Comparison of Three Angle of Attack (AOA) Indicators: a Usability Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Comparison of Three Angle of Attack (AOA) Indicators: a Usability Study Dissertations and Theses 11-2013 Comparison of Three Angle of Attack (AOA) Indicators: A Usability Study Camilo Jimenez Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/edt Part of the Aviation Commons, and the Psychology Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Jimenez, Camilo, "Comparison of Three Angle of Attack (AOA) Indicators: A Usability Study" (2013). Dissertations and Theses. 85. https://commons.erau.edu/edt/85 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMPARISON OF THREE ANGLE OF ATTACK (AOA) INDICATORS: A USABILITY STUDY By Camilo Jimenez A Thesis Submitted to the College of Arts and Sciences in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master in Science in Human Factors and Systems i Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Daytona Beach, Florida November 2013 ii ABSTRACT Researcher: Camilo Jimenez Title: COMPARISON OF THREE ANGLE OF ATTACK (AOA) INDICATORS: A USABILITY STUDY Institution: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Degree: Master in Science in Human Factors and Systems Year: 2013 Angle of Attack (AOA) is an important aeronautical concept used to understand the performance status of an aircraft during different flight stages. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has indicated the importance of developing and encouraging the use of affordable AOA based systems to increase inflight safety. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University’s flight department decided to install AOA indicators in its fleet of Cessna 172S, to increase safety and to help student pilots better understand this important concept. This paper presents a review of AOA, visual display design principles, and usability. This experimental study examined three different AOA indicators provided by the flight department. The goal was to conduct a usability study in order to understand which of these indicators was better suited for student training. Instructor pilots were used as participants in a series of flights, in which they were asked to perform different maneuvers in which using AOA indicators was thought to help increasing stall awareness and performance. At the end of each flight participants were asked to complete a series of surveys (including an adaptation of the system usability scale) and to provide comments in order to understand their preferences related to AOA indicators. The analysis of the data shows significant differences between the indicators. Discussion of the results and recommendations for future studies are also covered. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Review Committee Signature Page .............................................................................................................. iii Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................ iv List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................. vii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ viii Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Significance of the Study .......................................................................................................................... 6 Purpose Statement ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Hypotheses ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Limitations and Assumptions ................................................................................................................... 8 Definition of Terms ................................................................................................................................... 8 List of Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Review of the Relevant Literature .............................................................................................................. 10 Angle of attack ........................................................................................................................................ 10 Usability .................................................................................................................................................. 12 Methods ...................................................................................................................................................... 20 Research Approach ................................................................................................................................. 20 Sample .................................................................................................................................................... 20 Apparatus and Materials ......................................................................................................................... 21 Design and Procedures ............................................................................................................................ 22 Sources of the Data ................................................................................................................................. 25 Data Collection Device ........................................................................................................................... 25 Instrument reliability and validity ....................................................................................................... 25 Treatment of the Data ............................................................................................................................. 26 Results ......................................................................................................................................................... 27 Discussion, Conclusion, and Limitations .................................................................................................... 38 Discussion ............................................................................................................................................... 38 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................................. 45 Limitations .............................................................................................................................................. 48 References ................................................................................................................................................... 51 v Appendices A Approximate AOA Indications for Each Flight Maneuver ...................................................... 56 B Informed Consent Form ........................................................................................................... 58 C Pre-Flight Questionnaire .......................................................................................................... 61 D Post-Flight Questionnaire......................................................................................................... 67 vi LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Mean and Standard Deviation for SUS............................................................................ 28 Table 2 Mean and Standard Deviation for Visual Representation ............................................... 28 Table 3 Pairwise Comparisons for Visual Representation ........................................................... 29 Table 4 Mean and Standard Deviation for Enhanced Performance .............................................. 29 Table 5 Pairwise Comparisons for Enhanced Performance .......................................................... 30 Table 6 Mean and Standard Deviation for Enhanced Stall Awareness ........................................ 30 Table 7 Pairwise Comparisons for Enhanced Stall Awareness .................................................... 31 Table 8 Mean and Standard Deviation for Crosschecked Indicator During Maneuvers .............. 31 Table 9 Mean and Standard Deviation for Indicator would Enhance Students’ Performance ..... 32 Table 10 Ranks for Crosschecking the Indicator helped in Flying a More Stable Approach on Final (Normal Approach and Landing)......................................................................................... 32 Table 11 Ranks for Crosschecking the Indicator helped in Flying a More Stable Approach on Final (Short Field Approach and Landing) ................................................................................... 33 Table 12 Ranks for Crosschecking Indicator Enhanced Landing Performance (Normal Approach and Landing) ................................................................................................................................. 33 Table 13 Ranks for Crosschecking Indicator Enhanced Landing Performance (Short Field Approach and Landing)
Recommended publications
  • Enhancing General Aviation Aircraft Safety with Supplemental Angle of Attack Systems
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects January 2015 Enhancing General Aviation Aircraft aS fety With Supplemental Angle Of Attack Systems David E. Kugler Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Recommended Citation Kugler, David E., "Enhancing General Aviation Aircraft aS fety With Supplemental Angle Of Attack Systems" (2015). Theses and Dissertations. 1793. https://commons.und.edu/theses/1793 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENHANCING GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT SAFETY WITH SUPPLEMENTAL ANGLE OF ATTACK SYSTEMS by David E. Kugler Bachelor of Science, United States Air Force Academy, 1983 Master of Arts, University of North Dakota, 1991 Master of Science, University of North Dakota, 2011 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Grand Forks, North Dakota May 2015 Copyright 2015 David E. Kugler ii PERMISSION Title Enhancing General Aviation Aircraft Safety With Supplemental Angle of Attack Systems Department Aviation Degree Doctor of Philosophy In presenting this dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a graduate degree from the University of North Dakota, I agree that the library of this University shall make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for extensive copying for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor who supervised my dissertation work or, in his absence, by the Chairperson of the department or the dean of the School of Graduate Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Sailing for Performance
    SD2706 Sailing for Performance Objective: Learn to calculate the performance of sailing boats Today: Sailplan aerodynamics Recap User input: Rig dimensions ‣ P,E,J,I,LPG,BAD Hull offset file Lines Processing Program, LPP: ‣ Example.bri LPP_for_VPP.m rigdata Hydrostatic calculations Loading condition ‣ GZdata,V,LOA,BMAX,KG,LCB, hulldata ‣ WK,LCG LCF,AWP,BWL,TC,CM,D,CP,LW, T,LCBfpp,LCFfpp Keel geometry ‣ TK,C Solve equilibrium State variables: Environmental variables: solve_Netwon.m iterative ‣ VS,HEEL ‣ TWS,TWA ‣ 2-dim Netwon-Raphson iterative method Hydrodynamics Aerodynamics calc_hydro.m calc_aero.m VS,HEEL dF,dM Canoe body viscous drag Lift ‣ RFC ‣ CL Residuals Viscous drag Residuary drag calc_residuals_Newton.m ‣ RR + dRRH ‣ CD ‣ dF = FAX + FHX (FORCE) Keel fin drag ‣ dM = MH + MR (MOMENT) Induced drag ‣ RF ‣ CDi Centre of effort Centre of effort ‣ CEH ‣ CEA FH,CEH FA,CEA The rig As we see it Sail plan ≈ Mainsail + Jib (or genoa) + Spinnaker The sail plan is defined by: IMSYC-66 P Mainsail hoist [m] P E Boom leech length [m] BAD Boom above deck [m] I I Height of fore triangle [m] J Base of fore triangle [m] LPG Perpendicular of jib [m] CEA CEA Centre of effort [m] R Reef factor [-] J E LPG BAD D Sailplan modelling What is the purpose of the sails on our yacht? To maximize boat speed on a given course in a given wind strength ‣ Max driving force, within our available righting moment Since: We seek: Fx (Thrust vs Resistance) ‣ Driving force, FAx Fy (Side forces, Sails vs. Keel) ‣ Heeling force, FAy (Mx (Heeling-righting moment)) ‣ Heeling arm, CAE Aerodynamics of sails A sail is: ‣ a foil with very small thickness and large camber, ‣ with flexible geometry, ‣ usually operating together with another sail ‣ and operating at a large variety of angles of attack ‣ Environment L D V Each vertical section is a differently cambered thin foil Aerodynamics of sails TWIST due to e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • 41 Cockpit Motor Yacht Setup
    41 Cockpit Motor Yacht Setup 1. Install props. 13. Tighten all fasteners. 2. Remove tape and clean the areas where 14. Install the arch-to-hardtop glass. the bridge will set. Check for voids along the top of the windows. 15. Cosmetically seal around the wing door frames and hardtop-to-arch connectors, 3. Apply sealant (732 white multi-purpose and the back edges of the bridge. sealant) around deck bolts. 16. Install the aft deck seating. 4. Lifting points for the bridge are between the two stand-offs on the forward bridge 17. Use adhesive and two-sided tape to rail and two lifting eyes on the forward install the wing door windows. Try to part of the aft deck hardtop. Position clamp and let set overnight. bridge over boat. Run the appropriate wires to the aft port corner; and run the drain line, water line, and appropriate wires to the aft starboard corner. 5. Set bridge in place, making sure that no wires or hoses get caught or pinched off. Make sure the bridge is pushed all the way forward. 6. With the bridge in place, bolt it down: a. Five bolts under helm. b. One bolt on each side aft. 7. Install exterior seating on bridge. 8. Install mast light and TV antenna on arch. 9. Connect all dash wiring and wet bar hoses in the aft starboard corner. 10. Install the port and starboard wing door frames (leave them loose). Use a small amount of Tef Gel on each fastener. 11. Slide the hardtop into place and secure it, using the hardware provided, to the arch and wing door frames.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerodynamic Characteristics of Naca 0012 Airfoil Section at Different Angles of Attack
    AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF NACA 0012 AIRFOIL SECTION AT DIFFERENT ANGLES OF ATTACK SUPREETH NARASIMHAMURTHY GRADUATE STUDENT 1327291 Table of Contents 1) Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...1 2) Methodology……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 3) Results……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………......5 4) Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..9 5) References…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………10 List of Figures Figure 1: Basic nomenclature of an airfoil………………………………………………………………………………………………...1 Figure 2: Computational domain………………………………………………………………………………………………………………4 Figure 3: Static Pressure Contours for different angles of attack……………………………………………………………..5 Figure 4: Velocity Magnitude Contours for different angles of attack………………………………………………………………………7 Fig 5: Variation of Cl and Cd with alpha……………………………………………………………………………………………………8 Figure 6: Lift Coefficient and Drag Coefficient Ratio for Re = 50000…………………………………………………………8 List of Tables Table 1: Lift and Drag coefficients as calculated from lift and drag forces from formulae given above……7 Introduction It is a fact of common experience that a body in motion through a fluid experience a resultant force which, in most cases is mainly a resistance to the motion. A class of body exists, However for which the component of the resultant force normal to the direction to the motion is many time greater than the component resisting the motion, and the possibility of the flight of an airplane depends on the use of the body of this class for wing structure. Airfoil is such an aerodynamic shape that when it moves through air, the air is split and passes above and below the wing. The wing’s upper surface is shaped so the air rushing over the top speeds up and stretches out. This decreases the air pressure above the wing. The air flowing below the wing moves in a comparatively straighter line, so its speed and air pressure remain the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarès 13.80
    ANTARÈS 13.80 Spacious and powerful, a real seagoing power yacht from Beneteau with a luxurious environment aboard. Go further, go faster in all weather conditions. The Antares 13.80, the flagship of the Beneteau Antares range, invites you aboard for a wonderful voyage - first class all the way. Equiped with twin 480 cv engines and a bow thruster, this yacht is very easy to handle, even when mooring-in the marina and outside. 12 h : depart from Villefranche-sur-Mer heading for Ajaccio. The weather is beautiful and the crew are ready to leave. Comfortable The children are playing in their cabin, Alan is with me, To make you confortable at sea, huge importance has been attached to detail. The Antares 13.80 provides I am at the helm and completely relaxed. Visibility is great, maneuvering in the harbour is so easy… a unique sensation of safety at sea. The feeling of security when moving around the boat, is created by The Antares 13.80 just invites you to travel at sea ! the wide side decks, tall guard rails and deep cockpit. Extensive heat and sound insulation, underwater exhaust outlets, combine effectively to create the peaceful and comfortable environment found aboard and around the Antares 13.80. Manœuvrable LI Luxurious materials have been selected according to the tradition of prestigious yachts : leather, stainless steel, wood, fabrics… highlighted by the highly resistant glossy finish. * flat screen TV on option. Space… GHT AND SPACE With her beam of 4.30m, the Antares 13.80 is a real home afloat. Life aboard, both inside and outside is sheer enjoyment.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerodynamics of High-Performance Wing Sails
    Aerodynamics of High-Performance Wing Sails J. otto Scherer^ Some of tfie primary requirements for tiie design of wing sails are discussed. In particular, ttie requirements for maximizing thrust when sailing to windward and tacking downwind are presented. The results of water channel tests on six sail section shapes are also presented. These test results Include the data for the double-slotted flapped wing sail designed by David Hubbard for A. F. Dl Mauro's lYRU "C" class catamaran Patient Lady II. Introduction The propulsion system is probably the single most neglect­ ed area of yacht design. The conventional triangular "soft" sails, while simple, practical, and traditional, are a long way from being aerodynamically desirable. The aerodynamic driving force of the sails is, of course, just as large and just as important as the hydrodynamic resistance of the hull. Yet, designers will go to great lengths to fair hull lines and tank test hull shapes, while simply drawing a triangle on the plans to define the sails. There is no question in my mind that the application of the wealth of available airfoil technology will yield enormous gains in yacht performance when applied to sail design. Re­ cent years have seen the application of some of this technolo­ gy in the form of wing sails on the lYRU "C" class catamar­ ans. In this paper, I will review some of the aerodynamic re­ quirements of yacht sails which have led to the development of the wing sails. For purposes of discussion, we can divide sail require­ ments into three points of sailing: • Upwind and close reaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Cockpit & Deck
    Moulding, Rub Rail 413 Taco Marine Aluminum Edge Moulding Taco Marine Aluminum T-Hatch Trim Taco Marine Aluminum Solid Half Oval Rub Rail • Polished, clear anodized finish. • Polished, clear • Polished, clear anodized finish. • Drilled and countersunk for #5 anodized finish. • Drilled and countersunk for #5 screws on 6” centers. • Height 3/4”, screws on 6” centers. • Height 3/4”, width 1/4”. width 1-1/8”. • Height 3/4”, width 3/16”. • Length 12’. • Length 12’. • Length 12’. Order No. Mfg. No. / Description Price Order No. Mfg. No. / Description Price Order No. Mfg. No. / Description Price Cockpit & Deck Cockpit 748270 (A50-0275TAL) $64.98 I 748460 (A50-0304TAL) $116.98 I 748129 (A50-0195TAL) $74.98 I Taco Marine Aluminum Overlap Rub Rail Taco Marine Stainless Steel Hollow Back Rub Rail Fun & • Type 304 marine grade stainless steel. Flotation • Polished mirror finish. Anchor • Concave back design fits rigid vinyl rub rail & Dock • Polished, clear anodized finish. • Drilled and countersunk on 6” centers. • Drilled and countersunk for #8 screws on 6” centers. • Length 12’. Safety • Length 12’. Order No. Mfg. No. / Description Price Electronics Order No. Mfg. No. / Description Price 747709 (S11-4511P12) With 3/4” .062” Gauge Screw #8 $77.98 I 748181 (A11-0151TAL) Height 3/4”, Width 3/8” $72.98 I 747723 (S11-4650P12’) Width 1” .077” Gauge Screw #10 $90.98 I Trolling Motors Taco Marine Rub Rail Kits Taco Marine Flexible Black Vinyl Rub Rails Lighting Electrical Topside Acc. 750302 Cockpit • Soft durometer provides 750326 & Deck cushion effect to absorb impact. • Tight radius bending can be made with no heat.
    [Show full text]
  • Wing Load and Angle of Attack Identification by Integrating Optical
    applied sciences Article Wing Load and Angle of Attack Identification by Integrating Optical Fiber Sensing and Neural Network Approach in Wind Tunnel Test Daichi Wada * and Masato Tamayama Aeronautical Technology Directorate, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, 6-13-1 Osawa, Mitaka-shi, Tokyo 181-0015, Japan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +81-50-3362-5566 Received: 18 March 2019; Accepted: 2 April 2019; Published: 8 April 2019 Abstract: The load and angle of attack (AoA) for wing structures are critical parameters to be monitored for efficient operation of an aircraft. This study presents wing load and AoA identification techniques by integrating an optical fiber sensing technique and a neural network approach. We developed a 3.6-m semi-spanned wing model with eight flaps and bonded two optical fibers with 30 fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs) each along the main and aft spars. Using this model in a wind tunnel test, we demonstrate load and AoA identification through a neural network approach. We input the FBG data and the eight flap angles to a neural network and output estimated load distributions on the eight wing segments. Thereafter, we identify the AoA by using the estimated load distributions and the flap angles through another neural network. This multi-neural-network process requires only the FBG and flap angle data to be measured. We successfully identified the load distributions with an error range of −1.5–1.4 N and a standard deviation of 0.57 N. The AoA was also successfully identified with error ranges of −1.03–0.46◦ and a standard deviation of 0.38◦.
    [Show full text]
  • Moorings 5000 Specifications and Equipment List - Moorings Upgrades in Bold
    Moorings 5000 Specifications and Equipment List - Moorings Upgrades In Bold DECK & HULL Forward lounging cockpit with hardtop with watertight saloon access door and sliding hatch for easy foredeck access Fold down forward cockpit table Hardtop over fwd and aft cockpit complete with LED down lighting and concealed rope lighting in fwd and aft cockpit Hardtop bimini over helm with supports and LED lighting Helmsan enclosure - includes shade cloth sides and back Upholstered helmseat with cushion and upholstered backrest Compass at helm position Rope bag at helm with integral winch handle pocket Hardtop supports Cockpit table Stainless steel cockpit table stools 3 x Drinks holders - 2 in fwd cockpit and 1 at helm Aft cockpit side back shade curtains Sliding companionway door/window Guardwires with stanchions, bases, port & starboard side gates Guardwires across bow and stern 1600w verticle windlass with 10mm gypsey with handheld remote Anchor bow roller fitting Anchor chain stopper 1 x Anchor/windlass locker with chain bin 3 x Foredeck/forward cockpit lockers Liferaft locker with convertible fore/aft seat bolster in aft cockpit Acrylic smoke grey tinted windows 5 x Size 10 flush hatch over heads 5 x Size 44 flush hatch over cabins 1 x Size 60 flush hatch over port forepeak (includes mushroom cowl) 2 x Size 5 portlights in windscreen 8 x Size 1 portlights in hull side 2 x Custom portlights in transom 2 x Pulpits with seats 2 x Pushpits 2 x Coachroof handrails 2 x Hardtop grab handrails 2 x Transom grab rails 9 x 260mm mooring cleats Trampoline
    [Show full text]
  • Upwind Sail Aerodynamics : a RANS Numerical Investigation Validated with Wind Tunnel Pressure Measurements I.M Viola, Patrick Bot, M
    Upwind sail aerodynamics : A RANS numerical investigation validated with wind tunnel pressure measurements I.M Viola, Patrick Bot, M. Riotte To cite this version: I.M Viola, Patrick Bot, M. Riotte. Upwind sail aerodynamics : A RANS numerical investigation validated with wind tunnel pressure measurements. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, Elsevier, 2012, 39, pp.90-101. 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2012.10.004. hal-01071323 HAL Id: hal-01071323 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01071323 Submitted on 8 Oct 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. I.M. Viola, P. Bot, M. Riotte Upwind Sail Aerodynamics: a RANS numerical investigation validated with wind tunnel pressure measurements International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 39 (2013) 90–101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2012.10.004 Keywords: sail aerodynamics, CFD, RANS, yacht, laminar separation bubble, viscous drag. Abstract The aerodynamics of a sailing yacht with different sail trims are presented, derived from simulations performed using Computational Fluid Dynamics. A Reynolds-averaged Navier- Stokes approach was used to model sixteen sail trims first tested in a wind tunnel, where the pressure distributions on the sails were measured.
    [Show full text]
  • Lift Forces in External Flows
    • DECEMBER 2019 Lift Forces in External Flows Real External Flows – Lesson 3 Lift • We covered the drag component of the fluid force acting on an object, and now we will discuss its counterpart, lift. • Lift is produced by generating a difference in the pressure distribution on the “top” and “bottom” surfaces of the object. • The lift acts in the direction normal to the free-stream fluid motion. • The lift on an object is influenced primarily by its shape, including orientation of this shape with respect to the freestream flow direction. • Secondary influences include Reynolds number, Mach number, the Froude number (if free surface present, e.g., hydrofoil) and the surface roughness. • The pressure imbalance (between the top and bottom surfaces of the object) and lift can increase by changing the angle of attack (AoA) of the object such as an airfoil or by having a non-symmetric shape. Example of Unsteady Lift Around a Baseball • Rotation of the baseball produces a nonuniform pressure distribution across the ball ‐ clockwise rotation causes a floater. Flow ‐ counterclockwise rotation produces a sinker. • In soccer, you can introduce spin to induce the banana kick. Baseball Pitcher Throwing the Ball Soccer Player Kicking the Ball Importance of Lift • Like drag, the lift force can be either a benefit Slats or a hindrance depending on objectives of a Flaps fluid dynamics application. ‐ Lift on a wing of an airplane is essential for the airplane to fly. • Flaps and slats are added to a wing design to maintain lift when airplane reduces speed on its landing approach. ‐ Lift on a fast-driven car is undesirable as it Spoiler reduces wheel traction with the pavement and makes handling of the car more difficult and less safe.
    [Show full text]
  • Sorted by "Item" [Fancy Free] Inventory Listing - Sail
    Sorted by "Item" [Fancy Free] Inventory Listing - Sail Item Location Anchor, Primary, Delta 45, 160' chain 100' Rode Anchor Locker, Bow Anchor, Secondary, Danforth 40 Starboard Side of Anchor Locker Anchor, Secondary, Danforth 40 rode Port, Aft Lazarette Anchor, snubber line or bridle Anchor Locker, Bow Batteries, spare flashlight (2) Nav Table BBQ Cover Black BBQ, store in x locker when BBQ in use BBQ, Magma Catalina Grill Stern Rail, Port Bilge Pump, Manual, Handle Aft, Port Propane Locker Binoculars, West marine blue Salon, Port, Forward Shelf Boat Hook Port, Aft Lazarette Chart No.1, Symbols, Abbreviations, and Terms Salon, Port Shelf Chart, Maptech Chartbook, San Juan Islands Salon, Poer Shelf Chart, Roll #18421 San Juan Islands Salon, Port Shelf, In Tube Chart, Roll, # 3441, 3442 & 3443 Gulf Islands Salon, Port Shelf, In Tube Cockpit Cushions (2) Stateroom, Aft Starboard when not in use Compass, Handheld Nav Table Coolant, Engine Salon, Forward Settee Storage Crab Cooking Pot V-berth, Starboard Closet Crab Pot with Line & Float Starboard, Aft Lazarette Cruising Guide, Gulf Islands, Dreamspeaker Salon, Port Shelf Cruising Guide, San Juan Islands, Boater's Guidebook Salon, Port Shelf Cruising Guide, Wagonners Salon, Port Shelf Current Atlas & Tables Salon, Port Shelf Cushions, cockpit Stateroom, aft, starboard Cushions, Shorter Posts, dinette table berth conversion Cushion- V-berth, Starboard shelf Deck Fill Cap Wrench (Tool) Nav Table Dinghy, 12' Azzurro Mare inflatable boat; AM365 Dockside, At the Head, Cleated to Dock Dinghy, Foot
    [Show full text]