DOCSLIB.ORG

Sciences Recent Acquisitions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sciences Recent Acquisitions BLACKWELL’S RARE BOOKS SCIENCES RECENT ACQUISITIONS 1 Blackwell’s Rare Books 48-51 Broad Street, Oxford, OX1 3BQ Direct Telephone: +44 (0) 1865 333555 Switchboard: +44 (0) 1865 792792 Email: [email protected] Fax: +44 (0) 1865 794143 www.blackwell.co.uk/rarebooks Our premises are in the main Blackwell bookstore at 48-51 Broad Street, one of the largest and best known in the world, housing over 200,000 new book titles, covering every subject, discipline and interest, as well as a large secondhand books department. There is lift access to each floor. The bookstore is in the centre of the city, opposite the Bodleian Library and Sheldonian Theatre, and close to several of the colleges and other university buildings, with on street parking close by. Oxford is at the centre of an excellent road and rail network, close to the London - Birmingham (M40) motorway and is served by a frequent train service from London (Paddington). Hours: Monday–Saturday 9am to 6pm. (Tuesday 9:30am to 6pm.) Purchases: We are always keen to purchase books, whether single works or in quantity, and will be pleased to make arrangements to view them. Auction commissions: We attend a number of auction sales and will be happy to execute commissions on your behalf. Blackwell’s online bookshop www.blackwell.co.uk Our extensive online catalogue of new books caters for every speciality, with the latest releases and editor’s recommendations. We have something for everyone. Select from our subject areas, reviews, highlights, promotions and more. Orders and correspondence should in every case be sent to our Broad Street address (all books subject to prior sale). Please mention Sciences Catalogue when ordering. Winter 2014 Front cover illustration: Item 45 Rear cover illustration: Item 7 1. Anstice (Robert) Remarks on the Comparative Advantages of Wheel Carriages, of different Structure and Draught. Illustrated with Plates. Bridgewater: Printed for the Author, by S. Symes, 1790, FIRST EDITION, 8 folding engraved plates, and a small Masonic woodcut at the end, lacking half-title, some foxing, outer leaves a bit browned, pp. [3-] 69, 8vo, original(?) boards, worn at extremities, spine a bit defective at top and tail, good (ESTC N26268, 5 copies on either side of the Atlantic, but not in BL or Bodleian) £850 Robert Anstice (1757-1845) was a ship-owner and merchant, civil engineer and Somerset’s first County Surveyor. He was a keen amateur geologist and ornithologist, and wrote two books on mathematics. His professional work in the county covered roads and bridges, sea-wall work at Huntspill and Blue Anchor, and much drainage works, including Kings Sedgemoor Drain at Dunball. The present work, dedicated to the local Masonic Lodge, is ‘the fruit of leisure hours.’ The book is fairly poorly printed and on one page there is only a partial impression, but the text can be made out. These would seem to be the original boards, in which case the lack of the half-title is odd. 2. ‘Aristotle.’ Aristotle’s Works: Containing the Master- piece, Directions for Midwives, and Counsel and Advice to Child-bearing Women. With various useful remedies. Printed for the Booksellers [by John Smith, Tooley Street], c. 1850, with a colour printed frontispiece and additional title, 6 hand-coloured plates, and illustrations in the text, pp. 352, 16mo, original purple cloth, spine pictorially gilt, spine a little faded, good £250 A late flowering of this hardy perennial. The only copy in COPAC (York Minster) has a note after the imprint [?Halifax, Milner]. There are a few other UK locations in WorldCat, as well as a relatively small number in the US. 3. Arrhenius (Svante August) Recherches sur la conductibilité Galvanique des électrolytes. [Parts] I, II. Stockholm: P.A. Norstedt & Söner, 1884, 2 parts in 1 vol., with 1 lithographed plate, pp. [i, general title/wrapper], [1-3] 4-63; [1-3] 4-89 (the last leaf, verso blank, forming the rear self-wrapper), original printed wrappers, uncut and unopened, slight cracking to spine and a hint of browning round the edges, otherwise fine £1,200 The rare offprint issue of Arrhenius’s landmark discovery of the theory of electrolytic disassociation. Arrhenius was awarded the 1903 Nobel Prize in chemistry ‘in recognition of the extraordinary services he has rendered to the advancement of chemistry by his electrolytic theory of dissociation.’ By 1880, ‘it was known that solutions of certain compounds conduct electricity and that chemical reactions could occur when a current was passed. It was thought that the current decomposed the substance. In 1883 Arrhenius proposed a theory that substances were partly converted into an active form when dissolved. The active part was responsible for conductivity. In the case of acids and bases, he correlated the strength with the degree of decomposition on solution. This work was published as Recherches sur la 1 BLACKWELL’S RARE BOOKS conductibilite galvanique des electrolytes and submitted as his doctoral dissertation. Arrhenius sent his work to several leading physical chemists, including Jacobus van’t Hoff, Friedrich Ostwald, and Rudolf Clausius, who were immediately impressed’ (Biographical Encyclopedia of Scientists). The dissertation only gained Arrhenius a fourth class degree: Professor Sven Otto Petterson remarked ‘There are chapters in Arrhenius’ thesis which alone are worth more or less all the faculty can offer in the way of marks’ (quoted in DSB). 4. (Astronomy.) SPHAERAE ATQUE ASTRORUM COELESTIUM RATIO, NATURA, & MOTUS ad totius mundi fabricationis cognitione[m] fundamenta. [Basle]: Johann Walder, 1536, title-page with woodcut Valderus device within fine historiated woodcut title-border after Hans Holbein, numerous geometrical and astronomical woodcut diagrams in text (two full-page), text in Greek and Latin, a little browned in places, pp. [16], 104, [4], 105-294 (lacking the final blank leaf), the two unsigned leaves of tables here bound after p.104, before the opening of Aratus, small 4to, eighteenth-century blind-ruled sheep, spine richly gilt with red lettering piece, rebacked, endpapers replaced, manuscript ink inscription (cropped at foot) in an early hand to bottom margin of title-page (‘Satiabor cum apparuerit gloria tua’ [Psalm 16:15]), with ink corroded through paper (not affecting printed text), ownership inscription on title of Juan de Herrera, good (Adams S-1577; Hoffmann III, p.503; Houzeau & Lancaster I, 2440; VD16 S-8303; Hieronymus/Griechischer Geist Nr. 287; Hamel 3098) £2,500 First edition of this compilation of important astronomical texts, including the first printed edition (in any language) of Ptolemy’s Planisphaerium, accompanied by the related mediaeval work on the same subject by Jordanus. Written in the 2nd century AD, Ptolemy’s Planisphaerium deals with the problem of constructing a diagram in a plane representing the celestial sphere, in such a way that circles on the sphere are represented by circles in the plane. Ptolemy’s construction amounts, in fact, to producing a stereographic projection, that is, a projection through one of the sphere’s poles upon a plane parallel to the equator (though it is open to dispute whether Ptolemy was aware of this fact). Stereographic projection provided the mathematical basis of the plane astrolabe, an instrument which was widely used in the medieval Islamic world. The original Greek text of Planisphaerium is lost, but it survives in an Arabic translation by the 11th century astronomer and mathematician Maslamah Ibn Ahmad al-Majriti of Cordoba. The present Latin translation is by the philosopher and astronomer Herman Dalmatin, or Herman of Carinthia, one of the most important translators and popularisers of Arabic astronomical works in 12th century Europe. Ptolemy’s text is followed by a related medieval work by Jordanus de Nemore, a 13th century mathematician who probably taught at the University of Toulouse. His treatise on stereographic projection generally known as Demonstratio de plana sphaera (here simply called ‘Planisphaerium Iordani’) contains five propositions dealing with various aspects of stereographic projection. The first and historically the most important 2 SCiences proposition established in full generality that circles on the surface of a sphere when projected stereographically on a plane remain circles (Ptolemy had proved this only in certain special cases). The volume also includes the pseudo-Proclan work De sphaera in the original Greek with the acclaimed Latin translation by the English Tudor humanist Thomas Linacre. A textbook on spherical astronomy formerly ascribed to Proclus, De sphaera is now known to be an excerpt from the Elementa astronomiae of Geminus, a 1st century BC Greek author. De sphaera comprises the four chapters of Geminus’s work dealing with the general description of the celestial sphere, terrestrial zones and the constellations. It was first published by Aldus Manutius at Venice in 1499 as part of the celebrated compilation Scriptores astronomici veteres [see item 16]. The present edition includes the scholia of the itinerant geographer and cartographer Jacob Ziegler (ca. 1470-1549), which consist of fifty-six notes mostly concerned with spherical geometry. Several astronomical works by Ziegler himself are also included: De solidae sphaerae constructione, De canonica per sphaeram operatione, as well as his short study Hemicyclium Berosi of the semi-circular sundial devised by the 3rd century BC Babylonian historian, astronomer and priest Berossus the Chaldean. The collection also includes the influential hexameter poemPhaenomena by Aratus (ca. 310 BC-240 BC), in the original Greek with the scholia by Theon of Alexandria. It appears to be based on two prose works by Eudoxus of Cnidus, written about a century earlier. Its purpose is to give an introduction to the constellations, with the rules for their risings and settings; and of the circles of the sphere. The Phaenomena was first published in Scriptores astronomici veteres, and proved extremely popular. Aratus’s work is here preceded by a short treatise, inspired by Aratus, on the construction and use of celestial globes by the Byzantine monk Leontius Mechanicus.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hunting the White Elephant. When and How Did Galileo
    MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE Max Planck Institute for the History of Science PREPRINT 97 (1998) Jürgen Renn, Peter Damerow, Simone Rieger, and Michele Camerota Hunting the White Elephant When and how did Galileo discover the law of fall? ISSN 0948-9444 1 HUNTING THE WHITE ELEPHANT WHEN AND HOW DID GALILEO DISCOVER THE LAW OF FALL? Jürgen Renn, Peter Damerow, Simone Rieger, and Michele Camerota Mark Twain tells the story of a white elephant, a present of the king of Siam to Queen Victoria of England, who got somehow lost in New York on its way to England. An impressive army of highly qualified detectives swarmed out over the whole country to search for the lost treasure. And after short time an abundance of optimistic reports with precise observations were returned from the detectives giving evidence that the elephant must have been shortly before at that very place each detective had chosen for his investigations. Although no elephant could ever have been strolling around at the same time at such different places of a vast area and in spite of the fact that the elephant, wounded by a bullet, was lying dead the whole time in the cellar of the police headquarters, the detectives were highly praised by the public for their professional and effective execution of the task. (The Stolen White Elephant, Boston 1882) THE ARGUMENT In spite of having been the subject of more than a century of historical research, the question of when and how Galileo made his major discoveries is still answered insufficiently only. It is mostly assumed that he must have found the law of fall around the year 1604 and that only sev- 1 This paper makes use of the work of research projects of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin, some pursued jointly with the Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale in Florence, the Istituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza, and the Istituto Nazionale die Fisica Nucleare in Florence.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernardino Baldi's in Mechanica Aristotelis Problemata Exercitationes
    Bernardino Baldi’s In mechanica Aristotelis problemata exercitationes ii Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge Series Editors Jürgen Renn, Robert Schlögl, Bernard F. Schutz. Edition Open Access Development Team Lindy Divarci, Beatrice Gabriel, Jörg Kantel, Matthias Schemmel, and Kai Surendorf, headed by Peter Damerow. Scientific Board Markus Antonietti, Ian Baldwin, Antonio Becchi, Fabio Bevilacqua, William G. Boltz, Jens Braarvik, Horst Bredekamp, Jed Z. Buchwald, Olivier Darrigol, Thomas Duve, Mike Edmunds, Yehuda Elkana, Fynn Ole Engler, Robert K. Englund, Mordechai Feingold, Rivka Feldhay, Gideon Freudenthal, Paolo Galluzzi, Kostas Gavroglu, Mark Geller, Domenico Giulini, Günther Görz, Gerd Graßhoff, James Hough, Manfred Laubich- ler, Glenn Most, Pier Daniele Napolitani, Alessandro Nova, Hermann Parzinger, Dan Potts, Circe Silva da Silva, Ana Simões, Richard Stephen- son, Mark Stitt, Noel M. Swerdlow, Liba Taub, Martin Vingron, Scott Walter, Norton Wise, Gerhard Wolf, Rüdiger Wolfrum, Zhang Baichun. Sources 3 Edition Open Access 2011 Bernardino Baldi’s In mechanica Aristotelis problemata exercitationes Elio Nenci Communicated by Jürgen Renn and Antonio Becchi Edition Open Access 2011 Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge Sources 3 Communicated by Jürgen Renn and Antonio Becchi Translated from Italian into English by Adriano Carugo Copyedited by Lindy Divarci ISBN 978-3-86931-961-2 First published 2011 Printed in Germany by epubli, Oranienstraße 183, 10999 Berlin http://www.epubli.de Edition Open Access http://www.edition-open-access.de Published under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 3.0 Germany Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/de/ The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Na- tionalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de.
    [Show full text]
  • Galileo, Ignoramus: Mathematics Versus Philosophy in the Scientific Revolution
    Galileo, Ignoramus: Mathematics versus Philosophy in the Scientific Revolution Viktor Blåsjö Abstract I offer a revisionist interpretation of Galileo’s role in the history of science. My overarching thesis is that Galileo lacked technical ability in mathematics, and that this can be seen as directly explaining numerous aspects of his life’s work. I suggest that it is precisely because he was bad at mathematics that Galileo was keen on experiment and empiricism, and eagerly adopted the telescope. His reliance on these hands-on modes of research was not a pioneering contribution to scientific method, but a last resort of a mind ill equipped to make a contribution on mathematical grounds. Likewise, it is precisely because he was bad at mathematics that Galileo expounded at length about basic principles of scientific method. “Those who can’t do, teach.” The vision of science articulated by Galileo was less original than is commonly assumed. It had long been taken for granted by mathematicians, who, however, did not stop to pontificate about such things in philosophical prose because they were too busy doing advanced scientific work. Contents 4 Astronomy 38 4.1 Adoption of Copernicanism . 38 1 Introduction 2 4.2 Pre-telescopic heliocentrism . 40 4.3 Tycho Brahe’s system . 42 2 Mathematics 2 4.4 Against Tycho . 45 2.1 Cycloid . .2 4.5 The telescope . 46 2.2 Mathematicians versus philosophers . .4 4.6 Optics . 48 2.3 Professor . .7 4.7 Mountains on the moon . 49 2.4 Sector . .8 4.8 Double-star parallax . 50 2.5 Book of nature .
    [Show full text]
  • Treatise on Land Surveying Methods Using the Surveyor's Cross
    2019 IMEKO TC-4 International Conference on Metrology for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Florence, Italy, December 4-6, 2019 The sixteenth-century find “Treatise On Land Surveying Methods Using the Surveyor’s Cross”, by Francesco Paciotti, military and civil architect to the Duchy of Urbino: the technical evolution of a surveying tool. Raffaella Marotti1 1 School of Conservation and Restoration of Cultural Heritage, Department of Pure and Applied Sciences (DiSPeA), Università degli Studi di Urbino "Carlo Bo", piazza della Repubblica, 13, 61029, Urbino, Italy, [email protected] Abstract - This paper focuses on the autograph Treatise Council Archive) at the Biblioteca Umanistica “On Land Surveying Methods Using the Surveyor’s dell’Università degli Studi di Urbino “Carlo Bo”, Cross” found at the Biblioteca Umanistica represents a primary source of information and data on the dell’Università degli Studi di Urbino “Carlo Bo” design and construction of this topographic tool, which (“Carlo Bo” Urbino University Humanistic Library). aimed to provide specific and precise measurements when The treatise was for many years erroneously included surveying land for the construction of fortifications. among the writings of the Urbino mathematician Furthermore, the treatise is of central importance as it Muzio Oddi (1569-1639), author of Dello Squadro (On bears witness to the wide and peculiar technical-scientific Land Surveying Methods Using the Surveyor’s Cross) of debate that characterised the Duchy of Urbino from the 1625, but through careful bibliographic research has second half of the 15th century to the first half of the 17th now been attributed to the civil and military architect century, making it culturally unique in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Galileo, the Telescope, and the Science of Optics in the Sixteenth Century
    Galileo, the Telescope, and the Science of Optics in the Sixteenth Century A Case Study of Instrumental Practice in Art and Science Sven Dupré Proefschrift voorgelegd ter behaling van de graad van doctor in de wijsbegeerte Promotor : Prof. dr. Marc De Mey | Co-Promotor : Prof. dr. Fernand Hallyn Universiteit Gent - 2002 Contents List of illustrations page IV Acknowledgements XI Chapter I. Galileo’s Telescope in the History of Science 1 Chapter II. The Appropriation of Optics in the Sixteenth Century: Sixteenth Century Mathematical Practitioners and Medieval Optics 17 Chapter III. Optics and Instrument Design in the Sixteenth Century: Breaking Rays and Shadows Running Backwards 84 Chapter IV. The Point of Inversion in Sixteenth Century Optics: The ‘Theory of the Concave Spherical Mirror’ of Ettore Ausonio 127 Chapter V. Galileo, Mathematical Practitioner: His Early Sources on Optics 175 Chapter VI. ‘As Distant Cities in Flemish Paintings’: The Point of Inversion and the Invention of the Telescope 234 Chapter VII. ‘As Little Moons’: Galileo’s Exploration of Light 285 Chapter VIII. Postscript: Big History, Small History 319 Appendix I. Ausonio, Fragments 323 Appendix II. Transcription and Translation: Ausonio’s ‘Theorica Speculi Concavi Sphaerici’ 326 Abstract 327 Bibliography 333 III List of Illustrations List of Illustrations Cover Illustration Hans Bol, Flood Lanscape with a View of a City, 1562, ADV (Graz). Chapter I. Galileo’s Telescope in the History of Science. 1. Galileo, Telescope I, Museo di Storia della Scienza (Florence). 2. Replica of Telescope I by the Author. 3. Galileo, Telescope II, Museo di Storia della Scienza (Florence). 4. Galileo, Single Broken Lens, Museo di Storia della Scienza (Florence).
    [Show full text]
  • Running Head: BIOGRAPHY of GALILEO GALILEI 1 Physics 1010 Project Biography of Galileo Galilei Phong Ngo Salt Lake Community
    Running head: BIOGRAPHY OF GALILEO GALILEI 1 Physics 1010 Project Biography of Galileo Galilei Phong Ngo Salt Lake Community College BIOGRAPHY OF GALILEO GALILEI 2 Galileo Galilei is a well-known Italian scientist whose fields of profession include astronomy, mathematics, and physics. He had major contributions to the Scientific Revolution and has been honored with titles, one of which being “the Father of Modern Science” (Finocchiaro). Galileo was born to a noble family as the eldest child of Vincenzo Galilei’s six children in Pisa, February 15, 1564; though classified as noble, his family was not wealthy, which put them in financial difficulties during Galileo’s young adulthood. Three of Galileo’s five siblings, two sisters and the youngest brother, survived infancy. When Galileo was eight years old, his family left Pisa for Florence, his father’s homeland. He however stayed in Pisa with Muzio Tedaldi, a relative of his mother’s. Two years later, moved to Florence to rejoin his family. At the time Galileo reached the proper age, his parents sent him to study at the Camaldolese Monastery southeast of Florence. Galileo soon found comfort in the strict and solitary life at the monestary and desired to join the Order. His father, however, was not pleased of this and had him returned home since he had other plans for him. (O’Connor & Robertson) In 1581, Vincenzo sent Gelileo back to Pisa to live with Muzio Tedaldi and study medicine at the University of Pisa, for he hoped that Galileo would become a medical doctor. However, that was not what Galileo wanted, for his interest lay elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidobaldo Del Monte (1545–1607)
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Ghent University Academic Bibliography Guidobaldo del Monte (1545–1607) Theory and Practice of the Mathematical Disciplines from Urbino to Europe Edited by Antonio Becchi, Domenico Bertoloni Meli, Enrico Gamba Edition Open Access 2013 Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge Proceedings 4 Revised Proceedings of the International Conference held in Urbino- Mombaroccio 15–16 June 2007 Communicated by: Pier Daniele Napolitani Edited by: Antonio Becchi, Domenico Bertoloni Meli, Enrico Gamba Editorial Coordination: Lindy Divarci and Pierluigi Graziani Sponsoring Institutions: Regione Marche, Provincia di Pesaro e Urbino, Comune di Mombaroccio Scholarly Support: Centro internazionale di studi Urbino e la prospettiva (Urbino), Max Planck Institute for the History of Science (Berlin), Museo Galileo (Firenze), Dipartimento di Matematica, Facoltà di Ingegneria, Università di Brescia, Accademia Raffaello (Urbino), Società pesarese di studi storici (Pesaro) Sponsors: Università degli Studi “Carlo Bo” (Urbino), Soprintendenza per i Beni Storici, Artistici ed Etnoantropologici delle Marche, Comune di Urbino, Comune di Pesaro Financial Support: Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca, Centro internazionale di studi Urbino e la prospettiva (Urbino), Max Planck Institute for the History of Science (Berlin), Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Pesaro, Regione Marche, Provincia di Pesaro e Urbino, Comune di Mombaroccio Cover image: Federico
    [Show full text]
  • Defending Renaissance Italy: the Innovative Culture of Italian Military Engineers
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Theses Department of History Spring 5-11-2013 Defending Renaissance Italy: The Innovative Culture of Italian Military Engineers Brett M. Carter Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses Recommended Citation Carter, Brett M., "Defending Renaissance Italy: The Innovative Culture of Italian Military Engineers." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2013. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses/65 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEFENDING RENAISSANCE ITALY: THE INNOVATIVE CULTURE OF ITALIAN MILITARY ENGINEERS by BRETT M. CARTER Under the Direction of Nick Wilding ABSTRACT The cultural and social effect of the Renaissance Italian military engineer is profiled within this thesis. It encompasses their vocational careers concerning the fluctuations in individuality, print censorship, and uneasiness attached to patronage and marketability. Their work and reputation directly coincided with the demand for trace italienne from numerous Italian city-states and enti- ties throughout the cinquecento. As knowledge spread throughout the Italian peninsula, the indi- vidualistic demand for military engineers diminished, integrating their discipline with other pro- fessions. As the demand for patronage intensified, fears of fraudulence and plagiarism existed among printers and fellow engineers. This apprehension directly contributed to a lack of printed fortification treatises throughout the cinquecento and was escalated by foreign interventions (Sack of Rome, 1527). This thesis aims to tackle these issues met by Italian military engineers.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Report 2013-14
    MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE RESEARCH REPORT 2013—2014 Boltzmannstraße 22, 14195 Berlin, Phone (+4930) 22667– 0, www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE RESEARCH REPORT 2013—2014 REPORT RESEARCH Max Planck Institute for the History of Science INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE MAX-PLANCK- Cover: The photo of the Institute’s entrance hall was taken by Montserrat de Pablo with the Experimental Historical Camera Obscura (CO) of the MPIWG. This Camera served and serves investigations into the performance of optical CO’s of the 17th and 18th centuries when this instrument played an important role in the development of optics. These CO’s were also of significance for painting in the early modern period and later on no less for photography up to the present day. Montserrat de Pablo, who teaches photography at the Universidad de Castillia-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain, stayed at the MPIWG as a visiting scholar and artist-in-residence in Department I in 2014 and 2015. photographs p. 255: Yehuda Elkana © Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin, Johannes Fehr © Collegium Helveticum Most of the portrait photographs were taken by Skúli Sigurdsson RESEARCH REPORT 2013—2014 MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Department II 2 MPIWG RESEARCH REPORT 2013–2014 Introduction In 2014 the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science (MPIWG), Berlin, turned twenty. Since 2013, the MPIWG has witnessed a changing of the guard in key posi- tions: a new Department directed by Dagmar Schäfer has begun its work; Ohad Parnes has succeeded Jochen Schneider as Research Coordinator; and Esther Chen will soon take over as Head Librarian from Urs Schoepflin.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidobaldo Del Monte and Renaissance Mechanics
    Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge Proceedings 4 Walter Roy Laird: Guidobaldo del Monte and Renaissance Mechanics In: Antonio Becchi, Domenico Bertoloni Meli and Enrico Gamba (eds.): Guidobaldo del Monte (1545–1607) : Theory and Practice of the Mathematical Disciplines from Urbino to Europe Online version at http://edition-open-access.de/proceedings/4/ ISBN 9783844242836 First published 2013 by Edition Open Access, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 3.0 Germany Licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/de/ Printed and distributed by: Neopubli GmbH, Berlin http://www.epubli.de/shop/buch/27498 The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de Chapter 2 Guidobaldo del Monte and Renaissance Mechanics Walter Roy Laird To historians of mechanics, Guidobaldo del Monte presents something of a para- dox. On the one hand, he attempted to found mechanics on the strictest princi- ples of abstract, Archimedean statics. On the other, he insisted that mechanics was not a purely abstract, mathematical science, but rather was essentially con- cerned with actual machines. He vigorously criticized Tartaglia (among others) for vainly attempting to separate a mathematical from a physical mechanics, “as if mechanics could be considered apart from either geometrical demonstrations or actual motion.”1 His practical interest in the workings of actual machines has been remarked on by a number of historians, including Alex Keller, Enrico Gamba, Gi- anni Micheli, and Mary Henninger-Voss; they and others, notably Paul Lawrence Rose, Stillman Drake, and Domenico Bertoloni Meli, have also called attention to Guidobaldo’s important role in the sixteenth-century Archimedean revival.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidobaldo Dal Monte and the Archimedean Revival
    ;!i (: ;ii.ir,+;r:.1 t.i:::lr:i,L-::i .. :l tl . r:, i:.trr-..i l:.,.:!'r_..:::t 'l - -.t : . : ; -r '.:j - 'ia:r::'::: l .+,:::A*.:.:. :i ,.:i.ri1::-:.:l :.:,+?i;:ri;::l i'r{i::'-l,l:-, i. .'r ,::r':?i ll{;, .n1:. -i -: r. :::Ii!+:t lirl r:;,.,:',: :j1i.l::,:,, : _l - il.:tl|.;:'t,.,1 l ilr.=i+'iiirl ' _ : .., i!;i ,l 1t -lir::,it: :.iiiia: j ;ilr ::,.-,:1 t.i.. ' rl ,: , , Estr,aito! daz -i:1_'.i .r' .:"1 ,.' : . , ;i:,ijl:,rti - i: '] "--..- 1: 1,11 , . i : j . -.. :'r .'l Musuo u Srom,r obLr-l ScrnNze .:li:l.r :al iiii.:::::::.r=r::rll . "''I'rrrrrro.i FrnBNze :. :+: I : I l.-.. r,' .f ,ri.,;r:':jl:-: ',NUNCIUS a.__:1" ' '-f' -r.1: ixafl DI SroRIA ofir!4,sfm,,NzA. ' 'l- ..1 - ,, "1,.-;. .- I l 'li-: .: l' lAnno' J . ., .41. - :- r.:: . VII, 1992, f4sc.ll.'-1',.:llr.":r,' . -*.i-"11..::;. .r :r:, r" i :' i::irE j-; .,4, . "- '. :::lt-.- l ' j:.l;;,.::-'] -o r: I ':'.; I - 1::-..1. I l -: .,-.: r r i+;, ^] ,i'.,r.-. ] . -'.'., I l :--, .,', I : :. ,,,--.::,. ] ','; l:'i ll :--.::..:- i .l::t:r I :l r._, 1 l I; r.::-...; : I ::-.-...1 , :l l;it:;::.11;.: i :'::i tr,l ,;1:'l;;;;;';q'l ''1.:., ll::],:,]tl,t :::.1 :,.:+i:rr+;+:l] ,,.:i:: .rjs .:i. , : l i: ':] ..]\: : i -,,' :-r.:t::1,I +j n- t-ij::: ::r r::it,i i.":.,i....., ..: -:j . ,] .] GUIDOBALDO DAL MONTE AND THE ARCHIMEDEAN REVIVAL DOMENICO BERTOLONI MELI Jesus Co1lege, Cambridge RIASSUNTO Questo saggio esamina il ruolo di Guidobaldo dal Monte all'inter- .ro d.l rinasci]iento di studi matematici in ltalia nella seconda metA ,500.
    [Show full text]
  • Federico Barocci and the Science of Drawing in Early Modern Italy
    Chapter 1 Urbino’s Mathematical Humanism and the Reduction Compass Barocci’s development of new artistic methods did not arise merely from a particularly sensitive response to the climate of the Counter-Reformation; rather, Barocci had certain distinct cultural and technological advantages over his peers. A degree of provincial isolation afforded by Urbino preserved techniques from the High Renaissance, particularly the use of life and extensive preparatory drawings, which fell into relative disuse in the cosmopolitan capital of Rome, and later Florence. Nonetheless, the riches of the local mathematical and scientific culture of Urbino are important to note, especially the influence of a number of prominent scholars with documented contact with Barocci and his family. Of course, “science” as an organized practice did not exist in Barocci’s time.44 If the Counter-Reformation led to a demand for control and re-elevation of the work of a painter, Barocci’s response was richly informed by concrete influences in his hometown of Urbino, where he came of age, and to which he later permanently returned after a few important early years in Rome. One need only glimpse the view of Urbino’s ducal palace in the background of so many of Barocci’s paintings to sense the artist’s pride in his city. However, by looking more carefully, we can better understand the ways in which the culture of Urbino impressed itself upon Barocci. Artful Mathematics, Mathematical Arts Urbino was a center of advanced natural philosophy in Barocci's time.45 A number of thinkers of world-wide importance worked there, for the Dukes and their voracious appetite for knowledge secured a hospitable environment for numerous mathematicians.
    [Show full text]