University of Tulsa College of Law TU Law Digital Commons Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works 2007 Corporations and Commercial Speech Tamara Piety Ronald Collins Mark Lopez David Vladeck Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/fac_pub Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation 30 Seattle .U L. Rev. 895 (2007). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works by an authorized administrator of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Corporations and Commercial Speech Ronald Collins,t Mark Lopez,1 TamaraPiety,* David Vladeck** Ronald Collins: It's a delight to be back here in the Pacific Northwest where I once had the honor to teach. Thank you, Kellye Testy and Dana Gold, for including me in this splendid conference. And, of course, a bow to my colleague of many years, Professor David Skover. Today's discussion will be about a rather famous case-actually, a non-case, Nike v. Kasky. 1 Is there anybody in the room who didn't file an amicus brief in Nike? There were so many people who filed on this or that side in the case. All three of our panelists today filed amicus briefs. I think Martin Redish filed one as well. And Erik Jaffe, I think you also filed an amicus brief in Nike. Question: When you think about a case like Nike, where is the conservative/liberal divide? Laurence Tribe, he's liberal.