DOCSLIB.ORG

The Evolution of Case Grammar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Evolution of Case Grammar The evolution of case grammar Remi van Trijp language Computational Models of Language science press Evolution 4 Computational Models of Language Evolution Editors: Luc Steels, Remi van Trijp In this series: 1. Steels, Luc. The Talking Heads Experiment: Origins of words and meanings. 2. Vogt, Paul. How mobile robots can self-organize a vocabulary. 3. Bleys, Joris. Language strategies for the domain of colour. 4. van Trijp, Remi. The evolution of case grammar. 5. Spranger, Michael. The evolution of grounded spatial language. ISSN: 2364-7809 The evolution of case grammar Remi van Trijp language science press Remi van Trijp. 2017. The evolution of case grammar (Computational Models of Language Evolution 4). Berlin: Language Science Press. This title can be downloaded at: http://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/52 © 2017, Remi van Trijp Published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence (CC BY 4.0): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISBN: 978-3-944675-45-9 (Digital) 978-3-944675-84-8 (Hardcover) 978-3-944675-85-5 (Softcover) ISSN: 2364-7809 DOI:10.17169/langsci.b52.182 Cover and concept of design: Ulrike Harbort Typesetting: Sebastian Nordhoff, Felix Kopecky, Remi van Trijp Proofreading: Benjamin Brosig, Marijana Janjic, Felix Kopecky Fonts: Linux Libertine, Arimo, DejaVu Sans Mono Typesetting software:Ǝ X LATEX Language Science Press Habelschwerdter Allee 45 14195 Berlin, Germany langsci-press.org Storage and cataloguing done by FU Berlin Language Science Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party Internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. To Elise Contents Preface ix 1 Case and artificial language evolution 1 1.1 Introduction ............................. 1 1.2 Case and the grammar square ................... 2 1.2.1 Overview .......................... 2 1.2.2 The functions of case systems ............... 2 1.2.3 Stage I: no marking ..................... 3 1.2.4 Stage II: specific marking ................. 4 1.2.5 Stage III: semantic roles .................. 6 1.2.6 Stage IV: syntactic roles .................. 8 1.2.7 Further developments ................... 9 1.3 Modeling language evolution .................... 10 1.3.1 Overview .......................... 10 1.3.2 Three models of artificial language evolution ...... 10 1.3.3 The do’s and don’ts of artificial language evolution ... 13 1.4 A brief history of prior work .................... 16 1.4.1 Overview .......................... 16 1.4.2 The emergence of adaptive lexicons ............ 17 1.4.3 Towards grammar ..................... 18 1.4.4 Other research avenues .................. 20 2 Processing case and argument structure 23 2.1 Introduction ............................. 23 2.2 Representing and linking meanings ................ 24 2.3 A brief introduction to Fluid Construction Grammar ....... 27 2.3.1 Overview .......................... 27 2.3.2 Unify and Merge ...................... 28 2.3.3 Structure building. ..................... 30 2.4 Parsing ‘Jack sweep dust off-floor’ ................. 32 2.4.1 Overview .......................... 32 2.4.2 Unifying and merging lexical entries ........... 33 Contents 2.4.3 A syntactic case marker .................. 39 2.4.4 The caused motion construction .............. 40 2.5 Producing ‘jack sweep floor’ .................... 43 2.5.1 Overview .......................... 43 2.5.2 Unifying and merging lexical entries ........... 44 2.5.3 The agent-acts-on-surface construction .......... 45 2.6 Networks and conventionalization ................. 47 3 Baseline experiments 49 3.1 Introduction ............................. 49 3.2 Experimental set-up ......................... 49 3.2.1 Overview .......................... 49 3.2.2 Key abilities and self-assessment criteria ......... 50 3.2.3 Description games ..................... 52 3.2.4 The world, sensory-motor input and conceptualization . 54 3.2.5 Additional assumptions and scaffolds ........... 59 3.3 Baseline experiment 1: no marking ................. 62 3.3.1 Overview .......................... 62 3.3.2 An inferential coding system ............... 64 3.3.3 Results and discussion ................... 68 3.4 Baseline experiment 2: specific marking .............. 70 3.4.1 Overview .......................... 70 3.4.2 Speaker-based innovation ................. 70 3.4.3 Results and discussion ................... 79 3.5 Baseline experiment 3: semantic roles ............... 86 3.5.1 Overview .......................... 86 3.5.2 Generalization as a side-effect ............... 86 3.5.3 Results and discussion of set-up 3a ............ 95 3.5.4 Results and discussion of set-up 3b ............ 97 3.5.5 Results and discussion of set-up 3c ............ 101 3.5.6 Results and discussion of set-up 3d ............ 104 3.5.7 Conclusions and future work ............... 107 4 Multi-level selection and language systematicity 111 4.1 Introduction ............................. 111 4.2 Pattern formation .......................... 112 4.2.1 Overview .......................... 112 4.2.2 Pattern formation in language ............... 112 4.2.3 Operationalizing pattern formation ............ 116 vi Contents 4.3 Experiment 1: individual selection without analogy ....... 120 4.3.1 Overview .......................... 120 4.3.2 Experimental set-up .................... 120 4.3.3 Results and discussion ................... 121 4.3.4 The problem of systematicity in other work ....... 127 4.4 Experiment 2: multi-level selection without analogy ....... 132 4.4.1 Overview .......................... 132 4.4.2 Experimental set-up .................... 133 4.4.3 Results and discussion ................... 134 4.5 Experiment 3: multi-level selection with analogy ......... 141 4.5.1 Overview .......................... 141 4.5.2 Experimental set-up .................... 141 4.5.3 Results and discussion ................... 143 4.6 Towards syntactic cases ....................... 152 4.6.1 Overview .......................... 152 4.6.2 A first experiment ..................... 152 4.6.3 The grammar square: a roadmap for further work .... 159 5 Impact on artificial language evolution and linguistic theory 163 5.1 Introduction ............................. 163 5.2 Pushing the state-of-the-art ..................... 164 5.2.1 Overview .......................... 164 5.2.2 Experiment 1: A primitive case system? ......... 164 5.2.3 Experiment 2: dealing with variation ........... 168 5.2.4 Experiment 3: implementing communicative pressures . 171 5.2.5 Experiment 4: more innate knowledge .......... 172 5.2.6 Summary: case markers serve communication ...... 175 5.3 Argument structure and construction grammar ......... 176 5.3.1 Overview .......................... 176 5.3.2 Argument structure in BCG and SBCG .......... 177 5.3.3 An example: the ditransitive construction ........ 178 5.3.4 Discussion and comparison ................ 179 5.4 Analogy, multi-level selection and the constructicon ....... 184 5.4.1 Overview .......................... 184 5.4.2 The organization of the linguistic inventory ....... 185 5.4.3 Construction grammars .................. 186 5.4.4 The inventory in Fluid Construction Grammar ..... 188 vii Contents 5.5 Linguistic typology and grammaticalization ........... 191 5.5.1 Overview .......................... 191 5.5.2 The status of semantic maps ................ 192 5.5.3 Thematic hierarchies in case systems ........... 198 5.5.4 A redundant approach to grammaticalization ...... 200 Postscriptum 207 Artificial language evolution ....................... 208 Acknowledgements ............................ 209 Appendix: Measures 211 References 215 Index 229 Name index ................................. 229 Subject index ................................ 231 viii Preface This book is dedicated to the study of case – an inflectional category system for marking the relations between events and the roles of their participants. How- ever, I have to confess that it wasn’t exactly love at first sight between case mark- ing and me. Or second. I can still recite the complete Latin case paradigm without batting an eyelash because me and my fellow pupils were drilled to do justthat: -us -a -um -i -ae -a. Later, at the age of sixteen, I had an unpleasant encounter with what Mark Twain described as “that awful German language”. One time you had to say den and the other dem without any obvious reason. When I asked the teacher about it, I was literally told to just learn the dialogues in the book by rote and trust him that I was saying the right thing. In the meantime, English and French were stealing my heart because they opened new worlds to me without making a fuss about what seemed to be tiny little details at the time. And yet, here I am presenting a book about the origins and evolution of case systems. You may interpret this as an unhealthy tendency towards masochism, but I am in fact making amends for my early prejudices against case. While work- ing on my doctoral research, it dawned on me that case systems are very elegant solutions to a very complex communicative problem. Case markers turn out to be grammar’s Swiss army knife: they can be used for expressing event structure, spatial and temporal relations, gender and number distinctions, and many other subtle grammatically relevant meanings. I marveled at this unexpected display of functionality and I got intrigued by the rise and fall of case paradigms. The research in this book therefore tries to be a
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Intermediate German: a Grammar and Workbook / by 2 Anna Miell & Heiner Schenke 3 P
    111 INTERMEDIATE GERMAN: 2 3 A GRAMMAR AND WORKBOOK 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 1 2 13 4111 5 Intermediate German is designed for learners who have achieved basic 6 proficiency and wish to progress to more complex language. Its 24 units 7 present a broad range of grammatical topics, illustrated by examples which 8 serve as models for varied exercises that follow. These exercises enable 9 the student to master the relevant grammar points. 2011 1 Features include: 2 3 • authentic German, from a range of media, used throughout the book to 4 reflect German culture, life and society 5 6 • illustrations of grammar points in English as well as German 7 • checklists at the end of each unit for consolidation 8 9 • cross-referencing to other grammar units in the book 3011 • glossary of grammatical terminology 1 2 • full answer key to all exercises 3 4 Suitable for independent learners and students on taught courses, 5 Intermediate German, together with its sister volume, Basic German, forms 6 a structured course in the essentials of German. 7 8 Anna Miell is University Lecturer in German at the University of Westminster 9 and at Trinity College of Music in Greenwich and works as a language 4011 consultant in London. Heiner Schenke is Senior Lecturer of German at the 1 University of Westminster and has published a number of language books. 2 3 41111 111 Other titles available in the Grammar Workbook series are: 2 3 Basic Cantonese 4 Intermediate Cantonese 5 Basic German 6 7 Basic Italian 8111 Basic Polish 9 Intermediate Polish 1011 1 Basic Russian 2 Intermediate
    [Show full text]
  • Representation of Inflected Nouns in the Internal Lexicon
    Memory & Cognition 1980, Vol. 8 (5), 415423 Represeritation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon G. LUKATELA, B. GLIGORIJEVIC, and A. KOSTIC University ofBelgrade, Belgrade, Yugoslavia and M.T.TURVEY University ofConnecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06268 and Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut 06510 The lexical representation of Serbo-Croatian nouns was investigated in a lexical decision task. Because Serbo-Croatian nouns are declined, a noun may appear in one of several gram­ matical cases distinguished by the inflectional morpheme affixed to the base form. The gram­ matical cases occur with different frequencies, although some are visually and phonetically identical. When the frequencies of identical forms are compounded, the ordering of frequencies is not the same for masculine and feminine genders. These two genders are distinguished further by the fact that the base form for masculine nouns is an actual grammatical case, the nominative singular, whereas the base form for feminine nouns is an abstraction in that it cannot stand alone as an independent word. Exploiting these characteristics of the Serbo­ Croatian language, we contrasted three views of how a noun is represented: (1) the independent­ entries hypothesis, which assumes an independent representation for each grammatical case, reflecting its frequency of occurrence; (2) the derivational hypothesis, which assumes that only the base morpheme is stored, with the individual cases derived from separately stored inflec­ tional morphemes and rules for combination; and (3) the satellite-entries hypothesis, which assumes that all cases are individually represented, with the nominative singular functioning as the nucleus and the embodiment of the noun's frequency and around which the other cases cluster uniformly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strategy of Case-Marking
    Case marking strategies Helen de Hoop & Andrej Malchukov1 Radboud University Nijmegen DRAFT January 2006 Abstract Two strategies of case marking in natural languages are discussed. These are defined as two violable constraints whose effects are shown to converge in the case of differential object marking but diverge in the case of differential subject marking. The strength of the case bearing arguments will be shown to be of utmost importance for case marking as well as voice alternations. The strength of arguments can be viewed as a function of their discourse prominence. The analysis of the case marking patterns we find cross-linguistically is couched in a bidirectional OT analysis. 1. Assumptions In this section we wish to put forward our three basic assumptions: (1) In ergative-absolutive systems ergative case is assigned to the first argument x of a two-place relation R(x,y). (2) In nominative-accusative systems accusative case is assigned to the second argument y of a two-place relation R(x,y). (3) Morphologically unmarked case can be the absence of case. The first two assumptions deal with the linking between the first (highest) and second (lowest) argument in a transitive sentence and the type of case marking. For reasons of convenience, we will refer to these arguments quite sloppily as the subject and the object respectively, although we are aware of the fact that the labels subject and object may not be appropriate in all contexts, dependent on how they are actually defined. In many languages, ergative and accusative case are assigned only or mainly in transitive sentences, while in intransitive sentences ergative and accusative case are usually not assigned.
    [Show full text]
  • Possessive Constructions in Modern Low Saxon
    POSSESSIVE CONSTRUCTIONS IN MODERN LOW SAXON a thesis submitted to the department of linguistics of stanford university in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master of arts Jan Strunk June 2004 °c Copyright by Jan Strunk 2004 All Rights Reserved ii I certify that I have read this thesis and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. Joan Bresnan (Principal Adviser) I certify that I have read this thesis and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. Tom Wasow I certify that I have read this thesis and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. Dan Jurafsky iii iv Abstract This thesis is a study of nominal possessive constructions in modern Low Saxon, a West Germanic language which is closely related to Dutch, Frisian, and German. After identifying the possessive constructions in current use in modern Low Saxon, I give a formal syntactic analysis of the four most common possessive constructions within the framework of Lexical Functional Grammar in the ¯rst part of this thesis. The four constructions that I will analyze in detail include a pronominal possessive construction with a possessive pronoun used as a determiner of the head noun, another prenominal construction that resembles the English s-possessive, a linker construction in which a possessive pronoun occurs as a possessive marker in between a prenominal possessor phrase and the head noun, and a postnominal construction that involves the preposition van/von/vun and is largely parallel to the English of -possessive.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Restricted Locatives Ora Matushansky
    The case of restricted locatives Ora Matushansky To cite this version: Ora Matushansky. The case of restricted locatives. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung , 2019, 23 (2), 10.18148/sub/2019.v23i2.604. halshs-02431372 HAL Id: halshs-02431372 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02431372 Submitted on 7 Jan 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The case of restricted locatives1 Ora MATUSHANSKY — SFL (CNRS/Université Paris-8)/UiL OTS/Utrecht University Abstract. This paper examines the cross-linguistic phenomenon of locative case restricted to a closed class of items (L-nouns). Starting with Latin, I suggest that the restriction is semantic in nature: L-nouns denote in the spatial domain and hence can be used as locatives without further material. I show how the independently motivated hypothesis that directional PPs consist of two layers, Path and Place, explains the directional uses of L-nouns and the cases that are assigned then, and locate the source of the locative case itself in p0, for which I then provide a clear semantic contribution: a type-shift from the domain of loci to the object domain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Term Declension, the Three Basic Qualities of Latin Nouns, That
    Chapter 2: First Declension Chapter 2 covers the following: the term declension, the three basic qualities of Latin nouns, that is, case, number and gender, basic sentence structure, subject, verb, direct object and so on, the six cases of Latin nouns and the uses of those cases, the formation of the different cases in Latin, and the way adjectives agree with nouns. At the end of this lesson we’ll review the vocabulary you should memorize in this chapter. Declension. As with conjugation, the term declension has two meanings in Latin. It means, first, the process of joining a case ending onto a noun base. Second, it is a term used to refer to one of the five categories of nouns distinguished by the sound ending the noun base: /a/, /ŏ/ or /ŭ/, a consonant or /ĭ/, /ū/, /ē/. First, let’s look at the three basic characteristics of every Latin noun: case, number and gender. All Latin nouns and adjectives have these three grammatical qualities. First, case: how the noun functions in a sentence, that is, is it the subject, the direct object, the object of a preposition or any of many other uses? Second, number: singular or plural. And third, gender: masculine, feminine or neuter. Every noun in Latin will have one case, one number and one gender, and only one of each of these qualities. In other words, a noun in a sentence cannot be both singular and plural, or masculine and feminine. Whenever asked ─ and I will ask ─ you should be able to give the correct answer for all three qualities.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules and Exercises: German Textbooks for Teaching and Learning English Around 1800 87
    Anglistentag 1993 Eichstätt Proceedings edited by Günther Blaicher and Brigitte Glaser MAX NIEMEYER VERLAG TÜBINGEN 1994 Die Deutsche Bibliothek - CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Anglistentag <1993, Eichstätts Proceedings / Anglistentag 1993 Eichstätt / ed. by Günther Blaicher and Brigitte Glaser. - Tübingen : Niemeyer, 1994 (Proceedings of the conference of the German Association of University Teachers of English; Vol. 15) NE: Blaicher, Günther [Hrsg.]; Anglistentag: Proceedings of the ... ISBN 3-484-40128-1 © Max Niemeyer Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Tübingen 1994 Das Werk einschließlich aller seiner Teile ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung außerhalb der engen Grenzen des Urheberrechtsgesetzes ist ohne Zustimmung des Verlages unzulässig und strafbar. Das gilt insbesondere für Vervielfältigungen, Übersetzungen, Mikroverfilmungen und die Einspeicherung und Verarbeitung in elektronischen Systemen. Printed in Germany. Gedruckt auf alterungsbeständigem Papier. Druck und Einband: Weihert-Druck GmbH, Darmstadt Proceedings of the Conference of the German Association of University Teachers of English Volume XV CONTENTS SECTION 1: THE HISTORY OF LINGUISTIC IDEAS Werner Hüllen: Introduction 17 R. H. Robins: William Bullokar's Bref Grammar for English: Text and Context (Plenary Lecture) 19 Werner Hüllen: A Great Chain of Words: The Onomasiological Tradition in English Lexicography 32 Michael Cahn: The Printing Press as an Agent in the History of Linguistic Ideas? 47 David Cram: Collection and Classification: Universal Language Schemes and the Development
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Latin Nouns 1. Noun Entries – Chapter 3, LFCA Example
    Session A3: Introduction to Latin Nouns 1. Noun entries – Chapter 3, LFCA When a Latin noun is listed in a dictionary it provides three pieces of information: The nominative singular, the genitive singular, and the gender. The first form, called nominative (from Latin nömen, name) is the means used to list, or name, words in a dictionary. The second form, the genitive (from Latin genus, origin, kind or family), is used to find the stem of the noun and to determine the declension, or noun family to which it belongs. To find the stem of a noun, simply look at the genitive singular form and remove the ending –ae. The final abbreviation is a reference to the noun’s gender, since it is not always evident by the noun’s endings. Example: fëmina, fëminae, f. woman stem = fëmin/ae 2. Declensions – Chapters 3 – 10, LFCA Just as verbs are divided up into families or groups called conjugations, so also nouns are divided up into groups that share similar characteristics and behavior patterns. A declension is a group of nouns that share a common set of inflected endings, which we call case endings (more on case later). The genitive reveals the declension or family of nouns from which a word originates. Just as the infinitive is different for each conjugation, the genitive singular is unique to each declension. 1 st declension mënsa, mënsae 2 nd declension lüdus, lüdï ager, agrï dönum, dönï 3 rd declension vöx, vöcis nübës, nübis corpus, corporis 4 th declension adventus, adventüs cornü, cornüs 5 th declension fidës, fideï Practice: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek and Latin Roots, Prefixes, and Suffixes
    GREEK AND LATIN ROOTS, PREFIXES, AND SUFFIXES This is a resource pack that I put together for myself to teach roots, prefixes, and suffixes as part of a separate vocabulary class (short weekly sessions). It is a combination of helpful resources that I have found on the web as well as some tips of my own (such as the simple lesson plan). Lesson Plan Ideas ........................................................................................................... 3 Simple Lesson Plan for Word Study: ........................................................................... 3 Lesson Plan Idea 2 ...................................................................................................... 3 Background Information .................................................................................................. 5 Why Study Word Roots, Prefixes, and Suffixes? ......................................................... 6 Latin and Greek Word Elements .............................................................................. 6 Latin Roots, Prefixes, and Suffixes .......................................................................... 6 Root, Prefix, and Suffix Lists ........................................................................................... 8 List 1: MEGA root list ................................................................................................... 9 List 2: Roots, Prefixes, and Suffixes .......................................................................... 32 List 3: Prefix List ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rules Vs. Analogy in English Past Tenses: a Computational/Experimental Study Adam Albrighta,*, Bruce Hayesb,*
    Cognition 90 (2003) 119–161 www.elsevier.com/locate/COGNIT Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study Adam Albrighta,*, Bruce Hayesb,* aDepartment of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064-1077, USA bDepartment of Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1543, USA Received 7 December 2001; revised 11 November 2002; accepted 30 June 2003 Abstract Are morphological patterns learned in the form of rules? Some models deny this, attributing all morphology to analogical mechanisms. The dual mechanism model (Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1998). On language and connectionism: analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73–193) posits that speakers do internalize rules, but that these rules are few and cover only regular processes; the remaining patterns are attributed to analogy. This article advocates a third approach, which uses multiple stochastic rules and no analogy. We propose a model that employs inductive learning to discover multiple rules, and assigns them confidence scores based on their performance in the lexicon. Our model is supported over the two alternatives by new “wug test” data on English past tenses, which show that participant ratings of novel pasts depend on the phonological shape of the stem, both for irregulars and, surprisingly, also for regulars. The latter observation cannot be explained under the dual mechanism approach, which derives all regulars with a single rule. To evaluate the alternative hypothesis that all morphology is analogical, we implemented a purely analogical model, which evaluates novel pasts based solely on their similarity to existing verbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Systemic Polyfunctionality and Morphology-Syntax Interdependencies
    Systemic polyfunctionality and morphology-syntax interdependencies Farrell Ackerman1 Olivier Bonami2 Irina Nikolaeva3 1University of California, San Diego 2Université Paris-Sorbonne 3SOAS Defaults in Morphological Theory Lexington, May 2012 The basic problem: Systemic Polyfunctionality Cross-linguistically person/number markers (PNMs) in verbal paradigms often exhibit similarities (up to identity) with person/number markers in nominal possessive constructions (Allen 1964, Radics 1980, Siewierska 1998, 2004, among others): When a language has distinct PNM paradigms for verbal subject (S/A) and object (O) indexing, a question arises: Which paradigm does the possessive paradigm align with? (1) Retuarã (Tucanoan) S/A alignment b˜ıre yi-ha¯a-a¯ Psi yi-behoa-pi 2SG 1SG-kill-NEG.IMP 1SG-spear-INSTR ‘(Be careful), lest I kill you with my spear’ (Strom 1992:63) (2) Kilivila (Central-Eastern Malayo-Polynesian) O alignment lube-gu ku-sake-gu buva friend-1SG 2SG-give-1SG betel_nut ‘My friend, do you give me betel nuts?’ (Senft 1986:53) The basic problem: Systemic Polyfunctionality Among the 130 relevant languages in Sierwieska’s (1998) sample she observes that, We see that [...], among the languages in the sample the affinities in form between the possessor affixes and the verbal person markers of the O (41%) are just marginally more common than those with the S/A (39%). (Siewierska 1998:2) There are, by hypothesis, systemic properties of specific grammars, rather than language independent universals, that explain the alignments observed. The languages compared by Siewierska appear to have distinct markers for S/A and O, and the question asked is which paradigm appears in possessive marking.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Grammar and Its Implications to Developing Writing Skills
    n°11 (1998), 53-62 Case grammar and its implications to developing writing skills Abstract This article exposes the existing controversy among researchers about the role of traditional grammar in helping students to overcome their grammatical errors. It consequently shows the relevance of Fillmore’s Case Grammar to developing writing skills and improving linguistic proficiency. The strength of this semantic grammar lies in its "universalism and "generativism". It enables its users to generate MOUMENE Ahmed an infinitude of sentences and to avoid the burden of negative transfer. Institut des Langues It also offers new strategies to understand, analyse and criticise the Etrangères novel and the short story in an objectively-satisfying manner. Université Mentouri Constantine, Algérie 1.THE STATE OF THE ART he word grammar has first begun with the TGreek philosophical speculations and has come to mean “the art of speaking and writing correctly”. The twentieth century, however, has brought about many doubts about the contribution of ﻣﻠﺨﺺ traditional grammar to the development of linguistic ﻳﺘﻨﺎول هﺬا اﻟﻤﻘﺎل اﻟﺠﺪل اﻟﻘﺎﺋﻢ proficiency. As a result, some linguistic theories have ﺑﻴﻦ اﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﻴﻦ ﺣﻮل دور اﻟﻘﻮاﻋﺪ been put forward to help learners to grapple with the اﻟﺘﻘﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻡﺴﺎﻋﺪة اﻟﻄﻠﺒﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ intricacies of language. Case Grammar has become ﺕﺨﻄﻲ اﻷﺧﻄﺎء اﻟﻨﺤﻮﻳﺔ، وﻳﺒﺮز ﻡﺪى very popular because it can account for linguistic ﻥﺠﺎﻋﺔ ﻗﻮاﻋﺪ اﻟﺤﺎﻻت ﻟـ : ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻮر ﻓﻲ structures that cannot be accounted for by traditional, structural and transformational grammars. This is due ﺕﻄﻮﻳﺮ ﻡﻬﺎراﺕﻬﻢ اﻟﻜﺘﺎﺑﻴﺔ و ﺕﺤﺴﻴﻦ to the fact that this theory deals with sentences ﻗﺪراﺕﻬﻢ اﻟﻠﻐﻮﻳﺔ . وﺕﻜﻤﻦ ﻗﻮة هﺬﻩ without losing sight of the interaction of syntactic and اﻟﻘﻮاﻋﺪ اﻟﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ آﻮﻥﻬﺎ ﻗﻮاﻋﺪ semantic valency.
    [Show full text]