42Nd Boston International Antiquarian Book Fair 16-18 November 2018 - Booth #108

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

42Nd Boston International Antiquarian Book Fair 16-18 November 2018 - Booth #108 RARE & IMPORTANT BOOKS & MANUSCRIPTS IN THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE & MEDICINE 42nd Boston International Antiquarian Book Fair 16-18 November 2018 - Booth #108 Flæsketorvet 68 – 1711 København V – Denmark Cell: (+45)27628014 www.sophiararebooks.com Académie Royale des Sciences. A SUPBERB COLLECTION OF HITHERTO UNPUBLISHED MATHEMATICAL TRACTS ACADÉMIE ROYALE DES SCIENCES [AUZOUT, FRENICLE, HUYGENS, MARIOTTE, PICARD, ROBERVAL, RØMER]. Divers ouvrages de mathématique et de physique. Paris: L’Imprimerie Royale, 1693. $15,000 Folio (365 x 240 mm), pp. [viii, last leaf blank], 518, [2, colophon], with numerous woodcut diagrams and illustrations in text. Contemporary mottled calf with the arms of Louis XIV in the centre of each cover (Olivier 2494, fer 10), and with his monogram in each spine compartment, hinges with some wear and top capital chipped, an entirely unrestored copy in its original state. First edition of this superb collection of thirty-one treatises by the leading scientists of seventeenth-century France, almost all of which are published here for the first time. This is one of the earliest important publications of the Académie des Sciences, and one of the most magnificent, and the present copy was probably intended for presentation: it is bound in contemporary calf with the arms of Louis XIV on each cover. Of the eight works by Christiaan Huygens (1629-95) in the present volume, all appear here for the first time except for his treatise on gravity, De la cause de la pesanteur, which was first published three years earlier as an appendix to the Traitéde la lumière. Most of these works were reprinted at The Hague in 1731 in quarto format (in three separate volumes). Founded on 22 December 1666, one of the principal functions of the Académie 2 Académie Royale des Sciences. was to facilitate publication of the works of its members. Frenicle and Roberval by Descartes, his irreconcilable adversary. were founding members (as was Huygens), and without the assistance of the Académie it is likely that many of their works would have remained unpublished “Roberval was one of the leading proponents of the geometry of infinitesimals, (only two works by Frenicle and two by Roberval were published in their lifetimes). which he claimed to have taken directly from Archimedes, without having known After the death of Frenicle and Roberval in 1675, their books and manuscripts the work of Cavalieri. Moreover, in supposing that the constituent elements of a were entrusted to the astronomer Jean Picard; eight treatises by Huygens were figure possess the same dimensions as the figure itself, Roberval came closer to the also sent to Picard for publication in this collection. After Picard’s death in 1682, integral calculus than did Cavalieri, although Roberval’s reasoning in this matter publication of the works was brought to fruition by Philippe de la Hire. La Hire was not free from imprecision. The numerous results that he obtained in this area also included in the Divers ouvrages five treatises by Picard himself, including are collected in the Divers ouvrages, under the title of Traité des indivisibles. One an unusual 37-page work on dioptrics, one by Mariotte and two each by Auzout of the first important findings was, in modern terms, the definite integration of and Rømer. The most important work in the volume is probably Roberval’s the rational power, which he most probably completed around 1636, although by Traité des indivisibles, composed around the same time as Cavalieri’s Geometria what manner we are not certain. The other important result was the integration indivisibilibus (1635) but independent of it and published here for the first time. of the sine … the most famous of his works in this domain concerns the cycloid. The treatises by Frenicle, a close correspondent of Fermat, treat topics in number Roberval introduced the “compagne” (“partner”) of the original cycloidal curve theory and related fields. See below for a full list of contents. and appears to have succeeded, before the end of 1636, in the quadrature of the latter and in the cubature of the solid that it generates in turning around its base … Gilles Personne de Roberval (1602-75) arrived in Paris in 1628 and put himself in contact with the Mersenne circle. “Mersenne, especially, always held Roberval “On account of his method of the “composition of Movements” Roberval may be in the highest esteem. In 1632 Roberval became professor of philosophy at the called the founder of kinematic geometry. This procedure had three applications— Collège de Maître Gervais. On 24 June 1634, he was proclaimed the winner in the fundamental and most famous being the construction of tangents. “By means the triennial competition for, the Ramus chair (a position that he kept for the of the specific properties of the curved line,” he stated, “examine the various rest of his life) at the Collège Royal in Paris, where at the end of 1655 he also movements made by the point which describes it at the location where you wish succeeded to Gassendi’s chair of mathematics. In 1666 Roberval was one of the to draw the tangent: from all these movements compose a single one; draw the charter members of the Académie des Sciences in Paris … He himself published line of direction of the composed movement, and you will have the tangent of only two works: Traité de méchanique (1636) and Aristarchi Samii de mundi the curved line.” Roberval conceived this remarkably intuitive method during his systemate (1644). A rather full collection of his treatises and letters was published earliest research on the cycloid (before 1636). At first, he kept the invention secret, in the Divers ouvrages de mathématique et de physique par messieurs de I’Académie but he finally taught it between 1639 and 1644; his disciple François du Verdus royale des sciences (1693), but since few of his other writings were published in the recorded his lessons in Observations sur la composition des mouvemens, et sur le following period, Roberval was for long eclipsed by Fermat, Pascal, and, above all, moyen de trouver les touchantes des lignes courbes … In the second place, he also 3 Académie Royale des Sciences. applied this procedure to comparison of the lengths of curves, a subject almost untouched since antiquity … The third application consisted in determining extrema … “Roberval composed a treatise on algebra, De recognitione aequationum, and another on analytic geometry, De geometrica planarum et cubicarum aequationum resolutione. Before 1632, he had studied the “logistica speciosa” of Viète; but the first treatise, which probably preceded Descartes’s Géométrie, contains only the rudiments of the theory of equations. On the other hand, in 1636 he had already resorted to algebra in search of a tangent. By revealing the details of such works, he would have assured himself a more prominent place in the history of analytic geometry, and even in that of differential calculus … “In 1647 [Roberval] wrote to Torricelli: “We have constructed a mechanics which is new from its foundations to its roof, having rejected, save for a small number, the ancient stones with which it had been built” (p. 301) … around 1669, Roberval wrote Projet d’un livre de mechanique traitant des mouvemens composez … Roberval dreamed, certainly with too great temerity, of a vast physical theory based uniquely on the composition of motions” (DSB). Bernard Frenicle de Bessy (1605-75) was an accomplished amateur mathematician who corresponded with Descartes, Huygens, Mersenne and, perhaps most importantly, Fermat. “Frenicle de Bessy is best known for his contributions to number theory. In fact, Fermat, in a letter to Roberval, writes: ‘For some time M Frenicle has given me the desire to discover the mysteries of numbers, an area in which he is highly versed’ … He solved many of the problems posed by Fermat but he did more than find numerical solutions for he also put forward new ideas and posed further questions” (Mactutor). 4 Académie Royale des Sciences. In “Méthode pour trouver la solution des problèmes par les exclusions, Frenicle of his principle of gravitation … says that in his opinion, arithmetic has as its object the finding of solutions in integers of indeterminate problems. He applied his method of exclusion to “In 1673 Picard moved into the Paris observatory and collaborated with Cassini, problems concerning rational right triangles, e.g., he discussed right triangles, the Romer, and, later, Philippe de La Hire on the institution’s regular program of difference or sum of whose legs is given … The most important of these works by observations. He also joined many missions away from the observatory. The first Frenicle is the treatise Des quarrez ou tables magiques. These squares, which are of these enabled him to provide more precise data on the coordinates of various of Chinese origin and to which the Arabs were so partial, reached the Occident French cities (1672-1674); others, conducted from 1679 to 1681 with La Hire, had not later than the fifteenth century. Frenicle pointed out that the number of magic the purpose of establishing the bases of the principal triangulation of a new map squares increased enormously with the order by writing down 880 magic squares of France. The results of these geodesic observations were published in 1693 by La of the fourth order, and gave a process for writing down magic squares of even Hire [pp. 368-370 of the present work]” (DSB). “In 1692 William Molyneux, who order” (DSB). was familiar with [Isaac] Barrow’s Lectiones XVIII, published his Dioptrica nova, which was a practical treatise on lenses and telescopes. He independently arrived In 1666 Jean Picard (1620-82) “was named a founding member of the Académie at Huygens’s rule for images in thin lenses, though in a slightly different form and Royale des Sciences and, even before its opening, participated in several stated less generally.
Recommended publications
  • Euclid's Elements - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Euclid's Elements - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid's_Elements Euclid's Elements From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Euclid's Elements (Ancient Greek: Στοιχεῖα Stoicheia) is a mathematical and geometric treatise Elements consisting of 13 books written by the ancient Greek mathematician Euclid in Alexandria c. 300 BC. It is a collection of definitions, postulates (axioms), propositions (theorems and constructions), and mathematical proofs of the propositions. The thirteen books cover Euclidean geometry and the ancient Greek version of elementary number theory. The work also includes an algebraic system that has become known as geometric algebra, which is powerful enough to solve many algebraic problems,[1] including the problem of finding the square root of a number.[2] With the exception of Autolycus' On the Moving Sphere, the Elements is one of the oldest extant Greek mathematical treatises,[3] and it is the oldest extant axiomatic deductive treatment of mathematics. It has proven instrumental in the development of logic and modern science. The name 'Elements' comes from the plural of 'element'. The frontispiece of Sir Henry Billingsley's first According to Proclus the term was used to describe a English version of Euclid's Elements, 1570 theorem that is all-pervading and helps furnishing proofs of many other theorems. The word 'element' is Author Euclid, and translators in the Greek language the same as 'letter'. This Language Ancient Greek, translations suggests that theorems in the Elements should be seen Subject Euclidean geometry, elementary as standing in the same relation to geometry as letters number theory to language.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting the White Elephant. When and How Did Galileo
    MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE Max Planck Institute for the History of Science PREPRINT 97 (1998) Jürgen Renn, Peter Damerow, Simone Rieger, and Michele Camerota Hunting the White Elephant When and how did Galileo discover the law of fall? ISSN 0948-9444 1 HUNTING THE WHITE ELEPHANT WHEN AND HOW DID GALILEO DISCOVER THE LAW OF FALL? Jürgen Renn, Peter Damerow, Simone Rieger, and Michele Camerota Mark Twain tells the story of a white elephant, a present of the king of Siam to Queen Victoria of England, who got somehow lost in New York on its way to England. An impressive army of highly qualified detectives swarmed out over the whole country to search for the lost treasure. And after short time an abundance of optimistic reports with precise observations were returned from the detectives giving evidence that the elephant must have been shortly before at that very place each detective had chosen for his investigations. Although no elephant could ever have been strolling around at the same time at such different places of a vast area and in spite of the fact that the elephant, wounded by a bullet, was lying dead the whole time in the cellar of the police headquarters, the detectives were highly praised by the public for their professional and effective execution of the task. (The Stolen White Elephant, Boston 1882) THE ARGUMENT In spite of having been the subject of more than a century of historical research, the question of when and how Galileo made his major discoveries is still answered insufficiently only. It is mostly assumed that he must have found the law of fall around the year 1604 and that only sev- 1 This paper makes use of the work of research projects of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin, some pursued jointly with the Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale in Florence, the Istituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza, and the Istituto Nazionale die Fisica Nucleare in Florence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jesuits and the Galileo Affair Author(S): Nicholas Overgaard Source: Prandium - the Journal of Historical Studies, Vol
    Early Modern Catholic Defense of Copernicanism: The Jesuits and the Galileo Affair Author(s): Nicholas Overgaard Source: Prandium - The Journal of Historical Studies, Vol. 2, No. 1 (Spring, 2013), pp. 29-36 Published by: The Department of Historical Studies, University of Toronto Mississauga Stable URL: http://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/prandium/article/view/19654 Prandium: The Journal of Historical Studies Vol. 2, No. 1, (2013) Early Modern Catholic Defense of Copernicanism: The Jesuits and the Galileo Affair Nicholas Overgaard “Obedience should be blind and prompt,” Ignatius of Loyola reminded his Jesuit brothers a decade after their founding in 1540.1 By the turn of the seventeenth century, the incumbent Superior General Claudio Aquaviva had reiterated Loyola’s expectation of “blind obedience,” with specific regard to Jesuit support for the Catholic Church during the Galileo Affair.2 Interpreting the relationship between the Jesuits and Copernicans like Galileo Galilei through the frame of “blind obedience” reaffirms the conservative image of the Catholic Church – to which the Jesuits owed such obedience – as committed to its medieval traditions. In opposition to this perspective, I will argue that the Jesuits involved in the Galileo Affair3 represent the progressive ideas of the Church in the early seventeenth century. To prove this, I will argue that although the Jesuits rejected the epistemological claims of Copernicanism, they found it beneficial in its practical applications. The desire to solidify their status as the intellectual elites of the Church caused the Jesuits to reject Copernicanism in public. However, they promoted an intellectual environment in which Copernican studies – particularly those of Galileo – could develop with minimal opposition, theological or otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematicians
    MATHEMATICIANS [MATHEMATICIANS] Authors: Oliver Knill: 2000 Literature: Started from a list of names with birthdates grabbed from mactutor in 2000. Abbe [Abbe] Abbe Ernst (1840-1909) Abel [Abel] Abel Niels Henrik (1802-1829) Norwegian mathematician. Significant contributions to algebra and anal- ysis, in particular the study of groups and series. Famous for proving the insolubility of the quintic equation at the age of 19. AbrahamMax [AbrahamMax] Abraham Max (1875-1922) Ackermann [Ackermann] Ackermann Wilhelm (1896-1962) AdamsFrank [AdamsFrank] Adams J Frank (1930-1989) Adams [Adams] Adams John Couch (1819-1892) Adelard [Adelard] Adelard of Bath (1075-1160) Adler [Adler] Adler August (1863-1923) Adrain [Adrain] Adrain Robert (1775-1843) Aepinus [Aepinus] Aepinus Franz (1724-1802) Agnesi [Agnesi] Agnesi Maria (1718-1799) Ahlfors [Ahlfors] Ahlfors Lars (1907-1996) Finnish mathematician working in complex analysis, was also professor at Harvard from 1946, retiring in 1977. Ahlfors won both the Fields medal in 1936 and the Wolf prize in 1981. Ahmes [Ahmes] Ahmes (1680BC-1620BC) Aida [Aida] Aida Yasuaki (1747-1817) Aiken [Aiken] Aiken Howard (1900-1973) Airy [Airy] Airy George (1801-1892) Aitken [Aitken] Aitken Alec (1895-1967) Ajima [Ajima] Ajima Naonobu (1732-1798) Akhiezer [Akhiezer] Akhiezer Naum Ilich (1901-1980) Albanese [Albanese] Albanese Giacomo (1890-1948) Albert [Albert] Albert of Saxony (1316-1390) AlbertAbraham [AlbertAbraham] Albert A Adrian (1905-1972) Alberti [Alberti] Alberti Leone (1404-1472) Albertus [Albertus] Albertus Magnus
    [Show full text]
  • OF Versailles
    THE CHÂTEAU DE VErSAILLES PrESENTS science & CUrIOSITIES AT THE COUrT OF versailles AN EXHIBITION FrOM 26 OCTOBEr 2010 TO 27 FEBrUArY 2011 3 Science and Curiosities at the Court of Versailles CONTENTS IT HAPPENED AT VErSAILLES... 5 FOrEWOrD BY JEAN-JACqUES AILLAGON 7 FOrEWOrD BY BÉATrIX SAULE 9 PrESS rELEASE 11 PArT I 1 THE EXHIBITION - Floor plan 3 - Th e exhibition route by Béatrix Saule 5 - Th e exhibition’s design 21 - Multimedia in the exhibition 22 PArT II 1 ArOUND THE EXHIBITION - Online: an Internet site, and TV web, a teachers’ blog platform 3 - Publications 4 - Educational activities 10 - Symposium 12 PArT III 1 THE EXHIBITION’S PArTNErS - Sponsors 3 - Th e royal foundations’ institutional heirs 7 - Partners 14 APPENDICES 1 USEFUL INFOrMATION 3 ILLUSTrATIONS AND AUDIOVISUAL rESOUrCES 5 5 Science and Curiosities at the Court of Versailles IT HAPPENED AT VErSAILLES... DISSECTION OF AN Since then he has had a glass globe made that ELEPHANT WITH LOUIS XIV is moved by a big heated wheel warmed by holding IN ATTENDANCE the said globe in his hand... He performed several experiments, all of which were successful, before Th e dissection took place at Versailles in January conducting one in the big gallery here... it was 1681 aft er the death of an elephant from highly successful and very easy to feel... we held the Congo that the king of Portugal had given hands on the parquet fl oor, just having to make Louis XIV as a gift : “Th e Academy was ordered sure our clothes did not touch each other.” to dissect an elephant from the Versailles Mémoires du duc de Luynes Menagerie that had died; Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geodetic Sciences in Byzantium
    The geodetic sciences in Byzantium Dimitrios A. Rossikopoulos Department of Geodesy and Surveying, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki [email protected] Abstract: Many historians of science consider that geodeasia, a term used by Aristotle meaning "surveying", was not particularly flourishing in Byzantium. However, like “lo- gistiki” (practical arithmetic), it has never ceased to be taught, not only at public universi- ties and ecclesiastical schools, as well as by private tutors. Besides that these two fields had to do with problems of daily life, Byzantines considered them necessary prerequisite for someone who wished to study philosophy. So, they did not only confine themselves to copying and saving the ancient texts, but they also wrote new ones, where they were ana- lyzing their empirical discoveries and their technological achievements. This is the subject of this paper, a retrospect of the numerous manuscripts of the Byzantine period that refer to the development of geodesy both in teaching and practices of surveying, as well as to mat- ters relating to the views about the shape of the earth, the cartography, the positioning in travels and generally the sciences of mapping. Keywords: Geodesy, geodesy in Byzantium, history of geodesy, history of surveying, history of mathematics. Περίληψη: Πολλοί ιστορικοί των επιστημών θεωρούν ότι η γεωδαισία, όρος που χρησι- μοποίησε ο Αριστοτέλης για να ορίσει την πρακτική γεωμετρία, την τοπογραφία, δεν είχε ιδιαίτερη άνθιση στο Βυζάντιο. Ωστόσο, όπως και η “λογιστική”, δεν έπαψε ποτέ να διδά- σκεται όχι μόνο στα κοσμικά πανεπιστήμια, αλλά και στις εκκλησιαστικές σχολές, καθώς επίσης και από ιδιώτες δασκάλους. Πέρα από το ότι οι δύο αυτοί κλάδοι είχαν να κάνουν με προβλήματα της καθημερινής ζωής των ανθρώπων, οι βυζαντινοί θεωρούσαν την διδα- σκαλία τους απαραίτητη προϋπόθεση ώστε να μπορεί κανείς να παρακολουθήσει μαθήμα- τα φιλοσοφίας.
    [Show full text]
  • A Classificação Das Disciplinas Matemáticas E a Mathesis Universalis Nos Séculos XVI E XVII : Um Estudo Do Pensamento De Adriaan Van Roomen / Zaqueu Vieira Oliveira
    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas Câmpus de Rio Claro ZAQUEU VIEIRA OLIVEIRA Tese de Doutorado apresentada ao Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas do Câmpus de Rio Claro, da Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de Doutor em Educação Matemáitca. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Marcos Vieira Teixeira Apoio: FAPESP. Processo nº: 2011/20315-0 Rio Claro - SP 2015 510.09 Oliveira, Zaqueu Vieira O48c A classificação das disciplinas matemáticas e a Mathesis Universalis nos séculos XVI e XVII : um estudo do pensamento de Adriaan van Roomen / Zaqueu Vieira Oliveira. - Rio Claro, 2015 193 f. : il., figs., tabs. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas Orientador: Marcos Vieira Teixeira 1. Matemática - História. 2. Adriaan van Roomen. 3. Séculos XVI e XVII. 4. Classificação das matemáticas. 5. Quaestio de certitudine mathematicarum. I. Título. Ficha Catalográfica elaborada pela STATI - Biblioteca da UNESP Campus de Rio Claro/SP ZAQUEU VIEIRA OLIVEIRA Tese de Doutorado apresentada ao Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas do Câmpus de Rio Claro, da Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de Doutor em Educação Matemáitca. Comissão Examinadora Prof. Dr. Marcos Vieira Teixeira (Orientador) – IGCE-UNESP-Rio Claro Prof. Dr. Carlos Henrique Barbosa Gonçalves – EACH-USP-São Paulo Prof. Dr. Fàbio Maia
    [Show full text]
  • Richard P. Feynman Author
    Title: The Making of a Genius: Richard P. Feynman Author: Christian Forstner Ernst-Haeckel-Haus Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena Berggasse 7 D-07743 Jena Germany Fax: +49 3641 949 502 Email: [email protected] Abstract: In 1965 the Nobel Foundation honored Sin-Itiro Tomonaga, Julian Schwinger, and Richard Feynman for their fundamental work in quantum electrodynamics and the consequences for the physics of elementary particles. In contrast to both of his colleagues only Richard Feynman appeared as a genius before the public. In his autobiographies he managed to connect his behavior, which contradicted several social and scientific norms, with the American myth of the “practical man”. This connection led to the image of a common American with extraordinary scientific abilities and contributed extensively to enhance the image of Feynman as genius in the public opinion. Is this image resulting from Feynman’s autobiographies in accordance with historical facts? This question is the starting point for a deeper historical analysis that tries to put Feynman and his actions back into historical context. The image of a “genius” appears then as a construct resulting from the public reception of brilliant scientific research. Introduction Richard Feynman is “half genius and half buffoon”, his colleague Freeman Dyson wrote in a letter to his parents in 1947 shortly after having met Feynman for the first time.1 It was precisely this combination of outstanding scientist of great talent and seeming clown that was conducive to allowing Feynman to appear as a genius amongst the American public. Between Feynman’s image as a genius, which was created significantly through the representation of Feynman in his autobiographical writings, and the historical perspective on his earlier career as a young aspiring physicist, a discrepancy exists that has not been observed in prior biographical literature.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Radical Besinnung in Formale Und Transzendentale Logik (1929)
    1 Radical Besinnung in Formale und transzendentale Logik (1929)1 This is a pre-print of an article published in Husserl Studies. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1007/s10743- 018-9228-5 ABSTRACT. This paper explicates Husserl’s usage of what he calls ‘radical Besinnung’ in Formale und transzendentale Logik (1929, henceforth FTL). Husserl introduces radical Besinnung as his method in the introduction to FTL. Radical Besinnung aims at criticizing the practice of formal sciences by means of transcendental phenomenological clarification of its aims and presuppositions. By showing how Husserl applies this method to the history of formal sciences down to mathematicians’ work in his time, the paper explains in detail the relationship between historical critical Besinnung and transcendental phenomenology. Ultimately the paper suggests that radical Besinnung should be viewed as a general methodological framework within which transcendental phenomenological descriptions are used to criticize historically given goal- directed practices. KEYWORDS: Husserl, Formal and Transcendental Logic, Besinnung, mathematics, apophantic logic, phenomenological method, criticism. Introduction This paper explicates Husserl’s usage of what he calls ‘radical Besinnung’ in Formale und transzendentale Logik (1929, henceforth FTL). Husserl started to emphasize the importance of Besinnung already in the early in the 1920s,2 but, for the sake of a clear argument, I limit myself 1 This paper has been greatly improved thanks to the detailed criticisms and useful and generous suggestions of George Heffernan. I am particularly thankful for him for drawing my attention to FTL §§102-105, where Husserl discusses transcendental Selbst-Besinnung. 2 The term is mentioned already in Logical Investigations (e.g., Hua1/1, 24-25; 304).
    [Show full text]
  • Bernardino Baldi's in Mechanica Aristotelis Problemata Exercitationes
    Bernardino Baldi’s In mechanica Aristotelis problemata exercitationes ii Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge Series Editors Jürgen Renn, Robert Schlögl, Bernard F. Schutz. Edition Open Access Development Team Lindy Divarci, Beatrice Gabriel, Jörg Kantel, Matthias Schemmel, and Kai Surendorf, headed by Peter Damerow. Scientific Board Markus Antonietti, Ian Baldwin, Antonio Becchi, Fabio Bevilacqua, William G. Boltz, Jens Braarvik, Horst Bredekamp, Jed Z. Buchwald, Olivier Darrigol, Thomas Duve, Mike Edmunds, Yehuda Elkana, Fynn Ole Engler, Robert K. Englund, Mordechai Feingold, Rivka Feldhay, Gideon Freudenthal, Paolo Galluzzi, Kostas Gavroglu, Mark Geller, Domenico Giulini, Günther Görz, Gerd Graßhoff, James Hough, Manfred Laubich- ler, Glenn Most, Pier Daniele Napolitani, Alessandro Nova, Hermann Parzinger, Dan Potts, Circe Silva da Silva, Ana Simões, Richard Stephen- son, Mark Stitt, Noel M. Swerdlow, Liba Taub, Martin Vingron, Scott Walter, Norton Wise, Gerhard Wolf, Rüdiger Wolfrum, Zhang Baichun. Sources 3 Edition Open Access 2011 Bernardino Baldi’s In mechanica Aristotelis problemata exercitationes Elio Nenci Communicated by Jürgen Renn and Antonio Becchi Edition Open Access 2011 Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge Sources 3 Communicated by Jürgen Renn and Antonio Becchi Translated from Italian into English by Adriano Carugo Copyedited by Lindy Divarci ISBN 978-3-86931-961-2 First published 2011 Printed in Germany by epubli, Oranienstraße 183, 10999 Berlin http://www.epubli.de Edition Open Access http://www.edition-open-access.de Published under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 3.0 Germany Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/de/ The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Na- tionalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Energy Physics from 1945 to 1952/ 53
    CHS-17 March 1985 STUDIES IN CERN HISTORY High-energy physics from 1945 to 1952/ 53 Ulrike Mersits GENEVA 1985 The Study of CERN History is a project financed by Institutions in several CERN Member Countries. This report presents preliminary findings, and is intended for incorporation into a more comprehensive study of CERN's history. It is distributed primarily to historians and scientists to provoke discussion, and no part of it should be cited or reproduced without written permission from the Team Leader. Comments are welcome and should be sent to: Study Team for CERN History c/oCERN CH-1211 GENEVE23 Switzerland © Copyright Study Team for CERN History, Geneva 1985 CERN-Service d'information scientifique - 300- mars 1985 HIGH-ENERGY PHYSICS from 1945 to 1952/53 I. The scientific situation in 'elementary particle physics' around 1945/46 I.1. Cosmic-ray physics I.2 Nuclear physics II. Institutional changes in nuclear physics due to the war III. The post-war accelerator programmes III.1. The principle of phase stability III.2. The United States III.3. Great Britain - the leading country in Europe III.4. Continental western Europe III.5. AG focusing - another step into higher energy regions IV. Experimental particle physics: developments from 1946 to 1953 IV.1. The leptonic nature of the mesotron and the detection of the pi­ meson (1946/47) IV.2. The artificial production of charged and uncharged pi-mesons (1948/49) IV.3. The complexity of the mass spectrum (1947-1953) IV.3.1.The V-particles IV.3.2.The heavy mesons IV.3.3.The Bagneres-de-Bigorre Conference (1953) V.
    [Show full text]
  • 'N Goue Draad Wat Deur Die Geskiedenis Van Die Wiskunde Loop
    'n Goue Draad wat deur die Geskiedenis van die Wiskunde loop Prof D F M Strauss Dept Filosofie Fakulteit Geesteswetenskappe Universiteit van die Vrystaat Posbus 339, Bloemtontein 9300 [email protected] Opsomming Die aanvanklike sukses wat opgesluit gelê het in the Pythagoreïse oortuiging dat rasionale verhoudinge alles getalsmatig toeganklik maak het spoedig gegewens teëgekom wat nie met behulp van rasionale getalsverhoudinge hanteer kom word nie. Die onvermoë om hierdie probleem getalsmatig tot 'n oplossing tebring sou daartoe lei dat die Griekse wiskunde die weg van 'n geometrisering bewandel het. Daar is nie probeer om hierdie impasse met behulp van die idee van oneindige totaliteite te bowe te kom nie. Nie alleen het dit die aard van getal ondergeskik gemaak aan die ruimte nie, want dit het ook die middeleeuse spekulatiewe “metafisika van die syn” tot gevolg gehad. Eers via Descartes sou die moderne tyd 'n toenemende terugkeer na 'n aritmetiese perspektief vergestalt. Die ontdekking van die differensiaal- en integraalrekene deur Newton en Leibniz het egter opnuut probleme geskep, met name in die verantwoording van die aard van limiete. Die geykte benadering om limiete met behulp van konvergerende rye rasionale getalle te bepaal het 'n onverantwoorde sirkelredenasie bevat, want om as limiet te kan optree moes elke sodanige limiet rééds 'n getal gewees het. Skynbaar het Weierstrass daarin geslaag om 'n suksesvolle alternatiewe waardering van 'n veranderlike in sy statiese teorie te gee. Limiet- waardes kan willekeurig gekies word uit 'n domein van onderskeie getalle wat as 'n oneindige totaliteit opeens voorhande is. Toe hierdie benadering egter in die versamelingsteorie van Cantor tot Russel se kontradiksie lei, het twee teëgestelde reaksies die toneel oorheers.
    [Show full text]