Special Articles in Volumes 51-73 of the American Jewish Year Book
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SPECIAL ARTICLES IN VOLUMES 51-73 OF THE AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK Acquisition of Political and Social Rights by Oscar and Mary F. Handlin the Jews in the United States 56:43-98 The American Jew: Some Demographic Ben B.Seligman 51:3-52 Features American Jewish Tercentenary David Bernstein 57:101-18 American Jewry, 1970: Sidney Goldstein 72:3-88 A Demographic Profile Antisemitism as a Policy Tool in the Soviet Maurice Friedberg Bloc 71:123-40 The Church and the Jews: Judith Hershcopf 66:99-136 The Struggle at Vatican II 67:45-77 Concerning Jewish Theology in North Lou H. Silberman 70:37-58 America: Some Notes on a Decade Conference on Jewish Material Claims Lucy S. Dawidowicz Against Germany 54:471-85 61:110-27 Economic Status and Occupational Structure Eli E.Cohen 51:53-70 Eichmann Trial European Jewry Before and Ajter Hitler SaloW. Baron 63:3-53 The Proceedings Le'on Poliakov 63:54-84 America's Response George Salomon 63:85-103 The Judgment Sidney Liskofsky 63:104-19 Text of the Indictment 63:120-31 Intermarriage in the United States Arnold Schwartz 71:101 -21 Jewish Academics in the United States: Seymour Martin Lipset and Their Achievements, Culture and Politics Everett CarllLadd, Jr. 72:89-128 Jewish Education—For What? Walter I. Ackerman 70:3-36 Jewish Fertility in the United States Erich Rosenthal 62:3-27 645 646 / AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, 1973 Jewish Labor Movement in the United States Will Herberg 53:3-74 Jewish Social Work in the United States, Herman D. Stein 57:3-98 1654-1954 Jewish Studies in American Liberal-Arts Arnold J. Band 67:3-30 Colleges and Universities The Jews in Western Europe Today Arnold Mandel 68:3-28 The Legal Status of the Daniel J. Elazar and Stephen R. Goldstein 73:3-94 American Jewish Community Gerald Engel 71:161-87 North American Settlers in Israel Charles S. Liebman Orthodoxy in American Jewish Life 66:21-97 Yitzchak Leybush Peretz: An Appreciation S.Niger 54:542^9 Professional Personnel in the Social Services of the Jewish Community ArnulfM. Pins 64:203-35 The Purposes of the Jewish Community Carl Urbont 68:29-59 Center Movement: An Appraisal of Their Operation Reconstructionism in American Jewish Life Charles S. Liebman 71:3-99 Social Characteristics of American Jews, Nathan Glazer 56:3-41 1654-1954 The Soviet Jewish Problem at the United Ronald I. Rubin 71:141-59 Nations Spiritual Life of American Jewry, 1654—1954 Joseph L.Blau 56:99-170 Studies of Jewish Intermarriage in the United Erich Rosenthal 64:3-53 States Three Centuries of Jewish Life in England, S. D. Temkin 58:3-63 1656-1956 The Training of American Rabbis Charles S. Liebman 69:3-112 Two Centuries of Jewish Life in Canada, Louis Rosenberg 62:28^9 1760-1960 OBITUARIES Leo Baeck By Max Gruenewald 59:478-82 Jacob Blaustein By John Slawson 72:547-57 SPECIAL ARTICLES IN VOLUMES 51-73 / 647 Martin Buber By Seymour Siegel 67:37-43 Abraham Cahan By Mendel Osherowitch 53:527-29 Albert Einstein By Jacob Bronowski 58:480-85 Felix Frankfurter By Paul A. Freund 67:31-36 Louis Ginzberg By Louis Finkelstein 56:573-79 Jacob Glatstein By Shmuel Lapin 73:611-17 Hayim Greenberg By Marie Syrkin 56:589-94 Herbert H. Lehman By Louis Finkelstein 66:3-20 JudahL. Magnes By James Marshall 51:512-15 Alexander Marx By Abraham S. Halkin 56:580-88 Reinhold Niebuhr By Seymour Siegel 73:605-10 Joseph Proskauer By David Sher 73:618-28 Max Weinreich By Lucy S. Dawidowicz 70:59-68 Chaim Weizmann By Harry Sacher 55:462-69 Stephen S. Wise By Philip S. Bernstein 51:515-18 648 / AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, 1973 CLARIFICATIONS AND CORRECTIONS About Stuart Rosenberg's article on the Canadian Jewish community in AJYB, 1972 (Vol. 73), Mr. Sol Kanee, president of the Canadian Jewish Congress, writes: . That the 1971 Plenary Assembly of the Canadian Jewish Congress was "stormy" is a matter of opinion. What is misleading is to link this storminess with dissatisfaction with the Congress'earlier position on Soviet Jewry. There was no such opinion recorded on the floor in the debate, in our record. He [Dr. Rosenberg ] attempts to remove any credit for any reform in this system [of religion in the public schools] from the Canadian Jewish Congress and [describes] it as "more of a tribute to the growing awareness of the pluralistic religious nature of the province than to the efforts of Congress" . It is worthy of note, however, that the Report of the Keiller Mackay Committee (on religious education in the public schools of Ontario) was in language and spirit and in its specific recommendations extremely close, almost parallel, to the brief we submitted in 1967. We acknowledge that Congress grudgingly accepted the high school world religions course. ... it does not replace the 1944 Protestant-oriented course. It cannot replace it by definition since, as its name plainly shows . it is a high school course and the former is an elementary school course. Besides, ... the 1944 elementary school course in religion is still on the books and therefore we face not one, but two courses in religion. Dr. Rosenberg fails to mention Manitoba. There the Canadian Jewish Congress has favored asking for government funds for Jewish schools and has asked for this in a brief. Rabbi Rosenberg fails to note that the Premier, Mr. Schreyer, favors it too and that the opposition within the cabinet, including the three Jewish cabinet members, almost precipitated a cabinet crisis. ... in remaining neutral (not in "lining up against such aid") the CJC in Ontario is not bowing to lethargy or giving in to indifference, or expressing opposition to Jewish day school education, but is recognizing that there is a sizable and respectable weight of opinion in Ontario Jewry that does not want or seek government aid for its day schools—at one point in the past, 50% of our community. There are, within the leadership of Congress, men and women who favor government aid. Those working for such an end prefer to work for it outside of Congress, realizing that Congress can act only where there is a preponderant consensus. At this point such a preponderant consensus does not exist. And by the evidence of the provincial election of 1971 cited by Dr. Rosenberg, the consensus in the community at large is preponderantly opposed to this. CLARIFICATIONS AND CORRECTIONS / 649 ... On kashrut in penal institutions, Congress has recently made more progress than applies in probably any country in the world (Israel, of course. e»cepted). In the province of Ontario (in provincial institutions) any Jewish prisoner can be provided with regular kosher food. ... In religious broadcasting the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation has had two Jewish representatives on its Religious Advisory Committee for several years, named by Canadian Jewish Congress. ... he states that on all these matters "there was no real agreement." Among whom? Does he mean internal agreement within our own Jewish ranks or agreement from the authorities and others in respect to penal institutions, civil service regulations, religious broadcasting, etc.? We wonder, also, what purpose is served by Dr. Rosenberg's heavy-handed sarcasm in the phrase, "the so-called national office" of the Canada-Israel Committee. Does this touch add anything to the validity of his contribution? . The Canada-Israel Committee was in operation at the time Rabbi Rosenberg wrote his piece and has been functioning ever since. It has a full-time director with a varied and imaginative program. In discussing the Ontario Provincial Parliament, Rabbi Rosenberg omits to mention the Leader of the New Democratic Party, Mr. Stephen Lewis, who is a member of the Jewish community. The following is excerpted from a reply by Dr. Rosenberg: 1. Even the CJC Bulletin refers to the plenary sessions in 1971 as "stormy." So did the Canadian Jewish News, and many of my close associates who were in attendance told me the same thing. Mr. Kanee says that this is not in the official record. Some things rarely get put down in an "official record," precisely because it is official. Mr. Kanee, as president of CJC, can hardly be objective. Nor is he a scholar—with all due respect to him, as a fine human being and Jew. On the other hand, scores of delegates from Toronto, particularly young people, told me after the convention that they objected not only to what they saw as the inactivity of Congress on the issue of Soviet Jewry, but also to its political and cultural lag generally. Indeed, the very fact that shortly after that convention CJC took steps to appoint a director (still not full-time, by the way) for efforts on behalf of Soviet Jewry—long before undertaken on their own by other Canadian Jewish groups—proves that the convention had indeed shaken up the CJC leadership. That is precisely the import of my statement that CJC's "stand on Soviet Jewry . become positive and more activist. ..." 2. I did not withhold credit from CJC for any reform in the system of religion in the public schools. I looked at the total Canadian political-cultural scene rather than at 650 / AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, 1973 CJC alone. Changes in Canadian Jewish life are attributable not only to CJC and its leadership, but also to changes in milieu and thinking. If all that is needed is to sit back and wait for "consensus," why a Canadian Jewish Congress? I have in my possession declarations signed by almost 10,000 Jewish families in Ontario who support provincial aid to Jewish day schools—and this without a high-power campaign or newspaper ads, but simply by word of mouth.