2020 Money & Points List

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2020 Money & Points List 2020 Money & Points List WGA 18 Holers Individual Low Gross / Low Net 1-21-20 11:00 am Shotgun Leaderboard 2020 Points List Current Previous Number Points in Total Points Player Events Rank Rank of Wins this Event Points Behind Lead 1 2 Bingham, Ken 21 4 0 314 2 1 Pontesso, Fred 19 4 0 290 24 3 4 Glass, Gene 17 4 0 210 104 4 5 Barlow, Jim 18 5 0 200 114 5 4 Little, Gary 12 1 0 194 120 6 T8 Orbin, Justin 9 4 0 182 132 T7 6 Lundin, John 13 3 0 178 136 T7 10 Larson, Jim 8 2 0 178 136 T9 11 Larson, Laura 8 1 0 176 138 T9 7 Smith, Steve1 10 5 0 176 138 11 T8 Foulkes, David 10 2 0 170 144 12 14 Barclay, David 6 3 0 158 156 13 12 Hill, Michelle 9 2 0 156 158 14 13 Phillips, Jim 6 1 0 154 160 15 16 Glass, Laurie 11 4 10 150 164 16 15 Smith, Frank 13 3 0 142 172 17 T18 Rosson, Bob 9 1 0 136 178 18 17 Soukup, Tom 10 2 0 134 180 19 T18 Krejci, Bill 9 1 0 126 188 20 T23 Walker, Johnny 12 0 0 122 192 21 22 Lopez, Shirley 7 1 0 112 202 T22 24 Banasik, Bruce 10 1 0 104 210 T22 21 Aeschbach, Rich 9 6 0 104 210 24 T25 Dreyer, Gregg 4 0 0 100 214 25 23 Retrum, Stan 9 2 0 98 216 T26 T25 Lockwood, Walter 6 0 0 90 224 T26 T25 Barclay, Karen 4 1 0 90 224 28 T27 Lundin, Jean 5 2 0 86 228 29 32 House, Dorothy 5 1 0 84 230 30 T28 Dejonge, Alana 2 0 0 76 238 31 30 James, Ken 2 0 0 74 240 32 31 Lockwood, Vicki 4 1 0 72 242 33 T34 Banda, Onie 6 2 0 66 248 T34 33 Krejci, Janet 3 0 0 60 254 T34 37 Longoria, David 3 0 0 60 254 2020 Money & Points List WGA 18 Holers Individual Low Gross / Low Net 1-21-20 11:00 am Shotgun Leaderboard T36 T35 Curry, Carol 5 3 0 56 258 T36 T35 Skrasek, John 1 0 0 56 258 38 T39 Brooks, Jim 4 2 0 52 262 39 38 Soukup, Catherine 2 0 0 50 264 40 T62 Jackson, Cindy 4 1 0 44 270 T41 T39 Flood, Tom 4 0 0 42 272 T41 T39 Knapp, Charlie 4 1 0 42 272 T41 T39 Hatcher, Teresa 4 0 0 42 272 T44 T43 Tiefke, Matt 1 0 0 40 274 T44 T43 Midkif, Tyler 1 0 0 40 274 T44 T43 Nelle, Reed 1 0 0 40 274 T44 T43 Brunkenherfer, Cody 1 0 0 40 274 T44 T43 Dickson, Brock 1 0 0 40 274 T44 T43 Dickson, Darren 1 0 0 40 274 T44 T43 Dickson, Brody1 1 0 0 40 274 T44 T43 Dickinson, Debra 1 0 0 40 274 T44 T43 Guidry, CA 1 0 0 40 274 T44 T43 Arellano, Tomas 1 0 0 40 274 T44 T43 Budreau, Mary 1 0 0 40 274 T44 T43 Budreau, Dennis 1 0 0 40 274 T44 T43 Probst, Brian 1 0 0 40 274 T44 T43 Carpenter, Lynn 1 0 0 40 274 T44 T43 Sauer, Aaron 1 0 0 40 274 T44 T43 Watson, Brook 1 0 0 40 274 T44 T43 Day, Cj 1 0 0 40 274 T44 T43 Barton, Greg 1 0 0 40 274 T62 65 Jones, Sally 3 2 12 36 278 T62 61 Brown, Pam 3 2 0 36 278 64 63 Foulkes, Gorganna 3 0 0 32 282 65 64 Brown, Steven 3 0 0 30 284 T66 T64 Calvi, Jeanne 2 1 0 22 292 T66 T64 Bass, Lance 2 0 0 22 292 T66 T70 Tyndall, Tim 2 0 0 22 292 T69 T70 Boyd, Jerry 2 0 0 20 294 T69 68 Demuth, Nancy 2 0 0 20 294 71 - Yero, Daniel 1 1 0 14 300 72 69 Ryden, Janet 1 1 0 12 302 T73 T70 Conger, Debbie 1 0 0 10 304 T73 T70 Dimego, Dave 1 0 0 10 304 T73 T70 Powell, Marissa 1 0 0 10 304 2020 Money & Points List WGA 18 Holers Individual Low Gross / Low Net 1-21-20 11:00 am Shotgun Leaderboard T73 - Page, Jeff 1 0 0 10 304 T73 T70 Martinez, Ray 1 0 0 10 304 T73 T70 Staeb, Scott 1 0 0 10 304 T73 T70 Davis, Kevin 1 0 0 10 304 T73 T70 Collins, Harold 1 0 0 10 304 T73 T70 Lavalle, Art 1 0 0 10 304 T73 - Hawkins, Jim 1 0 0 10 304 T73 - Crownover, Randy 1 0 0 10 304 T73 - Crownover, Nancy 1 0 0 10 304 T73 - Royal, Rodger 1 0 0 10 304 T73 - Royal, Cathy 1 0 0 10 304 T73 T70 Aguilar, Cheryl 1 0 0 10 304 2020 Money & Points List WGA 18 Holers Individual Low Gross / Low Net 1-21-20 11:00 am Shotgun Leaderboard Player Points Summary Players Total Points Jones, Sally 12.00 Glass, Laurie 10.00 Total Points 22.00 2020 Money & Points List WGA 18 Holers Individual Low Gross / Low Net 1-21-20 11:00 am Shotgun Leaderboard Player Purse Summary Players Total Purse Jones, Sally $10.00 Total Purse $10.00 2020 Money & Points List WGA 18 Holers Individual Low Gross / Low Net 1-21-20 11:00 am Shotgun Leaderboard Individual Low Net To Par Total Pos. Player Purse Points Net Net 1 Jones, Sally +4 76 $10.00 2.00 2 Glass, Laurie +9 81 $0.00 0.00 Total Purse Allocated: $10.00 Total Points Allocated: 2.00 Strokes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Out 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 In Total Net ● ●● ● ● ● ●● ●● ● ●● ●● ●● ● ● ● ●● ●● ● ●● Jones, Sally (27) 5 6 5 5 6 8 5 7 6 53 5 6 3 4 3 8 6 9 6 50 103 76 ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ●● Glass, Laurie (21) 7 8 4 4 4 9 5 5 8 54 6 5 4 5 5 6 6 5 6 48 102 81 Starting Hole Start Hole Eagle or Better Eagle Birdie Par Bogey Double Bogey or Worse Dbl. Bogey 2020 Money & Points List WGA 18 Holers Individual Low Gross / Low Net 1-21-20 11:00 am Shotgun Leaderboard Participation Points Player Points Glass, Laurie 10.00 Jones, Sally 10.00 Total Points Allocated: 20.00.
Recommended publications
  • Wir Helfen Dem Sport … 2
    Das Klassifizierungssystem der paralympischen Sportarten Bundesinstitut für Sportwissenschaft (BISp) Fachbereich II – Wissenschaftliche Beratung Fachgebiet Sportanlagen und Sportgeräte Graurheindorfer Str. 198 53117 Bonn Tel.: 0 228 99 640 0 Fax: 0 228 99 640 9008 E-Mail: info@bisp.de Internet: www.bisp.de Stand: Februar 2008 Wir helfen dem Sport … 2 Warum eine Klassifizierung? Die folgenden Kapitel geben eine Übersicht über das Klassifizierungssystem der paralympischen Sportarten wieder. Die vollständigen, aktuellen Klassifizierungen erhalten Sie auf Anfrage bei den jeweiligen Sportfachverbänden des paralympischen Sports oder beim Internationalen Paralympischen Komitee (IPC). Der Zweck der Klassifizierung ist auch diejenigen zur aktiven Teilnahme am Wett- kampfsport zu motivieren, die aufgrund körperlicher Nachteile keine Chance auf eine er- folgreiche Teilnahme hätten. Die Anwendung von Klassifizierungssystemen fasst die Teilnehmer1 einer Sportart in ähn- liche Gruppen zusammen, so dass die Leistungen untereinander vergleichbar sind und sich die Chance vergrößert, gleichwertige und spannende Wettkämpfe zu erleben. In vielen Sportarten versucht man, zumindest die körperbehinderten Sportler funktionell zu klassifizieren, d. h. man achtet auf die Bewegungen, welche die Athleten unterschiedlicher Behinderungsarten gemeinsam haben. So sind bei den Rollstuhldisziplinen beinamputierte oder sogar spastisch gelähmte Sportler den querschnitt- oder poliogelähmten Athleten zugeordnet. Die Klassifizierungen bleiben aber im Behindertensport umstritten. Zu viele Klassen beeinträchtigen die Attraktivität des Sports und so wird weiterhin nach anderen Bewer- tungskriterien gesucht, die die Leistungen untereinander vergleichbar machen. Gab es bei den paralympischen Winterspielen in Salt Lake City 2002 noch 86 Entscheidungen, so waren es in Turin 2006 noch 52 in 5 Sportarten. Das Reglement wurde dahingehend verändert, das möglichst viele Sportler in einem Wettbewerb starten sollen, wobei die Handicapunterschiede durch Zeitgutschriften ausgeglichen werden.
    [Show full text]
  • Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games
    TOKYO 2020 PARALYMPIC GAMES QUALIFICATION REGULATIONS REVISED EDITION, JULY 2020 INTERNATIONAL PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games Programme Overview 3. General IPC Regulations on Eligibility 4. IPC Redistribution Policy of Vacant Qualification Slots 5. Universality Wild Cards 6. Key Dates 7. Archery 8. Athletics 9. Badminton 10. Boccia 11. Canoe 12. Cycling (Track and Road) 13. Equestrian 14. Football 5-a-side 15. Goalball 16. Judo 17. Powerlifting 18. Rowing 19. Shooting 20. Swimming 21. Table Tennis 22. Taekwondo 23. Triathlon 24. Volleyball (Sitting) 25. Wheelchair Basketball 26. Wheelchair Fencing 27. Wheelchair Rugby 28. Wheelchair Tennis 29. Glossary 30. Register of Updates INTERNATIONAL PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE 3 INTRODUCTION These Qualification Regulations (Regulations) describe in detail how athletes and teams can qualify for the Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games in each of the twenty- two (22) sports on the Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games Programme (Games Programme). It provides to the National Paralympic Committees (NPCs), to National Federations (NFs), to sports administrators, coaches and to the athletes themselves the conditions that allow participation in the signature event of the Paralympic Movement. These Regulations present: • an overview of the Games Programme; • the general IPC regulations on eligibility; • the specific qualification criteria for each sport (in alphabetical order); and • a glossary of the terminology used throughout the Regulations. STRUCTURE OF SPORT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATION
    [Show full text]
  • PI Classification Schedule GLRG.Xlsx
    Great Lakes Regional Games Classification Schedule for Athletes with a Physical Impairment Version 1.6 Athletes - Must present to the Classification Centre 15 minutes before the allocated time on the classification schedule. Must bring a passport or some other official form of identification to classification. Will be required to read and sign a classification release form prior to presenting to the classification panel. May be accompanied by one athlete representative and/or an interpreter. Must be appropriately dressed in their sport clothes including shorts under tracksuits and sport shoes. Must bring their track chairs, strapping etc that they will be using in competition, to the classification session. Must ensure their throwing frames are at the stadium for technical assessments if necessary. Classification Day 1 Date: 9 June 2016 Time Panel SDMS NPC Family Name First Name Gender Class In Status In CLASS OUT STATUS OUT 9:00 1 31066 USA Williams Taleah Female T46 New T47 Confirmed 2 31008 USA Croft Philip Male T54 Review T54 CRS 9:45 1 15912 USA Rigo Isaiah Male T53 Review T53 CRS 2 31016 USA Nelson Brian Male F37 New F37 Confirmed 10:30 1 31218 USA Beaudoin Margaret Female T37 New T37/F37 CNS 2 30821 USA Evans Frederick Male T34 Review F34 CRS 11:15 1 11241 USA Weber Amberlynn Female T53 Review T53 CRS 2 31330 USA Langi Siale Male F43 New F43 Confirmed 11:45 1 31098 USA Johnson Shayna Female T44 New T44 Confirmed 2 27200 USA Frederick Emily Female F40 New F40 Confirmed 12:15 1 Technical Assessments 2 13:00 Lunch 14:00 1 20880 USA
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-2021 Valspar Caddie Incentive Program.Xlsx
    2020-2021 Valspar Caddie Incentive Program 2020-21 Caddie Incentive Plan thru THE NORTHERN TRUST Position Position Top Ten Color hat Total Rounds After After Finish additional Points CADDIE NAME TOURNAMENT PLAYER Played Round 2 Round 3 Position points Earned A- Achatz, Matthew Bermuda Aaron Baddeley 2 T102 1 3 RSM Classic Aaron Baddeley 4 T30 T31 2 6 Sony Open Chase Seiffert 2 T74 1 3 American Express Chase Seiffert 4 T37 T8 2 8 Farmers Insurance Chase Seiffert 4 T21 T45 2 6 ATT Pebble Beach Chase Seiffert 2 T132 1 3 Puerto Rico Chase Seiffert 4 T215 T22 2 8 Honda Chase Seiffert 4 T58 T41 T3 2 11 Puntacana Chase Seiffert 4 T51 T40 2 6 Valero Chase Seiffert 4 T19 T49 2 8 RBC Heritage Chase Seiffert 4 T40 T36 2 6 Zurich Classic Chase Seiffert 2 T43 1 3 Valspar Chase Seiffert 2 T134 1 3 Wells Fargo Chase Seiffert 2 T94 1 3 Charles Schwab Chase Seiffert 2 T106 1 3 Palmetto Chase Seiffert 4 T29 T45 2 6 Travelers Chase Seiffert 2 T110 1 3 Rocket Mortgage Chase Seiffert 2 T121 1 3 John Deere Chase Seiffert 4 T3 T15 2 10 Barbasol Chase Seiffert 2 T95 1 3 3M Open Chase Seiffert 4 T55 T43 2 6 Barracuda Chase Seiffert 4 T54 T64 2 6 Wyndham Chase Seiffert 2 T91 1 3 120 Antus, Chad Safeway Open Peter Malnati 2 T86 1 3 Puntacana Peter Malnati 4 T21 T24 2 6 Sanderson Farms Peter Malnati 4 T12 T14 2 2 15 Shriners Peter Malnati 4 T12 T19 T5 2 15 Bermuda Peter Malnati 4 T6 T11 2 10 RSM Classic Peter Malnati 4 T11 T49 2 8 Mayakoba Peter Malnati 2 T107 1 3 Sony Open Peter Malnati 4 T7 T49 2 10 American Express Peter Malnati 2 T120 1 3 Farmers Insurance Peter
    [Show full text]
  • Athletics Classification Rules and Regulations 2
    IPC ATHLETICS International Paralympic Committee Athletics Classifi cation Rules and Regulations January 2016 O cial IPC Athletics Partner www.paralympic.org/athleticswww.ipc-athletics.org @IPCAthletics ParalympicSport.TV /IPCAthletics Recognition Page IPC Athletics.indd 1 11/12/2013 10:12:43 Purpose and Organisation of these Rules ................................................................................. 4 Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 4 Organisation ........................................................................................................................ 4 1 Article One - Scope and Application .................................................................................. 6 International Classification ................................................................................................... 6 Interpretation, Commencement and Amendment ................................................................. 6 2 Article Two – Classification Personnel .............................................................................. 8 Classification Personnel ....................................................................................................... 8 Classifier Competencies, Qualifications and Responsibilities ................................................ 9 3 Article Three - Classification Panels ................................................................................ 11 4 Article Four
    [Show full text]
  • Team Player Points Per Game 1 Berg 4E Kyle Widman 28 T2 Stavig 5 Leul Dawit Abebe 20 T2 Berg 3E Alexander Van Gerrevink 20 3
    Team Player Points Per Game 1 Berg 4E Kyle Widman 28 T2 Stavig 5 Leul Dawit Abebe 20 T2 Berg 3E Alexander van Gerrevink 20 3 Solberg 2S Reed Ritterbusch 18.33 4 Berg 4E Scott Ballard 16.5 5 Apartments Cooper Kruesel 15.5 T6 Gran 1 & 6 Chase Marso 14 T6 Solberg 1S Tanner Schulte 14 7 Berg 3E Kalib Mauch 13.33 8 Berg 4E Osaheni Amadasu 13 T9 Gran 3 & 5 Collin Lovell 12.4 T9 Gran 1 & 6 Ryne Lees 12.4 10 Solberg 2S Jesse Riddle 12.25 11 Berg 3E Braedan Myers 12 12 Gran 3 & 5 Nathan Merriman 11.6 13 Berg 2E Logen Secker 11 14 Gran 1 & 6 Tyler Field 10.8 15 Stavig 5 Cephas "Alex" Mampuya 10.75 16 Gran 1 & 6 Bryson Hamilton 10.5 17 Berg 4E Jonas Lovin 10 18 Gran 1 & 6 Cole Milbrath 9.8 T19 Berg 2E Tyler Beck 9 T19 Gran 1 & 6 Zachery Richter 9 20 Solberg 2S Brad Ostendorf 8.67 T21 Berg 2E Maxwell Boyum 8.5 T21 Gran 1 & 6 Jacob James 8.5 22 Berg 3E Brent Gorter 8.33 23 Gran 3 & 5 Adam Beyer 8.2 T24 Berg 2E William Steward 8 T24 Gran 1 & 6 Christiaan Malinowski 8 T25 Apartments Abe Oyesile 7 T25 Stavig 5 Josiah Nwokoro 7 T25 Berg 3E Will Bordewyk 7 T25 Solberg 2S Luke Barry 7 T26 Gran 3 & 5 Lucas Wilber 6.5 T26 Apartments Dylan Peters 6.5 T27 Apartments Isaac Schultz 6 T27 Apartments Nick Versteeg 6 T27 Solberg 1S Graham Fritz 6 T27 Solberg 2S Ryan Helgeson 6 28 Gran 3 & 5 Jacob Belgum 5.5 29 Apartments Bryan Halverson 5.25 T30 Gran 3 & 5 Ethan Guske 5 T30 Gran 3 & 5 Anh Mai 5 T30 Gran 3 & 5 Ryan Hamilton 5 T30 Gran 1 & 6 Jordan Johnson 5 T30 Berg 4E Jacob Angermeyr 5 T30 Solberg 1S Nathaniel Sackett 5 31 Gran 3 & 5 Jacob Dancler 4.5 32 Gran 3
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Money & Points List
    2020 Money & Points List WGA 18 Holers ABCD Shamble 2-Low Net (80% Hdcp) 1-28-20 11:00 am Shotgun Leaderboard 2020 Points List Current Previous Number Points in Total Points Player Events Rank Rank of Wins this Event Points Behind Lead 1 2 Bingham, Ken 23 4 0 334 2 1 Pontesso, Fred 20 4 0 300 34 3 4 Barlow, Jim 20 5 0 224 110 T4 T3 Glass, Gene 18 4 0 220 114 T4 5 Little, Gary 14 1 0 220 114 6 7 Orbin, Justin 11 5 0 210 124 7 6 Smith, Steve1 13 6 0 208 126 8 6 Larson, Jim 9 3 0 190 144 T9 11 Lundin, John 14 3 0 188 146 T9 T7 Larson, Laura 9 2 0 188 146 11 10 Foulkes, David 11 3 0 182 152 12 16 Smith, Frank 16 3 0 172 162 13 12 Glass, Laurie 13 4 10 170 164 14 13 Barclay, David 6 3 0 158 176 15 14 Hill, Michelle 9 2 0 156 178 16 15 Phillips, Jim 6 1 0 154 180 17 19 Walker, Johnny 15 0 0 152 182 T18 20 Krejci, Bill 10 1 0 136 198 T18 17 Rosson, Bob 9 1 0 136 198 20 18 Soukup, Tom 10 2 0 134 200 21 22 Lopez, Shirley 9 1 0 132 202 22 21 Banasik, Bruce 11 2 0 116 218 23 24 Aeschbach, Rich 10 6 10 114 220 24 23 Retrum, Stan 10 2 0 108 226 25 24 Dreyer, Gregg 4 0 0 100 234 T26 T25 Lockwood, Walter 6 0 0 90 244 T26 T25 Barclay, Karen 4 1 0 90 244 28 T27 Lundin, Jean 5 2 0 86 248 29 32 House, Dorothy 5 1 0 84 250 T30 33 Banda, Onie 7 3 0 82 252 T30 33 Lockwood, Vicki 5 1 10 82 252 32 31 Dejonge, Alana 2 0 0 76 258 T33 T34 Krejci, Janet 4 1 14 74 260 T33 32 James, Ken 2 0 0 74 260 35 T36 Curry, Carol 6 3 12 68 266 2020 Money & Points List WGA 18 Holers ABCD Shamble 2-Low Net (80% Hdcp) 1-28-20 11:00 am Shotgun Leaderboard 36 38 Jackson, Cindy 6
    [Show full text]
  • ATHLETICS Medal Events Male Female Mixed Total 93 74 1 (Universal Relay) 168 Detailed Medal Events List at the End of This Chapter
    ATHLETICS Medal Events Male Female Mixed Total 93 74 1 (Universal Relay) 168 Detailed Medal Events List at the end of this chapter Athlete Quota Male Female Gender Free Total 630 470 0 1100 Allocation of Qualification Slots An athlete may only obtain a maximum of one qualification slot. The qualification slot is allocated to the NPC not to the individual athlete. In case of a Bipartite Commission Invitation the slot is allocated to the individual athlete not to the NPC. Maximum Quota Allocation per NPC An NPC can be allocated a maximum of forty-five (45) male qualification slots and thirty-five (35) female qualification slots. Exceptions may be granted through the Bipartite Commission Invitation Allocation method. If an NPC is unable to use all of the allocated qualification slots in a given gender, the unused slots cannot be transferred to the other gender. They will be reallocated in the respective gender to other NPCs through the Bipartite Invitation Commission Allocation method. Athlete Eligibility To be eligible for selection by an NPC, athletes must: . hold an active World Para Athletics Athlete Licence for the 2020 season; . have achieved one (1) Minimum Entry Standard (MES) performance at a World Para Athletics Recognised Competition (IPC Competition, WPA Sanctioned Competition, or WPA Approved Competition) for each of their respective events between 1 October 2018 and 2 August 2020 in accordance with the IPC Athlete Licensing Programme Policies valid Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games – Qualification Regulations Athletics for the 2018-2020 seasons – exceptions may be made via the Bipartite Commission Invitation Allocation method; and .
    [Show full text]
  • Finish Top 20 Schools Scores 1 Point Loma 297 285 582 +6 2 Oklahoma
    RJGA Palm Valley Classic Palm Valley Golf Club Goodyear, , AZ Collegiate Women (WNMU) Dates: Apr 02 - Apr 03 finish top 20 schools scores 1 Point Loma 297 285 582 +6 2 Oklahoma Christian 300 288 588 +12 3 Texas A&M - Commerce 301 290 591 +15 4 West Texas A & M 297 295 592 +16 5 Texas @ Tyler 294 308 602 +26 6 Cameron 306 302 608 +32 7 Westminster Col.-UT 305 305 610 +34 T8 Western Washington 301 311 612 +36 T8 Colorado Mesa 308 304 612 +36 T10 Biola University 304 309 613 +37 T10 Colorado Christian Univ 307 306 613 +37 12 Chadron State 314 311 625 +49 13 Colorado - CO Springs 314 316 630 +54 14 Western New Mexico 320 311 631 +55 15 Montana State-Billings 317 315 632 +56 16 Metro State University 321 315 636 +60 17 Ft. Lewis College 330 324 654 +78 18 Northwest Nazarene 326 329 655 +79 19 St. Martin's University 325 333 658 +82 20 Hawaii - Hilo 342 321 663 +87 finish top 20 players school scores 1 Nicola Kaminski Point Loma 74 68 142 -2 2 Sarah Wongsinth Texas A&M - Commerce 70 73 143 -1 T3 Whitney Banz Westminster Col.-UT 71 73 144 E T3 Alli Kim Point Loma 72 72 144 E T5 Faith Kilgore Colorado Christian Univ 72 73 145 +1 T5 Wilma Merenmies Oklahoma Christian 72 73 145 +1 T7 Camilla Jarvela Oklahoma Christian 73 73 146 +2 T7 Sami Penor Biola University 73 73 146 +2 T7 Christine Perez Point Loma 77 69 146 +2 T10 Alyssa Campbell West Texas A & M 75 72 147 +3 T10 Kyndall Morgan Cameron 76 71 147 +3 T10 Amanda Portillo Western New Mexico 75 72 147 +3 T10 Elly Walters Colorado Mesa 74 73 147 +3 T14 Kiersten Bryant West Texas A & M 73 75 148
    [Show full text]
  • Compensatory Muscle Activity in Transtibial Sprinters Determining Compensatory Muscle Activations in Sprinters with Lower Limb A
    COMPENSATORY MUSCLE ACTIVITY IN TRANSTIBIAL SPRINTERS DETERMINING COMPENSATORY MUSCLE ACTIVATIONS IN SPRINTERS WITH LOWER LIMB AMPUTATION B.R. Moen, OPS-III1 Mentors: J. Howell, M.S, CPO2, F. Van Der Watt, CPO, LPO3, C.P. McGowan, Ph.D.4, A.M. Grabowski, Ph.D.5 1MSOP Candidate at Baylor College of Medicine, 2Director of Prosthetics and Orthotics at Baylor College of Medicine, 3Owner of Van Der Watt Prosthetics and Orthotics, 4Assistant Professor at University of Idaho, 5Assistant Professor at Colorado University, Boulder and VA Eastern Colorado Heathcare System COMPENSATORY MUSCLE ACTIVITY IN TRANSTIBIAL SPRINTERS DETERMINING COMPENSATORY MUSCLE ACTIVATIONS IN SPRINTERS WITH LOWER LIMB AMPUTATION B.R. Moen, OPS-III, J. Howell, M.S, CPO, F. Van Der Watt, CPO, C.P. McGowan, Ph.D., A.M. Grabowski, Ph.D. INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to make descriptive analyses of the muscles in the lower extremity of subjects with lower limb amputation during a maximum velocity sprint. Through the use of kinematic measures and electromyography (EMG), the researchers were able obtain a comprehensive picture of the sprinters with amputation. Research was designed to examine the use of compensatory muscle contractures and kinematic differences between comparable able-bodied sprinters and those with amputation performing at the highest levels. The principle aim of the research study was to examine compensatory muscle function in sprinters with transtibial amputation to determine which muscle groups are targeted most to replace speed and power lost by transected plantar and dorsi-flexors. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to quantify muscle activation patterns from the unaffected limb and the affected limb of transtibial amputee sprinters in order to identify potential differences between legs.
    [Show full text]
  • Live Scoring for Tournament Golf Skyhawk Invitational Player
    3/14/2017 Player Leaderboard Live Scoring for Tournament Golf Skyhawk Invitational 174.223.3.150 Leaderboards: Old Individual | Old Team | New Individual | New Team | New Team with Players Player Leader Board * player is participating as an individual rather than as a team member. Course:Callaway Gardens ­ Lake View: Lake View ­ NAIA Par 72 ­ 5804 yards position scoring all rnds total player team current start to par thru today 1 2 score 1 1 Courtney Lowery Point University +1 F +3 70 75 145 2 T3 Sam Burrus Lee University +2 F ­2 76 70 146 3 2 Anne Hedegaard Lee University +5 F +2 75 74 149 T4 T14 Tara Rodenhurst Lindsey Wilson Coll. +8 F ­1 81 71 152 T4 T7 Alexa Rippy Trevecca Nazarene U. +8 F +2 78 74 152 T4 6 Caroline Moore Lee University +8 F +3 77 75 152 7 T3 Annika Gino Lee University +9 F +5 76 77 153 8 T3 Megan Gaylor Milligan College +10 F +6 76 78 154 9 T10 Heidi Hinz Thomas University +13 F +5 80 77 157 T10 9 Kayla Chapman Truett McConnell +14 F +7 79 79 158 T10 T7 Haverly Harrold Lee University +14 F +8 78 80 158 12 T19 Ann Sullivan Milligan College +15 F +4 83 76 159 T13 T24 Raquel Romero Cumberland U. +17 F +5 84 77 161 T13 T19 Morgan Stuckey Cumberland U. +17 F +6 83 78 161 T15 T29 Kristen Sculley Thomas University +18 F +5 85 77 162 T15 T10 Caroline Parrish Thomas University +18 F +10 80 82 162 T15 T10 Sarah Son Milligan College +18 F +10 80 82 162 18 T33 Cassidy Gibson Milligan College +19 F +5 86 77 163 T19 T14 Rachael McMahan Trevecca Nazarene U.
    [Show full text]
  • Plywood Cylinders in Axial Compression
    LONGITUDINALLY STIFFENED JUIN-WALLED 'PLYWOOD CYLINDERS IN AXIAL COMPRESSION April 1948 LOAN CO 'Y Please return to Wood Engineerin esearch Forest Produc L-goratory Madison, Wis onsin 705 INFORMAi AND RLAt 1956 This Report is One of a Series Issued In Cooperation with the ARMY-NAVY-CIVIL COMMITTEE on AIRCRAFT DESIGN CRITERIA Under the Supervision of the AERONAUTICAL 130ARID No. 1562 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY Madison 5, Wisconsin In Cooperation with the University of Wisconsin LONGITUDINALLY STIFFENEDTHIN-WAT,TAID PLYWOOD CYLINDERS IN AXIAL COMPRESSION- By EDWARD W. KUENZI, Engineer and C. B. NORRIS, Engineer Summary Results are presented on tests of 1,050 specimens of, longitudinally stiffened thin-walled plywood cylinders in axial, compression. The specimens were cylindrical shells of thin plywood (approximately 0.05 inch thick) 18 inches in diameter with inner longitudinal stiffenerscf veneer, plywood, or solid wood. The stiffener thicknesses varied from 1/48 inch to 1 inch, the spacings between stiffeners from 1/4 inch to 6 inches, and the number of stif- feners from 9 to 28. The test data indicate that the average shell buckles at the critical stress of a complete unstiffened cylinder, provided the spacing between its stiffeners is not too small and the stiffeners are sufficiently rigid. If the stiffeners are more closely spaced and sufficiently rigid, the buckling stress of the shell is greater than that of ttn unstiffened cylinder. No theory is presented regarding specimens with closely spaced, rigid stiffeners. Most of the failures occurred, when the shell buckled. A few specimens having heavy stiffeners sustained loads subsequent to buckling of the shell: and finally failed because of general instability.
    [Show full text]