DOCSLIB.ORG

Thesis Composition and Fabric of the Kupferschiefer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THESIS COMPOSITION AND FABRIC OF THE KUPFERSCHIEFER, SANGERHAUSEN BASIN, GERMANY AND A COMPARISON TO THE KUPFERSCHIEFER IN THE LUBIN MINING DISTRICT, POLAND Submitted by Brianna E. Lyons Department of Geosciences In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall 2013 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Sally Sutton John Ridley Thomas Sale Copyright by Brianna Elizabeth Lyons 2013 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT COMPOSITION AND FABRIC OF THE KUPFERSCHIEFER, SANGERHAUSEN BASIN, GERMANY AND A COMPARISON TO THE KUPFERSCHIEFER IN THE LUBIN MINING DISTRICT, POLAND The Kupferschiefer, or "copper shale," is a thin carbonaceous marly shale deposited during the Late Permian within the Zechstein Basin of central Europe. A classic example of a sediment hosted stratiform copper deposit, the Kupferschiefer is mineralized with Cu and other metals of economic interest such as Pb, Zn, and Ag. The unit is overlain by the Zechstein Limestone and underlain by the Weissliegend sandstone; it is most well known in Germany and Poland. Overall, the Kupferschiefer in the Sangerhausen Basin in Germany has been less studied than its counterpart in the Lubin mining district in Poland. Some previous studies compare the Kupferschiefer from the Lubin mining district, and more rarely the Sangerhausen Basin, to other stratiform copper deposits, but few compare data from both locations. This study analyzes, compares, and contrasts geochemical, mineralogical, and petrologic data from five Sangerhausen Basin locations and four locations in the Lubin and Rudna mines of the Lubin mining district. A total of 101 samples were examined: 61 Sangerhausen samples (41 from above the Kupferschiefer-Weissliegend contact, and 20 from below the contact) and 41 Lubin mining district samples (28 from above the Kupferschiefer-Weissliegend contact, and 13 from below the contact). Of these, 62 (36 Sangerhausen and 26 Lubin mining district) were geochemically analyzed, and 65 samples were observed in thin section (35 Sangerhausen, 30 Lubin mining district). The Sangerhausen Basin Kupferschiefer exhibits textural, geochemical, and mineralization characteristics broadly similar to those of the Lubin mining district Kupferschiefer, with a few distinct differences. Sulfide mineralization, in the form of disseminated spherules, blebs, aggregates, framboids, and bedding-parallel and -perpendicular veins, is observed in both locations on macro- and microscopic ii scales. The most abundant sulfide in mineralized samples from both locations is chalcocite, followed by chalcopyrite. Sulfide mineralization is commonly associated with the presence of quartz and carbonate veins in Lubin mining district samples, while mineralization is rarely associated with these veins in Sangerhausen Basin samples. Fluorescence from hydrocarbons is observed in association with sulfide mineralization in some samples, and is generally more common in samples from the Sangerhausen Basin than in those from the Lubin mining district. Both locations show similar geochemical trends with stratigraphic depth, as the units transition from Weissliegend to Kupferschiefer to Zechstein Limestone. The Sangerhausen Basin Kupferschiefer exhibits P2O5 enrichment (averaging 0.26 wt.%) compared to Lubin mining district Kupferschiefer and average shale P2O5 values (averaging 0.13 wt.% and 0.16 wt.%, respectively). Copper concentrations are greater in samples from the Lubin mining district (~14 wt.% max, most samples above ~1 to 2 wt.%) compared to Sangerhausen samples (~10 wt.% max, most samples below 0.5 wt.%). The lower ~25 cm of the Kupferschiefer is enriched in ore metals (Cu, Ag, Pb, Zn, and U) in both locations, and in the Sangerhausen Basin, in middle rare earth elements (REEs) as well. This suggests that the reactions resulting from interaction between fluids migrating from the underlying Weissliegend and overlying Zechstein evaporates mostly occurred in the lower 20 cm of the Kupferschiefer. Assuming that the REEs were carried in the mineralizing fluids, the differences in REE patterns from Sangerhausen samples taken 7 and 8 cm above the basal contact of the Kupferschiefer suggest that even within a single basin the reactions resulting from fluid interaction did not occur at the same stratigraphic level at all locations. The strata-form nature of the deposit suggests large scale bedding-parallel fluid flow. On a smaller scale, the orientation of sulfide, quartz, and carbonate veins and of elongated sulfide macro-blebs suggests that the local, small-scale flow direction is preferentially bedding-parallel as well, especially in the lower 20 to 30 cm of the Kupferschiefer where the matrix is primarily composed of alternating lenses of carbon- and clay-rich pods, and carbonate-rich pods. However, the presence of bedding-perpendicular sulfide blebs and carbonate and quartz veins illustrate that flow was not exclusively bedding-parallel. The Lubin mining district probably experienced at least two pulses of fluid flow, as illustrated by the presence iii of veins that exhibit alternating carbonate and sulfide precipitation; similar characteristics were not observed in the Sangerhausen Basin samples. The presence of both yellow and blue fluorescence of bitumen in Sangerhausen samples, however, suggests that there were at least two pulses of hydrocarbon migration. The generally well-sorted Lubin mining district Weissliegend was more permeable than the poorly-sorted Sangerhausen Basin Weissliegend. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................... vii List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................. viii List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. ix Chapter 1 - Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Kupferschiefer: "Copper Shale" ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose of this Masters Thesis .......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Objectives .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 2 - Background ................................................................................................................................ 3 2.1 Kupferschiefer and Rotliegend/Zechstein Stratigraphy ..................................................................... 3 2.2 Geologic History ................................................................................................................................ 9 2.3 Mining History ................................................................................................................................ 15 2.4 Mineralization .................................................................................................................................. 17 2.4.1 Weissliegend Sulfide Bands ..................................................................................................... 25 2.4.2 Timing of Mineralization ......................................................................................................... 26 2.4.3 Small Scale Processes .............................................................................................................. 30 2.4.4 Temperature ............................................................................................................................. 31 2.5 Fluids ............................................................................................................................................... 31 2.6 Carbon/Organics/Hydrocarbons ...................................................................................................... 36 2.7 Rare Earth Elements ........................................................................................................................ 37 Chapter 3 - Methods .................................................................................................................................... 40 3.1 Field Work ....................................................................................................................................... 40 3.2 Lab Work ......................................................................................................................................... 42 3.3 Hand Sample Petrography ............................................................................................................... 44 3.4 Microscope Work ............................................................................................................................ 45 3.4.1 Thin Section Petrography ......................................................................................................... 45 3.4.2 Fluorescence Microscope ........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Landschaftspflegerischer Begleitplan Rückbau Deich Und Verwallung Jahrfeld

    Landschaftspflegerischer Begleitplan Rückbau Deich Und Verwallung Jahrfeld

    Landschaftspflegerischer Begleitplan Rückbau Deich und Verwallung Jahrfeld Inhaltsverzeichnis Seite 1.0 Einleitung .................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Anlass der Planung .................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Gesetzliche Grundlagen ........................................................................................... 4 2.0 Beschreibung des Planungsraumes ....................................................................... 4 2.1 Naturräumliche Grundlagen ..................................................................................... 4 2.1.1 Geologie und Geomorphologie ............................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Boden ...................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.3 Hydrologie ................................................................................................................................ 6 2.1.4 Klima ........................................................................................................................................ 7 2.1.5 Potentielle natürliche Vegetation/Reale Vegetation ................................................................ 8 2.1.6 aktuelle Flächennutzung ......................................................................................................... 8 2.1.7 Fauna ......................................................................................................................................
  • VGS-433 Hettstedt-Gerbstedt-Siersleben-Helbra Gültig Ab: 01.04.2021

    VGS-433 Hettstedt-Gerbstedt-Siersleben-Helbra Gültig Ab: 01.04.2021

    VGS-433 Hettstedt-Gerbstedt-Siersleben-Helbra gültig ab: 01.04.2021 Montag-Freitag Fahrtnummer 402 404 406 414 416 408 418 488 430 422 426 428 424 Verkehrbeschränkungen S S S S S S S S S Anmerkungen Hettstedt, Bf. Hettstedt, Busbf., Bst. 2 5.30 5.59 6.03 6.20 7.14 7.15 7.16 7.17 Hettstedt, Randsiedlung | | | | 7.19 | 7.21 | 13.00 Hettstedt, Goethestr. | | | | | | | | Hettstedt, Arnstedter Weg 5.35 | | 6.25 7.01 | | 7.22 | Hettstedt, C.-Ch.-Agthe-Str. 5.36 | | 6.26 7.03 | | 7.23 | Hettstedt, Beethovenstr. 5.37 | | 6.27 7.04 | | 7.24 | Hettstedt, Ascherslebener Str. 5.39 | | 6.29 | | | 7.26 | Hettstedt, Hettstedter Meile 5.40 | | 6.30 | | | 7.27 | Hettstedt, Mansfeld Center 5.43 | | 6.33 | | | 7.30 | Hettstedt, Kolpingwerk 5.44 | | 6.34 | | | 7.31 | Hettstedt, HELIOS Klinik 5.45 | | 6.35 | | | 7.32 | Hettstedt, Kirschweg I 5.48 | | 6.38 | 7.24 7.21 7.35 | Hettstedt, Kirschweg II 5.49 | | 6.39 | 7.25 7.22 7.36 | Hettstedt, Kiefernweg 5.50 | | 6.40 | 7.26 7.23 7.37 | Hettstedt, Fichtestr. II 5.51 | | 6.41 | | 7.38 | Hettstedt, Fichtestr. 5.52 | | 6.42 | 7.27 7.39 | Hettstedt, Goetheplatz 5.53 | | 6.43 | 7.28 7.40 | Hettstedt, Goethestr. 5.54 | | 6.44 | 7.30 7.41 | Hettstedt, Puschkinstr. 5.55 | | 6.45 | 7.31 7.42 | Hettstedt, Schillerstr. 5.56 | | 6.46 | 7.32 7.43 | Hettstedt, VGS | | | | | | | | Hettstedt, Schafplane | | | | | | | | Hettstedt, Beethovenstr. | | | | | | | | Hettstedt, Arnstedter Weg | | | | | | | | Hettstedt, Busbf., Bst. 2 5.59 | | 6.49 | 7.35 7.46 13.07 Hettstedt, Bf.
  • Polizeirevier Mansfeld-Südharz

    Polizeirevier Mansfeld-Südharz

    Polizeimeldung: 085/2021 Eisleben, den 10.05.2021 Polizeirevier Mansfeld-Südharz Polizeimeldungen Kriminalitäts- und Verkehrslage Polizeirevier Mansfeld-Südharz Berga / Betrug Eine unbekannte Täterin meldete sich telefonisch bei einem 73-Jährigen und teilt ihm mit, dass er an einem kostenlosen Gewinnspiel teilgenommen habe und es versäumt hat, fristgereicht zu kündigen. Aus diesem Grund muss er für zwei Jahre eine monatliche Gebühr in Höhe von 89,-€ zahlen. Der Mann erklärte der Täterin, dass er nicht an Gewinnspielen teilnimmt. Daraufhin bot sie ihm an, dass er nur 69,-€ monatlich zahlen müsste, dafür benötige sie aber seine Kontodaten. Er erwiderte, dass er zur Polizei gehe und beendete das Gespräch. Die im Display angezeigte Telefonnummer notierte er sich vorher. Ein Sachschaden ist nicht eingetreten. Eisleben / Falschgeld In einer Apotheke wurde mit einem vermutlich gefälschten 50-Euro-Schein bezahlt. Der Geldschein wurde sichergestellt. Die Ermittlungen dazu laufen. Quenstedt / Diebstahl Unbekannte Täter entwendeten zwei Elektrozäune von einem Feld zwischen den Ortslagen Walbeck und Sylda. Der dazugehörige Akku, welcher in einer Verschlussbox gesondert gesichert ist, wurde ebenfalls entwendet. Es gibt zurzeit keine Hinweise auf mögliche Tatverdächtige. Der Gesamtschaden beläuft sich ca. auf 300,-€. Sangerhausen / Einbruch Unbekannte Täter verschafften sich unerlaubt Zugang auf ein umzäuntes Gelände, auf denen mehrere Firmen ansässig sind. In einem leerstehenden Objekt wurde das Fenster beschädigt, sodass man in die Räumlichkeit eindringen konnte. Ob etwas entwendet wurde, ist noch nicht bekannt. Die Polizei sicherte Spuren. Am Fenster entstand Sachschaden. Sangerhausen / Diebstahl Unbekannte Täter entwendeten ein Fahrrad, welches angeschlossen vor einem Mehrfamilienhaus abgestellt wurde. Laut der Aussage des Eigentümers befand er sich nur etwa 30 Minuten im Haus.

  • 11701-19-A0558 RVH Landmarke 4 Engl

    Landmark 4 Brocken ® On the 17th of November, 2015, during the 38th UNESCO General Assembly, the 195 member states of the United Nations resolved to introduce a new title. As a result, Geoparks can be distinguished as UNESCO Global Geoparks. As early as 2004, 25 European and Chinese Geoparks had founded the Global Geoparks Network (GGN). In autumn of that year Geopark Harz · Braunschweiger Land · Ostfalen became part of the network. In addition, there are various regional networks, among them the European Geoparks Network (EGN). These coordinate international cooperation. 22 Königslutter 28 ® 1 cm = 26 km 20 Oschersleben 27 18 14 Goslar Halberstadt 3 2 1 8 Quedlinburg 4 OsterodeOsterodee a.H.a.Ha H.. 9 11 5 13 15 161 6 10 17 19 7 Sangerhausen Nordhausen 12 21 In the above overview map you can see the locations of all UNESCO Global Geoparks in Europe, including UNESCO Global Geopark Harz · Braunschweiger Land · Ostfalen and the borders of its parts. UNESCO-Geoparks are clearly defi ned, unique areas, in which geosites and landscapes of international geological importance are found. The purpose of every UNESCO-Geopark is to protect the geological heritage and to promote environmental education and sustainable regional development. Actions which can infl ict considerable damage on geosites are forbidden by law. A Highlight of a Harz Visit 1 The Brocken A walk up the Brocken can begin at many of the Landmark’s Geopoints, or one can take the Brockenbahn from Wernigerode or Drei Annen-Hohne via Schierke up to the highest mountain of the Geopark (1,141 meters a.s.l.).
  • Landschaftsplanverzeichnis Sachsen-Anhalt

    Landschaftsplanverzeichnis Sachsen-Anhalt

    Landschaftsplanverzeichnis Sachsen-Anhalt Dieses Verzeichnis enthält die dem Bundesamt für Naturschutz gemeldeten Datensätze mit Stand 15.11.2010. Für Richtigkeit und Vollständigkeit der gemeldeten Daten übernimmt das BfN keine Gewähr. Titel Landkreise Gemeinden [+Ortsteile] Fläche Einwohner Maßstäbe Auftraggeber Planungsstellen Planstand weitere qkm Informationen LP Arendsee (VG) Altmarkkreis Altmersleben, Arendsee 160 5.800 10.000 VG Arendsee IHU 1993 Salzwedel (Altmark), Luftkurort, Brunau, Engersen, Güssefeld, Höwisch, Jeetze, Kahrstedt, Kakerbeck, Kalbe an der Milde, Kläden, Kleinau, Leppin, Neuendorf am Damm, Neulingen, Packebusch, Sanne-Kerkuhn, Schrampe, Thielbeer, Vienau, Wernstedt, Winkelstedt, Ziemendorf LP Gardelegen Altmarkkreis Gardelegen 67 14.500 10.000 SV Gardelegen Landgesellschaft LSA 1999 Salzwedel 25.000 mbH LP Klötze Altmarkkreis Klötze (Altmark) 62 6.250 10.000 ST Klötze Bauamt 1996 Salzwedel 25.000 LP Griesen Anhalt-Zerbst Griesen 8 297 10.000 GD Griesen Hortec 1995; RK LP Klieken Anhalt-Zerbst Klieken 32 1.118 10.000 GD Klieken Reichhoff 1992 LP Loburg Anhalt-Zerbst Loburg 40 2.800 10.000 ST Loburg Seebauer, Wefers u. 1996 Partner LP Oranienbaum Anhalt-Zerbst Oranienbaum [Brandhorst, 32 3.669 10.000 ST Oranienbaum AEROCART Consult 1995 Goltewitz] LP Roßlau Anhalt-Zerbst Roßlau an der Elbe 30 14.150 10.000 ST Roßlau Reichhoff 1993 LP Wörlitzer Winkel Anhalt-Zerbst Gohrau, Rehsen, Riesigk, 66 50.000 ST Wörlitz Reichhoff 2000 Vockerode, Wörlitz LP Zerbst, Stadt Anhalt-Zerbst Zerbst 39 ST Zerbst Gesellschaft f. i.B.
  • Übersicht Der Alternativen Beratungsstellen

    Übersicht Der Alternativen Beratungsstellen

    Beratungshilfe hier: andere Hilfemöglichkeiten gemäß § 1 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 BerHG Stand: 30.09.2019 andere Hilfemöglichkeit Anschrift Telefonnummer Sprechzeiten Ansprechpartner Bemerkungen Rechtsschutzversicherung Rechtsschutzversicherung Behörden Ausländerbehörde Team Ausländer- und Asylwesen, 0345/2215310 Mo, Mi geschlossen Die: 8.- Herr Kokott Am Stadion 5, 06122 Halle 0345/2215311 12.00 Uhr, 13.-18.00 Uhr Frau Kopp 0345/2215309 Do: 8.-12.00 Uhr, 13-15.30 Frau Schmaeske 0345/2215321 Uhr Fr: 8.-12.00 Frau Kaizik Uhrr Jugendamt 1. ASD, Schoppenhauer Str. 4; 1. 0345/2215673 1. Frau Engelhardt 2. Kindesunterhalt 2. 0345/2215746 2. Frau Goldschmidt Finanzamt/ 1. Halle- Nord, Blücherstr. 01 2. 1. 0345/69240 Mo,Die,Do,Fr.: 8.00-12.00 Uhr, Betriebsstättenfinanzamt Halle- Süd, Blücherstr. 01 2.0345/69235 Die: 14-18.00 Uhr, Do: 14- 16.00 Uhr der nach Landesrecht zuständige Stellen gemäß Gesetz vom 7.5.1994 (GVBl. LSA S. 568) Auskunftspflicht Landesämter für 1. Landkreis Saalkreis, Landratsamt, 1. 0345/2043316 1. Frau Siebert Ausbildungsförderung (Leistungen Wilhelm- Külz- Str. 10, 06018 Halle 2. 0345/2213170 der Ausbildungsförderung) 2. Schulverwaltungsamt, Amt für Beratungsanspruch Ausbildunggsförderung, Kaulenberg 04, 06108 Halle Agentur für Arbeit/ sonstige 1. Bundesagentur für Arbeit, 1. 0345/524940000 1. Mo,Mi,Fr.: 7.30-12.00 Uhr Dienststellen der Bundesagentur für Arbeitsagentur Halle, (Vermittlung, Di: 7.30-16.30 Uhr Do: Arbeit (Leistungen der Schoppenhauerstr. 02, 06114 Halle Beratung) 7.30-18.00 Uhr 2. BIZ: Arbeitsförderung) (Leistungen 2. BIZ, Berufsinformationszentrum 2. 0345/5249 3000 Mo,Di: 7.30-16.30 uhr der Grundsicherung für (leistungsgewährung) Mi,Fr.: 7.30-13.00 Uhr Do: Arbeitssuchende) (Leistungen bei 3.
  • Preservation of Permian Fishes from the Marl Slate of County Durham

    Preservation of Permian Fishes from the Marl Slate of County Durham

    DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCES- DURHAM UNIVERSITY Prof. David Harper: [email protected] Dr Stuart Jones: [email protected] Preservation of Permian fishes from the Marl Slate of County Durham 1. Background The fossil fishes from the Permian Marl Slate (Fig.1) display superb preservation of palaeonis- A large fauna of beautifully-preserved fishes from coid fish from scales scattered sparingly to com- the Marl Slate was first described by William King plete whole specimens with extraordinary detail. in his landmark monograph on the Permian fossils of England, in 1850. The Marl Slate was deposited over large areas in middle Europe (extending from England to Russia) in a restricted, almost la- goonal environment; the setting is virtually unique in the stratigraphical record. Neverthe- less, we know little of the modes of preservation of the fishes, many of their life styles and their contribution to late Permian food webs. The po- tential too that soft parts may have been pre- served offers a unique opportunity to study the anatomy and decay processes of these Palaeozoic fishes. Outside Britain, the most closely compara- ble fish-bearing formation to the Marl Slate is the Kupferschiefer of Germany. This is a similar fine- grained, flaggy rock in which specimens are well preserved, flattened on individual laminae. The Kupferschiefer extends across north-west Europe (Lower Zechstein), and is regarded as marking a series of anoxic events prior to the main flooding of the Zechstein Basin in the first of five cycles Figure 1: Two examples of Palaeoniscus freislebenen- sis, Marl Slate, County Durham, UK The soft-part preservation remains because of se- lective preservation and subsequent diagenesis Key questions to study: to more resistant biopolymers.
  • An Introduction to the Triassic: Current Insights Into the Regional Setting and Energy Resource Potential of NW Europe

    An Introduction to the Triassic: Current Insights Into the Regional Setting and Energy Resource Potential of NW Europe

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322739556 An introduction to the Triassic: Current insights into the regional setting and energy resource potential of NW Europe Article in Geological Society London Special Publications · January 2018 DOI: 10.1144/SP469.1 CITATIONS READS 3 92 3 authors, including: Tom Mckie Ben Kilhams Shell U.K. Limited Shell Global 37 PUBLICATIONS 431 CITATIONS 11 PUBLICATIONS 61 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Reconstructing the Norwegian volcanic margin View project Paleocene of the Central North Sea: regional mapping from dense hydrocarbon industry datasets. View project All content following this page was uploaded by Ben Kilhams on 22 November 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on January 26, 2018 An introduction to the Triassic: current insights into the regional setting and energy resource potential of NW Europe MARK GELUK1*, TOM MCKIE2 & BEN KILHAMS3 1Gerbrandylaan 18, 2314 EZ Leiden, The Netherlands 2Shell UK Exploration & Production, 1 Altens Farm Road, Nigg, Aberdeen AB12 3FY, UK 3Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij (NAM), PO Box 28000, 9400 HH Assen, The Netherlands *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: A review of recent Triassic research across the Southern Permian Basin area demon- strates the role that high-resolution stratigraphic correlation has in identifying the main controls on sedimentary facies and, subsequently, the distribution of hydrocarbon reservoirs. The depositio- nal and structural evolution of these sedimentary successions was the product of polyphase rifting controlled by antecedent structuration and halokinesis, fluctuating climate, and repeated marine flooding, leading to a wide range of reservoir types in a variety of structural configurations.
  • Masterplan Strukturwandel Mansfeld-Südharz Ist Kein Abgeschlossenes, Sta- Tisches Dokument

    Masterplan Strukturwandel Mansfeld-Südharz Ist Kein Abgeschlossenes, Sta- Tisches Dokument

    Arbeitsgruppe Strukturwandel Mansfeld-Südharz Dr. Angelika Klein Landrätin und Vorsitzende Karsten Braun Büroleiter der Landrätin Sven Vogler Fachbereichsleiter I Uta Ullrich Amtsleiterin Kreisplanung/ÖPNV Kathrin Klein SB Haushalt und Finanzen Michael Schumann LEADER Manager – LAG Mansfeld-Südharz Andreas Hensel GF Standortmarketing Mansfeld-Südharz GmbH Dr. Martina Scherer Vors. d. GF der Agentur für Arbeit Sangerhausen Sangerhausen, 08. Juli 2020 2 | 197 Sitz: Büro der Landrätin Arbeitsgruppe Strukturwandel Mansfeld-Südharz Rudolf-Breitscheid-Straße 20/22 06526 Sangerhausen Telefon: +49 3464 535–1000 Landrätin Dr. A. Klein +49 3464 535–1010 Büroleiter K. Braun Fax: +49 3464 535-1590 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.mansfeldsuedharz.de Version 1.0 – 08.07.2020 3 | 197 KONTAKT ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Inhaltsverzeichnis ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Anlagenverzeichnis ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Abkürzungsverzeichnis ........................................................................................................................................... 8 VORWORT...................................................................................................................................................................
  • Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary Layer at Stevns Klint (Denmark): Copper and Copper(II) Porphyrins PAVLE I

    Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary Layer at Stevns Klint (Denmark): Copper and Copper(II) Porphyrins PAVLE I

    J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 64(5 6)349-358(1999) UDC 547.979.732:546.56/.562 JSCS-2675 Original scientific paper Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary layer at Stevns Klint (Denmark): copper and copper(II) porphyrins PAVLE I. PREMOVI], NIKOLA D. NIKOLI], IVANA R. TONSA, DEJAN T. DULANOVI] and MIRJANA S. PAVLOVI]* Laboratory for Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Ni{, P.O.Box 91, YU-18000 Ni{, Yugoslavia and *Vin~a Institute of Nuclear Sciences, P.O. Box 522, YU-11001 Belgrade, Yugoslavia (Received 2 September 1998, revised 11 February 1999) High concentrations (up to 4000 ppm) of copper(II) porphyrins have been detected in the kerogen of the Cretaceous/Tertiary (KT) boundary informal type sedi- ment, the Fish Clay, at Stevns Klint, Denmark. These pigments have also been found in the Danish KT sediment at Nye Kløv, which is about 300 km away from Stevns Klint. However, copper(II) porphyrins cannot be detected in the Danich boundary rock of the Dania site, which is separated from Stevns Klint by about 200 km. It is proposed that the kerogen copper(II) porphyrins are derived from humic materials of terrestrial (peat/soil) sources already enriched with these compounds, which were redeposited in the Danish KT boundary Basin. In addition, our results show that the kerogen copper(II) porphyrins are present, for comparison, in the Permian Kupferschiefer shale from Poland. The amounts are comparable to those in the Fish Clay kerogen. To our opinion, the same processes responsible for the kerogen copper(II) porphyrin enrichment have occurred in the Stevns Klint KT boundary sediment and in the Kupferschiefer.
  • Coincidence of Photic Zone Euxinia and Impoverishment of Arthropods

    Coincidence of Photic Zone Euxinia and Impoverishment of Arthropods

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Coincidence of photic zone euxinia and impoverishment of arthropods in the aftermath of the Frasnian- Famennian biotic crisis Krzysztof Broda1*, Leszek Marynowski2, Michał Rakociński1 & Michał Zatoń1 The lowermost Famennian deposits of the Kowala quarry (Holy Cross Mountains, Poland) are becoming famous for their rich fossil content such as their abundant phosphatized arthropod remains (mostly thylacocephalans). Here, for the frst time, palaeontological and geochemical data were integrated to document abundance and diversity patterns in the context of palaeoenvironmental changes. During deposition, the generally oxic to suboxic conditions were interrupted at least twice by the onset of photic zone euxinia (PZE). Previously, PZE was considered as essential in preserving phosphatised fossils from, e.g., the famous Gogo Formation, Australia. Here, we show, however, that during PZE, the abundance of arthropods drastically dropped. The phosphorous content during PZE was also very low in comparison to that from oxic-suboxic intervals where arthropods are the most abundant. As phosphorous is essential for phosphatisation but also tends to fux of the sediment during bottom water anoxia, we propose that the PZE in such a case does not promote the fossilisation of the arthropods but instead leads to their impoverishment and non-preservation. Thus, the PZE conditions with anoxic bottom waters cannot be presumed as universal for exceptional fossil preservation by phosphatisation, and caution must be paid when interpreting the fossil abundance on the background of redox conditions. 1 Euxinic conditions in aquatic environments are defned as the presence of H2S and absence of oxygen . If such conditions occur at the chemocline in the water column, where light is available, they are defned as photic zone euxinia (PZE).
  • The Texan Permian and Its Mesozoic Types of Fossils.. .1891

    The Texan Permian and Its Mesozoic Types of Fossils.. .1891

    WHITE, C.A. ...The Texan Permian and its Mesozoic types of fossils.. .1891. I*- b37(245 ¥58 jj DEPARTMENT OP THE INTERIOR OF THK UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY No. 77 THE TEXAN PERMIAN AND ITS MESOZOIC TYPES OF FOSSILS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1891 LIBRARY CATALOGUE SLIPS. United States, Department of the interior. (U. S. geological survey). Department of the interior |- | Bulletin | of the | United States | geological survey | mo. 77 | [Seal of the department] | Washington \ government printing office | 1891 Second title: United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | | The Texau Permian | and its | Mesozoio types of fossils | by | Charles A. White | [Vignette] | Washington | government printing office | 1891 8°. 5lpp. 4 pi. White (Charles A.). United States geological survey | J.W. Powell, director | The Texau Permian | audits | Mesozoic types of fossils | by | Charles A. White | [Vignette] | Washington | government printing office | 1891. 8«. 5t pp. 4 pi. [UNITED STATES. Department of the interior. (U. S. geological survey). Bulletin 77.] United States geological survey J. W. Powell, director | | The Texan Permian | and its | Mesozoic types of fossils | by | Charles A. White | [Vignette] | Washingto:a | government printing office | 1891 8". 5lpp. 4 pi. [UNITED STATES. Department <tf the interior. (U. S. geological survey). Bnlletin 77.] A.D'VBRTISEMKN'T. [Bulletin No. 77.] The publications of the United States Geological Survey are issued in accordance with the statute approved March 3, 1879, which declares that "Thepublicationsof tb.eGeological Survey shall consist of the annual report of operations, geological and economic maps illustrating the resources and classification of the lauds, and reports upon general and economic geology and paleontology.