Lithological and Stratigraphic Analysis of Glacial Diamictons, Sturgis, Michigan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lithological and Stratigraphic Analysis of Glacial Diamictons, Sturgis, Michigan Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 12-1997 Lithological and Stratigraphic Analysis of Glacial Diamictons, Sturgis, Michigan R. Christopher Gardner Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Gardner, R. Christopher, "Lithological and Stratigraphic Analysis of Glacial Diamictons, Sturgis, Michigan" (1997). Master's Theses. 4428. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/4428 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LITHOLOGIC AND STRATIGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF GLACIAL DIAMICTONS, STURGIS, MICHIGAN by R. Christopher Gardner A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Department of Geology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan December 1997 Copyright by R. Christopher Gardner 1997 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Iwouldlike tothank Dr. Kehew for his continuous support and guidance for this project and throughout my graduate career. My committeeadvisors, Dr.Harrison andDr.Barnes, deserve recognition for theircritques,interest,andborrowedbooks.WithoutDr.Grace'spresence and instruction, ts project may have never gotten off the ground. Accolades to the Geology department staff which never held back in helping me with various problems, thus the research and writing kept moving along. LindaNicks deserves much thanks forsharing her knowledge of glacial geology at anytime without notice andbeing a comrade in the trenches.MostofallIneedtocommend my soon tobewife,SkyAtwood, forherlovesupportthroughout my collegecareer.Heractonswent well beyondmy expectations, without which, I could stll be in Kalamazoo today. R ChristopherGardner ii LITHOLOGIC AND STRATIGRAPIDC ANALYSIS OF GLACIAL DIAMICTONS, STURGIS, MICHIGAN R. Christopher Gardner, M.S Western Michigan University, 1997 Seven diamictons are identified in the subsurface glacial drift near Sturgis, Michigan using textural analyses and x-ray diffraction of clay minerals. The clay mineral content is quantified by comparing the 7-A/10- A peak height ratios from x-ray diffraction diffractograms of oriented clay­ size particle ( <2um) mounts. Two diamictons occur at the base of the drift. Unit 1 is gray , resembling the shale it overlies. The texture of Unit 1 is sandy clay loam to loam and average 7-A/10-A peak height clay mineral ratios of 0.446 ±0.069. Unit 2 is a yellowish-brown diamicton, it overlies Unit 1, and is a sandy loam to loam with average 7-A/10-A clay mineral ratio of 0.657 ±0.151. Diamicton Units 4 and 5 overlie a thick unit of sand and gravel on top of Unit 2. Units 4 and 5 have similar color and texture, however the 7-A/10-A ratios are 1.059 ±0.090 and 0.810 ±0.072 respectively. Unit 6 is a thin diamicton unit, leached of calcite, and x-ray diffraction suggests that there is a range of weathering horzins between borings. Unit 7 is loamy, whereas Unit 8 generally ranges from sandy clay loam to sandy loam with average 7-A/10-A ratios of 0.865 ±0.090 and 1.195 ±0.189. TABLE OF CONENS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................. vi LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................................... Vll LIST OF PLATES................................................................................................. ix CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1 Introduction...................................................................................... 1 Location and Regional Glacial Geologic Setting....................... 2 Laboratory Analysis......................................................................... 6 Textural Analysis Procedure ................................................ 6 Hydrometer Method........................................................ 8 X-Ray Diffracton of Clay........................................................ 11 Sample Preparaton and X-Ray Diffraction Procedure............................................................................ 16 X-Ray Diffaction Procedure........................................... 18 I. GEOL(Y ................................................................................................. 20 Bedrock Geology .............................................................................. 20 Glacial Geology................................................................................. 24 Surficial Geology of Southwest Michigan and Northern Indiana .................................................................... 24 Glacial History ... .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .... .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 27 iii Table of Contents-continued CHAPTER 7-A/10-A Variation of Diamicton Units............................. 33 Ill. RE SUL TS.............. .............................. ........................ .. ............................ 38 X-Ray Diffraction and Textural Analysis Results..................... 38 Unit 1 and Unit 2 ..................................................................... 38 Unit 3, Unit 4, and Unit 5....................................................... 45 Unit 6.......................................................................................... 46 Unit 7 and Unit 8 ..................................................................... 51 Correlation of Unit 8 to the Fulton Till of Monaghan and Larson (1986) ................... :............................ 56 Correlation to Unpublished Data......................................... 57 IV. DISCUSSION........................................................................................... 58 Unit 1 and Unit 2............................................................................. 59 Unit 4 and Unit 5............................................................................. 60 Unit6........................................................................................... ....... 60 Unit 7 and Unit 8............................................................................. 61 V. CONCLUSIONS...................................................................................... 62 APPENDICES A. 7-A/10-A Ratio Statistics....................................................................... 66 B. Textural Analysis Results..................................................................... 69 C. W-46 Textural and X-Ray Diffraction Results.................................. 72 D. W-44 Textural and X-Ray Diffraction Results.................................. 76 iv Table of Contents-ontinued APPENDICE S E. W-45 Textural_ and X-Ray Diffraction Results.................................. 80 F. W-43 Textural and X-Ray Diffraction Results.................................. 83 G. Student-t Test Explanation................................................................... 85 H. Student-t Test Results Comparing 7-A/10-A Ratios Within Each Boring .... .. .............. ........................................................ .................. 88 I. Student-t Test Results Comparing 7-A/10-A Ratios Between Units and Landforms............................................................................. 91 J. Hydrometer Result Analysis................................................................ 93 K. Centifuge Extracton of Particles Greater Than Clay-Size From Solution......................................................................................... 95 BIBLIOG RAPHY.................................................................................................. 98 V LIST OF TABLES 1. Clay-Type and X-Ray Diffraction Properties......................................... 13 2. X- Ray Diffractometer Settings....................... _.......................................... 18 3. Student t-Test Comparing 7-A/10-A Ratios Between Borings, #1 ................................................................................................................... 41 4. Student t-Test Comparing 7-A/10-A Ratios Between Borings, #2 ................................................................................................................... 50 5. Student t-Test Comparing 7-A/10-A Ratios Between Borings, #3 ................................................................................................................... 54 6. 7-A/10-A Ratio Statistics.......................................................................... 67 7. Textural Analysis Results........................................................................ 70 8. W-46 Textural and X-Ray Diffraction Results..................................... 73 9. W-44 Textural and X-Ray Diffraction Results..................................... 77 10. W-45 Textural and X-Ray Diffraction Results..................................... 81 11. W-43 Textural and X-Ray Diffraction Results..................................... 84 12. Student-t Test Results Comparing 7-A/10-A Ratios Within Each Boring................................................................................................. 89 13. Student-t Test Results Comparing
Recommended publications
  • Lexicon of Pleistocene Stratigraphic Units of Wisconsin
    Lexicon of Pleistocene Stratigraphic Units of Wisconsin ON ATI RM FO K CREE MILLER 0 20 40 mi Douglas Member 0 50 km Lake ? Crab Member EDITORS C O Kent M. Syverson P P Florence Member E R Lee Clayton F Wildcat A Lake ? L L Member Nashville Member John W. Attig M S r ik be a F m n O r e R e TRADE RIVER M a M A T b David M. Mickelson e I O N FM k Pokegama m a e L r Creek Mbr M n e M b f a e f lv m m i Sy e l M Prairie b C e in Farm r r sk er e o emb lv P Member M i S ill S L rr L e A M Middle F Edgar ER M Inlet HOLY HILL V F Mbr RI Member FM Bakerville MARATHON Liberty Grove M Member FM F r Member e E b m E e PIERCE N M Two Rivers Member FM Keene U re PIERCE A o nm Hersey Member W le FM G Member E Branch River Member Kinnickinnic K H HOLY HILL Member r B Chilton e FM O Kirby Lake b IG Mbr Boundaries Member m L F e L M A Y Formation T s S F r M e H d l Member H a I o V r L i c Explanation o L n M Area of sediment deposited F e m during last part of Wisconsin O b er Glaciation, between about R 35,000 and 11,000 years M A Ozaukee before present.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy of Lake Michigan Lobe Deposits in Van Buren County, Michigan
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 6-2003 Stratigraphy of Lake Michigan Lobe Deposits in Van Buren County, Michigan Steven P. Beukema Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Beukema, Steven P., "Stratigraphy of Lake Michigan Lobe Deposits in Van Buren County, Michigan" (2003). Master's Theses. 4445. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/4445 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. f STRATIGRAPHY OF LAKE MICiflGANLOBE DEPOSITS IN VAN BUREN COUNTY, MICiflGAN by Steven P. Beukema A Thesis Submitted to the Facultyof The Graduate College in partial fulfillmentof the requirements forthe Degree of Master of Science Departmentof Geosciences WesternMichigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June 2003 Copyright by Steven P. Beukema 2003 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS There are several people who deserve recognition for their generous support. I would first like to thank Bill Bush forsuggesting the idea of doing graduate work in geology at WMU. Two of my cohorts in the department, Andrew Kozlowski and Brian Bird, deserve special recognition for endless hours of ruminating with me about many things, in particular about the last 20,000 years in southwest Michigan. I wish also to thank Andrew forstepping out of his pessimistic outlook to offerme continual encouragement to pursue science and academia. Brian was always willing to spend time making figures and answering my constant questions about GIS, Canvas, and a host of other programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Resources Inventory Map Document for Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore
    U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Directorate Geologic Resources Division Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore GRI Ancillary Map Information Document Produced to accompany the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) Digital Geologic Data for Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore indu_geology.pdf Version: 3/4/2014 I Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Geologic Resources Inventory Map Document for Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Table of Contents Geologic R.e..s.o..u..r.c..e..s.. .I.n..v.e..n..t.o..r..y. .M...a..p.. .D..o..c..u..m...e..n..t....................................................................... 1 About the N..P..S.. .G...e..o..l.o..g..i.c. .R...e..s.o..u..r.c..e..s.. .I.n..v.e..n..t.o..r..y. .P...r.o..g..r.a..m........................................................... 2 GRI Digital .M...a..p.. .a..n..d.. .S..o..u..r.c..e.. .M...a..p.. .C..i.t.a..t.i.o..n............................................................................... 4 Map Unit Li.s..t.......................................................................................................................... 5 Map Unit De..s..c..r.i.p..t.i.o..n..s............................................................................................................. 7 Qlmm - Fille..d.. .a..n..d.. .m..o..d..i.f.i.e..d../.d..i.s..t.u..r.b..e..d.. .l.a..n..d.. .(.H..o..l.o..c..e..n..e..).................................................................................................. 7 Qlma1 - Ch.a..n..n..e..l. .a..n..d.. .f.l.o..o..d..p..l.a..in.. .(..H..o..l.o..c..e..n..e..)................................................................................................................. 7 Qlma2 - Ch.a..n..n..e..l. .a..n..d.. .f.l.o..o..d..p..l.a..in.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of an Interlobate Boundary in the Wisconsinan Drift of Kalamazoo County and Adjacent Areas in Southwestern Michigan
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-1977 Analysis of an Interlobate Boundary in the Wisconsinan Drift of Kalamazoo County and Adjacent Areas in Southwestern Michigan Norman A. Lovan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Lovan, Norman A., "Analysis of an Interlobate Boundary in the Wisconsinan Drift of Kalamazoo County and Adjacent Areas in Southwestern Michigan" (1977). Master's Theses. 2207. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/2207 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANALYSIS OF AN INTERLOBATE BOUNDARY IN THE WISCONSINAN DRIFT OF KALAMAZOO COUNTY AND ADJACENT AREAS IN SOUTHWESTERN MICHIGAN by Norman A. Lovan A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Science Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 19 77 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ANALYSIS OF AN INTERLOBATE BOUNDARY IN THE WISCONSINAN DRIFT OF KALAMAZOO COUNTY AND ADJACENT AREAS IN SOUTHWESTERN MICHIGAN Norman A. Lovan, M.S. Western Michigan University, 1977 ABSTRACT A detailed investigation of selected textural and mineralogical aspects of tills in southwestern Michigan is used to define an interlobate boundary relationship be­ tween the Wisconsinan ice of the Lake Michigan and Saginaw lobes. Bedrock underlying the study area contributed lit­ tle to the bulk composition of the tills investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Analysis of Diamicton Units in Southern Allegan County, Michigan
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 4-2002 Stratigraphic Analysis of Diamicton Units in Southern Allegan County, Michigan Shannon A. Wong Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Wong, Shannon A., "Stratigraphic Analysis of Diamicton Units in Southern Allegan County, Michigan" (2002). Master's Theses. 4417. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/4417 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STRATIGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF DIAMICTON UNITS IN SOUTHERN ALLEGAN COUNTY, MICHIGAN by Shannon A. Wong A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillmentof the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Department of Geosciences WesternMichigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan April 2002 Copyright by Shannon A. Wong 2002 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gratefullyacknowledge some of the geology graduate students at Western Michigan University and friendswho have accompanied me in the field. Their assistance is greatly appreciated. I would like to thank John Grace, Andrew Kozlowski, and Brian Bird for their advice and support at the onset of my laboratory work. Getting started is the hardest part, especially when learning a new technique. I would like to acknowledge the US Army Research Officefor one year of sup­ port. I would also like to acknowledge my main advisor, Alan Kehew, forhis tremen­ dous help on my thesis and Ron Chase forintroducing me to his research site in Allegan County.
    [Show full text]
  • PLEISTOCENE STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS of Wisconsin
    MISCELLANEOUS PAPER 84-1 PLEISTOCENE STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS OF WISCONSiN by David M. Mickelson, Lee Clayton, Robert W. Baker, William N. Mode and Allan F. Schneider available from Geological and Natural History Survey University of Wisconsin-Extension 1815 University Avenue Madison, Wisconsin 53705 MISCELLANEOUS PAPER 84-1 PLEISTOCENE STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS OF WISCONSIN by David M. Mickelson, Lee Clayton, Robert W. Baker, William N. Mode and Allan F. Schneider available from Geological and Natural History Survey University of Wisconsin�Extension 1815 University Avenue Madison, Wisconsin 53705 JUL 1984 CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................... ..............It ................................................It .................. iv Abstract ............................................................................................................................ I Introduction It .. .. ........ .. .... .. ................ .. ........ .. .. .. ........ .. .. .. .. .. .... ........ .. .... .. .. ............ .. ........ I Principles of Lithostratigraphic Classification in Wisconsin •• •••••••• 2 Summary of Lithostratigraphic Units Defined in this Paper ••••••••••••• 5 Units of Probable Pre-Wisconsinan and Early Wisconsinan Age •••••••• 5 Units of Late Wisconsinan Age ............................................................................ 7 References Cited ............................................................................................................ 12 Appendix 1. Walworth Formation .. ................ ......It .... ....It
    [Show full text]
  • Glacial Lakes Around Michigan
    The Glacial Lakes around Michigan By William R. Farrand, University of Michigan Bulletin 4, revised 1988 Geological Survey Division Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Bulletin 4 - Glacial Lakes Around Michigan By William R. Farrand, University of Michigan, 1967 revised 1998 Illustrated by Kathline Clahassey, University of Michigan Published by Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. Geological Survey Division Contents Preface............................................................................................................................................ 3 Abstract........................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Was There A Glacier?..................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 1: The modem Great Lakes have a water surface area greater than 95,000 square miles, a total drainage area of about 295,000 square miles, and a shore line 8,300 miles long. ................................................................................................4 Figure 2: Features originating at a glacier front occur in a definite order. ...................................................................................5 Figure 3: Landforms of continental glaciation are unmistakable. Compare with figure 2 ............................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Chicago Region
    STATE OF ILLINOIS WILLIAM G. STRATTON, GoHntor DEPARTMENT OP REGISTRATION AND EDUCA'l'ION VERA M. BINKS, Dj,«UJr DIVISION OP THE STATE GEOLOG ICAL SURVEY M. M. LEIGHTON, Cbl;J URBANA B U L L E T I N N 0 . 65, P A 1t T I I GEOLOGY OF THE CHICAGO REGION PART II-IBEPLEISTOCENE BY J llARLBN BRETZ Pll.INTED BYUTHOlllTY A OF THE STATE O"l' lLLlNOlS URBANA, ILLINOIS 1955 STATE OF ILLINOIS WILLIAM G. STRATTON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION VERA M. BINKS, Director DIVISION OF THE STATE GEOLOG IC AL SURVEY M. M. LEIGHTON, Chief URBANA B u L L E T I N N 0 . 65, p A RT I I GEOLOGY OF THE CHICAGO REGION PART II - THE PLEISTOCEN E BY J HARLEN BRETZ PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS URBANA, ILLINOIS 1955 ORGANIZATION ST ATE OF ILLINOIS HON. WILLIAM G. STRATTON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION HON. VERA M. BINKS, Director BOARD OF NATURAL RESOURC ES AND CONS ERVAT IO N HON. VERA M. BINKS, Chairman W. H. NEWHOUSE, PH.D., Geology ROGER ADAMS, PH.D., D.Sc., Chemistry R. H. ANDERSON, B.S., Engineering 0 A. E. EMERSO�. PH.D., Biology LEWIS H. TIFFANY, PH.D., Po.D., Forestry W. L. EVERITT, E.E., PH.D., Representing the President of the University of Illinois DELYTE W. MORRIS, PH.D. President of Southern Illinois University GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVIS IO N M. M. LEIGHTON, PH.D., Chief STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION Natural Resources Building, Urbana M. M. LEIGHTON, PH.D., Chief Esm TOWNLEY, M.S., Geologist and Assistant to the Chief VELDA A.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaciotectonic Deformation Along the Valparaiso Upland in Southwest Michigan, USA
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 6-2010 Glaciotectonic Deformation along the Valparaiso Upland in Southwest Michigan, USA Brian C. Bird Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations Part of the Geology Commons, Geomorphology Commons, and the Glaciology Commons Recommended Citation Bird, Brian C., "Glaciotectonic Deformation along the Valparaiso Upland in Southwest Michigan, USA" (2010). Dissertations. 349. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/349 This Dissertation-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GLACIOTECTONIC DEFORMATION ALONG THE VALPARAISO UPLAND IN SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN, USA by Brian C. Bird A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Geoscience Advisor: Alan E. Kehew, Ph.D. Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June 2010 UMI Number: 3470399 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI' Dissertation Publishing UMI 3470399 Copyright 2010 by ProQuest LLC, All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Framework and Glaciation of the Eastern Area Christopher L
    Boise State University ScholarWorks Anthropology Faculty Publications and Department of Anthropology Presentations 1-1-2006 Geologic Framework and Glaciation of the Eastern Area Christopher L. Hill Boise State University This document was originally published in Handbook of North American Indians. Geological Framework and Glaciation of the Eastern Area CHRISTOPHER L. HILL Late Pleistocene landscapes in glaciated eastern North In the Great Lakes region, the Wisconsin stage has been America included changing ice margins, fluctuating lake divided into a series of chronostratigraphic units (W.H. and sea levels, and deglaciated physical settings that were Johnson et al. 1997; Karrow, Driemanis, and Barnett inhabited by a variety of extinct (Rancholabrean) fauna. 2000). The Altonian substage dates to before 30,500 B.C. , The glaciated East of North America consists of the mid­ while the Farmdalian substage ranges in age from about continent from Hudson Bay to south of the Great Lakes 30,500 to 28,000 B.C. The Woodfordian substage ranges in and extends eastward to the Atlantic coast. Glaciers were age from about 28,000 to about 12,800 B.C.; it is associated present along the Atlantic coast from southern New York with extensive glacial activity and subsumes previously north to Labrador. used terminology such as Tazewell, Cary, and Mankato Some of this region appears to have been ice-free during (Willman and Frye 1970). The Twocreekan substage is parts of the Middle Wisconsin; the interstadial ice margin a short interval after the Woodfordian and before the around 33,400-29,400 B.C. may have been situated within the Greatlakean, generally ranging 12,800-11,800 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • (Jijl()F Ll Fl Ii
    . State of Illinois De,attment of Registration and Education STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION Morris M. :te·i.ghton;. ·chief (JIJl()f ll�fl Ii GEOLOGICAL SCIENCE FIELD TRIP Sponsored by ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Lake County Waukegan Quadrangle Leader Gilbert O. Raasch Urbana, Illinois October 7, 1950 GUIDE LEAFLET NO. 1950-D HOST: Waukegan High School Waukegan Geological Science Fieid Trip Part I Itinerary o.o 0. 0 Caravan assembles on south side of Waukegan Township High School, headed,, southwest. on north siae of Glenrock.Avenue. O.O 0. 0 Turn left, south, on Jackson Street. 0.2 0.2 Traffic light. Continue ahead, turn immediately half-right, southwest, on blacktop road (Dugdale Avenue), and cross railroad. 0. 7 0.9 Stop sign. Continue ahead, southwest, on Dugdale Road. Route traverses rolling glacial topography of the Highland Park Moraine. 2.0 2. 9 Stop sign. Turn diagonal left, southeast, on Route 131. 0.8 3. 7 CAUTION. Entrance to Great Lakes '.Na'l-al Training Center. Co.ntinue.ahead on Route 131. 1. 7 5.4 Stop 1. Crest of the Highland Park Moraine. Remain in ears. This stop is on narrow crest of the Highland Park Moraine which runs in a general north-south direction and here slopes steeply on both its east and west sides. When the rate of melting of the glacial ice balances the rate of a glacier's movement, the ice front remains stationary. Here the rock and earth pushed in front of the ice, and freed by the melting of the ice, accumulate. When the glacier finally melts away, a ridge remains to mark the line of this ancient stalemate.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of the Geologic History of the Grand Traverse
    M ic h ig a n ? D e p a r t m e n t or C onservation ^ ^ ,l ; •;• i k i < ' ■ : r '• %)• ^¥ji\ • Geological Survey Division 'S ' th • - tIIh | J- ■ " / ;V \’ ’V. •■ ' ' ' . ■ ;' ■' : : "• '' ' '' : -pv- W W - S t ¥ . , I ■ OUTLINE K 'fc RffiAf;: : " w : ', ■ i': ' h ; . :& V t ; • •• . ;*-•:• .1 . I.1 ;. r 0F T H E U f e l i l l GEOLOGIC HISTORY .- -I . ■:- ’■. * "I! ' •' •; : ■■ . .|i A:v;if; 0F T H E ' GRAND T R A V E RSE REGION OUTLINE of the GEOLOGIC HISTORY of the GRAND TRAVERSE REGION By Helen M. Martin AN OUTLINE OF THE GEOLOGY OF THE (21 AND TRAVERSE REGION The four counties bordering Grand Traverse Bay with Kalkaska and Benzie counties form a unit sharing the same geologic history. The founda­ tion of the region is a segment of the western rim of the nest of rock bowls that are the bedrock of the Southern Peninsula. The Foundation Through millions of years Michigan was a-building. After the iron formations and the copper bearing lavas were piled on the northern rim of the granitic bowl we call the Michigan Basin, after earth movements had lift­ ed, compressed, folded, metamorphosed or changed, the sediments of the Huronian iron-forming age and had broken and uplifted the copper bearing lava flows of Keweenawan time, then came a time of quiet and of early life known as the Paleozoic, (primitive plants, algae, fungi, bacteria were in existence during the Huronian). During the Paleozoic, six major ocean-encroachments were made over North America, seas entered and retreated from the Michigan Basin.
    [Show full text]