Eight Years of Freshwater Crayfish (Paranephrops Zealandicus(White))

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eight Years of Freshwater Crayfish (Paranephrops Zealandicus(White)) Freshwater Crayfish 25(1):7–12, 2020 RESEARCH ARTICLE ISSN: 2076-4324 (Print), 2076-4332 (Online) https://doi.org/10.5869/fc.2020.v25-1.007 Eight Years of Freshwater Crayfish Paranephrops( zealandicus (White)) Harvest from One New Zealand Pond: Comments on the Resulting Population Structure John Hollows,1,* Thomas Song 1 and Callum Kyle 1 1 Ernslaw One Ltd., Invermay, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel 9053, New Zealand. *Corresponding Author.— [email protected] ABSTRACT ARTICLE INFO A 100 m2 forestry pond was stocked with 65 crayfish (Paranephrops zealandicus (White, 1847)), weighing Article History: approximately 35 g, in 2010. Sampling was undertaken at the end of each growing season (March - Submitted: 28 OCT 2019 April) from 2012 to 2019. All crayfish > 45 g were harvested from the population; from 2015 between Accepted: 24 MAR 2020 1.84 kg and 3.65 kg of crayfish < 45 g were harvested (11 to 24% of the < 45 g population). In 2014, refuge Published Online: 15 APR 2020 (Cytisus scoparius) for the crayfish was added to the pond. The following year there was a noticeable Published Print: 30 APR 2020 increase in crayfish biomass, particularly those 45 g or less. In 2018, eight kg of lime was added to the pond. This did not greatly change the pH or calcium in the pond water when measured 10 months later, Keywords: but there was a corresponding increase in total biomass and biomass of crayfish > 45 g. Crayfish biomass biomass; ranged from 2.76 kg (2012) to 17.71 kg (2017). Harvests of crayfish > 45 g ranged from 1.1 kg (2012) crayfish; to 3.98 kg (2019) and for crayfish < 45 g from 1.84 kg (2018) to 3.65 kg (2016). Our findings suggest density; that habitat modification and harvesting a range of crayfish size classes can increase total biomass, but not harvest; necessarily the biomass of larger crayfish. Paranephrops; refuge; Copyright © 2020 by The Author(s). Published by the International Association of Astacology. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. INTRODUCTION challenges in developing Paranephrops crayfish as an aquaculture species (Hammond et al. 2006). One approach suggested to New Zealand freshwater crayfish (Paranephrops spp.) have improve production and biomass is to increase refuge for the been investigated as an aquaculture species for many years (de crayfish (Hollows 2016). Refuge type has been demonstrated to Jong 2010; Jones 1981; Lawrence et al. 2006a; Shaddock 1976; have a significant effect on harvestable biomass, mainly through Hollows 2016). However, a freshwater crayfish industry has not increased survival in ponds (Jones and Ruscoe 2001). In natural developed despite this research (de Jong 2010). Limited research streams, Parkyn et al. (2009) found that increased refuge was funding for the intensification of freshwater crayfish farming associated with a higher abundance and biomass of P. planifrons. may partly explain this lack of development (Hammond et al. Lawrence et al. (2006b) noted that while doubling the amount of 2006; Hollows 2016; Lovett 2014). By comparison significant refuge increased the number of juvenile crayfish, it did not result government funding has been made available for Australian in increased numbers of market-sized crayfish. redclaw (Cherax quadricarinatus (von Martens)) (Stevenson et al. 2013) and marron (Cherax tenuimanus (Smith)) (Luckers 2015) Environmental factors need to be considered in an aquaculture research, and this industry is significantly more advanced in its setting as they can affect population dynamics, such as growth rates, intensification and production techniques. reproduction, and survival in crayfish populations. For example, water chemistry is an important determinant for successful New Zealand freshwater crayfish farming methods are mostly crayfish growth (Lowery 1988) and should be considered when extensive (de Jong 2010), with many ponds. These ponds are not attempting to increase production. Calcium is an essential element supplied with artificial food and are typically visited once or twice to all crustacea (Hessen et al. 1991), and slow or incomplete a year (Hollows 2016). This farming approach may be attributed recalcification due to lower calcium levels in the water can make to economics as Paranephrops spp. are slow growing, taking freshwater crustaceans more vulnerable to predation (Stein 1977) two to three years to produce a crayfish of approximately 50 g and cannibalism (Dick 1995). Improved moult survival rates (Jones 1981; Hollows 2016). Furthermore, their low fecundity, have been noted with higher levels of calcium for Paranephrops slow growth rates and cannibalistic nature indicate there are many zealandicus (White) (Hammond 2006) and Procambarus clarkii 7 8 Freshwater Crayfish Volume 25, Number 1 results from this approach to date have been inconclusive and questions remain as to its value (Froese et al. 2016). This paper discusses the results of eight consecutive years of P. zealandicus harvest from a small pond in New Zealand and the implications of modifying habitat, water chemistry and reducing crayfish biomass on population dynamics in an extensive aquaculture setting. METHODS A 100 m2 earthen pond in Dusky Forest, West Otago, New Zealand (-45.817611, 169.164472, WGS84, was used for this study. The pond receives water from rain and overland runoff and is isolated from any other ponds or flowing water sources. In 2010, there was no cover/refuge in the middle areas of the pond, with overhanging riparian vegetation providing the only Figure 1. Total crayfish biomass (kg), biomass (kg) of crayfish < 45 g in shelter for the crayfish. In June 2014, refuge was added to the pond weight and harvest biomass (kg) of crayfish > 45 g and < 45 g in weight in the form of recently cut broom (Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link), for P. zealandicus 2012 to 2019. an exotic leguminous shrub. This was placed in the middle of the pond approximately one metre from any bank and covered an area (Girard) (Bretonne et al. 1969). Furthermore, crayfish growth of approximately 52 m2. and survival during moulting has been demonstrated to be In June 2018, eight kg of dissolved lime (Daltons Big Value significantly higher with elevated pH inAustropotamobius pallipes Garden Lime made from ground limestone rock) was added to the (Lereboullet) when reared under laboratory conditions (Haddaway pond. Calcium and pH levels in the water were measured prior to et al. 2013). Water temperature is another determinant of crayfish the addition of lime, and measured again approximately 10 months growth (Whitmore 1997; Hammond 2006); differences in water later. temperature may influence growth, survival and/or reproductive The pond was stocked with 65 ~26 g P. zealandicus in 2010 output. Ten degrees Celsius has been suggested as a minimum (33 males and 32 females). The pond was harvested once at the for P. zealandicus growth to occur in natural streams (Whitmore end of each summer growing season (March – April) from 2012 to 1997). New Zealand’s temperate climate results in long periods 2019. A harvest event consisted of eight fyke nets set for 48 hours when water temperature does not exceed 10 degrees (Hollows (baited with salmon intestines), followed by three harvest events 2016). using a large dip net, undertaken at 10-minute intervals. Under extensive crayfish farming models, all large crayfish are All crayfish were measured; those > 45 g were removed, while harvested, and small crayfish and berried females are returned to all small crayfish and berried females were returned to the pond the pond. The implication of this harvest strategy on Paranephrops (2012 to 2014). A proportion of crayfish < 45 g were also removed spp. production is not fully understood and has not been previously during the 2015 to 2019 sampling. The number of eggs under each researched in an aquaculture setting. In many finfish and crustacean berried female was estimated and recorded for each year. fisheries, it has been reported that the harvesting of the largest specimens from a population may result in earlier onset of sexual RESULTS maturity, less overall fecundity in a population, and less harvest yield (Huner et al. 2015; Kuparinen and Merilä 2007). An example Total biomass of crayfish increased steadily up to 2014, then of this was reported in Australia, where the practice of removing exhibited a greater annual increase starting in 2015, following the addition of refuge in 2014. This peaked at 14.95 kg in 2017 large crayfish (Cherax albidus Clark) and leaving small crayfish (range 2.76 kg (2012) to 17.7 kg (2017) (Figure 1). The biomass and berried females to grow resulted in high density populations of of crayfish < 45 g ranged from 0.385 g (2012) to 14.95 kg (2017). small crayfish, and possible genetic selection for slower growing crayfish (Lawrence et al. 2006a). Furthermore, it was suggested There was a decrease in all crayfish measures in 2018 (Figure that this harvest model may lead to a sex bias towards females, as 1). This occurred after 3.65 kg of crayfish < 45 g was harvested males are more likely to be caught. Over time, this would result in in 2016 (36% of the < 45 g population) (Figure 1), compared to greater numbers of berried females and high densities of juvenile the ~1.9 kg harvested in other years (~11 to 23% of the < 45 g crayfish (Lawrence et al. 2006a). The balanced harvest model was population) (Figure 1). put forward as a way of maintaining increased yields and reducing The biomass of crayfish < 45 g removed from the population skewed size-class distributions in a population (Garcia et al. 2012). each year ranged from 1.84 kg (2018) to 3.65 kg (2016) (Figure 1). This model requires mortality to be spread over the widest range of The biomass of crayfish > 45 g (range 1.1 in 2012 to 3 kg in 2018) species and sizes in an ecosystem, thereby maintaining ecosystem did not increase proportionally as total biomass increased (range composition akin to an unharvested environment.
Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Predator Behaviours of A
    CATHY R. SHAVE, COLIN R. TOWNSEND and TODD A. CROWL1 1 Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand. 1 Present address: College of Natural Resources, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, U.S.A. ANTI-PREDATOR BEHAVIOURS OF A FRESHWATER CRAYFISH (PARANEPHROPS ZEALANDICUS)TOANATIVE AND AN INTRODUCED PREDATOR ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Summary: The anti-predator behaviours of a New Zealand freshwater crayfish (Paranephrops zealandicus) to the native long-finned eel (Anguilla dieffenbachii)and the introduced brown trout (Salmo trutta)were investigated. Crayfish modified their behaviour in the presence of both trout and eels. However, a significantly greater number of defensive chela displays and swimming responses were made to eels than trout. Crayfish were able to use chemical cues from skin mucus to detect eels but not trout. Paranephrops zealandicus is able to make some appropriate defensive behavioural responses to the introduced brown trout as well as to its native predator, the long-finned eel. However, crayfish may be at greater risk from the introduced predator because of their apparent inability to detect trout using non-contact chemical cues. This may be a reflection of the different co-evolutionary histories crayfish have had with trout and eels. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Keywords: anti-predator behaviour;
    [Show full text]
  • Circadian Clocks in Crustaceans: Identified Neuronal and Cellular Systems
    Circadian clocks in crustaceans: identified neuronal and cellular systems Johannes Strauss, Heinrich Dircksen Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius vag 18A, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Abstract 2. Introduction: crustacean circadian biology 2.1. Rhythms and circadian phenomena 2.2. Chronobiological systems in Crustacea 2.3. Pacemakers in crustacean circadian systems 3. The cellular basis of crustacean circadian rhythms 3.1. The retina of the eye 3.1.1. Eye pigment migration and its adaptive role 3.1.2. Receptor potential changes of retinular cells in the electroretinogram (ERG) 3.2. Eyestalk systems and mediators of circadian rhythmicity 3.2.1. Red pigment concentrating hormone (RPCH) 3.2.2. Crustacean hyperglycaemic hormone (CHH) 3.2.3. Pigment-dispersing hormone (PDH) 3.2.4. Serotonin 3.2.5. Melatonin 3.2.6. Further factors with possible effects on circadian rhythmicity 3.3. The caudal photoreceptor of the crayfish terminal abdominal ganglion (CPR) 3.4. Extraretinal brain photoreceptors 3.5. Integration of distributed circadian clock systems and rhythms 4. Comparative aspects of crustacean clocks 4.1. Evolution of circadian pacemakers in arthropods 4.2. Putative clock neurons conserved in crustaceans and insects 4.3. Clock genes in crustaceans 4.3.1. Current knowledge about insect clock genes 4.3.2. Crustacean clock-gene 4.3.3. Crustacean period-gene 4.3.4. Crustacean cryptochrome-gene 5. Perspective 6. Acknowledgements 7. References 1. ABSTRACT Circadian rhythms are known for locomotory and reproductive behaviours, and the functioning of sensory organs, nervous structures, metabolism and developmental processes. The mechanisms and cellular bases of control are mainly inferred from circadian phenomenologies, ablation experiments and pharmacological approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Naturalis Classica, Viii Historic Naturalis Classica
    HISTORIC NATURALIS CLASSICA, VIII HISTORIC NATURALIS CLASSICA EDIDERUNT J. CRAMER ET H.K.SWANN TOMUS vm BIBUOGRAPHY OF THE LARVAE OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEA AND LARVAE OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEA BY ROBERT GURNEY WITH 122 FIGURES IN THE TEXT REPRINTED 1960 BY H. R. ENGELMANN (J. CRAMER) AND WHELDON & WESLEY, LTD. WEINHEIM/BERGSTR. CODICOTE/HERTS. BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE LARVAE OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEA AND LARVAE OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEA BY ROBERT GURNEY WITH 122 FIGURES IN THE TEXT REPRINTED 1960 BY H. R. ENGELMANN (J. CRAMER) AND WHELDON & WESLEY, LTD. WEINHEIM/BERGSTR. CODICOTE/HERTS. COPYRIGHT 1939 & 1942 BY THfi RAY SOCIETY IN LONDON AUTHORIZED REPRINT COPYRIGHT OF THE SERIES BY J. CRAMER PUBLISHER IN WEINHEIM PRINTED IN GERMANY I9«0 i X\ T • THE RAY SOCIETY INSTITUTED MDCCCXLIV This volume (No. 125 of the Series) is issued to the Svhscribers to the RAY SOCIETY JOT the Year 1937. LONDON MCMXXXIX BIBLIOGKAPHY OF THE LARVAE OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEA BY ROBERT GURNEY, M.A., D.Sc, F.L.S. LONDON PRINTED FOR THE RAT SOCIETY SOLD BT BERNARD QUARITCH, LTD. U, GBAFTOK STBKET, NBW BOND STEBBT, LONDON, "W. 1 1939 PRINTED BY ADLABD AND SON, LIMITED 2 1 BLOOJlSBUBY WAY, LONDON, W.C. I Madt and printed in Great Britain. CONTENTS PAOE PBBFACE . " V BiBUOGRAPHY CLASSIFIED LIST . 64 Macrura Natantia 64 Penaeidea 64 Caridea 70 Macrura Reptantia 84 Nephropsidea 84 Eryonidea 88 Scyllaridea 88 Stenopidea 91 Thalassinidea 92 Anomura ; 95 Galatheidea . 95 Paguridea 97 Hippidea 100 Dromiacea 101 Brachyura 103 Gymnopleura 103 Brachygnatha 103 Oxyrhyncha 113 Oxystomata . 116 INDEX TO GENERA 120 PREFACE IT has been my intention to publish a monograph of Decapod larvae which should contain a bibliography, a part dealing with a number of general questions relating to the post-embryonic development of Decapoda and Euphausiacea, and a series of sections describing the larvae of all the groups, so far as they are known.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea)
    Tuhinga 22: 171–272 Copyright © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (2011) Annotated checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea) John C. Yaldwyn† and W. Richard Webber* † Research Associate, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa. Deceased October 2005 * Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand ([email protected]) (Manuscript completed for publication by second author) ABSTRACT: A checklist of the Recent Decapoda (shrimps, prawns, lobsters, crayfish and crabs) of the New Zealand region is given. It includes 488 named species in 90 families, with 153 (31%) of the species considered endemic. References to New Zealand records and other significant references are given for all species previously recorded from New Zealand. The location of New Zealand material is given for a number of species first recorded in the New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity but with no further data. Information on geographical distribution, habitat range and, in some cases, depth range and colour are given for each species. KEYWORDS: Decapoda, New Zealand, checklist, annotated checklist, shrimp, prawn, lobster, crab. Contents Introduction Methods Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda Suborder DENDROBRANCHIATA Bate, 1888 ..................................... 178 Superfamily PENAEOIDEA Rafinesque, 1815.............................. 178 Family ARISTEIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891..................... 178 Family BENTHESICYMIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891 .......... 180 Family PENAEIDAE Rafinesque, 1815 ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Risk to Norwegian Biodiversity from Import and Keeping of Crustaceans in Freshwater Aquaria
    VKM Report 2021: 02 Assessment of the risk to Norwegian biodiversity from import and keeping of crustaceans in freshwater aquaria Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment VKM Report 2021: 02 Assessment of the risk to Norwegian biodiversity from import and keeping of crustaceans in freshwater aquaria. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Alien Organisms and trade in Endangered Species (CITES) of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment 15.02.2021 ISBN: 978-82-8259-356-4 ISSN: 2535-4019 Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM) Postboks 222 Skøyen 0213 Oslo Norway Phone: +47 21 62 28 00 Email: [email protected] vkm.no vkm.no/english Cover photo: Mohammed Anwarul Kabir Choudhury/Mostphotos.com Suggested citation: VKM, Gaute Velle, Lennart Edsman, Charlotte Evangelista, Stein Ivar Johnsen, Martin Malmstrøm, Trude Vrålstad, Hugo de Boer, Katrine Eldegard, Kjetil Hindar, Lars Robert Hole, Johanna Järnegren, Kyrre Kausrud, Inger Måren, Erlend B. Nilsen, Eli Rueness, Eva B. Thorstad and Anders Nielsen (2021). Assessment of the risk to Norwegian biodiversity from import and keeping of crustaceans in freshwater aquaria. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Alien Organisms and trade in Endangered Species (CITES) of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment. VKM report 2021:02, ISBN: 978-82-8259- 356-4, ISSN: 2535-4019. Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM), Oslo, Norway. 2 Assessment of the risk to Norwegian biodiversity from import and keeping of crustaceans in freshwater aquaria Preparation of the opinion The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (Vitenskapskomiteen for mat og miljø, VKM) appointed a project group to draft the opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • Koura, Paranephrops Planifrons) in the Lower North Island, New Zealand
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Habitat determinants and predatory interactions of the endemic freshwater crayfish (Koura, Paranephrops planifrons) in the Lower North Island, New Zealand. A thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Ecology at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Logan Arthur Brown 2009 Acknowledgements My gratitude goes to all those who helped me throughout my thesis. The completion of this has taken many years and is thanks to the efforts of many who have helped me with fieldwork, made suggestions on ways to carry out experiments and been there for general support. A special thanks must go to my partner Emma who has put up with me for three years trying to complete this, also to my family and friends for their support. Thanks to my supervisor Associate Professor Russell Death for helping come up with the original topic and the comments provided on drafts. Thanks also to Fiona Death for proof reading final drafts of my thesis. The following people gave up their time to come and help me in the field. Matt Denton-Giles, Emma Round, Charlotte Minson, Jono Tonkin, Nikki Atkinson, Travis Brown, Jan Brown, Ray Brown, Peter Bills, Hannah Bills, Caitlin Bills, Brayden Bills, Hannah Rainforth, Shaun Nielson, Jess Costall, Emily Atkinson, Nikki McArthur, Carol Nicholson, Abby Deuel, Amy McDonald, Kiryn Weaver, Cleland Wallace, and Lorraine Cook.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Hydroperiod on the Growth of the Crayfish Species Procambarus Alieni and Procambarus Fall Ax: Two Keystone Species in the Florida Everglades
    THE EFFECT OF HYDRO PERIOD ON THE GROWTH OF THE CRAYFISH SPECIES PROCAMBARUS ALLEN! AND PROCAMBARUS FALLAX: TWO KEYSTONE SPECIES IN THE FLORIDA EVERGLADES by Matthew D. Gardner A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Charles E. Schmidt College of Science in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, Florida August 2006 © Copyright by Matthew D. Gardner 2006 11 THE EFFECT OF HYDROPERIOD ON THE GROWTH OF THE CRAYFISH SPECIES PROCAMBAR US ALLEN! AND P. F ALLAX: TWO KEYSTONE SPECIES IN THE FLORIDA EVERGLADES by Matthew D. Gardner This thesis was prepared under the direction of the candidate's thesis advisor, Dr. John C. Volin, Department of Environmental Science, and has been approved by the members of his supervisory committee. It was submitted to the faculty of The Charles E. Schmidt College of Science and was accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Dr. Ja . Stauffer, Jr. Date lll ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the members of my advisory committee, Dr. John C. Volin, Dr. John D. Baldwin, and Dr. Jay R. Stauffer, Jr. for their helpful comments. I would especially like to thank Dr. Volin for extending the opportunity to perform this project and for helping me see it to completion. I also extend my thanks and appreciation to Michael S. Lott for his endless support and assistance at every stage of this study. I thank Dr. Dianne Owen for her helpful comments regarding statistical analysis. Finally, I thank all ofthe individuals who helped me complete the field and laboratory work associated with this project.
    [Show full text]
  • ALMQ Data Analysis Final Report
    P.O. Box 25125, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3M 4H4 Telephone: (902) 876-1160 Fax: (902) 876-1320 www.fsrs.ns.ca Final Report Prepared for: Fishermen and Scientists Research Society Contract: FSRS2012-022 ATLANTIC LOBSTER MOULT & QUALITY PROJECT Data analysis and descriptive statistics September 22, 2013 www.lobstermoult.ca ALMQ data analysis Final Report Table of Content Report Contribution 3 Executive Summary 4 Project Background and Introduction 6 Materials and Methods 8 Site Selection 8 Sampling Procedure 8 Data Analysis 8 Moult Timing Definitions 10 Results 12 Descriptive Statistics 12 Moult Timing Based on Brix Index Value 15 Moult Timing Based on Moult Stage Proportion 18 Moult Timing Based on Shell Hardness 19 Comparison of Moult Timing Classification Methods 19 Graphical Comparison of Moult Timing Classification Methods 20 Interpretation 23 Acknowledgement 27 References 28 Appendices 31 2 ALMQ data analysis Final Report Report Contribution Primary authour Jean Lavallée Principal Consultant Aquatic Science & Health Services 465 University Avenue, PO Box 21116 Charlottetown, PE C1A 9H6 902.628.7981 [email protected] Other report resource Tim Burnley Melanie Burton Owner Field Biologist Eastern Epidemiological Services Aquatic Science & Health Services 23 Karen Drive 465 University Avenue, PO Box 21116 Cornwall, PE C0A 1H8 Charlottetown, PE C1A 9H6 902.626.8118 902.940.3788 [email protected] [email protected] John Tremblay Shannon Scott-Tibbetts Research Scientist & Head, Lobster Unit Research Biologist Population Ecology
    [Show full text]
  • Abiotic and Biotic Factors Affecting Size-Dependent Crayfish (Orconectes Obscurus) Distribution, Density, and Survival
    ABIOTIC AND BIOTIC FACTORS AFFECTING SIZE-DEPENDENT CRAYFISH (ORCONECTES OBSCURUS) DISTRIBUTION, DENSITY, AND SURVIVAL A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Jennifer M. Clark May 2009 Dissertation written by Jennifer M. Clark B.S., Kent State University, 2003 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2009 Approved by __________________________________, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Mark W. Kershner __________________________________, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Laura G. Leff __________________________________ Joseph R. Holomuzki __________________________________ Andrew L. Moore __________________________________ Accepted by __________________________________, Chair, Department of Biological Sciences James L. Blank __________________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences John R. D. Stalvey ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ……………………………………………………………………..vii LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………………….xi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS …………………………………………………………........xii CHAPTER I. Introduction………………………………………………………………..1 Current velocity…………………………………………………...2 Sediment grain size and heterogeneity……………………………4 Water depth………………………………………………………..5 Predation…………………………………………………………..6 Competition………………………………………………………..8 Flooding………………………………………………………….10 Organismal distribution………………………………………….11 Dissertation organization………………………………………...11 References………………………………………………………..13 II. Size-dependent effects of Visible Implant Elastomer marking on
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Ecological Interactions Between Crayfish and Fish
    Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems (2011) 401, 10 http://www.kmae-journal.org c ONEMA, 2011 DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2011024 Review A review of ecological interactions between crayfish and fish, indigenous and introduced J.D. Reynolds(1) Received January 17, 2011 Revised March 14, 2011 Accepted March 16, 2011 ABSTRACT Key-words: Crayfish (decapods) and fish are both long-lived large members of fresh- crayfish, water communities, often functioning as keystone species. This paper freshwater fish, reviews interactions between these, with emphasis on the European con- keystone text. Native crayfish and fish are in ecological balance, which may involve species, mutual predation, competition and sometimes habitat disturbance. This competition, balance is disrupted by range extensions and translocations of native predation, fish or crayfish into exotic situations. Some fish and crayfish have been translocation, translocated globally, chiefly from North America to other continents. Non- alien invasive indigenous crayfish species (NICS) may impact on native fish, just as in- species, troduced fish impact on indigenous crayfish species (ICS). Competition native species between ICS and NICS may result in making the former susceptible to various mechanisms of interaction with fish, indigenous or introduced. In Europe, long-established NICS – signals, spiny-cheek and red swamp crayfish – may occur in greater densities than ICS; they are more tolerant and aggressive and show more interactions with fish. More recent intro- ductions, still restricted in distribution, have not yet received enough study for their impacts to be assessed. Interactions between fish and crayfish in North and South America, Madagascar and Australasia are also explored. Mechanisms of interaction between fish and crayfish include mutual pre- dation, competition for food and spatial resources, food-web alteration and habitat modification.
    [Show full text]
  • A Photographic Guide to Freshwater Invertebrates of Taranaki's Rivers
    A Photographic Guide to Freshwater Invertebrates of Taranaki’s Rivers and Streams This book was first published in 1998 and adapted from a publication originally produced in 1997 by S C Moore, Otago Regional Council. This edition was updated and reprinted in 2009. For further information please contact the Taranaki Regional Council, 47 Cloten Road, Private Bag, 713, Stratford 4352. Phone: (06) 765-7127, Fax: (06) 765-5097 Email: [email protected], Web: www.trc.govt.nz Table of Contents Introduction 2 Beetles Nematode worms 17 Where to look and How to Elmidae 10 Proboscis worms 17 Sample 2 Scirtid 11 Paddle-worms 17 Identifying the Major Hydraenidae 11 Horse-hair worms 18 Invertebrate Groups 3 Hydrophilidae 11 Hirudinea (leeches) 18 Photographic Guide to the Berosus 11 True flies Freshwater Invertebrates 4 Dytiscidae 11 Orthoclad midges 18 Mayflies Bugs Maoridiamesa 18 Deleatidium 5 Microvelia 11 Tanytarsus 18 Coloburiscus 5 Sigara 12 Tanypodinae 18 Austroclima 5 Anisops 12 Polypedilum 19 Zephlebia 5 Dobsonfly Chironomus 19 Mauiulus 5 Archichauliodes 12 Harrisius 19 Nesameletus 5 Damselflies & Dragonflies Nothodixa 19 Ameletopsis 6 Xanthocnemis 12 Paradixa 19 Ichthybotus 6 Austrolestes 12 Aphrophila 19 Stoneflies Procordulia 12 Limonia 20 Stenoperla 6 Crustaceans Zelandotipula 20 Zelandoperla 6 Paranephrops 13 Paralimnophila 20 Megaleptoperla 6 Paratya 13 Eriopterini 20 Austroperla 6 Isopoda (estuarine) 13 Hexatomini 20 Zelandobius 7 Isopoda (freshwater) 13 Ceratopogonid 20 Acroperla 7 Paracalliope 13 Austrosimulium 21 Caddisflies Paraleptamphopus
    [Show full text]