DOCSLIB.ORG

Rules for Building and Classing Floating Production Installations 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rules for Building and Classing Floating Production Installations 2021 Rules for Building and Classing Floating Production Installations January 2021 RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING FLOATING PRODUCTION INSTALLATIONS JANUARY 2021 American Bureau of Shipping Incorporated by Act of Legislature of the State of New York 1862 © 2021 American Bureau of Shipping. All rights reserved. ABS Plaza 1701 City Plaza Drive Spring, TX 77389 USA Foreword These Rules specify the ABS requirements for building and classing Floating Production Installations (FPIs) that should be used by designers, builders, Owners and Operators in the offshore industry. The requirements contained in these Rules are for design, construction, and survey after construction of the floating installation (including hull structure, equipment and marine machinery), the position mooring system and the hydrocarbon production facilities. Floating installations of the ship-type, column-stabilized- type, tension leg platforms and spar installations are included, as well as existing vessels converted to FPIs. The requirements for optional notations for disconnectable floating installations, dynamic positioning systems and import/export systems are also provided. These Rules are to be used in conjunction with other ABS Rules and Guides, as specified herein. The effective date of these Rules is the first day of the month of publication. In general, until the effective date, plan approval for designs will follow prior practice unless review under these Rules is specifically requested by the party signatory to the application for classification. Changes to Conditions of Classification ( 1 January 2008) For the 2008 edition, Part 1, Chapter 1, “Scope and Conditions of Classification” was consolidated into a generic booklet, entitled Rules for Conditions of Classification – Offshore Units and Structures (Part 1) for all units, installations, vessels or systems in offshore service. The purpose of this consolidation was to emphasize the common applicability of the classification requirements in “Part 1, Chapter 1” to ABS- classed offshore units, pipelines, risers, and other offshore structures, and thereby make “Conditions of Classification” more readily a common Rule of the various ABS Rules and Guides, as appropriate. Thus, Part 1, Chapter 1 of these Rules specifies only the unique requirements applicable to floating production installations. These supplemental requirements are always to be used with the aforementioned Rules for Conditions of Classification – Offshore Units and Structures (Part 1). ABS RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING FLOATING PRODUCTION INSTALLATIONS • 2021 ii RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING FLOATING PRODUCTION INSTALLATIONS CONTENTS PART 1 Conditions of Classification............................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1 Scope and Conditions of Classification............................. 1 PART 3 Installation Types, Functions, Features and General Requirements..................................................................................... 24 CHAPTER 1 General Description......................................................... 25 CHAPTER 2 Design Basis and Environmental Loading....................... 35 CHAPTER 3 General Requirements.....................................................48 CHAPTER 4 Installation, Hook-up, and Commissioning...................... 55 APPENDIX 1 Abbreviations and References.........................................62 PART 4 Process and Import/Export Systems............................................... 67 CHAPTER 1 Hydrocarbon Production and Process Systems.............. 68 CHAPTER 2 Import and Export Systems............................................. 84 PART 5A Ship-Type Installations......................................................................93 CHAPTER 1 Design Considerations.....................................................95 CHAPTER 2 Additional Design Considerations for Conversions to FPI................................................................................. 126 CHAPTER 3 Structural Design Requirements....................................156 CHAPTER 4 Ship-Type Installations Under 150 meters (492 feet) in Length........................................................................453 PART 5B Other Installation Types.................................................................. 484 CHAPTER 1 Column-Stabilized Installations......................................485 CHAPTER 2 Tension Leg Platforms................................................... 506 CHAPTER 3 Spar Installations........................................................... 536 APPENDIX 1 .......................................................................................566 PART 6 Mooring Systems............................................................................. 573 CHAPTER 1 Position Mooring Systems............................................. 574 ABS RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING FLOATING PRODUCTION INSTALLATIONS • 2021 iii PART 7 Surveys............................................................................................. 580 CHAPTER 1 Surveys During Installation and Commissioning........... 581 CHAPTER 2 Surveys After Construction............................................ 595 APPENDIX 1 .......................................................................................667 ABS RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING FLOATING PRODUCTION INSTALLATIONS • 2021 iv PART 1 Conditions of Classification CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 Scope and Conditions of Classification............................................ 1 Section 1 Classification (1 January 2008)......................................... 3 Section 2 System Classification, Symbols and Notations (1 January 2008)....................................................................4 Section 3 Rules and the Criteria Presented for Classification ........ 18 Section 4 Submission of Plans, Data and Calculations .................. 20 ABS RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING FLOATING PRODUCTION INSTALLATIONS • 2021 1 This Page Intentionally Left Blank PART 1 C H A P T E R 1 Scope and Conditions of Classification CONTENTS SECTION 1 Classification (1 January 2008).......................................................... 3 SECTION 2 System Classification, Symbols and Notations (1 January 2008)......................................................................................................4 1 Classification Boundaries .............................................................. 4 3 Classification Symbols and Notations (1 July 2012).......................4 3.1 New Construction.............................................................. 5 3.3 Conversion to FPI.............................................................. 5 3.5 Floating Offshore Installation............................................. 6 5 Additional Class Notations..............................................................6 5.1 Disconnectable System..................................................... 6 5.3 Classification of Dynamic Positioning and Thruster Assisted Mooring Systems................................................ 6 5.5 Classification of Additional Equipment and Systems (1 July 2012)...................................................................... 7 5.7 Dynamic Loading Approach (DLA) (2017).........................7 5.9 Strength Criteria for Ship-Type Installations (1 July 2012)..................................................................................7 5.10 Strength Criteria for Other Installation Types (1 July 2012)..................................................................................9 5.11 Design Life and Design Fatigue Life (1 July 2012)............ 9 5.12 Spectral Fatigue Analysis (2017).....................................13 5.13 Additional Corrosion Margin (1 March 2006)................... 13 5.15 Hull Construction Monitoring Program.............................14 5.17 Brazilian Regulatory Compliance.....................................14 7 ✠ AMS Notation (2017)................................................................16 9 Notations for Automatic or Remote Control and Monitoring Systems........................................................................................17 9.1 ✠ ACC or ✠ ACCU Notations (October 2001)............... 17 9.3 ✠ AMCC or ✠ AMCCU Notations (March 2003)............ 17 11 Temporary Mooring Equipment Symbol .......................................17 13 Conversion of Existing Vessels or Floating Structures................. 17 ABS RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING FLOATING PRODUCTION INSTALLATIONS • 2021 1 15 Significant Change of Operating Conditions Affecting Safety of Unit or Personnel (1 July 2012)................................................ 17 TABLE 1 Regulatory Documents.........................................................15 SECTION 3 Rules and the Criteria Presented for Classification ...................... 18 1 Application.................................................................................... 18 1.1 General (1 July 2009)...................................................... 18 1.3 Application (1 July 2009)................................................. 18 3 Reference Standards....................................................................18 5 Risk Evaluations for Alternative Arrangements and Novel Features (April 2004)....................................................................19 SECTION 4 Submission of Plans, Data and Calculations ................................. 20 1 Design Plans and Data (1 March 2006)........................................20
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Hansard Acronyms List Remember: Ctrl+F for Quick Searches
    Federal Hansard Acronyms List Remember: Ctrl+F for quick searches A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A 2.5G [the first packet overlays on 2G networks] 2G second generation [the first generation of digital cellular networks, as opposed to analog] 3G third generation [next generation of cellular networks] 3GPP 3G Partnership Project [global standards body to oversee 3G] 4D meat from dead, dying, diseased or disabled animals 4GL fourth-generation language [computers] A&C automation and control A&D admission and disposition; alcohol and drugs A&E accident and emergency A&RMC formerly Austin & Repatriation Medical Centre [now Austin Health] AA anti-aircraft; Alcoholics Anonymous; Athletics Australia AAA Agriculture Advancing Australia; Australian Automobile Association; Australian Archaeological Association; Australian Airports Association AAAA Aerial Agricultural Association of Australia AAAE Australian Association of Automotive Electricians AAAGP Australian Association of Academic General Practice AAALAC Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International AAB Australian Associated Brewers AAC Aboriginal advisory committee; Australian Arabic Council; AARNet Advisory Committee AACAP ATSIC-Army Community Assistance Program AACC Aboriginal Affairs Coordinating Committee [WA]; Australian Association of Career Counsellors AACM Australian Association for Computational Mechanics AACS Australian Associations of Christian Schools [note: Associations—plural] AACV Australian Association of Cattle Veterinarians AAD Australian Antarctic Division [Department of the Environment and Heritage] AADCP ASEAN-Australia Development Cooperation Program [taking over AAECP] AADS advanced air defence simulator AADT average annual daily traffic AaE Australian air Express Pty Ltd AAEC Antarctic Animal Ethics Committee AAECP ASEAN-Australia Economic Cooperation Program [finishes in 2005] AAFCANS Army and Air Force Canteen Service [now known as Frontline Defence Services] AAGP Australian Association of Group Psychotherapists Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Annona Coriacea Mart. Fractions Promote Cell Cycle Arrest and Inhibit Autophagic Flux in Human Cervical Cancer Cell Lines
    molecules Article Annona coriacea Mart. Fractions Promote Cell Cycle Arrest and Inhibit Autophagic Flux in Human Cervical Cancer Cell Lines Izabela N. Faria Gomes 1,2, Renato J. Silva-Oliveira 2 , Viviane A. Oliveira Silva 2 , Marcela N. Rosa 2, Patrik S. Vital 1 , Maria Cristina S. Barbosa 3,Fábio Vieira dos Santos 3 , João Gabriel M. Junqueira 4, Vanessa G. P. Severino 4 , Bruno G Oliveira 5, Wanderson Romão 5, Rui Manuel Reis 2,6,7,* and Rosy Iara Maciel de Azambuja Ribeiro 1,* 1 Experimental Pathology Laboratory, Federal University of São João del Rei—CCO/UFSJ, Divinópolis 35501-296, Brazil; [email protected] (I.N.F.G.); [email protected] (P.S.V.) 2 Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos 14784-400, Brazil; [email protected] (R.J.S.-O.); [email protected] (V.A.O.S.); [email protected] (M.N.R.) 3 Laboratory of Cell Biology and Mutagenesis, Federal University of São João del Rei—CCO/UFSJ, Divinópolis 35501-296, Brazil; [email protected] (M.C.S.B.); [email protected] (F.V.d.S.) 4 Special Academic Unit of Physics and Chemistry, Federal University of Goiás, Catalão 75704-020, Brazil; [email protected] (J.G.M.J.); [email protected] (V.G.P.S.) 5 Petroleomic and forensic chemistry laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Federal Institute of Espirito Santo, Vitória, ES 29075-910, Brazil; [email protected] (B.G.O.); [email protected] (W.R.) 6 Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), Medical School, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal 7 3ICVS/3B’s-PT Government Associate Laboratory, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal * Correspondence: [email protected] (R.M.R.); [email protected] (R.I.M.d.A.R.); Tel.: +55-173-321-6600 (R.M.R.); +55-3736-904-484 or +55-3799-1619-155 (R.I.M.d.A.R.) Received: 25 September 2019; Accepted: 29 October 2019; Published: 1 November 2019 Abstract: Plant-based compounds are an option to explore and perhaps overcome the limitations of current antitumor treatments.
    [Show full text]
  • ML19092A066.Pdf
    r .. - .. - .. - .. - .. - .. - .. 8.- .. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -r- .. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -i .. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. I.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. 6.- .. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -1- .. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -s- .. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -. f .- .. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. 4.- .. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -1- .. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -3- .. - .. - .. - .. - .. - .. - .. I.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. 2.- .. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -1- .. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -·1- .. -.. - .. - .. - .. - .. - .. l CSAS ____ I 5OPENS ' ' ' [] ~® H v --017 ' I Cl S-A CLOSES TEST ;--- -s ~---<0 CONN. & DRAIN CSAS I ~---: ' STARTS I n ' I' ' I r- * 0 ' ' u 048-HCB-4 ' ' I C I NOZZLE! ' ITJ : i ~....L..._t-~::---1~------ -(0 TEST ' ' 'i' CONN. / NOTES 2 & 3 l..'..J~ ' A 0 ' u n r;ID ---~---:-n__ I PENI2Jl A I CONTAINMENT HV L 1 '---"'017 SPFiiAY PUMP (FE "' ~ -·-· v ~ 017 ,'Y :': r: . 0006 .. 7_ I' I _, 1- \@005 ' ' M-! 2GL01 ~- --- J-, ~ .. !i! L--,,.-,-_l r- --- I SEE < GCB HCB I ~ 049-HCB-2 l/2 I I NOTE 5 ( Vl ( c- 7J TO OA0009 1/ C I NOZZLE! ~---~ : "'"8 n ( B- 61 -(0 ?-:-- I P-eg I ::.. r04!-HCB-!0 - ~ I '-I L_~-L.....J~==---1CJf;J------ ~ B'X 10' lr-----~0~03~-~G~C=B--1~0~------------------r-----~,-~~~~~~0~40~-~H=C=B~-1,0~--..--~~,~--L~~,-~~D<}--------.------L-. __ ~r- 041-HCB-6 r­.__ I /2' T. C. [- ~ :, I > ~002) f::J- v:~~~4 II LJ 0:0--:-HCB-3/~ • V0~ V00~4 "'iii .__ ~ 1\ ~ ~ ... 1,'! l~]' \_ 041 -HCB-2 I /2 3/8' . j ... ,,.. ~_j l' X 314'- ._- 040-HCB-1 .;,;;j I 3 NOZZLES>' ~ t ~ ~ ss \ ,7 i!l 1 s \'"' •I" ~ Vlilt 28 - -~ Ur-...~ ~: TUB! NG- --._ ~ ..-,~I"~ _'I"~ ~ Io G 2 001- HCB-/14 0 GCB GCD ;7 ~ ;7 M • •z CTMT. RECI RC. 0 ~R\~~ 8 u .... _ I S 00 u SUMP 7~ C) 1"(0) ., "':I: <S>N u 3/ 4' " ., ~ hrl!:'l .._ ~ I 2' X I 4' ~tA' ~> • M-1 2EJ"I L,'> ~ FILL VENT CD > II <f 0 M ~;~~ u c E- 8> V0002 NOTE 4 --;= I .
    [Show full text]
  • Manuel Du HCB Pour L'utilisation Confinée D'organismes
    Manuel du HCB pour l’utilisation confinée d’organismes génétiquement modifiés Rueda CC IRRI CC IRRI Mafunyane CC Mafunyane Haut Conseil des biotechnologies 244 boulevard Saint-Germain 75007 Paris Remerciements Ce document est le résultat d'un travail collectif des membres du collège confiné1 du Comité scientifique du Haut Conseil des biotechnologies (HCB) lors de son premier mandat (2009- 2014) 2 , composé de : Jean-Christophe Pagès, Président, Jean-Jacques Leguay, Vice-Président, Elie Dassa, coordinateur, et par ordre alphabétique : Claude Bagnis, Pascal Boireau, Jean-Luc Darlix, Hubert de Verneuil, Robert Drillien, Anne Dubart-Kupperschmitt, Claudine Franche, Philippe Guerche, André Jestin, Bernard Klonjkowski, Olivier Le Gall, Didier Lereclus, Daniel Parzy, Patrick Saindrenan, Pascal Simonet et Jean-Luc Vilotte. Le Comité scientifique du HCB tient à remercier pour leur relecture critique, l'association Organibio, M. Bernard Cornillon (INSERM, risques biologiques). Le HCB remercie par ailleurs les experts qui ont contribué à la rédaction de l'ouvrage "PRINCIPES DE CLASSEMENT ET GUIDES OFFICIELS DE LA COMMISSION DE GENIE GENETIQUE" (publié en 1993 sous le double timbre du Ministère de la Recherche et du Ministère de l’Aménagement du Territoire et de l’Environnement), document dont la teneur a largement inspiré la rédaction du présent manuel. 1 Sous-ensemble d’experts du Comité scientifique traitant des questions spécifiques aux biotechnologies destinées à un usage en milieu confiné. 2 L’équipe du HCB tient à remercier Marion Pillot (Chargée de mission) pour son travail éditorial sur la première version du manuel. Avant-propos du Président du Comité scientifique du HCB Le présent manuel, supervisé par le CS du HCB, est la deuxième version d’un texte d’aide à la déclaration de l’usage d’OGM dans un environnement confiné.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Aspects of New Trucks and Lightweight Cars, Car 2
    Safety Aspects of New Trucks and Lightweight Cars, Car 2 Interim Report March 1991 12- SafetY DISCLAIMER This document is disseminated under the sponsorship ofthe Department ofTransportation in the interest ofinformation exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4 T~tleand Subtitle 5. Report Date Safcty Aspects of New Trucks March 1991 and Lightweight Cars, Car 2 (Interim Report) o 6. Performing Organization Code 7 Author($) Association of American Railroatls Nicholas G.Wilson 8. Performing Organization Report No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) 11. Contract or Grant No. Association of American Railroads Trans ortation Test Center DTFR53-82-GO0282 P.O. I! OX 11l.30 Task Order 29 Pueblo, CO 81001 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report or Period Covered U.S. Department of Transportation January 1987 - December 1989 Federal Railroad Administration Washington, D.C. 20590 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract Thc Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) has s onsored a program to continue the validation of ncw lcchniques for testing and analysis that could be app\ed to the evaluation of the safety and track worthiness aspccts of new freight car and suspension designs. The total program involves laboratory and on-track rcsling, and simulation of tests using a computer model.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Superior Court of the State of Washington 7 in and for the County of Skagit
    1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON 7 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SKAGIT 8 9 FAMILIAS UNIDAS POR LA JUSTICIA, No. AFL-CIO and UNITED FARM WORKERS 10 OF AMERICA, EMERGENCY PETITION FOR labor organizations, JUDICIAL REVIEW, DECLARATORY 11 JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTIVE Petitioners, RELIEF 12 vs. 13 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF 14 LABOR & INDUSTRIES and WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF 15 HEALTH, 16 Respondents. 17 I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 18 1.00 Familias Unidas por la Justicia, AFL-CIO (FUJ) and the United Farm Workers of 19 America (UFW) seek immediate injunctive relief to require the Department of Labor & 20 Industries and the Department of Health to adopt emergency rules related to the COVID-19 21 pandemic to protect the lives of all Washington farmworkers. 22 23 EMERGENCY PETITION FOR JUDICIAL Columbia Legal Services REVIEW, DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND 711 Capitol Way S #706 INJUNCTIVE RELIEF - 1 Olympia, WA 98501 (360) 943-6260 (360) 754-4578 (fax) 1 1.01 FUJ, UFW, and others sent a plea to Governor Inslee on March 19, 2020 for 2 emergency orders to protect farmworkers. This plea asked for specific mandates, but L&I and 3 DOH responded on April 3, 2020 by putting forth non-binding guidance—the worst of which 4 was the DOH guidance suggesting that labor camp operators could “isolate” farmworkers by 5 putting sick workers on one side of a bedroom and healthy workers on the other side of the same 6 room. (April 3, 2020 guidance is attached as Exhibit 1.) 7 1.02 Following the issuance of this guidance, FUJ, UFW, and others petitioned L&I 8 and DOH on April 6, 2020 to adopt emergency rules pursuant to RCW 34.05.350(1)(a) no later 9 than April 10, 2020 to protect farmworkers’ lives and their health.
    [Show full text]
  • SELECTION POLICY for CANADIAN PARA-CYCLING TEAMS Issued & Effective from April 1, 2013
    SELECTION POLICY FOR CANADIAN PARA-CYCLING TEAMS Issued & Effective from April 1, 2013 Note: In case of any wording discrepancies between the English and French versions of the selection policy, the English wording takes precedence. INTRODUCTION This Policy is in two parts. Part A sets out the background and procedure for selection of riders to all Canadian Road Pools and Teams. Part B sets out the general Selection Criteria and Schedules 1 to 3 set out the Specific Selection Criteria for each Category, namely: Schedule 1 – General competition and training camp programs ........ p. 11 Schedule 2 – Para-cycling road worlds’ ................................................. p. 18 Schedule 3 – Para-cycling track worlds .................................................. p. 20 Appendix 1 – Road time standards……………………………………………………..p. 22 Appendix 2 – Track time standards……………………………………………………. p. 23 1 2013 Selection Policy for 2013 Para-cycling teams | Cycling CANADA PART A - GENERAL Part A of this Policy sets out the scope and purpose of the Policy, who it applies to, the procedure of the Cycling CANADA Cyclisme (CC) Selection Committee, the eligibility and communication requirements for riders seeking selection and how this Policy can be amended. 1. SCOPE AND PURPOSE OF POLICY a. This Policy is issued by CC to clearly set out the process and criteria on which riders will be selected to be members of the Road Pools and Teams for the period 1 March, 2013 to 31 December, 2013. b. Subject to clauses 1.c (Part A) and 12.d (Part B), this Policy covers the selection of riders to Pools and Teams for the following Programs: •Greenville, USA P1 •Baie-Comeau, CAN •TBC •Road WC #1, ITA •Road WC #2, ESP •Nationals Dev camp, CAN •Road WC #3 (HP), CAN •Road WC #3 (Dev), CAN General competition and Road World Track World training camp Championships Championships programs c.
    [Show full text]
  • IAEA TECDOC SERIES Integrated Integrated of Mechanical Components for Fusion to Safety Classification Approach Applications
    IAEA-TECDOC-1851 IAEA-TECDOC-1851 IAEA TECDOC SERIES Integrated Approach to Safety Classification of Mechanical Components for Fusion ApplicationsApproach to Safety Classification of Mechanical Components for Fusion Integrated IAEA-TECDOC-1851 Integrated Approach to Safety Classification of Mechanical Components for Fusion Applications International Atomic Energy Agency Vienna ISBN 978-92-0-105518-7 ISSN 1011–4289 @ INTEGRATED APPROACH TO SAFETY CLASSIFICATION OF MECHANICAL COMPONENTS FOR FUSION APPLICATIONS The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN GERMANY PALAU ALBANIA GHANA PANAMA ALGERIA GREECE PAPUA NEW GUINEA ANGOLA GRENADA PARAGUAY ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA GUATEMALA PERU ARGENTINA GUYANA PHILIPPINES ARMENIA HAITI POLAND AUSTRALIA HOLY SEE PORTUGAL AUSTRIA HONDURAS QATAR AZERBAIJAN HUNGARY REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA BAHAMAS ICELAND ROMANIA BAHRAIN INDIA BANGLADESH INDONESIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION BARBADOS IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF RWANDA BELARUS IRAQ SAINT VINCENT AND BELGIUM IRELAND THE GRENADINES BELIZE ISRAEL SAN MARINO BENIN ITALY SAUDI ARABIA BOLIVIA, PLURINATIONAL JAMAICA SENEGAL STATE OF JAPAN SERBIA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JORDAN SEYCHELLES BOTSWANA KAZAKHSTAN SIERRA LEONE BRAZIL KENYA SINGAPORE BRUNEI DARUSSALAM KOREA, REPUBLIC OF SLOVAKIA BULGARIA KUWAIT SLOVENIA BURKINA FASO KYRGYZSTAN SOUTH AFRICA BURUNDI LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC SPAIN CAMBODIA REPUBLIC SRI LANKA CAMEROON LATVIA SUDAN CANADA LEBANON SWEDEN CENTRAL AFRICAN LESOTHO SWITZERLAND REPUBLIC LIBERIA CHAD LIBYA SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Guide
    US PARACYCLING ROAD CHAMPIONSHIPS Road, Time Trial, Criterium June 22 - 27, 2010 USAC Permit#2010-1529 Technical Guide 1 Contents General ................................................................................................................... 3 SPONSORS ................................................................................................ 3 GENERAL .................................................................................................. 6 ELIGIBILITY ............................................................................................... 6 REGISTRATION ........................................................................................... 6 PACKET PICK-UP ......................................................................................... 6 EQUIPMENT AND GEAR RESTRICTIONS................................................................ 7 GENERAL REGULATIONS ................................................................................ 7 NEUTRAL SUPPORT ...................................................................................... 7 RESULTS .................................................................................................. 7 ANTI-DOPING ............................................................................................. 7 AWARDS ................................................................................................... 8 MEDIA ..................................................................................................... 8 MEDICAL FACILITIES ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IPC Classification
    A guide to current Internaonal Paralympic Commiee Classificaons Archery is open to athletes with a physical impairment and classificaon is broken up into three classes: ARW1: spinal cord and cerebral palsy athletes with impairment in all four limbs ARW2: wheelchair users with full arm funcon ARST (standing): athletes who have no impairments in their arms but who have some impairment in their legs. This group also includes amputees, les autres and cerebral palsy standing athletes. Some athletes in the standing group will sit on a high stool for support but will sll have their feet touching the ground. Athlecs uses a system of leers and numbers is used to disnguish between them. A leer F is for field athletes, T represents those who compete on the track, and the number shown refers to their impairment. 11-13: track and field athletes who are visually impaired 20: track and field athletes who are intellectually disabled 31-38: track and field athletes with cerebral palsy 41-46: track and field amputees and les autres T 51-56: wheelchair track athletes F 51-58: wheelchair field athletes Blind athletes compete in class 11 and are permied to run with a sighted guide, while field athletes in the class are allowed the use of acousc signals, for example electronic noises, clapping or voices, if they compete in the 100m, long jump or triple jump. Athletes in classes 42, 43 and 44 must wear a prosthesis while compeng, but this is oponal for classes 45 and 46. Boccia (a bowling game) is open to athletes with cerebral palsy and other severe physical impairments (eg, muscular dystrophy) who compete from a wheelchair, with classificaon split into four classes: BC1 : Athletes may compete with the help of an assistant, who must remain outside the athlete's playing box.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Manual for Structural Stainless Steel 4Th Edition
    DESIGN MANUAL FOR STRUCTURAL STAINLESS STEEL 4TH EDITION DESIGN MANUAL FOR STRUCTURAL STAINLESS STEEL 4TH EDITION SCI PUBLICATION P413 DESIGN MANUAL FOR STRUCTURAL STAINLESS STEEL 4TH EDITION i SCI (The Steel Construction Institute) is the leading, independent provider of technical expertise and disseminator of best practice to the steel construction sector. We work in partnership with clients, members and industry peers to help build businesses and provide competitive advantage through the commercial application of our knowledge. We are committed to offering and promoting sustainable and environmentally responsible solutions. Our service spans the following areas: Membership Consultancy Individual & corporate membership Development Product development Advice Engineering support Members advisory service Sustainability Information Assessment Publications SCI Assessment Education Events & training Specification Websites Engineering software Front cover credits Top left: Top right: Canopy, Napp Pharmaceutical, Cambridge, UK Skid for offshore regasification plant, Grade 1.4401, Courtesy: m-tec Grade 1.4301, Courtesy: Montanstahl Bottom left: Bottom right: Dairy Plant at Cornell University, College of Águilas footbridge, Spain Agriculture and Life Sciences, Grade 1.4462, Courtesy Acuamed Grade 1.4301/7, Courtesy: Stainless Structurals © 2017 SCI. All rights reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study or criticism or review, Publication Number: SCI P413 as permitted under the Copyright Designs and Patents Act, 1988, this publication may not be ISBN 13: 978-1-85942-226-7 reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing Published by: of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic SCI, Silwood Park, Ascot, reproduction only in accordance with the terms of Berkshire.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Elite/U23/Junior/Paracycling Nat Champ Tech Guide
    2009 USA Cycling Elite/U23/Junior National Road Cycling Championships & US Paracycling National Time Trial Championships July 27 – Aug 2, 2009 Bend, Oregon USAC Permit#09-2100 Technical Guide Contents Table of Contents General ................................................................................................................... 3 SPONSORS ................................................................................................... 3 STAFF & ORGANIZATION .................................................................................. 3 ELIGIBILITY .................................................................................................. 5 REGISTRATION .............................................................................................. 7 PACKET PICK -UP ............................................................................................ 7 EQUIPMENT AND GEAR RESTRICTIONS .................................................................. 8 GENERAL REGULATIONS ................................................................................... 8 NEUTRAL SUPPORT ......................................................................................... 8 RESULTS ...................................................................................................... 8 ANTI -DOPING ................................................................................................ 8 AWARDS ...................................................................................................... 9 MEDIA .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]