Internationalizing KEK: the Early Days Cultural Differences You

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Internationalizing KEK: the Early Days Cultural Differences You Vol.6 No.1 Internationalizing KEK: The Early Days Cultural differences you would encounter in Japan Child Education in Japan Living in Japan Congratulations to Prof. Koshiba for his being awarded a Nobel prize KEK News The Early Days Internationalizing KEK: The Early Days In recent times, the number of foreign researchers and the level of international activity at KEK is rather high. This has not always been the case. In 1982, when I first came to KEK started in 1982 for a year-long sabbatical leave, there were three foreign researchers at KEK, and not many more in all of Tsukuba. (In 1982, seeing a foreigner in Tsukuba was a rare event; when we came across each other we either already knew each other or, if not, introduced ourselves.) During this visit, I shared an office with Steve Schnetzer, who, at the time, was a KEK post-doc working on a PS experiment. Steve's PS experiment finished and my attempts to work with one of the emerging TRISTAN experiments was not very successful. We, therefore, decided to pursue some ideas for a TRISTAN experiment that resulted in the Letter of Intent for the AMY experiment. Our ideas must have been pretty good, because the KEK program committee gave us some kind of a tentative approval---with a condition that we find some collaborators. Our LOI had only six names on it, all from the US. When our efforts to find collaborators in Japan failed, we looked elsewhere. Our first success happened in 1983, when Steve Schnetzer, while touring in China, presented himself at the guardhouse of IHEP in Beijing and asked to see the laboratory. After some scrambling, Zheng Zhi- Peng, was given the task of dealing with the crazy foreigner at the front gate. As it turned out, Steve and Zhi-Peng got on famously and, by the time Steve's tour of IHEP was over, Zhi-Peng was enthusiastic about joining AMY. After some correspondence, we happily added IHEP to the collaboration list that was part of the full AMY pro- posal that was submitted in Fall 1983. The next big breakthrough occurred when attempts by a group of Korean physicists to join one of the two approved TRISTAN experiments were not successful. When this happened (by then, I was back in the US), I was encouraged by Satoshi Ozaki to call Joo Sang Kang of Korea University and, as a result of this conversation, I visited Seoul in January 1984 and gave a talk at Korea University (where, in the audience, were such future high energy physics luminaries as Young Kee Kim and Sun Kee Kim). Soon afterwards, the Korea University group joined AMY. The international structure of the AMY group became complete when Amy-chan, the author's next-door neighbor in Aki Maki returned to KEK after a stint at Fermilab. Aki was enthusiastic 1982 was the inspiration about AMY physics and, with enthusiatic encouragement from Kasuke for the name of the AMY Takahashi ("AMY's Godfather"), recruited a highly talented KEK-based experiment. group that became the core element of the team that presented itself to the KEK program commit- tee in March 1984. After lengthy discussions, and in spite of grumbling from some committee members that we were a "bunch of amateurs," KEK Director-General Nishikawa decided to take a chance on us and approved the AMY experiment. We did our best to not disappoint Professor Nishikawa. Although our high hopes for discover- 1 KEK News Vol.6, No.1 The Early Days KEK News ing the top-quark or a new heavy lepton were not to be, we did our best to make a productive physics program from what we had. For some reason---I personally think that it was the healthy mix of differ- ent backgrounds and viewpoints---AMY was particularly successful: of the ten most highly cited papers from TRISTAN, seven were produced by AMY. Not bad for a bunch of amateurs! After the end of the TRISTAN pro- The first AMY summer picnic in 1985 was a chance for all the gram, this high degree of international- KEK staff to enjoy good fellowship with visitors from China, ization and excellent productivity was Korea and the US. successfully transferred to Belle. In Belle, like AMY, a majority of the researchers are at foreign institutions. Also, like AMY, this environ- ment of multiple backgrounds and viewpoints has proven to be extremely invigorating. In spite of a much smaller contingent of researchers and, until very recently, considerably less integrated luminosity than our competing experiment, the Belle group has more than held its own and has produced a large number of results, including some discoveries of profound importance. The exciting and vibrant intellectual working environment that we experienced in AMY is the reason many of us continued on in Belle. This despite a number of what I consider to be serious hurdles for foreigners working at KEK and in Japan. These include the poor long-term employ- ment prospects for foreigners in Japan, the abundant red-tape involved in living in Japan and working at KEK, and the exclusion of the foreign researchers from major decision-making at KEK. Today, internationalization is central to virtually all of KEK's programs. In particular, the col- laborations with China and Korea that started with AMY have become deep and lasting relations between the communities that encompass almost all of the laboratory's activities. Moreover, col- laborations with other national communities have proven to be similarly productive and valuable. KEK is truly an exciting cosmopolitan place to work. Interestingly, this all started with collabora- tions that were initiated by foreigners and done externally to KEK: with Steve Schnetzer and Zhi- Peng Zheng's chance encounter at IHEP in 1983 and my call from the US to Joo Sang Kang in Seoul, about six months later. The author of this article, Stephan L. Olsen is a Professor and the Principal Investigator of the University of Hawaii High Energy Physics Laboratory. He has been doing research at KEK for twenty years. He was spokesperson of the AMY experiment and is now a co-spokesperson of Belle. KEK News Vol.6, No.1 2 KEK News Cultural Differences Cultural differences you would encounter in Japan KEK has been at the forefront of high energy physics research for several decades already, but right now is an especially exciting time, both in neutrino physics and in the physics of the beauty quark (beauty factory), and this is attracting many foreign physicists to KEK. However, foreign visitors to Japan should beware of cultural differences, both in the scientific and research environ- ment and in everyday life. Japan was virtually isolated from the rest of the world for most of its history, and the result is that it has a most unique culture. However, at the first glance, life at KEK is not very different from life at any other high energy physics research institute elsewhere in the world. And inside the lab- oratory, the knowledge of English, but not Japanese, is sufficient. However, there are, when one understands the situation better, very significant differences. The following come to mind: 1. Seniority is more important at KEK, and there is more respect for the hierarchy, 2. At KEK decisions are made preferably by consensus, and 3. Team work plays a more important role. But there is more to the experience of working at KEK than just the research itself; there is also the chance to enjoy the unique culture of Japan, which is an added bonus for those who like to take advantage of such chances, e.g., the unique character of visiting the Japanese temples and shrines with Shinto and Buddhist flavor and unique Japanese touch. Foreign visitors may also take part in traditional Japanese activities like the first shrine visit on New Year's Day, the flower- viewing parties at cherry blos- som time or Japanese fireworks during summer months, just to name a few examples. Outside the laboratory, the most common mistake of west- ern visitors is to assume that things and procedures are more or less the same as in their home country. E.g., the authors have knowledge of a person who mis- erably failed to meet his friends 3 KEK News Vol.6, No.1 Cultural Differences KEK News in a major Tokyo train station because he assumed that train stations in Japanese cities are of mod- erate size (like in his own country) and realized too late that this station is in fact a large city in itself! Another frequent mistake is to assume that everybody speaks English and to underestimate the problems caused by signs and instructions being written only in Japanese. E.g., it happens rather often, when visitors come to Japan for the first time, and the signs are only in Japanese that they choose the inappropriate restroom. Here life is considerably easier if you do know some Japanese. The good news is that it is rather easy to acquire sufficient Japanese for basic survival. For those who like languages in addi- tion to physics, learning Japanese is fascinating. KEK is located in a very unique part of Japan. About 30 years ago, the Japanese government decided to form a new city for science and technology in this area which was then largely unde- veloped, containing mostly rice farms and a golf course. Tsukuba Science City is a hybrid between the rest of Japan and a typical California town. The resulting unique flavor probably makes life more comfortable for foreign visitors, e.g., the streets are broad and have a regular pattern, not narrow and haphazard like in most of the rest of Japan, and the bureaucracy in Tsukuba is more accustomed to dealing with foreigners than is the case elsewhere in Japan.
Recommended publications
  • Neutrinos and Beyond — Opening a New Era of Cosmic-Ray Research
    ADVERTISEMENT FEATURE THE UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO Neutrinos and beyond — Opening a new era of cosmic-ray research Takaaki Kajita, a recipient of the 2015 that neutrinos are massless. These discov- Nobel Prize in Physics, and other re- eries, which resulted in Kajita’s 2015 Nobel searchers at the University of Tokyo’s Prize in Physics, were made a team led by Institute for Cosmic Ray Research (ICRR) him in 1998. have been exploring new realms in par- Kajita acknowledged his success owed ticle physics research. Kajita’s work on a lot to the strong support he received neutrinos and related research at ICRR from two mentors and former supervisors is leading the world in this field. — Masatoshi Koshiba and Yoji Totsuka. Koshiba was awarded the 2002 Nobel Prize The path to a Nobel prize in Physics for detecting neutrinos pro- Particle physics and astrophysics are duced in supernovae using Kamiokande, among the most active research fields at the predecessor of Super-Kamiokande. the University of Tokyo, and its Institute for Totsuka led the Super-Kamiokande proj- Cosmic Ray Research (ICRR) is leading the ect as Koshiba’s successor. Totsuka’s con- world with explorations in these areas. ICRR tribution was so great that many believe is best known for its research on neutrinos he would have shared the Nobel Prize with using the world’s largest underground neu- Kajita if he were alive. trino detector, Super-Kamiokande. The de- Kajita’s award-winning work dates tector is located in a mine in central Japan back to 1986 when he earned his PhD for and is filled with 50,000 tons of pure water.
    [Show full text]
  • Biography (Modified, After Festetics 1983)
    Konrad Lorenz’s Biography (modified, after Festetics 1983) 1903: Konrad Zacharias Lorenz (KL) was born in Altenberg /Austria on Nov. 7 as the last of three children of Emma Lorenz and Dr. Adolf Lorenz, professor for orthopedics at the Medical branch of the University of Vienna. In the same year the representative and spacious Altenberg family home was finished. 1907: KL starts keeping animals, such as spotted newts in aquaria, raises some ducklings and is not pleased by his first experiences with a dachshound. Niko Tinbergen, his lifelong colleague and friend, is born on April 15 in Den Haag, The Netherlands. 1909: KL enters elementary school and engages in systematic studies in crustaceans. 1910: Oskar Heinroth, biologist and founder of "Vergleichende Verhaltensforschung" (comparative ethology) from Berlin and fatherlike scientific mentor of the young KL publishes his classical paper on the ethology of ducks. 1915: KL enters highschool (Schottengymnasium Wien), keeps and breeds songbirds. 1918: Wallace Craig publishes the comparative ethology of Columbidae (pigeons), a classics of late US biologist Charles O. Whitman, who was like O. Heinroth, a founding father of comparative ethology. 1921: KL excels in his final exams. Together with friend Bernhard Hellmann, he observes and experiments with aggression in a cichlid (Herichthys cyanoguttatum). This was the base for KL's psychohydraulic model of motivation. 1922: Father Adolf sends KL to New York to take 2 semesters of medicine courses at the ColumbiaUniversity, but mainly to interrupt the relationship of KL with longterm girlfriend Gretl Gebhart, his later wife. This paternal attempt to influence the mate choice of KL failed.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1, Version A
    GENDERING THE WORKPLACE: THE DISPOSITIF OF CONTEMPORARY WESTERN SCIENCE Janice McGibbon Crerar Bachelor of Science (Hons.) Graduate Diploma Secondary Education Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Northern Institute College of Indigenous Futures, Arts and Society Charles Darwin University September 2018 Keywords science; science education; sex/gender; feminist; poststructural; performativity. Gendering the workplace: the dispositif of contemporary western science i Abstract This thesis interrogates qualitative data from women scientists and women science teachers using feminist poststructural techniques. Social elements and power relations that produce and reproduce the ‘problem’ of women and science are described through the application of Foucauldian methodology. The interrelation and interplay of material and immaterial elements of the dispositif of contemporary Western science are used to identify potential points of disruption. Relations between sex/gender and science emerge as key elements in producing and reproducing discourses, statements and practices that maintain societal status quo in relation to the problem of women and science. The impact of binary categorisation of sex/gender definitions in policy, legislation and practice is critically examined in relation to social theories of gender subjectification, drawing on Judith Butler and Luce Irigaray. Through this analysis, the problem of women and science can be seen as an outcome of socio-cultural conditions of patriarchy emerging at the time of the Enlightenment and persisting into the 21st Century, despite legislation and rhetoric to the contrary. Many current programs, policies and initiatives are unlikely to effect the change required since they maintain the social conditions that make the problem inevitable. Instead, future research and educational strategies are recommended to disrupt the problem of women and science by challenging social assumptions about sex and gender.
    [Show full text]
  • Research in Kamioka and Kakenhi Takaaki Kajita Director of Institute for Cosmic Ray Research (ICRR) the University of Tokyo Rese
    Research in Kamioka and Kakenhi Takaaki Kajita Director of Institute for Cosmic Ray Research (ICRR) The University of Tokyo Research Theme Implemented in FY2017: First Detection of Gravitational Waves Using Cryogenic Laser Interferometer (Grant-in-Aid for Specially Promoted Research) I have conducted research underground Kamioka, Gifu Prefecture, since I was a graduate student. The first experiment I participated in was the Kamioka Nucleon Decay Experiment (Kamiokande). The experiment was initially proposed by Professor Masatoshi Koshiba, who was my thesis advisor, to search for proton decay. Professor Koshiba collaborated with a company to develop an unprecedentedly large 50-centimeter diameter photomultiplier tube (PMT) for the Kamiokande experiment. The PMT served a very important role in supernova neutrino observations that verified the supernova explosion mechanism and solar neutrino observations that confirmed the so-called solar neutrino problem. It is well known that, due to these achievements, Professor Koshiba received the Nobel Prize in physics in 2002. It is common for a large apparatus such as this to be realized by submitting a budget request from a host institute after long, vigorous discussions in relevant researcher communities. In this case, however, the enthusiasm of the relevant researchers in view of the importance of Kamiokande experiments made it possible to realize the experiment quickly with funds from various sources. Kamiokande initially materialized through collaboration with the University of Tokyo’s School of Science, to which Professor Koshiba belonged, the former National Laboratory for High Energy Physics (KEK), and the Institute for Cosmic Ray Research (ICRR) of the University of Tokyo. Although I was only a graduate student at that time and knew nothing about budgets, all of us participating in the effort recognized that people thought that this experiment was very important and endeavored to realize it as soon as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 FY 2015 Follow-Up of WPI Program by Program Committee February
    FY 2015 Follow-up of WPI Program By Program Committee February 2016 (This document reports on progress made under the WPI Program in FY 2014.) In FY2015, there were three important achievements: 1. Nobel Prize in physics awarded to Dr. T. Ka j i t a, P I of Kavli IPMU. (see section A, p2) 2. International Research Excellence Initiative (REI) workshop held jointly with Program committee meeting. (see section E, p5) 3. Future plan devised by the WPI program committee (see section E, p5) A. Dr. Takaaki Kajita, PI of Kavli IPMU, was awarded The 2015 Nobel Prize .................................... 2 B. Outline of WPI program .......................................................................................................... 2 C. WPI Centers ........................................................................................................................... 3 D. Follow up ............................................................................................................................... 4 E. REI International Workshop and 2015 Program committee meeting ........................................... 4 E-1. REI International Workshop ................................................................................... 5 E-2. Program committee meeting .................................................................................. 5 E-3. Future plan of WPI program ................................................................................... 5 F. Site visits ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Imagine, a World Without DIS-EASE Is It Possible?
    Imagine, A World Without DIS-EASE – Is It Possible? Mark S. Grenon Imagine, A World Without DIS-EASE Is It Possible? Mark S. Grenon Volume One Copyright © 2018 Mark S. Grenon All rights reserved. ISBN-13: 978-1727749144 ISBN-10:1727749146 Imagine, A World Without DIS-EASE – Is It Possible? Mark S. Grenon In LOVING Memory of Bishop David “Maverick” Glover for his help and dedication to creating “a world without dis-ease”! Imagine, A World Without DIS-EASE – Is It Possible? Mark S. Grenon 100% of the proceeds from this book will be donated to the Genesis II Church of Health and Healing to support its workers and support official G2 Projects around the world to help create, “a world without dis-ease.” REAL SCIENCE: We at the Genesis II Church of Health and Healing have been involved in one of the most comprehensive, worldwide, cross cultural, broad spectrum, voluntary, human health studies of this world for the past 8 years. If you include Jim Humble and his studies in Africa, it has been almost 20 years. 95% of the world's diseases have been CURED with the Genesis II Church Protocols! No monies were received from any pharmaceutical/medical companies wanting a certain result. The people of this world who have followed the G2C protocols have not been paid in any way, but they have “self-dosed” themselves voluntarily. “Self-Care” is what is being taught and encouraged by the Genesis II Church worldwide and it is working incredibly well. Every person on this earth has the God-given right to control their own health and not rely on the pharmaceutical/medical industry.
    [Show full text]
  • The Solar Neutrino Problem Has Not Been Solved
    I S S N 2 3 4 7 - 3487 Volume 13 Number 4 Journal of Advances in Physics The Solar Neutrino Problem Has Not Been Solved Jamal S. Shrair Helical Universe www.helical-universe.info [email protected] ABSTRACT A closer look at the data collected from different detectors, reveal that the so-called solar neutrino problem is far from being solved. And contrary to the assessment of the Nobel Committee, the experimental results from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory cannot be regarded as a confirmation of the Standard Solar Model. In fact, the obsoleteness of the current model has been recently exposed by the crisis of solar abundance. Furthermore, using images obtained by the Solar Dynamics Observatory, researchers found the convective motions (the plasma motions within the Sun's interior) to be nearly 100 times smaller than current theoretical expectations. This is a clear verdict on the notion of thermonuclear reactions that are supposed to be the processes that generate solar neutrinos. KEYWORDS Solar neutrino problem, neutrino oscillations, neutrino detectors, solar physics, standard solar model, astrophysics, ACADEMIC DISCIPLINE AND SUB-DISCIPLINES Solar physics and Astrophysics SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION Fundamental Solar Physics and Astrophysics TYPE (METHOD/APPROACH) Quantitative and Qualitative INTRODUCTION Based on the hypothesis of the standard solar model, the number of neutrinos produced by the Sun per second is approximately 1.8 x , which means 400 trillion neutrinos pass through our bodies every second. The model, also assumes that the absolute majority of neutrinos is, generated from the P-P reaction, and 99.99% of solar neutrinos have energy which is far too low for detection.
    [Show full text]
  • Super-Kamiokande: the Road to Neutrino Oscillations
    Super-Kamiokande: The Road to Neutrino Oscillations James Stone Boston University A Symposium on the Occasion of the Benjamin Franklin Medal for the Experimental Discovery of Neutrino Oscillations April 25, 2007 Philadelphia April 1, 1996 Atmospheric Neutrinos Yoji Totsuka James Stone McDonald/Totsuka Symposium 2 Fluxes (106 cm-2s-1) •e : 1.76(11) •, : 3.41(66) •TOTAL:5.09(64) •SSM :5.05 Art McDonald (ee ) ( ) (SSM) Solar Neutrinos James Stone James Stone McDonald/Totsuka Symposium 3 Plan for Today’s Talk Focus on the role of atmospheric neutrinos in revealing neutrino oscillations. Tell the story of large water Cherenkov detectors and why we built them. Give details of the initial discovery of neutrino oscillations and the current data. Present additional checks and confirmations. Preview the future for precision measurements in neutrino physics. I’ll start with some historical milestones ... James Stone McDonald/Totsuka Symposium 4 Discovery of the Free Neutrino, 1956 “Project Poltergeist” Hanford and Savannah River Reactors p n e Fred Reines Clyde Cowan Liquid Scintillator with Cadmium Phys. Rev. Lett. 92:330 (1953) Science 124(3201):103 (1956) “... A Confirmation” Phys. Rev. 117(1) :159 (1960) James Stone McDonald/Totsuka Symposium 5 Oscillations and Neutrino Flavor Bruno Pontecorvo first suggested the possibility of neutrino oscillations if they had a small mass. Since only one neutrino was known, he was thinking that analogous to KK 00 mixing: J.Exp.Theor.Phys. 33 549 (1957) J.Exp.Theor.Phys. 34 247 (1957) In 1962, Lederman, Schwartz, Steinberger, et al. published evidence for the muon neutrino the their BNL/AGS experiment.
    [Show full text]
  • 21.8 N&V PJ BG.Indd
    NEWS & VIEWS NATURE|Vol 454|21 August 2008 OBITUARY Yoji Totsuka (1942–2008) Leader in the discovery of neutrino oscillations. Yoji Totsuka, a major figure in the world of of the supernova and of the neutrinos particle physics, died on 10 July after a long themselves. battle with cancer. He was a leading light Shortly after the supernova, Koshiba in the thrilling advances in the physics of retired and Totsuka became leader of neutrinos over the past 30 years, and was the Kamiokande project. Two seminal a notably resolute figure in seeing through results from the group were subsequently the rebuilding of the Super-Kamiokande published. The first observed a deficit in neutrino detector after a disastrous accident atmospheric neutrinos that could not be in 2001. explained by systematic experimental errors Born on 6 March 1942, in Fuji, Japan, or uncertainties in the background neutrino Totsuka received his bachelor’s, master’s and flux. Instead, some “as-yet-unaccounted-for PhD degrees from the University of Tokyo. physics”, as the paper put it, might explain His thesis project studied ultra-high-energy the data. The second crucially confirmed the particle interactions, so kick-starting his solar neutrino deficit recorded by Davis. lifelong passion for particle physics. As a In 1991, Totsuka obtained funding for a Totsuka also supervised the successful research associate with the University of successor to Kamiokande. This was Super- Belle B-factory, where particles known as Tokyo, he then travelled to the Deutsches Kamiokande, an underground detector B-mesons were generated to study differences Electron Synchrotron Laboratory in that contained 50,000 tons of water.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations
    Nobel Lecture Dec 8, 2015 Takaaki Kajita Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, The Univ. of Tokyo Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations 1 Outline • Introduction: Kamiokande - the starting point - • Atmospheric neutrino deficit • Discovery of neutrino oscillations • Recent results and the future • Summary • Acknowledgements Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations 2 Introduction: Kamiokande - the starting point - Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations 3 Kamioka Nucleon Decay Experiment (Kamiokande) In the late 1970’s, new theories that unify Strong, Weak and Electromagnetic forces were proposed. These theories predicted that protons and neutrons (i.e., nucleons) should decay with the lifetime of about 1028 to 1032 years. Several proton decay experiments began in the early 1980’s. One of them was the Kamiokande experiment. Kamiokande (1000 ton Detector fiducial wall volume) Cherenkov light Photo detectors Charged particle Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations 4 Kamiokande construction team (Spring 1983) M. Takita TK A. Suzuki T.Suda M. Nakahata K. Arisaka M. Koshiba Y. Totsuka T. Kifune Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations 5 What are neutrinos? • Neutrinos; • are fundamental particles like electrons and quarks, • have no electric charge, • have 3 types (flavors), namely electron-neutrinos (νe), muon-neutrinos (νµ) and tau-neutrinos (ντ), • are produced in various places, such as the Earth’s atmosphere, the center of the Sun, …. • can easily penetrate through the Earth, the Sun… • can, however, interact with matter very rarely. A νµ produces a muon. A νe produces
    [Show full text]
  • CP Violation and Flavor Mixing Makoto Kobayashi KEK and JSPS Plan
    CP Violation and Flavor Mixing Makoto Kobayashi KEK and JSPS Plan 1. Introduction to the Standard Model 2. Sakata and His Group 3. The CP Paper with Maskawa 4. Experimental Verification at B-factories 5. Lepton Flavor Mixing Introduction to the Standard Model u d u Electron p Proton(p) n Nucleus d d u Atom Neutron(n) Introduction to the Standard Model Fundamental Particles u c t Quark d s b e μτ Lepton νe νμ ντ Fundamental Interactions • Strong Interaction QCD • Electro‐Magnetic Interaction • Weak Interaction Weinberg‐Salam‐Glashow Theory Introduction to the Standard Model Established in 1970’s ・ Development of gauge theory 1971 ‘t Hooft Electro‐Magnetic Interaction Strong Interaction Weak Interaction ・ Discoveries of new flavors u c t 1964 Gell‐Mann quark model d s b u, d, s e μτ 1973 Kobayashi Maskawa νe νμ ντ Six‐Quark Model After 1970 Sakata and His Group 1947∼ Discovery of Strange Particles Hadron : strongly interacting particle p n π±0 Λ ΛΣΞ±0 KK± 0 Λ lairmoeM kata Saf osyteruoC Archival Library Strange Particles Shoichi Sakata 1911-1970 1956 Sakata Sakata Model All the hadrons are composite states of p,, n Λ : Fundamental Triplet Sakata and His Group Weak Interaction in the Sakata Model - decayβ n→ p + − e ν + strange paticle→Λ p + e− ν + p ν n Λ e μ 1959 Gamba, Marshak, Okubo B‐L Symmetry 1960 Maki, Nakagawa, Ohnuki, Sakata Nagoya Modelp : = B+ν ,, n = B+ e Λ+ =μ B Sakata and His Group 1962 Discovery of Two Neutrinos ν e ν μ Lepton Flavor Mixing e μ MNS Matrix 1962 Maki, Nakagawa, Sakata + + + + p = B ν1 , n = B e , Λ = B μ , p'= B ν 2 ν1 = cosθ ν e + sinθ ν μ ν 2 = −sinθ ν e + cosθ ν μ Neutrino Oscillation 4th Fundametal Particle (GIM scheme) 1962 Katayama, Matumoto, Tanaka, Yamada Sakata and His Group Cosmic Ray Events 1971 Niu et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Takaaki Kajita: Tackling the Mysteries of the Universe By
    Japan’s 2015 Nobel Prize Winners Tackling the Mysteries of the Universe by Studying Neutrinos Dr. Takaaki Kajita, Nobel Prize in Physics Dr. Takaaki Kajita, director of the Institute for Cosmic Ray Research (ICRR) at the University of Tokyo, was one of the two winners of the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physics. The award was for the discovery of a type of neutrino oscillation; this showed that neutrinos have mass, contrary to what was previously assumed. In announcing the award, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences noted, “The discovery has changed our understanding of the innermost workings of matter and can prove crucial to our view of the universe.” Neutrinos are among the most common particles in the universe. They are constantly flying through the space around us in large numbers. But since they very rarely react to other matter, they are extremely difficult to detect. They have been studied at an observatory in Kamioka, Gifu Prefecture, using detectors—Kamiokande and its successor, Super-Kamiokande—installed in a mine site 1,000 meters (about 0.6 miles) underground to avoid interference from unrelated cosmic rays. Now plans are being made for an even more powerful detector, Hyper-Kamiokande. Dr. Kajita began his study of neutrinos as a research associate at the University of Tokyo in 1986. Neutrinos are observed using a huge tank full of purified water and highly sensitive photomultiplier tubes to detect the light given off on the rare occasions when a neutrino strikes a water molecule. Based on analysis of a tremendous volume of observational data, in 1998 he discovered the phenomenon of neutrino oscillation, meaning that the particles sometimes change type.
    [Show full text]