DOCSLIB.ORG

Adopted by the State Transportation Commission August 12, 2010 Effective: October 1, 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Adopted by the State Transportation Commission August 12, 2010 Effective: October 1, 2010 Adopted by the State Transportation Commission August 12, 2010 Effective: October 1, 2010 Version 08/12/2010 Table of Contents Introduction and Purpose ............................................................................................. 3 Mobility Plan ............................................................................................................. 3 Program Development Process ..................................................................................... 4 Act 120 of 1970 .......................................................................................................... 4 Twelve Year Program ................................................................................................ 5 State Transportation Commission .............................................................................. 6 Metropolitan Planning Organization .......................................................................... 7 Rural Planning Organization ...................................................................................... 8 Public Input Process ................................................................................................. 10 2011 Program ............................................................................................................... 10 Funding Level Summary .......................................................................................... 12 Linking Planning and NEPA .................................................................................. 13 Transportation Funding Crisis ................................................................................. 14 Planning Partner Regions ........................................................................................... 16 Adams ...................................................................................................................... 17 Altoona ..................................................................................................................... 19 Centre ....................................................................................................................... 21 Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) .................................. 23 Erie ........................................................................................................................... 26 Franklin .................................................................................................................... 28 Harrisburg ................................................................................................................ 30 Johnstown ................................................................................................................. 32 Lancaster .................................................................................................................. 34 Lebanon .................................................................................................................... 36 Lehigh Valley ........................................................................................................... 38 1 Northeastern Pennsylvania ....................................................................................... 40 North Central ............................................................................................................ 42 Northwest ................................................................................................................. 45 Northern Tier ............................................................................................................ 47 Reading .....................................................................................................................4 9 Scranton-Wilkes Barre ............................................................................................. 51 Shenango Valley ...................................................................................................... 53 SEDA-COG .............................................................................................................. 55 Southern Alleghenies ............................................................................................... 57 Southwestern Pennsylvania ...................................................................................... 59 Williamsport ............................................................................................................. 63 York .......................................................................................................................... 65 Appendix I Planning Partner Contacts ........................................................................................ 67 Appendix II STC Membership ..................................................................................................... 70 Appendix III 2011-2022 Twelve Year Program ............................................................................ 72 2 his document provides an overview of the Commonwealth’s 2011 Twelve Introduction and Year Transportation Program. Information related to federal and state T requirements and regulations is included, as are the program goals, stakeholders involved in the process and highlights of regional priorities. Purpose The Commonwealth’s Transportation Program reflects transportation priorities for the next twelve-year period. In Pennsylvania as elsewhere, the demand for transportation improvements far exceeds available resources. The programming process is designed to help Pennsylvania prioritize its many transportation projects within the available funding. It is a collaboration among the State Transportation Commission (STC), Metropolitan and Rural Planning Organizations, Federal Transportation Agencies and owners and operators of transportation services. he Pennsylvania Mobility Plan is the state’s current long-range transportation plan. The plan was completed in June of 2007. The Mobility Plan provides a framework to guide Mobility Plan T the development of specific transportation programs and projects, including the Twelve Year Program. Thus, each series of investments will have a common reference point aimed at shared goals. Over time, the effectiveness of the plan and the ensuing investments can be measured by the extent to which the Mobility Plan’s objectives are being achieved. The Mobility Plan covers all major modes of transportation in the state. This approach will be particularly important as we consider how to best achieve the plan’s broad goals on a mode-by- mode basis. The Plan’s vision which is to, “Provide the best performing transportation system for people, business, and places” is supported by five goals: 1. Move people and goods safely and securely. 2. Improve quality of life by linking transportation, land use, economic development, and environmental stewardship. 3. Develop and sustain quality transportation infrastructure. 4. Provide mobility for people, goods, and commerce. 5. Maximize the benefits of transportation investments. 3 A Mobility Plan User’s Guide has been developed to assist in integrating the statewide long-range plan into the work activities of the many entities involved in planning and programming process. The User’s Guide and other Plan documents are available at www.pamobilityplan.com. The Mobility Plan will be successfully implemented only with the active involvement of all entities that influence transportation in Pennsylvania. This begins by using our vision and goals as the umbrella direction under which plans and programs are developed. he first four years of the Program is referenced as the Transportation Program Improvement Program (TIP), which coincides with the federally required T Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The TIP lists highway, bridge, transit, rail freight, and aviation projects that intend to use federal Development Process and/or state matching funds excluding specified maintenance funds. Each MPO and RPO is responsible for developing a TIP. Public involvement is required when developing a TIP and public involvement activities are specified in each MPO/ RPO’s adopted Public Participation Plan (PPP). This plan provides the public with an active role in the development of transportation plans, programs, and projects beginning in the early stages of plan development and continuing throughout the planning process. As needs and priorities change, the TIP may be modified or amended. The State Transportation Commission (STC) reviews and approves the Twelve Year Program every two years and when finalized, the STC adopts the program. It is then forwarded to the Governor, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for their approval prior to the start of the federal fiscal year which is October 1 of each year. ct 120 of 1970 created PennDOT and the State Transportation Commission. Act Act 120 of 1970 120, as amended, requires the Department of Transportation to prepare and submit A to the State Transportation Commission (STC) every two years, a program of transportation improvements which it recommends be undertaken during the next twelve years, listing only programs and projects that are reasonably expected to be funded over the twelve-year period. 4 he Commonwealth’s Twelve Year Transportation Program (TYP) is Pennsylvania's official transportation program. It addresses all transportation Twelve Year Program T modes, including highways
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reporting Marks
    Lettres d'appellation / Reporting Marks AA Ann Arbor Railroad AALX Advanced Aromatics LP AAMX ACFA Arrendadora de Carros de Ferrocarril S.A. AAPV American Association of Private RR Car Owners Inc. AAR Association of American Railroads AATX Ampacet Corporation AB Akron and Barberton Cluster Railway Company ABB Akron and Barberton Belt Railroad Company ABBX Abbott Labs ABIX Anheuser-Busch Incorporated ABL Alameda Belt Line ABOX TTX Company ABRX AB Rail Investments Incorporated ABWX Asea Brown Boveri Incorporated AC Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACAX Honeywell International Incorporated ACBL American Commercial Barge Lines ACCX Consolidation Coal Company ACDX Honeywell International Incorporated ACEX Ace Cogeneration Company ACFX General Electric Rail Services Corporation ACGX Suburban Propane LP ACHX American Cyanamid Company ACIS Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACIX Great Lakes Chemical Corporation ACJR Ashtabula Carson Jefferson Railroad Company ACJU American Coastal Lines Joint Venture Incorporated ACL CSX Transportation Incorporated ACLU Atlantic Container Line Limited ACLX American Car Line Company ACMX Voith Hydro Incorporated ACNU AKZO Chemie B V ACOU Associated Octel Company Limited ACPX Amoco Oil Company ACPZ American Concrete Products Company ACRX American Chrome and Chemicals Incorporated ACSU Atlantic Cargo Services AB ACSX Honeywell International Incorporated ACSZ American Carrier Equipment ACTU Associated Container Transport (Australia) Limited ACTX Honeywell International Incorporated ACUU Acugreen Limited ACWR
    [Show full text]
  • Current Aviation Projects
    ATTACHMENT 1 State Fiscal Year 2021 - 2022 State/Local Projects Other / State Local MM Total Status BOA Airport Name Project Description Share Share Share Cost 80.00 Joseph A. Hardy Connellsville Acquire Airfield Maintenance Equipment $112,500 $37,500 $0 $150,000 Four Year Plan Airport 90.00 Pittsburgh International Airport Airfield Pavement Rehab $1,500,000 $500,000 $0 $2,000,000 Four Year Plan 89.00 Arnold Palmer Regional Airport Acquire Various Airport Equipment (Airfield Maintenance, Aircraft $225,000 $75,000 $0 $300,000 Four Year Plan Ground Support, Operations and Security) 84.00 Pennridge Airport Mitigate Obstructions $90,000 $10,000 $0 $100,000 Four Year Plan 84.00 York Airport Rehabilitate Hangar Area Apron, Ph. II: Construction $150,000 $50,000 $0 $200,000 Four Year Plan 83.00 Carlisle Airport Install Runway Lighting, Ph I: Design $22,500 $7,500 $0 $30,000 Four Year Plan 81.00 Wellsboro-Johnston Airport Acquire Airport Equipment $150,000 $50,000 $0 $200,000 Four Year Plan 81.00 Danville Airport Install PAPI Runway 27, Design and Construct $172,500 $57,500 $0 $230,000 Four Year Plan 81.00 Danville Airport Mitigate Obstructions, Permanently Displace Threshold RW 27 $45,000 $5,000 $0 $50,000 Four Year Plan (and repair / replace light fixtures or globes) 80.00 Bradford County Airport Acquire Airfield Maintenance Equipment $82,500 $27,500 $0 $110,000 Four Year Plan 80.00 Greater Breezewood Regional Acquire Airfield Maintenance Equipment (Tractor &Wide Area $76,875 $25,625 $0 $102,500 Four Year Plan Airport Mower) and Materials (Gravel) 80.00 John Murtha Johnstown-Cambria Acquire Airport Snow Removal and Maintenance Equipment (2 $83,588 $27,862 $0 $111,450 Four Year Plan County Airport plows and pickup trucks) 77.00 Hazleton Regional Airport Fuel Farm Improvements $112,500 $37,500 $0 $150,000 Four Year Plan 76.00 Pocono Mountains Municipal Airport Replace Fuel Farm, Ph.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Nonpoint Source Program Fy2003 Project Summary
    Rev.1/30/03 PENNSYLVANIA NONPOINT SOURCE PROGRAM FY2003 PROJECT SUMMARY Base Program/District Staff Project Title: Conservation District Mining Program Project Number: 2301 Budget: $ 125,000 Lead Agency: Western Pennsylvania Coalition for Abandoned Mine Reclamation (WPCAMR) Location: Western Pennsylvania bituminous coal region Point of Contact: Garry Price, BWM or Bruce Golden, Regional Coordinator, Western Pennsylvania Coalition for Abandoned Mine Reclamation The purpose of the WPCAMR is to promote and facilitate the reclamation and remediation of abandoned mine drainage (AMD) in western Pennsylvania. Through this project the Regional Coordinator will continue to develop an education program, coordinate AMD remediation activities, generate local support for remediation efforts, and assist watershed associations and conservation districts in the development of watershed management plans and in securing funding for AMD remediation. The Watershed Coordinator will continue to assist with the development and implementation of funded projects. Project Title: Conservation District Mining Program Project Number: 2302 Budget: $ 118,000 Lead Agency: Eastern Pennsylvania Coalition for Abandoned Mine Reclamation (EPCAMR) Location: Anthracite and northern bituminous regions of Pennsylvania Point of Contact: Garry Price, BWM or Robert Hughes, Eastern Pennsylvania Coalition for Abandoned Mine Reclamation EPCAMR was formed to promote and facilitate the reclamation and remediation of land and water adversely affected by past coal mining practices in eastern Pennsylvania. EPCAMR is a complimentary organization to the Western Pennsylvania Coalition. The EPCAMR Regional Coordinator will continue efforts to organize watershed associations, develop an education program, coordinate AMD remediation activities, generate local support for remediation efforts, and assist watershed associations and conservation districts in the development of watershed management plans and in securing funding for AMD remediation.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying the Distinct Rock Types in the Streambed of Muddy Run
    The JUNIATA JOURNAL of GEOLOGY, 1, 1-7 (2014) Original Article Identifying the Distinct Rock Types in the Streambed of Muddy Run Kristin N. Kopera Pennsylvania has many secondary and bedrock streams, and one such stream is Muddy Run. Muddy Run is located primarily in the Hamilton Formation, but also touches the Onondaga and Ridgeley Formations in Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania. This paper identifies the rock types that are currently in Muddy Run, and matches them to the local geologic formations. Instead of primarily finding Hamilton Group in the stream, the majority of the samples taken from Muddy Run were from the Tuscarora and Ridgeley Formations. This suggests that Muddy Run had, at one time, come in contact with the Tuscarora formation. This data could also suggest that Muddy Run once belonged to a larger stream that transported the Tuscarora sandstones and deposited them in Muddy Run’s current location. Keywords. — Bedrock Stream; Onondaga Formation; Ridgeley Formation; Meandering River; Tuscarora Formation Department of Geology, Juniata College, 1700 Moore Street, Huntingdon, PA 16652. Email: [email protected] INTRODUCTION Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania, is one such example. Bedrock streams, instead of just Rivers and streams are the main transporters of flowing over the ground, cut down into the local sediment and rock and they are known for their bedrock (Seidl & Dietrich 1993). This following powerful erosional capabilities. Sediment and paper will answer two questions concerning rock travel down gradient from location to Muddy Run. Firstly, throughout its geologic location until they come to rest in a delta history, from what locations has Muddy Run .Alternatively, the sediment could also be been eroding and transporting rock? In addition, deposited when the velocity of the water has where did the rocks in Muddy Run once belong become too slow to move the debris any farther.
    [Show full text]
  • Muncy Creek Township
    Muncy Creek Planning Area Plan Adoptions 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Plan Adoptions HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> MUNCY BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> SHREWSBURY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> WOLF TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> Lycoming 2030: Plan the Possible 2 Muncy Creek Planning Area Acknowledgements 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Acknowledgements Muncy Creek Planning Advisory Team (PAT) WALTER REED, REPRESENTATIVE OF HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH RICHARD SMITH, REPRESENTATIVE OF HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH STEVE JAQUITH, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH (ALTERNATE) BILL RAMSEY, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH LINDA STEIN, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH STEVEN CULVER, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BILL POULTON, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP ANGELA SNYDER, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BILL DORMAN, REPRESENTATIVE OF PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH EUGENE OTTERBEIN, REPRESENTATIVE OF PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH DEAN BARTO, REPRESENTATIVE OF WOLF TOWNSHIP MELANIE MCCOY, REPRESENTATIVE OF WOLF TOWNSHIP TERRY DINCHER, REPRESENTATIVE OF SHREWSBURY TOWNSHIP REBECCA FOUGHT, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING RECREATION AUTHORITY DAVID MACIEJEWSKI, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING SCHOOL DISTRICT MICHAEL PAWLIK, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING SCHOOL DISTRICT GENE CAHN, REPRESENTATIVE
    [Show full text]
  • Jjjn'iwi'li Jmliipii Ill ^ANGLER
    JJJn'IWi'li jMlIipii ill ^ANGLER/ Ran a Looks A Bulltrog SEPTEMBER 1936 7 OFFICIAL STATE September, 1936 PUBLICATION ^ANGLER Vol.5 No. 9 C'^IP-^ '" . : - ==«rs> PUBLISHED MONTHLY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA by the BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS HI Five cents a copy — 50 cents a year OLIVER M. DEIBLER Commissioner of Fisheries C. R. BULLER 1 1 f Chief Fish Culturist, Bellefonte ALEX P. SWEIGART, Editor 111 South Office Bldg., Harrisburg, Pa. MEMBERS OF BOARD OLIVER M. DEIBLER, Chairman Greensburg iii MILTON L. PEEK Devon NOTE CHARLES A. FRENCH Subscriptions to the PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER Elwood City should be addressed to the Editor. Submit fee either HARRY E. WEBER by check or money order payable to the Common­ Philipsburg wealth of Pennsylvania. Stamps not acceptable. SAMUEL J. TRUSCOTT Individuals sending cash do so at their own risk. Dalton DAN R. SCHNABEL 111 Johnstown EDGAR W. NICHOLSON PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER welcomes contribu­ Philadelphia tions and photos of catches from its readers. Pro­ KENNETH A. REID per credit will be given to contributors. Connellsville All contributors returned if accompanied by first H. R. STACKHOUSE class postage. Secretary to Board =*KT> IMPORTANT—The Editor should be notified immediately of change in subscriber's address Please give both old and new addresses Permission to reprint will be granted provided proper credit notice is given Vol. 5 No. 9 SEPTEMBER, 1936 *ANGLER7 WHAT IS BEING DONE ABOUT STREAM POLLUTION By GROVER C. LADNER Deputy Attorney General and President, Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen PORTSMEN need not be told that stream pollution is a long uphill fight.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft 2021 LRTP
    DRAFT SEDA‐COG Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN The Draft Long Range Transportation Plan includes regional overview information and the MPO region’s long range vision for prioritizing transportation investments. This copy of the draft plan is available as part of a 30‐day comment period beginning on May 24, 2021, and ending on June 22, 2021. The public comment period provides the public an opportunity to provide feedback on all facets of the Long Range Transportation Plan before its adoption. The plan can be reviewed online at: http://www.seda‐cog.org/departments/transportation/long‐range‐plan. Written and electronic comments may be submitted via email, SEDA‐COG web portal, fax, or Postal Service by 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 22, 2021. Email comments may be submitted to lrtp@seda‐cog.org or through the web portal at http://www.seda‐cog.org/departments/transportation/transportation‐comments Comments may be faxed to 570‐524‐9190 Please address all written comments to: Mr. Don Kiel SEDA‐COG MPO 201 Furnace Road Lewisburg, PA 17837 If you would like to provide comments or discuss the draft plan in person, a Virtual Public Meeting will be held during the public comment period as follows: Date: June 3, 2021 Time: 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Location: The content of this Notice is available in alternative formats and other languages upon request by contacting the SEDA‐COG MPO at 570‐524‐4491, or by written correspondence directed to the MPO at 201 Furnace Road, Lewisburg, PA 17837, or by email at jsaylor@seda‐cog.org.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Annual Report.Pdf
    U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program 2010 Annual Report 2010 Annual Report Department of Energy Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program Executive Summary The mission for the Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) is to ensure federal, state, tribal, and local responders have access to the plans, training, and technical assistance necessary to safely, efficiently, and effectively respond to radiological transportation accidents. To support this mission TEPP has formed strong partnerships over the last 15 years with state, tribal and local response organizations, Federal agencies and other national programs integrating TEPP planning tools and training into a variety of hazardous materials preparedness programs. These partnerships have resulted in states and tribes either using all or portions of the TEPP resources in their programs. Many have adopted the TEPP training program, Modular Emergency Response Radiological Transportation Training (MERRTT), into their hazardous material training curriculums to assist them in preparing their fire departments, law enforcement organizations, hazardous materials response teams, emergency management officials, public information officers and emergency medical technicians to respond to a radiological transportation accidents. This Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 DOE TEPP Annual Report highlights events, outreach, partnerships and training where TEPP has proven to be integral in building radiological response capabilities of states and tribes that may need to respond to radiological incidents. To help build those capacities, TEPP promotes state and tribal implementation by providing responders who successfully complete a MERRTT Train-the-Trainer (T3) course with the tools and knowledge to integrate MERRTT into their state, tribal, or local training programs. TEPP has proven to be an effective and growing preparedness resource across the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • I-180/I-80 Interchange Signing Project
    NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NOTICE OF HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT I-180/I-80 Interchange Signing HSIP-180-9(4); C.N. 13349 Identified as I-180/I-80 Interchange Signing, Construction is tentatively scheduled to begin the proposed project would install new spring of 2018 with completion within three overhead guide signs and two new overhead working days. sign structures at the Interstate 80 (I-80) and The proposed project would require short Interstate 180 (I-180) interchange located within duration detours during the removal and the city limits of Lincoln in Lancaster County. installation of the overhead signs and structures. The proposed project would begin on I-80 at mile The detours would be required for the on/off- marker (MM) 401.00 and end at MM 401.25 and ramps from westbound I-80 to northbound and begin on I-180 at MM 0.00 and end at MM 1.15. southbound I-180 and from northbound I-180 to westbound I-80. All detours would utilize I-80 The purpose of this project is to preserve the Exit 399 and Cornhusker Highway. I-180 and I-80 transportation asset, improve the reliability of the transportation system, and NDOT has worked to develop this project to perpetuate the mobility of the traveling public. minimize inconvenience and hardships. We are The need for this proposed project is based dedicated to improving Nebraska’s Highway on the condition of the overhead signs and system and with your help we can achieve this structures. goal. Proposed construction would consist of removing the existing overhead guide signs and Any questions or comments regarding this project should sign structures and installing new overhead guide be submitted to: Sarah Soula, Public Involvement Manager, Nebraska Department of Transportation, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Pennsylvania Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws PERMITS, MULTI-YEAR LICENSES, BUTTONS
    2018PENNSYLVANIA FISHING SUMMARY Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws 2018 Fishing License BUTTON WHAT’s NeW FOR 2018 l Addition to Panfish Enhancement Waters–page 15 l Changes to Misc. Regulations–page 16 l Changes to Stocked Trout Waters–pages 22-29 www.PaBestFishing.com Multi-Year Fishing Licenses–page 5 18 Southeastern Regular Opening Day 2 TROUT OPENERS Counties March 31 AND April 14 for Trout Statewide www.GoneFishingPa.com Use the following contacts for answers to your questions or better yet, go onlinePFBC to the LOCATION PFBC S/TABLE OF CONTENTS website (www.fishandboat.com) for a wealth of information about fishing and boating. THANK YOU FOR MORE INFORMATION: for the purchase STATE HEADQUARTERS CENTRE REGION OFFICE FISHING LICENSES: 1601 Elmerton Avenue 595 East Rolling Ridge Drive Phone: (877) 707-4085 of your fishing P.O. Box 67000 Bellefonte, PA 16823 Harrisburg, PA 17106-7000 Phone: (814) 359-5110 BOAT REGISTRATION/TITLING: license! Phone: (866) 262-8734 Phone: (717) 705-7800 Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. The mission of the Pennsylvania Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday PUBLICATIONS: Fish and Boat Commission is to Monday through Friday BOATING SAFETY Phone: (717) 705-7835 protect, conserve, and enhance the PFBC WEBSITE: Commonwealth’s aquatic resources EDUCATION COURSES FOLLOW US: www.fishandboat.com Phone: (888) 723-4741 and provide fishing and boating www.fishandboat.com/socialmedia opportunities. REGION OFFICES: LAW ENFORCEMENT/EDUCATION Contents Contact Law Enforcement for information about regulations and fishing and boating opportunities. Contact Education for information about fishing and boating programs and boating safety education.
    [Show full text]
  • Category 4A Waterbodies (Approved Tmdls)
    Lebanon County Impaired Streams Category 4a Waterbodies (Approved TMDLs) Waterway Impairment Source/Cause Bachman Run Nutrients Agriculture Siltation Crop Related Agriculture Bachman Run UNT Nutrients Agriculture Siltation Crop Related Agriculture Beach Run Siltation Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers Beach Run UNT Siltation Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers Beck Creek Nutrients Agriculture Buckholder Run Siltation Agriculture Chiques Creek Nutrients Agriculture Siltation Agriculture Chiques Creek UNT Nutrients Agriculture Siltation Agriculture Conewago Creek Nutrients Agriculture Siltation Agriculture Suspended Solids Agriculture Conewago Creek UNT Nutrients Agriculture Siltation Agriculture Deep Run Nutrients Agriculture Siltation Agriculture Suspended Solids Agriculture Nutrients Municipal Point Source Suspended Solids Industrial Point Source Deep Run UNT Nutrients Agriculture Siltation Agriculture Siltation Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers Earlakill Run Nutrients Agriculture Earlakill Run UNT Nutrients Agriculture Siltation Agriculture Elizabeth Run Suspended Solids Industrial Point Source Nutrients Municipal Point Source Siltation Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers Nutrients Agriculture Siltation Agriculture Elizabeth Run UNT Nutrients Agriculture Siltation Agriculture Gingrich Run Suspended Solids Agriculture Organic Enrichment/Low D.O. Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers Gingrich Run UNT Siltation Agriculture Hoffer Creek Nutrients Agriculture Siltation Agriculture Hoffer Creek UNT Nutrients Agriculture Siltation Agriculture Killinger Creek Nutrients Agriculture Siltation
    [Show full text]
  • Essential Air Service at Seven Montana Communities
    Order: 2016-8-24 Served: August 24, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 24th of August, 2016 Essential Air Service at DUBOIS, PENNSYLVANIA DOT-OST-2004-17617 JOHNSTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA DOT-OST-2002-11451 MORGANTOWN, WEST VIRGINIA DOT-OST-2005-20735 Under 49 U.S.C. § 41731 et seq. ORDER SELECTING AIR CARRIER Summary By this Order, the Department of Transportation (“the Department”) is selecting Southern Airways Express, LLC (“Southern”), to provide subsidized Essential Air Service (EAS) to the communities of DuBois and Johnstown, Pennsylvania, and Morgantown, West Virginia. Each community will receive 38 weekly round trips to large- or medium-hub airports. Background By Order 2014-7-11, issued July 18, 2014, the Department re-selected Silver Airways (“Silver”) to provide EAS at Morgantown, West Virginia, and Johnstown, Pennsylvania, from August 1, 2014, through September 30, 2016, and also re-selected Silver at DuBois, Pennsylvania, from October 1, 2014, through September 30, 2016. In anticipation of the end of these communities’ contracts on September 30, 2016, by Order 2016-3-33, issued on March 28, 2016, the Department requested proposals for EAS at DuBois, Johnstown, and Morgantown (along with other communities not addressed in this Order) with proposals due no later than May 3, 2016. On April 27, 2016, Silver requested an extension to the deadline until May 20, 2016. On April 28, 2016, the Department granted the extension request, thereby making proposals to serve the above communities due on May 20, 2016.
    [Show full text]