LA INFLUENCIA De FRANCISCO HERNÁNDEZ En La CONSTITUCIÓN De La BOTÁNICA MATERIA MÉDICA MODERNAS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LA INFLUENCIA De FRANCISCO HERNÁNDEZ En La CONSTITUCIÓN De La BOTÁNICA MATERIA MÉDICA MODERNAS JOSÉ MARíA LÓPEZ PIÑERO JOSÉ PARDO TOMÁS LA INFLUENCIA de FRANCISCO HERNÁNDEZ (1515-1587) en la CONSTITUCIÓN de la BOTÁNICA y la MATERIA MÉDICA MODERNAS INSTITUTO DE ESTUDIOS DOCUMENTALES E HISTÓRICOS SOBRE LA CIENCIA UNIVERSITAT DE VALENCIA - C. S. 1. C. VALENCIA, 1996 La influencia de Francisco Hernández (1515·1587) en la constitución de la botánica y la materia médica modernas CUADERNOS VALENCIANOS DE HISTORIA DE LA MEDICINA y DE LA CIENCIA LI SERIE A (MONOGRAFÍAS) JOSÉ MARÍA LÓPEZ PIÑERO JOSÉ PARDO TOMÁS La influencia de Francisco Hernández (1515-1587) en la constitución de la botánica y la materia médica modernas INSTITUTO DE ESTUDIOS DOCUMENTALES E HISTÓRICOS SOBRE LA CIENCIA UNIVERSITAT DE VALENCIA - C.S.I.C. VALENCIA, 1996 IMPRESO EN ESPA~A PRINTED IN SPAIN I.S.B.N. 84-370-2690-3 DEPÓSITO LEGAL: v. 3.795 - 1996 ARTES GRÁFICAS SOLER, S. A. - LA OLlVERETA, 28 - 46018 VALENCIA Sumario Los estudios sobre Francisco Hernández y su obra ...................................... 9 El marco histórico de la influencia de Hernández: la constitución de la botánica y de la materia médica modernas ........................................ 21 Francisco Hernández y su Historia de las plantas de Nueva España .......................................................................................... 35 El conocimiento de las plantas americanas en la Europa de la transición de los siglos XVI al XVII ........................................................... 113 La edición de materiales de la Historia de las plantas de Nueva España durante la primera mitad del siglo XVII .......................... 139 La influencia de Hernández en la botánica y la materia médica prelinneanas ................................................................................................ 189 La tradición hernandina a partir de Linneo .............................................. 213 Referencias bibliográficas ........................................................................... 235 7 Los estudios sobre Francisco Hemández y su obra Hernández y su obra se han dedicado durante más de tres siglos numerosos estudios, buena parte de los cuales no figura en los reper­ Atorios y bases de datos de bibliograffa histórico-médica e histórico• científica, ausencia que ha contribuído notablemente a los frecuentes errores que circulan sobre su trayectoria biográfica, sus aportaciones y la difusión e influencia de éstas. Por ello parece conveniente ofrecer una breve revisión historiográfica, exponiendo las etapas de los principales acercamientos al tema. El punto de partida del acercamiento biobibliográfico puede situarse en el Epitome de la Bibliotheca Oriental y Occidental Nautica y Geografica (1629), de Antonio de León Pinelo. En ocho epígrafes de este repertorio se anotan los originales hernandinos que se guardaban en la biblioteca de El Escorial, "los borradores que se hallan en el Colegio de la Compañía de Jesús, de esta Cor­ te", la selección de Recchi y su edición en castellano por Ximénez en 1615, así como la publicada por la Accademia dei Lincei, a la que se atribuye la fecha de 1628, con noticias confusas acerca de supuestas reimpresiones en Alemania, pero indicando las anotaciones de Faber, Terrentius y Colonna l. La segunda referencia en orden cronológico fue la que dedicó Hermann Con­ ring en su Introductio in universam artem medica m (1651), importante hito en el desarrollo de la historiograffa y la bibliograffa médicas2, referencia que, como veremos más tarde, fue utilizada y citada por el botánico Tournefort, especialmente en relación con los más de tres millares de plantas descritas en la Historia natural de Nueva España. En su fundamental libro sobre Her­ nández, Somolinos afirma que "no hemos conseguido encontrar ningún dato sobre este Conringio" y también desconoce la primera edición de la Biblio- 1 LEON PINELO (1629), p.127-128; (1737-1738), cols. 86S-869. 2 C{. HEISCHKEL (1949), p. 209-210. 9 theca Hispana Nova (1672), de Nicolás Antonio, creyendo que no fue impresa hasta 17833, Nicolás Antonio comienza anotando la amistad de Hernández con Ambrosio de Morales, a través de una cita de Las antigüedades de las ciudades de España (1575) de este autor, resume las indicaciones de León Pinelo, sitúa la edición romana en los años 1648 y 1651 y la traducción de Ximénez en 1615 y termina diciendo que "tradujo con notas la Historia natu­ ral de Plinio .. , en cuya obra, dedicada al rey Felipe II, se llama toledano"4, Conring y Nicolás Antonio fueron fuentes directas o indirectas de la infor­ mación relativa a Hernández que incluyeron después diversos repertorios biobibliográficos internacionales, entre los que figuran los médicos de Man­ get, Eloy y Dezeimeris y el botánico de Hallet, José Quer se ocupó de Hernández en el "Catálogo de los autores españoles que han escrito de Historia Natural" y en otras partes del volumen primero de su Flora Española (1762)6, Reprodujo los datos biográficos y la descrip­ ción de los volúmenes originales hernandinos depositados en la biblioteca de 7 El Escorial que había ofrecido en 1605 José de Sigüenza , anotó con preci­ sión la edición romana de la selección de Recchi y fue el primero en referirse a los materiales hernandinos incluídos en la Historia plantarum (1686- 1704), de John RayS, Francisco de los Santos, en las ediciones de su Descrip­ cion breve del Monasterio de S, Lorenzo el Real de El Escorial posteriores al incendio de 1671 en el que se destruyeron dichos volúmenes, había afirmado taxativamente que "todos perecieron en la fatalidad del incendio, aunque se procuraron rescatar''!}, Sin embargo, Quer planteó la posibilidad de que algu­ nos materiales se hubieran conservado, refiriéndose sobre todo a "algunos volúmenes del herbario de plantas secas americanas, y de algunas del paíS"lO, Esta duda fue mantenida a lo largo de los dos siglos siguientes por varios autores que, como hemos podido demostrar en otro lugar, se confun- 3 SOMOLINOS (1960), p. 320, nota 10; p. 98, nota 5. 4 ANToNIO (1672), vol. J, p. 372. 5 MANCET (1740), vol. 11, p. 679; ELOY (1778), vol. 11, p. 708; DEZEIMERlS (1828-1839), vol. m, p. 117; lIALLER (1771-1772), vol. I, p. 419. 6 QUER (1762), vol. I, p. 37-38, 115, 365. 7 SIGÜENZA (1605), p. 310-311. Cf. LoPEZ PIÑERO y PARDO TOMAS (1994), p. 18-19. 8 "Rayo sacó a luz in Historia Plantarum el Catalogo de estas plantas, tomo 11, p. 1219": QUER (1762), vol. I, p. 115. 9 SANTOS (1698), f. 92 r. 10 QUER (1762), vol. I, p.38. 10 dieron principalmente con unos herbarios del siglo XVI, de gran importan­ l1 cia, pero que no tienen ninguna relación con Hernández • En 1790, Casimiro Gómez Ortega publicó, como es sabido, una edición de los "borradores" hernandinos a los que se había referido León Pinelo y que había localizado el cronista de Indias Juan Bautista Muñoz. En el primer volumen de dicha edición, que quedó limitada al texto de la Historia de las plantas de Nueva España, incluyó un extenso "Ad lectorem praefatio" cuya importancia e influencia en los estudios hernandinos no ha sido debidamen­ te valorada. Aparte de resumir los datos relativos a los volúmenes deposita­ dos en El Escorial hasta su destrucción en el incendio de 1671, el "compen­ dium seu potius compilatio" de Recchi, su publicación por los Lincei y la traducción de Ximénez, expuso detalladamente los diferentes textos conteni­ dos en dichos borradores, así como la versión comentada por Hernández de la Historia natural de Plinio, cuyos volúmenes manuscritos, "in Regia Matri­ tensi Bibliotheca asservata ... a Franciscus Cerdano et Rico ... paucos ante annos detecta sunt". En su conjunto, esta información no fue superada hasta las reunidas por Miguel Colmeiro (1858) y José T. Medina (1900), a las que después nos referiremos. A continuación de su "praefatio", Gómez Ortega publicó, además, el célebre poema que Hernández dirigió a Benito Arias Montano12• La información de Quer, el "praefatio" de Gómez Ortega y el poema a Arias Montano fueron íntegramente reproducidos por Hernández Morejón y Chinchilla en sus historias de la medicina española 13. Por otra parte, Chin­ chilla describió con gran minuciosidad, citando párrafos y transcribiendo textos completos, el manuscrito hernandino Materia medicinal de la Nueva l4 España, actualmente extraviado • Con algunas variantes, el contenido de las primeras setecientas páginas de este manuscrito coincide con la tradu­ ción castellana por Ximénez de la selección de Recchi, pero a continuación incluye tres tablas: Primera tabla de la aplicación de las medicinas ... a toda 11 Cf. LoPEZ PIÑERO y PARDO TOMAS (1994), p. 17-32. 12 HERNANDEZ (1790), vol. J, p. I-XVITI. El poema, en las siguientes tres hojas s. n. En la mis­ ma fecha, se publicó por la Imprenta Real, de Madrid, una NOTICIA (1790) del hallazgo de los borradores hernandinos y los planes para su edición, seguramente redactada por el propio Gómez Ortega. 13 HERNANDEZ MOR&JON (1842-1852), vol. m, 398-408; CHINCHILLA (1841-1846), vol. 11, p.165- 175. 14 CHINCHILLA (1841-1846), vol. 11, p. 175-182. 11 diversidad de enfermedades, Tabla segunda de las virtudes y facultades de los medicamentos ... segun las diversas partes del cuerpo y Tabla tercera de los nombres de las medicinas en la lengua mexicana. La segunda, cuyos casi trescientos epígrafes transcribe Chinchilla, es la misma que edit6 Juan de Barrios en su Verdadera medicina (1607) y que Francesco Stelluti se atribu­ l5 y6 indebidamente en la edici6n romana, como hemos podido comprobar • En la misma década en la que aparecieron las obras de Hernández More­ j6n y Chinchilla, Martín Fernández de Navarrete, Pedro F. de Baranda y Miguel Salvá publicaron ocho cartas de Francisco Hernández dirigidas a Felipe II o a Juan de Ovando, presidente del Consejo de Indias, en el primer volumen de la Colección de Documentos inéditos para la Historia de España (1842)16. Estas cartas fueron reproducidas por Nicolás Le6n en su edici6n del texto castellano de Ximénez (1888), que citaremos más adelante, así como traducidas al alemán por Fritz Lejeune (1924), autor cuyos trabajos sobre la medicina española del Renacimiento han sido injustamente olvida­ dos.
Recommended publications
  • Caryophyllales 2018 Instituto De Biología, UNAM September 17-23
    Caryophyllales 2018 Instituto de Biología, UNAM September 17-23 LOCAL ORGANIZERS Hilda Flores-Olvera, Salvador Arias and Helga Ochoterena, IBUNAM ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Walter G. Berendsohn and Sabine von Mering, BGBM, Berlin, Germany Patricia Hernández-Ledesma, INECOL-Unidad Pátzcuaro, México Gilberto Ocampo, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, México Ivonne Sánchez del Pino, CICY, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Thomas Borsch, BGBM, Germany Fernando O. Zuloaga, Instituto de Botánica Darwinion, Argentina Victor Sánchez Cordero, IBUNAM, México Cornelia Klak, Bolus Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa Hossein Akhani, Department of Plant Sciences, School of Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, Iran Alexander P. Sukhorukov, Moscow State University, Russia Michael J. Moore, Oberlin College, USA Compilation: Helga Ochoterena / Graphic Design: Julio C. Montero, Diana Martínez GENERAL PROGRAM . 4 MONDAY Monday’s Program . 7 Monday’s Abstracts . 9 TUESDAY Tuesday ‘s Program . 16 Tuesday’s Abstracts . 19 WEDNESDAY Wednesday’s Program . 32 Wednesday’s Abstracs . 35 POSTERS Posters’ Abstracts . 47 WORKSHOPS Workshop 1 . 61 Workshop 2 . 62 PARTICIPANTS . 63 GENERAL INFORMATION . 66 4 Caryophyllales 2018 Caryophyllales General program Monday 17 Tuesday 18 Wednesday 19 Thursday 20 Friday 21 Saturday 22 Sunday 23 Workshop 1 Workshop 2 9:00-10:00 Key note talks Walter G. Michael J. Moore, Berendsohn, Sabine Ya Yang, Diego F. Registration
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • There Are Other Species That Have Thin Trailing Stems, with Spine Clusters
    There are other species that have thin MottramPhoto: Roy Mottram Photo: Roy trailing stems, with spine clusters, and look like a normal cactus, for example Aporocactus (the Rat’s Tail Cactus, easy to grow and spectacular in a hanging basket) (Fig. 3) and Selenicereus (the Queen of the Night) (Fig. 4). This plant likes to climb and scramble along the rafters of a greenhouse, but be careful as it can push through vents. The flowers are produced throughout the summer and take several weeks to develop. The flowers begin to open around 8.00pm and are finished by 8.00am the next day, but it is worth staying up to see them. Around 230mm (9”) diameter, they form creamy white trumpets with brownish thin outer petals and are slightly scented. A third interesting genus is Rhipsalis with a profusion of, mainly, small flow- ers and colourful berries (Figs. 5a–c). It is a good idea to give all epiphytes a Fig. 3 Aporocactus flagelliformis, the Rat’s Tail Cactus spell outside during the frost free months of the summer. Hanging baskets can be hung under trees, where the dappled shade is ideal. Pots of epicacti like a shady wall, and will often set fruit. Suitable composts include any rich in humus or peat, preferably slightly acidic and with very good drainage by the liberal addition of grit, gravel and/or sharp sand. They often have quite small root systems, particularly schlumbergeras, so when repotting, choose a pot only a little larger than their current one. As for other cacti, leave dry for a week after repotting, and longer if there is any root damage or rot.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature-Review-Of-Tagetus-Patula.Pdf
    Research & Reviews: Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry e-ISSN: 2321-6182 p-ISSN: 2347-2332 LITERATURE REVIEW OF TAGETUS PATULA Ankitha Reddy. Gongalla Department of Pharmacognosy, Gokaraju Rangaraju College of Pharmacy Mini Review Received date: 27/07/2020 ABSTRACT Accepted date: 28/07/2020 Published date: 04/08/2020 Tagetes patula L., Asteraceae, popularly known as French marigold, *For Correspondence: originated in Mexico. It is widely used as an ornamental plant and is sold Ankitha Reddy Gongalla, freely in open markets and garden shop. In folk medicine the flowers and Department of Pharmacognosy, leaves are used for his or her antiseptic, diuretic, depurative and bug Gokaraju Rangaraju College of repellent activities. Chemical studies with flowers and leaves of T. patula Pharmacy identified terpenes, alkaloids, carotenoids, thiophenes, fatty acids, and Tel: 7416683865 flavonoids, as constituents, some of which may elicit the biological Email:[email protected] activities; these include insecticidal, nematicidal, larvicidal, antifungal, anti-inflammatory activities. As Piccaglia and collaborators (1998) found, Keywords: French marigold, the flowers of T. patula are a rich source of lutein and its esters. For this Marigold, Tageteste, Calendula. reason the genus is widely cultivated in Central America as food coloring, which is approved by the European Union. However, after carotenoids are extracted, the residue is discarded or only used as animal feed or fertilizer. INTRODUCTION Morphology The flower head had tubular disk flowers in the centre and ray flowers, these often strap-shaped, around the periphery. Flowers are found in shades or yellow, orange, red and everything in between. The French marigold has smaller flowers than African kind.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    SYSTEMATICS OF TRIBE TRICHOCEREEAE AND POPULATION GENETICS OF Haageocereus (CACTACEAE) By MÓNICA ARAKAKI MAKISHI A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2008 1 © 2008 Mónica Arakaki Makishi 2 To my parents, Bunzo and Cristina, and to my sisters and brother. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I want to express my deepest appreciation to my advisors, Douglas Soltis and Pamela Soltis, for their consistent support, encouragement and generosity of time. I would also like to thank Norris Williams and Michael Miyamoto, members of my committee, for their guidance, good disposition and positive feedback. Special thanks go to Carlos Ostolaza and Fátima Cáceres, for sharing their knowledge on Peruvian Cactaceae, and for providing essential plant material, confirmation of identifications, and their detailed observations of cacti in the field. I am indebted to the many individuals that have directly or indirectly supported me during the fieldwork: Carlos Ostolaza, Fátima Cáceres, Asunción Cano, Blanca León, José Roque, María La Torre, Richard Aguilar, Nestor Cieza, Olivier Klopfenstein, Martha Vargas, Natalia Calderón, Freddy Peláez, Yammil Ramírez, Eric Rodríguez, Percy Sandoval, and Kenneth Young (Peru); Stephan Beck, Noemí Quispe, Lorena Rey, Rosa Meneses, Alejandro Apaza, Esther Valenzuela, Mónica Zeballos, Freddy Centeno, Alfredo Fuentes, and Ramiro Lopez (Bolivia); María E. Ramírez, Mélica Muñoz, and Raquel Pinto (Chile). I thank the curators and staff of the herbaria B, F, FLAS, LPB, MO, USM, U, TEX, UNSA and ZSS, who kindly loaned specimens or made information available through electronic means. Thanks to Carlos Ostolaza for providing seeds of Haageocereus tenuis, to Graham Charles for seeds of Blossfeldia sucrensis and Acanthocalycium spiniflorum, to Donald Henne for specimens of Haageocereus lanugispinus; and to Bernard Hauser and Kent Vliet for aid with microscopy.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Plant Patent (10) Patent No.: US PP12,848 P2 De Jong (45) Date of Patent: Aug
    USOOPP12848P2 (12) United States Plant Patent (10) Patent No.: US PP12,848 P2 de Jong (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 13, 2002 54) BOUWARDIA PLANT NAMED ROYAL UPOV-ROM GTITM Computer DatabDatabase, GTI JOUVE JANETTE Retrieval Software, citations for Royal Janette, Aug. 2000.* (76) Inventor: John M. F. de Jong, Floraweg 67-2371 European Union Community Plant Variety Office Decision Am, Roelofarendsveen (NL) No. 7010. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this European Union Certificate on the Grant of Community patent is extended or adjusted under 35 Plant Variety Rights No. 7010; Nov. 20, 2000. U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. Plant Varieties Journal No. 37, Canadian Applications Under Examination; Oct., 2000, Canada. (21) Appl. No.: 09/414,163 Plant Breeder's Rights Office, application (published Apr. 1-1. 16, 1998), denomination (published Mar. 6, 1998), decision (22) Filed: Oct. 8, 1999 (published Sep. 16, 1998); The Netherlands. (51) Int. Cl." .................................................. A01H 5/00 sk - (52) U.S. Cl. ....................................................... Pit/352 cited by examiner (58) Field of Search ........................................... Plt/352 Primary Examiner Bruce R. Campell (56) References Cited Assistant Examiner Anne Marie Grufiberg (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Foley & Lardner U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS (57) ABSTRACT PP6,723 P 4/1989 De Jong ..................... Pit/352 PP7,867 P * 5/1992 De Jong ..................... Pit/352 A new and distinct cultivar of Bouvardia plant named 'Royal Janette characterized by having bright orange/red flowers, OTHER PUBLICATIONS dark-green foliage, Short internodes, which makes it Suitable Huxley, A. ed. The New Royal Horticultural Society Dic for growing as a potplant, and excellent keeping quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Antonio José Cavanilles (1745-1804)
    ANTONIO JOSÉ CAVANILLES (1745-1804) Segundo centenario de la muerte de un gran botánico ANTONIO JOSÉ CAVANILLES (1745-1804) Segundo centenario de la muerte de un gran botánico Valencia Real Sociedad Económica de Amigos del País 2004 1. Dalia (cultivar de Dahlia pinnata Cav.). Según el sistema internacional de clasificación, pertenece al grupo “flor semicactus”. 2. Rosa (Rosa x centifolia L.). 3. Amapola (Papaver rhoeas L.). Variedad de flor doble. 4. Tulipán (variedad de jardín de Tulipa gesneriana L.) 5. Áster de China (Callistephus chinensis L.) = Nees (Aster chinensis L.), variedad de flor doble. 6. Jazmín oloroso (Jasminum odoratissimum L.). 7. Adormidera (Papaver somniferum L.). Variedad de jardín. 8. Crisantemo (Chysanthemum x indicum L.). 9. Clavel (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). 10. Perpetua (Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don = Gnaphalium italicum Roth.). 11. Hortensia (Hydrangea macrophylla (Thunb.) (Ser. = Viburnum macrophyllum Thunb.) 12. Fucsia (Fuchsia fulgens DC.). Identificación y esquema por María José López Terrada. Edita: Real Sociedad Económica de Amigos del País Valencia, 2004 ISBN: 84-482-3874-5 Depósito legal: V. 4.381 - 2004 Artes Gráficas Soler, S. L. - La Olivereta, 28 - 46018 Valencia ÍNDICE Presentación de Francisco R. Oltra Climent. Director de la Real Socie- dad Económica de Amigos del País de Valencia ........................... 1 La obra de Cavanilles en la “Económica”, de Manuel Portolés i Sanz. Coordinador por la Real Sociedad Económica de Amigos del País de Valencia de “2004: año de Cavanilles” ...................................... 3 Botànic Cavanilles per sempre, de Francisco Tomás Vert. Rector de la Universitat de València ........................................................ 5 Palabras de Rafael Blasco Castany. Conseller de Territorio y Vivienda de la Generalitat Valenciana .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cut Flowers, Cut Foliages, Cut Ornamentals, and Floral Arrangements for Their Corporate, Commercial, and Residential Clients
    2017 National Collegiate Landscape Competition Flower and Foliage ID List Brigham Young University—Provo, Utah Reminders for students about scientific names: 1) Genus names are always capitalized. 2) The specific epithet (species name) always starts with a lower-case letter. 3) Cultivar names are always capitalized and enclosed within single quotes. 4) Common names begin with lower-case letters; however, proper nouns are capitalized: i.e. lily of the Nile; Peruvian lily; star of Bethlehem; bells of Ireland 5) The cultivar name is considered a proper name because it is a specific selection of the species or hybrid; it often becomes part of the common name and continues to be capitalized: i.e. Philodendron bipinnatifidum ‘Hope’ = Hope philodendron 6) Technically, there is no space between the hybrid sign “x” and the specific epithet; a space has been used in this list for the sake of clarity: i.e. Chrysanthemum xgrandiflorum = Chrysanthemum x grandiflorum 7) Because numerous species are used and sometimes the exact species is not always known, “spp.” is written following the genus name in lower case letters (as shown on the list). 8) In the case of many hybrids and/or cultivars, the words “Hybrids” or “Hybrid Cultivars,” etc. (as shown) is listed following the genus name. 9) Information in parentheses, synonym scientific names, plant patent numbers, and plant groupings, etc. do not need to be memorized. 10) Although there will be an entire bunch of the same plant material in each vase or bucket, the common name should be listed for one stem: i.e. peony, not peonies; galax leaf, not galax leaves 11) Although genus and species names are generally italicized while cultivar names are not, you will not be required to italicize scientific names.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marigold: Easy-To-Grow, Colorful, a Timeless Beauty!
    n Seed de A r ss a o G c i e a t m i o o n H DS EZwww.ezfromseed.orgf omSEED.org The Marigold: Easy-to-grow, Colorful, a Timeless Beauty! Is there a flower more varied and easy-going than the marigold? Honored no fewer than 50 times with All America Selections awards, from the ‘Guinea Gold’ African marigold (Tagetes erecta) in 1933 to ‘Moonsong Deep Orange’, a T. erecta hybrid, in 2010, this versatile bedding flower is as dependable as it is popular. It’s interesting to note that “African” marigold is not from Africa, nor is “French” marigold from France. Both types hail from the Americas, from Argentina north to New Mexico and Arizona. For the full story of the marigold’s world travels, visit the National Garden Bureau’s “Year of the Marigolds” history at www.ngb.org. Tagetes patula, a.k.a. “French” marigolds, thrive in the heat of summer. Left to Right: Tagetes erecta ‘Moonsong Deep Orange‘ (AAS), T. patula ‘Jaguar’, T. erecta x T. patula ‘Zenith’ series, T. tenuifolia ‘Lemon Gem’. Dozens of marigolds are available to the home gardener, with more being introduced each year. The marigolds that are the easiest to grow from seed fall into several categories: Tagetes erecta, or “African” marigolds More appropriately called the Mexican or Aztec marigold, T. erecta is indigenous to Mexico and Guatemala, and is known for its big, pompom flowerheads, which are often more than 3 inches in diameter. The plants themselves can be as petite as 10 inches, or as tall as 4 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Communicationcombined Preharvest and Postharvest
    Scientia Horticulturae 227 (2018) 75–78 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Scientia Horticulturae journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scihorti Short communication Combined preharvest and postharvest treatments affect rapid leaf wilting in MARK Bouvardia cut flowers Rob E. Schoutena, Luka van Diena, Arwa Shahinb,c, Sjoukje Heimovaarac, Uulke van Meeterena, ⁎ Julian C. Verdonka, a Horticulture and Product Physiology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PD, Wageningen, The Netherlands b Plant Breeding, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands c Van Zanten Holding B.V., Rijsenhout, The Netherlands ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Bouvardia is an ornamental shrub, commercially cultivated as flowering stem. Occasionally, negative water Vase life balance, which leads to rapid leaf wilting, ends vase life immediately. This work studies the effect of preharvest Preharvest and postharvest conditions on vase life, water uptake and transpiration. Stems grown at moderate RH show a Stomata malfunction significantly longer vase life, lower water uptake and transpiration rate compared to those grown at high RH. Air emboli Postharvest treatments overcoming air emboli and wound response had a positive effect on vase life. One of the Wound inhibition treatments to overcome air emboli, surfactant treatment, increased water uptake and transpiration rate com- pared to control. Higher water deficit was measured in stems that had reduced vase life. Stomata malfunction (not closing in response to closing stimuli) resulting from high air humidity during growth conditions is likely one cause for the negative water balance. A combination of high transpiration rate (due to high RH) and hin- dering of vase water uptake (due to air emboli and/or stem-wounding responses) is likely the main reason for early wilting of Bouvardia leaves and short vase life.
    [Show full text]
  • Tagetes Spp. Essential Oils and Other Extracts: Chemical Characterization and Biological Activity
    molecules Review Tagetes spp. Essential Oils and Other Extracts: Chemical Characterization and Biological Activity Bahare Salehi 1,2 , Marco Valussi 3, Maria Flaviana Bezerra Morais-Braga 4, Joara Nalyda Pereira Carneiro 4, Antonio Linkoln Alves Borges Leal 4, Henrique Douglas Melo Coutinho 4 , Sara Vitalini 5 , Dorota Kr˛egiel 6 , Hubert Antolak 6 , Mehdi Sharifi-Rad 7,*, Nathália Cristina Cirone Silva 8, Zubaida Yousaf 9, Miquel Martorell 10,* , Marcello Iriti 5 , Simone Carradori 11,* and Javad Sharifi-Rad 12,13,* 1 Medical Ethics and Law Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 88777539, Iran; [email protected] 2 Student Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 22439789, Iran 3 European Herbal and Traditional Medicine Practitioners Association (EHTPA), 25 Lincoln Close, Tewkesbury GL20 5TY, UK; marco.offi[email protected] 4 Laboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Biology—LMBM, Regional University of Cariri—URCA, Crato, CE 63105-000, Brazil; fl[email protected] (M.F.B.M.-B.); [email protected] (J.N.P.C.); [email protected] (A.L.A.B.L.); [email protected] (H.D.M.C.) 5 Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Milan State University, via G. Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy; [email protected] (S.V.); [email protected] (M.I.) 6 Institute of Fermentation Technology and Microbiology, Lodz University of Technology, Wolczanska 171/173, 90-924 Lodz, Poland; [email protected] (D.K.); [email protected] (H.A.)
    [Show full text]
  • Some Major Families and Genera of Succulent Plants
    SOME MAJOR FAMILIES AND GENERA OF SUCCULENT PLANTS Including Natural Distribution, Growth Form, and Popularity as Container Plants Daniel L. Mahr There are 50-60 plant families that contain at least one species of succulent plant. By far the largest families are the Cactaceae (cactus family) and Aizoaceae (also known as the Mesembryanthemaceae, the ice plant family), each of which contains about 2000 species; together they total about 40% of all succulent plants. In addition to these two families there are 6-8 more that are commonly grown by home gardeners and succulent plant enthusiasts. The following list is in alphabetic order. The most popular genera for container culture are indicated by bold type. Taxonomic groupings are changed occasionally as new research information becomes available. But old names that have been in common usage are not easily cast aside. Significant name changes noted in parentheses ( ) are listed at the end of the table. Family Major Genera Natural Distribution Growth Form Agavaceae (1) Agave, Yucca New World; mostly Stemmed and stemless Century plant and U.S., Mexico, and rosette-forming leaf Spanish dagger Caribbean. succulents. Some family yuccas to tree size. Many are too big for container culture, but there are some nice small and miniature agaves. Aizoaceae (2) Argyroderma, Cheiridopsis, Mostly South Africa Highly succulent leaves. Iceplant, split-rock, Conophytum, Dactylopis, Many of these stay very mesemb family Faucaria, Fenestraria, small, with clumps up to Frithia, Glottiphyllum, a few inches. Lapidaria, Lithops, Nananthus, Pleisopilos, Titanopsis, others Delosperma; several other Africa Shrubs or ground- shrubby genera covers. Some marginally hardy. Mestoklema, Mostly South Africa Leaf, stem, and root Trichodiadema, succulents.
    [Show full text]