DOCSLIB.ORG

New Unrest Flares in Vietnam's Central Highlands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Unrest Flares in Vietnam's Central Highlands Asian Centre for Human Rights ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ P.O. Box 9627, Janakpuri, New Delhi-110058, India Phone: +91-11-25620583, 25503626; Fax: +91-11-25620583 Email: [email protected] ACHR Briefing Papers Embargoed for: 6 November 2003 Constitutional Coup in Sri Lanka: Back to the bad old days 1. Overview On 5 November 2003, Sri Lankan President Chandrika Kumaratunga1 in a constitutional coup declared emergency in the country. Prime Minister Ranil Wickramasinghe2 was on a visit to the United States. Earlier, on 4 November 2003, President Kumaratunga sacked Ministers for Information, Defence and Home, suspended the parliament for two weeks upto 19 November 2003 and ordered deployment of the troops in the key installations. President Kumaratunga justified her drastic steps due to the alleged threat to national security3 after the submission of the proposals by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) on 31 October 2003. The question remains as to whether allowing the LTTE to put across its proposals constitutes, what President Kumaratunga calls “making too many concessions”, to warrant the imposition of emergency. After all, on 1 November 2003, the Sri Lankan government led by Prime Minister Wickramasinghe said the offer made by the LTTE "differs in fundamental respects'' from its proposals made on 17 July 2003. But in an attempt to restart the process, the government said it was "convinced that the way forward lies through direct discussion of the issues''.4 A cursory analysis of the attempts to undermine each other by President and Prime Minister shows that rather than the LTTE proposals, the decision of the ruling United National Party (UNP) to put the motion to impeach controversial Supreme Court Chief Justice Sarath N Silva in the parliament on 6 November 2003 might have prompted the President to take such drastic steps. As any impeachment motion against the President ultimately has to be referred to a referendum by the Chief Justice, many Peoples Allaince (PA) leaders saw the impeachment of Chief Justice as the first step towards impeaching President Kumaratunga. President Kumartunga has so far successfully blocked any 1 . President Kumaratunga belongs to Peoples Alliance, the opposition party in the parliament. 2 . Prime Minister Ranil Wickremasinghe belongs to United National Party which holds majority in the parliament. 3 . http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3241763.stm 4 . 'Proposals, Govt. offer differ in fundamental respects', The Hindu, New Delhi, 2 November 2003 Constitutional Coup in Sri Lanka: 2 Back to the bad old days attempt to clip her wings by the parliament with the help of Supreme Court Chief Justice N Silva. Justice Silva has been openly supportive of her. 2. Old rivalry and biased judiciary The rivalry between President and Prime Minister Ranil Wickramasinghe in Sri Lankan politics has been continuing for over a decade. But it has become even more apparent since the UNP came to power after the last general elections held in December 2001. While President Kumaratunga welcomed negotiation with the LTTE, she gradually hardened her stand. The government and the LTTE signed a ceasefire agreement in February 2002 and formal peace negotiations started in September 2002. But the talks broke down in April 2003 in large part because of Kumaratunga’s increasingly provocative actions, in league with sections of the armed forces. The last two rounds of talks were disrupted by naval incidents involving the seizure or sinking of LTTE vessels.5 On 25 October 2003, Kumaratunga wrote to the Norwegian Prime Minister Kjell Magne Bondvik requesting the recall of the head of the Sri Lanka Monitoring Mission, Major General, Tryggve Tellefsen.6 President Kumaratunga also wrote to the armed forces chiefs on 24 October 2003 directing them not to follow any of the SLMM’s instructions or advice.7 Since the UNP came to power, President Kumaratunga has sought to maintain her direct control over key elements of the state apparatus, particularly the security forces. For months the government and the President have been engaged in a feud over who decides top appointments. She extended the service of Navy Vice Admiral Daya Sandagiri and Army Commander Lionel Balagalla—regarded as her supporters—beyond their due retirement dates. At the same time, Kumaratunga overruled a proposal by Interior Minister John Amaratunga that the service of the existing Inspector General of Police (IGP) be extended.8 In an attempt to counter President’s move, Defence Minister promulgated regulations to retire Commissioned Officers of the Sri Lanka Army at the age of 55. President Kumaratunga referred the order of the Defence Minister to the Supreme Court under Article 129 of the Constitution.9 In September 2002, the UNP government sought to clip the power of the President by bringing the controversial 19th amendment to the constitution. The 19th amendment, among others, sought to amend Articles 49 and 70 of the Constitution to clip the President's powers to dissolve Parliament unilaterally one year after the previous elections. About 20 odd Peoples Alliance Members of Parliament reportedly supported the move of the government. The amendment also empowered parliamentarians with 5 . http://www.asiantribune.com/show_article.php?id=1071 6 . The Statesman, New Delhi, 31 October 2003. 7 . http://www.asiantribune.com/show_article.php?id=1071 8 . Ibid 9 . Tamil Net, November 02, 2003 12:24 GMT ACHR Briefing Paper 2003 Constitutional Coup in Sri Lanka: 3 Back to the bad old days "cross-voting rights" so that they could vote according to their conscience without being deprived of their seats for defying party discipline.10 The Supreme Court led by Chief Justice Sarath N Silva came to President’s rescue and shot down the 19th amendment. The court ruled the sections empowering MPs with cross voting rights to be unconstitutional. As for the President's power to dissolve Parliament, the Bench ruled that apart from ensuring the support of a two-thirds majority in Parliament for it, the nation at large has to endorse it in a country-wide referendum for it to become law. The court however added a caveat that no referendum was necessary if the present one-year period restricting the President from dissolving Parliament was extended simply to a three-year period. A two-thirds majority alone would suffice for the purpose if the 19th amendment were on those lines.11 Since constitutional amendments could be made with two-thirds majority, the order of a referendum raised questions about the independence of judiciary. The Supreme Court also struck down the 18th Amendment which provided that “no legal suit or proceedings shall be instituted against the Constitutional Council, its chairman, a member, the secretary or an officer of the council regarding any act done or omitted by them in performing or discharging any duty or function, conferred or assigned to them under the Constitution or any other law”. It also sought to empower the Constitutional Council to make rules to set out procedure and guidance to be followed by it while performing duties and actions assigned under the Constitution. The 17th Amendment, which formed the Constitutional Council (CC) of Sri Lanka, provided for legal action to be taken against the Council members under fundamental rights provisions in the Constitution.12 The Supreme Court however upheld constitutional validity of such impunity under the Prevention of Terrorist Act, 1979 and allowed the judiciary to function under the order of the Attorney General and the Defence Minister.13 During the hearing on the Defence Minister’s regulations of retiring the commissioned officers at the age of 55, Chief Justice criticised the government's conduct and indirectly tried to cast aspersions on the Government-LTTE ceasefire agreement.14 As the outcome of the verdict on the issue was clear, on 3 November 2003, the ruling UNP announced its decision to place the motion for the impeachment of the Chief Justice. The motion was scheduled to be tabled in parliament on 6 November 2003 after the government parliamentary group sources claimed that it had already received the signatures of required number of parliamentarians to move the impeachment as required by Sri Lanka's 10 . http://www.dailymirror.lk/2002/09/03/frontpage/5.html 11 . Frontline, Volume 19 - Issue 22, October 26 - November 08, 2002 12 . http://www.dailymirror.lk/2002/09/19/News/6.htmls 13 . Sri Lanka: Time for Overhauling Human Rights Mechanisms, An Alternate Report to the United Nations Human Rights Committee on the fourth periodic report of Sri Lanka (CCPR/C/LKA/2002/4), Asian Centre for Human Rights, New Delhi, 31 October 2003 14 . http://www.asiantribune.com/show_article.php?id=1071 ACHR Briefing Paper 2003 Constitutional Coup in Sri Lanka: 4 Back to the bad old days Constitution.15 As any impeachment motion against the President ultimately has to be referred to a referendum by the chief justice, President Kumaratunga decided to strike back and suspend the parliament. By suspending the parliament, the President has effectively stalled any impeachment proceedings against Justice Silva or herself.16 On 4 November 2003, Supreme Court sent its determination on Defence Minister’s regulations of retiring the commissioned officers at the age of 55 to President. The Supreme Court, as expected, held that the President shall exercise the executive power of the people including the defense of Sri Lanka and the Minister of Defence has no legal authority to amend the existing Regulations under the Army, Navy and Air Force Acts as the power to frame regulation is vested only in the President.17 3. Does a proposal warrant emergency On 31 October 2003, the LTTE submitted its proposals18 which among others calls for establishment of an Interim Self-Governing Authority (ISGA) comprising of the eight districts namely: Amparai, Batticaloa, Jaffna, Kilinochchi, Mannar, Mullaitivu, Trincomalee and Vavuniya in the north-east.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chandrika Kumaratunga (Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga)
    Chandrika Kumaratunga (Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga) Sri Lanka, Presidenta de la República; ex primera ministra Duración del mandato: 12 de Noviembre de 1994 - de de Nacimiento: Colombo, Western Province, 29 de Junio de 1945 Partido político: SLNP ResumenLa presidenta de Sri Lanka entre 1994 y 2005 fue el último eslabón de una dinastía de políticos que, como es característico en Asia Indostánica, está familiarizada con el poder tanto como la tragedia. Huérfana del asesinado primer ministro Solomon Bandaranaike, hija de la tres veces primera ministra Sirimavo Bandaranaike ?con la que compartió el Ejecutivo en su primer mandato, protagonizando las dos mujeres un caso único en el mundo- y viuda de un político también asesinado, Chandrika Kumaratunga heredó de aquellos el liderazgo del izquierdista Partido de la Libertad (SLNP) e intentó, infructuosamente, concluir la sangrienta guerra civil con los separatistas tigres tamiles (LTTE), iniciada en 1983, por las vías de una reforma territorial federalizante y la negociación directa. http://www.cidob.org 1 of 10 Biografía 1. Educación política al socaire de su madre gobernante 2. Primera presidencia (1994-1999): plan de reforma territorial para terminar con la guerra civil 3. Segunda presidencia (1999-2005): proceso de negociación con los tigres tamiles y forcejeos con el Gobierno del EJP 1. Educación política al socaire de su madre gobernante Único caso de estadista, mujer u hombre, hija a su vez de estadistas en una república moderna, la suya es la familia más ilustre de la élite dirigente
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming Sri Lankan Presidentialism: Provenance, Problems and Prospects Volume 2
    Reforming Sri Lankan Presidentialism: Provenance, Problems and Prospects Edited by Asanga Welikala Volume 2 18 Failure of Quasi-Gaullist Presidentialism in Sri Lanka Suri Ratnapala Constitutional Choices Sri Lanka’s Constitution combines a presidential system selectively borrowed from the Gaullist Constitution of France with a system of proportional representation in Parliament. The scheme of proportional representation replaced the ‘first past the post’ elections of the independence constitution and of the first republican constitution of 1972. It is strongly favoured by minority parties and several minor parties that owe their very existence to proportional representation. The elective executive presidency, at least initially, enjoyed substantial minority support as the president is directly elected by a national electorate, making it hard for a candidate to win without minority support. (Sri Lanka’s ethnic minorities constitute about 25 per cent of the population.) However, there is a growing national consensus that the quasi-Gaullist experiment has failed. All major political parties have called for its replacement while in opposition although in government, they are invariably seduced to silence by the fruits of office. Assuming that there is political will and ability to change the system, what alternative model should the nation embrace? Constitutions of nations in the modern era tend fall into four categories. 1.! Various forms of authoritarian government. These include absolute monarchies (emirates and sultanates of the Islamic world), personal dictatorships, oligarchies, theocracies (Iran) and single party rule (remaining real or nominal communist states). 2.! Parliamentary government based on the Westminster system with a largely ceremonial constitutional monarch or president. Most Western European countries, India, Japan, Israel and many former British colonies have this model with local variations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017.12.08 (257-17) Final No Crops.Pub
    257 වන කා ඩය - 17 වන කලාපය 20 17 ෙදසැHබ 08වන .5රාදා ெதாAதி 257 --- இல. 17 2017 Jச{ப} 080808 , ெவளிpகிழைம th Volume 257 - No. 17 Fri day, 08 December, 2017 (හැනසා) பாராfமyற விவாதqக (ஹyசாu) PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) அதிகார அறிpைக OFFICIAL REPORT (අෙශLMත $ටපත / பிைழ தி^wதzபடாதP /Uncorrected) අVතගත )ධාන ක රජෙ[ QH $@බඳ කාරක සභාෙ වාතාව සජන පන ෙකOHපත , 2018 – [. !VවැW ෙවV කළ ආංක අN2ෂණ කාරක සභා වාතා >නය ] : )ශ්නවලට වාක $@! [ෂ 101, 201(8:ධ ශාසන) ; ෂ 108 , 202 , 308 ෙපM:ග කව දැYH ?ෙමV ඇ1 )ශ්නය: (තැපැ , තැපැ ෙසJවා, Kස් H ආගIක කට^! ) ; ග ම7Vද රාජප2ෂ මැ!මාට ෙශJෂ ආර2ෂාව ෂ 159 , 203 (සංචාරක සංවධන හා 9ස්යාW සැප]ම ආගIක කට^!); ෂය 167 (ෙශJෂ කායභාර $වන යදම පාලනය සඳහා රජය ෙගන ඇ 9යා මාග : $@බඳ); ෂය 194 (@ සංෙ:ශ හා _#ට යMතල පහ0කH); ෂය 196 (දaා, තා2ෂණ හා ග අVාමාතa!මාෙP )කාශය පෙ[ෂණ) ] - කාරක සභාෙ? සලකා බලන ල?. ෙපM:ග ක මV&VෙP පන ෙකOHප: 8ෙමLපාය සංවධන වaාපෘ පනත: ෙමLහV ලංකා පදනම (සංස්ථාගත 3ෙH) - [ග නාම ෙයLජනා රාජප2ෂ මහතා ] - පළK වන වර 3යවන ල? ආ\ෂා අධaාපන භාරය (සංස්ථාගත 3ෙH) - [ග ෙ2. කාද මස්තාV මහතා ] - පළK වන වර 3යවන ල? பிரதான உளடpக{ அரசாqகp கணpAக ப~றிய Ahவிy அறிpைக ஆயிஷா கவி ந{பிpைகz ெபா`zW (BuJைணwத) - [மாvWமிA கா.
    [Show full text]
  • Sugathapala Mendis and Another V Chandrika Kumaratunga and Others S C ( Waters Edge Case) 339
    Sugathapala Mendis and Another v Chandrika Kumaratunga and Others S C ( Waters Edge Case) 339 SUGATHAPALA MENDIS AND ANOTHR V CHANDRIKA KUMARATUNGA AND OTHERS (WATERS EDGE CASE) SUPREME COURT S.N. SILVA, C.J. TILAKAWARDANE, J RATNAYAKE, J. SC FR 352/07. MAY 29, 2008 JUNE 25, 26, 2008 JULY 14, 31,2008 Fundamental Rights - Article 12(1) - Public Interest litigation - Time limit - locus standi - Doctrine of Public Trust - Violation - Is the President subject to the Rule of the Law? - What is public purpose requirement? The petitioners/lntervenient petitioners complained of infringement pertaining to the acquisition of land on the premise that such land would be utilized to serve a public purpose whereas by the impugned executive or administrative action the land was knowingly, deliberately and manipulatively sold to a private entrepreneur to serve as an exclusive private golf resort in Sri Lanka. It was contented that, this was done through a process thatwas conniving and contrary to the equal protection of the law guaranteed by Article 12(1) of the Constitution which assures to the people the Rule of Law. It was further contended that those alleged to have initiated, facilitated and or empowered to achieve this outcome were those from the highest echelons of the executive and included senior officials members of the public sector, statutory bodies of the government, the former President (1st respondent) high government agencies. Held: (1) The Nature of large scale developments is that they occur over-time. In the instant case, though communication with UDA commenced in1997, completion of the project was delegated extensions granted and particulars changed, such that the project at the time this claim was brought remained unfinished.
    [Show full text]
  • Xxxx 31 Xxxxx
    CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (CSIS) A YEAR AFTER THE CIVIL WAR: CHARTING SRI LANKA’S FUTURE WELCOME AND MODERATOR: TERESITA SCHAFFER, DIRECTOR, SOUTH ASIA PROGRAM, CSIS SPEAKER: GAMINI LAKSHMAN PEIRIS, MINISTER OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA TUESDAY, MAY 25, 2010 2:30 P.M. WASHINGTON, D.C. Transcript by Federal News Service Washington, D.C. TERESITA SCHAFFER: Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you very much for joining us. Those of you have been here before know that this is the CSIS South Asia Program and I’m Tesi Schaffer, the director. And you probably also know that I had the great pleasure of being U.S. ambassador in Sri Lanka from 1992 to 1995. And one of the particular pleasures of that job was my association with Professor G.L. Peiris in several different capacities during that time, initially as vice chancellor of Colombo University and a distinguished law professor – one of, I think it’s two, former Rhodes scholars in Sri Lanka – and subsequently, after he joined politics, as minister initially for constitutional affairs and then for commerce in the government that was headed, at the time, by Chandrika Kumaratunga. Professor Peiris, inside and outside of government, has always brought great intellectual distinction to what he has done. He was one of the architects of Chandrika Kumaratunga’s constitutional proposals at the time that the effort was on to negotiate a peace with the LTTE. We are now meeting at a very different time. The war was ultimately won on the battlefield rather than resolved at the negotiating table.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF995, Job 2
    MONITORING FACTORS AFFECTING THE SRI LANKAN PEACE PROCESS CLUSTER REPORT FIRST QUARTERLY FEBRUARY 2006 œ APRIL 2006 CENTRE FOR POLICY ALTERNATIVES 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS CLUSTER Page Number PEACE TALKS AND NEGOTIATIONS CLUSTER.................................................... 2 POLITICAL ENVIRONM ENT CLUSTER.....................................................................13 SECURITY CLUSTER.............................................................................................................23 LEGAL & CONSTIIUTIONAL CLUSTER......................................................................46 ECONOM ICS CLUSTER.........................................................................................................51 RELIEF, REHABILITATION & RECONSTRUCTION CLUSTER......................61 PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS & SOCIAL ATTITUDES CLUSTER................................70 M EDIA CLUSTER.......................................................................................................................76. ENDNOTES.....… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … ..84 M ETHODOLOGY The Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) has conducted the project “Monitoring the Factors Affecting the Peace Process” since 2005. The output of this project is a series of Quarterly Reports. This is the fifth of such reports. It should be noted that this Quarterly Report covers the months of February, March and April. Having identified a number of key factors that impact the peace process, they have been monitored observing change or stasis through
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Parliament Present
    (Eighth Parliament - First Session) No. 134. ] MINUTES OF PARLIAMENT Tuesday, December 06, 2016 at 9.30 a. m. PRESENT : Hon. Karu Jayasuriya, Speaker Hon. Thilanga Sumathipala, Deputy Speaker and Chairman of Committees Hon. Ranil Wickremesinghe, Prime Minister and Minister of National Policies and Economic Affairs Hon. (Mrs.) Thalatha Atukorale, Minister of Foreign Employment Hon. Wajira Abeywardana, Minister of Home Affairs Hon. John Amaratunga, Minister of Tourism Development and Christian Religious Affairs and Minister of Lands Hon. Mahinda Amaraweera, Minister of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Development Hon. (Dr.) Sarath Amunugama, Minister of Special Assignment Hon. Gayantha Karunatileka, Minister of Parliamentary Reforms and Mass Media and Chief Government Whip Hon. Ravi Karunanayake, Minister of Finance Hon. Akila Viraj Kariyawasam, Minister of Education Hon. Lakshman Kiriella, Minister of Higher Education and Highways and Leader of the House of Parliament Hon. Mano Ganesan, Minister of National Co-existence, Dialogue and Official Languages Hon. Daya Gamage, Minister of Primary Industries Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Minister of Sports Hon. Nimal Siripala de Silva, Minister of Transport and Civil Aviation Hon. Palany Thigambaram, Minister of Hill Country New Villages, Infrastructure and Community Development Hon. Duminda Dissanayake, Minister of Agriculture Hon. Navin Dissanayake, Minister of Plantation Industries Hon. S. B. Dissanayake, Minister of Social Empowerment and Welfare ( 2 ) M. No. 134 Hon. S. B. Nawinne, Minister of Internal Affairs, Wayamba Development and Cultural Affairs Hon. Gamini Jayawickrama Perera, Minister of Sustainable Development and Wildlife Hon. Harin Fernando, Minister of Telecommunication and Digital Infrastructure Hon. A. D. Susil Premajayantha, Minister of Science, Technology and Research Hon. Sajith Premadasa, Minister of Housing and Construction Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Sri Lanka Assessment
    SRI LANKA COUNTRY ASSESSMENT October 2002 Country Information & Policy Unit IMMIGRATION & NATIONALITY DIRECTORATE HOME OFFICE, UNITED KINGDOM Sri Lanka October 2002 CONTENTS 1. Scope of Document 1.1 - 1.4 2. Geography 2.1 - 2.4 3. Economy 3.1 - 3.2 4. History 4.1 - 4.79 - Independence to 1994 4.1 - 4.10 - 1994 to the present 4.11 - 4.50 - The Peace Process January 2000 - October 4.51 - 4.79 2002 5. State Structures 5.1 - 5.34 The Constitution 5.1 - 5.2 - Citizenship and Nationality 5.3 - 5.4 Political System 5.5. - 5.7 Judiciary 5.8 - 5.10 Legal Rights/Detention 5.11 - 5.21 - Death penalty 5.22 - 5.23 Internal Security 5.24 - 5.25 Prisons and Prison Conditions 5.26 Military Service 5.27 - 5.28 Medical Services 5.29 - 5.33 Educational System 5.34 6. Human Rights 6.1 - 6.168 6.A Human Rights Issues 6.1 - 6.51 Overview 6.1 - 6.4 Freedom of Speech and the Media 6.5 - 6.8 - Treatment of journalists 6.9 - 6.11 Freedom of Religion - Introduction 6.12 - Buddhists 6.13 - Hindus 6.14 - Muslims 6.15 - 6.18 - Christians 6.19 - Baha'is 6.20 Freedom of Assembly & Association 6.21 - Political Activists 6.22 - 6.26 Employment Rights 6.27 - 6.32 People Trafficking 6.33 - 6.35 Freedom of Movement 6.36 - 6.43 - Immigrants and Emigrants Act 6.44 - 6.51 6.B Human Rights - Specific Groups 6.52 - 6.151 Ethnic Groups - Tamils and general Human Rights Issues 6.52 - 6.126 - Up-country Tamils 6.127 - 6.130 - Indigenous People 6.131 Women 6.132 - 6.139 Children 6.140 - 6.145 - Child Care Arrangements 6.146 - 6.150 Homosexuals 6.151 6.C Human Rights - Other Issues
    [Show full text]
  • “Disappearance” SRI Lankagulam Mohideen Mohammad Zakariya
    PUBLIC AI Index: ASA 37/28/00 UA 276/00 “Disappearance” 11 September 2000 SRI LANKAGulam Mohideen Mohammad Zakariya (45) A father of five has been arrested at a navy checkpoint in the eastern district of Trincomalee, and the navy has since denied having him in custody. His whereabouts are unknown, and Amnesty International believes his life is in danger. Gulam Mohideen Mohammad Zakariya had been visiting his mother, who lives in another part of the town of Nilaveli, with his wife and one of their children. They were on their way home on a bicycle when they were stopped, at around 7.30am on 11 August. The navy personnel took him away, and told his wife to take a bus home with her child. From the bus, she saw them questioning her husband. Later that day, when he did not come home, she made enquiries at the Nilaveli navy camp and was told that “no such person has been arrested”. His relatives have since appealed to the President of Sri Lanka and made complaints with the National Human Rights Commission and other local institutions. They have also asked the army for information about him, to no avail. BACKGROUND INFORMATION There has been a worrying increase in the number of “disappearances” reported from the north and east of Sri Lanka. On 31 August, Amnesty International appealed to President Chandrika Kumaratunga Bandaranaike to intervene to end the sudden increase in “disappearances” in Vavuniya district in the north, after seven people arrested there between 10 and 26 August reportedly “disappeared”. The “disappearance” of Gulam Mohideen Mohammad Zakariya is the second reported from Trincomalee this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs Sri Lanka Annual Performance
    MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS SRI LANKA ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2017 MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS Contents Page No 1. Mission, Subjects and Functions of the Ministry of Foreign 1 Affairs 2. Preface 3 - 5 3. Organizational Chart of the Ministry 7 4. Progress Report of the Divisions - Africa Division 9 - 27 - Consular Affairs Division 29 - 35 - East Asia and Pacific Division 37 - 80 - Economic Affairs and Trade Division 81 - 88 - European Union, Multilateral Treaties and Commonwealth 89 - 95 Division - Finance Division 97 - 102 - General Administration Division 103 - 106 - Legal Division 107 - 112 - Middle East 113 - 134 - Ocean Affairs and Climate Change Division 135 - 142 - Overseas Administration Division 143 - 149 - Overseas Sri Lankan Division 151 - 154 - Policy Planning Division 155 - 157 - Protocol Division 159 - 167 - Public Communications Division 169 - 172 - South Asia and SAARC Division 173 - 184 - United Nations and Human Rights Division 185 - 192 - United States of America and Canada Division 193 - 201 - West Division 203 - 229 5. Network of Diplomatic Missions Abroad 231 6. Revenue collected by Sri Lanka Missions Abroad in 2017 233 - 235 7. Consular activities carried out by Sri Lanka Missions Abroad - 236 - 238 2017 Vision To be a responsible nation within the international community and to maintain friendly relations with all countries. Mission The Promotion, Projection and Protection of Sri Lanka’s national interests internationally, in accordance with the foreign policy of the Government and to advise the Government on managing foreign relations in keeping with Sri Lanka’s national interests. Subjects and Functions of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Implementation of political plans and programmes in respect of Foreign Affairs; Representation of Sri Lanka abroad; International Agreements and Treaties; Foreign Government and international organization’s representation in Sri Lanka; External publicity; Diplomatic immunities and privileges and Consular functions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sri Lankan Insurgency: a Rebalancing of the Orthodox Position
    THE SRI LANKAN INSURGENCY: A REBALANCING OF THE ORTHODOX POSITION A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Peter Stafford Roberts Department of Politics and History, Brunel University April 2016 Abstract The insurgency in Sri Lanka between the early 1980s and 2009 is the topic of this study, one that is of great interest to scholars studying war in the modern era. It is an example of a revolutionary war in which the total defeat of the insurgents was a decisive conclusion, achieved without allowing them any form of political access to governance over the disputed territory after the conflict. Current literature on the conflict examines it from a single (government) viewpoint – deriving false conclusions as a result. This research integrates exciting new evidence from the Tamil (insurgent) side and as such is the first balanced, comprehensive account of the conflict. The resultant history allows readers to re- frame the key variables that determined the outcome, concluding that the leadership and decision-making dynamic within the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) had far greater impact than has previously been allowed for. The new evidence takes the form of interviews with participants from both sides of the conflict, Sri Lankan military documentation, foreign intelligence assessments and diplomatic communiqués between governments, referencing these against the current literature on counter-insurgency, notably the social-institutional study of insurgencies by Paul Staniland. It concludes that orthodox views of the conflict need to be reshaped into a new methodology that focuses on leadership performance and away from a timeline based on periods of major combat.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview Print Page Close Window
    World Directory of Minorities Asia and Oceania MRG Directory –> Sri Lanka –> Sri Lanka Overview Print Page Close Window Sri Lanka Overview Environment Peoples History Governance Current state of minorities and indigenous peoples Environment The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka (formerly known as Ceylon) comprises one large, compact island and several islets, separated from the Indian subcontinent by a strip of sea which at its narrowest point is 40 kilometres and centrally located in the Indian Ocean, lying off the southern tip of India. Sri Lanka is strategically placed in the Indian Ocean, alongside major trading routes from the Far East, Europe as well as from Africa. In contrast to other South Asian countries, Sri Lanka's population has not shown an excessive growth since independence and the country boasts of high social development indicators, including a high literacy rate (by some accounts 96 per cent). Peoples Main languages: Sinhala (official and national language), Tamil (national language), English Main religions: Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, Christianity Minority and indigenous groups include Sri Lankan Tamils(12.7%) (1981), Indian Tamil (5.5%) (1981) Muslims(7.4%) (1981), Veddhas2,000 (1981 Census), and Burghers (0.3%) (1981). A census was conducted in 2001 however it was not carried out in 7 districts in the conflict area which are all minority populous areas. Sri Lanka has a plural society. The majority group, the Sinhalese, speak a distinctive language (Sinhala) related to the Indo-Aryan tongues of north India, and are mainly Buddhist. There are two groups of Tamils: ‘Sri Lankan Tamils' (also known as ‘Ceylon' or ‘Jaffna' Tamils) are the descendants of Tamil-speaking groups who migrated from south India many centuries ago; and ‘Up Country Tamils' (also known as ‘Indian' or ‘estate' Tamils), who are descendants of comparatively recent immigrants.
    [Show full text]