Speech-Language Services in Arizona Schools: Guidelines for Best Practice

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Speech-Language Services in Arizona Schools: Guidelines for Best Practice Arizona Department of Education Diane M. Douglas, Superintendent of Public Instruction Exceptional Student Services Arizona Technical Assistance System (AZ-TAS) Speech-Language Services in Arizona’s Schools: Guidelines for Best Practice Speech-Language Services in Arizona’s Schools: Guidelines for Best Practices September 2016 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................ii Commonly Used Acronyms…………………………………………………………………………………..…….….……..iii Overview of School-Based Speech-Language Pathology...................................................... 1 Role of the School-Based Speech-Language Pathologist/Technician ......................................... 1 Federal and Arizona Definitions of Students with Disabilities.................................................... 1 Speech-Language Pathologists/Speech-Language Technicians ................................................. 4 Speech-Language Pathology Assistants (SLPAs) ......................................................................... 7 Substitutes and Vacancies .......................................................................................................... 9 Supervision and Mentoring ...................................................................................................... 10 Recruiting and Retaining Qualified Speech-Language Pathologists and Speech-Language Technicians .................................................................................................. 11 Evidence-Based Practice .................................................................................................. 14 Overview of Evidence-Based Practice ...................................................................................... 14 Documentation and Data Analysis............................................................................................ 17 Evaluation of Outcomes ............................................................................................................ 19 Assessment and Evaluation .............................................................................................. 21 Comprehensive Assessment ..................................................................................................... 23 Speech-Language–Specific Data Collection: SLP Probes, Tests, and Measures ........................................................................................................................... 28 Norm-Referenced Tests and Measures of Speech-Language Skills .......................................... 35 Educational Impact of the Speech-Language Impairment ....................................................... 42 The Speech-Language Evaluation Report ................................................................................. 43 Primary Eligibility vs. Related Service ....................................................................................... 44 Individualized Education Program (IEP) Development ...................................................... 46 Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance ................................. 47 Measurable Annual Goals ......................................................................................................... 47 Specially Designed Instruction .................................................................................................. 48 Accommodations, Modifications, and Supports for School Personnel .................................... 49 Postsecondary Transition ......................................................................................................... 49 Reviewing the IEP and Reporting Progress ............................................................................... 49 Reevaluation ................................................................................................................... 51 Terminating Services ................................................................................................................. 51 Preschool Transition and Private Schools ......................................................................... 53 Transition from Early Intervention ........................................................................................... 53 Private School Students with Disabilities.................................................................................. 53 Delivery of Services ......................................................................................................... 55 Service Delivery Methods ......................................................................................................... 56 Scheduling, Service Delivery, and IEPs ...................................................................................... 61 General Education Initiatives .................................................................................................... 63 Caseload Establishment ............................................................................................................ 64 Special Topics .................................................................................................................. 65 Literacy Development ............................................................................................................... 65 Linguistic and Cultural Diversity ............................................................................................... 66 Additional information may be found in the American Speech, Language, and Hearing Association’s Policy Documents Regarding English Language Learners in the Schools. .......... 71 Dysphagia .................................................................................................................................. 80 (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders ................................................................................... 82 Assistive Technology ................................................................................................................. 87 Telepractice ............................................................................................................................... 91 Medicaid Reimbursement in the Public Schools ...................................................................... 99 Appendices .................................................................................................................... 104 APPENDIX A: Web Resources .................................................................................................. 104 APPENDIX B: ASHA’s School Services Frequently Asked Questions ....................................... 106 APPENIX C: ASHA’s Ethics Q & A for School-Based Speech-Language Pathology Practice .... 108 APPENDIX C: Speech and Language Assessment Terms .............................................................................. 109 APPENDIX D: Speech-Language Sample Screening Forms ........................................................................... 112 APPENDIX E: Comprehensive Communication Assessment System ............................................................ 115 APPENDIX F: Additional Forms and Checklists…………………………………………………………………………………….…..138 Speech-Language Services in Arizona Schools: Guidelines for Best Practice Introduction The development of communication skills is important for all students and can impact school success. The school-based speech-language pathologist (SLP) or speech-language technician (SLT) plays an important role in education and may serve on both special education and general education teams. SLPs/SLTs may serve students directly or work with educators and families to address communication and language needs. This guidance document is designed to assist school-based SLPs/SLTs, administrators, teachers, and parents as they explore the role of speech services in the school-based setting and work together to serve students in Arizona. Further, these guidelines are provided to promote consistency within Arizona local education agencies (LEAs) in determining student eligibility or when considering dismissal for speech- language therapy as special education or as a related service. These guidelines are not to be used as criteria for speech-language impairment (SLI) eligibility, nor are they to be used to deny any student in Arizona access to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). No individualized education program (IEP) team may use these guidelines as the sole factor in determining whether a student is eligible for special education under the category of speech-language impairment, nor in determining whether speech services are necessary as a related service, nor should a team use these guidelines to determine the length or duration of speech-language therapy provided. The Department of Education’s Arizona Technical Assistance System (AZ-TAS), as well as other ADE guidance documents, should be used in conjunction with these guidelines. Click on the links below to be directed to these documents on the ADE website: “Processes and Procedures for Developing IEPs for Students with Disabilities” “Processes and Procedures From Referral to Determination of Eligibility” The Arizona Department of Education, Exceptional Student Services, employs staff to provide assistance in understanding information
Recommended publications
  • SHOWCASE BC 831 Funding Offers for BC Artists
    SHOWCASE BC 831 Funding Offers for BC Artists Funding offers were sent to the following artists on April 17 + April 21, 2020. Artists have until May 15, 2020, to accept the grant. A Million Dollars in Pennies ArkenFire Booty EP Abraham Arkora BOSLEN ACTORS Art d’Ecco Bratboy Adam Bailie Art Napoleon Bre McDaniel Adam Charles Wilson Asha Diaz Brent Joseph Adam Rosenthal Asheida Brevner Adam Winn Ashleigh Adele Ball Bridal Party Adera A-SLAM Bring The Noise Adewolf Astrocolor Britt A.M. Adrian Chalifour Autogramm Brooke Maxwell A-DUB AutoHeart Bruce Coughlan Aggression Aza Nabuko Buckman Coe Aidan Knight Babe Corner Bukola Balogan Air Stranger Balkan Shmalkan Bunnie Alex Cuba bbno$ Bushido World Music Alex Little and The Suspicious Beamer Wigley C.R. Avery Minds Bear Mountain Cabins In The Clouds Alex Maher Bedouin Soundclash Caitlin Goulet Alexander Boynton Jr. Ben Cottrill Cam Blake Alexandria Maillot Ben Dunnill Cam Penner Alien Boys Ben Klick Camaro 67 Alisa Balogh Ben Rogers Capri Everitt Alpas Collective Beth Marie Anderson Caracas the Band Alpha Yaya Diallo Betty and The Kid Cari Burdett Amber Mae Biawanna Carlos Joe Costa Andrea Superstein Big John Bates Noirchestra Carmanah Andrew Judah Big Little Lions Carsen Gray Andrew Phelan Black Mountain Whiskey Carson Hoy Angela Harris Rebellion Caryn Fader Angie Faith Black Wizard Cassandra Maze Anklegod Blackberry Wood Cassidy Waring Annette Ducharme Blessed Cayla Brooke Antoinette Blonde Diamond Chamelion Antonio Larosa Blue J Ché Aimee Dorval Anu Davaasuren Blue Moon Marquee Checkmate
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Chess Bulletin
    Ohio Chess Bulletin Volume 68 September 2015 Number 4 OCA Officers The Ohio Chess Bulletin published by the President: Evan Shelton 8241 Turret Dr., Ohio Chess Association Blacklick OH 43004 (614)-425-6514 Visit the OCA Web Site at http://www.ohiochess.org [email protected] Ohio Chess Association Trustees Vice President: Michael D. Joelson 12200 Fairhill Rd - E293 District Trustee Contact Information Cleveland, OH 44120 1 Cuneyd 5653 Olde Post Rd [email protected] Tolek Syvania OH 43560 (419) 376-7891 Secretary: Grant Neilley [email protected] 2720 Airport Drive Columbus, OH 43219-2219 2 Michael D. 12200 Fairhill Rd - E293 (614)-418-1775 Joelson Cleveland, OH 44120 [email protected] [email protected] Treasurer/Membership Chair: 3 John 2664 Pine Shore Drive Cheryl Stagg Dowling Lima OH 45806 7578 Chancery Dr. [email protected] Dublin, OH 43016 (614) 282-2151 4 Eric 1799 Franklin Ave [email protected] Gittrich Columbus OH. 43205 (614)-843-4300 OCB Editor: Michael L. Steve [email protected] 3380 Brandonbury Way Columbus, OH 43232-6170 5 Joseph E. 7125 Laurelview Circle NE (614) 833-0611 Yun Canton, OH 44721-2851 [email protected] (330) 492-8332 [email protected] Inside this issue... 6 Riley D. 18 W. Fifth Street – Mezzanine Driver Dayton OH 45402 Points of Contact 2 (937) 461-6283 Message from the President 3 [email protected] Editor Note/Correction 4 2014/2015 Ohio Grand Prix 7 Steve 1383 Fairway Dr. Final Standings 4 Charles Grove City OH 43123 MOTCF Addendum 5 (614) 309-9028
    [Show full text]
  • Move Similarity Analysis in Chess Programs
    Move similarity analysis in chess programs D. Dailey, A. Hair, M. Watkins Abstract In June 2011, the International Computer Games Association (ICGA) disqual- ified Vasik Rajlich and his Rybka chess program for plagiarism and breaking their rules on originality in their events from 2006-10. One primary basis for this came from a painstaking code comparison, using the source code of Fruit and the object code of Rybka, which found the selection of evaluation features in the programs to be almost the same, much more than expected by chance. In his brief defense, Rajlich indicated his opinion that move similarity testing was a superior method of detecting misappropriated entries. Later commentary by both Rajlich and his defenders reiterated the same, and indeed the ICGA Rules themselves specify move similarity as an example reason for why the tournament director would have warrant to request a source code examination. We report on data obtained from move-similarity testing. The principal dataset here consists of over 8000 positions and nearly 100 independent engines. We comment on such issues as: the robustness of the methods (upon modifying the experimental conditions), whether strong engines tend to play more similarly than weak ones, and the observed Fruit/Rybka move-similarity data. 1. History and background on derivative programs in computer chess Computer chess has seen a number of derivative programs over the years. One of the first was the incident in the 1989 World Microcomputer Chess Cham- pionship (WMCCC), in which Quickstep was disqualified due to the program being \a copy of the program Mephisto Almeria" in all important areas.
    [Show full text]
  • New Architectures in Computer Chess Ii New Architectures in Computer Chess
    New Architectures in Computer Chess ii New Architectures in Computer Chess PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit van Tilburg, op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. Ph. Eijlander, in het openbaar te verdedigen ten overstaan van een door het college voor promoties aangewezen commissie in de aula van de Universiteit op woensdag 17 juni 2009 om 10.15 uur door Fritz Max Heinrich Reul geboren op 30 september 1977 te Hanau, Duitsland Promotor: Prof. dr. H.J.vandenHerik Copromotor: Dr. ir. J.W.H.M. Uiterwijk Promotiecommissie: Prof. dr. A.P.J. van den Bosch Prof. dr. A. de Bruin Prof. dr. H.C. Bunt Prof. dr. A.J. van Zanten Dr. U. Lorenz Dr. A. Plaat Dissertation Series No. 2009-16 The research reported in this thesis has been carried out under the auspices of SIKS, the Dutch Research School for Information and Knowledge Systems. ISBN 9789490122249 Printed by Gildeprint © 2009 Fritz M.H. Reul All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the author. Preface About five years ago I completed my diploma project about computer chess at the University of Applied Sciences in Friedberg, Germany. Immediately after- wards I continued in 2004 with the R&D of my computer-chess engine Loop. In 2005 I started my Ph.D. project ”New Architectures in Computer Chess” at the Maastricht University. In the first year of my R&D I concentrated on the redesign of a computer-chess architecture for 32-bit computer environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Train Your Chess Pattern Recognition More Key Moves & Motifs in the Middlegame
    Arthur van de Oudeweetering Train Your Chess Pattern Recognition More Key Moves & Motifs in the Middlegame New in Chess 2016 To my parents, Ferrie and Joke, whose pride was always encouraging to me. To my wife and children, Edith, Julie and Ilja, who compassionately contributed in a tumultuous year. © 2016 New In Chess Published by New In Chess, Alkmaar, The Netherlands www.newinchess.com All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission from the publisher. Cover design: Volken Beck Production: Harald Keilhack Proofreading: René Olthof, Frank Erwich Supervision: Peter Boel Have you found any errors in this book? Please send your remarks to [email protected]. We will collect all relevant corrections on the Errata page of our website www.newinchess.com and implement them in a possible next edition. ISBN: 978-90-5691-613-8 Contents Preface . 7 Explanation of Symbols . 10 Part I: Typical Manoeuvres . 11 Chapter 1 Ladies First ..........................................13 Chapter 2 Réti’s Rifle ..........................................18 Chapter 3 Alekhine’s Gun.......................................25 Chapter 4 Rocking King’s Rooks..................................31 Chapter 5 The Swinging Queen’s Rook.............................37 Chapter 6 Mysterious Rook Moves ................................44 Chapter 7 A Little Leap Forward ..................................49
    [Show full text]
  • WSCC 2018: the 2018 World Speed Chess Championship
    WSCC 2018: the 2018 World Speed Chess Championship Article Accepted Version Krabbenbos, J., van den Herik, J. and Haworth, G. (2018) WSCC 2018: the 2018 World Speed Chess Championship. ICGA Journal, 40 (3). pp. 207-210. ISSN 2468-2438 doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/ICG-190078 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/78438/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ICG-190078 Publisher: IOS Press All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online WSCC 2018: The World Speed Computer Chess Championship Jan Krabbenbos, Jaap van den Herik and Guy Haworth1 Amersfoort, the Netherlands, Leiden, the Netherlands and Reading, UK WSCC 2018 took place on July 13th at the Stockholmsmässan in Stockholm, Sweden and was organised by the ICGA as an opener before the ‘WCSC’ World Chess Software and ‘WCCC’ World Computer Chess Championships (Krabbenbos et al., 2018a/b). Using their WCCC hardware, five of the eight WCCC participants took part as in Table 1: the format was therefore five rounds at a tempo of 5+5/move. The venue was part of the international conferences IJCAI, ECAI, AAMAS, ICML, ICCBR and SoCS.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the 3000 Elo Barrier a Glance Behind the Scenes of the Rybka Chess Engine by HARALD FIETZ
    Beyond the 3000 Elo barrier A glance behind the scenes of the Rybka chess engine by HARALD FIETZ t the end of 2005, the worked in the computer field. My looked very promising and scary for world of chess computers mother is also a trained mathematician. the opponent when I played them, but suddenly changed when an I have two younger brothers. We moved in a post-mortem Rybka sometimes engine with the name back to Prague when I was three weeks revealed them as crazy blunders. I A of Rybka appeared from old and stayed in the Czech Republic believe that using Rybka can help to virtually nowhere. At the prestigious until I was 11 The whole family develop an intuition about which International Paderborn Computer moved back to the USA at that time. I sacrifices actually work. For sure using Chess Championship the new program studied computer science at MIT Rybka has some influence on my by the American developer Vaclav (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) openings – I think that my repertoire is Rajlich – whom everybody simply calls near Boston and worked as a software getting much stronger thanks to my Vasik or Vas as his first name – won developer at Texas Instruments (Dallas, work with the engine.” a clear point ahead of established USA), Triada, a company specialized in machines such as Zappa, Spike, data compression, (Ypsilanti, USA), A programmer’s everyday life Shredder, Fruit or Jonny. Out of the Ford (Detroit, USA), at the Environ- and visions blue, Rybka skyrocketed to the top of mental Research Institute of Michigan, the Swedish computer rating list, which was developing radar imaging However, the improvement of a which had been regarded for a long systems (Ann Arbor, USA), and Option, sophisticated program also requires a time as the equivalent of the FIDE a leading company in the field of lot of support from other sources: rating list in the chess computer sector wireless communication technology “There are tons of people who are (cp.http://web.telia.com/~u85924109/ss (Adelsried, Germany), over the last involved in the project in various ways.
    [Show full text]
  • WCCC 2017: the 23Rd World Computer Chess Championship
    WCCC 2017: the 23rd world computer chess championship Article Accepted Version Krabbenbos, J., van den Herik, J. and Haworth, G. (2018) WCCC 2017: the 23rd world computer chess championship. ICGA Journal, 39 (3-4). pp. 210-221. ISSN 1389-6911 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/70937/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . Publisher: The International Computer Games Association All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online WCCC 2017: The 23rd World Computer Chess Championship Jan Krabbenbos, Jaap van den Herik and Guy Haworth1 Amersfoort, The Netherlands, Leiden, The Netherlands and Reading UK The 23rd World Computer Chess Championship started on July 3rd, 2017. Four programs as in Table 1 (CPW, 2017) participated in a triple round robin tournament of nine rounds. The tournament took place at Leiden University and was organized by the ICGA, LIACS and LCDS. It was sponsored by Oracle, the municipality of Leiden, Leiden University, its Faculty of Science, the ICGA, iSSC, SurfSara and Digital Game Technology. It was held in conjunction with the 7th World Computer Software Championship, the 20th Computer Olympiad and the 15th Advances in Computer Games conference. The classical tempo of 1h45+15/move for both sides was the one adopted.
    [Show full text]
  • WSCC 2017: the World Speed Computer Chess Championship
    WSCC 2017: the World Speed Computer Chess Championship Article Accepted Version Krabbenbos, J., Herik, J. v. d. and Haworth, G. (2018) WSCC 2017: the World Speed Computer Chess Championship. ICGA Journal, 40 (1). pp. 40-42. ISSN 1389-6911 doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/ICG-180034 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/70939/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ICG-180034 Publisher: The International Computer Games Association All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online WSCC 2017: The World Speed Computer Chess Championship Jan Krabbenbos, Jaap van den Herik and Guy Haworth1 Amersfoort, The Netherlands, Leiden, The Netherlands and Reading, UK WSCC 2017 took place during the evening of Wednesday, July 5th in the Turing Room of Leiden University’s Computer Science department. Three hours of lightning hand-speed and artificial intelligence resulted in twenty-two games, still played at a superhuman level despite the blitz tempo of 5+5/move.2 The field of five as in Table 1 included a subset of the WCSC 2017 and all the WCCC 2017 players (Krabbenbos et al, 2017a/b). The all-play-all format required five rounds, each of two matches of two games – the players taking White and Black once if not enjoying the bye.
    [Show full text]
  • WCSC 2018: the 8Th World Chess Software Championship
    WCSC 2018: the 8th world chess software championship Article Accepted Version Krabbenbos, J., van den Herik, J. and Haworth, G. (2019) WCSC 2018: the 8th world chess software championship. ICGA Journal, 40 (3). pp. 194-206. ISSN 1389-6911 doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/ICG-190079 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/78437/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ICG-190079 Publisher: IOS Press All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online WCSC 2018: The 8th World Chess Software Championship Jan Krabbenbos, Jaap van den Herik and Guy Haworth1 Amersfoort, the Netherlands, Leiden, the Netherlands and Reading, UK The ICGA’s 8th World Chess Software Championship was held at the Stockholmsmässan in Stockholm, Sweden on July 14th-15th, the day after the Speed Chess ‘opener’ and before the ‘open platform’ World Computer Chess Championship (Krabbenbos et al., 2018a/b). At the same time, the venue also hosted the international conferences IJCAI, ECAI, AAMAS, ICML, ICCBR and SoCS. The main sponsor was Digital Game Technology, DGT. The common platform here was a Dell laptop with i7-8550U, 1.80 GHz processor running on MS Windows 10 x64 with 16 GByte of internal memory.
    [Show full text]
  • 7Th World Chess Software Championship Jan Krabbenbos, Jaap Van Den Herik, Guy Haworth
    7th World Chess Software Championship Jan Krabbenbos, Jaap van den Herik, Guy Haworth The 7th World Chess Software Championship started on July 1, 2017. Seven programs participated in a round robin tournament of seven rounds. The tournament took place at the Leiden University and is organized by the ICGA, LIACS and LCDS. The sponsors are Oracle, the municipality of Leiden, Leiden University, Faculty of Science, ICGA, iSSC, SurfSara and Digital Game Technology. It is held in conjunction with the 23nd World Computer Chess Championship, 20th Computer Olympiad and the 10th Computers and Games conference. Round 1 Chiron – Komodo ½-½ Jonny – The Baron 1-0 Ziggurat – Shredder 0-1 Chess Ebbiz 9 - bye World Computer Software Champion Komodo started the tournament against Chiron which is considered an outsider. From a quiet Guicco Pianissimo it was clear that white tried to keep its small advantage as long as possible. Komodo showed tough counter play but could not turn the tables. The balance was not disturbed although Komodo attempted strongly. The audience was surprised on the resistance Chiron offered. Still Chiron managed to keep it this way and the game ended in a draw. Jonny usually plays on 2400 cores. In the WCSC it has to obey the platform rules which constitute playing with one processor containing 4 cores and having the possibility to use 8 threads. The speed of the Intel I7 processor is 3.4 GHz. This hardware was sufficient to show its superiority to the Baron. They played a Kings Indian game that followed the books up to 19. … b6. At least this move was not in the book, but maybe played in other human games.
    [Show full text]
  • Python-Chess Release 0.31.4 Unknown
    python-chess Release 0.31.4 unknown Aug 09, 2020 CONTENTS 1 Introduction 3 2 Documentation 5 3 Features 7 4 Installing 11 5 Selected use cases 13 6 Acknowledgements 15 7 License 17 8 Contents 19 8.1 Core................................................... 19 8.2 PGN parsing and writing......................................... 34 8.3 Polyglot opening book reading...................................... 42 8.4 Gaviota endgame tablebase probing................................... 43 8.5 Syzygy endgame tablebase probing................................... 45 8.6 UCI/XBoard engine communication................................... 47 8.7 SVG rendering.............................................. 58 8.8 Variants.................................................. 59 8.9 Changelog for python-chess....................................... 61 9 Indices and tables 91 Index 93 i ii python-chess, Release 0.31.4 CONTENTS 1 python-chess, Release 0.31.4 2 CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION python-chess is a pure Python chess library with move generation, move validation and support for common formats. This is the Scholar’s mate in python-chess: >>> import chess >>> board= chess.Board() >>> board.legal_moves <LegalMoveGenerator at ... (Nh3, Nf3, Nc3, Na3, h3, g3, f3, e3, d3, c3, ...)> >>> chess.Move.from_uci("a8a1") in board.legal_moves False >>> board.push_san("e4") Move.from_uci('e2e4') >>> board.push_san("e5") Move.from_uci('e7e5') >>> board.push_san("Qh5") Move.from_uci('d1h5') >>> board.push_san("Nc6") Move.from_uci('b8c6') >>> board.push_san("Bc4") Move.from_uci('f1c4')
    [Show full text]