DOCSLIB.ORG

MDS Tables for Underage Athletes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MDS Tables for Underage Athletes APPENDIX 2 Multi-Disability Standards (MDS) Tables for Underage Athletes - UPDATED 25/02/2020 TRACK - Boys TRACK - Girls Classification 100m 200m 400m 800m 1500m Classification 100m 200m 400m 800m 1500m T01 11.55 23.73 0:54.78 2:05.54 4:40.86 T01 12.81 26.02 1:00.19 2:25.56 5:06.11 T11 12.73 26.08 0:58.77 2:29.10 5:17.52 T11 14.34 30.70 1:06.97 3:00.95 6:38.25 T12 11.73 24.54 0:54.30 2:00.71 3:55.68 T12 13.34 27.50 1:07.22 2:37.71 5:27.75 T13 11.47 23.52 0:52.43 2:07.82 4:29.05 T13 12.95 27.20 1:03.69 2:39.64 5:30.09 T20 11.50 23.15 0:51.49 2:03.64 4:19.32 T20 13.04 27.14 1:01.81 2:28.18 5:12.27 WC T31 29.10 47.17 2:06.00 4:11.76 - T31 30.04 59.61 2:06.23 - - WC T32 27.60 46.81 1:53.50 3:28.08 5:15.00 T32 24.05 53.95 1:43.62 3:17.01 7:39.56 WC T33 25.12 31.51 1:29.25 2:02.68 4:10.27 T33 21.85 40.37 1:18.70 2:46.54 5:51.05 WC T34 15.48 27.57 0:51.74 1:41.49 3:13.30 T34 19.72 35.81 1:09.16 2:19.18 4:08.65 T35 14.56 29.83 1:08.56 2:49.85 6:07.52 T35 13.42 28.28 1:31.27 3:34.30 10:06.57 T36 13.07 25.70 0:57.48 2:33.69 5:36.25 T36 15.09 31.57 1:12.18 3:00.92 6:34.05 T37 12.62 25.98 0:57.67 2:11.89 4:40.30 T37 14.36 28.80 1:07.36 2:51.30 6:21.35 T38 11.40 23.05 0:52.82 2:07.45 4:17.61 T38 13.13 27.54 1:05.62 2:47.34 6:00.51 T40 19.58 41.86 1:44.64 4:15.62 7:38.80 T40 19.64 47.58 1:50.00 4:57.40 10:35.63 T41 16.04 33.74 1:35.70 4:10.00 7:10.61 T41 20.32 44.28 1:42.00 4:50.00 10:00.00 T42 16.09 38.08 1:35.70 4:09.31 6:09.21 T42 17.84 39.70 1:40.00 4:28.30 9:43.33 T43 14.00 29.35 1:10.10 2:55.56 5:45.00 T43 15.70 36.10 1:16.00 3:42.30 6:40.00 T44 12.23 25.23 0:58.56 2:36.78 5:23.90 T44 14.43 32.70 1:14.10 3:38.99 6:30.00 T45 12.52 25.90 1:12.34 2:32.91 4:08.26 T45 19.88 32.80 1:41.41 2:50.00 6:03.16 T46 11.23 22.51 0:50.22 2:03.04 4:07.55 T46 12.97 26.40 1:01.01 2:31.74 5:55.19 T47 11.95 24.05 0:54.67 - - T47 13.76 28.37 1:02.99 - - WC T51 22.95 41.92 1:19.03 2:52.85 4:57.01 T51 24.69 55.20 2:17.80 3:15.64 7:07.99 WC T52 19.68 37.42 1:18.43 2:35.04 4:20.38 T52 20.93 41.50 2:10.57 2:06.76 4:38.39 WC T53 15.65 27.36 0:52.76 1:47.17 3:05.31 T53 17.40 31.26 0:58.14 1:56.43 3:31.72 WC T54 14.94 26.05 0:48.84 1:38.60 3:05.31 T54 16.49 29.60 0:56.83 1:52.22 3:31.72 T60 14.17 24.47 0:55.59 2:14.64 4:39.13 T60 13.73 29.88 1:09.87 2:47.11 5:45.82 T61 (new) 17.90 29.40 1:20.40 - - T61 (new) 18.05 46.69 1:55.00 - - T62 (43) 13.77 29.33 1:10.10 2:52.80 6:08.70 T62 (43) 16.58 37.06 1:17.00 3:42.30 6:40.00 T63 (42) 15.97 38.15 1:26.44 4:09.31 6:57.30 T63 (42) 17.71 39.70 1:24.12 4:20.00 8:45.00 T64 (44) 12.10 24.86 0:57.89 2:38.01 5:57.94 T64 (44) 14.42 31.11 1:16.80 3:23.65 6:29.76 How to determine results using Multi-Disability Standards (MDS) for Track Events Competitors compete against a multi-disability standard time for their classification. Places are determined by the competitor’s time calculated against a percentage of the multi-disability standard for that classification. Competitors are then ranked from highest to lowest percentage to determine places. Example for 100 metres - : Boy competitor with classification of T20 has a performances is 16.52 sec. Percentage for determining results is T20 Classification MDS (from table above is 11.92) divided by competitors performance times 100. or (11.92/16.52) x 100 = 72.154% Please Note: Times in excess of 1 minute may need to be converted to equivalent seconds for ease of determining percentage. LANSW Rules of Competition - 2019/2020 Edition "E" - Multi Class Appendix 2 Multi-Disability Standards (MDS) Tables for Underage Athletes - UPDATED 25/02/2020 FIELD - Boys FIELD - Girls Classification High Jump Long Jump Triple Jump Shot Put Discus Javelin High Jump Long Jump Triple Jump Shot Put Discus Javelin F01 1.70 6.82 10.68 13.06 39.23 44.35 1.43 5.22 10.68 11.63 39.22 35.73 F11 1.22 4.47 10.71 9.36 33.02 35.26 1.13 3.76 7.29 8.98 26.23 18.52 F12 1.59 6.01 11.23 14.62 53.02 48.83 1.26 4.62 9.30 10.91 33.73 22.29 F13 1.86 6.31 13.12 12.53 41.84 48.40 1.44 4.93 8.99 9.70 32.98 27.40 F20 1.64 6.69 12.18 15.37 42.82 47.63 1.53 5.05 9.44 11.56 32.03 27.43 Seated F31 - - - - - 18.40 (Club) - - - - - 16.77 (Club) Seated F32 - - - 5.48 20.12 10.00(J)/19.19 (C) - - - 5.60 7.28 7.91(J)15.87(C) Seated F33 - - - 7.61 18.39 18.51 - - - 3.85 8.48 9.75 Seated F34 - - - 10.08 28.69 28.87 - - - 5.95 15.55 14.75 F35 - 4.47 - 10.81 31.71 31.65 - 3.15 - 7.11 21.35 21.34 F36 - 5.41 - 10.94 26.67 25.11 - 3.81 - 7.69 20.52 14.32 F37 1.28 5.41 - 11.99 41.26 38.92 1.05 4.46 - 10.72 28.84 28.59 F38 1.36 6.02 - 13.70 40.60 47.31 1.10 4.74 - 10.55 31.80 27.06 F40 - 2.83 - 6.91 17.65 19.02 - 1.49 - 5.78 13.34 19.58 F41 - 2.99 - 9.21 24.42 26.91 - 1.82 - 7.89 26.80 14.85 F42 5.37 4.16 - 10.50 34.35 35.66 0.97 4.03 - 7.46 23.45 18.36 F43 4.65 4.39 - 11.40 34.87 32.96 1.31 3.84 - 8.74 15.13 26.57 F44 5.90 6.10 - 15.73 42.14 44.80 1.31 4.49 - 10.61 33.17 26.64 F45 5.34 4.89 11.38 10.90 26.87 27.90 1.45 4.29 10.37 6.10 21.65 16.02 F46 5.96 6.08 11.38 12.54 38.63 42.10 1.40 5.53 10.37 9.70 27.50 29.34 F47 6.70 6.08 11.38 - - - 1.40 4.93 10.37 - - - Seated F51 - - - - 10.09 19.70 (Club) - - - - 9.13 24.31 (Club) Seated F52 - - - 7.38 15.04 15.23 - - - 5.24 9.57 8.42 Seated F53 - - - 4.92 13.81 12.51 - - - 3.42 9.49 7.57 Seated F54 - - - 7.33 22.20 24.27 - - - 4.94 12.60 10.70 Seated F55 - - - 8.25 24.02 22.19 - - - 6.08 14.94 14.34 Seated F56 - - - 10.43 33.94 28.29 - - - 6.84 18.18 14.70 Seated F57 - - - 11.97 39.47 38.44 - - - 6.85 18.18 16.63 F60 1.81 4.20 13.47 11.37 32.77 38.64 1.38 3.82 9.00 9.72 32.94 31.01 F61 (new) - 2.82 - 6.59 22.00 20.50 - 3.03 - 6.50 12.00 16.00 F62 (43) - 4.12 - 7.33 23.25 26.36 1.33 3.84 - 7.24 22.94 20.00 F63 (42) 1.67 4.21 - 10.40 32.90 37.27 1.38 3.08 - 9.19 18.79 18.28 F64 (44) 1.70 6.19 - 12.46 42.33 43.73 1.33 5.05 - 7.54 34.18 20.36 How to determine results using Multi-Disability Standards (MDS) for Field Events Competitors compete against a multi-disability standard height/distance for their classification.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wir Helfen Dem Sport … 2
    Das Klassifizierungssystem der paralympischen Sportarten Bundesinstitut für Sportwissenschaft (BISp) Fachbereich II – Wissenschaftliche Beratung Fachgebiet Sportanlagen und Sportgeräte Graurheindorfer Str. 198 53117 Bonn Tel.: 0 228 99 640 0 Fax: 0 228 99 640 9008 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.bisp.de Stand: Februar 2008 Wir helfen dem Sport … 2 Warum eine Klassifizierung? Die folgenden Kapitel geben eine Übersicht über das Klassifizierungssystem der paralympischen Sportarten wieder. Die vollständigen, aktuellen Klassifizierungen erhalten Sie auf Anfrage bei den jeweiligen Sportfachverbänden des paralympischen Sports oder beim Internationalen Paralympischen Komitee (IPC). Der Zweck der Klassifizierung ist auch diejenigen zur aktiven Teilnahme am Wett- kampfsport zu motivieren, die aufgrund körperlicher Nachteile keine Chance auf eine er- folgreiche Teilnahme hätten. Die Anwendung von Klassifizierungssystemen fasst die Teilnehmer1 einer Sportart in ähn- liche Gruppen zusammen, so dass die Leistungen untereinander vergleichbar sind und sich die Chance vergrößert, gleichwertige und spannende Wettkämpfe zu erleben. In vielen Sportarten versucht man, zumindest die körperbehinderten Sportler funktionell zu klassifizieren, d. h. man achtet auf die Bewegungen, welche die Athleten unterschiedlicher Behinderungsarten gemeinsam haben. So sind bei den Rollstuhldisziplinen beinamputierte oder sogar spastisch gelähmte Sportler den querschnitt- oder poliogelähmten Athleten zugeordnet. Die Klassifizierungen bleiben aber im Behindertensport umstritten. Zu viele Klassen beeinträchtigen die Attraktivität des Sports und so wird weiterhin nach anderen Bewer- tungskriterien gesucht, die die Leistungen untereinander vergleichbar machen. Gab es bei den paralympischen Winterspielen in Salt Lake City 2002 noch 86 Entscheidungen, so waren es in Turin 2006 noch 52 in 5 Sportarten. Das Reglement wurde dahingehend verändert, das möglichst viele Sportler in einem Wettbewerb starten sollen, wobei die Handicapunterschiede durch Zeitgutschriften ausgeglichen werden.
    [Show full text]
  • PI Classification Schedule GLRG.Xlsx
    Great Lakes Regional Games Classification Schedule for Athletes with a Physical Impairment Version 1.6 Athletes - Must present to the Classification Centre 15 minutes before the allocated time on the classification schedule. Must bring a passport or some other official form of identification to classification. Will be required to read and sign a classification release form prior to presenting to the classification panel. May be accompanied by one athlete representative and/or an interpreter. Must be appropriately dressed in their sport clothes including shorts under tracksuits and sport shoes. Must bring their track chairs, strapping etc that they will be using in competition, to the classification session. Must ensure their throwing frames are at the stadium for technical assessments if necessary. Classification Day 1 Date: 9 June 2016 Time Panel SDMS NPC Family Name First Name Gender Class In Status In CLASS OUT STATUS OUT 9:00 1 31066 USA Williams Taleah Female T46 New T47 Confirmed 2 31008 USA Croft Philip Male T54 Review T54 CRS 9:45 1 15912 USA Rigo Isaiah Male T53 Review T53 CRS 2 31016 USA Nelson Brian Male F37 New F37 Confirmed 10:30 1 31218 USA Beaudoin Margaret Female T37 New T37/F37 CNS 2 30821 USA Evans Frederick Male T34 Review F34 CRS 11:15 1 11241 USA Weber Amberlynn Female T53 Review T53 CRS 2 31330 USA Langi Siale Male F43 New F43 Confirmed 11:45 1 31098 USA Johnson Shayna Female T44 New T44 Confirmed 2 27200 USA Frederick Emily Female F40 New F40 Confirmed 12:15 1 Technical Assessments 2 13:00 Lunch 14:00 1 20880 USA
    [Show full text]
  • Para Athletics Classification Are You, Or Do You Know Someone Who May Be, Interested in Para Athletics?
    PARA ATHLETICS CLASSIFICATION ARE YOU, OR DO YOU KNOW SOMEONE WHO MAY BE, INTERESTED IN PARA ATHLETICS? Classification determines who is eligible to compete in a Para sport and then groups the eligible athletes into sport classes according to their activity limitation in a certain sport or event. Athletes are classified as “T” (Track and Jump) or “F” (Field) based on which event they are competing in, followed by a number that represents impairment type and level of impairment. For example, T12. First Letter Represents: First Number Represents: Second Number Represents: T/F TRACK OR FIELD 1-6 IMPAIRMENT TYPE 1-8 DESCRIPTION OF IMPAIRMENT Typically T identifies a track 1 = Visual Impairment The number 1 through 8 specifies event and F for a field event. 2 = Intellectual Impairment the description of the impairment as There are certain exceptions 3 = Co-ordination Impairment per the classification rules (i.e. Long Jump is a T event) 4 = Upper Limb Deficiencies; Lower Limb Deficiencies without the use of prosthetic; short stature 5 = Impaired muscle power or range of movement 6 = Limb deficiencies with the use of prosthetic PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT SHORT STATURE F40 F41 IMPAIRED MUSCLE POWER AND/OR PASSIVE RANGE OF MOVEMENT T/F51 T/F52 T/F53 T/F54 F55 F56 F57 Athletes who compete seated LIMB DEFICIENCY T/F42 T/F43 T/F44 T/F62 T/F63 T/F64 T/F45 T/F46 T/47 Lower limb deficiency without Lower limb deficiency with Upper limb deficiency the use of a prosthetic the use of a prosthetic with or without the use of a prosthetic ATHLETES WITH ATHETOSIS, ATAXIA AND/OR
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-2021 Valspar Caddie Incentive Program.Xlsx
    2020-2021 Valspar Caddie Incentive Program 2020-21 Caddie Incentive Plan thru THE NORTHERN TRUST Position Position Top Ten Color hat Total Rounds After After Finish additional Points CADDIE NAME TOURNAMENT PLAYER Played Round 2 Round 3 Position points Earned A- Achatz, Matthew Bermuda Aaron Baddeley 2 T102 1 3 RSM Classic Aaron Baddeley 4 T30 T31 2 6 Sony Open Chase Seiffert 2 T74 1 3 American Express Chase Seiffert 4 T37 T8 2 8 Farmers Insurance Chase Seiffert 4 T21 T45 2 6 ATT Pebble Beach Chase Seiffert 2 T132 1 3 Puerto Rico Chase Seiffert 4 T215 T22 2 8 Honda Chase Seiffert 4 T58 T41 T3 2 11 Puntacana Chase Seiffert 4 T51 T40 2 6 Valero Chase Seiffert 4 T19 T49 2 8 RBC Heritage Chase Seiffert 4 T40 T36 2 6 Zurich Classic Chase Seiffert 2 T43 1 3 Valspar Chase Seiffert 2 T134 1 3 Wells Fargo Chase Seiffert 2 T94 1 3 Charles Schwab Chase Seiffert 2 T106 1 3 Palmetto Chase Seiffert 4 T29 T45 2 6 Travelers Chase Seiffert 2 T110 1 3 Rocket Mortgage Chase Seiffert 2 T121 1 3 John Deere Chase Seiffert 4 T3 T15 2 10 Barbasol Chase Seiffert 2 T95 1 3 3M Open Chase Seiffert 4 T55 T43 2 6 Barracuda Chase Seiffert 4 T54 T64 2 6 Wyndham Chase Seiffert 2 T91 1 3 120 Antus, Chad Safeway Open Peter Malnati 2 T86 1 3 Puntacana Peter Malnati 4 T21 T24 2 6 Sanderson Farms Peter Malnati 4 T12 T14 2 2 15 Shriners Peter Malnati 4 T12 T19 T5 2 15 Bermuda Peter Malnati 4 T6 T11 2 10 RSM Classic Peter Malnati 4 T11 T49 2 8 Mayakoba Peter Malnati 2 T107 1 3 Sony Open Peter Malnati 4 T7 T49 2 10 American Express Peter Malnati 2 T120 1 3 Farmers Insurance Peter
    [Show full text]
  • Athletics Classification Rules and Regulations 2
    IPC ATHLETICS International Paralympic Committee Athletics Classifi cation Rules and Regulations January 2016 O cial IPC Athletics Partner www.paralympic.org/athleticswww.ipc-athletics.org @IPCAthletics ParalympicSport.TV /IPCAthletics Recognition Page IPC Athletics.indd 1 11/12/2013 10:12:43 Purpose and Organisation of these Rules ................................................................................. 4 Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 4 Organisation ........................................................................................................................ 4 1 Article One - Scope and Application .................................................................................. 6 International Classification ................................................................................................... 6 Interpretation, Commencement and Amendment ................................................................. 6 2 Article Two – Classification Personnel .............................................................................. 8 Classification Personnel ....................................................................................................... 8 Classifier Competencies, Qualifications and Responsibilities ................................................ 9 3 Article Three - Classification Panels ................................................................................ 11 4 Article Four
    [Show full text]
  • Team Player Points Per Game 1 Berg 4E Kyle Widman 28 T2 Stavig 5 Leul Dawit Abebe 20 T2 Berg 3E Alexander Van Gerrevink 20 3
    Team Player Points Per Game 1 Berg 4E Kyle Widman 28 T2 Stavig 5 Leul Dawit Abebe 20 T2 Berg 3E Alexander van Gerrevink 20 3 Solberg 2S Reed Ritterbusch 18.33 4 Berg 4E Scott Ballard 16.5 5 Apartments Cooper Kruesel 15.5 T6 Gran 1 & 6 Chase Marso 14 T6 Solberg 1S Tanner Schulte 14 7 Berg 3E Kalib Mauch 13.33 8 Berg 4E Osaheni Amadasu 13 T9 Gran 3 & 5 Collin Lovell 12.4 T9 Gran 1 & 6 Ryne Lees 12.4 10 Solberg 2S Jesse Riddle 12.25 11 Berg 3E Braedan Myers 12 12 Gran 3 & 5 Nathan Merriman 11.6 13 Berg 2E Logen Secker 11 14 Gran 1 & 6 Tyler Field 10.8 15 Stavig 5 Cephas "Alex" Mampuya 10.75 16 Gran 1 & 6 Bryson Hamilton 10.5 17 Berg 4E Jonas Lovin 10 18 Gran 1 & 6 Cole Milbrath 9.8 T19 Berg 2E Tyler Beck 9 T19 Gran 1 & 6 Zachery Richter 9 20 Solberg 2S Brad Ostendorf 8.67 T21 Berg 2E Maxwell Boyum 8.5 T21 Gran 1 & 6 Jacob James 8.5 22 Berg 3E Brent Gorter 8.33 23 Gran 3 & 5 Adam Beyer 8.2 T24 Berg 2E William Steward 8 T24 Gran 1 & 6 Christiaan Malinowski 8 T25 Apartments Abe Oyesile 7 T25 Stavig 5 Josiah Nwokoro 7 T25 Berg 3E Will Bordewyk 7 T25 Solberg 2S Luke Barry 7 T26 Gran 3 & 5 Lucas Wilber 6.5 T26 Apartments Dylan Peters 6.5 T27 Apartments Isaac Schultz 6 T27 Apartments Nick Versteeg 6 T27 Solberg 1S Graham Fritz 6 T27 Solberg 2S Ryan Helgeson 6 28 Gran 3 & 5 Jacob Belgum 5.5 29 Apartments Bryan Halverson 5.25 T30 Gran 3 & 5 Ethan Guske 5 T30 Gran 3 & 5 Anh Mai 5 T30 Gran 3 & 5 Ryan Hamilton 5 T30 Gran 1 & 6 Jordan Johnson 5 T30 Berg 4E Jacob Angermeyr 5 T30 Solberg 1S Nathaniel Sackett 5 31 Gran 3 & 5 Jacob Dancler 4.5 32 Gran 3
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Thickness
    Status of Environmental Work Carried out by India Dr. S.K.Das Ministry of Earth Sciences Government of India 9th November, 2010 Kingston, Jamaica Objectives • To establish baseline conditions of deep-sea environment in the proposed mining area To assess the potential impact of nodule mining on marine ecosystem To understand the processes of restoration and recolonisation of benthic environment To provide environmental inputs for designing and undertaking a deep-sea mining operation. Activities and milestones achieved Activity Period Status • Baseline data collection 1996 - 1997 Completed • Selection of T & R sites 1997 Completed • Benthic Disturbance and 1997-2001 Completed impact assessment • First monitoring studies 2001-2002 Completed • Second monitoring studies 2002-2003 Completed • Third monitoring 2003-2004 Completed • Fourth monitoring 2005 Completed • Environmental variability study 2003-2007 Completed • Evaluation of nodule associated 2008 onwards Continuing micro-environ. Creation of environmental database 2011 onwards Continuing Environmental studies for marine mining in Central Indian Basin Phase 1: Baseline data collection Phase 2: Benthic Disturbance & Impact Assessment Phase 3: Monitoring of restoration modeling of plume creation of environmental database 4 PARAMETERS ANALYSED Geology Biology Chemistry •Seafloor features •Surface productivity • Metals •Microbiology •Sediment thickness • Nutrients •Biochemistry •Topography • Meiofauna • DOC • Macrofauna •Sediment sizes • POC •Megafauna •Porewater and sediment chemistry Physics •Geotechnical • Currents props. • Temperature • Conductivity •Stratigraphy • Meteorology 5 Benthic Disturbance (1997) * 200 x 3000 m * 5400 m depth *Central Indian Basin * 26 tows * 9 days * 47 hrs * 88 km * 3737 t (wet) / 580 t (dry) sediment re-suspended 6 Results of different parameters in diff. Phases (4cm from top in disturbance zone) Parameter Pre-dist.
    [Show full text]
  • The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders Diagnostic Criteria for Research
    The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders Diagnostic criteria for research World Health Organization Geneva The World Health Organization is a specialized agency of the United Nations with primary responsibility for international health matters and public health. Through this organization, which was created in 1948, the health professions of some 180 countries exchange their knowledge and experience with the aim of making possible the attainment by all citizens of the world by the year 2000 of a level of health that will permit them to lead a socially and economically productive life. By means of direct technical cooperation with its Member States, and by stimulating such cooperation among them, WHO promotes the development of comprehensive health services, the prevention and control of diseases, the improvement of environmental conditions, the development of human resources for health, the coordination and development of biomedical and health services research, and the planning and implementation of health programmes. These broad fields of endeavour encompass a wide variety of activities, such as developing systems of primary health care that reach the whole population of Member countries; promoting the health of mothers and children; combating malnutrition; controlling malaria and other communicable diseases including tuberculosis and leprosy; coordinating the global strategy for the prevention and control of AIDS; having achieved the eradication of smallpox, promoting mass immunization against a number of other
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms Affecting Liquefaction Screening of Non-Plastic Silty Soils Using Cone Penetration Resistance
    Mechanisms affecting liquefaction screening of Non-Plastic silty soils using Cone Penetration Resistance USGS Award Number: 07HQGR0113 Final Report October 2014 S. Thevanayagam Principal Investigator & V. Veluchamy and Q. Huang Research Assistants University at Buffalo State University of New York Department of Civil, Struct. & Env. Eng. 212 Ketter Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260 Tel: 716-645-4376; [email protected] Program Element: III Key Words: Liquefaction, sand, silty sand, Cone Penetration Resistance "Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department of the Interior, under USGS award number (07HQGR0113). The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government." i Abstract Effect of non-plastic fines on the cone resistance and cyclic resistance of sands and silty sands remains an unresolved problem. This study focuses on: (a) cone penetrometer experiment study on penetration resistance of sands and silty sands at 15 and 25% silt content, (b) numerical study on the effect of permeability and compressibility (representing the effect of silt content), diameter of cone (dc) and penetration rate (v) on cone resistance in sands and silty sands, (c) comparative analysis of the results from (a) and (b) of the effect of silt content on cone resistance through a non-dimensional parameter To (=vdc/cv, where v is the penetration rate, dc is the cone diameter and cv is the coefficient of consolidation) for all soils at the same equivalent inter-granular relative void ratio [(ec)eq] or relative density [(Drc)eq], and (d) relationship between cyclic resistance and cone penetration resistance and the non-dimensional parameter To, and its utility for liquefaction screening.
    [Show full text]
  • Para Throws Coaching Manual
    Para Throws Coaching Manual A Technical Guide for Coaching Athletes with a Disability in Para Throws Acknowledgments LEAD PROJECT CONTRIBUTORS Ken Hall, ChPC – Former National Team Para Throws Coach, Athletics Canada and current Provincial Para Throws Coach, Ontario CP Sports Association and Cruisers Sports for the Physically Disabled Lisa Myers – Program Manager and Provincial Seated Throws Coach, BC Wheelchair Sports Association ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTORS Kim Cousins, ChPC – Paralympic Next Gen Manager and National Team Coach, Athletics Canada Jennifer Schutz, ChPC – Coaching Education Coordinator, BC Athletics PHOTOS Photos included throughout this manual are provided by: Rita Davidson Sue Furey Gerry Kripps Paul Lengyell BC Wheelchair Sports Association would like to thank the Government of Canada, Province of British Columbia, and viaSport for their generous support in the production of this manual. © 2017 BC Wheelchair Sports Association | Para Throws Coaching Manual 1 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................4 What is Para Throws? .............................................................................................................................................4 Classification ...............................................................................................................................................................4 Characteristics of Disability Groups ............................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • (VA) Veteran Monthly Assistance Allowance for Disabled Veterans
    Revised May 23, 2019 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Veteran Monthly Assistance Allowance for Disabled Veterans Training in Paralympic and Olympic Sports Program (VMAA) In partnership with the United States Olympic Committee and other Olympic and Paralympic entities within the United States, VA supports eligible service and non-service-connected military Veterans in their efforts to represent the USA at the Paralympic Games, Olympic Games and other international sport competitions. The VA Office of National Veterans Sports Programs & Special Events provides a monthly assistance allowance for disabled Veterans training in Paralympic sports, as well as certain disabled Veterans selected for or competing with the national Olympic Team, as authorized by 38 U.S.C. 322(d) and Section 703 of the Veterans’ Benefits Improvement Act of 2008. Through the program, VA will pay a monthly allowance to a Veteran with either a service-connected or non-service-connected disability if the Veteran meets the minimum military standards or higher (i.e. Emerging Athlete or National Team) in his or her respective Paralympic sport at a recognized competition. In addition to making the VMAA standard, an athlete must also be nationally or internationally classified by his or her respective Paralympic sport federation as eligible for Paralympic competition. VA will also pay a monthly allowance to a Veteran with a service-connected disability rated 30 percent or greater by VA who is selected for a national Olympic Team for any month in which the Veteran is competing in any event sanctioned by the National Governing Bodies of the Olympic Sport in the United State, in accordance with P.L.
    [Show full text]
  • "Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Annual Exercise Scenario."
    Browns Ferry 1992 Graded Exercise Controller Listing T~ele hone ~Pa er Exercise Coordinator C. T. Benton 39644 Lead CECC Controller Tom Adkins 751-1656 39379 Evaluator Larry Smith 751-1656 Plant Asmt Jimmy Johnson 751-1656 Rad Asmt Betsy Eiford-Lee 751-1658 Public Information Barbara Martocci 751-1724 RMCC Controller Dan Winstead 355-0206 Van Controller Ronald Morrison Van Controller Ellen Hensley Van Controller James Troxell REP Van 9144 Cellular Phone —205-656-7626 then 205-667-9904 REP Van 9131 Cellular Phone —205-656-9623 Lead Simulator Controller Eddie Howard 729-3451, 3452, 3975, 4985 Simulator Controller Thomas Taylor Simulator Operator John Parshall 729-3451, 3452, 3975, 4985 Simulator Operator Terry Chinn Simulator Evaluator John Beardon 49415 Simulator RadCon Curt Blair 49419 Lead TSC Controller Tony Feltman 90759 Rad Con Kenneth King 39407 Tech Asmt Earl Nave Evaluator David Lambert Lead OSC Controller Randy Ford 39406 Fire Operations R. V. White 39126 Fire Operations Dave Pond 39386 Security Roger Pentecost Evaluator Harry Williamson 99470 Evaluator Nick Catron 39379 Lead Operations Gene Tomlinson Field Controller Marilyn Reeves Field Controller James Johnson Field Controller Nancy Wallette Field Controller Carol Sanders Unit 2 Control Room Terry Balch Lead RadCon Brad Mitchell Rad Con Mike Mitchell Rad Con Vanessa Beers RadCon Henry Schwan RadCon Terry Johnson RadCon Jim Harris 14675 Lead Chemistry Peggy Kirby 14143 Chemistry James Cole Chemistry Stacy Cordes Lead Maintenance Bill Peggram Mechanical Controller Jerry Richardson Mechanical Controller Lynn Turner 10201 Mechanical Controller Jack Watson 10284 Mechanical Controller Doug Koonce Electrical Controller Paul Heck 14926 Electrical Controller Jeff Nauditt Electrical Controller Julian Bass 9212i50239 9209i8 PDR ADOCK 05000259 F PDR Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant 1992 Graded Exercise This document prepared by the Brogans Ferry Scenario Development Team Brogans Ferry Personnel J.
    [Show full text]