WCSC 2018: the 8Th World Chess Software Championship

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WCSC 2018: the 8Th World Chess Software Championship WCSC 2018: the 8th world chess software championship Article Accepted Version Krabbenbos, J., van den Herik, J. and Haworth, G. (2019) WCSC 2018: the 8th world chess software championship. ICGA Journal, 40 (3). pp. 194-206. ISSN 1389-6911 doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/ICG-190079 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/78437/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ICG-190079 Publisher: IOS Press All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online WCSC 2018: The 8th World Chess Software Championship Jan Krabbenbos, Jaap van den Herik and Guy Haworth1 Amersfoort, the Netherlands, Leiden, the Netherlands and Reading, UK The ICGA’s 8th World Chess Software Championship was held at the Stockholmsmässan in Stockholm, Sweden on July 14th-15th, the day after the Speed Chess ‘opener’ and before the ‘open platform’ World Computer Chess Championship (Krabbenbos et al., 2018a/b). At the same time, the venue also hosted the international conferences IJCAI, ECAI, AAMAS, ICML, ICCBR and SoCS. The main sponsor was Digital Game Technology, DGT. The common platform here was a Dell laptop with i7-8550U, 1.80 GHz processor running on MS Windows 10 x64 with 16 GByte of internal memory. Nine engines took part, see Table 1 and CPW (2018), and so there were nine rounds, this year at a tempo of 45+15/move. This tournament was played with commentary by International Grand Master Harry Schussler. We had many spectators owing to the fact that the conference hall hosted the set of conferences mentioned above. Table 1 The participants in WCSC 2018 (CPW, 2018) # id Program Author(s) Country Operator 1 B BOOOT Alex Morozov UA A M 2 H HIARCS Mark Uniacke GB Harvey 3 C CHIRON Ubaldo Andrea Farina IT U A F Kai Himstedt, 4 G GINKGO Frank Schneider DE Timo Haupt 5 J JONNY Johannes Zwanzger DE J Z 6 K KOMODO Don Dailey, Mark Lefler & Larry Kaufman US Erdogan Günes 7 P PAULINE Patrick Corey US P C 8 S SHREDDER Stefan Meyer-Kahlen DE S M-K 9 T THE BARON Richard Pijl NL R P Round 1: JONNY – BOOOT ½-½, HIARCS – KOMODO ½-½, CHIRON – THE BARON 1-0, SHREDDER – GINKGO ½-½, PAULINE bye The first round did not have any spectacular outcomes although JONNY and KOMODO may have expected a bit more from their game. For JONNY, the first twenty moves were from its opening book. Thereafter White proved to have some aggressive ideas in mind but BOOOT was able to annihilate all potential threats and reach a rook endgame in which Black had slightly the upper hand. Nevertheless, the draw was never out of sight. Indeed, ‘draw’ was JONNY’s prediction on move 63 and this result was agreed on move 66. We remark that BOOOT did play this game without access to an endgame database. 1 Corresponding author: [email protected] The game HIARCS – KOMODO was one between two giants. From the well-known Caro-Kann, the sharpest opening variation was chosen by Black. White was well prepared but could not get any advantage. During the game KOMODO collected some small benefits and hoped that the totality of these would lead to a tangible advantage. However, the trials that Black essayed did not result in real progress. This implied that the spectators for a long time saw forward and backward play. During this stage, White was prepared for a black penetration and prevented any dangerous situation. Finally, the opponents agreed to a draw. The game CHIRON – THE BARON started with the Dutch opening, the Leningrad variation. It is known as a fighting variant. The openings phase was followed by a series of subtle midgame manoeuvers in which White managed with 22. Ne4 to block the black e-pawn and gain some positional advantage. Soon thereafter, the white bishop appeared on the scene and after 25. Be6, see Fig. 1a, it was clear that White had some advantage. Black countered inventively but White managed to keep the advantage. It won the pawn on e5 and thereafter, the technical phase though difficult was not really an obstacle for CHIRON. On move 43, THE BARON resigned. The former world champion program SHREDDER had some high hopes for a good result in this very strong tournament. It is remarkable to see how strong the programs are and without any doubt, we may state that seven to eight programs here play above human world championship level. This implies that they are able to envisage the plans of the opponent. In many games, we therefore see anticipating moves intended to prevent any danger for the program’s position. Opponent GINKGO is no exception to this rule. Here it is noted that GINKGO is different from GRIDGINKGO since GINKGO was forced to use the uniform platform. If the players were human then the game might have been exciting but here, the opponents understood each other’s movements, exchanged the pieces in time, took strategic positions and reached a natural draw in the end. Standings after R1: 1 CHIRON 1/1; 2-7 BOOOT, HIARCS, GINKGO, JONNY, KOMODO, SHREDDER ½/1; 8 PAULINE 0/0; THE BARON 0/1 a b c Fig. 1. (a) R1, CHIRON – THE BARON 25b; R2, BOOOT – HIARCS (b) 21b and (c) 39b. Round 2: THE BARON – SHREDDER ½-½, KOMODO – CHIRON ½-½, BOOOT – HIARCS 1-0, PAULINE – JONNY 0-1, GINKGO bye In this round, we saw the first appearance of the program PAULINE, a newcomer in our community. The programmer is Patrick Corey. He named his program after his mother who is 86 and is in bad health. The name giving showed the touching courtesy of a son towards his mother. As we all know it is very difficult for newcomers to find their way in the strong community we have today with our top programmers. Although PAULINE managed to get opponent JONNY out of book as soon as the first move, it did not show much resistance towards the former world champion program. The game was a walkover for JONNY. In the game BOOOT – HIARCS the good old Ruy Lopez was played. Both sides followed well-known variations and well-known manoeuvers. On move 21, Black made a decision, which was wrong although the move looks logical, see Fig. 1b. Black played 21. … c4 but should have played 21. … cxd4: the majority on the queenside was not a real asset. The white attack on the kingside was more dangerous. The attack was not directly against the black king but was meant to obtain spatial advantage and free play for White’s pieces. In fact, these are more modern concepts than the tactical concepts which we used in previous games. White emphasized its possibilities by playing 27. h5 anticipating 27. … gxh5 28. Bf5 Nf8 29. Bxc8 Rxc8 30. gxh5. Although Black attempted to solve the problems on the queenside by playing 30. … c3 it was too late. White neutralized the dangers on that side and built up an advantage in the center and the kingside. In particular the move 39. f4 as in Fig. 1c established the fact that White was in the lead. Some moves later, Black resigned. In the game THE BARON – SHREDDER, White used the advantage of the first move by playing solidly and without taking any risk. The game went from opening play to midgame play in an equal situation. Anybody who expected that the formal world champion would outplay THE BARON in that phase was wrong. THE BARON played well and was ever alert. It did not give SHREDDER any chance for a counter-attack. In the end, they arrived at an equal position and agreed the draw. KOMODO – CHIRON was a game between two equally strong opponents. KOMODO started with a Queen Pawn opening whereas Black developed in a natural way. However, in the position which resulted from this special opening play, there was no direct point to focus on. This implied that both sides were looking for possibilities to strengthen their position. That was easier said than done. As the game continued, Black tried to increase its power in the center by playing 24. … Bc5 as in Fig. 2a but White quietly responded with 27. Nb3 forcing Black to retract the bishop. Thereafter White did not see any better opportunity than withdrawing its knight and Black started to repeat moves. After another repetition, a draw was agreed. a b c Fig. 2. (a) R2, KOMODO – CHIRON 25w; R3 (b) GINKGO – THE BARON 31w and (c) SHREDDER – KOMODO 30w. Standings after R2: 1-3 BOOOT, CHIRON, JONNY 1½/2; 4-5 KOMODO, SHREDDER 1/2; 6 GINKGO ½/1; 7-8 HIARCS, THE BARON ½/2; 9 PAULINE 0/1 Round 3: HIARCS – PAULINE 1-0, CHIRON – BOOOT ½-½, SHREDDER – KOMODO ½-½, GINKGO – THE BARON 1-0, JONNY bye The game HIARCS – PAULINE looked like a game between a giant and a dwarf. The opening read as follows 1. b3 g6 2. Bb2 e5 3. Bxe5 f6 and White was already a pawn up. The remainder of the game was played without much inspiration and White won, mating on move 26. The game GINKGO – THE BARON started as an irregular opening which transformed into a Philidor variation.
Recommended publications
  • Chess Tests: Basic Suite, Positions 16-20
    Chess Tests: Basic Suite, Positions 16-20 (c) Valentin Albillo, 2020 Last update: 14/01/98 See the Notes on Problem Solving 16.- Z. Franco vs. J. Gil FEN: rbb1N1k1/pp1n1ppp/8/2Pp4/3P4/4P3/P1Q2PPq/R1BR1K2/ b Black to play and win: 1. ... Nd7xc5 2. Qc5 Qh1+ 3. Ke2 Bg4+ 4. f3 Results Program CPU/Mhz Hash table Move Value Plys/Max Time Notes Chess Genius 1.0 P100 320 Kb Nd7xc5 +0.39 5/17 00:00:17 sees little value Chess Genius 1.0 P100 320 Kb Nd7xc5 +1.72 7/19 00:04:49 sees to 4. f3 Pentium Pro 200 MHz 24 Mb + 16 Mb Nd7xc5 +2.14 10/19 00:01:20 seen at 14s Crafty 12.6 P6 ? Nd7xc5 +1.181 11/17 00:01:46 see notes Crafty 13.3 Pentium Pro 200 Mhz ? Nd7xc5 +2.46 9 00:03:05 Chess Master 5500 Pentium Pro 200 Mhz 10 Mb Nd7xc5 +2.65 6 00:01:24 seen at 0:00, +0.00 MChess Pro 5.0 Notes: Using Chess Genius 1.0, both searches find the correct Knight's sacrifice. The 5-ply one, however, does not see it's full value, while the 7-ply search, though 16 times slower, correctly predicts the next 6 plies of the actual game, finding the move nearly two pawns worth. Crafty 12.6 finds the correct sacrifice too, though it needs to search to 10 ply, instead of the 7 plies required by CG1.0, but its better hardware makes for the shortest time.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft – Not for Circulation
    A Gross Miscarriage of Justice in Computer Chess by Dr. Søren Riis Introduction In June 2011 it was widely reported in the global media that the International Computer Games Association (ICGA) had found chess programmer International Master Vasik Rajlich in breach of the ICGA‟s annual World Computer Chess Championship (WCCC) tournament rule related to program originality. In the ICGA‟s accompanying report it was asserted that Rajlich‟s chess program Rybka contained “plagiarized” code from Fruit, a program authored by Fabien Letouzey of France. Some of the headlines reporting the charges and ruling in the media were “Computer Chess Champion Caught Injecting Performance-Enhancing Code”, “Computer Chess Reels from Biggest Sporting Scandal Since Ben Johnson” and “Czech Mate, Mr. Cheat”, accompanied by a photo of Rajlich and his wife at their wedding. In response, Rajlich claimed complete innocence and made it clear that he found the ICGA‟s investigatory process and conclusions to be biased and unprofessional, and the charges baseless and unworthy. He refused to be drawn into a protracted dispute with his accusers or mount a comprehensive defense. This article re-examines the case. With the support of an extensive technical report by Ed Schröder, author of chess program Rebel (World Computer Chess champion in 1991 and 1992) as well as support in the form of unpublished notes from chess programmer Sven Schüle, I argue that the ICGA‟s findings were misleading and its ruling lacked any sense of proportion. The purpose of this paper is to defend the reputation of Vasik Rajlich, whose innovative and influential program Rybka was in the vanguard of a mid-decade paradigm change within the computer chess community.
    [Show full text]
  • The SSDF Chess Engine Rating List, 2019-02
    The SSDF Chess Engine Rating List, 2019-02 Article Accepted Version The SSDF report Sandin, L. and Haworth, G. (2019) The SSDF Chess Engine Rating List, 2019-02. ICGA Journal, 41 (2). 113. ISSN 1389- 6911 doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/ICG-190107 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/82675/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . Published version at: https://doi.org/10.3233/ICG-190085 To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ICG-190107 Publisher: The International Computer Games Association All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online THE SSDF RATING LIST 2019-02-28 148673 games played by 377 computers Rating + - Games Won Oppo ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- 1 Stockfish 9 x64 1800X 3.6 GHz 3494 32 -30 642 74% 3308 2 Komodo 12.3 x64 1800X 3.6 GHz 3456 30 -28 640 68% 3321 3 Stockfish 9 x64 Q6600 2.4 GHz 3446 50 -48 200 57% 3396 4 Stockfish 8 x64 1800X 3.6 GHz 3432 26 -24 1059 77% 3217 5 Stockfish 8 x64 Q6600 2.4 GHz 3418 38 -35 440 72% 3251 6 Komodo 11.01 x64 1800X 3.6 GHz 3397 23 -22 1134 72% 3229 7 Deep Shredder 13 x64 1800X 3.6 GHz 3360 25 -24 830 66% 3246 8 Booot 6.3.1 x64 1800X 3.6 GHz 3352 29 -29 560 54% 3319 9 Komodo 9.1
    [Show full text]
  • SHOWCASE BC 831 Funding Offers for BC Artists
    SHOWCASE BC 831 Funding Offers for BC Artists Funding offers were sent to the following artists on April 17 + April 21, 2020. Artists have until May 15, 2020, to accept the grant. A Million Dollars in Pennies ArkenFire Booty EP Abraham Arkora BOSLEN ACTORS Art d’Ecco Bratboy Adam Bailie Art Napoleon Bre McDaniel Adam Charles Wilson Asha Diaz Brent Joseph Adam Rosenthal Asheida Brevner Adam Winn Ashleigh Adele Ball Bridal Party Adera A-SLAM Bring The Noise Adewolf Astrocolor Britt A.M. Adrian Chalifour Autogramm Brooke Maxwell A-DUB AutoHeart Bruce Coughlan Aggression Aza Nabuko Buckman Coe Aidan Knight Babe Corner Bukola Balogan Air Stranger Balkan Shmalkan Bunnie Alex Cuba bbno$ Bushido World Music Alex Little and The Suspicious Beamer Wigley C.R. Avery Minds Bear Mountain Cabins In The Clouds Alex Maher Bedouin Soundclash Caitlin Goulet Alexander Boynton Jr. Ben Cottrill Cam Blake Alexandria Maillot Ben Dunnill Cam Penner Alien Boys Ben Klick Camaro 67 Alisa Balogh Ben Rogers Capri Everitt Alpas Collective Beth Marie Anderson Caracas the Band Alpha Yaya Diallo Betty and The Kid Cari Burdett Amber Mae Biawanna Carlos Joe Costa Andrea Superstein Big John Bates Noirchestra Carmanah Andrew Judah Big Little Lions Carsen Gray Andrew Phelan Black Mountain Whiskey Carson Hoy Angela Harris Rebellion Caryn Fader Angie Faith Black Wizard Cassandra Maze Anklegod Blackberry Wood Cassidy Waring Annette Ducharme Blessed Cayla Brooke Antoinette Blonde Diamond Chamelion Antonio Larosa Blue J Ché Aimee Dorval Anu Davaasuren Blue Moon Marquee Checkmate
    [Show full text]
  • Extended Null-Move Reductions
    Extended Null-Move Reductions Omid David-Tabibi1 and Nathan S. Netanyahu1,2 1 Department of Computer Science, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel [email protected], [email protected] 2 Center for Automation Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA [email protected] Abstract. In this paper we review the conventional versions of null- move pruning, and present our enhancements which allow for a deeper search with greater accuracy. While the conventional versions of null- move pruning use reduction values of R ≤ 3, we use an aggressive re- duction value of R = 4 within a verified adaptive configuration which maximizes the benefit from the more aggressive pruning, while limiting its tactical liabilities. Our experimental results using our grandmaster- level chess program, Falcon, show that our null-move reductions (NMR) outperform the conventional methods, with the tactical benefits of the deeper search dominating the deficiencies. Moreover, unlike standard null-move pruning, which fails badly in zugzwang positions, NMR is impervious to zugzwangs. Finally, the implementation of NMR in any program already using null-move pruning requires a modification of only a few lines of code. 1 Introduction Chess programs trying to search the same way humans think by generating “plausible” moves dominated until the mid-1970s. By using extensive chess knowledge at each node, these programs selected a few moves which they consid- ered plausible, and thus pruned large parts of the search tree. However, plausible- move generating programs had serious tactical shortcomings, and as soon as brute-force search programs such as Tech [17] and Chess 4.x [29] managed to reach depths of 5 plies and more, plausible-move generating programs fre- quently lost to brute-force searchers due to their tactical weaknesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Chess Bulletin
    Ohio Chess Bulletin Volume 68 September 2015 Number 4 OCA Officers The Ohio Chess Bulletin published by the President: Evan Shelton 8241 Turret Dr., Ohio Chess Association Blacklick OH 43004 (614)-425-6514 Visit the OCA Web Site at http://www.ohiochess.org [email protected] Ohio Chess Association Trustees Vice President: Michael D. Joelson 12200 Fairhill Rd - E293 District Trustee Contact Information Cleveland, OH 44120 1 Cuneyd 5653 Olde Post Rd [email protected] Tolek Syvania OH 43560 (419) 376-7891 Secretary: Grant Neilley [email protected] 2720 Airport Drive Columbus, OH 43219-2219 2 Michael D. 12200 Fairhill Rd - E293 (614)-418-1775 Joelson Cleveland, OH 44120 [email protected] [email protected] Treasurer/Membership Chair: 3 John 2664 Pine Shore Drive Cheryl Stagg Dowling Lima OH 45806 7578 Chancery Dr. [email protected] Dublin, OH 43016 (614) 282-2151 4 Eric 1799 Franklin Ave [email protected] Gittrich Columbus OH. 43205 (614)-843-4300 OCB Editor: Michael L. Steve [email protected] 3380 Brandonbury Way Columbus, OH 43232-6170 5 Joseph E. 7125 Laurelview Circle NE (614) 833-0611 Yun Canton, OH 44721-2851 [email protected] (330) 492-8332 [email protected] Inside this issue... 6 Riley D. 18 W. Fifth Street – Mezzanine Driver Dayton OH 45402 Points of Contact 2 (937) 461-6283 Message from the President 3 [email protected] Editor Note/Correction 4 2014/2015 Ohio Grand Prix 7 Steve 1383 Fairway Dr. Final Standings 4 Charles Grove City OH 43123 MOTCF Addendum 5 (614) 309-9028
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Hiarcs 14 Uci Chess Engine Download
    Deep Hiarcs 14 Uci Chess Engine Download Deep Hiarcs 14 Uci Chess Engine Download 1 / 3 14, Arics (WB), Vladimir Fadeev, Belarus, SD, 0,08, no ?? ... 22, Ifrit (UCI), Бренкман Андрей (Brenkman Andrey), Russia, 0,04, no, 2200, B1_6 B1_7 B1_9 ... 1. deep hiarcs 14 uci chess engine download 2. deep hiarcs chess explorer download o Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC (available with the Deep HIARCS Chess Explorer ... Please note you can add other UCI chess engines including third party UCI ... publisher is "Applied Computer Concepts Ltd.", do not trust the download if it is not ... deep hiarcs 14 uci chess engine download deep hiarcs 14 uci chess engine download, deep hiarcs chess explorer, deep hiarcs chess explorer download, deep hiarcs chess explorer for mac Red Giant VFX Suite 1.0.4 With Crack [Latest] Free download deep hiarcs 14 uci engine torrent Files at Software Informer. HIARCS 12 MP UCI - a chess program that can do more than .... See my blog for more information and download instructions. ... UCI parameters When an engine runs through a chess GUI, it communicates all the settings ... HIARCS14 (HIARCS book), TC 15sec; +8 -5 =7 First test with Lc0-v0. inf. exe (only ... AlphaZero; Deep Learning; Deus X; Leela Chess Zero; Forum Posts 2019. call of duty black ops crack indir oyuncehennemi multi.flash.kit.2.10.30 free download deep hiarcs chess explorer download Pinegrow Web Editor Crack 5.91 With keygen Free Download 2020 It connects a UCI chess engine to an xboard interface such as ... the AlphaZero-style Monte Carlo Tree Search and deep neural networks a flexible, ..
    [Show full text]
  • Move Similarity Analysis in Chess Programs
    Move similarity analysis in chess programs D. Dailey, A. Hair, M. Watkins Abstract In June 2011, the International Computer Games Association (ICGA) disqual- ified Vasik Rajlich and his Rybka chess program for plagiarism and breaking their rules on originality in their events from 2006-10. One primary basis for this came from a painstaking code comparison, using the source code of Fruit and the object code of Rybka, which found the selection of evaluation features in the programs to be almost the same, much more than expected by chance. In his brief defense, Rajlich indicated his opinion that move similarity testing was a superior method of detecting misappropriated entries. Later commentary by both Rajlich and his defenders reiterated the same, and indeed the ICGA Rules themselves specify move similarity as an example reason for why the tournament director would have warrant to request a source code examination. We report on data obtained from move-similarity testing. The principal dataset here consists of over 8000 positions and nearly 100 independent engines. We comment on such issues as: the robustness of the methods (upon modifying the experimental conditions), whether strong engines tend to play more similarly than weak ones, and the observed Fruit/Rybka move-similarity data. 1. History and background on derivative programs in computer chess Computer chess has seen a number of derivative programs over the years. One of the first was the incident in the 1989 World Microcomputer Chess Cham- pionship (WMCCC), in which Quickstep was disqualified due to the program being \a copy of the program Mephisto Almeria" in all important areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Speech-Language Services in Arizona Schools: Guidelines for Best Practice
    Arizona Department of Education Diane M. Douglas, Superintendent of Public Instruction Exceptional Student Services Arizona Technical Assistance System (AZ-TAS) Speech-Language Services in Arizona’s Schools: Guidelines for Best Practice Speech-Language Services in Arizona’s Schools: Guidelines for Best Practices September 2016 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................ii Commonly Used Acronyms…………………………………………………………………………………..…….….……..iii Overview of School-Based Speech-Language Pathology...................................................... 1 Role of the School-Based Speech-Language Pathologist/Technician ......................................... 1 Federal and Arizona Definitions of Students with Disabilities.................................................... 1 Speech-Language Pathologists/Speech-Language Technicians ................................................. 4 Speech-Language Pathology Assistants (SLPAs) ......................................................................... 7 Substitutes and Vacancies .......................................................................................................... 9 Supervision and Mentoring ...................................................................................................... 10 Recruiting and Retaining Qualified
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Fritz Benchmark Top Ten World Chess E
    Módulos (engines) Deep Fritz Benchmarktop ten WorldColossus: chess download www.colossus.demon.co.uk/chess/colossuschessuci.htmengines pagechecksl.com Rybka Diagramas Shredder, Zappa, Chess Tutor, Freezer Juegue Computer chess ChessGenius flash CHESS III Táctica Táctica II Higher Intelligence Auto Response Chess System Aperturas Database Bruno's Chess Problem of The Day Finales Pro Deo ANAND-TOPALOV Books Posiciones kcehC Crafty Pogonina, N Kosteniuk, A Libros Fruit Stockfish Chesslogik Mundial CHESS Test The King XBoard Arena GUI Aquarium ChessBase página deutsche Fritz HIARCS Junior 0df20896bed45d7d33b1e3d899c64bc9875a0ad9 Sjeng3bbe03a3ae144d827a0d6d909232e519 RobboLito 0.085g3 64bits Komodo Naum _____________ Foros, revistas, tiendas y clubes (forums, magazines, shops and chess clubs) Club de Ajedrez Pueblo Nuevo Anand + AMD = V la casa del ajedrez HIARCS TalkChess.com HIARCS network Máquinas dedicadas Daily Chess News and Games. Weekly digest for download COUNTRYWIDE COMPUTERS! Photos Computerschaak Rybka checksl.com Marca Alybadix chess solving programs ICGA Sudoku Alybadix Playchess ICC Freezer Fics Tableros y relojes (boards and clocks) DGT Phoenix Chess Systems Torneos (Tournaments) Kanazawa 2010 Pamplona 2009 Torneos Fritz Benchmark 4.2 Intel Xeon 120-core / AMD Opteron 48-core chessbase.com/products/deepfritz12/index.asp kns/s Hardware Elo Intel i7-980X 3.33GHz 6x (T´s H) 18109 kn/s 2889 Elo 2xIntel Quad QX9775 15103 kn/s 2873 Elo Intel i7-975 (Tom´s Hardware) 12647 kn/s 2857 Elo AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 11219 kn/s 2846 Elo Intel
    [Show full text]
  • New Architectures in Computer Chess Ii New Architectures in Computer Chess
    New Architectures in Computer Chess ii New Architectures in Computer Chess PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit van Tilburg, op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. Ph. Eijlander, in het openbaar te verdedigen ten overstaan van een door het college voor promoties aangewezen commissie in de aula van de Universiteit op woensdag 17 juni 2009 om 10.15 uur door Fritz Max Heinrich Reul geboren op 30 september 1977 te Hanau, Duitsland Promotor: Prof. dr. H.J.vandenHerik Copromotor: Dr. ir. J.W.H.M. Uiterwijk Promotiecommissie: Prof. dr. A.P.J. van den Bosch Prof. dr. A. de Bruin Prof. dr. H.C. Bunt Prof. dr. A.J. van Zanten Dr. U. Lorenz Dr. A. Plaat Dissertation Series No. 2009-16 The research reported in this thesis has been carried out under the auspices of SIKS, the Dutch Research School for Information and Knowledge Systems. ISBN 9789490122249 Printed by Gildeprint © 2009 Fritz M.H. Reul All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the author. Preface About five years ago I completed my diploma project about computer chess at the University of Applied Sciences in Friedberg, Germany. Immediately after- wards I continued in 2004 with the R&D of my computer-chess engine Loop. In 2005 I started my Ph.D. project ”New Architectures in Computer Chess” at the Maastricht University. In the first year of my R&D I concentrated on the redesign of a computer-chess architecture for 32-bit computer environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Train Your Chess Pattern Recognition More Key Moves & Motifs in the Middlegame
    Arthur van de Oudeweetering Train Your Chess Pattern Recognition More Key Moves & Motifs in the Middlegame New in Chess 2016 To my parents, Ferrie and Joke, whose pride was always encouraging to me. To my wife and children, Edith, Julie and Ilja, who compassionately contributed in a tumultuous year. © 2016 New In Chess Published by New In Chess, Alkmaar, The Netherlands www.newinchess.com All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission from the publisher. Cover design: Volken Beck Production: Harald Keilhack Proofreading: René Olthof, Frank Erwich Supervision: Peter Boel Have you found any errors in this book? Please send your remarks to [email protected]. We will collect all relevant corrections on the Errata page of our website www.newinchess.com and implement them in a possible next edition. ISBN: 978-90-5691-613-8 Contents Preface . 7 Explanation of Symbols . 10 Part I: Typical Manoeuvres . 11 Chapter 1 Ladies First ..........................................13 Chapter 2 Réti’s Rifle ..........................................18 Chapter 3 Alekhine’s Gun.......................................25 Chapter 4 Rocking King’s Rooks..................................31 Chapter 5 The Swinging Queen’s Rook.............................37 Chapter 6 Mysterious Rook Moves ................................44 Chapter 7 A Little Leap Forward ..................................49
    [Show full text]