DOCSLIB.ORG

Brussels Bulletin No. 526: 6 January 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brussels Bulletin No. 526: 6 January 2017 Brussels Bulletin No. 526: 6 January 2017 NATIONAL PARLIAMENT OFFICE HOUSE OF COMMONS BRUSSELS BULLETIN NO. 526 6 January 2017 Contents Page 2017 LOOK AHEAD .............................................................................................................................. 2 A YEAR OF CHANGE FOR THE EU INSTITUTIONS ........................................................................................ 2 POLAND ................................................................................................................................................. 5 MEPS DEBATE DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW IN POLAND ............................................................... 5 OTHER NEWS ....................................................................................................................................... 8 BIRDS AND HABITATS DIRECTIVES TO REMAIN UNCHANGED .................................................................... 8 AFCO GIVES FINAL APPROVAL TO CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM REPORTS .................................................... 8 COUNCIL AGREES POSITION ON PACKAGE OF PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES LEGISLATION ......................... 9 COMMISSION TO TAKE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST UK IN LIGHT OF EMISSIONS SCANDAL ............................. 9 EP’S EMPL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS VOTING DOWN CETA ............................................................... 10 JHA COUNCIL AGREES ON PIF DIRECTIVE BUT EPPO TALKS CONTINUE ................................................ 10 EP AGREES REVISION OF ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE ................................................................................ 10 JOINT DECLARATION OF 2017 LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES SIGNED IN STRASBOURG ................................... 11 COMMISSION PROPOSES CHANGES TO SOCIAL SECURITY LEGISLATION .................................................... 11 ENVIRONMENTAL MEPS VOTE TO ALIGN ETS TARGETS WITH PARIS AGREEMENT ................................. 11 MEPS BACK VISA SUSPENSION MECHANISM ............................................................................................ 12 EU AND DENMARK REACH AGREEMENT ON ACCESS TO EUROPOL........................................................... 12 FINAL EUROPEAN COUNCIL SUMMIT OF 2016 TAKES PLACE .................................................................... 12 ECJ RULES THAT EU-SINGAPORE FTA IS A MIXED COMPETENCE AGREEMENT ...................................... 13 SIR IVAN ROGERS TO STAND DOWN AS UK AMBASSADOR TO THE EU .................................................... 13 CALENDAR ......................................................................................................................................... 14 MALTESE PRESIDENCY: FORTHCOMING FORMAL AND INFORMAL COUNCIL MEETINGS (JANUARY TO JUNE 2017) ................................................................................................................................................................ 14 MALTESE PRESIDENCY: FORTHCOMING INTER-PARLIAMENTARY MEETINGS IN VALLETTA AND BRUSSELS (JANUARY TO JUNE 2017) ........................................................................................................................ 14 FORTHCOMING INTER-PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE MEETINGS (ICMS) IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT14 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Track national parliament scrutiny at www.ipex.eu 1 Brussels Bulletin No. 526: 6 January 2017 2017 look ahead A year of change for the EU institutions European Parliament January 2017 marks the half-way point of the current five-year legislature, with the posts of European Parliament President, Vice-Presidents and Committee Chairs all up for re-election. EP President Following the 2014 EP elections, the two largest political groups, the European People’s Party (EPP) and the Socialists and Democrats (S&D), made an informal agreement to share the Presidency. Under the agreement, current EP President Martin Schulz (S&D, Germany) would stand down in January 2017 and be replaced by an EPP MEP until the next elections in May 2019. In autumn 2016, there were reports that Schulz could seek a third term as President (he also served as EP President in the second half of the previous legislature). The reasons put forward ranged from maintaining stability at a time of crisis to not having the three main EU institutions headed by centre-right politicians. On Thursday 24 November, Schulz announced that he would stand down as EP President and run for a seat in the German Bundestag.1 The whole EP will vote by secret ballot on 17 January in Strasbourg to elect the new President. To be elected President, a candidate must win an absolute majority of the votes cast. With 751 MEPs, this means 376 votes or more. The candidates From the EPP, Italian Antonio Tajani was elected by the Group on Tuesday 13 December, beating Irish MEP Mairead McGuinness, Alain Lamassoure of France, and Slovenian Alojz Peterle. Belgian MEP Helga Stevens is the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) candidate. From the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats (ALDE) Group, Sylvie Goulard (France) initially put her name forward, but withdrew her candidacy when Group Leader and EP Brexit negotiator Guy Verhofstadt (Belgium) announced that he would stand. For the GUE/NGL Group, Eleonora Forenza (Italy) is the candidate, whilst the Greens/EFA Group has nominated the UK’s Jean Lambert. None of these Groups are expected to secure the position, but their MEPs will carry influential votes and they can lobby to keep or add to their current Vice-President and Committee Chair posts. The EFDD Group has proposed Piernicola Pedicini of Italy as their candidate, with Romanian Laurențiu Rebega reported to be standing for the ENF Group. On 30 November, S&D Group Leader Gianni Pittella (Italy) threw his hat into the ring. In a press conference, Pittella said that one of the reasons for his candidacy was “political principle”; to ensure equal representation across the Presidencies of the three main EU institutions. In response to a question on the future of the so-called “grand coalition”, Pittella said that “the grand coalition has never existed as such in the European Parliament...for us, we had legislative cooperation with another group...it was essential for us to be able to take forward the work of the European Parliament.” The so-called “grand coalition” between the EPP and S&D Groups, with 217 and 189 MEPs respectively (totalling 403, therefore surpassing the 376 MEPs required for an absolute majority in the EP) was seen as a way of ensuring the smooth and timely passage of the 1 See Brussels Bulletin No. 524 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Track national parliament scrutiny at www.ipex.eu 2 Brussels Bulletin No. 526: 6 January 2017 Commission’s legislative priorities. The agreement was made on 24 June 2014, with the ALDE Group, totalling 69 MEPs, joining two days later. The three Groups agreed to: ...work to create a stable, pro-European majority in the House to defend the values and principles of European integration whilst striving, jointly, for reforms that will strengthen and improve the workings and transparency of the institutions and their effectiveness in delivering economic growth and meeting the EU's future challenges.2 Despite ALDE signing up to the arrangement, the “grand coalition” is usually used in reference to the EPP and S&D Groups only. EU-focused publication Politico reported that Schulz’s resignation and Pittella’s candidature amounts to a breakdown, likely to result in uncertainty and “legislative paralysis”. Schulz’s departure also brings to an end the “G5”; regular dinner meetings of Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, Commission First Vice-President Frans Timmermans, EP President Schulz, EPP Group Leader Manfred Weber and S&D Group Leader Pittella. It has been reported that the dinners were used to discuss policies and agree upon strategies; Weber has previously described it as “keeping a stable coalition that can legislate effectively”.3 Schulz and Juncker are known to be old friends; with his departure, Pittella has said that “for now, there won’t be any G5.” The UK posts up for re-election The UK holds no Vice-President positions. Catherine Bearder (ALDE) is a Quaestor of the EP, a post focusing on the organisation’s administration and one also up for re-election in January 2017. The UK also holds the Chairmanship of three EP Committees: Vicky Ford (ECR) chairs the EP’s Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO) Committee; Claude Moraes (S&D) chairs the EP’s Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) Committee; and Linda McAvan (S&D) chairs the EP’s Development (DEVE) Committee. It is unclear as of yet if any of the three MEPs will retain their posts. European Council and European Commission In the other two main EU institutions, the post of European Council President, Donald Tusk (Poland) is up for renewal in mid-2017. Heads of State or Government elect the President of the European Council by a qualified majority. It has been reported that the Polish Government will not support Tusk for a second term, and it remains unclear if he will keep the position. Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker has a five-year term, which runs until summer 2019. 2017 elections in Member States The Netherlands, France and Germany will hold elections in 2017, with voters also going to the polls in the Czech Republic and possibly Greece, Italy and Bulgaria. Other events The next informal meeting of the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue De La Loi 170 1000 Brussels
    Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue de la Loi 170 1000 Brussels Brussels, 16th April 2021 Dear Mr. High Representative; Mr Vice-President of the Commission: A delegation from the illegitimate National Assembly of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, which emerged from the electoral farce organised on 6th December 2020 by the regime of Nicolás Maduro, recently paid a visit to Brussels and was officially received by the institution you lead. According to a statement you made on behalf of the European Union on 6th December, this spurious process took place in the absence of electoral conditions that could have guaranteed its credibility, without any respect for political pluralism, and in an atmosphere of persecution and disqualification of democratic leaders whose legitimate rights were curtailed. Your statement concludes that such circumstances could not consider this process credible, inclusive, and transparent and therefore the results did not represent the will of the Venezuelan people. That initial statement was confirmed on 6 January of this year by a new declaration, in similar terms to those expressed on 6 December, and by the conclusions of the Foreign Affairs Council of 25 January. These reiterated the lack of recognition of the electoral process and regretted the behaviour of the authorities of the Maduro regime, whose actions are preventing a solution to the serious crisis in Venezuela. We were surprised and gravely concerned to learn that on 14th April, at your request, senior officials of the European External Action Service received the aforementioned delegation, comprising Iris Varela, Pedro Carreño and Desirée Santos Amaral, at the EEAS headquarters.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament 2019-2024
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ITRE_PV(2019)0925_1 MINUTES Meeting of 25 September 2019, 9.00-12.30 and 14.30-18.30 BRUSSELS 25 September 2019, 9.00 – 10.00 In camera 1. Coordinators’ meeting The Coordinators’ meeting was held from 9.00 to 10.00 in camera with Adina-Ioana Vălean (Chair) in the chair. (See Annex I) * * * The meeting opened at 10.04 on Wednesday, 25 September 2019, with Adina-Ioana Vălean (Chair) presiding. 2. Adoption of agenda The agenda was adopted. PV\1189744EN.docx PE641.355 EN United in diversityEN 3. Chair’s announcements Chair’s announcements concerning coordinators’ decisions of 3 September 2019. Chair has informed the Committee members that the Committee meeting of 7-8 October has been cancelled due to the Commissioner hearing. The next ITRE Committee meeting will take place on the 17 October 2019. 4. Approval of minutes of meetings 2-3 September 2019 PV – PE641.070v01-00 The minutes were approved. *** Electronic vote *** 5. Establishing the European Cybersecurity Industrial, Technology and Research Competence Centre and the Network of National Coordination Centres ITRE/9/01206 ***I 2018/0328(COD) COM(2018)0630 – C8-0404/2018 Rapporteur: Rasmus Andresen (Verts/ALE) Responsible: ITRE Vote on the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations The decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations was adopted: for: 49; against: 12; abstention: 2. (Due to technical issues, roll-call page is not available) 6. Labelling of tyres with respect to fuel efficiency and other essential parameters ITRE/9/01207 ***I 2018/0148(COD) COM(2018)0296 – C8-0190/2018 Rapporteur: Michał Boni Responsible: ITRE Vote on the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations The decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations was adopted: for: 56; against: 3; abstention: 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms Mairead Mcguinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr
    TO: Ms Mairead McGuinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr Valdis Dombrovskis European Commission Executive Vice-President for An Economy that Works for People CC: Mr Frans Timmermans European Commission Executive Vice-President for the European Green Deal Ms Kadri Simson European Commissioner for Energy Brussels, 13 April 2021 Dear Executive Vice-President Dombrovskis, Dear Commissioner McGuinness, We are convinced that the Taxonomy Regulation is crucial for the European Union to achieve both the new greenhouse gas emissions reduction target for 2030 and climate neutrality by 2050. Additionally, the Regulation should help strengthening the European Union’s strategic resilience and global economic competitiveness, maintaining its energy security and affordability, boosting growth and job creation and supporting a just and inclusive energy transition that leaves nobody behind. However, to what extent the Taxonomy Regulation will ultimately meet these expectations depends primarily on the technical screening criteria (TSC) defined in the Delegated Act on climate change mitigation and adaptation. We understand the European Commission will publish it later this month, whereupon the European Parliament may make full use of its scrutinizing prerogatives under Article 290 TFEU. In advance of its publication, we would like to share with you some of our major concerns regarding the revised draft version of this delegated act. Firstly, it is indispensable that the Taxonomy Regulation takes into account transition at the energy system level and supports the most cost-efficient decarbonisation pathway for each Member State in line with the principle of technology neutrality. In this context, it is key to acknowledge the role of gaseous fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • 30.6.2021 A9-0213/1 Amendment 1 Loránt Vincze, Frances Fitzgerald
    30.6.2021 A9-0213/1 Amendment 1 Loránt Vincze, Frances Fitzgerald, Ivan Štefanec, Paulo Rangel, Maria Walsh, Tomáš Zdechovský, Brice Hortefeux, Sven Simon, Michael Gahler, Esther de Lange, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Jeroen Lenaers, Esteban González Pons, Peter Jahr, Vladimír Bilčík, Maria Spyraki, Jarosław Duda, Axel Voss, Gheorghe Falcă, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Geoffroy Didier, Eugen Tomac, Rainer Wieland, Stefan Berger, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Michaela Šojdrová, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Christophe Hansen, Andrius Kubilius, Daniel Buda, Rasa Juknevičienė, Lena Düpont, Angelika Niebler, Helmut Geuking, Milan Zver, Inese Vaidere, François-Xavier Bellamy, Agnès Evren, Tomas Tobé, Jessica Polfjärd, Jörgen Warborn, Pernille Weiss, Iuliu Winkler, Henna Virkkunen, Danuta Maria Hübner, Miriam Lexmann, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Nathalie Colin-Oesterlé, Franc Bogovič, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar, Anne Sander, Fulvio Martusciello, Pablo Arias Echeverría, Lídia Pereira, Christine Schneider, Sabine Verheyen, Romana Tomc, Tom Berendsen, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Colm Markey, Lukas Mandl, Álvaro Amaro, David Casa, Peter Pollák, Janusz Lewandowski, Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou, Marion Walsmann, Gabriel Mato, Ralf Seekatz, Javier Zarzalejos, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Christian Sagartz, Jan Olbrycht, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Sven Schulze, Traian Băsescu, Siegfried Mureşan, David McAllister, Seán Kelly, Markus Pieper, Christian Ehler, Deirdre Clune Report A9-0213/2021 Helmut Scholz Citizens’ dialogues and
    [Show full text]
  • Intercultural & Religious Dialogue
    INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE ACTIVITY REPORT 2018 INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE Activity Report 2018 INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE ACTIVITY REPORT 2018 3 INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE Activity Report 2018 Activity Report 2018 INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENT DATE ACTIVITY PAGE The EPP Group Intercultural and Religious Dialogue activities aim to promote mutual understanding and an active sense of European citizenship for a peaceful living together. Decision makers are called 6 February Working Group Meeting 7 to provide answers to the complex crisis with political, economic, religious and cultural implications on Initiatives of religious organisations to face climate change in Europe. with CEC 'Intercultural and Religious Dialogue’ does not mean theological discussions in the European 28 February Conference on Oriental Christians in MASHREQ Region: 9 Consequences of the conflicts in the Middle-East on the Parliament. It is about listening to people from the sphere of religion and exchanging views with Christians Communities and future perspectives representatives of academia, governments, European Institutions on issues of common interest or concern and in connection to religion and intercultural relations. 6 March Seminar on the Importance for Europe to Protect Christian 13 Cultural Heritage - Views from the Orthodox Churches The Working Group on 'Intercultural and Religious Dialogue' is an official structure of the EPP 13 March Working Group Meeting 16 Group and is co-chaired by Jan
    [Show full text]
  • Live Report Thursday 2 March 2017
    Live Report Thursday 2 March 2017 Plenary Live: Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker presents White Paper on the Future of Europe Thu, 2 March 2017 | DeHavilland EU Live Coverage Summary Plenary Session, Brussels, 01/03/2017, 15:00-17:10 On 1 March 2017, Jean-Claude Juncker, President of the European Commission, presented the White Paper on the Future of Europe to the plenary assembly of the EP. The White Paper presented five scenarios for the future of the EU, by the titles “Carrying on”, “Nothing but the Single Market”, “Those who want to do more do more”, “Doing less more efficiently” and “Doing much more together”. During his speech, Mr Juncker said that he would not say which his favourite option was, as the Commission did not want to “dictate”, but to make decisions in an inclusive way. While the EPP group welcomed the White Paper and its structure, the S&D said that the Commission should have taken the lead and present the EU its input for action. In full Views from the Commission The President of the Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, reminded MEPs that the 60th Anniversary of the Treaty of Rome would soon be celebrated and stated that this would also mark the birth of the EU 27. He said that it was time to answer to a question as old as the EU itself: “Quo vadis, Europe 27?”. He then moved on to considering present-day challenges, calling for the EU to face them and “remain awake and alert”. He said that “the future of Europe should not become hostage to elections, party politics or short term domestic views of success”.
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Sitting of the Court of Justice
    Court of Justice of the European Union PRESS RELEASE No 42/10 Luxembourg, 3 May 2010 Press and Information Formal sitting of the Court of Justice Solemn undertaking before the Court of Justice of the European Union by the President and the Members of the European Commission Formal sitting of 3 May 2010 Today at 16:00, the Court of Justice of the European Union held a formal sitting during which the President and the Members of the European Commission gave the solemn undertaking laid down by the Treaties. The following gave the solemn undertaking: Mr José Manuel DURÃO BARROSO, President, Ms Viviane REDING, Vice-President, Mr Joaquín ALMUNIA, Vice-President, Mr Siim KALLAS, Vice- President, Ms Neelie KROES, Vice-President, Mr Antonio TAJANI, Vice-President, Mr Maroš ŠEFČOVIČ, Vice-President, Mr Janez POTOČNIK, Mr Olli REHN, Mr Andris PIEBALGS, Mr Michel BARNIER, Ms Androulla VASSILIOU, Mr Algirdas ŠEMETA, Mr Karel DE GUCHT, Mr John DALLI, Ms Maire GEOGHEGAN-QUINN, Mr Janusz LEWANDOWSKI, Ms Maria DAMANAKI, Ms Kristalina GEORGIEVA, Mr Günther OETTINGER, Mr Johannes HAHN, Ms Connie HEDEGAARD, Mr Štefan FÜLE, Mr László ANDOR, Ms Cecilia MALMSTRÖM and Mr Dacian CIOLOŞ. The solemn undertaking given by the President and the Members of the European Commission is the following: “Having been appointed as a Member of the European Commission by the European Council, following the vote of consent by the European Parliament I solemnly undertake: to respect the Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in the fulfilment of all my duties, to be completely independent in carrying out my responsibilities, in the general interest of the Union, in the performance of my tasks, neither to seek nor to take instructions from any Government or from any other institution, body, office or entity, to refrain from any action incompatible with my duties or the performance of my tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • My “Warts and All” Portrait of the EU Budget Process
    FUTURE EUROPE My “warts and all” portrait of the EU budget process As the EU’s budget commissioner until mid-2014, Janusz Lenwandowski wrestled for five years with the inconsistencies and political pressures that shape the Union’s spending policies t is perhaps fashionable, and certainly legitimate, to think of the EU’s budget as a gateway to a more modern and competitive Europe. But that often means over-burdening the budget Iwith excessive expectations, for the budget is not only much misunderstood but is also smaller than many believe. The budget amounts to only 1% of EU countries’ total gross national income (GNI), or to put it another way, 2.5% of the public spending of the 28 member states. That’s well below the national budgets of most federal states – the U.S. federal budget, for instance, is a quarter of America’s GDP. It may also come as a surprise that on average national budgets have since the new century been expanding more than has the EU budget, despite the EU’s “big bang” enlargement in 2004. A good many politicians keep telling their voters that it’s all about “us” and “them”, pitting contributions to “their” national budget against that which is “for Brussels”, and so doing much to foster resentment against the European Union. Yet the truth is that the EU’s administrative share of the European budget is less than 6%, so that 94% of the funds in the EU budget are spent beyond Janusz Brussels and benefit research institutes, regions, businesses and Lewandowski students across Europe, to say nothing of, say, Syria’s refugees and MEP was victims of natural disasters worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej
    CENTRUM BADANIA OPINII SPOŁECZNEJ SEKRETARIAT 629 - 35 - 69, 628 - 37 - 04 UL. ŻURAWIA 4A, SKR. PT.24 OŚRODEK INFORMACJI 693 - 46 - 92, 625 - 76 - 23 00 - 503 W A R S Z A W A TELEFAX 629 - 40 - 89 INTERNET http://www.cbos.pl E-mail: [email protected] BS/49/2009 SPOŁECZNY ODBIÓR POLSKICH PRZEDSTAWICIELI W INSTYTUCJACH UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ ORAZ OPINIE O PRACY EUROPOSŁA KOMUNIKAT Z BADAŃ WARSZAWA, MARZEC 2009 PRZEDRUK I ROZPOWSZECHNIANIE MATERIAŁÓW CBOS W CAŁOŚCI LUB W CZĘŚCI ORAZ WYKORZYSTANIE DANYCH EMPIRYCZNYCH JEST DOZWOLONE WYŁĄCZNIE Z PODANIEM ŹRÓDŁA SPOŁECZNY ODBIÓR POLSKICH PRZEDSTAWICIELI W INSTYTUCJACH UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ ORAZ OPINIE O PRACY EUROPOSŁA ¾ Co drugi badany uważa, że polscy europosłowie dobrze reprezentują Polskę i Polaków (51%) oraz należycie dbają o interesy kraju (50%), a ponad dwie piąte ankietowanych (43%) sądzi, że intensywnie działają na forum Parlamentu Europejskiego. ¾ Najlepiej odbieranym przedstawicielem naszego kraju w insty- tucjach unijnych jest komisarz Unii Europejskiej do spraw polityki regionalnej Danuta Hübner, natomiast największą nieufność wzbudza eurodeputowany LPR Maciej Giertych. ¾ Połowa Polaków uważa, że sprawowanie mandatu europosła daje politykom duże możliwości działania na rzecz kraju i wspierania polskich interesów. ¾ Niejednoznaczne pozostają opinie na temat ilości pracy i obowiąz- ków, jakie wiążą się z funkcją europarlamentarzysty. CZY, PANA(I) ZDANIEM, SPRAWOWANIE MANDATU EUROPOSŁA: wiąże się z dużą ilością pracy i obowiązków 37% Trudno 22% powiedzieć 41% tak naprawdę europosłowie niewiele mają do roboty Badanie „Aktualne problemy i wydarzenia” (226), 4–10 marca 2009 roku, reprezentatywna próba losowa dorosłych mieszkańców Polski (N=979). Na początku czerwca Polacy po raz drugi wybiorą swoich przedstawicieli do Parlamentu Europejskiego. Będzie to jednocześnie pierwszy od października 2007 roku realny test poparcia dla ugrupowań partyjnych funkcjonujących na polskiej scenie politycznej.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action
    Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS With the European elections approaching, CAN The scores were based on the votes of all MEPs on Austria 2 Europe wanted to provide people with some these ten issues. For each vote, MEPs were either Belgium 3 background information on how Members of the given a point for voting positively (i.e. either ‘for’ Bulgaria 4 European Parliament (MEPs) and political parties or ‘against’, depending on if the text furthered or Cyprus 5 represented in the European Parliament – both hindered the development of climate and energy Czech Republic 6 national and Europe-wide – have supported or re- policies) or no points for any of the other voting Denmark 7 jected climate and energy policy development in behaviours (i.e. ‘against’, ‘abstain’, ‘absent’, ‘didn’t Estonia 8 the last five years. With this information in hand, vote’). Overall scores were assigned to each MEP Finland 9 European citizens now have the opportunity to act by averaging out their points. The same was done France 10 on their desire for increased climate action in the for the European Parliament’s political groups and Germany 12 upcoming election by voting for MEPs who sup- all national political parties represented at the Greece 14 ported stronger climate policies and are running European Parliament, based on the points of their Hungary 15 for re-election or by casting their votes for the respective MEPs. Finally, scores were grouped into Ireland 16 most supportive parties. CAN Europe’s European four bands that we named for ease of use: very Italy 17 Parliament scorecards provide a ranking of both good (75-100%), good (50-74%), bad (25-49%) Latvia 19 political parties and individual MEPs based on ten and very bad (0-24%).
    [Show full text]
  • The European Commission 2010–14 Profiles and Priorities
    The European Commission 2010–14 Profi les and priorities You can find this booklet and other short, clear explanations about the EU online at ec.europa.eu/publications European Commission Directorate-General for Communication Publications 1049 Brussels BELGIUM Manuscript completed in April 2010 Photos: European Union Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2010 60 pp. — 16.2 × 22.9 cm ISBN 978-92-79-10627-9 doi:10.2775/43396 © European Union, 2010 Reproduction is authorised. Printed in Germany PRINTED ON WHITE CHLORINE-FREE PAPER The European Commission 2010–14 Profiles and priorities Introduction Karel De Gucht The European Commission at work .. 4 Generating prosperity, stability José Manuel Barroso and development ........................35 Setting long-term goals for the EU . 7 John Dalli Catherine Ashton Putting patients Promoting peace, protecting and consumers first .................... 37 the vulnerable and fighting poverty ..9 Máire Geoghegan-Quinn Viviane Reding Translating research into jobs ........39 A new era for justice Janusz Lewandowski and fundamental rights in Europe ....11 A strong and sound budget makes Joaquín Almunia a strong and sound EU ................. 41 CONTENTS Economic growth based on open Maria Damanaki and competitive markets...............13 Blue growth for a green economy...43 Siim Kallas Kristalina Georgieva Fast, safe and clean transport for all 15 Humanitarian aid, the European way: Neelie Kroes fast, coordinated and effective ......45 Full speed ahead for the online Günther Oettinger single
    [Show full text]
  • Download HRW Letter to President Barroso
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732-2009 Fax: + 32 (2) 732-0471 Mr. José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission Rue de la Loi 200 1049 Brussels Brussels, March 4, 2014 Re: Mandatory reporting on conflict minerals Dear President of the European Commission, We are writing ahead of the College of Commissioners’ meeting tomorrow to urge you to ensure that the Commission’s legislative proposal on responsible sourcing of minerals includes a mandatory obligation for companies to undertake supply chain due diligence—that is, measures that companies must undertake to identify, prevent, mitigate, and account for human rights abuses in their supply chains. It is our view that the proposal must include a clear mandatory supply chain due diligence requirement for companies that place unprocessed or processed tin, tantalum, tungsten or gold, or manufactured products containing these minerals, on the European market. This due diligence must include an obligation for companies to check and report on their supply chains, in line with existing international standards set by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas lays out a series of due diligence measures that companies should take to avoid contributing to armed conflict when sourcing minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas. The Guidance has been endorsed by OECD Governments, including EU Member States and the US, and was negotiated with the input of companies, governments, and civil society. In the United States, companies reporting under Section 1502 of the Dodd Frank Act are already required to do enhanced due diligence on products containing minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo and neighboring countries, obliging companies to publicly disclose the source of minerals originating from the region.
    [Show full text]