Bibliography

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bibliography Bibliography Afshar, Iraj: Bibliographie des Catalogues des Manuscrits Persans. Tehran: 1958. Almagest: see Ptolemy. Apollonius: Apollonii Pergaei quae Graece exstant cum commentariis Eutocii (ed. J. L. Heiberg), 2 vols. Leipzig: 1891, 1893. Arberry, A. J. : The Chester Beatty Library, A Handlist of the Arabic Manuscripts, Vol. VII. Dublin: 1964. Archimedes: Archimedis Opera Omnia cum commentariis Eutocii, (iterum ed. J. L. Heiberg), 3 vols. Leipzig: 1910-1915. Archimedes: see also Heath. Aristarchus of Samos: On the Sizes and Distances of the Sun and Moon (ed. T. Heath). Oxford: 1913. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics: Aristotelis Ethica Nicomachea (ed. I. Bywater). Oxford: 1894. Aristotle, Prior Analytics: Aristotelis Analytica Priora et Posteriora (ed. W. D. Ross and L. Minio-Paluello). Oxford: 1964. Autolycus: J. Mogenet, Autolycus de Pitane. Louvain, 1950 (Universite de Louvain, Recueil de Travaux d'Histoire et de Philologie, 3e. Serie Fasc. 37). Awad, Gurgis: "Arabic Manuscripts in American Libraries". Sumer 1, 237-277 (1951). (Arabic). Bachmann, Peter: Galens Abhandlung dariiber, dal3 der vorziigliche Arzt Philosoph sein mul3. Gottingen: 1965 (Ak. Wiss. Gottingen, Nachrichten Phil. -hist. Kl. 1965.1). Belger, C.: "Ein neues Fragmentum Mathematicum Bobiense". Hermes 16, 261-84 (1881). Boilot, D. J.: "L'oeuvre d'al-Beruni, essai bibliographique". Melanges de l'Institut Dominicain d'Etudes Orientales du Caire ~, 161-256 (1955). Bretschneider, C. A.: Die Geometrie und die Geometer vor Eukleides. Leipzig: 1870. 217 Bib Ziography Brockelmann, Carl: Geschichte der Arabischen Litteratur, zweite den Supplementbanden angepasste Aunage, 2 vols. Leiden: 1943, 1949 [GAL] [and] Supplementbande I-III. Leiden: 1937, 1938, 1942 [S]. Bulmer-Thomas, I.: "Conon of Samos". Dictionary of Scientific Biography III, (New York), 391 (1971). Bulmer-Thomas, I.: "Dionysodorus". Dictionary of Scientific Biography £! (New York), 108-10 (1971). Caley, Earle R. : Orichalcum and Related Ancient Alloys. New York: 1964 (Numismatic Notes and Monographs, 151). Cantor, Moritz: "tiber das neue Fragmentum Mathematicum Bobiense". Hermes J&, 640-42 (1881). Cantor, Moritz: Vorlesungen uber Geschichte der Mathematik. Vol. I, 3rd edn. Leipzig and Berlin: 1907. Casiri, M.: Bibliotheca Arabico-Hispana Escurialensis, 2 vols. Madrid: 1760, 1770. CLA: see Lowe. Cronert, Wilhelm: "Der Epikureer Philonides". SB Berlin 1900.2 942-59. Daiber, Hans: Die Arabische tibersetzung der Placita Philosophorum. Inaugural-Dissertation, Saarbrucken, 1968. Datta, Bimal Kumar: Libraries and Librarianship of Ancient and Medieval India. Delhi: 1970. Derenbourg, H., Renaud, H. P. -J.: Lea Manuscrits Arabes de l'Escurial, Vol. II. 2. Paris: 1941. Descartes, Rene: Geom.etrie, in D. E. Smith and M. L. Latham., The Geometry of Rene Descartes. Chicago and London: 1925 [With facsimile of the original text, pp. 297-412 of his Discours de la Methode, 1637J. Diels, Hermann: Antike Technik, 2nd edn. Leipzig and Berlin: 1920. Dijksterhuis, E. J.: Archimedes. Copenhagen: 1956. Drecker, Joseph: Die Theorie der Sonnenuhren. Berlin and Leipzig: 1925 (Die Geschichte der Zeitmessung und der Uhren, Bd. I, Lf. E). Etudes Thasiennes V: Recherches sur l'histoire et les cultes de Thasos II, par Christiane Dunant et Jean Pouilloux. Paris: 1958. Euclid: The Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements, tr. T. L. Heath, 2nd edn., 3 vols. Cambridge: 1926. Euclid, Phaenomena: Euclids Phaenomena et Scripta Musica (ed. H. Menge). Leipzig: 1916 (Euclidis Opera Omnia vm). al-Farabi: Matematicheskie Traktate (ed. S. E. Esenov). Alma-Ata: 1972 [Russian translations by various hands]. 218 Bibliography Fermat, Pierre de: Oeuvres de Fermat (ed. P. Tannery and Ch. Henry), 4 vols. Paris:1891-1912. Forbes, R. J.: Studies in Ancient Technology, Vol. VIII, 2nd edn. Leiden: 1971. Fraser, P. M.: ptolemaic Alexandria, 3 vols. Oxford: 1972. GAL: see Brockelmann. Galen: Claudii Galeni Opera Omnia (ed. C. G. Kiihn), 20 vols. Leipzig: 1821-33. Galen: Scripta Minora (ed. 1. Mueller), Vol. II. Leipzig: 1891. Galen: Compendium Timaei Platonis (ed. P. Kraus and R. Walzer). London: 1951 (Plato Arabus 1). Galen: On the Parts of Medicine On Cohesive Causes, etc. (ed. Malcolm Lyons). Berlin: ~969 (Corpus Medicorum Graecorum, Supplementum Orientale II). Galen: see also Bachmann. Gandz, Solomon: "Der Hultsch-Cantorsche Beweis von der Reihen­ folge der Buchstaben in den mathematischen Figuren der Griechen und Araber". Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Mathematik, Astronomie und Physik, B 1, 81-97 (1933). GAS: see Sezgin. Georr, Khalil: Les Categories d'Aristote dans leurs versions syro­ arabes. Beirut: 1948. Gibbs, Sharon: Greek and Roman Sundials. Ph. D. Dissertation, Yale University, 1972 (University Microfilms Dissertation 1f73-14334). Golchin-Ma'ani, Ahmad: Fihrist Kutub KaHl Kitabkana-i Astan-i Quds Ri<;lawL Vol. 8. Meshhed: 1350 [1972] [catalogue of the mathematical and astronomical manuscripts of the Shrine LibraryJ. Gomes Teixeira, F.: Traite des Courbes Speciales Remarquables Planes et Gauches, Vol. 1. Coimbra: 1908 (Gomes Teixeira, Obras sobre Mathematica, Vol. 4). Handlist: see Voorhoeve. Haschmi, Mohamed Y.: Propagations of Ray... from ... al-Kindi. Aleppo: 1967. Heath, T. L.: The v.brks of Archimedes. Cambridge: 1897. Heath, T. L.: A History of Greek Mathematics, 2 vols. Oxford: 1921 [HGMJ. Heiberg, J. L.: "Zum Fragmentum mathematicum Bobiense". Zeit­ schrift fiir Mathematik und Physik 28,(Hist.-lit. Abt.), 121-29 (1883) Heiberg, J. L.: "Ptolemaus de Analemmate". Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematik VII, 3-30 (1895) (= Zeitschrift fiir Mathematik und Physik 40, Supp.). 219 Bib~iography Heiberg, J. L.: "Eine neue Archimedeshandschrift". Hermes 42, 235-303 (1907). Heiberg, J. L.: see also Apollonius; Archimedes; [Heron]; Mathematici. Heiberg, J. L., Wiedemann, E.: "Ibn al Hailams Schrift Uber parabolische Hohlspiegel". Bibliotheca Mathematica 3 F. ~, 201-37 (1910). Heron: Pneumatica et Automata (ed. W. Schmidt) Leipzig: 1899 (Heronis Alexandrini Opera quae supersunt omnia 1). Heron: Mechanica et Catoptrica (ed. L. Nix and W. Schmidt). Leipzig: 1900 (Heronis Alexandrini Opera quae supersunt omnia II. 1). [Heron]: Geometrica (ed. J. L. Heiberg). Leipzig:1912 (Heronis Alexandrini Opera quae supersunt omnia N). HGM: see Heath. Hippolytus: Refutatio orr..nium haeresium (ed. Paul Wendland). Leipzig: 1916 (Die Griechischen Christlichen Schriftsteller der ersten drei Jahrhunderte: Hippolytus, Werke, 3). Huxley, G. L.: Anthemius of Tralles, A Study in Later Greek Geometry. Cambridge, Mass.: 1959. Hultsch, F.: "Dositheos 9". Paulys Real Encyclopadie der Classischen Altertumswissenschaften, new edition by G. Wissowa, V. 2. cols. 1607-08. Stuttgart: 1905, [RE]. Ibn AbT U!?aybi'a: KWib 'uytin al-anba) fi tabaqat al-atibba', (ed. A. MUller). 2 vols. Cairo: 1882. Ibn al-Haytham: Majmu' aI-rasa> il. Hyderabad-Deccan, 1357 A. H. [= A. D. 1938/9J (Osmania Oriental Publications Bureau). Ibn al-Qifti: Ta)rik al-Ijukama', (ed. J. Lippert). Leipzig: 1903. IG II2: Inscriptiones Graecae Voluminis II et III Editio Minor, Pars Altera F'asc. I (ed. J. Kirchner). Berlin: 1927. IGR: Inscriptiones Graecae ad res Romanas pertinentes, (ed. R. Cagnat and G. Lafaye), Vol. IV. Paris: 1906. Kepler, J.: Ad Vitellionem Paralipomena (Astronomiae Pars Optica) (ed. Franz Hammer). MUnchen: 1939 (Gesammelte Werke II). Kisa, Anton: Das Glas im Altertume, 3 vols. Leipzig~ 1908 (Hiersemanns HandbUcher TIl). Krasnova, S. A.: "Abu-I-Vafa al-Buzdzhani, Kniga 0 tom, chto neobkhodimo remeslenniku iz geometricheskikh postroeniyll. Fiziko-matimaticheskie nauki v stranakh vostoka I(N). Moscow: 1966, pp.42-140. Krause, Max: "Stambuler Handschriften islamischer Mathematiker". Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Mathematik, Astronomie und Physik, B 1, 437-532 (1936). 220 Bib Uography Kunitzsch. Paul: Der Almagest. Die Syntaxis Mathematica des Claudius Ptolemiius in arabisch-Iateinischer Uberlieferung. Wiesbaden: 1974. Lejeune. Albert: Recherches sur la catoptrique grecque. Bruxelles: 1957 (Academie Royale de Belgique. Memoires LII. 2). Letronne.A. J.: "Memoire sur l'utilite qu10n peut retirer de l'etude des nomspropres grecs pour l'histoire et l'archeologie". Letronne. Oeuvres Choisies (ed. E. Fagnan). 3 Ser.• Vol. 2. Paris: 1885. pp.1-126. Loria. G.: Spezielle Algebraische und Transzendente Ebene Kurven. 2nd edn.• 2 vols. Leipzig and Berlin: 1910. Lowe. E. A.: Codices Latini Antiquiores. Vol. III. Oxford: 1938 [CLAJ. LSJ: A Greek-English Lexicon compiled by H. G. Liddell and R. Scott. A new Edition... by H. Stuart Jones. Oxford: 1940. Maass. E.: Aratea. Berlin: 1892. Mathematici Graeci Minores: (ed. J. L. Heiberg). Copenhagen: 1927 (Det Kgl. Danske Vidensk. Selsk.• Hist.-fil. Meddelelser XIII. 3). Molther. Johannes: Problema Deliacum de Cubi Duplicatione. Frankfurt: 1619. Montucla. J. F.: Histoire des Mathematiques. 2nd edn .• Vol. I. Paris: An VII =[1798/9]. Mugler. Charles: Dictionnaire historique de la terminologie geometrique des Grecs. Paris: 1958. Neugebauer. 0.: "Apollonius-Studien". Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Mathematik. Astronomie und Physik. B 1. 215-54 (1933). Neugebauer. 0.: A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy. 3 vols. New York: 1975. Neugebauer. 0 .• van Hoesen. H. B.: Greek Horoscopes. Philadelphia: 1959 (American Philosophical Society. Memoirs. 48). Nix. L.: Das Fiinfte Buch der Conic a des Apollonius von Perga. Leipzig: 1889. Pappus. Collection: Pappi Alexandrini Collectionis quae supersunt (ed. F. Hultsch). 3 vols. Berlin: 1875-78. Pliny: Plinius.
Recommended publications
  • Mathematicians
    MATHEMATICIANS [MATHEMATICIANS] Authors: Oliver Knill: 2000 Literature: Started from a list of names with birthdates grabbed from mactutor in 2000. Abbe [Abbe] Abbe Ernst (1840-1909) Abel [Abel] Abel Niels Henrik (1802-1829) Norwegian mathematician. Significant contributions to algebra and anal- ysis, in particular the study of groups and series. Famous for proving the insolubility of the quintic equation at the age of 19. AbrahamMax [AbrahamMax] Abraham Max (1875-1922) Ackermann [Ackermann] Ackermann Wilhelm (1896-1962) AdamsFrank [AdamsFrank] Adams J Frank (1930-1989) Adams [Adams] Adams John Couch (1819-1892) Adelard [Adelard] Adelard of Bath (1075-1160) Adler [Adler] Adler August (1863-1923) Adrain [Adrain] Adrain Robert (1775-1843) Aepinus [Aepinus] Aepinus Franz (1724-1802) Agnesi [Agnesi] Agnesi Maria (1718-1799) Ahlfors [Ahlfors] Ahlfors Lars (1907-1996) Finnish mathematician working in complex analysis, was also professor at Harvard from 1946, retiring in 1977. Ahlfors won both the Fields medal in 1936 and the Wolf prize in 1981. Ahmes [Ahmes] Ahmes (1680BC-1620BC) Aida [Aida] Aida Yasuaki (1747-1817) Aiken [Aiken] Aiken Howard (1900-1973) Airy [Airy] Airy George (1801-1892) Aitken [Aitken] Aitken Alec (1895-1967) Ajima [Ajima] Ajima Naonobu (1732-1798) Akhiezer [Akhiezer] Akhiezer Naum Ilich (1901-1980) Albanese [Albanese] Albanese Giacomo (1890-1948) Albert [Albert] Albert of Saxony (1316-1390) AlbertAbraham [AlbertAbraham] Albert A Adrian (1905-1972) Alberti [Alberti] Alberti Leone (1404-1472) Albertus [Albertus] Albertus Magnus
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Famous Greek Mathematicians and Their Contributions 1. Euclid
    15 Famous Greek Mathematicians and Their Contributions 1. Euclid He was also known as Euclid of Alexandria and referred as the father of geometry deduced the Euclidean geometry. The name has it all, which in Greek means “renowned, glorious”. He worked his entire life in the field of mathematics and made revolutionary contributions to geometry. 2. Pythagoras The famous ‘Pythagoras theorem’, yes the same one we have struggled through in our childhood during our challenging math classes. This genius achieved in his contributions in mathematics and become the father of the theorem of Pythagoras. Born is Samos, Greece and fled off to Egypt and maybe India. This great mathematician is most prominently known for, what else but, for his Pythagoras theorem. 3. Archimedes Archimedes is yet another great talent from the land of the Greek. He thrived for gaining knowledge in mathematical education and made various contributions. He is best known for antiquity and the invention of compound pulleys and screw pump. 4. Thales of Miletus He was the first individual to whom a mathematical discovery was attributed. He’s best known for his work in calculating the heights of pyramids and the distance of the ships from the shore using geometry. 5. Aristotle Aristotle had a diverse knowledge over various areas including mathematics, geology, physics, metaphysics, biology, medicine and psychology. He was a pupil of Plato therefore it’s not a surprise that he had a vast knowledge and made contributions towards Platonism. Tutored Alexander the Great and established a library which aided in the production of hundreds of books.
    [Show full text]
  • Citations in Classics and Ancient History
    Citations in Classics and Ancient History The most common style in use in the field of Classical Studies is the author-date style, also known as Chicago 2, but MLA is also quite common and perfectly acceptable. Quick guides for each of MLA and Chicago 2 are readily available as PDF downloads. The Chicago Manual of Style Online offers a guide on their web-page: http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html The Modern Language Association (MLA) does not, but many educational institutions post an MLA guide for free access. While a specific citation style should be followed carefully, none take into account the specific practices of Classical Studies. They are all (Chicago, MLA and others) perfectly suitable for citing most resources, but should not be followed for citing ancient Greek and Latin primary source material, including primary sources in translation. Citing Primary Sources: Every ancient text has its own unique system for locating content by numbers. For example, Homer's Iliad is divided into 24 Books (what we might now call chapters) and the lines of each Book are numbered from line 1. Herodotus' Histories is divided into nine Books and each of these Books is divided into Chapters and each chapter into line numbers. The purpose of such a system is that the Iliad, or any primary source, can be cited in any language and from any publication and always refer to the same passage. That is why we do not cite Herodotus page 66. Page 66 in what publication, in what edition? Very early in your textbook, Apodexis Historia, a passage from Herodotus is reproduced.
    [Show full text]
  • General Disclaimer One Or More of the Following Statements May Affect
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19710025504 2020-03-11T22:36:49+00:00Z View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NASA Technical Reports Server General Disclaimer One or more of the Following Statements may affect this Document This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished by the organizational source. It is being released in the interest of making available as much information as possible. This document may contain data, which exceeds the sheet parameters. It was furnished in this condition by the organizational source and is the best copy available. This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts and/or pictures, which have been reproduced in black and white. This document is paginated as submitted by the original source. Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical nature of some of the material. However, it is the best reproduction available from the original submission. Produced by the NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) 6 X t B ICC"m date: July 16, 1971 955 L'Enfant Plaza North, S. W Washington, D. C. 20024 to Distribution B71 07023 from. J. W. Head suhiecf Derivation of Topographic Feature Names in the Apollo 15 Landing Region - Case 340 ABSTRACT The topographic features in the region of the Apollo 15 landing site (Figure 1) are named for a number of philosophers, explorers and scientists (astronomers in particular) representing periods throughout recorded history. It is of particular interest that several of the individuals were responsible for specific discoveries, observations, or inventions which considerably advanced the study and under- standing of the moon (for instance, Hadley designed the first large reflecting telescope; Beer published classic maps and explanations of the moon's surface).
    [Show full text]
  • The Geodetic Sciences in Byzantium
    The geodetic sciences in Byzantium Dimitrios A. Rossikopoulos Department of Geodesy and Surveying, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki [email protected] Abstract: Many historians of science consider that geodeasia, a term used by Aristotle meaning "surveying", was not particularly flourishing in Byzantium. However, like “lo- gistiki” (practical arithmetic), it has never ceased to be taught, not only at public universi- ties and ecclesiastical schools, as well as by private tutors. Besides that these two fields had to do with problems of daily life, Byzantines considered them necessary prerequisite for someone who wished to study philosophy. So, they did not only confine themselves to copying and saving the ancient texts, but they also wrote new ones, where they were ana- lyzing their empirical discoveries and their technological achievements. This is the subject of this paper, a retrospect of the numerous manuscripts of the Byzantine period that refer to the development of geodesy both in teaching and practices of surveying, as well as to mat- ters relating to the views about the shape of the earth, the cartography, the positioning in travels and generally the sciences of mapping. Keywords: Geodesy, geodesy in Byzantium, history of geodesy, history of surveying, history of mathematics. Περίληψη: Πολλοί ιστορικοί των επιστημών θεωρούν ότι η γεωδαισία, όρος που χρησι- μοποίησε ο Αριστοτέλης για να ορίσει την πρακτική γεωμετρία, την τοπογραφία, δεν είχε ιδιαίτερη άνθιση στο Βυζάντιο. Ωστόσο, όπως και η “λογιστική”, δεν έπαψε ποτέ να διδά- σκεται όχι μόνο στα κοσμικά πανεπιστήμια, αλλά και στις εκκλησιαστικές σχολές, καθώς επίσης και από ιδιώτες δασκάλους. Πέρα από το ότι οι δύο αυτοί κλάδοι είχαν να κάνουν με προβλήματα της καθημερινής ζωής των ανθρώπων, οι βυζαντινοί θεωρούσαν την διδα- σκαλία τους απαραίτητη προϋπόθεση ώστε να μπορεί κανείς να παρακολουθήσει μαθήμα- τα φιλοσοφίας.
    [Show full text]
  • Phantom Paths from Problems to Equations
    Archimedes and the Angel: Phantom Paths from Problems to Equations Fabio Acerbi CNRS, UMR 8163 ‘Savoirs, textes, langage’, Lille [email protected] Introduction This paper is a critical review of Reviel Netz’ The Transformation of Mathematics in the Early Mediterranean World.1 Its aim is to show that Netz’ methods of inquiry are too often unsatisfactory and to argue briefly for a substantially different interpretation of the evi- dence which he adduces. These two aims are pursued in parallel throughout the review and can hardly be disjoined. The review is uncommonly long and uncommonly direct, at times perhaps even a trifle vehement, in criticizing the methods and conclusions displayed in the book. There are two reasons for this. First, the transforma- tion of Academic scholarship into a branch of the editorial business and, very recently, into an expanding division of the media-driven star-system, has dramatically reduced the time left to study primary sources, to get properly informed of works by other scholars,2 and even just to read more than once what was written as a first draft. Second, at the same time, it is increasingly difficult to find serious reviews. Though the number of reviews and book-notices is explod- ing, it is clear that most reviews are written just to get a copy of an otherwise too expensive book. At any rate, the current policy is to keep sharp criticisms, if any, hidden under a seemingly gentle stylistic surface. The present paper is organized as follows. In the first section, I present Archimedes’ problem; in the next, I report the contents 1 R.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Rhetoric and Greek Mathematics: a Response to a Modern Historiographical Dilemma
    Science in Context 16(3), 391–412 (2003). Copyright © Cambridge University Press DOI: 10.1017/S0269889703000863 Printed in the United Kingdom Ancient Rhetoric and Greek Mathematics: A Response to a Modern Historiographical Dilemma Alain Bernard Dibner Institute, Boston To the memory of three days in the Negev Argument In this article, I compare Sabetai Unguru’s and Wilbur Knorr’s views on the historiography of ancient Greek mathematics. Although they share the same concern for avoiding anach- ronisms, they take very different stands on the role mathematical readings should have in the interpretation of ancient mathematics. While Unguru refuses any intrusion of mathematical practice into history, Knorr believes this practice to be a key tool for understanding the ancient tradition of geometry. Thus modern historians have to find their way between these opposing views while avoiding an unsatisfactory compromise. One approach to this, I propose, is to take ancient rhetoric into account. I illustrate this proposal by showing how rhetorical categories can help us to analyze mathematical texts. I finally show that such an approach accommodates Knorr’s concern about ancient mathematical practice as well as the standards for modern historical research set by Unguru 25 years ago. Introduction The title of the present paper indicates that this work concerns the relationship between ancient rhetoric and ancient Greek mathematics. Such a title obviously raises a simple question: Is there such a relationship? The usual appreciation of ancient science and philosophy is at odds with such an idea. This appreciation is rooted in the pregnant categorization that ranks rhetoric and science at very different levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Curves and the Lengths of Their Arcs Amelia Carolina Sparavigna
    Some Curves and the Lengths of their Arcs Amelia Carolina Sparavigna To cite this version: Amelia Carolina Sparavigna. Some Curves and the Lengths of their Arcs. 2021. hal-03236909 HAL Id: hal-03236909 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03236909 Preprint submitted on 26 May 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Some Curves and the Lengths of their Arcs Amelia Carolina Sparavigna Department of Applied Science and Technology Politecnico di Torino Here we consider some problems from the Finkel's solution book, concerning the length of curves. The curves are Cissoid of Diocles, Conchoid of Nicomedes, Lemniscate of Bernoulli, Versiera of Agnesi, Limaçon, Quadratrix, Spiral of Archimedes, Reciprocal or Hyperbolic spiral, the Lituus, Logarithmic spiral, Curve of Pursuit, a curve on the cone and the Loxodrome. The Versiera will be discussed in detail and the link of its name to the Versine function. Torino, 2 May 2021, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4732881 Here we consider some of the problems propose in the Finkel's solution book, having the full title: A mathematical solution book containing systematic solutions of many of the most difficult problems, Taken from the Leading Authors on Arithmetic and Algebra, Many Problems and Solutions from Geometry, Trigonometry and Calculus, Many Problems and Solutions from the Leading Mathematical Journals of the United States, and Many Original Problems and Solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece
    Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Ancient Greek Philosophy but didn’t Know Who to Ask Edited by Patricia F. O’Grady MEET THE PHILOSOPHERS OF ANCIENT GREECE Dedicated to the memory of Panagiotis, a humble man, who found pleasure when reading about the philosophers of Ancient Greece Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece Everything you always wanted to know about Ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask Edited by PATRICIA F. O’GRADY Flinders University of South Australia © Patricia F. O’Grady 2005 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Patricia F. O’Grady has asserted her right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identi.ed as the editor of this work. Published by Ashgate Publishing Limited Ashgate Publishing Company Wey Court East Suite 420 Union Road 101 Cherry Street Farnham Burlington Surrey, GU9 7PT VT 05401-4405 England USA Ashgate website: http://www.ashgate.com British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Meet the philosophers of ancient Greece: everything you always wanted to know about ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask 1. Philosophy, Ancient 2. Philosophers – Greece 3. Greece – Intellectual life – To 146 B.C. I. O’Grady, Patricia F. 180 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Meet the philosophers of ancient Greece: everything you always wanted to know about ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask / Patricia F.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollonius of Pergaconics. Books One - Seven
    APOLLONIUS OF PERGACONICS. BOOKS ONE - SEVEN INTRODUCTION A. Apollonius at Perga Apollonius was born at Perga (Περγα) on the Southern coast of Asia Mi- nor, near the modern Turkish city of Bursa. Little is known about his life before he arrived in Alexandria, where he studied. Certain information about Apollonius’ life in Asia Minor can be obtained from his preface to Book 2 of Conics. The name “Apollonius”(Apollonius) means “devoted to Apollo”, similarly to “Artemius” or “Demetrius” meaning “devoted to Artemis or Demeter”. In the mentioned preface Apollonius writes to Eudemus of Pergamum that he sends him one of the books of Conics via his son also named Apollonius. The coincidence shows that this name was traditional in the family, and in all prob- ability Apollonius’ ancestors were priests of Apollo. Asia Minor during many centuries was for Indo-European tribes a bridge to Europe from their pre-fatherland south of the Caspian Sea. The Indo-European nation living in Asia Minor in 2nd and the beginning of the 1st millennia B.C. was usually called Hittites. Hittites are mentioned in the Bible and in Egyptian papyri. A military leader serving under the Biblical king David was the Hittite Uriah. His wife Bath- sheba, after his death, became the wife of king David and the mother of king Solomon. Hittites had a cuneiform writing analogous to the Babylonian one and hi- eroglyphs analogous to Egyptian ones. The Czech historian Bedrich Hrozny (1879-1952) who has deciphered Hittite cuneiform writing had established that the Hittite language belonged to the Western group of Indo-European languages [Hro].
    [Show full text]
  • 9 · the Growth of an Empirical Cartography in Hellenistic Greece
    9 · The Growth of an Empirical Cartography in Hellenistic Greece PREPARED BY THE EDITORS FROM MATERIALS SUPPLIED BY GERMAINE AUJAe There is no complete break between the development of That such a change should occur is due both to po­ cartography in classical and in Hellenistic Greece. In litical and military factors and to cultural developments contrast to many periods in the ancient and medieval within Greek society as a whole. With respect to the world, we are able to reconstruct throughout the Greek latter, we can see how Greek cartography started to be period-and indeed into the Roman-a continuum in influenced by a new infrastructure for learning that had cartographic thought and practice. Certainly the a profound effect on the growth of formalized know­ achievements of the third century B.C. in Alexandria had ledge in general. Of particular importance for the history been prepared for and made possible by the scientific of the map was the growth of Alexandria as a major progress of the fourth century. Eudoxus, as we have seen, center of learning, far surpassing in this respect the had already formulated the geocentric hypothesis in Macedonian court at Pella. It was at Alexandria that mathematical models; and he had also translated his Euclid's famous school of geometry flourished in the concepts into celestial globes that may be regarded as reign of Ptolemy II Philadelphus (285-246 B.C.). And it anticipating the sphairopoiia. 1 By the beginning of the was at Alexandria that this Ptolemy, son of Ptolemy I Hellenistic period there had been developed not only the Soter, a companion of Alexander, had founded the li­ various celestial globes, but also systems of concentric brary, soon to become famous throughout the Mediter­ spheres, together with maps of the inhabited world that ranean world.
    [Show full text]
  • Archimedes' Cattle Problem
    Occam's Razor Volume 4 (2014) Article 4 2014 Archimedes' Cattle rP oblem Austin Hill Western Washington University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/orwwu Part of the Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Hill, Austin (2014) "Archimedes' Cattle rP oblem," Occam's Razor: Vol. 4 , Article 4. Available at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/orwwu/vol4/iss1/4 This Research Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Western Student Publications at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occam's Razor by an authorized editor of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hill: Archimedes' Cattle Problem ARCHIMEDES’ CATTLE PROBLEM by Austin Hill If thou art able, O stranger, to find out all these things and gather them together in your mind, giving all the relations, thou shalt depart crowned with glory and knowing that thou hast been adjudged perfect in this species of wisdom. - Archimedes 22 Published by Western CEDAR, 2017 1 Occam's Razor, Vol. 4 [2017], Art. 4 Archimedes, born nearly 2,300 years ago, is a man of legacy The problem was presented to Eratosthenes in the form of within the mathematical and scientific world. Known for a poetic letter and is broken up into two smaller problems. his work in the field of hydrostatics, mathematical calculus, For the first problem, Archimedes provides a system of and geometry, Archimedes’ mathematical advancements seven linear equations, each of which relates the number went unrivaled for 2,000 years until the time of Isaac of a certain color and gender of cattle to another two.
    [Show full text]