DOCSLIB.ORG

The 1855 Wairarapa Earthquake Symposium

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The 1855 Wairarapa Earthquake Symposium 150 years of thinking about magnitude 8+ earthquakes and seismic hazard in New Zealand 8–10 September 2005 Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa Proceedings Volume Compiled by John Townend, Rob Langridge, and Andrew Jones The papers collated in this volume have been reformatted, where necessary, from the authors’ originals, but have not otherwise been edited. The views expressed in these papers are those of the respective authors. The 1855 Wairarapa Earthquake Symposium — Proceedings Volume Published by Greater Wellington Regional Council Greater Wellington Publication Number: GW/RINV-T-05/205 ISBN: 0-909016-87-9 September 2005 PREFACE John Townend, Organising Committee Chair Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington ([email protected]) The 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake and tsunami remind us of the brutal levels of destruction that a large earthquake can wreak. This symposium, held to commemorate the 150th anniversary of the 1855 Wairarapa earthquake, is intended to facilitate discussion between people working on different facets of the problem of understanding and anticipating earthquakes in New Zealand. During planning for this event, the invited speakers were asked to address one or more of four key themes: what happened then; what has happened since; what is happening now; and where should we focus future efforts? As the abstracts in this volume attest, the significance of the 1855 Wairarapa earthquake lies not simply in the dramatic scale of its immediate geological and social effects, but in the much longer-term, ongoing influence it has exerted on research and practice in New Zealand science, engineering, and civil defence and emergency management planning. While the scientific and engineering communities’ understanding of earthquakes and their effects has developed immensely in recent decades, the growth of the wider community’s exposure to those earthquakes has been even more dramatic. The diversity of institutions and disciplines represented in this extended abstracts volume underscores the importance of experts in all fields being aware of what their colleagues elsewhere know and need to know. The organising committee gratefully acknowledges the generous support received from the following organisations, without which this event would not have been held: • The Earthquake Commission (Gold sponsor); • The Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences, the Wellington Emergency Management Office (Absolutely Positively Wellington), Greater Wellington Regional Council, and the Ministry of Civil Defence & Emergency Management (Silver sponsors); • Victoria Link Ltd., Victoria University of Wellington, and the International Conference Fund, administered by the Royal Society of New Zealand (Bronze sponsors). We particularly thank David Middleton (General Manager, Earthquake Commission) for his enthusiastic support of this symposium throughout its gestation. We also thank the Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences for its targeted sponsorship of student registrations, and Greater Wellington Regional Council for assistance in printing this volume and the accompanying field-trip guide. The 1855 Wairarapa Earthquake Symposium i ORGANISING COMMITTEE John Townend (Chair, Victoria University of Wellington) Dave Brunsdon (Wellington Lifelines Group) Ursula Cochran (Geological Society of New Zealand) Sophie Dalziel (Victoria Link Ltd.) Andrew Jones (Greater Wellington) Rob Langridge (Geological and Nuclear Sciences) Euan Smith (New Zealand Geophysical Society) The committee thanks Suzanne Vintiner and Judith Wayers (Te Papa) for their assistance in organising this event; Penny Murray (GNS) for help in formatting the abstracts; Anita Vallely (Victoria Link Ltd.) for designing the proceedings volume and field-trip guide covers; and Absolutely Organised, particularly Chris Wong Nam and Jill Herman, for handling the registrations and finances (www.absolutelyorganised.co.nz). ii The 1855 Wairarapa Earthquake Symposium PROGRAMME Thursday 8 September (Soundings Theatre, Level 2) Topic Speaker Organisation Start Duration Registration 0800 30 Welcome Cr Ian Greater 0830 10 Buchanan Wellington On the 23rd of January, 1855… [What happened then?] The 1855 January 23 M8+ Wairarapa Gaye Downes GNS 0840 40 earthquake — what contemporary accounts tell us about it Co-seismic slip during the 1855 earthquake, Tim Little Victoria 0920 20 southern Wairarapa Fault, New Zealand University Wairarapa Fault rupture — vertical John Begg GNS 0940 20 deformation in 1855 and a history of similar events from Turakirae Head Fault slip in the 1855 Wairarapa earthquake John Beavan GNS 1000 20 based on new and reassessed vertical motion observations: did slip occur on the subduction interface? Earthquakes from fault rupture: the scientific Rick Sibson University of 1020 20 impact of the 1855 Wairarapa earthquake Otago Tea 1040 20 Regional tectonic context [What we know about why it happened] Active faulting in the Wellington region Kelvin GNS 1100 20 Berryman The region’s paleoseismic record Russ Van GNS 1120 20 Dissen The southern end of the Wairarapa Fault, and Phil Barnes NIWA 1140 20 surrounding structures in Cook Strait Wairarapa and Wellington earthquakes: past, Martin Reyners GNS 1200 20 present, and future Lunch 1220 60 Earthquake hazards [Specific hazards, now and in the future] Strong ground shaking in the 1855 Wairarapa David Dowrick GNS 1320 20 earthquake Landslides and liquefaction effects caused by Graham Hancox GNS 1340 20 the 1855 Wairarapa earthquake: then and now Tsunami: curiosity or calamity? Rob Bell NIWA 1400 20 Post-earthquake fire and the 1855 Wairarapa Geoff Thomas Victoria 1420 20 earthquake University Tea 1440 20 Assessing hazards in the future [New developments] Earthquakes: their strategic importance in Peter Kingsbury MCDEM 1500 20 CDEM Group plans Earthquake risk: how bad and how often? Warwick Smith GNS 1520 20 Regional riskscape model: progress on Rob Bell NIWA 1540 20 developing a multi-hazard risk toolbox Discussion on hazards research: priorities for the next five years Selected speakers as discussion catalysts 1600 40 Session chairs to summarise the day’s 1640 10 highlights Drinks 1715 Te Papa Spring Lecture Series (free public event) The 1855 Wairarapa earthquake: what if it 3 × 15 min presentations and panel 1830 75 happened tomorrow? discussion: Gaye Downes, Richard Sharpe (Beca), David Johnston (GNS), and Chair (Hamish Campbell) The 1855 Wairarapa Earthquake Symposium iii Friday 9 September (Soundings Theatre, Level 2) Topic Speaker Organisation Start Duration Impact on humans and the built environment Humans The 1855 earthquake: societal impact and Hamish GNS 0840 20 response in Wellington Campbell Individuals' response to natural hazard events John McClure Victoria 0900 20 University Understanding the vulnerability of Erica Dalziell University of 0920 20 organisations Canterbury The built environment The promise of destruction — urban design in Chris McDonald Victoria 0940 20 response to past and future earthquakes University The earthquake's impact on property Graeme Blick LINZ 1000 20 boundaries Key developments: seismic isolation Bill Robinson Robinson Seismic 1020 20 Tea 1040 20 Issues associated with making existing Rob Jury NZSEE Study 1100 20 buildings safe Group Issues associated with the design and Des Bull University of 1120 20 construction of new buildings Canterbury As safe as houses? Stuart Thurston BRANZ 1140 20 Taking natural disaster events into account for Warwick Wellington 1200 20 transportation planning: time for a new Walbran Lifelines Group approach The role of communications in earthquakes Brian Potter Telecom NZ 1220 20 The vulnerability of lifelines to liquefaction: a George Butcher Wairarapa Eng. 1240 20 Wairarapa perspective Lifelines Assoc. Lunch 1300 60 Managing the event [Readiness, response and recovery] Managing the event — a regional CDEM Rian van GW/Wellington 1400 20 Group perspective Schalkwyk CDEM Group National Controller’s perspective Mike O’Leary MCDEM 1420 20 Central government’s role in disaster Pat Helm DPMC 1440 20 management Understanding the scope of the recovery Sarah Norman MCDEM 1500 20 process Tea 1520 20 1855, then and now — an EQC perspective Doug Bent EQC 1540 40 on the 1855 South Wairarapa earthquake Lance Dixon Business response and recovery after major Karen Stephens Resilience 1620 20 earthquakes — what can we expect? Another today: what effects would the 1855 earthquake have now? Selected speakers as discussion catalysts 1640 30 Session chairs to summarise the day’s 1710 10 highlights Saturday 10 September Start Meeting point Event Presenters Full-day field-trip along the Wairarapa Tim Little, John Begg 0800 Te Papa forecourt Fault focussing on fault slip during the 1855 earthquake (pre-registration required) Waterfront walking field-trips: earthquake Hamish Campbell, Richard 1100 Information Desk, impacts and mitigation measures in and Sharpe 1230 Level 2 around Te Papa (free public event) 1400 Water storage display (free public event) Dave Brunsdon, John 1000 Information Desk, Morrison, Rian van Schalkwyk Level 2 iv The 1855 Wairarapa Earthquake Symposium CONTENTS Preface............................................................................................................................... i J. Townend Organising committee.....................................................................................................ii Programme.....................................................................................................................iii
Recommended publications
  • Geology of the Wairarapa Area

    Geology of the Wairarapa Area

    GEOLOGY OF THE WAIRARAPA AREA J. M. LEE J.G.BEGG (COMPILERS) New International NewZOaland Age International New Zealand 248 (Ma) .............. 8~:~~~~~~~~ 16 il~ M.- L. Pleistocene !~ Castlecliffian We £§ Sellnuntian .~ Ozhulflanl Makarewan YOm 1.8 100 Wuehlaplngien i ~ Gelaslan Cl Nukumaruan Wn ~ ;g '"~ l!! ~~ Mangapanlan Ql -' TatarianiMidian Ql Piacenzlan ~ ~;: ~ u Wai i ian 200 Ian w 3.6 ,g~ J: Kazanlan a.~ Zanetaan Opoitian Wo c:: 300 '"E Braxtonisn .!!! .~ YAb 256 5.3 E Kunaurian Messinian Kapitean Tk Ql ~ Mangapirian YAm 400 a. Arlinskian :;; ~ l!!'" 500 Sakmarian ~ Tortonisn ,!!! Tongaporutuan Tt w'" pre-Telfordian Ypt ~ Asselian 600 '" 290 11.2 ~ 700 'lii Serravallian Waiauan 5w Ql ." i'l () c:: ~ 600 J!l - fl~ '§ ~ 0'" 0 0 ~~ !II Lillburnian 51 N 900 Langhian 0 ~ Clifdenian 5e 16.4 ca '1000 1 323 !II Z'E e'" W~ A1tonian PI oS! ~ Burdigalian i '2 F () 0- w'" '" Dtaian Po ~ OS Waitakian Lw U 23.8 UI nlan ~S § "t: ." Duntroonian Ld '" Chattian ~ W'" 28.5 P .Sll~ -''" Whalngaroan Lwh O~ Rupelian 33.7 Late Priabonian ." AC 37.0 n n 0 I ~~ ~ Bortonian Ab g; Lutetisn Paranaen Do W Heretauncan Oh 49.0 354 ~ Mangaorapan Om i Ypreslan .;;: w WalD8wsn Ow ~ JU 54.8 ~ Thanetlan § 370 t-- §~ 0'" ~ Selandian laurien Dt ." 61.0 ;g JM ~"t: c:::::;; a.os'"w Danian 391 () os t-- 65.0 '2 Maastrichtian 0 - Emslsn Jzl 0 a; -m Haumurian Mh :::;; N 0 t-- Campanian ~ Santonian 0 Pragian Jpr ~ Piripauan Mp W w'" -' t-- Coniacian 1ij Teratan Rt ...J Lochovlan Jlo Turonian Mannaotanean Rm <C !II j Arowhanan Ra 417 0- Cenomanian '" Ngaterian Cn Prldoli
  • Stakeholder Study: Resource Management of Wairarapa Moana

    Stakeholder Study: Resource Management of Wairarapa Moana

    Natalie Diltz Jena Mazzucco Austin Scott Jeffrey Sirocki March 2, 2016 STAKEHOLDER STUDY: RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OF WAIRARAPA MOANA Identification and Analysis of Wairarapa Moana Stakeholder Opinions Regarding the Management of the Blundell Barrage Gates Abstract This project aided the Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) in collecting opinions from five stakeholder groups concerning management of the naturally flooding Lake Wairarapa in New Zealand. Our team conducted a total of twenty-nine interviews with the Rangitāne (Māori), Department of Conservation, South Wairarapa District Council, landowners, and recreational water users regarding the Blundell Barrage Gates which play a vital role in flood management. Interview discussions indicate that water quality, sources of pollution, water levels, flood management, and future operation of the barrage gates are controversial. We identified communication, collaboration, and education as three areas of focus for the GWRC as they continue to improve their management of the region. i Executive Summary This project is concerned with Wairarapa Moana, a water system located in the Wairarapa region, situated on the North Island of New Zealand. Wairarapa Moana consists of the three main water bodies, shown in Figure 1; the coastal lake is Lake Onoke, the inland lake is Lake Wairarapa, and the main river is the Ruamahanga. The system is dynamic, which means water can flow in both directions. Both tidal movements and rainfall affect the direction of flow. The area is low-lying and sits between two mountain ranges exposing much of the land to seasonal flooding. The Greater Wellington Regional Council, the governing body for the Wellington region, developed the Lower Wairarapa Valley Development Scheme (LWVDS), to control flooding in the 1960s.
  • Subduction Initiation May Depend on a Tectonic Plate's History 22 June 2021, by David Shultz

    Subduction Initiation May Depend on a Tectonic Plate's History 22 June 2021, by David Shultz

    Subduction initiation may depend on a tectonic plate's history 22 June 2021, by David Shultz geological history makes it an ideal location to study how subduction starts. The team's seismic structural analysis showed that subduction zone initiation begins along existing weaknesses in Earth's crust and relies on differences in lithospheric density. The conditions necessary for the subduction zone's formation began about 45 million years ago, when the Australian and Pacific plates started to pull apart from each other. During that period, extensional forces led to seafloor spreading and the creation of new high-density oceanic lithosphere in the south. However, in the north, the thick and buoyant continental crust of Zealandia was merely stretched and slightly thinned. Over the next several million years, the plates rotated, and strike- The Puysegur Trench follows the natural curvature of slip deformation moved the high-density oceanic New Zealand’s South Island, extending southwest from lithosphere from the south to the north, where it the island’s southern tip. Credit: NASA slammed into low-density continental lithosphere, allowing subduction to begin. Subduction zones are cornerstone components of The researchers contend that the differences in plate tectonics, with one plate sliding beneath lithospheric density combined with existing another back into Earth's mantle. But the very weaknesses along the strike-slip boundary from the beginning of this process—subduction previous tectonic phases facilitated subduction initiation—remains somewhat mysterious to initiation. The team concludes that strike-slip might scientists because most of the geological record of be a key driver of subduction zone initiation subduction is buried and overwritten by the because of its ability to efficiently bring together extreme forces at play.
  • Mauriceville West: 1877-1972 This School Struggled Early

    Mauriceville West: 1877-1972 This School Struggled Early

    Mauriceville West: 1877-1972 This school struggled early a) March 1873 The first party of settlers moved onto their on in dealing and educating children with English as a 2nd land language. The area was settled by Scandinavian Settlers and the b) On a cleared section of land Christian Petersen a teachers had to cope with these people struggling in a foreign Norwegian who did his best to give them a smattering of country. The school was also famous at different periods for its English wood working, science lessons and huge gardens. 24 Kilometres c) They built a rough slab hut to serve as school and from Masterton residence for the teacher. d) Three rooms one to serve as a schoolroom e) Unfurnished and the schoolmaster and his sons set to work to make bunks a table and chairs. f) Christian Peterson received £100 for his services This was supplemented by payments by the settlers of a shilling a week for each pupil. g) If parents couldn’t pay then children couldn’t attend h) In Winter the teacher visited his pupils at home i) One year later he left and the school closed j) July 1886 Government overseer reported on deplorable and about 80 children were neglected. k) 2nd January 1877 “Old School” opened. The school consisted of a single room constructed of sawn timber and had a shingle roof 17th June 1873 With respect to the Danish settlement in School was situated where the hall is named on the map Mauriceville, Wairarapa, the Wairarapa Standard remarks:— "lt is not generally known that this, the youngest of Wairarapa townships, was christened after the Hon.
  • Geophysical Structure of the Southern Alps Orogen, South Island, New Zealand

    Geophysical Structure of the Southern Alps Orogen, South Island, New Zealand

    Regional Geophysics chapter 15/04/2007 1 GEOPHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF THE SOUTHERN ALPS OROGEN, SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND. F J Davey1, D Eberhart-Phillips2, M D Kohler3, S Bannister1, G Caldwell1, S Henrys1, M Scherwath4, T Stern5, and H van Avendonk6 1GNS Science, Gracefield, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, [email protected] 2GNS Science, Dunedin, New Zealand 3Center for Embedded Networked Sensing, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA 4Leibniz-Institute of Marine Sciences, IFM-GEOMAR, Kiel, Germany 5School of Earth Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand 6Institute of Geophysics, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA ABSTRACT The central part of the South Island of New Zealand is a product of the transpressive continental collision of the Pacific and Australian plates during the past 5 million years, prior to which the plate boundary was largely transcurrent for over 10 My. Subduction occurs at the north (west dipping) and south (east dipping) of South Island. The deformation is largely accommodated by the ramping up of the Pacific plate over the Australian plate and near-symmetric mantle shortening. The initial asymmetric crustal deformation may be the result of an initial difference in lithospheric strength or an inherited suture resulting from earlier plate motions. Delamination of the Pacific plate occurs resulting in the uplift and exposure of mid- crustal rocks at the plate boundary fault (Alpine fault) to form a foreland mountain chain. In addition, an asymmetric crustal root (additional 8 - 17 km) is formed, with an underlying mantle downwarp. The crustal root, which thickens southwards, comprises the delaminated lower crust and a thickened overlying middle crust.
  • SEASAT Geoid Anomalies and the Macquarie Ridge Complex Larry Ruff *

    SEASAT Geoid Anomalies and the Macquarie Ridge Complex Larry Ruff *

    Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 38 (1985) 59-69 59 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands SEASAT geoid anomalies and the Macquarie Ridge complex Larry Ruff * Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (U.S.A.) Anny Cazenave CNES-GRGS, 18Ave. Edouard Belin, Toulouse, 31055 (France) (Received August 10, 1984; revision accepted September 5, 1984) Ruff, L. and Cazenave, A., 1985. SEASAT geoid anomalies and the Macquarie Ridge complex. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 38: 59-69. The seismically active Macquarie Ridge complex forms the Pacific-India plate boundary between New Zealand and the Pacific-Antarctic spreading center. The Late Cenozoic deformation of New Zealand and focal mechanisms of recent large earthquakes in the Macquarie Ridge complex appear consistent with the current plate tectonic models. These models predict a combination of strike-slip and convergent motion in the northern Macquarie Ridge, and strike-slip motion in the southern part. The Hjort trench is the southernmost expression of the Macquarie Ridge complex. Regional considerations of the magnetic lineations imply that some oceanic crust may have been consumed at the Hjort trench. Although this arcuate trench seems inconsistent with the predicted strike-slip setting, a deep trough also occurs in the Romanche fracture zone. Geoid anomalies observed over spreading ridges, subduction zones, and fracture zones are different. Therefore, geoid anomalies may be diagnostic of plate boundary type. We use SEASAT data to examine the Maequarie Ridge complex and find that the geoid anomalies for the northern Hjort trench region are different from the geoid anomalies for the Romanche trough.
  • Transpressional Rupture Cascade of the 2016 Mw 7.8

    Transpressional Rupture Cascade of the 2016 Mw 7.8

    PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth RESEARCH ARTICLE Transpressional Rupture Cascade of the 2016 Mw 10.1002/2017JB015168 7.8 Kaikoura Earthquake, New Zealand Key Points: Wenbin Xu1 , Guangcai Feng2, Lingsen Meng3 , Ailin Zhang3, Jean Paul Ampuero4 , • Complex coseismic ground 5 6 deformation can be explained by slip Roland Bürgmann , and Lihua Fang on six crustal fault segments 1 2 • Rupture process across multiple faults Department of Land Surveying and Geo-informatics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China, School of 3 likely resulted from a triggering Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha, China, Department of Earth Planetary and Space cascade between crustal faults Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 4Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, • Rupture speed was overall slow, but Pasadena, CA, USA, 5Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, 6Institute of locally faster along individual fault segments Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing, China Supporting Information: Abstract Large earthquakes often do not occur on a simple planar fault but involve rupture of multiple • Supporting Information S1 • Data Set S1 geometrically complex faults. The 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikoura earthquake, New Zealand, involved the rupture of • Data Set S2 at least 21 faults, propagating from southwest to northeast for about 180 km. Here we combine space • Data Set S3 geodesy and seismology techniques to study subsurface fault geometry, slip distribution, and the kinematics of the rupture. Our finite-fault slip model indicates that the fault motion changes from predominantly Correspondence to: W. Xu, G. Feng, and L. Meng, right-lateral slip near the epicenter to transpressional slip in the northeast with a maximum coseismic surface [email protected]; displacement of about 10 m near the intersection between the Kekerengu and Papatea faults.
  • Find a Midwife/LMC

    Find a Midwife/LMC

    CCDHB Find a Midwife. Enabling and supporting women in their decision to find a Midwife for Wellington, Porirua and Kapiti. https://www.ccdhb.org.nz/our-services/maternity/ It is important to start your search for a Midwife Lead Maternity Carer (LMC) early in pregnancy due to availability. In the meantime you are encouraged to see your GP who can arrange pregnancy bloods and scans to be done and can see you for any concerns. Availability refers to the time you are due to give birth. Please contact midwives during working hours 9am-5pm Monday till Friday about finding midwifery care for the area that you live in. You may need to contact several Midwives. It can be difficult finding an LMC Midwife during December till February If you are not able to find a Midwife fill in the contact form on our website or ring us on 0800 Find MW (0800 346 369) and leave a message LMC Midwives are listed under the area they practice in, and some cover all areas: Northern Broadmeadows, Churton Park, Glenside, Grenada, Grenada North, Horokiwi; Johnsonville, Khandallah, Newlands, Ohariu, Paparangi, Tawa, Takapu Valley, Woodridge Greenacres, Redwood, Linden Western Karori, Northland, Crofton Downs, Kaiwharawhara; Ngaio, Ngauranga, Makara, Makara Beach, Wadestown, Wilton, Cashmere, Chartwell, Highland Park, Rangoon Heights, Te Kainga Central Brooklyn, Aro Valley, Kelburn, Mount Victoria, Oriental Bay, Te Aro, Thorndon, Highbury, Pipitea Southern Berhampore, Island Bay, Newtown, Vogeltown, Houghton Bay, Kingston, Mornington, Mount Cook, Owhiro Bay, Southgate, Kowhai Park Eastern Hataitai, Lyall Bay, Kilbirnie, Miramar, Seatoun, Breaker Bay, Karaka Bays, Maupuia, Melrose, Moa Point, Rongotai, Roseneath, Strathmore, Crawford, Seatoun Bays, Seatoun Heights, Miramar Heights, Strathmore Heights.
  • Contest 2015 Title: “Slip Rate and Paleoseismicity of the Kekerengu Fault: an Anchor Point for Deformation Rates and Seismic H

    Contest 2015 Title: “Slip Rate and Paleoseismicity of the Kekerengu Fault: an Anchor Point for Deformation Rates and Seismic H

    Contest 2015 Title: “Slip Rate and Paleoseismicity of the Kekerengu Fault: An anchor point for deformation rates and seismic hazard through central New Zealand” Leader: Timothy A. Little Organisation: Victoria University of Wellington Total funding (GST ex): $182,778 Title: Slip Rate and Paleoseismicity of the Kekerengu Fault: An anchor point for deformation rates and seismic hazard through central New Zealand Programme Leader: Timothy A. Little Affiliation: Victoria University of Wellington Co-P.I.: Russ Van Dissen (GNS Science) A.I.: Kevin Norton (VUW) Has this report been peer reviewed? Provide name and affiliation. Part of it: the paper by Little et al. was published in 2018 in the Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, which is a peer-reviewed international journal. Table of Contents: 1. Key Message for Media 2. Abstract 3. Introduction/ Background 4. Research Aim 1: Determining Kekerengu Fault Paleoseismic History 5. Research Aim 2: Determining the Late Quaternary Slip Rate of the Kekerengu Fault 6. Conclusions & Recommendations 7. Acknowledgments 8. References 9. Appendices Key Message for Media: [Why are these findings important? Plain language; 5 sentences.] Prior to this study, little scientific data existed about the rate of activity and earthquake hazard posed by the active Kekerengu Fault near the Marlborough coast in northeastern South Island. Our study was designed to test the hypothesis that this fault carries most of the Pacific-Australia plate motion through central New Zealand, and is a major source of seismic hazard for NE South Island and adjacent regions straddling Cook Strait—something that had previously been encoded in the NZ National Seismic Hazard Model.
  • A Gravity Survey of the Wharekauhau Thrust, Palliser Bay, New Zealand

    A Gravity Survey of the Wharekauhau Thrust, Palliser Bay, New Zealand

    New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics ISSN: 0028-8306 (Print) 1175-8791 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tnzg20 A gravity survey of the Wharekauhau Thrust, Palliser Bay, New Zealand Alastair F. McClymont To cite this article: Alastair F. McClymont (2000) A gravity survey of the Wharekauhau Thrust, Palliser Bay, New Zealand, New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 43:2, 303-306, DOI: 10.1080/00288306.2000.9514888 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00288306.2000.9514888 Published online: 23 Mar 2010. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 117 View related articles Citing articles: 2 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tnzg20 Download by: [121.75.88.191] Date: 27 March 2017, At: 18:58 New Zealand Journal of Geology & Geophysics, 2000, Vol. 43: 303-306 303 0028-8306/00/4302-0303 $7.00/0 © The Royal Society of New Zealand 2000 Short communication A gravity survey of the Wharekauhau Thrust, Palliser Bay, New Zealand ALASTAIR F. McCLYMONT TECTONIC SETTING School of Earth Sciences The Wairarapa Fault is one of six major faults of the North Victoria University of Wellington Island Dextral Fault Belt (Beanland 1995), a zone of P.O. Box 600 dominantly dextral strike-slip faults that lie within, and strike Wellington, New Zealand parallel to, the Australia-Pacific plate boundary along the southern North Island of New Zealand (Fig. 1). The M+8 earthquake in 1855 caused surface rupturing along the Abstract A gravity survey undertaken at Wharekauhau, Wairarapa Fault for a distance of at least 148 km (Grapes Palliser Bay, New Zealand, determines the geometry of the 1999).
  • Global-Research-Summary-Report.Pdf

    Global-Research-Summary-Report.Pdf

    Summary Report LET’S GET WELLINGTON MOVING This report presents summary findings of the Let’s Get Wellington Moving (LGWM) November and December 2017 public engagement. February 2018 Report prepared by Global Research Ltd Report By Global Research Ltd Foreword by Let’s Get Wellington Moving Let’s Get Wellington Moving (LGWM) is a joint initiative between Wellington City Council, Greater Wellington Regional Council, and the New Zealand Transport Agency. We’re working with the people of Wellington to develop a transport system that improves how the city looks, feels, and functions. Our focus is the area from Ngauranga to the airport, including the Wellington Urban Motorway and connections to the central city, port, hospital, and the eastern and southern suburbs. OUR WORK SO FAR In 2016 we talked with people around the region to learn what people like and dislike about Wellington and how they get around the city. Using feedback from more than 10,000 people, we developed a set of urban design and transport priniciples to guide our work. We then collected extensive transport data, and used the principles and ideas from the public to develop scenarios to improve Wellington’s transport and support the city’s growth. THIS REPORT In November and December 2017, we released four scenarios for Wellington’s transport future and promoted these in a region-wide public engagement programme. The scenarios were presented in the document Have Your Say…on Let’s Get Wellington Moving and on the website yourvoice.getwellymoving.co.nz. As a result, LGWM received 1,994 online and hardcopy-form responses, 147 letter/report style responses (including 55 from stakeholder groups), and 35 Facebook posts.
  • Quantifying the Incompleteness of New Zealand's Prehistoric

    Quantifying the Incompleteness of New Zealand's Prehistoric

    Quantifying the incompleteness of New Zealand’s prehistoric earthquake record A. Nicol, R.J. Van Dissen, M.W. Stirling, M.C. Gerstenberger BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE Nicol, A.; Van Dissen, R.J.; Stirling, M.W., Gerstenberger, M.C. 2017. Quantifying the incompleteness of New Zealand’s prehistoric earthquake record. EQC project 14/668 Final Report, 25 p. A. Nicol, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand R.J. Van Dissen, PO Box 30368, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand M.W. Stirling, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand M.C. Gerstenberger, PO Box 30368, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand EQC Project 14/668 Final Report 2 CONTENTS LAYMANS ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................... IV TECHNICAL ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................... V KEYWORDS ......................................................................................................................... V 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 6 2.0 DATA SOURCES ....................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Historical Earthquakes .................................................................................................. 8 2.2 active fault earthquake source identification ............................................................... 10 3.0 PROBABILITY OF