DOCSLIB.ORG

Interim Recovery Plan for the Threatened Migratory Shorebirds Visiting Western Australia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interim Recovery Plan for the Threatened Migratory Shorebirds Visiting Western Australia Wildlife Conservation Plan for Migratory Shorebirds Commonwealth of Australia 2015 Adopted as an Interim Recovery Plan for the Threatened Migratory Shorebirds visiting Western Australia Red knot (Calidris canutus) Curlew Sandpiper (Calidris ferruginea) Great Knot (Calidris tenuirostris) Greater Sand Plover (Charadrius leschenaultii) Lesser Sand Plover (Charadrius mongolus) Bar-tailed Godwit (western Alaskan) (Limosa lapponica baueri) Bar-tailed Godwit (northern Siberian) (Limosa lapponica menzbieri) Eastern Curlew (Numenius madagascariensis) Wildlife Management Program No. 65 Western Australia Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions December 2018 Western Australia Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia 6983 Foreword Recovery plans are developed within the framework laid down in the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions Corporate Policy Statement No. 35 (Parks and Wildlife, 2015b) and Corporate Guideline No. 36 (Parks and Wildlife, 2015a). Interim recovery plans outline the recovery actions that are needed to urgently address those threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened taxa or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process. The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds necessary to implement actions are subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. The Wildlife Conservation Plan for Migratory Shorebirds, Commonwealth of Australia 2015, has been adopted as an interim recovery plan by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Western Australia. Interim recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in status of the taxon or ecological community, and the completion of recovery actions. Information in the conservation plan was accurate as of August 2015 and the attached conservations advices in May 2015 or May 2016. Citation: Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (2018). Wildlife Conservation Plan for Migratory Shorebirds, Commonwealth of Australia 2015, adopted as an Interim Recovery Plan for the Threatened Migratory Shorebirds visiting Western Australia. Wildlife Management Program No. 65. Perth, WA: Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions. Disclaimer: The State of Western Australia and its employees do not guarantee that this publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. © State of Western Australia Government Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions 2018 ii Contents Foreword ...........................................................................................................................................ii Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Wildlife Conservation Plan for Migratory Shorebirds , Commonwealth of Australia 2015 ............. 4 Appendix 1 - Approved Conservation Advice for the Red knot (Calidris canutus) .........................35 Appendix 2 - Approved Conservation Advice for the Curlew Sandpiper (Calidris ferruginea) ......49 Appendix 3 - Approved Conservation Advice for the Great Knot (Calidris tenuirostris) ................63 Appendix 4 - Approved Conservation Advice for the Greater Sand Plover (Charadrius leschenaultii) ..............................................................................................................................76 Appendix 5 - Approved Conservation Advice for the Lesser Sand Plover (Charadrius mongolus) ...................................................................................................................................93 Appendix 6 - Approved Conservation Advice for the Bar-tailed Godwit (western Alaskan) (Limosa lapponica baueri) .........................................................................................................109 Appendix 7 - Approved Conservation Advice for the Bar-tailed Godwit (northern Siberian) (Limosa lapponica menzbieri) ..................................................................................................125 Appendix 8 - Approved Conservation Advice for the Eastern Curlew (Numenius madagascariensis) ....................................................................................................................140 3 Wildlife Conservation Plan for Migratory Shorebirds August 2015 © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2015. TheWildlife Conservation Plan for Migratory Shorebirds is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/au/ This report should be attributed as ‘Wildlife Conservation Plan for Migratory Shorebirds, Commonwealth of Australia 2015’. The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Front cover: Latham’s snipe feeding on Bribie Island (Graeme Chapman) Back cover: Sharp-tailed sandpiper (Brian Furby Collection) 2 / Wildlife Conservation Plan for Migratory Shorebirds Table of Contents 1 Summary 4 2 Introduction 5 2.1 Review of the 2006–2011 Wildlife Conservation Plan 6 3 Species covered under the Wildlife Conservation Plan 7 4 Vision 7 5 Objectives 7 6 Legal Framework 8 6.1 Statutory commitments relevant to migratory birds 8 6.2 Other Australian commitments relevant to migratory shorebirds 9 7 Important habitat for migratory shorebirds in Australia 11 8 Threats 14 8.1 Habitat loss 14 8.2 Habitat modification 15 8.3 Anthropogenic disturbance 16 8.4 Climate variability and change 16 8.5 Harvesting of shorebird prey 17 8.6 Fisheries by-catch 17 8.7 Hunting 17 8.8 Threat prioritisation 18 9 Actions to achieve the Specific Objectives 20 10 Affected interests 25 11 Organisations/persons involved in evaluating the performance of the plan 25 12 Major benefits to other migratory species, marine species, species of cetacean or conservation dependent species 27 13 References 28 14 Appendix A 30 3 1 Summary Migratory species which visit Australia such as This revised plan contains clarification of statutory shorebirds and seabirds received national protection elements of the EPBC Act by addressing topics as a matter of national environmental significance relevant to the conservation of migratory shorebirds, when the Environment Protection and Biodiversity including a summary of Australia’s commitments Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) took effect in under international conventions and agreements, and July 2000. Under the EPBC Act, wildlife conservation identification of important habitat. It outlines national plans may be prepared for the purposes of protection, actions to support EAAF shorebird conservation, and conservation and management of listed migratory, should be used to ensure these activities are integrated marine, cetacean or conservation dependant species. and remain focused on the long-term survival of migratory shorebird populations and their habitats. This Wildlife Conservation Plan for Migratory Shorebirds provides a framework to guide the The Wildlife Conservation Plan for Migratory conservation of migratory shorebirds and their habitat Shorebirds will remain in place until such time in Australia and, in recognition of their migratory that the shorebird populations that visit Australia habits, outlines national activities to support their have improved to the point where they do not appreciation and conservation throughout the East need research or management actions to support Asian-Australasian Flyway (EAAF). The previous their survival. This plan will be in place for five Wildlife Conservation Plan for Migratory Shorebirds years and will be reviewed in 2020. It is available came into effect in February 2006, and was the for download from the Department’s website at: first wildlife conservation plan developed under the www.environment.gov.au/resource/wildlife-conservat EPBC Act. ion-plan-migratory-shorebirds Based on expert opinion and new information, a review of the previous wildlife conservation plan recommended that Little ringed plover (Charadrius dubius) should be added to the revised list of species covered by the plan. The species is a known regular visitor to northern Australia in low numbers (Geering et al. 2007). Photo: Aerial view of the Oyster Farms and coastal area of Barilla Bay (Nick Rains) 4 / Wildlife Conservation Plan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table 7: Species Changing IUCN Red List Status (2014-2015)
    IUCN Red List version 2015.4: Table 7 Last Updated: 19 November 2015 Table 7: Species changing IUCN Red List Status (2014-2015) Published listings of a species' status may change for a variety of reasons (genuine improvement or deterioration in status; new information being available that was not known at the time of the previous assessment; taxonomic changes; corrections to mistakes made in previous assessments, etc. To help Red List users interpret the changes between the Red List updates, a summary of species that have changed category between 2014 (IUCN Red List version 2014.3) and 2015 (IUCN Red List version 2015-4) and the reasons for these changes is provided in the table below. IUCN Red List Categories: EX - Extinct, EW - Extinct in the Wild, CR - Critically Endangered, EN - Endangered, VU - Vulnerable, LR/cd - Lower Risk/conservation dependent, NT - Near Threatened (includes LR/nt - Lower Risk/near threatened), DD - Data Deficient, LC - Least Concern (includes LR/lc - Lower Risk, least concern). Reasons for change: G - Genuine status change (genuine improvement or deterioration in the species' status); N - Non-genuine status change (i.e., status changes due to new information, improved knowledge of the criteria, incorrect data used previously, taxonomic revision, etc.); E - Previous listing was an Error. IUCN Red List IUCN Red Reason for Red List Scientific name Common name (2014) List (2015) change version Category Category MAMMALS Aonyx capensis African Clawless Otter LC NT N 2015-2 Ailurus fulgens Red Panda VU EN N 2015-4
    [Show full text]
  • Nordmann's Greenshank Population Analysis, at Pantai Cemara Jambi
    Final Report Nordmann’s Greenshank Population Analysis, at Pantai Cemara Jambi Cipto Dwi Handono1, Ragil Siti Rihadini1, Iwan Febrianto1 and Ahmad Zulfikar Abdullah1 1Yayasan Ekologi Satwa Alam Liar Indonesia (Yayasan EKSAI/EKSAI Foundation) Surabaya, Indonesia Background Many shorebirds species have declined along East Asian-Australasian Flyway which support the highest diversity of shorebirds in the world, including the globally endangered species, Nordmann’s Greenshank. Nordmann’s Greenshank listed as endangered in the IUCN Red list of Threatened Species because of its small and declining population (BirdLife International, 2016). It’s one of the world’s most threatened shorebirds, is confined to the East Asian–Australasian Flyway (Bamford et al. 2008, BirdLife International 2001, 2012). Its global population is estimated at 500–1,000, with an estimated 100 in Malaysia, 100–200 in Thailand, 100 in Myanmar, plus unknown but low numbers in NE India, Bangladesh and Sumatra (Wetlands International 2006). The population is suspected to be rapidly decreasing due to coastal wetland development throughout Asia for industry, infrastructure and aquaculture, and the degradation of its breeding habitat in Russia by grazing Reindeer Rangifer tarandus (BirdLife International 2012). Mostly Nordmann’s Greenshanks have been recorded in very small numbers throughout Southeast Asia, and there are few places where it has been reported regularly. In Myanmar, for example, it was rediscovered after a gap of almost 129 years. The total count recorded by the Asian Waterbird Census (AWC) in 2006 for Myanmar was 28 birds with 14 being the largest number at a single locality (Naing 2007). In 2011–2012, Nordmann’s Greenshank was found three times in Sumatera Utara province, N Sumatra.
    [Show full text]
  • No General Shift in Spring Migration Phenology by Eastern North American Birds Since 1970
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.25.445655; this version posted May 26, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. No general shift in spring migration phenology by eastern North American birds since 1970 André Desrochers Département des sciences du bois et de la forêt, Université Laval, Québec, Canada Andra Florea Observatoire d’oiseaux de Tadoussac, Québec, Canada Pierre-Alexandre Dumas Observatoire d’oiseaux de Tadoussac, Québec, Canada, and Département des sci- ences du bois et de la forêt, Université Laval, Québec, Canada We studied the phenology of spring bird migration from eBird and ÉPOQ checklist programs South of 49°N in the province of Quebec, Canada, between 1970 and 2020. 152 species were grouped into Arctic, long-distance, and short-distance migrants. Among those species, 75 sig- nificantly changed their migration dates, after accounting for temporal variability in observation effort, species abundance, and latitude. But in contrast to most studies on the subject, we found no general advance in spring migration dates, with 36 species advancing and 39 species delaying their migration. Several early-migrant species associated to open water advanced their spring mi- gration, possibly due to decreasing early-spring ice cover in the Great Lakes and the St-Lawrence river since 1970. Arctic breeders and short-distance migrants advanced their first arrival dates more than long-distance migrants not breeding in the arctic.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Actitis Hypoleucos</I>
    Partial primary moult in first-spring/summer Common Sandpipers Actitis hypoleucos M. NICOLL 1 & P. KEMP 2 •c/o DundeeMuseum, Dundee, Tayside, UK 243 LochinverCrescent, Dundee, Tayside, UK Citation: Nicoll, M. & Kemp, P. 1983. Partial primary moult in first-spring/summer Common Sandpipers Actitis hypoleucos. Wader Study Group Bull. 37: 37-38. This note is intended to draw the attention of wader catch- and the old inner feathersare often retained (Pearson 1974). ers to the needfor carefulexamination of the primariesof Similarly, in Zimbabwe, first-year Common Sandpipers CommonSandpipers Actiris hypoleucos,and other waders, replacethe outerfive to sevenprimaries between December for partial primarywing moult. This is thoughtto be a diag- andApril (Tree 1974). It thusseems normal for first-spring/ nosticfeature of wadersin their first spring and summer summerCommon Sandpipers wintering in eastand southern (Tree 1974). Africa to show a contrast between new outer and old inner While membersof the Tay Ringing Group were mist- primaries.There is no informationfor birdswintering further nettingin Angus,Scotland, during early May 1980,a Com- north.However, there may be differencesin moult strategy mon Sandpiperdied accidentally.This bird was examined betweenwintering areas,since 3 of 23 juvenile Common and measured, noted as an adult, and then stored frozen un- Sandpiperscaught during autumn in Morocco had well- til it was skinned,'sexed', andthe gut contentsremoved for advancedprimary moult (Pienkowski et al. 1976). These analysis.Only duringskinning did we noticethat the outer birdswere moultingnormally, and so may have completed primarieswere fresh and unworn in comparisonto the faded a full primary moult during their first winter (M.W. Pien- and abradedinner primaries.The moult on both wingswas kowski, pers.comm.).
    [Show full text]
  • The Systematic Position of the Surfbird, Aphriza Virgata
    THE SYSTEMATIC POSITION OF THE SURFBIRD, APHRIZA VIRGATA JOSEPH R. JEHL, JR. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 The taxonomic relationships of the Surfbird, ( 1884) elevated the tumstone-Surfbird unit Aphriza virgata, have long been one of the to family rank. But, although they stated (p. most controversial problems in shorebird clas- 126) that Aphrizu “agrees very closely” with sification. Although the species has been as- Arenaria, the only points of similarity men- signed to a monotypic family (Shufeldt 1888; tioned were “robust feet, without trace of web Ridgway 1919), most modern workers agree between toes, the well formed hind toe, and that it should be placed with the turnstones the strong claws; the toes with a lateral margin ( Arenaria spp. ) in the subfamily Arenariinae, forming a broad flat under surface.” These even though they have reached no consensuson differences are hardly sufficient to support the affinities of this subfamily. For example, familial differentiation, or even to suggest Lowe ( 1931), Peters ( 1934), Storer ( 1960), close generic relationship. and Wetmore (1965a) include the Arenariinae Coues (1884605) was uncertain about the in the Scolopacidae (sandpipers), whereas Surfbirds’ relationships. He called it “a re- Wetmore (1951) and the American Ornithol- markable isolated form, perhaps a plover and ogists ’ Union (1957) place it in the Charadri- connecting this family with the next [Haema- idae (plovers). The reasons for these diverg- topodidae] by close relationships with Strep- ent views have never been stated. However, it silas [Armaria], but with the hind toe as well seems that those assigning the Arenariinae to developed as usual in Sandpipers, and general the Charadriidae have relied heavily on their appearance rather sandpiper-like than plover- views of tumstone relationships, because schol- like.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix M Migratory Bird Species Recorded in the Bing Bong - Mcarthur River Area
    APPENDIX M MIGRATORY BIRD SPECIES RECORDED IN THE BING BONG - MCARTHUR RIVER AREA COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME RECORDED RECORDED EPBC ACT NORTHERN GROUP FEEDING AREA RECORDED FEEDING IN (Blakers IN (Chatto PROTECTED HEMISPHERE FOODS (Lane METHOD et al 1985) 2000,2001,20 MATTERS MIGRANTS 1987) 03) White-breasted Sea-Eagle Haliaeetus leucogaster x x x bird of prey open water Osprey Pandion haliaetus x bird of prey open water Little Tern Sterna albifrons x x seabird open water dive Bridled Tern Sterna anaethetus x seabird open water dive Lesser Crested Tern ^ Sterna bengalensis seabird open water dive Common Tern ^ Sterna hirundo x seabird open water dive Black-naped Tern Sterna sumatrana x x seabird open water dive Masked Booby ^ Sula dactylatra seabird open water dive Brown Booby * Sula leucogaster seabird open water dive Common Noddy * Anous stolidus seabird open water dive Least Frigatebird * Fregata ariel seabird open water Great Frigatebird * Fregata minor seabird open water Caspian Tern Hydroprogne caspia x x seabird open water dive Streaked Shearwater Puffinus leucomelas x seabird dive Little Curlew ^ Numenius minutus x x shorebird dry grassland insects, vegetable matter Greater Sand-Plover Charadrius leschenaultii x x shorebird intertidal mudflats crabs, marine visual, run worms, insects and peck Lesser Sand-Plover Charadrius mongolus x x shorebird intertidal mudflats crabs, molluscs, crustacea, worms Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus x x x shorebird intertidal mudflats crabs probe Grey Plover Pluvialis squatarola x x shorebird intertidal
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aspects of Feeding Ecology of the Lesser Sand Plover Charadrius Mongolus in Three Different Zones in the Kadalundy Estuary, Kerala, South India
    Feeding ecology of Lesser Sand Plover in Kerala, S India – K.M. Aarif Some Aspects of Feeding Ecology of the Lesser Sand Plover Charadrius mongolus in Three Different Zones in the Kadalundy Estuary, Kerala, South India K.M. AARIF Department of Zoology, Mananthavady Campus, Kannur University, Waynad District, Kerala, South INDIA. Email: [email protected] Received 24 October 2009; accepted 12 December 2009 Abstract: The study on feeding ecology of the Lesser Sand Plover (LSP) at Kadalundy estuary from July 2007 to December 2008, revealed that there were 13 species of crustaceans and 16 species of polychaete worms identified in the study area of which all identified small crab species(4 species) and polychaete worms (4 species) were consumed by LSPs. The highest number of crustacean species was found in mangroves (11 species). In contrast the highest species number of polychaete worms (13 species) was seen in the mudflats while no polychaete worm was identified in the sandy beds. Of the Crustaceans, Sesarma quadrata and Ocypoda sp. occurred in all the habitats. Sampling polychaete worms undertaken once a month showed that the number peaked at 39 in December 2008 in mudflats. Using direct observations once a week, the number of feeding birds was at its highest in December and January. Pearson correlation test showed significant relationship between the number of polychaete worms and feeding LSPs both at mudflats and mangroves ( p<0.05) and the Scheffe univariate test (ANOVA) showed significant differences between the three habitat zones ( p<0.01). The highest number of average total pecks at prey was seen at mudflats (82.1 in the morning and 128.0 in the afternoon).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Shorebird Profiles
    List of Shorebird Profiles Pacific Central Atlantic Species Page Flyway Flyway Flyway American Oystercatcher (Haematopus palliatus) •513 American Avocet (Recurvirostra americana) •••499 Black-bellied Plover (Pluvialis squatarola) •488 Black-necked Stilt (Himantopus mexicanus) •••501 Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani)•490 Buff-breasted Sandpiper (Tryngites subruficollis) •511 Dowitcher (Limnodromus spp.)•••485 Dunlin (Calidris alpina)•••483 Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa haemestica)••475 Killdeer (Charadrius vociferus)•••492 Long-billed Curlew (Numenius americanus) ••503 Marbled Godwit (Limosa fedoa)••505 Pacific Golden-Plover (Pluvialis fulva) •497 Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa)••473 Ruddy Turnstone (Arenaria interpres)•••479 Sanderling (Calidris alba)•••477 Snowy Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus)••494 Spotted Sandpiper (Actitis macularia)•••507 Upland Sandpiper (Bartramia longicauda)•509 Western Sandpiper (Calidris mauri) •••481 Wilson’s Phalarope (Phalaropus tricolor) ••515 All illustrations in these profiles are copyrighted © George C. West, and used with permission. To view his work go to http://www.birchwoodstudio.com. S H O R E B I R D S M 472 I Explore the World with Shorebirds! S A T R ER G S RO CHOOLS P Red Knot (Calidris canutus) Description The Red Knot is a chunky, medium sized shorebird that measures about 10 inches from bill to tail. When in its breeding plumage, the edges of its head and the underside of its neck and belly are orangish. The bird’s upper body is streaked a dark brown. It has a brownish gray tail and yellow green legs and feet. In the winter, the Red Knot carries a plain, grayish plumage that has very few distinctive features. Call Its call is a low, two-note whistle that sometimes includes a churring “knot” sound that is what inspired its name.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration Route for Greater and Lesser Sand Plovers Spending the Non-Breeding Season in Kenya
    Biodiversity Observations http://bo.adu.org.za An electronic journal published by the Animal Demography Unit at the University of Cape Town The scope of Biodiversity Observations consists of papers describing observations about biodiversity in general, including animals, plants, algae and fungi. This includes observations of behaviour, breeding and flowering patterns, distributions and range extensions, foraging, food, movement, measurements, habitat and colouration/plumage variations. Biotic interactions such as pollination, fruit dispersal, herbivory and predation fall within the scope, as well as the use of indigenous and exotic species by humans. Observations of naturalised plants and animals will also be considered. Biodiversity Observations will also publish a variety of other interesting or relevant biodiversity material: reports of projects and conferences, annotated checklists for a site or region, specialist bibliographies, book reviews and any other appropriate material. Further details and guidelines to authors are on this website. Lead Editor: Arnold van der Westhuizen – Paper Editor: Les G Underhill CLUES TOWARDS THE MIGRATION ROUTE FOR GREATER AND LESSER SAND PLOVERS SPENDING THE NON-BREEDING SEASON IN KENYA Colin H.W. Jackson Recommended citation format: Jackson CHW 2016. Clues towards the migration route for Greater and Lesser Sand Plovers spending the non-breeding season in Kenya. Biodiversity Observations 7.36: 1–8. URL: http://bo.adu.org.za/content.php?id=229 Published online: 5 July 2016 – ISSN 2219-0341 – Biodiversity Observations 7.36: 1–8 1 MIGRATION breeds in north-western China (Hirschfield et al. 2000, Delany et al. 2009). CLUES TOWARDS THE MIGRATION ROUTE FOR In both species the adults return to their breeding grounds annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmanian Bird Report 38
    Tasmanian Bird Report 38 July 2017 BirdLife Tasmania, a branch of BirdLife Australia Editor, Wynne Webber TASMANIA The Tasmanian Bird Report is published by BirdLife Tasmania, a regional branch of BirdLife Australia Number 38 © 2017 BirdLife Tasmania, GPO Box 68, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001 ISSN 0156-4935 This publication is copyright. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may, except for the purposes of study or research, be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission in writing of BirdLife Tasmania or the respective paper’s author(s). Acknowledgments NRM South, through funding from the Australian Government’s National Landcare Programme, has provided financial assistance for the publication of this report. We thank them both for this contribution. Contents Editorial iv Wynne Webber State of Tasmania’s terrestrial birds 2014–15 1 Mike Newman, Nick Ramshaw, Sue Drake, Eric Woehler, Andrew Walter and Wynne Webber Risk of anticoagulant rodenticides to Tasmanian raptors 17 Nick Mooney Oddities of behaviour and occurrence 26 Compiler, Wynne Webber When is the best time to survey shorebirds? 31 Stephen Walsh A Eurasian Coot nests in Hobart 32 William E. Davis, Jr Changes in bird populations on Mt Wellington over a 40-year period 34 Mike Newman 2016 Summer and winter wader counts 44 (incorporating corrected tables for 2015 summer counts) Eric Woehler and Sue Drake Editorial In this Tasmanian Bird Report we institute what is hoped to be a useful and ongoing enterprise, which replaces the systematic lists of earlier years: a report on ‘The state of Tasmania’s birds’.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Red Knot (Calidris Canutus Rufa) in the Western Hemisphere
    Status of the Red Knot ( STATUS OF THE RED KNOT (CALIDRIS CANUTUS RUFA) IN THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE Calidris canutus rufa LAWRENCE J. NILES, HUMPHREY P. SITTERS, AMANDA D. DEY, PHILIP W. ATKINSON, ALLAN J. BAKER, KAREN A. BENNETT, ROBERTO CARMONA, KATHLEEN E. CLARK, NIGEL A. CLARK, CARMEN ESPOZ, PATRICIA M. GONZÁLEZ, BRIAN A. HARRINGTON, DANIEL E. HERNÁNDEZ, KEVIN S. KALASZ, RICHARD G. LATHROP, RICARDO N. MATUS, CLIVE D. T. MINTON, R. I. GUY MORRISON, ) Niles et al. Studies in Avian Biology No. 36 MARK K. PECK, WILLIAM PITTS, ROBERT A. ROBINSON, AND INÊS L. SERRANO Studies in Avian Biology No. 36 A Publication of the Cooper Ornithological Society STATUS OF THE RED KNOT (CALIDRIS CANUTUS RUFA) IN THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE Lawrence J. Niles, Humphrey P. Sitters, Amanda D. Dey, Philip W. Atkinson, Allan J. Baker, Karen A. Bennett, Roberto Carmona, Kathleen E. Clark, Nigel A. Clark, Carmen Espoz, Patricia M. González, Brian A. Harrington, Daniel E. Hernández, Kevin S. Kalasz, Richard G. Lathrop, Ricardo N. Matus, Clive D. T. Minton, R. I. Guy Morrison, Mark K. Peck, William Pitts, Robert A. Robinson, and Inês L. Serrano Studies in Avian Biology No. 36 A PUBLICATION OF THE COOPER ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY Front cover photograph of Red Knots by Irene Hernandez Rear cover photograph of Red Knot by Lawrence J. Niles STUDIES IN AVIAN BIOLOGY Edited by Carl D. Marti 1310 East Jefferson Street Boise, ID 83712 Spanish translation by Carmen Espoz Studies in Avian Biology is a series of works too long for The Condor, published at irregular intervals by the Cooper Ornithological Society.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Record of Spotted Redshank Tringa Erythropus for South America
    COTINGA 9 The first record of Spotted Redshank Tringa erythropus for South America David Fisher Se describe el registro del primer Tringa erythropus para América del Sur, en las lagunas Bon Accord, Tobago, el 13 febrero 1983. El registro ha sido recientemente aceptado por el Comité de Rarezas de Trinidad & Tobago. Se discute este registro a la luz de otras apariciones en USA, Barbados y aquellos de otras aves del Paleártico Occidental en Trinidad & Tobago. On the morning of 13 February 1983, while lead­ ing a combined Sunbird/Wings birdwatching tour to Trinidad and Tobago, I found a Spotted Redshank Tringa erythropus at the Bon Accord lagoons in south-west Tobago. It was associating with a small group of Willets Catoptrophorus semipalmatus, Greater Yellowlegs Tringa melanoleuca and Lesser Yellowlegs T. flavipes. Features which immediately made the bird stand out from the other waders present were its Figure 1. Field notes on the Spotted Redshank Tringa orange-red legs, long fine black bill with a red ba­ erythropus, made at the time of observation. sal half to the lower mandible, and broad white supraloral stripe extending just to the rear of the 1980, concurrently with a Greenshank Tringa eye. The upperparts were rath er uniform pale grey, nebularia (R. ffrench pers. comm.). though the tertials were well notched in the usual Tobago is, of course, well placed to receive va­ way for this species in w inter plumage. The under­ grants from the Western Palearctic and during parts were white. eight visits to Tobago between 1976–1989, I saw The record was submitted to Richard ffrench single Ruff Philomachus pugnax and Black-headed who included it in the second edition of his A guide Gull Larus ridibundus on two occasions each and to the birds of Trinidad and Tobago1 but square a single Lesser Black-backed Gull L.
    [Show full text]