DOCSLIB.ORG

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Bureau of Aviation Pavement Evaluation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Bureau of Aviation Pavement Evaluation Report Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Bureau of Aviation Pavement Evaluation Report FINAL REPORT March 2010 By Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT # 355I01 PROJECT # 071109 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-PA-2009-016-071109 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date March 2010 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Bureau of Aviation Pavement Evaluation Report 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Covalt, Maggie; Fisher, Monika; Hoerner, Todd; and Raczkowski, Laura 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. 115 W. Main Street, Suite 400 11. Contract or Grant No. Urbana, IL 61801 355I01/ 071109 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Final Report Bureau of Planning and Research Commonwealth Keystone Building 400 North Street, 6th Floor 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Harrisburg, PA 17120-0064 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract As part of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation’s (PennDOT) airport pavement management efforts, the Bureau of Aviation (BOA) retained Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. (APTech), assisted by DY Consultants, to evaluate the condition of the pavements at 95 public-use airports and heliports and to update their existing airport pavement management system (APMS) originally implemented in 2001. The results of this project are presented in this report and can be used by the BOA and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to identify, prioritize, and schedule pavement maintenance and rehabilitation actions at these airports. During this project, the conditions of the pavements were assessed using the FAA pavement condition index (PCI) methodology – the industry standard in aviation for visually assessing the condition of pavements. During a PCI evaluation, inspectors walk over the pavement and identify visible signs of deterioration. Pavement defects are characterized in terms of type of distress, severity level of distress, and amount of distress. This information is then used to develop a composite index (PCI number) that represents the overall condition of the pavement in numerical terms, ranging from 0 (failed) to 100 (excellent). The PCI number provides an overall measure of condition and an indication of the level of maintenance or rehabilitation work that will be required to maintain or repair a pavement. The individual distress information (such as cracking, rutting, and so on) provides insight into what is causing the pavement to deteriorate, which in turn can be used to select the appropriate maintenance or rehabilitation action to correct the problem. PCI data also serve as the basis for an APMS – a computerized tool used to track pavement condition, identify pavement repair needs, and develop prioritized maintenance and rehabilitation programs with associated schedules and budgets. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement No restrictions. This document is available Airport Pavement Management, PCI from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 192 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF AVIATION PAVEMENT EVALUATION REPORT Prepared By: Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. 115 West Main Street, Suite 400 Urbana, IL 61801 217-398-3977 www.appliedpavement.com March 2010 providing engineering solutions to improve pavement performance The preparation of this report was financed through a grant from the FAA under the airport improvement program and in part through a grant-in-aid from the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Bureau of Aviation. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF AVIATION PAVEMENT EVALUATION REPORT Prepared For: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Bureau of Aviation 400 North Street, 6th Floor East P.O. Box 3457 Harrisburg, PA 17105-3457 www.dot.state.pa.us Prepared By: Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. 115 West Main Street, Suite 400 Urbana, IL 61801 217-398-3977 www.appliedpavement.com March 2010 Pennsylvania Statewide Pavement Evaluation Report March 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 Project Background ..................................................................................................... 1 Scope of Work ............................................................................................................. 2 Deliverables................................................................................................................. 5 PAVEMENT INVENTORY............................................................................................... 6 Introduction.................................................................................................................. 6 Systems Inventory Process ......................................................................................... 6 Systems Inventory Results .......................................................................................... 7 PAVEMENT EVALUATION........................................................................................... 10 Pavement Condition Survey Procedure..................................................................... 10 Areas Inspected......................................................................................................... 14 Additional Data Collected .......................................................................................... 14 Pavement Condition Survey Results ......................................................................... 15 MICROPAVER CUSTOMIZATION................................................................................ 22 Background ............................................................................................................... 22 Database-Related Customization .............................................................................. 22 Network Level Customization................................................................................. 22 Branch Level Customization .................................................................................. 22 Section Level Customization.................................................................................. 23 Performance Modeling............................................................................................... 24 Maintenance and Rehabilitation Analysis Parameters............................................... 24 Maintenance and Rehabilitation Types and Cost Information ................................ 24 Prioritization Guidelines ......................................................................................... 27 RECOMMENDED PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE.......................................................... 28 AND REHABILITATION PROGRAM............................................................................. 28 Introduction................................................................................................................ 28 MicroPAVER Analysis Approach ............................................................................... 28 Analysis Results ........................................................................................................ 29 Zero Budget Analysis ............................................................................................. 29 Unlimited Budget Analysis ..................................................................................... 30 Constrained Budget Analysis ................................................................................. 30 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE REQUIREMENTS ....................... 89 Overview.................................................................................................................... 89 System Upkeep Guidelines ....................................................................................... 89 Feedback Loop.......................................................................................................... 90 Training Courses ....................................................................................................... 90 SUMMARY.................................................................................................................... 91 Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. i Pennsylvania Statewide Pavement Evaluation Report March 2010 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Pavement condition versus cost of repair........................................................ 2 Figure 2. GA airports’ pavement areas distributed by surface type................................ 8 Figure 3. Commercial service airports’ pavement areas distributed by surface type...... 8 Figure 4. GA airports’ pavement areas distributed by facility type.................................. 9 Figure 5. Commercial service airports’ pavement areas distributed by facility type........ 9 Figure 6. PCI versus repair type................................................................................... 10 Figure 7. Visual representation of PCI scale. ............................................................... 11 Figure 8. PCI by airport classification..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Infrastructure Status and Needs in Southwestern Pennsylvania
    University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics Infrastructure Policy Committee Infrastructure Status and Needs in Southwestern Pennsylvania: A Primer Fall 2014 Table of Contents Letter from the Infrastructure Policy Committee Co-Chairs .......................................................... 5 Air Transportation ........................................................................................................................... 7 Key Players ................................................................................................................................. 7 Funding ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Priorities ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Challenges and Opportunities ................................................................................................... 10 Intelligent Transportation Systems ........................................................................................... 11 The FAA Next Generation Air Transportation System ........................................................ 11 Resources .................................................................................................................................. 13 Electricity ...................................................................................................................................... 14 Context .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Current Aviation Projects
    ATTACHMENT 1 State Fiscal Year 2021 - 2022 State/Local Projects Other / State Local MM Total Status BOA Airport Name Project Description Share Share Share Cost 80.00 Joseph A. Hardy Connellsville Acquire Airfield Maintenance Equipment $112,500 $37,500 $0 $150,000 Four Year Plan Airport 90.00 Pittsburgh International Airport Airfield Pavement Rehab $1,500,000 $500,000 $0 $2,000,000 Four Year Plan 89.00 Arnold Palmer Regional Airport Acquire Various Airport Equipment (Airfield Maintenance, Aircraft $225,000 $75,000 $0 $300,000 Four Year Plan Ground Support, Operations and Security) 84.00 Pennridge Airport Mitigate Obstructions $90,000 $10,000 $0 $100,000 Four Year Plan 84.00 York Airport Rehabilitate Hangar Area Apron, Ph. II: Construction $150,000 $50,000 $0 $200,000 Four Year Plan 83.00 Carlisle Airport Install Runway Lighting, Ph I: Design $22,500 $7,500 $0 $30,000 Four Year Plan 81.00 Wellsboro-Johnston Airport Acquire Airport Equipment $150,000 $50,000 $0 $200,000 Four Year Plan 81.00 Danville Airport Install PAPI Runway 27, Design and Construct $172,500 $57,500 $0 $230,000 Four Year Plan 81.00 Danville Airport Mitigate Obstructions, Permanently Displace Threshold RW 27 $45,000 $5,000 $0 $50,000 Four Year Plan (and repair / replace light fixtures or globes) 80.00 Bradford County Airport Acquire Airfield Maintenance Equipment $82,500 $27,500 $0 $110,000 Four Year Plan 80.00 Greater Breezewood Regional Acquire Airfield Maintenance Equipment (Tractor &Wide Area $76,875 $25,625 $0 $102,500 Four Year Plan Airport Mower) and Materials (Gravel) 80.00 John Murtha Johnstown-Cambria Acquire Airport Snow Removal and Maintenance Equipment (2 $83,588 $27,862 $0 $111,450 Four Year Plan County Airport plows and pickup trucks) 77.00 Hazleton Regional Airport Fuel Farm Improvements $112,500 $37,500 $0 $150,000 Four Year Plan 76.00 Pocono Mountains Municipal Airport Replace Fuel Farm, Ph.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoar Named Senior VP; Several New Vps Appointed
    VOLUME 52 NUMBER 1 JANUARY 1.5, 1989 Hoar Named Senior VP; Several New VPs Appointed J. William Hoar has been named abethtown College in senior vice president, employee rela­ Pennsylvania and served tions. He will keep offices at TWA seven years with the U.S. headquarters in Mt. Kisco and in Navy. J. William Hoar Gary Bowring J. J. McCarthy Joseph Nemecek Steve Slade Kansas City. C. Gary Bowring has been promoted John J. McCarthy has been pro- Nemecek, who has served almost 30 Hoar will be responsible for the de­ to vice president, engineering and rooted to vice president, maintenance years with TWA, also has held various velopment and implementation of quality assurance, headquartered in operations, headquartered in Kansas management positions in electronics employee relations policies and pro­ Kansas City. Bowring has headed the engineering and jet aircraft engine pro- City. He had served as staff vice presi- · grams. He will retain duties in hotel engineering and quality assurance areas dent, maintenance operations, MCI, duction scheduling. administration, the Travel Academy since 1986 when he joined TWA since 1985. He is co-inventor and a patent holder and as chairman of TWA' s task force Prior to that, Bowring was vice presi­ McCarthy has worked in various on the automatic throttle control system on on-time performance. e dent, engineering and maintenance for capacities for TWA for more than 30 used by TWA on its Boeing Mod l 707 Hoar had served as vice president, Ozark Air L�es. He has served in years. Prior to 1985, he was director, and 727 aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report Volume I (2012) Appendices
    APPENDIX Appendix A. Glossary A A-WEIGHTED SOUND LEVEL: The sound pressure level which has been filtered or weighted to reduce the influence of low and high frequency (dBA). AC: Advisory Circular published by the Federal Aviation Administration. ADPM: Average Day of the Peak Month AFB: Air Force Base AGL: Above Ground Level AIA: Annual Instrument Approaches AICUZ: Air Installation Compatible Use Zones define areas of compatible land use around military airfields. AIP: Airport Improvement Program of the FAA. AIR CARRIER: The commercial system of air transportation, consisting of the certificated air carriers, air taxis (including commuters), supplemental air carriers, commercial operators of large aircraft, and air travel clubs. AIRCRAFT LANDING GEAR: The main landing gear consists on a single wheel under each wing. Single-wheel landing gear typically used on a single-engine aircraft that weighs less than 20,000 pounds. 91 APPENDIX AIRCRAFT MIX: The relative percentage of operations conducted at an airport by each of four classes of aircraft differentiated by gross takeoff weight and number of engines. AIRCRAFT OPERATION: The airborne movement of aircraft in controlled or non-controlled airport terminal areas and about a given en route fix or at other points where counts can be made. There are two types of operations - local and itinerant. An operation is counted for each landing and each departure, such that a touch-and-go flight is counted as two operations. AIRCRAFT TYPES: An arbitrary classification system which identifies and groups aircraft having similar operational characteristics for the purpose of computing runway capacity. AIR NAVIGATIONAL FACILITY (NAVAID): Any facility used for guiding or controlling flight in the air or during the landing or takeoff of an aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Freedom of Information (FOI) Request Log, 2000-2012
    Description of document: The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Freedom of Information (FOI) Request Log, 2000-2012 Requested date: 08-August-2011 Released date: 07-February-2012 Posted date: 20-February-2012 Title of document Freedom of Information Requests Date/date range of document: 23-April-2000 – 05-January-2012 Source of document: The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey FOI Administrator Office of the Secretary 225 Park Avenue South, 17th Floor New York, NY 10003 Fax: (212) 435-7555 Online Electronic FOIA Request Form The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website.
    [Show full text]
  • RIDC Westmoreland East Huntingdon Township 1001 Technology Drive • Mt
    RIDC Westmoreland East Huntingdon Township 1001 Technology Drive • Mt. Pleasant, PA 15666 Table of Contents 1. Building Specifications 2. Site Layout 3. Rail Oriented Development Areas for New Construction 4. Floor Plans 5. Location Map 6. Map of Corporate Neighbors 7. Mt. Pleasant/Westmoreland County Area Overview RIDC Westmoreland 1001 Technology Drive • Mt. Pleasant, PA 15666 Westmoreland County RIDC Westmoreland 1001 Technology Drive • Mt. Pleasant, PA 15666 Westmoreland County • East Huntingdon Township Building Specifications Land Area: Approximately 330 acres Gross Building Area: Entire Facility:Approximately 2.81 million SF Overview of Significant Rentable Spaces at Facility Main Assembly Building: Approximately 2.27 million SF First Floor: Approximately 1.77 million SF Second Floor: Approximately 504,000 SF West Annex: Approximately 74,000 SF East Annex: Approximately 134,000 SF Administrative Building: Approximately 96,000 SF Overall Contiguous Available: 50,000 SF to 1.0 million SF of flex/manufacturing Zoning: There is no zoning in East Huntingdon Township Current Status: Approximately 20% occupied by five tenants. Balance vacant and available. Proposed Use: RIDC is transitioning the Site into a multiple tenancy environment to serve uses such as manufacturing, natural gas chain supply, industrial, agricultural, educational, research and development, and computer operation centers. Physical Status: Well maintained and in good condition Regional Industrial Development Corporation of Southwestern Pennsylvania 3 RIDC Westmoreland 1001 Technology Drive • Mt. Pleasant, PA 15666 Westmoreland County Building Specifications (continued) Construction Type: Main Building & Physical Plant: Industrial manufacturing building with steel frame construction with concrete panel/siding walls and built up roof. First floor concrete slab design 500psf uniform live loads and second floor design 200psf uniform live load.
    [Show full text]
  • Leased Hangar Space May Be Taxable, Airport Authority Says
    Leased Hangar Space May be Taxable, Airport Authority Says Pennsylvania is one of a handful of states that collects “That regulation doesn’t describe our relationship, as a taxes on self storage rents. Airport authorities in at least government entity, to those who we lease space to,” Snyder one county in the Keystone State are trying to determine said to the officials. A recent state audit of authority whether it must collect $20,000 in back taxes from those records dating back to 2007 resulted in the finding that the who lease 65 hangars at Arnold Palmer Regional Airport authority must collect the tax on direct-lease payments. in Unity and Rostraver Airport. “Candidly, the state has been rather vigorous in finding The Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania Airport additional sources of revenue under the current economic Authority board of directors has asked its solicitor, Don climate,” Snyder said. He went on to say that he believes Snyder, to look into whether a state regulation regarding only those who lease hangars and then rent out the spaces self storage services requires the authority to charge the to secondary purchasers must charge the tax. six percent sales tax for space it leases. Leased hangars cost about $300 per month, said the authority’s executive director Gabe Monzo. v AttentionAttention MobileMobile AttentionAttention Multi-SiteMulti-Site StorageStorage Operators!Operators! Self-StorageSelf-Storage Operators!Operators! TOTAL RECALL Mobile Storage Software Manage multiple sites is the most comprehensive in a single MS SQL solution for your business. database with TOTAL RECALL Self-Storage Software. Get the Solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Helicopter Inventory
    DELAWARE VALLEY Helicopter Inventory dDELAWARE VALLEY "REGl!.rpc PLANNING COMMISSION June 2019 03-42-0125-017-2016 5 The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission is the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization for a diverse nine-county region in two states: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and MD Philadelphia in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and Mercer in New Jersey. • Baltimore DE dDELAWARE VALLEY DVRPC's vision for the Greater Philadelphia Region is a prosperous, innovative, equitable, "REGlyrpc resilient, and sustainable region that increases PLANNING COMMISSION mobility choices by investing in a safe and modern transportation system; that protects and preserves our natural resources while creating healthy communities; and that fosters greater opportunities for all. DVRPC's mission is to achieve this vision by convening the widest array of partners to inform and facilitate data-driven decision-making. We are engaged across the region, and strive to be leaders and innovators, exploring new ideas and creating best practices. TITLE VI COMPLIANCE I DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 7964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 7987, Executive Order 72898 on Environmental Justice, and related nondiscrimination statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. DVRPC's website, www.dvrpc.org, may be translated into multiple languages. Publications and other public documents can be made available in alternative languages and formats, if requested. DVRPC public meetings are always held in ADA-accessible facilities, and in transit-accessible locations when possible. Auxiliary services can be provided to individuals who submit a request at least seven days prior to a public meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Studies Series a History of the Civil Reserve
    RESEARCH STUDIES SERIES A HISTORY OF THE CIVIL RESERVE AIR FLEET By Theodore Joseph Crackel Air Force History & Museums Program Washington, D.C., 1998 ii PREFACE This is the second in a series of research studies—historical works that were not published for various reasons. Yet, the material contained therein was deemed to be of enduring value to Air Force members and scholars. These works were minimally edited and printed in a limited edition to reach a small audience that may find them useful. We invite readers to provide feedback to the Air Force History and Museums Program. Dr. Theodore Joseph Crackel, completed this history in 1993, under contract to the Military Airlift Command History Office. Contract management was under the purview of the Center for Air Force History (now the Air Force History Support Office). MAC historian Dr. John Leland researched and wrote Chapter IX, "CRAF in Operation Desert Shield." Rooted in the late 1930s, the CRAF story revolved about two points: the military requirements and the economics of civil air transportation. Subsequently, the CRAF concept crept along for more than fifty years with little to show for the effort, except for a series of agreements and planning documents. The tortured route of defining and redefining of the concept forms the nucleus of the this history. Unremarkable as it appears, the process of coordination with other governmental agencies, the Congress, aviation organizations, and individual airlines was both necessary and unavoidable; there are lessons to be learned from this experience. Although this story appears terribly short on action, it is worth studying to understand how, when, and why the concept failed and finally succeeded.
    [Show full text]
  • Essential Air Service at Seven Montana Communities
    Order: 2016-8-24 Served: August 24, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 24th of August, 2016 Essential Air Service at DUBOIS, PENNSYLVANIA DOT-OST-2004-17617 JOHNSTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA DOT-OST-2002-11451 MORGANTOWN, WEST VIRGINIA DOT-OST-2005-20735 Under 49 U.S.C. § 41731 et seq. ORDER SELECTING AIR CARRIER Summary By this Order, the Department of Transportation (“the Department”) is selecting Southern Airways Express, LLC (“Southern”), to provide subsidized Essential Air Service (EAS) to the communities of DuBois and Johnstown, Pennsylvania, and Morgantown, West Virginia. Each community will receive 38 weekly round trips to large- or medium-hub airports. Background By Order 2014-7-11, issued July 18, 2014, the Department re-selected Silver Airways (“Silver”) to provide EAS at Morgantown, West Virginia, and Johnstown, Pennsylvania, from August 1, 2014, through September 30, 2016, and also re-selected Silver at DuBois, Pennsylvania, from October 1, 2014, through September 30, 2016. In anticipation of the end of these communities’ contracts on September 30, 2016, by Order 2016-3-33, issued on March 28, 2016, the Department requested proposals for EAS at DuBois, Johnstown, and Morgantown (along with other communities not addressed in this Order) with proposals due no later than May 3, 2016. On April 27, 2016, Silver requested an extension to the deadline until May 20, 2016. On April 28, 2016, the Department granted the extension request, thereby making proposals to serve the above communities due on May 20, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Pittsburgh International Airport, Allegheny County Airport and the Allegheny County Airport Authority Economic Impact Study
    Pittsburgh International Airport, Allegheny County Airport and the Allegheny County Airport Authority Economic Impact Study Prepared for: Allegheny County Airport Authority Pittsburgh International Airport PO Box 12370, Pittsburgh, PA 15231 Prepared by: Economic Development Research Group, Inc. 155 Federal Street, Suite 600, Boston, MA 02110 In Association with: john j. Clark & Associates, Inc. 16 Niagara Road, Suite 2B, Pittsburgh, PA 15221 March 2017 Pittsburgh International Airport, Allegheny County Airport and the Allegheny County Airport Authority Economic Impact Study Prepared for: Allegheny County Airport Authority Pittsburgh International Airport PO Box 12370, Pittsburgh, PA 15231 Prepared by: Economic Development Research Group, Inc. 155 Federal Street, Suite 600, Boston, MA 02110 In Association with: john j. Clark & Associates, Inc. 16 Niagara Road, Suite 2B, Pittsburgh, PA 15221 March 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 1 Section I. Overview ....................................................................................................................... 4 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 5 3. Context ....................................................................................................................................... 13 Section II. 2015 Contribution of PIT and
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Inventory of Facilities
    Chapter 2 – Inventory of Facilities Chapter 2 Inventory of Facilities One of the initial tasks in the preparation of an airport master plan is the collection of information on the condition of existing facilities and services. This inventory of data is necessary to not only evaluate the physical attributes of airside and landside infrastructure, but also to complete subsequent study tasks, such as demand/capacity analyses and the determination of facility requirements. Information collected focuses on the use, size, quantity, type, area, operational intent, and other characteristics of the airside and landside components of an airport. Typical categories of information that are collected include history, physical infrastructure, regional setting, surrounding land uses, environmental features, historical aviation activity, business affairs, and socioeconomic demographics of the surrounding community. Several sources of information were referenced to compile a comprehensive database of the facilities and services at the University Park Airport (Airport). These included, but were not limited to, the previous Airport Master Plan, recent National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents, the Airport website, the Terminal Area Master Plan, the Land Use Plan, and the Airport Layout Plan (ALP). In addition, historical enplanements, aircraft operations, based aircraft, aircraft fleet mix, enplaned cargo, and automobile parking data were obtained from Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) databases and Airport records. Finally, an on-site visual
    [Show full text]