HUNTSVILLE TRANSIT STUDY | EXISTING CONDITIONS City of Huntsville

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HUNTSVILLE TRANSIT STUDY | EXISTING CONDITIONS City of Huntsville HUNTSVILLE TRANSIT STUDY | EXISTING CONDITIONS City of Huntsville HUNTSVILLE TRANSIT STUDY Final Report January 2019 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | i Table of Contents Page 1 Executive Summary .........................................................................................................1-1 Study Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................. 1-2 5-Year Service Plan .............................................................................................................................. 1-3 5-Year Capital Plan .............................................................................................................................. 1-5 Supporting Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 1-6 2 Existing Conditions ..........................................................................................................2-1 Transit Market Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 2-1 Huntsville Shuttle .................................................................................................................................. 2-15 Handi-Ride ............................................................................................................................................ 2-53 Fare Policy ............................................................................................................................................ 2-56 3 5-Year Service Plan ..........................................................................................................3-1 Phase 1 – August 2019 ........................................................................................................................ 3-1 Phase 2 – August 2020 ........................................................................................................................ 3-3 Phase 3 – August 2021 ........................................................................................................................ 3-4 Phase 4 – August 2022 ........................................................................................................................ 3-5 Phase 5 – August 2023 ........................................................................................................................ 3-6 Route Recommendations ....................................................................................................................... 3-7 5-Year Service Plan Summary .......................................................................................................... 3-27 Future Considerations .......................................................................................................................... 3-28 4 5-Year Capital Plan ..........................................................................................................4-1 Vehicles .................................................................................................................................................... 4-1 Bus Stops .................................................................................................................................................. 4-2 Showers Transit Center ......................................................................................................................... 4-7 Pedestrian Infrastructure ...................................................................................................................... 4-8 Rider Information ................................................................................................................................. 4-10 5-Year Capital Costs Summary ........................................................................................................ 4-12 5 Supporting Recommendations .........................................................................................5-1 Performance Metrics ............................................................................................................................. 5-1 Service Changes..................................................................................................................................... 5-2 Fare Policy .............................................................................................................................................. 5-4 Paratransit ............................................................................................................................................. 5-17 Rebranding ........................................................................................................................................... 5-19 Rideshare ............................................................................................................................................... 5-19 Subsidized Taxi/Ride-hailing ............................................................................................................ 5-20 6 Community Outreach .......................................................................................................6-1 Public Meetings ...................................................................................................................................... 6-1 Stakeholder and Operator Outreach ............................................................................................... 6-3 On-Board Survey ................................................................................................................................... 6-5 Online Survey ....................................................................................................................................... 6-12 Appendix A - On-Board Survey Instrument ............................................................................ A-1 Appendix B - On-Board Survey Open-Ended Comments .........................................................B-1 Appendix C - Online Survey Open-Ended Comments ............................................................ C-1 HUNTSVILLE TRANSIT STUDY | FINAL REPORT City of Huntsville 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY STUDY OVERVIEW The City of Huntsville conducted a comprehensive study of its transit system in 2018 to identify the best approach for optimizing and expanding service over the next five years. The study builds upon the route and schedule improvements implemented as part of a 2011 study that resulted in a 19% ridership increase without any additional service hours. One of the six elements of the recently completed comprehensive plan, The BIG Picture, is to design a “mobile and sustainable transportation network.” Recommendations of this study support that element by simplifying the route network, reducing rider travel times, increasing frequency on busy corridors, and improving access to employment, educational, and recreational destinations. This report presents results from the 2018 transit study and includes: . An overview of existing conditions (Chapter 2), including analysis of the transit market in Huntsville, analysis of Huntsville Shuttle and Handi-Ride service performance, and a description of current fare policy; . A 5-Year Service Plan (Chapter 3), which outlines detailed service changes year- by-year from 2019 through 2023 along with future considerations; . A 5-Year Capital Plan (Chapter 4), with recommendations regarding vehicles, bus stops, transit hubs, pedestrian infrastructure, and rider information; . Supporting recommendations (Chapter 5) regarding performance metrics, service changes, fare policy, paratransit, rideshare service, and branding; and . A summary of community outreach conducted for the study (Chapter 6). Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc. | 1-1 HUNTSVILLE TRANSIT STUDY | FINAL REPORT City of Huntsville EXISTING CONDITIONS Huntsville Shuttle ridership increased 80% from 2011 to 2016, while service increased by less than 5%, indicating an increasing demand for transit. Ridership is high along University Drive, at major shopping centers, and in dense, low-income neighborhoods. Route design varies throughout the system with several loop routes that require riders to travel indirect paths to reach their destinations. Routes are also infrequent, with seven of nine routes operating hourly, and service ends at 6pm or 7pm. Most riders take two buses to reach their destination due to the lack of timed connections outside of the downtown Transfer Center. Only 17% of bus stops in Huntsville are sheltered and many do not comply with the 2010 Americans with Disabilities Act Standards for Accessible Design. The combination of indirect and infrequent service along with basic bus stop conditions result in long travel times and a less than ideal transit experience for most riders. Rider feedback obtained through on-board surveys, community meetings, online surveys, and from bus drivers reveal that existing riders overwhelmingly prefer Saturday service, later evening service, and increased frequency over other service and capital investments. Demand for Handi-Ride paratransit service, which primarily transports seniors to medical and social service destinations, has also increased at a significant rate. Hand-Ride
Recommended publications
  • Mammoth Summer Transit Map -2021
    TOWN TROLLEY SERVICE Get across town with stops at Snowcreek Athletic Club, Minaret Village Shopping Center, The Village, Canyon Lodge and Juniper Springs Resort every 20 minutes. The open-air Lakes Basin Trolley leaves The Village for the Mammoth Lakes Basin every 30 minutes, MAMMOTH LAKES TRANSIT stopping at most of the lakes in the Mammoth Lakes Basin and providing access to area hiking trails. Also tows a 14-bike trailer for access to cycling. SUMMER SERVICE TROLLEY SERVICE ROUTE DATES TIMES FREQUENCY LOCATION TOWN Snowcreek Athletic Club May 28 – Jun 25 7 am – 10 pm Every 30 minutes See map inside COVID-19 REGULATIONS to The Village Jun 26 – Sep 6 7 am – 2 am Every 20 minutes (30 minutes after midnight) See map inside TROLLEY Masks are required. Please do not ride the bus if you are ill. to Canyon Lodge Sep 7 – Nov 19 7 am – 10 pm Every 30 minutes See map inside Schedules are subject to change without notice, please see TROLLEY SERVICE ROUTE DATES TIMES FREQUENCY LOCATION TIME LAST BUS estransit.com for current schedules. The Village to May 28 – Jun 25 9 am – 6 pm Weekends & holidays every 30 minutes, The Village / Stop #90 :00 and :30 5:00 LAKES BASIN WELCOME ABOARD! The Mammoth Transit summer system operates from TRANSIT MAP Lakes Basin weekdays every 60 minutes Lake Mary Marina / Stop #100 :19 and :49 5:19 TROLLEY Jun 26 – Aug 22 9 am – 6 pm Every 30 minutes Horseshoe Lake / Stop #104 :30 and :00 5:30 May 28 through November 19, 2021 and offers a convenient, fun and friendly (with 14-bike trailer) Aug 23 – Sep 6 9 am – 6 pm Weekends & holiday every 30 minutes, Tamarack Lodge (last bus)/Stop #95 :42 and :12 5:42 alternative to getting around Mammoth Lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • For Transit Information, Including Real-Time Next Bus, Please Call 604.953.3333 Or Visit Translink.Ca
    Metro Vancouver Transit Map Effective Until Dec. 19, 2016 259 to Lions Bay Ferries to Vancouver Island, C12 to Brunswick Beach Bowen Island and Sunshine Coast Downtown Vancouver Transit Services £ m C Grouse Mountain Skyride minute walk SkyTrain Horseshoe Bay COAL HARBOUR C West End Coal Harbour C WEST Community Community High frequency rail service. Canada Line Centre Centre Waterfront END Early morning to late Vancouver Convention evening. £ Centre C Canada Expo Line Burrard Tourism Place Vancouver Millennium Line C Capilano Salmon Millennium Line Hatchery C Evergreen Extension Caulfeild ROBSON C SFU Harbour Evelyne Capilano Buses Vancouver Centre Suspension GASTOWN Saller City Centre BCIT Centre Bridge Vancouver £ Lynn Canyon Frequent bus service, with SFU Ecology Centre Art Gallery B-Line Woodward's limited stops. UBC Robson Sq £ VFS £ C Regular Bus Service Library Municipal St Paul's Vancouver Carnegie Service at least once an hour Law Edgemont Hall Community Centre CHINATOWN Lynn Hospital Courts during the daytime (or College Village Westview Valley Queen
    [Show full text]
  • SEPTA Suburban St & Transit Map Web 2021
    A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA BB CC Stoneback Rd Old n d California Rd w d Rd Fretz Rd R o t n R d Dr Pipersville o Rd Smiths Corner i Rd Run Rd Steinsburg t n w TohickonRd Eagle ta Pk Rolling 309 a lo STOCKTON S l l Hill g R Rd Kellers o Tollgate Rd in h HAYCOCK Run Island Keiser p ic Rd H Cassel um c h Rd P Portzer i Tohickon Rd l k W West a r Hendrick Island Tavern R n Hills Run Point Pleasant Tohickon a Norristown Pottstown Doylestown L d P HellertownAv t 563 Slotter Bulls Island Brick o Valley D Elm Fornance St o i Allentown Brick TavernBethlehem c w Carversvill- w Rd Rd Mervine k Rd n Rd d Pottsgrove 55 Rd Rd St Pk i Myers Rd Sylvan Rd 32 Av n St Poplar St e 476 Delaware Rd 90 St St Erie Nockamixon Rd r g St. John's Av Cabin NJ 29 Rd Axe Deer Spruce Pond 9th Thatcher Pk QUAKERTOWN Handle R Rd H.S. Rd State Park s St. Aloysius Rd Rd l d Mill End l La Cemetery Swamp Rd 500 202 School Lumberville Pennsylvania e Bedminster 202 Kings Mill d Wismer River B V Orchard Rd Rd Creek u 1 Wood a W R S M c Cemetery 1 Broad l W Broad St Center Bedminster Park h Basin le Cassel Rockhill Rd Comfort e 1100 y Weiss E Upper Bucks Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Explore: an Attraction Search Tool for Transit Trip Planning
    Explore: An Attraction Search Tool for Transit Trip Planning Explore: An Attraction Search Tool for Transit Trip Planning Kari Edison Watkins, Brian Ferris, and G. Scott Rutherford University of Washington Abstract Publishing information about a transit agency’s stops, routes, schedules, and status in a variety of formats and delivery methods is an essential part of improving the usabil- ity of a transit system and the satisfaction of a system’s riders. A key staple of most transit traveler information systems is the trip planner, a tool that serves travelers well if the both origin and destination are known. However, sometimes the availabil- ity of transit at a location is more important than the actual destination. Given this premise, we developed an Attractions Search Tool to make use of an underlying trip planner to search online databases of local restaurants, shopping, parks and other amenities based on transit availability from the user’s origin. The ability to perform such a search by attraction type rather than specific destination can be a powerful aid to a traveler with a need or desire to use public transportation. Background Publishing information about a transit agency’s stops, routes, schedules, and status in a variety of formats and delivery methods is an essential part of improving the ease of use of a transit system and the satisfaction of a system’s riders. No longer the domain of just simple printed schedules, transit traveler information systems have grown to include route maps and timetables, trip planners, real-time track- ers, service alerts, and others tools made available across cell phones, web brows- ers, and new Internet devices as driven by rider demand (Multisystems 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborative Research and Mapping for Public Transit Anywhere
    Collaborative Research and Mapping for Public Transit Anywhere Application for IRU BUS Excellence Award July 2015 Vision/Goals Across the world, cities depend on buses as the critical core of their public transit system. In Africa, Asia, Latin America and elsewhere, transport authorities often do not exist and numerous operators run bus systems under the difficult conditions of high levels of informality. This means little to no information on routes, stops, fares and schedules (if they exist) is usually available. Yet this information is key to improving services, planning and providing basic passenger information important to smoother functioning of the system and higher customer satisfaction. This, in turn, is critical to a more sustainable, cleaner, low carbon future for these cities. Created to address this problem, Digital Matatus is a key player in the movement to leverage technological innovation, open data and collaborative networks to improve transportation in cities that depend on bus systems with high degrees of informality. We aim to make the bus services in these cities more visible, legible, service oriented, efficient, and open. Our work consists of engaging with operators, government, technology firms and civil society in a collaborative process to develop high quality open data on buses in standardized format that allows access to new tools. Through a collaborative process we support a community of users who can build on the data to generate innovation around transit applications, planning tools and passenger information systems. We support both the development of user-friendly technology for data collection Collaborative Research and Mapping for Public Transit Anywhere and local institutionalization of the knowledge and techniques of data collection to ensure long term, sustained data collection for bus improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • As a Di‘Erent Route Through Downtown Buses Continuing INTERBAY Swedish S
    N 152 St to Shoreline CC Snohomish County– to Aurora toAuroraVill toMtlk to Richmond NE 150 St toWoodinvilleviaBothell 373 5 SHORELINE 355 Village Beach Downtown Seattle toNSt Terr to Shoreline CC toUWBothell 308 512 402 405 410 412 347 348 77 330 309 toHorizonView 312 413 415 416 417 421 NE 145 St 373 308 NE 145 St ­toKenmoreP&R N 145 St 304 316 Transit in Seattle 422 425 435 510 511 65 308 toUWBothell 513 Roosevelt Wy N Frequencies shown are for daytime period. See Service Guide N 143 St 28 Snohomish County– 346 512 301 303 73 522 for a complete summary of frequencies and days of operation. 5 64 University District 5 E 304 308 For service between 1:30–4:30 am see Night Owl map. 512 810 821 855 860 E N 871 880 y 3 Av NW 3 Av Jackson Park CEDAR W Frequent Service N 135 St Golf Course OLYMPIC y Linden Av N Linden Av PARK t Bitter i Every 15 minutes or better, until 7 pm, Monday to Friday. C HILLS weekdays Lake e 372 Most lines oer frequent service later into the night and on NW 132 St Ingraham k a Ashworth Av N Av Ashworth N Meridian Av NE 1 Av NE 15 Av NE 30 Av L weekends. Service is less frequent during other times. (express) 373 77 N 130 St Roosevelt Wy NE 372 weekends 28 345 41 Link Light Rail rapid transit North- every 10 minutes BITTER LAKE acres 8 Av NW 8 Av Park 5 NW 125 St N 125 St Haller NE 125 St E RapidRide limited stop bus for a faster ride 345 Lake NE 125 St every 10–12 minutes 346 PINEHURST 8 Frequent Bus every 10–12 minutes BROADVIEW 99 347 348 continues as LAKE CITY 75 Frequent Bus every 15 minutes 41 345 NE 120 St Northwest
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Service
    TRANSIT SERVICE Transit services in Glendale include the Beeline local transit system and the services provided by the MTA. These systems combine to provide frequent transit service on many key streets in downtown Glendale. Transit service is offered at least every 10 minutes on Brand, Central south of Broadway, San Fernando, 4 Glendale Boulevard, and Broadway. With service this frequent, riders do not need to carry a schedule, but can depend on the next bus arriving soon after they reach their bus stop. Figure 4-1 shows the existing transit services in the study area, including services provided by MTA and the City of Glendale. Despite this network of high frequency transit services, many residents in Glendale find transit services inadequate, or are unaware of the level of service actually provided. GLENDALE DOWNTOWN MOBILITY STUDY | 4-1 4.1 PRINCIPLES The key principles for improving transit service in Glendale include increasing awareness about the services that are avail- able, and marketing a complete system to riders who can choose whether an MTA or Beeline route serves them best. The Downtown Mobility Study recommends operating a new shuttle route which will be dedicated to downtown travel, and linking regional transit corridors with the commercial, entertainment and employment opportunities in the Glendale core. The shuttle route, which can begin service almost immediately using exist- ing resources, should ultimately be improved and expanded for a long term future that may include streetcar operations. Create and market a comprehensive system of coordinated re- gional and local transit that takes advantage of the relatively high level of service that already exists in Glendale, and emphasizes new linkages where needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Hub SUNNY
    HALLANDALE BEACH BLVD E MIRAMAR PKWY E E 95 BROWARD COUNTY K I NW 215 ST 99 P MIAMI-DADE COUNTY NW 211 ST N R 95 U TO FORT TO LAUDERDALE NE 207 ST T D NE 205 ST GOLDEN S E NW 206 ST 297 ’ R BEACH NW 2 AVE NE 203 ST NE 2 AVE Y The Bus Terminal A RED ROAD 27 27 IR AVE NE 12 D A at Aventura Mall NW 202 ST I IVES D R FLAMINGO RD FLAMINGO NW 199 ST O 99 3,9 WI LLIAM LEHMAN CSWY 199 ST99 L M IAMI GARDENS F 183 17 210 95 E,S NE 192 ST 99,183 NW 52 AVE NW 52 NW 191 ST NW 47 AVE NW 47 NW 191 ST 95 99 MIAM 75 NE 186 ST NW 186 ST I GA 32 93, 95, 120 RDENS DR AV E AV E NW 183 ST MIAMI GARDENS DR 183 NORTH E 73 42 2,3 16 32 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY 54 95 MIAMI 267 286 CAROL 77 9,10 19 AVENTURA 120 286 NW NW 75 BEACH CITY NW 175 ST 17 E,H 22 93 E S 75 246 NE 19 AVE 286 NW 167 ST 75 D 3 BLV Golden Glades ES NW 167 ST E 246 2 210 SUNNY ISL E 75 826 PALMETTO EXPY 22 NE 163 ST 54 Golden Glades Northeast H 32 Terminal E Transit Hub SUNNY TRANSIT SYSTEM e NW 87 AVE 75 22 MIAMI v 217 155 19 75 ISLES 29 A LUDLAM RD LUDLAM LAKES 77 7 OPA-LOCKA BEACH 3 NW 156 ST 155 MIAMI LAKES DR NW 151 ST NE 151 ST 3 H H W 246 NE 6 AVE 27 267 N 277 16 135 120 OPA-LOCKA 17 77 9 10 EXECUTIVE AIRPORT 42 95 75 METROBUS ROUTES OKEECHOBEE ROAD 277 NW 138 ST NW 135 ST Opa-Locka 217 W DIXIE HWY 135 135 135 G Limited-Stop Service R 217 NORTH A 297 73 29 37 T 95 MIAMI BAY HARBOR IG WEST BRO A AVE COLLINS N 27 D CSW ISLANDS W 28 AVE G Y Express Service Y VIEW 96 ST W 68 ST EX 1 29 PY NW 12 AVE NW 119 ST E 65 ST HIALEAH 19 16 G BAL HARBOUR 54 19 D East–West Local-Stop Service GARDENS G MIAMI
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Transit 2017
    THE STATE OF TRANSIT 2017 CREATING OUR TRANSIT FUTURE Thank you to our 2017 About our Organization State of Transit sponsors Ride New Orleans is an independent nonprofit PLATINUM LEVEL organization. Our vision is a world class, multi-modal transportation system that promotes a vibrant, healthy, and sustainable New Orleans region. Our mission is to enhance the quality of life in the New Orleans region by promoting safe, convenient, and affordable transportation options. Visit rideneworleans.org for more information. GOLD LEVEL Board of Directors Fred Neal, Jr. – President Andrew Kingsley – Treasurer Jennifer Terry - Secretary Jacquelyn Dadakis – Past President Buddy Boe SILVER LEVEL Walt Leger, III Lacy McManus Rafe Rabalais Nina P. Red Jeff Schwartz Cedric Thompson Ride New Orleans Staff Alex Posorske – Executive Director Matthew Hendrickson – Senior Organizer & Policy Analyst Stephanie Jackson – Community Organizer BRONZE LEVEL State of Transit in New Orleans report Andrew Kingsley & Jennifer Rigterink Harrah’s contributors Huber, Slack, Thomas & Marcelle, LLP Kevin Harrison – Co-author and data collection & analysis Landis Construction Co., LLC Ann Wanserski – Layout and design Villavaso and Associates Isabel Barrios – Equitable fare research A special thanks to our 2017 organizational funders When we founded Ride New Orleans in 2009, we were driven by a love for our city and the people who live here. While improving, transit was still not working the way our residents needed. This was hurting the people of the city and harming our collective future. From the We set out to work with riders, the New Orleans Regional Transit Authority (RTA), the city, the business community, neighborhoods, local non-profits, and individual residents throughout the city to do what we could to make it better.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices in Evaluating Transit Performance Survey
    TABLE OF CONTENTSI CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTIONI ..............................................................................................................3 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW .......................................................................................................5 National Review of Best Practices for Transit Agencies............................................................................ 5 National Case Studies ............................................................................................................................. 13 MAP-21 Guidelines and Transit Performance Evaluation ....................................................................... 34 CHAPTER 3: PRACTICES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES USED BY FLORIDA TRANSIT AGENCIES ......... 39 Performance-Based Planning .................................................................................................................. 39 Review of Transit Development Plans and Online Performance Reports .............................................. 45 Survey Results ......................................................................................................................................... 58 Florida Case Studies ................................................................................................................................ 82 Recommendations ................................................................................................................................ 118 CHAPTER 4: TRANSIT PERFORMANCE MEASURE TOOLBOX
    [Show full text]
  • Muni Map 2015.Pdf
    map 76X – Weekend service to Marin Headlands Golden Gate Bridge 0 0.25 mi ew San Francisco Transit Map vi te Pier 39 a Ave M G Fisherman’s 13th Ave H Wharf Muni Metro BART/Caltrain Ave D 10 minutes or less Ave B Marin PresidiGo Shuttle e Jefferson 9th 76X – Weekend service Beach Muni Rapid to Montgomery/Market 10 minutes or less Line Terminals Lin Marina Green co North Point Treasure ln Casa B Marina Island 4th l Rico v d One way d Fort Mason Bay 10 minutes or less JeffersonPrado Cervantes Blvd Francisco Beach Powell/Hyde Cable Car California Nonstop Coit The Embarcadero Davis & Pine Mason M Chestnut Tower a Powell North PointCapra llo rc L Avila a a Every 20-300-0 minutes Gorgas y r y o b Moscone Lombard kw n Bay m Underground P lha Rec. Center Exploratorium Presidio A o led d o Greenwich R Francisco T d Lincoln BlvdHalleck Girard n Accessible a Filbert l s I Every 30-600-0 minutes Chestnut Ferry Plaza d Columbus e Powell/Mason Metro/Rapid Stops v r l (Steuart & Market) Montgomery Union u B PresidiGo service Cable Car s a Yerba Buena L Lombard e n to downtown r e r l T tt Pixley Transbay Tube T o e Island Non-Accessible Funston r Ahlers Van Ness Green c ma n n Greenwich i Moraga Presidio Express Metro/Rapid Stops L S um r n Vallejo u e Roger h Filbert Drumm t r Ar Point of Interest ac Sherman Broadway M Davis rd Union a Ferry rn Presidio a M Simonds Loop Justin Building Embarcadero San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge Historic Streetcar B ort Pacifc Hospital W on Green Rodriguez Portola W y MacArthur Herman r a r Plaza a a Jackson s u h s Liggett Library in h Arguello Q VallejoVallejo g in Clark to g Sibley to Washington Front n n Montgomery Battery Sansome Cable Car Broadway Kearny Grant Steuart School Bromley Clay Stockton Pacifc Powell Baker Taylor Embarcadero Mission & Main Market St.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro First Last Mile Strategic Plan Goals 1 Expand the Reach of Transit Through Infrastructure Improvements
    First Last Mile Strategic Plan & PLANNING GUIDELINES Sounds good, I haven’t been to LACMA in a while...the Pathway? Hmm...I’ll check it out. The Meet-Up! See you soon! In sunny downtown LA, we join Jeff in the middle of making plans to catch up with his long-time friend Bret... M M 5 min 10 min Jeff sets off on the pathway, following the signs to get to his nearest Metro station. A short and speedy Metro ride later... Ready to spend And with a quick look at the Jeff is off biking! Metro pylon to find the a great day nearest bike share program... with his friend! bike share metro station RL Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority - Metro I Southern California Association of Governments - SCAG MARCH - 2014 FIRST LAST MILE STRATEGIC PLAN ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Los Angeles County First Last Mile Metropolitan Transportation Authority Technical Advisory Committee (Metro) (Project TAC) Diego Cardoso, Metro Rye Baerg, Safe Routes to School Shahrzad Amiri, Metro Ellen Blackman, Accessibility Advisory Committee Neha Chawla, Metro Robert Boardman, City of Redondo Beach Steven Mateer, Metro Maddie Brozen, UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs Alexandra Oster, Metro Eric Bruins, Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition Connie Chung, County of Los Angeles Southern California Association Allan Crawford, City of Long Beach of Governments Troy Evangelho, County of Los Angeles (SCAG) Michelle Glickert, City of Santa Monica Sarah Jepson, SCAG Jay Kim, City of Los Angeles Alan Thompson, SCAG Alexis Lantz, LA County Department of
    [Show full text]