Stigma Height (Stigma), Anther Height (Anther), Herkogamy (HER) and Mismatch (MM) of the Species Used in This Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stigma Height (Stigma), Anther Height (Anther), Herkogamy (HER) and Mismatch (MM) of the Species Used in This Study 1 Supplementary information Table S1: Mean and SD (in mm) of stigma height (Stigma), anther height (Anther), herkogamy (HER) and mismatch (MM) of the species used in this study. Style length polymorphisms (PM) included are distyly (D) and stigma-height dimorphism (SHD). L and S represent the long- and short-styled morphs (M), respectively for mean sex organ heights and mean herkogamy. UP and LO represent upper and lower sex organ level (SL) for mean mismatch. Sample size is denoted by n. Reference denotes the serial number for the study from which data was extracted as per References at the end of this table. Three distylous species (Arcytophyllum macbridei, Polygonum hastatosagittatum and Psychotria trichophora) which were not identified by the phylogenetic tree but were included in evaluation of allometric relationship between anther and stigma heights have also been included in this table. Species PM M/SL n Stigma SD Anther SD HER SD MM SD Ref Arcytophyllum aristatum D L/UP 12 5.40 0.50 3.80 0.20 1.70 0.50 4.66 0.36 1 Standl. S/LO 12 4.20 0.20 5.50 0.50 1.30 0.40 0.46 0.29 Arcytophyllum capitatum D L/UP 17 7.50 1.00 3.40 0.50 4.10 1.20 1.27 1.13 1 (Benth.) K.Schum. S/LO 16 3.60 0.60 6.30 0.70 2.70 0.90 0.58 0.47 Arcytophyllum ciliolatum D L/UP 12 4.60 0.50 2.60 0.30 2.00 0.40 0.70 0.50 1 Standl. S/LO 12 2.30 0.40 4.80 0.70 2.50 0.60 0.49 0.31 Arcytophyllum filiforme D L/UP 10 5.30 1.00 4.00 0.20 1.30 0.60 1.23 0.83 1 (Ruiz & Pav.) Standl. S/LO 10 3.40 0.60 4.70 0.90 1.30 0.80 0.92 0.64 Arcytophyllum lavarum D L/UP 104 5.00 0.80 3.50 0.70 2.70 0.21 0.62 0.50 1, 2 K.Schum. S/LO 100 2.70 0.50 5.60 0.80 1.98 0.22 0.64 0.50 Arcytophyllum macbridei D L/UP 30 9.40 1.00 5.70 0.60 3.70 1.00 1.38 0.97 1 Standl. S/LO 23 5.20 0.40 8.20 0.70 3.00 0.70 0.78 0.57 Arcytophyllum rivetii D L/UP 11 5.60 0.80 3.50 0.60 2.00 0.60 0.77 0.59 1 Danguy & Cherm. S/LO 10 3.00 0.40 5.30 0.60 2.20 0.60 0.59 0.59 Arcytophyllum setosum D L/UP 10 8.10 0.80 5.40 0.60 2.80 0.80 1.13 0.76 1 (Ruiz & Pav.) Schltdl. S/LO 10 4.20 0.80 7.40 0.80 3.20 0.70 1.31 0.79 2 Table 1 continued. Species PM M/SL n Stigma SD Anther SD HER SD MM SD Ref Arcytophyllum thymifolium D L/UP 11 6.70 0.60 3.10 0.10 3.50 0.50 0.81 0.57 1 (Ruiz & Pav.) Standl. S/LO 10 3.40 0.80 6.40 0.70 3.00 0.80 0.54 0.43 Arcytophyllum vernicosum D L/UP 14 5.10 0.50 2.80 0.40 2.30 0.50 0.83 0.59 1 Standl. S/LO 14 3.20 0.40 5.00 0.90 1.80 1.10 0.56 0.43 Bouvardia ternifolia D L/UP 25 27.50 2.60 20.70 2.50 6.60 1.00 3.05 2.33 3, 4 (Cav.) Schltdl. S/LO 25 21.00 2.10 28.40 2.70 7.40 2.30 2.58 1.96 Carapichea ipecacuanha D L/UP 31 7.20 0.80 3.90 0.40 3.21 0.49 1.02 0.70 5 (Brot.) L.Andersson S/LO 33 3.20 0.50 6.40 0.70 3.11 0.55 0.68 0.46 Chassalia corallioides D L/UP 25 13.18 1.23 10.79 1.39 3.45 1.06 2.33 1.67 6 (Cordem.) Verdc. S/LO 25 7.61 1.46 14.00 1.60 9.35 1.82 4.36 1.64 Cordia dodecandra D L/UP 8 38.60 2.70 27.90 1.60 7.90 2.50 - - 7 A.DC. S/LO 10 26.10 3.20 35.31 4.00 5.70 3.70 - - Cordia macrocephala D L/UP 22 13.69 1.35 9.15 1.13 4.54 1.16 1.81 1.18 8 (Desv.) Kunth S/LO 17 11.27 0.94 12.37 1.12 1.12 0.71 2.14 1.40 Cordia sebestena D L/UP 9 31.30 2.70 25.80 2.40 6.00 1.90 - - 7 L. S/LO 11 25.30 2.20 31.90 2.10 5.30 2.40 - - Coussarea platyphylla D L/UP 50 43.18 9.31 37.76 7.99 9.73 7.22 9.11 6.70 9 Müll.Arg. S/LO 47 28.31 3.42 45.24 6.29 17.03 5.92 11.01 6.50 Damnacanthus indicus D L/UP 11 11.68 1.43 8.83 0.99 2.85 0.75 1.63 1.13 10 C.F.Gaertn. S/LO 11 7.50 0.89 10.63 1.04 3.13 0.75 1.55 0.98 3 Table 1 continued. Species PM M/SL n Stigma SD Anther SD HER SD MM SD Ref Damnacanthus major D L/UP 10 13.48 1.65 7.57 1.20 5.92 1.71 2.58 1.65 10 Siebold & Zucc. S/LO 12 8.56 1.35 11.05 1.04 2.49 1.06 1.63 1.14 Declieuxia fruticosa D L/UP 84 5.46 0.71 3.22 0.43 2.20 0.56 0.90 0.65 11 (Willd. ex Roem. & Schult.) Kuntze S/LO 90 3.53 0.59 5.53 0.81 2.01 0.79 1.05 0.57 Dionysia aretioides D L/UP 2 14.50 - 7.75 - 6.75 - - - 12 (Lehm.) Boiss. S/LO 2 7.75 - 15.50 - 7.75 - - - Dionysia bryoides D L/UP 2 11.00 - 4.75 - 6.25 - - - 12 Boiss. S/LO 2 4.75 - 9.50 - 4.75 - - - Dionysia hissarica D L/UP 2 14.00 - 7.00 - 7.00 - - - 12 Lipsky S/LO 2 7.00 - 14.00 - 7.00 - - - Dionysia lurorum D L/UP 2 13.00 - 6.00 - 7.00 - - - 12 Wendelbo S/LO 2 4.75 - 14.00 - 9.25 - - - Dionysia tapetodes D L/UP 2 11.75 - 7.75 - 4.00 - - - 12 Bunge S/LO 2 4.75 - 11.50 - 6.75 - - - Faramea occidentalis D L/UP 50 13.35 1.51 9.48 1.25 3.87 0.85 0.16 0.12 13 (L.) A.Rich. S/LO 50 6.78 1.09 12.94 1.11 6.17 1.66 0.28 0.16 Faramea suerrensis D L/UP 21 7.32 0.42 5.27 0.55 2.05 0.63 1.20 0.77 14 (Donn.Sm.) Donn.Sm. S/LO 11 2.96 0.27 8.48 0.76 5.52 0.65 2.31 0.59 Gaertnera vaginata D L/UP 25 22.12 1.57 13.69 1.38 8.43 1.55 3.12 2.11 15 Lam. S/LO 25 11.68 1.33 18.41 2.01 6.78 1.92 3.02 1.55 4 Table 1 continued. Species PM M/SL n Stigma SD Anther SD HER SD MM SD Ref Galianthe peruviana D L/UP 50 3.80 0.57 2.17 0.42 1.61 2.40 - - 11 (Pers.) E.L.Cabral S/LO 98 2.13 0.68 3.34 0.62 1.28 1.04 - - Galianthe valerianoides D L/UP 72 5.03 0.57 3.46 0.46 1.57 0.57 - - 11 (Cham. & Schltdl.) E.L.Cabral S/LO 38 2.76 0.52 4.94 0.85 2.17 0.63 - - Gelsemium sempervirens D L/UP 50 28.13 3.85 14.70 2.33 13.43 4.65 - - 16 (L.) J.St.-Hil. S/LO 98 15.87 3.63 23.73 3.04 8.24 4.60 - - Glandora diffusa D L/UP 66 9.02 1.00 5.63 0.62 3.38 0.41 1.08 0.79 17 (Lag.) D.C.Thomas S/LO 32 5.48 0.70 8.93 0.88 3.45 0.23 0.76 0.56 Glandora moroccana D L/UP 51 13.74 1.34 7.80 0.48 5.94 0.87 1.68 1.23 17 (I.M.Johnst.) D.C.Thomas S/LO 49 7.30 1.03 12.49 0.99 5.19 0.17 1.02 0.70 Glandora oleifolia D L/UP 27 13.30 1.15 7.78 0.31 5.52 0.85 1.11 0.75 17 (Lapeyr.) D.C.Thomas S/LO 37 7.20 1.46 13.25 0.69 6.05 0.84 1.39 0.79 Glandora prostrata SHD L/UP 52 7.92 0.89 5.97 0.71 1.95 0.24 1.67 0.98 17 (Loisel.) D.C.Thomas S/LO 48 4.10 0.68 6.32 0.63 2.22 0.14 1.90 0.91 Glandora rosmarinifolia D L/UP 56 13.58 1.50 7.40 0.44 6.18 1.11 1.70 1.29 17 (Ten.) D.C.Thomas S/LO 40 7.73 1.17 12.69 1.23 4.95 0.46 1.02 0.80 Goniolimon italicum D L/UP 27 7.63 0.49 6.16 0.56 1.47 0.41 0.85 0.46 18 Tammaro, Pignatti & Frizzi S/LO 20 6.09 0.50 6.98 0.40 0.89 0.43 0.51 0.39 Guettarda platypoda SHD L/UP 95 16.55 2.40 14.36 1.89 - - 2.98 2.12 19 DC.
Recommended publications
  • LA INFLUENCIA De FRANCISCO HERNÁNDEZ En La CONSTITUCIÓN De La BOTÁNICA MATERIA MÉDICA MODERNAS
    JOSÉ MARíA LÓPEZ PIÑERO JOSÉ PARDO TOMÁS LA INFLUENCIA de FRANCISCO HERNÁNDEZ (1515-1587) en la CONSTITUCIÓN de la BOTÁNICA y la MATERIA MÉDICA MODERNAS INSTITUTO DE ESTUDIOS DOCUMENTALES E HISTÓRICOS SOBRE LA CIENCIA UNIVERSITAT DE VALENCIA - C. S. 1. C. VALENCIA, 1996 La influencia de Francisco Hernández (1515·1587) en la constitución de la botánica y la materia médica modernas CUADERNOS VALENCIANOS DE HISTORIA DE LA MEDICINA y DE LA CIENCIA LI SERIE A (MONOGRAFÍAS) JOSÉ MARÍA LÓPEZ PIÑERO JOSÉ PARDO TOMÁS La influencia de Francisco Hernández (1515-1587) en la constitución de la botánica y la materia médica modernas INSTITUTO DE ESTUDIOS DOCUMENTALES E HISTÓRICOS SOBRE LA CIENCIA UNIVERSITAT DE VALENCIA - C.S.I.C. VALENCIA, 1996 IMPRESO EN ESPA~A PRINTED IN SPAIN I.S.B.N. 84-370-2690-3 DEPÓSITO LEGAL: v. 3.795 - 1996 ARTES GRÁFICAS SOLER, S. A. - LA OLlVERETA, 28 - 46018 VALENCIA Sumario Los estudios sobre Francisco Hernández y su obra ...................................... 9 El marco histórico de la influencia de Hernández: la constitución de la botánica y de la materia médica modernas ........................................ 21 Francisco Hernández y su Historia de las plantas de Nueva España .......................................................................................... 35 El conocimiento de las plantas americanas en la Europa de la transición de los siglos XVI al XVII ........................................................... 113 La edición de materiales de la Historia de las plantas de Nueva España durante la primera
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptic Self-Incompatibility and Distyly in Hedyotis Acutangula Champ
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/44648251 Cryptic self-incompatibility and distyly in Hedyotis acutangula Champ. (Rubiaceae) ARTICLE in PLANT BIOLOGY · MAY 2010 Impact Factor: 2.63 · DOI: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00242.x · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 16 38 3 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Dianxiang Zhang Chinese Academy of Sciences 91 PUBLICATIONS 410 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Dianxiang Zhang letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 03 December 2015 Plant Biology ISSN 1435-8603 RESEARCH PAPER Cryptic self-incompatibility and distyly in Hedyotis acutangula Champ. (Rubiaceae) X. Wu, A. Li & D. Zhang Key Laboratory of Plant Resource Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China Keywords ABSTRACT Distyly; Hedyotis acutangula; pollination; Rubiaceae; self-incompatibility; thrum Distyly, floral polymorphism frequently associated with reciprocal herkogamy, self- flowers. and intramorph incompatibility and secondary dimorphism, constitutes an impor- tant sexual system in the Rubiaceae. Here we report an unusual kind of distyly Correspondence associated with self- and ⁄ or intramorph compatibility in a perennial herb, Hedyotis D. Zhang, South China Botanical Garden, acutangula. Floral morphology, ancillary dimorphisms and compatibility of the two Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou morphs were studied. H. acutangula did not exhibit precise reciprocal herkogamy, 510650, China. but this did not affect the equality of floral morphs in the population, as usually E-mail: [email protected] found in distylous plants. Both pin and thrum pollen retained relatively high viabil- ity for 8 h.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Morphometrics, of Homostyly from Distyly In
    ORAL MORPHOMETRICS,DEVELOPMENT AND EVOLUTION OF HOMOSTYLYFROM DISTYLYIN AMSINCKI. (BORAGINACEAE) Ping Li Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia August 2001 O Copyright by Ping Li, 2001 National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1+1 ,canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue WeUington OnawaON KlAOW OttawaON KlAON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loaq distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microfonn, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la foxme de microfichelfilm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright ir; this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fkom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or othenvise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. .. Sigiiature page ...............................................................................................................u... Copyright agreement page ............................................................................................ru
    [Show full text]
  • The Flickering Connectivity System of the North Andean Páramos
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/569681; this version posted March 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 TITLS: The flickering connectivity system of the north Andean páramos 2 SHORT RUNNING TITLE: Andean flickering connectivity since 1 Ma 3 4 AUTHORS 5 Suzette G.A. FLANTUA1,2*, Aaron O’DEA3, Renske E. ONSTEIN4, Henry HOOGHIEMSTRA1 6 1 Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The 7 Netherlands. 8 2 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway 9 10 3 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Box 0843-03092, Balboa, Republic of Panama 11 4 German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzich, Deutscher Platz 5e, 12 04103 Leipzig, Germany. 13 14 * Corresponding author: [email protected]. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6526-3037 15 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 17 This work was part of SGAF’s doctoral thesis funded by Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research 18 (NWO, grant 2012/13248/ALW to HH.). The Hugo de Vries foundation is acknowledged for financially 19 supporting multiple grant proposals during the project including the development of the visualization 20 accompanying this paper. The Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (SNI) de SENACYT supported AO. 21 REO acknowledges the support of the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐ 22 Jena‐Leipzig funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)— 23 FZT 118.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetics of Distyly and Homostyly in a Self-Compatible Primula
    Heredity (2019) 122:110–119 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-018-0081-2 ARTICLE Genetics of distyly and homostyly in a self-compatible Primula 1,2 3 4 4 4 1 Shuai Yuan ● Spencer C. H. Barrett ● Cehong Li ● Xiaojie Li ● Kongping Xie ● Dianxiang Zhang Received: 30 December 2017 / Revised: 16 March 2018 / Accepted: 17 March 2018 / Published online: 4 May 2018 © The Genetics Society 2018 Abstract The transition from outcrossing to selfing through the breakdown of distyly to homostyly has occurred repeatedly among families of flowering plants. Homostyles can originate by major gene changes at the S-locus linkage group, or by unlinked polygenic modifiers. Here, we investigate the inheritance of distyly and homostyly in Primula oreodoxa, a subalpine herb endemic to Sichuan, China. Controlled self- and cross-pollinations confirmed that P. oreodoxa unlike most heterostylous species is fully self-compatible. Segregation patterns indicated that the inheritance of distyly is governed by a single Mendelian locus with the short-styled morph carrying at least one dominant S-allele (S-) and long-styled plants homozygous recessive (ss). Crossing data were consistent with a model in which homostyly results from genetic changes at the distylous linkage group, with the homostylous allele (Sh) dominant to the long-styled allele (s), but recessive to the short-styled allele (S). Progeny tests of open-pollinated seed families revealed high rates of intermorph mating in the L-morph but considerable 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: selfing and possibly intramorph mating in the S-morph and in homostyles. S-morph plants homozygous at the S-locus (SS) occurred in several populations but may experience viability selection.
    [Show full text]
  • Alma Mater Studiorum Università Degli Studi Di Bologna Pollination
    Alma Mater Studiorum Università degli studi di Bologna Faculty of Mathematical, Physical and Natural Sciences Department of Experimental Evolutionary Biology PhD in Biodiversity and Evolution BIO/02 Pollination ecology and reproductive success in isolated populations of flowering plants: Primula apennina Widmer, Dictamnus albus L. and Convolvulus lineatus L. Candidate: Alessandro Fisogni PhD Coordinator: PhD Supervisor: Prof. Barbara Mantovani Marta Galloni, PhD Cycle XXIII 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................7 1.1 Plant breeding systems ..................................................................................7 1.1.1 Distyly .......................................................................................................9 1.1.2 Resource allocation to sexual functions ..............................................10 1.2 Plant – pollinator interactions .......................................................................12 1.2.1 Floral rewards ........................................................................................12 1.2.2 Pollinators behaviour and insect-mediated geitonogamy ..................13 1.2.2 Pollen limitation and reproductive effort ..............................................14 1.3 Isolated populations, habitat fragmentation and demographic consequences ...........................................................................................................16 2. General purposes .....................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Plant Patent (10) Patent No.: US PP12,848 P2 De Jong (45) Date of Patent: Aug
    USOOPP12848P2 (12) United States Plant Patent (10) Patent No.: US PP12,848 P2 de Jong (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 13, 2002 54) BOUWARDIA PLANT NAMED ROYAL UPOV-ROM GTITM Computer DatabDatabase, GTI JOUVE JANETTE Retrieval Software, citations for Royal Janette, Aug. 2000.* (76) Inventor: John M. F. de Jong, Floraweg 67-2371 European Union Community Plant Variety Office Decision Am, Roelofarendsveen (NL) No. 7010. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this European Union Certificate on the Grant of Community patent is extended or adjusted under 35 Plant Variety Rights No. 7010; Nov. 20, 2000. U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. Plant Varieties Journal No. 37, Canadian Applications Under Examination; Oct., 2000, Canada. (21) Appl. No.: 09/414,163 Plant Breeder's Rights Office, application (published Apr. 1-1. 16, 1998), denomination (published Mar. 6, 1998), decision (22) Filed: Oct. 8, 1999 (published Sep. 16, 1998); The Netherlands. (51) Int. Cl." .................................................. A01H 5/00 sk - (52) U.S. Cl. ....................................................... Pit/352 cited by examiner (58) Field of Search ........................................... Plt/352 Primary Examiner Bruce R. Campell (56) References Cited Assistant Examiner Anne Marie Grufiberg (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Foley & Lardner U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS (57) ABSTRACT PP6,723 P 4/1989 De Jong ..................... Pit/352 PP7,867 P * 5/1992 De Jong ..................... Pit/352 A new and distinct cultivar of Bouvardia plant named 'Royal Janette characterized by having bright orange/red flowers, OTHER PUBLICATIONS dark-green foliage, Short internodes, which makes it Suitable Huxley, A. ed. The New Royal Horticultural Society Dic for growing as a potplant, and excellent keeping quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Antonio José Cavanilles (1745-1804)
    ANTONIO JOSÉ CAVANILLES (1745-1804) Segundo centenario de la muerte de un gran botánico ANTONIO JOSÉ CAVANILLES (1745-1804) Segundo centenario de la muerte de un gran botánico Valencia Real Sociedad Económica de Amigos del País 2004 1. Dalia (cultivar de Dahlia pinnata Cav.). Según el sistema internacional de clasificación, pertenece al grupo “flor semicactus”. 2. Rosa (Rosa x centifolia L.). 3. Amapola (Papaver rhoeas L.). Variedad de flor doble. 4. Tulipán (variedad de jardín de Tulipa gesneriana L.) 5. Áster de China (Callistephus chinensis L.) = Nees (Aster chinensis L.), variedad de flor doble. 6. Jazmín oloroso (Jasminum odoratissimum L.). 7. Adormidera (Papaver somniferum L.). Variedad de jardín. 8. Crisantemo (Chysanthemum x indicum L.). 9. Clavel (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). 10. Perpetua (Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don = Gnaphalium italicum Roth.). 11. Hortensia (Hydrangea macrophylla (Thunb.) (Ser. = Viburnum macrophyllum Thunb.) 12. Fucsia (Fuchsia fulgens DC.). Identificación y esquema por María José López Terrada. Edita: Real Sociedad Económica de Amigos del País Valencia, 2004 ISBN: 84-482-3874-5 Depósito legal: V. 4.381 - 2004 Artes Gráficas Soler, S. L. - La Olivereta, 28 - 46018 Valencia ÍNDICE Presentación de Francisco R. Oltra Climent. Director de la Real Socie- dad Económica de Amigos del País de Valencia ........................... 1 La obra de Cavanilles en la “Económica”, de Manuel Portolés i Sanz. Coordinador por la Real Sociedad Económica de Amigos del País de Valencia de “2004: año de Cavanilles” ...................................... 3 Botànic Cavanilles per sempre, de Francisco Tomás Vert. Rector de la Universitat de València ........................................................ 5 Palabras de Rafael Blasco Castany. Conseller de Territorio y Vivienda de la Generalitat Valenciana .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cut Flowers, Cut Foliages, Cut Ornamentals, and Floral Arrangements for Their Corporate, Commercial, and Residential Clients
    2017 National Collegiate Landscape Competition Flower and Foliage ID List Brigham Young University—Provo, Utah Reminders for students about scientific names: 1) Genus names are always capitalized. 2) The specific epithet (species name) always starts with a lower-case letter. 3) Cultivar names are always capitalized and enclosed within single quotes. 4) Common names begin with lower-case letters; however, proper nouns are capitalized: i.e. lily of the Nile; Peruvian lily; star of Bethlehem; bells of Ireland 5) The cultivar name is considered a proper name because it is a specific selection of the species or hybrid; it often becomes part of the common name and continues to be capitalized: i.e. Philodendron bipinnatifidum ‘Hope’ = Hope philodendron 6) Technically, there is no space between the hybrid sign “x” and the specific epithet; a space has been used in this list for the sake of clarity: i.e. Chrysanthemum xgrandiflorum = Chrysanthemum x grandiflorum 7) Because numerous species are used and sometimes the exact species is not always known, “spp.” is written following the genus name in lower case letters (as shown on the list). 8) In the case of many hybrids and/or cultivars, the words “Hybrids” or “Hybrid Cultivars,” etc. (as shown) is listed following the genus name. 9) Information in parentheses, synonym scientific names, plant patent numbers, and plant groupings, etc. do not need to be memorized. 10) Although there will be an entire bunch of the same plant material in each vase or bucket, the common name should be listed for one stem: i.e. peony, not peonies; galax leaf, not galax leaves 11) Although genus and species names are generally italicized while cultivar names are not, you will not be required to italicize scientific names.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas of Pollen and Plants Used by Bees
    AtlasAtlas ofof pollenpollen andand plantsplants usedused byby beesbees Cláudia Inês da Silva Jefferson Nunes Radaeski Mariana Victorino Nicolosi Arena Soraia Girardi Bauermann (organizadores) Atlas of pollen and plants used by bees Cláudia Inês da Silva Jefferson Nunes Radaeski Mariana Victorino Nicolosi Arena Soraia Girardi Bauermann (orgs.) Atlas of pollen and plants used by bees 1st Edition Rio Claro-SP 2020 'DGRV,QWHUQDFLRQDLVGH&DWDORJD©¥RQD3XEOLFD©¥R &,3 /XPRV$VVHVVRULD(GLWRULDO %LEOLRWHF£ULD3ULVFLOD3HQD0DFKDGR&5% $$WODVRISROOHQDQGSODQWVXVHGE\EHHV>UHFXUVR HOHWU¶QLFR@RUJV&O£XGLD,Q¬VGD6LOYD>HW DO@——HG——5LR&ODUR&,6(22 'DGRVHOHWU¶QLFRV SGI ,QFOXLELEOLRJUDILD ,6%12 3DOLQRORJLD&DW£ORJRV$EHOKDV3µOHQ– 0RUIRORJLD(FRORJLD,6LOYD&O£XGLD,Q¬VGD,, 5DGDHVNL-HIIHUVRQ1XQHV,,,$UHQD0DULDQD9LFWRULQR 1LFRORVL,9%DXHUPDQQ6RUDLD*LUDUGL9&RQVXOWRULD ,QWHOLJHQWHHP6HUYL©RV(FRVVLVWHPLFRV &,6( 9,7¯WXOR &'' Las comunidades vegetales son componentes principales de los ecosistemas terrestres de las cuales dependen numerosos grupos de organismos para su supervi- vencia. Entre ellos, las abejas constituyen un eslabón esencial en la polinización de angiospermas que durante millones de años desarrollaron estrategias cada vez más específicas para atraerlas. De esta forma se establece una relación muy fuerte entre am- bos, planta-polinizador, y cuanto mayor es la especialización, tal como sucede en un gran número de especies de orquídeas y cactáceas entre otros grupos, ésta se torna más vulnerable ante cambios ambientales naturales o producidos por el hombre. De esta forma, el estudio de este tipo de interacciones resulta cada vez más importante en vista del incremento de áreas perturbadas o modificadas de manera antrópica en las cuales la fauna y flora queda expuesta a adaptarse a las nuevas condiciones o desaparecer.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Hedyotisl. (Rubiaceae: Spermacoceae): Redefining A
    Vol. 62 (2) • April 2013 International Journal of Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Evolution Electronic Supplement to Phylogeny of Hedyotis L. (Rubiaceae: Spermacoceae): Redefining a complex Asian-Pacific assemblage Niklas Wikström, Suman Neupane, Jesper Kårehed, Timothy J. Motley & Birgitta Bremer Taxon : – TAXON 62 (2) • April 2013 Electr. Suppl. to: Wikström & al. • Phylogeny of Hedyotis Table S1. List of investigated taxa and accession numbers for sequences used in the analyses. DNA voucher information is given for new sequences. The generic names Oldenlandia and Hedyotis are used following Govaerts & al. (2011). Area of Lab. Taxon Taxon distribution DNA voucher collection Ident. rps16 petD ITS ETS Agathisanthemum bojeri Klotzsch Africa EU543018 EU557678 AM939424 – Agathisanthemum chlorophyllum (Hochst.) Bremek. Africa E.E. Galfrin m174 (A) S. Africa cB031 HE649787 HE657551 HE657657 HE681450 Agathisanthemum globosum (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Klotzsch Africa EU543019 EU557679 AM939425 – Agathisanthemum quadricostatum Bremek. Africa E. Mboya 606 (S) Tanzania cC031 HE649788 HE657552 HE657658 – Amphiasma merenskyanum Bremek. Africa R. Seydel 3118 (A) Namibia cB033 HE649789 HE657553 HE657659 HE681451 Arcytophyllum muticum (Wedd.) Standl. S. America AF002754 EU557682 AM939429 – Arcytophyllum thymifolium (Ruiz & Pav.) Standl. S. America AF333366 EU557683 AM939431 – Batopedina pulvinellata Robbr. Africa EU543021 EU557684 – – Carphalea madagascariensis Lam. Madagascar EU543023 EU557686 – – Cordylostigma microcala (Bremek.) Groeninckx & Dessein Africa EU543039 EU557725 AM939479 AM932962 Cordylostigma virgata (Willd.) Groeninckx & Dessein Africa R. Seydel 2723 (A) Namibia cB032 HE798557 HE657554 HE657660 HE681452 Dentella repens (L.) J.R. Forst. & G. Forst. Asia, Australasia, AF333370 EU557693 AM939440 AM932930 Pacific Dibrachionostylus kaessneri (S. Moore) Bremek. Africa AF002761 EU557694 AM939442 AM932932 Hedyotis acutangula Champ. ex Benth. China, Indochina S.Y. Hu & Y.C. Kong 184 (A) China cB002 HE649790 HE657555 HE657661 HE681453 Hedyotis ampliflora Hance China, Indochina F.C.
    [Show full text]