DOCSLIB.ORG

Semantic Pleonasm Detection

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Semantic Pleonasm Detection Semantic Pleonasm Detection Omid Kashefi Andrew T. Lucas Rebecca Hwa School of Computing and Information University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, 15260 kashefi, andrew.lucas, hwa @cs.pitt.edu { } Abstract some GEC corpora do annotate some words or phrases as “redundant” or “unnecessary,” they are Pleonasms are words that are redundant. To typically a manifestation of grammar errors (e.g., aid the development of systems that detect we still have room to improve our current pleonasms in text, we introduce an anno- for tated corpus of semantic pleonasms. We val- welfare system) rather than a stylistic redundancy idate the integrity of the corpus with inter- (e.g., we aim to better improve our welfare annotator agreement analyses. We also com- system). pare it against alternative resources in terms of This paper presents a new Semantic Pleonasm their effects on several automatic redundancy Corpus (SPC), a collection of three thousand sen- detection methods. tences. Each sentence features a pair of potentially 1 Introduction semantically related words (chosen by a heuris- tic); human annotators determine whether either Pleonasm is the use of extraneous words in an (or both) of the words is redundant. The corpus expression such that removing them would not offers two improvements over current resources. significantly alter the meaning of the expression First, the corpus filters for grammatical sentences (Merriam-Webster, 1983; Quinn, 1993; Lehmann, so that the question of redundancy is separated 2005). Although pleonastic phrases may serve from grammaticality. Second, the corpus is fil- literary functions (e.g., to add emphasis) (Miller, tered for a balanced set of positive and negative ex- 1951; Chernov, 1979), most modern writing style amples (i.e., no redundancy). The negative exam- guides caution against them in favor of con- ples may make useful benchmark data – because cise writing (Hart et al., 1905; Williams, 2003; they all contain a pair of words that are deemed to Turabian, 2013; Gowers, 2014; Strunk, 1920). be semantically related, a successful system can- An automatic pleonasm detector would be not rely on simple heuristics, such as semantic dis- beneficial for natural language processing tances, for discrimination. We evaluate the cor- (NLP) applications that support student writ- pus in terms of inter-annotator agreement, and in ing, such as grammar error correction (GEC) terms of its usefulness for developing automatic (Han et al., 2006; Rozovskaya and Roth, 2010; pleonasm detectors. Tetreault et al., 2010; Dahlmeier and Ng, 2011), automatic essay grading (Larkey, 1998; Landauer, 2 Semantic Pleonasm 2003; Ong et al., 2014), and intelligent writing tutors (Merrill et al., 1992; Aleven et al., 2009; Although pleonasm is generally a semantic and Atkinson, 2016). Pleonastic phrases may also rhetorical concept, it could have different aspects negatively impact NLP applications in general and be formed in different layers of language, in- because they introduce an unnecessary complexity cluding morphemic (e.g., “irregardless”(Berube, to the language. Their removal might facilitate 1985)) and syntactic layers (e.g., “the most un- NLP tasks such as parsing, summarization, kindest cut of all”). Detecting and correcting and machine translation. However, automated morphemic and syntactic pleonasms are more in pleonasm detection is a challenging problem, in the scope of GEC research, especially when they parts because there is no appropriate resources to cause errors. Semantic pleonasm, on the other support the development of such systems. While hand, is “a question of style or taste, not gram- 225 Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2018, pages 225–230 New Orleans, Louisiana, June 1 - 6, 2018. c 2018 Association for Computational Linguistics mar” (Evans and Evans, 1957). It occurs when the of finding redundancy, since semantically related meaning of a word (or phrase) is already implied words that are farther apart are more likely to by other words in the sentence. For example, the have different syntactic and semantic roles. To de- following is a grammatical sentence that has a re- termine semantic similarity, we use the TextBlob dundant word: I received a free gift. While writers Python interface2, which, for a given word, pro- might intentionally include the redundant word for vides access to WordNet synsets (Miller, 1995) emphasis, the overuse of pleonasm may weaken corresponding to each of the word’s senses. We the expression, making it “boring rather than strik- compare each pair of adjacent words in the dataset ing the hearer.” (Fowler, 1994). to see whether they share any synsets. Since WordNet serves as a coarse filter, we need to fur- 3 A Semantic Pleonasm Corpus ther improve recall. We select any sentences that Semantic pleonasm is a complex linguistic phe- contains a pair of adjacent words such that one of nomenon; to develop a useful corpus for it, we the words has a synset that is similar to a synset need to make some design decisions in terms of of the other word. TextBlob provides this “simi- a trading off between the breadth and depth of our lar to” functionality, which finds synsets that are coverage. close to a given synset in WordNet’s taxonomy tree. (note, however, that these words may not 3.1 Data Source be used in those senses in the sentence). Apply- We want to start from a source that is likely to con- ing these filtering rules, we are able to eliminate tain semantic redundancies. Because good writers a large percentage of sentences that do not con- are trained to guard against redundant phrasings, tain semantic redundancy; the method also help us professionally written text from Project Gutenberg identify a pair of words in each sentence that is or the Wall Street Journal would not be appropri- likely to have a redundancy. In the second step ate. Because we want to separate the issues of of filtering, we manually removed sentences that grammaticality from redundancy, learner corpora contained obvious grammatical mistakes. would also not be appropriate. A data source that 3.3 Annotation seems promising is amateur product reviews. The We set up a Amazon Mechanical Turk service to writers tend to produce more emotional prose that determine whether the potentially redundant word are at times exasperated or gushing; the writing pairs are actually redundant. Because we want to is more off-the-cuff and casual, and may contain build a balanced corpus, we first perform a quick more redundancy. Ultimately, we chose to work internal first pass, marking each sentence as ei- with restaurant reviews from Round Seven of the ther “possibly containing redundancy” or “prob- Yelp Dataset Challenge1 because it is widely dis- ably not containing redundancy” so that we can tributed. distribute the instances to the Turkers with equal 3.2 Filtering probability (they do not see our internal annota- tions). The Turkers are given six sentences at a Although redundant words and phrases occur fre- time, each containing a highlighted pair of words. quently enough that exhortations to excise them The workers have to decide whether to delete the is a constant refrain in writing guides, most sen- first word, the second word, both, or neither. Then, tences still skew toward not containing pleonasms. they indicate their confidence: “Certain,” “Some- Annotating all sentences would dilute the impact what certain,” or “Uncertain.” Lastly, they are of the positive examples, further complicate the given the opportunity to provide additional expla- annotation scheme, and increase the cost of the nations. Each sentence has been reviewed by three corpus creation. Thus, we opt to construct a bal- different workers. For about ninety percent of the anced corpus of positive and negative examples for sentences, three annotations proved sufficient to a specific kind of redundancy in a specific config- achieve a consensus. We collect a fourth annota- uration. In particular, we extract all sentences that tion for the remaining sentences, and are then able contained a pair of adjacent words that are likely to declare a consensus. to be semantically similar. We restrict our atten- tion to adjacent word pairs to increase the chance 1https://www.yelp.com/dataset/challenge 2http://textblob.readthedocs.io/en/dev/ 226 Consensus Level Fleiss’s Kappa One Both Neither Total First Second Word Level 0.384 Sentence Level 0.482 955 765 16 1,283 3,019 32% 25% 1% 42% 100% Table 1: Inter-Annotator Agreement 57% Table 2: Statistics of the Semantic Pleonasm Corpus A Few Examples Sentence: Freshly squeezed and no additives, sentences, both words are marked as redundant. • just plain pure fruit pulp. Table 2. shows the statistics of annotators consen- Consensus: plain is redundant. sus. The corpus, including all annotations and the final consensus, is available in JSON format from Sentence: It is clear that I will never have • http://pleonasm.cs.pitt.edu another prime first experience like the one I had at Chompies. 4 Automatic Pleonasm Detection Consensus: neither word is redundant. Given our design choices, the current SPC is not a Sentence: The dressing is absolutely incred- large corpus; we posit that it can nonetheless serve • ibly fabulously flavorful! as a valuable resource for developing systems to Consensus: both words are redundant. detect semantic pleonasm. For example, the ear- lier work of Xue and Hwa (2014) might have ben- 3.4 Inter-Annotator Agreement efited from this resource. They wanted to detect Because our corpus is annotated by many Turk- the word in a sentence that contributes the least ers, with some labeling only a handful of sen- to the meaning of the sentence; however, their ex- tences while others contributed hundreds, the typ- periments were hampered by a mismatch between ical pair-wise inter-annotated agreement is not ap- their intended domain and the corpus they eval- propriate. Instead, we compute Fleiss’s Kappa uated on – while their model estimated a word’s (Fleiss, 1971), which measures the degree of semantic redundancy, their experiments were per- agreement in classification over what would be ex- formed on NUCLE (Dahlmeier et al., 2013), a pected by chance for more than two annotator.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Redundancy As a Phonological Feature in the English Language
    International Journal of English Language and Communication Studies Vol. 4 No.2 2018 ISSN 2545 - 5702 www.iiardpub.org Redundancy as a Phonological Feature in the English Language Shehu Muhammed Department of GSE School of Education Aminu Saleh College of Education, Azare, Bauchi State Nigeria [email protected] Msuega Ahar Department of Languages and Linguistics, Benue State University, Makurdi [email protected] Daniel Benjamin Saanyol Department of Psychology, School of Education, Aminu Saleh College of Education Azare, Bauchi State [email protected] Abstract The study critically examines redundancy as a phonological feature in the English Language. It establishes that it is an integral aspect of the English phonology. The study adopts a survey method using structuralist approach. The study was conducted among the speakers of English language in Benue State University, Makurdi. The sample size of about 60 respondents were taken from a selected number of departments: Languages and linguistics, Mass communication, Religion and Philosophy, Theatre Arts, English language and the Political Science undergraduate students who ranged from 16 - 35 years. The study used the following instruments: oral interviews, personal observations and discussion group to obtain data for the study. The findings reveal that redundancy must be understood and given space in the daily practice of the language. This will enhance effective communication and understanding among speaker of English Language. In fact, failure in speaking the language with a consistent agreement to the entire phonological system (including the redundant features) will sometimes amount to communication breakdown and misinterpretation of the meaning. A close observation has shown that many speakers of English language lack a good knowledge of its phonological system.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Understand Conjugation in Japanese, Words That Form the Predicate, Such As Verbs and Adjectives, Change Form According to Their Meaning and Function
    How to Understand Conjugation In Japanese, words that form the predicate, such as verbs and adjectives, change form according to their meaning and function. This change of word form is called conjugation, and words that change their forms are called conjugational words. Yōgen (用言: roughly verbs and adjectives) Complex Japanese predicates can be divided into several “words” when one looks at formal characteristics such as accent and breathing. (Here, a “word” is almost equivalent to an accent unit, or the smallest a unit governed by breathing pauses, and is larger than the word described in school grammar.) That is, the Japanese predicate does not consist of one word; rather it is a complex of yōgen, made up of a series of words. Each of the “words” that make up the predicate (i.e., yōgen complex) undergoes word form change, and words in a similar category may be strung together in a row. Therefore, altogether there is quite a wide variety of forms of predicates. Some people do not divide the yōgen complex into words, however. They treat the predicate as a single entity, and call the entire variety of changes conjugation. Some try to integrate all variety of such word form change into a single chart. This chart not only tends to be enormous in size, but also each word shows the same inflection cyclically. There is much redundancy in this approach. When dealing with Japanese, it will be much simpler if one separates the description of the order in which the components of the predicate (yōgen complex) appear and the description of the word form change of individual words.
    [Show full text]
  • A Neurolinguistic Approach to Linguistic Redundancy
    A NEUROLINGUISTIC APPROACH TO LINGUISTIC REDUNDANCY Assistant Prof. Dr. Laura Carmen CU ŢITARU, “Alexandru I.Cuza” University of Ia şi Abstract This paper proposes a neurolinguistic explanation for the overlap of redundancy as conceptualized by information theory and redundancy as understood in literary theory. Keywords : information theory, language recognition, redundancy 1. The Concept of Redundancy In July and October 1948, Claude Shannon, an engineer working at the Bell Telephone Laboratories, published two papers in the Bell System Technical Journal , in which he formulated a set of theorems concerning quick and accurate transmission of messages from one place to another. Although intended primarily for radio and telephone engineers, the generalizations Shannon made established laws that proved to govern all kinds of messages, no matter the medium. He practically established information theory, and its tenets can be used in order to investigate any system in which a message/information is sent from a source to a receiver. One essential condition for any successful communication is that the message should be received and understood by the receiver. But there is a natural occurrence with communication systems in general to be exposed to interferences, which, in the jargon of this field, are called noise . Anything that corrupts the integrity of a message (like image distortions on a TV screen, static in a radio set, gaps or smudged lines in a written text) qualifies as noise. During World War II, Shannon worked on secret codes, and on ways to separate information from noise. What he found was to become one of the most important concepts in communications theory: redundancy .
    [Show full text]
  • CLIPP Christiani Lehmanni Inedita, Publicanda, Publicata Pleonasm and Hypercharacterization
    CLIPP Christiani Lehmanni inedita, publicanda, publicata titulus Pleonasm and hypercharacterization huius textus situs retis mundialis http://www.uni-erfurt.de/ sprachwissenschaft/personal/lehmann/CL_Publ/ Hypercharacterization.pdf dies manuscripti postremum modificati 23.02.2006 occasio orationis habitae 11. Internationale Morphologietagung Wien, 14.-17.02.2004 volumen publicationem continens Booij, Geert E. & van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2005. Heidelberg: Springer annus publicationis 2005 paginae 119-154 Pleonasm and hypercharacterization Christian Lehmann University of Erfurt Abstract Hypercharacterization is understood as pleonasm at the level of grammar. A scale of strength of pleonasm is set up by the criteria of entailment, usualness and contrast. Hy- percharacterized constructions in the areas of syntax, inflection and derivation are ana- lyzed by these criteria. The theoretical basis of a satisfactory account is sought in a holis- tic, rather than analytic, approach to linguistic structure, where an operator-operand struc- ture is formed by considering the nature of the result, not of the operand. Data are drawn from German, English and a couple of other languages. The most thorough in a number of more or less sketchy case studies is concerned with German abstract nouns derived in -ierung (section 3.3.1). This process is currently so productive that it is also used to hy- percharacterize nouns that are already marked as nominalizations. 1 1. Introduction Hypercharacterization 2 (German Übercharakterisierung) may be introduced per ostensionem: it is visible in expressions such as those of the second column of T1. T1. Stock examples of hypercharacterization language hypercharacterized basic surplus element German der einzigste ‘the most only’ der einzige ‘the only’ superlative suffix –st Old English children , brethren childer , brether plural suffix –en While it is easy, with the help of such examples, to understand the term and get a feeling for the concept ‘hypercharacterization’, a precise definition is not so easy.
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging Multimodal Redundancy for Dynamic Learning, with SHACER — a Speech and Handwriting Recognizer
    Leveraging Multimodal Redundancy for Dynamic Learning, with SHACER | a Speech and HAndwriting reCognizER Edward C. Kaiser B.A., American History, Reed College, Portland, Oregon (1986) A.S., Software Engineering Technology, Portland Community College, Portland, Oregon (1996) M.S., Computer Science and Engineering, OGI School of Science & Engineering at Oregon Health & Science University (2005) A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the OGI School of Science & Engineering at Oregon Health & Science University in partial ful¯llment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science and Engineering April 2007 °c Copyright 2007 by Edward C. Kaiser All Rights Reserved ii The dissertation \Leveraging Multimodal Redundancy for Dynamic Learning, with SHACER | a Speech and HAndwriting reCognizER" by Edward C. Kaiser has been examined and approved by the following Examination Committee: Philip R. Cohen Professor Oregon Health & Science University Thesis Research Adviser Randall Davis Professor Massachusetts Institute of Technology John-Paul Hosom Assistant Professor Oregon Health & Science University Peter Heeman Assistant Professor Oregon Health & Science University iii Dedication To my wife and daughter. iv Acknowledgements This thesis dissertation in large part owes it existence to the patience, vision and generosity of my advisor, Dr. Phil Cohen. Without his aid it could not have been ¯nished. I would also like to thank Professor Randall Davis for his interest in this work and his time in reviewing and considering it as the external examiner. I am extremely grateful to Peter Heeman and Paul Hosom for their e®orts in participating on my thesis committee. There are many researchers with whom I have worked closely at various stages during my research and to whom I am indebted for sharing their support and their thoughts.
    [Show full text]
  • O'zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy Va O'rta Maxsus Tahlim
    O’ZBEKISTON RESPUBLIKASI OLIY VA O’RTA MAXSUS TAHLIM VAZIRLIGI ZAHIRIDDIN MUHAMMAD BOBUR NOMIDAGI ANDIJON DAVLAT UNIVERSITETI XORIJIY TILLAR FAKULTETI Ingliz tili fonetikasi kafedrasi Mirzahamdamov Zokirjon (407-guruh) INGLIZ VA O’ZBEK TILLARIDA PLEONAZM VA TAVTOLOGIYANING STILISTIK MOHIYATI 5111400 – xorijiy til va adabiyoti (ingliz tili va adabiyoti) ta’lim yo’nalishi bo’yicha bakalavr akademik darajasini olish uchun yozilgan BITIRUV MALAKAVIY ISH Ish rahbari: assistant O. Yuldasheva Andijon – 2016 3 MINISTRY OF HIGHER AND SECONDARY SPECIALIZED EDUCATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN ANDIZHAN STATE UNIVERSITY NAMED AFTER ZAHIRIDDIN MUHAMMAD BOBUR FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH PHONETICS Mirzahamdamov Zokirjon Stylistic essence of pleonasm and tautology in English and in Uzbek languages 5111400-English language and literature GRADUATING QUALIFICATION PAPER written to get academic degree of Bachelor Supervisor of the work: Assistant O.Yuldasheva Content: 4 Introduction……………………………………………………………………..3-8 Chapter 1. The stylistic essence of pleonasm and tautology in English and in Uzbek languages 1.1. The stylistic essence of pleonasm and tautology in English language…..…9-12 1.2. The stylistic essence of pleonasm and tautology in Uzbek language…….13-20 Chapter 2. Tautology and pleonasm as a stylistic device 2.1. The stylistic functions of tautology……………………………………….21-26 2.2. The stylistic functions of pleonasm……………………….………………27-34 Chapter 3. Types of tautology and pleonasm 3.1. Types of tautology and pleonasm in English and Uzbek languages…...…35-53 3.2. The usage of pleonasm and tautology in the texts………………………..54-59 3.3. Plan of the demo lesson with different activities and tasks in teaching pleonasm and tautology……………………………………………..…………60-64 Methodological recommendation…………………………….……………..65-66 Conclusion…………………………………………………….………………67-69 Bibliography………………………………………………………………….70-71 5 Plan: Introduction Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 32. Affix Pleonasm 1. Introduction
    1 32. Affix pleonasm 1. Introduction 2. The definitional scope of pleonasm 3. Pleonasm in language 4. Types of affix pleonasm 5. Why affix pleonasm? 6. References Abstract Affix pleonasm is a cross-linguistically widespread phenomenon both in inflection and derivation. This article reviews the terminological confusion that has arisen around this term, surveys pleonasm in language in general and, narrowing down the scope, focuses on occurrences of pleonastic affixation in derivation in the languages of Europe. Additionally, theoretical approaches to the motivations of pleonasm are critically discussed. 1. Introduction While the concept of pleonasm in grammar has not escaped the interest of scholars of language, the terminological landscape surrounding it has been all but homogeneous. As a result, Malkiel’s (1957: 84) complaint about the harmful absence of any terminological agreement on the phenomenon still applies to the current state of linguistic research. The terminological proliferation seems to begin with the introduction of the German term Übertreibung der Kongruenz by Franz Nikolaus Finck (quoted in Glässer 1954: 429), followed by Überkennzeichnung (Horn 1939: 3–4), and the more widespread term ‘hypercharacterization’, which translates the German original Hypercharakterisierung coined by Eduard Schwyzer (1941) and has also been relabeled ‘overcharacterization’. More recent coinages encompass ‘double marking’, ‘exuberant marking’, ‘multiple exponence’, ‘affix repetition’, and sometimes ‘blending’. Focusing on affixation, Meyer-Lübke (1921, § 34) coined the label Einreihung, which Migliorini (1943: 451) rendered in Italian as inquadramento suffissale. The term ‘affix pleonasm’, which is adopted in this article, goes back to the German Pleonasmus, originally used in rhetorics and stilistics and later introduced into linguistics, most prominently, by Paul 1880 (Pleonasmus von Bildungselementen; see also the use of Pleonasmus with respect to the form Prinzessin in Oertel 1830 (s.v.
    [Show full text]
  • New Latin Grammar
    NEW LATIN GRAMMAR BY CHARLES E. BENNETT Goldwin Smith Professor of Latin in Cornell University Quicquid praecipies, esto brevis, ut cito dicta Percipiant animi dociles teneantque fideles: Omne supervacuum pleno de pectore manat. —HORACE, Ars Poetica. COPYRIGHT, 1895; 1908; 1918 BY CHARLES E. BENNETT PREFACE. The present work is a revision of that published in 1908. No radical alterations have been introduced, although a number of minor changes will be noted. I have added an Introduction on the origin and development of the Latin language, which it is hoped will prove interesting and instructive to the more ambitious pupil. At the end of the book will be found an Index to the Sources of the Illustrative Examples cited in the Syntax. C.E.B. ITHACA, NEW YORK, May 4, 1918 PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. The present book is a revision of my Latin Grammar originally published in 1895. Wherever greater accuracy or precision of statement seemed possible, I have endeavored to secure this. The rules for syllable division have been changed and made to conform to the prevailing practice of the Romans themselves. In the Perfect Subjunctive Active, the endings -īs, -īmus, -ītis are now marked long. The theory of vowel length before the suffixes -gnus, -gna, -gnum, and also before j, has been discarded. In the Syntax I have recognized a special category of Ablative of Association, and have abandoned the original doctrine as to the force of tenses in the Prohibitive. Apart from the foregoing, only minor and unessential modifications have been introduced. In its main lines the work remains unchanged.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalan Pronominalization and Information Structure: the Role of Primary Accent
    CATALAN PRONOMINALIZATION AND INFORMATION STRUCTURE: THE ROLE OF PRIMARY ACCENT MONTSERRAT FORCADELL Abstract Certain aspects of Catalan pronominalization cannot be described without taking into account how informational content is mapped onto sentence structure. In this paper, some data previously considered in the literature (mainly from Todolí’s “Els pronoms”) will be (re)analyzed considering the effects of information packaging articulation in Catalan in order to provide a more unified account. Information structure requirements are relevant for the analysis of the restrictions on pronominalization since, in Catalan, position in sentence structure reflects the pragmatic import of constituents. Viewing clitic binding as a result of a thematization procedure allows for a wider and more coherent approach to pronominalization, since proforms substitute not only for thematic material that is omitted but also for thematic material that is located in dislocated slots. 1. Introduction Pronominalization is an operation by which thematic material in the sentence is substituted by a proform. Thematic material may be either omitted and replaced by the corresponding clitic, or placed in a peripheral, dislocated position in the structure, since in Catalan, thematic material may not appear clause-internally; it must occupy a dislocated position (Vallduví, The Informational Component, “L’oració”). Hence, the existence of marked positions in the sentence should be taken into account when tackling pronominalization data, since material placed in dislocated
    [Show full text]
  • Hypernegation, Hyponegation, and Parole Violations
    BLS 35, No 1 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/bls.v35i1.3628 (published by the Berkeley Linguistics Society and the Linguistic Society of America) Hypernegation, Hyponegation, and Parole Violations LAURENCE R. HORN Yale University The classical law of Duplex negatio affirmat, adopted into English grammar by Bishop Lowth (1762), has always had its dissenters.1 While negative concord has been widely studied in the grammar of non-standard English, a number of less familiar mismatches between overt negative markers and interpretable logical negation beyond the clausal boundary emerge from the investigation of varieties of spoken English. I will briefly survey here two sets of constructions that respec- tively contain an apparently superfluous, uninterpreted negative marker or fail to contain an expected one. These are the two categories that I will term HYPERNEGATION and HYPONEGATION respectively.2 The most familiar variety of hypernegation is negative concord, when the ex- pression of sentence negation spreads to indefinites within the clause, as is the rule in many Romance and Slavic languages as well as most varieties of vernacu- lar English. Examples include (1a,b) (here and below, highlighting is added). (1) a. It ain’t no cat can’t get into no coop. (Labov 1972:773) (= standard Eng. ‘No cat can get into any coop’) b.I can’t get no satisfaction. (Jagger & Richards 1965) As the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/(I_Can't_Get_No)_Satisfaction wiki-entry on the Rolling Stones’ rock anthem notes, “The title line is an example of a double negative resolving to a negative, a common usage in colloquial English.” The cross-linguistic distribution of negative concord (NC) constructions has received a good deal of attention in recent work, much of it devoted to the relation of NC to negative polarity, the interpretive status of N-WORdS (indefinites with negative force, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Word Construction: Tracing an Optimal Path Through the Lexicon
    Word construction: tracing an optimal path through the lexicon Gabriela Caballero (UC San Diego) and Sharon Inkelas (UC Berkeley) Word construction: tracing an optimal path through the lexicon 1. Introduction In this paper we propose a new theory of word formation which blends three components: the “bottom-up” character of lexical-incremental approaches of morphology, the “top-down” or meaning-driven character of inferential-realizational approaches to inflectional morphology, and the competition between word forms that is inherent in Optimality Theory.1 Optimal Construction Morphology (OCM) is a theory of morphology that selects the optimal combination of lexical constructions to best achieve a target meaning. OCM is an incremental theory, in that words are built one layer at a time. In response to a meaning target, the morphological grammar dips into the lexicon, building and assessing morphological constituents incrementally until the word being built optimally matches the target meaning. We apply this new theory to a vexing optimization puzzle confronted by all theories of morphology: why is redundancy in morphology rejected as ungrammatical in some situations (“blocking”), but absolutely required in others (“multiple / extended exponence”)? We show that the presence or absence of redundant layers of morphology follows naturally within OCM, without requiring external stipulations of a kind that have been necessary in other approaches. Our analysis draws on and further develops two notions of morphological strength that have been proposed in the literature: stem type, on a scale from root (weakest) to word (strongest), and exponence strength, which is related to productivity and parsability. 2. The case study: blocking vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizen Participation and Local Democracy in Europe Joerg Forbrig 5
    Learning for Local Democracy A Study of Local Citizen Participation in Europe Joerg Forbrig Editor Copyright © 2011 by the Central and Eastern European Citizens Network The opinions expressed in this book are those of individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the authors‘ affiliations Published by the Central and Eastern European Citizens Network, in partnership with the Combined European Bureau for Social Development All Rights Reserved With the support of the Visegrad Fund With the support of the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency With the support of the Lifelong Learning Programme of the European Union This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. 2 Table of Contents Introduction: Citizen Participation and Local Democracy in Europe Joerg Forbrig 5 Building Local Communities and Civic Infrastructure in Croatia Mirela Despotović 21 Rebuilding Local Communities and Social Capital in Hungary Ilona Vercseg, Aranka Molnár, Máté Varga and Péter Peták 41 Citizen Education, Municipal Development and Local Democracy in Norway Kirsten Paaby 69 Public Consultations and Participatory Budgeting in Local Policy-Making in Poland Łukasz Prykowski 89 Public Participation Strengthening Processes and Outcomes of Local Decision-Making in Romania Oana Preda 107 Citizen Campaigns in Slovakia: From National Politics to Local Community Participation Kajo Zbořil 129 Contentious Politics and Local Citizen Action in Spain Amparo Rodrigo Mateu 151 Strengthening Local Democracy through Devolution of Power in the United Kingdom Alison Gilchrist 177 Conclusions: Ten Critical Insights for Local Citizen Participation in Europe Joerg Forbrig 203 Bibliography 213 About the Authors 219 3 4 Introduction: Citizen Participation and Local Democracy in Europe Joerg Forbrig Democracy in Europe is in trouble.
    [Show full text]