- lAg84Te
FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES (Díptera: Tephritidae)
by RICHARD H. FOOTE
I
Ç3
¿1
¿¡Siv UNITED STATES TECHNICAL PREPARED BY UU*) DEPARTMENT OF BULLETIN SCIENCE AND ""iS^ AGRICULTURE NUMBER 1600 EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES (Díptera: Tephritidae)
by RICHARD H. FOOTE
y r. ^
^¡S^v UNITED STATES TECHNICAL PREPARED BY (i4É! DEPARTMENT OF BULLETIN SCIENCE AND '^^^' AGRICULTURE NUMBER 1600 EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION 1 ABSTRACT
Foote, Richard H. 1980. Fruit fly genera south of the United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin 1600,79 pp.
The 88 genera of fruit flies in Mexico, Central America, the West Indies, and South America are discussed. Keys to all genera are pre- sented, and a synonymy, diagnosis, and discussion of each genus follow. Included for each genus is information about its distribution, its rela- tionship to other genera, its composition in terms of the species belong- ing to it, aids to its recognition, and references for identifying its species. Several diagnostic characteristics and the wing of at least one species in almost every genus have been illustrated. Four genera, previously re- garded as valid, have been synonymized with others, and three addi- tional genera, long recorded from the region, are shown not to occur in the New World or to belong to other fly families. Fruit flies comprise the most economically important family of plant-inhabiting Diptera, consid- ering the potential for agricultural damage by species of such genera as Anastrepha, Ceratitis, Dacus, and Rhagoletis. Used in conjunction with my catalog of Tephritidae published in 1967, this bulletin provides a means of identifying about two-thirds of the more than 600 species of fruit flies known to occur south of Texas and Florida.
KEYWORDS: Fruit flies, Tephritidae, Diptera, taxonomy, generic keys, South America, Central America, West Indies, Mexico. II
f-
mw-: MS mrnmwi wf( it CONTENTS Pa?« Subfamilies, tribes, and genera of Tephritidae 3 Genus Hexachaeta Loew 3i Key to subfamilies of Tephritidae 3 Genus Hexaresta Hering 32 Subfamily Dacinae 4 Genus Homoeothrix Hering 32 Key to genera of Dacinae 4 Genus Ictericodea Hering 32 Subfamily Myopitinae 5 Genus lachyropteron Bigot 33 Subfamily Oedaspidinae 6 Genus Laksyetaa Foote 33 Key to genera of Oedaspidinae 5 Genus Lamproxyna Hendel 33 Subfamily Trypetinae 6 Genus LamproxyneUa Hering 34 Key to genera of Trypetinae 7 Genus Lezca Foote 34 Subfamily Tephritinae 9 Genus Lilloaciura Aczél 34 Key to tribes of Tephritinae 9 Genus Metaaphenisca Hendel 35 Tribe Terelliini 10 Genus Molynocoelia Giglio-Tos 35 Key to genera of Terelliini . 10 Genus My ole ja Rondani 35 Tribe Ditrichini 10 Genus Nea3pt7o¿a Osten Sacken 36 Key to genera of Ditrichini 11 Genus N^eoacaníAoneura Hendel 36- Tribe Platensinini 12 Genus Neorhabdochaeta Malloch 36 Key to genera of Platensinini 12 Genus Neorhagoletia Kendel 37 Tribe Tephritini 13 Genus Neotaracia Foote 37 Key to genera of Tephritini _- 14 Genus Neotephritia Hendel 37 Tribe "Aciurini" 16 Genus Oedicarena Loew 38 Key to genera of "Aciurini" 16 Genus Orellia Robineau-Desvoidy 38 Descriptions of genera 17 Genus Ostracocoelia Giglio-Tos 38 Genus Acima Robineau-Desvoidy 17 Genus Oxyna Robineau-Desvo dy 39 Genus Actun'na Curran 17 Genus Paracantha Coquillett 39 Genus Acrotaenia Loew 18 Genus Paraatenopa Hendel 40 GenxjLS AcrotaeniacaTitha Hering 18 Genus Paroxyna Hendel 40 Genus Anaatrepha Schiner 19 Genus Plaumannimyia Hering 41 Genus Anomoia Walker 19 Genus Polionota Wulp 41 Genus Baryplegma Wulp 20 Genus Polymorphomyia Snow 41 Genus Blepharoneura Loew 20 Genus Procecidocharea Hendel 42 Genus Caenoriata Foote 21 Genus Procecidocharoidea Foote 42 Genus Cecidocharella Hendel . 21 Genus Protenaina Hendel 42 Genus Ceidochares Bezzi 21 Genus Paexidacrotaenia Hendel 43 Genus Celidosphenella Hendel 22 Genus Paetuieutreta Hendel 43 Genus Ceratitis Macleay 22 Genus Paevdoedaapia Hendel 43 Genus CeratodacTÁS Hendel 23 Grenus Paetidophorellia Lima 44 Genus Chetosioma Rondani 23 Genus Paevdopolionota himsL 44 Genus Chrysaciura Aczél 23 Genus Pyrgotoidea Curran .,: 44 Genus Cryptodacus Hendel 24 Genus Rhachiptera Bigot 45 Genus Cryptoplagia Aczél 24 Genus Rha^oletia Loew 45 Genus Cryptotreta Blanc and Foote 24 Genus Rhagoletotrypeta Aczél 46 Genus Dacus Fabricius 25 Genus Rhithrum Hendel 46 Genus Dietyotrypeta Hendel — : -> 25 Genus Storuola Hering . 46 Genus Dioxyna Frey . . 26 Genus Strobelia Rondani 47 Genus Draeontomyia Becker 26 Genus Tephritiê Latreille 47 Genus Dyseiuxresta Hendel 26 Genus Tetretiareata Hendel . ^- 47 Genus Ensina Robineau-Desvoidy 27 Genus Tomoplagia Coquillett 48 Genus Epoekrinopsi» Hering 27 Genus Toxotrypana Gerstâcker . 48 Genus Euaresta Loew 27 Genus Trupanea Schrank 49 Genus Euarêstoideê Benjamin 28 Genus Trypanareata Hering 49 G«nu8 EtLareatopêiê Hering 28 Genus Trypeta Meigen 49 Genus EiUreta Loew 29 Genus Urophora Robineau-Desvoidy 50 Genus Gerrhoceras Hering - 29 Genus XantkcLciura Hendel .« 50 Genus Gonioxyna Hendel 30 Genus Xenochaeta Snow — 51 Genus Goniurellia Hendel 30 Genus Zonoaemata Benjamin 51 Genus Gymnocarena Hering 30 Literature cited 51 Genus Haywardina Aczél 31 Index of names - 58 GenuB HetBchkomyia Uendel 31 Issued May 1980 IV I FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES (Diptera: Tephritidae)
By RKHAXD H. Foo-re, research entomologiaO
some of the Tephritinae of that area. In the The tephritid fauna of the Neotropical same year, Lima began to review the Tephrit- Region, with few exceptions, remained with- idae of southern South America, and m a o out anV comprehensive review until two 5' series of reports he presented a systematic 'S works by Hendel were pubhshed in 1914. The accounting of the Trypetinae (Lima 1933 7 first one (Hendel ISUbY included the then- 193ia, b, c; 1935a, b; 1953a, b. c; Lima and 7 ..^ known 44 neotropical genera in a key to the Leite 1952). By far the most signiñcant neo- S genera of the world. Of these 44 genera, 16 tropical work on the family has been by Aczel 8 fere described as new. Following that pub - of Tucumán, Argentina (Aczel 19J,9a, b; 1950; S cation a revision of the neotropical Tephriti- 1951; 1952a, b, c, d; 1953a, b, c; 195ia, b; 1955a, 9 dae (Hendel 19Uc) included a total of 53 gen- 9 b c-1 "5«). He began his studies with the Try- era with the same 16 genera, which appeared petinae and was systematically studying the O in the earlier work as new, also described as J fruit flies at the genus and species levels sub- ti new in the later revision. family by subfamily until his untimely death il Until 1914. the tephritids occurring from in 1959. , . . .1 Mexico through South America were known The most recent comprehensive work t2 rmiby scattered descriptions of genera and 42 (Foote 29Ö7) catalogs the 117 genus-group and 42 species Notable among the larger works was 818 species-group names (82 and 680 valid that of Wulp a«S5,1900), in which a number of names, respectively) known through 1965 but % Mexican genera and species were described leaves a rather large number of taxa unclas- 43 and some previously described taxa were re- sified. Since 1960, very few new taxa or 44 newed The appearance of Hendel's two pub- 44 nomenclatural changes have been reported m 44 UcaTfons evenï^ally awakened an interest m the literature, most of them contributed by 45 the neotropical fauna «"/»îf P^"^ °^^'^,^': Bush and Huettel Q970), Foote (Í960b, 1978), Curran reported several fruit flies from Puer- Hardy (X968), Korytkowski (X971), Steyska to Sc^and the Virgin Islands (Cun:ani92.. Q970; 1972a, b, e, d; 197U; 1977a, b), Steyskal TsSl) and from British Guiana (Curran ISS^a), 46 and Foote Q977), and Stoltzfus ÍÍ977). and he included a number of neotropical gen- In this publication, U of the 82 genera cata- 47 era in hS manual (Curran i W6). Concurrent- 47 loged in 1967 are no longer recognized. Lu^- 47 ly Malloch U9SS) reported on a la'^S« """^! maphila Stone 1939, Phobema Aldnch 1925, 43 of specimens in the British Museum (Natural and PaevAodacua Hendel 1914 were synony- «ig History) collected in Patagonia and southern 19 mized with Anaatrepha Schiner by Steyskal id ChU^. an interesting account, particularly of (1977a), and Rhagoletoidea Foote 1960 is a 4^ synonym of Oedicarena Loew (Steyskal and 50 Foote 1977)' Neanomoia Hendel 1»14 54) .Syrte«.tk Entomology Laboratory, c/o U.S. National 51 (inadvertently omitted from Foote 1967) and «S-y^r^Sc-'aSe^-riho.. name re.r, to Ham ;80 \ TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE mized with Anomoia Walker by Hardy (1973), ing this treatment at the supergeneric level, As a result of the present study, Ictericodes all the genera are arranged alphabetically, Hering 1942 is found not to occur in the Neo- each genus represented by its synonymy, tropical Region; Neoacanthoneura Hendel diagnosis, and discussion. 1914 is assigned to the family Otitidae; and The synonymies present all the important the genera Melanotrypana Hering 1944, Neo- literature known to me at the generic level. hexachaeta Lima 1953, Tomoplagiodes Aczél The initial synonymic entry is a citation to the 1954, and Ceratitoedaspis Aczél 1953 are as- original description of the genus. A statement signed to synonymy. of its type-species and how it was designated On the other hand, 17 valid genera not pre- follows. The subsequent synonymic entries viously included in the 1967 catalog have been for each name are annotated briefly so the added to the neotropical and Mexican fauna. reader can judge the nature of the informa- The genusEnsina Robineau-Desvoidy was re- tion presented in any particular publication. corded by Steyskal, and four genera were de- A special attempt has been made to make the scribed as new by Foote {1978). In the present generic synonymies complete. study, eight genera in the Nearctic Region The diagnoses are nested in that the taxo- are shown to have ranges extending into Mex- nomic characters discussed in the diagnosis of ico and the West Indies (Chetostoma Rondani, a subfamily or tribe are not usually repeated Gymnocarena Hering, My ole ja Rondani, Nea- in the generic diagnosis. Many of the taxo- spilota Osten Sacken, Orellia Robineau- nomic characters themselves were selected on Desvoidy, Oxyna Robineau-Desvoidy, Proce- the basis of their proven value, whereas cidocharoides Foote, and Xenochaeta Snow); others were used in an attempt to develop a three genera (Anomoia Walker, Gonioxyna new means for identification. A total of 44 Hendel, and Goniurellia Hendel) have never characters was originally used as the Or- been reported previously from the New dinate of a 2-dimensional matrix, in which the World; and the genus Dacus Fabricius was nature of all characters for all genera was re- not previously included in my catalog because corded. This matrix was then used to develop of its status as an introduced genus. all the diagnoses and keys. The objective of this study is to provide a current means for identifying the genera of The discussion of each taxon presents infor- Tephritidae occurring in the Neotropical Re- mation on its salient taxonomic characters, gion. Since most revisionary work on the te- its major relationships, a brief summary of phritids of the Nearctic Regrion does not in- the taxonomic work that has been accom- clude Mexico, this publication encompasses plished, and for each genus a mention of all the land areas of the New World from the where keys to species may be found. When northern border of Mexico and the southern used in conjunction with the available nearc- tip of Florida south to Tierra del Fuego. Thus tic and neotropical catalogs (Foote 1965a, it pertains to the southernmost part of the 1967), the present publication should provide Nearctic Region proper, by including all of a guide for the identification of half to two- Mexico, as well as to the entire Neotropical thirds of the known tephritid species of the Region. New World. This bulletin presents a diagnosis for each Table 1 represents the distribution of each tephritid genus occurring south of the United Subfamily 7 subfamily and in each subfamily having New Tribe T World tribes it gives a key to those tribes. The States by zoogeogn^aphic region and by coun- Nee keys to genera have a similar distribution in try and island group. It is immediately evi- Ore that where no tribes are discussed, the ge- dent that the range of many of the genera has neric key is placed with the diagnosis and dis- been extended as a result of this study. cussion of the subfamily, but the generic key The following list represents the supra- appears with the tribe wherever there is a specific structure of the family g^iven in this diagnosis and discussion at that level. Follow- publication: FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES ^1, SUBFAMILIES, TRIBES, AND GENERA OF TEPHRITIDAE y, Subfamily Dacinae Tribe Ditrichini It Dacus Fabricius Cryptotreta Blanc and Foote Toxotrypana Gerstacker 1. Dictyotrypeta Hendel e Subfamily Myopitinae Eut reta Loew Urophora Robineau-Desvoidy Lakayetaa Foote it Neorhabdochaeta Malloch d Subfamily Oedaspidinae Paracantha Coquillett Cecidoc hare lia Hendel ?s PaeudevXreta Hendel Cecidockares Bezzi e Rhachiptem Bigot Dracontomyia Becker Strohelia Rondani :i- Neorhagoletia Hendel Tribe Platensinini 1. Ostracocoelia Giglio-Tos m Acrotaenxa Loew le Procecidochares Hendel Acrotaeniacantha Hering Procecidocharoidea Foote Caenoriata Foote Neotaracia Foote )- Subfamily Trypetinae Anastrepha Schiner Paeudacrotaenia Hendel Anomoia Walker Tribe Tephritini d Blepharoneura Loew Acinia Robineau-Desvoidy Ceratitis Macleay Baryplegma Wulp n Ceratodacus Hendel Celidoaphenella Hendel Chetostoma Rondani Dioxyna Frey s Dyaeuareata Hendel a Cryptodacua Hendel Cryptoplagia Aczél Enaina Robineau-Desvoidy 4 Epochrinopaia Hering Euareata Loew Gerrhoceraa Hering Euareatoidea Benjamin Gymnocarena Hering Eiiareatopaia Hering Haywardina Aczél Gonioxyna Hendel Hetachkomyia Hendel Goniurellia Hendel Hexachaeta Loew Homoeothrix Hering Hexareata Hering Lamproxyna Hendel lachyro-pteron Bigot Lamproxynella Hering Lezca Foote Neotephritia Hendel Molynocoelia Giglio-Tos Oxyna Robineau-Desvoidy Myoleja Rondani Paroxyna Hendel Oedicarena Loew Plaumannimyia Hering Paraatenopa Hendel Protenaina Hendel Polionota Wulp Tephritia Latreille Pseudopkorellia Lima Tetreiuireata Hendel Pyrgotoides Curran Trupanea Schrank Rhagoletia Loew Trypanareata Hering Rhagoletotrypeta Aczél Tribe "Aciurini" Stoneola Hering Aciurina Curran Tomoplagia Coquillett Ckryaaciura Aczél Trypeta Meigen Lilloaciura Aczél Zonoaemata Bergamin Polymorphomyia Snow Paeitdoedaapis Hendel Subfamily Tephritinae Paetidopolionota Lima Tribe Terelliini Rhithrum Hendel Neaapilota Osten Sacken Xantkaciura Hendel Orellia Robineau-Desvoidy Xenochaeta Snow KEY TO SUBFAMILIES OF TEPHRITIDAE 1. Following bristles not present: Ocellar, dorsocentral, presutural, katepi- sternal, and usually humeral Dacinae (p. 4) These bristles never simultaneously lacking 2 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE 2. All the following must be present: Basal cubital cell closed transversely {ñg. 118), vein R4^-5 bare above, 1 pair upper fronto-orbital bristles, 1 pair dorsocentral bristles Myopitinae (p. 5) Diagnosis Basal cubital cell drawn to postero-apical point (ñg, 6), or vein R4-I-5 setose pointed, bl above, or more than 1 pair upper fronto-orbital bristles, or more than 1 fronto-orbif pair dorsocentral bristles 3 ocellars we 3. Scutellum strongly swollen in lateral view, usually polished black; wing with crossbanded pattern, usually at least one of hyaline fasciae passing uninter- carina; ant rupted across wing disk from anterior to posterior margins (fig. 42); face, 3d an never with a number of small, irregularly shaped marks near arista bare base Oedaspidinae (p. 5) tween tran Scutellum flat or gently rounded (except in Ceratitia, in wing base of which and postala are a number of small, irregularly shaped marks (fig. 48)), color various; suturais; 2 wing pattern various 4 4. Postocular bristles slender, sharply pointed, black (fig. 7) (yellow if other sternals; 1 body and head hairs are yellow); wings usually banded, usually without merals; 2 i reticulation; basal cubital cell often with poste ro-apical elongation longer femora ani than width of cell at base of elongation (fig. 6); dorsocentral bristles usually bristles; wir situated near transverse line through supra-alar bristles, or posterior line, either to it - Trypetinae (p. 6) Postocular bristles entirely whitish and swollen (fig. 8), or mixed with the veins d slender, dark, sharply pointed ones (fig. 9); reticulation usually present in die of disc wing pattern, although bands or combination of both may be present (fig. transverse! 36); elongation of basal cubital cell usually little longer than maximum any kind; rr width of elongation at its base; dorsocentral bristles usually situated close to transverse suture, but if closer to supra-alars, never posterior to trans- bullae abse verse line through them Tephritinae (p. 9) SubfamÜy DACINAE Diagnosis, Diagnosis.—Frons and face meeting at dis- cell equal in length to, or longer than, basal face in curv tinct angle in lateral view; postoculars part of cell; bullae absent. Ostracocoel slender, dark, sharply pointed; frons haired; faces meet 0-2 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 1 pair upper Discussion.—The subfamily is easily rec- 2--3 pairs fronto-orbitals; ocellars very short, fine, and ognized in the New World by the reduced upper front dark, or lacking; face usually with dark spots chaetotaxy and other characters previously antenna ne and with distinct carina; 3d antennal segment stated. It is represented in the New World by rounded ap rounded apically; mouthparts never genicu- the one indigenous genus, Toxotrypana dorsocentra late; 1 pair acrostichals; 1 pair anepistemals; Gerstacker. The genus Dacit^ is included here notopleura] 1 pair anepimerals; 2 pairs notopleurals; because of the occasional introduction of two anepisterni humerais, presuturals, dorsocentrals, and of its species (see discussion of Da^iis). The 2 pairs scut katepistemals absent; scutellum normally subfamily, treated extensively in numerous anterovent flat, 1 pair scutellars; no rows of ventral publications by D. E. Hardy and others, banded, wir spines or setae on middle or hind legs; wing reaches its maximum development in the píete or ne usually rather narrow, with banded pattern; Oriental, Pacific, and Afrotropical Regions, fascia basa vein r-m situated well apicad of middle of dis- where its members are the most economically wing and a: cal cell; posterior extension of basal cubital important tephritids infesting fruit. KEY TO GENERA OF DACINAE 1. Ovipositor sheath longer than abdomen; vein R2+3 undulate and with at least 1 short auxiliary vein anterior to vein R2+3; basal medial and basal cubital cells about same width (fig. 114) Toxotrypana GeraUcker Ovipositor sheath much shorter than abdomen; vein R2+3 nearly straight, without auxiliary veins; basal medial cell distinctly wider than basal cubi- tal cell (ñg. 65) DacuM Fabricius FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES SubfamUy MYOPITINAE Diagnosis.—Postoculars slender, sharply Discussion.—Members of this subfamily pointed, black; frons bare; 2 pairs lower may be recognized rather easily by the trans- fronto-orbitals; 1 pair upper fronto-orbitals; verse nature of vein Cu2, which closes the ocellars well developed; face without distinct basal cubital cell distally without any cell carina; antenna as lon^ as, or shorter than, elongation whatever along the anal vein (fig. face, 3d antennal segment rounded apically, 118) although the additional characters given arista bare; 1 pair dorsocentrals, situated be- in the key must also be present. Some species tween transverse lines through supra-alars of Tephritini have a rather similar basal and postalars; 1 pair acrostichals; 1 pair pre- cubital cell, but a slight extension of the cell suturals; 2 pairs notopleurals; 1 pair anepi- along the anal vein is always detectable, and sternals; 1 pair katepistemals, 1 pair anepi- the wings are nearly always reticulate in merals; 2 pairs scutellars; middle and hind those species rather than banded as in many femora and tibiae without ventral rows of of the species of Myopitinae. Although five or bristles; wing either distinctly banded or hya- moré genera are commonly recognized line, either with dark spots or streaks or only throughout the world, only one, Urophora the veins darkened; vein r-m at or near mid- Robineau-Desvoidy, is recognized in the New dle of discal cell; basal cubital cell closed World. Several palaearctic species of this ge- transversely without posterior extension of nus have been introduced into North America any kind; mouthparts sometimes geniculate; as candidates for the control of noxious weeds. bullae absent. SubfamUy OEDASPIDINAE Diagnosis.—In lateral view, frons meeting Discussion.—^The most easily used char- face in curve without distinct angle, except in acters for the recognition of members of this Ostracocoelia Giglio-Tos, in which these 2 sur- subfamily are the markedly swollen, shining faces meet at angle of about 90*; frons matte; scutellum (usually black) and the présence of 2-3 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 1-2 pairs banded wings with at least one of the hyaline upper fronto-orbitals; ocellars well developed; fasciae in almost all the specie; extending antenna never longer than face, 3d segment uninterrupted from the anterior to the poste- rounded apically, arista bare; usually 1 pair rior margins. No attempt has been made in dorsocentrals; acrostichals present; 2 pairs this study to distinguish between the tribes notopleurals, usually unicolorous; 1-3 pairs Oedaspidini and Cecidocharini discussed by anepistemals; scutellum shiny black, swollen, Hering (19470) or to assess their relationships 2 pairs scutellars; hind tibia usually devoid of to the New World fauna* Aczél (195Sa, p. 107) anteroventral hairs or spines; wing pattern discussed many of the neotropical genera arid banded, wing' of nearly all si>ecie8 with com- species in a rather thorough taxonomic revi- plete or nearly complete transverse hyaline sion. According to G. E. Bush (personal fascia basally, at midwing, or between mid- communication), most if not all the species wing and apex; vein R4-f5 usually bare. form galls on a wide variety of plants. KEY TO GENER4 OF OEDASPIDINAE 1« Vein r-m situated at about middle of discal cell; veins r^m and dm-cu sep- arated by transverse hyaline fascia, or vein r-ra lyin^j within fascia; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbital bristles . .. 2' Vein r~m situated distinctly apicad of middle of discal eel); veins r-m and dm- 2. All postocular bristles slender, black, sharply pointed; anal cell without pro- Ischyropt nounced anal lobe; palpi enlarged 3 Another Some postocular bristles whitish, enlarged; distinct anal lobe present; palpi ly placed not enlarged 4 3. One pair dorsocentral bristles; stigma reduced in size; costal margfin depressed Ceratitin immediately distad of subcostal cell (fíg. 90); veins r-m and dm-cu sep- and othe arated by transverse hyaline fascia ._ 0 itracocoelia Giglio-Tos lapping c Two pairs dorsocentral bristles; stigma normal in size; costa normally convex least in t distad of subcostal cell; only vein r-m situated in transverse hyaline assembla fascia Neorkagoleti» Hendel 4. Vein R2-I-3 terminating in costa at about level of vein r-m; wing membrane heavily thickened and blackened in area of subcostal cell; cell R no more than 2V^ times as long as its width at apex of subcostal cell (ñg. 58) Dmcontomyia Becker Vein R2+3 terminating in costa well beyond level of vein r-m; wing membrane normally thin in area of subcostal cell; cell R more than 3 times as long as its width at apex of subcostal cell (fíg. 42) Cecidocharella Hendel 5. One pair upper fronto-orbital bristles; postocular bristles inflated, whitish; transverse hyaline band of wing pattern subapical (flg. 96) Procecidochares Hendel Two pairs upper fronto-orbital bristles; postocular bristles either black, slender, and sharply pointed, whitish and inflated, or mixture of 2 types; transverse hyaline fascia of wing pattern, if present, at basal Vi or at center of wing disk 6 6. One pair dorsocentral bristles; postocular bristles all black and slender, or mixed with whitish, inflated ones Cecidocharen Bezzi Two pairs dorsocentral bristles; all postocular bristles whitish, inflated Procecidocharoides Foote SubfamÜy TRYPETINAE Diagnosis.—Head higher than long; mouth- phritinae: Ditrichini) and (2) a more or less parts nongeniculate; postoculars slender, distinctly elongated basal cubital cell. Scapu- black, sharply pointed (yellow in those species lars are usually, though not invariably, with body bristles entirely yellow); frons present. Hering {19U7h) divides the subfamily prominently haired in most genera; 2-4 pairs into four tribes, whereas Hardy {X97S) uses lower fronto-orbitals; 1-2 pairs upper fronto- seven for the Trypetinae of Southeast Asia orbitals; upper fronto-orbitals concolorous; 1 based on somewhat different criteria. In pair dorsocentrals, situated from slightly an- the present study, I have found the tribal terior to transverse line through supra-alars characters used by both authors to be so to one through acrostichals; acrostichals unstable that I have not been able to define a usually present; 1 pair humerais; 1 pair presu- tribal structure in the Trypetinae at this turals; 2 pairs notopleurals; 1-2 pairs anepi- time. For instance, the genus Molynocoelia stemals; 1 pair katepistemals; 1 pair anepi- Giglio-Tos may well be the sole New World merals (all these bristles generally same representative of the tribe Gastrozonini, but color); 1-4 pairs scutellars; wing pattern it lacks one of the gastrozonine characters banded rather than reticulate; posterior ex- specified by Hardy—i.e., a setose scutellum. tension of basal cubital cell usually rather Likewise, the genera Hexareata Hering, long, always longer than width of extension at Hexachaeta Loew, and Blepharoneura Loew its base; bulla absent. very probably belong to the tribe Acantho- Discussion.—^All the species placed here pos- nevrini, but an assignment to that tribe in my sess (1) relatively thin, black, sharply pointed opinion should be held in abeyance until the postocular setae without white, stouter setae affinities of the unusual forms represented by mixed with them (for example, see Te- Ceratodacus Hendel^Pyrgotoides Curran, and FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES lachyropteron Bigot can be determined. keyed presented here differ considerably from Another genus, Ceratitis Macleay, is various- treatments of the New World fauna presented ly placed in a tribe Ceratitini or in a subfamily by other authors. By and large, members of Ceratitinae, but I follow Hardy (197S, 197U) this subfamily infest fleshy fruit of various and others who argue that character over- plants rather than seeds or other plant parts, lapping destroys the limits of that tribe, at accounting for the fact that this subfamily least in the Oriental and Pacific Regions. The contains most of the fruit flies of greatest eco- assemblage of genera and the way they are nomic importance in the New World. KEY TO GENERA OF TRYPETINAE 1. Three pairs scutellar bristles 2 One or 2 pairs scutellar bristles 6 2. Arista white, bare, thickened along almost its entire length (fíg. 19); vein r-m situated near base of discal cell Cemtodacuê Hendel Arista bristlelike, slender, dark, usually distinctly haired; vein r-m situated near midpoint of discal cell or beyond 3 3. All tibiae, especially those of hind legs, swollen and densely covered with fine hairs (fig. 10); head and body bristles very short; abdominal terga bare except laterally Pyrgotoides Curran Tibiae not unusually swollen or densely haired; head and body bristles of normal length; abdominal terga with evenly distributed, distinct setae 4 4. Arista moderately long haired, longest hairs longer than width of arista; ocellar bristle poorly developed, at most little longer than longest post- ocular ..- Hexareâta Hering Arista with shorter hairs; ocellar bristle strongly developed 5 5. Veins CuA2 and A with setae dorsally; in lateral view, middle third or half of parafacial hidden behind anterior margin of compound eye (fig. 17); anterior upper fron to-orbital bristle situated anterior to Vii distance be- tween anterior ocellar triangle margin and antennal base Blepharoneura Loew Veins CuA2 and A bare dorsally; entire length of parafacial visible in lateral view; anterior fronto-orbital bristle situated posterior to Vb distance be- tween anterior ocellar triangle margin and antennal base Hexachaeta Loew 6. Antenna distinctly longer than face (fig. 12) 7 Antenna no longer than face, usually shorter 8 7. Three pairs upper fronto-orbital bristles; arista long haired, longest hairs longer than longest postorbital bristles (fig. 12) Molynocoelia Giglio-Tos Two pairs upper fronto-orbital bristles; arista with hairs no longer than diameter of aristal shaft Lezca Foote 8. Two pairs dorsocentral bristles, 1 anterior to suture; 4-6- pairs lower fh)nto-orbit*l bristles (fig. 30) Polwnoia Wulp One pair dorsocentral bristles, posterior to suture; 2-3 pairs lower fironto- orbital bristles 9 9. Vein R4-f 6 curved anteriorly at apical margin of wing (figs. 6, 38) Anoêtrepka Schiner Vein R4+6 entering apical wing margin without anterior curve 10 10. Ocellar bristle little longer or heavier than longest postocular bristle (fig. 13) . . 11 Ocellar bristle well developed, distinctly longer and heavier than longest postocular bristle 14 11. Subcostal cell foreshortened, distinctly wider than long; arista distinctly haired; wing with large dark area at center (fig. 93) Parastenopa Hendel Subcostal cell at least as long as greatest width, usually distinctly longer; arista bare or indistinctly haired; wing pattern various 12 8 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE 12. Head and scutum heavily pollinose; lunule larj^e, usually sunken below an- terior margfin of parafacial; parafacial at least half as wide as compound eye in lateral view {ñg, 24) _._ _ Gerrhoceras Heringr Pollinosity of head and scutum various; lunule not unusually enlargred, lying flush with surface of frons; parafacial narrower than half width of com- pound eye 13 13. Two pairs upper fronto-orbital bristles; arista bare; wing pattern various Myoleja Rondani Three pairs upper fronto-orbital bristles; arista haired; apical half of wing mostly hyaline, with narrow, dark, C-shaped band (fig. 39) Anomoia Walker 14. Acrostichal bristles absent; 1 pair upper fronto-orbital bristles 15 Acrostichal bristles present; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbital bristles 17 15. Wing hyaline basally, evenly dark apicad of vein dm-cu; vein r-m proximad of middle of discal cell lêchyropieron Bigot Wing pattern covering most of disk; vein r-m situated distad of middle of discal cell 16 16. Two pairs lower fronto-orbital bristles; arista bare; vein R4 + 5 bare; middle and hind femora lacking rows of outstanding setae or spines HeUchkomyia Hendel Three pairs lower fronto-orbital bristles; arista haired; vein R4-I-5 haired; middle and hind femora each with prominent row of spines Pseudophorellia Lima 17. Third antennal segment with dorso-apical point (ñg. 14) 18 Third antennal segment rounded apically 21 18. One or 2 pairs upper fronto-orbital bristles (if posterior pair present, they are very short); veins r-m and dm-cu close together and covered by same transverse brown band (fíg. 74) Haywardina Aczél Two pairs well-developed upper fronto-orbital bristles; vein r-m situated at least its own length from vein dm-cu 19 19. Wing without short marginal brown mark in opening of S-shaped band (fíg. 53) Crypioplagia Aczél Wing pattern various, but if S-shaped band present, so also is short marginal brown mark in one of its openings 20 20. Dorsocentral bristle closer to transverse line through anterior supra-alars than to one through postalars; body black with yellow and white markings, or yellow with contrasting dark marks Rhagoletis Loew (part) Dorsocentral bristle closer to transverse line through p«istalars than to one through anterior supra-alars; body yellow with both black and creamy white markings Zonosemata Benjamin 21. Scutum with white or yellowish streak broadening posteriorly to scuto- scutellar suture Rhagoletotrypeta Aczél Scutum without such light streak 22 22. Wing irregularly crossbanded, especially apicalmost bands with distinct light spots (fig. 63) „ _ Epochnnopêiâ Hering Wing spotted or banded (if latter, bands without light spots) 23 23. Slightly curved dark band with darkened margins running diagonally from subcostal cell to posterior wing margin; veins r-ni and dm-cu lying at distinct angle to each other (fíg. 52) Crypiodacuê Hendel Wing pattern otherwise; veins r-m and dm-cu more or less parallel 24 24. Dorsocentral bristles situated closer to suture than to transverse line through supra-alar bristles Tomoplagia Coquillett Dorsocentral bristles at most only slightly ahead of transverse line through supra-alars, or farther back 25 25. Dorsocentral bristles situated distinctly behind transverse line through supra-alars _. _. Oedicarena Loew Dorsocentral bristles in, or nearly in, transverse line through supra-alars 26 26. Facial carina absent 27 Facial carina present 29 27. Posterior extension of basal cubital cell expanded basad of apex (fig. 15); scutellum swollen, partly shining black CeratitU Macleay Posterior extension of basal cubital cell narrowing gradually to apex; scu- ^' tellum normally shaped, yellowish 28 FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 28. Oral margin anterior to genal bristle with several black bristles larger and distinctly longer than longest postocular (fíg. 20) Chetosioma Rondani Bristles anterior to genal bristle, if present, light in color and/or fíner and shorter than postoculars (fíg. 33) ._.. Trypeta Meigen 29. Middle and hind femora without rows of prominent anteroventral or postero- ventral spines Stoneola Hering Middle and hind femora with rows of prominent anteroventral and postero- ventral spines 30 30. Vein r-m situated distinctly apicad of middle of discal cell (fíg. 73); most body and head bristles yellow G^jmnocarena Hering Vein r-m situated at or very close to middle of discal cell (fíg. 103); most head and body bristles black Rhagoletiê Loew (part) SubfamÜy TEPHRITINAE Diagnosis.—In lateral view, head usually most of the species of this subfamily possess slightly to distinctly higher than long; face postoculars that are mixed black and white or and frons usually matte; face without distinct comprise only the whitish, expanded type of carina; 1-5 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 1-3 setae in addition to other significant char- pairs upper fronto-orbitals, posterior pair of- acters expressed in the key to subfamilies and ten light colored; ocellars well developed; all the diagnosis previously presented. The dis- postoculars white, expanded in diameter, or tinctions between these two subfamilies are mixed with black, slender ones, never all clear except in a few Tephritinae, in which all black; antenna never longer than face, 3d seg- the postoculars are dark, whereas all other ment rounded apically, arista bare; usually 1 characters indicate a clear tephritine rela- pair dorsocentrals, situated between trans- tionship. Hering (19i7b) used five tribes, of verse suture and transverse line through which three are in the present study. Hardy supra-alars; 1 pair humerais; 1 pair presu- (1973) indicated that four tribes are repre- turals; 2 pairs notopleurals, posterior pair of- sented in Southeast Asia, three of which are ten light colored; 1 pair acrostichals; 1-2 pairs clearly represented in the New World. In addi- anepistemals; 1 pair katepisternals; 1 pair tion, the tribe TerelHini is included here. Ber- anepimerals; scutollum normally shaped, 1-2 ing's subfamily Aciurinae is represented in pairs scutellars; abdominal tergum matte to the New World by species that I have as- shining; wing pattern never with appearance signed tentatively to the "Aciurini" (see dis- of bands unless reticulation is present; poste- cussion of that tribe). Very few species of rior elongation of cubital cell usually short, Tephritinae use fleshy fruit as a food source, rarely longer than its own width at base. employing instead other parts of their-plant Discussion.—In contrast to the trypetines, hosts. KEY TO TRIBES OF TEPHRITINAE Head and body yellowish; scutum broadly black, black area almost entirely obscured by white dusting; posterior upper fronto-orbital bristles conver- gent; dorsocentral bristle in transverse line through supra-alars TerelHini (p. 10) Color of head and body various; scutum differently ornamented; posterior upper fronto-orbital bristles reclinate or divergent; dorsocentral bristles usually anterior to transverse line through supra-alars 2 Both of following must be present: Postocular bristles mixed dark and white (fig. 9); dark spot (sometimes faint) on parafacial between eye and antennal base (figs. 23, 29); antennal bases often distinctly separated Ditrichini (p. 10) Postocular bristles white» expanded (fig. 8% or more slender and yellowish, or dark spot between eye and antennal bases on parafacial absent; an- tenna! bases rarely distinctly separated .. 3 10 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE 3. In lateral view, outline of head oval, frons and face curving into each other without visible angle (fig. 22); wing usually broad, reticulate in basal half or third, or dark with yellowish spots, sometimes with dark or light bands in addition (fig. 36) Platensinini (p. 12) In lateral view, face and frons meeting at angle (fig. 33), even if obtuse; wing usually rather narrow, either banded or reticulate, or both 4 4, Wing usually not predominantly dark, but if so, apical stellate mark (fig. 115) usually present, wing never with dark transverse bands unless they are reticulated; abdominal terga usually gray or brown, matte or shining (if shining, mouthparts distinctly geniculate (fig. 32)); scutum matte; in lateral view, frons and face meeting at rather distinct angle rarely exceeding 120* (fig. 27) (if more than 120* or rounded, frons swollen immediately before lunule (fig. 22)) Tephritini (p. 13) Wing predominantly dark with yellow or hyaline spots (fig. 119), or with dark marks or transverse dark fasciae on hyaline disk; abdominal terga, at least apical one, shining; black or with combination of several colors; scutum sometimes shining or subshining; in lateral view, meeting of frons and face variable "Aciurini" (p. 16) TribeTERELLIINI Diagnosis,—Head about as long as high in 2 pairs scutellars, posterior pair nearly as lateral view; postoculars light colored; frons long as anterior; row of short, slender setae matte; 3 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs only on hind tibia; vein r-m situated distinctly upper fronto-orbitals, posterior pair distinctly apicad of middle of discal cell; abdominal convergent, 2 pairs concolorous; face without tergum subshining, yellow to brown, often carina, unspotted; gena, face, and parafacial with black marks laterally. subshining; mouthparts never geniculate; Discussion.—Species belonging to this tribe antenna shorter than face, 3d antennal seg- are distinguished by convergent upper fronto- ment rounded apically, arista bare; scutum orbital bristles and the distinctive scutal pat- with shiny black surface almost completely tern described in the key and diagnosis of the obscured in undamaged specimens by dense tribe. Whether these two characters justify white pollen; 1 pair dorsocentrals, situated in the use of a tribal designation remains to be or very close to transverse line through seen as a result of a study of the world's supra-alars; 1 pair presuturals; 2 pairs noto- fauna. As far as I am aware, the tribe occurs pleurals; 2 pairs anepistemals; 1 pair katepi- only in the Palaearctic Region and on the stemals; 1 pair anepimerals (all these bristles North American continent no farther south concolorous); scutellum matte to subshining, than Mexico. t KEY TO GENERA OF TERELLIINI 1. One to several setae at node; frons bare; wing rarely less than 4 mm long (fig. 89) Oreilia Robineau-Desvoidy Node bare; frons haired; wing rarely as long as 4 mm (fig. 83) Neaspilota Osten Sacken I;- Tribe DITRICHINI Diagnosis.—In lateral view, face and frons geniculate; face usually without distinct ca- meeting at distinct angle greater than 90**; rina, sometimes shining and with distinct head higher than long; mouthparts never spots; commonly 3 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 'ièf, r FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 11 2-3 pairs upper fronto-orbitals; ocellars well ulars and a rather distinct dark spot on the developed; postocular setae mixed black and parafacial between the eye and the base of the white; parafrontal with dark spot between an- antenna. Some authors have indicated that tennal base and anterior margin of eye; an- the widely separated antennal bases is a tenna never longer than face, 3d segment significant character, but I have found it to be sometimes concave on dorsal margin and not consistently present in the tribe, and drawn to distinct point, arista bare, antennal widely separated antennae appear frequently bases characteristically (but not always) dis- elsewhere in the family. Paracantha Coquil- tinctly separated; scutum matte; 1 pair dorso- lett, Neorhabdochaeta Malloch, and Laksyetsa centrals, situated between transverse suture Foote form a distinct subset of this tribe. In and transverse line through supra-alars; 1 many ways these three genera resemble pair acrostichals; 1 pair presuturals; 2 pairs Rhabdochaeta de Meijere and its close con- notopleurals, posterior pair nearly always geners and thus perhaps should be placed in whitish; 1-2 pairs anepisternals; 1 pair kate- Schistopterinae. However, the species of pisternals; 1 pair anepimerals; scutellum nor- Paracantha show very little resemblance to mally shaped, never swollen, usually 2 pairs Schistopterum moebiusi Becker, having many scutellars; wing pattern usually reticulate, more characters in common with other Te- sometimes with hyaline or dark fasciae in ad- phritinae. I fully agree with H. K, Munro dition; subcostal cell always darkened, longer (personal communication) that the entire sub- than wide but never long and slender; vein as family Schistopterinae requires a thorough r-m at or near middle of discal cell. ae investigation on a world basis. Relatively Discussion.—Included here are the tephri- little is known about the hosts or biology of ly tines having mixed dark and white postoc- al the ditrichines. ^^ be o- KEY TO GENERA OF DITRICHINI >t- One pair scutellar bristles; wing broadly oval, extensively dark 2 Two pairs scutellar bristles; wing narrow or broad, pattern various ___" 3 >e Wing with discrete, sharply bordered hyaline spots and marginal incisions (figs. 5&-62); bulla prominent; 2 pairs lower fron to-orbital bristles «.. Dyêeuaresta Hendel (part) rs Wing with apical or preapical hyaline arc and hyaline incisions in cell 2d C (ñg. 99); bulla absent; 3 pairs lower fronto-orbital bristles Pêeudeutreta Hendel 3. Parafrontals, parafacials, much of frons, and all of face shining, usually yellow These head areas matte Two pairs dark lower fronto-orbital bristles, never a third, light-colored one anterior to them .. .1 . Three pairs lower fh>nto-orbital bristles, anterior pair usually light colored 5. Wing very narrow, posterior border straight and area anterior to it hyaline; vein r-m lying at distinct angle to vein dm-cu (fig. 102) Rhachiptera Bigot Wing oval, posterior margin convex, wing field dark to posterior margin; vein dm-cu curved, line drawn through its 2 ends nearly parallel with vein r-m (fig. 107) Strobelia Rondani 6. Dorsocentral bristles closer to transverse line through supra-alar bristles than to suture; anterior upper fronto-orbital bristle short, never situated anterior to posterior lower fronto-orbital bristle; apical half of wing more or less evenly dark LaksyeUa Foote Dorsocentral bristle closer to suture than to transverse line through supra- alar bristles; anterior upper ñx>nto-orbital bristle long, always mesad and anterior to posterior lower fronto-orbital bristle; apical half or third of 3; wing with narrow dark rays radiating to margin 7 12 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE 7. Lunule continued to prominent cone between and below antennal bases; dorsocentral bristle very close to suture; dark rays radiating from center of cell R5 to wing apex; bulla concolorous with light brown surrounding it (fig. 84) Neorhabdochaeta Malloch Lunule between and below antennal bases with at most slight swelling; dorso- central bristles somewhat removed from suture; dark rays of wing radiating from apical third of cell R5; bulla usually darker than surrounding dark color (fig. 92) Paracantha Coquillett 8. Apex of wing dark or with small, rounded hyaline spots (fig. 56) Dictyotrypeta Hendel Apex of wing with extensive hyaline area, often in form of arc 9 9. Frons bare; bulla present; vein R4+5 haired below, if only at base; hyaline marks present immediately distad of subcostal cell in cell Rl (fig. 54) Cryptotreta Blanc and Foote Frons haired; bulla absent; vein R4+5 haired above; at most yellowish cloud immediately distad of subcostal cell in cell Rl (fig. 69) Eutreta Loew Tribe PLATENSININI Diagnosis,—In lateral view, head oval, curving rather abruptly to costa; either or usually distinctly higher than long with face both veins R24-3 and R4-h5 sinuate or with smoothly curving into frons or meeting at pronounced curve; vein R4+5 haired above, in angle of greater than 130°; frons and face some species below as well; abdominal tergum matte; face usually without carina; postocu- subshining. lars white, expanded in diameter, in a few specimens mixed with fine black hairs; 3 or Discussion.—The wings of all platensine more pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs genera are broad, usually with hyaline spots upper fronto-orbitals; ocellars usually moder- at least in the basal one-half or one-third of ately well developed; antenna shorter than the dark field. A lateral view of the head face, 3d segment rounded apically, arista shows it to be distinctly higher than long with slender, bare; mouthparts never geniculate, the frons rounded into the face without any labella fleshy; scutum matte; usually 1 pair angle, or with only a very obtuse one, at the dorsocentrals, situated close to transverse su- antennal bases, producing a distinctly long- ture; 1 pair humerais; 1 pair presuturals; 2 oval outline. All the genera included here are pairs notopleurals, both same color; 2 pairs assignable to the tribe without reservation anepisternals; 1 pair katepisternals; 1 pair except Tetreuaresta Hendel, which has a anepimerals (all these bristles same color); broad wing and long-oval head but which scutellum matte to subshining, 2 pairs scutel- more closely resembles other genera of Te- lars; usually row of delicate bristles or phritini. No review of the New World genera outstanding hairs on hind tibia; wing rather and species has ever been published. Almost broad, disk generally dark with lighter mark- nothing is known about the biology or hosts of ings; subcostal cell short and wide; vein Rl these flies in the area covered by this study. KEY TO GENERA OF PLATENSININI 1. Apical V^ to V^ of wing with brown and/or hyaline rays diagronally from pos- terior border of cell M, in addition to other markings basally (figs. 36, 86) 2 Wing with dark rays radiating to wing margin from center or apical V^ of cell R5 (see fig. 37) 3 FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 13 2. Several large, prominent bullae occupying cell 2d C, subcostal cell, and part of cell Rl; apical half of wing light brown, basal half with numerous yel- low or hyaline spots (fig. 36) Acrotaenia Loew Bullae absent from those cells, 1 hyaline incision at apex of costa, 1 at apex of R2+3, intervening costa bowed anteriorly and entirely dark; dark areas of wing unicolorous brown (fig. 85) — Neotamcia Foote 3. Posterior lower fronto-orbital and anterior upper fronto-orbital bristles well separated; dark areas of wing unicolorous 4 Anterior upper fronto-orbital bristle very close to, even with, or anterior to posterior lower fronto-orbital bristle; dark areas of wing several shades of brown ^ 4. One pair dorsocentral bristles, postsutural; wing disk with bright, distinctly bordered hyaline spots and incisions (fig. 112) Tetreuaresta Hendel (part) Two pairs dorsocentrals, 1 of pairs presutural; wing disk with vaguely delim- ited lighter brown spots in dark-brown field (fig. 41) Caenoriata Foote 5. Distinct bulla present at junction of veins M and dm-cu; cell 2d C and basal half of wing disk with numerous small spots (fig. 37) Acrotaeniacantha Hering Bulla absent; cell 2d C with wide, dark, transverse band; wing with 6-12 oval hyaline spots, many of them bordered with darker brown (fig. 98) Pgeudacrotaenia Hendel Tribe TEPHRITINI Diagnosis.—In lateral view, head generally basal cubital cell usually rather short; bulla slightly higher than long, often giving ap- usually absent. pearance of being square in profile; face meet- Discussion.—Most of the species of Tephrit- ing frons at distinct angle, usually about ini can be recognized by their relatively small 90**-! 10°; postoculars always white and en- size, matte thorax and abdomen, generally larged in diameter; 1-5 pairs lower fronto- reticulated wings, and the placement of the orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals, poste- dorsocentral bristles, which are close to the rior pair light colored in all but a very few transverse suture. Most of the species possess species; ocellars well developed; antenna as white upper fronto-orbitals and white poste- long as, or shorter than, face, 3d segment rela- rior notopleurals (the other of the two bristle tively short and broad, rounded apically, pairs dark). In the New World and the arista bare; mouthparts short- or long- Palaearctic Region there are relatively few geniculate, or labella fleshy; 1 pair dorsocen- really distinctive genera, most of the species trals in all but 1 genus, always situated at or resembling each other closely or the genera very close to transverse suture; 1 pair intergrading in so many characters that one humerais, 1 pair presuturals; 2 pairs noto- is tempted to assign them to a single genus pleurals, posterior pair commonly light with various subgenera, species groups, etc. colored; 1-2 pairs anepistemals, both pairs Techniques involving other than simple ob- commonly dark; 1 pair katepisternals and 1 servation of currently employed morpholog- pair anepimerals, both usually light colored; ical characters must be brought to bear before scutellum never swollen, usually matte, 1-2 one can resegregate these closely similar ag- pairs scutellars; middle and hind legs com- gregations of species into sensible groups monly without rows of spines or outstanding above the species level. For instance, see dis- setae; wing pattern never banded; vein r-m cussion of the genus Celidosphenella. No up- usually situated apicad of middle of discal cell to-date, comprehensive review of the New but rarely closer to vein dm-cu than length of World genera and species is available. Nearly r-m; veins R2-h3 and R4-(-5 never markedly all species of which their biology is known in- sinuate, latter haired dorsally in some species fest the seeds of Compositae or closely related and ventrally rarely; posterior extension of plants. 14 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600. U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE KEY TO GENEFL\ OF TEPHRITINI 1. One pair scutellar bristles 2 Two pairs scutellar bristles 9 2. Two pairs lower fronto-orbital bristles 3 Three or more pairs lower fronto-orbital bristles Î 3. Head nearly as long as. to longer than, high; parafacial relatively wide; mouthparts usually distinctly geniculate 4 Head higher than long; parafacial usually narrow; mouthparts at most short-greniculate or labella fleshy 5 4. Subcostal cell usually with rounded hyaline spot; 3 hyaline spots usually occupying cell Rl immediately distad of subcostal cell (fíg. 108); head usually about as long as high, rarely higher than long (fíg. 32) :. Paroxyna Hendel (part) Subcostal cell often entirely dark; 2-3 hyaline spots occupying cell Rl im- mediately distad of subcostal cell; head usually longer than high — Dioxyna Frey 5. Wing with dark preapical stellate mark, with narrow dark rays to anterior, apical, and posterior margins, and often various dark markings in basal half of disk (fig. 115); frons bare _. Trupanea Schrank (part) Wing pattern otherwise; frons haired 6 6. Cell R5 dark at tip or with only small hyaline >pot apically (fig. 78), bulla absent; abdominal terga subshining black Lamproxynella Hering Cell R5 usually with broad hyaline apical spot (ñgs. 5d-^2), bulla present; abdominal terga subshining to matte Dyseuaresta Hendel (part) 7. Mouthparts long-geniculate; abdominal tergum shining black Lamproxyna Hendel Mouthparts at most short-geniculate, labella often fleshy; abdominal terga subshining or matte 8 8. Wing with dark preapical stellate mark with narrow dark rays to anterior, apical, and posterior margins, and few or no dark basal markings (fíg. 115) Trupanea Schrank (part) Wing disk broadly dark, broken by relatively few hyaline incisions and discal spots, or large quadrate or subquadrate hyaline area immediately distad of subcostal cell, sometimes with 1 or 2 dark costal marks near its center, and apices of veins R4+5 and M with dark marks or forming rays to preapical dark area, or apex almost entirely dark (fígrs. 44-47) CelidoàpheneUa Hendel 9. Mouthparts distinctly geniculate; 1 pair dark, slender lower fronto-orbital bristles, although stouter yellowish or white ones may be present (fíg. 28) Oxyna Robineau-Desvoidy Mouthparts geniculate or not; 2 or more pairs dark, slender lower fronto- orbital bristles 10 10. Two pairs lower fronto-orbital bristles 11 Three or more pairs lower fronto-orbital bristles 18 11. Cell Rl extremely wide at level of apex of subcostal cell, with large bullalike black spot enveloping subcostal cell and basal half of cell Rl, subcostal cell with straight posterior border (fíg. 71) : Goniaxyna Hendel Cells Rl and R2-H3 about same width at level of apex of subcostal cell, subcostal cell and basal half of cell Rl without such black spot; posterior border of subcostal cell usually rounded 12 12. Wing with dark-brown or yellow preapical stellate mark as in "typical" Trupanea species, sometimes with other dark brown or yellow marks basally : 13 Wing more or less evenly reticulate preapically, although distinct preapical dark spot may be present 15 13. Frons bare; wing never with distinct bulla -^^ TephritU Latreille (part) Frons haired; wing often with bulla 14 14. Basal % of wing yellowish, or with irregular dark markings, or both (fig. 116); head and body brown to yellow; all head and body bristles brown to yellow, never black Trypanaresta Hering T^ FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 15 Preapical stellate mark connected to stigma by broad dark band which rarely extends basad of vein Sc; hyaline wedge from subcostal cell termi- natmg in vein R2+3, or beyond in form of small hyaline droplet (fig. 72)- head and body brown to dark brown; head and body bristles usually black ,c TT'*T 7 7 '".". Goniurellia Hendel 15. Head nearly as long as high (fig. 32); parafacial relatively wide; mouthparts usually distinctly geniculate; subcostal cell often with rounded yellowish spot; 3 rather distinct hyaline spots occupying cell Rl immediately distad of subcostal cell; apex of cell R5 dark or with rounded subapical hyaline spot (fig. 108) . .,. ^ p^^^^ jj^^^^j Head usually higher than long; parafacial relatively narrow; labella fleshy, or at most mouthparts short-geniculate; wing markings various ' ig 16. In lateral view, frons swollen anteriorly, usually meeting face atañ^í^ greater than 90-(fig. 22); fore femur of male distinctly enlarged; external genitalia of male with conspicuous striations in anal region Euaresta Loew In lateral view, frons rather flat, usually meeting face at distinct angle of not much more than 90**; male without characters cited above 17 17. Wing evenly reticulate; subcostal cell yellowish or hyaline^'basaffy'^nd apically (ñg. 94) Plaumannimyia Hering Dark bar about as wide as length of subcostal cell covering subcostal cell and extending posteriorly at least to vein R2-H3, sometimes beyond; subcostal cell dark, sometimes with rounded yellowish or hyaline spot (figs. 109-111) j.^^^^^ Latreille (part) 18. One pair upper fi-onto^rbital bristles; mouthpari;s long-geniculate- head distinctly longer than high; wing disk hyaline, or with dark markings or mfumated, with indistinct lighter spots; antennal bases separated by dis- tinct facial carina 19 Two pairs upper fronto-,^rbitaî bristles; labena"ne7hy7orm¡L7h¿¡rt¡'¡hort^^ geniculate; head at least as high as long, usually higher; wing disk with contrasting dark and hyaline areas; antennal bases usually closely approximate 20 19. Head about 1.2 times as long as high (fig. 2l")rrn"¿rom¡r¡ñVerio7bi)7^^ parafacial longer than V, length of frons Ensina Robineau-Desvoidy Head more than 1.2 times as long as high (fig. 31); anterior border of para- facial less than Vii as long as frons _. Proiensina Hendel 20. Wmg disk yellowish, with many of hyaline spots riarrowly ringed with darker yellow or brown; all head and body bristles yellow .,_ 21 Wing pattern otherwise; at least some of body bristles darkbrowñ'JrbTack" 22 21. Apex of cell R3 dark or with only small hyaline spot (fig. 34); scutellum entirely yellow; vein R4+5 bare or haired at base Acinia Robineau-Desvoidy Apex of cell R3 broadly hyaline; scutellum with pair of lateral black siwts- vein R4+5 haired . »««.^iT». * w 1 ZZ. Wing with dark areas more extensive than hyaline ones; in lateral view, frons and face meeting in curve, or at angle exceeding 120" *^ 23 Wing disk equally light and dark, or more extensively hyafinVThan "d¡¿k; m lateral view, frons and face meeting at angle of less than I2(f ' 24 23. One pair dorsocentral bristles, postsutural; ftx)ns flat T^frJii^i^te Hendel Two pairs dorsocentral bristles, 1 of them presutural; ft^ns with median OA v^^/i^^^.u^'^l!"*^.*' Euarestop^ Hering 24. Vein R4-f 5 with rather long slender hairs ventrally to beyond vein dm-<:u, and haii^ dorsally to at least same extent Homoeothrix Hering Vem R4+6 haired ventrally but rarely ever beyond vein r-m; dorsally bare or with hairs only at base 215 26. Wing disk primarily hyaline with preapicar'¡t¡lTa't7"ra¡rk"78^íTm¿^^^^ and many dark markings in basal half of disk, or yellow markings basally; subcostal cell light yellow, without darker markings; vein R4+6 bare above and below (fig 67) Euare^toide, Benjamin Wing disk essentially dark, with numerous hyaline spots; stigma dark with 1 or more light yellow spots (figs. 86, 87); vein R4-h5 bare above and below, or at most 1-2 hairs dorsally and several not extending beyond vein r^ ventrally . N.otephntU Hendel -1 16 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE Tribe "ACIURINF^ Diagnosis,—In lateral view, head higher Discussion.—This highly artificial group than long; face and frons matte to subshining; represents an assemblage of several different face never spotted, rarely with carina; post- kinds of genera having few recognizable mor- ocular row always containing white, ex- phological relationships at the tribal level. It panded setae although they may be mixed comprises a group of close relatives, which with shorter dark ones; 2-3 pairs lower fronto- has defied the classification efforts of a orbitals; 1-2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals; ocel- number of prominent tephritid authorities. lars well developed; mouthparts never genic- As an example, these genera appear as the ulate; antenna shorter than face, 3d segment subfamily Aciurinae in the work of Hering almost always rounded apically, arista bare; {19U7b) and others, as part of the Tephritinae scutum matte to shining; usually 1 pair dorso- in that of Aczel (1958b), and as a tribe of the centrals, situated anterior to transverse line Trypetinae in that of Hardy (1973, 197U\ through supra-alars and often close to trans- Munro (191^7), even after conducting a careful verse suture; 1 pair acrostichals; 1 pair study on the basis of measurable morpholog- presuturals; 2 pairs notopleurals; 1-2 pairs ical characters, was unable to associate the anepisternals; 1 pair katepisternals; 1 pair "aciuroid" genera satisfactorily with other anepimerals; scutellum usually matte to major supergeneric groups. The discovery of unstudied morphological characters, or the subshining, 1-2 pairs scutellars; wing rela- Genus tively narrow; subcostal cell longer than application of biosystematic studies, will be wide; vein r-m nearly always apicad of middle required to break this apparent impasse. of discal cell; posterior extension of basal Munro (in litt.) reported that the aciuroid gen- cubital cell not much longer than its width at era infest only three plant families in South Acinia Robin base; abdominal tergum, at least posterior- Africa, but a wider variety of plants is used by RobineaL most, shining, usually black but sometimes these flies in other Zoogeographie regions. (Zetterstt trop, spe mixed with other colors. species).- %^nX—A 1958: 75 ( KEY TO GENERA OF ACIURINF' Baryplegma ^ n. sp.) [ = Trypanea {Tt 1 Frons wider than long; upper fronto-orbital bristles set well mesad of lower fronto-orbitals, anterior upper fronto-orbital anterior to postenor lower fronto-orbital; dorsocentral bristles in or close to transverse line through Diagnosi.- supra-alar bristles; 3d antennal segment drawn to very sharp P^^^^V angle of a dorsoapically (fig. 16) : ; XenochaetaSno^ pairs lowt Frons at most as wide as long, usually narrower; anterior upper fronto-orbital bristle distinctly posterior to line through posterior pair of lower fronto- pleural lig orbitals; dorsocentral bristles distinctly anterior to transverse line through pimeral lig supra-alar bristles; 3d antennal segment usually rounded, but if pointed, ^ rior pair Ic rarely sharply so — *•*"" " outstandii 2. Wing disk essentially dark; cell R3 completely dark from base to vein dm-Xanthaciura Hendel up 5. Apical half of cell R5 broadly hyaline without any dark transverse band; nt subcostal cell bicolored (fig. 106) Rhithrum Hendel Apical half of wing mostly dark, or with transverse or oblique dark and/or It hyaline bands; subcostal cell usually entirely dark $ 6. Hyaline marks in cell Rl immediately distad of subcostal cell about same size j a One of hyaline marks distad of subcostal cell markedly longer than other; es. disk hyaline with transverse or oblique dark bands g he 7. Two pairs lower fronto-orbital bristles; 2 pairs dark anepisternal bristles; vein R4-Í-5 at most gently curved apicad of vein r-m (fig. 51) Chrysacium Aczél ae Three pairs lower fronto-orbital bristles; 1 pair dark anepisternal bristles; vein R4-f-5 bowed sharply anteriorly apicad of vein r-m Lilloaciura Aczél #ne 8. One pair scutellar bristles; 2 pairs lower fronto-orbital bristles; dorsocentral 4). bristles situated very close to suture PseudoedaspU Hendel tul Two pairs scutellar bristles; 3 pairs lower fronto-orbital bristles; dorsocentral bristles somewhat removed from suture Aciurina Curran he er DESCRIPTIONS OF GENERA he be Genus/Icínía Robîneau-Desvoîdy species a row of hyaline spots progresses -e. through the subapical parts of cells R3, R5, a- (Fig. 34) and M, leaving the apices of these cells almost :h entirely dark (fig. 34). Acinia Robineau-Desvoidy 1830: 775, Type-species,jaceae Robineau-Desvoidy (Rondani 1871: 4) = comiculata The genus has about 10 species, one of (Zetterstedt).—Benjamin 1934: 46 (discussion neo- which is widespread in the United States, trop. species).-—Hendel 1935: 53 (comment on type- northern Mexico, and the West Indies. It species).—Hering 1941a: 124 (in key, Peruvian occurs widely throughout the New World and gen.).--Aczél 1949a: 271 (in neotrop. cat.).—Aczél is commonly found in collections. 1958: 75 (rev.).—Foote 1967: 57.4 (in neotrop. cat.). Baryplegma Wulp of Cole 1923: 473 (desc. of maculipennia, The genus Baryplegma Wulp is difficult to n. sp.) i^picturata (Snow)]. distinguish from Acinia and as a result of Trypanea {Tepkritis) Group I of Malloch 1933: 276. further studies may prove to be congeneric. The type-species, gilva Wulp, possesses char- Diagnosis.—In profile, frons meeting face at acters that are not entirely characteristic of angle of about 130°; frons haired; 3 or more the congeners of comiculata. pairs lower fronto-orbitals; posterior noto- pleural light colored; katepisternal and ane- pimeral light colored; 2 pairs scutellars, poste- Genus Aciurina Curran rior pair longer than 0.5 times anterior; row of outstanding setae only on tibiae of hind leg; (Fig. 35) wing with scattered hyaline spots, each bor- Aciurina Curran 1932:9. Type-species, ínara Curran (orig. dered with brown darker than general infus- desig.).—Curran 1934b: 293 (in key to Amer. cation of disk; subcostal cell brown with light gen.).-~Foote 1967: 57.5 (in neotrop. cat.). areas; vein R4+5 bare or haired only at base; Tephrella Bezzi of Aczél 1953a: 193 (rev.). bulla absent. Tephrella, authors. . Discussion.--The New World species of this Aciura, authors (part). genus can be readily recog^nized by the wing Diagnosis,—In lateral view, frons and face pattern—all species exhibit reticulation in meeting at obtuse angle; frons haired; 3 pairs which each rounded discal hyaline spot is nar- lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto- rowly bordered by a shade of brown darker orbitals, posterior one light colored or whit- than the general background, and in most ish; row of postoculars comprising expanded. 18 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE light-colored hairs, sometimes mixed with basal half of wing dark with numerous hya- shorter, more slender dark ones; 1 pair dorso- line spots, apical half with transverse brown centrals, between suture and transverse line bands; 3-5 bullae immediately posterior to through supra-alars; 2 pairs notopleurals, costa in cells 2d C, Rl, and R2-h3. both dark; 1 pair scutellars; wing disk gener- Discussion.—Species of Acrotaenia occur in ally dark with hyaline incisions and spots, of- Florida and south of Texas through Central ten with small rounded ill-defined clouds of America, the West Indies, northern South lighter brown, or hyaline with dark marks; America, and Brazil. Prior to this study, veins R2-h3 and R4-I-5 somewhat sinuate, Caenoriata Foote and Neotaracia Foote were latter bare or haired at base; bulla present in included in Acrotaenia (see discussions of most species. those genera). As restricted by the descrip- Discussion.—This principally North Ameri- tions of those genera (Foote, 1978\ the genus can genus is known south of the United States contains only those species with wings having 1 only by the single species mexicana, which oblique apical bands and basal reticulation. Aczel {1953a) described as a Tephrella from No key to the described species has been Mexico. I have seen a male from "Oajaca," published. Mexico,, that appears to represent an un- described species. It is in extremely poor con- dition with many of the head, body, and leg bristles missing. Genus Acrotaeniacantha Hering Eleven described species (and possibly others) of this strictly New World genus are (Fig. 37) restricted to the Western United States. Bates (1935) presented a key to all the species Acrotaeniacantha Hering 1939:188. Type-species, radiosa known at that time (as Tephrella), and Aczel Hering (orig. desig.).—Aczél 1949a: 269 (in neotiop. cat.).—Foote 1967: 57.6 (in neotrop. cat.). described, illustrated, and discussed mexi- cana in considerable detail. Diagnosis.—Frons haired; facial carina ab- sent; 3 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals, both light colored, ante- Genus Acroiaenia Loew rior pair anterior to and mesad of posterior pair of lowers; 2 pairs scutellars, posterior (Fig. 36) pair longer than 0.5 times anterior; wing disk dark in basal % with numerous small hyaline spots, apical third with prominent stellate Acrotaenia Loew 1873: 274. Type-species, Trypeta testu- mark; vein r-m apicad of middle of discal cell; diTiea Loew (origr. desig.).—Wulp 1899: 414 posterior extension of basal cubital cell rather (desc.).—Hendel 1914b: 94 (in key to world gen.).— Hendel 1914c: 58 (desc, rev.).—Bates 1934: 8 (taxon. long; vein R4-Í-5 haired ventrally; bulla notes).—Curran 1934b: 291 (in key. Amer, present. gen.).—Aczel 1949a: 268 (in neotrop. cat).—Foote Discussion,—^This genus resembles Acrotae- 1967: 67.5 (in neotrop. cat.). nia Loew in head and body characters, but the wing pattern is different. A. radiosa is the Diagnosis.—Frons haired or bare; 3-4 pairs only broad-winged New World tephritid I lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto- have seen with a dark second costal cell filled Orbitals, concolorous; setae in postocular row with numerous small yellowish or hyaline mixed black and light colored; facial carina spots. The characters given in the diagnoses absent; 1 pair dorsocentrals, situated very and the key will enable one to disting^uish the slightly behind suture; both pairs noto- two genera easily. The genus was originally pleurals light colored; 2 pairs scutellars, equal described from Venezuela, and all specimens I in length; vein r-m apicad of middle of discal have seen belong to radiosa from that cell; vein R2+3 sinuate; posterior extension of country—there are no other described basal cubital cell very short; bulla absent; species. I FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 19 •ya- O^nus Anastrepha Schiner Discussion.—The genus Anastrepha infests wn a wide range of host fruits, and the species are to (Fi^. 1-^, 38) recognized, along with the Mediterranean fruit fly and those oí Rhagoletis, as the most economically important fruit flies in the New in Anastrrp^M Schiner 1868: 263. Type-species, Dacua ser- ral petUimuM Wiedemann (orig. desig.).—Wulp 1899; 404 World. The genus extends virtually uninter- (lüicocMÍon, 2 Mex. species).—Hendel 1914a: 66 (key, rupted from southern Texas and Florida into dy. knowTt species); 84 (in key, world gen.).—Hendel every country to the south. (The absence of ere 12íl4«í 11 (in key, So. Amer, gen.).—Curran 1931:14 (in records from French Guiana reflects only in- kry^ Puerto Rican and Virgin Isl. gen.).—Curran sufficient collecting or our lack of complete of l^c^lK 287 (in key, Amer. gen.).-~Curran 1934a: 432 np. (speci^^^ Brit. Guiana).—Lima 1934a: 487 (rev.),— knowledge about the literature concerning lUS Crt^r^ 1934: 127 (rev,).—Hering 1941a: 123 (in key, the genus.) nng Perxrri9,n gen.); 136 (key, Peruvian species).—Stone The synonymy presented here reflects only on. 1^2: 11 (rev.).—Baker et al, 1944: 1 (biol., Mex. the most important taxonomic references. A specie*).—Aczél 1949a: 198 (in neotrop. cat.).—Yepez large body of literature concerning distribu- een 1953: 1 (review, Venezuelan species).—Aczél 1954a: 71 (in kipy, "Anastrepha group'*).—Bush 1962: 87 tion, hosts, economic factors, biological infor- (cytotaJion., larvae).—Foote 1967: 57.6 (in neotrop. mation, and control is currently being cata- catj^—Steyskal 1977a: 75 (synonymy).—Steyckal loged. lSf77b: 1 (pictorial key, all known species). With Steyskal's (1977a) placing of Lucuma- kcroUyxa Loew 1873: 227. Type-species, Dacus/ra^erctt/w« phila, Phobema, and Pseudodacus in syn- Wiedemann (Bezzi 1909). TryjH^ia (ATvotoxa) Loew: Osten Sacken 1878: 189. onymy with Anastrepha, the recognition of AnaxtrephA, subg. Paeudodacus Hendel 1914b: 97. Type- the last named genus is considerably facili- specie«, daciformia Bezzi (orig. desig.).—Hendel tated. All the species can now be recognized fa 1914e: 66 (key, known species).—Stone 1939a: 282 simply by the apex of vein M, which is turned (rev.)^—Stone 1942: 10 (taxon. note).—Aczél 1949a: anteriorly to merge with the costa without 23^ (in neotrop. cat.).—Foote 1967: 57.38 (in neotrop. cat.)*—Steyskal 1977a: 75 (synonymy).—Steyskal any visible angle (figs. 6, 38). Stone's revision ib- 1977b: I (key, known species). (1942) is the standard reference to the species *.rs Phobema Aldrich 1925: 7. Type-species, atrox Aldrich known at that time, presenting a key to the te- (orig» desig.).—Aczél 1949a: 238 (in neotrop. cat.),— species of Anastrepha (strict sense), describ- Foote 1967: 57.35 (in neotrop. cat.).--Steyskal 1977a: ing and illustrating each, and summarizing 75 (ji7nonymy).-~SteyskaI 1977b: 1 (key, known distribution and host data. Steyskal's (1977b) %r specie«). sk Lucumaphila Stone 1939b: 340. Type-species, aagittata excellent pictorial key makes possible the ne Stone (orig. desig,).—Stone 1942: 10 (taxon. accurate identification of the 155 species .te ' note)^—^Aczél 1949a: 233 (in neotrop. cat.).—Foote known to date. 1967: 57.30 (in neotrop. cat,).—Steyskal 1977a: 75 3ll; (synonymy),—Steyskal 1977b: 1 (key, known species). .er Genus Anomoia Walker (Fig. 39) Diagnoêis.—Large, yellow-bodied flies with few dark markings; frons swollen in lateral he Anomoia Walker 1836: 80. Type-species, Trypeta gaedii he view, distinctly haired; 3-4 pairs lower fronto- Meigen (monotypy) « permunda (Harris). I orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals; ocel- Neanomoea Hendel 1914b: 84. Tyî)e-sp€cies, approximata -Id lars well developed; facial carina present; an- Hendel (orig. desig.).—-Hendel 1931; 41 (nomencl. ne tenna usually no longer than face, 3d segment note).—Acz'el 1949a: 298 (in neotrop. cat,).—Acz'cl es rounded apically, arista bare; dorsocentrals 1954a: 72 (in key to gen.. Group 1 Trypetini). Hamouckaeta Blanchard 1929: 468. Type-species, agio- he situated in or very close to transverse line blini Blanchard (monotypy).—Hendel 1931: 41 through posterior alars; 2 pairs scutellars; (nomencl. note).—Foote 1967: 57.25 (in neotrop. cat). 5 I wing typically with brown S-shaped and a V- shaped band; crossvein r-m typically apicad Diagnosis.—Frons swollen in profile, haired; of middle of discal cell; vein R5 bare, curving 3 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 3 pairs upper anteriorly at apex. fronto-orbitals; ocellars short; no facial carina 20 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE present; antenna shorter than face, 3d seg- nosis and key will allow separation of this ment rounded apically, arista haired; dorso- genus from Acima. I have seen the holotype of centrals between transverse lines between gilva, known only from Mexico, in the British supra-alars and postalars; acrostichals pres- Museum (Natural History) (Foote 1965b), but ent; 2 pairs scutellars; wing largely dark that specimen now needs further study in the basally and with narrow brown apical arc; light of taxonomic characters being used vein r-m distinctly apicad of middle of discal here. A second species, described by Ender- cell; vein R4+5 haired. lain from Costa Rica, may be congeneric. Discussion.—The synonymy given here is that of Hardy (1973), who also includes P/ia^ro- Genus Blepharoneura Loew carpus Rondani, which is also abundantly represented in the Oriental and Pacific Re- (Figs. 11, 17, 40) gions. Although South American specimens do not appear to possess a strongly oblique Blepharoneura Loew 1873: 272. Type-species, Trypeta poecilogastra Loew (orig. desig.) = poecilos&ma vein dm~cu as described by Hardy, they (Schiner).—Wulp 1899: 411 (species described, correspond well in all other characters, keyed).—Hendel 1914b: 82 (in key, world gen.).— especially the distinctive wing pattern. This Hendel 1914c: 20 (rev.).—Bates 1933: 48 genus is represented in South America only (desc).—Curran 1934b: 287 (in key, Amer. gen.).— by ogloblini Blanchard from Argentina, not Hering 1941a: 123, 132 (in key, Peruvian gen., rev.).—Acz'el 1949a: 195 (in neotrop. cat.).—Aczél seen in this study, and by an undescribed 1953a: 104 (in key, genera of Acanthonevrini).— species from Brazil, which may eventually Foote 1967: 57.17 (in neotrop. cat.). prove to be conspecifíc with Acidi'i brasilien- sis Lima. Anomoia, as pointed out by Hardy, is closely Diagnosis.—Frons swollen in profile, haired; related in many respects to Myoleja; that dis- central third to half of parafacial hidden be- cussion should be consulted for further hind anterior margin of eye; 2 pairs lower details. fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals; ocellars well developed; facial carina absent; antenna shorter than face, 3d segment Genus Baryplegma Wulp rounded apically, arista haired; dorsocentrals between transverse lines across supra-alars Baryplegma Wulp 1899: 416. Type-species, gilva Wulp and postalars; 3 pairs scutellars; wing pattern (monotypy).—Hendel 1914b: 95 (in key. world gen.).—Hendel 1914c: 8 (in key. So. Amer, gen.); 62 reticulate, hyaline spots not distributed (cat., discussion).—Aczél 1949a: 274 (in neotrop. evenly on dark field; subcostal cell as long as cat.).—Foote 1965b: 243 (desc, type-species).—Foote, greatest width, or slightly longer; vein r-m 1967: 57.17 (in neotrop. cat.). very close to middle of discal cell; vein R4+5 Baryphlegma, authors. haired; vein CuAl haired; posterior extension of basal cubital cell rather long. Diagnosis.—Head higher than long; 3 pairs Discussion.—This genus is easily recogrnized lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto- by a combination of characters, including a Orbitals, anteriormost centrad of posterior haired arista and vein CuAl and the half- upper fronto-orbital and about even with it; hidden parafacial (lateral view). The habitus antenna shorter than face, 3d segment of these flies resembles that of Hexachaeta rounded apically, arista bare; 1 pair dorso- Loew, but the wing pattern, although vari- centrals very close to suture; 2 pairs scutel- able, is rather different in most species (cf. lars; wing pattern AciniaAike with light figs. 40 and 75). A dozen or so species of brown background and with darker brown Blepharoneura are found from Mexico south surrounding each hyaline spot; cell R5 with to Brazil, and individuals are commonly seen large light spot at apex, vein r-m apicad of in general collecting. Despite their abund- middle of discal cell; vein R4+5 haired. ance, however, the genus has never been Discussion.—The characters in the diag- taxonomically revised. FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 21 Genus Caenoriata Foote Discussion.—Previously known only from Texas, Argentina, Paraguay, and Brazil, this (Fig. 41) genus will probably be shown to exist throughout most of the Neotropical Region. I Caenoriata Foote 1978: 31. Type-species, Acrotaenia have seen a specimen in poor condition from pertinaz Bates (orig. desig.). Mexico, probably borrichia Bush and Huettel. Bush and Huettel (1970) reviewed the genus Diagnosis,—Frons bare; 3 pairs lower and keyed the three known species. They fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals, stated that its affinities lie most closely with concolorous; facial carina present; all setae in the genera Ostracocoelia Giglio-Tos, Neorha- postocular row light colored; 2 pairs dorso- goletis Hendel, and Dracontomyia Becker. centrals, 1 anterior to suture; notopleural bristles unicolorous; 2 pairs scutellars, poste- Genus Cecidochares Bezzi rior pair longer than 0.5 times anterior; vein r-m apicad of middle of discal cell; vein R2-I-3 (Fig. 43) sinuate; posterior extension of basal cubital cell rather long; bulla absent; wing almost Cecidochares Bezzi 1910: 20. Type-species, Trypeta niger- entirely dark from base to middle of cell R4-I-5, rima Loew (Hendel 1914c: 40) = cannexa from which point narrow dark rays proceed to (Macquart).—Hendel 1914b: 87 (in key, world gen.).— anterior, apical, and posterior margins of Hendel 1914c: 40 (ta.Kon. discussion).—Lima 1934b: 120 (taxon. discussion).—Aczél 1949a: 186 (in neotrop. wing. cat,).—Aczél 1953a: 110, 126 (rev.).—Foote 1967: 57.19 Discussion.—Caenoriata pertinax (Bates) is (in neotrop. cat.). a distinctive species (see key) different in Cecidochares subg. Eucecidochares Bezzi and Tavares many important respects from those that are 1916: 157, 159. Type-species, Urophora connexa Mac- typically congeneric with testudínea (Loew), quart (orig. desig.). Costalimaia Hering 1947a: 4. Type-species, Procecido- the type-species of Acrotaenia. Caenoriata is chares fluminensis Lima (orig. desig.). so far known only from Brazil. Diagnosis.—Frons bare; face matte; facial Genus Cecidocharella Hendel carina absent; 3 pairs lower fronto-orbitals, 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals, both dark; all (Fig. 42) postoculars dark, slender, sharply pointed; Cecidocharella Hendel 1936: 74. Type-species, elegana scutum shining, covered by expanded white Hendel (monotypy).—Aczéî 1949a: 189 (in neotrop. setae in irregular rows; 2 pairs dorsocentrals, cat.).—Aczél 1953a: 109 (in key, genera of Oedaspdinae); 114 (rev.).~-Foote 1967: 57.18 (in neo- 1 presutural; both notopleurals dark; 2 pairs trop. cat.).—Bush and Huettel 1970: 88 (rev.). anepisternals; wing hyaline with fairly A¥ide, dark, diagonal bands; subcostal cell longer Diagnosis.—Frons haired; eye almost 2 than wide; vein r-m about its own length dis- times as high as wide in profile; face matte, tant from vein dm-cu; veins R2-f-3 and R44'5 facial carina present; 3 pairs lower fronto- straight or nearly so, latter haired dorsally; orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals, poste- bulla absent. rior one light colored; postocular row with Discussion.—Eleven described species of both light-colored and dark setae; 1 pair dor- Cecidochares are known in South America socentrals very close to suture; notopleurals from Ecuador and Venezuela to Argentina unicolorously dark; 2 pairs anepisternals; and Brazil. The entire genus is neotropical. In wing hyaline with dark transverse bands; this study I have seen specimens from Central subcostal cell longer than greatest width; America and Mexico that are yet to be iden- vein r-m at or very close to middle of discal tified. The wings of all but one of the known cell; veins R24-3 and R4+5 sinuate, latter species are similar in having a hyaline fascia bare; posterior extension of basal cubital cell extending completely across the wing from short; bulla present; abdominal tergum the second costal through the anal cells and subshining. three or four dark, oblique bands apicad of 22 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICU that fascia. Although distinctive, the genus is marks, extending along cell Rl apicad of the similar to Procecidochares Hendel and Proce- subcostal cell (figs. 44-47); and often incom- cidocharoides Foote. plete dark rays to the apical margin of the disk (fig. 44). Sexual dimorphism in the wing pattern is common (compare figs. 44 and 45,46 Genus Celidosphenella Hendel and 47); the differences between the sexes are rather pronounced in some cases. (Figrs. 44-47) Celidosphenella Hendel 1914b: 86 (1914c: 48). Type- species, maculata Hendel (orig. desig.).—Aczel 1949a: 258 (in neotrop. cat.).—Aczél 1953a: 148 (in key, gen- Genus Ceratitis Macleay era of Group I Tephritinae).—Aczél 1953b: 273 (rev., diespasmena group).~Foote 1967: 57.20 (in neotrop. (Figs. 15, 18, 48) cat.).—Hardy 1968: 137 (poecila). Trypanea (Trypanea) Group VII (part), Malloch 1933: 292 Ceratitis Macleay 1829: 482. Type-species, citriperda (keys, discusses 3 species, Chile, Patagonia). Macleay (monotypy) = capitata (Wiedemann).— Melanotrypana Hering 1944a: 14. Type-species. Acani/ito- Hendel 1914b: 76 (in key, world gen.).—Hendel 1914c: philus benoisti Seguy (orig. design.). NEW 10 (in key, So. Amer, gen.).—Curran 1934b: 287 (in SYNONYMY. key, Amer, gen.).—Aczél 1949a: 190 (in neotrop. cat.).—Foote 1967: 57.20 (in neotrop. cat.). DiagnosLs.—In profile, face and frons meet- ing at distinct angle of about 90^; frons bare; 3 Diagnosis.—In profile, frons and face meet- or more pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 1 pair scu- ing at curve rather than at angle, both matte; tellars; wing pattern resembling that of Te- frons haired; 2 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 phritis but with a subrectangular hyaline pairs upper fronto-orbitals, posterior pair area immediately beyond subapical cell, comparatively short and slender, anterior which descends into cell R4-h5; subcostal cell pair (in males of capitata) enlarged and entirely dark with dark area immediately broadly capitate; ocellars well developed; face posterior to it; vein R4+5 bare or haired; bulla without carina; antenna shorter than face, 3d absent. segment rounded apically, arista visibly Discussion.—As indicated in my catalog haired; 1 pair dorsocentrals, in transverse (Foote 1967), Celidosphenella (and the syno- line through anterior supra-alars; scutellum nyms discussed here) comprises six described rather swollen; 2 pairs scutellars, about equal species that have been recorded only from in length; wing moderately broad, disk hya- Ecuador, Chile, and Argentina. A rather large line with light brown transverse or oblique number of tephritines with three pairs of bands and small, dark, irregularly shaped lower fronto-orbitals and one pair of scutel- spots at base; vein r-m near middle of discal lars appear to be congeneric with C. maculata cell; vein R4+5 bare; posterior extension of Hendel, and additional ones exit to that genus basal cubital cell long and somewhat swollen in the key more because they definitely do not near its middle; bulla absent. belong to Lamproxyna Hendel or to Trupanea Discussion.—As far as is known, capitata Schrank. (Wiedemann), the Mediterranean fruit fly, is Thus the genus as it stands will tend to be- the only species of Ceratitis or its related gen- come a 'dumping ground' unless revisionary era known to have occurred in this study area. work is undertaken to establish the true con- The characters used and the information pre- geners of maculata. No guide to the identifica- sented in this bulletin refer only to that spe- tion of species is available. cies. It ranks with certain species of Amistre- The wing pattern of species fitting my con- pha andRkagoletis as one of the most econom- cept of the genus has a dark subcostal cell ically important species of Tephritidae in the with a more or less solid dark area posterior to New World. In many parts of Central and it, as in Tephritis; a rectangular hyaline area, South America, it does not cause appreciable sometimes broken by much smaller dark damage to agriculture because it can exist in FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 23 the many wild fruits. However, its recent appear- Genus Chetostoma Rondani ance in southern Mexico has caused much the concern among those engaged in protecting (Figs. 20, 50) ing U.S. agriculture as it has on several occasions >,46 when introduced into California, Texas, and Cketostoma Rondani 1856: 112. Type-species, curvinerve Rondani (orig. desig.).—Foote and Blanc 1963: 12 are Florida. Two excellent articles (Anonymous (rev., Calif.).—Foote 1965a: 677 (in No. Anier. cat). 1975, Rhode 1976) summarize the history and Chaetoatoma, emendation. significance of the Mediterranean fruit fly in the United States, Mexico, and Central Diagnosis.—In profile, face and frons meet- America. ing: at angle of about 130^; frons rather nar- C. capitata is known to exist more or less row, haired; 3 pairs rather slender lower permanently in almost all the South Ameri- fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals, can countries. During this study I have seen anterior pair strongly developed; ocellars well specimens from Colombia, Surinam, and developed; face unspotted, facial carina ab- erda Ecuador; these three countries, along with sent; gena with several black bristles as long n).~ Guyana and French Guiana, have never re- as, and anterior to, genal bristle; antenna nic: ported its presence. 7 (in shorter than face, 3d segment rounded api- : rop. Both sexes of the Mediterranean fruit fly cally, arista bare; 1 pair dorsocentrals, in are easily recognized by the characters given transverse line through supra-alars; acro- in the key and diagnosis. stichals present; 2 pairs scutellars, about eet- equal in length; wing hyaline with narrow tte; transverse brown bands; vein r-m distinctly s;2 Genus Ceratodacus Hendel apicad of middle of discal cell; vein R4-h5 >air haired. ior (Figs. 19, 49) Discussion.—An unknown number of palaearctic species of Chetostoma comple- ace Ceratodacus Hendel 1914b: 81 (1914c: 10). Type-species, ment the two known from the Western United .3d longicomis Hendel (orig. desig.).—Hering 1941a: 123 (in key, Peruvian gen.).—Aczél 1949a: 192 (in neotrop. States and Mexico, the latter by one speci- bly cat.).—Aczél 1953a: 104 (in key to genera of men, as yet unidentified to species, as a result rse Acanthoneurini).—Foote 1967: 57.20 (in neotrop. cat.). of this study. The species closely resemble jm those of nearctic Trypeta Meigen but have a ^al Diagnosis.—In lateral view, face and frons slightly different wing pattern and a number ya- meeting at about 90**; frons distinctly haired; of equally strong genal bristles. [ue face shining, spotted, with distinct carina; 2 led pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper cal fronto-orbitals; ocellars well developed; an- Genus Chrysaciura Aczél : of tenna distinctly longer than face, 3d segment «len rounded apically, arista whitish, swollen (Fig. 51) along almost all its length; 1 pair dorso- 7 ta centrals, very close to or in transverse line Chrysaciura Aczél 1953a: 188. Type-species, bipuncta Aczél (orig:. desig.).—Foote 1967: 57,21 (in neotrop. . is through postalars; scutellum rather rounded cat.). en- with indistinct cleft at apex; 3 pairs scutel- ea. " lars; vein r-m distinctly basad of middle of Diagnosis.—In profile, frons and face meet- mre- : discal cell; vein R4+5 bare. ing at angle of slightly more than 90**; frons t Discussion.—It is difficult to misidentify the bare; 2 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs re- - type-species, known to date only from Peru, upper fronto-orbitals, posterior pair light because of its very distinctive characteristics. colored; postoculars expanded, light colored; 1 :he r' Although I have not seen longicomis, a sec- pair dorsocentrals, very close to suture; poste- ad 1 end, very similar species from Brazil has ap- rior notopleurals light colored; 1 pair anepi- mle ^ peared during this study. It has a different in sternals; 1 pair scutellars; wing rather nar- t^ wing pattern and may be undescribed. row; disk bicolored brown, narrow darker 24 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. D-EPT. OF AGRICULTURE band along costa to apex of cell R5, and short Diagnosis,—Frons somewhat swollen in ent wing p rounded hyaline incisions and discal spots; lateral view, haired; 3 pairs lower fronto- them apart vein R2+3 with abrupt bend anteriorly to orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals; ocel- Specimens costa; vein R4-h5 gently curved, bare; bulla lars well developed; facial carina present; an- collecting. absent. tenna shorter than face, 3d segment pointed Discussion.—Aczél {1953a) described, illus- dorso-apically, arista bare; dorsocentrals in or trated, and discussed bipuncta in consider- very close to transverse line through supra- able detail. The type-species, known only from alars; 2 pairs scutellars; wing disk hyaline Argentina, is the only known member of the with brown transverse bands; vein r-m near genus. Paratypes in the U.S. National Mu- middle of discal cell; vein R4+5 bare. Dacus Fabricii seum, Washington, D.C., have been available Discussion.—The holotype and allotype of C. cius (Hend for study. cuculiformis Aczél are in the U.S. National Museum of Natural History, Washington, Diagnosis, Genus Cryptodacus Hendel D.C. The genus is not likely to be confused sometimes easily with its close relatives Lezca, Hay- markings, v (Fig. 52) wardina, or Cryptodacus. Known previously costa and o only from AczéVs type-species from Peru, disk; 2 pai Cryptodacus Hendel 1914b: 84 (1914c: 12). Type-species, Cryptoplagia contains what appears to be a upper froRî obliquus Hendel (orig. desig.).—Aczél 1949a; 192 (in second but undescribed Peruvian species. very short, neotrop. cat.).—Aczél 1954a: 72 (in key to gen., Trype- little longer tini Group 1).—Foote 1967: 57.21 (in neotrop. cat.). rather trun. Genus Cryptotreta Blanc and Foote posterior to Diagnosis.—Three pairs lower fronto- distinctly w orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals; ocel- (Fig. 54) R4-h5 rathe lars well developed; antenna shorter than Discussion face, 3d segment rounded apically, arista Cryptotreta Blanc and Foote 1961: 82. Type-species, is, or has be bare; 1 pair dorsocentrals, in transverse line gions. In tl through postalars; acrostichals present; 2 Eurosta pallida Cole (orig. desig.).—Foote 1967: 57.21 (in neotrop. cat.). only in Eg^ pairs scutellars; wing hyaline with distinct union of the transverse band at middle of disk; vein r-m Diagnosis.—In profile, face nieeting frons at Pacific Reg apicad of middle of discal cell, lying at distinct distinct angle of about 120**; irons matte, bare; of two speci angle to vein M. 3 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper of the gem Discussion.—The diagnosis given here and fronto-orbitals; face matte; parafacial spot Hendel has information in the discussion of the genus present; 1 pair dorsocentrals, between suture California f Lezca serve to distinguish this genus from its and transverse line through supra-alars; 1-2 campaigns. other close relatives, Haywardina and Cryp- pairs anepisternals; 2 pairs scutellars, poste- Coquillett toplagia. Two species, one from Bolivia and rior pair longer than 0.5 times anterior pair; County, Ca one from Brazil, have previously been as- wing reticulate, often with distinct, large hya- were identi signed to this American genus, but I have line spot in basal posterior quarter of disk; quarantine examined four specimens representing two vein R2-h3 sinuate; vein R4+5 haired below pulco, Mex distinct, apparently undescribed species, pre- only; posterior extension of basal cubital cell were follow sumably from Colombia, which are certainly short to moderately long; bulla present but out additio congeneric except for differences in wing may be indistinct. The genus i patterns. Discussion.—Only two species of Crypto- further inti treta, pallida Cole from Baja California and formation h Cenu9 CryptoplOrgia Aczél cislimitensis Steyskal from San Ysidro, Calif., of these tw are known. The only new specimens seen in apply to se^ (Fig. 53) this study that are definitely assignable to Viewed ñ this genus, also from Baja California, are probably tl Cryptoplagia Aczél 1951: 265. Type-species, cuculiformis probably pallida. The species generally re- genus in th Aczél (orig. desig.).—Foote 1967: 57.21 (in neotrop. semble those of Eutreta Loew, but the differ- wide range cat.). FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 25 ent wing pattern and other characters set Genus Dictyotrypeta Hendel them apart adequately for ready recognition. Specimens are rarely found in general (Fig. 56) collecting. Dictyotrypeta Hendel 1914b: 93 (1914c: 49). Type-species, 8y88ema Hendel (orig, desig.).—Hering 1941a: 124 (in Genus Dacus Fabrîcîus key, Peruvian gen.); 148 (desc.).—Aczél 1949a: 259 (in neotrop. cat.).—Foote 1967:57,21 (in neotrop. cat). (Fig. 65) Diagnosis.—Frons matte, haired; 3 pairs Dacua Fabricius 1805: 272. Type-species, armatus Fabri- lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto- cius (Hendel 1927: 24). orbitals all dark, all light, or posterior pair light; face matte, sometimes spotted; 1 pair Diagnosis.—Bro^nish-yeWo'N flies, body dorsocentrals, very close to suture; 2 pairs sometimes with black and/or bright yellow scutellars about equal in length; notum with markings, wings usually with dark band along bare patches devoid of setulae; wing rela- costa and often with other markings on wing tively narrow; vein R2-H3 sinuate; vein R4+5 disk; 2 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 1 pair straight, haired to level of vein dm-cu; basal upper fronto-orbitals; ocellars, if present, cubital cell with very little extension; bulla very short, fíne, hairlike; antenna at most present; abdominal tergum with long white little longer than face, arista bare; scutellum setae. rather truncate, 1-2 pairs scutellars, situated Discussion.—The determination that the posterior to middle of scutellum; basal M cell genus Ictérica Loew does not occur south of distinctly wider than basal cubital cell; vein the United States and that Ictericodes Her- R4+5 rather sinuate; cell R5 relatively wide. ing, proposed to replace it for related neo- Discussion.—This easily recognized genus tropical species, is restricted to the Palaearc- is, or has been, found in all Zoogeographie re- tic Region, leaves Dictyotrypeta as the genus gions. In the Palaearctic Region it appears into which several species occurring from only in Egypt, the Near East, and along the Mexico to Brazil may possibly be placed. union of the Palaearctic with the Oriental and I have not seen a species that can definitely Pacific Regions. The accidental introduction be identified with the type-species syssema of two species represents the only occurrence Hendel, but several specimens representing of the genus in the New World. D, dorsalis two species are congeneric with Dictyotrypeta Hendel has been found on several occasions in without any doubt. Additional material seen California followed by successful eradication in this study indicates the possible existence campaigns. One specimen of D. cucurbitae of at least three closely related genera, if not Coquillett was trapped in Los Angeles congeneric. One of them has a yellowish head County, Calif., in 1956, and several larvae and body setae, the other a wing with the were identified from material intercepted at brown in two shades and a distinct bulla. Ad- quarantine, presumably originating in Aca- ditional specimens are required for a deeper pulco, Mexico, in 1976. Both of these finds analysis. were followed up by intensive surveys with- This New World genus appears to be much out additional specimens being discovered. more widespread (Mexico to Argentina and The genus is included here in the event that Brazil) than previously recognized. further introductions might be found. The in- formation here centers on the characteristics of these two species, although it might well Genus Dioxyna Frey apply to several other species as well. Viewed from a world standpoint, Dacua is (Fig. 57) probably the most economically important Dioxyna Frey 1945: 62. Type-species, Trypeta sororcula genus in the family; its species attack a very Wiedemann (orig. desig.).--Foote 1967: 57.21 (in neo- wide range of plants. trop. cat.).~-Novak 1974: 1 (rev.. No. Amer.; some Mex. records). 26 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600. U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE Diagnosis.—In profile, face and frons meet- verse line between supra-alars; posterior pair ing at rather distinct angle of more than 90**; of notopleurals light colored; 1 pair anepi- head as long as high; parafacials relatively sternals; wing hyaline with prominent dark wide; frons bare; 2 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; transverse bands; vein r-m at or very close to 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals, posterior one middle of discal cell; veins R2+3 and R4-h5 light colored; antenna as long as face, 3d seg- distinctly sinuate, latter bare; anal cell with ment rounded apically; mouthparts distinctly very short posterior extension; bulla present. geniculate; 1 pair dorsocentrals; notopleurals Discussion.—This distinctive genus, known concolorously dark; 1 pair anepisternals; only by two species, one from Ecuador and one these, katepisternals, and anepimerals con- from Peru, is easily recognized by its unusual colorously dark; 1 pair scutellars; no out- wing with its wide cell Rl, sinuate veins R2+3 standing rows of setae on middle or hind legs; and R4+5, and distinctive pattern. No other wing reticulate, subcostal cell commonly en- genus appears to be closely related morpho- tirely dark without rounded light spot; vein logically. The species may be identified by r-m apicad of middle of discal cell; vein R4 + 5 consulting AczéFs revision {195Sa). bare; bulla absent. Discussion.—This genus, widespread in the New World, is represented by five described species and several undescribed ones found Genus Dyseuaresta Hendel during this study from numerous localities. (Figs. 59-62) Although Munro (1957) discussed this genus in detail and its relationships with Paroxyna Dyseuaresta Hendel 1928: 368. Type-species, adelphica Hendel in the Afrotropical Region, a thor- Hendel (orig. desig.).—Curran 1931: 14 (in key to gen., ough, detailed study of the two genera in the Puerto Rico and Virgin Isl.).—Curran 1934b: 293 (in New World is required. Externally the species key, Amer, gen.).—Bates 1934: 15 (taxon. com- ment).—Benjamin 1934: 51 (diagnosis, discus- are very similar and therefore will probably sion).—Hering 1941a: 125 (in key. Peruvian gen.); 156 require at least the examination of male and (desc.).—Aczél 1949a: 279 (in neotrop. cat.).—Foote female postabdomens to reveal useful dis- 1967: 57.22 (in neotrop. cat.). tinguishing characters. Species of Dioxyna al- ways have only one pair of scutellars and Diagnosis.—In profile, face meeting frons at usually a slightly longer head than those of distinct angle of about 90**; fron^ haired; 2 Paroxyna, although that character is often pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper difficult to use as a distinguishing one. Novak fronto-orbitals, posterior pair light colored; at {Ji97U) keyed and discussed the U.S. species, least 1 species with parafacial spot at level of but no guide to those south of the United antennal base; notopleurals, katepisternals, States is available. and anepimerals light colored; 1 pair scutel- lars; wing predominantly brown, sometimes bicolored, with numerous hyaline incisions Genus Dracontomyia Becker and rounded discal spots; stigma entirely dark; vein R4+5 haired in most species, occa- (FifiT. 58) sionally to level of vein r-m, and sometimes ventrally as well; bulla present. Dracontomyia Becker 1919: 193. Type-species, Hveti Discussion.—This entirely New World genus Becker (monotypy).—Aczéî 1949a: 312 (in neotrop. is represented by only one species in the cat.).—Aczél 1953a: 109, 120 (rev.).—Foote 1967: 57.22 (in neotrop. cat,). United States. This study indicates that there are probably several undescribed species Diagnosis.—Frona haired; facial carina ab- from Mexico south, but the limits of the genus sent; 3 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs are not well known. For instance, the genus upper fronto-orbitals, posterior pair light col- runs in two places in the key owing to my as- ored; postoculars slender, sharply pointed; 1 signment of a broad-winged species with a pair dorsocentrals between suture and trans- very dark disk and the head having a para- FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 27 facial spot at the level of the antennal bases. Genus Epochrinopsis Hering Di- Another species, rather unlike mexicana rk (Wiedemann), is Trupanea caracasana Fer- (Figr. 63) to nandez, which differs also from most D^/seua- -5 resta species in that the wing disk resembles Epochnnopsis Hering 1939: 168. Type-species, hicolorata .h that of Acinia in comprising two shades of Hering (orig. desig.).—Aczel 1949a: 252 (in neotrop. t. cat.).—Aczel 1951: 256 (in key, genera of brown with many of the hyaline spots lying in Tryptetini).—Aczel 1954a: 74 (rev. of previous key, n the lighter shade and bordered by the darker desc.).--Foote 1967: 57.23 (in neotrop. cat), le brown. I also include a fourth species, Z>2/seua- Epochrinopsis, subgenus Epochrella Hering 1961: 2. al resta trinotata Bates (fig. 59), which needs Type-species, rivellioidea Hering (orig. desig.).— -3 further study to determine its correct generic Foote 1967: 57.23 (in neotrop. cat.). er status. o- Diagnosis.—In profile, frons EuarestaAike, swollen, broad, haired; facial carina absent; 3 Genus Ensina Robineau-Desvoidy or more pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs (Fig. 21) upper fronto-orbitals set well mesad of lowers; ocellars very long and heavy, about Ensina Robineau-Desvoidy 1830: 751. Type-species, 1.5 times as long as longest lower fronto- Musca sonchi L. (monotypy).--Wulp 1899: 416 orbital; antenna shorter than face, 3d seg- (discussion, new species).—Hendel 1914b: 96 (in key, ment rounded apically, arista bare; dorso- world firen.).~-HendeI 1914c: 66 (in key, neotrop. g-en.).-—Curran 1931: 14 (in key, Puerto Rican and centrals situated at suture; acrostichals Virgin Isl. gen.).—Malloch 1933: 272 (taxon. present; 2 pairs scutellars; wing with rather discussion).—Hering 1941a: 124 (rev.).—Aczel 1949a: diffuse brown bands that are rather heavily 274 (in neotrop. cat.).—Steyskal 1970: 158 (general reticulated with hyaline spots, such spots also discussion). evident in subhyaline areas between bands; vein r-m at or little beyond middle of discal ■>6 Diagnosis,—In profile, face and frons meet- cell; vein R4-I-5 haired. e ing at distinct angle of about 120°; head about Discussion.—Neither of Hering's type- as long as high; frons bare; 3 pairs lower species was found in this study. However, I fronto-orbitais; 1 pair upper fronto-orbitals; have seen a single female from Quito, Ecua- mouthparts distinctly geniculate; noto- dor, which is closely related to, but doubtfully pleurals concolorously dark; anepisternal conspecific with, rivellioides Hering. Hering's dark; katepisternal and anepimeral both light distinction between Epochrella and typical colored; 2 pairs scutellars, posterior pair at >f Epochrinopsis does not seem to justify the least half as long as anterior pair; neither erection of a subgenus. A final decision is middle nor hind leg with rows of outstanding hereby reserved until the type-species can be setae; wing mainly hyaline with several examined. The genus has not undergone re- small, ill-defined dark areas; subcostal cell vision since its original description. dark with lighter areas; vein r-m apicad of middle of discal cell; vein R4+5 bare; bulla i- absent. Genus Euaresta Loew Z?wciMwio/i.—Steyskal {1970) discussed the (Figs. 8, 22, 64-66) history and status of the Ensina-Protensina question in detail and thoroughly reviewed Euaresta Loew 1873: 296. Type-species, Trypeta festiva the literature. He concluded that Ensina is Loew (Coquillett 1910: 540).—Wulp 1900: 423 (species, Mex.).--Coquillett 1910: 540 (typ€-desig.).--Hendel represented in the New World only by the 1914b: 96 (in key, world gen.).—Hendel 1914c: 70 (in ubiquitous E. sonchi (L.), which apparently key, So. Amer, gen.),—Curran 1928: 70 (in key, Puerto occurs from the West Indies south to Brazil. I Rican gen.).—Curran 1931: 14 (in key, Puerto Rican have seen nothing during this study to con- and Virgin Isl. gen.).—Benjamin 1934: 49 (desc, tradict these findings, but a closer study of taxon. discussion).—Aczel 1949a: 281 (in neotrop, cat.).—Quisenberry 1950: 9 (rev.. No. Amer.).—Aczel material that has recently come to hand is 1962d: 147 (rev.).—Foote 1967: 57.23 (in neotrop. required. cat.).—Steyskal 1972a: 130 (taxon. comment). Ï ^ t 28 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE Camaromyia Hendel 1914b: 96 (1914c: 63). Type-species, ing at distinct angle of about 120''; frons Trypeta bullans Wiedemann (orig. desig.).—Malloch 1933: 273 (taxon. discussion, key to Chilean haired; 3 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; posterior species).—Hering 1941a: 126 (in key, Peruvian gen.); notopleural light colored; both katepisternal 166 (desc.).-~Aczél 1949a: 295 (in neotrop. cat.).— and anepimeral light colored; 2 pairs scutel- Aczél 1952a: 130 (in neotrop. cat. sup.). lars, posterior pair more than 0.5 times as Euareata, subgenus Setigeresta Benjamin 1934: 50. Type- long as anterior pair; hind tibia with row of species, Trypeta aequalis Loew (orig. desig.). delicate setae; wing reticulate, subcostal cell Diagnosis.—In profile, frons and face meet- characteristic yellowish, shiny; vein R4-f-5 ing in curve or at very obtuse angle, frons haired only at base; bulla absent. noticeably swollen near lunule; frons haired; Discussion.—Very closely related to Neo- 2 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs scutel- tephritis Hendel, Euarestoides is easily rec- lars, posterior pair longer than 0.5 times an- ognized by the characteristic wing pattern terior pair; tibiae without rows of outstanding and the presence in some species of extensive setae; fore femur of male distinctly enlarged; yellow areas basally. In the latter respect, wing dark with discrete hyaline spots; sub- some species resemble those of Trypanaresta costal cell usually with light mark; vein R4-h5 Hering but can be distinguished by the pres- haired; bulla present or absent. ence, among other characters, of three pairs Discussion.—I follow Aczél (1952a) in consid- of lower fronto-orbitals. The North American ering Camaromyia Hendel and Setigeresta species are very common in collections; they Benjamin as synonyms of Euaresta. All three have been keyed by Foote (1958), The genus is appear to be congeneric based on characters widespread in the Neotropical Region, and that are not the property of one sex alone. It further studies will probably show it to be is of interest to note that the enlarged fore ubiquitous. femora and distinctive external genitalia of males are characters that appear elsewhere Genus Euarestopsis Hering in the Tephritini (see discussion of Plauman- Euarestopsia Hering 1937: 299. Type-species, paupera nimyia, for instance), and I have also seen Hering (orig. desig.).—Aczél 1949a: 283 (in neotrop. them in a badly damaged male belonging to cat.).—Foote 1967: 57.24 (in neotrop. cat.). an unknown genus of Trypetinae. During this study, I have also seen some specimens of Diagnosis.—In lateral view, head Euaresta- Euaresta from South America that resemble like, with swollen frons; frons bare, with ele- Eitaresta bella (Loew) of North America more vated ridge from ocellâr triangle to lunule; 3 closely than the widespread bullans (Wiede- pairs lower fronto-orbitals, 2 pairs upper mann). Such species were not included in fronto-orbitals, both light colored; 2 pairs AczéFs revision (Aczél 1952a) of Euaresta, dorsocentrals, 1 presutural; 2 pairs noto- which was confined to close relatives of buU pleurals, posterior pair light colored; 1 pair lans. Further study may show that my con- dark anepisternals; 2 pairs scutellajrs, poste- cept of Euaresta is actually a complex of dis- rior pair longer than half length of anterior crete groups at the generic or subgeneric level pair; wing disk broad, pattern as in Tetreua- in the New World. resta; stigma with lighter marks; vein r-m distinctly apicad of middle of discal cell; vein Genus Euarestoides Benjamin R4+5 haired; bulla absent. Discussion.—In his comments on the type- (Figs. 67, 68) specimen of paupera (male, Costa Rica), Her- ing (1937) indicated that the frons above the Trupanea, subgenus EiLarestoides Benjamin 1934: 57. lunule is "stark vorgeschwollen" and appears Type-species, Trypeta ahstersa Loew (orig. desig.).— to be narrowed anteriorly. He further stated Hering 194Íá: 126 (rev.).—Aczél 1949a: 292 (in neo- trop. cat).—Foote 1958: 288 (rev., No. Araer. that if this condition is not due to shrinkage, species).—Foote 1967: 57.24 (in neotrop. cat.). the character might be considered to have generic value. Diagnosis.—In profile, face and frons meet- The frons of the only specimen examined in FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 29 this study, a female from Sao Paulo, Brazil, tinctive in having a broad wing, the dark- or exhibits a similar condition. One's first im- al brown field with numerous small light-brown pression certainly is of shrinkage, since the or hyaline spots, and a narrow hyaline arc 1- antennal bases and lunule are deeply sunken is apically. In some neotropical species, how- below the level of the frons, a condition that ever, only a partial apical hyaline arc is pres- of might possibly cause the ridge to appear ^11 ent, or it is represented by a hyaline spot that along the length of the frons. However, be- is not shaped like a sickle. Stoltzfus (1977) cause this character has appeared in both should be consulted for keys to the species of sexes and at such widely separated localities, the New World. I accept the condition as normal pending the I have seen a headless female from Minas examination of additional specimens. n Gerais, Brazil, in which the íu^reía-like wing Bering's illustration and description ofpau- is light at the base, a character uncommon to pera indicate that the female from Brazil is a the known species. t different, very probably undescribed, species. 1. Genus Cerrhoceras Hering Genus Eutreta Loew (Figs. 24, 70) (Figs. 23, 69) Gerrhoceras Hering 1941b: 474. Type-species, paradoxa Hering (orig. de s ig.).—Aczél 1949a: 252 (in neotrop. Icaria Schiner 1868: 276. Type-species, Trypeta sparsa cat.).—Aczél 1954a: 73 (taxon., key, rev.),—Foote Wiedemann (orig. desig.); preocc. Saussure 1853. 1967: 57.25 (in neotrop. cat.). Eutreta Loew 1873: 276. Type-species, Trypeta sparsa Wiedemann (Coquillett 1910: 543).—Wulp 1899: 413 (2 Diagnosis.—In profile, face and frons meet- species discussed).—Coquillett 1910: 543 (type desig.).—Hendel 1914b: 93 (in key, world gen.).— ing in curve rather than at angle; parafacial Hendel 1914c: 54 (in key, So. Amer, gen., desc.).—Lima at least 0.5 times as wide as eye; lunule usu- 1934b: 126 (biol. notes).—Curran 1934b: 291 (in key, ally sunken below level offrons; frons haired; Amer, gen.).—Hering 1941a: 124 (in key, Peruvian 3 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper iSen.)\ 149 (desc.).—Aczél 1949a: 264 (in neotrop. fronto-orbitals; facial carina absent; antenna cat.).—Foote 1967: 57.24 (in neotrop. cat.).—Stoltzfus 1977: 369 (rev., New World species). shorter than face, 3d segment pointed api- Eutreta, subgenus Phasmatocephala Hering 1937: 297. cally, arista bare; 1 pair dorsocentrals, in Type-species, rhinophora Hering (orig, desig.). transverse line through supra-alars; acro- Stoltzfus 1977: 374 (rev., New World species). stichals present; 2 pairs scutellars; wing rather narrow, hyaline with dark transverse Diagnosis.—Frons matte, haired; 3 pairs and oblique bands and some reticulation in lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto- dark areas; vein r-m apicad of middle of discal orbitals, posterior pair light colored; face cell; vein R4-f5 bare; posterior extension of matte, spotted or not; parafacial spot present; basal cubital cell rather long. 1 pair dorsocentrals, between suture and Z)wcas«io/i.—Previously known only from transverse line through supra-alars; 2 pairs Bolivia and Peru, this unusual genus is also scutellars, about equal in length; wing rather represented by specimens, as yet unidentified broad, dark-brown disk with apical hyaline to species, from Mexico as a result of this arc and numerous small hyaline and/or light- study. Except for the wing pattern, the habi- brown spots; vein R2+3 sinuate; vein R4+5 tus of this genus closely resembles that of the haired; bulla absent. North American genus Eurosta Loew in hav- Discussion.—The genus Eutreta is restricted ing a dark head and body covered in older to the New World, where it occurs from specimens with what appears to be an oily Canada south to Brazil. It has been found substance that obscures the color and detail commonly during this study, and it is often of the surface. The genus is distinctive as indi- taken in general collecting in the Nearctic Re- cated in the diagnosis and key, and it has no gion* All the North American species are dis- close relatives in Mexico or South America. m I m % 30 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE Genus Gonioxyna Hendel Discussion.—In describing this taxon as a subgenus of Trypanea [sic], Hendel (1927) ap- (Fig. 71) parently misidentified Trypeta augur Frauen- feld, the designated type-species, which, ac- Gonioxyna Hendel 1927: 160. Type-species, magnipennis cording to Freidberg and Kugler (1977) and Hendel (orig, desig.).—Zia 1937: 196 (taxon. discus- Munro (1957) properly belongs to the African sion, desc.).—Zia and Chen 1938: 114 (taxon. discus- sion, desc). genus Dectodesis Munro in having long- geniculate mouthparts, a bare frons, and two Diagnosis.—In profile, frons meeting face at pairs of scutellars. Freidberg and Kugler distinct angle of about ISS''; mouthparts (1977) explained this situation in requesting geniculate; frons bare; 2 lower fronto- the International Commission on Zoological orbitals; both pairs notopleurals dark; kate- Nomenclature to designate, as type of Goniu- pisternal dark; anepimeral light colored; 2 rellia, the species tridens Hendel, with which pairs scutellars, posterior pair less than 0.5 the material in this study is more properly times as long as anterior pair; few delicate associated. outstanding setae on hind femur only; wing This palaearctic genus has not heretofore reticulate, costa bowed forward in region of been recorded from the Neotropical Region. subcostal cell, cell Rl in this region extremely- During the preparation of this publication, wide; bulla present. evidence has been presented to me by Amnon Discussion.—Prior to this study, donioxyna Freidberg (pers. commun.) that Old World was known only from the eastern Palaearctic Goniurellia species are not congeneric with Region; at least four species have been de- the species included under this heading. scribed from Mongolia, China, and Japan. However, from descriptions and wing pat- Foote and Blanc {1979) reviewed the three terns as figured in the literature, a New World species, which range from Guate- number of species representing localities as mala north to Wyoming. The genus is easily widespread as Mexico, Ecuador, Chile, and recognized by its geniculate mouthparts and Argentina outwardly resemble Old World the greatly expanded cell Rl. species. A thorough study of males is required to establish generic limits on a world basis. I am aware of no characters that indicate any Genus Goniurellia Hendel neotropical species are associated with Decto- desis. Specimens appear to be rather rare in (Fig. 72) collections. Trypanea, subgenus Gcmiurellia Hendel 1927: 198. Type- species, Trypeta augur Frauenfeld (orig. desig.; misi- dent.) - tridens Hendel (application to Commission Genus Gymnocarena Hering pending; see below).—Munro 1957: 1043 (desc, taxon.).—Freidberg and Kugler 1977: 208 (nomencL, (Figs. 25, 73) discussion of type-species). Trypanea {TephritU) Group II (part), Malloch 1933: 278 Gymnocarena Hering 1940a: 4. Type-species, Oedicarena (discussion, desc. of species, Chile). diffusa Snow (orig. desig.).—Foote 1960d: 112 (rev.. No. Amer, species). Oedicarena Snow (error), Curran 1934b: 289 (in key. Diagnosis.—In profile, face and frons meet- Amer. gen.). ing at distinct angle of about 90**; frons haired; Tomoplagiodea Aczél 1954a: 91. Type-species, mexicanus 2-3 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; posterior pair Aczél (orig. desig.).—Foote 1967: 57.48 (in neotrop. notopleurals light colored; katepisternals and cat.). NEW SYNONYMY. anepimerals light colored; 1-2 pairs scutel- lars; wing Trypanea-like, with subcostal cell Diagnosis.—Large yellow-bodied flies with connected to apical stellate mark by broad few or no dark markings, all head and body dark band, hyaline wedge in cell Rl rarely bristles yellow; frons markedly swollen imme- crossing vein R2-h3 into cell R3; vein R44-5 diately posterior to lunule in lateral view (ñg- ^. Hetschko bare; bulla usually absent* 25); frons bare; 3-4 pairs lower fronto- FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 31 Orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals; ocel- 123 (in key, Peruvian gen.).—Aczél 1949a: 241 (in neo- P- lars well developed; face receding in profile, trop. cat.).—Aczél 1951: 254 (in key, genera of n- with broad carina; antenna shorter than face, Trypetini).—Aczél 1952a: 126 (in neotrop. cat.),— Foote 1967: 57.26 (in neotrop. cat. as Hexachaeta, • c- 3d segment rounded apically, arista bare; dor- error). id socentrals about in transverse line through Brachytes Hendel 1914c: 33 and explanation of plates fol- m ffupra-alars; 2 pairs scutellars; tibia of hind lowing p. 84 (preocc. Westwood 1842). Nomen nudum. leg: with row of rather delicate posteroventral setae; wing hyaline, dark pattern broken, Diagnosis.—Two pairs lower fronto-orbitals; vo 1 pair upper fronto-orbitals; ocellars well sometimes consisting only of apical patch of er developed; antenna shorter than face, 3d seg- brown; vein r-m distinctly apicad of middle of ment rounded apically, arista bare; acro- al discal cell; vein R4-f 5 haired dorsally and ven- trally to level of vein dm-cu. stichals absent; scutellum somewhat swollen, I' rounded in lateral view; 2 pairs scutellars; Discussion.—The genus Gymnocarena is wing hyaline with irregular patches of brown rarely found in collections and is represented ly not in definite pattern; vein r-m apicad of in the region under study here only by the middle of discal cell; vein R4+5 bare. species mexicana Aczél. It may be readily rec- e Discussion.—I have not seen any specimens ognized by characters presented in the key, n. assignable to this genus during this study. despite its great similarity to one or more Hetschkomyia belongs in a group of genera species of Oedicarena. I am indebted to including Ischyropteron Bigot and Pseudo- George C. Steyskal for suggesting the possi- d phorellia Lima, which lack acrostichals en- bility that Tomoplagiodes Aczél is a synonym. h tirely. Characters in the key serve to distin- O* Genus Haywardina Aczél guish these three genera. The genus is known t- only by its type-species, recorded to date only a {Fig. 74) from Cuzco, Peru. id Haywardina Aczél 1961: 258. Type-species, Tomoplagia Genus Hexachaeta Loew d cuculí (orig. desig.).—Foote 1967: 57.25 (in neotrop. cat.). (Fig. 75) I Hexachaeta Loew 1873: 219. Type-species, Trypeta eximia Diagnosis.—In lateral view, frons and face Wiedemann (Coquillett 1910: 552).—Wulp 1899: 402 meeting at angle of about 135^ frons haired; 3 (key to, discussion of 6 species, Mex.).—Hendel 1914b: pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper 82 (in key, world gen.).—Hendel 1914c: 23 (taxon. dis- fronto-orbitals; ocellars well developed; gena cussion, So. Amer, species).—Bates 1933: 50 (desc,).—Lima 1933: 382 (taxon.).—Curran 1934b: 287 about 0.3 times eye height; facial carina pres- (in key, Amer, gen.).—Lima 1935a: 235 (rev,).—Hering ent; antenna shorter than face, 3d segment 1941a: 123 (in key, Peruvian gen.); 134 (rev.).—Aczél pointed apically, arista bare; dorsocentrals in 1949a: 192 (in neotrop. cat.).—Aczél 1952a: 123 (in or close to transverse line through supra- sup., neotrop. cat.).—Lima and Leite 1952:297 (key to, alars; 2 pairs scutellars; wing hyaline with 2 desc. of, known species).—Aczél 1963a: 104 (in key, genera of Acanthonevrini).—Lima 1953c: 557 (rev., narrow brown bands; vein r-m distinctly api- "Group 1").—Lima 1954: 281 (keys to species, "socia- cad of middle of discal cell; vein R4-I-5 bare. lis" group).—-Foote 1967: 57.26 (in neotrop. cat. as Discussion.—^The characters in this diag- Hetschkomyia, error). nosis serve to distinguish Haywardina from Neohexachaeta Lima 1953c: 566. Type-species, guatema- all closely related genera (see discussion of lensis Lima (orig. desig.).—Foote 1967: 57.31 (in neo- trop. cat). NEW SYNONYMY. Lezca for further information on this genus). Known only from Argentina, the type-species Diagnosis.—In profile, frons definitely swol- ÎS the only representative. The genus was not len, haired; facial carina absent; 3 pairs lower seen in this study. fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals; rx ocellars short and fine; antenna shorter than v7 Genus Hetschkomyia Hendel face, 3d segment rounded apically, arista haired; 1 pair dorsocentrals, between trans- Hetschkomyia Handel 1914b: 86 (1914c: 33). Type-species, verse lines through supra-alars and post- maeulipennis Hendel (orig. desig.).—Hering 1941a: alars; acrostichals present; 3 pairs scutellars; 32 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE wing hyaline with distinctive dark transverse dark with hyaline incisions and discal spots, bands and usually 1 or 2 large hyaline trian- somewhat reminiscent of Tetrevfiresta or gles in cell Rl distad of subcostal cell; vein Xanthaciura; vein r-m at or close to middle of r-m at or close to middle of discal cell; vein discal cell; vein R4+5 bare. R4+5 haired; femur of hind leg usually with Discussion.—Without doubt, Hering's de- cluster of dorsal preapical bristles. scription of this distinctive type-species Discussion.—Previous to this study, the 25 places it in the Acanthonevrini. I have not yet described species of Hexachaeta were known seen this monotypic genus, known only from principally from Mexico, Central America, Surinam. and northern South America. I have seen specimens from Guyana, Ecuador, Bolivia, Genus Homoeothrix Hering and Argentina in addition to the previously recorded distribution. The genus is easily rec- (Fig. 76) ognized by its wing pattern and other char- acters given in the key. Homoeothrix Hering 1944a: 7 Us Homoeothrix, emended Loosely translated, Lima's {195Sc) descrip- by Hering 1947a: 7). Type-species, Euribia lindigi Hendel (orig. desig.).—Aczéî 1949a: 284 (in neotrop. tion of Neohexachaeta guaternalensis is short cat.).—Foote 1967: 57.28 (in neotrop. cat). and lacks detail: "... the general characters of Hexachaeta, from which it is distinguished by Diagnosis.—In lateral view, face and frons the presence of 4 pairs of scutellar meeting at angle of about 120'*; 3 pairs lower bristles... the single male is in too poor condi- fronto-orbitals; both pairs upper fronto- tion to permit a complete description '' The orbitals dark; both pairs notopleurals dark; 2 wing is typically Hexachaeta in pattern and pairs anepisternals, 1 pair katepisternals, 1 venation, and as shown by Lima's figures, pair anepimerals, both pairs dark; 2 pairs scu- there is little to distinguish the postabdomen tellars, posterior pair more than 0.5 times as from that of eximia (Wiedemann). The holo- long as anterior pair; delicate setae in rows on type, said to be deposited in the U.S. National femora and tibiae of midlegs and hind legs; Museum, Washington, D.C., cannot be found. wing dark with irregular reticulation; sub- Many specimens of Hexachaeta found in costal cell with light marks; vein R4+5 haired this study have an extra unpaired bristle on dorsally and ventrally; bulla absent. one side or the other of the scutellum. Since Discussion.—This little-known genus from Lima apparently saw only one specimen and Colombia and Venezuela is known only by its since there is a general tendency toward the type-species, lindigi (Hendel). Several speci- presence of more than three pairs of scutel- mens from Colombia seen in this study are lars, I consider Neohexachaeta and Hexachae- closely related but have light-colored or white ta congeneric. upper fronto-orbitals, and vein r-m is farther removed from vein dm-cu than its own length. These specimens probably represent an unde- Genus Hexaresta Hering scribed species, but their generic relation- Hexaresta Hering 1941c: 18. Type-3pecies,iwantia Heringr ships bear further study. (orig. desig:.).—Aczél 1949a: 191 (in neotrop. cat,).— Aczél 1953a: 104 (in key to genera of Acantho- nevriniX—Foote 1967: 57.28 (in neotrop. cat.). Genus Ictericodes Hering Diagnosis.—^Two pairs lower fronto-orbitals; Ictericodea Hering 1942: 6. Tjrpe-species, Trypeta japón- ica Wiedemann {-schneideri (Lw.)).—Aczél 1952a: 1 pair upper fronto-orbitals; antenna shorter 120 (taxon. discussion).—Foote 1967: 57.28 (in neo- than face, 3d segment rounded apically, arista trop. cat.). long haired, longest hairs longer than width of 3d antennal segment; 1 pair dorsocentrals, Discussion.—^The designation by Hering of about halfway between lines through supra- Trypeta japónica Wiedemann as the type- alars and postalars; 3 pairs scutellars; wing species restricts Ictericodes to the Palaearctic FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 33 Region, and I have seen no neotropical speci- Genus Laksyetsa Foole niens that can be considered congeneric. Hering's and Loew's descriptions and Loew's (Fig. 77) wing figure of japónica make rather difficult the distinguishing of Ictericodes from Te- Laksyetsa Foote 1978: 29. Type-species, trinotata Foote phritis, which is actually somewhat distantly (orig. desig.). related. The actual relationships of these two genera must await further studies. Diagnosis.—Head higher than long; frons All the New World species formerly as- and face meeting in profile at angle of about signed to Ictericodes by Aczél (1950, 1952a) 120°; face shining, spotted, oral margin mark- and Foote {1967) belong to other genera in this edly projecting, carina absent; frons haired, study. wider than long; 3 pairs lower fronto-orbitals, anterior one white; 2-3 pairs upper fronto- orbitals, all light colored; postoculars mixed black and white; parafacial spot present; an- Genus Ischyropteron Bigot tenna as long as face, 3d segment triangular but apex not sharply pointed, arista bare; 1 Ischyropteron Bigot 1889a: xxix. Type-species, nigricau- pair dorsocentrals, in transverse line through datum Bigot (monotypy).—-Foote 1967: 57.29 (in neo- trop. cat.). supra-alars; 3 pairs anepisternals, 1 pair kate- Calopteromyia Bigot 1889b: xciii (unjustified new name pisternals, 2 pairs anepimerals; 2 pairs scutel- for Ischyropteron Bigot). Type-specieSy Isckyropteron lars, posterior pair as long as anterior; bulla nigricaudatum Bigot (automatic). present; vein R2-h3 bent forward around it; Ischyropterum (error or emendation) Hendel 1914b: 93 (in vein r-m apicad of middle of discal cell; vein key, world g^n.).—Hendel 1914c: 49 (in key. So. Amer. gen.).—Aczél 1949a: 258 (in neotrop. cat.). R44-5 bare; posterior extension of basal m cubital cell nearly 2 times as long as its width at base. 1 Diagnosis.—An unusual large yellowish fly with long, broad distinctively patterned Discussion.—The genus was described from wings and extremely slender legs; 1 pair a series of specimens from Oaxaca, Mexico, dorsocentrals, halfway between transverse that are very closely related, especially in lines through anterior supra-alars and post- head characters, to several species of Para- alars; acrostichals absent; 2 pairs anepi- cantha Coquillett. The ^/ing pattern and key stemals; katepisternals absent; scutellum characters will distinguish the genus readily. shining, flat sided, 2 pairs long, black scutel- Only one species is known; it has no close rela- lars; legs long, slender, without rows of setae, tives in the Nearctic Region. even on fore femur; wing hyaline with only tip darkened; subcostal cell very long, narrow; Genus Lamproxyna Hendel vein r-m basad of middle of discal cell; vein R44-5 distinctly haired; basal cubital cell Lamproxyna Hendel 1914b: 96 (1914c: 64). Type-species, wide; bulla absent. nitidula Hendel (orig. desig.).—Hering 1941a: 125 (in key, Peruvian gen.); 153 (rev., Peru).—Aczél 1949a: Discussion.—The holotype of nigricauda- 275 (in neotrop. cat.).—Foote 1967: 57.29 (in neotrop. tum, borrowed from the Bigot collection at cat.). Cambridge, England, is headless, leaving the true affinities of this extremely unusual fly a Diagnosis.—In lateral view, frons curving mystery. Its placement in the Trypetini in into face without angle; 3 pairs lower fronto- this study is entirely arbitrary. Except for the orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals; mouth- sharply bent subcostal vein, one is tempted to parts distinctly geniculate; 1 pair dorso- state that almost every other taxonomic char- centrals, postsutural; 1 pair scutellars; wing acter is unusual for not only the tribe but the pattern reticulate; stigma entirely dark; vein family as well The diagnosis and key char- r-m apicad of middle of discal cell; bulla ab- acters explain the nature of these differences. sent; abdominal tergum shining black, The genus is known only from Brazil. "nearly unhaired'' (Hendel 19Uc). 34 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE Discussion.—The outstanding characteris- Genus Lezca Foote tics are the short-geniculate mouthparts and the shining black abdomen. The wing is (Figs. 26, 79) largely dark with one or two rather large hya- line spots distad of the stigma in cell Rl, a Lezca Foote 1978: 27. Type-species, tau Foote (orig. desig-). large one at the apex of vein R2+3 in cell R3, and numerous small hyaline spots scattered Diagnosis.—Head higher than long, in pro- throughout the rest of the wing disk, file, face meeting frons at distinct angle of clustered more closely in cell CuAl and anal about ISS''; frons haired; 3 pairs lower fronto- cell than elsewhere. orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals; ocel- Neither of the two described species, both lars poorly developed; face shining, spotted, from Peru and Bolivia, was seen in this study. with deep antennal fovea and broadly rounded carina; antenna distinctly longer than face, 3d segment elongated and narrow, arista bare; 1 pair dorsocentrals, between Genus Lamproxynella Hering transverse lines between supra-alars and postalars; acrostichals present; 1 pair anepi- (Fig. 78) sternals; 2 pairs scutellars; wing hyaline with Lamvroxynella Hering 1941a: 163. Type-species, ^un6aa prominent transverse 2-toned brown band keliodes Hendel (orig. desig.).—Hering 1942:11 (key to and other dark marks; vein r-m closer to vein species).—Aczél 1949a: 290 (in neotrop. cat.).—Foote dm-cu than length of former; vein R2+3 1967: 57.29 (in neotrop. cat.).—Steyskal 1974:49 (desc, slightly sinuate; vein R4-h5 haired; posterior discussion of species). extension of basal cubital cell long. Discussion.—A very distinctive trypetine, Diagnosis.—In profile, face and frons meet- the single known species from Mexico is read- ing at distinct angle of about 90°; frons haired; ily identifiable by use of the key characters. 2 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; posterior noto- Lezca rather closely resembles Cryptodacus pleurais light colored; katepisternals and ane- Hendel (Hendel iPi^a, 6), Cryptoplagia Aczél pisternals light colored; 1 pair scutellars; deli- (Aczél 1951)y and Haywardina Aczél (Aczél cate outstanding setae on hind tibia; wing 195í). However, veins^r-m and dm~cu in Cryp- reticulate, usually rather extensive though todacus and Cryptoplagia are far removed sometimes broken hyaline area immediately from each other and are covered by separate distad of subcostal cell in cell Rl, apex of cell transverse brown bands, whereas those of R5 usually with only small hyaline spot; vein Lezca and Haywardina are situated very close R4-I-5 bare or haired; bulla absent. together and are covered by a single brown Discussion.—Among the genera of Tephrit- band. The last two genera differ from, each ini having one pair of scutellars and two pairs other in that the transverse brown band of of lower fronto-orbitals, Lamproxynella is Haywardina is very narrow and a second par- rather distinctive in its wing pattern. Many of tial brown band is completely lacking. the species have a rather extensive hyaline area in cell Rl immediately distad of the sub- costal cell, often not broken by dark marks. Genus Lilloaciura Aczél Some wings, however, remind one of Neote- phritis vdth a rather large light mark at the Lilloaciura Aczél 1963a: 191. Type-species, eurvinervis apex of cell R5- The genus appears to inter- Aczél (orig. desig.). Foote 1967:67.30 (in neotrop. cat.). grade in some respects with Dyseuaresta, but these two genera, along with representatives Diagnosis.—In lateral view, face and frons of others bearing close resemblance, require a meeting at angle of about 120"*; 3 pairs lower great deal of study. As defined here, the genus fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals; occurs in Central America, Colombia, and postoculars expanded, whitish; mesonotum countries across mid-South America. rather shining; 2 pairs anepisternáls; 1 pair FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 35 scutellars; wing predominantly dark with large marginal incisions and hyaline discal Genus Molynocoelia Giglio-Tos spot; vein dm-cu at distinct angle to vein K4+5; vein R2+3 bent forward; veins R4+5 (Figs. 12, 81) ong. and M sinuate, latter haired; bulla absent. Molynocoelia Giglio-Tos 1893: U. Type-species, lutea Di8cussion.-No specimens representing O.gl.o-Tos (nionotypy)._Gigiio.Tos 1895: 59 (desc.).- this genus were seen during the study, but îu .n'r'"."^ ^e "" ""'^ *° "°'''* «en.).-Hendel mro- curvtnervis and its possible congeners should 1914c: 10 (in key. So. Amer. gen.).-Curran 1934b: 287 3 of not be difficult to recognize from the char- On key Amer. gen.)._Aczé! 1949a: 191 (i„ „eotrop. ito- acters given in the key. The genus is known cat.).-Foote 1967: 57.31 (in neotrop. cat.). cel- only by its type-species from Argentina I .ed, have seen a female from Chubut Province, Ar- Diagnosis.-Frons haired, in profile dis- dly gentina, which runs unsatisfactorily in'the tinctly swollen; 2 pairs lower fronto-orbitals- 3 key to this genus. It is rather large, and the pairs upper fronto-orbitals; ocellars well de- 3W, wing (about 7 mm) has a largely dark field veloped; facial carina absent; antenna dis- fen with broad, bright hyaline incisions and tinctly longer than face, 3d segment rounded .nd rounded discal spots, more extensive and dif- apically, arista long haired; 1 pair ddrso- pi- ferently arranged than in curvinervis. centrals, in transverse line through post- ith alars; acrostichals present; scutellum flat «nd with vertical sides, 2 pairs scutellars; wing Mn hyaline with prominent Y- and inverted V- -3 Genus Metasphenisca Hendel shaped bands; vein r-m at or near middle of or discal cell; vein R4-H5 haired; posterior exten- (Fig. 80) sion of basal cubital cell rather long e, Z)tóc«*,io/i.-The habitus of this genus re- Metasphenisca Hendel 1914b: 92. Type-species, Trypeta sembles that of Blepharoneura Loew and s. Oracthpes Loew (orig. desig.).—Malloch 1933; 265 Hexachaeta Loew, but the scutellum has only ta desc discussion of ßexuosa Bigot).-Munro 1947- two pairs of bristles. The arista, mounted on 1127 (rev., Africa)._Aczél 1953a: 184 (discussion of él flexuosa Bigot). an antenna distinctly longer than the face, is él furnished with setulae longer than on any Discussion.—The genus is included here be- neotropical tephritid I have seen to date. It cause of its association with flexuosa Bigot probably is the only neotropical representa- e made by Malloch {1933). Both Munro {19U7) tive of the trypetine tribe Gastrozonini. To /f and Aczél {1953a) showed evidence that the date the genus has been known only by its e association is incorrect and that no species of type-species from Mexico, but I have recently .1 Metasphenisca actually occur in the New seen an undescribed species from Brazil. h World. Munro left unsolved the generic status of Genus Myoleja Rondani flexuosa, but Aczél expressed the possibility that It IS a species of Pseudoedaspia. Taking (Figs. 13, 82) into account the generic characters used in .Vyoieya Rondani 1856:112. Type-species. r«pÄn«. lucida this study, this is not an acceptable solution í allen (ong. desig.).-SteyskaI 1972d: 207 (key No as the latter genus possesses only one pair of Amer, species). ' acutellars and two pairs of lower fronto- Myioleja. Myicteia. Myiolia, Myolia. errors or emenda- orbitals (two and three, respectively, in lions. Euleia, authors, not Walker. ^ flexuosa). Several specimens in very poor con- - dition seen in this study are probably con- . generic wMhßexuosa, but they possess wing Diagnosia.~ln lateral view, frons and face ; patterns that differ in important details. Ad- meeting at angle of about 135°, frons rather h ditional study material is needed to solve this swollen, haired; facial carina absent; 3 pairs '^ problem. lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto- orbitals; ocellars fine, short; antenna as long 36 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE as, or shorter than, face, 3d segment rounded Diagnosis.—Frons haired; head and body apically, arista bare; 1 pair dorsocentrals, bristles generally light colored; palpi not slightly anterior to transverse line through usually projecting anteriorly beyond oral postalars; acrostichals present; 2 pairs scutel- margin; wing rarely more than 4 mm long; lars; wing hyaline with rather heavy brown disk hyaline, stigma usually with yellowish transverse bands; vein r~m distinctly apicad cast; pattern, if present, consisting at most of of middle of discal cell; vein R4-f-5 haired; partial dark bands or isolated dark marks; posterior extension of basal cubital cell long. vein R4+5 bare. Discussion.—Most of the species of Myoleja Discussion.—Ten species of this strictly New in the New World may be recognized by the World genus are distributed throughout the very short, slender ocellar bristle in combina- United States and southern Canada. The tion with an elongated basal cubital cell and a species in Mexico have not yet been identified, fairly large, relatively unbroken dark area but there is no doubt of their association with proximad of vein r-m extending from the this genus. Benjamin {193U\ Quisenberry costa to at least vein CuAl. In some respects, (lH9bX and Foote and Blanc (196S) presented Myoleja resembles Anomoia Walker, espe- keys to all or some of the North American cially as these two genera belong to a group of species. New World flies having very short, fine ocel- lars and some other associated characters. In Genus Neoacanthoneura Hendel fact, Hardy (iP7.f, iP7^) indicated that in parts Neoacantho7i€ura Hendel 1914b: 82 (1914c: 32). Type- of the Oriental and Pacific Regions the two species, magnipennis Hendel (orig. desig:.).—Hering may eventually prove to be congeneric. His 1941a: 123 (in key, Peruvian gen.); 126 (desc.).—Aczél discussions of this situation should be con- 1949a: 182 (in neotrop. cat.).—Foote 1967: 57.31 (in sulted for further details. However, in the neotrop. cat). New World they may be separated easily by the characters given in the key. It is obvious Discussion.—The genus is included here that a solution to this interesting problem can because of its previous association with the be obtained only by a study of the fauna of Tephritidae by Hendel, Hering, Aczél, and both genera for the entire world. myself. The venation and pattern of the wing The genus Myoleja is worldwide, with four shown by Hendel (i9Í4b) indicate that Neo- nearctic species. Previous to this study it has acanthoneura without doubt is an otitid never been reported south of Texas and closely related to the genus Aciuroides Her- Florida. I have seen specimens undoubtedly ing (Hering 19Uld), as pointed out by my col- referable to the genus from the West Indies league George C. Steyskal. and Brazil, the latter probably an unde- scribed species. As specimens of the genus are Genus Neorhabdochaeia Malloch not commonly seen, it would not be surprising (Fig. 84) to discover that Myoleja occurs throughout Neorhabdochaeta Malloch 1941b: 124. Type-species, andw- the Neotropical Region. zei Malloch (orig. desig.).—Aczél 1949a: 181 (in neo- trop. cat.).—Foote 1967: 57.31 (in neotrop. cat.). Genus Neaspilota Osten Sacken Diagnosis.—Frons matte, bare; 3 pairs lower (Fig. 83) fronto-orbitals, anteriormost pair rather small and light colored; 3 or more pairs upper Aapilota Loew 1873: 286 (preocc. Förster 1862). Type- species, Trypeta alba Loew (Coquillett 1910: 511). fronto-orbitals, all light colored; face shining, Neaspilota Osten Sacken 1878: 192 (new name for Aapi- spotted; lunule projecting into small triangle lota Loew).—Curran 1934b: 289 (in key, Amer. gen.X-- between antennal bases; parafacial spot pres- Benjamin 1934: 34 (desc, key to No. Amer, species).— ent; 1 pair dorsocentrals, very close to suture; Quisenberry 1949b: 83 (key, No. Amer, species).— 2 pairs scutellars in addition to long, ex- Foote and Blanc 1963: 33 (rev., Calif.). Aapilomyia Hendel 1907: 98 (new name for Aapilota panded, whitish hairs at base of scutellum; Loew). Type-species, Trypeta alba Loew (automatic). femora of front legs with long, expanded, Neoaspilota, error or emendation. whitish hairs; scutum with setulae arranged FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 37 ody to leave numerous bare patches; wing rather are more diagonally placed as in species of ««lot narrow, pattern similar to species of Paracan- Cecidochares. This specimen is not in good ral tha; veins R2+3 and R4 + 5 sinuate; posterior enough condition for description. lg; extension of basal cubital cell rather long; =sh bulla present; abdomen with long, expanded, -of whitish hairs laterally and sometimes along Genus Neotaracia Foote ks; posterior margins of tergites. (Fig. 85) Discussion.-^ eorhabdochaeta has been placed in the Schistopterinae by several au- Neotaracia Foote 1978: 31. Type-species, Acroia^ma imox ew Bates (origr. desig.). he thors owing more to the rather deep costal he break than for any other reason. Its affinities Diagnosis.—Frons bare; 3 pairs lower ^d, ^thParacantha, however, are so close that to th place the two genera in separate subfamilies fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals, posterior pair light colored; all setae in post- m-y is strictly untenable. Paracantha Coquillett, ocular row light colored; 1 pair dorsocentrals, ed Neorhabdochaeta Malloch, and Laksyetsa emerging directly from suture; both pairs m Foote form a distinct group, which is more closely allied to other genera of Ditrichini and notopleurals unicolorous; 2 pairs scutellars, naturally exits in the key in that tribe. Neor- posterior pair less than 0.5 times as long as habdochaeta, previous to this study known anterior; vein r-m at, or near, middle of discal only from Venezuela, is also represented by a cell; vein R24-3 straight or nearly so; posterior single specimen in very poor condition from extension of basal cubital cell very short; Central America. Further study and addi- bulla absent; costa remarkably bowed ante- tional specimens will be required to deter- riorly near middle of wing, most of cell Rl mine its taxonomic status. dark except small hyaline spot immediately apicad of subcostal cell and one at extreme apex descending into cell R2H-3; several other ne Genus Neorhagoletis Hendel hyaline marks present. Neorkagoletis Hendel 1914b: 91 (1914c: 30). Type-species, Discussion.—This genus was established to latifrons Hendel (orig. desig.).~Aczél 1949a: 240 (in recognize the distinctive nature of imox neotrop. cat.).—Aczél 1953a: 109 (in key, genera of (Bates), which differs from Acrotaenia testu- Oedaspidinae).—Foote 1967: 57.31 (in neotrop. cat.). dinea (Loew) in several important respects other than the wing pattern. This strictly Diagnosis.—Three pairs lower fronto- New World genus is known from Mexico, orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs Central America, the West Indies, northern dorsocentrals, one of them presutural; sub- South America, and Brazil. Foote (in press) costal cell much longer than wide; vein r-m at, has revised the New World species. or very close to, middle of discal cell; vein R4+5 bare; extension of basal cubital cell rather long; bulla absent; abdominal tergum Genus Neotephritis Hendel shining black. ' (Figs. 27, 86, 87) Discussion.—This distinctive genus, known only by its type-species from Bolivia, was not NeotepkHtiB Hendel 1935: 54. Type-species, Trypeta fi- seen in this study. However, I have seen a nalia Loew (ong. desig.).—Hering 1947a: 6 (taxon. female specimen from Salesopolis, State of note).—Aczel 1949a: 284 (in neotrop. cat.).—Foote 1967: 57.31 (in neotrop, cat.).—Steyskal 1972c: 414 Sao Paulo, Brazil, with a badly shrunken (key to known species). head, which at least superficially resembles this genus in sharing many characters, in- Diagnosis.—In profile, frons and face meet- cluding the two pairs of dorsocentrals. It can ing at distinct angle of about 110**; frons hardly be considered congeneric, however, as haired; 3 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; posterior it has only two pairs of lower fronto-orbitals, pair notopleurals light colored; katepisternals vein r-m is situated distinctly apicad of the and anepimerals both dark; 2 pairs scutellars, middle of the discal cell, and the wing bands posterior pair longer than 0.5 times anterior 38 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE pair; hind tibia with row of delicate, outstand- prominent S-shaped band; vein r-m at about Ceratitoe ing setae; wing surface dark, reticulate, a middle of discal cell; vein R4+5 haired only at Aczé number of hyaline marks immediately distad base. cat.). of subcostal cell semicoalescing to form rather Discussion.—Long known to occur only in Diagn distinct inverted triangle, apex of cell R5 the Southwestern United States and Mexico, fronto-* usually dark; vein R4+5 bare; bulla absent. Oedicarena is also represented in the West In- all post Discussion.—This strictly New World genus dies by a possibly undescribed species. It is a spotted is represented by three species in the United distinctive genus easily identified by the key central.^ States. N.finalis (Loew) is common in collec- characters. Steyskal and Foote (1977) keyed tions, is widespread in the States, and extends the known species. supra-a into northern Mexico; N. inomata (Coq.) is colorou: primarily western United States in distribu- distinct tion; and iV. rava Foote is known so far only Genus Orellia Robineau-Desvoidy than its depressi from Arizona, Congeners also occur farther (Fig. 89) south into Central America and northern verse d South America, some of which very probably Orellia Robineau-Desvoidy 1830: 765. Type-species,/Zavt- rather s I cans Robineau-Desvoidy (monotypy) = punctata r-m at c have not yet been described. Steyskal (1972c) Schrank.—Curran 1934b: 291 (in key, Amer, gen.).— presents a very useful key to the 11 described Discus^ McFadden and Foote 1961: 253 (rev.. No. Amer.).— to exam species based on material then in the U.S. Na- Foote and Blanc 1963: 38 (rev., Caiif.).—Steyskal and tional Museum. This key and the generic con- Foote 1977: 146 (taxon. note). Tos, his cept presented here include a number of that spe South American species that lack the typical Diagnosis.—Frons bare; oral margin pro- neric wit dark area in the apex of cell R5 and the dis- duced anteriorly; palpi usually projecting nation o tinctive inverted hyaline triangle apicad of anterior to anterior oral margin; head and species the subcostal cell. Whether the latter species body bristles comparatively dark; 2-3 pairs synonym are truly congeneric with finalis (Loew) re- lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto- from Me: mains to be determined. orbitals; ocellars well developed; wing rarely represen less than 4 mm long, pattern of dark trans- lection I Genus Oedicarena Loew verse bands or combination of bands and localities (Figr. 88) spots on hyaline field; vein R4+5 haired only also cong at extreme base. Oedicarena Loew 1873: 247. Type-species, Trypeta teta- Discussion.—One of only three New World Genu nops Loew (orig. desig.).--Curran 1934b: 289 (in key, genera in the tephritine tribe Terelliini, Orel- Amer, gen.).—Aczél 1949a: 251 (in neotrop. cat.).— Aczél 1954a: 74 (in partial key to gen.).—Foote 1960c: lia is primarily palaearctic, where more than 145 (taxon. discussion).—Foote 1967: 57.32 (in neo- 15 species are widespread. Only three species Oxyna Rob i trop. cat.).—Steyskal and Foote 1977: 162 (key to occur in North America, as far as is known. parietir known species, discussion). One of these is holarctic. McFadden and Foote 19î4b:S Rhagoletoidea Foote 1960c: 145. Type-species, Spilogra- (1961) keyed the North American species, but (rev., N pha latifrons Wulp (orig. desig.). Calif.). undosa (Coq.) ha? been referred to the genus Chaetostomella by Steyskal and Foote (1977). Diagnosis.—Medium-sized to large brown- Diagnos Orellia is represented in this study by a single ish-yellow flies with few or no dark body meeting . female from near Guadalajara, Mexico, the markings; frons swollen in lateral view, than 9 •at Polymorphomyia Snow 1894: 165. Type-species, basilica la. Snow (monotypy). Wulp 1899: 410 (in generic of key).—Hendel 1914b: 87 (in key, worid gen.).—Hendel n) Genus Polionota Wulp 1914c: 28 (in key, So. Amer, gen.; discussion).— nd (Figs. 30, 95) Curran 1931: 14 (in key, Puerto Rico and Virgin Isl.).—Bates 1933: 51 (desc.).—Curran 1934b: 291 (in ^e Polionota Wulp 1899: 409. Type-species, i4cro¿oxa mucida key, Amer, gen.).—Aczél 1949a: 249 (in neotrop. Giglio-Tos (orig. desig.).—Hendel 1914b: 87 (in key, cat.).—Aczel 1951: 255 (in key, Trypetini).—Aczél 42 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE 1963a: 148 (rev.).—Foote 1967: 57.36 (in neotrop. oblique bands; vein r-m apicad of middle of Diagno cat.).—Korytkowski 1971: 446 (desc, key to known species). discal cell; vein R2+3 sinuate, vein R4-h5 at distin gently bent, bare; bulla absent. longer tl DiagnosUi.—Distinctive species with an- Discussion. —Procecidochares is a strictly as wide teriorly bowed costa resulting in very broad New World genus, having 11 described species fronto-oi wing with dark disk and narrow anteroapical and several additional undescribed ones in (all relat hyaline arc; in lateral view, head narrow-oval, the United States and Canada. The genus has not geni frons and face curved into each other rather been known only from Mexico in the area beyond ! than meeting at distinct angle; frons haired; 3 studied here, but I have recently seen addi- ously da pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 1 pair upper tional specimens from Colombia and Peru anepime fronto-orbitals; postoculars expanded, whit- that may represent undescribed species. The pairs sci ish; mesonotum and abdominal tergum sub- key characters serve to distinguish the genus disk mai shining black, overlayed with contrasting ex- from Cecidochares Bezzi, which it rather spots; su panded white setulae; 1 pair dorsocentrals, closely resembles. vein r-rr between suture and transverse line through R4+5 ba supra-alars; posterior notopleural light col- Genus Procecidocharoides Foole Discus.^ ored; 2 pairs anepisternals; 2 pairs scutellars; (Fig. 97) history i vein R2+3 sinuate; vein R4+5 bare, veins r-m detail. 0 and dm-cu close together, latter at distinct Procecidocharoides Foote 1960g: 671. Type-species, Try- define gt angle to former; bulla absent. peta iOedaspis) penelope Osten Sacken (orig. desig,). describe! Z)wcu4?sion.—Korytkowski {1971) offers the one tha Ensina. most recent key and revision of the four Diagnosis.—Frons bare; 3 pairs lower known species that occur only in Mexico, the species i fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals, species, I West Indies, and from Ecuador south to both either light or dark; postoculars light Brazil. This broad-winged genus closely men that colored, expanded; facial carina absent; sion of E resembles Pseudeutreta Hendel in having a notum and abdominal tergum shining; 2 pairs very broad, dark wing with an apical hyaline dorsocentrals, 1 of them presutural; both arc, but it differs from that genus in lacking pairs notopleurals dark; 1 pair anepisternals; Gen the head characters that would otherwise wing rather slender, hyaline with prominent place it in the Ditrichini. Aczél (195Sa) pro- dark transverse and oblique bands; ^^ein r-m vided additional data on the species. apicad of middle of discal cell; veins R2+3 and Acrotaenia (1914c: R4H-5 gently curved, latter bare; bulla absent. Schine Discussion.—Prior to this study, this genus Hende Genus Procecidochares Hendel has not been reported from south of the key, P (Fig. 96) United States, although it might well have Aczél been expected to occur at least in Mexico. I (in neo Procecidochares Hende! 1914b: 91 (1914c: 42). Type- species, Trypeta atra Loew (orig. desig.).—Aldrich have seen three specimens from Pueblo, Mexico, which I have identified without hesi- Diagno 1929: 1 (rev.).—Lima 1934b: 123 (desc, bid.).— fronto-o] Curran 1934b: 291 (in key. Amer, gen.).—Aczél 1949a: tation as pulíala Foote. The four species, 188 (in neotrop. cat.).—Aczél 1953a: 110 (in key, gen- three from the Western United States and the anterior era of Oedaspidinae); 125 (rev.).—Foote 1967: 57.36 (in fourth widespread from the east coast west to lowers, t neotrop. cat.), Michigan, have been keyed by Foote {1960g). black ar Oedaspis, authors, not Loew. sent; 2 than 0.5 Diagnosis.—^Frons bare; 2 pairs lower fronto Genus Protensina Hendel dark wit Orbitals; 1 pair dark upper fronto-orbitals; (Fig. 31) ginal im postoculars light colored, slender, pointed; apicad o facial carina absent; scutum and scutellum Protensina Hendel 1914b: 95 (1914c: 64). Type-species, langicepa Hendel (orig. desig.).—Hering 1941a: 152 Discus: shining; 1-2 pairs dorsocentrals, 1 presutural; (taxon.).—Aczél 1949a: 2Î4 (in neotrop. cat.).—Foote, strictly I both notopleural pairs dark; 1 pair anepi- 1967: 67.37 (in neotrop. cat,),—Steyskal 1970: 158 south to sternals; wing hyaline with distinct brown (taxon.). of specie FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 43 Diagnosis.—In profile, frons and face meet seldom found or represented in collections. Its at distinct angle of about 90''; head distinctly affinities lie most closely with Acrotaenia longer than high; parafacial about 0.5 times Loew, from which it can easily be distin- as wide as eye; frons bare; 3 pairs lower guished by characters given in the key and fronto-orbitals; 1 pair upper fronto-orbitals respective diagnoses. The genus has not been (all relatively slender and short); mouthparts recently revised. Hering (IHla) keyed only not geniculate, labella extending posteriorly the species known in Peru. beyond head margin; notopleurals concolor- ously dark; anepisternal, katepisternal, and anepimeral bristles concolorously dark; 2 Genus Pseudeutreta Hendel pairs scutellars, about equal in length; wing (Fig. 99) disk mainly hyaline with small indistinct dark Pseudeutreta Hendel 1914b: 86 (1914c: 56). Type-species. spots; subcostal cell dark with lighter marks; Trypeta adspersa Wiedemann (orig. desig.).—Bates vein r-m apicad of middle of discal cell; vein 1933: 51 (desc.).—Aczél 1949a: 266 (in neotrop. R4-h5 bare; bulla absent. cat.).—Foote 1967: 57.38 (in neotrop. cat.). Discussion.Steyskal {1970) discussed the Polymorphomyia (part), Aczél 1953a: 149 (desc, key to history and status of this Peruvian genus in species). detail. Of all characters used in this study to define generic limits, the profile of the head as Diagnosis.—Frons matte, haired; 3 or more described in the key is apparently the only pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper one that distinguishes this genus from fronto-orbitals, posterior pair light colored; Ensina. A much more detailed study of the face subshining, unspotted; parafacial spot species is required. In addition to the type- present; 1 pair dorsocentrals, very close to su- species, I have seen another Peruvian speci- ture; 1 pair scutellars; wing relatively broad men that may be undescribed. See also discus- with apical or subapical hyaline arc and often sion oi Ensina. numerous small discal hyaline spots; vein r-m at or near middle of discal cell; veins R2-f3 and R4-h5 sinuate, latter haired dorsally; Genus Pseudacrotaenia Hendel bulla absent. (Fig. 98) Discussion.—Aczél (1953a, p. 155) revised and keyed the known species, including them Acrotaenia, subgenus Pseudacrotaenia Hendel 1914b: 98 (1914c: 58). Type-species, Carphotricha vespillo in his key to the species of Polymorphomyia Schiner (orig. desig.).—Bates 1934: 8 (taxon.).— Snow. However, despite their general resem- Hendel 1935: 54 (taxon. note).—Hering 1941a: 124 (in blance, these two genera are abundantly dis- key, Peruvian gen.); 150 (key to species, Peru).— tinct as shown by characters presented in the Aczél 1949a: 269 (in neotrop. cat.),—Foote 1967: 57.37 key (see also discussion of Poiymorphomyia). (in neotrop. cat.). Previous to this study, species of Pseudeu- treta were known only from Bolivia to Brazil, Diagnosis.—Frons haired; 3 pairs lower but I have seen specimens recently from fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals, anterior pair anterior to posterior pair of Mexico and Chile as well. lowers, both light colored; postoculars mixed black and expanded white; facial carina ab- sent; 2 pairs scutellars, apical pair longer Genus Pseudoedaspis Hendel than 0.5 times basal pair; wing principally (Fig:. 100) dark with small hyaline discal spots and mar- Pseudoedaspis Hendel 1914b: 86 (1914c: 44). Type-species, ginal incisions, especially apically; vein r-m biseta Hendel (orig. desig.).—Aczél 1949a: 257 (in neo- apicad of middle of discal cell; bulla absent. trop. cat,).—Aczél 1953a: 148 (rev.).—Foote 1967:57.39 Discussion.—Hhe 10 described species of this (in neotrop. cat.). strictly New World genus occur from Mexico south to Brazil. This relatively large number Diagnosis.—Frons and face meeting at dis- of species is remarkable because the genus is tinct angle somewhat more than 90*; frons 44 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE bare; 2 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs The condition of stonei (Lima), the Pana- upper fronto-orbitals, posterior pair light manian species, does not allow a proper colored; postocular row with mixed black and comparison- whitish setae; 1 pair dorsocentrals, very close to suture; posterior notopleurals light colored; 1 pair scutellars; veins R2-I-3 and Genus Pseudopolionota Lima R4-h5 gently bowed, latter bare; bulla absent. Discussion.—Since members of this genus Pseudopolionota Lima 1935b: 200. Type-species, radians Lima (orig. desig.).—Aczél 1949a: 257 (in neotrop. are not commonly found, the forms are not cat.).—Aczel 1953a: 149 (in key to Group I well known. All three species were originally Tephritinae).—Foote 1967: 57.39 (in neotrop. cat). described from Argentina, but I have seen several Chilean specimens (as yet uniden- Diagnosis.—Frons somewhat swollen in tified to species) that add the only new lateral view; 3 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 material to the genus since Aczel (195Sa) pairs upper fronto-orbitals; postoculars Hght revised it and keyed the species. The wing pat- colored, somewhat expanded; scutum sub- terns oîPseudoedaspis very closely resemble shining; 1 pair dorsocentrals, between suture those of many species oíAciurina Curran, but and transverse line through supra-alars; 2 the two genera can be distinguished easily by pairs anepisternals; 2 pairs scutellars; wing chaetotaxic characters. mainly dark with marginal hyaline incisions and discal spots; vein r-m at middle of discal cell; veins R2-h3 and R4-h5 gently recurved, Genus Pseudophorellia Lima latter haired dorsally; bulla absent. (Fig. 101) Discussion.—This Brazilian genus, no speci- Pseudophorellia Lima 1934c: 139. Type-species, macúlala mens of which were seen in this study, has a Lima (orig. desig.).—Aczel 1949a: 249 (in neotrop. wing pattern rather similar to that ofXantha- cat.).—Foote 1967: 57.39 (in neotrop. cat.). ciura Hendel with two large inverted tri- angles in cell Rl immediately distad of the Diagnosis,—In lateral view, face and frons subcostal cell and three diagonal hyaline meeting at about 150°; face with distinct fascia in the distal one-fourth of the wing disk. carina; 3 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 1 pair Lima's original description is the only de- upper fronto-orbitals; antenna about as long tailed information available, but it is suffi- as face, 3d segment rounded apically, arista cient to justify a separate generic status for haired; 1 pair dorsocentrals, in transverse radians. line through postalars; acrostichals absent; scutellum flat, with vertical sides, 2 pairs scu- tellars; wing hyaline with brown transverse Genus Pyrgotoides Curran bands; vein r-m apicad of middle of discal cell, (Fig. 10) vein R4-h5 haired; extension of basal cubital cell long. Pyrgotoides Curran 1934a: 289. Type-species, crassipes Curran (orig. desig.).—-Aczel 1949a: 251 (in neotrop. Discussion.—The haired arista and absence cat.).—Aczel 1954a: 74 (taxon.).—Foote 1967: 57.40 (in of acrostichals place this genus as similar, in neotrop. cat.). several additional respects, to Hetschkomyia Hendel, but I have seen no specimens in Diagnosis.—In lateral view, frons rounded complete enough condition to be able to study into face, 2 not meeting at angle; frons bare; 3 its true relationships. Lima (1934c, 1953b) de- pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper i scribed the two known species, one from fronto-orbitals; ©cellars well developed; face Panama and one from Brazil. Two specimens shining, without carina, spotted; antenna in poor condition, one from Puerto Rico and shorter than face, 3d segment rounded api- one from Jamaica, appear to be congeneric ex- cally, arista bare; 1 pair dorsocentrals, in cept possibly for the presence of a second, transverse line through supra-alars; acro- well-developed, upper fronto-orbital bristle. stichals present; scutellum swollen, rounded FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 45 in profile, 3 pairs scutellars; vein r~m apicad resent a complex of species deserving further of middle of discal cell; vein R4 + 5 bare; all study. tibiae swollen; abdomen with inconspicuous dorsal setation, widest at posterior margin of 3d segment. Genus Rhagoletis Loew Discussion,—^This extremely rare species, the only known member of the genus and (Figs. 7. 103) known only from Panama, is distinctive Rhagoletis Loew 1862: 44. Type-species,.Ifusca ceraai Lin- enough to be recognized by means of the key naeus (monotypy).—Wulp 1899: 408 (desc. ofstriatella characters and illustrations. The species is Wulp),—Hendel 1914b: 91 (in key, world gen.).— aptly named because of its close resemblance Hendel, 1914c: 29 (in key, So. Amer, gen.); 67 (discussion of 3 species).—Cresson 1929: 401 (rev.).— to species of Pyrgotidae. Only two specimens Malloch 1933: 264 (taxon. discussion).—Benjamin are known to exist in collections. 1934: 12 (diagnosis, discussion of pomonella ex Mex.).—Curran 1934b: 289 (in key, Amer. gen.).—Hering 1941a: 124 (in key, Peruvian gen.); 141 (rev., Peruvian species).—Aczél 1949a: 239 (in neo- Genus Rhachiptera Bigot trop. cat.).—Azcél 1951: 257 (in key, genera of Trypetini).—Aczél 1954a: 75 (taxon., key to neotrop. (Fig. 102) species).—Bush 1966: 431 (rev., No. Amer, and north. Rhachiptera Bigot 1859: 313. Type-ñpecies\limhata Bigot Mex.).—Foote 1967: 57.40 (in neotrop. cat.). (monotypy).—Hendel 1914b: 93 (in key, world gen.).— Hendel 1914c: 53 (in key, neotrop. gen.).—Aczél 1949a: Diagnosis,—Frons somewhat swollen in 263 (in neotrop. cat.).—Foote 1967: 57.40 (in neotrop. lateral view, distinctly haired; 3 pairs lower cat.). fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals; Percnoptera Philippi 1873: 307. Type-species, angustipen- nis Philippi = lirnbata Bigot (monotypy), ocellars well developed; distinct facial carina Eupterocalla Brèthes 1916: 12. Type-species, opazoi present; antenna shorter than face, 3d seg- Brèthes = lirnbata Bigot (orig. desig.). ment usually pointed dorsoapically but rounded apically in a few species, arista bare; Diagnosis.—Frons shining, bare; 2 pairs dorsocentrals anywhere between transverse lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto- lines through supra-alars and postalars but orbitals, posterior pair light colored; face typically closer to former; 2 pairs scutellars; shining, spotted; parafacial spot present; 1 wing hyaline with narrow to broad, distinct pair dorsocentrals, very close to transverse transverse brown bands; vein r-m close to line through supra-alars; 2 pairs scutellars, middle of discal cell; vein R4 + 5 bare. about equal in length; wing rather narrow, Discussion.—Rhagoletis, economically one of disk mostly of 2 shades of brown but posterior the most important tephritid genera, is wide- margin of wing hyaline and rather straight; ly distributed over the Palaearctic and Nearc- vein r-m at or near middle of discal cell; vein tic Regions. Twenty-one named species occur R4-H5 haired; bulla absent. in Mexico, West Indies, and throughout most Discussion.—Species of this rather distinc- of South America; Foote (in press) has revised tive genus occur, as far as is known, only in the species that occur south of the United South America and have been recorded from States. Its closest relatives are Zonosemata Chile, Bolivia, Argentina, and Brazil. Based Benjamin and Rhagoletotrypeta Aczél in the on specimens seen in this study, as yet un- New World, and several palaearctic genera identified to species, this range has been also closely resemble it. Bush (1966) provided expanded to include Colombia and Peru. In detailed information on a wide variety of sub- many respects the genus closely resembles jects concerning the nearctic members of the Strobelia Rondani, from which it is distin- genus in his excellent revision. guished by the hyaline, relatively straight, The genus appears in two separate places in posterior wing margin, and evidence suggests the key because a few species possess an api- that some species of Strobelia may actually be cally rounded rather than pointed third an- congeneric. In any case, these two genera rep- tennal segment. 46 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600. U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE Genus Rhagoletoirypeta Aczel posterior pair light colored; scutum subshin- (Fig. 104) ing; 1 pair dorsocentrals, rather close to su- ture; posterior notopleural pair light colored; Rhagoletoirypeta Aczel 1950: 313. Type-species, xantho- 2 pairs anepisternals; 2 pairs scutellars, Strobelia gastra Aczel (orig. desig.).—Aczel 1961: 256 (in key. Rondu genera of Trypetini).—Aczel 1954b: 138 (discussion, posterior pair less than 0.5 times as long as to wo desc.).—Foote 1966: 803 (rev.).—Foote 1967: 57.41 (in anterior; hyaline of wing disk about one-half 1941a neotrop. cat.). covered by brown banding and other marks, 26 Kir Serpentinographa Aczel 1950: 308. Type-species, aryenii- apical half of cell R5 almost entirely hyaline; cat). nensis Aczel (orig. desig.).—Aczel 1961: 256 (in key to veins R2-h3 and R4+5 gently curved, latter Diagno genera of Trypetini). bare; bulla absent. Chaetorhagoletis Blanchard, in Aczel 1954b: 138. Nomen lower fr nudum. Discussion.—^The two species of this genus, Orbitals, known only from Peru, Bolivia, and Argen- spotted; tina, are rarely obtained in general collecting. Diagnosis.—Frons somewhat swollen in centrals, The genus can be recognized among the Aciu- lateral view, distinctly haired; 3 pairs lower supra-al rini by the extensive hyaline area in the fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals; posterior apical half of cell R5, but its position in the key ocellars well developed; distinct facial carina wing re present; antenna shorter than face, 3d seg- may not reflect its true affinities. See Aczel numerou (195Sa) for detailed information. ment rounded apically, arista bare; dorso- posterioî centrals between transverse lines through R2-h3 rat supra-alars and postalars; scutum with nar- absent. row yellow wedge-shaped longitudinal mark; Discuss 2 pairs scutellars; wing hyaline with dark placed in transverse bands; vein r-m rather close to Genus Stoneola Hering and havi middle of discal cell; vein R4+5 bare. (Fig. 106) Peru sou Discussion.—Species of this strictly New parently World genus are rarely seen. Three of the Stoneola Hering 1941a: 123. Type-species, Anastrepha fuscobasalis Hering (orig. desig.).—Stone 1942: 10 Mexico, I known species were described originally from (taxon. note).—Aczel 1949a: 236 (in neotrop. prove to Argentina, one from Mexico, and one cat.).—Aczel 1951: 254 (in key to genera of viously t (apparently introduced) from the Eastern Trypetini).—Foote 1967: 57.42 (in neotrop. cat). closely r United States. No records of the South Amer- which it ican species have appeared subsequent to Diagnosis.—^Three pairs lower fronto- acters (b their original descriptions during the early orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals; facial The spec 1950's except a single unidentified specimen carina present; antenna shorter than face, 3d taxonomi in poor condition from Uruguay that was seen segment rounded apically, arista bare; 1 pair during this study. Foote (1966) keyed and dis- dorsocentrals in transverse line through cussed the known species. supra-alars or somewhat behind that line; acrostichals present; 2 pairs scutellars; wing hyaline with pale brown bands slightly re- Tephritia La sembling those of Anastrepha; vein r-m at or Llnnaet rather close to middle of discal cell; vein R4-H5 (discuss Genus Rhithrum Hendel haired; posterior extension of basal cubital world g Amer, g (Figr. 106) cell rather long. Curran Discussion.—^The type-species, previously 1941a: 11 Rhithrum Hendel 1914b: 85 (1914c: 45). Type-species, rivu- known only from Peru, was found during this latum Hendel (ori^. desi«^.).—Hering 1941a: 126 (in flcey to key to Peruvian gen.).—Aczel 1949a: 253 (in neotrop. study in Argentina. It is a rather large yellow discussic cat.).—Aczel 1963a: 148 (in key, Tephritinae); 175 fly with a very distinctive wing pattern some- cat).-~F (rev.).—Foote 1967: 57.42 (in neotrop. cat.). what resembling that of Anastrepha but with other ge Trypanea (T major differences; moreover, the apex of vein (key to s Diagnosis.—In profile, frons and face meet- R4-f 5 is not turned anteriorly as in the latter ing at about 90**; frons bare; 2 pairs lower genus. S.fuscobasalis is still the only known DiagnosL fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals, member. ing at dist FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 47 im- Genus Strobelia Rondani pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs scutellars, p su- (Fig. 107) posterior pair longer than 0.5 times anterior ed; pair; hind tibia usually with row of short, deli- rs, Strobelia Rondani 1868: 29. Type-species, bacckaridis Rondani (Hendel 1914b: 93).—Hendel 1914b: 93 (in key cate setae; wing relatively narrow, dark with as to world gen.).—Hendel 1914c: 50 (rev.).—Hering hyaline areas discrete and usually covering alf 1941a: 124 (in key to Peruvian gen.).—Aczél 1949a: up to ¥i of disk, usually with solid dark area ks, 261 (in neotrop. cat.).—Foote 1967: 67.42 (in neotrop. cat.). immediately posterior to subcostal cell; vein fie; R4-f 5 bare or with few setae at extreme base; ter Diagnosis.—Frons shining, bare; 2 pairs bulla absent. lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto- Discussion.—The genus Tephritis, with over us, orbitals, posterior one light; face shining, 75 described species, is found in nearly all the spotted; parafacial spot present; 1 pair dorso- zoogeographical regions of the world and oc- ^g. centrals, between transverse lines between curs in Mexico, Peru, Chile, and Argentina. piu- Since specimens are fairly common in collec- he supra-alars and postalars; 2 pairs scutellars, tions, it is rather surprising to find that this :ey posterior pair more than 0.5 times anterior; genus has not been found from a number of zéï wing relatively narrow, disk brown with numerous hyaline or lighter brown spots to South American countries in my study posterior margin, which is rounded; vein material. R2-f 3 rather sinuate; vein R4H-5 haired; bulla The species are most readily recognized by absent. the wing pattern, which usually has an un- Discussion.—^The seven species currently marked dark area extending posteriorly from placed in Strobelia were described before 1929 the subcostal cell. A few species, however, and have been known since then only from possess wings more closely resembling those Peru south to Brazil. In this study an ap- of Trupanea, and I have seen other specimens pka parently undescribed species was seen from with an intermediate pattern as well. 10 Mexico, leading one to believe the genus may I have diagnosed the genus and discussed op. prove to be more widely distributed than pre- the North American species (Foote 1960a), of viously thought. It is closely related to, and Hering (19Ub) presented a key to nearly all closely resembles, Rhachiptera Bigot, from the described species of the world. which it may be separated by the key char- O- acters (but see discussion of Rhachiptera). Genus Tetreuaresta Hendel «pal ^d The species have not been keyed or treated ir taxonomically in a single publication. (Fig. 112) ;h Tetreuaresta Hendel 1928: 368. Type-species, Trypeta ob^ e; Genus Tephritis Lalreille scunventria Loew (orig. desig.).—Curran 1931: 14 (discussion, in key to genera of Puerto Rico and Vir- (Figs. 109-111) gin Isl.).—Bates 1933: 53 (brief desc.).—Bates 1934: 8, cir Tephritis Latreille 1804:196. Type-species. .Ifu^ca amicae 15 (taxon. notes).—Curran 1934b: 291 (in key, Amer! Linnaeus (Cresson 1914: 278).—Wulp 1900: 419 (part) gen.).—Hering 1941a: 125 (in key, Peruvian gen.); 154 -5 (discussion, Mex. species).—Hendel 1914b: 90 (in key, (rev.).—Aczél 1949a: 276 (in neotrop. cat.).-Foote al world gen.).—Hendel 1914c: 31 (part) (in key, So! 1967: 57.43 (in neotrop. cat.).—5teyskal 1972b: 403 Amer, gren.).—Cresson 1931: 3 (taxon. discussion).— (key to known species). îy Curran 1934b: 291 (in key. Amer, gen.).—Hering 1941a: 126 (in key, Peruvian gen.).—Hering 1944b: 17 Diagnosis.—In profile, head higher than (key to species, worid).—Hering 1947a: 7 (taxon. long, face and frons meeting in continuous discussion).—Aczél 1949a: 296 (part) (in neotrop. cat.).—Foote 1960a: 71 (diagnosis, comparison with curve; frons bare; 3 or more pairs lower :h other gen.).—Foote 1967: 57.43 (in neotrop. cat.). fronto-orbitals; both pairs notopleurals usual- :n Trjfpansa (Tephritig) Group II (part), Malloch 1933: 278 ly dark; katepisternals and anepimerals dark; (key to species, Chile). ?^r 2 pairs scutellars, posterior pair of varying ^1 length; wing usually broad, dark with dis- ^ Diagnc8ie.—ln profile, face and frons meet- tinctly bordered hyaline spots; vein R4-I-5 ing at distinct angle of 90**-120**; frons bare; 2 prominently haired; bulla usually absent. 48 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE Discussion.-Species of Tetreuaresta are widespread and one from the Western States, Genus rather easily identified by the oval head, dark and 44 additional ones are known south of broad wing with discrete hyaline spots and Texas and Florida, The wings of almost all the vein R4-H5 haired, and three or more pairs of species are distinctive in that three to lower fronto-orbitals. A large number of de- four prominent yellow-to-dark-brown bands scribed species occur from Mexico south to obliquely occupy most of the disk. AczéFs Trupan^rm Guettar southern Brazil. They have never been criti- (1955a) revision makes possible their satisfac- (author not bir cally studied as a group, but Steyskal (1972b) tory identification, and his morphological Trupane^ Schran presented a useful key to all the described study of the genus (1955b) is one of the most Schrmnk (mom complete in scope and size that I have seen on 1928: TO (in key species, which are restricted to the New (in key, Puert World. the Tephritidae. 1934b: 293 (in neotrop. cat.). Genus Toxotrypana Gerstacker groupX—Foote Genus Tomoplagia Coquillett 1964: 1 (rev., A (Fig. 114) neotrop, cat.). (Fig. 113) Trypanea^ emenda; Toxotrypana Gerstäcker 1860: 191. Type-species, curvi- Trypanea {Trypane Plagtotoma Loew 1873: 252 (preoccupied Dujardin 1841). cauda Gerstacker (monotypy).—Hendel 1914b: 74 (in MaJloch 1933: 2 Type-species, Trypeta obliqua Say (Coquillett 1910: key, world g'jn.).—Hendel 1914c: 10 (in key, So. Amer, species). 59l).-_Wulp 1899: 405 (obliqua (Say) treated).—Lutz gen.).—Curran 1931: 14 (in key, genera of Puerto Rico UreUia Robineau-D and Lima 1918: 9 (key to species).—Curran 1931:14 (in and Virgin Isl.).—Benjamin 1934: 10 (diagnosis).— trapae Robinei key, Puerto Rican and Virgin Isl. gen.). Curran 1934b: 293 (in key, Amer, gen.),—Hering 8t€llata (Fuesi Tomoplagia Coquillett 1910: 591, 615 (new name for Pla- 1941a: 123 (in key, Peruvian gen.); 126 (dis- species).—Brèt^ giotoma Loew). Type-species, Trypeta obliqua Say cussion).—Aczél 1949a: 180 (in neotrop. cat.).—Aczél Argentina), (automatic).—Hendel 1914b: 88 (in key, world gen.).— 1952a: 123 (in neotrop. cat.).—Blanchard 1959: 33 Hendel 1914c: 33 (in key, So. Amer, gen.).—Benjamin (rev.).—Foote 1967: 57.48 (in neotrop. cat.). Diagnosis.—Ir 1934: 32 (desc, discussion of Fla. species).—Curran Mikimyia Bigot 1884: xxix. Type-species,/urci/era Bigot ing at distinct a 1934b: 291 (in key, Amer, g3n.).—Hering 1941a: 124 (in (monotypy) = curvicauda Gerstäcker. pairs lower f^Oi key, Peruvian gen.)\ 143 (desc, discussion of Toxotrypanea, error or emendation. species).—Aczél 1949a: 241 (in neotrop. cat.).—Aczél few species tha 1961: 255 (in key, genera of Trypetini).—Aczél 1955a: Diagnosis.—Large brownish flies, female rather long scu 321 (rev.).—Aczél 1955b: 139 (comparative morphol. of with greatly elongated, downwardly curved setae; wing pat species).—Foote 1967: 57.45 (in neotrop. cat.). ing dark area a Plagiostama, error. ovipositor sheath, abdomen of both sexes rela- tively long, constricted at base; lower fronto- narrow bands r posterior margi . Diagnosis.—Smrúl to medium-sized yellow- orbitals absent; antenna distinctly longer marks bajally; ^ ish flies with few black spots on thorax and than face, arista distinctly haired; ocellars Discussion. —^T abdomen and wings with characteristically short, fine, hairlike; scutellum shining, scutel- 100 described sp diagonal bands; frons swollen in lateral view, lars situated apicad of middle of scutellum; geographic regi bare; 3 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs wing long and narrow, hyaline, with broad, or will prove to upper fronto-orbitals; ocellars well developed; light-brown costal band; vein R2+3 distinctly the region unde * face matte, without carina; antenna shorter sinuate, with at least 1 small, anteriorly di- cies can be rece than face, 3d segment rounded apically, arista rected, accessory vein; vein R4-I-5 straight; which has a cha: bare; 1 pair dorsocentrals, between suture basal M cell and basal cubital cell about equal late mark with and transverse line through supra-alars, com- in width. the anterior, ap monly closer to former than to latter; acro- Discussion.—This distinctive genus, which is gins, and by tht stichals present; 2 pairs scutellars; vein r-m restricted to the New World, is easily recog- Orbitals and one ^ apicad of middle of discal cell; vein R4-f 5 bare; nized by the characters in the diagnosis and appears twice i. posterior extension of basal cubital cell rather key. The taxonomy and biology of T. curvi- cauda in the Southern United States, Mexico, few specimens t long. pairs of lower frc Discussion.—Specimens seen in this study and the West Indies are discussed in several R4+5 is haired, from Trinidad, Venezuela, and Chile leave reports. Blanchard (1959) revised the genus, cies has been ke only Uruguay and the three "Guianas" as not described six new species from Argentina and il960e) presente f being represented in the distribution of this Brazil (the only ones added to the genus sub- and Foote and E extremely widespread New World genus. Two sequent to its original description), and keyed fomia species. species are known from the United States, one the known species of the Neotropical Region. FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 49 Genus Trupanea Schrank Genus Trypanaresta Hering of le (Fig. 116) to (Figr. 115) Is Trypanaresta Hering 1940a: 10. Type-species, irnitatrix I's Hering (orig. des ig.).—Hering 1941a: 125 (in key, Trupanea Guettard 1762: 170-173. Unavailable name Peruvian gen.); 156 (rev.).—Aczél 1949a; 293 (in neo- (author not binominal). trop, cat.).—Foote 1967: 57.53 (in neotrop. cat.). al Trupanea Schrank 1795: 147. Type-species, radiata Trypanea (Tephritis), Group II (part) of Malloch 1933: 278 St Schrank (monotypy) = stellata (Fuessley).-~Curran (desc. of species). n 1928: 70 (in key, Puerto Rican gen.).—Curran 1931: 14 (in key, Puerto Rican and Virgin Isl. gen.).—Curran Diagnose.—In profile, frons and face meet- 1934b: 293 (in key, Amer, gen.).—Aczél 1949a: 298 (in neotrop. cat.).—Aczél 1953c: 273 (rev., Argentina ing at angle of about 120^; frons distinctly group).—Foote 1960: 1 (rev., U.S. species).—Munro haired; 2 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs 1964: 1 (rev., African species).—Foote 1967: 57,48 (in upper fronto-orbitals; posterior notopleural neotrop. cat.). light colored; katepisternals and anepimerals Trypanea, emendation. concolorously dark; 2 pairs scutellars, pos- Trypanea (Trypanea) Groups III, IV, VI, and VII (part), Malloch 1933: 282, 284, 290. 292 (desc, keys to Chilean terior pair shorter than 0.5 times anterior; •r. species). wing with rather typical Trupanea pattern mo Urellia Robineau-Desvoidy 1830: 774. Type-species, calci- but with yellowish or darker markings proxi- trapae Robineau-Desvoidy (Coquillett 1910: 618) = mally in addition; subcostal cell entirely dark; stellata (Fuessley).—Wulp 1900: 426 (desc, Mex. bulla absent or present. iS- species).—Brèthes 1908: 367 (key to species, el Argentina). Discussion.—At first glance, species of Try- Ml panaresta are similar to those species ofEua- Diagnosis.—In profile, face and frons meet- restoides having the proximal half of the wing ing at distinct angle of about 90°; frons bare; 3 yellowish. In some species, the dark fascia pairs lower fronto-orbitals in all but a very from the subcostal cell to the starlike mark few species that possess only 2 pairs; 1 pair may be missing, but if so, the yellow area has rather long scutellars; tibiae without rows of a sharp margin apically. The starlike mark setae; wing pattern very characteristic, hav- can be yellow rather than black, but in that ing dark area at center of wing from which event, a black spot orbulla is present cen- narrow bands reach to anterior, apical, and trally in it. posterior margins, and sometimes other dark Hering's original description of the type- marks basally; vein R44-5 bare; bulla absent. species and subsequent study of its congeners Discussion.—The genus Trupanea, with over leave little doubt that Trypanaresta is dis- 100 described species, occurs in all the major tinct; the presence of only two lower fronto- geographic regions of the world and is found, orbitals is additional supporting evidence. or will prove to be found, in every country in Hering (1940a) published a key to some of the l- the region under study here. Most of the spe- neotropical species. cies can be recognized by the wing pattern, which has a characteristic dark preapical stel- late mark with narrow dark rays attaining Genus Trypeta Meigen the anterior, apical, and posterior wing mar- gins, and by the three pairs of lower fronto- (Figs. 33. 117) 1 orbitals and one pair of scutellars. The genus appears twice in the key to accommodate a Trypeta Meigen 1803: 277. Type-species, Muaca arte- few specimens that appear to have only two misiae Fabricius (Coquillett 1910: 618).—Cresson ! 1914: 276 (nomencl., taxon. comment).—Curran pairs of lower fronto-orbitals, or in which vein 1934b: 289 (in key, Amer, gen.).—Hendel 1936: 53 R44-5 is haired. None of the neotropical spe- (taxon. notes).—Foote 1960f: 253 (rev. No. Amer, cies has been keyed for the region, but Foote species).—Foote 1967: 57.53 (in neotrop. cat.). U960e) presented a key to the nearctic fauna Forelia Robineau-Desvoidy 1830: 760. Type-species, ono- and Foote and Blanc U96S ) a key to the Cali- pordi Robineau-Desvoidy (Rondani 1870: 7) = arte- fornia species. misiae (Fabricius). 50 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE Spilographa Loew 1862b: 39. Type-species, Trypeta hami- curring in all the zoogeographical regions of fera Loew (Coquillett 1910: 607).—Wulp 1899: 406 (in along post the world, have a wide distribution in the New key, Mex. species). sometimes Siplographa, error. World from the United States to Brazil. Five bulla abse: Euribia, authors, not Meigen. known species, including at least 1 introduced Discussio from Europe for the biological control of World gem Diagnosis.—Medium-sized flies with brown- weeds, occur in the Western United States ern half of ish or yellowish body and hyaline wing with and 16 additional ones are known to the south. West Indie either complete or partial S-shaped band or There are a number of undescribed species, as isolated brown spots; vertex rounded in the genus occurs rather frequently in general Neotropica Brazil. Th€ lateral view; frons swollen in lateral view, collecting and there has been no recent taxo- haired; face matte, with distinct carina; 3 nomic investigation. lecting, an« the species pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper In the New World, no other genus of Te- 119. Aczél ( fronto-orbitals; ocellars well developed; 3d an- phritidae lacks completely an extension of the tennal segment shorter than face, 3d segment basal cubital cell. However, in some te- viewed mos rounded apically, arista bare; 1 pair dorso- phritines this extension is so short as to be centrals, situated from slightly ahead to nearly undetectable, but the additional char- Gei slightly behind transverse line through acters in the key will enable one to recognize supra-alars; 2 pairs scutellars; vein r-m at the species of this genus. about middle of discal cell; vein R4-h5 bare. Discussion.—The genus Trypeta has been Xenochaeta St Genus Xanthaciura Hendel Snow (mor recogized under a wide variety of generic trop, gen, names for about 200 years in Europe, where gen.).—Foc numerous species abound on a variety of (Fig:. 119) hosts. It is apparently holarctic, with seven Xanthaciura Hendel 1914b: 86 (1914c: 45). Type-species, Diagnosis. species described from the United States and Trypeta chrysura Thomson (orig. desig.).—Bates ing at abou Canada (Foote 1960f) and three from Mexico 1933: 55 (desc.).—Malloch 1933: 266 (rev.).—B^^njamin pairs lower (Wulp 1899). Additional Mexican material, 1934: 43 (diagnosis, discussion).—Curran 1934b: 293 fronto-orbita unidentified to species, was seen in this study, (in key. Amer, gen.).—Hering 1941a: 124 (in key, Peru- mesad of lo^ vian gen.); 147 (rev., Peruvian species).—Aczél 1949a: indicating that the genus does not extend 253 (in neotrop. cat.).—Aczél 1949b: 111 (rev.),-Aczél to posterior ] much farther south. Species of New World 1952c: 245 (morphol., further rev.).—Aczél 1953a: 148 light colored Trypeta are not easily recognized except for (in key, genera of Group I Tephritinae); 184 (taxon. segment wit' the banded or spotted wing and the more or discussion).—Foote 1967: 57,54 (in neotrop. cat.). dorsocentral less receding face. Suspect specimens should Tetraciura Hendel 1914b: 90 (1914c: 48). Type-species, supra-alars; quadriaetosa Hendel (orig. desig.; as quadriseta, be examined carefully when using the key and error). light colored: diagnostic characters. Aciura, subgenus ^ucormopiero Phillips 1923: 131, Type- swollen, shin species, Acturo tetraspina Phillips (Bates 1933: 55), pair more th: Genus Urophora Robineau-Desvoidy Aciura Robineau-Desvoidy of Curran 1928: 70; Curran wing dark wi 1931: 14; and other authors. r-m angular; curved, latter (Fig. 118) Diagnosis.—In profile, frons and face meet- sent; abdom ing in curve rather than angle; frons narrow, EuHbia Meigen 1800: 36. Type-species, .Vu^ca cardui Lin- colored setae naeus (Hendel 1927: 41). Suppressed by Internat!. bare; 3 pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 1 pair Discussion, - Comn. Zool. Nomencl. 1963:339.—Hendel 1914b: 96 (in upper fronto-orbitals; postoculars expanded, was known or key, world gen.).~-HendeI 1914c: SB (in key, So. Amer, light colored; scutum shining to subshining, from the Wes gen.).—Hering 1941a: 127 (in key, Peruvian usually black; 1 or 2 pairs dorsocentrals, if species).-Aczél 1949a: 182 (part) (in neotrop. cat.). cently seen a only 1 pair, it is close to suture; notopleurals Urophora Robineau-Desvoidy 1830: 769. Type-species, huahua, Mexi êonehi Robineau-Desvoidy (Weatwood 1840: 149) - concolorously dark; 1 pair anepisternals; 1 cardui (Linnaeus).—Bezzi 1923: 1 (desc; key, Amer, pair scutellars; characteristically dark wing species).—Foote 1967: 67.64 (in neotrop. cat). with 2 inverted hyaline triangles in cell Rl immediately apicad of subcostal cell, cell R3 ANONYMOUa Diagnosis. See diagnosis of subfamily. entirely dark except sometimes tips of these 1976. MED Discussion.—The species of this genus, oc- triangles, and 2 or more hyaline incisions U.S, (43): FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES -ions of 51 along posterior border of wing; vein R2+3 ■'me New sometimes rather sinuate; vein R4-f5 bare; south of the United States. The species are J. Five bulla absent. rarely found in general collecting but usually >duced can be recognized by the presence of a short, rol of Discussion.—This is a very distinctive New World genus. Three species occur in the south- stout spine at the dorsal apex of the third an- States ern half of the United States, Mexico, and the tennal segment (fig. 16) in combination with south, West Indies, and 13 are found throughout the the extremely wide frons and the yellowish ^ies, as abdomen with prominent dark spots. eneral Neotropical Region south to and including taxo- Brazil. The genus is common in general col- lecting, and the wing patterns of nearly all Genus Zonosemata Benjamin the species are similar, appearing as in figure of Te- 119. Aczél (lH9b, 1952c, 1953a) keyed and re- of the (Figrs. 14, 121) me te- viewed most of the neotropical species. to be Zonosemata Benjamin 1934: 17. Type-species, Trypeta Genus Xenochaeta Snow electa Say (ong. desigJ.—Curran 1934b: 289 (in key char- Amer. gen.).-Ac2éI 1961: 257 (taxon. discussion).—* gnize Aczel 1954b: 152 (taxon. comments).—Bush 1965- 307 (Figs. 16, 120) (rev.).~Foote 1967: 57.56 (in neotrop. cat). Zonosema Loew of authors, Xenochaeta Snow 1894: 166. Type-species, dichromata Phorellia Hendel (part). Snow (monotypyX—Hendel 1914c: 6 (in key to neo- Sjyilographa Loew (part). trop. gen.).—Curran 1934b: 287 (in key, Amer gen.).—Foote 1960d: 107 (taxon. discussion). Diagnosis.—Frons somewhat swollen in lateral view, haired; 3-4 pairs lower fronto- pecies. Diagnosis.—In profile, frons and face meet- ing at about 90^; frons very wide, haired; 3 Orbitals; 2 pairs upper fronto-orbitals; ocel- Bates lars well developed; distinct facial carina pairs lower fronto-orbitals; 2 pairs upper b: 293 fronto-örbitals, unicolorously dark, uppers present; antenna shorter than face, 3d see- Peru- mesad of lowers, anterior upper pair anterior ment pointed dorsoapically, arista bare; dor- 1949a: socentrals distinctly behind transverse line Aczél to posterior lower pair; postoculars expanded, light colored; antenna shorter than face, 3d through supra-alars; acrostichals present- 2 h: 148 pairs scutellars; notum and pleurae yelloW axon. segment with short, dorsoapical spine; 1 ¿air dorsocentrals, in transverse line through brown, and black; wing disk with r'-shaped ecîes, band, in costal opening of which is small supra-alars; posterior pair of notopleurals brown mark; vein r-m rather close to middle light colored; 2 pairs anepisternals; scutellum of discal cell; vein R4+5 bare. swollen, shining; 2 pairs scutellars, posterior Fype- Discussion.-This New World genus is close- .>5). pair more than 0.5 times as long as anterior; irran wing dark with scattered hyaline spots; vein ly related to Rhagoletis Loew, Rhagoletotry^ : r~m angular; veins R2+3 and R4-f5 gently peta Aczel, Oedicarena Loew, and, according ' curved, latter haired only at base; bulla ab- to Bush (1965), to the palaearctic genus Car- .€iet- sent; abdominal tergum with long, light- pomyta Rondani. As far as is known, its hosts row, colored setae. are solanaceous plants. The genus is distinc- prair tive and IS readily identified by use of the key Discussion.—^lOT to this study this genus ied, characters. Bush 0965) keyed the species was known only by its two described species ingr, known from the United States, Mexico, and % if from the Western United States. I have re- cently seen an undescribed male from Chi- Jamaica, but specimens, possibly unde- rals scribed, from Central America and Colombia s; 1 huahua, Mexico, the first record of the genus have been seen ¡n this study. ^ing Rl LITERATURE CITED R3 ANONYMOUa 1975. ACZéL, M. %se MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN THE U.S. - 1975. 1949a. ins V.S. Dept. Agrr. Coop. Econ. Insect Rpt 26 CATALOGO DE LA FAMILIA "TRYPETIDAE" DE LA (43): 836-839, illus. REGION NEOTROPICAL, Acta Zool. Lilloana 7: 177-328. illus. 52 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE 1884. ACZÉL, M. 1955c. THE GENUS PARASTENOPA HENDEL. Wasmann THE GENUS "XANTHACIURA" BASED ON ARGEN- 1949b. Jour. Biol. 13: 167-187, illus. TINE SPECIES. Acta Zool. Lilloana 8: 111- 146. ilius. 1958. REVISION OF THE AMERICAN SPECIES OF THE GENUS ACINIA ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY. Rev. GÉNEROS Y ESPECIES DE LA TRIBU "TRYPE- 1889a. 1950. Brasil, de Ent. 8: 75-106, illus. TINI." I. DOS GÉNEROS Y TRES ESPECIES ALDRICH, J. M. NUEVOS DE LA ARGENTINA. Acta Zool. 1925. NEW DÍPTERA OR TWO-WINGED FLIES IN THE Lilloana 9: 307-323, ilIus. UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM. U.S. Nati. Mus. Proc. 66 (Art. 18): 1-36, illus. 1889b. 1961. GÉNEROS Y ESPECIES NEOTROPICALES DE LA BLANC, F. L. TRIBUS "TRYPETINI." IL DOS GÉNEROS Y UNA 1929. A REVISION OF THE TWO-WINGED FLIES OF THE 1961. ESPECIE NUEVOS, Acta Zool, Lilloana 12: GENUS PROCECIDOCHARES IN NORTH AMERICA 25a-278, ilIus. WITH AN ALLIED NEW GENUS. U.S. Nati. Mus. Proc. 76 (Art. 2): 1-13, illus. SUPLEMENTO AL "CATALOGO DE LA FAMILIA BLANCHARD, 1952a. BAKER, A. C, STONE, W. E., PLUMMER, C. C, and TRYPETIDAE DE LA REGION NEOTROPI- 1929, MCPHAIL, M. CAL." Acta Zool. Lilloana 12 (1951): 1944. A REVIEW OF STUDIES ON THE .MEXICAN FRUIT- 117-133, illus. FLY AND RELATED MEXICAN SPECIES. U.S. Dept. Agr- Misc. Pub. 531, 155 pp., illus. 1959. 1952b. REVISION PARCIAL DEL GENERO AMERICANO BATES, M. PARACANTHA COQUILLETT. Acta Zool. 1933. NOTES ON AMERICAN TRYPETIDAE H. Psyche Lilloana 10: 199-243, illus. 40: 48-56, illus. BRETHES, J. 1908. FURTHER REVISION OF THE GENUS XANTHA- 1952c. 1934. NOTES ON AMERICAN TRYPETIDAE IV. CIURA HENDEL. Acta Zool. Lilloana 10: 245- ACROTAENIA AND SIMILAR GENERA. Rev. de 280, illus. Ent. 4: 1-17, illus. 1916. EL GENERO EUARESTA LOEW (-CAMAROMYIA 1952d. NOTES ON AMERICAN TRYPETIDAE (DÍPTERA) IIL HENDED EN LA REGION NEOTROPICAL. Rev. 1935. THE GENUS TEPHRELLA. Pan-PaciflC Ent. Chilena Ent. 2: 147-172, illus. 11: lOa-114, illus. BUSH, G. L. BECKER, T 1953a. LA FAMILIA TEPHRITIDAE EN LA REGION NEO- 1962. 1919. DIPTERES. BRACHYCERES. Mission du Serv, TROPICAL. I. Acta Zool. Lilloana 13: 97- Géog. de TArmée Mesure d'un Arc 200, illus. Méridien Equatorial en Amer, du Sud 10 (2): 163-214, illus. 1953b. THE GENUS TRUPANEA SCHRANK IN THE NEO- 1965. BENJAMIN, TROPICAL REGION. L THE DIESPASMENA F. H. 1934. DESCRIPTIONS OF SOME NATIVE TRYPETID GROUP. Dusenia 4: 273-286, illus. FLIES WITH NOTES ON THEIR HABITS. U.S. Dept. AgT. Tech. Bul. 401, 95 pp.. illus. 1953c. THE GENUS TRUPANEA IN THE NEOTROPICAL BEZZI, M. 1966. REGION. 2. THE ARGENTINA GROUP. Dusenia 1909. LE SPECIE DEI GENER! CERATITIS, ANASTREPHA 4: 365-387, illus. E DACUS. Portici R. Scuola Super, di Agr., Lab. ZooL Gen, e Agr. BoL 3: 273-313, illus. 1964a. GÉNEROS Y ESPECIES DE LA TRIBUS "TRYPE- TINI." 3. SOBRE LOS GÉNEROS RHAGOLETIS. "PHO- 1910. RESTAURAZIONE DEL GENERE CARPOMYIA RELLIA," Y TOMOPLAGiODEa Dusenla 5: and y (ROND.). A. COSTA. Portici R. Scuola Super, 1970. 71-94, illus. di Agr., Lab. Zool. Gen. e Agr. BoL 5: 1-32, illus. 1964b. GÉNEROS Y ESPECIES DE LA TRIBUS TRYPETLVL 4. EL GENERO RHAGOLETOTRYPETA Y NUEVAS THE GENUS UROPHORA ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY IN ESPECIES DE TOMOPLAGU Y ZONOSEMATA. 1923. AMERICA. Amer. Ent. Soc. Trans. 49: 1^» Dusenia 5: 137-164, illus. illus. (30LE, F. R. 1923. and TAVARES, A. S, 1965a. FRUIT FLIES OP THE GENUS TOMOPLAGIA 1916. ALGUNS MUSCIDEOS CECIDOGENICOS DO COQUILLETT. U.S. NatL Mus. Proc. 104 (No. BRASIL. Brotéria, Sér. ZooL 14: 155-170, il- 3343): 321-411, illus. lus. COQUILLETT, 1965b. THE COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE TOMO BIGOT, J. DIPTERORUM ALIQUOT NOVA GENERA. ReV- et 1899. PLAGIA COQUILLETT SPECiEa Dusenia 6: 1859. 13&-170, illus. Mag. de Zool.^ No. 7, pp. 30&-315, illus. FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 53 Piîin 1884. (DESCRIPTION D'UN NOUVEAU GENRE ET D'UN 1910. THE TYPE-SPECIES OF THE NORTH AMERICAN NOUVELLE ESPECE DE DIPTERES DE LA FA- GENERA OF DÍPTERA. U.S. Nati. Mus. Proc. MILLE DES ORTALIDAE.) Soc. Ent. de 37: 49^-647. France Ann., ser. 6, 4 (Bul.): xxix-xxx. CRESSON, E T., JR. ev. 1914. SOME NOMENCLATORIAL NOTES ON THE DIP- 1889a. NOVUM GENUS DIPTERORUM. EX TRYPETIDIS, TEROUS FAMILY TRYPETIDAE. Ent. News 25: GENUS CHAETOSTOMAE (RONDANI) SAT VICINUM. 275-279. Soc. Ent. de France Bui. (1889): xxix-xxx. 1929. A REVISION OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SPECIES 1889b. {CHANGE OF GENERIC NAME). Soc. Ent. de OF FRUIT FLIES OF THE GENUS RHAGOLETIS France Ann., ser. 6, 9 (Bul.): xciii. (DÍPTERA: TRYPETIDAE). Amer. Ent. Soc. HE BLANC, F. L., , and FooTE, R. H. Trans. 55: 401-414, illus. ICA 1961. A NEW GENUS AND FIVE NEW SPECIES OF CALI- Iti. FORNIA TEPHRiTiDAE. Pan-Pacific Ent. 37: 1931. NOTES ON THE ABSTERSA GROUP OF THE GENUS 73-83, illus. TEPHRITIS, AND A DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPE- ind BLANCHARD, E. E. CIES FROM CALIFORNIA (DÍPTERA; TRYPETIDAE). 1929. DESCRIPTIONS OF ARGENTINE DÍPTERA. Physis Ent. News 42: 3-5. 9: 458-465, illus. CURRAN, C. H. s. 1928. DÍPTERA, OR TWO-WINGED FLIES. Porto Rico, 1959. EL GENERO "TOXOTRYPANA * EN LA REPÚBLICA Vir^n Isl., Sei. Survey, v. 11, pt. 1, Insects. ARGENTINE. Acta Zool. Lilloana 17: 33-44, 118 pp., illus. N.Y. Acad. Sei. illus. BRETHES, J. 1931. FIRST SUPPLEMENT TO THE 'DÍPTERA OF PORTO 1908. EL GENERO URELLIA (DÍPTERA) EN LA PLATA. RICO AND THE VIRGIN ISLANDS.* Amer. Mus. fV. Buenos Aires Mus. Nac. Ann. 16: 367- Nat. Hist., Amer. Mus. Novitates 456: 1-23, ie 374, illus. illus. 1932. 1916. DESCRIPTION D'UN NOUVEAU GENRE ET D'UN NEW SPECIE.^ OF TRYPANEIDAE. WITH KEY TO a NOUVELLE ESPECE D'ORTALIDAE DU CHILE. THE NORTH AMERICAN GENER.\. Amer. Mus. •«It. An. de Zool. Aplicada 3: 12-13, illus. Nat. Hist., Amer. Mus. Novitates 556: 1-19, illus. BUSH, G. L. 1962. THE CYTOTAXONOMY OF THE LARVAE OF SOME 1934 a. THE DÍPTERA OF K.ARTABO. BARTICA DISTRICT, MEXICAN FRUIT FLIES IN THE GENUS ANASTRE- BRITISH GUIANA, WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF NEW PHA. Psyche 69: 87-101, illus. 10 SPECIES FROM OTHER BRITISH GUIANA LOCALI- TIES. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. Bui. 66: m 1965. THE GL: US ZONOSEMATA, WITH .NOTES ON THE 287-532, illus. D CYTOLOGY OF TWO SPECIES. Psyche 72: 307- 323, illus. s. 1934b. THE FAMILIES AND GENERA OF .NORTH AMERI- CAN DÍPTERA. 512 pp. Ballou Press, New 1966. THE TAXONOMY. CYTOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OP York. (Rev. 1964.) ^A THE GENUS RHAGOLETIS IN NORTH AMERICA FABRICIUS, J. C. (DÍPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE). Harvard Univ. 1805. SYSTEMA ANTLIATORU.M SECUNDUM ORDINES, Mus. Compar. Zool. Bui. 134 (11): 431- GENERA. SPECIES. 373 pp. Brunswick, Ger- 562, illus. :A many.. •r- and H UETTEL, M. D. FoOTE, R. H. 1970. CYTOGENETICS AND DESCRIPTION OF A NEW 1958. THE GENUS EUARESTOIDES IN THE UNITED NORTH AMERICAN SPECIES OF THE NEO- STATES AND MEXICO. Ent. Soc. Amer. Ann. TROPICAL GENUS CECIDOCHARELLA (DÍPTERA: 51: 288-293, illus. TEPHRITIDAEX Ent. Soc. Amer. Ann. 63: 88-91, illus. J5, 1960a. THE GENUS TEPHRITIS LATREILLE IN THE COLE, F. R. NEARCTIC REGION .NORTH OF MEXICO: DESCRIP- 1923. DÍPTERA FROM THE ISLANDS AND ADJACENT nONS OF FOUR NEW SPECIES AND NOTES ON SHORES OF THE GULF OF CALIFORNIA. IL GEN- OTHERS. Kans. Ent Soc Jour. 33: 71-85, ERAL REPORT. Calif. Acad. Sei. Proc., ser. 4, illus. 12: 457-481, illus. COQUILLETT, D. W. 1960b. THE TEPHRITIDAE AND OTITIDAE OF THE BA- 1899. NOTES AND DESCRIPTIONS OP TRYPETIDAE. HAMA ISLANDS. N.Y. Ent. Soc. Jour. 68: N.Y. Ent. Soc Jour. 7: 259-268. 83-99, illus. TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE 54 FREY, R. VJrt, FooTE, R. H. TIERGEOGRAPHISCHE STUDIEN ÜBER DIE DIP- A NEW TEPHRITID GENUS. RHAGOLETOIDES, 1945 1960c. TERENFAUNA DER AZOREN, l. VERZEICHNIS WITH NOTES ON ITS DISTRIBUTION AND SYSTEM- DER BISHER VON DEN AZOREN BEiC\NNTEN DIP- ATIC POSITION. Ent, News 71:145-149, illus. TEREN. Finsk. Vetensk. Soc. Comm. Biol. 8 ÎDA (10): 1-114, illus. T960d. NOTES ON SOME NORTH AMERICAN TEPHRITI- DAE. WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF TWO NEW GENERA GERSTACKER, A. 1860. BESCHREIBUNG EINIGER AUSGEZEICHTNETEN AND TWO NEW SPECIES. Wash. Biol. Soc. NEUEN DIPTEREN AUS DER FAMILIE MUS- Proc. 73: 107-118, illus. CARIAE. Stettin Ent. Ztg. 21:163-208, illus. 192^1 T960e. A REVISION OF THE GENUS TRUPANEA IN AMER- GiGLio-Tos, E. 1893. DIAGNOSI DI NUOVl GENERI E Dl NOUVE SPECIE ICA NORTH OF MEXICO. U.S. Dept. Agr. Tech. DI DITTERI. IX. [Turin Univi Mus. Zool. ed. BuL 1214, 29 pp., illus. Anat. Compar. Bol. 8 (No. 158): 1-14. 19&N "T960f. THE GENUS TRYPETA MEIGEN IN AMERICA 1895. DITTERI DEL MESSICO. PARTE IV. MUSCIDAE NORTH OF MEXICO (DÍPTERA. TEPHRIT- CALYPTERATAE, MUSCIDAE ACALYPTERA- IDAE). Ent. Soc. Amer. Ann. 53: 253-260, TAE. R. Accad. delle Sei. Torino Mem., ser. illus. I9i3í>. II, V. 45, 74 pp., illus. 1960g. A NEW NORTH AMERICAN FRUIT FLY GENUS, GREENE, C. T. 1934. A REVISION OF THE GENUS ANASTREPHA BASED PROCECIDOCHAROIDES (DÍPTERA: TEPHRIT- ON A STUDY OF THE WINGS AND ON THE LENGTH IDAE). Ent. Soc. Amer. Ann. 53: 671-675, OF THE OVIPOSITOR SHEATH. Wash. Ent. Soc. illus. Proc. 36: 127-179, illus. 1965a. FAMILY TEPHRITIDAE. In Stone, A., et aL, GUETTARD, J. E. eds„ A Catalog of the Díptera of America 1762. OBSERVATIONS QUE PEUVENT SERVIR A FORMER QUELQUES CARACTERES DE COQUIL- North of Mexico, pp. 658-678. U.S. Dept. Agr. Agr. Handb. 276. Washington, D.C. LAGES. {Paris] Acad. Roy. des Soi., Hist, avec Mém. Math, et Phys. Mém. 1756: 145-183. 1^5? T965b. A STUDY OF THE TYPES OF TEPHRITIDAE DE- SCRIBED BY F. M. VAN DER WULP IN "BIOLOGÍA HARDY, D. THE FRUIT FLY TYPES IN THE NATURHISTORI- CENTRALI AMERICANA." Kans. Ent. SoC. 1968. SCHES MUSEUM. WIEN (TEPHRITIDAE-DÍPTERA). Jour. 38: 236-247. Wien. Naturhist. Mus. Ann. 72: 107-155, il- 1966. THE GENUS RHAGOLETOTRYPETA. WITH A NEW lus. NEARCTIC SPECIES (DÍPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE). Ent. Soc. Amer. Ann. 59: 803-807, illus. 1973. THE FRUIT FLIES (TEPHRITIDAE-DÏPTERA) OF 3i^ THAILAND AND BORDERING COUNTRIES. 1967. FAMILY TEPHRITIDAE. In Vanzolini, M., ed., Pacific Insects Monog. 31, 353 pp., illus. A Catalog of the Díptera of the Americas IS* South of the United States, v. 57. pp. 1974. THE FRUIT FLIES OF THE PHILIPPINES 57.1-57.91. Dept. ZooL, Sec Agr., Sao (DÍPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE). Pacific Insects Paulo, Brasil. Monog. 32, 266 pp., illus. HENDEL, F. I>C NEW GENERA AND SPECIES OF NEOTROPICAL 1978. 1907. NOMINA NOVA FUR MEHRERE GATTUNGEN DER TEPHRITIDAE (DiPTERAX Wash. Acad. Sei. ACALYPTRATEN MUSCIDEN. Wien. Ent. Ztg. Jour. 68: 27-32, illus. 26: 98. 1S# , and BLANC, F. L. 1963. THE FRUrr FLIES OR TEPHRITIDAE OF CALI- 1914a. ANALYTISCHE ÜBERSICHT ÜBER DIE FORNIA. Calif. Insect Survey Bui, 7, 117 ANASTREPHA-ARTEN (DIPT.). Wien. Ent. Ztg. pp., illus. »r 33: 66-70. and BLANC, F. L. 1969. NEW SPECIES OF TEPHRITIDAE (DÍPTERA) FROM 1914b. DIE GATTUNGEN DER BOHRFLIEGEN (ANALY- THE WESTERN UNITED STATES, MEXICO, AND TISCHE ÜBERSICHT ALLER BISHER BEKANNTEN GUATEMALA, WITH BEVISIONARY NOTEa Pan- »r GATTUNGEN DER TEPHRITINAEX Wien. Ent. Pacific Ent. 56: 161-179. Ztg. 33: 73-98. FREIDBERG, A., and KUGLEB, J. 1977. THE TYPE-SPECIES OF GONIURELLIA HENDEL, i#e 19Î4C. DIE BOHRFLIEGEN SUDAMERIKAS. K. Zool. I9n (INSECTA: DÍPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) ZM. (S.) Anthrop.-Ethnog. Mus. Abhandl. Ber. 2157. IntematL Comn. Zool. Nomencl., Bui. (1912) 14 (3): l-«4, illus. Zool. Nomencl. 33: 20a-211, illus. FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 55 1927. TRYPETIDAE. FAMILY 49. In Lindner, E., 1944a. NEUE GATTU.VGEN UND ARTEN VON FRUCHT- ed., Die Fliegen der Palaearktischen Re- FLIEGEN DER ERDE. Siruna Seva 5: 1-17, il- gion, V. 5, 221 pp, illus. Stuttgart, lus. 1928. NEUE ODER WENIGER BEK-\NNTE BOHRFLIEGEN 1944b. BESTIMMUNGSTABELLE DER GATTUNG TEPH- (TRYPETIDAE) AUS DE.M DEUTSCHEN ENTOMOLO- RITIS LATREILLE. 1804. Siruna Seva 5: GISCHEN INSTITUT BERLIN-DAHLEM. Ent. 17-31. Mitt. 17: 341-^70. 1947a. NEUE GATTUNGEN UND ARTEN DER FRUCHT- 1931. KRITISCHE UND SYNONYMISCHE BEMERK- FLIEGEN. Siruna Seva 6: 1-12, illus. UNGEN ÜBER DIPTEREN. Zool.-Bot. GeselL Wien, VerhandL 81: 4-19. 1947b. BESTIMMUNGSTABELLE DER UNTERFAMILIEN UND TRIBUS DER TRYPETIDAE. Siruna Seva 1935. BEMERKUNGEN ZU "THE FAMILIES AND GENERA 6: 12-16. OF NORTH AMERICAN DÍPTERA" BY C. H. CUR- RAN, NEW YORK. 1934. Konowia 14: 51-57. 1953. NEUE FRUCHTFLIEGEN VON CHINA, VORDERA- SIEN. BRASILIEN UND GUATEMALA. Siruna 1936. ERGEBNISSE EINER ZOOLOGISCHEN SAMMEL- Seva 8: 1-16. illus. REISE NACH BRASILIEN, INSBESONDERE IN DAS AMAZONASGEBIET, AUSGEFÜHRT VON DR. H. ZERNY. X TEIL; DÍPTERA: MUSCIDAE ACALYP- 1961. BEITRAGE ZUR KENNTNIS DER I.NSEKTFAUNA TRATAE (EXCL. CHLOROPIDAE). Wien. BOLIVIENS .XVL DÍPTERA L ALTE UND NEUE Naturhist. Mus. Ann. 47: 61-106, illus. FRUCHTFLIEGEN VON BOLIVIEN. Opusc. ZooL 57: 1-7, illus. HERING, E. M. INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLA- 1937. NEUE NEOTROPISCHE BOHRFLIEGEN AUS DEM TURE. HAMBURGER MUSEUM. Rev. de Ent. 7: 296- 1963. OPINION 678. THE SUPPRESSION UNDER THE 302, illus. PLENARY POWERS OF THE P.AMPHLET PUB- LISHED BY MEIGE.N, 1800. Intematl. Comn. 1938. NEUE BOHRFLIEGEN AUS BRASILIEN {32. BEI- Zool. Nomencl., Bui. Zool. Nomencl. 20: 339- TRAGE ZUR KENNTNIS DER TRYPETIDAE). ReV. 342. de Ent. 8: 187-196. illus. KORYTKOWSKI, C. A. 1971. A NEW CECIDOGENOUS SPECIES OF THE GENUS 1939. NEUETRYPETIDEN DER ERDE. VII Internati. POLYMORPHOMYIA SNOW (DÍPTERA: TEPHRITI- Cong. Ent. (1938) 1: 165-190, illus. DAE). Wash. Ent Soc. Proc. 73: 446-449, il- lus. 1940a. I. NEUE ARTEN UND GATTUNGEN. Siruna LATREILLE, P. A. Seva 1: 1-16, illus. 1804. TABLEAU METHODIQUE DES INSECTES. In SoC. Nat, et d'Agr., Nouveau Dictionnaire d'Histoire Naturelle, Appliqué, aux Artes, 1940b. NEUE ALT- UND NEUWELTLICHE BOHRFLIEGEN. í^rincipalement à TAgTriculture et à Arb. über Morph. u. Taxonom. Ent. Berlin- TEconomie Rurale et Domestique, v. 24, Dahlem 7: 50-57, illus. sect 3, pp. 12^200. Paris. LIMA, A. DA COSTA. 1941a. TRYPETIDAE. In Beitrage zur Fauna 1933. NOTAS SOBRE TRYPETÎDAS BRASILIERA3 (IX Perus, V. 1, pp. 121-176, illus. Jena. Rev. de Ent 3: 382-584, illus. 1934a. MOSCAS DE FRUTAS DO GENERO ANASTREPHA 1941b. FÜNF NEUE NEOTROPISCHE FRUCHTFLIEGEN. Rev. de Ent. 12: 474-480, illus. SCHINER. 1868. Inst Oswaido Cruz Mem. 28: 487-675, illus. 1941c. NEUE DACINAE UND TRYPETINAE DES ZOOLO- 1934b. NOTAS SOBRE TRIPETIDAS BRASILIERA3 GISCHEN MUSEUMS DER UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN. dix ESPECIES CECIDOGENAS DA AMERICA DO Siruna Seva 3: 1-25, illus- SUL. Inst de Biol. Vegr. Arq. 1: 115-130, illus. 1941d. PTEROCALLIDAE BRASILIENSIS (DIPT.). Mün- chen. Ent Gesell. Mitt. 31: 197-201. illus. 1934c. NOTAS SOBRE TRIPETIDAS BRASILIERAS (lia Inst de Biol. Veg. Arq. 1: 139-141, illus. 1942. NEUE GATTUNGEN UND ARTEN PALAEARK- 1935a. NOTAS SOBRE TRYPETIDAS BRASILIERAS (IVJ. TISCHER UND EXOTISCHER FRUCHTFLIE- MOSCAS DO GENERA _HEXACHAETA LOEW, GEN. Siruna Seva 4: 1-31, illus. Acad. BrasiL de Cien. An. 7: 235-250. TECHNICAL BULI^ETIN 1600. U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE 56 RONDAN!, c. LIMA. A. DA COSTA. 1803. VERSUCH EINER NEUEN GATTUNGSEINTHEI- 1935b. NOTAS SOBRE TRYPETIDAS BRASILIERAS (M. LUNG DER EUROPAISCHEN ZWEFLUGELIGEN IN- 1856. D G Rev. de Ent. 5: 199-202, illus. SEKTEN. Mag. f. Insektenkunde 2: 259-281. N r953a. MOSCAS DE FRUTAS DO U.S. NATIONAL MUSEUM MUNRO, H. K. (SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION)(I). Acad. Brasil, 1947. AFRICAN TRYPETIDAE (DIPTERAK So. Africa de Cien. An. 25: 151-152. illus. Ent. Soc. Mem. 1: 1-284, illus. 1868. 1953b. MOSCAS DE FRUTAS DO U.S. NATIONAL MUSEUM TRYPETIDAE. In Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), (SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION) (II). Acad. 1957. Ruwenzori Expedition, 1934-35, v. 2 (9): BrasiL de Cien. An. 25: 153-155, illus. 853-1054, illus. 1870. T953C. MOSCAS DE FRUTAS DO U.S. NATIONAL MUSEUM (SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION) (III). Acad. 1964. THE GENUS TRUPANEA IN AFRICA. So. Africa Brasil, de Cien. An. 25: 557-566, illus. Ent. Mem., Dept. Agr. Tech. Serv.. Rpt. 8: 1871. 1-101, illus. 1954. MOSCAS DE FRUTAS DO U.S. NATIONAL MUSEUM (SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION) (IV). Acad. NOVAK, J. A. Brasil, de Cien. An, 26: 277-282, illus. 1974. A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF DIOXYNA AND PAR- SCHINER, I. R and LEITE, I. DA COSTA. OXYNA (DIPTERA. TEPHRITIDAE) FOR AMERICA 1868. 1952. .MOSCAS DO GÉNEROS HEXACHAETA E BLEPHA- NORTH OF MEXICO. Melanderia 16: 1-53, il- RONEURA. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz Mem. 50: lus. 297-310, illus. SCHRANK, F. % and LEITE, I. DA COST.V OSTEN-S.\CKEN, C. R. 1795. 1862. DIE EUROPAISCHEN BOHRFLIEGEN (TRY- 1878. CATALOG OF THE DESCRIBED DIPTERA OF PETIDAE). 128 pp.. illus. Wien, Austria. NORTH AMERICA. Ed. 2. Smithsn. Misc. and LEITE, I. DA COST.V Collect. 270: 1-276. SNOW, 1873. .MONOGRAPHS OF THE DíPTERA OF NORTH W. A. AMERICA. PART III. Smithsn. Misc. Collect. PHILIPPI, R. A. 1894. 1873. CHILENISCHE INSERTEN. Stettin Ent. Ztg. 11 (39 ( = publ. 256)): 1-351, illus. 34: 29^-321, illus. LuTZ, A., and LIMA, A. DA COSTA. 1918. CONTRIBUCAO PARA ESTUDO DAS TRIPANEIDAS STEYSKAL. G. (MOSCAS DE FRUTAS) BRASILIERAS. Inst. Os- PHILLIPS, V. T. 1970. 1923. A REVISION OF THE TRYPETIDAE OF NORTH- waldo Cruz Mem. 10: 5-15. illus. EASTERN AMERic.\. N.Y. Ent. Soc. Jour. 31: MCFADDEN, M. W.. and FOOTE. R. H. 119-154, illus. 1961. THE GENUS ORELLIA R.-D. IN AMERICA .NORTH OF MEXICO. Wash. Ent. Soc. Proc. 62 (1960): QUISENBERRY, B. F. 1972a. 253-261, illus. 1949a. THE GENUS OXT'NA IN THE NEARCTIC REGION NORTH OF MEXICO (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE). MACLEAY, W. S. 1829. .NOTICE OF CERATITIS CITRIPERDA. AN INSECT Pan-Pacific Ent. 25: 71-76, illus. VERY DESTRUCTIVE TO ORANGES. Zool. Jour. (London): 4: 475-482. 1972b. 1949b. NOTES AND DESCRIPTIONS OF NORTH AMERI- MALLOCH, J. R. x^r . «• * ^ CAN TEPHRITIDAE (DIPTERA). Kans. Ent. SoC. 1933. ACALYPTRATA. In Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Jour. 22: 81-88, illus. Díptera of Patagonia and South Chile, fase. 4, pt. 6, pp. 177-391, illus. 1972c. 1950. THE GENUS EUARESTA IN THE UNITED STATES. London. N.Y. Ent. Soc. Jour. 58: 9-38, illus. r941a. THE AMERICAN GENUS PARACANTHA COQUIL- RHODE, R. H. LETT. Rev. de Ent. 12: 32-42, illus. 1976, THE HISTORY AND CURRENT STATUS OF THE 1972d. MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN NORTH AMERICA. Rio Grande Valley Hort. Soc. 1941b. VENEZUELAN DÍPTERA. L Soc. Venezol. de Jour. 30: 11-17. Cien. Nat. BoL 7: 123-126, illus. ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, J. B. 1974. MEIGEN, J. W. 1830. ESSAI SUR LES MYODAIRES. [Paris] Inst. de 1800. NOUVELLE CLASSIFICATION DES MOUCHES A France (Cl. des] Sei., Math, et Phys., Acad. DEUX AILES (DIPTERA L.) D'APRES UN PLAN Roy. des Sei., Mem., ser. 2, 2: 1-813. TOUTE NOUVEAU. 40 pp. Paris. FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 57 RONDANl. C. 1977a. TWO NEW NEOTROPICAL FRUITFLIES OF THE 1856. DIPTEROLOGIAE ITALICAE PRODROMUS. V. I: GENUS AN ASTRE PHA, WITH NOTES ON GENERIC GENERA ITALÍCA ORDINIS DIPTERORUM ORDI- SYNONYMY (DÍPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE). Wash. NATUM DTSPOSITA ET DISTINCTA ET IN FAMI- Ent. Soc. Proc. 79: 75-81. illus. LIAS ET STIRPES AGGREGATA. 228 pp. Parma, Italy. 1977b. PICTORIAL KEY TO THE SPECIES OF THE GENUS ANASTREPHA (DÍPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE). 35 pp., 1868. DÍPTERA ALIQUA IN AMERICA MERIDIONALI illus. Wash. Ent. Soc, Washington, D.C. LECTA. Soc. Nat. di Modena Ann, 3: 24-40, and FooTE, R. H. illus. 1977. REVISIONARY NOTES ON NORTH AMERICAN TEPHRITIDAE (DÍPTERA). WITH KEYS AND DE- 1870. ORTALIDINAE ITALICAE COLLECTAE, DISTINC- SCRIPTIONS OF NEW SPECIES. Wash. Ent. TAE ET IN ORDINEM DISPOSITAE. Soc. Ent Soc. Proc. 79: 146-155, illus. Ital. Bui. 2: 5-31. STOLTZFUS, W. B. 1977. THE TAXONOMY AND BIOLOGY OF EUTRETA 1871. ORTALIDINAE ITALICAE COLLECTAE, DISTINC- (DÍPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE). lowa State Jour. TAE ET IN ORDINEM DISPOSITAE. Soc. Ent. Res. 51: 369-438, illus. Ital. Bui. 3: 3-24, 161-188. STONE, A. 1939a. A REVISION OF THE GENUS PSEUDODACUS HEN- SCHINER, I. R. . 1868. DÍPTERA (ART. I). In Reise der österreichi- DEL. Rev. de Ent. 10: 282-289, illus. schen Fregatte Novara. Zoology 2, abt. 1. sect. B, pp. 1-388. Wien, Austria. 1939b. A NEW GENUS OF TRYPETIDAE NEAL ANASTRE- PH.\. Wash. Acad. Sei. Jour. 29: 340-350, il- SCHRANK, F. VON P. lus. 1795. NATÜRHISTORISCHE UND ÖKONOMISCHE BRIEFE ÜBER DAS DONAUMOOR. 211 pp., 1942. THE FRUITFLIES OF THE GENUS ANASTREPHA. illus. Mannheim, Germany. U.S. Dept. Agr. Misc. Pub. 439,112 pp., illus. SNOW, W. A. WALKER, F. 1894. DESCRIPTIONS OF NORTH AMERICAN TRYPETÎ- 1836. DESCRIPTIONS OF THE BRITISH TEPHRITITES. DAE, WITH NOTES. Kans. Univ. Quart. 2: Ent. Mag. (London) 3: 57-85, illus. 159-174, illus. WESTWOOD, J. O. 1840. ORDER XIII. DíPTERA ARISTOTLE (ANTLIATA STEYSKAL, G. C. FABRIC I US. HALTE RIPTERA CLAIRV.)., His An 1970. ENSINA SONCH! (L.) IN SOUTH AMERICA (DÍPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE). Wash. Acad. Sci. Introduction to the Modem Classification of Insects. Synopsis of the Genera of Brit- Jour. 60: 158-159. ish Insects, pp. X25-158. London. WuLP, F. M. VAN DER. 1972a. EUARESTA RETICULATA (HENDED. NEW COML • 1899. GROUP TRYPETiNAE. In Godman, F. D,, and NATION (DÍPTERA; TEPHRITIDAE). Wash. Ent. Salvin, O., eds., Biologia Centrali- Soc. Proc. 74: 130. Americana, Zoology-Insects-Diptera, v. 2, pp. 401-416, illus. London, England. 1972b. A PRELIMINARY KEY TO THE SPECIES OF THE NEOTROPICAL GENUS TETREUARESTA HENDEL. 1900. GROUP TRYPETINAE. In Godman, F. D., and Wash. Ent. Soc. Proc. 74: 403-405. Salvin, O., eds., Biologia Centrali- Americana, Zoology-Insects-Diptera, v. 2, pp. 417-r428, pis. 11, 12. London, England. 1972c. A PRELIMINARY KEY TO THE SPECIES OF NEO- TEPHRITIS HENDEL (DÍPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE). YEPEZ, F. F. 1953. CONTRIBUCIÓN AL ESTUDIO DE LAS .MOSCAS DE Wash. Ent. Soc. Proc. 74: 414-416. LAS FRUTAS DEL GENERO ANASTREPHA SCHINER (DÍPTERA: TRYPETIDAE) DE VENE- 1972d. A NEW SPECIES OF MYOLEJA WITH A KEY TO ZUELA- II Cong. Cien. Nat. Afínes NORTH AMERICAN SPECIEa Fla. Ent. 55: (Caracas), Cuaderno No. 7, 42 pp., illus. 207-211, illus. ZiA, Y. 1937. STUDY ON THE TRYPETIDAE OR FRUIT FLIES OP 1974. ADDITIONAL DATA ON TEPHRITIS UNICOLOR CHINA- Sinensia 8: 103-219, illus. WALKER, 1837, NEWLY REFERRED TO THE GENUS _ and CHEN, C. H. LAMPROXYNELLA HERING (DÍPTERA: TEPHRITI- 1938. TRYPETIDAE OF NORTH CHINA. Sinensia 9: DAEX Wash. Ent. Soc. Proc. 76: 49-51. 1-172, illus. Dioxyna Frey Ditrichini - dorsalis Hend Dracontomyii Dyseuaresta electa (Say), I elegans (Blar INDEX OF NAxMES elegans Henc Boldface numbers refer to principal discussion, italic to key, and roman to other mention. Ensina Robii Epochrella H Pag« Epochrinopsi Pag« Euaresta Lot abstersa (Loew), Euarestoides 28 calcitrapae Robineau-Desvoidy 49 Calopteromyia Bigot 33 Euarestoides Acanthonevrini 32 Euarestopsis Acinia Robineau-Desvoidy 15, 17, 20, 26, 27 Camaromyia Hendel 28 capitata (Wiedemann), Ceratitis 22 Eucecidochai Aciura ^'^ Eucosmopter Aciurina Curran. i7, 17, 43, 44 caracasana (Fernandez), Dyseuaresta 27 cardui (Linnaeus), Urophora — 50 Euleia ——- Aciurinae ^» 1^ Eupterocalla "Aciurini" ^flO, 16,46 Carphotricha 39 Carpomyia Rondani 51 Euribia Aciuroides Hering 36 Eurosta Loe Acrotaenia Loew i^f 18, 21, 43 Cecidocharella Hendel 6, 21 Cecidochares Bezzi 6, 21, 37, 42 Eutreta Loe Acrotaeniacantha Hering i^, 18 eximia (Wied Acrotoxa Loew -— 1^ Cecidocharini 5 adelphica Hendei, Dyseuaresta 26 Celidosphenella Hendel i4, 22 festiva (Loev. adspersa (Wiedemann), Pseudeutreta 43 cerasi (Linnaeus), Rhagoletis 45 fínalis (Loew aequalis (Loew), Euaresta 27 Ceratitinae '7 flavicans Ro? alba (Loew), Neaspilota 36 Ceratitini '7 flexuosa (Big: Anastrepha Schiner 1, 7, 19, 22, 46 Ceratitis Macleay 7,.?, 22 fluminensÍ5 * anastrephoides (Curran), Parastenopa 40 Ceratitoedaspis Aczél 2, 39 Forelia Robii anduzei Malloch, Neorhabdochaeta 36 Ceratodacus Hendel 6, 7, 23 fraterculus C angustipennis (Philippi), Rhachiptera 45 Chaetorhagoletis Blanchard 46 furcifera Big Anomoia Walker 2,8, 19. 36 Chaetostoma 23 fuscobasalis apicata (Becker), Plaumannimyia 41 Chaetostomella Hendel 38 approximata (Hendel), Anomoia 19 Chetostoma Rondani 2, 9, 23 arcuata Hendel, Parastenopa 40 (Thrysaciura Aczél 1^* 23 gaedii Me igt argentinensis (Aczél), Rhagoletotrypeta — 46 chrysura Thomson, Xanthaciura 50 Gastrozonini (jerrhoceraá armatus Fabricius, Dacus 25 cislimitensis Steyskal, Cryptotreta 24 arnicae (Linnaeus), Tephritis 47 citriperda Macleay, Ceratitis — 22 gilva Wulp, i artemisiae (Fabricius), Trypeta 49 connexa (Macquart), Cecidochares 21 Gonioxyna F Goniurellia • Aspilomyia Hendel 36 corniculata (Zetterstedt), Acinia 17 Aspilota Loew 36 Costalimaia Hering 21 gracilipes (L guatemalen> atra (Loew), Procecidochares 42 crassipes Curran, Pyrgotoides 44 Gymnocarer atrox Aldrich, Phobema 19 Cryptodacus Hendel S, 24, 34 augur (Frauenfeld), Goniurellia 30 Cryptoplagia Aczél ^» 24. 34 Cryptotreta Blanc and Foote i^, 24 hamifera (Li baccharidis (Rondani), Strobelia 47 cuculi (Hendel), Haywardina 31 Hamouchae Baryphlegma 20 cuculiformis Aczél, Cryptoplagia 24 Haywardina Baryplegma Wulp 15, 17, 20 cucurbitae Coquillett, Dacus 25 heliodes He basilica Snow, Polymorphomyia 41 culta (Wiedemann), Paroxyna ^— 39 Hetschkomy bella (Loew), Euaresta 28 curvicauda (Jerstàcker, Toxotrypana 48 Hexachaeta benoisti (Seguy), Celidosphenella 22 curvinerve Rondani, Chetostoma 23 Hexaresta K bicolorata Hering, Epochrinopsis 27 curvinervis Aczél, Lilloaciura 34, 35 Homoeothri bipuncta Aczél, Chrysaciura 23 Homoeothrl biseta Hendel, Pseudoedaspis 43 daciformis Bezzi, Anastrepha 1^ Blepharoneura Loew 6, 7, 20, 35 Dacinae ^» ^ Icaria Schir borrichia Bush and Huettel, Cecidocharella 21 Dacus Fabricius 2, -4. 25 Ictérica Lot Brachytes Hendel 1 31 Dectodesis Munro 30 Ictericodes brasiliensis Lima, Acidia 20 dichromata Snow, Xenochaeta 51 imitatrix H bullans (Wiedemann), Euaresta 27, 28 Dictyotrypeta Hendel 1^* 25 imox (Bate^ diespasmena group, Celidosphenella 22 inomata (C Caenoriata Foote .IJ. 18,21 diffusa (Snow), Gymnocarena 30 58 FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 59 Pajfe Dioxyna Frey M, 25, 39 Ischyropteron Bigot 7,^,31,33 Ditrichini 6, P, 10, 39 Ischyropterum 33 dorsalis Hendel, Dacus 25 Dracontomyia Becker - S, 21, 26 jaceae Robineau-Desvoidy, Acinia 17 Dyseuaresta Hendel U, Uy 26, 34 japónica (Wiedemann), Ictericodes ^32, 33 Juanita Hering, Hexaresta ^— 32 electa (Say), Zonosemata — — 51 ele^ans (Blanchard), Parastenopa 40 Kartabia Curran 40 elegans Hendel, Cecidocharella 21 Ensina Robineau-Desvoidy 2,15, 27, 43 Laksyetsa Foote 11, 33, 37, 39 Epochrella Hering 27 Lamproxyna Hendel i^, 22, 33 Epochrinopsis Heringr 8, 27 Lamproxynella Hering -14, 34 Euaresta Loew 15, 27, 41 latifrons Hendel, Neorhagoletis 37 Euarestoides Benjamin __ 15, 28, 49 latifrons (Wulp), Oedicarena 38 Euarestopsis Hering 15, 28 Lezca Foote 7, 24, 31, 34 Eucecidochares Bezzi and Tavares 21 Lilloaciura Aczél ■?7, 34 Eucosmoptera Phillips 50 limbata Bigot, Rhachiptera 45 Euleia 35 lindigi (Hendel), Homoeothrix 32 Eupterocalla Brèthes 45 longiceps Hendel, Protensina 42 Euribia 50 longicornis Hendel, Ceratodacus 23 Eurosta Loew 29 lucida (Fallen), Myoleja 35 Eutreta Loew .1 12, 24, 29 Lucumaphila Stone 1, 19 eximia (Wiedemann), Hexachaeta 31, 32 lútea Giglio-Tos, Molynocoelia 35 festiva (Loew), Euaresta 27 maculata Hendel, Celidosphenella 22 finalis (Loew), Neotephritis 37, 38 maculata (Lima), Pseudophorellia 44 flavicans Robineau-Desvoidy, Orellia 38 maculipennis Cole, Baryplegma 17 flexuosa (Bigot), Metasphenisca 35 maculipennis Hendel, Hetschkomyia 31 fluminensis (Lima), Cecidochares 21 magnipennis Hendel, Gonioxyna 30 Forelia Robineau-Desvoidy 49 magnipennis Hendel, Neoacanthoneura 36 fraterculus (Wiedemann), Anastrepha 19 Melanotrypana Hering 2, 22 furcifera Bigot, Mikimyia 48 Mesaraelia Blanchard 40 fuscobasalis Hering, Stoneola 46 Mesrelia 40 Metasphenisca Hendel 35 gaedii Meigen, Trypeta 19 mexicana (Aczél), Aciurina 18 Gastrozonini 35 mexicana (Aczél), Gymnocarena .— 30, 31 Gerrhoceras Hering 8, 29 mexicana (Wiedemann), Dyseuaresta 27 gilva Wulp, BaryplegTTia 17, 20 Mikimyia Bigot 48 Gonioxyna Hendel 2, U, 30 mirabilis Giglio-Tos, Ostracocoelia 38 Goniurellia Hendel 2,15, 30 moebiusi Becker, Schistopterum 11 gracilipes (Loew), Metasphenisca 35 Molynocoelia Giglio-Tos 6, 7, 35 guatemalensis (Lima), Hexachaeta 31, 32 mucida (Giglio-Tos), Polionota 41 Gymnocarena Hering 2, 9, 30 Myioleia 35 Myioleja 35 hamifera (Loew), Trypeta 50 Myiolia 1 35 Hamouchaeta Blanchard . 1, 19 Myoleja Rondani . 2, 7, 20, 35 Haywardina Aczél -—8, 24, 31, 34 Myolia 35 heliodes Hendel, Lamproxynella 34 Myopitinae 4, 5 Hetschkomyia Hendel 8, 31, 44 Hexachaeta Loew 6, 7, 20, 31, 32, 35 Neanomoea Hendel 1, 19 Hexaresta Hering 6, 7, 32 Neaspilota Osten Sacken 2,10, 36 Homœothrix Hering 15, 32 Neoacanthoneura Hendel 2, 36 Homoeothrlx Hering 32 Neoaspilota 36 Neohexachaeta Lima 2, 31, 32 Icaria Schiner 29 Neorhabdochaeta Malloch 11,12, 36, 37, 39 Ictérica Loew — 25 Neorhagoletis Hendel S, 21, 37 Ictericodes Hering 2, 25, 32, 33 Neotaracia Foote 1^, 18, 37 Imitatrix Hering, Trypanaresta 49 Neotephritis Hendel 15, 28, 34, 37 imox (Bates), Neotaracia 37 nigerrima Loew, Trypeta L 21 inomata (Coquillett), Neotephritis 38 nigricaudatum Bigot, Ischyropteron 33 60 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE Pasre Pasfe Trypana nitidula Hendel, Lamproxyna 33 quadriseta (Hendel), Xanthaciura 50 quadrisetosa (Hendel), Xanthaciura 50 Trypane;? Noeeta Robineau-Desvoidy 40 Trypane radians Lima, Pseudopolionota 44 Trypeta obliqua (Say), Tomoplagia 48 radiata Schrank, Trupanea 49 Trypetin obliquus Hendel, Cryptodacus 24 radiosa Hering, Acrotaeniacantha 18 obscuriventris (Loew), Tetreuaresta 47 rava Foote, Neotephritis 38 undosa11 Oedaspidinae ^^ ^ reticulata (Hendel), Euaresta 41 Urellia Î Oedaspidini ^ Rhabdochaeta deMeijere 11 Urophor Oedaspis ^^ Rhachiptera Bigot — ii, 45, 47 Oedicarena Loew 1? *. 31, 38, 51 Rhagoletis Loew S, P, 19, 22, 45, 51 ogloblini (Blanchard), Anomoia 19 Rhagoletoides Foote 1> 38 onopordi Fabricius, Forellia 49 Rhagoletotrypeta Aczél ^» 45, 46, 51 opazoi (Brèthes), Eupterocalla 45 rhinophora Hering, Eutreta 29 Oreilia Robineau-Desvoidy 2,10, 38 Rhithrum Hendel ^7, 46 Ostracocoelia Giglio-Tos ^» 21, 38 rivellioides (Hering), Epochrinopsis 27 Oxyna Robineau-Desvoidy 2, i4, 39 riveti Becker, Dracontomyia 26 rivulatum Hendel, Rhithrum 46 pallens Hering, Plaumannimyia 41 pallida (Cole), Cryptotreta 24 sagittata (Stone), Anastrepha 19 paipalis (Acz'el), Ostracocoelia 39 Schistopterinae H» 36, 40 Paracantha Coquillett 11. l^^ 33, 37, 39 schneideri (Loew), Ictericodes 32 paradoxa Hering, Gerrhoceras 29 Serpentinographa Aczél 46 Parastenopa Hendel ^ 7, 40 serpentinus (Wiedemann), Dacus 19 parietina (Linnaeus), Oxyna 39 Setigeresta Benjamin 28 Paroxyna Hendel U. Î5, 26, 39, 40 Siplographa ^0 paupera Hering, Euarestopsis 28 sonchi (Linnaeus), Ensina 50 penelope (Osten Sacken), Procecidocharoides 42 sonchi Robineau-Desvoidy, Urophora 27 Percnoptera Philippi 45 sororcuia (Wiedemann), Dioxyna 25 permunda (Harris), Anomoia 19 sparsa (Wiedemann), Eutreta 29 pertinax (Bates), Caenoriata 21 Spilographa Loew 50, 51 Phagocarpus Rondani 20 stellata (Fuessley), Trupanea 49 Phasmatocephala Hering - 29 stonei (Lima), Pseudophorellia 44 Phobema Aldrich 1» 19 Stoneola Hering ^» 46 Phorellia - - 49, 51 striatella Wulp, Rhagoletis 45 picturata (Snow), Acinia 1'^ Strobeha Rondani ^^» 45, 47 Plagiostoma 48 syssema Hendel, Dictyotrypeta 25 Plaiifiotoma Loew 48 Platensinini ^^* ^2 tau Foote, Lezca 34 Plaumannimyia Hering -^5, 28, 41 Tephrella Bezzi —— l*^» ^^ poecila (Schiner). Celidopshenella — 22 Tephritinae ^^ ^ po€cilogastra Loew, Trypeta 20 Tephritini ^0, 13 poecilosoma (Schiner), Blepharoneura 20 Tephritis Latreille U. 15, 22, 33, 47 Polionota Wulp - 7. 41 Terelliini ^» 1^, 38 Polymorphomyia Snow i^. 41, 43 tessellata (Loew), Stylia 40 Polyonota 41 testudinea (Loew), Acrotaenia 18, 21, 37 pomonella (Walsh), Rhagoletis 46 tetanops (Loew), Oedicarena 38 Procecidochares Hende! ^» 22, 42 Tetraciura Hendel ^0 Procecidocharoides Foote 2, 5, 22, 42 tetraspina Phillips, Xanthaciura 50 Protensina Hendel i^f 27, 42 Tetreuaresta Hendel i^, ^5, 28, 32, 47 Pseudacrotaenia Hendel ^«^» 43 Tomoplagia Coquillett ^» 48 Pseudeutreta Hendel -^^. 42, 43 Tomoplagiodes Aczél 2, 30, 31 Pseudodacus Hendel 1» 19 Toxotrypana Gerstácker ^* 48 Pseudoedaspiâ Hendel -í^» 35, 43 Tóxotrypanea ^^ Pseudophorellia Lima *» 31, 44 tridens Hendel, Goniurellia 30 Pseudopolionota Lima ^^» 44 trinotata Bates, Dyseuaresta . 27, 33 pullata Foote, Procecidocharoides 42 trinotata Foote, Laksyetsa 33 punctata Schrank, Orellia 38 trixa Curran, Aciurina 1 ' Pyrgotidae - 45 Trupanea Guettard ^^ Pyrgotoides Curran Ö, 7, 44 Trupanea Schrank U, 22, 47, 49 mtmj'u. '-kifírmmjtm.' -JIIUHM"í'.. J» JHMW g^iiwa.pii'.*i> '!■ tmmm'i-iMtm FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 61 Pajfe Paife Vespillo (Schiner), Pseudacrotaenia 43 Trypanaresta Hering ^^' 2^» ^^ Trypane« --30. 49 Trypanea (Trypanea) —- ^" Xanthaciura Hendel 17, 32, 44. 50 Trypeta Meigen ^' '^^^ ^^ xanthogastra Aczél, Rhagoletotrypeta — 46 Trypetinae 1' ^' ^' ^'^' "^^ Xenochaeta Snow 2,16, 51 undosa (Coquillett), ChaetostoiChaetostomella 38 Urellia Robineau-Desvoidy -^ 49 Z^nosema^Loew^ .^-^-.^. -~^^^ 51 Urellia Robineau-Desvoidy — Zonosemata Benjamin ^. 45, 51 Urophora Robineau-Desvoidy .5,50 I 62 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE I »fi» FIGURES 1-3.—Head of Anastrepha luderis (Loew), female: 1, Side view; 2, front view; 3, hind view. (AR, arista; IAS, ñrst antennal segment; 2AS, second antennal seg^ment; 3AS, third antennal segment; C, clypeus; E, compound eye; FA, face; FOP, fronto-orbital plate; fos, fronto-orbital setulae; FR, frons; G, gena; gb, genal bristle; QG, genal groove; gs, genal setulae; ivb, inner vertical bristle; LAB, labellum; Ifo, lower fronto-orbital bristles; LUN, lunule; MOS, median occipital sclerite; OC, ocellus; ocb, ocellar bristle; OCC, occiput; OF, occipital foramen; OM, oral margin; os, occipital setulae; OT, ocellar triangle; ovb, outer vertical bristle; P, palpus; PF, parafacial; PG, postgena; pgb, postgenal bristle; pgs, postgenal setulae; po, postocular bristle; poc, postocular seta; PTF, ptilinal furca; PTS, ptilinal suture (facial ridge); pvb, postvertical bristle; sc, supracervical setulae; ufo, upper fronto-orbital bristles; V, vertex) FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 63 iit^l FIGURES 4-5-Thorax oí Anastrepha luden, (Loew). female: 4, Dorsal view; 5, side view. Prescutellar bnstle ¿ded (A abdomen acr, acroLhal bristles; ANE. anepistemum; aneb. anepisternal bristles; ANP. anep.meron; «pb anep meral bristle asa, supra-alar bristle; dc. dorsocentral bristle; H. humérus; HA halter; hb. humera bristíe ?a "ñ^ra-alar bristle; KEP katepisternum; kepb, katepistemal bristle; ntpl. notopleural bnstle; pa. postalar briltle pU. propleural setulae; PN. postnotum; prs, presutural bristle; PS. pleural suture; PSC postscutellum; scap. scapular setae; scb, scutellar bristles; SCL. scutellum; SCM, scutum; SU, transverse suture.) R4 + 5 CuAl f- PlGOBE 6 -Right Win». AnaHrepha luden, (Loew). female. (A. anal cell; al, alula; AM. apical medial cell; BCu. bawd ^biUlceU;BM.bL.lmedi^cell;bmM:u.ba,.lmediocubitalcro,svein;C.cos^^ coSal cell; C«. cubital vein; CuAl. anterior (apical) cubital cell; CuAl. CuA2^ antenor cub.tal vem»; J. - Í <)tm\M..ixjmmii 'f'wn' ^ t> 64 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE FIGURES 7-16.—Side view of head, showing postocular bristles: 7, Rhagoletia pomonella (Walsh); 8, Euaresta aequalis (Loew); 9, Paracantha cultarii (Coquillett). 10, Pyrgotoidea craasipea Curran, hind leg; 11, Blepharoneura sp., left antenna; 12, Molynocoelia sp.. left antenna; 13, MyoUja sp., top view of head, showing ocellar triangle and ocellar bristles; 14, Zonoaemata vittigera (Coquillett), left antenna; Ib^Ceratitia capitata (Wiedemann), basal half of right wing, showing posterior extension of basal cubital cell; and 16, XeTiochaeta sp., left antenna. FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 65 11 • •■H'WW ,ü'>>9.!jigiwr>K ■! -awnm «; 66 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE 38 38 FíccneEí* 'r¡::^i^" 31 FIGURES 26-33.—Side view of heads of Tephritidae: 26, Lezca tau Foote; 27, Neotephritig finalis (Loew); 28,Oarvna sp.; 2Ö, Paracantha evUarU (Coquillett); 30, Polionota sp.; 31, ProUntina sp.; 32, Paroxyna sp.; and 33, Trypeia sp. » »»»i.nwwi.1 "i'LPmpii.i'wwii"i.wi t .wrniiw ■** 36 141 FIGURES 34-41.—Winers of Tephritidae: 34, Acima sp.; 36, Acmrina mexicana (Aczél); 36, Acroíaenia teBtudinea (Loew); 37, Acrota«ntacaniÄa »p.; 38, Ana«erepAa obliqua (Macquart); 39, Anomoia sp.; 40, Blepharoneura sp.; 41, Caémoriaía p€TtÍTiax (BatesX 68 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600. U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE ^' 50 52 ■sí**:« ■_ *^vfyuPä»i.'tr* 46 54 'A^' ^ 56 *'ii*;^'.H«fc«ii FIGURES 42-49,—Wings of Tephritidae: 42, Cecidoc hare lia sp.; 43, Cecidocharea sp.; 44, C elido sphene lia sp. (male); 45, Celidoapenella sp. (female); 46, Celidoêphenella sp. (male); 47, CelidoB-phenella sp. (female); 48, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann); 49, CeratodacuM longicomiê Hendel. FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 69 57 FIGURES 50-57.—Wingrs of Tephritidae: 60, Chetostoma rubida (Coquillett); 51, Chryaaciura bijmnctata Aczél; 52, Cryp- todacuê sp.; bS.Cryptoplagia cuculiforme Aczél; 54, Cryptotreta ap.; 55, Dacus dorsalis Hendel; bS,Dictyotrypeta sp.; 57, Dioxyna picciola CBigot). M«9!Ml^!SMpe'«9r'^'>~'^ • TiiiTimnTiiiïïTmiMïïiinri^ .jp n % •70 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600. U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE oOrt*^ 66 ^"^ 66 70 72 FIGURES 5»^5.-Wing:s of Tephritidae: 58. Dracantomyia fooM Aczél; 59. Dy,euare,ta trinotata Bates; 60, D. caraca- FIGURES 66-T3.—' Euarestoides nocarena s p. ,ï #r $ FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 71 66 *^=^>rC ^^ 69 FIGURES 66-73.—Wings of Tephritidae: 66, Euaresta reticulata (Hendel); 67, Euarestoides acutangulus (Thomson); 68, Evxkrestoides sp.; 69, Eutreta héspera (Banks); 70, Gerrhoceraa sp.; 71, Gonioxyna sp.; 72, Goniurellia sp.;-73, Gym- nocarena sp. ^ # • 72 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE 82 84 vl86 ^^ : .i*.. ..•*.■,«*■*.-( 5^ ri 80 /^¿y^ FIGURES 74-81.—Wings of Tephritidae: 74, Haywardina cuculi Hendel; 75, Hexachaeta obscura Hendel; 76, Homoeothrix FIGURES 8^-8^ sp.; 77, Laksyetsa trinotata Foote; 78, Lamproxynella unicolor (Walker); 79, Lezca tau Foot«; 80, "Metasphenisca" Ar«oteraci flexuoêa Bigot; 81, Molynocoelia sp. (Loew). j'wiujstyii'imiiuiimj -iww. FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 73 87 ^^':^„^^'^Ç;:^- FIGURES 82--89.—Wings of Tephritidae: 82. Myoleja sp.; 83, Neaapilota albidipennis (Loew); 84, Neorhabdochaeta sp.; 86, Neotaracia imox (Bates); SS, Neotephritia finalia (Loew); SI.Neotephritia sp.; 88, Oedicarena sp.; 89, Oreiiia palposa (Loew). 74 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600. U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE "-It - - 98 '4 100 102 104 FIGURES 90-97.—Wings of Tephritidae: 90, Ostracocoelia sp.; 91, Oxyna aterrima f Doane); 92, Paracantha cultaris FIGURES 9S-10S.—' Coquillett; 93, Parastenopa sp.; 94, Plaumannimyia sp.; 95, Polionota sp.; 96, Procecidocharea anthracina (Doane); 8piê sp,; 101, P 97, Procecidocharoides ßaviasima Foote. trypeta rohwer FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 75 100 102 103 . :n 105 FIGURES 98-105.—Wings of Tephritidae: 98, Paeudacrotaenia sp.; 99, Pseudeutreta anteapicalis Hendel; 100, Paeudoeda- 8piê sp.; lOl, Pseudophorellia stonei Lima; 102, Rhachiptera sp.; IOS, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh); 104, Rhagoleto- trypeta rohweri Foote; 106, Rhithrum rivtUatum Hendel. ! Í 76 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1600. U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE «I ^^>nHÍT^ 107 114 108 ^11S ^t - ^^' 58 * mi 110 111 112 1» m: IÎ -- «iT'KiWWÎ.î^P???» itawg^r-n^fgjiBty?*^^»»^^;»^^ .y jwiiw.ii,iC1g4aSS^jg;tg,a^,J5^3»i^^ FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 77 114 117 T118:. , .r4»fe^j^v >*h- FíGURES 114-121.—Wings of Tephritidae; 114, Toxotrypana curvicauda (Gerst&cker); 115, Trupanea signata Foote; 118, 4Tnt Trypanaresta sp.; 117, Trypeta sp.; 118, Urtyphora sp.; W^.Xanthaciura insecta (Loew); l2Q,Xenúchaeta aurantiaea (Doane); 121, Zonoaemata vittigera (Coquillett). |"'..>UPfk4U ■wjwwiw.' T.B.H l.-DistHbution offrait fly .enera soutk of the United States Fruit Fly Genus A ein ¡3 Ac i urina Aero taenia A ero taeniacan tha Anastrepha Anomoia Barypiegma Btepharoneura Caen i o rata Cecidocharella Cecidocfiares Celidosphenella Cerati Ceratodaci.^ Chetostoma Chrysaciura Cryptodacus Cryptoplagia Cryptotreta Dacus Dictyotrypeta Dioxyna Oracontomyia Dyseuaresta Ensina Epochrinopsis Euaresta Euarestoides Euarestopsis Eutreta Gerrhoceras Gonioxyna Goniurellia Gymnocarena ^aywardina f^etschkomyia Hexachaeta Hexaresta Homoeothrix ischyropteron Laksyetsa Lamproxyna Lamproxynella Lezca O ^«Porttd In • Specimens seen iittraturt '\n this study ® Specimens seen in this study and reported in literature ® Specimens introduced and reported In hterature Q Reported in literature ppiww jw" ^-msfi • •••fima^Kx- FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES 79 TABLE I.—Distribution of fruit fly genera south of the United States—Continued T5 C ■O o.y c fO -u OJ a U E to < O C > O CÖ (O en CQ % 03 <Ô n ro JZ 4-> Ü o E ^ E -- -S c c o c (U O as "x c c > o> en CD (U 3 r\ Reported in • Specimens seen (#) Speciment seen in this study Hterature in this study and reported in literature iiw-ntart 0»*«Cf- 19«0 O—299-243 I I I9 _Z^I m'^mr'^**-^*m»t<\ »JfOll l;ll»wmjM""i