RESISTANCE, REBELLION, and DEATH, by Albert Camus. Knopf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RESISTANCE, REBELLION, and DEATH, by Albert Camus. Knopf BOOKS Albert Camus: The Life of Dialogue RESISTANCE, REBELLION, AND DEATH, by Albert Camus. Knopf. 272 pp. $4.00. By comparison with the work of the waywardness of impulse, the needs men like Koestler, Silone and Orwell, of personal feeling, the claims of the Albert Camus' writing has always body. Real virtues, and in our time seemed to me somewhat grandiose and among the greatest a writer could have. porous. He lacked Koestler's capacity But they were virtues that also brought for sustained argument, Silone's mix- with them two significant weaknesses: ture of humor and humaneness, Or- a temptation to reduce humanism to a well's gritty concern for facts. To be mere literary device and an incapacity sure, Camus never succumbed to the to embody his moral sentiments as po- casuistry of the later Koestler or the litical ideas. occasional anti-intellectualism of Or- To some extent, these weaknesses re- well; but except for The Stranger, his flect the dilemma of the post-Resist- one first-rate novel and his deepest ex- ance intellectuals in France who re- ploration of the problem of nihilism, fused to surrender themselves to any Camus' work had a disturbing quality: total ideology yet felt a need for some all too often he seemed to be making principle by which to guide their pub- a speech. lic life. The hopes nurtured by the To note these reservations is to do Resistance having been so sadly dis- that, and no more; it is surely not to sipated, they began to fall back upon deny that Camus deserved much of the large and unprovisioned sentiments of praise that has been rendered him. As fraternity, sentiments without which a man reflecting upon the life of our little else can be worth while but time, Camus could be, in his very be- which in themselves seldom lead to wilderment, an enormously sympa- concrete realizations in life or art. Per- thetic figure. His mind was not really haps that is one reason Camus' reflec- fecund, like Sartre's, but then he never tions tend to go soft and his fiction became infatuated, again like Sartre, seems thin-blooded. with his own dilemmas and agilities. Camus really preferred the truth to THESE VIEWS were reinforced when I everything else, even to his own secur- started to read Resistance, Rebellion, ity as an intellectual. In defense of and Death, a collection of Camus' the values by which he tried to live, journalism beginning with war-time he could be properly intransigeant; but statements in behalf of the Resistance, he was also ready to bend before reaching a point of climax in the mag- 210 nificent essay denouncing capital pun- assumptions — assumptions often vio- ishment, and ending with some recent lated, yet operative as both checks declarations on the place of the artist upon evil and inducements to good— in modern society. There is a discon- which had in the past been at the certing sameness of tone in these arti- foundation of the human order. And cles, a fondness for the glittering epi- this Camus did superbly: gram and oratorical lilt which seem to The world I live in is loathsome belie Camus' claim to be writing from to me, but I feel at one with the the very edge of despair. In part my men who suffer in it ... it seems objection is simply to the tradition of to me that there is [an] ambition French journalism, which seems per- that ought to belong to all writers: manently infatuated with operatic to bear witness and shout aloud, every time it is possible, insofar as grandeur; but in part it raises the more our talent allows, for those who serious problem of the extent to which are enslaved as we are. the moral pronouncement can satisfy a political need. And again: And here, trying to imagine once Yes, the great event of the twen- again the situations in which Camus tieth century was the forsaking of had written these overwrought pieces, the values of freedom by the revo- lutionary movement, the progres- I had to acknowledge that the force sive retreat of socialism based on of my objections was not very great. freedom before the attacks of Cae- For his journalism makes clear that sarian and military socialism. Since Camus was not really a "political that moment a certain hope has man," even to the limited extent that disappeared from the world and a solitude has begun for each and Silone is; Camus drove himself to re- every man. turn to journalism whenever he could no longer bear his detachment as an The scores of similar passages in artist, whenever, that is, he suffered Camus' writing testify to the fact that, too much from the "bad faith" of si- as far as he could, he helped preserve lence. And recalling these occasions— the idea of freedom in a dark age, and the Resistance, the post-war struggle equally important, preserve the idea in France, the Algerian war, the Hun- of human possibility. As far as he could garian revolution—one is struck (as if —that phrase bulks large at the mo- it were some sort of discovery!) with ment, since these past few decades the the fact that it was the moral response dilemma of the democratic left, which which was the essential one, the moral Camus shared, has been its inability to response which now became a kind of move from abstract position to a con- politics. crete program and then from a con- The traditional competition between crete program to an active politics. But socialists and liberals, as even at times this was our dilemma: the one we felt between socialists and conservatives, to be an essential part of our expe- had rested on a tacit assumption of rience. What Camus, clearly sensing some shared values as to the needs and the depth and range of that dilemma, nature of man. But in the age of the tried meanwhile to do was to keep total state, when this consensus was alive the possibility of a renewed broken by terror, the first task of radi- radicalism, with or without the social- cal intellectuals who still believed in ist label and vocabulary, for the dec- human freedom was to articulate the ades to come. 211 In doing this Camus was closer to ing to see that by now it was too late us, more a true friend and comrade, for such proposals: there was no than the vast bulk of party politicians longer any choice but to allow inde- in Europe who, from sheer inertia or pendence to countries like Algeria petty advantage, clung to the name of even if one knew that the leadership socialism. So far as I know, Camus did of the FLN contained authoritarians not call himself a socialist, though he and worse, and even if one suspected expressed a strong kinship with the that an FLN-controlled Algeria would traditions of socialism; but to whom mean the substitution of a new-style does one feel closer: Camus or Guy dictatorship for old-style colonialism. Mollet, the chauvinist leader of the Perhaps so. But if one goes beyond French Socialist party? Camus or 01- ready-made "positions" and tries to lenhauer, the klein biirgerlich leader think about the realities of the Alger- of the German Social Democracy? For ian tragedy, then one may be a little that matter, which leader of the social- more respectful of Camus' opinion, ist movement in the recent years would even if still supposing him to be mis- have had the humane imagination to taken. He spoke on this subject, as on compose a pamphlet as profoundly all others, with that good faith, that stirring and politically significant as commitment to human freedom, which Camus' attack on capital punishment? is the essential requirement for modern Norman Thomas, Asoka Mehta, per- politics. That the essential is some- haps two or three others .. times not the sufficient, is something else again. THE INADEQUACY of Camus' journalism To the political life of our time in regard to concrete politics demon- Camus contributed two simple ideas. strates the power of its moral judg- He kept urging that the traditional ment—for without the latter one would ideologies had become bulwarks of not even think to notice the former. misconception and pretexts for a re- When it came to specific proposals, he fusal to communicate; he urged peo- shared the troubles of everyone else, ple to talk to each other, those who and shared them with a modesty that really cared about socialism and free- bears recommending both to some of dom; he was impatient with dialectics, his contemporaries in the intellectual ideologies and positions. That he was world of Paris and to many of the not entirely right in saying all this I "politicals" who clung to the socialist have tried to indicate, but anyone fa- word even as they were incompetent miliar with the congealing of tradi- to perform a socialist deed. Camus, for tional leftist opinion in France knows example, took a position on Algeria he was primarily right. that some of us might at first glance And then Camus understood the reject: he did not favor unconditional primacy of the idea of liberty in this Algerian independence, though he did age. He was not the kind of intellect- speak out for Algerian self-determina- ual who would sacrifice, in behalf of tion. He called for an end to the ter- fidelista rhetoric, his fidelity to the rorization of civilians by both sides, he idea of liberty; he was not the kind of proposed an autonomous Algerian intellectual who could be swerved by community linked to France, he spoke production statistics, the rapture of for a restoration of civil freedom and mass meetings, and the lure of rising order.
Recommended publications
  • Freedom Quotes, May 2015 May 1. Freedom Is Not Worth Having If It
    Freedom Quotes, May 2015 May 1. Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes. Mahatma Ganhdi May 2. When a man is denied the right to live the life he believes in, he has no choice but to become an outlaw. Nelson Mandela May 3. The most important kind of freedom is to be what you really are. You trade in your reality for a role. There can’t be any large-scale revolution until there’s a personal revolution, on an individual level. It’s got to happen inside first. Jim Morrison May 4. Freedom lies in being bold. Robert Frost May 5. People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought they seldom use. Soren Kierkegaard May 6. Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves. Abraham Lincoln May 7. I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do. Robert A. Heinlein May 8. If we don’t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don’t believe in it at all. Noam Chomsky May 9. Freedom is nothing else but a chance to be better. Albert Camus May 10. ---To be free is not merely to cast off one’s chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others. Nelson Mandela May 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Uyghur Dispossession, Culture Work and Terror Capitalism in a Chinese Global City Darren T. Byler a Dissertati
    Spirit Breaking: Uyghur Dispossession, Culture Work and Terror Capitalism in a Chinese Global City Darren T. Byler A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2018 Reading Committee: Sasha Su-Ling Welland, Chair Ann Anagnost Stevan Harrell Danny Hoffman Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Anthropology ©Copyright 2018 Darren T. Byler University of Washington Abstract Spirit Breaking: Uyghur Dispossession, Culture Work and Terror Capitalism in a Chinese Global City Darren T. Byler Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Sasha Su-Ling Welland, Department of Gender, Women, and Sexuality Studies This study argues that Uyghurs, a Turkic-Muslim group in contemporary Northwest China, and the city of Ürümchi have become the object of what the study names “terror capitalism.” This argument is supported by evidence of both the way state-directed economic investment and security infrastructures (pass-book systems, webs of technological surveillance, urban cleansing processes and mass internment camps) have shaped self-representation among Uyghur migrants and Han settlers in the city. It analyzes these human engineering and urban planning projects and the way their effects are contested in new media, film, television, photography and literature. It finds that this form of capitalist production utilizes the discourse of terror to justify state investment in a wide array of policing and social engineering systems that employs millions of state security workers. The project also presents a theoretical model for understanding how Uyghurs use cultural production to both build and refuse the development of this new economic formation and accompanying forms of gendered, ethno-racial violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Camus and Absurd Communication: from Undecidability to Übercommunication
    Albert Camus and Absurd Communication: From Undecidability to Übercommunication by Jorge Lizarzaburu B.A., USFQ, 2010 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Communication 2012 This thesis entitled: Albert Camus and Absurd Communication: From Undecidability to Übercommunication written by Jorge M. Lizarzaburu has been approved for the Department of Communication Gerard Hauser Janice Peck Robert Craig Date 5/31/2012 The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we Find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards Of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline iii Lizarzaburu, Jorge M. (M.A., Communication, Department of Communication) Albert Camus and Absurd Communication: From Undecidability to Übercommunication Thesis directed by professor Gerard Hauser Communication conceived as understanding is a normative telos among scholars in the field. Absurdity, in the work of Albert Camus, can provide us with a framework to go beyond communication understood as a binary (understanding and misunderstanding) and propose a new conception of communication as absurd. That is, it is an impossible task, however necessary thus we need to embrace its absurdity and value the effort itself as much as the result. Before getting into Camus’ arguments I explain the work of Friedrich Nietzsche to understand the French philosopher in more detail. I describe eternal recurrence and Übermensch as two concepts that can be related to communication as absurd. Then I explain Camus’ notion of absurdity using a Nietzschean lens.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Camus' Dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky Sean Derek Illing Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2014 Between nihilism and transcendence : Albert Camus' dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky Sean Derek Illing Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Illing, Sean Derek, "Between nihilism and transcendence : Albert Camus' dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky" (2014). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1393. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1393 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. BETWEEN NIHILISM AND TRANSCENDENCE: ALBERT CAMUS’ DIALOGUE WITH NIETZSCHE AND DOSTOEVSKY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Political Science by Sean D. Illing B.A., Louisiana State University, 2007 M.A., University of West Florida, 2009 May 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation is the product of many supportive individuals. I am especially grateful for Dr. Cecil Eubank’s guidance. As a teacher, one can do no better than Professor Eubanks. Although his Socratic glare can be terrifying, there is always love and wisdom in his instruction. It is no exaggeration to say that this work would not exist without his support. At every step, he helped me along as I struggled to articulate my thoughts.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Camus As Moral Politician
    Articles The Passion and the Spirit: Albert Camus as Moral Politician Jan Klabbers* TABLE OF CONTENTS: I. Introduction. – II. A manifesto. – III. On Camus. – IV. Camus and the virtues. – V. A smouldering continent. – V.1. Financial crisis. – V.2. Refugee flows. – V.3. Russia and Crimea. – V.4. Refer- enda, governance, responsibility. – VI. To conclude. ABSTRACT: This essays addresses the curious circumstance that for all their visibility on blogs, twitter and the 'op-ed' pages of newspapers, public intellectuals offer remarkably little ethical guidance regarding current events and crises. These intellectuals may offer their expertise (explanations, predictions), but do not provide much ethical inspiration, almost as if 'right' and 'wrong' have be- come meaningless categories. Things were different a few generations ago, when the likes of Al- bert Camus would search their souls in order to figure out how to live. This essay portrays Camus as private citizen and public moralist, and briefly discusses current political events in a mindset inspired by Camus. KEYWORDS: Albert Camus – virtue ethics – political crisis – Europe – public intellectuals. “… for us Europe is a home of the spirit where for the last twenty centuries the most amazing adventure of the human spirit has been going on”.1 I. Introduction Europe is, if not on fire, at least smouldering. The last couple of years alone have seen the continent confronted with the unabashed annexation of the Crimea; the shooting down, accidental or otherwise, of civilian aircraft; a financial crisis and a country on the brink of bankruptcy; and an influx of refugees seen as threatening in its own right, and which threatens to bring down the European Union (EU) and threatens to turn Europe * Academy Professor (Martti Ahtisaari Chair), University of Helsinki, and Visiting Research Professor, Erasmus Law School, Erasmus University Rotterdam, [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Page the Stranger Albert Camus Language A
    The Stranger Albert Camus Language A: Literature English III IB RISING JUNIORS Name__________________________Date________________Period______________ 1 | P a g e English A: Literature HL Junior year Summer Reading Assignment – Mrs. Flanagan Email: [email protected] Directions: Read The Stranger by Albert Camus (pronounced: al-bear camu) and answer the questions in this packet. You will need to complete the following: # 1 and 2, are worth up to 100 points each: (1) the reading questions (pp. 14-20) (2) the assignments listed in Parts I and II (pp. 20-21) and Read the concepts and information outlines on pages 3-11 – these will be very important concepts to know. Review the literary terms on pages 22-26. Be prepared for a test to cover your summer readings: the novel and the terminology, upon returning to school. This packet is due on the first day of school, Monday, August 12, 2019. If you will be out of town, still on vacation, or otherwise indisposed, please mail with adequate time to reach me by the due date to: Ms. Jennifer Flanagan William T. Dwyer High School 13601 North Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 As you read, consider the following: (Just think about them and their role and significance to the work.) The People What is the role of each of the people in the novel? What does each symbolize? Which characters, if any, are essential? . the director of the home . the caretaker from the home . old Thomas Pérez . Raymond . Masson . Salamano . Marie . Céleste 2 | P a g e . Witnesses at the trial .
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Camus and the Anticolonials: Why Camus Would Not Play the Zero Sum Game James D
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications, Department of History History, Department of 2014 Albert Camus and the Anticolonials: Why Camus Would Not Play the Zero Sum Game James D. Le Sueur University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historyfacpub Part of the Continental Philosophy Commons, European Languages and Societies Commons, French and Francophone Literature Commons, History Commons, and the Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons Le Sueur, James D., "Albert Camus and the Anticolonials: Why Camus Would Not Play the Zero Sum Game" (2014). Faculty Publications, Department of History. 192. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historyfacpub/192 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, Department of History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. WHY CAMUS WOULD NOT PLAY THE ZERO SUM GAME / LE SUEUR 27 Albert Camus and the Anticolonials: Why Camus Would Not Play the Zero Sum Game1 James D. Le Sueur, University of Nebraska, Lincoln IN 1994, I RETURNED FROM PARIS TO HYDE PARK just in time to catch a lecture about Albert Camus that an esteemed colleague, the late Tony Judt, was giving at the University of Chicago. I was much younger then, eager to engage in debate, and I had just spent most of the past two years turning over the recently opened pages of Camus’ private papers in Paris and trolling through the private papers of other prominent French intellectuals, as well as newly declassified state archives for what was to become my first book,Uncivil War.2 I had also done dozens of interviews with Camus’ friends and fellow travelers (Jean Daniel, Germaine Tillion, Jean Pélégri, etc.), as well as old adversaries (including Françis Jeanson).
    [Show full text]
  • Camus with and Against the Theorists of Dialogic Ethics
    CHAPTER 4 From Revolution to Rebellion: Camus with and against the Theorists of Dialogic Ethics 1 Beyond Nihilism, Sympathetic Imagination: Camus with Levinas “Yes, there is a crisis of man when the death or torture of a [human] being can in our world be examined with a sentiment of indifference or of amiable curi- osity . ., or with simple passivity . .,” Albert Camus proclaimed to his American audience at the McMillan Theatre on 28 March 1946.845 Characteristically, rather than launch into declamations concerning first principles or exegesis of august authorities, Camus illustrated his meaning by narrating four con- crete examples. All of these had been related to him by victims or witnesses. They dated from the six years of the European war, then finished for less than one year. In the first, an SS guard, after torturing his two charges in what today would be called an ‘enhanced interrogation’ session, calmly took his petit déjeuner in front of the battered men. Reproached by one of them for the derisive inhu- manity of this action, the guard replied calmly that “he never pays any mind to his lodgers”—for the make-shift prison was a requisitioned tenement building. Camus’ second example came from one of his resistance comrades. This man had his ear torn off, in another ‘enhanced interrogation session’ with the Nazis. His tormenter then approached him, leaned close to his bandaged head and asked with affected concern: “how are your ears?” Camus’ third story involved a classic Sophie’s choice: the kind of bizarre, catastrophic situation that still exercises moral philosophy classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics and Politics in the Thought of Martin Buber and Albert Camus
    Ethics and Politics in the Thought of Martin Buber and Albert Camus by Merom Kalie A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Merom Kalie 2015 Ethics and Politics in the Thought of Martin Buber and Albert Camus Merom Kalie, Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, 2015 Abstract The dissertation provides a discussion and comparison of the ideas of Martin Buber and Albert Camus regarding human connectedness and solidarity, ethics and politics. The aim of the dissertation is to examine the ways in which these thinkers dealt with the possible tension between human solidarity and connectedness on the one hand, and the need for ethical restraints on the other. The dissertation begins with a presentation and comparison of certain aspects of Buber’s and Camus’ respective biographies. It then examines and compares the thinkers’ views regarding human relationship, especially given the loss of the traditional existential and moral anchors in the wake of modernity. At the centre of the comparison stands the difference between Buber, a believer who understood connectedness and dialogue between human beings and with God to be a primordial and inherent need that could and should be fulfilled; and Camus, who was secular in his personal beliefs, and discussed a concept of solidarity which is largely based on rebellion against oppression and shared human experience in the face of the absurd – the bold acknowledgement of human beings’ inability to fully achieve harmony and meaning. ii The second part of the dissertation discusses the conceptual ethical mechanisms the two thinkers developed in order to prevent connectedness or solidarity from devolving into destructive social and political behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory Six: the Good Life Is Your Life
    Theory Six: The Good Life is Your Life “Try again. Fail again. Fail better.” –Samuel Becket “I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth.” -Umberto Eco Existentialism is… 1. Existentialism is an Attitude more than a Philosophy 2. Freedom is Inescapable 3. Individual Responsibility/Authenticity 4. Passionate Franz Kafka 1883 – 1924 The Metamorphosis In the Penal Colony The Trial Passers-by (1912) When one is taking a walk through the street at night, and a man - already visible from a distance because the street rises in front of us and the moon is full - runs toward us, we will not tackle him, even if he is weak and ragged, even if someone is running behind him and screaming, but rather we will let him continue running. Because it is night, and it isn't our fault that the street is rising before us in the full moon, and besides, maybe these two have staged this chase for their own entertainment, maybe both of them are pursuing a third, maybe the first man is being pursued even though he is innocent, maybe the second man wants to kill him and we will become accomplices to the murder, maybe the two of them know nothing about one another and each is going independently to his bed, maybe they are sleepwalkers, maybe the first man is armed. And after all, don't we have a right to be tired, haven't we drunk a lot of wine? We are happy when the second man has also vanished from sight.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Camus and Jean-Paul Sartre/ Camus and the Death Penalty
    Albert Camus and Jean-Paul Sartre/ Camus and the Death Penalty Santos Reyes, Khiem Huynh, David Hildebrand, Julian Stanley Overview ● Background ● Jean- Paul Sartre ● Camus and Sartre’s Relationship ● Camus’ Thoughts on Death Penalty ● Reflections of the Guillotine ● Video ● Discussion Questions Background (leading up to Camus meeting Sartre) ● 1940- Left algeria because he was a national security threat due to his writings being published (went against the war) ● Camus went into exile with his return to Paris, where he was editor of newspaper calling for strong moral actions ● During this time, Camus met Sartre at a dress rehearsal of Sartre’s play ● Camus went into politics after seeing the Algerian poor; Sartre got involved in politics after seeing WW2 prison camps ● Liberation of France made the 2 men the country’s new intellectual heralds that led the belief existentialist Jean- Paul Sartre(biography/known for) ● French philosopher, playwright, novelist, political activist ● Had philosophical view of atheism “loss of God is not mourn” ● Believed in existentialism ● Once man realizes freedom, man has to make this meaning himself ● Best work was “The Flies” Camus and Sartre: The Beginnings ● Met in June of 1943 during Sartre’s play The Flies ● Met simply by saying “I’m Camus” ● Sartre “found him a most likeable personality” ● Camus and Sartre bonded because they were both readers for the same publisher ● Sartre offered Camus the lead role in his upcoming play [No Exit], and the friendship was cemented. Similarities Between Camus and Sartre ● Both lost their fathers as children and were raised by struggling mothers ● Both went to university to study philosophy ● Both believed in existentialism and portrayed the idea through their novels ● Both were activists through journalism Camus and Sartre’s Portrayal of Existentialism ● Camus portrays existentialism in The Stranger through Meursault’s choice to please the spectators at his execution in the end.
    [Show full text]
  • Anarchism and Existentialism
    CHAPTER 19 Anarchism and Existentialism Shane Wahl Introduction One way to approach the relationship between anarchist philosophy and exis- tentialist philosophy would be to trace the historical connections between the two and provide an account of how certain thinkers in both “schools” share philosophical and pragmatic concerns, questions, and maybe even answers. Such an approach has the merits of comprehensiveness and perhaps exhaus- tiveness on its side. This method would give ample breadth to the relationship and its philosophical underpinning, providing a full account of historical and theoretical connections. While this chapter is meant to give a solid overview along these lines, I am also mostly concerned with developing a “philosophy of the future” for anarchist-existentialists (or existentialist-anarchists). A key part of this, in my view, is to grapple with a major problem that confronts both the existentialist and the anarchist at the theoretical and practical level. This is the problem of the supposed (or maybe assumed) distinction—sometimes held to be hard and fast—between the “individual” and the “social.” Focusing on this particular issue will provide some depth to the discussion. Anarchism has varying degrees of “individualism” built-in theoretically, that is, there are different kinds of anarchists seeking different understandings of how anarchism is to operate in terms of individual liberty versus social cohe- sion, often with some strong skepticism for the possibility of the latter in an- archist theory and practice.1 The practical issue regarding the individual and social cannot be overlooked. A “common sense” understanding of anarchism as somewhat synonymous with “chaos” breeds an outlook of dismissal of any claims of it “working” in any kind of truly social setting.
    [Show full text]