Draft Working Paper

DRAFT WORKING PAPER

14 June 2016

A Community of Users on Secure, Safe and Resilient Societies (CoU) Mapping EU policies and FP7 research for enhancing partnerships in H2020

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2. OVERVIEW OF TASKS AND OBJECTIVES

2.1 Background

2.2 Objectives

2.3 List of CoU tasks

2.4 Logistics

2.5 Governance and knowledge transfer

3. RATIONALE BEHIND THE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMUNITY OF USERS

3.1 Introduction

3.2 Who are the users?

3.3 Why building up a Community of Users?

4. TARGETING READERS

4.1 Key actors / levels, including market issues (and public?)

4.2 Communication channels

5. POLICY BACKGROUND

5.1 General framework

5.2 EU Civil Protection Mechanism and related international policies

5.3 Critical Infrastructure Protection

5.4 CBRN and Explosives

5.4.1 CBRN Action Plan

5.4.2 Explosive Action Plan and Regulation 98/2013

5.4.3 International conventions

5.5 Major accidents hazards

5.6 Serious cross-border threats to health

5.7 EU Adaptation Strategy to climate change

5.8 Water and marine-related policies

5.9 Control of exports, Union Custom Code

5.10 Border security

5.11 Fight against crime and terrorism

6. EU-FUNDING INSTRUMENTS - RESEARCH AND CAPACITY-BUILDING

6.1 Introduction

6.2 HORIZON 2020

6.3 DG ECHO

6.4 DG HOME - ISF

6.5 DG DEVCO - CoE

6.6 LIFE+

6.7 Structural funds

6.8 Education / Training

6.9 Joint Research Centre

6.9.1 JRC CBRN-E activities

6.9.2 ERNCIP

6.9.3 Disaster Risk Management Knowledge Centre (DRMKC)

6.10 EDA

7. MAPPING EU POLICIES VS RESEARCH IN THE LIGHT OF OPERATIONAL FEATURES

7.1. Introduction

7.2. Disaster Resilience / Crisis Management (natural hazards)

7.2.1. All hazards

7.2.1.1. Earth observation in support of emergency and disaster management

7.2.1.2. Multi-risk assessment and management

7.2.1.3. Demonstration in the area of multi-hazards crisis management

7.2.1.4. Multi-hazards risk reduction, preparedness and resilience enhancement

7.2.1.5. Multi-hazards situation awareness / early warning

7.2.1.6. Multi-hazards emergency and humanitarian crisis 2

7.2.1.7. Multi-risk assessment of natural hazards, including cascading effects

7.2.1.8. Crisis emergency, including cascading effects

7.2.1.9. Systems of systems demonstration for post-crisis management (generic)

7.2.2. Geological hazards

7.2.2.1. Data access to geohazard information

7.2.2.2. Detection of earth-surface / ground deformation

7.2.2.3. Landslides assessment and preparedness

7.2.2.4. Seismic risk evaluation and earthquake risk reduction, preparedness and protection

7.2.2.5. Tsunami risk evaluation and reduction

7.2.2.6. Volcanic risk assessment and forecasting

7.2.3. Climate-related hazards

7.2.3.1. Climate impact assessments

7.2.3.2. Climate-related hazards risk prevention, awareness and preparedness

7.2.3.3. Flood risk management

7.2.3.4. Coastal risks induced by storm events or flooding

7.2.3.5. Drought risk management

7.2.3.6. Forest fire prevention and preparedness

7.2.4. Health threats crisis management

7.2.4.1. Prevention/preparedness to contagion, outbreaks, pandemics

7.2.4.2. Improved medical responses

7.2.4.3. CBRN detection

7.2.5. Victim triage and identification

7.2.6. Information / Communication systems for disaster management

7.2.6.1. Communication systems with focus on disaster management (general)

7.2.6.2. Communication systems / response coordination for first responders

7.2.7. Cost assessment of hazards

7.2.8. Training

7.2.9. Networking

7.2.10. Best practices and knowledge management

7.3. Critical Infrastructures Protection

7.3.1. Multi-hazard assessment / stress tests 3

7.3.2. Protection against electromagnetic radiations

7.3.3. Electrical power and smart grids

7.4. Security and safety (general)

7.4.1. Resilience of urban built environment with focus on safety and security threats

7.4.2. Security threats in complex environments

7.4.3. Cyber security

7.4.4. Detection / Control of CBRN-E risks

7.4.4.1. EDEN demonstration

7.4.4.2. Detection of RN sources for inspection and monitoring in case of RN emergency

7.4.4.3. CBRN detection and post-crisis assessment for civil security

7.4.4.4. CBRN detection of biological threats

7.4.4.5. EDA projects in the field of CBRN detection (dual-use research)

7.4.4.6. Protective equipments

7.4.5. Risk assessment of major accident hazards

7.4.6. Water safety and security

7.4.7. Food supply chain and related threats

7.4.8. Detection / Inspection for customs in relation to security threats

7.4.8.1. Detection of illegal drugs and hidden persons

7.4.8.2. Supply chain security

7.4.9. Transport security threats

7.4.9.1. Railway security

7.4.9.2. Urban transport and road network security

7.4.9.3. Security of critical infrastructures in relation to mass transportation

7.4.10. Risk assessment related to radicalisation

7.4.11. Disaster response and security of citizens

7.4.12. Standardisation

7.4.13. Foresights

7.4.14. Roadmaps

7.5. Border Security

7.5.1. Aviation security

7.5.1.1. Air traffic management 4

7.5.1.2. Protection of civil aviation

7.5.2. Maritime security

7.5.3. Land border security

7.5.4. Identification technologies

7.5.5. Standardisation

7.6. Fight against crime and terrorism

7.6.1. Detection of intruders in Critical Infrastructures

7.6.2. Detection of terrorist threats and crimes

7.6.2.1. Threat detection, video surveillance

7.6.2.2. Emergency planning for CBRN threats

7.6.2.3. Testing and certification

7.6.3. Crime forensics

7.6.3.1. Crime scene investigations

7.6.3.2. Crime scene and forensics for CBRN-E threats and incidents

7.6.3.3. Information gathering and prevention strategies

7.6.4. Explosives

7.6.4.1. Detection / Characterisation of explosives and their precursors

7.6.4.2. Crime scenes investigations related to explosives

7.6.5. Decontamination

7.6.5.1. Decontamination of CBRN agents

7.6.5.2. EDA projects in the field of decontamination

7.6.6. Prevention of extremist events and counterterrorism

7.6.7. Post-crisis response and recovery following terrorist attacks

7.6.8. Removal of anti-personal landmines

7.6.9. Cyber crime

7.6.10. Finances, economics

7.7. Population alert and civil protection in case of emergencies

7.7.1. Population alerting

7.7.2. Public protection

7.7.3. Civil protection operations

7.8. Societal and ethical implications 5

7.8.1. Post-crisis societal support

7.8.2. Public involvement and use of social media

7.8.2.1. Enhanced communication in crisis management

7.8.2.2. Civil society engagement

7.8.3. Ethics

8. WAY AHEAD

This draft working paper has been prepared by the Secure Societies Programme (DG HOME). It does not reflect a formal position of the European Commission and is prone to iterations following discussions and comments from the Community of Users

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

In a world facing a growing risk of man-made and natural disasters resulting from increasingly frequent and severe natural, industrial and man-made hazards, the security of citizens, infrastructure and assets and the environment protection have become a high priority in the European Union. Strengthening capacities in disaster risk / crisis management and improving resilience in the fields of CBRN-E (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear and Explosive) and natural and man-made disaster management, as well as in the areas of border security and the fight against crime and terrorism, represent key EU policy and research challenges. The overall EU security policy framework covers many different sectors, which require coordination among various communities. In this respect, policy development and implementation rely on effective interactions among policy-makers, research, industry (including SMEs) and operational actors (first responders, civil protection units, police forces etc.) in the EU Member States. This requires a proper exchange of information and communication about either policy updates or (research) project results, which should be tailor-made to different sectors concerned with the goal of enhancing the transfer of research solutions or new policy recommendations to users in a timely and relevant fashion. Such exchanges are also needed to identify and address users' needs regarding research, technologies and policies, in order to better design funding programmes at an EU level. Finally, a proper transfer of knowledge from research to policy and operational sectors may have a positive impact on policy formulation and review. However, the policy complexity, the high number of research projects, the difficulties associated with bringing innovative tools to the market and the lack of "interfacing" mechanisms make it difficult to efficiently reach these goals. In order to improve this situation, the European Commission is funding various types of projects, including large- scale demonstration projects. In the field of Disaster Risk and Crisis Management (including CBRN-E, natural and man-made disasters), large-scale projects have helped build a critical mass by federating efforts at an EU level, namely "EDEN" and "DRIVER", as well as other projects which have an "interfacing" component. These projects, along with different policy committees and think-tanks, develop networks with user's groups in the Member States which have great potential but are currently too fragmented. In this respect, the need to build a “Community of Users” in the EU based on existing user's communities has been expressed in various fora. Discussions with different actors have hence taken place over the past months and a mapping of policies and research projects has been carried out in light of operational features regarding the overall risk management cycle (from preparedness / prevention, detection / surveillance, response / recovery) and the need to ensure a proper transfer (and implementation) of research outputs to users. This working paper presents the reasoning for the development of a Community of Users on Secure, Safe and Resilient Societies and the results of the mapping of policies and (FP7 secure societies and sector-specific) research, which is aimed to pave the way for improving future links among Horizon2020, capacity-building, training, industrial developments and policy implementation. It has been prepared in view of setting a background for the Community of Users. It does not reflect a formal position of the European Commission. 7

2. OVERVIEW OF TASKS AND OBJECTIVES 2.1 Background The management of disaster risks and crises of different kinds (unintentional or intentional man-made disasters, natural hazards) as well as other security / safety issues in the areas of border control, supply chains and crime are ruled by a number of international, EU and national policies covering various sectors and operational features such as preparedness, prevention, detection, surveillance, response, and recovery. A wide range of research and technological developments, as well as capacity-building and training projects, are striving to support the implementation of these policies. However, the complexity of the policy framework and the wide variety of research, capacity-building and training initiatives often leads to a lack of awareness about policies and/or project outputs by the among users, namely policy-makers, scientists, industry/SMEs and practitioners, e.g. civil protection units, medical emergency services and police departments. Highly fragmented information often leads to poor awareness of policy requirements by research and industry communities and poor transfer of research results to policy and stakeholders communities. 2.2 Objectives In the light of the above, there is a strong need to establish a mechanism enabling better information exchanges with regular updates for all possibly interested organisations and effective interactions among projects and different communities. To better understand the type of information that should be considered and how it fits to a larger "architecture", a mapping exercise was carried out to highlight the scientific and technological challenges of key related policies and their possible matching by research projects funded by the 7th Framework Programme. A first step is to build up the framework of science-policy-industry- practitioner's interactions and to figure out how an efficient mechanism of information transfer could be made operational at EU and national levels in the light of Horizon 2020 developments. This is the core objective and mission of the proposed Community of Users on Secure, Safe and Resilient Societies. More specifically, five key objectives are defined, namely: 1. Ensuring that research programming (particularly H2020) takes account practitioners' needs, thereby promoting research results that are relevant to them; 2. Identifying the most promising tools, methods, guidelines (including those developed in FP7 and H2020 projects) that have the potential to be taken up by practitioners; 3. Support the competitiveness of EU industry by enhancing the market for research results; 4. Ensuring that the expertise of practitioners is available to policy makers, thereby facilitating the policy-making process; 5. Facilitating the implementation of policy.

2.3 List of CoU tasks The Community of Users aims to gather as many actors as possible. The registration is hence open and membership can be achieved through a simple request to be included in the CoU mail directory. To fulfil the above defined objectives, the following tasks are considered: 1) The forum of information exchanges represents a first level of interactions at EU level among research, policy, industry and practitioners within the Horizon 2020 framework. It principally concerns the organisation of meetings and reporting through: (a) Information exchanges (objectives 1 to 5) through biannual meetings organised in spring and autumn under the coordination of DG HOME with support from the Research Executive Agency (REA), relevant projects and the EC Joint Research Centre. The meetings aim to enhance links and interactions among research, policies, industrial developments and practitioner's needs; they will gather representatives of the Community of Users either through physical attendance (selection done according to themes to be discussed) or via Internet (web streaming) to exchange information about research and policy updates. In particular, information will be given on key findings of FP7 / H2020 projects, as well as on newly funded projects from other funding instruments. It is hoped that these regular information exchanges and debates will help developing a culture of dialogue among the different communities at International, EU and Member State levels. (b) Highlight new projects, research outputs (objective 2) and policy updates (objective 4) through annual reporting (based on a similar structure as the present report) under the coordination of DG HOME and REA with involvement and contributions from other EC Directorate-Generals, complementing the present background mapping document. 2) The improvement of synergies among future Horizon2020 projects, capacity-building, training and industrial developments is the second level aimed to be developed through: (a) Regular survey (objective 2) of projects issued from different calls / programmes to keep the information basis as complete as possible. This will be jointly carried out by REA and DG HOME, in close cooperation with other DGs, on the basis of project fact sheets (extracts of project catalogues, or sheets produced on the basis of existing formats) regularly updated by the projects at the early stage of the projects (description of objectives), mid-term (interim findings) and final (key findings) stages. (b) Exchange of views with policy-makers and stakeholders (objectives 2, 4, 5) through ad-hoc meetings coordinated by REA, in close coordination with DG HOME and other DGs, gathering selected projects (max. 10) on a given theme to discuss possible synergies. Such meetings will be held in Brussels back-to-back to biannual CoU meetings and on other occasions (depending on project milestones). (c) Through the above subtasks, bridging projects from different funding sources (objectives 1, 2) in particular linking demonstration / training components of H2020 projects to ECHO / HOME (ISF) capacity-building and training projects. This will be a joint undertaking by concerned DGs and REA.

3) The identification of promising tools / technologies / recommendations and the production of tailor-made information (objective 2) addressed to the different communities, including Member States representatives in different policy sectors, will result from the above interactions, representing a third level, namely: Under joint coordination by DG HOME and REA, and in close cooperation with other DGs, establishing close ties between H2020 projects and their potential users from the very start of the projects by inviting coordinators of projects selected from regular calls to present their project objectives to Policy DGs, Member States (via relevant Committees) and practitioners. Depending upon the nature of the project outputs, these interactions will be coordinated either in an ad-hoc way project by project (i.e. specific meeting with a single project), or through CoU or ad-hoc meetings (see above). 4) Better channelling information (in an appropriate format) on the identified outputs to different users (objectives 1, 4, 5). This concerns in particular projects which have a potential to directly support policy implementation and update and feed research programming through developed tools, technologies, guidelines and roadmaps that are of potential interest to policy-makers, industry stakeholders and practitioners in the Member States. This should result in well-designed briefs, starting from the policy background and describing the project outputs. The production of briefs will be carried out by the projects under coordination of DG HOME, REA and other DGs concerned. 5) The fifth level of interactions concerns the development of networking with practitioners at EU level through close cooperation with Member States to improve their involvement and facilitate the effective transfer and uptake of project outputs, namely through: (a) Sectorial networks (objective 2) with close involvement of practitioners to ensure that the identified project outputs (resulting from the three levels above) are transferred from the EU to national / regional levels in partnership with Member States committees, EU Agencies, Intergovernmental Agencies, and International Organisations. (a) Return of experiences (objective 4) through interactions with practitioners to get feedback about experiences in the Member States regarding the implementation of research solutions. 2.4 Logistics The agenda and organisation of the Community of Users is under the responsibility of DG HOME.B4 in close consultation with various DGs and Agencies, as well as with REA and relevant projects. In its first phase (2014-2015), the development of the Community of Users has been closely linked to two demonstration projects (EDEN1 and DRIVER2) in terms of logistics, i.e. CoU meetings were organised under the umbrella of these two projects, while all other tasks were coordinated with other services. In the second phase (2016-2017), logistics will be carried out under a service contract with the development of a dedicated website.

1 https://www.eden-security-fp7.eu/ 2 http://driver-project.eu/ 10

The first phase of the CoU development has focused on disaster risk and crisis management. The scope of the mapping has been enlarged to encompass all the areas covered by research on secure, safe and resilient societies. On the longer term (2018 and beyond), depending on the development of the CoU, the initiative could be institutionalised through an internal financing that remains to be defined, that could take over some of the tasks (meeting organisation, annual reporting) while the CoU will remain under the coordination and policy responsibility of DG HOME.B4. 2.5 Governance and knowledge transfer The governance of the Community of Users and related knowledge transfer have to be established in the lights of the different interactions among different categories of actors, linking research, industry, policy sectors and practitioners. In this respect, several levels of governance need to be considered: (1) a "horizontal" level in the framework of which interactions among research, industry, policy-makers and practitioners are established in a coordinated way at different scales, i.e. EU, national and regional; (2) a "vertical" level which establishes operational links among the EU, national and regional levels through appropriate information relays, synergies and demonstration activities.

Figure 1. Different levels of governance

The different levels are illustrated in Figure 1 and deals with, in particular: Horizontally o Science to science: sharing information and developing interactions among H2020 projects (via the Research DGs) dealing with specific themes to develop a critical mass and reduce fragmentation, and bring tools/technologies to the market through links with industrial stakeholders. EU-funded projects respond to topics which are generally based on well-defined policy hooks. We might hence expect that projects supporting common policy goals will establish synergies, which is rarely the case without a push from the Commission owing to various considerations (IPR and classified information in particular). Here again, sharing information and developing interactions on a regular basis should become a practice that the Commission asks of projects. o Policy to policy: policy interactions in the light of policy implementation needs, including the respective DGs, and establishing links with Member States through formal committees (e.g. CBRN-E Advisory Group, Civil Protection Committee, Seveso Committee etc.). While International and EU policies are developed in close consultation among different sectors, in practice few interactions take place at the implementation level among sectors within the Member States. This is partly due to insufficient sharing of information and joint actions. o Science to policy: formatting/translation of research information in a way which is tailor- made to policy-makers and ultimately user's needs, responding to well specified technical challenges. This is obviously directly linked to the above, with the requirement for the scientific community to format/translate research information in a way which is tailor-made to policy applications, basically responding to well specified technical challenges. This is the subject of the mapping described in this document. o Policy to science: identification of research needs from policy-makers, stakeholders and practitioners on the short to long term and communication of these needs to be taken into account in research programming, development and implementation. An essential component of the policy to science interaction is the capacity for policy-makers to identify research needs on the short to long term and communicate these needs in anticipation to the research community so that programming, research development and implementation can match the policy timeline (e.g. access to the scientific state-of-the- art, short-term research / capacity building, longer term research goals, pre- and co- normative research). Vertically o International/EU to National: in the research sector, interactions through H2020 consortia; in the policy sector, interactions through Committees representing Member States and stakeholders, working out appropriate relays to national authorities and stakeholders based on well-formatted information. At international/EU level, policies are elaborated by relevant organisations (e.g. UN for various conventions and European Commission for security-related EU policies). The links to the National level take place through Committees in which Member States are represented. There is a need to ensure that these Committees be informed on similar grounds about science & policy developments.

o National to Regional/Local: information relays through interactions with regional research partners and regional authorities as well as practitioner's networks and associations. Once representatives of the Member State's Committee are duly informed, it is to be expected that appropriate relays with regional / local implementers will then take place under the MS responsibility. This also requires a level of coordination which depends upon the willingness and capacity of each Member State. This level of interaction is less well defined than the EU level because of different settings within the Member States. o Regional to National/EU: return of experiences from either practitioners involved in EU- funded projects or practitioners informed via national channels to the EU level.

3. RATIONALE BEHIND THE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMUNITY OF USERS 3.1 Introduction This document presents the reasoning for the development of the Community of Users on Secure, Safe and Resillient Societies and the results of the mapping of policies and (FP7 secure societies and sector-specific) research, which is aimed to pave the way for improving future links among Horizon2020, capacity-building, training, industrial developments and policy implementation. In a world facing a growing risk of man-made and natural disasters resulting from increasingly frequent and severe natural, industrial and man-made hazards, the security of citizens, infrastructure and assets has become a high priority in the European Union. Strengthening capacities in disaster risk / crisis management and improving resilience in the fields of CBRN-E (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear and Explosives) and natural and man-made disaster management represent key EU policy and research challenges. In the case of CBRN-E incidents and threats, the huge explosion at the AZF fertiliser factory in Toulouse in 2001, the deadly E. Coli outbreak which hit Germany in May 2011 and the current Ebola crisis, as well as the recent chemical weapons use during the Syrian conflict, are some examples illustrating the level of risk faced by the EU today. Terrorist threats are also among the most serious risks to be anticipated as shown by the recent attacks in Paris on the 13th November 2015 and in Brussels on the 22nd March 2016. Linked to this, enhanced research efforts are called in the area of the fight against crime and terrorism. Finally, the EU is facing the refugee crisis with related border security challenges, which represent another area requiring research developments. The impact of climate change on natural hazards has also seen a rise in the severity and frequency of various natural disasters in Europe and beyond. Meteorological hazards such as extreme weather events, floods and heat waves, as well as forest and wildfires have become recurrent phenomena in the EU. The Xynthia storm in 2010, the major floods in Southern Germany and neighbouring regions in 2013, and the deadly heat wave which struck Europe in 2003 are a few examples. Similarly, crisis management also addresses various geological hazards such as earthquakes, volcanoes and tsunamis, as well as health-related hazards (pandemics, livestock epidemics) and other man-made risks (cyber-attacks, loss of critical infrastructure) which all present risks to the EU and its citizens.

The many different risks affecting security involve various communities covering research, policy and operational actors (including industry/SMEs, first responders, civil protection units, decision-makers etc.), all of which have specificities but present also common features regarding the overall risk management cycle (preparedness / prevention, detection / surveillance, response / recovery) and the need to ensure a proper transfer (and implementation) of research outputs to "users". Disaster Risk / Crisis Management policies have common technical grounds, including the need to check the effectiveness and performance of existing equipment, tools and processes (testing and validation), the detection of new threats (e.g. new substances) and risk assessment, training and exercises ; in addition, they all support improving the usage of research results. This diversity of actors requires that the dissemination and communication of project results be tailor-made to different sectors, while bearing in mind that the common goal is to ensure that "solutions" resulting from research will reach users (often regional implementers, first responders, civil protection units, SMEs, individuals, etc.) in a timely and relevant fashion and be translated into "useful & used operational tools", hence contributing also to the European economy through improved competitiveness. The high number of research projects and the lack of "interfacing" mechanism make it difficult to efficiently reach this goal. This is why large-scale demonstration projects have been funded by the European Commission to improve the situation. In the field covering Disaster Risk and Crisis Management (including CBRN-E, natural and man-made disasters), two large-scale projects have the potential to help build a critical mass by federating efforts: EDEN and DRIVER (see section 1.2), as well as other projects which have an "interfacing" component. At the present stage, the wide range of sectors, disciplines and actors involved in "security” as well as "safety" issues are not sufficiently interlinked. While some specificities of each sector do not necessarily require multi-sectoral interactions (e.g. tools specific to a given hazard), general aspects related to disaster risk management are often common to all types of hazards (CBRN-E, natural and man-made). The need to build a “Community of Users” in Europe based on existing user communities has been expressed in various fora (Figure 1). In this respect, discussions with different actors have taken place over the last few months and a mapping of policies and research projects has been carried out in the light of features regarding the overall risk management cycle (preparedness / prevention, detection / surveillance, response / recovery). The results of this mapping address several needs such as proper transfer (and implementation) of research outputs to "users" in the light of specific policy requirements (formulation, implementation, review), identifying users' needs and taking them into consideration in designing research programmes. 3.2 Who are the users? Fields concerned by security, safety and resilience for societies are themselves scattered into many different disciplines and sectors. To simplify, we will distinguish five main categories of users: (a) Policy–makers; (b) Scientists; (c) Industry (including SMEs); (d) Training and Operational units; and (e) NGOs and general public: a. Policy-makers and stakeholders o At the international level, UN bodies are closely working with the EU in the fight against crime and terrorism (UNICRI), disaster risk reduction (UN-ISDR), transboundary industrial accidents (UNECE), environment protection (UNEP) etc. 14

o At the EU level, the main policy DGs concerned with Crisis Management are DGs HOME (migration and home affairs), ECHO (civil protection), SANTE (health), GROW (enterprise), ENV (environment), CLIMA (climate action), ENER (energy), MOVE (transport), TAXUD (customs), TRADE (export, trade), EEAS/FPI (external security, foreign policy instrument) and the SG (Secretariat General), as well as the Joint Research Centre (JRC) as supporting DG, see section 5 o At the Member State’s level, Ministries of Defence, Interior, Foreign Affairs, Civil Protection, Environment, Research and Industry, as well as Agencies and Regional Authorities, are concerned o Often working at the interface between policy and science, various stakeholders are involved in bridging interests of different communities, e.g. consultancy companies b. Scientists o Security research involves a wide range of scientific disciplines which have to interact, ensure complementarity and build interdisciplinary networks o Different types of scientists are to be considered (universities, research institutes, research units linked to Defence/Interior ministries or agencies) c. Industry (including SMEs) o Many industry branches and stakeholders are involved in the areas of defence, forensics, civil protection etc. Research results can benefit most first responders o Different communication approaches to be followed towards large industries and SMEs often disconnected from discussions at EU level d. Practitioners o First responders, i.e. fire brigades, emergency services, police forces, civil protection units, military units, laboratories, water/flood management etc. as well as Decision- makers (at national or regional levels) o Training centres for first responders, command control centres e. NGOs and general public o NGOs, Civil Society Organisations, public at large, education (schools) and training While some of the above actors in categories a, b and c are used to participate in international meetings, this is less frequent for SMEs (in category c) and even less for actors in categories d and e. New ways must be found to ensure that information may freely circulate “horizontally” as well as “vertically” (see p. 7) in order to fertilize all project deliverables while, at the same time, maturing them to the final operational phase (also called "usefulness & use") by end-users, and integrating them into appropriate policy implementation and development. 3.3 Why build a Community of Users? The large span of projects leads to a huge dispersion of resources as no mechanism is presently in place to establish a common platform to exchange information of public character, boost awareness and transfer of relevant (FP7 and H2020) research projects to relevant users (and to industrial/SMEs share- and stake-holders) and make them "useful and 15

used". In addition, efforts will be done to better address users' needs which will be reflected into possible inputs to research programming. Another aspect stems from the contribution of scientific progress to policy formulation, implementation and review which also requires better coordination. This awareness is readily made for the FP7 projects resulting from the Secure Societies programme (SEC), a large part of which is managed by the Research Executive Agency (REA). Information exchanges occur even less among SEC projects and projects managed by other DGs. This lack of a sharing platform led to the idea of developing a Community of Users along the principle shown in Figure 2. A Community of Users will benefit from a better coordination of information exchanges of general nature through a visible platform. This can hardly be done without resources and by the sole officials in charge of the projects. Two Demonstration Projects (EDEN for CBRN-E, DRIVER for Crisis Management) acted as catalysts for the first phase of development of such a Community of Users (2014-2015). Both projects inter alia aim to demonstrate the added value of large scale integration of solutions (related to various risks) and to support Member States' preparedness and response organisations in improving integration and information sharing in countering various threats. They have both their own specificities and user's platform in the framework of which confidential information is shared among the partners, and the proposed Community of Users will naturally not interfere with these specific fora. Other FP7 and H2020 projects have also the capacity to help the Community of User's development and contribute effectively to exchanges of information and practices. This is one of the objectives of the initiative.

Figure 2. Principles of the Community of Users

The intention of the Community of Users is hence to provide an "umbrella" at EU level (with connexions at international level) which will provide an overall outlook (based on publicly available information) of science and policy developments in the relevant sectors.

4. TARGETING READERS 4.1 Key Actors / Levels Key actors who have a role and interest in the objectives and implementation of security- related research programmes or projects include users (direct beneficiaries), as well as those responsible for ensuring that the results are produced as planned, and those who are accountable for the legal framework and resources that they provide to that programme or project3. In the field of security, three categories of stakeholders are considered as users of products, technologies, services and processes developed by suppliers in various fields of security4:

 Operators / Practitioners / End-users - Field experts who operate in their everyday duties the security products, technologies and services purchased by customers for the benefit of the general public, e.g. first responders (firefighters, policemen, medical personnel), border control agents, etc. In many projects, the terms operators, practitioners and end-users can be used indistinctly whereas the term users covers a wider concept in which end-users are part of as a distinct subcategory. Operators as practitioners and end-users rather have a technology point of view and take the perspective of support to the products and technologies. They represent the backbone of the innovation system and infrastructure.  Customers - Persons, companies, or other public and private entities which take decisions on purchasing the products, technologies, services and implementation of processes to be used by operators for the benefit of the general public, e.g. airport managers, public health agencies, civil protection authorities, hospitals. They are interested in the functionality of innovative solutions and make decisions on the uptake of such solutions.  Consumers / General public - EU citizens who benefit from the security products, technologies, services and processes and pay for them indirectly (e.g. through paying taxes, buying flight tickets, paying for health care services, drugs and vaccines, etc.). The general public today has increasing opportunities to influence the design, introduction and trajectory of new technologies and services in both private and public sectors. Consumers also have the ability to directly influence innovation and encourage the development of new technologies. In recent years, there has been a growing emphasis by governments on the importance of collaboration with citizens and service users as drivers for innovation to improve service delivery5.

3 UN Development Programme. Glossary; http://web.undp.org/evaluation/documents/mae-glo.htm 4 Vybornova O. et al: A Proposed Framework for Uptake by Security EU&O of Innovation Management Practices. Report of FP7-SEC-ARCHIMEDES project "Support for Security End-Users", grant agreement N°: 285061, 2012 5 The OECD Innovation Strategy: Getting a Head Start on Tomorrow - © OECD 2010 17

4.2 Communication channels Targeting readers and ensuring appropriate communication channels should hence consider the point of view of:

- The above specified 3 categories of users of security products, technologies, services and processes. - Technology suppliers: academic researchers, RTOs, SMEs and large industry. - Regulators and policy-makers, i.e., members of European, intergovernmental and/or governmental regulatory agencies that ensure compliance with laws, regulations, established rules, as well as individuals who set the plan pursued by a European, intergovernmental and/or governmental institution level, having the authority to set the policy framework of an organisation.

These different categories and subcategories of stakeholders are illustrated in Figure 3.

Security Stakeholders

Regulators and policy makers

Technology Suppliers Users (i.e., Direct Beneficiaries)

- RTOs - Operators (Practioners, Endusers) - SMEs, Industries - Research centres - Customers - Academia… - Consumers

Figure 3. Categories of Security Stakeholders

5. POLICY BACKGROUND 5.1 General framework A large span of sectors and policies cover secure, safe and resilient society's issues in a direct or indirect way, either by providing legally-binding frameworks of actions by EU Member States in the form of Directives, general frameworks in the form of Communications or technical specifications in the form of Decisions, for example. Figure 4 gives an illustration of the different "families" of EU General Directorates as well as Intergovernmental Agencies.

Figure 4. The EU Policy Landscape

Crisis Management policies follow an integrated approach for the management of natural and man-made hazards focusing on disaster risk reduction (prevention and preparedness) and disaster response. The policy is mainly represented by the EU Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM)6, and the operational dimension is coordinated by the Emergency Response Coordination Centre (ERCC). Disaster risk management is also addressed through the EU Internal Security Strategy7 and the resulting European Agenda on Security adopted in April 20158 (DG HOME) and Consumer Health Protection policies (DG SANCO)9. In addition,

6 Decision 1313/2013 7 Internal Security Strategy for the European Union: Towards a Eropean Security Model, 5842/2/2010 8 The European Agenda on Security, COM(2015) 185 final 9 Decision 1082/2013 19

climate-related disasters are covered by environmental and climate policies (DG ENV, in particular the Flood Directive10 and DG CLIMA through the EU climate change adaptation strategy11). Finally, intergovernmental agencies are also involved in security policies, namely the European External Action Service (EEAS) – which implements the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy – and Europol – which is the EU Law Enforcement Agency. Both agencies assist EU Member States. There are also links with the Council Decision 2014/415/EU on the arrangements for the implementation by the Union of the solidarity clause, which covers response, situational awareness and analysis and threat assessment at Union level. Other key EU policies concern industrial competitiveness and innovation, namely the EU Industrial Policy12 which aims to boost industrial competitiveness and innovation (thus the access to market of developed technologies) and the EU research policy represented by Horizon202013. With regards to CBRN-E, the key EU policy is represented by the CBRN Action Plan14 (DG HOME) and the EU Action Plan on Enhancing the Security of Explosives15 which are to expire at the end of 2015; the Regulation 98/2013 on the Marketing and Use of Explosives Precursors16 has entered into force and is directly applicable to all MS. Other EU policies include CBRN as a focal point, namely in the sectors of Civil Protection and Consumer Health Protection (see above), as well as Energy Infrastructure and Transport Networks17 (DGs ENER and MOVE), Customs18 (DG TAXUD), Environment and Industrial Risks19 (DG ENV) and International Cooperation, e.g. CBRN-E Centres of Excellence (DG DEVCO). Complementary to EU policies, international policies are also active in Disaster Risk and Crisis Management. In the case of CBRN-E, various conventions exist, namely the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540, the Chemical Weapon Convention (CWC controlled by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, OPCW), the Biological and Toxin Weapon Convention (BTWC without control mechanisms), and the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT controlled by the International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA). In the field of Disaster Risk Management, Disaster Risk Reduction has been the core action line of the United Nations Hyogo Framework for Action on how to mitigate the impact of natural and man-made disasters, now continued by the Sendai Framework for Action setting priorities for the 2015-2025 period, among which the promotion of a better understanding of disaster risk management through the building, sharing and development of knowledge and the strengthening of the policy-science interface at local, national, regional and global levels. The implementation of these policies represents a complex and ambitious challenge as they involve a wide variety of players whereas each Member State often follows specific national approaches (national action plans) for dealing with crises and are also differently organised

10 Directive 2007/60/EC 11 COM (2013) 216 final 12 COM(2012) 417 final 13 Horizon2020 14 COM(2009) 273 final and COM(2014) 247 final 15 Doc. 8109/08 16 Regulation 98/2013 17 Regulation 347/2013 and Decision 661/2010 18 COM(2012) 793 final 19 Directive 2012/18/EU 20

in terms of disaster risk management capabilities. The EU framework represents a means and a real opportunity to discuss possible ways to improve coordination among the various national approaches and develop a common EU vision strengthened by a joint strategy in this field. The development of a Community of Users is, in this respect, an essential component to bring together key scientific, policy and industry actors, as well as other stakeholders (e.g. first responders, police representatives, fire fighters, civil protection units) around this common vision and strategy. This is closely linked to the EU industrial policy20 under the responsibility of DG GROW, the EU research policy21 coordinated by DG R&I and involving DG HOME (Secure Societies Programme), DG CNECT and JRC, the EU civil protection policy managed by DG ECHO, as well as the EU environmental and climate policies coordinated by DG ENV and CLIMA respectively. 5.2 EU Civil Protection Mechanism and related international policies The UCPM22 aims to facilitate reinforced cooperation between the EU and the Member States and to facilitate coordination in the field of civil protection, in order to improve the effectiveness of systems for preventing, preparing for and responding to natural and man- made disasters. It supports and complements the efforts of the Member States for the protection, primarily of people but also of the environment and property, including cultural heritage, in the event of natural and man-made disasters, acts of terrorism and technological, radiological or environmental accidents, including marine pollution. Built upon these policy instruments, the UCPM is about developing an integrated approach to disaster management. The EU action is based on the principles of solidarity. The overall mechanism takes due consideration of laws and international commitments, and exploit synergies with relevant Union initiatives such as the European Earth Observation Programmes (Copernicus), the European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP) and the Common Information Sharing Environment (CISE). The mechanism is based on the Emergency Response Coordination Centre (ERCC) and the European Emergency Response Capacity (EERC) in the form of voluntary pool of pre-committed capacities from the Member States, trained experts, a Common Emergency Communication and Information System (CECIS) managed by the Commission and contact points in the MS. It also recognises the role of regional and local authorities in disaster management. Outside the Union, disaster response is coordinated with the United Nations and other relevant international actors with reference to Council Regulation No 1257/96 concerning humanitarian aid23. Finally, the use of military means under civilian leads as a last resort may constitute an important contribution to disaster response. On technical grounds, the UCPM is working towards a general policy framework on disaster risk prevention aimed at achieving a higher level of protection and resilience against disasters by preventing or reducing their effects and by fostering a culture of prevention. From this perspective, it promotes the review of risk assessment, risk management planning conducted at national/regional level and the development of an integrated approach, linking risk prevention, preparedness and response actions. On the basis of information received from the EU Member States, the European Commission establishes and regularly updates a

20 COM (2010) 2020 final 21 COM (2011) 152 final 22 Council Decision 2007/779/EC, OJ L 314, 1.12.2007 23 Council Regulation No 1257/96, OJ L 163, 2.7.1996 21

cross-sectoral risk overview. Among its priorities is the action to 'improve the knowledge base on disaster risks and facilitate the sharing of knowledge, best practices and information24. The UCPM is closely related to the Sendai Framework for Action 2015-202525 "Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters" which is the successor of the Hyogo Framework for Action adopted by 168 UN Member States that voluntarily committed to work towards achieving its objectives, in particular improving disaster resilience and disaster risk reduction as a necessary ingredient for the achievement of poverty reduction and sustainable development. The Sendai Framework for Action sets out an ambitious set of priorities to place disaster risk reduction as a key element of sustainable development efforts, to define further steps to reduce existing and emerging risks and foster disaster resilience. As stressed in Council Conclusions on this matter, the EU supports a framework which strengthens the contribution of disaster risk management to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by promoting the use and development of innovative technologies and encouraging a more systematic and reinforced science-policy interface in disaster risk management. These objectives are supported by IPCC recommendations expressed in the special report on extreme events26. The UCPM is also financing actions related to preventing, preparing for and responding to disasters. These include: an important EU Civil protection training programme, regular large- scale exercises and modules exercises, exchange of experts, prevention and preparedness projects (through annual calls for applications27), logistical and transport support for response missions, deployment of coordination, assessment or advisory missions, adaptation and certification of assets to be included in the Voluntary Pool, the availability of buffer capacities under the Voluntary Pool (additional assets than those made available by the Member States). In the area of marine pollution these actions are coordinated with the European Maritime Safety Agency and the regional sea conventions. 5.3 Critical Infrastructure Protection The new approach to the European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection28 (EPCIP) is built on a review of the 2006 programme and the Council Directive 2008/114/EC29 on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection. It aims to ensure a high degree of protection of EU infrastructures and increase their resilience (against all threats and hazards). It looks at interdependencies between critical infrastructures, industry and state actors, taking account of the cross border dimension and interdependencies between sectors (e.g. European high- voltage electricity grid). The EPCIP established (1) procedures for the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and assessment of the need to improve their protection (Directive 2008/114/EC); (2) measures to facilitate its implementation, including an action plan, CIWIN, CIP expert groups at EU level and information sharing process; (3) funding for CIP-related measures and projects focussing on 'Prevention, Preparedness and

24 Art.5.1(a), Council Decision No. 1313/2013/EU, Official Journal of the European Union, L347, 20.12.2013 25 Sendai FA 26 SREX report, IPCC 27 http://ec.europa.eu/echo/en/funding-evaluations/financing-civil-protection-europe/selected-projects 28 SWD(2013) 318 final 29 Council Directive 2008/114/EC, OL L345/75 22

Consequence Management of Terrorism and other Security Related Risks'; and (4) an external dimension for engagement with third countries on CIP. At the time of publication of the revised approach (2013), less than 20 European Critical Infrastructures had been designated and hence very few Operator Security Plans had been produced; the number of ECI designated has since increased substantially. The Directive 2008/114/EC has mainly encouraged bilateral engagement of Member States instead of a real European forum for cooperation – the sector-focused approach of the directive represents a challenge to a number of MS as in practice the analysis of criticalities is not confined to sectoral boundaries and follows rather a 'system' or 'service' approach (e.g. hospitals, financial services). There is a need for a cross-sectoral approach development. In practical terms, development of preparedness strategies are based around contingency planning, stress tests, awareness raising, training, joint courses, exercises and staff exchange. The programme also promotes the dialogue between the operators of the critical infrastructures and those who rely upon them in order to better prepare responses to events affecting European critical infrastructures. The gaps identified in the review of the EPCIP led the Commission to present its new approach to the implementation of the EPCIP in 2013, with a greater focus on interdependencies and proposing practical work with four critical infrastructures of a European dimension (Eurocontrol, Galileo, the electricity transmission grid and the gas transmission network). The guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure30 are built upon the Communication of 28 February 2011 entitled 'Energy infrastructure priorities for 2020 and beyond – A blueprint for an integrated European energy network'; it stipulates that the Union's energy infrastructure should be upgraded in order to prevent technical failure and to increase its resilience against such failure, natural or man-made disasters, adverse effects of climate change and threats to its security, in particular as regards European Critical Infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection. Creating the environment for safe transport is essential for European citizens. EU transport policies31 cover a wide range of security and safety policies in the air, road, maritime and rail areas which all relate to technical standards for preventing / detection risks and responding to major threats, including terrorist attacks, crimes and accidents. In order to maintain proper security levels cooperation with third countries is paramount and the Commission consolidates and strengthens security by working together with major international partners, exchanging experiences and best practices. Security in transport also relies on new technologies that can really assist in developing smooth high-security systems for the future but without making the security checks too long and intense.

30 Regulation (EU) no 347/2013 of 17 April 2013, OJ L115/39 of 25.04.2013 31 Transport 23

5.4 CBRN and Explosives From the above, it is clear that Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear and Explosive (CBRN-E) threats are covered by a range of policies. In views of improving coordination of actions related to CBRN-E risk management, the European Commission has issued strategic documents which main features are described below regarding technical challenges. 5.4.1 CBRN Action Plan The CBRN Action Plan aimed to ensure that unauthorised access to CBRN materials of concern is as difficult as possible. Prevention is based on robust risk-assessment processes, which include the prioritisation, security and control of high-risk CBRN materials and facilities, developing a high-security culture of staff, improving the security of transport, information exchange, import and export regimes, and strengthening cooperation on the security of nuclear materials. Key Actions defined in the Plan are designed to reduce threat and damage from CBRN incidents of accidental, natural and intentional origin, including terrorist threats. It is a political commitment which may be seen as a roadmap of intentions guided by principles of EU solidarity (the responsibility of protecting populations against CBRN incidents lays with the Member States), EU added value (respecting principles of subsidiarity and proportionality), based on existing regulations and instruments, and in close consultation with national authorities. Actions are based on risk- and threat assessments and cost-effective assessments. Confidentiality of certain types of information is taken into account. Actions have been financially supported by expired and existing Union programmes and fund32,33. The plan aims to efficiently respond to incidents involving CBRN materials and recover from them as quickly as possible. Specific attention is made to CBRN emergency planning, strengthening countermeasure capacity, reinforcing information flows, developing better modelling tools and improving criminal investigation capacity. The plan focuses on the required capability to detect CBRN materials in order to prevent or respond to CBRN incidents. This is related to the development of minimum detection standards to be applied across the entire EU, establishing trialling, testing and certification schemes for CBRN detection and improving the exchange of good practices on the detection of CBRN materials. The Plan promotes a scenario-based/modelling approach at EU level to identify work priorities in the detection field (identification of CBRN material and detection technologies), wide risk assessment (including events with cross-border effects) built on existing scenarios and national experience, and gap analysis; it supports the exchange of methods and procedures for developing scenarios and modelling, interconnecting detectors at national levels where feasible including data on incidents, coordination of exercises and lessons learnt. It also promotes a mechanism of information exchange among Member States on methodologies of scenario development related to sampling and detection, taking appropriate confidentiality into account. In the specific area of biological pathogens and toxins, the Plan promotes the development of detection models, considering distribution, possible vectors, infectious dose and stability.

32 OJ L 58, 24.2.2007, p.1-6 - Prevention, Preparedness and Consequence Management of Terrorism and other Security related risks 33 OJ L 150, 20.5.2014, p. 93 – Internal Security Fund - Police 24

The CBRN Action Plan is complemented by the new EU approach to the detection and mitigation of CBRN-E risks which adopts a proactive approach to the detection of threats, and proposes among others to put effective, proportional safeguards in place, including prevention, preparedness and response measures at EU level with the objective to better assess the risks, to develop countermeasures, to share knowledge and best practices, test and validate new safeguards with the ultimate goal of adopting new security standards. The response mechanisms within the CBRN Action Plan are linked to various EU policy instruments such as the EU Mechanism for Civil Protection (see section 5.2), the EU Integrated Political Crisis Response Arrangements (IPCR), the implementation of the Solidarity Clause, the ARGUS crisis management system allowing for an immediate exchange of information among Commission rapid alert systems such as the ECURIE system for radiological emergencies, the Early Warning and Response System (EWRS) for communicable diseases, and the RAS-BICHAT for biological and chemical health threat. 5.4.2 Explosive Action Plan and Regulation 98/2013 The enhancement of the security of explosives has been identified as a priority issue for the European Commission in its efforts in the field of combating terrorism. Home-made explosives can be fabricated from certain easily accessible chemical precursors and can be misused by terrorists to inflict casualties and damage. In order to mitigate the risk of such misuse, in 2008 the Justice and Home Affairs Council approved the EU Action Plan on Enhancing the Security of Explosives. The Action Plan thus contributes to the implementation of the EU Counter Terrorism Strategy (2005) and is in line with the Internal Security Strategy (2010). The EU Explosives Action Plan contains 48 measures related to the prevention, detection, and preparedness and response to explosives-related incidents. The recommendations for action address a comprehensive range of relevant aspects, such as precursors, storage, transport, traceability, detection, research, information exchange, and inter-agency coordination. A first set of horizontal measures aims at improving the exchange of timely information and best practices, and supporting and promoting research, including research into inhibitors to precursors. A second set of measures focuses on prevention around explosives precursors, by raising staff awareness, increasing control over substances and explosives available on the market (including pyrotechnics), and establishing a mechanism for reporting suspicious transactions. Other prevention measures cover the security of explosives facilities and transport, as well as the security vetting of personnel at any stage in the supply chain. The action plan calls, in addition, for increased efforts to reduce the presence of bomb-making information over the internet. A third set of actions focuses on the detection of explosives threats. The plan has as a priority to establish a scenario-based approach to identifying priorities in the detection field, notably to identify detection technology requirements, current equipment that is available, and common minimum detection standards which should be applied. In the area of detection, the action plan recognises that there is an urgent need for improved exchange of information between authorities, researchers, and end- users, particularly in order to establish an EU-wide certification, testing and trialling scheme for the detection of explosives, and to continuously reassess the use of detection technologies in specific locations. Finally, a set of preparedness and response measures call on the creation of a network which improves the exchange of information and best practices 25

among explosives ordnance disposal units in Europe, and also supports the development of threat assessments on explosives and on specific threats. The actions contained in the EU Explosives Action Plan are implemented through a joint effort of the European Commission, Member States, Europol, research institutions as well as private sector stakeholders. DG HOME aimed at fully achieving implementation by the end of 2015. One of the key actions of the EU Explosives Action Plan called on the Commission to consider measures to regulate the availability of explosives precursors on the market. As a result of the work done to implement this action, Regulation (EU) 98/2013 on the marketing and use of explosives precursors was adopted with a view to enhancing the protection of citizens from the threat of homemade explosives. Regulation 98/2013 came into force on 2 September 2014. It restricts availability, possession and use, by members of the general public, of seven dangerous substances ('restricted explosives precursors,' listed in Annex I). Member States may decide to grant access by the public to these substances only through a system of licenses and registration. In addition, the Regulation introduces obligations for economic operators who place such substances on the market. Operators must ensure the appropriate labelling of restricted explosives precursors, and must also report any suspicious transactions involving both the seven restricted substances and eight other non-restricted substances which are also considered of concern (listed in Annex II). 5.4.3 International Conventions At international level, the EU strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD strategy), together with relevant Community Instruments, in particular the Instrument for Stability (supporting third countries to develop training and assistance on CBRN risk mitigation and preparedness), reinforces actions on reducing the risks from CBRN materials. This is linked to nuclear non-proliferation for strengthening nuclear security34. Furthermore, the Implementation of the UN Security Council Resolution 1540 will be further strengthened by supporting the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), in particular contributing to more efficient export control and border monitoring systems. Regional Centres of Excellence will be instrumental in order to exchange best practices, support capacity building and share experiences gathered at EU level with key regions. Issues related to the threat of CBRN materials are also discussed by international organisations such as the Organisation for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), the BTWC Conference, Interpol and the Global Health Security Initiative (GHSI). 5.5 Major accident hazards Major accidents can have consequences beyond the limits of industrial establishments and the human, ecological and economic costs of an accident are borne not only by the establishment affected, but also by the society concerned. It is therefore necessary to establish and apply safety and risk-reduction measures to prevent possible accidents, to reduce the risks of accidents occurring and to minimise the effects if they do occur, thereby making it possible to ensure a high level of protection throughout the Union.

34 COM(2009) 143 final, 26.03.2009 26

The Directive 2012/18/EU (on major-accidents hazards involving dangerous substances)35 sets risk management goal oriented objectives based on the fact that operators are obliged to take all necessary measures to prevent major accidents and to limit their consequences for human health or the environment. The Directive 2012/18/EU is better known as the so- called "Seveso III" directive; it replaced the previous Directive 96/82/EC ("Seveso II") which was repealed in May 2015. The Directive lays down rules for the prevention of major accidents which involve dangerous substances and the limitation of their consequences for human health and the environment, and criteria for the obligations are based on the maximum amounts of the hazardous substances that are, or are likely to be present in the establishment (industrial plant) in the potential course of the accident. The Directive is focused on the un-intentional (accidental, including natural hazards) potential events in the establishments, thus usually not related to the intentional acts (attacks) and is excluding the military establishments, pipelines, as well as the transportation outside establishments. It does not focus on the cause of an (unintentional or intentional) accident but is rather impact-oriented. The safety report has to consider operational causes, natural causes and external causes (although the text does not explicitly mention causes such as sabotage), and is complemented by CIP regulations for attack-prone installations. At international level, the Convention on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial Accidents (TEIA)36 of UNECE (UN Economic Commission for Europe) is designed to protect people and the environment against industrial accidents, aiming to prevent accidents from occurring, or reducing their frequency and severity and mitigating their effects if required. The Convention promotes active international cooperation between countries before, during and after an industrial accident. It therefore closely cooperates with the EU, in particular in the framework of the Seveso III Directive implementation. The TEIA has also close links with the Sendai Framework for Action (see section 5.2). 5.6 Serious cross-border threats to health The protection of human health is a matter which has a cross-cutting dimension and is relevant to numerous Union policies and activities. The Commission should ensure, in liaison with the Member States, the coordination and exchange of information between the mechanisms and structures established under the Decision 1082/2013/EU on serious cross- border threats to health4 as well as activities which are relevant to the preparedness and response planning, monitoring, early warning of, and combating serious cross-border threats to health. Pursuant to Decision 2119/98/EC a network for the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases in the Community has been set up. Apart from communicable diseases, a number of other sources of danger to health, in particular related to other biological or chemical agents or environmental events, which include hazards related to climate change, could by reason of their scale or severity, endanger the health of citizens in the entire Union, lead to the malfunctioning of critical sectors of society and the economy and jeopardise an individual Member State's capacity to react. The legal

35 Directive 2012/18/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on major-accidents hazards involving dangerous substances, amending and subsequently repealing Council Directive 96/82/EC, Official Jornal of the EU, No. L 197/1, 24.7.2012. 36 http://www.unece.org/env/teia.html

framework set up under the above Decision should, therefore, be extended to cover other threats and provide for a coordinated wider approach to health security at Union level. In the context of this Decision, an important role in the coordination of recent crises of Union relevance has been played by an informal group composed of high-level representatives from Member States, referred to as the Health Security Committee, and established on the basis of the Presidency Conclusions of 15 November 2001 on bioterrorism. The Decision promotes preparedness and response planning through consultation among the Member States and the Commission in order to share best practice and experience, as well as interoperability of national preparedness planning and addressing the intersectoral dimension of preparedness and response planning at Union level. The Health Security Committee plays an important role in responding to health threats (notably in terms of crisis preparation, exercises on CBRN events and the listing of pathogens and chemicals which pose a health threat) whilst the European Centre for Disease and Control (ECDC) provides risk assessments for communicable diseases and biological incidents. 5.7 EU Adaptation Strategy to Climate Change The EU Adaptation Strategy to Climate Change highlights the consequences of climate change and the need for adaptation measures. It focuses on early, planned and coordinated action rather than reactive adaptation. The communication highlights the need for systematic exchanges of best practice on how to best adapt to climate change. The strategy takes account of global climate change impacts such as disruptions to supply chains or impaired access to raw materials, energy and food supplies. The overall aim is to contribute to a more climate resilient Europe by enhancing the preparedness and capacity to respond to the impacts of climate change at local, regional, national and EU levels, developing a coherent approach and improving coordination. This strategy is closely linked to national adaptation strategies which are considered as recommended instruments by the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. A close coordination between climate change adaptation and disaster risk management / policies is also required. Development is foreseen of guidelines on minimum standards for disaster prevention based on good practices. The requirement for "climate-proofing" and mainstreaming of adaption measures in various sectors also calls for strengthened preparedness and science-policy links. The strategy makes reference, in particular, to the Marine Framework Directive (Directive 2008/56/EC)37 and various environmental policies, related to e.g. Forestry (EC Regulation 2152/2003), Water (Directives listed in the COM(2012)673 on the Blueprint to Safeguard Europe's Water Resources38), as well as other sectors such as Transport (Decision 661/2010/EC), Energy (COM(2011)665/3), and the above described Disaster Risk Prevention (within the Union Civil Protection mechanism) and Health (Decision 1082/2013).

37 Directive 2008/56/EC 38 COM(2012) 673 final 28

5.8 Water and Marine policies Linked to the above, specific policy instruments are in place in the water sector related to extreme hydrometeorological events such as floods and droughts. In the first place, complementing the Water Framework Directive (WFD)39 (and its daughter Directives, namely the Priority Substances Directive40 and the Groundwater Directive41), flood prevention and management are tackled by the Flood Directive which requires EU Member States to assess and manage flood risks, with the aim of reducing adverse consequences for human health, the environment, cultural heritage and economic activity associated with floods in Europe. This directive has to be coordinated with the implementation of the WFD from the second river basin management plan onward (which will take place from 2015 to 2021). It therefore provides a comprehensive mechanism for assessing and monitoring increased risks of flooding, taking into account the possible impacts of climate change, and for developing appropriate adaptation approaches. Water scarcity and droughts are also considered in the policy context42. In particular, a European assessment of water scarcity and droughts has been conducted by the European Commission in the framework of the Water Scarcity and Drought Communication to monitor changes across Europe and to identify where further action is needed in response to climate change. Recommendations have been taken on board in the Blueprint to Safeguard Europe’s Water Resources. It may, therefore, be considered that the successive steps of the WFD River Basin Management Planning (RBMP) and the related flood and drought policy framework may conveniently incorporate adaptation to climate-related water risks through risk assessment, monitoring, environmental objective setting, economic analysis and action programmes to achieve well defined environmental objective.

The Drinking Water Directive (DWD)43 regulates the quality of water intended for human consumption. The Directive is currently under evaluation as a follow-up of the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) Right2Water44. The policy concerns the quality of drinking water from around 100,000 water supplies. It aims to protect human health by ensuring that drinking water at the consumer tap is wholesome and clean. It lays down essential quality standards at EU level, for which monitoring programmes have to be performed. For any failure remedial action has to be taken. Its intervention logic was to address all possible contamination causes, including from treatment and distribution, by setting strict minimum parametric values to be complied with at the consumer tap. It thus implicitely includes deliberate poisoining risks. The abstraction of drinking water and the protection of water bodies for this aim is, however, not regulated in the DWD, but in Article 7 of the above mentioned Water Framework Directive (WFD), which requires Member States to identify bodies of water for the abstraction of drinking water and to protect them, so that the resulting water will meet the DWD requirements under the water treatment regime applied.

39 Directive 2000/60/EC 40 Directive xxxxx 41 Directive xxxxx 42 COM(2007) 414 final 43 Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption, OJ L 330, 5.12.1998, p. 32 44 Communication from the Commission on the European Citizens' Initiative "Water and sanitation are a human right! Water is a public good, not a commodity!" COM/2014/0177 final 29

Finally, while the protection of the (coastal) marine environment is covered by the WFD, EU environmental policymakers considered there was a lack of strategy underpinning the policies to protect the marine environment. A strategy was thus developed in the sixth Environmental Action Programme (2002-2012) which resulted in setting up environmental objectives for the marine environment. The related protection regime is regulated under the EU Marine Strategy which was adopted in 200845. 5.9 Control of export and Union Custom Code The Council Regulation (EC) no 428/2009 on a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items46 is setting rules that Member States have to apply to control the transfer of certain dual-use items within the Community in order to safeguard public policy or public security. This includes the effectiveness of controls on exports from the Community and those items which only pass through the territory of the Community (i.e. not assigned to a customs-approved treatment or use other than the external transit procedure or placed in a free zone or warehouse with no record of them). EU customs policy for security and trade facilitation47 aim to facilitate legitimate trade whilst applying the level of controls necessary for guaranteeing the safety and security of citizens and protecting the public health, environment, financial and economic interests of the EU and its Member States. The increase in global terrorism has expanded customs to become a major player in the field of supply chain security. The deployment of detection technologies plays an essential role. 5.10 Border security (to be checked / complemented) xxxxx Communication "Examining the creation of a European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR)" (COM(2008) 68 final) SHORT DESCRIPTION In this framework, support needed in the area of border security targeted the development of technologies and capabilities which are required to enhance systems, equipment, tools, processes, and methods for rapid identification to improve border security, whilst respecting human rights and privacy. This includes both control and surveillance issues, contributing to the further development of the EUROSUR and promoting an enhanced use of new technology for border checks; also in relation to the Smart Borders legislative initiative (for both EUROSUR and the Smart Borders, the Commission published the initial relevant communications on 13 February 2008).

At sea, the main technical challenge was identified in the detection and identification of small non cooperative vessels (and of their anomalous behaviour). At the system level the identified priority was to improve the sharing of information amongst actors active in maritime surveillance. A close interactive dialogue has taken place with other Commission DGs (DG HOME, DG MARE, DG JRC, DG MOVE) as well as with EU agencies (Frontex, EMSA and EDA). This helps the setting by the Frontex Agency of CONOPS (concepts of operations) as related to the detection small boats detection.

45 EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive, 2008/56/EC 46 OJ L 134/1 of 29.05.2009 47 Regulation (EU) no 952/2013 30

5.11 Fight against crime and terrorism Regarding the fight against crime and terrorism, the European Commission is not in charge of operational activities but supports and facilitates the activities of the security practitioners at the EU level.

The main policy framework for this action is provided by the European Agenda on Security (COM(2015) 185 final) adopted on 28th April 2015, which provides strategic focus for the EU and Member States for the overall goal of strengthening the Union's security framework. The three pillars of the Union's action to obtain this goal are: to strengthen the information exchange; to increase the operational cooperation; and to provide support in training, funding, research and innovation. The main thematic priorities listed in the Agenda are: terrorism, organised crime and cybercrime.

A Communication on the delivery of the Agenda on Security (COM(2016) 230 final) has been adopted in April 2016. It acknowledges the common position of the European Parliament, the EU Ministers for Justice and Home Affairs and the Commission to press ahead with the measures foreseen and to deepen the fight against terrorism. For this reason, the Communication, one year on from the presentation of the Agenda, takes stock of the progress that has been made in its implementation as concerns the EU contribution to counter-terrorism.

In addition to the Agenda, a number of more specific EU legislative and policy documents apply in the area of fight against crime and terrorism. Two of the most relevant ones are the Regulation (EU) No 98/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2013 on the marketing and use of explosives precursors, and the Communication COM(2016) 379 final on supporting the prevention of radicalisation leading to violent extremism.

Also, on 13 and 14 December 2011, the Council approved conclusions (17537/11 ENFOPOL 413 COPEN 342) on the vision for European Forensic Science 2020 including the creation of a European Forensic Science Area and the development of forensic science infrastructure in Europe. Their aim was to foster cooperation between police and judicial authorities across the European. An action plan has been developed under the Dutch presidency which should be adopted as Council conclusions in June 2016.

Furthermore, the Commission assists EU Member States in the implementation of existing legal instruments such as e.g. the Data Retention Directive, the Decision on access for consultation of the Visa Information System etc.[1]. The EC also participates in specialised working groups of the Council such as COSI, and agencies such as Europol and CEPOL.

Finally support to security practitioners is also granted via the financing of national and multi-national projects that enhance police cooperation, including among police networks.

6. EU-FUNDING INSTRUMENTS - RESEARCH AND CAPACITY-BUILDING 6.1 Introduction As highlighted in section 4.1, EU research funding is orchestrated by different "research families", namely various programmes of DG RTD, DG CNECT and DG HOME, as well as research actions undertaken by the Joint Research Centre (JRC). Other funding instruments focus on capacity-building and training (e.g. prevention, preparedness and response projects in disaster risk management funded by DG ECHO, security-related projects funded by DG HOME) but they will not be developed in this document. Linked to EU research actions, the European Defense Agency (EDA) funds research projects with interactions with DG HOME funded projects under the so-called European Framework Cooperation (EFC). While research programming and policy responsibilities lay with the respective General- Directorates of the European Commission, the management of projects is increasingly delegated to "sister" agencies, namely the Research Executive Agency (REA) and the Executive Agency for SMEs (EASME). 6.2 Horizon 2020 Horizon 2020 is the biggest EU Research and Innovation programme ever with nearly €80 billion of funding available over 7 years (2014 to 2020) – in addition to the private investment that this money will attract. It promises more breakthroughs, discoveries and world-firsts by taking great ideas from the lab to the market. Horizon 2020 is the financial instrument implementing the Innovation Union, a Europe 2020 flagship initiative aimed at securing Europe's global competitiveness. By coupling research and innovation, Horizon 2020 is helping to achieve this with its emphasis on excellent science, industrial leadership and tackling societal challenges. The goal is to ensure Europe produces world-class science, removes barriers to innovation and makes it easier for the public and private sectors to work together in delivering innovation. In the Security area, Horizon 2020 will contribute to the implementation of the policy goals of the Europe 2020 strategy, the Security Industrial Policy, the Internal Security Strategy, the Cyber Security Strategy48, the Union Civil Protection Mechanism, as well as supporting the various above-mentioned thematic policies. The primary aim of the Work Programme on "Secure societies – Protecting freedom and security of Europe and its citizens" is to enhance the awareness, preparedness and resilience of our society against natural and man-made disasters. Crisis Management (including CBRN-E, natural and man-made disaster risk management) related research will be considered in various topics focusing on new crisis management tools, novel solutions for the protection of critical infrastructure, and new forensic tools for fighting crime and terrorism.

The current EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation is built up upon achievements of the 7th Framework Programme, which mapping is focused upon and which embedded serveral programmes of direct or indirect relevance to secure, safe and resilient societies, namely:

 Xxxxxx

48 COM (2013) 48 final 32

 Xxxxxxx  Xxxxxx  Xxxxxxx  Xxxxxxx  xxxxx TO BE ADDED: details on the different H2020 programmes dealing with DR/Crisis Mgt/BES/FCT issues

6.3 DG ECHO Text on ECHO capacity-building & training funding programme will be added

6.4 DG HOME / ISF The goal of the Internal Security Fund, managed by DG HOME, is to contribute to ensuring a high level of security in the EU. One of two general objectives is enhancing the capacity of EU States and the Union for managing effectively security-related risk and crisis, and preparing for protecting people and critical infrastructure against terrorist attacks and other security related incidents. In this context the Fund co-finances projects in the areas of CBRN-E, critical infrastructure protection as well as crisis management. The projects are supposed to be much more operational than those funded under the Horizon 2020. The majority of the funds are implemented via the shared management, nevertheless the Commission directly manages – as union actions – around 1/3 of the total budget (which for the 2014-20 period, slightly over EUR 1 billion). These funds will have to cover however all security-related priorities, i.e. apart from above-mentioned areas, also fight against organized crime and police cooperation mechanisms. 6.5 DG DEVCO - CoE As a matter of new international priority, the European Union decided in 2010 to launch and fund a new concept called "CBRN Risk Mitigation Centers of Excellence (CoE)", based on a voluntary, cross border, local ownership and, last but not least, bottom up approach. As of today, 52 partner countries joined the initiative, coordinated around 8 regional secretariats based Georgia, Jordan, Algeria, Morocco, Kenya, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan and The Philippines launched its chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) Centres of Excellence (CoE) initiative (hereinafter the initiative) in May 2010. The initiative is designed to strengthen the institutional capacity of non‑EU countries to mitigate CBRN risks which, if not countered, may constitute a threat to the EU. The origin of these risks can be criminal (proliferation, theft, sabotage and illicit trafficking), accidental (industrial catastrophes, in particular chemical or nuclear, waste treatment and transport) or natural (pandemics but also consequence of natural hazards on CBRN material and facilities). With a budget of 250 million euro for the 2010–2020 period, the initiative is the single biggest measure of the long‑term component of the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP). The IcSP was designed to provide the European Union with a new strategic tool to address a number of global security and development challenges. The IcSP provides non‑EU partner countries with technical and financial assistance for risk mitigation and preparedness relating to chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear material or agents. According to the European Parliament and the Council, the measures adopted through the IcSP should be complementary and consistent with measures adopted in pursuit of the EU’s common foreign and security policy. The main objectives of the EU CBRN Centres of Excellence initiative are tο strengthen the long‑term national and regional CBRN governance and capabilities of responsible authorities and administrative infrastructure. The CoE initiative is a provider of tools and means for increased CBRN governance. It facilitates CBRN governmental officials from partner countries, belonging to all relevant ministries and agencies involved in CBRN governance, to meet regularly at the national level but also twice a year at the regional level between CBRN (round tables). This cross agency cooperation is key to stimulate further networking and has been much appreciated by partner countries. It funding for CBRN activities identified and agreed by partner countries during these regional round tables meetings. By implementing 34

these activities, Member States come together and work to create action and provide CBRN governance support. More than fifty CoE projects have been funded in the last 5 years. These activities include a wide variety of formats, such as workshops and trainings, train the trainers programmes, capacity building or even equipment. Interagency cooperation, team building and support for CBRN administrative reforms are also part of these activities. Furthermore, the CoE provides a funding platform and a sound methodology to first assess CRBN gaps needs at the national levels (NAQs with hundreds of supporting questions) which is activated only upon request from a partner country, and, secondly, a methodology to develop CBRN National Action Plans based on the needs assessments. Results are fully confidential and belong entirely to the country.In the last two years, more than 25 partner countries completed their CBRN needs assessments and more than 15 started to develop their own National Action Plans. Some of the first NAPs developed within the initiative will be presented shortly this afternoon by their CoE country representatives. The European External Action Service (EEAS), the body responsible for the EU foreign policy, is responsible for the strategic orientation of the initiative. DG DEVCO —International Cooperation and Development — is the decision‑making body and is responsible for implementing the initiative’s budget. It prepares the annual action programmes of the IcSP and monitors the work of the main implementing bodies: the Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) and the UN Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute (UNICRI). Further detailed info: http://www.cbrn-coe.eu/

6.6 LIFE+ Text on LIFE+ funding programme will be added

6.7 Structural funds Text will be added

6.8 Education / Training (DG EAC) Text will be added

6.9 JRC 6.9.1 JRC's CBRNE activities The extensive ongoing work in CBRNE in the European Commission's Joint Research Centre is bringing together JRC's competences in chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosive risks to respond to the needs of policy DGs in successfully addressing CBRNE as an emerging issue in the EU and in global security. In this context, the JRC collaborates with DG HOME for actions inside the EU in the implementation of the EU CBRN and Explosives action plans, and in aviation security; with DG DEVCO to support the mirroring of activities with partner countries of the EU, acknowledging that security issues are not limited by borders; and with several other partner DGs to fulfil their technical and scientific needs in the CBRNE areas. Security and non-proliferation issues remain an important pillar of the JRC's Euratom activities, extending our support to international safeguards, combating illicit trafficking of nuclear and radioactive materials, enhancing nuclear forensics, export control, and supporting several activities of training (in nuclear safeguards and nuclear and radiological security), as well as research agreements with several institutions in the EU MS. International cooperation with key partners (US, IAEA) in activities such as the Border Monitoring Working Group is also very important in this regard. Finally, standardisation in security is a key issue for the EU market, and the JRC actively supports the development of standards by providing scientific inputs to the European and International technical committees. The activities in CBRNE security are strongly synergic and are aggregated in JRC's CBRNE cluster, currently including 34 projects focused on several key areas: support to the implementation and monitoring of EU CBRN security policy and international cooperation, support to CBRNE standardisation, improving CBRNE detection, optimising the prevention and detection approach to the emergence of new psychoactive drugs, implementing capacity building and training in nuclear security, supporting export control of dual use items, enhancing critical infrastructure protection and developing nuclear forensics. Some examples of JRC's activities in CBRNE security include:  The establishment and running of EUSECTRA - European nuclear security training centre, located in the JRC premises in Karlsruhe and Ispra, inaugurated in April 2013. EUSECTRA offers hands-on training using a wide variety of radioactive and nuclear materials and a broad selection of equipment and measurement instruments. So far, 36

EUSECTRA has conducted trainings for several partners, among them DG TAXUD (Front Line Officers Training Course on Radiation Detection Techniques; customs experts from all the EU Member States will be trained over in total five sessions between June 2015 and February 2016), DG HOME (training for law enforcement officers being planned) and DG ENER but also external customers such as the US' Second Line of Defence programme. It remains at the disposal of MS needs.  The JRC leads the ITRAP+10 Phase II project, which aims at testing various families of the RN detection equipment produced in the European Union. Manufacturers of instruments used against illicit trafficking of radioactive sources and nuclear material have been invited to participate in an extensive test programme, based on available IEC and ANSI standards, and IAEA recommendations. The important results of the project have been the basis for the input given to International Standardisation Organisations to review and improve the standards. Also, a certification scheme is being set up to capacitate MS laboratories to perform the same verifications.  The CBRN Centres of Excellence initiative (see section 6.5), launched in 2010 by the European Union, provides a platform for voluntary regional cooperation on all CBRN- related hazard issues, be it of criminal (trafficking, terrorism), natural (pandemics, volcanic eruptions) or accidental (e.g. Fukushima) origin. It also includes the JRC support to the EU outreach activities in export control for dual-use items. The initiative is managed by DG DEVCO and the EEAS, with the technical and scientific support of a task force from the JRC and the collaboration of the United Nations' UNICRI institute. The JRC supports countries participating in the initiative to work together to identify risks, assess gaps and needs, draft National Action Plans and design capacity building projects to be implemented in the partner regions by EU MS consortiums. Fifty-two countries are now partners of the initiative, and a further 25 are looking to join.  The JRC - Institute for reference materials and measurements (IRMM) supports the development of advanced measurement standards and training in several fields including safety and security linked to CBRN-E threats. For example the institute provides nuclear reference measurements and conformity assessment tools to safeguards authorities, industry and the international community helping to stop illicit trafficking of nuclear and radiological materials. JRC-IRMM reviews and tests the performance of new and existing chemical, biological and explosives threat detection equipment for current and emerging substances of interest, and develops testing protocols for first responder (hand-held) equipment. Scientific studies are performed on request for DG HOME and the Standing Committee for Precursors. JRC- IRMM will also produce explosives simulants as quality control tools to i) check that regulatory requirements for explosives detection equipment are met and ii) to support the end users in the Member States. JRC-IRMM provides impartial analysis and technical support to the continuous development and implementation of EU aviation security policies. JRC-IRMM supports the implementation EU requirements for explosives trace detection (ETD), by i) assisting the Commission's own team of aviation security inspectors, ii) providing reference materials to EU test centres who carry out testing of ETD equipment, and iii) developing training tools for personnel involved in operating ETD equipment at security checkpoints. JRC-IRMM supports a 37

new Commission Regulation aiming at harmonising the certification of aviation security equipment, by providing impartial technical analysis of the conformity assessment practices. 6.9.2 ERNCIP The Institute for the Protection and the Security of the Citizen of the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission set up the European Reference Network for Critical Infrastructure Protection (ERNCIP) project in 2009 (https://erncip-project.jrc.ec.europa.eu/). This took place under the mandate of the DG HOME, in the context of the European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP), and with the agreement of Member States. ERNCIP is a European effort with the mission to “foster the emergence of innovative, qualified, efficient and competitive security solutions, through networking of European experimental capabilities”, with three strategic goals to:  Improve the protection of critical infrastructure in the EU  Support the development of the EU’s single market for security  Identify gaps in EU security product testing capabilities. To achieve these goals, ERNCIP maintains an online inventory of experimental capabilities in Europe (“The ERNCIP Inventory”) and has developed a network of experts to identify and promote good test practices to form the basis of common European testing standards, aiming at harmonisation of test methodologies and test protocols, where practical. Currently, ERNCIP brings together over 200 active volunteers in this network. The ERNCIP Inventory (https://erncip-project.jrc.ec.europa.eu/inventory) is a free-to-use search tool for information on European security experimental and testing facilities. It helps all types of critical infrastructure stakeholders to identify and make contact with CIP-related experimental expertise located in the EU. For the laboratories that are registered in the ERNCIP Inventory it provides greater visibility and increased business potential. Member States and the Commission jointly define the Thematic Areas (TA) of concern, for ERNCIP to address at the EU level. When the need for a TA is identified, ERNCIP forms a Thematic Group (TG) to address this concern. A TG consists of nominated experts from research facilities, and also other stakeholders such as manufacturers and vendors of security solutions, government authorities, academia, and operators of critical infrastructures. Each group is led by an appointed Coordinator, who is responsible for the work programme for the TG to deliver against, in order to achieve the objectives agreed with ERNCIP. 6.9.3 Disaster Risk Management Knowledge Centre (DRMKC) The Knowledge Centre for Disaster Risk Management is an initiative of the European Commission to further enhance and exploit the knowledge and evidence base of the Commission and the EU member states in disaster risk management. The Knowledge Centre adopts a networked approach to the science/knowledge-policy interface in Disaster Risk Management to support translating complex scientific data and analyses into usable

information and provide science-based advice for DRM policies, as well as timely and reliable scientific-based analyses for emergency preparedness and response coordinated activities.

The Knowledge Centre could become a focal point of reference to support the work of Member States, relevant Commission services and the wider DRM community within and beyond the EU. For example, through taking up the results of other projects such as FP7 DRIVER, the Knowledge Centre can advise and inform Member States and others on DRM tools and cooperate with other initiatives (Community of Users). In addition, via the international dimension of the Knowledge Centre, the EU could support the Sendai framework for Disaster Risk Reduction to promote a more systematic and reinforced science-policy interface to strengthen the contribution of DRM to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth globally. 6.10 Joint Investment Programme - EDA The European Commission (EC) and the European Defence Agency (EDA) aim at maximising the complementarity and synergy of civilian security and defence-related research activities. This synchronisation of Research & Technology (R&T) investment takes place in the context of the European Framework Cooperation (EFC). In September 2011 the EFC cooperation agreement was signed on the CBRN protection by high representatives of EDA and the EC. The EDA contribution takes the form of a Joint Investment Programme (JIP-CBRN), with a centrally managed budget funded by all contributing Members (cM). The cooperation encompasses research activities identified under the security research theme of the Union’s seventh research framework programme (FP7 SEC) and the EDA JIP CBRN.

The JIP CBRN is a so called EDA R&T CAT A programme managed by a Management Committee comprising one representative from each cM. This committee is chaired by EDA and also comprises a non-voting representative from the Commission. The Management Committee is in charge of the management of the programme, the technological content and the selection of the proposals. Furthermore, they will follow the projects and do the dissemination of the results. As the JIP CBRN is an R&T Cat A programme, all the outcomes are research results (technology demonstration may be included) to be used by all the contributing Members.

Contributing Members of JIP CBRN are Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Germany, Spain, France, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Sweden and Norway. The budget allocated to the JIP CBRN programme is 12 Million Euro.

CBRN incidents have a low probability but high impact nature. CBRN Protection is an important dual use domain in which Member States are prepared to jointly invest at a European level. In view of existing and emerging CBRN threats mid- to long-term, Member States see a need for enhanced technological development to protect against these threats. End users require that the CBRN detection technologies are high in performance and low in detection thresholds. Stand-off detection and improved point detection of threat agents are required in order to have more time to respond and protect. Furthermore, there is a need for development of Decontamination (control), Individual and Collective Protection. Modelling and Simulation and Data networking are needed to design the optimal protection and detection architectures.

7. MAPPING EU POLICIES VS RESEARCH IN THE LIGHT OF SECURE, SAFETY AND RESILIENCE SOCIETAL CHALLENGES 7.1 Introduction While policies and research programming are designed in a concerted way at EU level (to avoid possible duplications and ensuring best possible complementarity), in practice policy coordination in operational terms (i.e. implementation by Member States) and research synergies are often lagging behind what could be achieved. This is partly due to a lack of "matrix" which establishes links among different branches of a given sector (in the case of this document, focusing on secure, safe and resilient societies), but this lack of matrix concerns all fields which involve policy, research, industry and training / practitioners). This section proposes a way to establish such a matrix which is not solely linked to given sectors (e.g. internal security, civil protection, health etc.) but to common features of the disaster risk / crisis management cycle and other related issues. A review of different EU policies showed that almost all regulations contain operational elements of (crisis) management cycle, namely detection/surveillance (covering the full cycle), prevention / preparedness and risk assessment (pre-crisis), situation awareness / early warning (occurrence of an event), response / recovery (post-crisis), and socio-economic impacts (full crisis cycle). In addition, horizontal and external actions (e.g. international cooperation) also embed operational features that are common to all sectors. Figure 5 below gives an illustration of the various areas covered by this document (both policy and research wise). The mapping of FP7 projects vs. different areas (and policies) are described in the sections below.

Figure 5. Various areas covered by the CoU

Complementing the above, a mapping of projects funded under the FP7 Secure Societies programme, as a starting point, has been carried out to establish links among project's objectives and outputs and policy challenges. The mapping has been complemented by projects funded by other FP7 programme and EDA. Based on the mapping elements, and taking into considerations the technical/scientific/training needs of the various EU policies, it has been possible to establish links among these (operational elements / policies) and EU- funded projects (Figure 6). The objective was not to make an impact assessment but to understand the complexity of the matrix and better prepare the ground for a strategy of science-policy-industry- operator's interactions within future Horizon2020 projects.

Figure 6. Science-policy matrix

In the sections below, the different policy sectors are separated into operational goals with highlights of specific actions to which FP7 projects have a potential to respond (in the various tables throughout the document). It should be stressed again that, at this stage, the document is not providing an analysis of the research outputs but rather provides the overall architecture of science-policy interactions related to the different sectors. Links among policy objectives and specific projects are tentatively established with regard to an area coverage and not sensu stricto, i.e. attributions/references are prone to modifications.

7.2 Disaster resilience / Crisis management (natural hazards) Most of the research projects listed in this section directly or indirectly support the UCPM (see section 5.2) which address all aspects of the DRM cycle by strengthening cooperation and facilitating coordination within Europe in the areas of disaster prevention, preparedness and response. The mechanism indeed includes an action to 'improve the knowledge base on disaster risks and facilitate the sharing of knowledge, best practices and information'49. The use of various Union funds that may support sustainable disaster prevention is promoted and EU Member States and regions are encouraged to exploit those funding opportunities. 7.2.1 All hazards Series of projects are of generic nature and address tools and technologies related to DRM (from prevention to recovery) that can be applied to all types of (natural) disasters. The inter-operability of tools/technologies is actually mentioned in the CBRN Action Plan and UCPM as a mean to improve planning of disaster response operations, scenario building and response capacities (of direct support to the ERCC mission). The UCPM also promotes consistency in the response of disasters (networking), and the support to coordination of operational organisations (UN Offuce for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) and Member States). The following section provides a snapshot of FP7 projects categorised according to specific sectors / themes related to natural hazards. 7.2.1.1 Earth observation in support of emergency and disaster management Earth observation tools are mainly developed within projects funded by the Space Programme. The project below (ended in 2012) is an illustration of a project supporting rescue and emergency operations and management.

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

GEO-PICTURES FP7 - Space March 2010 / Combining state of the art in Coordinator: April 2012 satellite communication, navigation 1. Ansur Technol. – Fornebu (NO) GMES and Earth Space-2009-1 and earth observation. Ggeo-tagged Observation with EUR image and sensor communication Consortium: Position-based 2,424,751 combined with latest satellite earth 2. Assoc. Brasileira Telecom. - Rio De Image and sensor Janeiro (BR) REA – 242390 observation, allowing a large Communications number of accurate optical field 3. D.M.A.T. Consult. KG – Lieboch (AT) Technology for observations, tagged with position, 4. Johanniter-Unfall-Hilfe EV – Berlin Universal Rescue, transferred via satellite-optimized (DE) Emergency and protocols to a control center. Optical 5. Kongsberg Satellite Services AS – Surveillance observations are extended to video, Tromso (NO) management audio and sensors that measures 6. Sec. Estado de Ciência e Tecnologia – Manaus (BR) temperature, moisture, wind etc. Such data is helpful in emergency/ 7. UN Inst. Training and Research – disaster management and for Geneva (CH) improving interpretation of GMES 8. Univ. Estado do Amazonas

data. Design of small lightweight Fundacao – Manaus (BR) 9. Univ. Autonoma de Barcelona - equipment a disaster management expert comments pictures directly Cerdanyola del Valles (ES) on scene pictures and main needs according to the assessment, sending them immediately to the Status: Operation Center. FINISHED http://www.geo-pictures.eu/

49 Art.5.1(a), Council Decision No. 1313/2013/EU, Official Journal of the European Union, L347, 20.12.2013 42

7.2.1.2 Multi-risk assessment and management of natural hazards Research projects benefit from support from capacity building, in particular centres of excellences, and example of which is given below in the field of natural disaster monitoring capacities.

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

BEYOND FP7 – REGPOT June 2013 / Building Capacity for a Centre of Coordinator: May 2016 Excellence dedicated to Natural 1. Nat. Observatory – Athens (GR) Building Capacity 2012-2013-1 Disaster Management in for a Centre of EUR Consortium: southeastern Europe, including Excellence for EO- 2,305,650 European Balkan countries, with 2. Univ. Valencia – Valencia (ES) based monitoring 3. Univ. Valladolid – Valladolid (ES) RTD – 316210 a potential to expand to an even of Natural Disasters wider geographic area through 4. Supercomputing Centre– Barcelona (ES) harmonizing the observational capabilities available in the 5. King's College – London (UK) partners. Setting up integrated 6. Norw. Inst. Air Res.– Kjeller (NO) observational solutions allowing 7. Marmara Res. Cent.– Ankara (TR)

different monitoring networks 8. Inst. Atm. Sci. Clim. – Basilicata (IT) 9. SARMAP – Purasca (CH) (space borne and in-situ) to cooperate in a complementary, 10. Hydromet. Service – Belgrade (RS) unified and coordinated manner, 11.Helmholtz-Centre– Potsdam (DE) 12. Inst. Troposph. Res.– Leipzig (DE) creation of archives and data bases of long series of 13. Univ. Hamburg – Hamburg (DE) observations and higher level 14.Ist.Naz. Geofis. Vulcanl.– Rome (IT) products, and making the 15. Nat. Inst. Optoelectronics –

observations and products Bucharest (RO) 16. UK MET Office – Exeter (UK) available for exploitation with state-of-the-art science and models. Status: http://www.beyond- ON-GOING eocenter.eu/

7.2.1.3 Demonstration in the area of multi-hazards crisis management As highlighted in the introductory part, DRIVER is one of the largest FP7 projects dealing with crisis management. The project has a larger focus than only natural hazards as it also covers other (man-made) threats. It is expected that this demonstration programme, running until March 2019, will have a strong role to play in bringing projects together and support the developing Communty of Users.

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

DRIVER FP7 - Secure June 2014 / DRIVER s demonstration project Coordinator: Societies March 2019 focusing on augmenting rather than 1. ATOS – Madrid (ES) DRiving InnoVation replacing existing crisis management in crisis Call 2013-1 EUR (CM) capabilities, will aim at Consortium: management for 33,468,209 producing comprehensive, well- 2. Fraunhofer INT – Euskiirchen (DE) European IP 3. FOI - Stockholm (SE) REA– 607798 balanced, cost-effective Portfolio of Resilience CM tools exploiting high potential 4. Frequentis - Wien (AT) 5. Edisoft - Porto (PT) RTD work from last decade.Aims at 2 main dimensions: - Firstly, 6. Thales - Paris (FR) development of a pan-EU test-bed 7.GMV Aerosp. Defence - Madrid (ES) enabling testing & iterative 8. Isdefe - Madrid (ES)

refinement of new crisis 9. Ecorys - Rotterdam (NL) 10. Austrian Red Cross - Wien (AT) management (CM) solutions & facilitating capability development 11. Red Cross - Berlin (DE) through provision of respective 12. Red Cross - København (DK) 13. British Red Cross - London (UK) methodologies & infrastructure; - secondly, at actual development of 14. Magen David Adom (IL) Portfolio of Tools that improves 15. Pole Risque - Aix en Provence (FR) 16. Armines - Paris (FR) 43

crisis management at MS &EU level. 17. JRC - Brussels (BE) 18. ITTI - Poznan (PL) DRIVER will carry out 19. TNO - Delft (NL) experimentation campaigns in three 20. Cent. Irish Eur. Sec. - Dublin (IE) strands: tools and methods for 21. CITET - Madrid (ES) responders, resilience of civil society 22. DLR ZKI - Wessling (DE) and learning by both. The intra- 23. DIN - Berlin (DE)

strand experimentation leads into 24. Disaster Waste Rec. - London (UK) two Joint Experiment campaigns and 25. E-Semble - Delft (NL) a Final Demo focusing on challenges 26. EOS - Brussels (BE) requiring highly complex interaction 27. AIT - Wien (AT) between CM tools 28. SATCEN - Torrejón de Ardoz (ES) 29. HKV Consultancy - Lelystad (NL) 30. Inst. Info. Comm. Tech. - Sofia (BG) 31. MSB - Karlstad (SE)

32. PRIO Peace Res. Inst. - Oslo (NO) 33. PSCEF - Brussels (BE) 34. Q4PR Ltd - Dublin (IE) 35. THG- City of the Hague (NL) 36. Westfälische Wilhelms- Universität Münster - Münster (Germany) Status: 37. Univ. IAT - Stuttgart (DE) ON-GOING 38. Techn. Hilfswerk THW - Bonn (DE)

7.2.1.4 Multi Natural Hazards risk reduction, preparedness and resilience enhancement A range of projects on multi (natural) hazards risk reduction, preparedness and resilience has been funded in FP7 from different programmes, in particular the FP7 Environment programme. This section gives an overview of these projects, starting with terminated ones:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

CATALYST FP7 - October 2011 Strengthening capacity Coordinator: Environment / September development in hazard risk 1. FEEM – Milano (IT) Capacity 2013 reduction and adaptation through Development for Call 2011. knowledge exchange and science- Consortium: Hazard Risk 1.3.4-1 EUR 843,931 application interface, adding value 2. Geological Survey – Copenhagen Reduction and (DK) CA to integrated knowledge on Adaptation NH/DRR and reinforcing existing 3. UFZ –Leipzig (DE) 4. Seeconsult Gmbh – Osnabruck (DE) RTD – 283177 network capacity. NH/DRR reference website and online 5. Landbouwkundig Onderzoek – discussion forum (think tank), Wageningen (NL) information archive about NH/DRR 6. World Acad. Sciences – Triest (IT) Status: resources and research work. 7. United Nations University - Shibuya FINISHED Ku Tokyo (JP) http://www.catalyst-project.eu/

IncREO FP7 - Space January 2013 Improved preparedness and Coordinator: / December mitigation planning for areas highly 1. SPOT Images – Toulouse(FR) Increasing Space-2012-1 2014 vulnerable to natural disasters and Resilience through already noticeable climate change Consortium: Earth Observation EUR trends. Solutions adjusted to users’ 2. CNR - Roma (IT) 1,924,718 and end-users’ needs, reflecting on 3. GEOMER Gmbh – Heidelberg (DE) 4. Geoville Inform. Datenverarbeitung REA – 312461 short-term climate change scenarios. Selected case studies on Gmbh – Innsbruck (AT) dam failure, storm surge and wave 5. INFOTERRA– Immenstaad (DE)

height, flood, earthquake and 6. Meteo-France - Saint Mande (FR) 7. Nat. Inst. Meteorol. Hydrol. – Sofia landslide. Based on state-of-the-art methodologies, implemented by (BG) means of up-to-date mapping and 8. Rom. Space Ag.– Bucharest (RO) 9. UNESCO – Paris (FR) modelling / procedures and finally appropriately disseminated to the 10. Univ. Twente – Enschede (NL) relevant stakeholder groups. Status: FINISHED http://www.increo-fp7.eu/ 44

CAPHAZ-NET FP7 - June 2009 / Identification and assessment of Coordinator: Environment May 2012 existing practices and policies for 1. UFZ – Leipzig (DE) Social Capacity social capacity building in the field Building for Natural ENV. EUR 910,000 of natural hazards and elaboration Consortium: Hazards: Toward 2008.1.3.2.1 2. Dial. Gemein. Gesel. Komm. RTD – 227073 of strategies and recommendations More Resilient for activities to enhance the Kooperationsforsch. – Stuttgart (DE) Societies resilience of European societies to 3. Eidgenoessische Forschungsanstalt Wsl - Birmensdorf (CH) the impacts of natural hazards. Living document representing the 4. Ist. Sociologia Internazionale Di state of the art and providing initial Gorizia I.S.I.G – Gorizia (IT) suggestions on how to improve 5. Lancaster Univ. - Lancaster (UK)

societies’ capacity building. Down- 6. Middlesex Univ.– London (UK) 7. Univ. Auton. Barcelona -Cerdanyola scaling in particular regional contexts and evaluated in respect of del Valles (ES) local experiences and existing 8. Znanstvenoraziskovalni Center Slovenske Akademije Znanosti in practices and tools. Study of three geographical areas representing Umetnosti – Ljubljana (SI) different natural hazards types. Recommendations for specific steps

to improve social capacity building of European societies’ facing natural hazards and give guidance for Status: future research. FINISHED http://www.caphaz-net.org/

EMBRACE FP7 - October 2011 Development of conceptual and Coordinator: Environment / September methodological approach to clarify 1. UCL – Brussels (BE) Building Resilience 2015 how the resilience capacity of a Amongst ENV. society confronted with natural Consortium: Communities in 2011.1.3.2-1 EUR hazards and disasters can be 2. Accad. Europea Bolzano– Bolzano Europe 3,243,423 characterized, defined and (IT) 3. Eidgenoessische Forschungsanstalt RTD – 283201 measured. Disaster footprints and a review of current data gaps and WSL – Birmensdorf (CH) challenges for human impacts and 4. UFZ - Leipzig (DE) development databases in providing 5. King's College– London (UK)

resilience data on regional and 6. Middle East Technical University – Ankara (TR) national levels will help inform indicator development. Six case 7. SEI Oxford Office Ltd– Oxford (UK) studies across Europe exposed to 8. Univ. Reading – Reading (UK) 9. UN University - Shibuya Ku (JP) different natural hazards, situated in different governance settings and 10. Univ. Northumbria - Newcastle socio-demographic-economic Upon Tyne (UK) contexts. Advanced methodologies 11. Univ. York – York (UK)

for evaluating, modeling and Status: assessing resilience of different FINISHED actors. http://www.embrace-eu.org/

CRISMA FP7 - Secure March 2012 / CRISMA developed a simulation- Coordinator: Societies August 2015 based decision support system, for 1.VTT – Espoo (FI) Modelling crisis modelling crisis management, management for Call 2011.4.1-1 EUR improved action & preparedness. It Consortium: improved action 10,107,160 2. FhG IAO - Stutgartt (DE) IP shall facilitate simulation, modelling and preparedness of realistic crisis scenarios, possible 3. AIT - Wien (AT) REA – 284552 4. AMRA- Napoli (IT) response actions, impacts of crisis depending on both external factors 5. ADIA - Coimbra (PT) driving crisis development & various 6. Tallinn Univ. Technol. - Tallinn (EE) actions of crisis management team. 7. NICE Systems Ltd - Haifa (IL) 8. EADS Cassidian - Paris (FR) 9. Insta DefSec - Tampere (FI)

10. Spacebel SA - Liège (BE)

11. Cismet Gmbh - Saarbrücken (DE) 12. Pelastusopisto Emerg. Serv.College - Kuopio (FI)

13. Magen David Adom - Tel Aviv (IL) 14. PSCEF - Brussels (BE)

Status: 15. Finnish Meteor. Inst. - Helsinki (FI) FINISHED http://www.crismaproject.eu/ 16. DE Rotes Kreuz - Berlin (DE) 17. Artelia Eau & Environ. - Lyon (F)

Two projects in the area of disaster risk management and preparedness are due to deliver their final recommendations / outputs by April and November 2016 respectively.

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

ENHANCE FP7 - December Development of new ways to Coordinator: Environment 2012 / enhance society’s resilience to 1. VU-VUMC – Amsterdam (NL) Enhancing risk November catastrophic natural hazard impacts management Call 2012.6.4-1 2016 (heat waves, forest fires, flood, Consortium: partnerships for 2. Acad. Studii Econ.–Bucharest (RO) drought, storm surge, and volcanic catastrophic natural EUR eruptions), by providing new 3. Agenzia Regionale Emilia-Romagna disasters in Europe 5,992,084 scenarios and information in – Bologna (IT) 4. Empresa Aguas SA – Valencia (ES) selected hazard cases at different geographical- and spatial scales in 5. European Business and Innovation RTD – 308438 Europe in close collaboration with Centre Network – Brussels (BE) stakeholders, and by contributing to 6. FEEM - Milano (IT)

the development of new multi- 7. Haskoli Islands – Reykjavik (IS) 8. Helmholtz Geesthacht Zent. sector partnerships (MSPs) to reduce or redistribute risk. Outputs Material- Kustenforsch.– Geesthacht are harmonised dynamic scenarios (DE) 9. HKV Lijn in Water BV – Lelystad (NL) of vulnerability / exposure, guidelines for resilience 10. Instit. Sup. Agronomia – Lisboa (PT) enhancement and risk reduction, 11. Int. Inst. Angewandte methods for linking MSPs to novel Systemanalyse – Laxenburg (AT)

scientific risk scenarios and 12. JRC - Brussels (BE) 13. London School of Economics and assessments; economic instruments and non-structural mitigation Political Science – London (UK) measures at the national, regional, 14. Metacortex – Lisboa (PT) 15.Open. Railway Techn. – Wien (AT) and local levels, policy recommendations to the EU and 16. Perspectives GmBH – Hamburg HFA signatories. (DE) 17. Univ. Cambridge – Cambridge (UK) 18. Univ. Oxford – Oxford (UK) 19. UN-ISDR - Geneva (CH) 20. Univ. Potsdam – Potsdam (DE) Status: http://enhanceproject.eu/ 21. Univ. Pol.. Valencia – Valencia (ES) ON-GOING 22. UCL - Louvain-La-Neuve (BE) 23. Wadden Sea Forum E.V. – Wilhelmshaven (DE) 24. Willis Limited - London (UK) TACTIC FP7 - Secure May 2014 / Studies on risk perception, Coordinator: Societies April 2016 preparedness to develop a 1. Helmholtz-Zentr.UFZ - Leipzig (DE) Tools, methods And community preparedness audit training for Call 2013.4.1-5 EUR 999,083 enabling communities to assess, Consortium: CommuniTIes and 2. Trilateral Res. Consul. - London (UK) CSA REA– 608058 impacts in multi-hazard context, Society to better their motivations & capacities to 3. Univ. Northumbria - Newcastle upon prepare for a Crisis prepare for large-scale & /or cross- (UK) 4. European Dynamics - Athens (GR) border disasters. Developing education & training strategies, 5. Inst. Meteorol. Water Manag. - practices, etc. for increasing overall Warszawa (PL) prepares of communities & societies 6. ME Tech. Univ. - Ankara (TR)

across EU. Four case studies 7. Saxon State Office Environ.. - Dresden (DE) focusing on terrorism, floods, pandemics, earthquakes. Status: ON-GOING http://www.tacticproject.eu/

In Horizon2020, this area is complemented by strategic developments expected with the DRS-10-2015 topic on "Natural Hazards: Towards risk reduction science and innovation plans at national and European level", as well as projects under the DRS-7-2014 topic (started around summer 2015) on "Crises and disaster resilience – operationalizing resilience concepts" which are due to provide a direct contribution to the Civil Protection Mechanism.

7.2.1.5 Multi Natural Hazards situation awareness / early warning Situation awareness, early warning and alert systems are part of the UCPM policy portfolio, including specific actions in support of ERCC. Tools and technologies developed by FP7 projects included airborne platforms, multi-modal assessment platforms etc. as illustrated by the (finished) projects below.

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

AIRBEAM FP7 - Secure January 2012 Development of a situation Coordinator: Societies / awareness toolbox for the 1. EADS Astrium – Paris (FR) AIRBorne December management of crisis over wide area information for Call 2010.4.2-3 2015 taking benefit of an optimised set of Consortium: Emergency 2. VITO – Mol (BE) CP aerial (unmanned) platforms, situation EUR including satellites. By running 3. TU Dortmund (DE) Awareness and 9,894,307 scenarios defined by end-users in a 4. FOI - Stockholm (SE) Monitoring simulated environment, the 5. Vigilance BV - Eindhoven (NL) ENTR – 6. Astrium - Paris (FR) 140358 increased capabilities for situation awareness has been assessed 7. EADS GMBH - Ottobrunn (DE) methodically. Various platform and 8. Dassault Aviation - Paris (FR) sensor mixes have been compared 9. Mini. Notranje Zadeve- Ljubjana (SI)

using key performance indicators 10. CSS Kemea - Athens (GR) 11. Emergency serv. Coll. - Kuopio (FI) among which is cost effectiveness, with live demonstrations with 12. Thales - Paris (FR) multiple civil unmanned aerial 13. Sagem - Paris (FR) platforms. 14. Alenia Aeronautica - Napoli (IT) 15. Isdefe - Madrid (ES) 16. Radiolabs - Rome (IT) 17. Selex - Rome(IT) 18. Lapin Yliopisto - Rovaniemi (SE/FI) 19. Laurea - Helsinki (FI) Status: 20. Inst. Novas Technol. - Lisboa (PT) FINISHED http://airbeam.eu/project/ 21. INDRA - Madrid (ES)

MOSAIC FP7 - Secure April 2011 / Multi-modal data intelligence Coordinator: Societies April 2014 capture, analytics including video & 1. Univ. Reading – Reading (UK) Multi-Modal text collaterals for decision support Situation Call 2010.2.3-3 EUR for automated detection, Consortium: Assessment & 2,664,559 2. BAE Systems Ltd - Rochester, CP recognition, geo-location, mapping, Analytics Platform including intelligent decision support Farnborough (UK) REA– 261776 3. A E Solutions - Badsey (UK) to enhance situation awareness, surveillance targeting, camera 4. Synthema Srl - Pisa (IT) handover. Systems architecture to 5. TU Berlin (DE) support wide area surveillance with 6. DResearch Digital Media Systems

edge, central fusion, decision Gmbh - Berlin (DE) 7. West Midlands Police Authority - support capabilities, algorithms for disparate multi-media information Birmingham (UK) Status: correlation. 8. Warwickshire Police - Leek FINISHED Wootton (UK), http://www.mosaic-fp7.eu/

COPE FP7 - Secure February Novel technologies to achieve a step Coordinator: Societies 2008 / change in information flow both 1. VTT - Helsinki (FI) Common January 2011 from & to first responder in order to Operational Picture Call 2007-4.3-1 increase situational awareness Consortium: Exploitation EUR 2. BAE Systems - Farnborough (UK) CP across agencies & at all levels of 2,535,049 command chain. Screening of 3. BAE Systems C-ITS - Stockholm(SE) 4. Trinity College Dublin - Dublin (IE) REA– 217854 technologies, building innovative solutions; end-users' input in 5. UTI Group - Bucarest (RO) technology development & 6. GMV - Lisboa (PT)

verification, in trial exercise design, 7. CESS - München (DE) 8. IGSU - Bucarest (RO) validation. Integration of all components into demonstrator 9. ESC - Kuopio (FI) “System of Systems” & setup of Status: large scenario based mixed live, FINISHED tabletop type trial exercise. http://cope.vtt.fi/

Another project dealing with situation awareness and survivor localisation has started uin 2014 and will last until September 2018:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

INACHUS FP7 - Secure September In support of increased efficiency in Coordinator: Societies 2014 / Urban Search, Rescue Operations 1. ICCS - Zografou / Athens (GR) Technological and September through refined information to Methodological Call 2013-1 2018 response forces following disaster Consortium: Solutions for 2. ASI Europe, SRL - Piacenza (IT) CP event to assist in helping to find Integrated Wide EUR survivors. Initial situation 3. Centre for Irish and European Area Situation 10,008,434 assessment based on satellite Security Ltd - Dublin (IE) Awareness and 4. Cinside AB - Linköping (SE) REA– 607522 imagery & damage simulation with Survivor synthetic models, followed by 3D 5. Crisisplan BV - Leiden (NL) Localisation to data generation based on imagery 6. Diginext sarl - Aix en Provence (FR) Support Search and from unmanned aerial vehicles 7. CEREN Pole Risque - Gardanne (FR) Rescue Teams (UAV) and ground-based laser 8. EXUS Software Ltd - London (UK) 9. FhG EMI - Freiburg (DE) scanners, and eventually robots and other suitable instruments to find 10. Fund. Tekniker - Gipuzkoa (ES) survivors being deployed in the field. 11. Holistic Innovation Institute - Follow-up of RECONASS project. Madrid (ES)

Tools include decision and planning 12. Laurea-ammattikorkeakoulu oy - Espoo near Helsinki (FI) modules for advanced casualty and damage estimation; integration 13. Mikrosyst. Mikrorois Gia - Aghia existing and novel sensors Paraskevi (GR) 14. Onera - Paris (FR) (electromagnetic, vision, chemical) for detecting & high-accurate 15. Schüßler-Plan Ingenieurgesell. - localization, and mobile phones Düsseldorf (DE) signals for estimating number of 16. SDIS 13 - Marseille (FR)

trapped humans; snake robot 17. Södertörns brandförsvars förbund - Stockholm (SE) mechanism etc.; as well as resilient, interoperable communication 18. Stiftelsen Sintef - Tronheim (NO) platform; enhanced data analysis 19. TELINT rtd Consult. Services Ltd - London (UK) techniques, 3-D visualization tool of to be operated by crisis managers, 20. FOI - Stockholm (SE) Status: decision makers; etc.. Contribution 21. Univ. Twente (NL) ON-GOING to standards, training package for First Responders.

In the early warning / alert systems area, three other projects have been running from 2011 until 2014, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

A4A FP7 - Secure March 2011 / Improving the effectiveness of Coordinator: Societies December People-Centred Early Warning 1. DLR – Berlin (DE) Alert for All 2013 Systems paradigm in case of Call 2010.4.1-1 Consortium: major disasters. Development of CP EUR simulation tool for spreading 2. Bund. Bevölkerungsschutz und 3,497,469 information and human Katastrophenhilfe - Bonn (DE) behaviour to key crisis scenario, 3. BAPCO - Manchester (UK)

communications plans, 4.Technalia - Bilbao (ES) 5. AFACERILOR - Bucarest (RO) REA – 261732 social/cultural crowds. Management portal for sharing 6. Deutsches Rotes Kreuz - Berlin (DE) information among authorities 7. EDISOFT (PT) 8. EUTELSAT S.A. – Paris (FR) /first responders about crises, overcoming regional and national 9. Inst. Rundfunktechnik – Münich (DE) Status: barriers 10. TECNOSYLVA - Leon (ES) FINISHED 11. FOI - Stockholm (SE) www.aler4all.eu 12. Univers. Stuttgart (DE)

OPTI-ALERT FP7 - Secure January Improvement of alerting of Coordinator: Societies 2011/ general public in crisis situations 1. FhG FOKUS – Berlin (DE) Enhancing the January 2014 through personalized, culturally efficiency of Call 2010.1 sensitive multi-channel Consortium: alerting systems EUR 2. Univ. Innsbruck (AT) CP communication. In addition to in- through 2,531,122 depth & interdisciplinary studies 3. TNO - Delft (NL) personalized, 4. Impact - Diemen (NL) of sociologists, media scientists culturally sensitive on perception of crisis 5. Acad. Med. Cent - Amsterdam (NL) multi-channel REA – 261699 communication, development of 6. UNIZ Faculty of Humanities and communication a demonstrator to test proposed Social Sciences - Zagreb (HR) 7. MDA - Tel Aviv (Israel) socio-culturally adaptive alerting tool, corresponding alert 8. Tripitch - Utrecht (NL) simulation component in 9. SAMUR - Madrid (ES) practice. 10. CSSC - Roma (IT) Status: 11. CRISMART - Stockholm (SE) FINISHED www.opti-alert.eu

In the Space research area, an-going project focuses on satellite imaging for prediction / early detection of emergencies and population alerting:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

PHAROS FP7 - Space December Developing a sustainable, pre- Coordinator: 2013 / June operational open service 1. Deutsches Zentrum fuer Luft - und Project on a multi- Space-2013 2016 platform which integrates space- Raumfahrt EV – Koeln (DE) hazard open based observation, platform for EUR communications and navigation Consortium: satellite based 2,499,440 technologies to provide 2. Avanti Communications Ltd – London downstream (UK) REA – 606982 innovative services for various services users and application domains. 3. Eutelsat S.A. – Paris (FR) 4. Fundacio d'ecologia del FOC i Gestio Multi-hazard applications such as the prediction/early detection of d'incendis - Tivissa Tarragona (ES) emergencies, population alerting, 5. IQ Wireless Gmbh – Berlin (DE) environmental monitoring, crisis 6. Space Hellas S.A. – Athens (GR)

management and risk 7. Stichting Platform Mobile Messaging – Hoofddorp (NL) assessment through a single, user friendly interface, targeting 8. Tecnosylva SL – Leon (ES) several users (crisis managers, operators of critical infrastructures, insurance Status: companies, scientific/academic). ON-GOING http://www.pharos-fp7.eu/

In Horizon2020, this area (situational awareness) is complemented by a topic opening the possibility for a future PCP, namely the DRS-02-2016 topic on "CSA on situational awareness systems to support civil protection preparation and operational decision making".

7.2.1.6 Multi-Hazard Emergency and Humanitarian Crisis A large-scale project has supported the implementation of emergency response, mainly in the meteorological and geophysical risks, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

SAFER FP7 - SPA January 2009 Implementation of preoperational Coordinator: / March 2012 versions of the Emergency Response 1.SPOT Image (SI) SA – Toulouse (FR) Services and 2007-1.1-01 Core Service, reinforcement of Applications For EUR European capacity to respond to Consortium: Emergency 26,912,700 emergency situations: fires, floods, 2. Accad.Europ. Bolzano – Bolzano (IT) Response earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, 3. Altamira Inform. SL – Barcelona (ES) REA – 218802 4. Artelia Eau Environ.– Echirolles (FR) landslides, humanitarian crisis. Short term improvement of response 5. Bund Bevölk. Katast.– Bonn (DE) when crisis occurs, with rapid 6. CNES – Paris (FR) mapping capacity after disastrous 7.CEFRIS – Pavia (IT)

events, including the relevant 8.CNR – Roma (IT) 9. Critical Software SA – Coimbra (PT) preparatory services (reference maps). Delivering services at full 10. Zentrum Luft – Raum. – Koeln (DE) scale for real events or during 11. Ecole Normale Sup. - Paris (FR) 12. Edisoft – Caparica (PT) specific exercises. Follow-up by extension to core service 13. E-Geos SPA – Matera (IT) components before and after the 14.Elsag Datamat S.P.A. – Genova (IT) crisis, targeting the longer term 15.ECMRWF – Reading (UK)

service evolution, through the 16.EU Satellite Centre - Madrid (ES) 17.Eurosense Belfotop N.V. – Tielt (BE) provision of thematic products, to be added in the portfolio of services. 18. GRSRC– Gumligen (CH) The main performance criterion is 19. Geoid BVBA – Leuven (BE) 20. GeoMer Gmbh – Heidelberg (DE) the added-value of products with risk-specific information. In SAFER, 21. Gisat S.R.O. - Praha 7 (CZ) thematic products covered mainly 22.GMV Aerosp Defence – Madrid (ES) the meteorological and geophysical 23. GMVIS Skysoft SA – Lisboa (PT) risks. Users’ involvement as a key 24.Indra Sistemas S.A. - Madrid (ES) 25.Infoterra Gmbh -Bodensee (DE) driver and a specific task addresses the federation of the key users, both 26.Infoterra Ltd – Leicester (UK) for interventions in Europe and 27.Ingen. Serv. Aeroesp. – Madrid (ES) outside Europe. 28.Inst.Geodynamics– Bucharest (RO) 29.Isti.. Geofis. Vulcanol.– Roma (IT) 30. Joanneum Research - Graz (AT)

31. JRC - Brussels (BE)

32.Keyobs S.A. – Herstal (BE) 33.Magellium- Ramonville St Agne(FR) 34.MapAction– Buckinghamsire (UK)

35.Meteo-France - Saint Mande (FR) 36. Metria AB – Gävle (SE)

37. Min. Interieur - Asnieres (FR) 38. Nat. Inst. Meteor. – Sofia (BG)

39.National Observatory– Athens (GR)

40. Norsk Inst. Luftforsk- Kjeller (NO) 41. Univ. Salzburg – Salzburg (AT) 42. Planetek Hellas – Athens (GR)

43. Protezione Civile – Rome (IT) 44. ReSAC - Sofia (BG)

45. Space Agency – Bucharest (RO) 46. Eurosense – Bucharest (RO) 47. Sogreah – Echirolles (FR)

48. T.R.E. s.r.l. – Milano (IT) 49. Telespazio SPA – Roma (IT) 50. Nat. Land Survey - Gaevle (SE) 51. UN-ITR – Geneva (CH)

52. Univ. Alcala – Alcala/Madrid (ES)

53. Univ. Valladolid – Valladolid (ES) . 54. Univ. Firenze – Florence (IT) Status: 55. Univ. Strasbourg – Strasbourg (FR)) FINISHED http://www.emergencyresponse.eu/ 56. Univ.Bratislave - Bratislava (SK) 57. World Food Programme (IT)

Linked to this area, an on-going project is investigating ways to develop tools in support of assessment, recovery, health an dsocial needs as well as other critical humanitarian needs:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

COBACORE FP7 - Secure April 2013 / Improving the matching of needs Coordinator: Societies March 2016 with capacities, through building 1. TNO – The Hague (NL) Community Based upon community as important Comprehensive Call 2012.4.3-1 EUR source of information & capabilities. Consortium: Recovery 3,497,636 2. Univ. Ulster - Coleraine (UK) CP Development of suite of tools that will support common needs 3. Deutsches Rotes Kreuz - Berlin (DE) REA– 4. Ned. Rode Kruis - The Hague (NL) 5068485 assessments efforts, damage recovery needs, economic needs, 5. Future Analytics Consulting Ltd - health & social needs, and other Dublin (IE)

critical humanitarian needs. 6. Kath. Univ. Tilburg - Tilburg (NL) 7. Integrasys SA - Madrid (ES), COBACORE assets will stimulate community-wide involvement in information gathering, sense- making, needs assessment practices. COBACORE platform is a set of interconnected mechanisms that maintain 3 information models:

community model, context model, Status: needs model. ON-GOING http://cobacore.eu/index.html

In Horizon2020, this area is complemented by strategic developments expected with the DRS-01-2016 topic on " Integrated tools for response planning and scenario building".

7.2.1.7 Multi-risk assessement of natural hazards including cascading effects Multi-risk assessment of natural hazards with possible cascading effects has been investigated in a project funded in 2010-2013:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

MATRIX FP7 - October 2010 Method integration for multi- Coordinator: Environment / December type assessment, accounting for 1. Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam New Multi-HAzard 2013 risk comparability, cascading Deutsches – Potsdam (DE) and MulTi-RIsK Call 2010. hazards, and time-dependent Assessment 1.3.4-1 EUR vulnerability, as compared to Consortium: MethodS for 3,395,870 2. Amra – Napoli (IT) established methods for single- Europe type hazard and risk analysis 3. Aspinall & Assoc.– Salisbury (UK) 4. BRGM – Paris (FR) based on three test cases RTD – 265138 (Naples, Cologne and the French 5. Deutsches Komitee West Indies), and a “virtual city”. Katastrophenvorsorge E.V. - Bonn (DE) Development of tools to support 6. Eidgenössische Tech. Hochschule

cost-effective mitigation and Zürich – Zurich (CH) 7. Inst. Sup. Agronomia – Lisboa (PT) adaptation in multi-risk environment related to the most 8. Int. Inst. Angewandte Systemanalyse important hazards for Europe – Laxenburg (AT 9. Karlsruher Inst.Tech.– Karlsruhe (DE) (earthquakes, landslides, volcanic eruptions, tsunamis, wildfires, 10. Stiftelsen Norges winter storms, and both fluvial Geotekniskeinstitutt, Oslo (NO) and coastal floods. Involvement 11. Technische Univ. Delft – Delft (NL)

of European National Platforms 12. Univ. British Columbia – Vancouver (CA) Status: for Disaster Reduction. FINISHED http://matrix.gpi.kit.edu/

In a complementary vein, radar and satellite imaging developments support improved multi- hazard risk analyses, including assessment of natural hazards risks on critical infrastructure systems:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

RASOR FP7 - Space December Development of a platform to Coordinator: 2013 / June perform multi-hazard risk analysis to 1. Fondazione CIMA - Savona (IT) Rapid Analysis and Space-2013 2016 support the full cycle of disaster Spatialisation Of management, including targeted Consortium: Risk EUR support to critical infrastructure 2. Acrotec Srl – Savona (IT) 2,459,760 monitoring and climate change 3. AG Europe SAS - Simiane-La- Rotonde (FR) REA – 606888 impact assessment, exploiting internally produced and available 4. Altamira Info. Sl – Barcelona (ES) services. Adapting the newly 5. CEFRIS– Pavia (IT)

developed 12m resolution TanDEM- 6. Deutsches Zentrum fuer Luft - und Raumfahrt EV – Koeln (DE) X Digital Elevation Model (DEM) to risk management applications, using 7. Ist. Naz. Geofis. Vulcanol– Roma (IT) it as a base layer to interrogate data 8. Nat. Observatory – Athens (GR) 9. Deltares - Delft (NL) sets and develop specific disaster scenarios. RASOR overlays archived 10. Univ. Strasbourg – Strasbourg (FR) and near-real time very-high resolution optical and radar satellite

data, combined with in-situ data for both global and local applications. A scenario-driven query system allows users to project situations into the future and model multi-hazard risk both before and during an event. Managers can determine the extent of flooding in a given area and determine, for example, the risk Status: pending on Critical Infrastructure ON-GOING Systems. http://www.rasor-project.eu/

7.2.1.8 Crisis emergency, including cascading effects In the field of crisis emergency / response to disasters, a range of projects have been funded by the Secure Societies Programme, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

DISASTER FP7 - Secure February Improvement of inter-operability & Coordinator: Societies 2012 / understanding between 1. Treelogic - Madrid (ES) Data January 2015 heterogeneous Emergency Interoperability Call 2011.5.3-2 Management Systems (EMS) located Consortium: Solution At EUR 2. Univ. Appl Sciences – Cologne (DE) CP in different countries & operating STakeholders 2,783,970 within different contexts. 3. Fundación CTIC - Gijón (ES) Emergency 4. Danish Inst. Fire and Security REA – 285069 Development of common modular Reaction ontology shared by all stakeholders Technol. - Hvidovre (DK) 5. Aimtech consulting ltd - Leeds (UK) to offer best solution to gather all stakeholders knowledge in unique, 6. Veiligheidsregio kennemerland - flexible data model, taking into Haarlem (NL) account different countries cultural, 7. antwortING Ingenieurbüro Weber

linguistic, legal issues. Addressing Schütte Käser Partnerschaft- Köln (DE) interoperability information burden by means of transparent SOA mediation algorithms compliant with current data formats & existing solutions. Status: FINISHED http://disaster-fp7.eu/

IDIRA FP7 - Secure May 2011 / Development of conceptual Coordinator: Societies April 2015 framework for supporting, 1. FhG IVI - Dresden (DE) Interoperability of augmenting regionally available data and Call 2010.4.2-1 EUR emergency management capacities Consortium: procedures in 8,032,971 (including IT systems) with flexibly 2. Salzburg Research - Salzburg (AT) large-scale IP 3. Frequentis AG - Wien (AT) REA – 261726 deployable Mobile Integrated multinational Command & Control Structure. This 4. Brimatech Serv. Gmbh - Wien (AT) disaster response system of technologies & guidelines 5. NKUA - Athens (GR) actions is designed to help in optimal 6. EPPO - Athens (GR) 7. German Red Cross - Dresden (DE) resource planning & operations across national, organisational 8. Univ. Greenwich - London (UK) borders. 9. IES Solutions - Rome (IT) 10. Flexit Systems - Salzburg (AT) 11. Austrian Red Cross - Wien (AT) 12. Hellen. Min. Defence - Athens (GR)

13. Min. Interior CNVVF - Rome (IT) 14. Satways Ltd STWS - Halandri (GR) 15. TLP, spol - Praha (CZ) Status: 16. WAPM-ERR - Geneva (CH) FINISHED 17. Achaia Prefecture - Patra (GR) http://www.idira.eu/ 18. KEMEA - Athens (GR)

HIT-GATE FP7 - Secure February Development of solution for Coordinator: Societies 2012 / communications interoperability 1. Thales – Paris (FR) Heterogeneous August 2014 between First-Responder (FR) Interoperable Call 2011.5.2-1 networks, interconnecting all Consortium: Transportable EUR 2. KEMEA - Athens (GR) existing communication systems via GATEway for First- 3,451,257 a dedicated node, ensuring 3. Teletel SA - Athens (GR) Responders interoperability of all desired 4. Amper Sa - Madrid (ES) REA – 284940 5. CTSC - Madrid (ES) systems without modifications of handset devices, major 6. Edisoft - Porto (PT) communications infrastructure. 7. Rohill Tech.. BV - Hoogeveen (NL) 8. ITTI - Poznan (PL) Status: 9. Thyia Tehnol. doo - Lubjana (SL) FINISHED 10. Rinicom Ltd. - Lancaster (UK) http://www.hit-gate.eu

SICMA FP7 - Secure March 2008 / Improved decision-making Coordinator: Societies August 2010 capabilities through integrated suite 1. Selex - Florence (IT) Simulation of crisis of modelling, analysis tools management Call 2007-4.3-2 EUR providing insights into collective Consortium: activities 2,566,330 behaviour of whole organisation in 2. Skytek Ltd - Dublin (IE) CP 3. Centre for European Security REA– 217855 response to crisis scenarios. Decision Support provided: - preparation, Strategies Gmbh - München (DE) assisting identification - 4. Ifad TS A/S - Odense (DK) implementation, providing forecast 5. Elbit Systems - Haifa (Israel)

of scenario evolution, proposing 6. ITTI Ltd - Poznan (PL) 7. IABG Ind. Betriebsgesellschaft mbh - doctrine-based solutions, evaluating effects of alternative decisions- Ottobrunn (DE) Status: debriefing. 8. CNR - Napoli (IT) FINISHED 9. Univ.. Cattolica del Sacro Cuore - www.sicmaproject.eu Milano (IT)

BRIDGE FP7 - Secure April 2011 / Development of technical, Coordinator: Societies April 2015 organisational solutions that 1. SINTEF - Trondheim (NO) Bridging resources significantly improve crisis, and agencies in Call 2010.4.2-1 EUR emergency management in EU MS Consortium: large-scale 12,983,143 to increase safety of citizens. 2. Almende B.V. - Rotterdam (NL) emergency DEMO 3. CNet Svenska AB - Stockholm (SE) REA– 287658 Platform that will provide technical management support for multi-agency 4. FhG FIT - Sankt Augustin (DE) 5. Lancaster Univ. - Manchester (UK) collaboration in large-scale emergency relief efforts. Key to this 6. Crisis Training AS - Oslo (NO) is to ensure interoperability, 7. SAAB Training Syst. - Huskvarna (SE) harmonization & cooperation among 8. Thales Nederland B.V. - Delft (NL)

stakeholders on technical & 9. Alpen-Adria Univ. - Klagenfurt (AT) 10. Paris-Lodron Univ. - Salzburg (AT) organisational level. 11. Test Gallery Ltd - Zürich (CH) Status: 12. Tech. Univ. Delft- Delft (NL) FINISHED 13. Stockholms Univ. - Stockholm (SE) http://sec-bridge.eu 14. Helse Stav. HF - Stavanger (NO)

EMILI FP7 – Secure January 2010 New generation of data Coordinator: Societies / December management & control systems for 1. FhG IAIS - Sankt Augustin (DE) Emergency 2012 large Infrastructures (CIs) including Management in Call 2009-4.3-3 appropriate simulation & training Consortium: Large EUR 2. Skytec AG - Unterfohring (DE) CP capabilities. Adaptation of today s Infrastructures 3,139,228 control systems to new challenges ( 3. ASIT - Bern (CH need new generation of control 4. Stichting Centrum voor Wiskunde ENTR – en Informatica CWI - Amsterdam (NL) 242438 systems), their methodology & technology. it brings together 5. Aplicaciones en Informática leading research groups in Avanzada AIA - Barcelona (ES)

operational & data management, 6. Ludwig-Maximilians Univ. - Munich (DE) complex event processing, reactivity, knowledge representation, SCADA 7. Inst. Mihailo Pupin - Belgrade (RS)

with industrial partners offering use cases & know-how for SCADA in airports, public transport, power grids. It will strengthen EU research in CI emergency management,

expanding it with focus on event- based, executable knowledge, transfer it into areas of vital socio- Status: economic relevance. FINISHED http://emili-project.eu

This area is complemented by several on-going projects which are dealing with modelling, decision-support tools, guidance systems etc.

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

CASCEFF FP7 - Secure April 2014 / Escalating incidents in complex Coordinator: Societies March 2017 environments can lead to severe 1. Sveriges Tek. Forskningsinst. (SE) - Modelling of cascading effects which can have Göteborg (SE) dependencies and Call 2013.4.1-2 EUR enormous consequences with cascading effects 3,594,938 respect to life and environment. Consortium: for emergency CP 2. E-Semble BV - Delft (NL) REA– 607665 CascEff aims to improve management in understanding the chain of 3. INERIS - Creil (FR) crisis situations cascading effects in crisis situations 4. Lunds Univ. - Malmö (SE) 5. MSB - Karlstad (SE) through the identification of initiators, dependencies and key 6. Northamptonshire County Council decision points. The objectives are (UK) achieved thorugh the development 7. Safety Centre Europe - Antwerpen

of an Incident Evolution Tool. (BE) 8. Service Public Federal Intérieur -

The tool will support Incident Brussels (BE) Status: Commanders to improve their 9. Univ. Lorraine - Metz (FR) ON-GOING response strategy in order to 10. Univ. Gent (BE) reduce collateral damages and 11. Univ. Leicester (UK) other unfortunate consequences associated with large crises. www.casceff.eu

SNOWBALL FP7 - Secure March 2014 / The cascading effects which may Coordinator: Societies February occur in a “system of systems” in 1. GEDICOM - Le Plessis (FR) Lower the impact of 2017 case of a crisis, need to be better aggravating factors Call 2013.4.1-2 understood in order to predict at Consortium: in crisis situations EUR 2. FhG EMI - Freiburg (DE) CP best the impact of the crisis and to thanks to 3,882,463 take the appropriate measures. It is 3. Istit. Sup. Mario Boella - Torino (IT) adaptative 4. Univ. Napoli (IT) REA– 606742 necessary not only to understand foresight & causes and consequences, but also 5. Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Univ. - decision-support why consequences may expand, in Greifswald (DE) tools order to improve public safety. 6. UCL - Brussels (BE) 7. INEO - Paris (FR) The overall objective of the project 8. Szkola Glowna Sluzby Pozarniczej - is to increase the preparedness of Warszawa (PL) the European Union in respect to 9. Pelastusopisto emergency services hazards that could amplify a large college - Kuopio (FI) 54

Status: crisis. A dedicated simulation tool is 10. EvroProject Ood - Sofia (BG) ON-GOING being developed in order for 11. Magyar Vöröskereszt - Budapest decision makers, public authorities, (HU) emergency planners and first respondersto to apprehend, predict and react to the cascading effects that occur in a crisis. http://snowball-project.eu/

EVACUATE FP7 - Secure April 2013 / Development of capabilities of a Coordinator: Societies May 2017 framework that will enhance 1. Exodus AE - Athens (GR) A holistic, scenario- effectiveness of complex crowd independent, Call 2012.4.2-2 EUR evacuation operations by defining Consortium: situation- 8,583,311 the full architecture of required 2. Univ. Southampton IT Innovation awareness and IP Centre - Southampton (UK) REA– 313161 systems & services supporting guidance system for variety of complex crowd 3. ICCS - Athens (GR) sustaining Active evacuation operations, integrating 4. HKV LIJN in Water BV - Lelystad (NL) Evacuation Route existing modules (e.g. visual 5. Telesto Technologies - Athens (GR) for large crowds cameras, hyper-spectral imaging), 6. TEK - Eibar Guipuzcoa (ES) 7. Athens Int. Airport SA - Athens (GR) early location devices, etc., studying, developing underlying 8. Vitrociset spa - Rome (IT) socio-economic environment by 9. Crowd Dynamics Int. - Oxted (UK) addressing ethics, legal issues, 10. INDRA Sistemas - Madrid (ES)

regulation societal context, 11. KULeuven - Leuven (BE) 12. Diginext - Aix en Provence (FR) standardization, National & International operating procedures, 13. Politechnico Di Torino – Torino (IT) and demonstrating developed 14. STX - Saint Nazaire (FR) 15. Tech. Univ. Dresden (DE) system, validating its operational characteristics in full-scale field 16. TU Chemnitz (DE) Status: trials that will simulate realistic 17. Real Sociedad De Futbol Sad - San ON-GOING emergencies, crises. Sebastian (ES) 18. Metro Bilbao SA (ES) www.evacuate.eu 19. Telecom Italia Spa - Milano (IT)

PREDICT FP7 - Secure April 2014 / PREDICT aims at developing a Coordinator: Societies March 2017 comprehensive solution for dealing 1. CEA- Paris (FR) PREparing for the with cascading effects in muti- Domino effect in Call 2013.4.1 EUR sectorial crisis situations covering Consortium: Crisis siTuations 3,460,193 aspects of critical infrastructures. 2. ITTI Sp - Poznan (PL) CP 3. FhG IAIS - Sankt Augustin (DE) REA– 607697 The PREDICT solution will be composed of the following three 4. Thales - Paris (FR) pillars: methodologies, models and 5. CEIS - Brussels (BE) software tools. A generic approach 6. TNO - Delft (NL)

will be setup to prevent or mitigate 7. VTT - Espoo (FI) 8. Safety Region South Holland - cascading effects which will be applied in selected cases agreed Amsterdam (NL) with with end-users. 9. Syke Finnish Environment Institute - Helsinki (FI) Status: Three end-users are part of the 10. Int. Union railways - Paris (FR) ON-GOING project and are directly involved in 11.Thales Res.Techn..- The Hague (NL) the three test cases that will validate the PREDICT Suite.

.http://www.predict-project.eu/

S(P)EEDKITS FP7 - Secure March 2012 / Provide kits that can be pre- Coordinator: Societies February positioned, mobilized very quickly, 1. VUB / Centexbel - Brussels (BE) Rapid deployable 2016 easily, modular, adaptable, low kits as seeds for Call 2011.4.2-3 cost, high-tech in conception but Consortium: self-recovery EUR 2. Croix-Rouge - Luxembourg (LU) IP low-tech in use. These kits can 6,117,066 literally improve lives of millions of 3. Red Cross - Amsterdam (NL) 4. Sioen Industries NV - Ardooie (BE) REA– 284931 peoples the first hours, days, weeks after major disaster. It targets 5. VUB - Brussels (BE) smart (re-)design of existing /novel 6. TU Eindhoven (NL)

kits via smart packaging & via 7. Politecnico di Milano (IT) 8. D’Appolonia Spa - Genova (IT) introduction of latest technological developments from wide range of 9. De Mobiele Fab.- Amsterdam (NL) domains like coated textile 10. Stichting Waste - Gouda (NL) materials, ICT, material 11. Sticht. Practica - Papendrecht (NL) 12. Int. Biogas Bioenergie Kompet.. - 55

development, tensile structures & Kirchberg/Jagst (DE) construction. 13. Millson BV - Apeldoorn (NL) 14. Médecins sans frontieres -

Status: Amsterdam (NL) ON-GOING 15. Norwegian Refugee Council - Oslo (NO) http://www.speedkits.eu/

FORTRESS FP7 - Secure April 2014 / Improved crisis management Coordinator: Societies March 2017 practices by identifying the 1. TUB Berlin (DE) Foresight Tools for diversity of cascading effects due to Responding to Call 2013-1 EUR the multiple interrelations of Consortium: cascading effects in 3,400,666 2. Trilateral Res. & Cons.- London (UK) CP systems and systems of systems, a crisis and by designing a tool that will 3. Trrelogic - Madrid (ES) REA – 607579 4. EDF - Paris (FR) assist in forecasting potential cascading effects. The Scenario 5. Dialogik - Stuttgart (DE) Builder (FSB) is a web-based 6. IRKS-Research Gmbh - Wien (AT) platform that enables stakeholders 7. Ritchey Consult. - Stockholm (SE)

from different sectors to map their 8. Univ. College London (UK) 9. Ist. Sup. Sistemi Territoriali per system elements, indicate criticalities and dependency- l’Innovazione - Torino (IT) relations in a collaborative process. 10. GMV Aerospace and Defence SA Unipersona - Madrid (ES) Two main innovations for inter- 11. GGD Veiligheidsregio sectoral risk management can be Kennemerland - Haarlem (NL) expected, first, inter- 12. SDIS- 04 - Gardanne (FR) connectedness of infrastructure 13. Berliner Wasserbetriebe - Berlin systems and mapping of these (DE)

connections in a proper way, second, indication by users (CI operators, crisis managers) of their Status: relevant sub-systems, objects, ON-GOING criticalities and relations. http://fortress-project.eu/

7.2.1.9 Systems of systems demonstration for post-crisis management (generic) Post-crisis management has been investigated by a CSA for preparing demonstrations and experiments: Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

ACRIMAS FP7 - Secure February Development of user-centric, Coordinator: Societies 2011 / scenario-based approach for 1. FhG INT – Euskirchen (DE) Aftermath Crisis May 2012 Crisis management (CM) Management Call 2010.4.1-1 integrating diverse technologies, Consortium: System-of-systems CSA EUR concepts, frameworks, decision 2. EADS Cassidian - Paris (FR) Demonstration 1,109,381 supports, logistics etc. 3.KEMEA - Αthens (GR) 4.Crisis Man. Initiat. - Helsinki (FI) Preparation of demonstrations & experiments for enhancing CM 5. JRC - Brussels (BE) REA – 261669 capabilities, procedures, 6. DEMOKRITOS - Athens (GR) technologies, policies, standards 7. TNO - Delft (NL)

through real field tests, 8. NFIV - Arnhem (NL) 9. SELEX -Rome (IT) facilitating EU wide collaboration in CM and improving cross- 10. Technol. Frontières - Brussels (BE) Status: fertilisation between MS. 11. FOI - Stockholm (SE) FINISHED 12. Turk. Kizilay Dernegi - Ankara (TR) www.acrimas.eu 13. UNU-EHS - Bonn (DE),

7.2.2 Geological hazards Research and studies about geological hazards have been mainly undertaken by the Space and Environment programmes, covering tools and technological developments supporting various steps of crisis and disaster risk management. 7.2.2.1 Data access to geohazard information Geohazard data gathering has been subject to a GMES related project involving a wide range of organisations, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

PanGeo FP7 - Space February Service enabling free and open Coordinator: 2011 / access to geohazard information in 1. CGG Services - Crawley (UK) Enabling access to Space-2010-1 January 2014 support of GMES achieved by the geological generation of a validated Geohazard Consortium: information in EUR Data Layer supported by a 2. ABConsulting – Edinburgh (UK) support of GMES 2,404,925 Geohazard Summary for 52 of the 3. Adm. Ponts et Chaussees– Luxembourg (LU) REA – 242371 largest towns listed in the GMES Land Theme’s Urban Atlas involving 4. Altamira Info. – Barcelona (ES) all 27 countries of the EU. Upon 5.Bund. Geowissens.– Hannover (DE) user enquiry, a PanGeo web-portal 6. BRGM – Paris (FR)

will automatically integrate the 7. CTTC – Castelldefels (ES) 8. Ceska Geol. Sluzba - Prague (CZ) geohazard data with the Urban Atlas to highlight the polygons influenced. 9. CGG Mapping Ltd - Crawley (UK) The datasets will be made 10.Inst. Geomatica–Castelldefels (ES) 11. Depa. Comm., Energy and Natural discoverable, accessible and useable via a distributed web-map system as Resources – Dublin (IE) built and demonstrated by 12. Eesti Geol.– Tallinn (EE) OneGeology Europe 13. Ethniko Kentro Viosimis Kai

(www.onegeology-europe.eu). Aeiforou Anaptyxis – Acharnae (GR) 14. EuroGeoSurveys – Brussels (BE)

Products will be made by 15. Fed. Eur. Geologues – Paris (FR) integrating: a) interpreted InSAR 16. Gamma Remote Sensing Research terrain-motion data (derived from And Consulting AG – Gumligen (CH) existing projects, e.g. ESA GSE 17. Geol. Tutkimuskeskus – Espoo (FI) Terrafirma plus new processing), b) 18. Geol. Survey – Copenhagen (DK) geological information, and c) the 19. Geol. Bundesanstalt – Wien (AT) landcover and landuse data 20. Geol. Zavod Slov.– Ljubljana (SI) contained within the Urban Atlas. 21. IGME – Madrid (ES) The integration and interpretation, 22. Inst. Geol.– Acharnae (GR) plus a validation of key features 23.Inst. Royal Scie. Nat – Brussels(BE) observed, will be made by the 24. Inst. Geol. Rom.– Bucharest (RO) corresponding national Geological 25. ISPRA – Rome (IT) Survey for the towns concerned. It 26. LNEG - S.Mamede de infesta (PT)

is planned to deliver the service for 27.Landmark Info. Group–Exeter (UK) two Urban Atlas towns in each 28. Latvijas Univ.– Riga (LV) country of the EU (Luxembourg and 29. Liet. Geol. - Vilnius (LT) Cyprus only 1), equalling fifty-two 30. Magyar Allami Foldtani Intezet – towns in total. The geological survey Budapest (HU) concerned will choose the towns for 31. Magyar Foldtani es Geofizikai processing from the Urban Atlas list Intezet – Budapest (HU) using their own knowledge as to 32. MRA - Marsa (MT)

where the information will be of 33. Min. Agriculture – Nicosia (CY) most use, probably the largest 34. Min. Environ. - Sofia (BG) towns, which, when extrapolated, 35. NERC - Swindon (UK) would equal (13% of total EU urban 36. TNO – Delft (NL) population). User input to design 37. Inst. Geologiczny - Warszawa (PL) will be facilitated by the Surveys 38. Statny Geol.– Bratislava (SK) contracted into the project and 39. Sveriges Geol. - Uppsala (SE) initiation of ‘Local Authority 40. SIRS - Villeneuve d’Ascq (FR) Status: Feedback Group’. 41. T.R.E. S.R.L. – Milano (IT) FINISHED 42. Univ. Mining Geol. - Sofia (BG) http://www.pangeoproject.eu/

7.2.2.2 Detection of earth-surface / ground deformations Earth observation imaging have been used for detecting earthquake precursors and ground deformations, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

DORIS FP7 - Space October 2010 Advanced downstream service for Coordinator: / September the detection, mapping, monitoring 1. CNR – Rome (IT) Ground Space-2009-1 2013 and forecasting of ground Deformations Risk deformations, that integrates Consortium: Scenarios: an EUR traditional and innovative Earth 2. Agenzia Spaziale Ital.– Roma (IT) Advanced 3,395,866 Observation (EO) and ground based 3. Altamira Info. Sl - Barcelona (ES) Assessment Service (non-EO) data and technologies. 4. Booz & Comp. BV– Amsterdam (NL) REA – 242212 5. Booz & Comp. – Düsseldorf (DE) Evaluation of new SAR sensors, including ALOS, COSMO-SkyMed and 6. FDETEC.– Bern (CH) TERRASAR-X, exploiting the different 7. GRSRC – Gumligen (CH) bands (L/X), the significantly 8. IGME– Madrid (ES)

reduced revisiting time, and the 9. MFGI – Budapest (HU) 10. Panst. Inst. Geol. - Warszawa (PL) higher spatial resolution offered by these sensors. Mapping ground 11. Protezione Civile – Rome (IT) deformations, to identify the 12. Tecnol. Osserv. della Terra ed i Rischi Naturali - Tito Scalo (IT) Status: elements at risk, and for dynamic risk scenarios design. 13. T.R.E. s.r.l. – Milano (IT) FINISHED 14. Univ. Firenze – Florence (IT)

SEMEP FP7 - Space December Investigation of the short-term Coordinator: 2010 / transient processes in the global 1. Univ. Sheffield (UK) Search for Electro- Space-2010-1 November lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere Magnetic 2012 coupled system using synchronous Consortium: Earthquake satellite and ground-based 2. CNRS- Paris (FR) Precursors EUR 452,515 observations. Analysis of data 3. Russian Acad. Sci. Physics of the combining satellite Earth RAS – Moskva (RU) REA – 262005 obtained from several micro- and ground-based satellites, including the French 4. Inst. Marine Geol., Russian Acad. Sci. facilities spacecraft DEMETER together with - Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk (RU) 5. Space Res. Inst. Russian Acad. Sci.– those collected from the specialized network of identical VLF receivers Moskva (RU) distributed in Russia, Europe and Japan. Creation of experimental

database of electromagnetic and seismic observations from both satellite and ground-based sources using data covering the Far East and Status: Southern European regions. FINISHED http://www.ssg.group.shef.ac.uk/ semep/

SENSUM FP7 - Space January 2013 Innovative methodologies and Coordinator: / December software tools for dynamic, multi- 1. Helmholtz-Zentrum – Potsdam (DE) Framework to Space-2012-1 2014 resolution monitoring of pre- integrate Space- disaster vulnerability and Consortium: based and in-situ EUR preparedness and post-disaster 2. Central-Asian Inst. Appl. sENSing for 1,931,683 recovery planning and monitoring, Geosciences – Bishkek (KG) dynamic 3. CEFRIS– Pavia (IT) REA – 312972 based on current and future space- vUlnerability and based products and a novel 4. Deutsches Zentr. Luft - und recovery approach to in-situ observation for Raumfahrt EV – Koeln (DE) Monitoring data rich and data poor countries, 5. Imagecat Ltd – Ashtead (UK) 6. Inst. Geol., Acad. Sci. Republic of with focus on earthquake and landslide related vulnerability Tajikistan - Dushanbe (TJ) indicators through test-cases in and 7. Stiftelsen Norges Geotekniske Inst.– outside Europe. Oslo (NO) Status: 8. Univ. Cambridge – Cambridge (UK) FINISHED http://www.sensum- project.eu/home

In the area of ground deformation, a project has focused on subsidence hazards in coastal areas, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

SUBCOAST FP7 - Space April 2010 / Development of service for Coordinator: September monitoring subsidence effects in 1. TNO – Delft (NL) A collaborative Call 2009.1.1.01 2013 coastal lowlands and project aimed at demonstrate its capability in Consortium: developing a GMES- EUR various pilots for a variety of 2. Univ. Bologna – Bologna (IT) service for 3,108,688 settings around Europe with 3. Consorci Institut de Geomatica – monitoring and Castelldefels (ES REA – 242332 focus on flood risks. Monitoring forecasting of integrity of coastal barrier 4. Fugro NPA Ltd – Edenbridge (UK) subsidence hazards systems and infrastructure and 5. Hansje Brinker BV – Delft (NL) in coastal areas assessment of impact of 6. Lietuvos geologijos tarnyba prie around Europe subsidence due to natural or Aplinkos ministerijos – Vilnius (LT) 7. NERC - Swindon Wiltshire (UK) man-made causes (groundwater pumping and oil/gas production) 8. Inst. Geologiczny – Panstwowy (PL) on land use and hydrology. 9. Inst. Badawczy – Warszawa (PL) Validation using the Terrafirma 10. Stichting Deltares – Delft (NL)

site. Services oriented along 11. Tech. Univ. Delft – Delft (NL) 12. T.R.E. s.r.l. – Milano (IT) existing guidelines established in previous GMES-projects, and in 13. Geol. Survey of Denmark and line with relevant directives at Greenland – Copenhagen (DK) Status: European Level. FINISHED http://www.subcoast.eu/ An on-going project funded by the FP7 People programme is aiming to bring together experts in the area of real-time detection of earth-surface deformation, that is:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

MELINA FP7 – People October 2013 Bringing together experts in Coordinator: / September geodetic satellite positioning for 1. Techn. Univ. Crete – Chania (GR) Development of a FP7-PEOPLE- 2017 precise earth-surface deformation global network for 2013-IRSES monitoring related to natural Consortium: the real-time EUR 151,200 disasters, like earthquakes, 2. Latvijas Universitate - Riga (LV) Detection of REA – 612590 landslides, rockfalls, etc. to develop failures and statistical tools for early detection of extreme events in failures or progressive secular natural disasters changes of very small magnitude in geodetic monitoring signals, in a timely, precise, uniform and reliable manner to support early warnings. Networking activity achieved by

sharing knowledge, enhancing research training, and finally acquiring new techniques through algorithm development for quality Status: control and deformation monitoring ON-GOING of signals produced by satellite positioning.

7.2.2.3 Landslides assessment and preparedness This area is linked to the above projects. The example below is more focused on landslide events than on ground deformation. It focuses on modelling and risk management.

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

LAMPRE FP7 - Space March 2013 / Increasing GMES limited operational Coordinator: February capacity to cope with triggered 1. CNR – Rome (IT) LAndslide Space-2012-1 2015 landslide events and their Modelling and tools consequences, in Europe and Consortium: for vulnerability EUR elsewhere. Enhanced landslide risk 2. Altamira Info.– Barcelona (ES) assessment 1,964,196 mitigation/preparedness efforts and 3. Fed. Dep. Environment Transports Preparedness and Energy and Comm.– Bern (CH) REA – 312384 post-event-landslide recovery and REcovery reconstruction activities, in highly 4. Geomatrix UAB – Kaunas (LT) management vulnerable geographic and geologic 5. IGME– Madrid (ES) 6. King's College– London (UK) regions, achieved by dynamically integrating satellite/airborne 7. Pernice Umberto – Palermo (IT) imagery, designing and using 8. Protezione Civile – Rome (IT) intelligent image processing 9. PWC Strategy & Consulting

techniques, modelling landslide- Netherlands) B.V. – Amsterdam (NL) 10. Univ. Firenze – Florence (IT) infrastructure interactions using advanced numerical modelling and ground based thematic information, and proposing standards for landslide mapping, susceptibility Status: zonation and image processing. FINISHED http://www.lampre-project.eu/

7.2.2.4 Seismic risk evaluation and earthquake risk reduction, preparedness and protection Seismic risks and related research on prevention, scenario building etc. have been subject to a wide range of research projects funded by various programmes, in particular the FP7 Environment programme. The table below gives a snapshot of finished projects with a focus on risk reduction:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

MARSITE FP7 - November State of the art assessment of Coordinator: Environment 2012 / seismic risk evaluation and 1. Bogazici Universitesi – Istanbul (TR) New Directions in October 2015 management at European level, Seismic Hazard Call 2012.6.4-2 moving a “step forward” towards Consortium: assessment EUR new concepts of risk mitigation 2. AMRA - Napoli (IT) through Focused 5,965,286 and management by long-term 3. BRGM – Paris (FR) Earth Observation monitoring activities carried out 4. CNRS – Paris (FR) in the Marmara RTD – 5. CEFRIS – Pavia (IT) 308417 both on land and at sea in the Supersite Marmara Sea and in the 6. CNR – Roma (IT) 7. Daimar Srl - Mazara Del Vallo Tp (IT) surrounding urban and country areas. Coordination of initiatives 8. EM Seism. Cent.– Arpajon (FR) to collect multidisciplinary data, 9. European Space Agency – Paris (FR) to be shared, interpreted and 10. Guralp Systems Ltd - Reading (UK)

merged in consistent theoretical 11. Helmholtz-Zentrum– Potsdam (DE) 12. IFREMER - Issy-Les-Moulineaux (FR) and practical models suitable for the implementation of good 13. IFSTTAR - Marne La Vallee (FR) practices to move the necessary 14. INERIS - Verneuil En Halatte (FR) information to the end users. 15. Teknik Universitesi – Istanbul (TR) 16. Istanbul Universitesi - Istanbul (TR) 17. Ist. Naz. Geofis. Vulc.– Roma (IT) 18. Kocaeli Univ. - Izmit Kocaeli (TR) 19. Sarmap Sa – Bedigliora (CH) 20. Turkiye Bilimsel Ve Teknolojik Status: Arastirma Kurumu – Ankara (TR) FINISHED http://marsite.eu/ 21.Univ. Pavia – Pavia (IT)

SHARE FP7 - June 2009 / Harmonized assessment of Coordinator: Environment November seismic hazard (engineering 1. Eidgenoessische Tech. Hochschule Seismic Hazard 2012 requirements and applications, Zurich – Zuerich (CH) Harmonization in Call 2008.1.3.1.1. collection and analysis of input Europe EUR data, procedures for hazard Consortium: 3,200,000 2. Aristotelio Pan.– Thessaloniki (GR) assessment).Unified framework and computational infrastructure 3. Bogazici Universitesi – Istanbul (TR) RTD – 4. BRGM – Paris (FR) 226967 for seismic hazard assessment and integrated European 5. CRAAG - Alger (DZ)

probabilistic seismic hazard 6. Helmholtz-Zentrum – Potsdam (DE) 7. Inst. Superior Tecnico – Lisboa (PT) assessment (PSHA) model and specific scenario based modeling 8. Inst. Nat. Cercetare - Bucuresti (RO) tools serving as reference for the 9. Ist. Naz. Geofis. Vulcanol– Roma (IT) 10. Kon. Sterrenwacht - Brussels (BE) Eurocode 8 application. Homogeneous input for the 11. LNEC – Lisboa (PT) correct seismic safety assessment 12. Middle East Tech.Univ– Ankara (TR) for critical industry, such as the 13. Nati. Univ. Athens – Athens (GR)

energy infrastructures and the re- 14.NERC - Swindon Wiltshire (UK) 15. Seizmol. Zavod– Podgorica (ME) insurance sector. 16. Stiftelsen Norsar (NO) Status: http://www.share-eu.org/ 17. Univ. Pavia – Pavia (IT) FINISHED 18. Univ. Joseph Fourier– Grenoble (FR)

PERPETUATE FP7 - January 2010 Development of European Coordinator: Environment / December Guidelines for evaluation and 1. Univ. Genova - Genova (IT) Performance-based 2012 mitigation of seismic risk to approach to the Call 2009.3.2.1.1 cultural heritage assets, with Consortium: earthquake EUR innovative techniques for the 2. AN Nuove Tecnol., energia, Sviluppo 3,499,993 Econ. Sostenibile – Roma (IT) protection of seismic strengthening of historical buildings and the preservation of 3. Aristotelio Pan.– Thessaloniki (GR) cultural heritage in RTD – 4. BRGM - Paris (FR) European and 244229 artworks (frescos, stucco-works, statues, battlements, banisters, 5. Gradbeni Inst. – Ljubljana (SI) Mediterranean …). Validation of methodology 6. Il Cenacolo Srl – Roma (IT) countries including vulnerability evaluation 7.Nat.Technical Univ.- Athens (GR) 8.Proind Srl Prod. Indust. – Opera (IT) and design of interventions, use of safety verification in terms of 9.Univ. Sciences et la Technologie displacement etc. Houari Boumediene – Alger (DZ) 10. Univ. Bath – Bath (UK) Status: http://www.perpetuate.eu/ 11. Univerza V Ljubljani – Ljubljana (SI) FINISHED

NERA FP7 - November Improvement and long-term Coordinator: Infrastructure 2010 / impact in the assessment and 1. Eidgenoessische Tech. Hochschule Network of October 2014 reduction of the vulnerability of Zurich – Zuerich (CH) European Research Call INFRA-2010- constructions and citizens to Infrastructures for 1.1.27 EUR earthquakes. Integration of the Consortium: Earthquake Risk 9,000,000 key research infrastructures in 2. CSIC – Madrid (ES) Assessment and 3. Aust. Inst. Technol. – Wien (AT) RTD –262330 Europe to monitor earthquakes Mitigation and assess their hazard and risk, 4. AMRA – Napoli (IT) 5. Aristotelio Pan.– Thessaloniki (GR) combining expertise in observational and strong-motion 6. Bogazici Universitesi – Istanbul (TR) seismology, modeling, 7. Architect. Res. Ltd– Cambridge (UK) geotechnical and earthquake 8. CNRS – Paris (FR)

engineering to develop activities 9. CEFRIS – Pavia (IT) 10. EM Seismol. Cent.– Arpajon (FR) to improve the use of infrastructures and facilitate the 11. Univ. Lisboa – Lisboa (PT) access to data. Provision of high- 12. Helmholtz-Zent. - Potsdam (DE) 13. Inst Tech. Seism. - Thessaloniki (GR) quality services, including access to earthquake data and 14. Inst. Nat. Cercetare - Bucuresti (RO) parameters and to hazard and 15. Ist. Naz. Geofis. Vulc.– Roma (IT) risk products and tools. 16. Inst. Technologie – Karlsruhe (DE)

Coordination with other EC 17. KUL – Leuven (BE) 18. Meteorologisch Insti. - De Bilt (NL) projects (SHARE, SYNER-G) for comprehensive dissemination 19. Middle East Tech.Univ– Ankara (TR) effort. Contribution to OECD 20. Nat. Observatory – Athens (GR) 21. NERC - Swindon Wiltshire (UK) GEM program and to EPOS ESFRI infrastructure.. 22. Earthquake Plan. Org. – Athens (GR) 23. Forsch. Prüfz.. Arsena – Vienna (AT) 24. Stichting Orfeus - De Bilt (NL) 25. Stiftelsen Norsar – Kjeller (NO) 26. Univ. Liverpool – Liverpool (UK)

27. Universitaet Linz – Linz (AT) 28. Univ. Leicester – Leicester (UK) 29. Vce Holding Gmbh – Wien (AT) Status: 30. Vedurstofa Islands – Reykjavik – (IS) FINISHED http://www.nera-eu.org/

BLACKSEAHAZNET FP7 - People January 2011 Coordinated joint program of Coordinator: / December researcher’s exchanges on 1. Inst. Nuclear Res. – Sofia (BG) Complex Research Call 2009. 2013 earthquake forecasting. of Earthquake’s Proposed regional network as Consortium: Prediction EUR 475,200 first step for creating wide 2. Geol. Inst. St.Dimitrov- Sofia (BG) Possibilities, 3. Cent. Mar.Res. - Anavissos Attiki (GR) REA – 246874 interdisciplinary scientific Seismicity and consortia for formulation of more 4. Jozef Stefan Institute- Ljubljana (SI) Climate Change adequate models of today 5. Nat. Inst. Geophysics – Sofia (BG) Correlations Climate change, Earth seismic 6. Space & Solar Terrestrial Research Institute – Sofia (BG) processes as well as different time scales regional earthquakes 7. Univ. Skopje - Skopje (FY) forecasts. Which will the bases 8. TUBITAK Marmara Research Center for future EC framework , - Gebze, Kocaeli (TR) Status: regional and bilateral Projects. 9. Znanstvenoraziskovalni Center - FINISHED Ljubljana (SI) http://theo.inrne.bas.bg/~mavro di/ blackseahaznet/

REAKT FP7 - September Improvement of efficiency of Coordinator: Environment 2011 / real-time earthquake risk 1. AMRA - Napoli (IT) Strategies and tools December mitigation methods and their for Real Time 2011.1.3.1-1 2014 capability of protecting Consortium: Earthquake RisK structures, infrastructures and 2. Arist.. Panepist.–Thessaloniki (GR) ReducTion EUR populations. Developed 3. Bogazici Univ.– Istanbul (TR) 6,972,190 methodologies to enhance the 4. BRGM - Paris (FR) 5. CNRS - Paris (FR) RTD – 282862 quality of information provided by earthquake forecasting, early 6. CEFRIS – Pavia (IT) warning and real-time 7. Cceo - St Augustine (TT)

vulnerability systems, as well as 8. Eidg. Tech. Hochsch.– Zuerich (CH) 9. EM Seismol. Centre – Arpajon (FR) establishing best practices for how to use all of this information 10. Helmholtz-Zentr. - Potsdam (DE) in a unified manner. In order to 11. Inst. Sup. Tecn.– Lisboa (PT) 12. Inst. Nat. Cercetare-Bucuresti (RO) be used effectively, such information needs to be 13.Ist.Naz.Geofis.Vulcanol.– Roma (IT) combined into a fully 14.Karlsr. Inst.Tech.– Karlsruhe (DE) probabilistic framework, 15. Min. Land, Infrastructure, Transport

including realistic estimates of And Tourism - Tokyo (JP) 16. Univ. Athens - Athens (GR) the uncertainties involved, that is suitable for decision making in 17. Nat. Taiwan Univ.– Taipei (TW) real time. through operational 18. Univ. Edinburgh – Edinburgh (UK) 19. Univ. West Indies - Kingston (JM) earthquake forecasting, early warning and rapid assessment of 20. Univ. Patras - Rio Patras (GR) damage and vulnerability, 21. Univ. Southern California - Los decision making and capacity Angeles (US) building, and the application of 22. Univ. Ulster – Coleraine (UK) 23.Vedurstofa Islands – Reykjavik (IS) Status: the developed methodologies to FINISHED 12 strategic test cases. http://www.reaktproject.eu/

SYNER-G FP7 – November Elaborating, in the European Coordinator: Environment 2011 / March context, fragility relationships for 1. Aristotelio Panepistimio Systemic Seismic 2013 the vulnerability analysis and loss Thessalonikis – Thessaloniki (GR) Vulnerability and ENV.2009.1.3.2.2 estimation of all elements at risk, Risk Analysis for EUR Consortium: CP for buildings, building aggregates, Buildings, Lifeline 3,500,000 utility networks (water, waste 2. AMRA – Napoli (IT) Networks and 3. BRGM – Paris (FR) RTD – 244061 water, energy, gas), Infrastructures transportation systems (road, 4. JRC – Brussels (BE) Safety Gain railways, harbors) as well as 5. Karlsruher Inst. Technol.– Karlsruhe (DE) complex medical care facilities (hospitals) and fire-fighting 6. Middle East Techn. Univ.– Ankara systems. (2) To develop social (TR) and economic vulnerability 7. Nat. Univ. Corporation - Kobe (JP)

relationships for quantifying the 8. Stiftelsen Norges Geotekniskeinstit.– Oslo (NO) 62

impact of earthquakes. (3) To 9. Univ. Illinois – Champaign (US) develop a unified methodology, 10. Univ. Pavia – Pavia (IT) and tools, for systemic 11. Univ. la Sapienza – Roma (IT) vulnerability assessment 12. Univ. Patras - Rio Patras (GR° accounting for all components 13. VCE Holding GmbH – Wien (AT) (structural and socio-economic) 14. Willis Limited - London (UK) exposed to seismic hazard, Status: considering interdependencies FINISHED within a system unit and between systems. http://www.vce.at/SYNER-G/

In the same area (risk reduction), an international cooperation is on-going under the FP7 People programme, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

TCAINMAND FP7 – People January 2014 Sino-Latin American-European Coordinator: / December team of researchers to exploit 1. Centre Int. Metodes Numerics en Tri Continental Call People-2013 2017 open source codes and numerical enginyeria - Barcelona (ES) Alliance in methods for designing effective Numerical Methods EUR 436,800 tools to mitigate the main Natural Consortium: applied to Natural 2. Swansea Univ. - Swansea (UK) REA – 612607 Disasters in the three regions, by Disasters a collaborative interchange of software resources, scientific knowledge and, naturally, scientific experts in the different fields. Besides the two European

partners, an American one, Status: CIMAT in Mexico and a fourth and ON-GOING last partner in Asia, Tsinghua University (THU). http://tcainmand.cimne.com/ Other projects dealt with specific issues related to protection and monitoring of earthquake risks:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

NIKER FP7 – January 2010 Study of earthquake-induced Coordinator: Environment / December failure mechanisms, construction 1. Univ. Padova (IT) New integrated 2012 types and materials, intervention knowledge based 2009.3.2.1.1 and assessment techniques and Consortium: approaches to the EUR cross-correlations aiming to 2. Bozza Legnami S.r.l. - Vigonza (IT) protection of 2,736,114 develop new integrated 3. BAM – Berlin (DE) cultural heritage 4. Cairo Univ.– Giza (EG) RTD – 244123 methodologies with a systemic from earthquake- approach. Testing of novel 5. Cintec International Ltd. – Newport induced risk collaborative combinations of (UK) 6. Ecole Nat. Architect.– Rabat (MA) them will be tested on structural components (walls, pillars, floors, 7. Gazi Univ.– Ankara (TR) vaults) and on structural 8. Interprojekt d.o.o. – Mostar (BA) connections (wall-, floor- and 9. Israel Antiquities Authority –

roof-to-wall), which converge the Jerusalem (IL) 10. Monumenta - Lisboa (PT) behaviour of single strengthened elements into the global 11. NTUA– Athens (GR) structural response. The 12. Politec. Milano (IT) 13. S&B - Kifissia Athina (GR) envisaged techniques have been validated on model buildings and 14. Univ. Minho – Braga (PT) substructures.. 15. Univ. Politec. Catalunya – Barcelona (ES) 16. Univ. Bath (UK) 17. Ustav Teoreticke a Aplikovane Status: Mechaniky Avcr- Praha (CZ) FINISHED http://www.niker.eu/ 18. Ziegert Seiler Ingenieure Gmbh – Berlin (DE) 63

PRE-EARTHQUAKES FP7 - Space January 2011 Cooperation among EU and Coordinator: / December Russian researchers to integrate 1. Univ. della Basilicata - Potenza (IT) Support EO-driven Space-2010-1 2012 different observational data forest and carbon (including ESA and ROSKOSMOS Consortium: monitoring in EUR 499,490 satellite data) and to improve, by 2. Deutsches Zentr. Luft - Und Central Africa for Raumfahrt EV – Koeln (DE) REA – 263502 cross-validating, their REDD methodologies, in order to 3. Geospazio Italia s.r.l. – Potenza (IT) 4. ITMIRW, Acad. Sci.– Troitsk (RU) improve our knowledge of preparatory phases of 5. Russian Space Syst. - Moscow (RU) earthquakes and their possible 6. State Inst. Appl. Geophysics – Moskva precursors, and to promote a (RU)

worldwide Earthquake 7. Turkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu – Ankara (TR) Observation System (EQuOS) as a dedicated component of GEOSS Status: (Global Earth Observation System FINISHED of Systems). In the area of response / rescue operations, projects focused on search of victims in collapsed building further to an earthquake in an urban environment, and other types of disasters (e.g. tsunami):

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

SGL FOR USAR FP7 - Secure October 2008 Oriented towards solving critical Coordinator: Societies / October problems following large scale 1. Nat. Tech. Univ. - Athens (GR) Second generation 2012 structural collapses in urban locator for urban Call 2007-4.2-2 locations, combining chemical & Consortium: search and rescue EUR 2. SDIS 84 - Avignon (FR) CP physical sensors integration with operations 4,859,026 development of an open ICT 3. DGPEI - Barcelona (ES) 4. Faenzy Srl - Grossetto (IT) REA– 217967 platform for addressing mobility & time-critical requirements of USaR 5. VTT - Espoo (FI) Operations. Focus on medical issues, 6. GAS - Dortmund (DE) on relevant ethical dilemmas. 7. Ecomed bvba - Brussels (BE)

Development of two tangible 8. Environics Oy - Mikkeli (FI) 9. Austrian Acad. Sci. - Wien (AT) product prototypes: FIRST portable rescue device to monitor hazardous 10. Entente de l’Environnement contre conditions or locate entrapped l’Incendie - Gardanne (FR) 11. ANCO SA - Athens (GR) victims/dead bodies within collapsed buildings; REDS network of remotely 12. Univ. Dortmund (DE) controlled sensors, installed in a 13. TEMAI Ingenieros - Madrid (ES). collapsed building for unattended Univ. Politec. Madrid (ES)

monitoring & to detect life signs or 15. Savox Comm. Ltd - Espoo (FI) 16. Univ. Athens (GR) hazardous conditions. 17. Markes Int. - Mid Glamorgan (UK) 18. Bay Zoltan Foundation for Applied Res. - Budapest (HU) Status: www.sgl-eu.org 19. Critical Links SA - Coimbra (PT) FINISHED 20. Univ. Loughborough (UK)

ICARUS FP7 - Secure February Development of integrated solutions Coordinator: Societies 2012 / for search, rescue teams that act 1. Ecole Royale Militaire - Brussels (BE) Integrated January 2016 after disasters, such as earthquakes Components for Call 2011.4.2-2 in Haiti, Italy, tsunami in Japan. Consortium: Assisted Rescue EUR 2. Space Appl. Services - Brussels (BE) IP Unmanned vehicles (land, air, sea) and Unmanned 12,584,933 will be equipped with sensors to 3. Estudios GIS - Miñano (ES) Search operations detect victims that will facilitate 4. CTAE - Barcelona (ES) REA– 285417 5. FhG IZM- Berlin (DE) rescue work. Introduction of unmanned Search & Rescue devices 6. IMM - Warszawa (PL) can offer a valuable tool to save 7. JMDThèque - Binic (FR) human lives, to speed up SAR 8. TU Wien (AT)

process. ICARUS concentrates on 9. IntegraSys - Madrid (ES) 10. Skybotix AG - Zurich (CH) development of unmanned SAR technologies for detecting, locating, 11. Quobis Networks SL - Vigo (ES) rescuing humans. 12. INESC Porto - Porto (PT) 13. Univ. Neuchatel (CH) 14. ETHZ - Zurich (CH) 15. Atos - Madrid (ES) 16. TU Kaiserslautern (DE) 17.NATO Undersea Res.- La Spezia (IT) 64

18. Calzoni Srl - Calderara Di Reno (IT) 19.Metalliance- St Lubin la Haye (FR) 20. Esri Portugal - Lisboa (PT) 21. SpaceTec Partners - Brussels (BE) 22. Escola Naval CINAV - Lisboa (PT) Status: 23. Belgian cross Bfast - Brussels (BE) FINISHED 24. EPFL - Lausanne (CH) http ://www.fp7-icarus.eu/ 25. Allen-Vanguard- Tewkesbury (UK),

7.2.2.5 Tsunami risk evaluation and reduction Fundamental research on tsunamis has been initiated in several programmes, an example of which is given below (ERC):

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

URBANWAVES FP7 – ERC January 2014 Using experimental capability to Coordinator: / December reproduce flows on shorelines 1. University College London (UK) Urban Waves: 2018 from tsunami to provide evaluating information for fundamental Consortium: structure EUR research into tsunami flows 2. HR Wallingford Ltd – Wallingford vulnerability to 1,911,315 onshore as well as the forces and (UK) Tsunami and ERC – 336084 pressures they exert on model Earthquakes buildings and coastal protection structures. The study findings will be used to propose simplified relationships for tsunami forces/pressures suitable for Status: inclusion in codes of practice (for ON-GOING buildings and coastal defences

Other tsunami-related projects are investigating strategies to improve risk assessment and reduction as well as mitigation of impacts:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

ASTARTE FP7 - November Development of comprehensive Coordinator: Environment 2013 / strategy to mitigate tsunami 1. Inst. Portugues do Mar e da Atmosfera Assessment, October 2016 impact in the North East Atlantic, - Lisboa (PT) STrategy And Risk ENV-2013.6.4-3 Mediterranean and Adjacent Seas Reduction for EUR (NEAM) region, improving basic Consortium: Tsunamis in Europe 5,999,677 knowledge of tsunami generation 2. Univ. Bologna – Bologna (IT) 3. Bogazici Univ.– Istanbul (TR) RTD – 603839 and recurrence going beyond simple catalogues, with novel 4. CNRS – Paris (FR) empirical data and new statistical 5. CNRST – Rabat (MA) analyses for assessing long-term 6. CEA - Paris (FR)

recurrence and hazards of large 7. Dan. Tekn Univ. - Lyngby (DK) 8. Univ. Lisboa- Lisboa (PT) events in sensitive areas of NEAM. Development of numerical 9. Helmholtz-Zentr. - Potsdam (DE) techniques for tsunami 10.Inst. Nat. Cercetare-Bucharest (RO) 11. Ist.Naz.Geofis.Vulcanol.– Roma (IT) simulation, with focus on real- time codes and novel statistical 12.Mid. East Tech. Univ– Ankara (TR) emulation approaches, and 13. Nat. Observatory - Athens (GR) methods for assessment of 14. NERC - Swindon (UK)

hazard, vulnerability, and risk. 15. Port And Airport Res. Inst. - Yokosuka (JP) Production of guidelines for tsunami Eurocodes,) better tools 16. Russian Acad. Scie. - Yuzhno for forecast and warning for Sakhalinsk (RU) 17. Geotekniske Institutt - Oslo (NO) CTWPs and NTWCs, and guidelines for decision makers to 18. Tech. Univ. Crete - Chania (GR) increase sustainability and 19. Univ. Cantabria – Santander (ES) resilience of coastal communities. 20. Univ. Bremen – Bremen (DE) In summary, overall development 21. Univ. Hamburg - Hamburg (DE) 65

of basic scientific and technical 22. Univ. Barcelona -Barcelona (ES) elements allowing for a significant 23. Univ. College Dublin– Dublin (IE) enhancement of the Tsunami 24. Univ. South. California - Los Angeles Warning System in the NEAM CA (US) region in terms of monitoring, 25. Univ. Tokyo – Tokyo (JP) early warning and forecast, 26.US Dep. Comm.- Washington (US) governance and resilience. Status: ON-GOING http://www.astarte-project.eu/

SEISMIC FP7 - ERC October 2013 Development of comprehensive Coordinator: / October strategy to mitigate tsunami 1. Austrian Inst. Technol.- Wien (AT) Slip and Earthquake ERC-SG-PE10 2016 impact; Improvement of seismic Nucleation in hazard evaluation in earthquake- Consortium: Experimental and EUR prone regions. Better 2. CSES - Otford Sevenoaks (UK) Numerical 2,995,117 understanding of the processes 3.Chalmers Tek. Hoeg.– Göteborg (SE) Simulations: a 4. Fond. Ric. Dell' Anci – Roma (IT) RTD – 612493 that control earthquake Multi-scale, nucleation using a novel acoustic 5. Eurocities Asbl – Bruxelles (BE) Integrated and imaging technique to obtain 6. ECWT - Drammen (NO) Coupled Approach direct information on the internal 7. Humboldt-Univ. – Berlin (DE) 8.Iq Samhallsbyg. Ab– Stockholm (SE) microstructural evolution of fault slip zones during deformation, 9. Istanbul Tek. Univ.–Istanbul (TR) and on how this evolution leads 10. Reg. Env. Cent. – Szentendre (HU) to unstable slip. Experiments 11. Sticht. Platform31- Den Haag (NL)

linked with sophisticated 12. Univ. Karlova V Praze - Praha (CZ) 13. VITO – Mol (BE) numerical models of grain-scale frictional processes. Validation of the resulting models for fault slip by simulating and comparing patterns of seismicity for the Status: l’Aquila region and a reservoir ON-GOING involving induced seismicity in the Netherlands.

7.2.2.6 Volcanic risk assessment and forecasting Risk assessment and management related to volcanic eruptions are closely related to observation capacities which space services can offer, here is an example of research:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

EVOSS FP7 - Space March 2010 / Six volcano observatories with Coordinator: June 2013 responsibility in current major 1. Inst. Phys. du Globe – Paris (FR) European volcano Space-2009-1 unrests at 11 volcanoes worldwide. observatory space EUR Implementation of spaceborne Consortium: services 3,007,294 support to volcano monitoring 2. Booz & Company SRL- Milan (IT) 3. CGS SPA Comp. Gene. Spazio – REA – 242535 capacity by a substantial amount, acting at supra-regional scale and Milan (IT) including multi-parameter tracking 4. Deutsches Zentrum fuer Luft - Und with temporal resolutions Raumfahrt EV – Koeln (DE)

(multispectral EO) and spatial 5. Inst. D'aeronomie Spatiale de Belgique – Bruxelles (BE) resolutions (Radar EO) hitherto unachieved. Development or 6. Intelligence For Environment & finalization of advanced data Security – Roma (IT) 7. KNMI - De Bilt (NL) processing techniques for Gas/Ash, Thermal (high-temperature) and 8. NERC - Swindon Wiltshire (UK) Ground deformation, underlain by 9. Sci. Technol. B.V. – Delft (NL) robust theory and brought 10. T.R.E. S.R.L. – Milano (IT)

seamlessly to the End User for use in 11. Terrasphere Imaging & Gis B.V. – Amsterdam (NL) Status: surveillance routine and emergency 12. Univ. la Sapienza – Roma (IT) FINISHED decision. Focus on EU and Africa but potential to extend globally. 13. ULB – Brussels (BE)

Another project is focusing on surveillance, combining satellite imaging to ground data:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

APhoRISM FP7 - Space December Development and testing of two Coordinator: 2013 / new methods to combine Earth 1. Ist. Naz. Geofis. Vulcanol– Roma (IT) Advanced Space-2013 December Observation satellite data from PRocedures for 2016 different sensors, and ground data. Consortium: volcanIc and Aim to provide new improved 2. Alma Sistemi SAS di Iorio Alessio & C Seismic Monitor EUR Copernicus products useful for - Guidonia Montecelio Rm (IT) 1,915,452 seismic and volcanic crisis 3. BRGM– Paris (FR) 4. Consorci Institut de Geomatica - REA – 606738 management. Earthquake damage mapping to address the detection Castelldefels (ES) and estimate of damage caused by a 5. Gamma Remote Sensing Research

seism. This relies on a priori and Consulting AG – Gumligen (CH) 6. Univ. Oxford – Oxford (UK) information derived by InSAR time series to measure surface 7. Univ. la Sapienza – Roma (IT) movements, shakemaps obtained from seismological data, and vulnerability information. Status: ON-GOING http://www.aphorism-project.eu/

Three major projects (funded by the FP7 Environment programme) has built up a solid scientific basis for improved assessment and forecasting of volcanic risks:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

MIAVITA FP7 - October 2008 Development of tools and Coordinator: Environment / November integrated cost effective 1. BRGM – Paris (FR) Mitigate and assess 2012 methodologies to mitigate risks risk from volcanic Call from various hazards on active Consortium: impact on terrain 2007.1.3.3.1. EUR volcanoes (prevention, crisis 2. CNRS – Paris (FR) and human 3,475,164 management and recovering). 3. Dept. Energi Dan Sumber Daya activities Int. Cooperation project focusing Mineral – Jakarta (LD) RTD – 211393 4. Inesc Id - Lisboa (PT) on risk assessment methodology based on a multi-risk approach, 5. Inst. Nac. Meteor. Geofisica – cost efficient monitoring tools Espargos (CV) designed for poorly monitored 6. Inst. Superior Tecnico – Lisboa (PT)

volcanoes (satellite & gas analysis 7. Ist. Naz. Geofis. Vulcanol– Roma (IT) 8. Kell Srl – Arezzo (IT) & volcano-seismology), improved vulnerability assessment (people, 9. Mini. Industrie, Mines et Dev. buildings and biosphere), socio- Technol.– Yaounde (CM) 10. Min. Intérieur, Défense et Sécurité economic surveys to enhance community resilience, Integrated Civile - Asnieres Sur Seine (FR) information system taking 11. Norsk Inst. Luftforsk.– Kjeller (NO) advantage of GEONETCast 12. Philippine Inst. Volcanol. Seismol. -

initiative. Quezon City (PH) 13. Protezione Civile – Rome (IT) Status: http://miavita.brgm.fr/ 14. Univ. Cambridge – Cambridge (UK) FINISHED default.aspx 15. Univ. Hohenheim - Stuttgart (DE)

VUELCO FP7 - October 2011 Based on unrest periods at six Coordinator: Environment / September type volcanoes in Italy, Spain, the 1. Univ. Bristol - Bristol (UK) Volcanic unrest in 2015 West Indies, Mexico and Europe and Latin Call Ecuador, development of global Consortium: America: 2007.1.3.3.1. EUR strategies for enhanced 2. CSIC – Madrid (ES) Phenomenology, 3,499,993 monitoring capacity and value, 3. CNRS - Paris (FR) eruption 4. Escuela Politec. Nac. - Quito (EC) RTD – 282759 mechanistic data interpretation precursors, hazard and identification of reliable 5. Ist. Naz. Geofis. Vulcanol– Roma (IT) forecast, and risk eruption precursors. Numerical 6. Ludwig-Maximilians-Univ. Muenchen mitigation models to help establishing a link – Muenchen (DE) 7. Protezione Civile – Rome (IT) between the processes and volcano monitoring data to 8. Univ. West Indies - Kingston (JM) inform on the causes of unrest 9. Univ. Nac. Autonoma - Mexico (MX) and its short-term evolution. 10. Univ. Leeds – Leeds (UK) 67

Development of best-practice approach to risk mitigation, communication, decision-making and crisis management during unrest periods. Strategic options for effective risk mitigation, management and governance

during unrest episodes. Status: http://www.vuelco.net/ FINISHED

FUTUREVOLC FP7 - October 2010 Integrated volcanological Coordinator: Environment / March 2016 monitoring procedure through 1.Haskoli Islands – Reykjavik (IS) A European European collaboration, volcanological Call 2012.6.4-2 EUR development of new methods to Consortium: supersite in Iceland: 5,994,434 evaluate volcanic crises, increase 2. Chalmers Tekn. - Goeteborg (SE) a monitoring 3. Deutsches Zentrum Luft – Raumf. - RTD – 308377 scientific understanding of system and magmatic processes and improve Koeln (DE) network for the delivery of relevant information 4. Guralp Syst. Ltd - Reading (UK) future to civil protection and 5. Helmholtz-Zentr. - Potsdam (DE) 6. HIMET S.r.l. - L'aquila (IT) authorities. Aims to mitigate the effects of major eruptions that 7. ITEM SRL – Firenze (IT) pose cross-border hazards with 8. Julius-Maximilians Univ. Wuerzburg – Iceland chosen as a laboratory Wuerzburg (DE)

supersite area for demonstration. 9. MET Office – Exeter (UK) 10. Min. Interior – Reykjavik (IS) From the knowledge gathered, development of operational 11. Miracle EHF – Reykjavik (IS) models of magma discharge rate, 12. NERC - Swindon Wiltshire (UK) 13. Nicarnica Aviation– Kjeller (NO) contributing directly to improved forecasts of ash dispersion, 14. Norsk Inst. Luftforsk– Kjeller (NO) helping minimise economic 15. Samsyn EHF – Reykjavik (IS) disruption on a European scale 16. Tech. Univ. Delft - Delft (NL)

during eruptions. By integrating a 17. Univ.Cambridge– Cambridge (UK) 18. Univ. dell'aquila - L'aquila (IT) Volcanic Ash Advisory Centre and a civil protection unit into the 19. Univ. Firenze – Florence (IT) project, European citizens will 20. Univ. Palermo – Palermo (IT) 21. Univ. Blaise Pascal - Clermont- benefit directly from the scientific work. Ferrand (FR) 22. Univ. Geneve – Geneva (CH) 23. Univ. College Dublin – Dublin (IE) 24. Univ. Bristol - Bristol (UK) 25. Univ. Leeds – Leeds (UK) Status: http://futurevolc.hi.is/ 26. Uppsala Univ.– Uppsala (SE) FINISHED 27. Vedurstofa Islands – Reykjavik (IS)

Further projects are on-going either from a fundamental perspective (ERC) or demonstration (supersite):

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

CHRONOS FP7 - ERC May 2014 / New method of investigation for Coordinator: April 2019 assessing volcanic eruption 1. Univ. Perugia – Perugia (IT) A geochemical ERC-CG-2013- timing and improving prediction clock to measure PE10 EUR using a surgical approach timescales of 1,993,818 integrating textural, geochemical volcanic eruptions ERC – 612776 and experimental data on magma mixing, using the compositional heterogeneity frozen in time in the rocks the same way a broken clock at a

crime scene is used to determine the time of the incident. Status: http://pvrg.unipg.it/research- ON-GOING projects/

MED-SUV FP7 - June 2013 / Improving assessment capacity of Coordinator: Environment May 2016 volcanic hazards in Supersites of 1.Ist Naz. Geofis. Vulcanol – Roma (IT) MEDiterranean Southern Italy by optimising and SUpersite Call 2012.6.4-2 EUR integrating existing and new Consortium: Volcanoes 5,998,851 observation/monitoring systems, 2. CSIC – Madrid (ES) 3. AMRA – Napoli (IT) RTD – 308665 by a breakthrough in understanding of volcanic 4. BRGM – Paris (FR) processes and by increasing the 5. CNRS – Paris (FR) effectiveness of the coordination 6. CIVISA – Ponta Delgada (PT)

between the scientific and end- 7. CNR – Roma (IT) 8. Deltag SRL – Arezzo (IT) user communities. Exploit the unique detailed long-term in-situ 9. Deutsches Zent. fuer Luft Raumf.– monitoring data sets available for Koeln (DE) 10. ESA - Paris (FR) these volcanoes and integrate with Earth Observation (EO) data, 11. Helmholtz-Zent.– Potsdam (DE) setting the basic tools for a 12. Ludwig-Maximilians-Univ.– significant step ahead in the Muenchen (DE)

discrimination of pre-, syn- and 13. Marwan Technol.– Pisa (IT) 14. Protezione Civile – Rome (IT) post-eruptive phases. Specific experiments and studies carried 15. Survey Lab – Roma (IT) out to improve our 16. Terradue UK Ltd – London (UK) 17. Univ. West. Ontario –London(CA) understanding of the volcanic internal structure and dynamics, 18. US Geol. Survey – Reston (US) as well as to recognise signals 19. Univ. Granada – Granada (ES) related to impending unrest or 20. Univ. Açores - Ponta Delgada (PT) eruption. 21. Univ. Milano – Milano (IT) 22. Univ. Malta – Msida (MT) Status: 23. Univ. Blaise Pascal - Clermont- ON-GOING Ferrand (FR) http://med-suv.eu/ 24. Univ Bristol - Bristol (UK) 25. Univ. Durham – Durham (UK)

7.2.3 Risk assessment of climate-related hazards Preparedness and adaptation planning to threats related to climate change are defined in the EU Adaptation Strategy to Climate Change, which calls for bridging the knowledge gap, in particular on damage and adaptation costs and benefits, regional and local-level analyses and risk assessments, tools to support decision-making, monitoring and evaluating past adaptation efforts. Links with Horizon2020 DRS topics have been designed in this respect. This section highlights projects dealing with risk management-related tools and technologies that are applicable mainly to climate-related hazards – Forest fires are included in this category, keeping in mind that they also may be due to intentional man-made actions. 7.2.3.1 Climate impact assessments – TO BE FILLED IN Assessment of climate change-induced risks has been subject to research developments since the 6th Framework Programme. A project cluster within FP7 has specifically focused on risks related to water and security in the Mediterranean area (CLIWASEC cluster):

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

CLIMB FP7 – xxxx / xxxx Xxxxxx Coordinator: Environment 1. xxxxx Climate induced EUR xxxx Xxxxxx changes on the Call xxxxxx Consortium: hydrology of RTD – xxx 2. xxxxx Mediterranean CP 3. basis 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 69

10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

17. 18. 19. 20. Status: 21. FINISHED

WASSERMED FP7 – xxxx / xxxx Xxxxxx Coordinator: Environment 1. xxxxx Xxxxxxxx EUR xxxx Xxxxxx Call xxxxxx Consortium: RTD – xxx 2. xxxxx CP 3. 4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14.

15. 16. 17. 18. Status: 19. FINISHED 20. 21.

CLICO FP7 – xxxx / xxxx Xxxxxx Coordinator: Environment 1. xxxxx Xxxxxxxx EUR xxxx Xxxxxx Call xxxxxx Consortium: RTD – xxx 2. xxxxx CP 3. 4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14.

15. 16. 17. 18. Status: 19. FINISHED 20. 21.

Another international cooperation project has investigated climate change impacts on urban environment in Africa:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

CLUVA FP7 – December Development of methods and Coordinator: Environment 2010 / knowledge to be applied to African 1. AMRA - Napoli (IT) CLimate change November cities to manage climate risks, to and Urban 2010.2.1.5-1 2013 reduce vulnerabilities and to improve Consortium: Vulnerability in 2. Addis Ababa Univ. (ET) CP coping capacity and resilience Africa EUR 3,494,580 towards climate changes. Aim to 3. Ardhi Univ. - Dar es Salaam (TZ) 4. CEMCC – Lecce (IT) RTD – 265137 improving the capacity of scientific institutions, local councils and civil 5. CSIR – Pretoria (ZA) society to cope with climate change, 6. UFZ – Leipzig (DE) assessing the environmental, social 7. Københavns Univ. (DK)

and economic impacts and the risks of 8. Norsk Institutt for by- Og Regionforskning –Oslo (NO) climate change induced hazards expected to affect urban areas 9. Techn. Univ. Muenchen (DE) (floods, sea-level rise, storm surges, 10. Univ. Manchester (UK) 11. Univ. Ouagadougou (BF) droughts, heat waves, desertification, storms and fires) at various time 12. Univ. Yaounde (CM) frames. Developing innovative climate 13. Univ. Gaston Berger - Saint Louis change risk adaptation strategies (SN)

based on strong interdisciplinary Status: components. FINISHED http://www.cluva.eu/

Further projects are on-going to improve risk assessment of climate extreme events and varying climatic conditions, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

RAIN FP7 – Secure May 2014 / Develop systematic risk management Coordinator: Societies April 2017 framework that explicitly considers 1. Trinity College Dublin (IE) Risk Analysis of impacts of extreme weather events Infrastructure Call 2013.2.1-2 EUR 3,493,600 on critical infrastructure & develops Consortium: Networks in 2. European Sever Storms CP REA – 608166 series of mitigation tools to enhance Response to security of pan-EU infrastructure Laboratory - Wessling (DE) Extreme Weather network. Outputs will aid decision 3. Univ. Žilina (CZ) 4. Tech. Univ. Delft (NL) making in long term, securing new robust infrastructure development & 5. Gavin and Doherty Geosolutions protection of existing infrastructure Ltd - Dublin (IE) against changing climates, 6. Dragados SA - Madrid (ES)

increasingly more unpredictable 7. Freie Univ. Berlin (DE) 8. Roughan & O' Donovan Ltd - weather patterns. RAIN will minimise risk of chaos in extreme weather Dublin (IE) events by predicting, using most 9. Hellenberg Int. Oy - Helsinki (FI) 10. ISIG - Gorizia (IT) advanced statistical methods, how both weather patterns are likely to 11. PSJ - Delft (NL) emerge & how infrastructures will 12. FMI - Helsinki (FI) react, reducing uncertainty & 13. Youris.com - Brussels (BE) Status: considering impacts on society. 14. Gas Nat. Fenosa - Barcelona (ES) ON-GOING 15. AIA - Barcelona (ES) http://rain-project.eu/

EUPORIAS FP7 – November Development of reliable predictions Coordinator: Environment 2012 / January of the impacts of future climatic 1. MET Office – Exeter (UK) EUropean 2017 conditions on a number of key sectors Provision Of Call 2012.6.1-1 (to include water, energy, health, Consortium: Regional Impact EUR 8, 976,723 transport, agriculture and tourism), 2. Adm.Nat. Meteor.- Bucharest (RO) Assessment on a CP 3. Ag. Estatal Meteor.– Madrid (ES) RTD – 308291 on timescales from seasons to years Seasonal-to- ahead. Climate services and tools will 4.Ag. Naz. Nuove Tecnol.– Roma (IT) decadal timescale target the needs of the users, and will 5. Cetaqua – Barcelona (ES) 6. Deutscher Wetterdienst - share knowledge to promote the technologies created within the Offenbach am Main (DE) 7. Dhi – Hoersholm (DK) 71

project. EUPORIAS will also improve 8. Eidgenoessisches Departement the users’ understanding of their des Innern – Bern (CH) vulnerability to varying climatic 9. EDF S.A. – Paris (FR) conditions as well as better prepare 10. Inst. Catala Ciencies del Clima – them to utilise climate forecasts, Barcelona (ES) thereby reducing risks and costs 11. Futureeverything CIC – associated with responding to varying Manchester (UK)

climatic conditions. As a result 12. IPMA – Lisboa (PT) businesses, governments, NGOs, and 13. Knmi - De Bilt (NL) society in general will be able to 14. Lunds Univ. (SE) better manage risks and opportunities 15. Meteo-France - Saint Mande(FR) associated with varying climatic 16. Predictia Intelligent Data Sol. - conditions, thus becoming more Santander (ES) resilient to the variability of the 17. Sver. Meteor. Och Hydrol. Inst.– climate. The project will provide the Norrkoeping (SE)

basis for developing a strong climate 18. Tourisme Territoires Transports service market within Europe. Environ. Conseil – Marseille (FR) 19. Univ. Cantabria – Santander (ES) 20. Univ. Lisboa (PT) 21. Univ. Leeds (UK) 22. Wageningen Univ. (NL) Status: http://www.euporias.eu/ 23. World Food Programme (IT) ON-GOING 24. WHO – Geneve (CH)

7.2.3.2 Climate-related hazards risk prevention, awareness and preparedness Complementing the above, risk prevention and reduction of climate-related disasters have been subject to major research efforts, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

KULTURISK FP7 - January 2011 Development of culture of risk Coordinator: Environment / December prevention by means of 1. UNESCO (FR) – Paris (FR) Knowledge-based 2013 comprehensive demonstration of approach to Call 2010. benefits of prevention measures Consortium: develop a cULTUre 1.3.2-1 EUR through enhanced memory and 2. Autorita di Bacino – Venezia (IT) of Risk prevention 3,225,616 knowledge of past disasters, 3. Consorzio di Ricerca Sistema Lagunare Di Venezia – Venezia (IT) RTD – 265280 communication and understanding capacity of current and future 4. Eidgenoessische Forsch.– hazards; awareness of risk and Birmensdorf (CH) preparedness for future events. 5. European Centre for Medium-

Measures include early warning Range Weather Forecasts – Reading (UK) systems, non-structural options (e.g. mapping and planning), risk transfer 6. JRC - Brussels (BE) strategies (e.g. insurance policy), and 7. King's College London – London (UK) structural initiatives. Focus on water- related hazards with case on floods, 8. Univ. Brescia – Brescia (IT) debris flows and landslides, storm 9. University of Bristol – Bristol (UK) surges. 10. Univerza v Ljubljani – Ljubljana Status: (SI) FINISHED http://www.kulturisk.eu/ 11. Willis Limited – London (UK)

KNOW-4-DRR FP7 – June 2013 / Exploring the fragmentation and Coordinator: Environment June 2015 separations in risk knowledge 1. Politecnico di Milano (IT) Enabling knowledge management strategies in order to for Disaster risk Call 2013.6.5-2 EUR 992,951 frame a knowledge management Consortium: reduction in system for disaster risk reduction and 2. Accademia Europea Bolzano (IT) integration to CP RTD – 3. Adelphi Res. Gmbh – Berlin (DE) 6038071 climate change adaptation that may climate change be considered as a comprehensive 4. CSIC– Madrid (ES) adaptation reference for establishing, 5. CIESAS - Mexico DF (MX) 6. Dev. Workshop France Assoc. - reinforcing, or revising current prevention, mitigation and Trejouls Lauzerte (FR) adaptation strategies. 7. Harokopio Univ.– Athens (GR) 8. Paris-Lodron-Univ. Salzburg (AT) Status: 9. Ticonuno Srl – Milano (IT) FINISHED 10. UN Univ. - Shibuya Ku Tokyo (JP) http://www.know4drr.polimi.it/ 11. Univ. Savoie – Chambery (FR)

An on-going project funded by the FP7 Secure Societies focuses on impacts of extreme wheather events on critical infrastructures:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

INTACT FP7 – Secure May 2014 / Objectives: • assess regionally Coordinator: Societies April 2017 differentiated risk in EU associated 1. TNO - Delft (NL) On the Impact of with extreme weather; • identify, Extreme Weather Call 2013.2.1-2 EUR 3,445,519 classify on EU wide basis CI & to Consortium: on Critical 2. CMCC - Lecce (IT) CP REA – 607799 assess resilience of such CI to EWE Infrastructures impact; • raise awareness of 3. DELTARES - Delft (NL) 4. FAC Ltd - Dublin (IE) decision-makers, CI operators about challenges EW conditions may pose to 5. Dragados Sa - Madrid (ES) their CI; • identify potential 6. HR Wallingford Ltd (UK) measures, technologies to consider, 7. Panteia BV - Zoetermeer (NL)

implement, be it for planning, 8. NGI - Oslo (NO) 9. CSIC - Madrid (ES) designing, protecting CI or for effectively preparing for crisis 10. UNU-EHS - Tokyo (Japan) response, recover; It brings together 11. Univ. Ulster - Coleraine (UK) 12. VTT - Espoo (FI) community of climatologists, civil protection operators, meteorologists, Status: with those of owners / operators of ON-GOING CI planners to develop prevention of major disasters in cascading effects.

In addition, in the framework of the EU Adaptation to climate change, a mandate has been given to CEN to map industry-relevant standards in the area of energy, transport and buildings and identifying standards to be revised for better inclusion of adaptation considerations. Within Horizon2020, several topics responded to research needs in support of the adaptation strategy, namely the DRS-9-2014/2015 topic on "Science and innovation for adaptation to climate change: from assessing costs, risks and opportunities to demonstration of options and practices", the DRS-11-2015 on "Mitigating the impacts of climate change and natural hazards on cultural heritage sites, structures and artefacts" and a study on "Impact of climate change in third countries on Europe's security" (DRS-22-2015). Another major area related to climate threats is covered by the DRS-1-2016 topic on "Crisis management topic 1: potential of current measures and technologies to respond to extreme weather and climate events". 7.2.3.3 Flood risk management Flood risk assessment has been studied by projects funded by the FP7 People programme, as follows:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

MAN-U FP7 – People March 2011 / Improvement of understanding Coordinator: February and management of 1. King's College London (UK) Managing PEOPLE-2009- 2012 uncertainties arising from the uncertainties in IEF intersection of flood risk Flood risk and EUR 87,451 assessment and climate change climate change REA – 253773 projection with policy making, assessment: An concentrating on interplay of exploratory study science and policy and exploring how first order scientific uncertainties about future flood

risk are amplified by various institutional risks arising from the Status: uncertainties of the policymaking FINISHED process itself.

DCGGEOPHYS FP7 – People March 2014 / Developing new tools to Coordinator: March 2016 determine the internal structure 1. Univ. Centre in Svalbard (NO) - Subsurface 2012-IEF and geotechnical properties of Longyearbyen (NO) conditions in EUR 216,034 moraine and ice dams, and to Himalayan glaciers REA – 330805 understand the controls on lake – implications for expansion rates to better predict outburst Flood risk glacial lake outburst. prediction Status: FINISHED

Another on-going project on fundamental research on flood risk assessment is funded by FP7 ERC:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

FLOODCHANGE FP7 – ERC April 2012/ Understanding how changes in Coordinator: March 2017 land use and climate translate 1. Technische Univ. Wien (AT) Deciphering River ERC-AG-PE10 into changes in river floods, what Flood Change EUR Consortium: CP are the factors controlling this 2,263,565 relationship and what are the Flood Research Consortium (International experts) REA – 291152 uncertainties involved. Deciphering the relationship between changes in floods and

their drivers by analysing the processes separately for different flood types such as flash floods, rain-on-snow floods and large scale synoptic floods, and use of the data to build a probabilistic Status: flood-change model that ON-GOING explicitly describes the change mechanisms.

Flood early warning and alert systems, and more generally flood risk management operations have been subject to a wide range of research projects funded by various programmes:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

FLADAR FP7 – People September Production of flood risk zones in Coordinator: 2007 / August selected areas southeast of Athens, Nat. Technical Univ. Athens (GR) Flood zoning in PEOPLE-2007-4- 2011 Greece. Conducting a comprehensive Southeast Attica 3.IRG flood study in a currently developing using gauge EUR 100,000 region of Athens, where effective calibrated radar REA – 211108 flood management planning may not rainfall and only mitigate flood impact but also advanced modeling prevent it. Support to major goals of techniques the EU Flood Directive. Status: FINISHED

FLOODSAT FP7 – People April 2011 / Flood early warning systems are the Coordinator: March 2014 most effective way to mitigate flood Middle East Tech. Univ. - Ankara (TR) Advancement of FP7-PEOPLE- induced hazards. The reliability of satellite rainfall 2009-RG EUR 75,000 such systems depends on the applications for REA – 277183 availability of timely and good-quality hydrologic rainfall estimates. The overall goal of 74

modeling with the project is to “advance the utility emphasis on flood of satellite-based rainfall estimates monitoring for hydrologic modeling, specifically for flood monitoring”. Status: FINISHED

IMPRINTS FP7 – January 2009 Improvement of the preparedness Coordinator: Environment / December and the operational risk management 1. Univ. Politecnica de Catalunya - IMproving 2012 for Flash Flood and Debris Flow Barcelona (ES) Preparedness and 2008.1.3.3.2 [FF/DF] generating events, as well as RIsk maNagemenT EUR Consortium: to contribute to sustainable for flash Floods and 3,280,000 development through reducing 2. Agència Catalana de l'Aigua – debriS flow events damages to the environment. Barcelona (ES) RTD – 226555 3. Agencia de Medio Ambiente Y Methods and tools to be used by emergency agencies and utility Agua de Andalucia – Sevilla (ES) companies responsible for the 4. Auto. Bacino Sele - Napoli (IT) management of FF/DF risks and 5. Azienda Elettrica Ticinese –

associated effects. Impacts of future Bellinzona (CH) 6. CUPPGR– Penta di Fisciano (IT) changes, including climatic, land use and socioeconomic will be analysed in 7. Cetaqua - Barcelona (ES) order to provide guidelines for 8. Departement Bau Und Umwelt– Glarus (CH) mitigation and adaptation measures. Systems tested on five selected flash 9. Eidgenoessische Forsch. Wsl flood prone areas supervised by risk Birmensdorf (CH) management authorities and utility 10. Eidgenoessisches Dep. Innern –

company managers in duty of Bern (CH) 11. HIS – Barcelona (ES) emergency management. One major result of the project will be a 12. JRC– Brussels (BE) operational prototype including the 13. Lancaster Univ. (UK) 14. Min. Ecologie – Paris (FR) tools and methodologies developed under the project. This prototype will 15.Servei Meteorològic De Catalunya be designed under the premise of its – Barcelona (ES) ultimate commercialization and use 16. Univ. Kwazulu-Natal – Westville Status: worldwide. (ZA) FINISHED 17. Verzasca Sa – Lugano (CH) http://www.imprints-fp7.eu 18. Wageningen Univ. (NL)

URBANFLOOD FP7 – ICT December Development of internet based Coordinator: 2009 / platform for Early Warning Systems 1. TNO - Delft (NL) UrbanFlood ICT-2009.6.4 November connected to sensor networks, to Consortium: 2012 online sources of information and other EWSs. The platform is able to 2. Akad. Gorniczo-Hutnicza – Krakow EUR host multiple EWSs, corresponding to (PL) 2,990,544 various hazards and belonging to 3. HR Wallingford Ltd (UK)

different organisations. Artificial 4. Siemens – Moskva (RU) CNECT – 5. Stichting Toegepast Onderzoek 248767 intelligence technologies detecting alarming conditions and informing Waterbeheer – Utrecht (NL) stakeholders about disaster risks. The 6. Univ. Amsterdam (NL) platform can be used as a simulator with which disaster mitigation scenarios can be developed and personnel can be trained. Status: FINISHED http://www.urbanflood.eu/

FLOODPROBE FP7 – November Development, testing and Coordinator: Environment 2009 / dissemination of technologies, 1. Deltares - Delft (NL) Technologies for October 2013 methods, concepts and tools for risk the cost-effective 2009.3.1.5.1 assessment and mitigation, focussing Consortium: Flood Protection of EUR particularly on the adaptation of new 2. Acciona Infraestructuras S.A. – the Built 3,498,727 and existing buildings (retrofitting) Alcobendas (ES) Environment and on infrastructure networks. 3. DeltaSync BV – Delft (NL) RTD – 243401 4. Dura Vermeer Groep NV – Addressing the vulnerability of critical infrastructure, the reliability of urban Zoetermeer (NL) flood defences and construction 5. EIVP – Paris (FR) technologies and concepts for flood- 6. HR Wallingford Ltd (UK)

proofing buildings and infrastructure 7. IFSTTAR - Champs-Sur-Marne (FR) 8. INRSTEA - Antony Cedex (FR) networks to increase the floodresilience of the urban system as well 9. Metcenas OPS - Praha (CZ) as for retrofit and repair of flood 10. Mostostal SA – Warszawa (PL) defences in the most economic and 11. Oxford Brookes University – 75

cost beneficial manner. Elements Oxford (UK) integrated into state-of-the-art flood 12. Regionalni Environmentalni risk management strategies and Centrum (REC) – Prague (CZ) tested and validated via pilot study 13. Samui Design & Management Ltd sites. – Longworth (UK) Status: 14. Solintel M&P SL - Nuevo Baztan FINISHED http://www.floodprobe.eu/ (ES) 15. Sintef – Trondheim (NO)

INFLATER FP7 – SME October 2011 Design and building of portable dam, Coordinator: / January which can be placed anywhere 1. Ateknea Solutions Hungary KFT - Development of a SME-2011-1 2014 quickly, easily and does not require Budapest (HU) universal Flood much manpower. To aid the Protection tool EUR mechanical design, electrical sensors Consortium: using the force of 1,099,900 can be introduced and used to 2. L'eau Protection Sarl - Saint Pol De the water to Laon (FR) REA – 286522 monitor the system and the river, protect against helping predicting its behaviour and 3. Budapesti Muszaki Es Gazdas. Floods sending warnings to the surrounding Egyetem – Budapest (HU) 4. Buildair Ingenieria y Arquitectura areas via wireless communication to help avoid a tragedy. SA - Sant Joan Despi Barcelona (ES) 5. Dublin City Council - Dublin (IE) 6. Fordam Gazdasagi Tanacsado KFT – Budapest (HU) 7. Labor S.R.L. – Roma (IT) Status: 8. Tausec SRO – Kosice (SK) FINISHED http://inflater.eu/ 9. X-Treme Holding BV – Breda (NL)

FLOODSTAND FP7 – SST March 2009 / The project derived most of the Coordinator: February missing data for validation of time- 1. Aalto-Korkeakoulusaati - Aalto (FI) Integrated Flooding SST-2007-4.1- 2012 domain numerical tools for Control and 01 assessment of ship survivability and to Consortium: Standard for EUR develop a standard for a 2. Aalto-Korkeakoulusaatio (FI) Stability and Crises 2,999,840 comprehensive measure of damaged 3. BMT Group Ltd – Teddington (UK) Management ship stability, as a means of 4.Bureau Veritas-Neuilly s/Seine(FR) RTD – 218352 5. CNRS – Paris (FR) addressing systematically, rationally and effectively the risk of flooding. 6. Centrum Techniki Okretowej The envisaged standard will reflect Spolka Akcyjna - Gdansk (PL) the stochastic nature of the damaged 7. DNV GL AS – Hovik (NO)

ship stability in waves. It will be based 8. Maritime And Coastguard Agency – Southampton (UK) on first-principles modeling comprising loss of either (or both), 9. MEC Inseneril.– Tallinn (EE) flotation and stability, but also and 10. Meyer Werft– Papenburg (DE) 11. Napa Ltd – Helsinki (FI) more importantly ultimate loss of human life. Since risk-based, the 12. NTUA – Athens (GR) standard will form a basis for decision 13. Rosemount Tank Radar AB – support. It is expected that by explicit Goteborg (SE)

disclosure of the risks associated with 14. Safety at Sea Ltd – Glasgow (UK) 15. SSPA Sweden – Göteborg (SE) ship flooding and thus addressed from early design to operation. 16. Stichting Marit. Res. Inst. Status: Nederland - Wageningen (NL) FINISHED http://floodstand.aalto.fi/ 17. STX Finland OY – Turku (FI) 18. Univ. Strathclyde – Glasgow (UK)

Flood information (emergency) services were covered by the following project by the FP7 Space programme:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

FLOODIS FP7 - Space October 2013 Providing accurate location based Coordinator: / July 2015 application for portable devices, 1. Ist. Sup. Mario Boella – Torino (IT) Integrating GMES Space- closing a critical gap for disaster Emergency Services 2013.1.2.1 EUR management teams, civil protection, Consortium: with satellite 1,543,145 field/emergency response units to 2. Alpha Consult. S.R.L. – Milano (IT) navigation and 3. Eoxplore ug (Haftungsbeschrankt) REA – 607220 better address and mitigate crisis communication for situations arising before, during, and GmBH - Weil am Rhein (DE) establishing a Flood after heavy flooding. Access to open- 4. Geoville Informationssyst. information service source, location based smart phone Datenverarb. GmBH – Innsbruck (DE) application for the general public to 5. ND Consult Ltd – London (UK) 76

enable the capacity for individuals to 6. Terranea ug (Haftungsbeschrankt) take pre-cautionary actions, therefore GmBH – Burgstadt (DE) vastly reducing the likelihood of 7. UNESCO – Paris (FR) human and economic loss. The project will also consider rescuers relying on professional terminals and legacy communication channels. This

combines Earth Observation and GNSS (GPS, Galileo, EGNOS/EDAS) technologies to deliver alerts and interactive maps on flooding risk/events to users in the geographical area at risk. Status: FINISHED http://www.floodis.eu/

As continuation of the above-mentioned INFLATER projec is under development to improve protection against floods:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

INFLATER-DEMO FP7 – SME December Follow-up of INFLATER project, Coordinator: 2013 / developing a flood protection device 1. Ateknea Solutions Hungary KFT - Demonstration od a SME-2013-3 December that uses the force of the flooding Budapest (HU) universal flood 2016 water to raise INFLATER to the protection tool that required height and deflate once the Consortium: uses the force of EUR 793,000 water level goes down. The validated 2. L'eau Protection Sarl - Saint Pol De the water to Leon (FR) REA – 606207 INFLATER will be suitable for protect against riverbanks to protect long segments 3. Buildair Ingenieria y Arquitectura floods and home protection. The consortium SA - Sant Joan Despi Barcelona (ES) 4. Fordam Gazdasagi Tanacsado KFT consists of the same SMEs who are taking part in INFLATER. Additional – Budapest (HU) Status: tests on the different geometries and 5. X-Treme Holding BV – Breda (NL) ON-GOING materials are prone to ensure a much more promising market success.

Flood resilience is another area that has been tackled by EU-funded research, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

SMARTEST FP7 – January 2010 Development of innovative smart Coordinator: Environment / June 2013 technology, systems and 1. Building Research Establishment Smart Resilience implementation tools for flood Ltd - Waterford (UK) Technology, 2009.3.1.5.1 EUR EUR resilient systems in the urban Systems and Tools 3,488,457 environment through the use of case Consortium: 2. Centre Scient. Tech. Batiment - RTD – 244102 studies in seven partner countries. Production of manual of Flood Champs Sur Marne (FR) Resilience technology, systems and 3. Dion.Toumazis Assoc.–Nicosia (CY) implementation tools. 4. ENPC - Marne La Vallee (FR) 5. Leibniz-Inst. Okologische Raumentwicklung EV – Dresden (DE)

6. Nat. Kapodi. Univ. Athens (GR)

7. Tech. Univ. Hamburg-Harburg(DE) 8. Tech. Univ. Delft (NL) Status: 9. Univ. Manchester (UK) FINISHED http://www.floodresilience.eu/ 10. Univ. Politec. Madrid (ES)

CORFU FP7 – April 2010 / EU-Asia international cooperation Coordinator: Environment June 2014 project to develop advanced and 1. Univ. Exeter (UK) Collaborative novel strategies for improved flood research on Flood 2009.1.3.3.1 EUR management in cities. Cross- Consortium: Resilience in urban 3,490,000 fertilisation of latest technological 2. AREP Ville – Paris (FR) areas advances with traditional and 3. Beijing Municipal Inst. City RTD – 244047 Planning And Design - Beijing (CN) emerging approaches to living with floods, enabling European and Asian 4. Beijing Univ.Technol– Beijing (CN) 77

institutions to learn from each other 5. Cetaqua – Barcelona (ES) through joint investigation, 6. China Academy Of Urban Planning development, implementation and And Design – Beijing (CN) dissemination of strategies that 7. Cranfield Univ. (UK) enabled more scientifically sound 8. DHI – Hoersholm (DK) management of the consequences of 9. Dura Vermeer Groep NV – urban flooding. Assessment of flood Zoetermeer (NL)

impacts in urban areas and possible 10. Hamburg. Weltwirtschaftsinst. responses by envisaging different Gemeinnützige– Hamburg (DE) scenarios: urban development, socio- 11. Hydromet. Innovative Solutions – economic trends and climate changes, Barcelona (ES) leading to quantification of the cost- 12. IIT Bombay – Mumbai (IN) effectiveness of resilience measures 13. Inst. Water Model.– Dhaka (BD) and integrative and adaptable flood 14. ICUWHRIF – Incheon (KR) management plans. 15. Nat. Taiwan Univ.– Taipei (TW) Status: 16.Tech.Univ.Hamburg-Harburg(DE) FINISHED http://www.corfu-fp7.eu/ 17. Univ. Nice Sofia Antipolis (FR)

Finally, flood risk governance has been studied, leading to recommendations addressed to different decision-makers and policy implementers:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

STARFLOOD FP7 – October 2012 Improvement of Flood Risk Strategies Coordinator: Environment / March 2016 (FRSs), integrating risk prevention, 1. Univ. Utrecht (NL) STrengthening And flood defense, mitigation, preparation Redesigning ENV.2012.6.4-1 EUR and recovery. Development of Consortium: European Flood risk 5,284,529 innovative Flood Risk Governance 2. CEPRIA– Orleans (FR) practices Towards 3. Grontmij Nederland - De Bilt (NL) RTD – 308364 Arrangements (FRGAs). with concrete appropriate and recommendations for policy and law 4. Inst. Agricult. Forest Environment resilient Flood risk at EU level, as well at levels of – Poznan (PL) governance member states, regional authorities, 5. Katholieke Univ. Leuven (BE) arrangements and public-private partnerships. 6. Lulea Tekn. Univ.– Lulea (SE) 7. Middlesex Univ.– London (UK) Comparative analysis of FRGAs in six EU member states with ex-ante 8. Katholieke Univ.– Nijmegen (NL) Status: evaluation. 9.Univ. Francois Rabelais– Tours(FR) FINISHED 10. Univ. Antwerpen (BE) http://www.starflood.eu/

7.2.3.4 Coastal risks induced by storm events or flooding Coastal risks have been prone to research projects funded by two programmes, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

MICORE FP7 – June 2008 / Development of probabilistic mapping Coordinator: Environment September of the morphological impact of 1. Univ. Ferrara (IT) Morphological 2011 marine storms and to the production Impacts and 2007.1.3.1.1 of early warning and information Consortium: COastal Risks EUR 3,499,954 systems to support long-term disaster 2. Ag. Reg. Prevenzione E Ambiente induced by Dell'emilia Romagna – Bologna (IT) RTD – 202798 reduction. Review of historical storms Extreme Storm that had a significant impact on nine 3. BRGM – Paris (FR) events representative sensitive European 4. Consorzio Ferrara Ricerche - Ferrara (IT) sites according to wave exposure, tidal regime and socio-economical 5. Univ. Lisboa (PT) pressures. One-year monitoring to 6. Inst. Oceanology - Varna (BG) collect new data sets. Development 7. Int. Marine Dredg. Consult.–

and tests of numerical models of Antwerpen (BE) 8. NERC Swindon - Wilthshire (UK) storm-induced morphological changes, linking wave and surge 9. Regione Emilia Romagna – forecasting models to set-up a real- Bologna (IT) 10. Deltares –Delft (NL) time warning system and to implement its usage within Civil 11. Techn. Univ. Delft (NL) Protection agencies. Conception of 12. Univ. Cadiz (ES) 78

Storm Impact Indicators (SIIs) with 13. Univ. Algarve – Faro (PT) defined threshold for the 14. Univ. Pablo De Olavide – Sevilla identification of major morphological (ES) Status: changes and flooding associated risks. 15. Univ. Plymouth (UK) 16. Univ. Szczecin (PL) FINISHED https://www.micore.eu/

SIM.COAST FP7 – People April 2010 / Improved process understanding, new Coordinator: March 2014 knowledge, methods, new and 1. Technische Universitaet Hamburg- Numerical Call 2009-IRSES improved numerical tools, resulting in Harburg (DE) Simulation Tools EUR 171,000 decision support systems serving for Protection of Consortium: RTD – 247468 decision-making at protection of Coasts against coasts against flooding and erosion. 2. Black Sea - Danube Assoc. Res. Flooding and Support to decision makers in Devel. – Varna (BG) Erosion improving co-ordination of coastal 3. Univ. Roma Tre – Roma (IT) erosion and surface water flood risk - strengthening emergency planning Status: arrangements. FINISHED http://www.simcoast.eu/

THESEUS FP7 – December Developing a systematic approach to Coordinator: Environment 2009 / delivering both a low-risk coast for 1. Univ. Bologna (IT) Innovative coastal November human use and healthy habitats for technologies for 2009.3.1.6.1 2013 evolving coastal zones subject to Consortium: safer European 2. Aalborg Univ. (DK) IP multiple change factors. Innovative coasts in a EUR 6,530,000 combined mitigation and adaptation 3. Arist. Panepist. - Thessaloniki (GR) changing climate technologies will include ecologically- 4. Athens Univ. Economics (GR) RTD – 244104 5. Bangor Univ. (UK) based mitigation measures (such as restoration and/or creation of 6. BRGM – Paris (FR) habitats), hydro-morphodynamic 7. CETMF - Compiegne (FR) techniques (such as wave energy 8. CGCCARIS Lagun. Venezia (IT)

converters, sediment reservoirs, 9. East China Univ.– Shanghai (CN) 10. EIDLM - Montpellier (FR) multi-purpose structures, overtop resistant dikes), actions to reduce the 11. Hamburg Port Authority (DE) impact on society and economy (such 12. Helmholtz-Zentr.Geesthacht (DE) 13. Infram Int. - Marknesse (NL) as promotion of risk awareness or spatial planning) and GIS-based 14. Inst. Oceanol. - Varna (BG) software to support defence planning. 15. IBWPAN – Gdansk (PL) 8 study sites across Europe, with 16. Inst. Meteor.– Warszawa (PL)

specific attention to the most 17. ISPRA – Rome (IT) 18. KU Leuven (BE) vulnerable coastal environments such as deltas, estuaries and wetlands, 19. Knaw – Amsterdam (NL) where many large cities and industrial 20. Latvijas Univ. - Riga (LV) areas are located. 21. Mar. Hydr. Inst.–Sevastopol (UA) 22. Middlesex Univ. – London (UK) 23. Cheng Kung Univ.– Tainan(TW) 24.Shirshov Inst. Oc.–Moscow (RU) 25. NIOZ - Den Hoorn Texel (NL) 26. Univ. Cantabria – Santander (ES) 27. Univ. Nac. Aut. Mexico (MX) 28. Univ. Versailles (FR) 29. Univ. Delaware – Newark (US)

Status: 30. Univ. Plymouth FINISHED http://www.theseusproject.eu/ 31. Univ. Southampton (UK) 32. Vzw – Oostende (BE)

Catastrophic events such as the Xynthia event in France (February 2010) highlighted research needs in the prevention / preparedness of such extreme events, that were reflected in two major projects, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

PEARL FP7 – January 2014 / Developing more sustainable risk Coordinator: Environment December management solutions for coastal 1. UNESCO - Paris (FR) Preparing for 2017 communities focusing on present and Extreme And Rare ENV.2013.6.4-3 projected extreme hydro- Consortium: events in coastaL EUR 4,998,851 meteorological events. Seven case 2. Asian Inst.Tech.– Pathumthani(TH) regions studies from across the EU to develop 3. Cetaqua – Barcelona (ES) RTD – 603663 4. DHI – Hoersholm (DK) a holistic risk reduction framework that can identify multi-stressor risk 5. GISIG – Genova (IT) assessment, risk cascading processes 6. Hydrol. Res. Bv – Delft (NL) and strengthen risk governance by 7. Hydromet. Innovative Solutions –

enabling an active role for key actors. Barcelona (ES) 9. Imperial College – London (UK) Development of novel technologies and methods that can improve the 10. IWA - London (UK) early warning process and its 11. King's College London (UK) 12. Max Planck Res. Inst. – components, building a pan-European knowledge base gathering real case Muenchen (DE) studies and demonstrations of best 13. Nat. Taiwan Ocean Univ. - practice across the EU to support Keelung (TW)

capacity development for the delivery 14. NTUA - Athens (GR) 15. OMM - Geneva (CH) of cost-effective risk-reduction plans. Additionally, the project provides an 16. Publ. Works Res.Inst. – Tsukuba interface to relevant ongoing tsunami (JP) 17. Satways - Halandri (GR) work: it plugs into global databases, early warning systems and processes 18. SINTEF - Trondheim (NO) at WMO, and contributes to 19. Tech.Univ. Hamburg-Harburg(DE) community building, development of 20. Tech. Univ. Delft (NL) guidelines and communication. 21. Univ. Cambridge (UK) 22. Univ. Exeter (UK) Status: http://www.pearl-fp7.eu/ 23. United Nations Univ. - Shibuya ON-GOING Ku Tokyo (JP) 24. Univ. Nice - Sophia Antipolis (FR)

RISC-KIT FP7 – December Development of ready-to-use Coordinator: Environment 2013 / methods, tools and management 1. Deltares – Delft (NL) Resilience- December approaches to reduce risk and Increasing Call 2012.6.1-3 2016 increase resilience to low-frequency, Consortium: Strategies for 2. Bund. Wasserbau – Karlsruhe (DE) CP high-impact hydro-meteorological Coasts EUR 5,999,692 events. Open-source and free-ware to 3. CNRS – Paris (FR) 4. Fondazione CIMA – Savona (IT) RTD – 603458 assess assess present and future hot spot areas of coastal risk due to multi- 5. Consorzio Ferrara Ricerche (IT) hazards, high-resolution Early 6. Ecologic Institut – Berlin (DE) Warning and Decision Support System 7. Fund. Eurocean – Lisboa (PT)

(EWS/DSS) for use on these hot spots 8. Inst. Oceanology – Varna (BG) 9. Int. Marine And Dredging (with a scale of 10’s of km) and web- based management guide offering Consult.– Antwerpen (BE) innovative, cost-effective, ecosystem- 10. Middlesex Univ.– London (UK) 11. OMM – Geneve (CH) based DRR measures. Testing toolkit using data collected on ten diverse 12. Stockholm Environ. Inst. (SE) case study sites along each of 13. Techn. Univ. Delft (NL) Europe’s regional seas and one 14. Univ. Cambridge (UK)

international site. 15. Unesco – Paris (FR) 16. Univ. Algarve – Faro (PT) Status: http://www.risckit.eu/np4/ 17. Univ. Polit. Catalunya – ON-GOING home.html Barcelona (ES) 18. Univ. Caen Basse Normandie (FR)

7.2.3.5 Drought risk management In the light of the Water Scarcity and Drought Communication, technological needs have been expressed regarding to drought risk assessment, trend studies and monitoring. Several research projects aimed to respond to these needs, namely projects by the FP7 Environment programme.

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

DEWFORA FP7 – January 2011 / EU-Africa internation cooperation Coordinator: Environment December aiming to develop a framework for 1. Deltares - Delft (NL) Improved Drought 2013 the provision of early warning and Early Warning and 2010.1.3.3-1 response to mitigate the impact of Consortium: FORecasting to EUR 3,490,000 droughts in Africa. Key targets were 2. CSIR – Pretoria (ZA) strengthen 3. Dinder Center Environ. Res. Ltd – RTD – 265454 improved monitoring, prototype preparedness and operational forecasting, knowledge Khartoum (SD) adaptation to dissemination through a stakeholders 4. ECMRWF – Reading (UK) droughts in Africa platform that includes national and 5. Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam (DE) 6. IGAD– Nairobi (KE) regional drought monitoring and forecasting agencies, as well as NGOs. 7. IAV Hassan II – Rabat (MA) 8. JRC - Brussels (BE) Main impact to increase the 9. ICAMAS - Zaragoza (ES) effectiveness of drought forecasting, 10. Min. Water Resources And warning and response, guidance on Irrigation –Giza (EG)

how and where drought preparedness 11. PIK – Potsdam (DE) and adaptation should be targeted to 12. Stichting Wetlands International contribute to increased resilience and – Wageningen (NL) improved effectiveness of drought 13. UNESCO – Paris (FR) mitigation measures. 14. Univ. Porto (PT) 15. Univ. Eduardo Mondlane – Maputo (MZ) 16. Univ. Politec. Madrid (ES) Status: 17. Waternet Trust - Gaborone (BW) FINISHED http://www.dewfora.net/ 18. WR Nyabeze and Associates – Midrand (ZA)

DROUGHT-R&SPI FP7 – October 2011 / xxxxxx. Coordinator: Environment March 2015 1. Wageningen Universiteit (NL) Xxxxxx http://xxxxx 2011.1.3.2-2 EUR xxxxx Consortium: 2. Albert-Ludwigs-Univ. Freiburg(DE) RTD – 282769 3. Eidgen. Forschungsanstalt WSL – Birmensdorf (CH) 4. Eidgen. Techn. Hochschule Zurich – Zurich (CH)

5. Inst. Sup. Agron.– Lisboa (PT) 6. NTUA – Athens (GR) 7. Stichting Dienst Landbouwkundig Onderzoek – Wageningen (NL) 8. Univ. Complutense de Madrid(ES) 9. Univ. Commerciale 'Luigi Bocconi' – Milano (IT) 10. Univ. Politec. Valencia (ES) Status: 11. Univ. Caen Basse-Normandie (FR) FINISHED 12. Univ. Oslo (NO)

7.2.3.6 Forest fire prevention / preparedness and response Research on forest fires (from both natural and man-made causes) has been funded by several programmes, examples of which are shown below with focus on Mediterranean:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

PREFER FP7 - Space December Responding to major fire prevention Coordinator: 2012 / needs in Southern Europe by : 1) 1. Univ. la Sapienza - Roma (IT) Space-based Space-2012-1 November providing timely multi-scale Information 2015 information products based on Consortium: Support for exploitation of all available 2. Cent. Sec. Studies – Athens (GR) Prevention and EUR spaceborne sensors; 2) offering a 3. CGS SPA– Milano (IT) REcovery of Forest 1,906,360 portfolio of EO products focused both 4. GMV Aerospace and Defence SA– Fires Emergency in Madrid (ES) REA – 312931 on Pre-crisis and Post-crisis forest fire the MediteRranean emergency cycle in the EU 5. IES Consulting Srl – Roma (IT) Area Mediterranean area; 3) preparing the 6. SATWAYS - Halandri (GR) 7. Univ. Coimbra – Coimbra (PT) exploitation of new spaceborne sensors available by 2020 (e.g. : 8. Univ. Strasbourg – Strasbourg (FR) Sentinels) and 4) contributing to the definition of User requirements for Status: the new EO missions. FINISHED http://www.prefer-copernicus.eu/

FIRESMART FP7 – February Contribution to the prevention of Coordinator: Environment 2010 / April unwanted forest fires, retrieving fire 1. GMV Aerospace and Defense SA - Forest and land 2012 prevention theories and practices Tres Cantos (ES) management 2009.2.1.6.1 currently in use in the Mediterranean options to prevent EUR 920,000 Europe, evaluating strengths and Consortium: unwanted forest CP 2. Ambiente Italia s.r.l. - Milan (IT) RTD – 243840 weaknesses involved in fire fires prevention taking into account socio- 3. CEPF AsBL – Luxembourg (LU) 4. Entr. Info. Forestal– Madrid (ES) economic, institutional and legislative aspects. The analysis led to 5. Forestis – Porto (PT) recommendations for stakeholders 6. INRSTEA - Antony (FR) involved in the entire sustainable 7. INITAA – Madrid (ES)

management chain of silviculture, as 8. JRC – Brussels (BE) Status: well as a strategic roadmap. FINISHED http://www.firesmart-project.eu/

FUME FP7 – January 2010 Learning from the past to understand Coordinator: Environment / December future impacts of forest fires in 1. Univ. de Castilla - La Mancha - Forest fires under 2013 relation to socioeconomics changes Ciudad Real (ES) climate, social and Call 2012.6.1-3 and how climate and weather economic changes EUR Consortium: CP affected fire in dynamically changing in Europe, the 6,178,152 landscapes. Fires will be mapped 2. CSIC - Madrid (ES) Mediterranean and 3. Arizona Board of Regents– Tempe RTD – 243888 throughout Europe to determine other fire-affected hazard burning functions. Since (USA) areas of the world climate has changed, an attempt to 4. CEPS – Bruxelles (BE) 5. CNRS – Paris (FR) attribute (sensu IPCC) fire regime change to climate, differentiating it 6. CEMAGREF – Antony (FR) from socioeconomic change, will be 7. CEMCC – Lecce (IT) made. Production of scenarios of 8. CNR – Roma (IT)

change (climate, including extremes, 9. Fac. Cienc., Univ. Lisboa (PT) 10. CEAM - Paterna, Valencia (ES) land-use land-cover, socioeconomics, vegetation) for various emissions 11. Ilmatieteen Laitos – Helsinki (FI) pathways and three time-slices during 12. IRD – Marseille (FR) 13. INRGREF - Ariana (TN) this century. Models and field experiments projected impacts on 14. Inst. Sup. Agron.– Lisboa (PT) fire-regime and vegetation 15. JRC – Brussels (BE) vulnerabilities will be calculated, 16. Lunds Univ. (SE)

including climate extremes (drought, 17. ICAMAS – Zaragoza (ES) 18. Southwest Anatolia Forest Rese. heat-waves). Further investigation on adaptation options in fire- and land- Inst.– Antalya (TR) management, including restoration. 19. Nat. Univ. Athens (GR) 20. PIK – Potsdam (DE) Fire prevention and fire fighting protocols will be tested/developed 21. Sec. Etat Environ. –Rabat (MA) under the new conditions to 22. South African Nat. Biodiversity mitigating fire risks. A company Inst. - Cape Town (ZA) 82

managing fire will be a key player. 23. Tecnol. Ser. Agrarios, S.A. – Costs and policy impacts of changes in Madrid (ES) fire will be studied. Research will 24. US Geol. Survey – Reston (US) focus on old and new fire areas, the 25. Univ. Austral Chile– Valdivia (CL) rural interface, whole Europe and the 26. Univ. Cantabria – Santander (ES) Mediterranean, including all 27. Univ. Tuscia – Viterbo (IT) Mediterranean countries of the 28. Univ. Sassari (IT)

world. Users will be involved in 29. Univ. Ioannina (GR) Status: training and other activities. 30. Univ. Wollongong (AU) FINISHED 31. Univ. Ferhat Abbas- – Setif (DZ) http://www.fumeproject.eu/ 32. US Forest Service - Albany (US)

A more specific project has looked into fire detection and protection in cultural heritage areas:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

FIRESENSE FP7 – December Development of automatic early Coordinator: Environment 2009 / warning system to remotely monitor 1. Centre Res. Technol. Hellas – Fire Detection and February 2013 areas of archaeological and cultural Thessaloniki (GR) Management 2009.3.2.1.2 interest from the risk of fire and through a Multi- EUR 2,697,092 extreme weather conditions. The Consortium: Sensor Network for CP 2. Bilkent Üniv.– Ankara (TR) REA – 244088 proposed system took advantage of the Protection of recent advances in multi-sensor 3. Bogazici Univ.– Istanbul (TR) Cultural Heritage surveillance technologies, using a 4. CNR – Roma (IT) Areas from the Risk wireless sensor network capable of 5. ESC Tunis – Ariana (TN) of Fire and monitoring different modalities (e.g. 6. Hellenic Min. Cult. Tourism – Extreme Weather temperature) andoptical and infrared Athens (GR) Conditions cameras, as well as local weather 7. Marac Electronics- Perama (GR) 8. SCWI – Amsterdam (NL) stations on the deployment site, and capable of generating automatic 9. Titan Bina Elektr. Sistem. Teknol. warning signals for local authorities in Sanayi Ve Ticaret Ltd – Ankara (TR) case of dangerous situation. 10. Xenics NV – Leuven (BE) Status: FINISHED http://www.firesense.eu/

Forest fire fighting is prone to an on-going project funded by the FP7 Secure Societies programme:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

AF3 FP7 - Secure June 2014 / Implementing capabilities to Coordinator: Societies April 2017 increase efficiency of fire-fighting 1. SELEX – Florence (IT) Advanced Forest operations, to save human lives, Fire Fighting Call 2013.4.1-6 EUR reduce damages to environment. Consortium: 12,985,486 Integration of 3 complex systems: 2. ARIA Technol. SA - Paris (FR) Demo 3. SRC PAS - Warszawa (PL) REA– 607276 (1) Command & Control station (to allocate resources), (2) Risk Analysis 4. ELBIT Systems LTD - Haifa (IL) Tool (to assess behaviour & health 5. EADS -- Madrid (ES)

risks to human, livestock, 6. EFPC Consulting - Glasgow (UK) 7. TRACSA SA - Madrid (ES) infrastructures), and (3) Fire Fighting Lab (to predict fire progression & 8. FhG Zv - München (DE) active / passive countermeasures 9. Intracom SA - Athens (GR) 10. Univ.Linkoping - Stockholm (SE) effect). Engine, receiving input data from wide array of sensors (satellite, 11. Min. Dell'Interno - Rome (IT) airborne, mobile, stationary 12. Min. Nat. Defence - Athens (GR) systems), will process, merge 13. Min. Public Sec. - Tel Aviv (IL)

heterogeneous information, will run 14. DEMOKRITOS - Athens (GR) 15. Politecnico di Torino - Torino (IT) in real time mission simulation to improve decision-making. 16. SKYTEK Ltd - Dublin (IE) Status: 17. Univ. Westminster - London (UK) ON-GOING https://www.iit.demokritos.gr/ 18. Univ. Politec. Valencia (ES), project/af3

7.2.4 Health threats crisis management The Decision 1082/2013 requires sharing best practice and experience in response planning among the Member States, and the establishment of early warning and response system (EWRS) for alerting, assessing public health risks and determining the measures that may be required to protect public health in consideration of relevant information. Besides, the CBRN Action Plan promotes strengthening sharing medical counter-measures across borders in the case of an incident. Recommendations also concern ways in which medical staff and other first responders can receive guidance on dealing with large scale CBRN emergencies and a rapid increase of the number of victims. Various projects support these goals: 7.2.4.1 Prevention / preparedness to contagion, outbreaks, pandemics Specific research thas been developed about neurotoxins and their risks to security:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

ANTIBIOBABE FP7 – Secure September Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs), the Coordinator: Societies 2010 / most toxic substances known, are 1. Centre Rech. Service Santé des Neutralizing February 2015 susceptible for use as bioweapons Armées - La Tronche (FR) antibodies against Call 2009-4.3-1 (listed as class A agents by CDC). This botulinum toxins EUR 2,966,386 Consortium: CP project targeted most lethal types of A,B,E BoNTs according to their high affinity 2. TU Braunschweig (DE) ENTR – 241832 3. Helsingin Yliopisto - Helsinki (FI) & in vitro neutralization property. The six most neutralizing scFvs were 4. Inst. Pasteur - Paris (FR) tested in vivo, in standardised model 5. CNRS - Paris (FR) of protection & against toxins 6. Health Prot. Agency - London (UK)

obtained from collections of clostridia 7. Vitamib Sas - Grenoble (FR) 8. LFB Biotech - Paris (FR) strains. Security against bio-threats in EU, based upon a family of well- 9. Min. Defense - Paris (FR) Status: tolerated & effective molecules. 10. Medecine and Healthcare FINISHED Products Agency - London (UK) http://antibotabe.com/ A range of on-going projects are investigating various aspects of medical issues in relation to civil protection (preparedness, emergencies):

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

PANDHUB FP7 – Secure xxxxx / xxxxx Integrated toolbox to aid transport Coordinator: Societies operators, relevant actors in major 1. VTT - Helsinki (FI) Xxxx EUR 3,142,004 transport hubs in development of Call 2013.2.2-2. current pandemic & dangerous Consortium: ENTR – 607433 2. Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de CP pathogen preparedness, response plans. Toolbox including modelling Paris AP/HP - Paris (FR) components to simulate spread of 3. EpiData Association - Odense (DK)

diseases, evaluate effects of 4. Health Prot. Agency - London (UK) 5. Itä-Suomen yliopisto - Kuopio (FI) countermeasures. Facilitation of efficient & rapid response to cross- 6. MEDES - Toulouse (FR) border incident. Co-ordinated & 7. Univ. Nottingham (UK), appropriate data collection, collation, analysis tools developed will allow swift ‘joined-up’ epidemiological investigation. Status: ON-GOING https://xxxx

PULSE FP7 – Secure July 2013 / The project focuses on a) studying Coordinator: Societies June 2016 procedures, processes, training 1. Skytek Ltd (IE) - Dublin (IE) Platform for requirements; b): developing European Medical Call 2012-1 EUR 2,789,940 standard & consistent response Consortium: Support during 2. CESS - München (DE) CP REA – 607799 procedures; c) providing tools to major emergencies support decision making in 3. Onest Solutions - Bucarest (RO) 84

preparedness & response phases; d) 4. SELEX - Rome (IT) providing Framework that ensures 5. Trilateral Research & Consulting decision makers have access to timely LLP - London (UK) key data and support tools; e) 6. Univ.Catt.del Sacro Cuore - Milan presenting innovative training (IT) techniques to improve personnel response training; f) developing

‘emergency apps’ for smart phones that will allow users fast, flexible access to emergency resource Status: availability information. ON-GOING http://www.pulse-fp7.com/

S-HELP FP7 – Secure February 2014 Volatile events such as disasters bring Coordinator: Societies - ICT / January 2017 prospect of rapid contagion & threat 1. Univ. College Cork - (IE) Securing of disastrous impacts for EU. The Health.Emergency. Call 2013-1 ICT EUR 3,496,836 project will enhance protection of Consortium: Learning.Planning public health and interoperability by 2. Accelopment AG - Zurich (CH) CP REA – 607865 3. Magen David Adom- Tel Aviv (IL) significantly advancing existing knowledge required for develop next 4. Future Analytics Consulting Ltd - generation Decision Support (DS) Dublin (IE) tools & user-centred. It will offer 5. HSE - Kildare (IE)

evidence-based solutions to improve 6. Lunds Universitet - Lund (SE) 7. Public Health Agency Northern Health Services performance, developing holistic framework to Ireland - Belfast (UK) guide stakeholder needs analysis, 8. Technische Univ. Graz (AT) 9. Univ. Wien (AT) integrating advanced DS tool-set. It will execute multi-scenario based end 10. VectorCommand Ltd - Havant user training, alongside ‘what-if’ (UK) analysis, and simulate 3 multi-

factorial, multi-agency scenarios (Chemical explosion; mass flooding; regional bio-hazard), model, projected evolution of 3 emergencies to communicate collaborative problem solving across agencies. Status: ON-GOING http://www.accelopment.com/en/pro jects/s-help

IMPRESS FP7 – Secure May 2014 / Improving the efficiency of decision Coordinator: Societies May 2017 making in emergency health 1. INTRASOFT International SA - IMproving operations, having direct impact on Luxembourg (LU) Preparedness and Call 2013.4.1-4 EUR 3,251,315 services quality to citizens. Output Response of HEalth Consortium: CP REA – 608078 provides consolidated concept of Services in major operations implemented as modular 2. PHE - London (UK) criseS Decision Support System managing 3. CNR - Rome (IT) 4. Adittess Ltd - Nicosia (CY) medical resources, prepare, coordinate response activities, using 5. Satways Ltd - Halandri Attikis (GR) data from multiple heterogeneous 6. Inst. Inform. Comm. Technol. - sources. Improve preparedness of Sofia (BG)

emergency medical services including 7. KEMEA - Athens (GR) 8. FhG IVI - Dresden (DE) planning, increasing surge capacity, developing interoperable systems ect. 9. Ecomed bvba - Lille (FR) and response capabilities in case of 10. Europ. Univ. Cyprus- Nicosia(CY) large disasters. 11. National Health Command Status: Center Ekepy - Athens (GR) ON-GOING www.fp7-impress.eu

CONCORDE FP7 - Secure April 2014 / Addressing the issue of mass casualty Coordinator: Societies April 2017 incidents or medical surges to 1. Cambridge Uni. Hospital (UK) Development of healthcare systems with Coordination Call 2013-1 EUR 3,378,212 considerations of different types of Consortium: Mechanisms 2. Crisis Training - Elverum (NO) CP REA– 285266 such incidents (natural disasters, During Different explosions, humanitarian crises, 3. Ellin. omada diasosis - Athens (GR) Kinds of others) meaning different framework 4. Esri Portugal - Lisboa (PT) Emergencies for responders. Development of 5. European Dynamics - Athens (GR) 6. Global Security Intelligence Ltd - Decision Support System (DSS) to improve preparedness & London (UK) interoperability of medical services 7. Inovamais - Porto (PT) during emergency which affects 8. Koç University - Istambul (TR) 85

health of population at local, regional 9. DEMOKRITOS - Athens (GR) or cross-border level. It will 10. AISBL - Brussels (BE) incorporate existing operational 11. SIVECO Rom. SA - Bucharest (RO) assets related to security, trust, 12 Stichting Crisislab- Renswoude infrastructure & leverage them within (NL) Status: DSS. 13. VTT - Espoo (FI) ON-GOING 14. Univ. Cyprus - Nicosia (CY) http://www.concorde-project.eu/

Within Horizon2020, a major topic (particularly relevant in consideration of the Ebola crisis) has been published in the 2014 call, namely the DRS-4-2014 topic on "Feasibility study for strengthening capacity-building for health and security protection in case of large-scale pandemics". 7.2.4.2 Improved medical responses Needs for improved medical responses, in support of the Decision 1082/2013, have been investigated in a CSA funded by the FP7 Secure Societies programme:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

NMFRDISASTER FP7 – Secure May 2008 / Project considered ethical, emotional, Coordinator: Societies June 2009 legal, media communication aspects 1. Magen David Ado - Tel Aviv (IL) Identifying the of medical first response tasks. It Needs of Medical Call 2007-7.2 EUR 815,079 concludes that a lack of public Consortium: First Responders in 2. Charles Univ. - Prague (CZ) CSA REA – 218057 understanding of medical tasks in Disasters emergency, combined with sensitivity 3. DK Red Cross - Copenhagen (DK) 4. Fund. Rioja Salud - Logrono (ES) towards issues such as blood donation, medical “triage” 5. Samur Prot. Civil- Madrid (ES) prioritisation, may place medical 6. CSSC - Rome (IT) responders at great risk of legal 7. Sinergie Srl - Torino (IT) Status: liability charges & emotional trauma. 8. Ambulanc. Ned - Al Zwolle (NL) FINISHED 9. Univ.. Al-quds - Jerusalem Abu Dis http://www.mdais.org (Palestine)

7.2.4.3 CBRN detection Assessment / Detection of CBRN threats is an essential component when dealing with health risks assessments, as well as requirements for ensuring the quality and comparability of data. Projects which contributed to this goal in the C and B area are:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

MIRACLE FP7 – Secure December Harmonizing definition of a CBRN Coordinator: Societies 2013 / May mobile laboratory, identify needs, 1. UCL - Brussels (BE) MobIle Laboratory 2015 solutions for deployment in- and Capacity for the Call 2012.4.4-1 outside EU. Methods: Evidence-based Consortium: Rapid Assessment EUR 1,130,605 multi dimensional matrix (type of 2. RIVM - Bilthoven (NL) of CBRN Threats CSA 3. FOI - Stockholm (SE) ENTR – 312885 threats, magnitude, location, societal Located within and impact) will be used to define 4. Health canada - Ottawa (Canada) outside the EU scenarios, missions justifying use of 5. Bundesministerium der CBRN deployable capacities. Verteidigung BMVg - Berlin (DE) 6. Police Service of Northern Ireland Status: PSNI - Coleraine (UK) FINISHED 7. FFI - Kjeller (NO) http://www.miracle-fp7.eu/ 8. EADS Astrium - Paris (FR)

BIO-PROTECT FP7 – Secure June 2010 / Anthrax attack success depends on Coordinator: Societies January 2014 concentrating sufficient amount of 1. LGI Consulting - Paris (FR) Ionisation-based pathogens in a defined area. Hence detector of Call 2009-1.3-1 EUR 3,125,577 safeguarding a certain area regarding Consortium: airborne bio- B agents demands the detection of 2. Aalborg Univ. - Aalborg (DK) agents, viruses and 3. C-TECH Innov. Ltd - Chester (UK) 86

toxins for fast-alert CP REA – 242306 pathogenous bacteria, spores and 4. Robert Koch-Institut - Berlin (DE) and identification viruses in various matrices or 5. Environics-IUT Gmbh - Berlin (DE) suspicious aerosols. BIO-PROTECT 6. O Zuravliovo Imone Avista - Vilnius develops fast-alert, easy-to-use device (LT) to be applied for detection and 7. CEA - Paris (FR) identification of airborne bacteria, 8. IUT - Berlin (DE) spores, viruses and toxins. Based on 9. Environics OY - Mikkeli (FI) bioaerosol detection by fluorescence,

scattering and background aerosol measurement followed by ionization of air flow, analysis of the spectrum of relative speed of passage, which, in Status: turns, enables identification of FINISHED harmful biological agents. http://fp7-bioprotect.eu/ In the radiological sector, one project investigated tools in support of the management of high scale radiological casualties:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

MULTIBIODOSE FP7 – Secure May 2010 / Analyse variety of biodosimetric tools Coordinator: Societies April 2013 &adapt them to different mass 1.Univ. Stockholm (SE) Multi-disciplinary casualty scenarios, for assessing biodosimetric tools Call 2009-4.3-2 EUR 3,493,199 radiation exposure to general Consortium: to manage high 2. Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz BfS CP REA – 241536 population, enabling identification of scale radiological those exposed who should receive - Salzgitter (DE) casualties medical treatment. Biodosimetric 3. Univ.. Gent (BE) 4. Health Protection Agency - tools were tested: dicentric & micronucleus assay, gamma-H2AX London (UK) assay, blood serum protein assay, 5. IRSN - Paris (FR) electron paramagnetic resonance 6. ISS - Rome (IT)

optically stimulated dosimetry.It 7. NRPA - Osteraas (NO) 8. STUK - Helsinky (FI) established a biodosimetric network called “Realizing the European 9. Univ. Aut. Barcelona (ES) Network of Biodosimetry” (RENEB), 10. INCT - Warszawa (PL) kicked off January 2012. 11. Helmholtz Zentr. München (DE) 12. BIR - Ulm (DE) Status: 13. Univ. Oxford - Oxford (UK) FINISHED 14. European Radiation Dosimetry http://www.multibiodose.eu/ Group - Braunschweig (DE)

7.2.5 Victim triage and identification Identification and triage of victims after a disaster, or identification of unidentified bodies are prone to a wide range of research developments in support of civil protection and security policies. 7.2.5.1 Triage of victims exposed to biological contamination The project below addressed triage of persons exposed to biological contamination in support of First Responder operations:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

BOOSTER FP7 – Secure September BOOSTER project addresses rapid Coordinator: Societies 2010 / June triage of exposed persons. It is a 1. CEA – Paris (FR) BiO-dOSimetric 2013 capability project designed to Tools for triagE to Call 2009-4.3-2 research and develop new bio- Consortium: Responders EUR 3,284,291 dosimetric tools in order to quickly 2. Nat. Univ. Ireland - Galway (IE) CP 3. ORSZAGOS ATOMENERGIA REA – 242361 evaluate the level of potential casualties, determine by appropriate HIVATAL - Budapest (HU) sensors their sequences, allow an 4. Karlsruher Inst. Technol. - efficient triage of exposed people, Karlsruhe (DE) 87

integrate a useful and usable toolbox, 5. Univ. Politecnica - Valencia (ES) train civil protection operators and 6. MAGYAR TUDOMANYOS define commercial exploitation AKADEMIA - Budapest (HU) potentialities. New bio-dosimetric 7. CANBERRA - Paris (FR) tools.These approaches will be combined in a prognostic toolkit that will allow effective management of Status: exposed persons presenting at triage. FINISHED http://www.booster-project.org/

7.2.5.2 Post-disaster victim identification In another domain, also related to forensics, research has focused on the identification of victims after a disaster:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

FASTID FP7 - Secure April 2010 / Creation of the first ever police Coordinator: Societies April 2013 database to identify & link missing 1. Interpol – Lyon (FR) FAST and efficient persons, unidentified bodies on international Call 2009-4.2-1 EUR international level. Establish general Consortium: disaster victim 2,270,476 2. German Federal Criminal Police - CP requirements: - Filling gap in data Identification exchange; - Decentralized access (It Wiesbaden (DE) REA– 242339 3. FhG IOSB - Karlsruhe (DE) will be based on INTERPOL’s Ante- Mortem Disaster Victim 4. FhG IGD - Darmstadt (DE) Identification & Post-Mortem DVI 5. PlassData - Holbæk (DK) forms (missing persons), Black 6. Univ. Dundee (UK)

Notice (unidentified bodies) forms); 7. Crabbe Consuling. - Stockton-on- Tees (UK) Status: - Comprehensive training; - Forensic FINISHED research.

7.2.6 Information / Communication systems for Disaster Management Disaster management closely relies on appropriate information / communication systems e.g. for alerting population, support first responder operations, etc. Several FP7 projects investigated this area. 7.2.6.1 Communication systems with focus on disaster management (generic) Crisis management relies on proper connection and assessment of tasks for improved pre- crisis evaluation, inventory etc., examples of projects are given below:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

CRISCOMSCORE FP7 - Secure February Connecting tasks of communication Coordinator: Societies 2008 / April with crisis management & providing 1. Univ. Jyväskylä, Finla – Yliopisto (FI) Developing a crisis 2011 quality criteria for crisis communication Call 2007-6.1-3 communication. Tool used for Consortium: scorecard EUR 799,174 preparation, crisis preparedness, 2. Univ. Tartu - Tartu (EE) CP 3. Ben Gurion Univ. of The Negev - REA– 217889 organisation and its communication plan, strategy development process, Beer Sheva (IL) evaluation of crisis exercise or 4. Norwegian Univ. Sci. & Technol. - reflection on real-life performance Trondheim (NO)

after emergency situation. Another 5. Emergency Services College - Kuopio (FI) aspect concerns Warning & Crisis response when situation is at its peak, whereas the last phase concerns actions when situation has calmed down. Status: http://www.crisiscommunication.fi/ FINISHED criscomscore/ 88

Other on-going projects are:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

SECINCORE FP7 - Secure May 2014 / Identification of data sets, Coordinator: Societies October 2017 processes, information systems, 1. Univ. Paderborn (DE) Secure Dynamic business models used by first Cloud for Call 2013.5.1-1 EUR responders, Police authorities Consortium: Information, 3,124,666 leading to dynamic, secure cloud 2. TU Dortmund (DE) Communication CP 3. Univ. Lancaster (UK) REA – 607832 based ‘common information space’. and Resource This includes a pan-EU inventory of 4. T6 Ecosystems srl - Rome (IT) Interoperability past critical events and 5. EADS Cassidian - Paris (FR) based on Pan- consequences focusing on 6. CloudSigma AG - Zurich (CH) European Disaster collaborative emergency operations 7. British APCO - Lincoln (UK) Inventory & real-time decision making while 8. KEMEA - Athens (GR) taking ethics, law, social practices & privacy into account, design of secure, dynamic cloud based knowledge base, communication

system concept including ability to use emergency information by means of trans-EU communication infrastructure. Status: http://groups.uni- ON-GOING paderborn.de/secincore/

ISITEP FP7 - Secure September Global solution for interoperability Coordinator: Societies 2013 / between first responder (FR) 1. SELEX IT – Florence (IT) Inter System December communication systems. 2 main Interoperability for Call 2012.5.3-4 2016 PPDR communication systems in EU: Consortium: Tetra-TetraPol 2.Belgian Federal Police - Brussels (BE) CP TETRA & TETRAPOL remaining Networks EUR operational until 2025. Tackling 3. Motorola - Copenhagen (DK) 10,292,495 incompatibility of radio systems, 4. Amper - Madrid (ES) 5. Devoteam Fringes - Madrid (ES) REA – 312484 unavailability of suitable interconnection interfaces, lack of 6. Univ. Pol. Catalunya- Barcelona (ES) common procedures, improvement 7. Net Technologies - Athens (GR)

of Interoperability to allow FRs to 8. EADS Cassidian - Paris (FR) 9. ISCOM - Rome (IT) communicate through their own terminals in visiting Country by 10. Univ. Degli Studi Roma - Rome (IT) interconnecting networks with 11. Mini. Justice and Public Safety - Oslo (NO) gateways, enabling visiting terminals to migrate to foreign networks using 12. Min. Security & Justice - Delft (NL) radio coverage of visited countries 13. TNO - Delft (NL) & sharing talk groups. 14. MSB - Stockholm (SE) Status: ON-GOING http://isitep.eu/about/project- objectives.php

C2-SENSE FP7 - Secure April 2014 / Development of “profiling” Coordinator: Societies April 2017 approach to achieve seamless 1. SAGEM – Paris (FR) Interoperability interoperability by addressing all Profiles for Call 2013.5.3-1 EUR layers of communication stack in Consortium: Command/Control 2,885,416 security field, e.g. profile-based 2.AIT GmbH - Seibersdorf (AT) Systems and Sensor CP 3. Innova.Puglia - Bari (IT) REA – 607960 Emergency Interoperability Systems in Framework using existing standards, 4. Lutech SPA - Milano (IT) Emergency semantically enriched Web services, 5. PIAP - Warszawa (PL) Management Sensor Systems & other emergency/ 6. Regione Puglia - Bari (IT) 7. Regola srl - Torino (IT) crisis management systems. Assessment of outcomes in a 8. SRDC - Ankara (TR) Status: realistic “Flood Scenario in Italy”. ON-GOING http://c2-sense.eu/

7.2.6.2 Communication systems / Response coordination for First Responders ICT systems are also developed to directly support first responder operations, in particular in emergency situations:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

INFRA FP7 - Secure March 2009 / Development of new digital-based Coordinator: Societies / ICT March 2011 personal technologies for 1. thena GS3 Security Implementations Innovative & Novel integration into secure emergency Ltd - Holon (IL) First Responders Call 2007-1.0-4 EUR managment system to support first Applications 2,642,895 responders (FRs) involved in critical Consortium: CP 2. Halevi Dweck & Co. Arttic Israel REA– 225272 infra structure incidents. This includes robust ad-hoc mesh Company Ltd - (IL) topology broadband wireless 3. Univ. Limerick (IE) network for interoperability 4. Isdefe - Madrid (ES)

between standard FRs radio sets; 5. Univ. Thrace - Komotiní (GR) 6. Rinicom - Lancaster (UK) non-invasive biometric sensors integrated onto wearable; “finger 7. Everis - Madrid (ES) clip” to monitor FR’s vital signs such 8. Hopling Networks BV - Almere (NL) 9. Opgal Optronic Ind. - Karmiel (IL) as blood haemoglobin, oxygen levels, heart rate, temperature; 10. Res. Educ. Lab. Info. Technol. - lightweight optical gas sensors for Athens (GR) detecting O2, CO2, methane levels,

radiation sensors for detecting x- Status: rays, alpha & beta rays, and video FINISHED annotation system to enhance visu. http://www.infra-fp7.com/

DITSEF FP7 - Secure February Increasing effectiveness & safety of Coordinator: Societies / ICT 2010 / March First Responders (FR) by optimal 1. SAGEM - Paris (FR) Digital and 2013 information gathering, sharing with innovative Call 2007-1.0-4 their command levels. Self- Consortium: technologies for EUR 2. TNO - Delft (NL) CP organising, robust ad-hoc security and 2,798,517 communications where existing 3. EADS - Paris (FR) efficiency of first 3. KEMEA - Αthens (GR) REA– 225404 infrastructure may be compromised, responders allowing communication between 4. CEA (leti & list) - Paris (FR) operation FRs & their command level; accurate 5. Elsag Datamat - Genova (IT) 6. Demokritos NCSR - Αthens (GR) novel 3D positioning in indoor environments; sensors offering 7. Infitheon Technol. - Αthens (GR) reliable overview of the situation & 8. T‐SOFT - Praha (CZ) of potential threats (expl., chem., 9. Min. Emergency Situations MES‐

fire ...); enhanced vision for FRs in TDCP - Sofia (BG) Status: visually-impaired conditions. FINISHED http://www.ditsef.eu

ESS FP7 - Secure July 2009 / Integrating several existing front end Coordinator: Societies June 2013 data collection technologies into 1. Verint Syst. Ltd - Herzliya Pituach (IL) Emergency support unique platform. Development of system Call 2007-4.2-1 EUR sensors, requisite accessories. To Consortium: 9,142,126 enable portable sensor to 2. Wind Telecom. SpA - Rome (IT) IP 3. Int. Geosp. Serv. Inst. - Emden (DE) REA– 217951 communicate with back-office, porting platform will include 4. Intergraph CS - Praha (CZ) communication component which 5. GMV Sistemas SA - Madrid (ES)

will consist of wireless modem 6. Diginext - Aix-en- Provence (FR) 7. Fraunhofer IAIS - St Augustin (DE) based on WLAN, Wi-MAX or GPRS.ESS portal creates efficient 8. ITIS Holdings plc.- Altrincham (UK) synchronization framework 9. Algosystems SA - Kallithea (GR) 10. Alcatel-Lucent - Milano (IT) managing data & information flow between different public authorities 11. APD Comm. - Milton Keynes (UK) involved in emergency management 12. CEREN - Gardane (FR) operations & crisis managers 13. Kemea - Athens (GR)

(Rescue forces, Police, Fire- 14. Imego Acreo AB – Göteborg (SE) 15. Magen David Adom - Tel Aviv (IL) department, Homeland-security, Municipality...). 16. Ernst & Young Ltd - Tel Aviv (IL) Status: 17. Aeronautics Defense Systems - FINISHED www.ess-project.eu Yavne (IL)

SECRIROM FP7 - Secure September Demonstrate within integrated Coordinator: Societies 2008 / April communication infrastructure: 1) 1. Qinetik Ltd - Farnborough (UK) Seamless 2012 Cross system/platform communication for Call 2007-4.2-4 communication; 2) Security: Non- Consortium: crisis management EUR 2. Ardaco, a.s. - Bratislava (SK) CP repudiation, authenticity, integrity, 8,606,568 confidentiality, accountability - User 3. Bumar Ltd.- Warsaw (PL) 4. NEXTEL S.A.- Bilbao (ES) REA– 218123 authentication; 3) Quality of service; 4) Resilient connectivity; 5) 5. Infineon Technologies AG - Integrated, demonstrated. Neubiberg (DE)

Applications of SECRICOM results: 6. Univ. Luxembourg (LU) 7. Inst. Informatics, Slovak Acad. Sci. - Emergency responders, paramedics, police, fire brigades, public bodies, Bratislava (SK) crisis management headquarters, 8. Graz Univ. Technol. - Graz (AT) eHealth systems, eCommerce; 9. Smartrends, s.r.o. - Trnava (SK) Status: 10. ITTI Sp. zoo - Poznan (PL) FINISHED 11. BAPCO LBG - Lincoln (UK) 12. CEA Paris (FR) http://www.secricom.eu 13. Hitachi Europe SAS - Paris (FR)

GERYON FP7 - Secure December Innovative emergency inter- Coordinator: Societies 2011 / May networking system capable of 1. Univ. Basque Country UPV/EHU - Next generation 2014 connecting existing first responder Guipúzcoa (ES) technology Call 2011.5.2-1 (FR) communication systems, independent EUR Consortium: CP enabling integration of next interoperability of 2,512,308 generation mobile networks by 2.COSMOTE Mobile Telecomm. - emergency services defining technology independent Maroussi (GR) REA– 284863 3. Grupo Cys - Zaratamo (ES) standardized interfaces, autonomic configuration, adaptation 4. Itelazpi - Zamudio (ES) techniques under IMS umbrella. 5. NCSR Demokritos - Athens (GR) Proposed system will ensure 6. Plymouth University (UK)

seamless operation, take advantage 7. VIOTECH Communications - Versailles (FR) of coverage & responsiveness of existing PMRs, 4G broadband data services. It aimed to demonstrate both classical (i.e. PTT, MTP and preemptive calls) & enhanced emergency services (i.e. multimedia streaming, data services) over Status: across-frontier testbed. FINISHED http://www.sec-geryon.eu

E-SPONDER FP7 - Secure July 2010 / Study, design & implementation of Coordinator: Societies December robust platform for provision of 1. EXODUS A.E. - Athens (GR) A holistic approach 2014 specialized ad-hoc services, facilities towards the Call 2009-4.2-1 & support for first responders (FR) Consortium: development of the EUR 2. UNIMORE - Modena (IT) CP that operate at crisis scenes located first responder of 8,790,044 mainly within critical infrastructures. 3. CrisisPlan BV - Leiden (NL) the future Modularity is key issue to overall 4. Prosyst Software Gmbh - Köln (DE) REA– 242411 5. Immersion SA - Bordeaux (FR) system design whether it refers to mobile / dispersed units of first FRs 6. Rose Vision - Sesena (ES) or back-office applications, systems 7. Telcordia Poland Sp - Warsaw (PL) & services: FR Units (FRU), Mobile 8. S.A.CSEM - Neuchatel (CH)

Emergency Operations Centre 9. Smartex Srl - Prato (IT) 10. Tech. Univ. - Dresden (DE) (MEOC), Emergency Operations Centre (EOC), Logistics of FRs, 11. YellowMAP - Karlsruhe (DE) Status: Training of FRs. 12. PANOU - Athens (GR) FINISHED 13. Inst. Information - Taipei (Taiwan) http://www.e-sponder.eu/ 14. EPLFM - Gardanne (FR)

OD FP7 - ERC January 2011 Study of programmatic texts and Coordinator: / June 2015 training manuals of civil protection 1. Goldsmith's College – London (UK) Organizing Disaster. ERC-SG-SH2 agencies looking at how civil Civil Protection and EUR protection conceives the the Population 1,180,471 relationship between the ERC – 263731 organisation and the population on paper and how these views have changed along with organisational structures since the 1950ies. Status: FINISHED http://organizingdisaster.net/

These are complemented by the following on-going projects:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

SPARTACUS FP7 - Secure November Development and validation of Coordinator: Societies 2013/ simulated & real world scenarios 1. D'Appolonia Spa - Genova (IT) Satellite Based October 2016 GALILEO-ready tracking/positioning Asset Tracking for Call 2012.4.2-1 solutions for critical asset tracking & Consortium: Supporting EUR 2. Rom. Railway Auth. - Bucarest (RO) CP crisis management. Implementation Emergency 3,175,396 of solutions for location awareness 3. TriaGnoSys Gmbh - Wessling (DE) Management in 4. DMAT Consulting KG - Lieboch (AT) REA– 313002 based on existing (GPS, EGNOS, Crisis Operations EDAS) & incoming (GALILEO) 5. AnsuR Technol. - Fornebu (NO) 6. GlobalGPS BH - Sarajevo (BA) satellite services, technologies providing precise tracking/ 7. Univ. Pavia (IT) positioning, ensuring no lacks of 8. Univ. Bologna (IT) communication, no gaps of 9. Univ. Newcastle upon Tyne (UK)

information in coordination actions 10. Inst. Mihajlo Pupin - Belgrade (RS) 11. Akkon Univ. Johanniter-Unfall-Hilfe in support of safety of first responders. eV - Berlin (DE) Status: ON-GOING http://www.spartacus-project.eu/

REDIRNET FP7 - Secure March 2014 / Decentralized framework for Coordinator: Societies August 2016 interoperability for first responders’ 1. Ardaco – Bratislava (SK) Emergency systems based on public meta-data Responder Data Call 2013.5.1-1 EUR gateway controlled by agencies Consortium: Interoperability 3,498,968 2. Nextel SA - Bizkaia (ES) CP themselves via socio-professional Network web, with detailed mapping of user 3. CETIC - Brussels (BE) REA– 607768 4. Univ. Luxembourg (LU) preferences, related legal requirements using innovative 5. BAPCO – Manchester (UK) technologies on sensor systems & 6. Inst. Jozef Stefan - Ljubljana (SI) cameras, additional IT systems (data 7. Slovak Acad. Sci. - Bratislava (SK)

bases). Agencies will be able link up 8. Verde - Bratislava (SK) 9. Pramacom - Praha (CZ) Status: to partner agencies of their choice & ON-GOING operational need.

7.2.7 Cost-assessments of hazards This area has not been widely covered by FP7, one project has looked into natural hazards:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

CONHAZ FP7 - February Insight into cost assessment Coordinator: Environment 2010 / methods needed for an integrated 1. Helmholtz-Zentr.UFZ - Leipzig (DE) Costs of Natural January 2012 planning and overall budgeting, and Hazards ENV.2009.1.3.2 to prioritise natural hazard Consortium: EUR 899,487 management and adaptation 2. Helmholtz-Zentr. –Potsdam (DE) 3. Middlesex Univ.– London (UK) RTD – 244159 policies. Compilation and evaluation of state-of-the-art methods dealing 4.Soc.Math.Appl. Sci. Hum.– Paris (FR) with costs of natural hazards 5. Univ. Ferrara – Ferrara (IT)

including droughts, floods, storms, 6. Univ. Innsbruck – Innsbruck (AT) 7. Univ. Aut. Barcelona- Barcelona (ES) and alpine hazards, and impacted economic sectors such as housing, 8. Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek en industry and transport, and non- Patientenzorg – Amsterdam (NL) economic sectors such as health and nature. Assessment of accuracy of cost predictions and best-practice- methods of validation. Status: FINISHED http://www.conhaz.org/

7.2.8 Training Training activities are a recognised tool for supporting security policies and funding instruments are in place by the main policy DGs, namely DG HOME and DG ECHO, to stimulate training at EU level. A range of research projects also include training components in the work programmes, primarily to enhance testing capacities of developed tools and methods. Examples target training for first responders, civil protection agencies and security personnel.

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

INDIGO FP7 - Secure March 2010 / Solution enabling inter- Coordinator: Societies April 2013 organisational preparation, support 1. DIGINEXT sarl - Aix en Provence (FR) Innovative Training response to transboundary crises & & Decision Support Call 2009-4.3-3 EUR disasters, in any environment. Inter- Consortium: for Emergency 2,787,672 2. CNR – Rome (IT) CP organisational exercising, operations information sharing and analysis 3. CASRD Sardinia - Pula (IT) REA– 232441 4. Immersion SAS - Toulouse (FR) (mining both horizontal and vertical relations) of relation between 5. CEN - Brussels (BE) central command centres & field 6. Crisisplan CRISP - Leyden (NL) units, involvement of First 7. CRISM - Stockholm (SE)

responders (FR) in large-scale 8. CEREN - Gardane (FR) Status: strategic exercises. FINISHED http://indigo.diginext.fr

HYRESPONSE FP7 June 2013 / World’s first comprehensive training Coordinator: May 2016 programme for first responders, i.e. 1. Ecole Nat. Sup. Officiers de Sapeurs- European Hydrogen SP1-JTI- a European Hydrogen Safety Pompiers - Aix-en-provence (FR) Emergency FCH.2012.5.3 EUR Training Platform (EHSTP), to Response training 1,858,453 facilitate safer deployment of FCH Consortium: programme for 2. Air Liquide Hydrogen Energy – Paris ?? – 325348 systems and infrastructure. First Responders Development of engineering tools to (FR) 3. Areva Stockage d'énergie SAS - Aix- assess accident scene status and facilitate decision making. Three En-Provence (FR) pilot training sessions with 4. Crisis Simulation Engineering SARL – Emergency Response Guide, Roquevaire (FR)

explaining details of intervention 5. FAST - Milano (IT) 6. CCS Global Group Ltd - Great Status: strategy and tactics, Bookham (UK) ON-GOING http://www.hyresponse.eu/ 7. Univ. Ulster – Coleraine (UK)

CRISIS FP7 - Secure October 2010 CRISIS using an Interactive Simulated Coordinator: Societies / October Environment) is developing a 1. Middlesex Univ. – London (UK) CRitical Incident 2013 train•on•demand simulation management Call 2009-4.3-3 platform, which adapts advance Consortium: training System EUR 2.Nat.Aerospace Lab - Amsterdam(NL) CP video games technology to train first using an Interactive 3,495,612 responders & crisis managers. CRISIS 3. E-Semble - Delft (NL) Simulation 4. ObjectSecurity - Cambridge (UK) REA – 242474 will support both collocated & environment distributed training across different 5. Space Appl. Serv. - Zaventem (BE) 6. VSL Systems - Linköping (SE) emergency service organisations. Reconfiguration and Re-purpose: 7. Linköping Univ. - Linköping (SE) Airports to Stadiums. 8. Univ. Iceland - Reykjavík (IS) 9. AE Solutions - Badsey (UK) Status: 10. Aeroportos Portugal - Lisboa (PT) FINISHED 11. British Transp. Polic - London (UK) http://idc.mdx.ac.uk/projects/crisis/ 12. ISAVIA - Reykjavík (IS)

CAST FP7 - Secure September Security-centered training course Coordinator: Societies 2009 / June curricula on disaster management 1. Salzburg Univ. (AT) Comparative 2011 for first responders; comparative Assessment of Call 2007-1.6.2 assessment Consortium: Security-Centered EUR 2. ISCC - Wien (AT) Training Curricula CSA 1,974,620 3. Saab - Huskvarna (SE) for First 4. Hamburg Fire (DE) Responders on REA – 218070 5. Diamond aircraft indus. - Wien (AT) Disaster 6. Swedish Police - Stockholm (SE) Management in the 7. S. Freud Univ. - Wien (AT) 8. DSTS Advisers - Wien (AT) 93

EU 9. Defence Minist. - Praha (CZ) 10. Tecnatom - Madrid (ES) 11. Feur Ministr. - Wien (AT) 12. Red Cross - Wien (AT) 13. BCE - Budapest (HU) Status: 14. PSNI Police - Dublin (IE) FINISHED 15. FhG ICT - (DE) http://www.research.sbg.ac.at/cast/

L4S FP7 - Secure July 2009 / L4S develop deployable life-long Coordinator: Societies July 2011 learning service to improve crisis 1. Deloitte Business Solutions – Athens Learning for management skills, competencies of (GR) security project Call -ICT-SEC- EUR security personnel, focused on air, 2007-11 2,415,768 sea transport disaster scenarios. Consortium: 2. Oesterreichische Studiengesellschaft CP REA – 225634 “L4S learning experiences service” consist of advanced simulation Fuer Kybernetik - Wien (AT) games, learning/networking 3. Alphalabs Sarl - Chartrettes (FR)

applications. L4S portfolio contains a 4. Univ. Bundeswehr - Muenchen (DE) 5. Lab. Business Admin. - Athens (GR) WEB 2.0 advanced networking, sharing tool named “CRISIS TUBE 6. Univ. Catt. Sacro Cuore - Milan (IT) Leadership Learning Network”, as 7. FVA Sas - Rome (IT) 8. Int. airport - Athens (GR) well as supportive online workshop tool known as “OWL4S”. 9. Creurers del port de Barcelona (ES) Status: 10. Frequentis AG - Wien (AT) FINISHED www.L4S-project.info 11. Akad Wissensch. Hochschule Lahr Gmbh - Stuttgart (DE)

7.2.9 Networking Complementing the above, some projects focus on enhanced networking for information exchanges and training in emergencies:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

ESENET FP7 - Secure January 2013 User requirements & lesson learnt Coordinator: Societies / December on all levels of interoperability; 1.IES Solutions – Rome (IT) Emergency Services 2014 network of end users willing to Europe Network Call 2012.5.3-2 leverage quality of Emergency Consortium: EUR 629,266 services; roadmap for common EU 2. EENA – Brussels (BE) CSA 3. Erupsi Slovakia - Bratislava (SK), REA– 313013 approach to new standards & legal framework related to emergency services. Status: FINISHED http://www.esenet.org/

GARTNET-E FP7 - Space May 2010 / To enable and enhance the ability of Coordinator: April 2012 African states to use satellite Earth 1. Infoterra Ltd – Leicester (UK) GMES for Africa: Space-2009-1 Observation for the management of Regional Network EUR 999,481 natural and man-made humanitarian Consortium: for Information 2. AARSE – Benmore (ZA) REA – 242385 emergencies. To develop a network Exchange and of EU, African organisations and 3. CRTS – Rabat (MA) Training in African users, in order to build 4. CSIR – Pretoria (ZA) Emergencies economic, technical and commercial 5. DMC Int. Imag. Lt – Guildford (UK) 6. Edisoft - Monte de Caparica (PT) capacity within African states, along the priority lines being identified in 7. EIS-Africa– Pretoria (ZA) consultation with the African Union 8. GEOSAS Consult. - Addis Ababa (ET) under the ‘GMES and Africa’ 9. Keyobs S.A. – Liege (BE)

initiative. 10. Metria AB – Gävle (SE) 11. Min. Admin. Interna - Praia (CV)

12. Paris-Lodron-Univ. – Salzburg (AT) 13. RCMRD.– Nairobi (KE) 14. RCTAS - Ile Ife (NG)

15.SA Nat. Space Agen. - Pretoria (ZA) Status: 16. Spacetec SPRL – Brussels (BE) http://www.gmes-garnete.net/ FINISHED 17. SYSECO SPRL – Brussels (BE) 18. Nat. Land Survey – Gaevle (SE) 19. Univ. Twente – Enschede (NL) 20. VITO. – Mol (BE)

7.2.10 Best practices and knowledge management Finally, exchange of best practices and improved knowledge management are also part of FP7 developments, e.g. for post-crisis management:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

ELITE FP7 - Secure January 2013 Web solution comprising repository Coordinator: Societies / June 2014 of best practices & guidelines, social 1. Univ. Navarra – San Sebastian (ES) Elicite to Learn media features. Best acquisition, Crucial Post-Crisis Call 2012-1 EUR 940,418 categorisation, analysis of tacit, Consortium: Lessons fragmented knowledge acquired by 2. Austrian Red Cross - Wien (AT) CSA REA – 312497 3. FFI - Kjeller (NO) crisis management responders, ensuring best practice insights. 4. Gjøvik Univ. College - Gjøvik (NO) Living document targeted as 5. I.S.A.R. Germany - Duisburg (DE) Wikipedia-like solution so as to 6. Thales - Paris (FR)

attract & serve whole spectrum of 7. School of Fire Serv. - Warsawa (PL) 8. CNR - Rome (IT) end-users & crisis decision makers in EU. Identification of major remaining 9. ANCI Umbria - Rome (IT) Status: gaps & recommendations. FINISHED http://elite-eu.org/

7.3 Critical Infrastructure Protection The European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (see section 5.3) is an all- hazards programme with a broad range of activities and areas related to prevention, preparedness and response. In this respect, risk management is taking stock of existing research and innovation activities conducted notably in the FP7 Environment (including climate change) programme, in particular the Group on Earth Observation (GEO) such as the Supersites Initiative and research on "stress tests" for critical infrastructures. The programme is furthermore enhancing links with management activities undertaken within the Union Civil Protection Mechanism. 7.3.1 Multi-hazard risk assessment, stress tests This section focuses on multi-hazard risk assessment and stress tests, with applications to critical infrastructures. It is hence linked to secions 7.2 (cascading effects) and 7.4 (safety and security):

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

INFRARISK FP7 - October 2013 Development of reliable stress tests Coordinator: Environment / September on European critical infrastructure 1. Roughan & O'Donovan Ltd – Novel Indicators for 2013 using integrated modelling tools for Sandyford (IE) identifying critical Call 2013-6.4-4 decision-support, leading to higher INFRAstructure at EUR Consortium: CP infrastructure networks resilience to RISK from natural 2,802,336 rare and low probability extreme 2. CSIC – Madrid (ES) hazards events, known as “black swans”. 3. Dragados SA – Madrid (ES) RTD – 603960 4. Eidgenoessische Techn. Hochschule Applications to critical land-based infrastructure which may be Zurich - Zuerich (CH) exposed to or threatened by 5. Gavin and Doherty Geosolutions Ltd (multiple) natural hazards and risks - Aughrim (IE)

with cascading impact assessments. 6. Prak Peter Leonard – Ijsselstein (NL) 7. Probabilistic Solutions Consult and Collaborative platform involving risk management professionals. Training - Den Haag (NL) 8. Ritchey Consult. - Stockholm (SE) 9. Sintef – Trondheim (NO) Status: 10. Univ. College– London (UK) FINISHED http://www.infrarisk-fp7.eu/ 11. Univ. Southampton (UK)

STREST FP7 - October 2013 Establishment of common and Coordinator: Environment / September consistent taxonomy of CIs; 1. Eidgenoessische Technische Harmonized 2013 developing a rigorous, consistent Hochschule Zurich – Zuerich (CH) approach to stress Call 2013-6.4-4 modelling approach to hazard, tests for critical EUR Consortium: CP vulnerability, risk and resilience infrastructures 3,000,000 assessment of low probability-High 2. Amra – Napoli (IT) against natural 3. Aristotelio Panepistimio – RTD – 603389 consequence (LP-HC) events; design hazards a stress test framework and specific Thessaloniki (GR) 4. Basler & Hofmann Ag, Ingenieure applications to address the vulnerability, resilience and Und Planer – Zurich (CH) interdependencies of CIs. Focus on 5. Bogazici Univ.– Istanbul (TR) earthquakes, tsunamis, geotechnical 6. CEFRIS – Pavia (IT)

effects and floods, and on three 7. Ecole Polytec. Fed. Lausanne – Lausanne (CH) principal CI classes: (a) individual, single-site, high risk infrastructures, 8. Ist.Naz.Geofis. Vulcan.– Roma (IT) (b) distributed and/or geographically 9. JRC – Brussels (BE) 10.TNO – Delft (NL) extended infrastructures with potentially high economic and 11. Univ. Joseph Fourier – Grenoble environmental impact, and (c) (FR) distributed, multiple-site 12. Univ. V Ljubljani – Ljubljana (SI)

infrastructures with low individual impact but large collective impact or dependencies. Status: FINISHED http://www.strest-eu.org/

Another on-going project funded by the FP7 Secure Societies programme covers various aspects of preparedness, resilience of critical infrastructures:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

CIPRNET FP7 - Secure March 2013 / Building a long-lasting, durable Coordinator: Societies February virtual centre of shared & integrated 1. FhG IAIS (DE) - Sankt Augustin Critical 2017 knowledge and expertise in CIP and Infrastructure Call 2012.7.4-2 CI MS&A (Modelling, Simulation, Consortium: Preparedness and EUR 2. ENEA - Rome (IT) NoE Analysis) by integrating resources & Resilience Research 6,569,842 R&D activities acquired in 50 EU co- 3. TNO - The Hague (NL) Network funded projects. This centre will 4. Union Internationale des Chemins REA – 312450 de Fer - Paris (FR) form the foundation for the EU Infrastructures Simulation & Analysis 5. CEA - Paris (FR) Centre (EISAC) by 2020. It will 6. JRC - Brussels (BE) strengthen and structure the EU 7. Deltares - Delft (NL)

Research Area on CIPs. It includes 8. KIOS - Nicosia (CY) 9. Univ. Technol. Life Sci. - Bydgoszcz training & expert service to find & access the right pockets of EU CIP (PL) expertise. Enhances EU CI resilience 10. Univ. Campus Bio-Medico - Roma (IT) by knowledge & understanding, preparation and mitigation of CI 11. Univ. British Columbia - Vancouver disruptions. It forms the stepping (CND) stone for the development of long-

lasting cooperation & integration of R&D. EU CIP innovation process is boosted. Provide actionable, risk- informed CIP analyses & strategies that support the preparation for, response to, & recovery from major Status: CI disruptions. ON-GOING https://www.ciprnet.eu/

7.3.2 Protection against electromagnetic radiations Threats to Critical Infrastructures against electromagnetic radiations has been subject to several FP7 projects as shown below, focusing on protection and resilience improvements as well as monitoring and control:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

HIPOW FP7 - Secure June 2012 / Develop a holistic regime for Coordinator: Societies May 2015 protection of critical infrastructures 1.FOI – Stockholm (SE) Protection of CI against threats from Critical Call 2011-1 EUR electromagnetic radiation, including Consortium: Infrastructures 3,373,579 guidance regarding hardening 2. Demokritos Center - Athens (GR) against High Power CP 3. Valencia Itaca (ES) ENTR – measures, robust architectures, risk Microwave Threats management process applicable on 4. EADS - Paris (FR) 284802 5. EIYD (ES) organisational level, input to standards, guidelines applicable for 6. ONERA - Paris (FR) CI on national & EU level. Real 7. AIT – Seibersdorf (AT) experiments and sensor 8. FhG IAIS - Sankt Augustin (DE)

development for radiation 9. FhG INT - Euskiirchen (DE) 10. CPST – Vilnius (LT) detection. Recommendation for detection and protective measures. 11. Danish Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organisation - Ballerup (DK) http://www.hipow- 12. Grupoetra - Valencia (ES) project.eu/hipow/ 13. FFI - Kjeller (NO) Status: 14. Net Technologies - Athens (GR) FINISHED 15. QinetiQ - Farnborough (UK) 16. VOP - Šenov u Nového Jičína (CZ)

STRUCTURES FP7 - Secure July 2012 / Aims at analysing possible effects of Coordinator: Societies July 2015 electromagnetic (e.m.) attacks, in 1. Ing. Sistemi Spa IDS. – Pisa (IT) Strategies for The particular of intentional e.m. impRovement of Call 2011.2.2-2 EUR interference on CIs: • at analyzing Consortium: critical 3,497,673 2. EPFL - Lausanne (CH) CP possible effects of electromagnetic infrastrUCTUre (e.m.) intentional attacks, • at 3. HES‐SO - Delémont near Sion (CH) Resilience to ENTR – 4. Univ. York (UK) 285257 assessing impact for defense, Electromagnetic economic security, • at identifying 5. Montena Technol. - Rossens (CH) attackS innovative awareness, protection 6. Univ. Helmut Schmidt - Hamburg (DE) strategies, • providing picture for policy makers on possible 7. Univ. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz - consequences, • bring together Hannover (DE) existing research in IEMI, • Analysis 8. Univ. Wuppertal (DE)

of risks to critical infrastructure, • 9. Univ. Twente (NL) 10. ISMB - Torino (IT) Protection, detection, • Guidelines for end users, policy makers, 11. Navigate Consortium - Rome (IT) Status: 12. Rheinmettall Waffe Munition GmB FINISHED http://www.structures-project.eu/ - Oberndorf am Neckar (DE) 13. Politecnico di Torino (IT)

VIKING FP7 – Secure November Objectives: • To investigate Coordinator: Societies - ICT 2008 / vulnerability of SCADA systems, cost 1. ABB AG – Berlin (DE) Vital infrastructure, November of cyber attacks on society • To networks, Call ICT-SEC- 2011 propose, test strategies, Consortium: information and 2007.1.7 technologies to mitigate these 2. ABB - Vasteras (SE) control systems EUR 3. ETHZ Swiss Federal Institute of weaknesses • To increase management 1,824,950 awareness for importance of critical Technology - Zürich (CH) infrastructures & need to protect 4. E.ON - Düsseldorf (DE) CNECT – 5. Astron Informatics Ltd - Budapest 225643 them. Methodologies for analysis, design & operation of resilient & (HU) secure industrial control systems for 6. Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan KTH -

Cis developed and tested with Stockholm (SE) 7. Univ. Maryland Foundation USMF - particular focus on increased robustness of control system. Focus Adelphi (US) Status: on power transmission, distribution 8. MML Analys & Strategi AB - Ahus FINISHED networks. (SE)

7.3.3 Electrical Power and Smart Grids Vulnerability and security assessment for electrical power Critical Infrastructures and smart grids have been subject to several research initiatives dealing with protection, monitoring and control, as well as measures for contingency planning:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

AFTER FP7 – Secure September Increasing TSO capabilities in Coordinator: Societies 2011 / August creating, monitoring, managing 1. Ricerca sul Sistema Energetico - A Framework for 2014 secure inter connected electrical Milan (IT) electrical power Call 2010-2.3-2 power system infrastructures, to sysTems EUR Consortium: CP survive major failures & efficiently vulnerability 3,473,803 restore service supply after major 2. ENEA - Rome (IT) identification disruption. Objectives were to define 3. SINTEF - Trondheim (NO) ENTR – 4. Univ. Genova (IT) 261788 & develop architecture of a framework for risk and vulnerability 5. Univ. College Dublin (IE) assessment for integrated power, ICT 6., City Univ. London (UK) systems and develop methods, tools 7. Alstom Power Systems - Paris (FR)

and techniques for dealing with these 8. Siemens AG - München (DE) 9. JRC - Brussels (BE) risks. 10. Elia - Brussels (BE) 11. Terna - Rome (IT) 12. CEPS – Praha (CZ) Status: http://www.pyro.es/web/ 13. SINTEF Energi AS - Trondheim FINISHED Pyro_en.html (NO)

SEGRID FP7 – Secure ?? Enhance protection of smart grids Coordinator: Societies against cyber-attacks. Development 1. TNO – Delft (NL) Security for smart EUR of novel security measures for smart Electricity GRIDs Call 2013.2.2-3 3,403,457 grids : • Identifying threats & Consortium: potential future cyber-attack 2. ABB AS - Oslo (NO) CP ENTR – 3. ABB SCHWEIZ AG - Baden (CH) 607109 pathways; • Determining gap between currently available security 4. EDP Energias de Portugal - Faro standards, methods & measures for (PT)

smart grids in order to derive which 5. ENCS - Delft (NL) 6. Univ. Lisboa (PT) additional security methods, measures required; • Developing 7. Incode - Madrid (ES) necessary new security methods, 8. Kungliga tekniska ho¨gskolan KTH) - Stockholm (SE) measures for privacy, communication & system security in smart grids, to 9. Liander NV - Duiven (NL) mitigate threats; • Building up 10. Swedish Institute of Computer realistic test environment to verify Science. SICS - Lund (SE)

new security methods, measures; • 11. ZIV Metering Solutions SL - Vizcaya (ES), Evaluating, improving current risk management methodos; • Feeding results into EU global standardisation Status: bodies, industry groups, smart grid FINISHED suppliers.

SESAME FP7 – Secure May 2011 / Developing Decision Support System Coordinator: Societies May 2014 for protection of EU power 1. Politecnico di Torino – Turin (IT) Securing the transmission, distribution, generation European electricity Call 2010.2.3-2 EUR system. Results: » Risk Assessment Consortium: Supply Against 2,753,790 System; » Knowledge base of impacts 2. Energy Institute at the J. Kepler Malicious and CP University Linz EI-JKU - Linz (AT) REA – 261696 of blackout on society; » Software accidental thrEats tool for estimation of damage costs 3. Indra Sistemas SA - Madrid (ES) 4. Heriot Watt University - Edinburgh caused by power interruption; » Assessment of security of electricity (UK) supply indicators; » Comparative view 5. e-Control - Wien (AT) on different EU regulatory regimes; » 6. Deloitte - Madrid (ES)

Development of regulatory policy 7. TU Delft (NL) 8. Transelectrica - Bucarest (RO) Status: framework. 9. Univ. Durham (UK) FINISHED https://www.sesame-project.eu/

ARGOS FP7 – Secure January 2014 Supply, distribution of gas or Coordinator: Societies / December electricity & Infrastructures that 1. Everis Spain SL – Madrid (ES) Advanced 2015 generate it or transport it (power pRotection of Call 2012.2.3-1 plants, gas pipes), are vital to day-to- Consortium: critical buildinGs by EUR 2. Res. & Educ. Lab. Info. Technol. - CP day functioning of any country; This Overall anticipating 3,476,412 project proposal will enhance the Athens (GR) System capacity of those Infrastructures in 3. DEMOKRITOS - Athens (GR) ENTR – 4. Univ. Karlova v Praze - Praha (CZ) 313217 order to monitor, deter, and respond to a potential threat using ‘Early 5. Athena GS3 Ltd - Holon (IL) Warning Technologies’. ARGOS has 6. Infitheon Technol. - Athens (GR) focus on development of non-privacy 7. Thales - Paris (FR)

invasive technologies such as 8. Hi Iberia Ingenieria y Protectos - Madrid (ES) vibration sensors, audio sensors, video sensors, will contemplate 9. Mira Telelecom - Bucarest (RO) embedded video analytics for 1st 10. Aratos Technolo. S.A - Patras (GR) level processing (together with 2nd level of powerful video analytics 11. KEMEA - Athens (GR) Status: placed in the local gateway). 12. Autoritad Portuaria - Gijon (ES) FINISHED 13. VTT - Espoo (FI) http://www.argos-project.eu/

EURACOM FP7 – Secure July 2009 / EURACOM addresses issue of Coordinator: Societies - ICT March 2001 protection, resilience of energy 1.EOS – Brussels (BE) EUropean Risk supply for EU interconnected energy Assessment and Call ICT-SEC- EUR 833,860 networks. It is to identify, together Consortium: COntingency 2007-1 with EU Critical Energy Infrastructures 2. Altran - Paris (FR) planning REA – 225579 3. CEA - Paris (FR) CP operators, common & holistic Methodologies for approach (end-to-end energy supply 4. Edisoft - Caparica (PT) interconnected chain) for risk assessment & 5. JRC - Brussels (BE) energy networks management solutions. By 6. Thales - Paris (FR) 7. TNO - Delft (NL) establishing links & coherent risk management procedures across energy sectors & EU countries, resilience of critical energy services

across the whole (end-to-end’) Status: energy infrastructure chain is sought FINISHED to be increased. http://www.eos-eu.com

Within Horizon2020, several topics concern Critical Infrastructure Protection, namely for the 2015 call, DRS-12-2015 on "Critical Infrastructure "smart grid" protection and resilience under "smart meters" threats", DRS-13-2015 linked to standardisation (but not only) on "Demonstration activity on tools for adapting building and infrastructure standards and design methodologies in vulnerable locations in case of natural or man-originated catastrophes", DRS-14-2015 on "Critical Infrastructure indicator – analysis and development of methods for assessing resilience" and the SME instrument topic DRS-17-2014/2015 on "Protection of urban soft targets and urban critical infrastructures". These research efforts will be complemented by an ethics/societal topic, namely DRS-20-2014 dealing with "Improving protection of Critical Infrastructures from insider threats".

7.4 Security and Safety (general) Security and safety are closely interrelated as reflected by different policy trends. This section highlights FP7 developments in various sectors related to threats affecting urban environments, cyber security, CBRN-E risks, major accidental hazards ect. 7.4.1 Resilience of urban built environment with focus on safety and security threats Research on safety and security threats to urban built environment has been subject to several projects funded the FP7 Secure Societies programme. Examples of finished projects are listed below:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

THE HOUSE FP7 - Secure March 2012 / The House involves testing of Coordinator: Societies February 2014 provision of coordination standards 1.UNICRI –Turin (IT) Enhancing during major events in EU. Standards European Call 2011.7.1- EUR 2,774,300 concern key areas which were Consortium: Coordination for 1 identified as commonalities of 2. Min. Interior BM.I - Wien (AT) National Research ENTR– 285099 3. Deutsche Hochschule der Polizei - NoE interest as being the basic Programmes in the constituents of major event security Muenster (DE) Area of Security at planning in EU requiring further 4. Min. Interior - Madrid (ES) Major Events coordination. After previous projects 5. Min. Interieur - Paris (FR) 6. Metropolitan Police Service - London (EU-SEC, EU-SEC II) provision is now being tested in The House project. (UK) Involves Consortium of 24 EU MS, 7. An Garda Síochána - Dublin (IE) will contribute to elaboration of 8. Min.Interno - Rome (IT)

common EU major events security 9. Min. Sec. Justice - Den Haag (NL) 10.Inst. Sup.Ciênc.Policiais- Lisboa(PT) planning framework, will facilitate adoption of common policing 11. KEMEA - Athens (GR) approach at EU level. 12. Min. Interior - Riga (LV) 13. Min. Rom. Police - Bucarest (RO) 14. Min. Interior - Bratislava (SK) 15. Min. Interior - Sofia (BG) 16. Min.Interior - Ljublljana (SI) 17. Min. Interior - Tallinn (EE) 18. Cyprus Police - Nicosia (CY)

19. Police Force - Budapest (HU) 20. Malta Police Force - Floriana (MT)

21. Swedish Police - Stockholm (SE) 22. Nat. Police - Copenhagen (DK ) 23. Police Min. Interior - Vilnius (LT) Status: http://thehouse-majorevents.org/ FINISHED 24. Min. Interior - Helsinki (FI) 25. Policji w Szczytnie - Szczytno (PL)

DESURBS FP7 – Secure January 2011 / Results will be an internet portal Coordinator: Societies December with functionality to identify weak 1. Research Management AS – Designing Safer 2014 spots & to contribute to design of Trondheim (NO) Urban Spaces Call 2010.2.3- more robust & resilient spaces. This 1 EUR 3,208,549 includes: 1. urban space security Consortium: 2. Loughborough University - Leicester CP REA – 261652 cases database; 2. integrated security resilience (ISR) design (UK) framework; 3. Comprehensive & 3. Univ. Birmingham (UK)

generic supporting tools & 4. Hebrew Univ. Jerusalem (IL) 5. Techn. Univ. Crete - Chania (GR) methodologies, including urban resilient design guidelines, 6. CIMME - Barcelona (ES) quantitative risk, vulnerability 7. Univ. Southampton (UK) assessment methods to facilitate 8. Bezalel Academy of Arts and Design - Status: Jerusalem (IL) FINISHED qualitative ISR assessment process. http://www.desurbs.net/

EU-SEC II FP7 - Secure September EU-SEC II aimed to establish a Coordinator: Societies 2008 / comprehensive EU-wide network of 1.UNICRI – Turin (IT) Coordinating October 2014 national authorities in the field of national research Call 2007-7.0- Major Event security as well as Consortium: programmes and 2 EUR 2,527,000 common security planning standards 2. Europol - Den Haag (NL) policies on security to foster future European 3. Min. Interior - Wien (AT) 100

at major events in CSA REA– 218076 coordination in this area. Produce: » 4. German Police Univ. - Münster (DE) Europe stronger cooperation and 5. Nac.Policía Spain- Madrid (ES) coordination among the relevant 6. Min. Interior - Helsinki (FI) security stakeholders, including 7. Min. Interieur - Paris (FR) private sector, to develop integrated 8. Metropol. Police Serv - London (UK) & comprehensive operational 9. An Garda Siochana - Dublin (IE) security plans; » implementation of 10. Min. Interno - Rome (IT) specific training curricula to 11. Min. Justice - Den Haag (NL)

disseminate common policing 12. Min. Interior - Lisboa (PT) methods & a culture of increased 13. CSS - Athens (GR) attention to develop. of relationships 14. Police Academy - Riga (LV) with general public & media. 15. Min. Interior - Bucarest (RO) 16. Min. Interior - Bratislava (SK) http://www.eu-secii.org/ 17. Min. Interior - Sofia (BG) 18. Policijska uprava - Maribor (SL) 19. Min. Justice - Tallinn (EE)

20. Cyprus Police - Nicosia (CY) 21. National Police - Budapest (HU) 22. Malta Police Force - Floriana (MT) Status: 23. National Police - Stockholm (SE) FINISHED 24. National Police - Copenhagen (DK) 25. Min. Interior - Riga (LV),

SPIRIT FP7 – Secure January 2012 / Terrorist attacks by bombing or CBR- Coordinator: Societies December agents are threats with a low 1.TNO – Delft (NL) Safety and 2014 probability but with disastrous Protection of built Call 2009-2.3- sequences. Solutions have to be Consortium: Infrastructure to 1 EUR 3,497,684 derived to realize sufficient 2. FhG EMI - Freiburg (DE) Resist Integral 3. CEA - Paris (FR) CP ENTR – resilience of the urban Threats infrastructure. The project 4. Schüßler-Plan Engineers Ltd - 242319 Warszawa (PL) developeda methodology to quantify the vulnerability of built 5. Arup Group Ltd - London (UK) infrastructure; guidance tool to 6. Hamilton Erskine Ltd - Ballygowan assess the vulnerability and define (UK)

effective counter measures to 7. Artemis control AG - Uster (CH) 8. Ducon Gmbh - Moerfelden-Walldorf achieve a required protection level; guidelines to enable safety based (DE) engineering and the incorporation of 9. Ionicon Anal. Gmbh - Innsbruck (AT) 10. Corsmit Raadgevend Ingenieurs BV - Status: CBRE protection; suite of ready to use CBRE countermeasure products. Rijswijk (NL) FINISHED 11. JRC - Brussels (BE) http://www.spirit-ion.eu/

VITRUV FP7 – Secure January 2012 / Development of software tools for Coordinator: Societies December long, complex screening process 1. FhG EMI – Freiburg (DE) Vulnerability 2014 (urban planning). Based on hazard Identification Tools Call 2010.2.3- risk approach, tools will enable Consortium: for Resilience 1 EUR 3,339,898 planners: • to make well-considered 2. Crabbe Consult. Ltd - Stockton-on- Enhancements of Tees (UK) CP REA – 261741 systematic qualitative decisions Urban (concept level), • to analyse 3. Provincia di Bologna - Bologna (IT) Environments susceptibility of urban spaces to new 4. West Yorkshire Police - Wakefield (UK) threats, • to perform vulnerability analyses of urban spaces by 5. Schüßler-Plan - Duesseldorf (DE) computing damage on individuals, 6. DISSING+WEITLING architecture - buildings, traffic infrastructure. All Copenhagen (DK)

levels (concept, plan, detail) will 7. TNO - Delft (NL) 8. Future Analytics Consulting Ltd - contribute to enabling more robust, resilient space in field of urban Dublin (IE) (re)planning/(re)design/(re)engineeri 9. Sigmund Freud Private Univ. Vienna - Wien (AT) ng. Planners will be able to deliver urban space less prone to & less 10. Decisio BV - Amsterdam (NL) Status: affected by attacks, disasters. 11. THALES Security - Paris (FR) FINISHED 12. London Borough of Southwark - http://www.vitruv-project.eu/ London (UK)

BESECURE FP7 - Secure April 2012 / Based on studies of various urban Coordinator: Societies March 2015 areas in EU, development of 1.TNO – The Hague (NL) Best practice comprehensive set of indicators and Enhancers for Call 2011.6.2- EUR 3,468,092 pragmatic risk assessment model Consortium: Security in Urban 1 2. CNR – Rome (IT) REA – 285222 that can provide clues about Environments development of certain scenarios 3. Univ. Ulster – Coleraine (UK) 4. ITTI SP - Poznan (PL) 101

CP with the aim to improve urban 5. Crabbe Consulting Ltd.- Stockton-on- security policy-making by sharing Tees (UK) best practices that are in use 6. FhG EMI - Freiburg (DE), throughout EU, & by providing visualisation, assessment tools, guidelines that will help local policy makers to assess impact of their Status: practices. FINISHED http://www.besecure-project.eu

The above projects are complemented by on-going projects dealing with various aspects of security and safety of built environment, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

VASCO FP7 - Secure March 2014 / Innovative IT tool enabling security Coordinator: Societies February 2017 professionals, administrators to 1. Diginext Sarl, Aix en Provence (FR) Virtual Studio for jointly formulate, test, adjust Security Concepts Call 2013.2.1 EUR 3,037,341 security concepts, measures in Consortium: and Operations CP virtual environment, for protection 2. CNR, Rome (IT) of government buildings. 3. Cent. Adv. Studies, Cagliari (IT) 4. Immersion SAS , Bordeaux (FR) www.security.gr/vasco-virtual- 5. KEMEA, Athens (GR) studio-security-concepts-operations/ 6. CrisisPlan - Leiden (NL) Status: 7. Swedish Nat. Defense College, ON-GOING Stockholm (SE)

HARMONISE FP7 - Secure June 2013 / Via synergies with existing FP7 Coordinator: Societies May 2016 projects (VITRUV, RIBS, DESURBS), 1.Future Anal. Consult. Ltd - Dublin (IE) Holistic Approach development of interactive semantic to Resilience and Call 2012.2.1 EUR 3,493,771 intelligence platform and tools to Consortium: Systematic Actions 2.Building Design Partnership Ltd - CP REA – 312013 improve design of urban areas, to make Large increase their security, resilience Manchester (UK) Scale UrbaN Built against new threats, resulting in 3.Univ. Ulster - Coleraine (UK) Infrastructure significant resilience enhancement 4. Comune de Genova (IT) Secure methods and supporting tools for 5. Selex ES - Rome (IT) 6. Tecnalia - San Sebastian (ES) design/planning stage for large scale urban built infrastructure 7. Univ. Warwick - Coventry (UK) development. 8. Lonix Oy - Helsinki (FI) 9. Univ. Wuppertal - Wuppertal (DE) Status: http://futureanalytics.ie/ 10. LeighFisher Ltd - Manchester (UK) ON-GOING p_harmonise.html 11.Ayuntamiento of Bilbao (ES) 12. VTT - Espoo (FI),

ELASSTIC FP7 - Secure May 2013 / Improvement of security and Coordinator: Societies May 2016 resilience of large scale multi- 1.TNO – The Hague (NL) Enhanced Large functional building complexes to scale Architecture Call 2012.2.1 EUR 3,472,071 natural & man-made disasters by Consortium: with Safety and 2. FhG EMI - Freiburg (DE) CP REA – 312632 providing a methodology and tools Security for achitects from the early design & 3. Siemens AG - München (DE) Technologies and planning phase of such projects 4. Schüßler-Plan Ingenieurgesellschaft special Information through a comprehensive approach MBH - SP - Düsseldorf (DE) Capabilities for designing safe, secure, resilient 5. Arcadis Nederland BV - Arnhem (NL) 6. Inst. Consult. Desarrollo SL Incode - large scale built infrastructures (housing, shopping centre, transport Seville (ES) node, business centre & 7. Northwest Architectes Sarl - Paris (F) entertainment centre). 8. Uniresearch BV - Delft (NL) Status: 9. Joubert Architect - Rotterdam (NL) ON-GOING http://www.elasstic.eu/

ECOSSIAN FP7 – Secure June 2014 / A prototype system will be Coordinator: Societies May 2017 developed which facilitates 1. Techn. Forsch. Planungsgesellschaft European COntrol preventive functions like: - Threat mbH, Austria – Villach (AT) System Security Call 2013.2.5- EUR 9,224,459 monitoring - Early indicator and real Incident Analysis 3 Consortium: REA – 607577 threat detection - Alerting - Support Network of threat mitigation - Disaster 2. EADS Deutschland Gmbh - IP Ottobruhn (DE) management. Advanced technologies need to be integrated, 3. Bord Gais - Cork (IE) 102

including fast data aggregation & 4. AIT - Seibeldorf (AT) fusion, visualization of the situation, 5. FhG - Münich (DE) planning & decision support, flexible 6. Alma Mater Studiorum University of networks for information sharing Bologna (IT) coordination support, connection of 7. EADS Cassidian - Paris (FR) local operations centres. Factors of 8. INESC - Lisboa (PT) societal perception and appreciation, 9. Rede Ferroviaria Nac. - Lisboa (PT)

the existing & required legal 10. Polícia Judiciária PJ - Lisboa (PT) framework, questions of information 11. Espion Ltd - Dublin (IE) security & implications on privacy 12. VTT - Espoo (FI) will be analyzed, assessed and 13. Katholieke Univ.- Leuven (BE) regarded in the concept. The system 14. Bertin IT - Paris (FR) will be tested, demonstrated & 15. Inst. Automation Kommunikation - evaluated in realistic use cases. Magdeburg (DE) 16. Poste Italiane - Rome (IT) Status: http://ecossian.eu/news 17. CESS - München (DE) ON-GOING 18. EADS UK Ltd - London (UK)

7.4.2 Security threats in complex environments More specific research focused on security threats to complex environments and areas such as e.g. land border surveillance, high security sites, historical sites etc. as well as other environments such as off-shore platforms:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

BASYLIs FP7 – Secure May 2011 / Development of low-cost smart Coordinator: Societies May 2013 sensing platform that can 1.INDRA – Madrid (ES) moBile, automatically, effectively detect a Autonomous and Call 2010.2.3-3 EUR range of security threats in complex Consortium: affordable SYstem 2,037,265 2. New Technol. Global Systems - CP environments. System targeted at to increase safety refugee camp protection, critical Madrid (ES) in Large ENTR – 3. Univ. Firenze UFL (IT) 261786 infrastructures protection, land unpredIctable border surveillance, protection of 4. TERMA - Lystrup(DK) environmentS high security prisons, protection of 5. Microflow Avisa - Arnhem (NL) 6. MIRASYS - Helsinki (FI) historical sites, palaces etc. Security solution combining radar, ladar, 7. Univ. Madrid (ES) acoustic vector sensors, unattended 8. Univ. College London UCL (UK) ground, sensors, bracelets for 9. Min. Interior - Madrid (ES)

personal security, video intelligence Status: for alarm recognition, classification. FINISHED http://www.basylis.european- project.eu/

UAN FP7 – Secure October 2008 Development, test at sea an Coordinator: Societies - ICT / September innovative wireless network 1. CINTAL - Faro (PT) Underwater 2011 integrating submerged, terrestrial, acoustic network Call ICT-SEC- aerial sensors for protection of off- Consortium: 2007.1.7 EUR 2. Selex Sistemi Integrati - Rome (IT) shore & coastline critical 2,950,000 infrastructures. Integrated approach 3. Univ. Genova (IT) CP 4. Univ. Pisa (IT) CNECT – involving underwater & land/air sensors, actuators for surveillance, 5. Sintef - Trondheim (NO) Status: 225669 monitoring, deterrence. 6. FOI - Stockholm (SE) FINISHED 7. Norsk Marinteknisk - Trondheim http://www.siplab.fct.ualg.pt/UAN/ (NO)

103

7.4.3 Cyber Security Cyber security has become one of the core research area of the FP7 Secure Societies – ICT programme (managed by DG CNECT). A range of finished projects are examplified below:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

COCKPITCI FP7 – Secure October 2013 Improve resilience & dependability Coordinator: Societies / September of CIs by automatic detection of 1.SELEX – Rome (IT) Cybersecurity on 2013 cyber-threats, sharing of real-time SCADA: risk Call 2013-6.4-4 information about attacks among CI Consortium: prediction, analysis EUR 2. IEC - Haifa (IL) CP owners. Aims to identify, in real and reaction tools 2,986,675 time, CI functionalities impacted by 3. Transelectrica - Bucarest (RO) for Critical 4. LYSE Energi- Stavanger (NO) REA – 285647 cyber-attacks & assess degradation Infrastructures of CI delivered services. CockpitCI 5. Itrust consul. - Luxembourg (LU) 6. Multitel - Mons (BE) will design, develop a system capable of detecting malicious 7. Univ. Roma - Rome (IT) network traffic which may disrupt 8. ENEA- Rome (IT) correct functioning of a SCADA 9. CRAT - Rome (IT)

system & tamper with its normal 10. Univ. Surrey - Guildford (UK) 11. CRPHT - Luxembourg (LU) Status: operation. 12. FTUC - Coimbra (PT) FINISHED http://www.cockpitci.eu/

PRECYSE FP7 – Secure March 2012 / Definition, development, validation Coordinator: Societies February of a methodology architecture, set 1. Etra Investigacion y Desarrollo Sa – Prevention, 2015 of technologies & tools to improve Valencia (ES) protection & Call 2011.2.5-1 by design security, reliability, REaction to CYber EUR Consortium: CP resilience of ICT systems supporting attackS to critical 3,292,792 CIs. It will build on previous research 2. Skytek Ltd - Dublin (IE) infrastructures & existing standards, will pay due 3. Univ. Agder - Kristiansand (NO) ENTR – 4. Univ. Queen's Belfast (UK) 285181 attention to performance demands of current CI systems, as to relevant 5. Ayuntamiento de Valencia (ES) privacy, legal & ethical issues. 6. FhG IOSB - Karlsruhe (DE) 7. Thales - Milan (IT) Status: http://www.csit.qub.ac.uk/ 8. AIT - Seibeldorf (AT) FINISHED InnovationatCSIT Projects/PRECYSE/ 9. Linz Strom Gmbh - Linz (AT)

SECRIT FP7 – Secure January 2013 Multidisciplinary research project Coordinator: Societies / December with mission to analyse, evaluate 1. AIT - Seibersdorf (AT) Secure Cloud 2015 cloud computing technologies with Computing for Call 2009-3.2-2 respect to security risks in sensitive Consortium: Critical EUR 2. Etra Investigacion y Desarrollo SA - CP environments, to develop Infrastructure IT 3,397,319 methodologies, technologies, best Valencia (ES) 3. FhG IESE - Kaiserslautern (DE) REA practices for creating a secure, trustworthy, & high assurance cloud 4. Karlsruhe Inst. Technol. (DE) computing environment for critical 5. NEC Europe Ltd.- London (UK) infrastructure IT. 6. Univ. Lancaster (UK) 7. Mirasys Ltd - Helsinki (FI) https://www.seccrit.eu 8. Hellenic Telecommunications

Organisation OTE - Athens (GR) Status: 9. Ajuntament de Valencia (ES) FINISHED 10. Amaris - Wien (AT)

SPARKS FP7 – Secure April 2014 / Recommendations for smart grid Coordinator: Societies March 2017 security standards. Reduce attack 1. AIT - Seibersdorf (AT) Smart Grid surface of smart grid systems, detect Protection Against Call 2013.2.2-3 EUR cyber-attacks in real-time, improve Consortium: Cyber Attacks 3,429,551 resilience during an attack. Provide 2. EVB Energy Solutions (Diehl) - CP Velbert (DE) REA – 608224 deeper understanding of threats, vulnerabilities, economic 4. FhG AISEC - Garching (DE) consequences of cyber-attacks on 5. SWW - Wunsiedel (DE) smart grid infrastructure, raise 6. KTH - Stockholm (SE)

awareness amongst industry 7. Landis + Gyr Ag - Zug (CH) 8. Univ. Queen’s Belfast (UK) leaders, present convincing information to stakeholders, 9. EMC Information Systems improve cyber readiness of EU International - Ovens (IE) network operators. 10. Energie Institut an der Johannes Status: Kepler Universität Linz (AT) FINISHED https://project-sparks.eu/ 11. UTRC - Cork (IE)

104

INSPIRE FP7 - Secure November Protection of critical information Coordinator: Societies ICT 2008 / infrastructures by appropriately 1. CINI - Roma (IT) INcreasing Security January 2011 configuring, managing, securing the and Protection Call SEC-2007-1 communication network which Consortium: through EUR 2. TU Darmstadt (DE) STREP interconnect distributed control Infrastructure 3,697,402 systems: • Analysis, modelling of 3. Thales - Paris (FR) REsilience dependencies between CIs & 4. Elsag Datamat (IT) CNECT – 5. ITTI - Poznan (PL) 225553 underlying communication networks; • Designing, 6. S21Sec Information Security labs - implementing traffic engineering Pamplona (ES) algorithms to provide SCADA traffic 7. KITE Solutions - Laveno/Mombello

with quantitative guarantees; • (IT) 8. Centre for European Security Exploiting peer-to-peer overlay routing mechanisms for improving Strategies - München (DE) resilience of SCADA systems; • Defining self-reconfigurable architecture for SCADA systems, Development of diagnosis, recovery techniques for SCADA systems. Status: FINISHED http://www.inspire-strep.eu

MICIE FP7 - Secure September Critical Infrastructure Warning Coordinator: Societies - ICT 2008 / Information Network (CIWIN) to 1.SELEX – Florence (IT) Tool for systemic February design, implement so-called "MICIE risk analysis and Call ICT-SEC- 2011 alerting system" that identifies, in Consortium: secure mediation of 2007.1.7CP real time, the level of possible 2. Univ.. Coimbra (PT) data exchanged EUR threats induced on given CI by 3. Centre de Recherche Public Henri across linked CI 3,496,456 "undesired" events happened in Tudor - Luxembourg (LU) information 4. Univ. Rome CRAT - Rome (IT) CNECT – such CI and/or other interdependent infrastructures CIs. MICIE alerting system will 5. ENEA - Rome (IT) 225353 6. PIAP - Warsawa (PL) support CI operators providing them with a real time risk level (e.g. 7. Israel Electric Corp - Haifa (IL) expressed in a chromatic scale such 8. itrust consult. sarl - Berbourg (LU) as green, yellow, red). 9. Multitel ASBL - Mons (BE) Status: 10. Univ. Bradford (UK) FINISHED http://www.micie.eu/

SERSCIS FP7 - Secure October Develop adaptive service-oriented Coordinator: Societies 2008/ technologies for creating, 1. Southampton Univ. (UK) Semantically September monitoring, managing secure, enhanced resilient Call ICT-SEC- 2011 resilient & highly available Consortium: and secure critical 2007.1.7 information systems underpinning 2. Joanneum Forschungsgesellschaft infrastructure EUR mbh - Graz (AT) CP critical infrastructures CIs, so they services 2,000,000 can survive faults, mis-management, 3. Port of Gijón (ES) cyber-attack, & automatically adapt 4. Qinetiq Ltd - London (UK) CNECT – 5. Kemea - Athens (GR) 225336 to dynamically changing requirements arising from direct 6. Austro Control - Wien (AT) impact on CI from natural events, Status: accidents, malicious attacks. FINISHED http://www.serscis.eu/

INSPIRE- FP7 - Secure October 2009 Better understanding of SCADA Coordinator: INTERNATIONAL Societies - ICT / December threats and accordingly developing 1. CINI – Roma (IT) 2010 mitigation and prevention INcreasing Security Call ICT- techniques. Developing a Consortium: and Protection 2009.9.2 EUR 99,300 middleware that aims at increasing 2. ITTI Sp.Zo.o. – Poznan (PL) through the protection level of SCADA 3. Techn. Univ. Darmstadt (DE) Infrastructure STREP CNECT – 248737 systems, which can be easily REsilience- adopted for power grid International infrastructures. cooperation aspects http://www.inspire‐strep.eu Status: FINISHED

WSAN4CIP FP7 – Secure January 2009 Advance Wireless Sensor Coordinator: Societies - ICT / December technology, Actuator Networks 1. Eurescom EUR - Heidelberg (DE) Wireless sensor 2011 (WSANs) beyond state of art, to networks for the Call ICT-SEC- improve protection of Critical Consortium: protection of 2007.1.7 EUR Infrastructures (CIs). By advancing 2. NEC Europe Ltd - Heidelberg (DE) 105

critical STREP 2,775,000 WSAN technology, project will 3. INOV, INESC - Porto (PT) infrastructures contribute to networked 4. EDP Energias de Portugal - Faro (PT) CNECT – information, process control systems 5. Budapest Univ. Technol. Economics 225186 more secure & resilient. Distributed - Budapest (HU) nature of WSANs enables them to 6. IHPM - Leibniz (DE) survive malicious attacks, accidents, 7. INRIA - Le Chesnay (FR) operational failures. It makes them 8. Luleå Univ. Technol. - Luleå (SE) dependable in critical situations, 9. Sirrix - Homburg (DE)

when information is needed to 10. Tecnatom AS - Madrid.(ES) prevent further damage to CIs. 11. Univ. UMA Malaga (ES) WSAN4CIP will: - Enhance reliability 12. FWA - Frankfurt (DE) of CIs critical infrastructures by providing surveillance data for CIs management; - Increase dependability of CIs security by providing self-healing, dependability Status: modules for WSAN; FINISHED http://www.wsan4cip.eu

VIKING FP7 – Secure November Objectives: • To investigate Coordinator: Societies - ICT 2008 / vulnerability of SCADA systems, cost 1. ABB AG – Berlin (DE) Vital infrastructure, November of cyber attacks on society • To networks, Call ICT-SEC- 2011 propose, test strategies, Consortium: information and 2007.1.7 technologies to mitigate these 2. ABB - Vasteras (SE) control systems EUR 3. ETHZ Swiss Federal Institute of weaknesses • To increase management 1,824,950 awareness for importance of critical Technology - Zürich (CH) infrastructures & need to protect 4. E.ON - Düsseldorf (DE) CNECT – 5. Astron Informatics Ltd - Budapest 225643 them; Objective is to develop, test, evaluate methodologies for analysis, (HU) design & operation of resilient & 6. Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan KTH -

secure industrial control systems for Stockholm (SE) 7. Univ. Maryland Foundation USMF - CIs. Methodologies will be developed with particular focus on Adelphi (US) increased robustness of control 8. MML Analys & Strategi AB - Ahus (SE) system. Focus is on power transmission, distribution networks. Project combines holistic management perspective -in order

to counteract sub-optimization in Status: the design- with development of FINISHED security solutions adapted to specific requirements of networked control systems.

On-going FP7 projects are complementing the above research efforts:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium Acronym/Title Instrument details

SERINITI FP7 – People March 2014 / Creation of novel network design Coordinator: February techniques by solving multi-criteria 1. Universitatea Petru Maior din Targu Cyber Security and Call People- 2018 optimization problems that take into Mures - Targu Mures (RO) Resilience of 2013 account several aspects such as NCI Networked Critical EUR 100,000 design standards, e.g. NIST SP 800- Infrastructures CP REA – 631128 82 and NERC CIP 002-009, resilient operation of physical process, but also installation-specific information, Status: e.g. geographical aspects. ON-GOING http://www.upm.ro/sereniti/

106

PROGRESS FP7 - Secure May 2014 / Focus on improving security, Coordinator: Societies April 2017 resilience of Global Navigation 1.CEA – Paris (FR) Protection and Satellite Systems GNSS. Resulting Resilience Of Call 2013.2.2-5 EUR threats prioritisation, scenarios will Consortium: Ground based 3,337,014 2. Crabbe Consulting Ltd - Stockton- CP be used as input to develop infRastructures for prototype Security Management on-Tees (UK) European Space ENTR – 3. Decisio BV - Amsterdam (NL) 607679 Solution: PROGRESS SMS, Systems centralized solution able to detect 4. DLR Köln - Köln (DE) 5. FhG FHR - Wachtberg (DE) automatically attacks with built-in reconfiguration capability ensuring 6. Qascom - Bassano del Grappa VI overall system Quality of Service. (IT) Composed of Integrated Ground 7. Securiton Gmbh - Achern (DE)

Station Security Monitoring System 8. Univ. Ljubljani - Ljubljana (SI) 9. Thales Alenia Space - Madrid (ES) IGSSMS, Security Control Centre. IGSSMS will be innovative solution 10. Thales Alenia Space - Rome (IT) for detection of cyber attacks, 11. Thales Alenia Space - Paris (FR) Radiofrequency attacks, physical attacks. Security Control Centre will analyse impact of reported attacks on system performance, propose Status: mitigation strategies, automatic ON-GOING system reconfiguration,

Within Horizon2020, security and safety aspects for critical infrastructures are covered by the SME instrument topic DRS-17-2014/2015 on "Protection of urban soft targets and urban critical infrastructures". These research efforts will be complemented by an ethics/societal topic, namely DRS-20-2014 dealing with "Improving protection of Critical Infrastructures from insider threats". 7.4.4 Detection / Control of CBRN-E risks The CBRN Action Plan as well as the Explosives Action Plan include various requirements regarding detection, surveillance and control, for example requirements for appropriate measures to ensure that security plans/security management systems are in place in high- risk chemical facilities. Controls also concern the delivery of high-risk chemicals and equipment by chemical industry to legitimate users and licensing schemes in particular for Chemical Warfare Agents (CWA) precursors. In the radiological and nuclear areas, controlling measures are focused on e.g. the causes and consequences of the loss of control over radioactive sources, on current status of used and disused sources in the EU and transport patterns for legal uses of radioactive sources.

7.4.4.1 Demonstration project in the field of CBRNE crisis management (generic) Capitalising on various FP7 developments, a major demonstration project is currently developing an integrated approach for CBRNE tools development and testing:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

EDEN FP7 – Secure September A Toolbox of Toolboxes: i.e. ability to Coordinator: Societies 2013 / integrate already existing Tools and 1. Bae Systems - Farnborough (UK) End-user driven December Toolboxes, to upgrade them, develop DEmo for cbrNe Call 2012-1.5.1 2016 new tools & propose a comprehensive Consortium: larger approach: 2. EADS Astrium - Paris (FR) Demo EUR 3. Ainia - Valencia (ES) 24,766,823 • Covering preparedness, crisis 4. Astri Polska - Warszawa (PL) response and recovery phases 5. Bruker - Coventry (UK) ENTR – 313037 6. CBRNE Centre UMU - Umea (SE) • Involving more stakeholders: 7. CBRNE Ltd - Ashford (UK) 107

• Users: public organisations, first 8. CSSC - Rome (IT) responders, large operators, media & 9. ENEA - Rome (IT) population, 10. EU-VRI - Stuttgart (DE) 11. FRS - Paris (FR) • Suppliers and SMEs with additional 12. FhG EMI - Freiburg (DE) functions 13. FhG ICT - Karlsruhe (DE) 14. FhG INT - Euskiirchen (DE) • User restricted forum and networks, 15. Hotzone - Den Haag (NL) • Scientific expertise & networks, 16. Indra Systemas - Madrid (ES) 17. Ineris - Verneuil near Paris (FR) • Market place 18. Un. Basque Country - Leioa (ES) 19. IAI - Rome (IT) 20. Ldiamon - Tartu (EE) 21. LDI Innovation - Talinn (EE) 22. Polish Fire Serv. - Warszawa (PL)

23. MDA - Tel Aviv (IL) 24. Microfluidic MIC - Jena (DE) 25. FFI - Kjeller (NO)

26. Nucletudes - Paris (FR) 27. Omnidata - Bucarest (RO) 28. PIAP - Warszawa (PL) 29. RKI - Berlin (DE) 30. SAMU - Paris (FR) 31. SELEX ES - Rome (IT) 32. SICPA - Prilly (CH) 33. SRC - Warszawa (PL) 34. Tecnoalimenti TCA - Milan (IT) 35. Un.Cat. Sacro Cuore - Milan (IT) Status: 36. UCL - Brussels (BE) ON-GOING http://www.eden-security-fp7.eu/ 37. Univ. Reading (UK) 38. VTT - Espoo (FI)

7.4.4.2 Detection of RN sources for inspections and monitoring in case of RN emergency Research on detection, monitoring and inspections of radioactive sources has been subject to a range of projects funded by the FP7 Secure Societies and Fission Programmes, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

COCAE FP7 – Secure October 2008 / Technology development for Coordinator: Societies March 2012 spectroscopic measurements of 1. Technol. Educational Inst. Athens Cooperation across radioactive sources. Applications to – Psahna (GR) Europe for Call 2007-1.3-1 EUR 2,031,347 localize radioactive sources and Cd(Zn)Te based Consortium: CP REA – 88212 estimate their activity taking security information about the source 2. Albert-Ludwigs-Univ..Freiburg - instruments environment (shielding, absorption in Freiburg (DE) 3. Rigas Tehniska Univ. - Riga (LV) the surrounding materials). Aim to improve the quality of the data 4. Oy Ajat Ltd - Espoo (FI) gathered by the customs officers 5. Nat. Acad. Sci. Ukraine - Kiev during the routine inspections at the (Ukraine)

boarders & assistance to first 6. Demokritos - Αthens (GR) 7. Greek Atomic Energy Commission responders in case of a radiological or nuclear emergency. - Paraskevi (GR) Status: 8. Nat. Univ. - Chernivtsi (Ukraine) FINISHED www.cocae.eu

SCINTILLA FP7 – Secure January 2012 / Building innovative, comprehensive Coordinator: Societies December toolbox of devices, best-of-breed 1. CEA – Paris (FR) Development of 2015 technologies for enhanced detection detection Call 2011.1.5-1 & identification of difficult to detect Consortium: capabilities of EUR 3,023,652 radioactive sources & nuclear 2. JRC - Brussels (BE) difficult to detect CP 3. INFN - Torino (IT) REA – 285204 materials. It covers broad range of radioactive sources different usage cases as automatic 4. Ansaldo STS - Genova (IT) and nuclear screening of moving targets: people, 5. Hung. Acad. Sci - Budapest (HU) materials cars, trucks, inspection of large 6. FhG INT - Euskiirchen (DE) containers detection of radioactive 7. Arttic - Paris (FR) Status: 8. Saphymo Sas - Massy (FR) 108

FINISHED sources in bombs. 9. Symetrica Security Ltd - Southampton (UK) http://www.scintilla-project.eu/

MODES-SNM FP7 – Secure January 2012 / Development of a prototype for Coordinator: Societies June 2014 mobile, modular detection system for 1. Univ. Padova (IT) Modular detection radioactive, Special Nuclear Materials. system for special Call 2011.1.5-1 EUR 2,411,633 Maximizing detection capability for Consortium: nuclear material SNM, the prototype combines 2. Arktis Radiation Detectors Ltd - CP REA – 284842 Zurich (CH) detectors for fast, thermal neutrons, gamma-rays. Key detector technology 3. Nat. Centre Nuclear Res. - Otwock is high pressure scintillation cells filled (PL) with noble gases. Fully integrated & 4. ETH Zurich (CH)

field tested prototype of modular 5. CAEN Spa - Viareggio (IT) 6. Univ. Dell' Insubria - Varese (IT) mobile system capable of passively detecting weak or shielded 7. Revenue Commissioners - Dublin radioactive sources with accuracy (IE) 8. Univ. Liverpool (UK) Status: higher than currently available FINISHED systems. http://www.modes-snm.eu/

REWARD FP7 – Secure December Novel mobile system for real-time, Coordinator: Societies 2011 / wide-area radiation surveillance, 1. CSIC – Barcelona (ES) REal-time Wide- December based on integration of new Area RaDiation Call 2011-1.5-1 2014 miniaturized solid-state radiation Consortium: Surveillance 2. Sensing & Control Systems - CP sensors: CdZnTe detector for gamma System EUR 3,020,795 radiation & high efficiency neutron Barcelona (ES) 3. Vitrociset Spa - Rome (IT) REA detector based on novel silicon technologies. Sensing unit includes 4. Univ. Freiburg (DE) wireless communication interface to 5. ITN - Lisboa (PT) send data remotely to monitoring 6. XIE. X-ray Imaging Europe -

base station as GPS system to Freiburg (DE) 7. EDISOFT - Lisboa (PT) calculate the tag position. Applications for many different 8. Civil Protection Unit of Campania - scenarios such as nuclear terrorism Napoli (IT) Status: threats, lost radioactive sources, FINISHED contamination or nuclear accidents. http://www.reward-project.eu/

NERIS-TIP FP7 Fission February 2011 Establishing a platform where the Coordinator: / January 2014 operational and research community 1. Karlsruher Insti. Technol. - Towards a self Fission-2010- can meet and discuss with all the Karlsruhe (DE) sustaining 3.3.1 EUR 1,455,747 relevant stakeholders the topics European Consortium: RTD – 269718 related to emergency response and Technology recovery preparedness and on the 2. Beredskabsstyr.– Birkerod (DK) Platform (NERIS- other hand to tackle urgent research 3. Bund. Strahlensch– Salzgitter (DE) TP) on topics in the area of nuclear 4. CEEPD - Fontenay-Aux-Roses (FR) Preparedness for emergency response and recovery 5. Ciemat – Madrid (ES) Nuclear and preparedness. Through a 6. DK Tekn. Univ.- Lyngby (DK) Radiological collaboration of industry, research 7. Dep. Health – Leeds (UK) Emergency and governmental organisations in 8.HPA - London (UK) Response and Europe, methodological aspects and 9. Inst.Nat. Cercetar - Magurele (RO) Recovery computational models will be 10. Mutadis Consult. - Paris (FR) 11.Demokritos - Aghia Paraskevi (EL) developed to be consistent with recent recommendations from 12. Norwegian Radiation Protection international bodies such as the ICRP Authority – Osteraas (NO) (International Commission of 13. Univ. Western Macedonia -

Radiation Protection) and improve Kozani (GR) 14. Pdc-Argos Aps – Brondby (DK) Europe’s response by coupling the decision support systems with an 15. Prolog Dev. Center A/S – early notification system such as Brondby (DK) 16. Sateilyturvakeskus – Helsinki (FI) ECURIE. Within this project, a platform will be established that will 17. SCK – Brussel (BE) be a unique place for combined 18. Acad. Technol. Sci. Ukraine Llc – meeting of the research and the Kyiv (UA)

operational community. 19. Univ. Politec.– Madrid (ES) 20. Univ. Miljo Og Biovit.– As (NO) Status: 21. Vuje As – Trnava (SK) FINISHED

109

DETECT FP7 Fission June 2009 / Developing a methodology for Coordinator: December optimising the design of monitoring 1. Studiecentrum voor Kernenergie – Design of Call Fission- 2011 systems for timely and effective Brussels (BE) optimised systems 2008-3.3.1 decision making in an emergency”. for monitoring of EUR 400,000 This objective together with the Consortium: radiation and 2. Danmarks Tekniske Universitet - RTD – 232662 expected impact (“A tool for making radioactivity in more efficient use of monitoring Lyngby (DK) case of a Nuclear resources and improving the bases for 3. Helmholtz Zentr. Muenchen (DE) or Radiological decision making in emergencies, in 4. Deutsches Forsch.. Gesundheit emergency in particular in the context of the need Umwelt– Neuherberg (DE) Europe to upgrade/replace during the next 5. Karlsruher Insti. Technol. - Karlsruhe (DE) decade many of the monitoring systems installed post-Chernobyl”) 6. Norwegian Radiation Protection can be seen so that the project shall Authority – Osteraas (NO) provide all relevant information 7. Westfaelische Wilhelms-Univ.

needed in design of monitoring Muenster – Muenster (DE) strategies and show how this information can be used in planning of monitoring systems in an optimised Status: way. FINISHED http://detect.sckcen.be/en

Another on-going project is focusing on tools and platforms for improved post-accident responses in case of radiological emergencies:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

PREPARE FP7 Fission February 2014 Closing gaps that have been identified Coordinator: / January 2019 in nuclear and radiological 1. Univ. Antwerpen (BE) Innovative Fission-2012- preparedness following the first integrative tools 3.3.1 EUR evaluation of the Fukushima disaster: Consortium: and platforms to 23,992,375 Update of emergency management 2.Acad.Med.Centr– Amsterdam (NL) be prepared for 3. Biocartis Nv – Mechelen (BE) RTD – 602525 and rehabilitation strategies and Radiological expertise in Europe. Review of 4. Biomax Inform.– Planegg (DE) emergencies and existing operational procedures in 5. Biomerieux Sa - Marcy (FR) post-accident dealing with long lasting releases, 6. Capnetz Stiftung – Hannover (DE) Response in addressing the cross border 7. Cardiff Univ.– Cardiff (UK) Europe problematic in monitoring and safety 8. Erasmus Univ. Med. Centrum – Rotterdam (NL) of goods and further developing still missing functionalities in decision 9. European Society Of Intensive support system ranging from Care Medecine – Geneve (CH) improved source term estimation and 10. Fond. Penta – Padova (IT)

dispersion modelling to the inclusion 11. Hla Et Medecine – Paris (FR) 12. Imperial College Of Science – of hydrological pathways for European water bodies. Development London (UK) of means on a scientific and 13. Inst. Pasteur - Paris (FR) 14. Janssen Infectious Diseases operational basis to improve information collection, information Diagnostics Bvba – Beerse (BE) exchange and the evaluation for such 15. Servizo Galego De Saude - types of accidents. This will be Santiago De Compostela (ES)

achieved through a collaboration of 16. Univ. Split – Split (HR) 17. Univ. Oxford – Oxford (UK) industry, research and governmental organisations in Europe taking into 18. Univ. Western Australia – account the networking activities Crawley (AU) 19. Univ. Bonn – Bonn (DE) carried out under the NERIS-TP project. Furthermore, the NERIS 20.Univ.Med. Centrum– Utrecht(NL) Platform member organisations (so 21.Univ. College Dublin – Dublin (IE) far 43 partners) will be actively involved in the development. Status: http://www.prepare- ON-GOING eu.org/index.php

110

7.4.4.3 CBRNE detection and post-crisis assessment for civil security CBRN detection for civil security applications is high on the agenda of the CBRN Action Plan and has been covered by several projects funded by the FP7 Secure Societies programme:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

HANDHOLD FP7 – Secure April 2012 / Development of CBRNE modular Coordinator: Societies September sensor platform which is 1. Queen's Univ. Belfast (UK) HANDHold - 2015 reconfigurable & can be deployed for HANDHeld Call 2011-1 stand-off detection for periods of up Consortium: OLfactory Detector EUR 3,495,805 to 8 h, operating on battery alone. 2. Tyndall-UCC - Cork (IE) CP 3. Scorpion Networks Ltd - Clane (IE) ENTR – 284456 This platform will be capable of stand- alone use, mimicking operational 4. Karlsruher Inst. Technol. FIT - characteristics of sniffer dogs used to Karlsruhe (DE) detect drugs & explosives. 5. Defendec Ou - Tallinn (EE)

Development of sensors for chemical, 6. INOV - Lisboa (PT) 7. Univ. Ireland - Galway (IE) explosives, biohazard detection, and RN detection. Status: FINISHED http://www.handhold.eu/

IMSK FP7 – Secure March 2009 / Combining technologies for area Coordinator: Societies February 2013 surveillance; checkpoint control; 1. SAAB AB – Göteborg (SE) Integrated Mobile CBRNE detection; support for VIP Security Kit Call 2007-1.2-2 EUR protection into mobile system for Consortium: 14,864,308 rapid deployment at venues & sites 2. JRC - Brussels (BE) Demo 3. CEA - Paris (FR) ENTR – 218038 (hotels, sport/festival arenas...). It accepts input from wide range of 4. Reading Univ - London (UK) sensor modules. Sensor data will be 5. Tyia tech - Lubjana (SI)

integrated through secure 6. Telespazio - Rome (IT) 7. D Fussball Bund - Frankfurt (DE) communication module & data management module, output to 8. DLR - Köln (DE) command & control centre. End-users 9. Trivision APS - Odense (DK) 10. Selex - Rome (IT) will define overall system requirements, ensuring compatibility 11. Min.. Intérieur - Paris (FR) with pre-existing security systems & 12. Qascom - Bassano (IT) procedures. Compatible with new 13. Airshipvision int - Paris (FR)

sensors, including cameras (visual & 14. Univ. Catania - Catania (IT) 15. Regione Lombardia - Milano (IT) infra-red); radar; acoustic; vibration; x-ray gamma radiation & CBRNE. 16. FOI - Stockholm (SE) Tracking of goods, vehicles & 17. Univ. Oxford( UK) 18. Eppra - Paris (FR) individuals will enhance situational awareness, personal integrity will be 19. Thales - Paris (FR) maintained by non-intrusive terahertz 20. Cilas - Orléans (FR) sensors. Close cooperation with end- 21. AS regio - Tartu (EE) users will ensure compatibility with 22. FhG ISST - Berlin (DE) 23. VTT - Espoo (FI) Status: national requirements, appropriate interfaces with existing procedures. 24. Diehl - Uberlingen (DE) FINISHED 25. Bruker - Bremen (DE) http://www.imsk.eu/ 26. Swedish Police - Stockholm (SE)

LOTUS FP7 – Secure January 2009 / LOTUS concept is to detect precursors Coordinator: Societies July 2011 over wide urban area. The detectors 1. FOI – Stockholm (SE) Localisation of may be placed at fixed positions Threat Substances Call 2007-1.3-3 EUR 3,189,146 although most detectors should be Consortium: in urban areas mobile. Size of today's detectors 2. Portendo AB - Stockholm (SE) CP ENTR – 217925 3. Saab AB Göteborg (SE) makes placement suitable in vehicles such as police or other law 4. Bruker Gmbh - Bremen (DE) enforcement vehicles. Major outputs 5. Ramem SA - Madrid (ES) from LOTUS project: 1. knowledge 6. Bruhn NewTech A/S - Soeborg

on threat substance manufacture, (DK) 7. Res. Educ. Lab. Info. Technol. - dispersion; 2. 4 networked sensor modules; 3. one operations centre Athens (GR) display unit; 4. test, verification and 8. TNO - Delft (NL) 9. Univ.. Barcelona (ES) Status: demonstration of LOTUS concept to stakeholders & end-users in EU. 10. Secrab Security Research - Uttran FINISHED (SE) www.lotusfp7.eu

111

CREATIF FP7 – Secure January 2009 / Networking strategy to strengthen Coordinator: Societies July 2011 cooperation, knowledge exchange 1. Seibersdorf Labor GmbH - CBRNE related within EU. CREATIF, network of Seibersdorf (AT) testing and Call 2007-1 EUR 831,279 testing facilities for security related certification Consortium: CP ENTR – 217922 products & services focused to CBRNE facilities detection will be established. This 2. Cotecna Inspection S.A. - Genève (CH) network is dedicated to provide a communication platform for 3. Min. Défense DGA - Paris (FR) Status: technology users & decision makers. 4. TNO - Delft (NL) FINISHED 5. FOI - Stockholm (SE) http://www.creatif-network.eu

AVERT FP7 – Secure January 2012 / Autonomous Vehicle Emergency Coordinator: Societies October 2014 Recovery Tool to provide unique 1. IDUS Consultancy Ltd – Reading Autonomous capability to Police and Armed (UK) Vehicle Emergency Call 2011.1.3-1 EUR 2,810,822 Services to rapidly deploy, extract and Recovery Tool remove both blocking and suspect Consortium: CP REA – 285092 2. Zurcher Hochsch. Angewante vehicles from vulnerable positions such as enclosed infrastructure Wissenschaften - Winterthur (CH) spaces, tunnels, low bridges as well as 3. Democritus Univ. Thrace - under-building and underground car Thessalonique (GR)

parks. Vehicles can be removed from 4. Force Ware Gmbh - Stuttgart (DE) 5. Bernd Siegfried Willy Birkicht - confined spaces with delicate handling, swiftly and in any direction Stuttgart (DE) to a safer disposal point to reduce or 6. Marshall SDG Ltd - Cambridge (UK) eliminate collateral damage to infrastructure and personnel. Remote command and autonomous operation under its own power and sensor Status: awareness. FINISHED http://avertproject.eu/

CBRN contamination risks in complex crises situation are also investigated in an on-going project funded by the FP7 Secure Societies programme:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

DESTRIERO FP7 – Secure September Developing next generation post-crisis Coordinator: Societies 2013 / August needs assessment tool for 1. E-Geos Spa – Rome (IT) DEcision Support 2016 reconstruction & recovery planning, Tool for Call 2012.4.3-1 including structural damage Consortium: Reconstruction and EUR 2,933,015 assessment through advanced remote 2. Consorzio Interuniversitario Naz. recovery and for CP per l’Informatica - Rome (IT) REA – 312721 sensing enriched by in-field data the IntEroperability collection by mobile devices 3. Thales - Paris (FR) of international (buildings, bridges, dams) & related 4. Amper Programas de Electronica y Relief units in case data integration, analysis, based on Comunicaciones - Madrid (ES) Of complex crises internat. standards, novel 5. Univ. Politécnica de Valencia (ES) situations, (automated) data & information 6. FhG IAO - Stuttgart (DE) including CBRN interoperability across organisations, 7. AETI - Bilbao (ES) contamination systems, in combination with 8. Selex ES Spa Sesm - Napoli (IT) risks advanced multi-criteria decision 9. ITTI Sp - Poznań (PL) 10. Saadian Technol.Ltd - Dublin (IE) analysis tool, methodology for multi- stakeholder information analyses, 11. AMI International Medical priority setting, decision making & Assistance Foundation - Lisboa (PT) recovery planning. Earth observation 12. Police Service of Northern

images will contribute to fast damage Ireland (PSNI) - Dublin (IE) 13. Slozkola Glowna Sluzby assessment, monitoring areas, with data acquired by relief units on field Pozarniczej - Warszawa (PL) using novel smart-phone apps. Interoperability of information, service & decision support tool. Recovery of social & economic aspects, consideration of Status: humanitarian aspects. ON-GOING http://www.destriero-fp7.eu/

112

7.4.4.4 CBRN detection of biological threats CBRN detection of biological threats is directly relevant to the CBRN Action Plan and has been tackled by projects funded by the FP7 Secure Societies programme, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

MULTISENSE CHIP FP7 – Secure June 2011 / Development of detection, Coordinator: Societies June 2015 identification system for biological 1. Microfluidic ChipShop Gmbh - The lab-free CBRN pathogens. This chip system includes Jena (DE) detection device Call 2010.4.2-2 EUR 6,619,400 both sample preparation function, for the Consortium: CP REA – 261810 during which target molecules are identification of directly extracted nucleic-acid-based 2. Bertin Technology - Paris (FR) biological and/or immunological detection, 3. Friedrich Loeffler Inst. - Jena (DE) pathogens on identification steps. Disruptive 4. Integr. Microsyst. quality of Life SL nucleic acid and technologies (optoelectronic sensors iMicroQ - Tarragona (ES) immunological or electrochemical sensors), lab-on-a- 5. FhG ICT-IMM - Mainz (DE) level as lab-on-a- chip technology, innovative 6. Univ. Rovira i Virgili - Tarragona chip system instrumentation are key to reaching (ES) applying as yet unrealized goal of identifying 7. Inst. Phys Biology - Domžale (SI) multisensor multiple pathogens in parallel on both 8. Cedralis - Paris (FR) technologies molecular biological level via PCR & Status: immunological means repectively; FINISHED http://www.multisense-chip.com

TWOBIAS FP7 – Secure December Develop demonstrable modular & Coordinator: Societies 2010 / “close-to-market” demonstrator of 1. FFI - Kjeller (NO) Two stage rapid December stationary, reliable, vehicle-portable, biological Call 2009-1.3-1 2013 low false alarm rate Two Stage Rapid Consortium: surveillance and 2. MinIntérieur DGA- Le Bouchet (FR) CP Biological Surveillance and Alarm alarm system for EUR 3,577,834 System for Airborne Threats 3. Dycor Global Solutions Ltd - airborne threats (TWOBIAS) for use at indoor or Limassol (CY) REA – 242297 4. TNO - Delt (NL) outdoor public sites regarded as targets for bioterrorist attacks. It will 5. Q-linea AB - Uppsala (SE) provide reliable information to 6. VVI SUJCHBO VVI Nat. Institute command control systems, first CBRN Protection - Millin (CZ)

responders within seconds, enhancing 7. FOI - Stockholm (SE) 8. Thales - Paris (FR) Status: security related to biological threats 9. Univ. Uppsala (SE) FINISHED at high profile public sites http://www.twobias.com/

A further research effort on CBRN detection within Horizon2020 will be through the DRS-2- 2014 topic on "Tools for detection, traceability, triage and individual monitoring of victims after a mass CBRN contamination and/or exposure". 7.4.4.5 EDA projects in the field of CBRN (dual-use research) Technology development have always benefited from flows from defence to civil or vice- versa. This interesting cross-fertilisation is however limited by several factors including the legitimate confidentiality that must surround both sensitive defence applications, but also cutting-edge civilian development bringing a competitive advantage. Few technologies are per se military or civilian, very often innovative technologies can find applications in various sectors: civil, space and defence. So there is a need to understand the multipurpose nature of technologies and to make the best use of the limited resources to develop them in a coordinated manner to the benefit of all potential users. Efforts should be taken for the future European Research & Innovation Framework Programmes to have a more comprehensive approach of key multi-purpose technologies, with an explicit objective of 113

cross-fertilization between defence and civil research. In order to find dual-use synergies, since a few years EDA and the Commission are coordinating research under the so called European Framework Cooperation (see section 6.10), especially for CBRN protection research. This has proven successful. Calls are coordinated and information is exchanged as far as the legal frameworks allow. Expertise in EDA and Commission has been shared as much as possible: the Commission is part of the management committee of the EDA Joint Investment Programme on CBRN Protection (JIP-CBRN) and EDA is often represented in Advisory boards of CBRN related projects under the Commission Research Framework Programmes (FP7 and H2020). Selected projects are listed below: Stand-off C detection

Project Acronym Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Instrument details case of GA amendment) AMURFOCAL EDA JIP June 2014 / Capability to specifically detect Coordinator: ?????? liquid or powder contamination, 1. Diehl BGT Defence GmbH&Co. KG - amplified quantum cascade laser Überlingen (DE); Call A-1152-RT- EUR technology, laser source, GP 1.501.023,00 detector Consortium: 2. Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Forderung der angewandten Forschung e.V - München (DE) 3. Bundeswehr Research Institute for Protective Technologies and NBC Protection - Berlin (DE) 4. Bertin Technologies - Montigny-le- Bretonneux (FR) Status: 5. Thalesgroup Research & Technology - ON-GOING Palaiseau (FR) www - not yet available 6. Military University of Technology - Warsaw (PL) MICLID EDA JIP Nov. 2013 / A new generation lidar system Coordinator: ???????? for stand-off detection of 1. ONERA - Paris (FR) chemical warfare agents Call A-1152-RT- EUR Consortium: Status: GP 1.120.163,00 2. KTH Royal Institute of Technology - ON-GOING Stockholm (SE) www - not yet available 3. VVU Military Research Institute - Brno (CZ)

Next generation B detection

Project Acronym Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Instrument details case of GA amendment) IPODS EDA JIP ???????? Detection using single cell Coordinator: ? MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry Consortium: ????? EUR ????? linked to a quick immune 2. ???? detection system

http://xxxx RAMBO EDA JIP May 2013 / Orthogonal detection techniques, Coordinator: ?????? sensor 1. Selex ES - Rome (IT)

Call A-1152-RT- EUR Consortium: GP 2.000.000,00 2. CREO Srl - Milano (IT) 3. ENEA - Rome (IT) 4. Microfluidic ChipShop - Jena (DE) 5. Military University of Technology - Warsaw (PL) www - not yet available 6. University of Lyon Claude Bernard Academia - Lyon (FR) BIOTYPE EDA JIP April 2013 / Nanophotonic technology, an Coordinator: June 2015 early warning system 1. Das Photonics - Valencia (ES)

114

Call A-1152-RT- EUR Consortium: GP 984.842,52 2. IBP-CNR - Napoli (IT) 3. PoliMi Politecnico - Milano (IT) 4. Selex ES - Rome (IT) 5. UPV Polytechnic - Valencia (ES) 6. ITM Instituto Tecnologico de la Maranosa - Madrid (ES) 7. IMM GmbH - Mainz (DE) www - not yet available 8. CNRS/ISL - Paris (FR) 9. Academia - Lyon (FR)

Risk mitigation and defence capabilities (dual-use research)

Project Acronym Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Instrument details case of GA amendment) BFREE EDA JIP May 2013 / New methods for Coordinator: ??????? removal/inactivation of biological 1. Norwegian Defence Research agents, efficient sample Establishment - Kjeller (NO) Call A-1152-RT- EUR processing and risk mitigation GP 1.318.500,00 methods for ensuring safe Consortium: handling and preparation of 2. Swedish Defence Research Agency - mixed CBRN samples Stockholm (SE) 3. TNO - Delft (NL) 4. Armament and Defence Technology - Vienna (AT) 5. DGA Paris (FR) 6. Centre for Applied Molecular Technologies - Louvain-la-Neuve (BE) 7. Bundeswehr Research Institute for Protective Technologies and NBC- www - not yet available Protection - Berlin (DE) MaSC EDA JIP Nov. 2013 / CBRN defence architectures; Coordinator: Nov. 2015 capability gap analysis, mission 1. TNO - Delft (NL) planning, future CBRN defence Call A-1152-RT- EUR capabilities Consortium: GP 612.350,00 2. Thales Communication&Security SAS - Gennevilliers (FR) 3. ITTI Sp. z o.o. - Poznan (PL) 4. National Defence University, - Warsaw (PL) 5. Royal Military Academy - Brussels www - not yet available (BE)

CBRN situation awareness

Project Acronym Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Instrument details in case of GA amendment) CENSIT EDA JIP Sept. 2014 / Sensor information in tactical Coordinator: ????? networks, CBRN situational awareness 1. Forsvarets forsknigsinstitutt - Kjeller (NO) Call A-1152-RT- EUR GP 793.684,79 Consortium: 2. TNO - Delft (NL) www - not yet available 3. ITTI Sp. z o.o. - Poznan (PL) 4. Technisch Mathematische Studiengesellschaft - Boon (DE)

115

7.4.4.6 Protective equipments Research on protective equipments is of direct support to EU policies such as the CBRN Action Plan and the UCPM, so addressing both security and safety needs for first responders. Examples of finished projects are:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

FRESP FP7 - Secure June 2008 / Network of scientists & research Coordinator: Societies May 2012 institutions, who will develop broad- 1.Ecole Royale Militaire – Brussels Advanced first spectrum, low-burden, tailor-made (BE) response Call 2007-4.3-3 EUR nanoporous adsorbent, to integrate respiratory 3,029,967 Consortium: CP the 2 main areas of protection (versus protection chemical warfare agents & toxic 2.Budapest Univ. Technol. Econ. – REA– 218138 Budapest (HU) industrial chemicals) without significant loss of capacity. It will 3. Univ. Brighton (UK) integrate features that are not at all 4. Univ. Alicante (ES) available in current state-of-art 5. TNO - Delft (NL)

adsorbents: protection against 6. High Technol. Filters - Athens (GR) 7. MAST Carbon - Basingstoke (UK) radioactive gases, biological threats. Primary goal is development of broad 8. NORIT Nederland BV - Amersfoort -spectrum low-burden respiratory (NL) 9. Laser Optical Engin. Ltd - Status: protection systems for first responders. Loughborough (UK) FINISHED 10. ProQares BV - Rijswijk ZH (NL) www.rma.ac.be/fp7-fresp

IF REACT FP7 – Secure January 2012 IFREACT aims to provide next Coordinator: Societies / December generation of protective clothing for 1. Univ. Paris XII SAMU - Paris (FR) Improved First 2014 first responders. Bringing together Responder Call 2011.4.4-1 leading protective technology and Consortium: Ensembles Against EUR 2. EADS Astrium - Paris (FR) CP blending it with some of latest CBRN Terrorism 3,394,615 software, it will enhance chemical, 3. Bertin Technologies - Aix en Provence (FR) REA – 285034 biological, radiological protection of EU first responders. EU major cities 4. Blücher Group - Erkrath (DE) continue to face threat of terrorism, & 5. Business Editing - Paris (FR) in near future, may be subject to 6. National Protection and Rescue

serious chemical, biological or Directorate DUZS - Zagreb (HR) 7. Hotzone Sol. - Den Haag (NL) radiological terrorist attack. 8. NBC-Sys - Versailles (FR) Status: http://www.ifreact.eu/ 9. Prometech - Utrecht (NL) FINISHED 10. SÚJCHBO - Zagreb (HR) 11.. CBRNe World - Winchester (UK)

SMART@FIRE FP7 - ICT November Development of a commonly agreed Coordinator: 2012 / Public Procurement Procedure (PCP) 1.Agentschap Innovatie Wetensch. Integrated ICT Call 2011.11.1 February approach that can be deployed and Technol. – Brussels (BE) Solutions for Smart 2016 duplicated in the EU and formulate Personal Protective answers for the identified Consortium: Equipment for Fire EUR bottlenecks. Tackling the challenge on 2.Addestino Innovation Fighters and First 1,507,173 how to increase the safety of fire Management CVBA – Deinze (BE) Responders fighters and first responders 3. Centre Sci. Tech. Industrie Textile Belge – Brussels (BE) undertaking fire fighting and civil CNECT – protection work. Development of ICT- 4. European Apparel and Textile 317898 solutions in Smart Personal Protective Confederation – Brussels (BE) Equipment that might prevent injuries 5 Fire & Rescue Auth.–

or deaths. Stimulation of exchange of Manchester(UK) 6. Innova Eszak – Debrecen (HU) PCP expertise in order to create a PCP approach that works on a European 7. Ned. Inst. Fysieke Veiligheid – scale. Develop smarter ICT-solutions Arnhem (NL) 8. SDIS-13 - Marseille (FR) for PPE that are transferable in a global market 9. Service Public Federal Interieur – Status: Brussels (BE) ON-GOING http://www.smartatfire.eu/ 10. Stadt Dortmund – Dortmund (DE) 11. Universiteit Gent - Gent (DE)

116

An on-going project is focusing on protective clothing for law enforcement personnel, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

SMARTPRO FP7 – Secure April 2014 / Development of lightweight, smart Coordinator: Societies September protective clothing, incorporating 1. Anonymi Etaireia Viomichanikis Lightweight, 2017 smart functionalities, designated for Erevnas (GR) - Volos flexible and smart Call 2013.1.4-1 law enforcement authorities. protective clothing EUR Consortium: CP Develop optimized ballistic textiles for law 2,781,067 (woven, spacer knitted fabrics) , 2. Leitat Technological Center - enforcement Terrassa (ES) REA – 607295 apply innovative surface treatments personnel (e.g. shear thickening fluids, ceramic 3. Nazionale di Ricerca - Prato (IT) 4. Found. Res. Technol. - Heraklion coatings) to improve their performance. Main parameters (GR) include physiological comfort, 5. Costas Siamidis AE - Viotia Tanagra ergonomic design. Smart functions, (GR)

including positioning systems, will be 6. RWTH - Aachen (DE) 7. BCB Intern. Ltd - Cardiff (UK) integrated to further increase efficiency body armour, to reduced 8. Soliani Emc Srl - Como (IT) Status: casualties.. 9. E. Cima SA - Barcelona (ES) ON-GOING 10. Generalitat de Catalunya - http://www.smartpro-project.eu/ Barcelona (ES)

EDA Projects in the field of collective and individual protection equipments

Project Acronym Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Instrument details case of GA amendment) RIAQ EDA JIP ???????? High efficiency air purification by Coordinator: ? smart filtration Consortium: ????? EUR ????? 2. ???? http://xxxx PRO-SAFE EDA JIP ???????? Nano-fiber based protective Coordinator: ? textile with low burden and Consortium: ????? EUR ????? control of saturation 2. ????

http://xxxx SwitchProtect EDA JIP May 2014 / Personal protective equipment, Coordinator: Nov. 2017 civilian scenario, component 1. Blucher GmbH - Erkrath (DE), development and testing Call A-1152-RT- EUR Consortium: GP 1.033.668,00 2. J.Blaschke Wehrtechnik GmbH - Wien (AT), www - not yet available 3. GFE mbH - Abtsteinach (DE), 4. TNO Delft (NL)

117

7.4.5 Risk Assessment of Major Accident Hazards Related to the major accident hazards and its risk management, the Directive 2012/18/EU on major-accidents hazards involving dangerous substances sets a number of obligations both to the Member States (e.g., legislation, organisation of the Inspections, reporting to the EC, etc.) as well as to the industrial establishments. To date, there are very few Secure Societies projects which cover major accident hazards. However, within Horizon2020, the DRS-15-2015 topic (2015 call) on "Protecting potentially hazardous and sensitive sites/areas considering the multi-sectorial dependencies" will support research in support of the Directive 2012/18/EU, addressing the need that potential impacts also from -major accidents to the national or EU infrastructure are to be analysed and considered also at the strategic level, thus extending the risk management and risk assessment beyond usual scope (establishment level). Environmental accidents and early warning related to new technology risks have been subject to two projects, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

SECURENV FP7 – Secure May 2009 / Identification and analysis of major Coordinator: Societies April 2011 industrial & environmental accidents 1. Geonardo Environmental Tech. - Assessment of for better understanding of future Budapest (HU) environmental Call 2007-6.3-1 EUR 850,596 risks in natural phenomena (fires, accidents from a Consortium: CSA ENTR – 218152 floods), industrial accidents (chemical, security biological ..). Models were used to 2. FOI - Stockholm(SE) perspective develop systematic security foresight 3. Adelphi Ggmbh (DE) approach. Result methodology is a combination of assessment methods including input, expertise from survey addressing more than 600 experts in Status: EU & beyond,. FINISHED www.securenv.eu

iNTeg-Risk FP7 – NMP December Large-scale integrating project aimed Coordinator: 2008 / May at improving the management of European Virtual Institute for Early Recognition, 2007-3.1-3 2013 emerging risks in the innovative Integrated Risk Management – Monitoring and IP industry. Reducing time-to-market for Stuttgart (DE) Integrated EUR the lead market EU technologies and Management of 13,629,109 promote safety, security, And a wide range of partners Emerging, New RTD – 213345 environmental friendliness and social Technology responsibility as a trade-mark of the Related Risks advanced EU technologies. Improvec early recognition and monitoring of emerging risks, reduction of accidents caused by them (estimated 75 B€/year EU27) and decrease of

reaction times if major accidents Status: involving emerging risks happen. FINISHED http://www.integrisk.eu-vri.eu/

TOSCA FP7 – NMP February 2013 Integration of industrial operations Coordinator: / January 2016 into a total performance management 1. D'APPOLONIA SPA – Genova (IT) Total Operation 2012.3.0-2 system so that concerns about safety, management for EUR 3,150,000 quality and productivity are addressed Consortium: Safety Critical 2. Univ. Bologna (IT) RTD – 310201 in an integrated way during life-cycle Activities of a project or a product. The 3. Electricity Supply Board - Dublin (IE) industrial domain of application regards process control industries 4. European Association of Craft (e.g., chemical industries, power SMEs – Bruxelles (BE) generation, offshore oil & gas 5. Inst. Jozef Stefan – Ljubljana (SI)

platforms, etc.) that may vary in size, 6. INERIS - Verneuil en Halatte (FR) 7. K &N Efthymiadis AE - Sindos (GR) regulatory and cultural aspects. 8. Nat. Center for Scientific Research 118

Assessement of vulnerabilities of the "Demokritos" - Aghia Paraskevi (GR) technical, human and organisational 9. Oil Services 4 U Ltd - Borris Carlow systems that may have an impact in (IE) safety, quality and productivity from 10. Distribucijo Energentov, Trgovino the perspectives of many in Storitve Doo – Maribor (SI) stakeholders and decision-making at 11. Politec. Torino (IT) different organisational levels. 12. PROMIS@Service Sarl –

Descriptions of how the system works Luxembourg (LU) and how responses should be 13. Reviatech SAS – Venette (FR) coordinated across the whole 14. Techn. Univ. Crete – Chania (GR) Status: organisation. FINISHED http://www.toscaproject.eu/

7.4.6 Water safety and security Water security threats are directly related to the risks of quality degradation, either from an user's viewpoint (quality of drinking water) or ecological standpoint (ecological or chemical water status). While intentional degradation of water quality is not specifically covered by EU water policies, the quality deterioration is nevertheless regulated by the Water Framework Directive and its parent directives dealing with drinking water, priority substances and groundwater. Related projects are:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

SECUREAU FP7 – Secure February 2009 Mitigate the threat of public water Coordinator: Societies / January 2013 contamination. Develop sensors, 1. Univ. Lorraine - Nancy (FR) Security and specific contingency plans to identify, decontamination Call 2012.6.1-3 EUR 5,266,871 address contamination of water in Consortium: of drinking water 2. CEA - Paris (FR) CP ENTR – 217976 urban & rural water distribution distribution networks. It carried out experiments 3. CNRS - Paris (FR) systems following on wall deposits & biofilms to 4. Univ. Riga (LV) a deliberate determine kinetic parameters for 5. Univ. Southhampton (UK) contamination absorption, desorption of 6. TJHL - Helsinki (FI) 7. IWW - Mulheim an der Ruhr (DE) contaminants, methods for decontaminating water & cleaning 8. Veolia - Paris (FR) pipes. It also used software to model 9. Univ. Porto (PT) contamination of drinking water 10. Sateilyturvakeskus - Helsinki (FI)

networks & identify contamination 11. Kelda - Bradford (UK) 12. Monitoring Systems Ltd - Status: sources. Waterlooville (UK) FINISHED www.secureau.eu 13. INRA - Antonny (FR) 14. Affinity water - Hatfield (UK)

On-going projects are dealing with sensor systems for improved security of water supply, detection of contamination events, and tap water radioactivity real-time monitoring.

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

ISIS FP7 – Secure January 2014 / Integrated intelligent sensor system Coordinator: Societies December for improved security of water supply; 1. C-Tech Innov. Ltd - Chester (UK) Integrated 2016 ISIS will provide public security intelligent sensor Call 2012-1.5.2 developing an advanced monitoring Consortium: system for EUR 3,484,929 system for drinking water networks 2. Kauno Vandenys - Kaunas (LT) improved security CP 3. Vivaqua - Brussels (BE) ENTR – 312330 that instantly detects chemical or of water supply biological tamination, gives clear 4. CNIguard - Stanmore (UK) 5. Advanticsys Sistemas y Servicios - indication of the risk level. The ISIS project will combine advances in Madrid (ES) state-of-art in 4 main areas: sensors; 6. Aleksandras Stulginskis Univers. - wireless networks; intelligent Dotnuva (LT)

surveillance strategies & integrated 7. CEA- Paris (FR) risk analysis software. It will enable 8. Univ. Wien (AT) 119

immediate alert of C or B taminations 9. Univ. Tor Vergata -Roma (IT) &, crucially, indicate location & nature 10. IOS Internat. - Diepenbeek (BE) of hazard, level of risk. Status: http://www.isis-project.eu/ ON-GOING

SAFEWATER FP7 – Secure December Developing an affordable global Coordinator: Societies 2013 / generic solution for detection & 1. Arttic - Paris (FR) Innovative tools for December management of drinking water crises the detection and Call 2012.1.5-2 2016 resulting from CBRN contamination. It Consortium: mitigation of CBRN 2. FhG ISOB - Karlsruhe (DE) CP addresses key drinking water incident related EUR 3,494,338 management challenges at large, & 3. Checklight Ltd - Qiryat Tiv on (IL) contamination 4. Whitewater tech. Ltd - Tel Aviv(IL) ENTR – 312764 current shortcomings related to events of drinking contamination of water networks by 5. Hagihon Co Ltd - jerusalem (IL) water CBRN agents. Functionalities of 6. Acreo Swedish ICT - Kista (SE) 7. 3s Consult Gmbh - Garbsen (DE) leading Event Management System will be expanded by introducing 8. CEA- Paris (FR) online simulation capacities, allowing 9. Aguas do Algarve SA - Faro (PT) users to have close to real-time view

of network’s behaviour. New sensors Status: will be proposed for online B, R water ON-GOING quality measurements.

TAWARA_RTM FP7 – Secure December Demonstrate, test new tool for real- Coordinator: Societies 2013 / May time monitoring of radioactive 1. Univ. Degli Studi di Padova (IT) TAp WAter 2016 contamination in tap water. Provide RAdioactivity Real Call 2012.1.5-2 real time measurement of water Consortium: Time Monitor EUR 2,564,554 activity (measuring gross alpha, beta 2. Univ. Degli Studi di Pisa (IT) CP 3. Narodowe Centrum Badan ENTR – 312713 activity) to verify whether distributed water is far from limits set by the EU Jadrowych - Warszawa (PL) legislation (see Directive 98/83/CE of 4. Miejskie Przed. Wodociagow EU Council). Include development of Kanalizacji - Warszawa (PL)

complete platform including fast Real- 5. Wardyński Wspólnicy spk - Warszawa (PL) Time Monitor system (RTM), Spectroscopic system (SPEC) as well 6. Scionix Holland BV - Bunnik (NL) Status: as Information & Communication 7. CAEN SpA - Viareggio (IT) ON-GOING System, designed to include in future 8. ENEA - Rome (IT) also chemical and biological sensors.

7.4.7 Prevention of Food Supply Chain-related threats The Decision 1082/2013/EU requests measures to prevent food supply related threats regarding communicable disease and health issue. Projects look at border threats, focusing on the food chain security:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

SNIFFER 2 FP7 – Secure June 2010 / Envisions design, development of Coordinator: Societies October 2011 network of distributed detection 1. Tekever ASDS – Lisbon (PT) Securing the food devices, capable of rapid, on-site chains from Call 2012.1 EUR 2,720,029 detection of multiple agent kinds, CBR Consortium: primary production 2. Min. Defesa Nacional - Lisboa (PT) CSA REA – 312411 agents with high sensitivity & and animal feeds specificity throughout most 3. Univ. Umea (SE) to consumer-ready vulnerable stages of food supply chain 4. INESC - Porto (PT) food against major (farms, collection centers, 5. Univ. Burgos (ES) deliberate, wholesalers…). Capability to network 6. Oster. Ag. Gesundheit und accidental or different devices with different Ernahrungssicherheit - Wien (AT) natural CBRN functionalities (capable of detecting 7. CSEM - Neuchatel (CH) contamination different agents) throughout entire 8. FFI - Kjeller (NO) food supply chain will reduce detection time (between contaminating specific food, detecting contaminated food somewhere along Status: chain) of contaminant agents, FINISHED introduced deliberately, accidentally or through natural sources. 120

PLANTFOOSEC FP7 – Secure February 2011 Virtual research network in order to Coordinator: Societies / January 2016 improve quality, impact of training, 1. Univ. Torino (IT) Plant and Food relation to crop & food bio security Biosecurity Call 2010.7.1 EUR 4,624,499 research in EU. Project has identified Consortium: 2. NIAB - Cambridge (UK) NoE ENTR – 261752 regulatory threats in countries; prioritised target crops ( food, feed, 3. FERA - York (UK) timber crops); prioritised target 4. Univ. Bonn (DE) pathogens; set up tool for 5. INRA - Paris (FR)

prioritisation of target human 6. REC - Szentendre (HU) 7. Imperial College London (UK) pathogens on plants HPOP, mycotoxins, designed virtual 8. METU - Ankara (TR) diagnostic network. Future outcomes 9. SPIN-TO Srl - Torino (IT) 10. UNICRI - Torino (IT) expected: decision-making tool for use by law enforcement offices to 11. AROI - Bet Dagan(IL) allow discrimination between 12. NIMFFAB (Oklahoma State deliberate & accidental outbreaks; University ) - Stillwater (USA)

risk assessment tools for plant 13. Kansas State University - Manhattan (USA) Status: pathogens. FINISHED http://www.plantfoodsec.eu/

SPICED FP7 – Secure July 2013 / The examination of spices & herbs Coordinator: Societies June 2016 supply chain, possible vulnerable 1. Federal Institute for Risk Securing the spices points, investigation of tenacity data Assessment - Berlin (DE) and herbs Call 2012.1.5-4 EUR 3,499,942 of biological agents, identification of commodity chains Consortium: CP ENTR – 312631 chemical adulterations will lead to in Europe against better more comprehensive view on 2. Osterreichische Agentur Gesund deliberate, this heterogeneous matrix & will Ernahrungssicher - Wien (AT) accidental or improve prevention, response 3. Partikas Drosibas Institut BIOR - natural biological mechanisms in spices, herbs market. Rēzekne (LV) and chemical With SPICED approach it will be 4. Stichting Dienst Landbouwkundig contamination possible to improve food safety & Onderzoek DLO - Wageningen (NL) 5. Fuchs - Essen (DE) food security aspects in spices and herbs food chain and to reduce high 6. Keki - Budapest (HU) economic impact and human 7. RTD Services - Innsbruck( AT) casualties since spices and herbs are 8. Univ. Limerick (IE)

present in almost every processed 9. VÚP Výskumný ústav potravinársky - Bratislava (SK) food. EU level of expertise will be significantly increased. 10. Bundesministerium der Status: Verteidigung BMVg - Bonn (DE) ON-GOING www.spiced.eu 11. Univ. Wageningen (NL)

7.4.8 Detection / inspection for customs in relation to security threats The Regulation 952/2013 highlights the need to develop and test detection technologies, in particular Non-Intrusive Inspection equipment and radiation detection for conducting inspections. Examples of projects in this area are described in this section. 7.4.8.1 Detection of illegal drugs and hidden persons Supporting this area, a range of projects has been funded to develop methods of used by customs for e.g. detecting hidden persons, identifying narcotics and support countermeasures, examples are:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

LINKSCH FP7 – Secure February 2012 Comparative strategic study of two Coordinator: Societies / January 2015 major drug markets, heroin and 1. Univ. Glasgow (UK) Grasping the Links marijuana, through prism of transit in the Chain: Call 2011.1.4-1 EUR 881,742 chains, operating between Consortium: Understanding the 2. Virtual Hand Research - CSA REA – 285073 Afghanistan, EU, North Africa, with a Unintended view to then evolving a more Amsterdam (NL) Consequences of comprehensive counter-narcotics 3. CNRS - Paris (FR) International policy aimed at minimising 4. Univ. Coventry (UK) Counter-Narcotics proliferation of unintended 5. Univ. London (UK) Measures for the consequences. Research 6. Thornley Mansfield Ltd - Plymouth 121

EU disseminating in the form of concrete (UK) policy recommendations via 7. Univ. Potsdam (DE) Status: conference activity and publications. FINISHED

DOGGIES FP7 – Secure June 2012 / Deployment of practical efficient Coordinator: Societies May 2015 means to detect hidden persons, 1. xxxIII V Lab GIE - Paris (FR) Detection of illegal substances at border crossing Olfactory traces by Call 2011.3.4-2 EUR 3,499,966 points to avoid terrorism, human Consortium: orthoGonal Gas 2. CINSTM - Firenze (IT) CP ENTR – 285446 trafficking or smuggling. identification Demonstrating stand-alone sensor for 3. Thales - Koropi (GR) technologIES detection of hidden persons, drugs & 4. Min. Intérieur - Paris (FR) 5. ISAS - Dortmund (DE) explosives. Trace detection by combination of Mid-Infrared 6. AEA S.R.L. - Angeli di Rosora (IT) spectroscopy technology and Ion 7. Univ. Athens (GR) mobility spectrometry (IMS). 8. CEA - Paris (FR) 9. G.A.S. - Dortmund (DE) 10. KEMEA - Athens (GR) Status: 11. CNR - Rome (IT) FINISHED http://www.fp7-doggies.eu 12. Gasera Oy - Turku (FI)

CUSTOM FP7 – Secure June 2010 / Aims to perform chemical Coordinator: Societies November identifications in custom offices, 1. SELEX - Florence (IT) Drugs and 2013 inspection of trucks, cars, containers, Precursor Sensing Call 2009-1.3-2 people & baggage. The 2 Consortium: by Complementing EUR 3,486,406 complementary technologies are 2. ENEA - Rome (IT) Low Cost Multiple CP 3. Technalia - Bilbao (ES) REA – 242387 Laser Photo Acoustic Spectroscopy & Techniques UV induced Fluorescence. 4. Gasera Ltd - Turku (FI) 5. Turku Univ. (FI) 6. INSTM - Modena (IT) 7. CNR - Napoli (IT) 8. Alcatel Thales - Palaiseau (FR) Status: http://custom-project.eu/ 9. Aalto Univ. Found. - Helsinki (FI) FINISHED 10. DNRED - Paris (FR)

SNIFFER FP7 – Secure February 2012 Highly innovative one-stop shop Coordinator: Societies / January 2015 approach to complement sniffer dogs 1. CEA - Paris (FR) A bio-mimicry & leverage their capabilities, based enabled artificial Call 2011.3.4-2 EUR 3,493,821 on state-of-theart technologies Consortium: sniffer centred on new generation of 2. Univ. Manchester (UK) CP ENTR – 285203 3. Min. Intérieur - Paris (FR) olfactory biosensors. It covers variety of border security situations in which 4. Armines - Evry (FR) dogs are used today. Capabilities will 5. EADS - Ottobruhn (DE) allow security forces to operate 24/7, 6. EPFL - Lausanne (CH)

while saving use of real dogs for cases 7. CSSC - Rome (IT) 8. Univ. Padua (IT) in which they can potentially make difference. Border security, especially 9. ESIEE Chambre de Commerce et at airports, will be significantly d’Industrie - Paris (FR) 10. GTP - Labège (FR) enhanced as regards illegal trafficking of all kinds (drugs, tobacco, illegal 11. TraceTech Security- Tel Aviv (IL) immigration…) as well as terrorist acts 12. 3D General Aviation Applications (thanks to explosive detection). SA 3DSA - Thessanoliki (GR) Status: 13. Israel National Police - Ramle (IL) FINISHED http://www.sniffer-project.eu/ 14. ARTTIC - Paris (FR)

SNIFFLES FP7 – Secure January 2012 / Develop Linear Ion Trap Mass Coordinator: Societies April 2015 Spectroscopy (LIT MS) based device 1. TWI Ltd - Abingdon (UK) Artificial sniffer with mass range larger than other MS using linear ion Call 2011.3.4-2 EUR 3,493,625 techniques to detect weapons, drugs, Consortium: trap technology hidden persons at border crossings; 2. Univ. Liverpool (UK) IP REA – 285045 3. Univ. Aix-Marseille Provence (FR) identifying in parallel elemental, molecular or biological composition 4. DSM R&D Sol. BV - Sittard (NL) all at high speed of detection. Stand- 5. Q Technol. Ltd - Liverpool (UK) off capability complementary that of 6. SAES Getters Spa - Lainate (IT)

sniffer dogs. Device includes high 7. Envisiontec Gmbh - Gladbeck (DE) 8. Xaarjet AB - Jarfalla (SE) speed detection, continuous monitoring of air & surfaces to 9. Wagtail UK Ltd - Holywell (UK) prevent transport of illegal substances Status: at crossing points on land, at airports, FINISHED seaports. www.twi.co.uk

122

DIRAC FP7 – Secure January 2010 / Development of a point sensor to be Coordinator: Societies March 2014 used by customs and police officers in 1. Consorzio C.R.E.O. - L'Aquila (IT) Rapid screening their daily fight against trafficking of and identification Call 2009-1.3-2 EUR 2,985,507 illicit drugs, suitable in particular to Consortium: of illegal Drugs by & 4 detect and identify amphetamines 2. FhG IPM - Freiburg (DE) IR Absorption REA – 242309 3. CNR IMM - Rome (IT) CP and their precursors. Compact size, spectroscopy and capable to analyze both trace and 4. EADS IW - Ottobrunn (DE) gas bulk material and both volatile and 5. SELEX ES - Rome (IT) Chromatography non-volatile material; Identification 6. Univ. Lausanne (CH) 7. Univ. Galati (RO) capacity superior to commercial sensors based on IMS. Analysis / 8. NICC - Brussels (BE) recognition based on Infrared 9. NBI - Vantaa (FI) Absorption Spectroscopy. 10. Elsag Datamat - Genova (IT) Status: FINISHED http://www.fp7-dirac.eu/

SNOOPY FP7 – Secure January 2014 / Integration of handheld artificial Coordinator: Societies December sniffer system for customs/police 1. Univ. Brescia (IT) Sniffer for 2016 inspection purposes. Able to seek concealed people Call 2012.3.4-4 hidden persons, controlled goods, Consortium: discovery EUR 1,835,891 illicit drugs, safety & security hazards. 2. CNR - Rome (IT) CP 3. C-Tech Innovation - Chester (UK) ENTR – 313110 Target gases cover human perspirations like carbonic acids, 4. EADS Gmbh - Ottobruhn (DE) aldehydes, thiolic compounds, 5. Univ. Roma Tor Vergata (IT) nitrogen compounds, human 6. KEMEA - Athens (GR)

breathing product CO2 with different Status: kinds of sensors. Benchmarking FINISHED towards dogs and ion mobility spectrometry.

CONSORTIS FP7 – Secure January 2014 / Develop a demonstrator for stand-off Coordinator: Societies February 2017 real-time concealed object detection 1. VTT - Espoo (FI) Concealed Objects for future implementations of high Stand-Off Real- Call 2012.3.4-5 EUR 3,953,449 throughput security screening for EU Consortium: Time Imaging for 2. TU Delft (NL) CP ENTR – 312745 mass-transit markets & infrastructure Security security. Approach incorporating 3. Innovasec - Malvern (UK) 4. Wasa Millimeter Wave AB - multi-frequency passive submillimetre-wave video camera, Göteborg (SE) coupled with active 340 GHz 3D 5. FOI - Stockholm (SE) imaging radar system. Automatic 6. Asqella Oy - Helsinki (FI)

Anomaly Detection algorithms to 7. ST Andrews Univ., Dundee (UK) 8. Gotmic AB - Göteborg (SE) improve automation. privacy issues. End-user demo at a EU airport. 9. Univ. Tübingen - (DE) Status: 10. Rapiscan Systems Ltd - Stoke-on- FINISHED http://virtual.vtt.fi/virtual/consorti/in Trent (UK) dex.htm 11. Finavia Oyj - Vantaa (FI)

ARENA FP7 – Secure May 2011 / Flexible surveillance system for Coordinator: Societies May 2014 detection & recognition of threats 1. FOI - Stockholm (SE) Architecture for towards deployment on mobile the Recognition of Call 2010.2.3-3 EUR 3,178,761 critical assets/platforms such as Consortium: thrEats to mobile 2. Univ. Reading (UK) CP REA – 261658 trucks, trains, vessels, oil rigs. Develop assets using methods for detection & recognition, 3. Sagem - Paris (FR) Networks of based on multisensory data analysis. 4. BMT Group - London (UK) multiple Affordable Reducing number & impact of false 5. TNO - Delft (NL) sensors alarms towards optimized decision 6. PRO DOMO Sas - Paris (FR) 7. ITTI - Poznan (PL) making; integrated, scalable, easy to deploy monitoring system. Testing of 8. MORPHO - Paris (FR) different platforms including trucks, trains, vessels, oil rigs. Status: FINISHED http://www.ARENA-fp7.eu

123

7.4.8.2 Supply chain security Other projects are focusing on supply chain security, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

ISTIMES FP7 – Secure July 2009 / Prototypical modular, scalable Coordinator: Societies (ICT) June 2012 ICTbased system, exploiting 1. TeRN - Tito Scalo (IT) Integrated system distributed & local sensors, for non- for transport Call FP7-ICT- EUR 3,113,460 destructive electromagnetic Consortium: infrastructure SEC-2007-1 monitoring, dedicated to reliability, 2. Telespazio Spa - Rome (IT) surveillance, REA - 225663 3. Dip. Protezione Civile - Rome (IT) CP safety of critical transport infra monitoring by structures, able to couple current 4. EMPA - Thun (CH) electromagnetic monitoring of CIs with high situational 5. Ifsttar - Marne la Vallée (FR) sensing awareness during crisis management. 6. Univ. Lund - (SE) 7. Univ. Tel Aviv (IL) Updated, detailed real time information about the infrastructure 8. Territorial Data Elaboration - status to improve decision support for Bucarest (RO) emergency & disasters stakeholders. 9. Norsk Elektro Optikk AS - Status: Lørenskog (NO) FINISHED www.istimes.eu/

CASSANDRA FP7 – Secure June 2011 / CASSANDRA’s main strategic goal was Coordinator: Societies June 2015 to improve supply chain visibility and 1. TNO – the Hague (NL) Common business execution as well as the assessment and Call 2010.3.2-1 EUR 9,958,749 efficiency and effectiveness for Consortium: analysis of risk in 2. Erasmus Univ. - Rotterdam (NL) IP REA - 261795 government supervision. This was global supply chain facilitated by data sharing and a new 3. Techn. Univ. Delft (NL) 4. ISEL - Bremen (DE) approach towards risk assessment. The project will enable and facilitate 5. Fund. Zaragoza Logi. Centre (ES) the combination of existing 6. Cross-border Res. Assoc. - information sources in supply chains Lausanne CH)

into a new data sharing (“information 7. GS1 AISBL - Brussels (BE) 8. IBM BV - Amsterdam (NL) pipeline”) concept which improves visibility and thus also assessment of 9. GMVIS Skysoft SA - Lisboa (PT) risks by both business and 10. Intrasoft -- Luxembourg (LU) 11. Atos - Madrid (ES) government. A new approach in risk assessment will make sure that 12. Descartes AISBL - Brussels (BE) government can use data more 13. City of Bremen, Germany (DE) efficiently and therefore improve 14. Min. Financien - The Hague (NL)

overall effectiveness. 15. HM Revenue and Customs - London (UK)

16. Korps Land. Politie Diensten (NL) 17. Portic Barcelona S.A. (ES) 18. ECT Particip. - Rotterdam (NL)

19. Dbh Logistics - Bremen (DE) 20. Seacon Venlo Exp. - Venlo (NL) 21. BAP Logistics - Felixstowe (UK) 22. Kuehne+Nagel GmbH- Wien (AT)

23. DHL Manag. Ltd - Basel (CH)

24. North-South Consultants Exchange LLC - Cairo (Egypt) 25. Port Authority of Setubal & Status: http://www.cassandra-project.eu Sesimbra - Setubal (PT) FINISHED 26. Portbase BV - Rotterdam (NL)

LOGSEC FP7 – Secure January 2009 / Developed a strategic roadmap for Coordinator: Societies July 2011 supply chain security, analyzed 1. EFP Consulting – Leeds (UK) Development of a importance of political, regulatory, strategic roadmap Call 2009-1.1-1 EUR 753,372 technological aspects, produced Consortium: towards a 2. Atos - Madrid (ES) CSA REA - 241676 recommendations . Keytechnologies, demonstration procedural aspects include: container, 3. Cross-border Research Association project in EU goods/inventory, authentication, - Lausanne (CH) logistics & supply traceability, inspection, monitoring 4. European Council of Transport chain security technologies; risk assessment systems Users - Brussels (BE) 5. Szkoła Główna Handlowa w - & models; Information transfer systems; Intermodal transport Warszawa (PL) security; modernisation of customs 6. Clecat - Brussels (BE) procedures; protection of supply 7. Innovative Compliance Europe Ltd

chain infrastructure. User - London (UK) 124

requirements, data collection steps 8. Eidgenössische Zollverwaltung - included: » literature, project reviews, Bern (CH) » end-user interviews, » user surveys, Status: » user workshops. FINISHED www.logsec.org/

SECURECHAINS FP7 – Secure May 2010 / Mission is to contribute to more Coordinator: Societies April 2012 competitive Security Technology 1. INOVAMAIS – Porto (PT) Integration of Supply Chains (STSC). 6 main security technology Call 2009-7.0-2 EUR 820,032 objectives : (1) identify supply chains, Consortium: supply chains and 2. FhG FKIE - Wachtberg (DE) CSA REA - 242417 stakeholders; (2) detect untapped identification of potential integrated in EU STSC ; (3) 3. DHL Innov. Cent. - Troisdorf (DE) weaknesses and engage innovative low tier suppliers in 4. Innova Spa - Rome (IT) untapped potential STSC; (4) contribute to building of 5. Sollerta Ltd - Weimouth (UK) 6. Tecnalia - San Sebastian (ES) R&D competences in STSC; (5) develop awareness building activities 7. Mr. Juergen K. von der Lippe and in R&D Security; (6) promote, Dr. Jean Cornier - Hannover (DE) facilitate communication 8. Univ. din Craiova - Craiova (RO)

platform/website. 9. Alma Consult. - Paris (FR) 10. Teseo Sprl - Brussels (BE) Status: www.securechains.eu 11. Informatics Research Institute FINISHED INA -Thessaloniki (GR)

OSMOSIS FP7 – Secure April 2010 / Fostering involvement of SMEs in Coordinator: Societies March 2012 security technology supply chain & to 1. Ciaotech Srl – Milano (IT) Overcoming facilitate collaboration between SMEs Security Market Call 2009-7.0-2 EUR 580,889 & key stakeholders in EU Security Consortium: Obstacles for SMEs CSA 2. SESM - Rome (IT) REA - 242416 domain, create a nurturing Involvement in the environment for involvement of SMEs 3. GMVIS Skysoft - Lisboa (PT) technological in overall Security Market, by 4. TU München (DE) Supply Chain increasing their capabilities to 5. CINI - Rome (IT) 6. Innostart - Budapest (HU) understand & focus on security market trend & untapped potentials, 7. Honeywell spol sro - Praha (CZ) link with relevant stakeholders, 8. INTA - Madrid (ES) facilitate their involvement in 9. Fundación para el Conocimiento -

technological supply chain, also by Madrid (ES) 10. ELSAG Datamat - Rome (IT) favoring joint R&D activities with RTD organisations & large industries. 11. PNO Consultants Sas - Paris (FR) Status: FINISHED www.osmosisecurity.eu

SAFEPOST FP7 – Secure April 2012 / Reuse and development of Security Coordinator: Societies March 2016 Knowledge assets for International 1. Assoc. Europ. Public Postal Reuse and Postal supply chains; EU fund: Operators AISBL – Brussels (BE) development of Call 2011.2.4-1 EUR 9,523,423 Security SAFEPOST aims to raise current level Consortium: Knowledge assets IP ENTR - 285104 of postal security by integrating 2. BMT Group - Teddington (UK) for International innovative screening solutions that: 1) 3. Geopost- Smethwick (UK) Postal Supply do not disrupt the flow of enormous 4. FOI - Stockholm (SE) chains volumes of parcels & letters 5. Tellusecure TLS - Lund (SE) associated with operational postal 6. MJC2 Ltd - Crowthorne (UK) processes; 2) support customs & 7.Inlecom Systems - Burgess Hill(UK) counter-crime intelligence work 8. Correos y Telégrafos - Madrid (ES) within a EU-wide cooperative 9. Atos - Madrid (ES) distributed model. After making 10. NMI - Delft (NL) inventory of security gaps these will 11. Conf. Org. Road Transport

be developed into generic postal Enforcement AISBL - Brussels (BE) security models integrated into a 12. Hellenic Post - Athens (GR) Postal Security Target Operating 13. K-NET - Athens (GR) Model, enabling postal operators, 14. Marlo - Heer (NO) customs, other relevant actors to 15. Fundación Zaragoza Logistics understand how to securely exchange Center ZLC - Zaragoza (ES) information related not only to 16. Conceptivity - Meyrin (CH) security but also to optimisation of 17. ĺslandspóstur - Reykjavik (IS)

postal flows. 18. Univ. Genova - Genova (IT) Status: 19. Cross-border Research

FINISHED Association - Echandens (CH) http://www.safepostproject.eu 20.EOS - Brussels (BE)

125

Other on-going projects are complementing the above:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

IPATCH FP7 – Secure March 2014 / Collection and in-depth analysis of Coordinator: Societies April 2017 historical data on piracy incidents in 1. BMT Group Ltd - Teddington (UK) Intelligent Piracy terms of legal, ethical, societal, Avoidance using Call 2013.2.4-2 EUR 2,976,845 economic implications; production of Consortium: threat detection 2. FOI - Stockholm (SE) CSA REA - 607567 a manual on use & implement of and countermeasures against piracy; Build 3. Univ. Reading - London (UK) countermeasure an on-board system for early 4. ITTI - Poznan (PL) heuristics detection, classification, mitigation of 5. Sagem - Paris (FR) 6. Univ. Cattolica del Sacro Cuore - piracy threats; demonstration of automated decision support for piracy Milano (IT) threat countermeasures; Maritime 7. Thermal Engineering Systems AB - Data Set to evaluate performance of Linkoping (SE)

threat detection algorithms. 8. Univ. Namur - Namur (BE) 9. Foinikas Shipping Company - Status: http://www.ipatchproject.eu/partner Athens (GR) ON-GOING s.aspx

CORE FP7 – Secure June 2014 / CORE will consolidate, amplify, Coordinator: Societies April 2018 demonstrate EU knowledge, 1. ESC – Brussels (BE) Consistently capabilities, international co- Optimised Resilient Call 2013.2.4-1 EUR operation for securing supply chains Consortium: Secure Global 29,254,829 2.Advanced Track & Trace- Paris(FR) IP whilst maintaining or improving Supply-Chains business performance, with specific 3. A.P. Moller - Copenhagen (DK) REA - 603993 4. ATOS - Madrid (ES) reference to key Supply Chain Corridors. Driven by: • Customs, law 5. BAP Logistics Ltd - Suffolk (UK) enforcement authorities, other 6. BMT Group Ltd - Teddington (UK) agencies nationally & internationally 7. Brimatech Services - Wien (AT)

to increase effectiveness of security & 8. KEMEA - Athens (GR) 9. Clecat - Brussels (BE) trade compliance, without increasing transaction costs for business & to 10. CLMS - London (UK) increase co-operative security risk 11. Conceptivity Sarl - Meyrin (CH) 12. CONEX SA - Orchies (FR) management (supervision & control); • business communities, specifically 13. IBI - Bologna (IT) shippers, forwarders, terminal 14. FloraHolland - Aalsmeer (NL) operators, carriers, financial 15. Cross-border Research

stakeholders to integrate compliance Association - Lausanne (CH) 16. CSS - Zürich (CH) & trade facilitation concepts like green lanes, pre-clearance with 17. dbh Logistics IT - Bremen (DE) supply chain visibility, optimisation. It 18. Douane Tax and Customs Admin. - DJ Heerlen (NL) will consolidate solutions developed in each supply chain sector (port, 19. Descartes Systems - Lier (BE) container, air, post). Implementation- 20. DHL Spain - Madrid (ES) driven R&D will be undertaken 21. eBOS Technol. - Strovolos (CY) designed to discover gaps, practical 22. Enide Solutions– S. Andreu (ES) 23. EIA - Brussels (BE) problems & to develop capabilities, solutions that could deliver sizable, 23. EOS - Brussels (BE) sustainable progress in supply chain 24. Fundacion Zaragoza Logistics (ES) security across all EU MS & on global 25. Georgia Tech - Atlanta (US)

scale. 26. HMRC - London (UK) 27. Icontrol Networks–Redwood (US)

28. Inlecom Systems - London (UK) 29. ILM - Warszawa (PL) 30. Intrasoft Int. - Luxembourg (LU)

31. IRTU - Brussels (BE) 32. MIT - Rome (IT) 33. JRC - Brussels (BE) 34. Log. without Paper - Hoorn (NL)

35. Logit One - Geel (BE)

36. Mar. Cargo Proc.-Felixstowe (UK) 37.Metro Ship.– Birmingham (UK) 38.Min. Ecol. Dév. Dur. En.- Paris (FR)

39. Min. Financien - Den Haag (NL) 40. MJC2 Ltd - Crowthorne (UK) 41. TNO - Delft (NL) 42. Portic Barcelona - Barcelona (ES)

43. Procter & Gamble - Brussels (BE) 126

44. Seabridge NV - Zeebrugge (BE) 45. Seacon Venlo Exp. - Venlo (NL) 46. Sec. Projects Ltd - Rainham (UK) 47. Haefen Bremen (DE) 48. Serv. Public Fin. (BE) 49. Smiths Detection - Watford (UK) 50. Sunwell Technologies Inc -

Woodbridge (CA) 51. TU Delft (NL) 52. TU Eindhoven (NL) 53. Telespazio TPZ - Rome (IT) 54. Term. Maritima - Zaragoza (ES) 55. Interpol - Lyon (FR) 56. FOI - Stockholm (SE) 57. SESE - Lund (SE)

58. TTS Italia - Rome (IT) 59. Uniserve Ltd - Heathrow (UK) 60. Virtual Logistics Transport Status: http://www.coreproject.eu/ Network - Brussels (BE) ON-GOING

7.4.9 Transport Security Threats Security related research is also focusing on several branches of transport policies as illustrated below. 7.4.9.1 Railway security

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

SECRET FP7 – Secure August 2012 / Protection of railway infrastructure Coordinator: Societies July 2015 against EM attacks. Identifying 1. Europe Recherche Transport - SECurity of vulnerability points at different levels Lyon (FR) Railways against Call 2011.2.2-2 EUR 3,059,433 (electronic, systemic), EM attack Electromagnetic Consortium: CP ENTR – 285136 scenarios, risk assessment (service aTtacks degradation, potential accidents, 2. FhG IAIS - Sankt Augustin (DE) 3. Politecnico di Torino (IT) economic impacts), public equipment which can be used to generate EM 4. Trialog - Paris (FR) attacks; developing protection rules 5. IFSTTAR - Paris (FR) to strengthen infrastructure 6. Univ. Liège (BE)

(electronic, architecture, systemic 7. Zanassi Alessandro - Modena (IT) 8. Univ. Basque Country - Leioa (ES) levels), EM attack detection devices & processes, resilient architecture able 9. SNCF - Paris (FR) to adequately react in case of EM 10. UICF - Paris (FR) 11. Alstom - Paris (FR) attack detection; extracting recommendations to ensure Status: resiliency, contributing to standards. FINISHED http://secret-project.eu/

PROTECTRAIL FP7 – Secure September To develop integrated system to Coordinator: Societies 2010 / June improve security of rail transportation 1. ANSALDO - Genoa (IT) Railway-Industry 2014 through better protection of railways, Partnership for Call 2009-2.2-1 trains, to reduce disparity in security Consortium: Integrated Security CP EUR between EU railway systems. This will 2. SELEX - Rome (IT) of Rail Transport 13,115,064 include immunity of signal, power 3. TNO - Delft (NL) 4. UICF - Paris (FR) REA – 242270 distribution systems against electromagnetic terrorism, detection 5. Bombardier Transp. - Berlin (DE) of abnormal objects on or under 6. Alstom Transport SA - Paris (FR) ballast; clearance of trains before 7. Thales - Paris (FR)

daily use; control of access to driver’s 8. Sarad Gmbh - Dresden (DE) 9. UNIFE - Brussels (BE) cabin, detection of unauthorised driver; new methods/tools to isolate 10. Morpho - Paris (FR) & secure luggage; as well as study, 11. Sagem Sécurité SA - Paris (FR) 12. Ductis Gmbh - Goldbach (DE) tools to reduce disparity of EU railway systems’ security. It will demonstrate 13. Železničná spoločnosť Slovensko potential of EU rail transportation as - Bratislava (SK) 14. Joint Stock Company Lithuanian 127

systems for improved protection & Railways - Vilnius (LT) homogeneity. 15. ItalCertifer Scpa - Florence (IT) 16. PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe SA -

Warszawa (PL) 17. D’Appolonia Spa - Genova (IT) 18. Elbit Systems Ltd - Haifa (IL) 19. Univ. Namur (BE)

20. Eppra - Courtaboeuf (FR)

21. Kingston Univ. (UK) 23. Sodern - Paris (FR) 24. Smiths Heimann Sas - Vitry (FR)

25. Rail Cargo - Wien (AT) 26. CEA - Paris (FR) 27. Institut Franco-Allemand de Recherches de Saint-Louis (FR) Status: 28. Turk. State Railways- Ankara (TR) FINISHED 29. Mer Mec Spa - Monopoli (IT) http://www.protectrail.eu/ 30. SNCF - Paris (FR)

7.4.9.2 Urban transport and road network security

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

SECUR-ED FP7 – Secure August 2011 / Integrate consistent, interoperable Coordinator: Societies September mix of technologies & processes, 1. Thales - Paris (FR) Secured Urban 2014 covering all aspects. Rationale is to Transportation - Call 2012.6.1-3 create a global EU improvement in Consortium: European EUR 2. Alstom Transport - Paris (FR) CP mass transportation security through Demonstration 25,468,072 development of packaged modular 3. Ansaldo STS - Genova (IT) 4. ATM - Milano (IT) ENTR – 261605 solutions validated in 4 demonstrations. It aimed to be used 5. Bombardier Transp. - Berlin (DE) on transport systems in EU medium & 6. CEA - Paris (FR) large sized cities. It defines consistent 7. CRT Madrid (ES)

& interoperable mix of technologies & 8. Deutsche Bahn AG - Berlin (DE) 9. EOS - Brussels (BE) processes; »toolkit of operational procedures aimed at identifying, 10. Edisoft - Lisboa (PT) managing risks, planning 11. FOI - Stockholm (SE) 12. FhG IAO - Stuttgart (DE) operations,ensuring fast restoration of activities; »series of improved 13. Hamburg Consult HCO (DE) technical security solutions: Video 14. ICC - Madid (ES) analytics, Protection, hardening, CIs 15. INOV - Lisboa (PT)

resilience, CBRN-E sensor 16. JRC - Brussels (BE) 17. RTB - Bucarest (RO) systems;»Standardized information management & comm. systems 18. EMEF - Lisboa (PT) controlling exchange of information 19. MTRS3 Ltd - Tel Aviv (IL) 20. NICE Systems Ltd - Haifa (IL) between transport actors/users ;»Intelligent incident prevention, EWS 21. Univ. Paderborn (DE) using multiple-source correlation. 22. RATP - Paris (FR) 23. Morpho - Paris (FR) 24. EMT Madrid (ES) 25. Min. Intérieur - Paris (FR) 26. SNCF - Paris (FR) 27. Ferrovie Nord Milano (IT) 28. Univ. Stavanger (NO) 29. STIB - Brussels (BE) 30. TNO - Delft (NL)

31. TU Dresden (DE) 32. UITP - Brussels (BE) 33. UNIFE - Brussels (BE) 34. VTT - Espoo (FI) 35. Univ.. Julius-Maximilians - Wuerzburg (DE) 36. IET - Madrid (ES) 37. GTE - Tel Aviv (IL) Status: 38. AXIS Comm. - Lund (SE) FINISHED www.secur-ed.eu 39. Turk. Cumhuriyeti - Ankara (TR) 40. Selex - Rome (IT) 128

SERON FP7 – Secure November Investigating impacts of possible man- Coordinator: Societies ICT 2009 / October made attacks on transport network, in 1. Planung Transport Verkehr AG - Security of road 2012 particular resulting regional, supra- Karlsruhe (DE) transport networks Call ICT-SEC- regional impacts on transport links 2007-1.1 EUR 2,246,110 their economic impacts. It focuses on Consortium: 2. Bund. Straßenwesen BASt - CP REA – 225354 development, validation of innovative methodology, designed to provide Bergisch Gladbach (DE) common framework for analysis of 3. Parsons Brinckerhoff - Newcastle

critical road infrastructure objects or (UK) 4. Techn. Univ. Graz (AT) road transport networks with regard to their importance within EU 5. Traficon nv - Wevelgem (BE) transport network with regard to 6. Ernst Basler & Part. - Zollikon (CH) 7. Niras Rådgivende Ingeniører og possible attacks. This methodology is based on interdisciplinary interaction Planlæggere - Alleroed (DK) of expertise, innovative simulation methods. Status: FINISHED www.seron-project.eu/

STAR-TRANS FP7 – Secure November STAR-TRANS created models that can Coordinator: Societies ICT 2009 / April represent possible risk incidents, 1. Intrasoft International SA – Strategic Risk 2013 structure & assets of EU’s Luxemburg (LU) Assessment and Call ICT-SEC- heterogeneous transport systems, Contingency 2007-1.0-01 EUR 2,105,588 relationship between different assets Consortium: Planning in CP 2.NRC Demokritos – Athens (GR) REA - 225594 in networks. Project developed a interconnected STAR-TRANS modelling language & 3. KEMEA - Athens (GR) Transport impact-assessment modelling 4. CORTE AISBL - Brussels (BE) Networks language. 5. QinetiQ SA - Farnborough (UK) 6. FhG IVI - Dresden (DE) 7. CERTH - Thessaloniki (GR) 8. Metropolitan Police Service - London (UK) 9. CTL Ltd - Lefkosia (CY) 10. Squaris Ltd - Brussels (BE) Status: 11. Societa' reti e mobilita' spa - FINISHED Bologna (IT) http://www.startrans-project.eu/

7.4.9.3 Security of Critical Infrastructures in relation to Mass Transportation

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

DEMASST FP7 – Secure August 2009 Facilitate protection of EU citizens, Coordinator: Societies / July 2013 property & infrastructure against 1.FOI – Stockholm (SE) Security of critical threats of terrorism, crime, riots, by infrastructures Call 2007-2.1-1 EUR 956,558 automatic detection of abnormal Consortium: related to mass human behaviour based on expert 2. Ansaldo STS - Genova (IT) transportation CP ENTR – 3. TIFSA - Madrid (ES) 218264 classifications, analysis of CCTV operator behaviour. Algorithms 4. Sintef - Trondheim (NO) detecting pre-defined threat 5. CEA - Paris (FR) behaviours with accurate & robust 6. Tecnalia - San Sebastian (ES) detection, data from audio, video 7. TNO - Delft (NL) sensors. Tested on real-time 8. Diehl - Uberlingen (DE) evaluation platform on large-scale 9. Thales - Paris (FR) events (football arena), & critical 10. EADS Astrium - Paris (FR) infrastructure (airports). 11. FFI - Kjeller (NO) http://www.demasst.eu

129

7.4.10 Risk assessment related to radicalisation Radicalisation has become one of the core research area with the recent events, few projects have covered this area in FP7 but the coverage will be enhanced in H2020:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

IMPACT EUROPE FP7 – Secure January 2014 / Filling gap in knowledge & Coordinator: Societies August 2015 understanding of 'what works' in 1. TNO – Delft (NL) Innovative Method tackling violent radicalization, and Procedure to Call 2012-1 EUR 2,801,537 developing evaluation toolkit that Consortium: Assess Counter- 2. CEVAS di Liliana Leone - Rome (IT) CP REA – 312235 enables evaluators, policy-makers, violent- frontline workers, academics in field 3. FRS - Paris (FR) radicalisation of violent radicalization to answer 4. Int. Sec. Counter-terrorism Techniques in how effective are various programs at Academy - Rishon Le-Zion (IL) Europe tackling violent radicalization, what is 5. ISC - Brussels (BE) 6. ITTI - Poznan (PL) best practice in tackling violent radicalization, how does this inform 7. Politie Zaanstreek - Zaandam (NL) our knowledge, understanding? This 8. Radical Middle Way Community evaluation toolkit aims to help Interest Co - Wembley (UK)

professionals in their interventions 9. RAND - Cambridge (UK) 10. Stichting dr. Hilda Verwey-Jonker Status: and integrating best practice into Instituut - Utrecht (NL) FINISHED design. 11. Sticht. Hogeschool - Utrecht (NL) http://impacteurope.eu/ 12. Univ. Milano-Bicocca (IT)

SAFIRE FP7 – Secure xxxx / xxxx xxxxxx Coordinator: Societies xxxx Scientific approach EUR xxxx to finding Call xxxxx Consortium: indicators of and xxxx xxxxxx responses to xx radicalisation Status: xxxxx

7.4.11 Disaster Response and Security of Citizens Complementing Chapter 7.2 focusing on natural disasters, issues related to disaster response and security are handled in research projects which often include classified components and involve different categories of stakeholders. The section below provides insights into projects in this area. 7.4.11.1 Interoperability and communication with focus on security Projects below illustrate research trends in (interoperable) communications to enhance citizen's security:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

FREESIC FP7 - Secure February Investigating barriers to Coordinator: Societies 2014 / interoperability of emergency 1. Ardaco, a.s. – Bratislava (SK) Free Secure July 2014 services, proposing communication Interoperable Call 2011.5.2-1 solution to support information Consortium: Communications EUR 2. Nat. Sec. Authority - Bratislava (SK) CP exchange through heterogeneous 3,284,040 communication systems, deploys 3. Univ. Luxembourg (LU) 4. BAPCO - Lincoln (UK REA – 285205 interoperability platform into 3 countries & evaluates its operation. 5. ITTI Ltd - Poznan(PL) Creating solution that will allow 6. NEXTEL SA - Zamudio (ES)

highly secure & cost effective 7. Cent.Comm. Gouv. - Senningen (LU) 8. World Consult - Bratislava (SK) interoperability between communication infrastructures right 9. Pramacom Prague - Praha (CZ) across Europe. System operating

130

Status: free-of-charge through an open FINISHED source gateway. http://www.freesic.eu

CRISYS FP7 - Secure February Roadmap building capable of full Coordinator: Societies 2011 / implementation to show specific 1. EOS - Brussels (BE) Critical Response in May 2012 demonstration actions whilst Security and Safety Call 2010.4.1-1 establishing contacts & awareness Consortium: Emergencies EUR 740,945 with main public & private 2. Indra Sistemas SA - Madrid (ES) CSA 3. Thales - Paris (FR) REA– 261682 stakeholders. CRISYS links approaches, technical solutions, 4. Edisoft SA - Paço de Arcos (PT) procedures, & standards that exist in 5. KEMEA - Athens (GR) civil protection field, which can be 6. Demokritos - Athens (GR)

extremely fragmented at national, 7. Altran BV - Amsterdam (NL) 8. Teletron TLT - Elmas (IT) local level, to permit fast, adequate response to natural & manmade 9. Min. Interior FMOI - Helsinki (FI) threats. 10. Univ. Lancashire - Preston (UK) 11. SFMC - Paris (FR) 12. Ist. Affari Int. - Rome (IT) 13. Zanasi Alessandro - Modena (IT) Status: www.crisys-project.eu FINISHED 14. Transelectrica - Bucarest (RO) 15. CTIF - Stockholm (SE)

DARIUS FP7 - Secure April 2012 / Development of solutions to adapt Coordinator: Societies February unmanned systems to SAR 1. BAE Systems – Rochester (UK) Deployable SAR 2015 operations needs & constraints. Integrated Chain Call 2011.4.2-2 Integration Project: system of Consortium: with Unmanned EUR 2. EADS Cassidian - Paris (FR) CP systems, system, platforms, sensors, Systems 7,475,830 communications. At system level, 3. DFRC AG - Zug (CH) 4. Skytech Ltd - Dublin (IE) REA– 284851 solutions designed will be mobile or at least transportable. 5. ECA - Toulon (FR) 6. SINTEF - Trondheim (NO) http://www.darius-fp7.eu/ 7.NTUA - Athens (GR) 8. Future Intell. Ltd - Athens (GR) 9. TELINT - London (UK)

10. ONERA - Paris (FR) 11. KEMEA - Athens (GR) 12. EUSDEM)- Brussels (BE) Status: 13. NMCI - Cork (IE) FINISHED 14. CEREN - Gardanne (FR)

On-going projects are complementing the above research efforts:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

EPISECC FP7 - Secure June 2014 / In disaster situation 3 things Coordinator: Societies May 2017 contribute to success: having right 1. AIT - Seibersdorf (AT) Establish Pan- resource available in shortest time, European Call 2013-1 EUR with highest relevance & at right Consortium: Information Space 3,764,547 location. Access to necessary 2. Cassidian Finland - Helsingfors (FI) to Enhance seCurity CP 3. Cassidian Sas - Paris (FR) REA – 607078 information, communication with of Citziens other rescuers, & stakeholders as 4. Deutsche Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.- Berlin (DE) well as availability of resources are key factors in minimizing damage & 5. Frequentis AG - Wien (AT) loss of life. 6. IES Solutions Srl -Rome (IT) 7. HWC Ltd - Lancaster (UK) 8. HITEC Lux. SA - Hollerech (LU) 9. KU Leuven - Leuven (BE)

10. PSC Forum AISBL - Brussels (BE) Status: 11. Univ. Split - Split (HR) ON-GOING 12. TU Graz - Graz (AT) https://www.episecc.eu/ 13. TETRA Assoc. - Newcastle (UK)

SALUS FP7 - Secure September Design, implementation & Coordinator: Societies 2013 / evaluation of next generation 1. Inst. Telecom. – Lisboa (PT) Security And August 2016 communication network for Public InteroperabiLity in Call 2012.5.2-1 Protection & Disaster Relief (PPDR), Consortium: Next Generation EUR providing security, privacy, seamless 2. EADS Cassidian - Paris (FR) PPDR 3. Rohill Tech. BV - Hoogeveen (NL) 131

CommUnication CP 3,499,829 mobility, QoS, reliability support for 4. Airwave Solutions Ltd - Slough (UK) InfrastructureS mission-critical Private Mobile Radio 5. FhG IOSB - Karlsruhe (DE) ENTR – (PMR) voice & broadband data 6. Twente Inst. Wireless and Mobile 313296 services.Full techno-economic scope Comm. - Twente (NL) regarding development & 7. OneSource Consultoria Informatica deployment by focusing on Lda - Coimbra (PT) integration / migration to 4G 8. Univ. Ljubljana (SI) wireless developments targeting 3 9. Univ. Twente (NL)

critical scenarios: 1) city security, 2) 10. Univ. Kingston (UK) disaster recovery, 3) temporary 11. Univ. of Patras (GR) protection 12. Ubitel Ltd - St. Petersburg (Russia) 13. Univ. Belgrade (Serbia)

14. PSCE AISBL - Brussels (BE) 15. Alcatel-Lucent Int. - Paris (FR) Status: 16. Pelastusopisto Emergency Services ON-GOING http://www.sec-salus.eu/ College - Kuopio (FI)

SECTOR FP7 - Secure September Establishing foundations of future Coordinator: Societies 2014 / Common CCM (Collaborative Crisis 1. E-Geos SPA – Rome (IT) Secure European April 2017 Management) Information Spaces common Call 2013.5.1-1 by expanding EU scientific Consortium: information space EUR 2. ASELSAN Elektronik - Istanbul (TR) CP knowledge base on cross-border for the 3,156,202 multi-agency CCM processes, 3. Univ. Polit. Valencia - Valencia(ES) interoperability of 4. FOI - Stockholm (SE) REA – 607821 complications these imply when first responders aiming at setting-up & design cross- 5. ITTI - Poznan (PL) and police border supporting information 6. CINI - Rome (IT) authorities Systems. 7. Saadian Technol. Ltd- Dublin (IE) 8. SESM - Rome (IT) 9. Univ. Stuttgart (DE) 10. Thales - Paris (FR) 11. Police Service of Northern Ireland - Belfast (UK) 12. Wyższa Szkoła Policji w Szczytnie -

Szczytno (PL) 13. Health Serv. Executive - Naas (IE) 14. Szkola Glowna Sluzby Pozarniczej - Warszawa (PL) Status: 15. Stichting Studio Veiligheid - Den ON-GOING Haag (NL 16. Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen - Tübingen (DE)

7.4.12 Standardisation Standardisation supports a range of EU policies and is closely related to research developments (pre-, co- and post-normative research). The Mandate 487 report prepared by CEN has identified a number of needs and recommendations in the CBRN-E, Crisis Management and Border Control areas, which resulted in the selection of priorities by the Commission. These were dealt with in two different ways for CBRN-E and Crisis Management: (1) the development of Workshop Agreements within the framework of expert groups coordinated by the European Reference Network for CIP (ERNCIP); and (2) mandates to CEN for the development of selected standards. Besides these formal activities, FP7 research projects also include standardisation components as described below. Within Horizon2020, the DRS-6-2015 topic on "Addressing standardisation opportunities in support of increasing disaster resilience in Europe" will complement on-going activities (see above) on standardisation (derived from M487 recommendations) and discuss gaps and perspectives for future standardisation developments. In the sector of civil protection, the establishment of the European Emergency Response Capacity (EERC) is linked to quality requirements (based on international standards where

132

such standards exist) defined by the Commission for the response capacities that Member States will commit. It is related to a process for certification and registration of the Member States response capacities made available to the EERC. Potentially significant strategic response capacity gaps in the EERC are identified with help by the Commission to Member States consortia. Key standardisation goals are identified in the CBRN and Explosive Action Plans, in particular the requirement to make a comprehensive overview of relevant regulations or standards at hand and their relevance to biosecurity and biosafety, and to consider implementation of the CEN Workshop Agreement CWA 15793 and WHO Laboratory Biosecurity Guidance. The plan also promotes the development of a coherent set of minimum technical detection standards (including within the context of border monitoring) based on scenarios, user requirements and risk and threat assessments while building on existing work, in particular the engagement of the private sector, especially ESOS (CEN, CENELEC, ETSI) and consideration of forensic requirements for evidence as well as legal metrology requirements. This is complemented by the requirement to develop reference materials of biological agents for both clinical and environmental samples (according to internationally accepted standards) in order to achieve quality assurance in detection. Finally, the plan also requires the setting of minimum requirements for sampling, detection, identification and monitoring of pathogens and toxins within a civilian security context at EU level and make these available to the private sector, with due consideration of confidentiality. The CBRN Action plan also requires the development of guidelines based on existing standards for CBRN training of Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) specialists, including standards developed by EDA to the non-military context.

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

SLAM FP7 – Secure April 2012 / Enhancing competence in MS in Coordinator: Societies March 2014 development of common methods, 1. Univ. Umea (SE) Standardisation of procedures, protocols for detection, laboratory Call 2011.5.4-1 EUR 1,117,608 analysis identification of CBRN Consortium: analytical methods substances allowing for significant 2. TNO - Delft (NL) CSA ENTR – 285410 3. Robert Koch Inst. - Berlin (DE) comparison of results from different laboratories & operators within EU. A 4. FOI - Stockholm (SE) road-map suggesting methods of 5. Health Prot. Agency - London (UK) choice, processes, means to 6. CEA - Paris (FR)

implement necessary standards to 7. FFI - Kjeller (NO) CBRN analysis will be presented & reported. Functional standardisation of CBRN analysis at necessary level of stringency will become important component of a EU more resilient to CBRN incidents. Status: http://www.cbrnecenter.eu/project/s FINISHED lam/

HECTOS FP7 – Secure September Focus on industrial standards for Coordinator: Societies 2014 / August explosives detection & person- 1. FOI – Stockholm (SE) Harmonized 2017 scanning technology. Study if and how Evaluation, Call 2013.5.4-1 existing evaluation, certification Consortium: Certification and EUR 3,489,016 schemes used in other areas including 2. DIN - Berlin (DE) Testing of Security CP 3. FhG ICT Karlsruhe (DE) ENTR – 606861 Common Criteria, New Legislative Products Framework, ECAC CEP, CertAlarm... 4. Iconal Technol. - Cambridge (UK) 5. Morpho - Paris (FR) could be used & possibly further developed/ enhanced/ adapted/ 6. TNO - Delft (NL) integrated as general approach for 7. NPL Management Ltd - Hook (UK) assessment, certification of products 8. Univ. Warwick - Coventry (UK)

used for physical security of people & 133

infrastructure. As mechanisms to independently evaluate security product performance, it will consider ethical, privacy requirements, regulatory compliance. Approach will be validated through experiments using 2 different product groups as

case studies: weapons, explosives detection systems & biometric recognition. Develop roadmap for dev. new harmonized certification schemes, provide standardization bodies with proposals for new work Status: items. ON-GOING httpxxxxxx

7.4.13 Foresights studies on security threats The constant progress of science and implementation of security policies require a degree of anticipation about future needs (either related to research or policy implementation). This is why many projects are running foresight studies and discuss roadmaps to better prepare the future. Examples of finished projects are given below:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

ETTIS FP7 - Secure January 2012 Provide means to establish Coordinator: Societies / December sustainable process of anticipating 1. Peace Res. Inst. – Oslo (NO) European security 2014 emerging threats to society & to trends and threats Call 2011.6.3-1 societal security, to translate them Consortium: in society EUR 2. FOI - Stockholm (SE) CP into research priorities. Future 2,285,586 threats & needs of security 3. Den Haag Centr. Strat. Studies HCSS - Den Haag (NL) REA – 285593 organisations are explored in context & situational scenarios. 4. Trilateral Research & Consulting LLP Identification, assessment of - london (UK)

opportunities for enhancing societal 5. FhG INT - (DE) 6. CIES - Dublin (IE) security is conducted within context of these scenarios. Options 7. AIT - Wien (AT) identified in stakeholder process, 8. Morpho - Paris (FR) 9. Magen David Adom - Tel Aviv (IL) aiming to identify collective priorities. Exploration of needs, 10. Police Service of Northern Ireland options for policy intervention with PSNI - Dublin (UK) emphasis on EU policy level. Status: FINISHED www.ettis-project.eu

FESTOS FP7 - Secure January 2009 Identification of future security Coordinator: Societies / December threats posed by emerging 1. ICTAF - Tel-Aviv (IL) Foresight of 2011 technologies, narrative scenarios, evolving security Call 2007-1 assessment of need for knowledge Consortium: threats posed by EUR 824,552 control, evaluation of policy 2. Turku School Economics - Turku (FI) emerging CSA 3. Found. European Sci. Cooperation - REA – 217993 measures to cope with threats. technologies Adequate mix of Foresight methods Warszawa (PL) 4. EFP Consulting - Leeds (UK) were employed, e.g. horizon scanning, weak signals analysis, 5. TU Berlin (DE) expert surveys, brainstormings, 6. Uniwers. Lodzki - lodz (PL) futures wheel , interactive scenario

building, STEEPV analysis. Status: http://www.festos.org FINISHED

EVOCS FP7 - Secure October 2010 Security which differ depending on Coordinator: Societies / October place and time and to analyse 1. FhG INT - Euskirchen (DE) The evolving 2013 similarities, differences between concept of security: Call 2009-4.3-3 them. Bringing together relevant Consortium: A critical evaluation EUR 918,125 2. Tecnalia - Bilbao (ES) CP European stakeholders to discuss across four core values, threats to them, 3. Ist. Affari Internazionali - Rome (IT) 134

dimensions REA – 605142 measures to be taken to protect 4. PISM - Warszawa (PL) them. Recommendations for 5. HCSS - Den Haag (NL) changes in working parameters of 6. Scuola Sup. Sant'Anna - Pisa (IT various types of security end-users, 7. Univ. Loughborough (UK) will serve as guidelines for policy 8. Univ. Cat.. Sacro Cuore - Milan (IT) makers responsible for formulating 9. Procon - Sofia (BG) measures that influence an evolving

EU concept. Focus on EU & close neighbours, providing a holistic view on complex & somewhat diffuse concept of security by evaluating it across 4 dimensions: core values, areas of security & time. 4 regional case studies: West-Mediterranean EU, Eastern EU Border, North- Status: Western EU, South-Eastern EU; FINISHED http://evocs-project.eu/

ANVIL FP7 - Secure March 2012 / Development of consensus Coordinator: Societies February definitions of effectiveness and 1. RESMAN – Oslo (NO) Analysis of Civil 2014 efficiency and then apply them to Security Systems in Call 2011.6.1-1 the different country and regional Consortium: Europe EUR 2. Univ. Utrecht (NL) CSA security systems looked at in the 2,009,228 project. ANVIL will provide specific 3. UI (SE) 4. Univ. Essex - Colchester (UK) REA – 284678 advice, based on objective indicators and analysis, about what changes or 5. Inst. Med. Odnose - Zagreb (HR) modifications could result in 6. Univ. Hellenberg Oy - Helsinki (FI)

improvements to the security 7. Ist. Affari Internazionali - Rome (IT) 8. IFSH - Hamburg (DE) situation in certain regions or countries where this might be 9. Swedish Nat. Defence Coll. (SE) desired by EU policymakers. 10. Univ. Beogradu - Belgrade (SRB) 11. FRS -Paris (FR) Status: www.anvil-project.net 12. Univ. Adama Mickiewicza - Poznan FINISHED (PL)

FOCUS FP7 - Secure April 2011 / Concentrating on alternative future Coordinator: Societies April 2013 EU roles to prevent or respond to 1. Sigmund Freud Univ. – Wien (AT) Foresight Security incidents situated on the Scenarios : Call 2011-1.6.3- EUR “borderline” between internal and Consortium: Mapping Research 2 3,407,075 external dimensions of the security 2. Atos - Madrid (ES) to a Comprehensive 3. BOC Asset Man. - Wien (AT) CP REA – 261633 affecting Union and its citizens. It Approach to will do so by elaborating multiple 4. Inst. Inform. Comm. Technologies Exogenous EU scenarios, based on IT-supported CDSM - Sofia (BG) Roles foresight. It will deliver tangible 5. Cross-border Research Association - Lausanne (CH) products (such as an IT platform) and contents (i.e., a roadmap) for 6. Isdefe - Madrid (ES) planning research and deciding on 7. České Vysoké Učení Technické v priorities. It will design, apply an Praze - Praha (CZ)

“embedded scenario” method of 8. Seceur - Brussels (BE) 9. Univ. Weiterbildung - Krems (AT) integration. FOCUS’s foresight work led to its ultimate result: an IT-based 10. Univ. Haifa (IL) interactive roadmap for security 11. BOKU - Wien (AT) 12. INTA - Madrid (ES) Status: research. FINISHED http://www.focusproject.eu/ FORCE FP7 - Secure May 2014 / Based on previous Security foresight Coordinator: Societies March 2016 studies & horizon-scanning activities 1. EFPC Ltd – Glasgow (UK) FOResight in FP7 & elsewhere in EU, Coordination for Call 2013.1 EUR 930,510 production of Intelligent Decision Consortium: Europe Support System (IDSS), evolvable, 2. Atos - Madrid (ES) CSA REA – 607858 3. Globaz SA - Azeméis (PT) scalable with future Foresight research activities conducted in EU 4. Inovamais - Matosinho (PT) to assist policy makers & 5. TU Berlin (DE) stakeholders in the Security domain. 6. Univ..Tel Aviv (IL)

Strategic planning for risks related to emerging technologies, social changes in society. FORCE activities will include: •Examining outputs from FP7 Security projects & other; •Mapping identified risks against 135

foresight methodolog. •Assessing foresight methods, Identification of appropriate methods with respect to mix of methods; •Identifying gaps between potential risks and methods; •Producing a Foresight model, scalable and sustainable; Status: •Developing an Intelligent Decision FINISHED Support System. www.force-europe.eu

7.4.14 Roadmaps Most FP7 projects dealing with exchange of good practices and training are generally turned towards civil protection operators, even when CBRN-E is concerned. Therefore, the relevant projects have been included in Section 7.2 of this report. The same applies to foresights and roadmaps, most relevant projects of which are found in Section 7.2. A specific CBRNE project is:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

CBRNEMAP FP7 – Secure June 2010 / Plan for the development of Coordinator: Societies October 2011 technologies & systems needed for an 1. Univ. Umea (SE) Road-mapping optimised demonstration programme. study of CBRNE Call 2009-1.1-2 EUR 1,376,185 Evaluation of events leading up to, Consortium: demonstrator during & after CBRNE terrorist 2. UCL - Brussels (BE) CSA REA – 94694 3. SELEX - Rome (IT) incident as well as potential roles of various sectors, including law 4. Robert Koch Inst. - Berlin (DE) enforcement, civil protection, rescue, 5. EADS - Ottobrunn (DE) health. Gaps between CBRNE science 6. Min. Défense - Paris (FR)

& technology were identified, 7. FOI - Stockholm (SE) 8. Lindholmen Science Park illustrating the importance of a system-of-systems in CBRNE counter- Aktiebolag - Goteborg (SE) terrorism. Demonstrator focuses on 9. CILAS - Orléans (FR) 10. FRS - Paris (FR) threatened societal functions as mass transport & gatherings, political 11. Státní ústav jaderné, chemické a infrastructure. Mapping relied on biologické ochrany, v. v. i - Milin (CZ) interviews. It is developing 12. Home Office - London (UK)

technological roadmap for 13. IAI - Rome (IT) 14. Haut Comité Français à la investments in research & technology development. Défense Civile - Paris (FR) Status: FINISHED https://www.cbrnemap.org

136

7.5 Border security 7.5.1 Aviation security 7.5.1.1 Air traffic management An on-going project funded by the Secure Societies programme is focusing on global Air Traffic Management regarding security threats:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

GAMMA FP7 - Secure September Development of solutions to Coordinator: Societies 2013 / emerging air traffic management 1. Selex - Florence (IT) Global ATM August 2017 vulnerabilities backed up by practical security Call 2012.2.2-2 proposals for implementation of Consortium: management EUR 2. Airbus ProSky - Toulouse (FR) IP these solutions, considering new 9,124,760 scenarios created by Single EU Sky 3. Boeing - Madrid (ES) 4. Airbus Cassidian - Paris (FR) REA– 312382 programme. Comprehensive assessment of full set of security 5. CiaoTech - Rome (IT) threats & vulnerabilities affecting 6. DLR - Köln (DE)

existing ATM system of systems, 7. ENAV - Rome (IT) 8. Isdefe - Madrid (ES) covering operational technological aspects. Providing basis to develop 9. Univ. Lancaster (UK) security management framework for 10. RNC Avionics - Lancaster (UK) 11. Romatsa - Bucarest (RO) day-to-day operation of air traffic management security. Defining 12. SEA - Milano (IT) requirements of security solution, 13. Thales - Paris (FR) including ability to manage incidents 14. Ústav Informatiky - Bratislava (SK) Status: & crises spreading. 15. 42 Solutions - Eindhoven (NL) ON-GOING http://www.gamma-project.eu/

7.5.1.2 Protection of civil aviation Security in the civil aviation sector is supported by a continuous research programme since the beginning of FP7, in particular:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

COPRA FP7 – Secure September COPRA aims to answer 2 questions: Coordinator: Societies 2011 / 1. FhG EMI – Freiburg (DE) Comprehensive February 2013 - How does the threat situation in civil European Call 2010-1 aviation evolve in the future, taking Consortium: approach to the EUR 986,382 into account both existing and new 2. European Business School - protection of civil CSA technologies and proliferation? Frankfurt am Main (DE) aviation ENTR - 261651 3. TNO- Delft (NL) - Which opportunities arise from the 4. Airbus SAS - Blagnac (FR) development and proliferation of new 5. Fraport AG Frankfurt - Frankfurt technologies and security procedures am Main (DE) to overcome the current complex and 6. EOS - Brussels (BE) expensive security situation and to 7. Smiths Heiman Gmbh - enable sustainable growth for the Wiesbaden (DE)

future? 8. Koninklijke Luchtvaart - Optimal balance between security, Amstelveen (NL) privacy, public acceptability, mobility 9. CEA - Paris (FR)

and costs (ideas on how to increase 10. Univ. Ljubliani - Ljubliana (SI) flexibility and resilience of the whole 11. Morpho - Paris (FR) aviation system against threats. Status: FINISHED http://www.copra-project.eu/

TASS FP7 – Secure April 2010 / TASS is a multi-segment, multi-level Coordinator: Societies April 2014 intelligence & surveillance system, 1. VERINT Systems Ltd - Tel Aviv (IL) Total airport aimed at creating entire airport security system Call 2009-2.2.2 EUR 8,986,696 security monitoring solution providing Consortium: 2. BAA Limited - Heathrow (UK) 137

IP REA - 241905 real-time accurate situational 3. Grupo Mecanica del Vuelo awareness to airport authorities. Sistemas SA - Valladolid (ES) Concept is based on integrating 4. Rapiscan Systems Ltd - Stoke-on- different types of selected real time Trent (UK) sensors & sub-systems for data 5. CRAT - Rome (IT) collection in variety of modes, 6. Demokritos - Athens (GR) including fixed & mobile, all suitable 7. GMVIS Skysoft SA - Lisboa (PT)

for operation under any 8.Mentum SA – Villacoublay (FR) environmental conditions. Provides 9. Vitrociset Spa - Rome (IT) airports’ C3 systems with actionable 10. Alcatel-Lucent Italia - Milano (IT) information that they seek, to allow 11. Univ. Queen Elizabeth - Dublin effective timely response. Provide (IE) real-time accurate situational 12. IMEGO AB - Goteborg (SE) awareness of all airport facilities, 13. Elbit Security Systems – Haifa (IL) surroundings (perimeters, terminal, 14. Athens Int. Airport SA (GR)

access-points, sensitive areas...), 15. Real Fusio France - Toulouse (FR) people (passengers, employees...), 16. Immersion SAS - Paris (FR) vehicles, cargo, airplanes. 17. Red-M Wireless - Horsham (UK) 18. BAE Systems- Farnborough (UK)

Status: 19. Ernst & Young - Tel Aviv (IL) FINISHED 20. Aeroportos De Portugal SA - Lisboa (PT) www.tass-project.eu 21. INOV Inesc - Porto (PT)

SUBITO FP7 – Secure January 2009 / Culminate in a demonstration at end Coordinator: Societies October 2011 user site, of semi-automated, human- 1. SELEX Sensors and Airborne Surveillance of intheloop data processing operating Systems Ltd – Southampton (UK) Unattended Call 2007-2.3-1 EUR 2,581,052 with existing circuit television Baggage and the Consortium: CP REA - 218004 technology , demonstrating: • Fast Identifcation detection of baggage abandoned, • 2.ELSAG Datamat Spa - Genova (IT) andTracking of the Fast identification of individual who 3. Onera - Paris (FR) Owner left baggage, • Fast determination of 4. L-1 Identity Solutions AG - Bochum (DE) their location or path followed. Objectives: • To understand threat 5. CEA - Paris (FR) scenarios involving unattended goods 6. Univ. Leeds (UK) from user perspective, identify alarm 7. Uni. Reading (UK)

& non-alarm conditions related to 8. VTT - Espoo (FI) 9. Fachhochschule Technikum Wien these & decision logic applied by human operators in taking proactive (AT) or reactive actions. • To determine 10. Fiera di Genova - Genova (IT) 11. Univ. Oxford - Oxford (UK) measures of performance, • To undertake Privacy Impact Assessment process. • To develop algorithms that provide capability to detect, segment,

track, classify moving objects within monitored scene. • To demonstrate integrated system operating against Status: realistic scenarios in typical end user FINISHED facility. http://www.subito-project.eu

Further on-going projects are pursuing these research efforts:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

ABC4EU FP7 – Secure January 2014 / ABC Gates are deployed in main Coordinator: Societies June 2017 European airports, most as pilot 1. Indra Sistemas – Madrid (ES) ABC Gates for EU projects to test their capability to Call 2012.3.4-6 EUR Consortium: improve the border crossing 12,015,246 processes in aspects such as speed, 2. Centre for Irish and European IP Security – Dublin (IE) REA - 312797 security, automation, false rejection reduction, etc. Harmonisation is 3. Cognitec Systems - Dresden (DE)

required in areas as e-passports 4. Dermalog Ident. Systems Gmbh - Hamburg (DE) management, biometrics, gate design, human interface, processes, PKD 5. ETICAS - Madrid (ES) certificate exchange, signalling and 6. ISDEFE - Madrid (ES) interoperability. Project identifying 7. LAUREA - Helsinki (FI) 138

requirements for an integrated, 8. Min. Admin. Int.erna - Lisboa (PT) interoperable and citizen’s rights 9. Politsei- ja Piirivalv.– Tallinn (EE) respectful ABC system at EU level, and 10. SAFE ID Solutions Gmbh - paying special attention to citizen München (DE) rights, privacy and other related 11. Min. Interior - Madrid (ES) ethical aspects. Harmonisation in the 12. VISIONBOX - Lisboa (PT) design and operational features of 13. Univ. Milano (IT)

ABC Gates. Two-steps validation: 14. Univ. Juan Carlos - Madrid (ES) Upgraded ABC systems in several MS (airports, harbours and land borders) will be integrated with RTP and EES Status: prototypes. ON-GOING https://abc4trust.eu/

XP-DITE FP7 – Secure September Develop, validate comprehensive, Coordinator: Societies 2012 / March passenger-centred approach to 1. TNO – Delft (NL) Accelerated 2017 design, allowing airports, checkpoint checkpoint design Call 2011.2.2-1 designers, regulators to incorporate Consortium: integration test EUR 9,992,635 2. FhG ICT - Karlsruhe (DE) Demo IP wide range of requirements, to and evaluation evaluate checkpoint performance 3. FOI - Stockholm (SE) ENTR - 285311 4. Isdefe - Madrid (ES) against security performance, cost, throughput, passenger satisfaction, 5. Schiphol NL AAS - Schiphol (NL) ethical factors. Design process & 6. Morpho - Paris (FR) supporting software based on 7. Smiths Heimann SMI - Wiesbaden

conceptual model, overall (DE) 8. Eurofast IDP - Paris (FR) requirements will be developed. This will help ensure robust, controllable 9. Iconal Technol. - Cambridge (UK) aviation checkpoint security 10. Cascade Technol. - Stirling (UK) 11. Alfa Imaging - Madrid (ES) performance, whilst providing freedom for airport operators to 12 Albert-Ludwigs-Univ. Freiburg design checkpoints with innovative (DE) technologies, procedures. security 13. Manchester Airport Group -

checkpoints at airports. Manchester (UK) Status: http://www.xp-dite.eu/ ON-GOING

EUROSKY FP7 – Secure May 2013 / EUROSKY will raise the bar in air cargo Coordinator: Societies May 2017 security to safeguard internat. supply 1. BMT Group Ltd – London (UK) Single European chains & security of citizens & air Secure Air-Cargo Call 2012.2.2-3 EUR travellers across EU MS by: Consortium: Space 11,708,124 comprehensive list of threats to 2. Swissport Int. AG - Oppfikon (CH) IP Demo 3. Athens Int. Airport - Athens (GR) ENTR - 312649 aviation system through all-hazard approach; contributing to unified EU 4. Dep. Transport - London (UK) aviation security approach; 5. Conzorzio IBI - Bologna (IT) developing strategic set of effective 6. SGPS - Sao Juliao do Tojal (PT)

innovative measures, centred on 7. Geopost Ltd - Smethwick (UK) 8. Fast Freight Marconi SPA - next-generation detection systems. It wil support common approach & Bologna (IT) associated infrastructure for internat. 9. Heavyweight Air Express Ltd - Derby (UK) co-operation, for enforcing air- security regulations, risk-based 10. Rapiscan Systems - Radlett (UK) approaches in EU uniform manner; 11. Multix SA - Paris (FR) specify detection technology 12. FOI - Stockholm (SE)

requirements & future research areas; 13. Inlecom Systems Ltd - Burguess Hill (UK) monitor effectiveness of regulations, standards, enforcement controls to 14. Conceptivity Sarl - Geneve (CH) fuel continuous improvement; 15. Mass Spec Anal. - Bristol (UK) 16. Enide Solutions SL - Sant Andreu Provide innovative aviation security solutions to implement EU policy de la Barca (ES) addressing requirements. 17. CEA - Paris (FR) 18. MJC2 Ltd - Crowthorne (UK) Status: 19. EOS - Brussels (BE) ON-GOING 20. IDOM - Madrid (ES) 21. CLMS Ltd - London (UK)

139

7.5.2 Maritime security With the current Refugee crisis, maritime surveillance has become a top priority. The issue had been identified as a research priority in the early stage of FP7 as illustrated by the following finished projects dealing with maritime surveillance related to illegal immigration and suspicious activities:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

WIMAAS FP7 – Secure January 2009 / Airborne building block of maritime Coordinator: Societies November surveillance, more autonomous & 1. Thales - Paris (FR) Surveillance in 2011 improved efficiency through Wide Matime Call 2007-3.3-2 introduction of air vehicles with Consortium: areas, (air EUR 2,737,169 2. Selex - Rome (IT) CP reduced or zero onboard crew to vehicules) control illegal immigration. Air assets 3. Dassault - Paris (FR) ENTR – 217931 4. Sener Inge. Sistemas - Getxo (IT) for wide area maritime surveillance providing situation awareness over 5. FOI - Stockholm (SE) extended areas (endurance, speed, 6. FhG IOSB - Karlsruhe (DE) long distance detection), re-direction 7. JRC - Brussels (BE)

to areas of interest (threat), flexible 8. Air Force Inst. Technol. - Warszawa (PL) reaction (inspection). Simulation based on operational scenarios, 9. Eurosense Belfotop NV - Tielt (NL) innovative concepts, technologies 10. Satcom1 - Greve (DK) 11. SETCCE - Ljubjana (SI) held by simulation, In flight experiment (remote control, crew 12. Univ. TA Malta (MT) Status: concept). 13. Aerovision Vehiculos - San FINISHED Sebastian (ES) www.wimaas.eu

AMASS FP7 – Secure March 2008 / Development of innovative fully Coordinator: Societies August 2011 automated & autonomous system to 1. Carl Zeiss Opptonics Gmbh - Autonomous keep a watchful eye on EU's coastlines Stuttgart (DE) maritime Call 2007-3.3-2 EUR 3,450,460 for suspicious activity. Design of surveillance system reliable, round-the-clock maritime Consortium: CP REA – 218290 2. Crabbe Consult. - Newcastle (UK) monitoring solution, including a flotation platform, optronics, 3. HSF spol. s r.o. - Sokolov (CZ) hydrophones, thermal imaging 4. Inst. Canario de Ciencias Marinas - camera, communications, power Las Palmas (ES)

management & image exploitation, as 5. Univ. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria - Las Palmas (ES) well as command & control. Upon detection of suspicious vessel, images 6. FhG Zv - München (DE) relayed directly to a control centre on 7. IQ Wireless Gmbh - Berlin (DE) 8. CTM - Gdansk (PL) shore, enabling coastguards & other services to take swift & appropriate 9. Fugro Oceanor AS - Tronheim (NO) Status: action. 10. Armed Forces MALTA, Luqa (MT) FINISHED www.amass-project.eu

SECTRONIC FP7 – Secure February 2008 Observation, protection of critical Coordinator: Societies / January 2012 maritime infrastructures: Passenger & 1. Univers. Queen Mary - London Security system for goods transport, Energy supply, Port (UK) maritime Call 2007-2.3-4 EUR 4,496,106 infrastructures. It combined various infrastructure, Consortium: CP REA – 218245 observation systems (radar, sonar, ports and coastal satellites) to develop an early warning 2. Uniresearch BV - Delft (NL) zones system EWS, installed on ship’s bridge 3. Det Norske Veritas - Hovik (NO) 4. Norwegian Defence Research or in port control rooms. EWS tracks, characterises objects of significance in Establishment - Kjeller (NO) a 360 degree radius around. System 5. Univ. Technol. Chalmers - also facilitates responses to threats.It Goeteborg (SE)

analysed performance gaps in existing 6. Advanced Computer Systems Spa - Rome (IT) monitoring facilities, based on userdefined scenarios, & 7. Nato Undersea Research Centre - recommended new sensors & La Spezia (IT) algorithms. 8. Carnival Corp. - London (UK) 9. BW Offshore AS - Oslo (NO) Status: 10. BW Gas ASA - Oslo (NO) FINISHED 11. Havenbedrijf Rotterdam (NL) http://www.sectronic.eu/ 12. Autorità Portuale della Spezia (IT)

140

OPERAMAR FP7 – Secure March 2008 / Assessment of challenges of boosting Coordinator: Societies May 2009 seamless exchange of information, 1. Thales - Paris (FR) An interoperable ensuring sufficient level of approach to Call 2007-7.0-2 EUR 669,132 interoperability between current Consortium: European Union CP 2. SELEX - Rome (IT) REA – 218045 maritime security management maritime security systems amongst EU MS. It undertook 3. Indra Sistemas - Madrid (ES) management 40 field visits & stakeholder surveys, 4. Quintec Associates Ltd - Weybridge (UK) used to ascertain current state of information gathering, integration, 5. Alliance of Maritime Regional dispatch between stakeholders in Interests in Europe - Brussels (BE) maritime surveillance field. It 6. JRC - Brussels (BE)

concluded that getting information 7. Ist. Affari Intern. - Rome (IT) 8. EDISOFT - Caparica (PT sharing to become routine while also developing a common Concept of 9. STM Savunma Teknolojileri Status: Operations ( “ConOps”) are more of Muhendislik ve Ticaret - Ankara (TR) FINISHED an impediment in this domain than actual technological obstacles.

CONTAIN FP7 – Secure October 2011 / Demonstrating EU Shipping Coordinator: Societies March 2015 Containers Surveillance system which 1. FOI – Stockholm (SE) Container Security will encompass regulatory, policy & Advanced Call 2010-1 EUR standardisation recommendations, Consortium: Information 10,044,904 2.BMT Group - Teddington (UK) Demo new business models & advanced Technology container security management 3. Conceptivity - Meyrin (CH) ENTR - 261679 4. Inlecom Systems – London (UK) capabilities. Demonstrate Secure Multimodal Corridor Design, Chain 5. Consorzio IB - Bologna (IT) Monitoring & Control across intern. & 6. JRC - Ispra (IT) EU corridors. Cornerstones include: 7. Selex- Rome (IT)

•Upgraded Container Monitoring 8. Thales - Addlestone (UK) 9. Telespazio TPZ - Rome (IT) Solutions (permanent & reliable localisation & information on the 10. Marlo - Marlo (NO) integrity & content of containers); 11. Novacom - Toulouse (FR) 12. VTT - Espoo (FI) •Situational Awareness Support Platform that facilitate development 13. MJC2 - Crowthorne (UK) of innovative, configurable, highly 14. eBOS Technol. - Nicosie (CY) automated distributed information 15. EOS - Brussels (BE)

management applications 16. Valencia Port Authority - Valencia (ES) guaranteeing & safeguarding information chain on container 17. Italian customs and excise movements at sea & land; •CONTAIN department - Rome (IT) 18. Sogemar SpA - Milano (IT) Decision Support Services that exploit extended container monitoring & tracking information to optimise container transport related processes both in terms of security performance, efficiency, quality of container transport services. Status: FINISHED http://www.containproject.com/

I2C FP7 – Secure January 2010 / I2C proposes a new generation of Coordinator: Societies January 2014 innovative sea border surveillance 1. DCNS SA – Toulon (FR) Integrated system system to track all vessel movements for interoperable Call 2009-3.2-2 EUR 9,869,621 to early identify, report on threats Consortium: sensors & 2. Rockvell Collins – Blagnac (FR) IP REA - 232440 associated to detected suspicious information events. Outcomes: » Innovative 3. Furuno Finland Oy - Espoo (FI) sources for capacities to collect/pre-process/ 4. SES Astra TechCom- Betzdorf (LU) common abnormal fuse/exploit collected data & 5. Kongsberg Norcontrol IT - Horten vessel behaviour & information to track all vessel types, (NO) collaborative to detect suspicious events, early 6. Kongsberg Spacetec - Troms (NO) identification of identification of associated threats; » 7. ClearPriority SA - Waterloo (BE) threats Assessments of added value of 8. ZLT Zeppelin Luftschifftechnik GmbH - Friedrichshafen (DE) various sensor types, integrated data processing according to various 9. Meteosim Sl - Barcelona (ES) threats, detection conditions; » 10. Ajecco Oy - Espoo (FI) Demonstration showing that 11. Airshipvision international SA -

integrated system fulfils operational Paris (FR) 12. Anne Littaye - Bidart (FR) needs with prototypes installed in a few operational centres. 13. Intuilab - Labege (FR) 14. Sofresud - La Seyne sur Mer (FR) 15. Eric Van Hooydonk Advocaten - 141

Antwerp (BE) 16. Armines – Evry (FR) 17. Univ. Paul sabatie - Toulouse (FR) 18. Onera - Paris (FR) 19. JRC - Brussels (BE) Status: http://www.i2c.eu 20. Deutsche Zeppelin-Reederei DZR FINISHED - Friedrichshafen (DE)

SUPPORT FP7 – Secure July 2010 / July SUPPORT will address ‘total’ port Coordinator: Societies 2014 security upgrade solutions 1. BMT GROUP Ltd – London (UK) Security Upgrade encompassing legal, organisational, for Ports Call 2009-3.2-1 EUR 9,920,607 technology, human factors Consortium: 2. Sonarsim Ltd - Limerick (IE) CP ENTR - 242112 perspectives. These solutions should provide substantial improvements in 3. Gemeente Amsterdam (NL) performance, reliability, speed, cost 4. Piraeus Port (GR) of EU port security. It will deliver : (1) 5. Lisboa Port (PT)

validated’ generic port security 6. STSLC - Den Haag (NL) 7. Univ. Bristol (UK) management models (capturing reusable state-of-art, best practices); 8. Inlecom Syst - Rotherfield (UK) (2) training & open standards based 9. Univ. Innsbruck (AT) 10. Europhar - Valencia (ES) tools to aid security upgrade in EU ports. 11. Stena Line Scandinavia - Göteborg (SE) 12. Securitas AB - Stockholm (SE) 13. FOI - Stockholm (SE) 14. INRIA- Paris (FR)

15. Maritime Administration of Latvia - Riga (LV) 16. Cargotec Oyj - Helsinki (FI) 17. eBOS Technologies Ltd -

Strovolos(CY) 18. Marlo AS - Heer (NO) 19. Marac SA - Perama (GR) 20. Valtion Teknillinen - Espoo (FI) Status: 21. Nautical Enterprise - Cork (IE) FINISHED 22. Norsk Marinteknisk - Trondheim http://www.supportproject.info/ (NO)

TRITON FP7 – Secure December In scenario of civilian, commercial Coordinator: Societies 2013 / maritime control: surveillance & 1. Isti. Sup. Mario Boella – Genoa (IT) Trusted vessel November safety systems may be under attack information from Call 2012-1 2015 aiming to bypass, mystify control Consortium: trusted on-board 2. 7I Group AB - Stockholm (SE) CP system to obtain economic gain. instrumentation EUR 1,533,099 systems such as AIS (Automatic 3. Granturco partners - Brussels (BE) 4. Kongsberg Norcontrol IT - Horten ENTR - 312687 Identif. System), LRIT (Long Range Identif. Tracking), VMS (Vessel (NO) Monitoring System), whose reported 5. ALPHA Consult - Milano (IT) data (vessel ID, accurate position & 6. Acorde Technologies SA -

time, course over ground, speed over Santander (ES) ground, heading, rate of turn...) are not verified nor validated. Proof of concept of proposed technological solutions will be given in a prototype & appropriate test suites. It focuses on: 1. GPS/Galileo receiver robust to intentional jamming, spoofing attacks;

2. Enhancing robustness of communication link from vessel to vessels & shore base stations. Status: FINISHED http://tritonproject.eu/

SEABILLA FP7 – Secure June 2010 / SeaBILLA proposal aims to: Coordinator: Societies February 2014 1. SELEX – Florence (IT) Sea border • define architecture for cost- surveillance Call 2009-3.2-2 EUR 9,841,604 effective EUSea Border Surveillance Consortium: systems, integrating space, land, sea, 2. Alenia Aeronautica - Venegono IP REA - 241598 air assets, including legacy systems; Superiore (IT) 3. CNIT - Parma (IT) • apply advanced technological 4. BAE Systems - Farnborough (UK) solutions to increase performances of 5. Correl. Systems - Or Yehuda (IL) 6. EADS Cassidian - Paris (FR) 142

surveillance functions; 7. Edisoft - Paco de Arcos (PT) 8. Eurocopter España - Albacete (ES) • develop & demonstrate significant 9. FOI - Stockholm (SE) improvements in detection, tracking, 10. Holland Insti. Traffic Technol. BV identification, automated behaviour - Apeldoorn (NL) analysis of all vessels, including hard 11. Indra Sistemas - Madrid (ES) to detect vessels, in open waters as 12. JRC - Brussels (BE)

well as close to coast. 13. Mondeca SA - Paris (FR) 14. Sagem - Paris (FR) 15. Space Appl.Serv. Zaventem (BE) 16.Thales Alenia Space - Rome (IT) 17. Thales Defence - Stuttgart (DE)

18. TNO - Delft (NL) 19. Telespazio - Rome (IT) 20. Thales Systèmes - Paris (FR)

21. TTI Norte - Santander (ES) 22. Univ. College London (UK) 23. Univ. UMU de Murcia (ES) Status: http://www.seabilla.eu 24. Univ. Portsmouth Higher FINISHED Education Corporation (UK)

PERSEUS FP7 – Secure January 2011 / Build, demonstrate an EU maritime Coordinator: Societies December surveillance system integrating 1. Indra Sistemas – Madrid (ES) Protection of 2014 existing national, communitarian European seas & Call 2010.3.1-1 installations enhancing them with Consortium: borders through EUR 2. EADS Cassidian - Paris (FR) CP innovative technologies.PERSEUS will the intellilgent use 27,847,579 deliver : » A system of systems 3. DCNS - Paris (FR) of surveillance representative of what will be 4. Engin. Ingegneria Informatica Spa ENTR - 261748 - Rome (IT) available from 2015 onwards; » A target vision for an integrated EU 5. Isdefe - Madrid (ES) maritime border surveillance system; 6. EADS-Casa - Madrid (ES) 7. Demokritos - Athens (GR) » A set of recommendations, best 8. Guardia Civil - Madrid (ES) practices to instantiate this target 9. PRIO - Oslo (NO)

vision in different contexts, to extend 10. SAAB - Linkoping (SE) it to more countries, based on user & 11. SES-ASTRA - Betzdorf (LU) provider feedbacks acquired through 12. AJECO Oy - Espoo (FI) 2 real-life exercises operating in 13. INTUILAB - Labege (FR) Western & Eastern Mediterranean 14. METEOSIM - Barcelona (ES) regions. 15. LUXSPACE - Betzdorf (LU) 16.SOFRESUD- la Seyne sur mer (FR) 17. INOV INESC - Lisboa (PT)

18. SKYTEK - Dublin (IE) 19. LAUREA - Vantaa (FI) 20. DFRC - Zug (CH) 21. BOEING EUROPE - Madrid (ES)

22. ECORYS - Rotterdam (NL) 23. Cork Institute CIT - Cork (IE) 24. Min. Interieur - Paris (FR) 25. Força Aérea Portuguesa -

Amadora (PT) 26. SATWAYS - Halandri (GR) 27. Min. Nat. Defence HMOD - Athens (GR)

28. NATO Undersea Research Centre

- La Spezia (IT) Status: 29. Min. Citizens Protection - Athens FINISHED http://www.perseus-fp7.eu/ (GR) 30. KEMEA - Athens (GR)

PROMERC FP7 – Secure March 2014 / ProMerc aims to reduce vulnerability Coordinator: Societies February 2016 of EU merchant fleets, maritime 1. Flir Systems Ltd - Kings Hill (UK) Protection supply lines to criminal abduction, measures for Call 2013.2.4-2 EUR 2,224,958 extortion; It reduces risk to mariners, Consortium: merchant ships CP shipping, environment, costs. 2.NATO - Brussels (BE) REA - 607685 3. Univ. World Maritime - Malmoe Provision of: • Independent review, recommendations about non-lethal (SE) technologies for pirate avoidance & 4. Panepistimio Aigajou - Mytilini opposing boarding of vessels by (GR)

pirates; • automated voyage planning 5. Security Assoc. For Maritime support tool to aid shore based Industry Ltd - London (UK) 143

authorities; • automated decision 6. Uniresearch BV - Delft (NL) support tool to provide seafarers with 7. TNO - Delft (NL) real time threat assessment, 8. Engineering Informatica Spa - evaluation of possible courses of Rome (IT) action & recommended course of 9. Oldendorff Carriers Gmbh - action; • Recommendations on Lubeck (DE) further development of counter Status: piracy measures; FINISHED

AEROCEPTOR FP7 – Secure January 2013 / Interception of non-cooperative Coordinator: Societies December vehicles by law enforcement agencies 1. Inst. INTA – Madrid (ES) UAV based means 2015 is dangerous task. Accident may occur for land & sea non- Call 2011.1.4-2 that threatens lives of those who Consortium: cooperative EUR 3,468,860 2. ISDEFE - Madrid (ES) CP intercept. Innocent 3rd parties are vehicles stop involved in accidents occurring in 3. Aerospace and Defence SAU GMV ENTR - 285144 - Madrid (ES) vehicular pursuits. It will develop a concept that will increase 4. ONERA - Paris (FR) effectiveness, safety of procedures, 5. PIAP - Warszawa (PL) enhancing capability range by 6. UNIBO - Bologna (IT)

developing technologies. LEAs to 7. AIT - Wien (AT) 8. IAI - Tel Aviv (IL) monitor, track, stop land & maritime non cooperative vehicles owing to 9. Turk Otomobil Fabrikasi Anonim automated aerial system. Remote Sirketi TOFAS - İstanbul (TU) 10. Sigmund Freud Privatuniversitat Piloted Aerial System is solution able to combine human capability for Wien GMBH (AT) decision making with high automated 11. Min. Interior - Madrid (ES) operation capability owing to 12. ROTEM Ltd - Mishor Rotem

continuous monitoring of operation & Neguev (IL) 13. LACROIX - Nice (FR) fulfilling state of art privacy respect legal requirement. 14. Min. Public Security MOPS/INP - Status: Tel Aviv (IL) FINISHED http://www.aeroceptor.eu/ 15. Zabala Innovation Consulting, SA - Madrid (ES)

Complementing the above, a series of projects are still on-going, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

EU CISE 2020 FP7 – Secure June 2014 / EU CISE 2020 is an important step of Coordinator: Societies June 2017 the EU roadmap for CISE (Common 1. Agenzia Spaziale Italiana – Rome EU test bed for Information Sharing Environment, EU (IT) maritime common Call 2013-1 CP EUR 9,853,031 maritime institutions & Surveillance). information Consortium: ENTR - 608385 Project based on DG MARE, sharing BluemassMed, MARSUNO, PERSEUS, 2. Agencia Estatal de Admin. environment in the SEABILLA. EU CISE 2020 will manage Tributaria - Madrid (ES) 2020 perspective the elaboration of the action plan for 3. Agenzia per la Promozione della Ricerca Europea - Rome (IT) the operational validation of new elements of R&D needed to develop 4. Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui CISE (concepts of architecture, Cambiamenti Climatici - Lecce (IT) concepts of operation, standards of 5. Danmarks Meteorologiske

data and services, new services, new Instituts - Copenhagen (DK) 6. SATCEN - Torrejón de Ardoz (ES) processes, ...), the development of an open European test bed for 7. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e incremental advancement of CISE in Vulcanologia - Roma (IT) 8. Italian Ministry of Infrastructure the medium-long term, the independent Verification & Validation Transports - Rome (IT) of the new elements of R&D. 9. Kystverket - Oslo (NO) 10. Laurea-ammatti korkeak oulu oy - Vantaa (FI) 11. Liikennevirasto - Helsinki (NO)

12. Liikenteen turvallisuusvirasto- Helsinki (NO) 13. Isdefe - Madrid (ES) 14. Min. Fomento - Madrid (ES) 15. Min. Interior - Madrid (ES) 16. MIin. Difesa - Rome (IT) 17. Min. dell'ambiente e della tutela 144

del territorio e del mare - Rome (IT) 18. Min. Econ. e Finanze - Rome (IT) 19. MIin. Interior - Oslo (NO) 20. Min. Transport, Info. Technol. Commun. - Sofia (BG) 21. Sintef - Tronheim (NO) 22. SE Coast Guard - Göteborg (SE) Status: 23. Swedish Maritime Administration ON-GOING - Norrköping (SE) 24. Univ. Cyprus - Nicosia (CY)

CLOSEYE FP7 – Secure April 2013 / » To validate new security solutions Coordinator: Societies October 2016 taking into account any aspect of 1. Guardia Civil GUCI – Madrid (ES) Collaborative border security that could threaten evaluation of Call 2012.3.1-2 EUR 9,218,256 human rights or break international Consortium: border surveillance 2. Guardia Nacional Republicana - CSA ENTR - 313184 law; » To enable public authorities in technologies in charge of border surveillance to Lisbon (PT) maritime innovate faster in the provision of 3. ISDEFE - Madrid (ES) environment by their institutional services, making 4. Agenzia Spaziale Italiana - Rome pre-operational them more efficient & effective; » To (IT) validation of increase research capacity, innovation 5. European Union Satellite Center - innovative performance of EU companies & Torrejón de Ardoz ES (EU) solutions research institutions, creating new 6. Marina Militare Italiana - Venice (IT) opportunities to take international leadership in new markets; » To conduct pre-operational validation of common application of surveillance

tools at EU level via competitive testing & assessment of several potential solutions; » To achieve Status: competitive testing framework. ON-GOING http://www.closeye.eu/

7.5.3 Land border security Two projects dealing with land border surveillance systems have been developed in the first part of FP7, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

TALOS FP7 – Secure June 2008 / TALOS is an innovative Surveillance Coordinator: Societies August 2012 System, rapidly deployable, mobile, 1. Przemysłowy Instytut Automatyki i Transportable unmanned ground, air vehicles, which Pomiarów – Warszawa (PL) autonomous patrol Call 2007-3.2-2 EUR will address new challenges: » Is for land border 12,898,332 capable of Detecting, Locating, Consortium: surveillance system IP 2. STM Savunma Teknolojileri REA - 218081 Tracking and Tracing individuals, vehicles, hazardous substance. Muhendislik ve Ticaret - Ankara (TR) 3. ASELSAN Elektronik Sanayi ve » Combines remote & autonomous Ticaret - Ankara (TR) platforms featuring multi sensor data 4. European Business Innovation & fusion (B, C), active imaging, data Research Center - Bucarest (RO) Fusion, command Control & 5. HAI Hellenic Aerospace Industry

Communication. Main objectives: » To SA - Athens (GR) design Surveillance System 6. Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd - (Unmanned Ground); » To run Tel Aviv (IL) research works; » To implement core 7. ITTI Sp - Poznan (PL) components of TALOS system as 8. Onera - Paris (FR) proof-of-concept prototype; » To run 9. Defendec Ou - Tallinn (EE) TALOS demonstrator; » To promote 10. Sonaca - Gosselies (BE) usage of TALOS system; » To show 11. Telekom. Polska - Warszawa (PL)

cost-effectiveness. 12. TTI Norte Sl - Santander (ES) Status: 13. VTT - Espoo (FI) www.talos-border.eu FINISHED 14. Politechnika Warszawska (PL)

OPARUS FP7 – Secure October 2010 / OPARUS is to elaborate open Coordinator: Societies May 2012 architecture for operation of 1. SAGEM – Paris (FR) Open architecture 145

for UAV-based Call 2009.3.4.1 EUR 1,188,312 unmanned air-to-ground wide area Consortium: surveillance system land, sea border surveillance 2. AFIT Inst. Tech. Wojsk Lotniczych - CSA REA - 242491 platforms in EU. It focuses on cost- Warszawa (PL) efficient solutions enabling maximum 3. BAE Systems - Farnborough (UK) efficiency of unmanned aircraft 4. Dassault Aviation - Paris (FR) systems operations for EU border 5. DLR - Berlin (DE) surveillance. OPARUS aimed to define 6. EADS-CASA - Madrid (ES an open architecture for operating 7. Israel Aerospace Indu. – Lod (IL)

unmanned aerial systems (UAS) for 8. INTA - Madrid (ES) wide-area land, coastal, sea border 9. ISDEFE - Madrid (ES) surveillance in EU. This took into 10. ONERA - Paris (FR) account emerging legislation for safe 11. Selex Galileo - Rome (IT) deployment of UAS platforms across 12. Thales - Paris (FR) EU’s controlled civil airspace – 13. Tony Henley Consulting Limited - regulatory & technical concept known London (UK) as “air insertion”. Three workshops to Status: define operational scenarios with FINISHED end-users & receive their feedback on project results.

On-going projects are pursuing research efforts about border crossing and illegal entry, as well as situation awareness:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

EWISA FP7 – Secure September Following Frontex, intelligence Coordinator: Societies 2014 / June picture of possible threats against MS 1.Politia de Frontiera – Bucarest (RO) Early warning for 2018 is obtained, picture created outside increased Call 2013.3.2-1 MS and Schengen area, through Consortium: situational EUR 2. Kemea - Αthens (GR) CP combination of radar pictures with awareness 10,899,765 video pictures, intelligence collected 3. Min. Interior - Budapest (HU) 4. Min. Interior - Madrid (ES) ENTR - 608174 from sensor stations. Threats: a) illegal migration, b) smuggling, c) 5. Min. Interior - Helsinki (FI) trafficking in drugs and forbidden materials, d) trafficking in weapons. It

will provide assessment of stand- alone technology, assessment of integration into current surveillance infrastructure of new capabilities provided by industry. Objective is to increase intelligence in video surveillance: • camera-specific processes; • modular implementation

of successive analysis layers, applied for optimal situational awareness: chaining, motion, figure, face; • In addition to camera's processing Status: capabilities, network consists of: ON-GOING sensors, network analysis and system for control room.

SUNNY FP7 – Secure January 2014 / Contribute to EUROSUR by defining Coordinator: Societies June 2017 new tool for collecting real-time 1. BMT GROUP Ltd – London (UK) Smart Unmanned information in operational scenarios: aerial vehicle Call 2012-1 EUR 9,569,977 •A two-tier intelligent heterogeneous Consortium: sensor network for IP Demo 2. INESC Inov - Porto (PT) ENTR - 313243 UAV sensor network in order to detection of provide both large field & focused 3. Demokritos - Athens (GR) border crossing surveillance capabilities, where first- 4. CNIT - Parma (IT) and illegal entry tier sensors, carried by medium 5. Tech. Univ. Crete - Chania (GR) 6. Queen Mary Univ. London (UK) altitude, long-endurance autonomous UAVs, are used to patrol large border 7. Technalia - San sebastian (ES) areas. Novel algorithms will analyse 8. Xenics NV - Leuven (BE) data collected by sensors for robust, 9. Min. Defensa Nac. - Lisboa (PT)

accurate target identification & event 10. Metasensing BV - Noordwijk (NL) 11. KEMEA - Athens (GR) detection; •Novel sensors, on-board processing generation, integrated on 12. SAAB - Göteborg (SE) 13. Altus Lsa - Chania (GR) 146

UAV system, focused on low weight, 14. Specim Spectral Imaging Oy - low cost, high resol. Sunny will Oulu (FI) develop sensors that generate RGB 15. TTI Norte - Santander (ES) image, Near Infrared & hyperspectral 16. Alenia Aermacchi - Pomigliano image, use radar information to d'Arco (IT) detect, discriminate & track objects, 17. Marlo AS - Heer (NO) •exploitation, adaptation of emerging 18. Vitrociset - Rome (IT)

standard wireless technologies & Status: architectures as IEEE, DVB-T2, Mobile ON-GOING WiMAX, LTE.

MOBILEPASS FP7 – Secure May 2014 / It will focus on research, development Coordinator: Societies October 2016 towards advanced mobile equipment 1. AIT – Seibersdorf (AT) A secure, modular at land border crossing points. Allow and distributed Call 2013.3.2-3 EUR 3,141,322 border control authorities to check Consortium: mobile border 2. FhG IOSB - Karlsruhe (DE) CP REA - 608016 EU, visa-holding & frequent third control solution for country travellers in comfortable, fast, 3. UNU - Maastricht (NL) European land secure way. It incorporates new 4. Regula Baltija - Daugavpils (LV) border crossing technologies needed in mobile 5. Videmo Intelligente Videoanalyse points scenarios, embeds them in actual - Karlsruhe (DE) 6. Univ. Carlos III Madrid (ES) border crossing workflow to speed up control procedures. The entire 7. ITTI - Poznan (PL) innovation process, from components 8. Giesecke & Devrient Group G&D - development to integration will Munich (DE)

continuously be evaluated by border 9. Indra - Madrid (ES) 10. Romanian Border Police - Status: guard authorities. Bucarest (RO) ON-GOING http://mobilepass-project.eu/ 11. Spanish National Police Corps - Madrid (ES)

7.5.4 Identification technologies Several projects are focusing on identification aspects, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

FIDELITY FP7 – Secure February 2012 The project aimed to demonstrate Coordinator: Societies / February privacy enhanced solutions to 1. Morpho – Paris (FR) Fast and 2016 authentication of documents, Trustworthy Call 2011.3.4-1 preventing impersonation and fraud; Consortium: Identity Delivery EUR 2. FhG IGD - Darmstadt (DE) CP improve ePassport security and and Check with 12,013,194 usability (authentification processes, 3. Gjøvik Univ. College - Gjøvik (NO) ePassports 4. BKA - Wiesbaden (DE) REA - 284862 ID check speed, accuracy of Leveraging biometrics, management of 5. Min.Intérieur - Paris (FR) Traveller Privacy certificates, access to remote data 6. Hochschule Darmstadt (DE) 7. Univ. Bologna - Bologna (IT) bases, convenience of biometric sensors and inspection devices). The 8. Thales - Paris (FR) solutions will strengthen trust and 9. Selex ES - Rome (IT) confidence of stakeholders and 10. Min.Interno - Rome (IT)

citizens in ePassports, provide more 11. Katholieke Univ. - Leuven (BE) 12. Bundesdruckerei - Berlin (DE) reliable ID checks, hence hinder criminal movements, and ease 13. FOI - Stockholm (SE) implementation of E/E records 14. Biometrika - Cattolica (IT) 15. KXEN - Rome (IT) providing better analysis of migration flows. Solutions will be designed for 16. Inst. Baltic Studies - Tartu (EE) backwards compatibility to be 17.Linköping Univ. - Linköping (SE) deployed progressively in the existing 18. ARTTIC - Paris (FR) Status: infrastructure. 19. Min. Sec. Justice - Den Haag (NL) FINISHED http://www.fidelity-project.eu/

VIRTUOSO FP7 – Secure May 2010 / Aims to provide integrated open Coordinator: Societies June 2013 source information exploitation 1. CEA – Paris (FR) Versatile toolbox to EU authorities working in Information Toolkit Call 2009-3.2-3 EUR 7,999,182 border security. This toolbox will Consortium: for end-users 2. EADS Cassidian - Paris (FR) CP REA - 242352 extend the “security distance” of EU’s oriented open borders by allowing EU agencies & MS 3. ATOS - Madrid (ES) sources to anticipate, identify, respond to 4. Mondeca SA - Paris (FR) 5. Newstin a.s - Praha (CZ) 147

exploitation strategic risks & threats. Aims to: » 6. Sail Technology AG - Wien (AT) Improve situational awareness of 7. Univ. Aalborg (DK) those organisations, individuals 8. Thales - Paris (FR) charged with securing EU’s borders; » 9. Bertin Technologies - Paris (FR) Help anticipate risks as terrorism, 10. Stichting Katholieke Univ. illegal migration, trafficking of goods, Brabant - Tilburg (NL) people using OSINF; » Create kernel 11. TNO - Delft (NL)

of pan-EU technological platform for 12. Isdefe - Madrid (ES) collection, analysis, dissemination of 13. Hawk Assoc. - London (UK) open source information; » Provide 14. ETHZ - Zurich (CH) tools for crisis management response 15. CEIS - Paris (FR) if anticipation fails or in event of 16. Univ. Modena (IT) rupture scenar. OSINF platform will 17. Columba Global Systems Ltd - aggregate, in realtime, content from Swords (IE) internet, leading subscription

providers, broadcast media. Deliverables include demonstrator of VIRTUOSO toolkit. Core platform will be freely available as open source Status: software. FINISHED http://www.virtuoso.eu/

EFFISEC FP7 – Secure May 2009 / Efficient Integrated Security Coordinator: Societies January 2014 Checkpoints; Eu fund: 1. Morpho – Paris (FR) Efficient Integrated Security Call 2007-3.2-3 EUR Illegal immigration & illicit material Consortium: Checkpoints 10,034,837 detection is a growing concern at EU 2. JRC - Brussels (BE) CP borders; in that respect border 3. CNRS - Paris (FR) REA - 217991 security checkpoints must be efficient 4. Reading Univ - Reading (UK) against any kind of threat: airport 5. Sagem - Paris (FR) checkpoints controls.EFFISEC is to 6. Thales - Paris (FR) deliver to border authorities more 7. Selex Galileo Avionica - Firenze (IT) efficient technological equipment that 8. Elsag Datamat - Genova (IT)

provides higher security level of 9. Smiths Heimann - Wiesbaden (DE) identity, luggage control of 10. Soc. Eur. de Analisis Diferencial pedestrians, passengers inside de Movilidad - Madrid (ES) vehicles, at land & maritime 11. VTT - Espoo (FI) checkpoints. It will maintain the flow 12. FOI - Stockholm (SE) of people crossing borders & will 13. Min. Interior - Bucarest (RO) improve work conditions of border 14. Secalliance SI - Albi (FR) inspectors, with more powerful 15. Microwave Characterization

capabilities, less repetitive tasks, Center MIC - Villeneuve d'Ascq (FR) Status: more ergonomic equipment. 16. Porto de Lisboa (PT) FINISHED www.effisec.eu

On-going projects in this area are listed below:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

INGRESS FP7 – Secure November It is to research, develop, validate Coordinator: Societies 2013 / October innovative technology to take 1. Morpho – Paris (FR) Innovative 2016 fingerprint images by looking at Technology for Call 2012.3.4-2 additional biometrics associated with Consortium: Fingerprint Live EUR 3,233,782 2. Univ. Lausanne (CH) CP the finger. It will pave the way to Scanners innovative fingerprint scanners 3. CSEM - Neuchatel (CH) REA - 312792 4. CNRS - Paris (FR) capable of properly sensing intrinsic very-low quality and/or characterized 5. Min. Intérieur - Paris (FR) by superficial skin disorders. 6. Przedsiębiorstwo Badawczo- Technology stream focuses on Produkcyjne OPTEL Spółka zoo -

medical imaging technique, such as Wrocław (PL) 7. Turkiye Bilimsel Kurumu - Ankara ultrasound, Full Field Optical Coherence Tomography (FFOCT), to (TR) acquire fingerprint matrix in dermis. 8. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (NL) 9. Hogskolen i - Gjovik (NO) Status: 10. Univ. Bologna Alma mater ON-GOING studiorum - Bologna (IT)

148

ORIGINS FP7 – Secure xxxx / xxxx ORIGINS aims to study the security of Coordinator: Societies extended border, particularily 1. Morpho – Paris (FR) Recommendations EUR 1,727,383 passport breeder document security. for Reliable Call 2013-1 Consortium: ENTR - 607663 It is to improve security & therefore Breeder to restore confidence in application 2. Agence Nationale des Titres Documents process, issuance of e-passports, by Sécurisés - Paris (FR) Restoring e- filling gaps in security of breeder 3. ARH Inform. Zrt - Budapest (HU) Passport documents. While some assurance 4. Afnor - Paris (FR) Confidence, approaches have been implemented 5. CSSC - Rome (IT) Leveraging in a few countries, they remain 6. Collis BV - Leiden (NL) Extended Border insufficient to provide breeder 7. Eurofast Sàrl - Paris (FR) Security documents in complete security & 8. Gemalto SA - Gémenos (FR) trustworthiness. 9. Univ. Darmstadt of Applied Sciences - Darmstadt (DE) 10. Høgskolen i Gjøvik - Gjøvik (NO) 11. ID Management - Lugano (CH) 12. Immigratie- en Natur - DenHaag (NL)

13. Inst. Baltic Studies - Tartu (EE) 14. Min. Interior - Riga (LV) 15. Polish Security Printing Works - Status: Warszawa (PL) ON-GOING 16. TUBITAK - Ankara ( TR) 17. Univ. CARLOS III Madrid (ES)

TERASCREEN FP7 – Secure May 2013 / Develops innovative concept of multi- Coordinator: Societies October 2016 frequency multi-mode Terahertz (THz) 1. Alfa Imaging – Madrid (ES) Multi-frequency detection with new automatic multi-mode Call 2012.3.4-5 EUR 3,489,932 detection, classification Consortium: Terahertz 2. Univ. Navarra - Pamplona (ES) CP ENTR - 312496 functionalities. Developed, screening for demonstrates, at live control point, 3. Anteral - Sarriguren Navarra (ES) border checks safe automatic detection, 4. Science Technology Facilities Council STFC - Swindon (UK) classification of objects concealed under clothing, whilst respecting 5. Teratech - Didcot (UK) privacy & increasing current 6. Acreo Swedish AB - Kista (SE) throughput rates.This innovative 7. Omnic Sas - Limeil Brevannes (FR)

screening system combines multi- 8. Univ. Roma “Tor Vergata” (IT) 9. Univ. Goethe - Frankfurt am Main frequency images taken by passive & active imagers which scan subjects & (DE) obtain complementary information, 10. FhG FKIE - Wachtberg (DE) 11. ICTS Ltd - London (UK) Status: thus allowing for automatic threat recognition. 12. Univ. Albert-Ludwigs -Freiburg ON-GOING (DE) http://fp7-terascreen.com/

ZONESEC FP7 – Secure xxxx / xxxx Advancement of 24/7 surveillance Coordinator: Societies systems for security of WideZones 1. Exodus AE – Athens (GR) Towards a EU EUR 9,262,732 with multiple assets at localized scales framework for Call 2013.1.6-3 is of extreme strategic relevance to Consortium: security of REA - 607292 2. Acciona Infraestruct - Madrid (ES) IP EU economies, industries, authorities, Widezones Citizens. Cost for large deployments, 3. Aditess Ltd - Nicosia (CY) 4. Atos - Madrid (ES) maintenance of ground sensing networks for local surveillance across 5. Attikes Diadromes SA - Attica (GR) these WideZones is extremely high. It 6. Crisisplan BV - Leiden (NL) could lead to large systemic failures of 7. Diginext - Aix en Provence (FR)

processes operating in wider zones, 8. EADS Gmbh - Ottobrunn (DE) 9. Fund. Tekniker - Gipuzkoa (ES) while economic stability, safety, security in EU compromised. Secure, 10. Gap Analysis SA - Athens(GR) interoperable observation data & 11. Holistic Innovation Institute Sl - Pozuelo (ES) information management services using open standards shall be 12. Inst. Communication and deployed in ZONeSEC with aim of Computer Systems - Athens (GR) cost-effectively reusing them in 13. ISIG - Trieste (IT)

surveillance of many other EU 14. NV Nederlandse Gasunie - Groningen (NL) WideZones. Several pilots specializing in detection of illegal unauthorized 15. SC Compania Aquaserv SA - entrances to or trespassing premises; Mures County (RO) 16. Silixa Limited - Warrington (UK) or actions to damage to or deployment of harmful devices on 17. TU Dresden (DE) installations shall be fully 18. Thales SA - Paris (FR) demonstrated. These concern Water, 19. Univ. Southampton (UK) 149

Status: Oil and Transnational Gas Pipelines; ON-GOING Highways and Rail tracks conveyed in six European countries.

ACXIS FP7 – Secure September The main objectives of the project Coordinator: Societies 2013 / ACXIS are to develop a manufacturer 1. EMPA – Zurich (CH) Automated February 2017 independent reference data base for Comparison of X- Call 2012.3.4-1 X-ray images of illegal and legitimate Consortium: ray Images for EUR 3,394,004 2. FhG EZRT - Erlangen (DE) CP cargo, procedures and algorithms to Cargo Scanning uniform X-ray images of different 3. Smiths Heimann SAS - Paris (FR) ENTR - 312998 4. APSS Soft (CH) cargo scanners and measurement parameters. 5. CEA - Paris (FR) 6. Eidgenössische Zollverwaltung FCA - Berne (CH) 7. APSS SOFTWARE & SERVICES AG CASRA (CH) Status: 8. Financ Minist DTCA - Den Haag ON-GOING (NL)

FASTPASS FP7 – Secure January 2013 / FastPass will establish & demonstrate Coordinator: Societies December a harmonized, modular approach for 1. AIT – Seibersdorf (AT) Harmonized, 2016 Automated Border Control (ABC) modular reference Call 2012.3.4-6 gates, for different border control Consortium: system for all EUR 2. VTT - Espoo (FI) IP points (land-, sea- and air-) across EU. European 11,287,715 The FastPass solution will provide 3. Min. Interior - Wien (AT) automatic border 4. Österreichische Staatsdruckerei REA - 312583 travellers a seamless, fast border crossing points transit harmonized for different Gmbh OeSD - Wien (AT) 5. FhG IOSB - Karlsruhe (DE) border control points across EU & will enable border guards to maintain 6. Katholieke Univ. - Leuven (BE) strict, absolute control which is both 7. Rajavartiolaitos Finnish Border unobtrusive & convenient to use. Guard RAJA - Helsinki (FI)

FastPass will be based on innovative 8. Secunet Security Networks AG - Dortmund (DE) modules that can be standardized across Europe using the experiences 9. Mirasys Ltd - Helsinki (FI) of several test installations. 10. Regula Baltija SIA - Daugavpils Latvia (LV) 11. Univ. Reading - London (UK) 12. Int. Centre for Migration Policy Development - Wien (AT) 13. Univ. Tampere - Tampere (FI) 14. Gunnebo Entrance Control Ltd -

Wolverhampton (UK) 15. Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh -

Münich (DE) 16. Modi Modular Digits Gmbh - Gummersbach (DE) 17. Magnetic Autocontrol Gmbh - Baden-Baden (DE) 18. JRC - Brussels (BE) 19. ITTI Sp - Poznan (PL) 20. Deltabit Oy - Tampere (FI)

21. Univ. Oxford (UK) 22. Min. Spraw Wewnetrznych - Warsawa(PL)

23. Finavia Oyj - Helsinki (FI) 24. Municipal Port Authority of Mykonos (GR) Status: 25. Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport ON-GOING Services Worldwide - Frankfurt (DE) https://www.fastpass-project.eu/ 26. Flughafen Wien AG - Wien (AT) 27. Intrepid Minds - Oxford (UK)

150

7.5.5 Standardisation Complementing projects listed in Section 7.4, some projects are dealing with standardisation for border security:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

GLOBE FP7 – Secure September Produce comprehensive approach to Coordinator: Societies 2008 / June integrated border management in EU. 1. Telvent Interactiva – Sevilla (ES) Global Border 2009 2 key areas were identified as ripe for Environment Call 2007-3.1-1 further development & synergy in EU: Consortium: EUR 999,891 risk analysis & decision making. 2. Amper Sistemas - Madrid (ES) CSA 3. GMV Aerospace Defence SA REA - 218207 GLOBE recommends that 28 EU MS adopt common definitions & criteria Unipersona - Madrid (ES) for sharing source data, risk analysis 4. Inst. Nac. Técnica Aeroespacial -

results and decision making Madrid (ES) 5. Altran Technol. - Paris (FR) indicators, reports. GLOBE produced its road-map. 6. Settce - Lubjana (SI) 7. Econet Polska sp - Warsaw (PL) 8. Eurosense Belfotop NV - Tielt (BE) 9. Skysoft - Lisboa (PT)

10. CES vision Ltd - Budapest (HU) 11. PRIO - Oslo (NO) 12. Edisoft - Caparica (PT) 13. Cogent Systems Gmbh - Maria

Enzersdorf (AT)

Status: 14. Ciaotech Srl - Rome (IT) FINISHED http://globe.ti-projects.com/ 15. Tecnalia - San Sebastian (ES)

7.6 Fight against Crime and Terrorism 7.6.1 Detection of intruders in Critical Insfrastructures A range of projects specificially focus on detecting intruders in critical infrastructures:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

RIBS FP7 - Secure December RIBS derives a scientific method for Coordinator: Societies 2010 / security system engineering design 1. Univ. College London (UK) Resilient November that can be challenged & improved infrastructure and Call 2010-1 2013 similarly to other areas of Consortium: building security engineering & physical sciences. will 2. Technion Israel Insti. Technol. - CP EUR Haifa (IL) be carried out for range of security 3,321,957 systems aimed at securing buildings 3. H.Petropoulea&co - Athens (GR) 4. KTH Royal Institute of Technology - REA – 242497 against hostile reconnaissance,intruders and Stockholm (SE)

hazardous attack (including 5. Techn. Univ. Denmark - Lyngby (DK) 6. Nati. Bank of Greece - Athens (GR) chemical, biological and explosive). Results include : »1: Study of live 7. Aedas Architects Ltd - London (UK)

building, its ‘eco-system’, its protection measures, threats; integration of elements into single multi-layer model; » 2: Identification of vulnerabilities through incident

analysis, protection-measures Status: analysis; » 3: Development of design FINISHED requirements. http://www.ribs-project.eu/

IDETECT 4ALL FP7 – Secure June 2008 / Overarching objective was to Coordinator: Societies June 2011 develop, test a system of sensor Novel intruder 1. Instro Precision Limited - technologies to protect critical Broadstairs (UK) detection & Call 2007-2.3-4 EUR infrastructure. Key driver was to find authentication 2,298,014 CP ways to overcome high cost, Consortium: optical sensing unacceptable false alarm rates 2. Motorola Israel Ltd - Tel Aviv (IL) 151

technology REA – 217872 limiting deployment of existing 3. EVERIS Consulting - Madrid (ES) security sensor technologies. Work 4. Cargo Airlines - Ben Gourion Airport focused on prototype sensors to (IL) detect intruders, remotely 5. 3D sa - Thessaloniki (GR) scan/read optical tags worn by 6. ANA Aerop. Portugal - Lisboa (PT) authorised personnel & vehicles. 7. Liège Air Cargo Handling Services - Concept is based on illuminating Grace Hoologne (BE)

protected area with invisible, 8. Azimuth Tecnol. Ltd - Raanana (IL) modulated light, by using solid state 9. Pro Optica SA - Bucarest (RO) scanning, to continuously monitor 10.Halevi Dweck & Co. Arttic Israel the 3D surface profile within Company Ltd - Jerusalem (IL) protected area. Presence, location of 11. Arttic Israel Int. Man. Serv. Ltd - intruders will be detected from Jerusalem (IL) Status: variations inflicted on this 3D profile FINISHED http://www.idetect4all.eu

CRISALIS FP7 – Secure March 2012 / CRISALIS project aims at providing Coordinator: Societies April 2015 new means to secure CI 1. Symantec Ltd – Dublin (IE) CRitical environments from targeted attacks, Infrastructure Call 2011.2.5-1 EUR carried out by resourceful & Consortium: Security AnaLysIS 3,426,387 2. Twente Univ.. - Twente (NL) CP motivated individuals. It focus on 2 different interlinked, use cases 3. Liander NV - Arnhem (NL) ENTR – 4. Siemens - Muenchen (DE) 285477 typical for power grid infrastructure: control systems based on SCADA 5. Security Matters BV -Enschede (NL) protocols & Advanced Metering 6. Enel - Rome (IT)

Infra structure. Pursuing 3 main 7. Eurecom - Sophia Antipolis (FR) 8. Chalmers Tekniska Högskola AB - research objectives: (i) Providing new methodologies & techniques to Göteborg (SE) secure CI systems; (ii) Providing new tools to detect intrusions; (iii) Developing new, more effective, Status: techniques to analyse infected FINISHED systems. http://www.crisalis-project.eu/

7.6.2 Detection of terrorist threats 7.6.2.1 Detection of terrorist threats, video-surveillance Surveillance systems are being developed for early detection of terrorist threats and enhancing citizen's security:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

INDECT FP7 - Secure January Development of solutions, tools Coordinator: Societies 2009/ for automatic threat detection 1. AGH Univ. Sci. Technol. – Krakowie Intelligent January 2014 through e.g. processing of CCTV (PL) information system Call 2007-1.2-01 camera data streams, supporting EUR Consortium: CP standardization of video sequence observation, 10,906,984 quality for user applications, 2. Univ. Technol. - Gdansk (PL) searching and 3. InnoTec Data Gmbh - Bad threat detection in computer detection for networks as well as data & privacy Zwischenahn (DE) security of citizens REA – 218086 protection. New techniques for 4. Grenoble INP - Grenoble (FR) in urban data intelligent analysis to allow 5. Gen. Police Headquar. - Warsaw (PL) environment giving alert before too late, 6. Indesol - Lleida (ES) 7. PSI Transcom Gmbh - Berlin (DE) recognizing events that could lead to terrorist attacks (e.g. left 8. Police Service of Northern Ireland - luggage at airport, automatic Belfast (UK) recognition of dangerous tools). 9. Poznan Univ. Technol. - Poznan (PL)

Support to decision system in 10. Univ. Carlos III – Madrid (ES) 11. Techn. Univ. Sofia - Sofia (BG) combating criminal activities, as human trafficking, child 12. Univ. Wuppertal - Wuppertal (DE) pornography, detection of 13. Univ. York - York (UK) 14. Tech. Univ. Ostrava - Ostrava (CZ) dangerous situations, use of dangerous objects (e.g. knives or 15. Tech. Univ Kosice - Kosice (SK) 16. X-Art Pro Div. Gmbh - Wien (AT) 152

guns) in public spaces. 17. Fachhochschule Tech. - Wien (AT), Status: www.indect-project.eu FINISHED

SMARTPREVENT FP7 – Secure March 2014 / • Studying characteristics of Coordinator: Societies February frequent criminal activities in real 1. TTLREE - Llanera (ES) Smart Video- 2016 urban scenarios including typical Surveillance System Call 2013.7.2-1 variations & unanticipated Consortium: to Detect and EUR criminal situations. 2. Univ. Queen Mary and Westfield Prevent Local CP 1,499,996 College - London (UK) Crimes in Urban • Developing low-cost adaptative 3. Vision Semantics - London (UK) Areas REA – 606952 video-surveillance system in order 4. Emza Visual Sens - Kafar Saba (IL) to detect & prevent criminal 5. Ayuntamiento de Madrid (ES) activities. 6. Ankara Strateji Enstitusu Dernegi - Ankara (TR) • Building video-surveillance system as punitive tool in order to store most relevant evidences of Status: detected criminal activities ON-GOING http://www.smartprevent.eu/

ADABTS FP7 – Secure August 2009 / Facilitate protection of EU Coordinator: Societies September citizens, property & infrastructure 1. FOI – Stockholm (SE) Automatic 2013 against threats of terrorism, Detection of Call 2007-2.3-3 crime, riots, by automatic Consortium: Abnormal EUR 2. Sintef - Oslo (N0) CP detection of abnormal human Behaviour and 3,229,034 behaviour by extracting 3. TNO – Delft (NL) Threats in crowded 4. Amsterdam Univ. (NL) ENTR – characterizations in realistic Spaces security settings based on expert 5. BAE - Farnborough (UK) 218197 6. Home office - London (UK) classifications & analysis of CCTV operator behaviour. Algorithms 7. Min. Inter. - Sofia (BG) detecting pre-defined threat 8. Detec As - Oslo (NO) behaviours with accurate &

robust detection, data from audio, video sensors. Tested on real-time evaluation platform on large-scale events (football arena), critical infrastructure (airports). Status: FINISHED www.adabts-fp7.eu

ADVISE FP7 – Secure March 2012 / Aimed at designing and Coordinator: Societies February developing a unification 1. Ingegneria Informatica spa - Roma (IT) Advanced Video 2015 framework for surveillance- Surveillance Call 2011.5.3-4 footage archive systems. ADVISE Consortium: archives search EUR 2. CERTH/ITI - Thessaloniki (GR) CP system with 2 major components: Engine for security 2,989,761 first one performing the 3. Neuropublic A.E. - Thessaloniki (GR) applications semantically enriched, event 4. Queen Mary Univ. London (UK) REA – 285024 5. SingularLogic - Athens (GR) based video analysis which will offer efficient search capabilities 6. Inst. European studies - Vrije of video archives and Universiteit Brussel (BE) sophisticated result visualization, 7. ISDEFE - Madrid (ES)

and second one enforcing the 8. Almaviva - Rome (IT) 9. Innovation Engin. - Rome (IT) legal, ethical and privacy constraints that apply to the 10. Madrid Municipal Police (ES) Status: exchange and processing of FINISHED surveillance data. http://www.advise-project.eu/

SAMURAI FP7 – Secure June 2008 / Develop and integrate an Coordinator: Societies November innovative surveillance system for 1. Queen Mary Univ. - London (UK) Suspicious and 2011 monitoring both interior & Abnormal Call 2013-6.4-4 surrounding areas of critical Consortium: behaviour EUR 2. Univ. Verona - Verona (IT) CP public infrastructure site. For Monitoring Using a 2,478,051 abnormal behaviour detection, it 3. Elsag Datamat Spa - Genova (IT) netwoRk of 4. Waterfall Solutions Ltd - Woking (UK) REA – 217899 combined multi-sensor source cAmeras for data processing with series of 5. Borthwick-Pignon OÜ - Tartu (EE) sItuation awareness preprogrammed abnormal, rare 6. Esaprojekt SP. Zoo - Katovice (PL) enhancement or “of interest” behavioural 7. SMTRAL - Lyon (FR) 153

triggers. To integrate sensory 8. BAA Ltd - Hounslow (UK) input from patrolling staff, SAMURAI designed & developed Ninja, wearable sensor suit with built in data ports for camera & audio inputs. http://www.samurai-eu.org

The above projects are complemented by an on-going FP7 project, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

EWISA FP7 – Secure September Following Frontex, intelligence Coordinator: Societies 2014 / June picture of possible threats against 1. Politia de Frontiera - Bucarest (RO) Early warning for 2018 MS is obtained, picture created increased Call 2013.3.2-1 outside MS and Schengen area, Consortium: situational EUR 2. KEMEA - Αthens (GR) CP through combination of radar awareness 10,899,765 pictures with video pictures, 3. Min. Interior - Budapest (HU) intelligence collected from sensor 4. Min. Interior - Madrid (ES) ENTR – 5. Min. Interior - Helsinki (FI) 608174 stations. Threats: a) illegal migration, b) smuggling, c) trafficking in drugs and forbidden

materials, d) trafficking in weapons. It will provide assessment of stand-alone technology, assessment of integration into current surveillance infrastructure of new capabilities provided by industry. Objective is to increase

intelligence in video surveillance: • camera-specific processes; • modular implementation of successive analysis layers, applied for optimal situational awareness: chaining, motion, figure, face; • In addition to camera's processing capabilities, network consists of: Status: sensors, network analysis and FINISHED system for control room.

7.6.2.2 Preparedness / emergency planning for CBRN threats linked to terrorist attacks In the CBRN sector, two projects have investigated solutions to enhance preparedness and emergency planning as described below:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

CATO FP7 – Secure January 2012 / Development of comprehensive Open Coordinator: Societies December Toolbox for dealing with CBRN crises 1. Ness - Tel Aviv (IL) CATO - CBRN crisis 2014 due to terrorist attacks using non- management: Call 2010.4.2-2 conventional weapons or on facilities Consortium: Architecture, EUR 2. Jyväskylän yliop. - Jyväskylä (FI) Demo with CBRN material. Know-how, DSS Technologies and 10,278,062 buildiMany elements for CBRN crisis 3. Beredskabsstyr. - Birkerød (DK) Operational 4. Státní rad. ochrany - Praha (CZ) ENTR – 261393 management exist (detectors, Procedures personal protective equipment, 5. VTT - Espoo (FI) 6. Min. Defense - Paris (FR) decontamination methods,Standard Operating Procedures, emergency 7. Univ. Salzburg (AT) managements systems, training 8. CEA - Paris (FR) programmes, etc.). Overall approach 9. CESS - München (DE)

to CBRN preparedness and resilience 10. Home Office - London (UK) 11. Centre for Science - Rome (IT) which: -Addresses the overall effectiveness and performance of the 12. ARTTIC - Paris (FR) 154

response & not just of the individual 13. MDA - Tel Aviv (IL) agencies -Can be adapted to different 14.Vectorcommand–Hampshire (UK) geopolitical, organisational & 15. FhG FKIE - Wachtberg (DE) geographic settings; -Facilitates the 16. Police CBRN cent. - London (UK) multiple usage of the underlying 17. Prolog Dev. Cent - Brøndby (DK) techno; -Creates environment 18. DEMA - Copenhagen (DK) supporting progressive learning. It will 19.Tech.Univ. Denmark- Lyngby (DK)

also: -Support effective collaboration 20. SCK CEN - Brussels (BE) and dialogue, as related to CBRN 21. Helmholtz Zent. - München (DE) between EU, MS; -Define, develop 22. RKI - Berlin (DE) tools which allow to prepare & 23. SURO - Praha (CZ) respond to major disasters. 24. VUJE AS - Trnava (SI) 25. Service Santé Armées - Paris (FR) 26. Bonn Hospital Univ. - Bonn (DE) 27. EMAUG - Greifswald (DE) Status: http://www.cato-project.eu 28. PRIO - Oslo (NO) FINISHED 29. Inconnect - Doordrecht (NL)

PRACTICE FP7 – Secure May 2011 / PRACTICE is to improve preparedness Coordinator: Societies October 2014 & resilience of EU MS to attack from 1.Umea Univ. – Umea (SE) Preparedness and terrorist group using non Resilience against Call 2010.4.2-2 EUR 8,424,029 conventional weapons as CBRN Consortium: CBRN Terrorism 2. Astri Polska Sp - Warsaw (PL) Demo REA – 261728 materials.It will develop a new using Integrated toolbox focusing on: •Identification, 3. EADS Astrium - Paris (FR) Concepts and organisation, establishment of 4. Bruhn NewTech - Soeborg (DK) Equipment knowledge of critical elements in 5. EADS Cassidian - Paris (FR) 6. CBRNE Ltd - Ashford (UK) event structure through studies of wide selection of scenarios, real 7. CEN - Brussels (BE) incidents & exercises; •Analysis, 8. Europ. CBRNE Center - Umea (SE) identification of gaps; •Allocated 9. FFI - Kjeller (NO)

system or public information kit for 10. FOI -Stockholm (SE) 11. HCFDC Services - Paris (FR) decision-support, first-responder training & exercise.Toolbox (complete 12. Health Protection - London (UK) system) will provide EU MS with 13. King’s College London (UK) 14.Mid Sweden Univ - Sundsvall (SE) flexible, integrated system for coordinated response to CBRN 15. Demokritos NCSRD - Athens (GR) terrorist attack, with attention to 16.Neth.For. Inst - the Hague (NL) human factors, societal aspects. 17. Prometech - Utrecht (NL) 18. Södersjukhuset - Stockholm (SE) 19. SELEX Systemas - Rome (IT)

20. SGSP - Warszawa (PL)

Status: 21. SUJCHBO VVI - Milin (CZ) FINISHED http://www.practice-fp7-security.eu/ 22. TNO - Delft (NL) 23. UCL - Brussels (BE)

7.6.2.3 Testing and certification, and quality assurance Trialling, testing and certification schemes for CBRN detection in the EU are also promoted as key actions in the plan, in particular regarding technical requirements necessary for the sampling and detection of CBRN materials (according to the field of applications of the devices). It also supports the exchange of good practices and methodologies for quality assurance (including criteria for method validation) related to CBRN detection in the Member States, the establishment of an EU validation and certification scheme based on continuing quality assurance mechanisms and an EU-wide trialling scheme to evaluate the quality of both detection tools and systems in practical field operations. The new CBRN-E approach is more specific as regards the support of further short-term trials for practitioners in order to improve detection during future sport, cultural and other large-scale events; it also further supports CBRN-E research, testing and validation activities and progress towards appropriate detection standards adapted to each type of environment, including projects such as ERNCIP (European Reference Network for Critical Infrastructure Protection) and continues to support ITRAP Phase 2 assessing the feasibility of integrating radiological and

155

nuclear risks and explosives detection in the same device, and helping Member State's laboratories to obtain accreditation in the detection of radiological and nuclear risks, evaluate new detection equipment and enabling the definition of European or international standards. Examples of FP7 projects which have contributed to the certification / testing goals are listed below.

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

EQUATOX FP7 – Secure June 2010 / By creating a network of experts, the Coordinator: Societies December project will help to minimise security 1. Robert Koch Inst. - Berlin (DE) Establishment of 2014 & health threats posed by biological Quality Assurances Call 2011.5.4-1 toxins. B toxins: ricin, botulinum Consortium: for the Detection EUR 1,338,634 toxins, staphylococcal enterotoxins, 2. JRC - Brussels (BE) of Biological Toxins NoE 3. Institut Scientifique de Santé ENTR – 285120 saxitoxin could be used for terrorist of Potential attacks on the basis of their Publique - Brussels (BE) Bioterrorism Risk availability, ease of preparation, high 4. Univ. Helsinki (FI) 5. French agency for food - Paris (FR) toxicity and/or lack of medical counter measures. Some of toxins are 6. Toxogen Gmbh - Hannover (DE) considered among most relevant 7. FOI - Stockholm (SE) agents in the field of bio terrorism. 8. Federal Department of Defence

Good practices & critical gaps in SPIEZ - Bern (CH) 9. Switzerland ChemStat - Bern (CH) detection technology will be identifiedas foundations to harmonise and standardise detection Status: capabilities. FINISHED http://equatox.net/equatox_project/

Ref. to 2016-DRS-03

7.6.3 Crime forensics 7.6.3.1 Crime scene investigations Forensic evidence based on analyses, as well as intelligence analysis has been covered by several projects in FP7, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

MIDAS FP7 – Secure September MiDAS will deliver automated DNA Coordinator: Societies 2010 / August analysis technology, will validate this 1. Forensic Science Service Ltd - The development 2013 technology, associated processes Marston Green (UK) and validation of a Call 2009-1.3-4 required for its implementation, rapid millifluidic EUR 3,231,404 enabling forensic DNA analysis to be Consortium: DNA analysis CP 2. Arizona Board of Regents - Tempe REA – 242345 carried out at crime scene. With fast system for forensic results authorities will have (USA) casework samples opportunity to rapidly compare scene 3. Medizinische Univ. Innsbruck (AT) 4. NFI - The Hague (NL) samples against DNA profiles from known criminals or results from other 5. BKA - Berlin (DE) crime scenes held in national DNA 6. Forensic Science Service Ltd - databases. It will have dramatic Birmingham (UK)

implications for both criminal justice, 7. Grid Xitek Ltd - Usk (UK) international security, with ability to deliver vital intelligence results much more quickly both in national sense Status: and across the EU.. FINISHED http://web.ita.es/midas/

156

3D-FORENSICS FP7 – Secure February 2011 3D-reconstruction of evidence with a Coordinator: Societies / mobile high resolution 3D-scanning 1. FhG IPK, Berlin (DE) Mobile high- July 2013 system and automatic 3D-data resolution 3D- Call 2012.7.2-1 analysis software. The users are Consortium: Scanner and 3D EUR 1,420,262 potentially every crime scene 2. Crabbe Consul. Ltd -Newcastle data analysis for CP (UK) investigation unit and/or forensic forensic evidence crime expert in the world. 3. DELFTTECH BV - Delft (NL) REA – 312307 4. ENCLUSTRA GmbH - Zürich (CH) www.3D-Forensics.eu 5. GEXCEL SRL - Brescia (IT) Status: 6. LUCAS INSTR. GMBH - Jena (DE) FINISHED 7. REGIO POLITIE ZELAND (NL)

MEPROCS FP7 – Secure February 2012 Common EU framework to allow Coordinator: Societies / July 2014 extensive application of CS technique 1. Fund. Progreso del Soft Forensic in practical forensic identification Computing - Mieres (ES) identification by Call 2011.1.4-3 EUR 1,005,800 scenarios commonly tackled by EU craniofacial Consortium: CSA REA - 285624 scientific police units. It will include: i) superimposition implementation of existing semi- 2. Consorzio di RIcerca Sistemi ad Agenti - Salerno (IT) automatic method to assist forensic experts in application of CS; ii) 3. Europäischer Ausschuß für definition of standard protocols at EU Rechtsmedizin e.V - Köln (DE) level; iii) specification of forensic 4. Univ. Granada (ES)

science methodology to provide 5. Univ. Coimbra FTUC (PT) 6. Min. Interior - Madrid (ES) objective evaluation of forensic identification results achieved by CS; 7. Min. Public Security - Ramle (IL) Project promotes validation, exchange of CS protocols, methodologies among different organisations. Complete screening made on craniofacial identification,

practitioners, research groups. It has defining standard protocols for each kind of consider scenario, by selecting Status: best practices identified. FINISHED http://www.meprocs.eu

BEAT FP7 – Secure March 2012 / BEAT proposes a framework of Coordinator: Societies February 2016 standard operational evaluations for 1. Idiap Research Institute – Biometrics biometric technologies. This will be Martigny (CH) Evaluation and Call 2011.5.1-1 EUR 3,499,784 achieved by (1) developing an online Testing & open platform to transparently, Consortium: CP REA - 284989 2. TUBITAK - Ankara (TR) independently evaluate biometric systems against validated 3. HESSO - Delemont (CH) benchmarks, (2) designing protocols, 4. Univ. Surrey - Guildford (UK) tools for vulnerability analysis, (3) 5. EPFL - Lausanne (CH)

developing standardization 6. Katholieke Univ. Leuven (BE) 7. TUVIT - Essen (DE) documents for Common Criteria evaluations. Decision-makers & 8. CEA - LETI - Paris (FR) authorities will be informed about 9. Univ. Auton. Madrid (ES) 10. Morpho - Paris (FR) progress, results will have impact on standards for contributing to development of a EU Identification Certification System. Status: FINISHED www.beat-eu.org

RECOBIA FP7 – Secure February 2012 Improve quality of intelligence Coordinator: Societies / Janvier 2015 analysis by reducing negative impact 1. CEIS - Paris (FR) Reduction of of cognitive biases upon intelligence Cognitive Bias in Call 2011.6.1-4 EUR 3,215,454 analysis. Assessment of cognitive Consortium: Intelligence 2. Hawk Assoc. Ltd - London (UK) CP REA - 285010 biases & assess how these biases Analysis affect the practice of intelligence 3. Thales - Paris (FR) 4. Atos - Madrid (ES) analysis. Building on this initial assessment, best practices to reduce 5. CEA - Paris (FR) negative impact of cognitive biases 6. ISEA Psy - Mondeville (FR) will be defined, likely to be found in 7. EUROSINT Forum - Brussels (BE)

software tools domains, training of 8. Zanasi Alessandro - Modena (IT) 9. Univ. Konstanz (DE) Status: analysts & organisational issues. 10. Technische Univ. Graz (AT) FINISHED https://www.recobia.eu/

157

SAWSOC FP7 – Secure November Aims at bringing significant Coordinator: Societies 2013 – April advancement in convergence of 1. SELEX – Florence (IT) Convergence of 2016 physical & logical security physical / logical Call 2012.2.5-1 technologies. It means: effective Consortium: security EUR 3,491,379 2. CINI - Rome (IT) CP cooperation (i.e. a coordinated & technologies results-oriented effort to work 3. FhG IOSB - Karlsruhe (DE) REA - 313034 4. Israel Electric Corporation IEC - together) among previously disjointed functions. SAWSOC holistic approach Haifa (IL) will allow dependable (i.e. accurate, 5. ENAV Spa - Rome (IT) timely, & trustworthy) detection, 6. Intercede Ltd - Leicester (UK)

diagnosis of attacks: 1.Guaranteeing 7. ESPION Ltd - Dublin (IE) 8. Lonix Oy - Helsinky (FI) protection of citizens & assets 2.Improving perception of security by 9. Univ. Wuppertal BUW (DE) Status: citizens. 10. Esaprojekt - Chorzow (PL) FINISHED 11. Comarch - Cracovia (PL) http://www.sawsoc.eu/

Other on-going projects are focusing on this research sector:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

VALCRI FP7 – Secure March 2014 / Addressing European Needs for Coordinator: Societies December Information Exploitation of Large 1. Middlesex Univ. – London (UK) Visual Analytics for 2017 Complex Data in Criminal Intelligence Sense-making in Call 2013-1.6-4 Analysis; will employ science & Consortium: CRiminal EUR 2. A E Solutions Ltd - Badsey (UK) Demo IP technology of Visual Analytics to Intelligence 13,053,686 develop capability by combining novel 3. Battelle Memorial Inst. - analysis visualisation, interaction techniques Columbus (US) ENTR – 608142 4. Exipple Studio SL - Barcelona (ES) with powerful analytic software for automated extraction of meaningful 5. Univ. Katholieke Leuven (BE) information & related text, 6. Univ. Linköping (SE) documents, images, video, for 7. ObjectSecurity - Cambridge (UK)

detecting signatures or patterns 8. SPFI - Brussels (BE) 9. Space Appl. Serv. - Brussels (BE) across multi dimensional data that provide early warning or triggers of 10. Stad Antwerpen (BE) impending criminal or terrorist action. 11. TU Graz (AT) 12. TU Wien (AT) 13. Univ. City London (UK) 14. Unabhängiges Landeszentr. Datenschutz - Kiel (DE) 15. Univ. Konstanz (DE) 16. West Midlands Police Authority -

Birmingham (UK) 17. FhG IDMT - Oldenburg (DE) Status: http://www.i-intelligence.eu/valcri/ ON-GOING 18. i-Intelligence - Winterthur (CH)

EUROFORGEN- FP7 – Secure January 2016 / The EUROFORGEN-NoE proposal aims Coordinator: NOE Societies December to develop a network of excellence for 1. Klinikum der Univers. Köln – Köln 2016 the creation of a European (DE) European Forensic Call 2011.7.4-1 Virtual Centre of Forensic Genetic Genetics – EUR 6,613,680 Research. Forensic genetics is a highly Consortium: Network of NoE 2. Univ. Santiago de Compostela (ES) REA - 285487 innovative field of applied science Excellence with a strong impact on the security 3. Norwegian Inst. Public Health - Oslo (NO) of citizens. However, the genetic methods to identify offenders as well 4. Dept. Forensic Medicine, Univ. as the creation of national DNA Copenhagen (DK) databases have caused concerns to 5. Netherlands Forensic Institute -

the possible violation of privacy Den Haag (NL) 6. Innsbruck Medical Univ. - rights. Furthermore, studies to assess the Innsbruck (AT) societal dimension of security 7. Norwegian Univ. Life Sciences - Ås (NO) following the implementation of even more 8. Northumbria Univ. Centre for intrusive methods such as the genetic Forensic Science - Newcastle (UK) prediction of externally visible 9. Jagiellonian Univ. Krakow -

characteristics are highly relevant for Cracovie (PL) 10. Epiontis Gmbh - Berlin (DE) their public acceptance. The network 11. GABO - Munich (DE) 158

includes some of the leading groups in 12. King's College London (UK) European forensic genetic research. It aims to create a closer integration of existing collaborations, as well as establishing new interactions in the field of security, as all key players are addressed: scientists, stakeholders, Status: end-users, educational centres ON-GOING and scientific societies

LASIE FP7 – Secure May 2014 / Design and development of a novel Coordinator: Societies October 2017 framework to assist forensic analysts 1. Engineering - Ingegneria Large Scale in their investigations, based on Informatica Spa – Roma (IT) Information Call 2013.1.6-1 EUR 8,323,805 automated technology for advanced Exploitation of Consortium: IP REA - 607480 data processing supported by an Forensic important human component in 2. Centre for Research and Technology Hellas - Athens (GR) critical decision making stages, as well as, legal and ethical aspects. The 3. Neuropublic Ae - Athens (GR) framework consist of tools to 4. Univ. Queen Mary Westfield automatically manipulate, analyse College - London (UK)

and fuse vast amounts of 5. Metropolitan Police Service - London (UK) heterogeneous data acquired from different sources including CCTV 6. Sensegraph Ltd - Hartlepool (UK) surveillance content, confiscated 7. Prio Institutt for Fredsforskning Stiftelse - Oslo (NO) desktops and hard disks, mobile devices, Internet, social networks, 8. Huawei Technologies Duesseldorf handwritten and calligraphic Gmbh - Berlin (DE) documents. The type of data 9. TU Berlin (DE)

considered includes text, images, 10. United Technol. Research Centre Ltd - Belfast (IE) video, audio and biometric information in multiple formats. In 11. Innovation Engineering Srl - order to manage the results of the Milan (IT) 12. Venaka Media Ltd - Manchester automated processing, a knowledge repository will be built. It will consider (UK) explicit analyst-knowledge and critical 13. ACIC sa - Mons (BE) legacy information from previous 14. Inst. Mines-Telecom - Paris (FR) cases. The proposed knowledge 15. Univ. Politecnica de Madrid (ES) 16. Visionware-Sistemas de representation framework will also allow the system to provide Informacao - Santander (ES) recommendations to analysts, guide 17. Ayuntamiento de Madrid (ES) the investigation process and perform 18. Univ. Greenwich (UK)

inference based on evidence Status: extracted from available data. ON-GOING http://www.lasie-project.eu/

SIIP FP7 – Secure May 2014 / Break-through Suspect Identification Coordinator: Societies April 2018 solution based on a novel Speaker- 1. VERINT Systems Ltd - Tel Aviv (IL) Speaker Identification (SID) engine fusing Identification Call 2013.5.1-2 EUR multiple speech analytic algorithms Consortium: Integrated Project 10,529,211 (e.g. voiceprints recognition, 2.EADS Cassidian - Paris (FR) IP 3. Idiap Res. Instit. - Martigny (CH) REA - 607784 Gender/Age/Language/Accent ID, Keyword/ Taxonomy spotting and 4. Green Fusion Ltd - Dublin (IE) Voice cloning detection). This Fused 5. INESC Inov - Porto (PT) Speaker Identification will result in 6. Int. Biometric Group - London (UK)

significantly higher true-positive 7. Laboratorio di Scienze della Cittadinanza - Rome (IT) speaker identification, reduced False- Positives/Negatives while increasing 8. Loquendo Spa - Milano (IT) reliability & confidence. The system 9. Min. Justiça - Lisboa (PT) 10. OK2GO Cellular Solutions - Tel will provide judicial admissible evidence for identifying crime/terror Aviv (IL) suspects as well as for 11. PSNI Police Service of Northern mapping/tracing the suspect Ireland - Belfast (UK)

terror/crime network. To maximize its 12. Rijksuniversiteit - Groningen (NL) 13. Sail Labs Technol. AG - Wien (AT) impact, it will be designed, developed and tested with INTERPOL and police 14. Centre For Research And forces in the UK and Portugal. Technology - Thessaloniki (GR) 15. Synthema srl - Pisa (IT) Status: http://www.siip.eu/ 16. Interpol - Lyon (FR) ON-GOING 17. Univ. Warwick (UK)

159

7.6.3.2 Crime scene and forensic evidences for CBRN-E threats and incidents The CBRN Action Plan promotes the improvement of the capacity to conduct criminal investigations, e.g. through the analysis of potential problems in the transport of CBRN contaminated evidence across borders within the context of criminal investigations and emergency situations in general. Linked to this Eurojust and a network of Forensic Science Institutes develop recommendations to ensure that collected forensic evidence in a CBRN crime scene is of a high enough quality to be admissible in court proceedings in the EU Member States, with establishment of laboratory practices which can be used during legal prosecutions to be coordinated by Eurojust, Europol, The European Network of Forensic Science Institutes and the JRC Institute for Trans Uranium elements. These goals are supported by enhancing and supporting cooperation between forensic laboratories, reference and specialised laboratories, including those equipped for measurement/analysis of CBRN materials. Examples are:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

FORLAB FP7 – Secure March 2012 / ForLab will deliver a novel systematic Coordinator: Societies March 2015 methodology for optimizing evidence 1. INDRA Systemas – Madrid (ES) Forensic collection in scenarios after blast of Laboratory for in- Call 2011-1 EUR 3,087,446 improvised explosive device (IED). Consortium: situ evidence 2. ENEA - Rome (IT) CP REA – 285052 Expected results: » Improve analysis in a post efficiency of procedures used by EU 3. EADS ASTRIUM - Paris (FR) blast scenario Security Forces for investigation of 4. Univ. Thessaly - Volos (GE) 5. SAS - Zaventen (BE) post-blast scene; » Reduce number of samples collected » Improve 6. Astri Polska - Warszawa (PL) capability to re-create scene during 7. Nat. Bureau of Investigation - field investigation » Present to Vantaa (FI)

technician in Command Control 8. Min. Difesa - Rome (IT) 9. PIAP - Warszawa (PL) Centre real time, updated information about investigation;. 10. Nucletudes - Paris (FR) Status: 11. Min.Intérieur - Paris (FR) FINISHED http://www.fp7-forlab.eu/ 12. Min. Interior - Madrid (ES)

MISAFE FP7 – Secure June 2013 / Development of soil DNA tools within Coordinator: Societies May 2015 MiSAFE will improve on conventional 1. Hebrew Univ. Jerusalem - The Development approaches. It aims to develop tools Jerusalem (IL) and Validation of Call 2012.7.2-1 EUR 1,991,000 for crime-fighting-prevention (genetic Microbial Soil Consortium: nnnnn CP REA – 313149 forensics): 1. Develop appropriate Community sample collection, storage, processing 2. Libragen - Toulouse (FR) Analyses for tools for soil DNA applied to forensic 3. CLC bio A/S - Aarhus (DK) Forensics Purposes science. 2. Apply, delimit use of DNA- 4. Ecole Centrale Lyon (FR) 5. The James Hutton Institute - based technologies in soil forensic science for search & evidence. 3. Dundee (UK) Develop, apply data analysis software, 6. Min. Public Security – Ramle (IL) user interface for soil DNA tools. 4. 7. Min. Interior - Madrid (ES)

Validate & legally consolidate use of microbial soil forensic science across the range of EU legal systems. 5. Provide basic standards, procedures Status: for creating a pan-EU soil microbial FINISHED database.

160

On-going projects are complementing the above actions, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

GIFT-CBRN FP7 – Secure January 2014 / Forensic investigation is hampered by Coordinator: Societies January 2017 a lack of protocols, training in carrying 1. NFI - The Hague (NL) Generic Integrated out forensic analysis on CBRN- Forensic Toolbox Call 2013-1 EUR 5,464,047 contaminated materials. GIFT-CBRN is Consortium: for CBRN incidents 2. Analyze IQ Limited - Galway (IE) CP ENTR – 604347 to develop a forensic toolbox for investigating CBRN incidents. It would 3. AWE Plc - Reading (UK) provide (1) procedures, sampling 4. CEA - Paris (FR) methods, detection of CBRN agents at 5. SPFJ - Brussels (BE) crime scene, (2) traditional forensic 6. MRA - Brussels (BE) laboratory methods for contaminated 7. Eticas Res. & Consulting - evidence (3) laboratory methods for Barcelona (ES) profiling the CBRN agents released. 8. Falcon Comm. Uk Ltd - Procedures for chain of custody, from Winchester (UK) crime scene to court, will be 9. JRC - Brussels (BE) developed. Education, training 10. LQC s.l. - La Escala (ES) curriculum will be designed.Develop 11.M Squared Lasers - Glasgow (UK) novel methodologies to enable 12.Nanobiz - Ankara (TR) traditional forensic science (DNA, 13. TNO - Delft (NL) fingerprint and electronic devices. 14. Ramen SA - Madrid (ES) 15. RIVM - Utrecht (NL) 16. Stuk - Helsinki (FI) 17. SAS - Brussels (BE) 18. SKL - Linköping (SE) 19. Secretary of State for Envir., Food and Rural Affairs - London (UK) 20. FOI - Stockholm (SE) 21. Tyndall-UCC, Univers. College Cork (IE)

CRIM-TRACK FP7 – Secure January 2014 / Demonstrate a working sensing Coordinator: Societies December device, developed into portable, 1. Danish Emergency Management Sensor system for 2017 miniaturized, automated, rapid, low Agency – Copenhagen (DK) detection of Call 2012-1 cost, highly sensitive, & simple criminal chemical EUR 3,583,940 “sniffer” & detection unit, based on Consortium: substances CP 2. DTU Nanotech & Informatics - ENTR – 313202 disposable micro-colorimetric chip. Unit can be used for identification of Lyngby (DK) wide variety of illegal drugs, drug 3. Cranfield Univ. - Shrivenham (UK) precursors, home-made explosives. It 4. Securetec Gmbh - Neubiberg (DE) combines highly advanced disciplines, 5. Pro Design Electronic Gmbh - as organic chemistry, micro Bruckmühl (DE) fabrication, hardware technology, 6. Gammadata Instruments - machine learning & signal processing Uppsala (SE) techniques. It will provide custom 7. Belastingdienst - Rotterdam (NL) officers, police & other authorities 8. Mykolas Romeris Univ. - Vilnius with an effective tool to control (LT) trafficking of illegal drugs, drug precursors. http://www.crimtrack.eu/

In the forensics area, the H2020 FCT-3-2015 topic on "Mobile, remotely controlled technologies to examine a crime scene in case of an accident or a terrorist attack involving CBRNE materials" will also support the CBRN and Explosives Action Plans for the detection part.

161

7.6.3.3 Information gathering and prevention strategies Fighting and preventing crime have been subject to a range of projects funded by the Secure Societies Programme, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

SCIIMS FP7 – Secure November The team focused on computer-based Coordinator: Societies 2009 / October technology to strengthen ability of 1. BAE Systems - Rochester (UK) Strategic crime and 2012 LEAs to search, mine, fuseinformation immigration Call 2007-1.3-6 from massive datasets obtained from Consortium: information EUR 2,318,996 diverse sources. Taking into account 2. Data Fusion Int. - Dublin (IE) management CP 3. Denodo Technol. - A Coruna (ES) REA - 218223 how investigators construct & system represent data for an investigation, it 4. Indra Sistemas - Alcobendas (ES) 5. Selex - Rome (IT) produced an integrated demonstration system to show 6. Hungarian Acad. Sciences - effectiveness of their technologies, Budapest (HU) which support the various stages of 7. Univ. A Coruña - La Coruna (ES)

investigation, from the foraging for information to making sense of it. Useful in detecting unusual & criminal Status: behavior & preventing crime in EU. FINISHED http://www.sciims.co.uk/

TRACE FP7 – Secure May 2014 / Support stakeholders in combating & Coordinator: Societies April 2016 disrupting human trafficking, a form 1. Trilateral Research & Consulting - Support of modern-day slavery, one of largest London (UK) stakeholders in Call 2013.6.1-3 EUR 1,006,492 world criminal enterprises, by combating & Consortium: CP REA - 607669 assessing, consolidating information disrupting human surrounding perpetrators & wider 2. Vrije Univ. Brussels (BE) trafficking trafficking enterprise. TRACE adopts a 3. Stichting Katholieke Univ. Brabant Tilburg –(NL) multi-disciplinary approach: legal, criminological, socio-economical, 4. Council of the baltic Sea States psychological, law enforcement- Secretariat - Stockholm (SE) oriented, to build upon on-going EU & 5. Agentia Nat. Impotriva Traficului

national projects, activities. It focuses de Persoane - Bucarest (RO) 6. Nat. Comm. Combating Trafficking on perpetrators activities developing understanding of the structure, social in Human Beings - Sofia (BG) relationships, modus operandi, travel 7. Cyprus police - Nicosia (CY) 8. Comité contre l’esclavage routes, technologies associated with different types of human trafficking. moderne - Paris (FR) Status: 9. The International La Strada FINISHED http://trace-project.eu/ Association - Amsterdam (NL)

GRAFFOLUTION FP7 – Secure March 2014 / “Collaborative Knowledge Base” Coordinator: Societies February 2016 empowering city administrations, 1. SYNYO GmbH – Wien (AT) Awareness and public transport services, law prevention Call 2013-1 EUR xxxx enforcement agencies across EU to Consortium: solutions against 2. Univ. Barcelona (ES) CP REA - 608152 share statistics, knowledge, good graffiti vandalism practices, prevention strategies using 3. Univ. Arts London (UK) in public areas and intuitive modules & cooperation 4. Sine-Institut - München (DE) transport features. Proposed interactive “Open 5. Ferroccarrills de La Generalitat de Catalunya - Barcelona (ES) Information Hub” addressing local communities, citizens, sprayers to 6. London Borough of Islington - strengthen public awareness & London (UK) reduce illegal spraying activities, using 7. Union Internationale des Chemins

effectual tools, visualisations. Created de Fer - Paris (FR) web platform will serve as central collaborative instance against graffiti vandalism for all experts, stakeholders, citizens. It will be flexible, scalable to include future data sources, apps, modern strategies that support artistic expression while

preserving public & private property, Status: safety. FINISHED www.graffolution.eu

162

ODYSSEY FP7 – Secure November Odyssey tackles the problem of Coordinator: Societies 2008 / April analysing crime, ballistics data, taken 1. Sheffield Hallam Univ. (UK) Strategic pan- 2011 from disparate heterogeneous European ballistics Call 2007-1.3-6 ballistic systems, across EU. The Consortium: intelligence EUR 2,395,000 bedrock of these findings was 2. An Garda Síochána - Dublin (IE) platform for CP 3. Atos - Madrid (ES) REA - 218237 creation of potential set of new EU combating standards for gun crime data defined 4. Ecole Royale Mil. - Brussels (BE) organised crime by own data structures, taxonomies, 5. Europol - Den Haag (NL) and terrorism ontologies. These can now be taken 6.Forensic Pathways Tamworth (UK) 7. Min. Interno - Rome (IT) onward to CEN, or ISO for evaluation & use. 8. Min. Amministr. Publ.- Milano (IT) 9. North Yorkshire Police Authority - Northallerton (UK) 10. SAS Software Ltd - Marlow (UK) odyssey-project.eu 11. Sesa Commerce Handelsgmbh -

Modling (AT) 12. West Midlands North Yorkshire Police - Birmingham (UK) Status: 13. Xlab razvoj programske opreme FINISHED in svetovanje doo - Ljubljana (SI)

EPOOLICE FP7 – Secure January 2013 / Efficient effective environmental Coordinator: Societies Decembre scanning system as part of an early 1. ISDEFE – Madrid (ES) Early Pursuit 2015 warning system for detection of against Organized Call 2012.6.3-1 emerging organised crime threats, Consortium: Crime using EUR 3,493,810 supporting LEAs (Law and IntelligenCE 2. Univ. Aalborg (DK) environmental CP 3. CEA - Paris (FR) ENTR - 312651 systems): to scan environment to feed scanning, the Law new & emerging threats into serious 4. Thales - Paris (FR) and Intelligent & organised crime threat assessment 5. FhG FKIE - Wachtberg (DE) systems processes to map changes that impact 6. Univ. Granada (ES) 7. Univ. Sheffield Hallam (UK) security of EU MS to enable strategic decision makers to counter balance 8. Inthemis - Montpellier (FR) detected upcoming threats before 9. Legind Technol. - Esjbjerg (DK) they materialize by using feedback 10. SAS Software Ltd - Marlow (UK)

from analysts to distillate, propose 11. Min. Interior - Madrid (ES) 12. West Yorkshire Police Authority - new indicators / signals & adjust its warning / alert levels discovering & Wakefield (UK) proposing new sources to be scanned 13. UNICRI - Torino (IT) 14. FHVRP - München (DE) evaluating importance of sources; more effective information providing 15. Europol - Den Haag (NL) into foresight to fight all sorts of 16. Inst. Fremtidsforskning Forening organised crime providing better CIFS - Copenhagen (DK),

under standing of new & upcoming 17. Thales - Hengelo Ov (NL) Status: technologies & trends, leading to FINISHED strategic planning into security issues. https://www.epoolice.eu/

P-REACT FP7 – Secure April 2014 / Develops a sensor data (video, Coordinator: Societies March 2016 motion) capturing, archiving 1. Vicomtech-IK4 - San Sebastián (ES) Petty criminality network/platform for protection of diminution through Call 2013.7.2-1 EUR 1,489,396 small businesses from petty crimes. Consortium: search and analysis 2. Kinesense Ltd - Dublin (IE) CP REA - 607881 Builts in capabilities (sensors, in multi-source embedded systems) interconnecting 3. Aditess Ltd - Lefkosia (CY) video capturing using established & emerging 4. Future Intell. Ltd - London (UK) and archiving technologies, as Digital Subscriber 5. CERTH - Thessaloniki (GR) platform Lines, Cloud computing: low-cost 6. KEMEA - Athens (GR) 7. SRM - Bologna (IT) cameras, smart sensors in small business’ premises networked directly to Cloud-based, Data Centers, continuously monitored, recorded.

Potential incident detected may also trigger neighbour sensors in other premises near incident. The platform will be able to receive information (images, video) captured by mobile smart devices (phones, tablets...) Status: operated by users found at incident FINISHED place. http://p-react.eu/

163

7.6.4 Explosives The EU Explosives Action Plan calls on Member States and the Commission to set up explosives-related research, and to ensure the aggregation and spread of research results, in particular in the areas of precursors linked to IEDs, IEDs and their properties, inhibitors which could be added to precursors to explosives to prevent them being used to manufacture explosive devices, detection technologies, and identification of various problems, detection of explosives and precursors including through the use of additives, mobile explosives testing kits/detection devices (non destructive methods), certification, testing and trialling schemes for explosives detection solutions etc. 7.6.4.1 Detection / Characterisation of explosives and their precursors Projects in support of the action plan are shown below:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

PREVAIL FP7 – Secure June 2010 / PREVAIL is to inhibit the use of some Coordinator: Societies January 2013 common materials for use as 1.FOI – Stockholm (SE) PRecursors of precursors to explosives & to allow for ExplosiVes: Call 2009-1.3-3 EUR 3,343,162 easier detection. Homemade Consortium: Additives to Inhibit 2. TNO - Delft (NL) CP RTD – 241858 explosives (HMEs) attracts terrorists their use including to manufacture. Objectives are to 3. CEA - Paris (FR) Liquids prevent use of hydrogen peroxide 4. WIHiE Mil. Inst. Hygiene and Epidemiology - Warsaw (PL) (HP) & acetone as precursors to HMEs by development of series of novel 5. Yara International ASA - Oslo (NO) inhibitors, & to ensure that detection 6. Arkema - Paris (FR) of ammonium nitrate (AN) based 7. Inscentinel Ltd - Harpenden (UK) Status: devices is facilitated by adding 8. KCEM - Karlskoga (SE) FINISHED markers tailored to a very sensitive 9. SECRAB - Uttran (SE) detection system. 10.Tech.Inst. Technol. - Technion (IL)

BONAS FP7 – Secure April 2011 / BONAS is to design, develop, test a Coordinator: Societies September novel wireless sensors network for in 1.ENEA – Rome (IT) BOmb factory 2014 particular against threat posed by IED detection by Call 2010.1.3-3 devices. It will focus on detection of Consortium: Networks of EUR 3,488,360 2. Univ.. Belfast (IE) CP traces of precursors (particulates, Advanced Sensors gases and/or waterborne) present in 3. King's College London (UK) ENTR – 261685 4. EADS - Ottobrunn (DE) environment surrounding vicinity of a 'bomb factory'. Develop: Lidar/Dial 5. Onera - Paris (FR) system; QEPAS sensor; SERS sensor; 6. Tekever - Lisboa (PT) an Immunosensor. Prepare potential 7. CESM - Neuchatel (CH)

future deployment of key sensors 8. CEA - Paris (FR) 9. Univ.. Lyon (FR) aboard a flying platform with view towards increasing BONAS network 10. Univ. Lausanne (CH) detection capabilities. 11. Laser Diagnostic Instrum - Thallinn (EE), 12. Serstech AB - Lundt (SE) 13. CREO - L'Aquila (IT) Status: FINISHED 14. Nat. Bureau Investigation - www.bonas-fp7.eu Vantaa (FI)

EMPHASIS FP7 – Secure October 2011 / Develop system for detecting ongoing Coordinator: Societies September illicit production of explosives & 1. FOI – Stockholm (SE) Explosive Material 2015 improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in Production Call 2010.1.3-3 urban areas. Area sensors, Consortium: (Hidden) Agile EUR 3,406,050 strategically positioned, for 2. TNO - Delft (NL) Search and CP 3. CNRS - Paris (FR) ENTR – 231381 monitoring of explosives or precursors Intelligence System to explosives. Static sensors, 4. FhG (DE) 5. Police Scientifique - Paris (FR) positioned in sewer, for monitoring of sewage for indicative traces. 6. Cascade Technol. - Glasgow (UK) Detectors will be connected in 7. Vigo syst. - Warsaw (PL) network. Intention is to cover large 8. Portendo AB - Stockholm (SE)

area that can be reduced step by step 9. Morpho - Paris (FR) 164

into narrower areas due to positive alert. For final verification stand-off detectors in equipped mobile units Status: will be used to pinpoint location of FINISHED bomb factory. http://www.foi.se/

OPTIX FP7 – Secure November Development of a transportable Coordinator: Societies 2008 / June system for standoff detection & 1. Indra Systemas – Madrid (ES) Optical 2013 identification of explosives in real technologies for Call 2007-1.3-1 scenarios at distances of around 20 Consortium: identification of EUR 2,487,556 2.Univ. Malaga (ES) CP metres (sensor to target), using explosives alternative or simultaneous analysis 3. FOI - Stockholm (SE) REA – 218037 4. EKSPLA - Vilnius (LT) by 3 different complementary optical technologies (LIBS, RAMAN, IR). 5. Avantes BV - Apeldoorn (NL) 6. Tech. Univ. Clausthal - Clausthal- Zellerfeld (DE) Status: 7. Univ. Technol. Wien (AT) FINISHED http://www.fp7-optix.eu 8. Univ. Dortmund (DE) 9. Guardia Civil - Madrid (ES)

ROSFEN FP7 – Secure April 2013 / Detection of high-explosive primer Coordinator: Societies April 2015 charge (PETN) is hampered by higher- 1. Tyndall Nat. Institute - Cork (IE) Rapid On-site concentration residues from main Forensic Analysis Call 2012.7.2-1 EUR 1,420,262 charge (ammonium nitrate). Consortium: of Explosives and 2. Microsaic Systems - Surrey (UK) CP REA – 312829 Detection of the primer is essential in Narcotics order to secure prosecution. 3. Environics OY - Mikkeli (FI) 4. Univ. Basel (CH) ROSFEN’s goal is to deliver an advanced forensic platform for rapid, 5. Department of Justice Northern on-site direct detection, lab-quality Ireland, Forensic - Belfast (UK) analysis of narcotics, explosives, 6. Police Service of Northern Ireland

precursors. It is based on novel chip- PSNI - Belfast (UK) based triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with advanced front- end ion filter & sample Status: introduction/pre-concentration FINISHED module. http://www.rosfen.eu/

SALIANT FP7 – Secure September Development of a hand-held device Coordinator: Societies 2010 / for real-time analysis of trace levels of 1. Univ. Newcastle upon Tyne (UK) Selective December explosives, toxic chemicals and drugs. Antibodies Limited Call 2009-1.3-4 2013 Key innovation is a highly novel simple Consortium: Immuno Assay 2. Selective Antibodies Ltd - CP positive detection lateral-flow test for Novel Technology EUR 3,471,992 small molecules, highly sensitive, very Newcastle upon Tyne (UK) 3. Oy Reagena Ltd - Toivala (FI) REA – 242377 easy to use. It is ideally suited for deployment by first responders at 4. Indicia Biotechnology - Oullins (FR) crime scenes & terrorist incidents. 5. Department of Justice Equality & SALIANT is employing positive Law reform - Dublin (IE)

detection technology of Selective 6. UNIZA - Zilika (SK) 7. NFI - The Hague (NL) Antibodies Ltd to develop robust system for measurement of low level 8. Appl. Analyzers - Schiedam (NL) Status: samples. 9. DLO-FBR - Wageningen (NL) FINISHED 10. CELS- Newcastle upon Tyne (UK) http://www.saliant.eu/ 11. KITE - Huddersfield (UK)

COMMONSENSE FP7 – Secure January 2011 / Developing a multivariate sensing Coordinator: Societies December platform that detects manufacturing 1. Tyndall-UCC - Cork (IE) Development of a 2013 facilities for improvised explosive Common Sensor Call 2010.1.3-3 devices. Making headway in creation Consortium: Platform for the EUR 3,404,935 & demonstration of this network of 2. Alphasense Ltd - Braintree (UK) Detection of IED CP 3. BAM - Berlin (DE) REA – 614155 sensors through development of "Bomb Factories" novel materials, portable sensors, 4.PSNI Police Service of Northern wireless communications network. Ireland - Dublin (IE) 5. SensL Technol. Ltd - Cork (IE) Status: 6. Technion - Haifa (IL) FINISHED 7. Thales - Paris (FR) http://www.fp7projectcommonsense. 8. Univ. Manchester (UK) eu/

ENCOUNTER FP7 - Secure May 2012 / Tools and procedures for neutralising Coordinator: (N) or mitigating (M) the effects of 165

Title? Societies June 2015 IEDs and to respond appropriately 1. FOI, Stockholm (SE) and effectively to threat in the urban Call 2011-1 EUR 3,313,630 environment with various scenarios Consortium: CP 2. FhG EMI - Freiburg (DE that EOD bodies and police units address. Evaluation of concept of 3. CNRS - Paris (FR) operation (CONOP) of the EOD bodies 4. Blastech Ltd BLT, Sheffield (UK) and the police units operating in 5. Univ. Sheffield (UK) Status: urban environment. 6. Isdefe, Madrid (ES) FINISHED 7. Advanced Quarrying Ltd (IL) http://www.foi.se/ 8. Albert-Ludwigs-Univ. , Freiburg (DE)

On-going projects are complementing the above actions:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium Acronym/Title Instrument details

HOMER FP7 – Secure November Basic knowledge unknown about Coordinator: Societies 2013 / October HMEs; composition, characterisation. 1. PSNI Police Police Service of Homemade 2016 Review freely available recipes Northern Ireland – Belfast (UK) explosives (HMEs) Call 2012.1.3.2 (internet), to evaluate their and recipes EUR 3,436,875 dangerousness. HOMER will Consortium: characterisation- CP 2. BAM - Berlin (DE) ENTR – 312883 implement comprehensive EU wide Capability study on HMEs addressing many key 3. Min. Interior - Madrid (ES) 4. KENEA - Thessaloniki (GR) questions including " what can be done to prevent or inhibit production 5. Isdefe - Madrid (ES) of HMEs? what types of chemicals are 6. Defense Institure - Sofia (BG) available freely today for direct use in 7. Queens Univ. - Belfast (UK)

HMEs & what is chemical stability of 8. Yara SA - Brussels (BE) 9.Cent.Res.Tech. - Thessaloniki (GR) Status: HMEs. 10.Un Queen's Elisabet h- Dublin (IE) ON-GOING 11. tamar israeli advanced quarrying co - Bazra (IL)

SUBCOP FP7 – Secure June 2013 / Develop technologies, procedures to Coordinator: Societies May 2016 be applied by Police Security Forces 1.FOI – Stockholm (SE) Suicide Bomber when responding to a suspected Counteraction and Call 2012.1.3-1 EUR 3,486,040 PBIED (Person Borne Improvised Consortium: Prevention Explosive Device). It is insensitive to 2. TNO - Delft (NL) CP ENTR – 312375 3. Karolinska Instit. - Stockholm (SE) how alert is raised, should it be based on detection of explosives or 4. TU Eindhoven (NL) explosive devices, informants 5. Rand - Cambridge (UK) reporting, or other intelligence 6. Aselsan Elektr. San. Ticaret AS -

sources. It will develop guidance as to Ankara (TR) 7. Min. Public Security – Ramle (IL) what response to a PBIED that is ethically & socially justifiable. 8. CBRNE Ltd - Ashford (UK) 9. İçişleri Bakanlığı - Ankara (Turkey) 10. Cerberus Black Ltd - Haywards Status: Heath (UK) ON-GOING http://www.subcop.eu/q_and_a.htm 11. FhG VVS - Freiburg (DE)

7.6.4.2 Crime scene investigations related to explosives Scene investigations related explosives have been subject to few projects, namely:

Project Funding Contract bstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

HYPERION FP7 – Secure August 2012 / HYPERION develop, test a system Coordinator: Societies July 2015 concept for on-site forensic analysis 1.FOI – Stockholm (SE) Hyperspectral of an explosion. Lead to very imaging IED and Call 2011-1 EUR 3,458,969 significant reduction in time delay of Consortium: explosives 2. FhG IAF - Freiburg (DE) CP ENTR – 284585 delivered forensic evidence requested reconnaissance by police. The fast crime scene 3. TNO - Delft (NL) system investigation provided can help in 4. Aselsan Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS - Ankara (TR) rapidly finding terrorists, thus being pro-active in preventing future 5. Selex - Rome (IT) 6. Morpho - Paris (FR) 166

attacks. 7. Bund. Kriminal Amt BKA - Wiesbaden (DE) 8. VIGO - Warszawa (PL) 9. Turkish Nat. Police - Ankara (TR) 10. Portendo - Stockholm (SE) 11. Tecnalia - Bilbao (ES) 12. Swedish National Laboratory of Status: www.hyperion-fp7.eu Forensic Science - Linköping (SE) FINISHED

An an on-going project:

Project Funding Contract bstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

EXPEDIA FP7 – Secure September It will create a EU guide for first Coordinator: Societies 2014 /August responders with basic instructions on 1.FOI – Stockholm (SE) EXplosives 2017 how to interpret findings on crime PrEcursor Defeat Call 2013-3 scene when suspected bomb factories Consortium: by Inhibitor EUR 3,480,602 2. Brodarski Inst. - Zagreb (HR) CP encountered. In order for EU Additives legislators to carry out right work in 3. Bundeskriminalamt BKA - ENTR – 604987 Wiesbaden (DE) fight against terrorism, access to accurate data, in-depth understanding 4. CEA - Paris (FR) of HMEs characteristics, various 5. Dow Operation - Angus Chemie formulations thereof is of crucial Gmbh - Ibbenbüren (DE)

importance. It will feed its produced 6. Esbit Comp. - Hamburg (DE) 7. FhG ICT - Karlsruhe (DE) information about HMEs directly to these groups via appropriate 8. KCEM AB - Uppsala (SE) channels. Research for solutions to 9. National Bureau of Investigation - Vantaa (FI) prevent misuse of some explosive precursors, not yet been investigated. 10. TNO - Delft (NL) Inhibition of these precursors will be 11. Wojskowy Inst. - Warszawa (PL) closely linked to feasibility & 12. Yara International - Oslo (NO) Status: implementation cost studies, ON-GOING toxicology studies.

7.6.5 Decontamination Strengthening decontamination and remediation capacity is another goal of the CBRN Action Plan. The JRC is assessing modelling tools with modelling experts and emergency response personnel in order to assess practical requirements for modelling tools with the aim to identify research needs. Available means for decontamination of affected population, environment and infrastructure are also assessed, as well as their capacity to deal with mass casualties with reference to CBRN materials with different cultural and social contexts. In the RN sector, further investigations are undertaken about the possibility of using RODOS (Real- time On-line Decision Support system for off-site emergency management in Europe) and ARGOS (Accident Reporting and Guidance Operational System) or other Decision Support Systems to address CBRN releases, e.g. radiological dispersal devices in events such as the polonium incident in 2006 as well as development of transport and dispersion models for large buildings, e.g. airports, railway stations and underground systems. Several projects are running in this field, some of which can be found in the civil protection and forensics sections.

167

7.6.5.1 Decontamination of CBRN agents

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

COUNTERFOG FP7 – Secure November Development of Fog-based Large Coordinator: Societies 2013 / October Scale Decontamination System for use 1.Univ. Carlos III – Madrid (SE) Device For Large 2017 in large facilites & open-air Scale Fog Call 2012.4.4-2 conditions. It will be new, rapid Consortium: Decontamination EUR 3,471,992 response system for collapsing all 2. Univ. Strathclyde - Glasgow (UK) CP 3. VOP CZ - Brno (CZ) REA – 312804 kinds of dispersed agents (smoke, fog, spores...) by using a fog made of 4. Univ. Del Alcala - Madrid (ES) solution that could eventually contain 5. Inst. Inorg. Chem. - Prague (CZ) any kind of neutralizing component. It 6. Inst. Solid State Phys. - Sofia (BG)

will be permanent installation in large 7. Consilium Marine & Safety AB - Göteborg (SE) public buildings like railway stations but also portable COUNTERFOG for 8. AEF - Madrid (ES) use outdoors, used to counteract 9. CIEMAT - Madrid (ES) 10. BPE E.K.- Eckental (DE) Status: CBRN attack in its earliest stages. It ON-GOING will use the same “weapon” as CBRN attack: dispersed state with large surface/volume ratio.

7.6.5.2 EDA projects in the field of decontamination Projects funded by EDA also deal with decontamination aspects, namely:

Project Acronym Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Instrument details case of GA amendment) DCLAW EDA JIP March 2015/ Bio-decontamination Coordinator: April 2015 1. Aquila Bioscience Limited Innovation Centre - Galway (IE); Call A-1152-RT- GP EUR www - not yet available Consortium: 247.990,00 2. University of Defence - Kralove (CZ) QUIXOTE EDA JIP October 2013 Plasma decontamination Coordinator: / February 1. IBATECH - Madrid (ES); 2015 Call A-1152-RT- Consortium: GP EUR 2. TITANIA ?; 1.107.208,00 3. ITM Institute of Technology - Madrid (ES); 4. VVU Military Research Institute - Brno (CZ); 5. MIHE - Military Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology - Warsaw (PL); 6. WIChiR - Military Institute of Chemistry and Radiometry - Warsaw www - not yet available (PL); 7. AIT - Vienna (AT) RACED EDA JIP ???????? Development of DECON methods Coordinator: ? and risk management tool for Consortium: ????? EUR ????? remaining hazards ("how clean is 2. ???? clean")

http://xxxx

168

7.6.6 Prevention of extremist events and counterterrorism In line with the policy framework described in section 5.11, a range of projects have been funded for the development of improved prevention / detection of threats of extremist events and counterterrorism actions:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

TACTICS FP7 – Secure September Most terrorist attacks in EU have Coordinator: Societies 2012 / August occurred at airports or public 1. TNO – Delft (NL) Tactical Approach 2015 transport. TACTICS introduces 3 roles: to Counter Call 2011.1.4-1 Threat Manager TM, Threat Consortium: Terrorists in Cities EUR 2. RAND Europe - Cambridge (UK) CP Decomposition Manager TDM, ongoing research 3,478,464 Capabilities Manager CM. It aims to 3. Dutch Nat. Police - Den Haag (NL) develop trustful, effective strategies 4. Peace Research Insti. Oslo (NO) ENTR – 5. ITTI - Poznan (PL) 285533 in order to support each of these managers in responding more quickly 6. Trinity College Dublin (IE) in more structured, efficient way to 7. ISCA - Rishon Le-Zion (IL)

specific threat as well as minimizing 8. Univ. Politéc. Valencia (ES) 9. FhG IESE - Kaiserslautern (DE) occurrence of false positives & negatives.. 10. Royal Netherlands Marechaussee Status: - Amsterdam (NL) FINISHED http://www.fp7-tactics.eu/ 11. Morpho - Paris (FR)

DECOTESSC1 FP7 – Secure April 2010 / Thorough understanding of the Coordinator: Societies June 2011 system-of-systems’ structure will be 1. TNO – Delft (NL) DEmonstration of developed, requirements for ideal COunterTErrorism Call 2009-1.1-2 EUR system will be proposed as well as Consortium: System-of-Systems 1,001,627 2. FhG ICT & INT (DE) CSA description of current state-of-art, in against CBRNE order to fill gaps a strategic roadmap: 3. Technalia - Bilbao (ES) phase 1 ENTR – 4. CEA - Paris (FR) 242294 involving stakeholders (workshops, meetings). 5. CEIS - Paris (FR) 6. VTT - Espoo (FI) 7. Seibersdorf labor - Seibersdorf (AT) 8. JRC - Brussels (BE) Status: 9. AIT - Wien (AT) FINISHED http://www.decotessc1.eu/ 10. FOI - Stockholm (SE)

PROACTIVE FP7 – Secure May 2012 / Research holistic citizen-friendly multi Coordinator: Societies April 2015 sensor fusion & intelligent reasoning 1. Vitrociset SPA - Roma (IT) PRedictive framework enabling prediction, reasOning and Call 2011-1 EUR detection, understanding, efficient Consortium: multi-source fusion 3,371,800 2. AGH Univ. Sci. Technol. - Krakowie CP response to terrorist interests, goals empowering & courses of actions in urban (PL) AntiCipation of ENTR – 3. AIT - Athens (GR) 285320 environment (UE). Fusion of both attacks and static knowledge (intelligence 4. CMR - Milano (IT) Terrorist actions In information) & dynamic information 5. HW Comm. Ltd - Lancaster (UK) Urban (data observed from sensors 6. KEMEA - Athens (GR) EnVironmEnts deployed in UE). It will incorporate 7. Kingston Univ. (UK) 8. ISIG - Gorizia (IT) advanced reasoning techniques (adversarial reasoning) in order to 9. Magyar Tudományos Akadémia intelligently process, derive high level Sztaki - Budapest (HU) terroristic semantics from multitude 10. Univ. Bundeswehr - München Status: of source streams. (DE) FINISHED http://www.fp7-proactive.eu/

RAPTOR FP7 – Secure January 2010 Development of a mobile, rapidly Coordinator: Societies / January deployable, inflatable structure for 1. FhG ICT – Pfinztal (DE) Rapidly 2014 ballistic protection. Working on deployable, gas Call 2007-1.2-2 specific solutions to support EU Consortium: generator assisted. EUR 2. Bundeskriminalamt BKA - CP security forces in prevention, inflatable mobile 2,060,995 response to various threat scenarios. Wiesbaden (DE) security kits for 3. Dr. Lange GmbH & Co KG - REA – 218259 Emphasis is placed on protection of ballistic protection individuals, general security at Hannover (DE) of European events, humanitarian workers (as Red 4. Explosia as - Pardubice (CZ) civilians against Cross); Development of textiles & 5. P-D Interglas Ltd - Sherborne (UK) crime and terrorist coatings for ballistic protection; attacks Development of a gas generator

169

formulation with high mass specific gas output, low gas temperature, non-toxic gas components; Status: Evaluation, testing of combustion FINISHED chamber designs with respect to small size, light weight;. http://www.raptor-project.eu/

SAFE-COMMS FP7 – Secure April 2009/ Goal is to help public authorities in EU Coordinator: Societies April 2011 better reacting to terror crises by 1. Bar Ilan Univ. - Tel Aviv (IL) Counter-terrorism providing effective communication crisis Call 2007-6.1-3 EUR strategies for aftermath of terror Consortium: communications 1,088,244 attacks, seeking to spread fear, panic, 2. A&B One Gmbh - Frankfurt am strategies for CP Main (DE) REA – 218285 by breaking news media throughout recovery and world. Effective recovery depends on 3. Res. Instit. European and American continuity carefully planned, trained Studies - Athens (GR) 4. Univ. Ulster - Coleraine (UK) communication strategy, restoring public & quick return to normality. 5. Univ. Burgos (ES) Public authorities need a counter- 6. Univ. Rousse Angel Kunchev - terrorism communication strategy Rousse (BG)

comprised of activities aimed at relevant audiences. SAFE-COMMS aims to provide public authorities throughout Europe with an effective, Status: modular communication strategy for FINISHED terror crises. http://faculty.biu.ac.il/~sshpiro/

COREPOL FP7 – Secure January 2012 1. To provide a basis for coordinated Coordinator: Societies / December research activities in area of police- 1. Deutschen Hochschule der Polizei – Conflict Resolution, 2014 minority relations using comparative Münster (DE) Mediation and Call 2011-1 method of data analysis; Findings will Restorative Justice EUR Consortium: CP further police science research in this and the Policing of 1,429,681 crucial area of peace building as part 2.Fed. Min. Interior - Wien (AT) Ethnic Minorities in 3.IRKS - Wien (AT) REA – 285166 of democratic process within Eu Germany, Austria societies. 2.To address practical issue 4. Police College, Min. Interior - and Hungary of effective dissemination of research Budapest (HU) 5. European Research Services GmbH, findings to improve police-minority interaction making use of realm of Münster (DE) police tertiary education, in-service staff training but also involving other

agencies including NGOs. 3.To serve as principal network for practice oriented dissemination of RJ strategies, peace building in conflict zone of police & minorities. In police education, this concerns CEPOL course curricula & material, curricula for similar influential target groups, Status: civil & public sector agencies.. FINISHED http://www.corepol.eu/

DETECTER FP7 – Secure December DETECTER aims at increasing Coordinator: Societies 208 / January compliance of counter-terrorism with 1. Univ. Birmingham (UK) Detection 2012 human rights & ethical standards in technologies, Call 2007-6.5-1 rapidly changing field of detection Consortium: terrorism, ethics EUR 2. Åbo Akademi Univ. - Abo (FI) CP technologies. It addresses and human rights 1,869,684 increasingly international character of 3. Danish Inst. Human Rights - Copenhagen (DK) REA – 217862 counter-terrorism, increasing use of informal mechanisms for altering law- 4. Europ. Univ. Inst.- Firenze (Italy) enforcement practice to meet threat 5. Norwegian Centre for Human of terrorism, great variety of Rights - Oslo (NO)

detection technologies & their uses. 6. Nottingham Univ. (UK) 7. Raoul Wallenberg Inst. Human Need for human rights standards to be informed by dialogue with both Rights and Humanit. Law - Lund (SE) manufacturers of detection technology & law-enforcement officials directly involved with counter-terrorism using this 170

technology & influence development of products. It combines applied ethical & legal research with this dialogue in order to affect design & use of products, to make ethical, legal research better informed, to innovate conceptually..

http://www.detecter.bham.ac.uk/

Status: FINISHED

Two further FP7 projects are investigation related to prevention / mitigation of extremist events, namely:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

PRIME FP7 – Secure xxxx 2013 / Support design of technologies Coordinator: Societies xxxx 2017 (counter-measures, communication) 1. Univ. College London (UK) PReventing, for prevention, interdiction, Interdicting and Call 2013-1 EUR 2,842,878 mitigation of lone actor extremist Consortium: Mitigating 2. Univ. Aarhus (DK) CP REA – 608354 events (LOEEs). Communication Extremist events: strategies aimed at a range of 3. King's College London (UK) Defending against audiences, including extremists & 4. Hebrew Univ. Jerusalem (IL) lone actor general public. Deliver knowledge- 5. Univ. Leiden (NL) extremism base to inform design measures by 6. Univ.. Warszawski - Warsaw (PL) achieving: 1): Characterising risk posed by LOEEs; 2) Producing cross- level risk analysis framework to articulate key factors, processes

implicated in LOEEs (radicalisation, attack preparation). 3): Translating risk analysis framework into meta- script of LOEEs. 4): Producing integrated, cross-level script of LOEEs, & identifying categories of intervention points or 'pinch points'. 5): Delivering portfolio of

requirements for design of measures Status: & communication. ON-GOING http://xxxxx

VOX-POL FP7 – Secure January 2014 / VOX-Pol’s purpose is establishment of Coordinator: Societies November robust partnering, research, training, 1. Univ. Dublin City (IE) Virtual Centre of 2018 dissemination network with core Excellence for Call 2012.7.4-2 function: comprehensive research, Consortium: Research in Violent EUR 5,129,681 analysis, debate, critique of topics in 2. Univ. Oxford (UK) Online Political NoE 3. Kings College London (UK) REA - 312827 &issues surrounding Violent Online Extremism Political Extremism. In order to: 1. 4. Univ. Amsterdam (NL) 5. TNO - Delft (NL) Create sustainable critical mass of innovative activity among what is 6. Indraprastha Inst. Information currently a burgeoning, but Technology – Delhi (India) fragmented group of researchers & 7. CMCS - Budapest (HU)

research topics. 2. Ensure that EU, 8. Univ. Hamburg , IFSH - Hamburg (DE) MS strategies, policies targeting VOPE are based on concrete evidence, experience, knowledge about Status: contours & workings of VOPE & thus ON-GOING increasing their likelihood of success. http://voxpol.eu/

171

7.6.7 Post-crisis response and recovery following terrorist attacks The above projects are complemented by a research action which is focusing on recovery planning further to a terrorist attack:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

RECONASS FP7 - Secure December Monitoring system for constructed Coordinator: Societies 2013 / facilities, as target for terrorist 1. ICCS - Zografou / Athens (GR) Reconstruction and June 2017 attacks, providing real time, reliable, REcovery Planning: Call 2012-1 continuously updated assessment of Consortium: Rapid and EUR 2. Univ. Twente (NL) CP structural condition of monitored Continuously 4,260,240 facilities after disaster with detail to 3. TU Dresden (DE) Updated 4. FOI - Stockholm (SE) REA– 312718 be useful for recovery planning. In COnstruction spatially extended events, speedy 5. Risa Gmbh - Berlin (DE) Damage, and local calibration of satellite & 6. Tecnic Spa - Rome (IT) Related Needs oblique aerial photography reducing 7. D. Bairaktaris Assoc. Ltd- Athens ASSessment required time to inform post (GR) 8. GeoSIG Ltd - Zurich (CH) disaster/crisis needs assessment process, providing base data for 9. Federal Agency Tech. Relief THW - reconstruction efforts. Tool enabling Bonn (DE) the fusion of external information,

and international interoperability between involved units for reconstruction & recovery planning & support collaborative work Status: between actors. ON-GONG http://www.reconass.eu/

7.6.8 Removal of anti-personal landmines Specific projects tackled the issue of removal of anti-personal landmines, namely:

Project Funding Contract bstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

D-BOX FP7 – Secure January 2013 / D-BOX tackles the burning issue of Coordinator: Societies December anti-personal landmines & cluster 1. EADS ASTRIUM SAS – Paris (FR) Demining tool-BOX 2015 munitions remaining from armed for humanitarian Call 2011.1.3-3 conflicts. It will provide Demining Consortium: clearing of large EUR 6,898,085 stakeholders with innovative, “easy to 2. e-GEOS SPA - Matera (IT) scale area from CP 3. Univ. Leicester (UK) REA – 284996 use” & low cost solutions interfaced anti-personal and/or integrated in comprehensive 4. VTT - Espoo (FI) landmines and toolbox. It could be used during all 5. Univ. Surrey - Guildford (UK) cluster munitions demining activities to help operators 6. TNO - The Hague (NL) 7. Telespazio - Rome (IT) & end users chose most suitable answer for optimal planning 8. Terra Spatium SA - Athens (GR) &preparation to low cost tools for 9. Selex - Rome (IT) specific tasks during different steps of 10. RadioLabs - Rome (IT)

demining activities adapted for 11. Inst. Security Technologies MORATEX - Lodz (PL) varying scenarios, conditions. 12. Infoterra Ltd - Leicester (UK) 13. FhG EMI, ILT, IME, INT, IOSB (DE) 14. FOI - Stockholm (SE) Status: 15. Univ. Technol. - Delft (NL) FINISHED http://www.d-boxproject.eu/ 16. CNIT - Parma (IT) 17. CEN - Brussels (BE)

TIRAMISU FP7 – Secure January 2012 / Anti-personnel landmines & Coordinator: Societies December unexploded ordnance (UXOs) present 1. Ecole Royale Mil.– Brussels (BE) Toolbox 2015 important obstacle to transition from Implementation Call 2011.1.3-3 crisis to peace for war-affected Consortium: for Removal of EUR 2. Univ. Genova (IT) CP countries. They threaten post-conflict Anti-personnel 14,934,745 development & welfare. Provide Mine 3. EOC - Oberpfaffenhofen (DE) Mines, 4. Univ. Coimbra ISR - Coimbra (PT) REA – 284747 Action community with toolbox to Submunitions and assist in addressing many issues 5. CSIC - Barcelona (ES) related to Humanitarian Demining, 6. Univ. Catania (IT) 172

UXO thus promoting peace, national & 7. IMM - Warszawa (PL) regional security, conflict prevention, 8. Dialogis UG - Freilassing (DE) social & economic rehabilitation, 9. Univ. Zagreb (HR) post-conflict reconstruction. Tools 10. Hrvatski Centar za razminiranje- development: 1) Demining planning Centar za testiranje - Karlovac (HR) tools, to locate landmines & UXOs, 11. Noveltis - Aix-en-Provence (FR) define contaminated areas. 2) 12. Paris-Lodron Univ - Salzburg (AT)

Detection, disposal tools, to neutralise 13. Wojskowy Inst. - Warszawa (PL) mines & UXOs. 3) Training, Mine Risk 14. Univ. St Andrews (UK) education tools. 15. ULB - Brussels (BE) 16. Spinator AB - Stockholm (SE)

17. ProTime GmbH (DE) 18. SpaceTec Partners- Brussels (BE) 19. Satcen - Torrejon de Ardoz (ES) 20. Vallon Gmbh - Eningen Unter

Achalm (DE)

21. Ing. Sistemi Spa IDS - Pisa (IT) 22. Pierre Trattori di Giovanni Battista Polentes & C. Snc - Silvano

D'orba (IT) http://www.fp7-tiramisu.eu/ 23. Brimatech Services Gmbh - Wien Status: (AT) FINISHED 24. CEN - Brussels (BE)

7.6.9 Cyber crime Cyber crime affects a very wide range of sectors and it hence justified the funding of a wide range of projects, as exemplified below:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

CAPER FP7 – Secure September Create a common platform for Coordinator: Societies 2011 / June prevention of organised crime 1. 21SEC INFORMATION SECURITY Collaborative 2014 through sharing, exploitation, analysis LABS S.L. – Pamplona (ES) information, Call 2010.1.2-1 of Open and private information acquisition, EUR 5 579 346 sources. Features: (a) Information Consortium: processing, IP 2. FhG FKIE - Wachtberg (DE) REA - 58612 acquisition from a linguistically exploitation and neutral point of view; (b) Information 3. Min. Public Security – Ramle (IL) reporting for the Processing having into account 4. Synthema s.r.l. - Pisa. (IT) prevention of different information types and 5. Studio Professionale Associato a organised crime different cultural biases; (c) Baker & McKenzie - Milano (IT) 6. Technion - Haifa (IL) Information Exploitation through a Visual Analytics component; (d) 7. Inst. Technol. (IL) Standardisation for interchange of 8. Altic Sarl - Paris (FR) data and tools; (e) Integration with 9. Univ. Autonoma Barcelona (ES)

Large scale Systems; (f) Secure 10. Generalitat de Catalunya - Barcelona (ES) knowledge sharing and collaboration; (g) Study and recommendations about 11. CNR - Rome (IT) legal, ethical and societal issues, User 12. Min. Justiça - Lisboa (PT) focused 13. Guardia Civil - Madrid (ES) 14. VICOMTech - San Sebastian (ES) 15. Min.Interno - Rome (IT) 16. Voiceinteraction - Lisboa (PT) Status: 17. Angel Iglesias - IKUSI - San FINISHED http://www.fp7-caper.eu/ Sebastian (ES) 18. Alma Consulting - Paris (FR)

ESCORTS FP7 – Secure June 2008 / ESCoRTS is a joint endeavour among Coordinator: Societies December EU process industries, utilities, leading 1. CEN – Brussels (BE) European netwotk 2010 manufacturers of control equipment for the security of Call 2007-7.0-2 & research institutes to foster Consortium: control and real- EUR 673,603 2. JRC - Brussels (BE) CSA progress towards cyber security of time systems control & communication equipment 3. Enginet - Milano (IT) REA - 218217 4. ABB - Baden (CH) in EU. It will be intersectoral, embracing following industrial fields: 5. Alstom - Paris (FR) power, gas, oil, chemicals and 6. Siemens - München (DE) petrochemicals, pharmaceuticals, 7. Enel Produzione - Rome (IT) 173

manufacturing. Key objectives 8. Transelectrica - Bucarest (RO) include: - Developing common 9. MediterraneadelleAcque - Genova understanding of industrial needs & (IT) requirements regarding security of 10. OPUS publishing - Seal Beach control systems & related California (US) standardisation, accompanied by 11. UNINFO - Torino (IT) raising awareness programme. -

Identifying, disseminating best practice, possibly in joint endeavour between manufacturers & end users, resulting in joint capability & technology taxonomy of security solutions. Status: FINISHED http://www.escortsproject.eu/

CAMINO FP7 – Secure April 2014 / Comprehensive Approach to cyber Coordinator: Societies March 2016 roadMap coordINation and 1. ITTI – Poznan (PL) Comprehensive develOpment; EU funds: approach to cyber Call 2013-1 EUR 1,036,888 Consortium: roadmap Provide realistic roadmap for 2. CBRNE Ltd - Ashford (UK) coordination and CSA REA - 607406 improving resilience against 3. CNR - Rome (IT) development cybercrime, cyber terrorism. 2 4. DFRC AG - Bern (CH) Objectives: To develop 5. Espion Ltd - Dublin (IE) comprehensive cyber crime & cyber 6. Everis Aeroespacial y Defensa S.L. terrorism research agenda & To - Madrid (ES) initiate long-term activities providing 7. Univ. Montpellier I (FR) stable platform of security research 8. WSPol - Szczytno (PL) experts & organisations. 9. S21sec Information Security Labs

S.L. - Pamplona (ES)

Status: 10. Sec-Control Finland Ltd - Helsinki FINISHED http://www.fp7-camino.eu/ (FI)

CYBERROAD FP7 – Secure June 2014 / This roadmap will be built through an Coordinator: Societies May 2016 in-depth analysis of all technological, 1. Univ. Cagliari (IT) Development of social, legal, ethical, political, the Cybercrime Call 2013.2.5-1 EUR 1,289,764 economic aspects rooted. Roadmap Consortium: and Cyber- 2. Demokritos - Athens (GR) CSA REA - 607642 achieved by co-ordinating efforts terrorism research along 3 key directions: •Technology 3. TU Darmsdadt - Darmsdadt (DE) roadmap •Society •Cybercrime, cyber- 4. SBA II - Wien (AT) 5. INDRA Sistemas.- Madrid (ES) terrorism. The Workplan includes all required milestones, deliverables 6. Royal Holloway University of required to monitor the progress of London Egham (UK) CyberROAD activities, to measure 7. CEFRIEL - Milano (IT)

achievement of expected results. 8. McAfee UK Ltd - Berkshire (UK) 9. Eidgenössisches Dept.

Verteidigung (DE) 10. Min. Justiça - Lisboa (PT) 11. Bevölkerungsschutz und Sport

VBS - Berne (CH), 12. Foundation for Research and Technology - Iraklio (GR) 13. INOV - INESC - Lisboa (PT)

14. Ivarx Ltd - Hove (UK)

15.Min. Nat. Defense –Athens(GR) 16. Naukowa i Akademicka Sieć Komputerowa - Warszawie (PL)

17. Poste Italiane - Rome (IT) 18. Proprs - London Ltd. (UK) 19. Scuola Univ. Svizzera italiana (SUPSI) - Lugano (CH) http://www.cyberroad-project.eu/ 20. Security Matter - Eindhoven(NL) Status: 21. Vitrociset spa - Rome (IT) FINISHED

SAFECITI FP7 – Secure January 2014 / The SAFECITI project proposes the Coordinator: Societies February 2016 creation of a simulation system for 1. ISDEFE – Madrid (ES) Future Internet Police intelligence analysts to predict Applied to Public Call ICT- EUR 1,422,734 the behavior of crowds in urban Consortium: Safety in Smart 2013.7.6-1 environments under specific threats 2. Thales - Paris (FR) Cities REA 607626 3. KEMEA - Athens (GR) CP or stresses (turmoil, violence, panic, catastrophes or terrorism) in order to 4. Research & Education Laboratory 174

train and develop better safety plans, in IT - Athens (GR) and tactic operations. This platform 5. Athena GS3 Ltd - Holon (IL) will be designed both as a simulation 6. Tekever - Lisboa (PT) platform for training purposes and as 7. Mira Telecom Srl - Bucarest (RO) a predictive tool for operational use. 8. Everis Spain SL - Madrid (ES) The platform will also include 9. Ayuntamiento de Madrid (ES) performance measurement tools 10. Hi Iberia Ingenieria y Protectos -

based on safety goals (people and Madrid (ES) infrastructure damage) to measure 11. Tecnalia - San Sebastian (ES) the skills of the analyst. 12. FOI - Stockholm (SE) Status: 13. VTT - Espoo (FI) FINISHED http://www.safecity-project.eu/ 14. Aratos Technol. SA - Patras (GR) 15. Telecom Italia Spa - Milano (IT)

CWIT FP7 – Secure September Collect, identify gaps in current Coordinator: Societies 2013 / August legislation in place at International & 1. Interpol – Lyon (FR) Countering WEEE 2015 EU level such as EC Directives on illegal trade, Waste Call 2012.2.2-1 hazardous substances in products Consortium: Electrical Electronic EUR 1,868,303 2. Compliance & Risks - Cork (IE) CSA placed on market in EU: - Directive on Equipement Waste Electrical Electronic Equipment 3. Cross-Border Research Association REA - 312605 - Lausanne (CH) WEEE Directive 2012-19 - Directive on Restriction of Use of Certain 4. UNICRI - New York (US) Hazardous Substances in Electrical & 5. UNU Japan - Tokyo (JP) Electronic Equipment RoHS Directive 6. WEEE Forum headquarters -

2011-65-EU - Regulation 1013-2006 Brussels (BE) 7. Zanasi & Partners - Modena (IT) on Shipments of Waste. CWIT will: - analyse involvement of organized crime in WEEE global distribution; - analyse criminal activity & crime types with illegal WEEE shipments, draw on other work being carried out targeting illegal e-waste exports on

international scale; - estimate true volume of WEEE generated & amounts inappropriately; - assess typology of companies involved in export market, identifying those with criminal history; - develop detailed understanding of destinations & routes used to carry illegal shipments, to possibly enable contacts with Status: regulators & enforcers in destination FINISHED countries. http://www.cwitproject.eu/

On-going projects are listed below:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

E-CRIME FP7 – Secure April 2014 / Analyses economic impact of cyber Coordinator: Societies March 2017 crime & develops concrete measures 1. Trilateral Research & Consulting Economic impacts to manage risks & deter cyber Llp – London (UK) of Cybercrime Call 2013.2.5-2 EUR 3,004,180 criminals in non-ICT sectors. First Consortium: CP REA - 607775 detailed taxonomy, inventory of cyber crime & analyses cyber criminal 2. Global Cyber Security Center - structures & economies, Second Roma (IT) assess existing counter-measures, 3. Ipsos BE - Waterloo (BE)

best practices, awareness & trust 4. Univ. Groningen (NL) 5. Tallinn Univ. Technol. (EE) initiatives, Third develop a multi-level model to measure the economic 6. TU Delft (NL) impact of cyber crime on non ICT- 7. Interpol - Lyon (FR) 8. Univ. Warwick (UK) sectors, Fourth integrate all its previous findings to identify, develop 9. Univ. Lausanne (CH) concrete counter-measures, 10. Univ. Westfälische Wilhelms combined in portfolios of inter-sector Münster (DE)

& intra-sector solutions, including

175

enhancement for crime-proofed applications, risk management tools, policy & best practices, trust & Status: confidence measures. ON-GOING http://ecrime-project.eu/

EKSISTENZ FP7 – Secure June 2014 / Today’s identity can take various Coordinator: Societies May 2017 forms, as primary identity delivered 1. Morpho – Paris (FR) Fight against by M.S. (passport, ID card, driving identify theft – Call 2013.1.1-2 EUR 3,482,175 license...) but more in “2.0” world Consortium: protect theft from 2. Agenzia per l'Italia Digitale IgID - CP REA - 607049 (secondary identity for banking, stealing citizen's administration, professional, Rome (IT) paper documents, commercial activities...). Similarly 3. Bundesdruckerei - Berlin (DE) or using digital identity theft can take various forms, 4. DPA SIA Latvia - Riga (LV) means from stealing citizens' paper 5. Public Safety Communication EU Forum AISBL - Brussels (BE) documents, or using digital means. It is to protect EU citizens’ identities 6. Interactif Delta Prod. - Paris (FR) from all current threats. It will study 7. Inst. Baltic Studies - Tartu (EE) in deep identity theft phenomenon in 8. Katholieke Univ. Leuven (BE)

EU, revealing flaws in different 9. Min. Interior - Riga (LV) 10. TNO - Delft (NL) “paper-based” procedures also in new dematerialized processes, assess 11. Patrick Wajsbrot Consultants - threat for citizen, will develop Paris (FR) 12. Univ. Juan CARLOS III - Madrid technological components, backward compatible. Bring together different (ES) types of users involved in identity chain (authorities, industrials,

stakeholders, businesses), technology providers, data protection experts. It will recommend updates to EU Status: regulations to clearly inform, protect, ON-GOING propose responses & increase its resilience.

COURAGE FP7 – Secure May 2014 / Will deliver a measured, Coordinator: Societies April 2017 comprehensive, relevant research 1. Engineering Ingegneria Research agenda agenda for Cyber Crime and Cyber Informatica S.p.A – Roma (IT) for Cyber Crime Call 2013-1 EUR 1,294,426 Terrorism. It builds on three pillars, and Terrorism namely:-a user centric methodology, Consortium: CSA REA - 607949 2. Aconite Internet Solutions Ltd - to identify gaps, challenges and barriers based on real-world needs Dublin (IE) and experiences; an analytical and 3. Conceptivity Sarl - Meyrin (CH) semantic approach, to deliver a 4. Cybercrime Res. Inst. GmbH -

taxonomy and create a common Cologne (DE) 5. EOS - Brussels (BE) understanding; market oriented approach, to foster practical 6. FhG (DE) implementations of counter-measures 7. Jožef Stefan Institute (SI) 8. Cyber Investigations Training using effective test and validation solutions. This agenda will be Academy - Sofia (BG) elaborated through a progressive and 9. TNO - The Hague (NL) collaborative approach, consolidating 10. Paweł Walentynowicz - Warsaw

contributions from the legislative, law (PL) 11. Police and Crime Commissioner enforcement, research and industrial communities. for West Yorkshire - Wakefield (UK) 12. Selex - Rome (IT) 13. Univ. Sheffield Hallam (UK) 14. Katholieke Univ. Brabant Tilburg

- Tilburg (NL) http://www.courage-project.eu/ 15. Thales - Paris (FR) Status: 16. FOI - Stockholm (SE) ON-GOING 17. Unicri - Turin (IT)

SCOUT FP7 – Secure xxxx / xxxx Study, design, analyze on risk-based Coordinator: Societies approach security system relying on 1. CNIT – Parma (IT) Multitech Security EUR 2,382,811 multiple technologies for protection system for Call 2013-1 of space control ground stations Consortium: interconnected ENTR - 607019 2. Agenzia Spaziale Italiana - Rome CP (SCGSs) against physical, cyber attacks space control & for intelligent reconfiguration of (IT) ground stations ground station network in case of 3. Nat. Academy of Sciences of nodes fail. 3 subsystems: 1) Ukraine - Kiev (Ukraine) 4. FhG Zv - Muenchen (DE) 176

Distributed multisensor network for 5. Fsc.-bezpecnostni-poradenstvi as - protection against physical attacks: Ostrava (CZ) low impact passive sensors: passive 6. MetaSensing Bv - Noordwijk (NL) radar, infrared camera, radiometric 7. Politechnika Warszawska (PL) SAR), low emission radars: noise radar 8. Tecnobit Sl - Madrid (ES) based sensors; 2) Distributed telecom 9. Univ. Alcala - Madrid (ES) network sensing system by hardware 10. Vitrociset spa - Rome (IT)

& software probes, honeynet, central engine; 3) Management network system for automatic restoration, intelligence reconfiguration of SCGS network. MCU tasks: 1) data processing 2) decision making Status: support 3) subsystem control with ON-GOING graphical user interface.

HYRIM FP7 – Secure April 2014 / Identify, evaluate ‘Hybrid Risk Coordinator: Societies April 2017 Metrics’ for assessing & categorising 1. AIT – Seibersdorf (AT) Hybrid Risk security risks in interconnected utility Management for Call 2013.2.5-4 EUR 3,387,085 infrastructure networks in order to Consortium: Utility Providers 2. Etra Investigacion y Desarrollo SA - CP REA - 608090 provide foundations for novel protection, prevention mechanisms. Valencia (ES) 3. Univ. Passau (DE) - Development, evaluation of Hybrid 4. Selex - Rome (IT) Risk Metrics for 5. Akhela Srl - Torino (IT) 6. Univ. Lancaster (UK) coupled complex critical 7. LINZ AG für Energie,

infrastructure networks Telekommunikation, Verkehr und - Development of tools, methods for Kommunale Dienste - Linz (AT) risk assessment for utility providers in 8. Suministros Especiales

face of novel threads, Alginetenses Coop. V - Poeta Juan Status: Alegre (ES) - Definition of security architectures ON-GOING for utility providers

PREEMPTIVE FP7 – Secure March 2014 / Provide innovative solution for Coordinator: Societies March 2017 enhancing existing methods & 1. Vitrociset SPA – Roma (IT) Preventive conceiving tools to prevent against Methodology and Call 2013.2.5-4 EUR 3,831,016 cyber attacks on utility networks. It Consortium: Tools to Protect 2. Univ. Twente (NL) CP REA - 607093 addresses prevention of cyber attacks Utilities against hardware, software systems 3. SecurityMatters - Enschede (NL) 4. Aplicaciones en Informática as DCS, SCADA, PLC, networked electronic sensing, monitoring, Avanzada Sl - Barcelona (ES) diagnostic systems used by utilities 5. FhG IOSB - Karlsruhe (DE) networks. It proposes to: • Enhance 6. HW Communication Ltd -

existing methodological security, Lancaster (UK) 7. Univ. Roma (IT) prevention frameworks for harmonizing Risk & Vulnerability 8. European Network for Cyber Assessment methods,.• Design, Security ENCS - Den Haag (NL) 9. IEC Ltd - Haifa (IL) develop prevention & detection tools,.• Define taxonomy for 10. Katholieke Univ. Leuven (BE) classifying utilities networks.• Define 11. Fundacio Inst. Recerca de guidelines for improving CIs l’Energia de Catalunya - Sant Adria Status: surveillance. de Besos (ES) ON-GOING 12. Harnser Ltd - Norwich (UK) http://preemptive.eu/

177

7.6.10 Finances, Economics IT Security threats also affect finance and economic sectors, which required research actions for protection, prevention and detection as follows:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

PARSIFAL FP7 – Secure September Concerning how to better protect FCI Coordinator: Societies ICT 2008 / & information infrastructure that link 1. ATOS – Madrid (ES) Protection and February 2010 FCI with other Critical Infrastrucutre in trust in financial Call ICT-SEC- EU: 1) Bringing together CFI & TSD Consortium: instractructures 2007.1.7 EUR 688,848 research stakeholders; 2) 2. Waterford Inst. Technol. - Contributing to understanding of CFI Waterford (IE) CSA CNECT - 3. Arendt Business Consulting - 225344 challenges; 3) Developing longer term visions, research roadmaps, CFI Idstein (DE) scenarios & best practice guides; 4) 4. Acris Gmbh - Luzern (CH)

Co-ordinating relevant research work, 5. Edge Intern. BV - Amsterdam (NL) 6. Avoco Secure, Ltd.- London (UK) knowledge, experiences. Related Projects: COMIFIN, Think Trust Status: FINISHED http://www.parsifal-project.eu/

EUSECON FP7 – Secure March 2008 / EUSECON strives to create an Coordinator: Societies April 2012 analytical framework for 1. DIW – Berlin (DE) Agenda for complementary research within the European Security Call 2007-6.4-1 EUR 2,357,188 discipline of security economics. It Consortium: Economics relates human-induced insecurity 2. German Inst. Economic Research - CP REA - 218105 Berlin (DE) (terrorism & organised crime) to other forms of insecurity (industrial 3. Univ. Hamburg (DE) accidents, natural disasters, 4. Econ. Inst. Sciences Academy - geopolitical insecurity) & security Praha (CZ)

measures. Methods : » 5. Univ. Charles - Prague (CZ) 6. Univ. Patras (GR) Acknowledging Historical Context; » Analyzing Perceptions of Insecurity; » 7. Univ. Oxford (UK) Filling Knowledge Gaps. 8. Isdefe - Madrid (ES) 9. Basque Univ.. - Leioa/Bizkaias (ES) 10. RAND Europe - Cambridge (UK) 11. Hebrew Univ. - Jerusalem (IL) 12. Univ. Thessaly - Volos (GR) 13. Univ. Linz (AT) 14. PRIO - Oslo (NO)

15. Inst. Social Studies - Rotterdam (NL)

16. Athens Univ. Economics and Status: www.economics-ofsecurity. Business AUEB-RC - Athens (GR) FINISHED

HEMOLIA FP7 – Secure May 2011 / The project took into account existing Coordinator: Societies April 2014 legal frameworks to hybridize and 1. VERINT SYSTEMS Ltd - Herzliya Hybrid Enhanced correlate the Financial and Telecom Pituach (IL) Money Laundering Call 2010.1.3-1 EUR 2,979,390 Planes in order to create richer and Intelligence, Consortium: CP REA - 261710 more accurate alerts, intelligence and Investigation, investigation tools, as well as 2. FIU.Net - Den Haag (NL) Incrimination and information sharing, both nationally 3. Financial Investigation Unit Alerts and internationally. A major part dealt Romania - Bucarest (RO) 4. Grupo AIA - Barcelona (ES) with legal research and provision of legal guidelines to all ML fighters. The 5. Capgemini - Paris (FR) developed model may have 6. Univ. Amsterdam VU (NL) outstanding impact on AML because it 7. Związek Banków Polskich Izba

means that FIs will be alerted based Gospodarcza - Warszawa (PL) 8. Univ. Warszawa (PL) on data of all other FIs and based on Telecom service providers at the 9. Ver. Christelijk Hoger Onderwijs national and international level, Patientenzorg - Amsterdam (NL) 10. Orange Polska - Warszawa (PL) opening up a new era of Money Laundering and financial crime 11. Indust. Res. Inst. Automation and Status: reporting by FIs to FIUs. Measurements - Warszawa (PL) FINISHED 12. Ernst & Young - Tel Aviv (IL) http://www.hemolia.eu/

178

VALUESEC FP7 – Secure February 2011 Develop innovative risk assessment Coordinator: Societies / January 2014 techniques, tools that will support 1. FhG IFF - Magdeburg (DE) Mastering the policy makers in security-related Value Function of Call 2010.6.3-3 EUR 3,443,210 decisions, included social, economic Consortium: Security Measures factors. Project approach: - Problem 2. VTT - Espoo (FI) CP REA - 261742 3. CESS Centre for EuropeanSecurity Analysis and Requirements; - Theories, Methodologies, Strategies - München (DE) Components; - Design, usability; - 4. PRIO - Oslo (NO) Dev.: How will the system work? 5. Atos - Madrid (ES)

Models transformation, utility 6. UIS’ Centre for risk management and societal safety - Stavanger (NO) function into applicable tools; - Evaluation: How do the implemented 7. EMAG’s R&D - Katowice (PL) tools really work & help? - 8. WCK Grc software - Bnei-Brak (IL) 9. Valencia Local Police (ES) Dissemination & exploitation; Related projects: SECONOMICS, SAPIENT, PACT, SAMRISK, NEAT, EUSECON, SecureCHAINS, OSMOSIS, PoSecCo, Status: NESSoS. FINISHED http://www.valuesec.eu/

COMFIN FP7 – Secure June 2010 / CSA among ongoing EU and US R&D Coordinator: Societies ICT February 2011 projects focused on the protection of 1. ELSAG Datamat Spa – Genova (IT) Communication financially Critical Infrastructures. Middleware for Call ICT-SEC- EUR 152,565 Provide "CI level monitoring, Consortium: monitoring 2007.1.7 2. IBM - Tel Aviv (IL) CNECT - notification andmitigation" Financial CI middleware as an FIP essential 3. Waterford Inst. Technol. - CSA 225407 Waterford (IE) element. Supporting business continuity of a financial actor on top 4. Min.Econom. Finanze - Rome (IT) of anunmanaged network of managed 5. Univ. Modena (IT) financial infrastructures under 6. TU Darmstadt (DE)

allforeseeable failure scenarios 7. Finanzdepartmentet - Oslo (NO) 8. OptXware Kutatás-Fejlesztési Kft - including operational failures and deliberate breaches. Budapest (HU) Status: 9. Consorzio Interuniv. Naz. per FINISHED http://www.comifin.eu l’Informatica - Rome (IT)

7.7 Population alert and civil protection in case of emergencies Research actions involving population and civil protection units are increasingly needed to enable the development and validation of new tools and methods for faster and more efficient respondes in case of emergencies. 7.7.1 Population alerting Alert systems for population are also related to preparedness actions (see section 7.2.1.4). The project below issued recommendations in this area:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

POP-ALERT FP7 - Secure September Drawing from past & existing Coordinator: Societies 2013 / community preparedness 1.Univ. Greenwich (UK) Population Alerting: October 2015 techniques and using its own Linking Call 2013-1 research on use of contemporary Consortium: Emergencies, EUR 998,848 communications tools in order to 2. EOS - Brussels (BE) Resilience and CSA 3. CTIF - Paris (FR) REA– 608030 create practical & flexible strategies Training for preparing population to cope 4. ALTRAN - Schiphol Oost (NL) 5. Civil Protection Dep. - Lisboa (PT) with crisis & disasters. POP-ALERT targets variety of stakeholders who 6. Training 4 Resilience - Dorset (UK) are likely to face different types of 7. Siemens Building - Düsseldorf (DE) threats as: Landslips, Wildfires, 8. Edisoft-Empresa de Servicios

Floods, Man-made disasters Desenvolimento Software - Porto (PT) 9. Kemea - Athens (GR) (technical failures, terrorism). Analysing the behaviours, 10. Univ. Chester (UK) involvement of different community 11. High Corsica Fire Department and groups & evaluate whether tackling 179

these groups separately could Rescue Service SDIS2B - Bastia (FR) improve preparedness & early warning. The approach proposed takes traditional Crisis Management research a step further by carrying out series of empirical studies. Status: http://www.pop- FINISHED alert.eu/index.php/about

7.7.2 Public Protection

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

PPDR-TC FP7 - Secure April 2013 / Significant amount of network Coordinator: Societies October 2015 capacity needs to be available 1. Exodus AE – Athens (GR) Public Protection throughout disaster & affected areas and Disaster Relief Call 2010.4.2-2 EUR to support effective Public Consortium: Transformation 2,890,684 2. ICCS - Athens (GR) CP Protection & Disaster Relief PPDR Center communications where mobility is 3. Thales - Paris (FR) REA– 313015 4. Rinicom Ltd - Lancaster (UK) main requirement. At very early response stages voice 5. Teletel Sa - Athens (GR) communications are critical. 6. Aegis Systems - Cobham (UK) Objective is to define set of 7. ITTI - Poznan (PL)

reference services, valuable for 8. Tekever - Lisboa (PT) 9. Univ. Modena (IT) PPDR agencies, given needs, requirements, current technological 10. LRTC Lithuanian Radio TV Centre - availability. Classification of a set of Vilnius (LT), 31 reference services including PPDR voice, narrowband & broadband data, video, transversal services, challenge services enabled by next Status: generation of technologies. FINISHED http://www.ppdr-tc.eu

7.7.3 Civil protection operations

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

HELI4RESCUE FP7 - Secure August 2014 Study of possibility for Civil Security Coordinator: Societies / July 2014 operators to use large air transport 1. FhG IML – Dortmund (DE) Heavy Payload systems for deploying heavy loads Helicoper for Last Call 2011.7.5-2 EUR on crisis sites (last mile). Consortium: Mile Rescue 1,047,524 Development of appropriate 2. Min. Interno - Rome (IT) CSA 3. Eurocopter - Ottobrunn (DE) REA– 284658 requirements for offering transport solutions to management of large 4. Česká asoc. hasičských důstojníků - emergencies. Support to Civil Sdružení (CZ) Security policies prepared with 5. Assoc. Pegase - Aix en Provence (FR)

dissemination activities, development of roadmaps for effective implementation of analysed solutions, common EU Status: approach for the definition of large FINISHED air transport systems. www.heli4rescue.eu

180

7.8 Socio-economic and ethical implications 7.8.1 Post-crisis societal support psychological support

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

OPSIC FP7 - Secure February Best practice-studies for Coordinator: Societies 2013 / psychosocial support in crisis in 1. Red Cross - Copenhagen (DK) Operationalising January 2016 order to match methods & tools to Psychosocial Call 2012.4.1-2 all relevant target groups, types, Consortium: Support in Crisis EUR 2. Univ. Innsbruck (AT) CP phases of emergencies, to develop 3,333,918 IT based system – Operational 3. TNO - Delft (NL) 4. Impact - Diemen (NL) REA– 312783 Guidance System (OGS) as go-to- point for all tools needed to plan, 5. AMC - Amsterdam (NL) conduct & evaluate psychosocial 6. UNIZ Fac. Humanities and Social

support intervention. Development Sciences - Zagreb (HR) 7. Magen David Adom - Tel Aviv (IL) of web-based operational guidance system operating as common shared 8. Tripitch - Utrecht (NL) platform. Validation through 9. SAMUR - Madrid (ES) 10. CSSC - Roma (IT) simulations tests in 3 countries with crisis managers, first responders, 11.CRISMART - Stockholm (SE) volunteers, possible victims &evaluated according to selected Status: key performance indicators FINISHED http://opsic.eu/

NDTERROR FP7 - PEOPLE August 2011 Study of structured methodology Coordinator: / July 2015 and detailed information on 1. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Can Natural PEOPLE-2011- terrorism, natural disasters, and – Jerusalem (IL) Disasters Incite CIG EUR 100,000 other relevant economic and Terror? REA – 293564 demographic variables of 165 countries between 1970 and 2007 to provide identification and empirical quantification of the effect of natural disasters on terrorism. Status: Recommended strategies for FINISHED mitigating terrorist actions during disaster recovery.

SUPER FP7 - Secure April 2013 / Holistic integrated framework for Coordinator: Societies March 2017 understanding citizens’ reactions 1. Vitrociset SPA – Roma (IT) Social sensors for against emergencies in social media, secUrity Call 2013.6.1-1 EUR while at same time empowering Consortium: Assessments and 3,117,318 security forces, civil protection 2. Univ. of Glasgow (UK) Proactive CP 3. ICCS - Zografou (GR) REA– 606853 agencies to fully leverage social EmeRgencies media in their operations. 4. CEFU Civil Protection Service - management Modelling citizens’ social media Campania (IT) 5. Barcelona Media - Barcelona (ES) behaviour before, during, after emergencies; Virtual Spaces for 6. Sensap Swiss AG - Zurich (CH) evaluating public opinion; Rumour 7. IN2 - London (UK) tracking, Automatic identification, 8. Sensing & Control - Barcelona (ES)

verification of emergency relevant information from social media; Fast extensible search across multiple Status: social media streams etc. ON-GOING http://super-fp7.eu/

PSYCRIS FP7 - Secure September Status quo analysis of psychological, Coordinator: Societies 2013 / June medical support in crises in EU 1. Univ. Ludwig-Maximilians - PSYcho-Social 2016 countries; - Improvement of München (DE) Support in CRISis Call 2012.4.1-2 support strategies for victims, Management EUR Consortium: CP affected individuals, crisis managers; 3,827,525 - Enhancement of psycho-medical 2.Univ. Granada UGR - Granada (ES) 3. UMIT - Hall in Tirol (AT) REA– 312395 preparedness for major incidents (contingency planning); - 4. Kitokie projektai KKP - Vilnius (LT) Development of interventions to 5. Blended Solutions Gmbh BSO -

deal with stress & reduce stress Hamburg (DE) related disorders of crisis 6. Bayerische Forschungsallianz Gmbh - München (DE) 181

management personnel, authorities; 7. Cohen-Harris Resil. Cent. Trauma - Providing efficient self-help and Disast. Interv. - Tel Aviv (IL) strategies to communities affected 8. Insight Instruments ISI - Hallein (AT) by crises; - Investigation of long- 9. Protection Civile Luxembourg (LU) term psycho-social, societal, cultural 10. COPAO - Granada (ES) impact of crises. Results will have significant impact on public health,

community resilience, international Status: cooperation, cost containment. FINISHED http://psycris.eu/

BESECU FP7 - Secure March 2008 / Investigation of cross-cultural Coordinator: Societies December differences of human behavior in 1. Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Univ.. Human behaviour 2011 crisis situations in order to better Greifswald (DE) in crisis situations: Call 2011.5.1-1 tailor security-related a cross cultural EUR Consortium: CP communication, instructions, investigation to 2,093,808 procedures. Understanding cultural 2. Univ. Hamburg-Eppendorf - tailor security- Hamburg (DE) REA– 218324 reactions to crisis situations could related help develop better emergency 3. Univ. di Bologna - Bologna (IT) communication policies & procedures. By studying 4. Psychiatricke Centrum - Praha (CZ) 5. Faculty of Fire Safety Engineering how different people react in emergencies & identifying what SGSP - Warszawa (PL) impact culture has on behaviour, it 6. Ambulance & Emergency Physicians undertook the largest-ever study on Association - Izmir (TR)

topic by interviewing over 1 000 7. AB Man-Technology-Organisation (MTO)-Psychology - Stockholm (SE) disaster survivors & over 3 000 first responders in these countries. 3 8. Inst. Seguridad Publica de Cataluna building evacuations conducted in - Barcelona (ES) 9. Hamburg Fire and Emergency Czech Republic, Poland, Turkey: identify set of behaviours that are Service Academy - Hamburg (DE) unique across cultures, highlighting 10. Univ. Greenwich - Greenwich (UK) significant differences in response Status: among the 4 populations. FINISHED www.besecu.de

7.8.2 Public involvement / engagement in research and use of social media 7.8.2.1 Enhanced communication in crisis management Communication is a very critical issues in case of a crisis and research is developing strategies for improving / enhancing capacities in emergencies and study the use of Social Media, the projects below illustrate these trends:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

PEP FP7 - Secure January 2012 Study on how crisis response Coordinator: Societies / December abilities of public can be enhanced, 1. Jyväskylän yliopiston - Jyväskylä (FI) Public 2014 what public empowerment policies Empowerment Call 2011.4.2-4 are successful in realising this aim. Consortium: Policies for Crisis EUR 950,023 2. Inst. Telecom. - Lisboa (PT) CSA Nowadays authorities realize that Management behaviour of citizens is vital to crisis 3. FhG IAF - Freiburg (DE) REA– 284927 4. Univ. Patras (GR) response and recovery. It will identify best practices in community 5. Univ. Kingston (UK) approach to crisis resilience, give 6. Thales - Paris (FR) directions for future research & 7. Telefonica Investigacion y Desarrollo

implementation, including the use of SA - Madrid (ES) 8. Pale Blue AB - Akersberga (SE) social media, mobile services, to further citizen response. Status: FINISHED https://agoracenter.jyu.fi/ projects/pep

ISAR+ FP7 - Secure January 2013 Study of the use of social media in Coordinator: Societies / June 2015 crisis management under THEO 1.Tekever – Lisbon (PT) Online and Mobile analytical framework, which Communications EUR embraces dimensions: 1. Consortium: 182

for Crisis Response Call 2013.6.1-1 3,987,991 Technological - focused on 2. Area7 - Roma (IT) and Search and integration of equipment, 3. Polícia Segur. Pública - Lisboa (PT) Rescue CP REA– 312850 communications, information 4. Deveryware - Paris (FR) processing technologies; 2. Human, 5. Emergency Serv. Coll. - Kuopio (FI) dedicated to citizens’ perspective on 6. Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Univ. Greifswald acceptance, employment of mobile – Inst. Psychology - Greifswald (DE) & social media technologies in 7. ITTI - Poznan (PL) crises; 3. Ethical, legal - concerned 8. Nat. Centre Emergency Comm. with ethical principles, legal Health - Bergen (NO)

framework applicable to establish 8. North Savo Rescue Department - ethics-by-design project, debate Savo (FI) boundaries of privacy rights & public 9. Police and Crime Commissioner for security; 4. Organisational - North Yorkshire - Harrogate (UK) considering PPDR organisations, 10. Pôle Pilote de Sécurité Locale - culture, roles, processes, Elancourt (FR) competences, training, 11. Police Coll. Finland - Tampere (FI) technologies. 12. Univ. Dublin (IE)

13. Thales - Paris (FR)

Status: 14. Univ. Eastern Finland - Kuopio (FI) FINISHED http://isar.i112.eu/ 15. Zanasi & Partners - Modena (IT)

HELP FP7 - Secure February Establishment of technic. Coordinator: Societies 2011 / May foundation, strategy dev. roadmap 1. Univ. Polit. Catalunya – Barcelona Enhanced 2012 aimed at increasing wireless (ES) Communications in Call 2010-1 communication capabilities of public Emergencies by REA– 261659 Consortium: CSA safety organisations by proposing Creating and innovative approaches for network 2. BAPCO British Assoc. - Manchester Exploiting Synergies management, spectrum resources. (UK) in Composite Radio Solution framework (system 3. EADS Cassidian - Paris (FR) Systems concept) for provision of public 4. DATAX Sp. DTX - Wrocław (PL) 5. JRC - Brussels (BE), safety communications over diverse wireless infrastructures; framework for management of composite emergency network; techno-

economic analysis; consolidated basis, roadmap for realisation of the envisioned solution framework. Status: FINISHED http://www.fp7-sec-help.eu

COSMIC FP7 - Secure April 2013 / Role of social networks in mitigation Coordinator: Societies March 2015 of consequences of crises & 1. Eur. Dyn. Adv. Syst. Telecomm., COntribution of disasters; COSMIC will deliver set of Inform & Telematics SA – Athens (GR) Social Media In Call 2012.6.1-3 EUR 997,040 instructions, recommendations, best Crisis management practices related to exploitation of Consortium: CSA REA– 312737 2.Trilateral Research & Consulting - social media in emergency situations. This will be done by London (UK) addressing, analysing roles of major 3. Safety region South Holland South stakeholders associated with crisis and Crisislab - Radboud (NL)

management & by reviewing their 4. Univ. Nijmegen - Nijmegen (NL) 5. Koç University - Istanbul (TR) communication needs, infrastructure bottlenecks & security 6. Hellenic Rescue Team - Thessaloniki Status: priorities during disasters. (GR) FINISHED 7. Public Safety Communication www.cosmic-project.eu Europe (BE)

On-going projects complement the above actions:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

SOTERIA FP7 - Secure September Developing recommendations & Coordinator: Societies 2014 / associated toolbox enabling public 1.Tekever – Lisbon (PT) Online and Mobile February safety organisations (PSOs) & Communications Call 2013.6.1-1 2017 citizens using new mobile, online Consortium: for Emergencies social media technologies to 2. Deveryware - Paris (FR) CP EUR 3. Pôle Pilote de Sécurité Locale PPSL - communicate before, during & after 3.971.177 an emergency event, exchange Elancourt near Paris (FR) critical information for PSOs' 4. Thales - Paris (FR) 183

REA– 606796 intervention, medical assistance 5. Emergency Serv. Coll. - Kuopio (FI) situations. Empowered by new 6. North Savo Rescue Department - mobile phones with cameras, text Savo (FI) messaging, internet-based 7. Univ. Eastern Finland - Kuopio (FI) applications, SOTERIA innovates to 8. Police Coll. Finland - Tampere (FI) dynamics between PSOs & citizens 9. Itä-Suomen yliopisto UEF - Kuopio in emergencies, allowing (i) (FI)

understanding of impact social 10. Univ. College Dublin (IE) media entails in emergency 11. Bridge129 Spa - Reggio Emilia (IT) management systems; (ii) use of all 12. Centre for Science, Society & communication channels, including Citizenship - Rome (IT) social media, (iii) exploitation of 13. Zanasi Alessandro - Modena (IT) mobile platforms’ ubiquity to locate, 14. Univ. Hospital - Bergen (NO) communicate with citizens in 15. ITTI SP - Poznan (PL) distress, (iv) leverage of PSOs’ levels 16. Police and Crime Commissioner for

of shared awareness, performance, North Yorkshire - Harrogate (UK) benefiting from citizens’ social 17. Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Univ.. media information. Greifswald - Greifswald (DE) Status: 18. Ambulance & Emergency ON-GOING Physicians Association - Izmir (TR)

EMERGENT FP7 - Secure April 2014 / Understanding positive & negative Coordinator: Societies April 2017 impact of social media in 1. Univ. Paderborn (DE) Emergency emergencies in order to: •enhance Management in Call 2013.6.1-1 EUR safety, security of citizens before, Consortium: Social Media 3,331,184 2.IES Solutions - Rome (IT) CP during & after emergencies, Generation •strengthen role of EU companies 3. Oxford Computer Consultants - REA– 608352 Oxford (UK) supplying services & products related to EmerGent’s results. Ad- 4. Univ. Siegen - Siegen (DE) hoc communities are built through 5. Tavistock Institute of Human existing social media channels, often Relations - London (UK)

not connected at all or weakly to 6. Western Norway Research Institute - Sogndal (NO) emergency management services. Analysis of impact that social media 7. Federation EU Fire Officer have on citizen, emergency Associations - Luxembourg (LU) 8. European Emergency Number management in all its phases. Identifying requirements for Association - Brussels (BE) implementing, evaluating novel 9. Fire Department - Dortmund (DE) methods & tools for integrating 10. Scientific and Research Centre for

social media in emergency Fire Protection - Warsawa (PL) management. Guidelines for professionals & public for social Status: media use in emergencies.. ON-GOING http://www.fp7-emergent.eu/

7.8.2.2 Civil Society engagement The engagement of the civil society and other end-users is at the core of the Community of Users, and will be developing on the short to medium term.

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

SECUREPART FP7 - Secure May 2014 / Understanding status quo about Coordinator: Societies April 2016 CSOs participation; 2 Helping CSOs 1. Bantec consultores iniciativas Increasing the to cope with increasing complexity emprendedoras - San Sebastián (ES) engagement of civil Call 2013.7.3.1 EUR 889,888 of security research; 3 Supporting society in security Consortium: CSA REA– 608039 internal structure of CSOs, research promoting collaboration links among 2. Dr. Lange GmbH & Co KG - Hannover (DE) them & stakeholders; 4 Defining strategy, produce action plan with 3. ENNA - Brussels (BE) action steps how to increase CSO 4. Nexus inst. Koop. Man. Interdisz. participation in both shaping Forsch. - Berlin (DE)

implementation of security. 5. Univ. Johann Wolfgang Goethe - Frankfurt am Main (DE) Resulting in Comprehensive inventory of CSO forms of 6. Univ. Salford (UK) involvement in FP7; societal 7. Globaz - Oliveira de Azeméis (PT) 184

dimension of EU research; exhaustive analysis of internal CSO capacities, collaboration links among CSOs & dialogue between CSO & stakeholders. Status: ON-GOING http://www.securepart.eu/

ASSERT FP7 - Secure May 2013 / Series of workshops to create basis Coordinator: Societies July 2014 of a tool & strategy. Starting from 1.IRKS – Wien (AT) Assessing Security synthesis of state of art discussions Research: Tools and Call 2012-1 EUR 553,420 on societal security, it will identify Consortium: Methodologies to best practice cases exploring, 2. Techn. Univ. Berlin (DE) measure societal NoE ENTR– 3. Trilateral Res. Consul.- London (UK) 313062 assessing societal impacts of science impact & technology in security domain & 4. King’s College London (UK) 5. Univ. Stirling - Glasgow (UK) beyond carefully analyse their structural properties. This will be 6. Hamburg-Consult Gesellschaft für done in multidisciplinary fashion Verkehrsberatung m.b.H. (DE) from different perspectives,

including end-users, stakeholders, researchers, policy-makers, NGOs. Bringing together these different perspectives in series of workshops will create basis for development of a tool & strategy for sustainable implementation of societal impacts in future EU research activities. Status: FINISHED http://assert-project.eu/

PANDORA FP7 - Secure January 2010 Development of smart, novel digital Coordinator: Societies / March 2012 support environment, crisis 1.Univ. Greenwich (UK) Advanced training simulation system to enhance, environment for Call ICT-SEC- EUR expand training exercises. Consortium: crisis scenarios 2007-1.0-2 2,930,000 Consideration of emotional affect 2. CNR – Rome (IT) 3. CEFRIEL - Milano (IT) CP REA – 225387 on trainees of both crisis scenario & multimedia inputs from which they 4. Xlab razvoj programske opreme in have to garner information, to base svetovanje doo - Ljubljana (SI) strategic decisions.It creates 5. Fond. Ugo Bordoni - Rome (IT)

environment that can provide 6. ORT - Paris (FR) 7. Univ. East London (UK) appropriate metrics on crisis manager performance. System is 8. Business Flow Consulting – Sceaux required to capture emotional, (FR) 9. Emerg. Planning College - York (UK) behavioural state of each trainee, at appropriate level within defined scale. This information has to be passed to internal mash-up engine

as result of direct trainer input. Status: http://pandora.eupm.net/public/ FINISHED pandora.php

ARCHIMEDES FP7 - Secure June 2012 / Weak participation of end-users & Coordinator: Societies December operators (EU&O) in all the stages of 1. EOS – Brussels (BE) Support to security 2014 security research.Objective: 1) end users Call 2011.7.5-1 Develop an Innovation Management Consortium: EUR 2. PIAP - Warszawa (PL) CSA methodology & promote a common 1,353,848 innovation culture; 2) Sustainable 3. UCL - Brussels (BE) 4. Haut Comité Français Défense Civile REA – 285061 process for definition of common operational needs & early R&T - Paris (FR)

demands with EU & MS security 5. Min. Interior - Madrid (ES) 6. German European Security policies; 3) Promote security EU&O networking and permanent public- Association ESV - Berlin (DE) Status: private dialogue through Forum to 7. ISDEFE - Madrid (ES) FINISHED reinforce cooperation. 8. Mediaservice Net SRL - Torino (IT) www.eos-eu.com

185

On-going projects are complementing the above trends:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification in Acronym/Title Instrument details case of GA amendment)

NITIMSER FP7 - People October 2012 Advanced practices of governance of Coordinator: / September crisis management, strategic and 1.CETIM – Leiden (NL) A Networked and Call 2012-ITN 2016 operative management, IT-enabled Firm's Consortium: involvement and engagement of Perspective on EUR self-motivated individuals - actors, 2. AON Groep Nederland BV – Crisis management 3,655,652 agents, volunteer, citizens or, as we Rotterdam (NL) 3. Fund. Priv. Univ. Tecnol.– Barcelona REA– 317382 call them - entrepreneurs. Aim to explore new frontiers of safety and (ES) security with the institutional, 4. Univ. Bundeswehr Muenchen – governance, organisational and Neubiberg (DE)

managerial challenges of crisis 5. Univ. Leiden – Leiden (NL) 6. Unternehmensberatung H&D Gmbh networks, to develop and test innovative approaches for – Munchen (DE) coordination in real world settings 7. Westfaelische Wilhelms-Univ.– Muenster (DE) Status: and to build Europe-wide connected ON-GOING clusters for crisis management and implement integrated solutions.

ATHENA FP7 – Secure December The goal of the project is to deliver Coordinator: Societies 2013 / two major outputs that will enable 1. Yorkshire Police Authority – Empowering November and encourage users of new media Manchester (UK) citizens, protecting Call 2012.6.1-3 2016 to contribute to the security of communities citizens in crisis situations and for Consortium: CP EUR 2. Univ. Sheffield Hallam (UK) search and rescue actions, namely 2,631,592 a set of best practice guidelines for 3. Municipality of Ljublljana (SI) 4. Int. Org. Migration - Brussels (BE) REA – 313220 LEAs, police, first responders and citizens for the use of new media, 5. Epidemico Ltd - Dublin (IE)

supporting tools and technologies in 6. Univ.Virginia- Charlottesville(USA) 7. Latvijas Republika - Riga (LV) crisis situations, and a suite of prototype software tools to 8. Res. in Motion Ltd - Waterloo enhance the ability of LEAs, police, Ontatio (Canada) 9. Sas Software Ltd - Londres (UK) first responders and citizens in their use of mobile and smart 10. Thales - Delft (NL) devices in crisis situations. This 11. Epam Systems - Stockholm (SE) project will explore how the huge 12. Izmir Buyuksehir - Izmir (TR)

popularity of new communication 13. FhG FKIE - Wachtberg (DE) media, particularly web-based social media such as Twitter and Facebook, and the prolific use of high-tech mobile devices, can be harnessed to provide efficient and effective communication and enhanced situational awareness Status: during a crisis. ON-GOING http://www.projectathena.eu/

Within Horizon2020, the DRS-19-2014 topic on "Next generation emergency services" will provide a mean to improve early warning and communication in the area of civil protection. In addition, a Pre-commercial Procurement (PCP) has been opened via the DRS-18-2015 topic (2015 call) on "Interoperable next generation of broadband radio communication system for public safety and security" which will be a direct continuation of the FP7 research efforts. The implementation of security policies is supported by good practices exchanges, which are recommended in the EU Civil Protection Mechanism. This practice is often part of research projects which have hence the capacity to respond to policy recommendations.

186

7.8.3 Ethics Finally, ethic issues are also well represented in research funded by the Secure Societies Programme, as shown below:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

ALTERNATIVE FP7 – Secure February 2012 Provide alternative, deepened Coordinator: Societies / January 2016 understanding based on empirical 1. Katholieke Univ. Leuven (BE) Developing evidence of how to handle conflicts in alternative Call 2011.6.5-1 EUR 3,423,262 intercultural contexts in democratic Consortium: understandings of 2. Univ. Ulster - Coleraine (UK) CP REA - 285368 societies to set up security solutions security and justice for communities, whith active 3. Foresee Research Group KFT - through restorative participation of citizens. 4 intensive Budapest (HU) justice approaches case studies feeding theoretically 4. NOVA - Oslo (NO) in intercultural grounded & empirically tested models 5. European Forum for Restorative settings within of dealing with conflicts in Justice VZW - Brussels (BE) democratic intercultural settings by RJ 6. Verein für Rechts und Kriminal societies processes.Dealing mainly with Soziologie - Wien (AT) 7. Victimology Society of Serbia - alternative epistemologies of justice & security, conflict analysis, RJ models Belgrade (RS) Status: application & their relevance for EU FINISHED policies.

PACT FP7 – Secure June 2012 / PACT brings together policy, privacy, Coordinator: Societies July 2015 ethical, social, technical expertise at 1. Vitamib TAMIB – Grenoble (FR) Public perception the highest level of EU & world of security and Call 2011-1 EUR 2,675,107 excellence. Challenge: 1 to develop Consortium: privacy new reference framework for 2. Atos - Madrid (ES) CP REA - 285635 3. KEMEA - Athens (GR) assessing security investment from a wider societal perspective; 2 to carry 4. CIES - Dublin (IE) out first pan-EU survey on public 5. CSSC - Rome (IT) preferences & trade-offs between 6. PRIO - Oslo (NO)

security, privacy, fundamental rights 7. Min. Public Sec. - Tel Aviv (IL) 8. DEMOKRITOS - Athens (GR) to build an original Privacy Reference Framework & comprehensive 9. RAND Europe - Cambridge (UK) Decision Support System - to provide 10. Hebrew Univ. Jerusalem (IL) 11. Univ. Westminster - London (UK) adaptable model for security investment in terms of wider social 12. Univ. Uppsala (SE) Status: acceptance, concerns & reactions. 13. Market & Opinion Research FINISHED Intern. Ltd - London (UK) http://www.projectpact.eu/

PRISMS FP7 – Secure February Analyse traditional trade-off model Coordinator: Societies 2012/ July between privacy & security & devise 1. FhG ISI – Karlsruhe (DE) Technologies 2015 more evidence-based perspective for enhancing security Call 2011-1 reconciling privacy & security, trust & Consortium: are subjecting EUR 2,985,744 concern. Examine how technologies 2. Trilateral Research & Consulting citizens to CP LLP - London (UK) REA - 285399 aimed at enhancing security are increasing subjecting citizens to increasing 3. Vrije Univ. Brussels (BE) surveillance, amount of surveillance, causing 4. TNO - Delft (NL) causing infringements of privacy, fundamental 5. Univ. Edinburgh (UK) infringements of rights. Conduct both multidisciplinary 6. EKINT - Budapest (HU) privacy, inquiry into concepts of 7. Market & Opinion Research fundamental rights privacy/security, their relationships, International, Ltd - London (UK) 8. Stichting Hogeschool - Utrecht EU-wide survey to determine whether people evaluate introduction of (NL) security technologies in terms of a trade-off. It will determine factors

affecting public assessment of security & privacy implications of given security technology. It will devise decision system providing users constraints & limits of specific security investments compared to alternatives taking into account wider society context. Status: FINISHED http://prismsproject.eu/

187

SECONOMICS FP7 – Secure February 2012 Synthesizing sociological, economic, Coordinator: Societies / January 2015 security science into usable, concrete, 1.Univ. Trento (IT) Socio-economic actionable knowledge for policy meets Security Call 2011.7.5-2 EUR 3,451,096 makers, social planners responsible Consortium: 2. FhG ISST - Berlin (DE) CP REA - 285223 for citizen's security. Developing & furthering state of art in modelling 3. Deep Blue SRL - Rome (IT) security problems in technological, 4. Univ. Rey Juan Carlos - Madrid (ES) socio economic context & applying 5. Univ. Aberdeen (UK)

state of art risk assessments, analysis 6. Durham Univ. (UK) 7. Transports Metropolitans de of social context to develop optimal policies. Outputs are twofold: first Barcelona (ES) assessment of future & emerging 8. Atos - Madrid (ES) 9. SecureNOK - Stavanger (NO) threats in identified areas with rigorous modeling of optimal 10. IS AS CR - Praha (CZ) mechanisms for mitigation within 11. Nat. Grid Electricity Transmission policy domain. The lasting impact will plc - London (UK)

be a methodological revolution driven 12. Anadolu Univ. - Eskisehir (TR) by common set of modelling tools & utilizing recent advances in modelling Status: technology. FINISHED http://seconomicsproject.eu/

SUPRISE FP7 – Secure February 2012 SURPRISE re-examines relationship Coordinator: Societies / January 2015 between security & privacy, which is 1. OEAW - Wien (AT) Surveillance, commonly positioned as ‘tradeoff’. Privacy and Call 2011.6.5-2 EUR 3,424,109 Provision of framework to evaluate Consortium: Security security solutions & technologies to 2. Agencia de Protección de Datos de CP REA - 285492 la Comunidad de Madrid (ES) be highly relevant for taking investment, policy decision related to 3. CSIC - Madrid (ES) security issues. Provision of insight to 4. DBT - Copenhagen (DK) understand drivers of insecurity, ways 5. European Univ. Inst. - Firenze (IT)

to prevent it ; allowing governments 6. Verein für Rechts und Kriminal Soziologie IRKS - Wien (AT) to distribute resources in more efficient, comprehensible way. 7. Medián Opinion and Market Improving social inclusion by Research Ltd. - Budapest (HU) 8. Norwegian Board of Technology - highlighting potential sources of discrimination, unintended Oslo (NO) consequences produced by 9. The Open University - Milton introduction of security solutions, Keynes (UK)

other aspects that threaten social 10. Akademien der Wissenschaften Schweiz Verein - Bern (CH) cohesion with respect to security issues. 11. Unabhaengiges Landeszentrum Status: fuer Datenschutz - Kiel (DE) FINISHED http://surprise-project.eu/

INEX FP7 – Secure March 2008 / The project dealt with knowledge of Coordinator: Societies March 2011 high relevance to ethics, value-laden 1.PRIO – Oslo (NO) Converging and tensions arising along continuum conflicting ethical Call 2007-6.5-2 EUR 1,890,248 internal & external security in EU: Consortium: values in EU 2. Ericsson - Fornebu (NO) CP REA - 218265 1.Ethical consequences of prolif. of internal / external security technol., 2. Legal dilemmas 3. Centre d’Etudes sur les Conflits - security continuum from transnational security Paris (FR) 4. Vrije Univ. Brussel (BE) arrangements, 3.Ethical, value questions from shifting role of 5. Vrije Univ. Amsterdam (NL) security professionals, 6. Collegium Civitas - Warszaw (PL) 4.Consequences of changing role of 7. CIDOB Found. - Barcelona (ES)

foreign security policy. Geopolitical 8. Bilkent Univ. - Ankara (TR) 9. CEPS - Brussels (BE) axis: Eastern European including Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova & Mediterranean ‘neighbourhood’ including Morocco, Algeria, Egypt. Analyses of current security challenges with particular attention to the human side of the security

challenge. Status: http://www.inexproject.eu/ FINISHED

188

RESPECT FP7 – Secure February 2015 Investigate if current, foreseeable Coordinator: Societies / May 2015 implementation of ICTs in surveillance 1. Univ. Groningen (NL) Rules, Expectations is in balance & where lack of balance & Security through Call 2011.10.6 EUR 3,492,690 may exist or is perceived by citizens Consortium: Privacy-Enhanced 2. Univ. Wien (AT) CP ENTR - 285582 not to exist. It explores options for Convenient redressing balance through 3. CNR - Napoli (IT) Technologies combination of Privacy-Enhancing 4. Univ. Georg-August - Goettingen (DE) Technologies, operational approach. Investigating 5 key sectors not yet 5. Univ. Ljubljana (SI) tackled by other projects researching 6. Univ. Uppsala (SE) surveillance (CCTV, database mining & 7. Univ. Oslo (NO)

inter connection, on-line social 8. Univ. Sheffield (UK) 9. Univ. Barcelona (ES) network analysis, RFID & geo- location/sensor devices, financial 10. Univ. Malta (MT) tracking), it will carry out research on 11. Univ. Masaryk (CZ) 12. Univ. Babes Bolyai - Cluj Napoca citizens awareness, attitudes to surveillance. It will produce tools (RO) enable for policy makers to 13.Univ.Edith Cowan-Mt Lawley(AU) understand socio-cultural as 14. Univ. Komenskeho - Bratislava

operational & economic impact of (SK) 15. Law Internet Found. - Sofia (BG) surveillance systems. 16. Univ. Leon (ES) 17. Univ. Westminster (UK) 18. Interpol - Lyon (FR) 19. Lab. Sci. Cittadinanza - Rome (IT) Status: 20. Univ. Central Lancashire - FINISHED Preston (UK) http://respectproject.eu/ 21. Univ. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz - Hannover (DE)

SAPIENT FP7 – Secure February 2011 Provide strategic knowledge on the Coordinator: Societies / July 2014 state of the art of surveillance studies, 1. FhG ISI – Karlsruhe (DE) Supporting emerging smart surveillance fundamental Call 2010.6.5-2 EUR 1,248,577 technologies, & adequacy of existing Consortium: rights, Privacy and 2. Trilateral Research & Consulting CP REA - 261698 legal framework. It will entail the Ethics in development & validation of LLP - London (UK) surveillance scenarios around future smart 3. CSSC - Rome (IT) technologies surveillance systems, & will apply best 4. Vrije Univ. Brussel (BE) 5. Univ. Lugano (CH) elements of existing PIA (privacy impact assessment) methodologies to 6. King’s College London, Dept War construct a surveillance related PIA Studies - London (UK) framework. It will lead to a practical 7. CEPS - Brussels (BE) Status: handbook. FINISHED http://www.sapientproject.eu/

SURVEILLE FP7 – Secure January 2012 / Provides comprehensive survey of Coordinator: Societies April 2015 surveillance technology deployed in 1. Europ. Univ. Inst. – Florence (IT) Surveillance: EU & appraises security concerns, Ethical issues, Legal Call 2011.6.1-5 EUR 3,382,354 economic cost, public perceptions, Consortium: Limitations and 2. Univ. Birmingham (UK) CP ENTR - 284725 infringement of fundamental rights, & Efficiency examines legal, ethical issues of 3. Raoul Wallenberg Inst. Human Rights and Human. Law - Lund (SE) surveillance technology in prevention, investigation & prosecution of 4. TU Delft (NL) terrorism, other serious crimes. 5. FhG-IOSB - Karlsruhe (DE) SURVEILLE will continuously 6. Univ. Libre Bruxelles (BE)

communicate results with 7. European Forum for Urban Security - Paris (FR) stakeholders - EU decision-makers, law enforcement, local authorities, 8. Merseyside Police Merpol - technology developers - & receive Liverpool (UK) feedback to inform ongoing research. 9. Univ. Albert-Ludwigs - Freiburg Status: (DE) FINISHED http://www.surveille.eu/

VIDEOSENSE FP7 – Secure May 2011 / VideoSense integrated leading Coordinator: Societies April 2015 European research groups to create a 1. Univ. Reading (UK) Virtual Centre of long term open integration of critical Excellence for Call 2010.7.0-1 EUR 5,282,366 mass in the twin areas of Ethically- Consortium: Ethically-guided 2. Univ. Queen Mary - London (UK) NoE REA - 261743 Guided and Privacy Preserving Video and Privacy- Analytics where the advent of new 3. Eurecom - Biot (FR) respecting Video data intelligence technologies against 4. Thales Sec. Solutions - Paris (FR) Analytics in the background of dynamic societal 5. Isdefe - Madrid (ES) 189

Security and citizen’s goals, norms, 6. Technical Univ. Berlin (DE) expectations, safety and security 7. Ecole Polytech. Fed. Lausanne needs and thus surveillance (CH) requirements have all contributed to a complex interplay of influences which deserve in-depth study and solution seeking in order for the

European society, citizen and industry to strike the optimal balance in resolution of the various challenges in this arena. Status: http://www.videosense.eu/ FINISHED

ADDPRIV FP7 – Secure February 2011 ADDPRIV proposes novel knowledge Coordinator: Societies / March 2014 and developments to limit the storage 1. Anova IT Consult. – Madrid (ES) Automatic Data of unnecessary data, to be relevancy Call 2010.6.5-2 EUR 2,818,338 implemented on existing multicamera Consortium: Discrimination for 2. Kingston Univ. - London (UK) CP REA - 261653 networks in order to make them a Privacy-sensitive better comply with citizen´s privacy 3. Politech. Gdanska - Gdansk (PL) video surveillance rights. 4. Goldsmith College - London (UK) 5. Avanzit Tecnología - Madrid (ES) 6. Hewlett Packard - Rome (IT) 7. SEA Aeroporti - Milano (IT) Status: www.addpriv.eu FINISHED 8. Renfe Operadora - Madrid (ES) 9. Trinity College Dublin (IE)

SECILE FP7 – Secure May 2013 / Create an empirically-informed view Coordinator: Societies October 2014 of legitimacy, effectiveness of EU 1. Durham University (UK) Securing Europe security legislation (legal, societal, through Counter- Call 2012.6.5-1 EUR 703,098 operational, democratic Consortium: terrorism – Impact, 2. CIES – Dublin (IE) CSA REA - 313195 perspectives). Produce Legitimacy and interdisciplinary & multi-stakeholder 3. Statewatch - London (UK) Effectiveness understanding of mechanisms for 4. National Maritime College of Ireland - Cork (IE) measuring impact, legitimacy of legal measures, connecting theoretical & 5. PRIO - Oslo (NO) practical perspectives with sound & 6. King’s College London’s (UK) operationally-informed analysis of 7. The Supreme Court of the

these measures in practice. Identify Republic of Latvia - Riga (LV) strengths, weaknesses, assumptions, dissonances across & between existing theoretical, institutional & operational perspectives. Strategic approach to create dynamic synergies between legal, sociological, ethical disciplines, authorities & end users in

order to generate holistic understanding of operation of EU legal measures. Status: FINISHED http://secile.eu/about-us/

PARIS FP7 – Secure January 2013 / PARIS will demonstrate a Coordinator: Societies February 2016 methodological approach for 1. Trialog – Paris (FR) Privacy Preserving development of surveillance Infrastructure for Call 2012-1 EUR 3,490,491 infrastructure which enforces right of Consortium: Surveillance citizens to privacy, justice, freedom. 2. AIT - Seiberdorf (AT) CP REA - 312504 3. INRIA - Paris (FR) Management tool will be developed in order to 1) allow for creation, 4. Katholieke Univ. Leuven (BE) editing of conceptual framework, 2) 5. Univ. Malaga (ES) subsequently act as reference for 6. Univ. Namur (BE)

surveillance system designers. A SALT 7. Thales - Paris (FR) 8. Visual Tools SA - Madrid (ES) compliant design process will be defined so that the balance of surveillance & privacy according to Status: the specialised framework will be FINISHED ensured. http://www.paris-project.org/

190

On-going projects are respectively:

Project Funding Contract Abstract / website Consortium (prone to modification Acronym/Title Instrument details in case of GA amendment)

EVIDENCE FP7 – Secure March 2014 / Objectives: 1: Tracing EVIDENCE Road Coordinator: Societies August 2016 Map for realization of Common EU 1. CNR – Pisa (IT) European Legal Framework for using, collecting, Informatics Data Call 2013-1 EUR 1,924,589 exchanging electronic evidence Consortium: Exchange 2. CNR - Rome (IT) CSA REA - 608185 including research agenda identifying Framework for issues, policies, actions; 2: Develop 3. Univ. Groningen (NL) Court and Evidence common, shared understanding on 4. Interpol - Lyon (FR) 5. Univ. Leibniz - Hannover (DE) what electronic evidence is & which are relevant concepts of electronic 6. Laboratory of Citizenship Sciences evidence in involved domains, related - Rome (IT) fields (digital forensic, criminal law, 7. Univ. Malta (MT)

criminal procedure, international 8. Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe - Brusssels (BE) cooperation); 3: Detecting which are rules, criteria utilized for processing 9. Law and Internet Foundation - electronic evidence in EU MS, how is Sofia (BG) 10. CETIC - Brussels (BE) exchange of evidence regulated; 4: Detecting of existence of criteria, standards for guaranteeing reliability, integrity, custody requirement chain

in EU MS; 5: Defining operational, ethical implications for Law Enforcement Agencies all over EU; 6: Identifying, developing technological functionalities for a Common EU Framework in gathering, exchanging Status: electronic evidence. ON-GOING http://www.evidenceproject.eu/

SOURCE FP7 – Secure January 2014 / SOURCE is to create a robust and Coordinator: Societies January 2018 sustainable virtual centre of 1. PRIO – Oslo (NO) Virtual centre of excellence capable of exploring and excellence for Call 2012-7.4-2 EUR 4,997,588 advancing societal issues in security Consortium: research support 2. FOI - Stockholm (SE) NoE REA - 313288 research and development. Through and coordination an integrated information gathering 3. TNO - Delft (NL) on societal security hub, education programmes across 4. Tecnalia - Madrid (ES) 5. King's College London (UK) the security sectors, and a comprehensive programme of 6. FhG INT - Euskiirchen (DE) networking activities the SOURCE 7. Sciences Po - Paris (FR) project will advance European 8. EOS - Brussels (BE)

excellence in research and industrial 9. CEPS - Brussels (BE) 10. Verein für Rechts und Kriminal innovation and form the foundation for a permanent virtual centre of Soziologie - Wien (AT), excellence capable of continuing to 11. Vrije Univ. Brussel (BE) 12. CIES - Dublin (IE) bring added-value to research on societal security. It will meet the goals of raising the awareness among policy makers and end-users, raising

the competitiveness of the security industry by better applying it to the social layers of insecurity in society and, as a consequence, contribute to Status: the improvement of the well-being ON-GOING and security of European citizens. http://www.societalsecurity.net/

SLANDAIL FP7 – Secure April 2014 / The social media landscape consists of Coordinator: Societies March 2017 a range of digitized documents in a 1. Queen Elizabeth Univ. –Belfast (IE) Security System for variety of formats, updated by a language and Call 2013.6.1-1 EUR 2,942,445 diverse and geographically distributed Consortium: image analysis people and organisations. During an 2. Inst. Angewandte Informatik EV - CP REA - 607691 Leipzig (DE) emergency, authorities use websites and the population, empowered by 3. Univ. Ulster - Coleraine (UK) social media systems, can broadcast 4. Univ. Padova (IT) for help or to inform others of their 5. CID Gmbh - Freigericht (DE) 6. Univ. Leipzig INFAI (DE) 191

well-being. The burden of search and 7. CIES - Dublin (IE) interpretation in the social media 8. PSNI - Belfast (UK) space, however, is largely on the end- 9. DataPiano - San dona di Piave (IT) users that is the authorities and the 10. Bundesministerium der citizens. Information obtained during Verteidigung - Bonn (DE) emergencies may contain personal 11. Pintail Ltd - Dublin (IE) details and the details may or not be 12. An Garda Síochána - Dublin (IE)

correct – there are no protocols for Status: dealing with the ethical and factual ON-GOING provenance of such data.

P5 FP7 – Secure August 2013 / The goal of the P5 project is an Coordinator: Societies July 2016 intelligent perimeter proactive 1. FOI – Stockholm (SE) Privacy Preserving surveillance system that works Perimeter Call 2012-1 EUR 3,498,214 robustly under wide range of Consortium: Protection Project weather, lighting conditions, that has 2. Univ. Reading - (UK) CP ENTR - 312784 3. Thermal Engin. Systems AB - strong privacy preserving features. System will monitor region outside Linkoping (SE) security area of critical buildings, 4. SAGEM - Paris (FR) infrastructure, give early warning if 5. Univ. Namur (BE)

detection of terrestrial/air threats, in 6. Visual Tools - Madrid (ES) 7. Inst. Mobil- und support of human operator. Multispectral sensor suite comprising Satellitenfunktechnik Gmbh - Kamp- both passive, active sensors is Lintfort (DE) 8. Oskarshamnsverkets Kraftgrupp envisaged, i.e., system based on radar, visual, thermal sensors. It will AB - Oskarshamn (SE) be complemented with advanced 9. Home Office Centre for Applied algorithms for information fusion, Technology CAST - London (UK)

object detection, classification, privacy preservation, high level modelling of intent, behaviour Status: analysis. P5 project will make ON-GOING contributions to evolving standards in detection systems.

192

8. WAY AHEAD Most policies dealing with Disaster Risk and Crisis Management have established operational links with research. For example, the CBRN and Explosive Action Plans include the goal to strengthen and prioritise research. Furthermore, an engagement in further research cooperation with international partners is promoted with a view to enhancing synergies and avoiding duplications, using existing scientific networks, taking into account the research work performed by EDA, JRC and ESRIF (expired in 2009), organisation of periodic meetings by the Commission. While interactions among research and policies are high on the policy agenda, much remains to be done to improve the way information flows from the different communities involved in implementation of both research outputs and policies. This includes capitalizing on past research and enhancing cooperation among EU Member States organisations. The complexity of the security sector stems from the wide variety of actors involved and the lack of coordination mechanism at EU and national level regarding the transfer of information and their actual use by implementers and decision-makers. The need for enhanced coordination and information sharing form the basis of the Community of Users on Safe, Secure and Resilient Societies described in this paper. Prior to developing a Community of Users (based on existing communities which are presently fragmented) with the view of improving science-policy-industry-operator's links in the context of Horizon2020, it was essential to understand the architecture of the research framework and how it interacted with various policy technical/scientific challenges. This was the subject of the mapping described in the present document which should not be regarded as an impact assessment (i.e. no analysis was done about the actual impact and use of research outputs on policies) but rather as a means to better understand the complex science-policy working environment at EU and national levels and propose a mechanism to streamline information flows and transfer in the future. The analytical value of the document stands for the "matrix" established between research and science, i.e. a factual image of the present situation. For the time being, it does not go as far as analysing the real outputs of research regarding policy implementation but complements the work of the Commission's Disaster Risk Management Knowledge Centre (DRMKC) which intends to improve science-based services and analysis, the use and uptake of research and operational knowledge as well as to advance science and technology in DRM. Based on this report, what is the way ahead? Several objectives will be pursued, from the short to the long term, which are described in details in Section 2 "Tasks and objectives". Besides the technical objectives and the coordination of a better information exchange system, the Community of Users on the long term has the capacity to rise sharing of experiences among different actors involved in disaster risk and crisis management, with possible initiatives leading to synergies in the EU and beyond. What is at stake here is to create a mechanism involving different levels (EU, national and regional) by which the different actors, and primarily the "users", will be able to rapidly trace back information and experiences issued from research, capacity-building and training projects, giving them the possibility to identify and contact right persons at the right time to get the feedback that they are looking for via the CoU dedicated website. Regular information exchanges and debates orchestrated by the Community of Users will enable to 193

better channel the information to the "users", which will have a direct effect on research programming, policy implementation and update. It will also have an effect on the involvement of end-users at various levels, e.g. in steering committees of Horizon 2020 projects, consortia, and cater links between research projects and capacity-building / training initiatives, e.g. making links with training programmes and centres, modules exercises, etc. If the Community of Users develops as expected, it has a potential to become a useful complementary supporting group on research related activities to EU security policies (not duplicating existing advisory groups dealing with policy implementation but rather channelling information about research outputs) in the framework of which the European Commission with the EU Member States (through the policy and programme committees), EU Agencies, Intergovernmental Agencies, International Organisations and the wide range of sectors concerned (research, industry, operators) will cooperate for boosting implementation of research outputs, including their usability for policy implementation in the Member States (through information given to relevant existing committees and advisory groups). This will in addition have the capacity of returns of experiences from Industry and practitioners to the EU level, and enable to identify the most potential technologies, tools and methods in order to support their access to the market. The Community of Users, along with the DRMKC, will enable to better visualise / identify research (and on the long term capacity-building and education) projects related to different themes relevant to safety, security and resilience. While this network is progressively establishing "horizontal" dialogues and helping interactions among different disciplines and actors, it will not have the capacity to create operational links with users at large without dedicated thematic networks (referred to as "Communities of practice") in Figure 5.

Figure 5. Linking CoU to Communities of practice 194

This need for "vertical" transfer of information from the EU to the national and the regional levels could be fulfilled by connecting the CoU to appropritate expert networks or communities, either existing or to be developed, that would play the role of knowledge integrating and "translating" bodies at European levels, with the mission – in support and in connexion with MS authorities – to effectively relays research outputs (e.g. new tools or technologies, methods etc.) to appropriate users at national, regional and even local levels. This process of pulling EU research outputs to users, i.e. transforming these outputs into outcome, can only be possible through an effective partnership with users. In other words, if the CoU provides on a regular basis information on new tools / technologies or other research information, different "communities of practice" might format this information to address different categories of users (policy-makers, scientists, industry/SMEs, practitioners, civil society) and undertake ad-hoc actions to ensure that potentials of EU research developments are known and possibly applied by them. This flow of information would enable that we do not miss opportunities (or duplicate work) and would also create effective bridges among the EU down to the citizen's level with possible feedback received and contributing to further research programming. Two examples are given below to illustrate this purpose. In the CBRN-E area, the CoU will continue its efforts in identifying relevant projects funded by different (research, capacity- building) programmes with the aims to propose clustering initiatives through platforms of information exchanges. Stakeholders will continue to interact with these programmes to help interfacing with relevant policies. The CoU is naturally not interfering with policy development and implementation, but contacts are readily established with different policy bodies, enabling to inform users about possible updates and helping research information to be efficiently disseminated to policy actors. The "Community of practice" need to be activated to relay ad-hoc information to users as shown in Figure 6a.

Figure 6a. Main actors in the CBRN-E area

195

Zooming into the CBRN picture, this would imply that each Community of practice gets a comprehensive overview of leading projects in their area (research, capacity-building, training / education), help bringing these projects together if and when possible so that synergies and a critical mass may be built-up. Interfacing among research & innovation and other actors in the industry and policy areas should be facilitated by stakeholder expert / working groups with a mediating role, i.e. able to translate / format the information to target speciticially different users (e.g. specific technology information addressed to industry, support to a specific policy action with reference to the appropriate regulation ect.). In bridging the different "worlds", there is a greater chance that users will get better channeled information as the knowledge base would in principle become consolidated and made known to a wide range of different actors.

Figure 6b. Channelling information in the CBRN area

The same can be examplified in the area of natural hazards, taking into consideration the different "communities" (Figure 7a) and hazards (Figure 7b). In conclusion, the Community of Users has the vocation to act as a facilitating platform, creating links and dialogues among different actors / disciplines (the "horizontal level") and among different levels (from EU to local). Based on the present mapping, a similar architecture will be used to develop a website which will facilitate information searches (not repeating what is readily in place but rather providing paths helping users to more easily find information per themes / areas). This mapping will be complemented on a regular basis (annually) for H2020 and other projects, and the CoU will pursue the organisation of gathering events to consolidate a culture of exchanges at EU level for the sake of improved safety, security and resilience of our societies.

196

Figure 7a. Main actors in the Natural Hazards area

Figure 7b. Channelling information in the Natural Hazards area

197