DOCSLIB.ORG

Albert Camus' Dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky Sean Derek Illing Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Albert Camus' Dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky Sean Derek Illing Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Sillin12@Gmail.Com Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2014 Between nihilism and transcendence : Albert Camus' dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky Sean Derek Illing Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Illing, Sean Derek, "Between nihilism and transcendence : Albert Camus' dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky" (2014). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1393. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1393 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. BETWEEN NIHILISM AND TRANSCENDENCE: ALBERT CAMUS’ DIALOGUE WITH NIETZSCHE AND DOSTOEVSKY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Political Science by Sean D. Illing B.A., Louisiana State University, 2007 M.A., University of West Florida, 2009 May 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation is the product of many supportive individuals. I am especially grateful for Dr. Cecil Eubank’s guidance. As a teacher, one can do no better than Professor Eubanks. Although his Socratic glare can be terrifying, there is always love and wisdom in his instruction. It is no exaggeration to say that this work would not exist without his support. At every step, he helped me along as I struggled to articulate my thoughts. Frankly, I do not believe one can come closer to the Hellenic ideal of the educator than Dr. Eubanks. So thank you Cecil, for pointing the way and for teaching me the meaning of a philosophical education. I sincerely hope this work is something of which you can be proud. As a mentor, Dr. Wayne Parent has been instrumental to my success at LSU. Without Wayne, I am not sure I would have survived. Whether he was helping me find funding or easing my many anxieties at our weekly lunches, Wayne was a pillar of support. Over the course of the last four years, I have learned much from him. Above all, he showed me what it means to be a friend. No one is more generous with his time or possessions than Wayne, and his reputation as an excellent teacher and a good man are well deserved. So thank you Wayne, for your friendship, for the edifying whiskey nights, and for your constant direction. Nothing I write here will express my admiration for Dr. Dustin Howes. Besides our mutual love for basketball, Dustin and I share a passion for social and political justice, and I’ve turned to him on several occasions for advice. Last spring, when he asked me to teach his course on nonviolence, I happily agreed. In addition to being one of the more rewarding and instructive experiences I’ve had as a teacher, Dustin’s class ii expanded my interest in the problem of violence and helped to crystallize many of the ideas in this dissertation. It was in Dustin’s seminar, in fact, that I was first introduced to Camus, and his insights then and later were central to my subsequent research. So thank you Dustin, for your time, for your kindness, and for your example. I also owe a great deal to the Political Science faculty and to my fellow graduate students. Thanks: to Dr. Sobek for forcing me to choose between IR and Theory and for the many afternoons of beer pong; to Dr. Sandoz for introducing me to Voegelin and to the history of political thought more generally; to Dr. Stoner for finding me an assistantship my first year and for trusting me to teach an upper-level course at the last minute; and to each of my instructors for challenging my ideas and biases. I cannot imagine having finished this project without the support of my friends and colleagues at LSU. Dr. Nathan Price was a reliable voice of sanity and, most importantly, a good friend. Our weekly pitcher nights were a reprieve during those coursework years. Matthew Snyder is a true comrade. Your generosity and friendship over the years have helped me through the torments of graduate school. Thank you, brother. I began this journey in 2005 with Brian Morris, as each of us muddled through our final year in the military. Those early years at LSU are among the best of my life, and they would not have been what they were without you. Lastly, each of my classmates, in their own way, helped to light my path. I thank you all. I must thank my family and loved ones. I would not have completed this dissertation without the many sacrifices of my father in particular, who was ready and willing to do whatever was needed to ensure that I finished graduate school. When money dried up at the end of the semester, as it often did, my mother always offered to iii help. Besides sparing me the embarrassment of asking, this kept me afloat until the next stipend payment – for that I am grateful. The encouragement I received from all of my family meant everything to me, and I thank each of you for telling me that I’ve made you proud. Finally, I want to thank my partner and best friend, Lauren Stuart. Thanks for being patient, loving, and understanding throughout this process. I could not have finished this thing without your support. Those long days of writing would have been insufferable without your infectious grace and delicious peanut butter balls. I thank you from the bottom of my heart and look forward to whatever the future holds for us. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………..………….ii ABSTRACT…………….……………………………….................................................vii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION…………………...…………………………..........1 The Appeal of Nietzsche and Dostoevsky………………………………………...7 Camus’ Dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky………………..……………..10 Previous Literature……………………...………………………………………..14 CHAPTER 2: CAMUS’ SENSUALIST LITERATURE………………………………..28 Camus’ Early Fiction…………………………………………………………….41 A Happy Death…..………………………………………………………………50 The Stranger…………………………………………………………………...…55 Caligula…...……………………………………………………………………...59 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………….62 CHAPTER 3: THE ABSURD PSYCHE……………………………………......……...65 The Stranger and Caligula……………………………………………………….72 The Misunderstanding……………………………………..……………....…….79 The Fall……………………………………………………….………………….83 Estrangement in The Fall and Notes From Underground…………..……….…...93 Nietzschean Resentment in The Fall and Notes From Underground…………..100 Conclusion…………………………………………………………...…………110 CHAPTER FOUR: ABSURDITY AND THE APOTHEOSIS OF REASON…..……113 Dostoevsky and Reason…………………………………...……………………123 Ideology and Logical Crime…………………………….……………………...130 Hegel and the Deification of Reason…………………………..……………….139 Freedom and Despotism………………………………….…………………….150 Conclusion……………………………………………...………………………156 CHAPTER FIVE: THE POLITICS OF REVOLT……………………………….…….159 Freedom and Morality Without God…………………………..……………….167 From Solipsism to Revolt………………………………......…………………..176 The Growing Stone………………………………………………………..……186 The First Man…………………………………………………………………...190 Revolt as Tension………………………………………………………...……..195 Revolt in Practice………………………………………………………….……203 The Just Assassins……………………………………………………………...208 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………...212 CHAPTER SIX: CONCLUSION…………………………………………………...…217 Between Nihilism and Transcendence………………………….…..…………..221 Camus’ Legacy………………………………………………………...……….229 v REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………………239 VITA……………………………………………………………………………………245 vi ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the impact of Fyodor Dostoevsky and Friedrich Nietzsche on the development of Albert Camus’ political philosophy. The innovation of the present study is in the attempt to offer a substantive examination of Camus’ dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky. To the extent that connections between these writers have been discussed, it has been in the general context of modern thought or it has focused on overlapping literary themes. This project emphasizes the political dimensions of these connections. In addition to re-interpreting Camus’ political thought, the aim is to clarify Camus’ struggle with transcendence and to bring renewed attention to his unique understanding of the relationship between nihilism, ideology, and political violence in the twentieth century. I focus on Camus’ dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky for three reasons. First, these are the thinkers with whom Camus is most engaged. Indeed the problems and themes of Camus’ work are largely defined by Dostoevsky and Nietzsche; a full account of this dialogue will therefore enhance our understanding of Camus while also reinforcing the enduring importance of Nietzsche and Dostoevsky. Second, it allows me to recast Camus’ political philosophy as both a synthesis of and a response to Nietzsche and Dostoevsky’s projects. Finally, I believe this approach allows for a re- assessment of Camus’ broader political significance, which I contend has been undervalued in the literature. Ultimately, I argue that Camus remains among the most important moral and political voices of the twentieth century. Although limited, his philosophy of revolt offers a humane portrait of justice and articulates a meaningful alternative to the extremes of ideological politics. vii CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION “In the spectacle of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Problems of Mimetic Characterization in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy
    Illusion and Instrument: Problems of Mimetic Characterization in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy By Chloe Susan Liebmann Kitzinger A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Irina Paperno, Chair Professor Eric Naiman Professor Dorothy J. Hale Spring 2016 Illusion and Instrument: Problems of Mimetic Characterization in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy © 2016 By Chloe Susan Liebmann Kitzinger Abstract Illusion and Instrument: Problems of Mimetic Characterization in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy by Chloe Susan Liebmann Kitzinger Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures University of California, Berkeley Professor Irina Paperno, Chair This dissertation focuses new critical attention on a problem central to the history and theory of the novel, but so far remarkably underexplored: the mimetic illusion that realist characters exist independently from the author’s control, and even from the constraints of form itself. How is this illusion of “life” produced? What conditions maintain it, and at what points does it start to falter? My study investigates the character-systems of three Russian realist novels with widely differing narrative structures — Tolstoy’s War and Peace (1865–1869), and Dostoevsky’s The Adolescent (1875) and The Brothers Karamazov (1879–1880) — that offer rich ground for exploring the sources and limits of mimetic illusion. I suggest, moreover, that Tolstoy and Dostoevsky themselves were preoccupied with this question. Their novels take shape around ambitious projects of characterization that carry them toward the edges of the realist tradition, where the novel begins to give way to other forms of art and thought.
    [Show full text]
  • LD5655.V855 1992.D687.Pdf (7.598Mb)
    WALKING NIETZSCHE’S TIGHTROPE, A THESIS FOR NO ONE by Paul Robert Dotson Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in POLITICAL SCIENCE APPROVED: all + Timo¢thy WY Lukel Chairman Stephen K. White i=e Gwyton B. Hammond May 1992 Blacksburg, Virginia CY LD SS VB5S5 (G42 V6%) Cie ABSTRACT The philosophyof Friedrich Nietzsche is thought provoking and enigmatic. This work is an exploration of three of the bulwarks of Nietzsche's philosophy and an attempt to trace their political implications. Analyses of Nietzsche’s concepts of the will to power, eternal return, and the Ubermensch are presented in an effort to build a coherent vision of Nietzsche’s work. The will to power has been interpreted in many ways, and in this text I make the case that it is a drive for self-cultivation and finding one’s own direction in life. Eternal return is presented as a mythic idea which Nietzsche thought would spur people to live each moment as if they wished it would recur eternally, rather than judging their actions by future promises or past glories. The Ubermensch is the Nietzschean individual who believes in eternal return and engages in self-cultivation through the will to power. There are interesting political implications which follow from this philosophical framework, which I discuss in the final chapter. Based on the analysis of the three concepts mentioned above, I argue that Nietzsche thought societal problems were never cured or even lessened by politics or any political theory.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Assessment of the Political Doctrines of Michael Oakeshott
    David Richard Hexter Thesis Title: A Critical Assessment of the Political Doctrines of Michael Oakeshott. Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 1 Statement of Originality I, David Richard Hexter, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work or that where it has been carried out in collaboration with, or supported by others, that this is duly acknowledged and my contribution indicated. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other Intellectual Property Right, or contain any confidential material. I accept that the college has the right to use plagiarism detection software to check the electronic version of the thesis. I confirm that this thesis has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other university. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. David R Hexter 12/01/2016 2 Abstract Author: David Hexter, PhD candidate Title of thesis: A Critical Assessment of the Political Doctrines of Michael Oakeshott Description The thesis consists of an Introduction, four Chapters and a Conclusion. In the Introduction some of the interpretations that have been offered of Oakeshott’s political writings are discussed. The key issue of interpretation is whether Oakeshott is best considered as a disinterested philosopher, as he claimed, or as promoting an ideology or doctrine, albeit elliptically.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan Lendl Uy Sir Jay Flores Introduction to Philosophy of The
    Uy 1 Jan Lendl Uy Sir Jay Flores Introduction to Philosophy of the Human Person 1 April 2018 Comparative Philosophical Analysis on Man’s Existential Purpose: Camus vs. Marcel The purpose of man’s existence has been a topic of study and debate ever since the dawn of philosophy during the time of ancient Greece. This topic is quite broad and complex as the purpose of man differs in perspective. Throughout the course of many eras, philosophers continuously sought for the true essence of human existence. As of today, there is still no definite answer to this as we, humans, remain divided by our own beliefs. This divide roots back from the varying views of philosophers who expressed their own interpretation of man’s existence, backed up by thorough research and lifelong studies. Among many views, there are two particular philosophical perspectives which are prominent for their contrasting qualities: existentialism and absurdism. Existentialism proposes that the individual has free will, which means he has the capacity to create his own purpose in life. According to Jones College, the existentialist view illustrates that humans are thinking beings who are capable of living in independence. We shape our own lives. The individual is free to choose what to believe in and is solely responsible for every decision and action made. Existentialism puts forward the idea that man is an independent being who has the freedom to make its own interpretation of the purpose of existence. Uy 2 Leonora Cohen, in explains that, in the existentialist view, the world does not have an inherent meaning (2).
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Camus and Education
    Albert Camus and Education Albert Camus and Education Aidan Hobson Unitec Institute of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand A C.I.P. record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. ISBN: 978-94-6300-918-8 (paperback) ISBN: 978-94-6300-919-5 (hardback) ISBN: 978-94-6300-920-1 (e-book) Published by: Sense Publishers, P.O. Box 21858, 3001 AW Rotterdam, The Netherlands https://www.sensepublishers.com/ All chapters in this book have undergone peer review. Printed on acid-free paper All Rights Reserved © 2017 Sense Publishers No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface vii Introduction xiii Chapter 1: The Myth of Sisyphus 1 The Broad and Enduring Appeal of the Camusean Absurd 1 The Emerging Educational Interest 3 The Predominant Theme: The Absurd and Pedagogy 4 The Imagery of Sisyphus and Education 8 Education and Sisyphus 10 Educative Feelings 12 Exile 13 The Absurd 14 Limits 16 Absurd Reasoning 17 Absurd Learner 18 Absurd Creation 20 Chapter 2: Exile and the Kingdom 23 Looking Back at This Article 23 The Precipice between Exile and the Kingdom 23 Empowering Relations, Revolt and Martin Buber 25 Almost Authentic – Characters on the Precipice 28
    [Show full text]
  • Dostoevsky's Ideal
    Student Publications Student Scholarship Fall 2015 Dostoevsky’s Ideal Man Paul A. Eppler Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship Part of the Philosophy Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Eppler, Paul A., "Dostoevsky’s Ideal Man" (2015). Student Publications. 395. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/395 This is the author's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/ 395 This open access student research paper is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dostoevsky’s Ideal Man Abstract This paper aimed to provide a comprehensive examination of the "ideal" Dostoevsky human being. Through comparison of various characters and concepts found in his texts, a kenotic individual, one who is undifferentiated in their love for all of God's creation, was found to be the ultimate to which Dostoevsky believed man could ascend. Keywords Dostoevsky, Christianity, Kenoticism Disciplines Philosophy Comments This paper was written for Professor Vernon Cisney's course, PHIL 368: Reading- Dostoevsky, Fall 2015. This student research paper is available at The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ student_scholarship/395 Dostoevsky’s Ideal Man Paul Eppler Professor Vernon Cisney Reading Dostoevsky I affirm that I have upheld the highest principles of honesty and integrity in my academic work and have not witnessed a violation of the Honor Code.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sociological Study of Nihilism: a Case Study
    International Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Science ISSN: 2307-924X www.ijlass.org A Sociological Study of Nihilism: A Case Study Jahangir Jahangiri, PhD Assistant Professor of Sociology, Department of Sociology and Social Planning, Faculty of Social Sciences, Shiraz University, Eram Place, Shiraz, Fars, Iran Code Postal: 7194685115 Email: [email protected] Rayehe Ghareh M.A in Sociology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran Email: [email protected] Abstract The present research aims at studying nihilistic thoughts among students of Shiraz University. The framework of the research is Crosby’s theory about nihilism. The study is based on a quantitative approach and employs a survey method so as to collect the required data. Statistical population of the study is the whole Students of Shiraz University that according to the formal statistics consists of 20000 students. 400 students are selected by multistage sampling method. The results show that there is a significant relationship between the independent variables of gender, adherences to religious practices, fatalism, fear of failure, need for achievement and the dependent variable nihilism. Stepwise regression method used to predict the dependent variable. Ordinarily, five variables of fatalism, fear of failure, Adherences to religious practices, gender and need for achievement could predict 33% of dependent variable (R2=0.338) Key Words: Nihilism, Sociology, University Students, Shiraz University, Iran Introduction Undoubtedly, the most fundamental question that every human being faces with, is about the purpose of life. Not only modern human, but also pre-modern human beings have been encountered with this question. The intolerable journey from birth to death, and relentless onslaughts of hopelessness and despair, persuade every human to answer the question, as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Rereading Joseph Heller?S Catch-22 from the Viewpoint of Existential
    Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi The Journal of International Social Research Cilt: 10 Sayı: 49 Volume: 10 Issue: 49 Nisan 2017 April 2017 www.sosyalarastirmalar.com Issn: 1307-9581 REREADING JOSEPH HELLER’S CATCH-22 FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF EXISTENTIAL PHILOSOPHY AND CAMUS’ ABSURDISM Mehmet Recep TAŞ * Abstract Published in 1961, Joseph Heller's Catch-22 came into prominence among important American novels of the twentieth century. It coined a new expression that connotes the illogical, inconsistent and irrational situations. It deals with the absurdities and unsolvable paradoxical policies of the state’s policymaking groups that drive the individuals into a meaningless, absurdist worldview. It is likely as well to assert that Catch-22 is a novel, which reflects and promote an existential worldview. However, this worldview is closer to Sartre’s standpoint than that of Camus’. Considering the novel, the existential philosophy of Sartre (which suggests that we're able to basically invent meanings of our own) and Camus’ absurdism (which suggests that the search for meaning is in itself both absurd and determined to fail, so; we should embrace the absurd and find happiness in it), this article aims to underline the importance of adopting the existential philosophy of Sartre for the individuals to cope with the sense of nihilism when confronted with the absurdities of today’s world policy making groups. Keywords: Catch-22, Absurdism, Camus, Existentialism, Sartre. INTRODUCTION In order to understand and evaluate a novel written decades before the time in which we live, contrary to New Critics who focus merely on the form dismissing the historical back ground of the work and the experiences by which the author has created the work, it is essential to have a look on social, political issues and the zeitgeist of the period.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Quotes, May 2015 May 1. Freedom Is Not Worth Having If It
    Freedom Quotes, May 2015 May 1. Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes. Mahatma Ganhdi May 2. When a man is denied the right to live the life he believes in, he has no choice but to become an outlaw. Nelson Mandela May 3. The most important kind of freedom is to be what you really are. You trade in your reality for a role. There can’t be any large-scale revolution until there’s a personal revolution, on an individual level. It’s got to happen inside first. Jim Morrison May 4. Freedom lies in being bold. Robert Frost May 5. People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought they seldom use. Soren Kierkegaard May 6. Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves. Abraham Lincoln May 7. I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do. Robert A. Heinlein May 8. If we don’t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don’t believe in it at all. Noam Chomsky May 9. Freedom is nothing else but a chance to be better. Albert Camus May 10. ---To be free is not merely to cast off one’s chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others. Nelson Mandela May 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Egoism and Altruism: the “Antagonists” Or the “Brothers”?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by InfinityPress Journal of Studies in Social Sciences ISSN 2201-4624 Volume 7, Number 2, 2014, 164-188 Egoism and Altruism: the “Antagonists” or the “Brothers”? Levit L. Z., Ph. D. The Centre for Psychological Health and Education, Minsk, Belarus Abstract. The article under consideration deals with the theoretical analysis and the practical research of the ratio between the two notions: egoism and altruism. The author shows the inadequacy of the one-sided, morally loaded interpretations of both terms. The scores of two ESM-investigations mostly show the positive correlation between the “egoism” and the “altruism” scales in a person’s everyday activity. The results obtained give the opportunity to replace the inadequate view on egoism and altruism as opposites by a more appropriate metaphor of the older and the younger brother. Such an approach removes the idea of antagonism which is usually ascribed to the egoism-altruism interrelation. Key words: egoism, altruism, meaning, happiness, personal uniqueness, positive psychology. © Copyright 2014 the authors. 164 Journal of Studies in Social Sciences 165 Person-oriented conception of happiness: introduction and the brief explanation. In the years 2006 – 2012 the author (Leonid Levit) elaborated a synthesizing conception of self-realization and happiness, which is based on the ideas of the systemic approach and combines biological, psychological, social and spiritual (the highest) levels of individual life and activity. The results of our seven-year work on the problem are summarized in five monographs (Levit, 2010; 2011a; 2011c; 2012 a; 2013 c) and articles (Levit, 2009; 2011 b, 2012 b, 2012 c; 2013 a; 2013 b; 2013 e; Levit, Radchikova, 2012 a).
    [Show full text]
  • By Samuel Beckett Alumno
    UNIVERSIDAD DE JAÉN Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación Trabajo Fin de Grado DE LAS EDUCACIÓN LAS DE Theatre of the Absurd: “Waiting for Godot” by Samuel Beckett Alumno: Santiago Riaza Martínez Tutor: Juan Ráez Padilla Dpto: Filología Inglesa Febrero, 2016 FACULTAD DE HUMANIDADES Y CIENCIAS CIENCIAS Y HUMANIDADES DE FACULTAD E 0. Abstract In this essay, it is going to be analysed the enigmatic and eclectic play Waiting for ​ Godot by Samuel Beckett throughout a philosophical point of view. Some of these philosophies are related to existentialism, absurdism, hegelianism and religion. Besides, it is going to be explained the genre of this play: The Theatre of the Absurd, its historical background and the relationship between this play and contemporary cinema. The main purpose of this essay is giving some food for thought to its readers to face the problematic and mystery that surrounds this play. Keywords Absurdism, Samuel Beckett, Existentialism, Waiting for Godot, Theatre of the Absurd, Albert Camus, Religion, Drama, Cinema, Second War World, Esslin, Language, Postmodernism, Modernism, Ireland, Paris, Berlin, Jean Paul Sartre, Communication, Silence, Minimalism. 1 Contents Pages 0. Abstract and keywords 1 1. Introduction 3 2. Context 3­13 2.1. Biography 3­5 2.2. Literary Works 5­6 2.3. Historical context 6­7 2.4. The Theatre of the Absurd 7­8 2.5. Are the Theatre of the Absurd and the Existentialist Theatre the same genre? 8­9 2.6. The tradition of the Theatre of the Absurd 9­10 2.7. Is Waiting for Godot a modernist or a postmodernist play? 10­13 ​ ​ 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Camus' Biography
    Albert Camus’ biography (briefly) Born November 7th, 1913, in Mondovi, a small village in French Algeria where Camus’ great grandfather, originally from Bordeaux in France, had settled in the early 19th century. Camus’ father was a shipping wine clerk and military veteran who died in WW1 when Camus was less than a year old. All he knew of his father was that he had become violently ill after witnessing a public execution. Camus’ mother was illiterate, partially deaf, and poor. After her husband’s death, Camus, his mother and his older brother lived with his maternal uncle and grandmother in a cramped three-room apartment in a working-class area of Algiers where his mother worked in an ammunition factory and cleaned houses. Camus was able to afford elementary school because of his dead father’s veteran status and, although he had recurring health issues, including tuberculosis, he distinguished himself as a student and won a scholarship to the Grand Lycee. There he was an avid reader (Gide, Proust, Verlaine, etc.). In 1932, Camus received his Baccalauréat Degree; in 1933, he enrolled at the University of Algeria for an advanced degree. 1933-1937: Married Simone Hié, divorced her, briefly joined the Communist Party, became disillusioned with it, and was expelled. During this period, he began his theatrical and writing career. 1940s—Married Francine Faure, worked as a journalist in France for the French Resistance newspaper Combat, wrote The Stranger which brought him immediate literary renown, followed by the philosophic The Myth of Sisyphus and became an editor at Gallimard Publishing.
    [Show full text]