaspis, 83 Iowa, 83 Bennett Member, Red Eagle Ainsworth Table, Nebraska, 5 Missouri, 137 Formation, Nebraska, 37 Alexander County, Illinois, 247, 257 Ash Hollow Creek, Nebraska, 31 Benton County, Indiana, 344 algae Ash Hollow Formation, Nebraska, 1, Benzie County, Michigan, 303 Indian, 333 2, 5, 26, 29 Berea Sandstone, Ohio, 404, 405, Michigan, 282 Ash Hollow State Historical Park, 406, 427, 428 Missouri, 137 Nebraska, 29 Berne Conglomerate, Logan Ohio, 428 asphalt, Illinois, 211 Formation, Ohio, 411, 412, 413 Alger County, Michigan, 277 Asphalting, 246 Bethany Falls Limestone Member, Algonquin age, Michigan, 286, 287 Asterobillingsa, 114 Swope Formation, Missouri, Allamakee County, Iowa, 81, 83, 84 Astrohippus, 26 135, 138 Allegheny Group, Ohio, 407 Atherton Formation, Indiana, 352 Bethany Falls Limestone, Iowa, 123 Allen County, Indiana, 328, 329, 330 athyrids, Iowa, 111 Betula, 401 Allensville
    [Show full text]