Effect of Hydroperiod on the Growth of the Crayfish Species Procambarus Alieni and Procambarus Fall Ax: Two Keystone Species in the Florida Everglades

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Effect of Hydroperiod on the Growth of the Crayfish Species Procambarus Alieni and Procambarus Fall Ax: Two Keystone Species in the Florida Everglades THE EFFECT OF HYDRO PERIOD ON THE GROWTH OF THE CRAYFISH SPECIES PROCAMBARUS ALLEN! AND PROCAMBARUS FALLAX: TWO KEYSTONE SPECIES IN THE FLORIDA EVERGLADES by Matthew D. Gardner A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Charles E. Schmidt College of Science in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, Florida August 2006 © Copyright by Matthew D. Gardner 2006 11 THE EFFECT OF HYDROPERIOD ON THE GROWTH OF THE CRAYFISH SPECIES PROCAMBAR US ALLEN! AND P. F ALLAX: TWO KEYSTONE SPECIES IN THE FLORIDA EVERGLADES by Matthew D. Gardner This thesis was prepared under the direction of the candidate's thesis advisor, Dr. John C. Volin, Department of Environmental Science, and has been approved by the members of his supervisory committee. It was submitted to the faculty of The Charles E. Schmidt College of Science and was accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Dr. Ja . Stauffer, Jr. Date lll ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the members of my advisory committee, Dr. John C. Volin, Dr. John D. Baldwin, and Dr. Jay R. Stauffer, Jr. for their helpful comments. I would especially like to thank Dr. Volin for extending the opportunity to perform this project and for helping me see it to completion. I also extend my thanks and appreciation to Michael S. Lott for his endless support and assistance at every stage of this study. I thank Dr. Dianne Owen for her helpful comments regarding statistical analysis. Finally, I thank all ofthe individuals who helped me complete the field and laboratory work associated with this project. Funding for this project was provided by the South Florida Water Management District through the Recover program (CP040132). lV ABSTRACT Author: Matthew D. Gardner Title: The effect of hydroperiod on the growth of the crayfish species Procambarus alieni and Procambarus fall ax: two keystone species in the Florida Everglades Institution: Florida Atlantic University Thesis Advisor: Dr. John C. Volin Degree: Master of Science Year: 2006 The Everglades ecosystem is home to two species of freshwater crayfish: the Everglades crayfish Procambarus alieni and the slough crayfish Procambarus fallax. These species play a key ecological role by transporting energy from primary producers to higher trophic levels. Understanding the factors that regulate crayfish growth is an essential step in restoring their productivity in the Everglades ecosystem. In order to determine the effect ofhydroperiod on crayfish growth, I collected crayfish from the Florida Everglades and subjected them to one of three hydroperiod treatments. The growth of both crayfish species in reduced hydroperiod treatments was significantly less than those in long hydroperiod treatments. Procambarus alieni had a significantly faster initial growth rate than P. fallax, which may give it a competitive advantage in shorter hydroperiod marshes and help explain the distributions of these two species. The results of this study indicate that lengthening hydroperiods in the Everglades ecosystem may have a positive effect on crayfish productivity. v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .... .. ............................... ........... ... ... .. ........................ vii LIST OF TABLES ................... ................................................ .... .......... viii INTRODUCTION ....................................... .. .................... ....................... 1 METHODS ............................................ ... ... ... ... ... .. .... ........................... 8 Experimental Design ... ... ................ .... ...... ... ...................... ................ ..... 8 Statistical Analysis .... .... .... .. ..... .................................. .. ........... ............ 13 RESULTS .................................................... ........................................ 15 DISCUSSION ............................ ........................................................... 26 LITERATURE CITED ..................................... ................ ...................... 35 Vl LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Collection sites of Procambarus alieni and Procambarus faliax in Water Conservation Area 3A and southwestern Shark River Slough, Everglades National Park .................................... 9 Figure 2. Example of one of six 6.1 m x 3.0 m concrete block mesocosms used to study crayfish growth ..... ................................... 10 Figure 3. Mean(± S.E.) dry mass and fresh mass measurements for Procambarus alieni and Procambarus fallax through time ........................................................ ; ............................ 18 Figure 4. Mean(± S.E.) final relative growth rate for Procambarus alieni and Procambarus faliax in short, medium, and long hydroperiod treatments where relative growth rate is based on dry mass and fresh mass ....................................... ......... 21 Figure 5. Mean(± S.E.) relative growth rates based on dry mass for Procambarus alieni and Procambarus fall ax treatments through time ............................................................... 23 Vll LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Comparison of male and female fresh mass and dry mass at time for Procambarus alieni and Procambarus fallax .. ... ....................................... ..... ............. .................... 16 Table 2. Linear regression equations used to estimate dry mass for Procambarus alieni and Procambarus fall ax ... ... .................. 17 Table 3. Mean (±S.E.) total length (mm) for Procambarus alieni and Procambarus fall ax at time ................................................... 24 Vlll INTRODUCTION The Everglades ecosystem has undergone a variety of changes resulting from anthropogenic influences; including the alteration of historical hydropattems, water quality changes, fragmentation, and compartmentalization (Light and Dineen 1994). Wide scale changes in the Everglades first began in the late 1880's with the construction of canals leading from Lake Okeechobee to the Gulf of Mexico. By 1929, there were five major canals leading from Lake Okeechobee to the Atlantic Ocean (DeGrove 1974). In 1928 and 194 7, South Florida experienced two major hurricanes that resulted in widespread flooding and economic damage (Light and Dineen 1994). These events provided the impetus that was needed to begin larger water management projects throughout southern Florida. Today, the region has 1,600 km of levees, 1,160 km of canals and nearly 200 water control structures (USACE 2005) that provide flood protection, irrigation for agricultural needs, retention areas for drinking water and control inputs to Everglades National Park (Hendrix 2000). The hydropattem, water quality, and landscape changes have altered the Everglades ecosystem in a number of ways. For example, researchers have observed shifts in the composition of plant communities (Davis et al. 1994; Davis et al. 2005; Ogden 2005), decreases in marsh fish abundance (Loftus et al. 1990; Loftus and Eklund 1994), severe reductions in wading bird populations (Ogden 1994), decreased production among the Everglades crayfish (Procambarus alieni) (Faxon) (Acosta and Perry 2001; Acosta and Perry 2002a), etc. The Everglades ecosystem is comprised of a variety of 1 plant communities that are determined by and respond to a variety of fluctuating environmental variables (Gunderson 1994). Davis et al. (1994) and Ogden (2005) discuss the disturbance and alteration of marsh plant communities that most likely result from altered hydrology. Changes to hydrology patterns are most often expressed as decreased water levels and/or hydroperiods, although in some areas, the contrast is found where water levels and/or hydroperiods are greater than historical conditions. Changes to fire management practices in the Everglades have also contributed to shifts in vegetative communities (Ogden et al. 2005). Freshwater fishes are affected by shifts in vegetative communities and they represent an important component of the Everglades ecosystem; they are found throughout the trophic scale ranging from primary consumers of vegetation and detritus to top-level predators (Loftus and Eklund 1994). Loftus et al. (1990) and Loftus and Eklund (1994) discuss the reduction in small fish abundance due to repeated annual dry-downs in Northeast Shark River Slough. They speculate that historical fish biomass across the Everglades was many times greater than it currently is and that complete dry-downs were probably much more infrequent. One of the most dramatic reductions of a functional group has been among the wading birds. Ogden (1994) indicates that wading bird populations have experienced a 90% reduction from historical levels. Some authors have speculated that the reduction in wading bird populations may have resulted from a disturbance of their prey base within the Everglades ecosystem (Gunderson and Loftus 1993; Ogden 1994; Frederick and Spalding I. 1994; Gawlik 2002). Crayfish (Procambarus spp.) are an important prey item for many species and provide a direct link between primary producers and higher trophic levels (Acosta and 2 Perry 2001). Everglades crayfish are preyed upon by large fish, bull frogs (Rana grylio), American bitterns (Botaurus lentiginosus), pied-billed grebes (Podilymbus podiceps), white ibis (Eudocimus albus), raccoons (Procyon lotor), river otters (Lutra canadensis), and alligators (Alligator mississipiensis) (Kushlan and Kushlan 1979). Kushlan and Kushlan
Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Predator Behaviours of A
    CATHY R. SHAVE, COLIN R. TOWNSEND and TODD A. CROWL1 1 Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand. 1 Present address: College of Natural Resources, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, U.S.A. ANTI-PREDATOR BEHAVIOURS OF A FRESHWATER CRAYFISH (PARANEPHROPS ZEALANDICUS)TOANATIVE AND AN INTRODUCED PREDATOR ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Summary: The anti-predator behaviours of a New Zealand freshwater crayfish (Paranephrops zealandicus) to the native long-finned eel (Anguilla dieffenbachii)and the introduced brown trout (Salmo trutta)were investigated. Crayfish modified their behaviour in the presence of both trout and eels. However, a significantly greater number of defensive chela displays and swimming responses were made to eels than trout. Crayfish were able to use chemical cues from skin mucus to detect eels but not trout. Paranephrops zealandicus is able to make some appropriate defensive behavioural responses to the introduced brown trout as well as to its native predator, the long-finned eel. However, crayfish may be at greater risk from the introduced predator because of their apparent inability to detect trout using non-contact chemical cues. This may be a reflection of the different co-evolutionary histories crayfish have had with trout and eels. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Keywords: anti-predator behaviour;
    [Show full text]
  • Circadian Clocks in Crustaceans: Identified Neuronal and Cellular Systems
    Circadian clocks in crustaceans: identified neuronal and cellular systems Johannes Strauss, Heinrich Dircksen Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius vag 18A, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Abstract 2. Introduction: crustacean circadian biology 2.1. Rhythms and circadian phenomena 2.2. Chronobiological systems in Crustacea 2.3. Pacemakers in crustacean circadian systems 3. The cellular basis of crustacean circadian rhythms 3.1. The retina of the eye 3.1.1. Eye pigment migration and its adaptive role 3.1.2. Receptor potential changes of retinular cells in the electroretinogram (ERG) 3.2. Eyestalk systems and mediators of circadian rhythmicity 3.2.1. Red pigment concentrating hormone (RPCH) 3.2.2. Crustacean hyperglycaemic hormone (CHH) 3.2.3. Pigment-dispersing hormone (PDH) 3.2.4. Serotonin 3.2.5. Melatonin 3.2.6. Further factors with possible effects on circadian rhythmicity 3.3. The caudal photoreceptor of the crayfish terminal abdominal ganglion (CPR) 3.4. Extraretinal brain photoreceptors 3.5. Integration of distributed circadian clock systems and rhythms 4. Comparative aspects of crustacean clocks 4.1. Evolution of circadian pacemakers in arthropods 4.2. Putative clock neurons conserved in crustaceans and insects 4.3. Clock genes in crustaceans 4.3.1. Current knowledge about insect clock genes 4.3.2. Crustacean clock-gene 4.3.3. Crustacean period-gene 4.3.4. Crustacean cryptochrome-gene 5. Perspective 6. Acknowledgements 7. References 1. ABSTRACT Circadian rhythms are known for locomotory and reproductive behaviours, and the functioning of sensory organs, nervous structures, metabolism and developmental processes. The mechanisms and cellular bases of control are mainly inferred from circadian phenomenologies, ablation experiments and pharmacological approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Naturalis Classica, Viii Historic Naturalis Classica
    HISTORIC NATURALIS CLASSICA, VIII HISTORIC NATURALIS CLASSICA EDIDERUNT J. CRAMER ET H.K.SWANN TOMUS vm BIBUOGRAPHY OF THE LARVAE OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEA AND LARVAE OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEA BY ROBERT GURNEY WITH 122 FIGURES IN THE TEXT REPRINTED 1960 BY H. R. ENGELMANN (J. CRAMER) AND WHELDON & WESLEY, LTD. WEINHEIM/BERGSTR. CODICOTE/HERTS. BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE LARVAE OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEA AND LARVAE OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEA BY ROBERT GURNEY WITH 122 FIGURES IN THE TEXT REPRINTED 1960 BY H. R. ENGELMANN (J. CRAMER) AND WHELDON & WESLEY, LTD. WEINHEIM/BERGSTR. CODICOTE/HERTS. COPYRIGHT 1939 & 1942 BY THfi RAY SOCIETY IN LONDON AUTHORIZED REPRINT COPYRIGHT OF THE SERIES BY J. CRAMER PUBLISHER IN WEINHEIM PRINTED IN GERMANY I9«0 i X\ T • THE RAY SOCIETY INSTITUTED MDCCCXLIV This volume (No. 125 of the Series) is issued to the Svhscribers to the RAY SOCIETY JOT the Year 1937. LONDON MCMXXXIX BIBLIOGKAPHY OF THE LARVAE OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEA BY ROBERT GURNEY, M.A., D.Sc, F.L.S. LONDON PRINTED FOR THE RAT SOCIETY SOLD BT BERNARD QUARITCH, LTD. U, GBAFTOK STBKET, NBW BOND STEBBT, LONDON, "W. 1 1939 PRINTED BY ADLABD AND SON, LIMITED 2 1 BLOOJlSBUBY WAY, LONDON, W.C. I Madt and printed in Great Britain. CONTENTS PAOE PBBFACE . " V BiBUOGRAPHY CLASSIFIED LIST . 64 Macrura Natantia 64 Penaeidea 64 Caridea 70 Macrura Reptantia 84 Nephropsidea 84 Eryonidea 88 Scyllaridea 88 Stenopidea 91 Thalassinidea 92 Anomura ; 95 Galatheidea . 95 Paguridea 97 Hippidea 100 Dromiacea 101 Brachyura 103 Gymnopleura 103 Brachygnatha 103 Oxyrhyncha 113 Oxystomata . 116 INDEX TO GENERA 120 PREFACE IT has been my intention to publish a monograph of Decapod larvae which should contain a bibliography, a part dealing with a number of general questions relating to the post-embryonic development of Decapoda and Euphausiacea, and a series of sections describing the larvae of all the groups, so far as they are known.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea)
    Tuhinga 22: 171–272 Copyright © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (2011) Annotated checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea) John C. Yaldwyn† and W. Richard Webber* † Research Associate, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa. Deceased October 2005 * Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand ([email protected]) (Manuscript completed for publication by second author) ABSTRACT: A checklist of the Recent Decapoda (shrimps, prawns, lobsters, crayfish and crabs) of the New Zealand region is given. It includes 488 named species in 90 families, with 153 (31%) of the species considered endemic. References to New Zealand records and other significant references are given for all species previously recorded from New Zealand. The location of New Zealand material is given for a number of species first recorded in the New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity but with no further data. Information on geographical distribution, habitat range and, in some cases, depth range and colour are given for each species. KEYWORDS: Decapoda, New Zealand, checklist, annotated checklist, shrimp, prawn, lobster, crab. Contents Introduction Methods Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda Suborder DENDROBRANCHIATA Bate, 1888 ..................................... 178 Superfamily PENAEOIDEA Rafinesque, 1815.............................. 178 Family ARISTEIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891..................... 178 Family BENTHESICYMIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891 .......... 180 Family PENAEIDAE Rafinesque, 1815 ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Risk to Norwegian Biodiversity from Import and Keeping of Crustaceans in Freshwater Aquaria
    VKM Report 2021: 02 Assessment of the risk to Norwegian biodiversity from import and keeping of crustaceans in freshwater aquaria Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment VKM Report 2021: 02 Assessment of the risk to Norwegian biodiversity from import and keeping of crustaceans in freshwater aquaria. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Alien Organisms and trade in Endangered Species (CITES) of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment 15.02.2021 ISBN: 978-82-8259-356-4 ISSN: 2535-4019 Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM) Postboks 222 Skøyen 0213 Oslo Norway Phone: +47 21 62 28 00 Email: [email protected] vkm.no vkm.no/english Cover photo: Mohammed Anwarul Kabir Choudhury/Mostphotos.com Suggested citation: VKM, Gaute Velle, Lennart Edsman, Charlotte Evangelista, Stein Ivar Johnsen, Martin Malmstrøm, Trude Vrålstad, Hugo de Boer, Katrine Eldegard, Kjetil Hindar, Lars Robert Hole, Johanna Järnegren, Kyrre Kausrud, Inger Måren, Erlend B. Nilsen, Eli Rueness, Eva B. Thorstad and Anders Nielsen (2021). Assessment of the risk to Norwegian biodiversity from import and keeping of crustaceans in freshwater aquaria. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Alien Organisms and trade in Endangered Species (CITES) of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment. VKM report 2021:02, ISBN: 978-82-8259- 356-4, ISSN: 2535-4019. Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM), Oslo, Norway. 2 Assessment of the risk to Norwegian biodiversity from import and keeping of crustaceans in freshwater aquaria Preparation of the opinion The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (Vitenskapskomiteen for mat og miljø, VKM) appointed a project group to draft the opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • Koura, Paranephrops Planifrons) in the Lower North Island, New Zealand
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Habitat determinants and predatory interactions of the endemic freshwater crayfish (Koura, Paranephrops planifrons) in the Lower North Island, New Zealand. A thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Ecology at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Logan Arthur Brown 2009 Acknowledgements My gratitude goes to all those who helped me throughout my thesis. The completion of this has taken many years and is thanks to the efforts of many who have helped me with fieldwork, made suggestions on ways to carry out experiments and been there for general support. A special thanks must go to my partner Emma who has put up with me for three years trying to complete this, also to my family and friends for their support. Thanks to my supervisor Associate Professor Russell Death for helping come up with the original topic and the comments provided on drafts. Thanks also to Fiona Death for proof reading final drafts of my thesis. The following people gave up their time to come and help me in the field. Matt Denton-Giles, Emma Round, Charlotte Minson, Jono Tonkin, Nikki Atkinson, Travis Brown, Jan Brown, Ray Brown, Peter Bills, Hannah Bills, Caitlin Bills, Brayden Bills, Hannah Rainforth, Shaun Nielson, Jess Costall, Emily Atkinson, Nikki McArthur, Carol Nicholson, Abby Deuel, Amy McDonald, Kiryn Weaver, Cleland Wallace, and Lorraine Cook.
    [Show full text]
  • ALMQ Data Analysis Final Report
    P.O. Box 25125, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3M 4H4 Telephone: (902) 876-1160 Fax: (902) 876-1320 www.fsrs.ns.ca Final Report Prepared for: Fishermen and Scientists Research Society Contract: FSRS2012-022 ATLANTIC LOBSTER MOULT & QUALITY PROJECT Data analysis and descriptive statistics September 22, 2013 www.lobstermoult.ca ALMQ data analysis Final Report Table of Content Report Contribution 3 Executive Summary 4 Project Background and Introduction 6 Materials and Methods 8 Site Selection 8 Sampling Procedure 8 Data Analysis 8 Moult Timing Definitions 10 Results 12 Descriptive Statistics 12 Moult Timing Based on Brix Index Value 15 Moult Timing Based on Moult Stage Proportion 18 Moult Timing Based on Shell Hardness 19 Comparison of Moult Timing Classification Methods 19 Graphical Comparison of Moult Timing Classification Methods 20 Interpretation 23 Acknowledgement 27 References 28 Appendices 31 2 ALMQ data analysis Final Report Report Contribution Primary authour Jean Lavallée Principal Consultant Aquatic Science & Health Services 465 University Avenue, PO Box 21116 Charlottetown, PE C1A 9H6 902.628.7981 [email protected] Other report resource Tim Burnley Melanie Burton Owner Field Biologist Eastern Epidemiological Services Aquatic Science & Health Services 23 Karen Drive 465 University Avenue, PO Box 21116 Cornwall, PE C0A 1H8 Charlottetown, PE C1A 9H6 902.626.8118 902.940.3788 [email protected] [email protected] John Tremblay Shannon Scott-Tibbetts Research Scientist & Head, Lobster Unit Research Biologist Population Ecology
    [Show full text]
  • Abiotic and Biotic Factors Affecting Size-Dependent Crayfish (Orconectes Obscurus) Distribution, Density, and Survival
    ABIOTIC AND BIOTIC FACTORS AFFECTING SIZE-DEPENDENT CRAYFISH (ORCONECTES OBSCURUS) DISTRIBUTION, DENSITY, AND SURVIVAL A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Jennifer M. Clark May 2009 Dissertation written by Jennifer M. Clark B.S., Kent State University, 2003 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2009 Approved by __________________________________, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Mark W. Kershner __________________________________, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Laura G. Leff __________________________________ Joseph R. Holomuzki __________________________________ Andrew L. Moore __________________________________ Accepted by __________________________________, Chair, Department of Biological Sciences James L. Blank __________________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences John R. D. Stalvey ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ……………………………………………………………………..vii LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………………….xi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS …………………………………………………………........xii CHAPTER I. Introduction………………………………………………………………..1 Current velocity…………………………………………………...2 Sediment grain size and heterogeneity……………………………4 Water depth………………………………………………………..5 Predation…………………………………………………………..6 Competition………………………………………………………..8 Flooding………………………………………………………….10 Organismal distribution………………………………………….11 Dissertation organization………………………………………...11 References………………………………………………………..13 II. Size-dependent effects of Visible Implant Elastomer marking on
    [Show full text]
  • Eight Years of Freshwater Crayfish (Paranephrops Zealandicus(White))
    Freshwater Crayfish 25(1):7–12, 2020 RESEARCH ARTICLE ISSN: 2076-4324 (Print), 2076-4332 (Online) https://doi.org/10.5869/fc.2020.v25-1.007 Eight Years of Freshwater Crayfish Paranephrops( zealandicus (White)) Harvest from One New Zealand Pond: Comments on the Resulting Population Structure John Hollows,1,* Thomas Song 1 and Callum Kyle 1 1 Ernslaw One Ltd., Invermay, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel 9053, New Zealand. *Corresponding Author.— [email protected] ABSTRACT ARTICLE INFO A 100 m2 forestry pond was stocked with 65 crayfish (Paranephrops zealandicus (White, 1847)), weighing Article History: approximately 35 g, in 2010. Sampling was undertaken at the end of each growing season (March - Submitted: 28 OCT 2019 April) from 2012 to 2019. All crayfish > 45 g were harvested from the population; from 2015 between Accepted: 24 MAR 2020 1.84 kg and 3.65 kg of crayfish < 45 g were harvested (11 to 24% of the < 45 g population). In 2014, refuge Published Online: 15 APR 2020 (Cytisus scoparius) for the crayfish was added to the pond. The following year there was a noticeable Published Print: 30 APR 2020 increase in crayfish biomass, particularly those 45 g or less. In 2018, eight kg of lime was added to the pond. This did not greatly change the pH or calcium in the pond water when measured 10 months later, Keywords: but there was a corresponding increase in total biomass and biomass of crayfish > 45 g. Crayfish biomass biomass; ranged from 2.76 kg (2012) to 17.71 kg (2017). Harvests of crayfish > 45 g ranged from 1.1 kg (2012) crayfish; to 3.98 kg (2019) and for crayfish < 45 g from 1.84 kg (2018) to 3.65 kg (2016).
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Ecological Interactions Between Crayfish and Fish
    Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems (2011) 401, 10 http://www.kmae-journal.org c ONEMA, 2011 DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2011024 Review A review of ecological interactions between crayfish and fish, indigenous and introduced J.D. Reynolds(1) Received January 17, 2011 Revised March 14, 2011 Accepted March 16, 2011 ABSTRACT Key-words: Crayfish (decapods) and fish are both long-lived large members of fresh- crayfish, water communities, often functioning as keystone species. This paper freshwater fish, reviews interactions between these, with emphasis on the European con- keystone text. Native crayfish and fish are in ecological balance, which may involve species, mutual predation, competition and sometimes habitat disturbance. This competition, balance is disrupted by range extensions and translocations of native predation, fish or crayfish into exotic situations. Some fish and crayfish have been translocation, translocated globally, chiefly from North America to other continents. Non- alien invasive indigenous crayfish species (NICS) may impact on native fish, just as in- species, troduced fish impact on indigenous crayfish species (ICS). Competition native species between ICS and NICS may result in making the former susceptible to various mechanisms of interaction with fish, indigenous or introduced. In Europe, long-established NICS – signals, spiny-cheek and red swamp crayfish – may occur in greater densities than ICS; they are more tolerant and aggressive and show more interactions with fish. More recent intro- ductions, still restricted in distribution, have not yet received enough study for their impacts to be assessed. Interactions between fish and crayfish in North and South America, Madagascar and Australasia are also explored. Mechanisms of interaction between fish and crayfish include mutual pre- dation, competition for food and spatial resources, food-web alteration and habitat modification.
    [Show full text]
  • A Photographic Guide to Freshwater Invertebrates of Taranaki's Rivers
    A Photographic Guide to Freshwater Invertebrates of Taranaki’s Rivers and Streams This book was first published in 1998 and adapted from a publication originally produced in 1997 by S C Moore, Otago Regional Council. This edition was updated and reprinted in 2009. For further information please contact the Taranaki Regional Council, 47 Cloten Road, Private Bag, 713, Stratford 4352. Phone: (06) 765-7127, Fax: (06) 765-5097 Email: [email protected], Web: www.trc.govt.nz Table of Contents Introduction 2 Beetles Nematode worms 17 Where to look and How to Elmidae 10 Proboscis worms 17 Sample 2 Scirtid 11 Paddle-worms 17 Identifying the Major Hydraenidae 11 Horse-hair worms 18 Invertebrate Groups 3 Hydrophilidae 11 Hirudinea (leeches) 18 Photographic Guide to the Berosus 11 True flies Freshwater Invertebrates 4 Dytiscidae 11 Orthoclad midges 18 Mayflies Bugs Maoridiamesa 18 Deleatidium 5 Microvelia 11 Tanytarsus 18 Coloburiscus 5 Sigara 12 Tanypodinae 18 Austroclima 5 Anisops 12 Polypedilum 19 Zephlebia 5 Dobsonfly Chironomus 19 Mauiulus 5 Archichauliodes 12 Harrisius 19 Nesameletus 5 Damselflies & Dragonflies Nothodixa 19 Ameletopsis 6 Xanthocnemis 12 Paradixa 19 Ichthybotus 6 Austrolestes 12 Aphrophila 19 Stoneflies Procordulia 12 Limonia 20 Stenoperla 6 Crustaceans Zelandotipula 20 Zelandoperla 6 Paranephrops 13 Paralimnophila 20 Megaleptoperla 6 Paratya 13 Eriopterini 20 Austroperla 6 Isopoda (estuarine) 13 Hexatomini 20 Zelandobius 7 Isopoda (freshwater) 13 Ceratopogonid 20 Acroperla 7 Paracalliope 13 Austrosimulium 21 Caddisflies Paraleptamphopus
    [Show full text]