Construction Analysis

Intel 266MHz 32-Bit II (Klamath) Processor

Report Number: SCA 9706-542

miconducto Se r I l nd a u b s o t l r G y

e S h i t n

c

g e

n

i

1

v

9

r

6

e

4 S

¨

15022 N. 75th Street Scottsdale, AZ 85260-2476 Phone: 602-998-9780 Fax: 602-948-1925 e-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.ice-corp.com/ice INDEX TO TEXT

TITLE PAGE

INTRODUCTION 1 MAJOR FINDINGS 1

TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION Assembly 2 Die Process 2 - 3

ANALYSIS RESULTS I Assembly 4 - 5

ANALYSIS RESULTS II Die Process and Design 6 - 9

ANALYSIS PROCEDURE 10

TABLES Overall Evaluation 11 Package Markings 12 Wirestrength Results 12 Die Material Analysis 12 Horizontal Dimensions 13 Vertical Dimensions 14

- i - INTRODUCTION

This report describes a construction analysis of the 266MHz Pentium II (Klamath) Processor. Two samples were used for the analysis. The devices were received in 540-pin BGA () packages with a metal heatsink.

MAJOR FINDINGS

Questionable Items:1

¥ Quality of die manufacturing was good and we found no areas of quality concerns.

Special Features:

¥ Four metal, P-epi, CMOS process (not BiCMOS).

¥ All metal levels employed stacked tungsten via/contact plugs.

¥ Chemical-mechanical-planarization (CMP).

¥ Oxide-filled shallow-trench isolation.

¥ Titanium silicided diffusion structures.

¥ Aggressive feature sizes (reported 0.28 micron, measured 0.25 micron gates).

¥ Beveled die edges at top of die.

1These items present possible quality or reliability concerns. They should be discussed with the manufacturer to determine their possible impact on the intended application. - 1 - TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION

Assembly:

¥ The devices were packaged in 540-pin BGA (Ball Grid Array) packages. A metal heatsink was employed on the top of the package. The die was mounted cavity down.

¥ Eight decoupling capacitors were present on top of the package.

¥ The BGA was constructed of fiberglass in which the package cavity was employed. The package was covered with a green conformal coating. The cavity was filled with black plastic material.

¥ Triple tier package lands plated with gold.

¥ Ultrasonic wedge wirebonding using gold wire. Wirebonds (to the die and package lands) had double “footprints.”

¥ Sawn dicing (full depth). The edges of the die had been beveled at the surface.

¥ Silver-epoxy die attach. The backside of the die was plated with gold.

Die Process:

¥ Fabrication process: Oxide-filled shallow-trench isolation, CMOS process apparently employing twin-wells in a P-epi on a P substrate.

¥ Die coat: A thin patterned polyimide die coat was present over the entire die.

¥ Final passivation: A single layer of nitride.

- 2 - TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION (continued)

¥ Metallization: Four levels of metal defined by dry-etch techniques. All consisted of aluminum with titanium-nitride caps (except M4). Metal 4 employed a substantial titanium adhesion layer. There appeared to be evidence of very thin titanium adhesion layers under metals 1 - 3. Tungsten plugs were employed for all vertical interconnect. Metals 2 - 4 employed tungsten plugs with “stubs” underneath, for improved contact. The “stubs” penetrated into the metal below the tungsten plus. This is a unique processing feature. All plugs were lined with titanium-nitride. Stacked vias were employed at all levels.

¥ Interlevel dielectrics 1, 2 and 3: The interlevel dielectric between all metals consisted of the same structure. A very thin glass was deposited first, followed by two thick layers of glass. The second layer had rounded corners around metal sidewalls. The third layer of glass was planarized by CMP.

¥ Pre-metal glass: A thick layer of glass followed by a thin layer of glass. This dielectric was also planarized by CMP.

¥ Polysilicon: A single layer of dry-etched polycide (poly and titanium-silicide). This layer was used to form all gates on the die. Nitride sidewall spacers were used to provide the LDD spacing.

¥ Diffusions: Implanted N+ and P+ diffusions formed the sources/drains of . Titanium was sintered into the diffusions (salicide process). No bipolar devices appeared to be present.

¥ Isolation: Isolation consisted of oxide-filled shallow-trenches.

¥ Wells: Twin-wells in a P-epi on a P substrate.

¥ SRAM: On-chip Level 1 data and instruction Cache memory cell arrays (16KByte each) were employed. The memory cells used a 6T CMOS SRAM cell design.

¥ No redundancy fuses were found.

- 3 - ANALYSIS RESULTS I

Assembly : Figures 1 - 8

Questionable Items:1 None.

Special Features:

¥ Beveled die edges.

¥ Unique double “footprint” wirebonding technique.

¥ Extremely tight bond pitch (80 microns).

General items:

¥ The devices were packaged in 540-pin BGAs. A metal heatsink was employed on top of the packages. The die was mounted cavity down. They were constructed of fiberglass and were covered with a green conformal coating. The cavity was filled with black plastic material. Eight decoupling capacitors were employed on top of the packages.

¥ Overall package quality: Good. No defects were found on the external or internal portions of the packages. Solder ball placement was good. No voids were noted in the plastic cavity fill.

¥ Wirebonding: Ultrasonic wedge bond method using 0.9 mil gold wire. All wirebonds had a double “footprint” which is the first time we’ve seen this type of bonding used on these types of devices. A three tier package land structure was used. Wire spacing and placement was good. Bond pitch was very close (80 microns); however, no problems were noted.

1These items present possible quality or reliability concerns. They should be discussed with the manufacturer to determine their possible impact on the intended application. - 4 - ANALYSIS RESULTS I (continued)

¥ Die attach: Silver-epoxy die attach of good quality. No voids were noted in the die attach. The backside of the die was plated with gold.

¥ Die dicing: Die separation was by full depth sawing and showed normal quality workmanship. No large chips or cracks were present at the die edges. The top edges of the die had been beveled (see Figures 7 and 8). This is highly unusual and it is not apparent why it is done.

- 5 - ANALYSIS RESULTS II

Die Process and Design: Figures 9 - 49

Questionable Items:1

¥ No items of concern were found in the area of die fabrication.

Special Features:

¥ Four metal, twin-well, P-epi, CMOS process.

¥ All vertical interconnect employed tungsten via/contact plugs.

¥ Chemical-mechanical-planarization (CMP).

¥ Oxide-filled shallow-trench isolation.

¥ Titanium salicided diffusion structures.

¥ Aggressive feature sizes (0.25 micron gates).

General Items:

¥ Fabrication process: Oxide-filled shallow-trench isolation, CMOS process apparently employing twin-wells in a P-epi on a P substrate. No problems were found in the process.

¥ Design implementation: Die layout was clean and efficient. Alignment was good at all levels.

¥ Design features: Slotted bus lines were employed to relieve stress. Anti-dishing patterns were employed for planarization purposes. Numerous unconnected metal 4 vias (which appear to be used for probing purposes) were present.

¥ Surface defects: No toolmarks, masking defects, or contamination areas were found. - 6 - ANALYSIS RESULTS II (continued)

¥ Die coat: A patterned polyimide die coat was present over the entire die surface.

¥ Final passivation: A single layer of nitride. Coverage was good. Edge seal was also good as the passivation extended to the scribe lane to seal the metallization.

¥ Metallization: Four levels of metallization. All consisted of aluminum with titanium-nitride caps (except M4). Metal 4 employed a fairly thick titanium adhesion layer. The other levels probably used a titanium layer too thin to detect. Tungsten plugs were employed under all metals. Holes (voids) were noted in the center of some tungsten plugs (mainly metals 3 and 4). Although this indicates incomplete fill of the via holes no problems are foreseen. All plugs were lined with titanium-nitride underneath and the presumed titanium layer over top.

¥ Metal patterning: All metal levels were defined by a dry etch of good quality. Metal lines were widened (where needed), where vias made contact to them from above.

¥ Metal defects: None. No voiding, notching or cracking of the metal layers was found. No silicon nodules were found following removal of the metal layers.

¥ Metal step coverage: No metal (aluminum) thinning was present at the connections to the tungsten via plugs. The absence of thinning is due to the good control of plug height and the planarization technique employed.

¥ Vias and contacts: All via and contact cuts were defined by a dry etch of good quality. Again, alignment of the metals and plugs was good. Metals 2 - 4 employed tungsten “stubs” at the bottom of the tungsten plugs. These unique features consisted of stubs of tungsten metallization that penetrate into the underlying aluminum. The profiles of the “stubs” varied quite a lot indicating inconsistency in the processing. Vias and contacts were placed directly over one another (stacked vias). No problems were noted.

- 7 - ANALYSIS RESULTS II (continued)

¥ Interlevel dielectrics: The interlevel dielectric between metal levels consisted of the same oxide structure. A very thin glass was deposited first, followed by two thick layers of glass. The third layer of glass was subjected to CMP which left the surface very planar. The appearance of the second glass layer on ILD 1 was somewhat unusual; however, it does not appear to present a problem. No problems were found with any of these layers.

¥ Pre-metal glass (under metal 1): A thick layer of silicon-dioxide followed by a thin layer of glass. This layer also appeared to have been planarized by chemical- mechanical-planarization. No problems were found.

¥ Polysilicon: A single level of polycide (poly and titanium-silicide) was used. It formed all gates and word lines in the array. Definition was by dry etch of good quality. Nitride sidewall spacers were used throughout and left in place. No problems were found.

¥ Isolation: The device used oxide-filled shallow-trench isolation. The step at the oxide transition was somewhat larger than normally seen.

¥ Diffusions: Implanted N+ and P+ diffusions were used for sources and drains. Titanium was sintered into the diffusions (salicide process) to reduce series resistance. An LDD process was used employing nitride sidewall spacers. No problems were found. No bipolar devices were found on these parts which makes them the first non BiCMOS Pentium parts we’ve seen.

¥ Wells: Apparent twin-wells were used in a P-epi on a P substrate. Definition was normal.

¥ Buried contacts: Not used.

- 8 - ANALYSIS RESULTS II (continued)

¥ SRAM: On-chip Level 1 data and instruction Cache memory cell arrays (16KByte each) were employed. The memory cells used a 6T CMOS SRAM cell design. Metal 4 distributed GND and Vcc to Metal 3. Metal 3 distributed GND and Vcc (via metals 1 and 2) and formed “piggyback” word lines. Metal 2 formed bit lines and metal 1 provided cell interconnect and provided GND and Vcc throughout the cells. Polycide formed the N-channel select and storage transistors and the P- channel pull-up transistors. Cell pitch was 4.1 x 4.8 microns (19 microns2).

¥ No redundancy fuses were noted.

- 9 - PROCEDURE

The devices were subjected to the following analysis procedures:

External inspection

X-ray

Inspect assembly features

Die optical inspection

Wirepull test

Delayer to metal 4 and inspect

Aluminum removal (metal 4) and inspect tungsten plugs

Delayer to metal 3 and inspect

Aluminum removal (metal 3) and inspect tungsten plugs

Delayer to metal 2 and inspect

Aluminum removal (metal 2) and inspect tungsten plugs

Delayer to metal 1 and inspect

Aluminum removal (metal 1) and inspect tungsten plugs

Delayer to polycide/substrate and inspect

Die sectioning (90° for SEM)*

Measure horizontal dimensions

Measure vertical dimensions

Die material analysis

*Delineation of cross-sections is by silicon etch unless otherwise indicated. - 10 - OVERALL QUALITY EVALUATION : Overall Rating: Normal

DETAIL OF EVALUATION

Package integrity G Package markings N Die placement G Wirebond placement G (tight wirebond pitch) Wirebond quality G (double footprints) Dicing quality G (beveled edges) Die attach quality G Die attach method Silver-epoxy Dicing method Sawn Wirebond method Ultrasonic wedge bonds using 0.9 mil gold wire.

Die surface integrity: Toolmarks (absence) G Particles (absence) G Contamination (absence) G Process defects (absence) N General workmanship N Passivation integrity G Metal definition N Metal integrity G Metal registration N Contact coverage N Via/contact registration N Etch control (depth) N

G = Good, P = Poor, N = Normal, NP = Normal/Poor

- 11 - PACKAGE MARKINGS

TOP (heatsink)

Sample 1 C70609 14-0257 (plus coded markings)

Sample 2 (only coded markings)

WIREBOND STRENGTH

# of wires pulled: 90 (30 each tier)

Bond lifts: 0

Force to break - high: 10g

- low: 5g

- avg.: 6.7g

- std. dev.: 0.9

DIE MATERIAL ANALYSIS

Overlay passivation: Single layer of nitride.

Metallization 4: Aluminum with a titanium adhesion layer.

Interlevel dielectrics 1, 2 and 3: A thin layer of glass followed by two thick layers of glass.

Metallization 1 - 3: Aluminum with a titanium-nitride cap and probably a very thin titanium adhesion layer.

Via/contact plugs (M1 - M4) Tungsten (lined with titanium-nitride).

Pre-metal dielectric: Thick layer of silicon-dioxide followed by a thin glass. (No reflow glass).

Polycide: Titanium-silicide on polysilicon.

Salicide on diffusions: Titanium-silicide.

- 12 - HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS

Die size: 13.3 x 14.6 mm (525 x 575 mils) Die area: 195 mm2 (301,875 mils2) Min pad size: 0.07 x 0.15 mm (3 x 5.9 mils) Min pad window: 0.06 x 0.14 mm (2.4 x 5.3 mils) Min pad space: 4 microns Min metal 4 width: 1.6 micron Min metal 4 space: 1.1 micron Min metal 3 width: 0.6 micron Min metal 3 space: 0.55 micron Min metal 2 width: 0.55 micron Min metal 2 space: 0.5 micron Min metal 1 width: 0.4 micron Min metal 1 space: 0.55 micron Min via (M4-to-M3): 0.6 micron Min via (M3-to-M2): 0.6 micron Min via (M2-to-M1): 0.5 micron Min contact: 0.5 micron Min diffusion space: 0.4 micron Min polycide width: 0.25 micron Min polycide space: 0.5 micron Min gate length* - (N-channel): 0.25 micron - (P-channel): 0.25 micron Min gate-to-contact space: 0.3 micron SRAM cell size: 19.7 microns2 SRAM cell pitch: 4.1 x 4.8 microns

*Physical gate length

- 13 - VERTICAL DIMENSIONS

Die thickness: 0.5 mm (20 mils)

Layers:

Passivation: 0.7 micron Metal 4 - aluminum: 1.7 micron - barrier: 0.1 micron - plugs: 0.9 micron (not including “stub”) Interlevel dielectric 3 - glass 3: 0.45 - 1.4 micron - glass 2: 0.4 micron - glass 1: 0.1 micron Metal 3 - cap: 0.05 micron (approximate) - aluminum: 0.75 micron - plugs: 0.7 micron (not including “stub”) Interlevel dielectric 2 - glass 3: 0.4 - 1.3 micron - glass 2: 0.35 micron - glass 1: 0.1 micron Metal 2 - cap: 0.05 micron (approximate) - aluminum: 0.8 micron - plugs: 0.6 micron (not including “stub”) Interlevel dielectric 1 - glass 3: 0.2 - 0.9 micron - glass 2: 0.25 micron - glass 1: 0.1 micron Metal 1 - cap: 0.05 micron (approximate) - aluminum: 0.55 micron - plugs: 0.55 - 0.85 micron Pre-metal glass - glass 2: 0.13 micron - glass 1: 0.3 - 0.7 micron Polycide - silicide: 0.07 micron (approximate) - poly: 0.27 micron Trench oxide: 0.4 micron N+ S/D: 0.2 micron P+ S/D: 0.25 micron N-well: 0.8 micron (approximate) P-epi: 1.6 micron

- 14 - INDEX TO FIGURES

ASSEMBLY Figures 1 - 8

DIE LAYOUT AND IDENTIFICATION Figures 9 - 11

PHYSICAL DIE STRUCTURES Figures 12 - 40

COLOR DRAWING OF DIE STRUCTURE Figure 41

MEMORY CELL Figures 42 - 48

GENERAL CIRCUITRY Figure 49

- ii - Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

Mag. 1.3x

Mag. 1.3x

Mag. 1.2x

Figure 1. Package photographs and x-ray view of the Intel Pentium II Processor. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

Mag. 1.25x

Mag. 3x Figure 2. Cavity views of the package. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

Mag. 30x

BONDING TIERS

GOLD PLATED LAND

GOLD WIRES Mag. 260x

GOLD PLATED LAND

DOUBLE FOOTPRINT

Mag. 1000x

GOLD WIRE

Figure 3. SEM views of typical wirebonding. 60°. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

ALUMINUM BOND PAD

Mag. 410x

GOLD WIRE

Mag. 500x, 60°

DIE COAT

DOUBLE FOOTPRINT

Mag. 1000x, 60°

PAD PUSHOUT

DIE COAT

Figure 4. Optical and SEM views illustrating bond pad pitch and typical bonds. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

BOND

PASSIVATION

Mag. 3500x

METAL 4 (BOND PAD)

METAL 4 (FROM PAD)

METAL 3 Mag. 9000x

METAL 2 (TO CIRCUITRY)

METAL 1

POLY GATE

PAD WINDOW CUTOUT

PASSIVATION

Mag. 10,000x METAL 4 (BOND PAD)

Figure 5. SEM section views of the pad structure. Intel Pentium II Processor

PASSIVATION METAL 4

METAL 4 (FROM PAD)

METAL 3

METAL 2 POLY GATE

METAL 1 Integrated CircuitEngineeringCorporation

N+ S/D

SHALLOW TRENCH OXIDE

Figure 6. SEM section views of an I/O structure. Mag. 6000x. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

Mag. 80x

DIE ATTACH

BEVEL

Mag. 160x

DIE ATTACH

DIE SURFACE

BEVELED EDGE Mag. 350x

Figure 7. SEM views of a die corner illustrating dicing and die attach. 60°. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

DIE SURFACE

Mag. 800x

BEVELED EDGE

DIE SURFACE

Mag. 1600x BEVEL

PASSIVATION

METAL 4

METAL 3 Mag. 6500x

METAL2

METAL 1

N+

Figure 8. SEM section views of the edge seal structure. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

Figure 9. Whole die photograph of the Intel Pentium II Processor. Mag 14x. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

Figure 10. Die identification markings. Mag. 100x. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated CircuitEngineeringCorporation

Figure 11. Optical views of die corners. Mag. 225x. Intel Pentium II Processor

PASSIVATION

METAL 4

METAL 2

M3 PLUG METAL 3 M2 PLUG

M1 PLUG POLY GATES

METAL 1 Integrated CircuitEngineeringCorporation N+ S/D

Figure 12. SEM section view illustrating general device structure. Mag. 6500x. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

PASSIVATION

METAL 4

M4 PLUG

METAL 3 Mag. 8000x

METAL 2 METAL 1

N+ M1 PLUG

PASSIVATION

METAL 4

M4 PLUG METAL 3 Mag. 8400x

METAL 2

POLY GATE METAL 1 M1 PLUG

N+ S/D

PASSIVATION

METAL 4

METAL 3 M3 PLUG Mag. 9000x

M2 PLUG METAL 2

TRENCH OXIDE M1 PLUGS METAL 1

N+

Figure 12a. SEM section views illustrating general device structure. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

METAL 4

ILD 3

ILD 2 METAL 3 METAL 2

ILD 1 METAL 1

POLY GATE M1 PLUGS

METAL 4 METAL 3

ILD 3 DELINEATION ARTIFACTS

METAL 2

M3 PLUGS M2 PLUG

METAL 1

METAL 4

METAL 3

ILD 3

M3 PLUG ILD 2

M2 PLUG ILD 1

METAL 1

TRENCH OXIDE POLY

Figure 13. Glass etch section views illustrating general structure. Mag. 9000x. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

Mag. 2800x

Mag. 5700x Figure 14. SEM views of general passivation coverage. 60°. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

PASSIVATION

METAL 4

Mag. 10,000x

METAL 3

METAL 2

PASSIVATION Mag. 13,000x

METAL 4

ILD 3

PASSIVATION

Mag. 26,000x ALUMINUM 4

Ti BARRIER

Figure 15. SEM section views of metal 4 line profiles. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

Figure 16. Topological SEM view of metal 4 patterning. Mag. 3700x, 0°.

Mag. 3700x

Mag. 7400x

Figure 17. SEM views of general metal 4 coverage. 50°. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

PASSIVATION

METAL 4

Mag. 20,000x

M4 PLUG ILD 3

METAL 3 “STUB”

PASSIVATION

METAL 4 M4 PLUGS

Mag. 15,000x

METAL 3

ALUMINUM 4

Ti BARRIER

W PLUG VOIDS Mag. 35,000x

“STUB” METAL 3

Figure 18. SEM section views of metal 4-to-metal 3 vias. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

VOIDS

M4 PLUGS METAL 3

Mag. 25,000x

VOID

W PLUG

METAL 3

Mag. 35,000x Figure 19. SEM section views of metal 4 plugs. 55°. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

ILD 3

METAL 3

ILD 2

METAL 2

Mag. 20,000x

ILD 3 TiN CAP

DELINEATION ARTIFACT ALUMINUM 3

Mag. 26,000x Figure 20. SEM section views of metal 3 line profiles. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

METAL 3

VIAS (M3-M2)

Mag. 6000x

METAL 3

VIAS (M3-M2)

Mag. 8000x Figure 21. Topological SEM views of metal 3 patterning. 0°. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

Mag. 9000x

METAL 3

Mag. 30,000x

W PLUG

METAL 2

TiN CAP

ALUMINUM 3 Mag. 34,000x

W PLUG

METAL 2

Figure 22. SEM views of metal 3 coverage. 55°. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

VOIDS

METAL 2

M3 PLUGS

Mag. 27,000x

VOID

W PLUG

METAL 2

Mag. 35,000x Figure 23. SEM views of metal 3 plugs. 50°. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

VOID VOID METAL 3

Mag. 20,000x

METAL 2 M3 PLUGS

TiN CAP ALUMINUM 3

VOID

Mag. 40,000x

W PLUG

METAL 2 “STUB”

METAL 3

Mag 30,000x M3 PLUG

ILD 2

METAL 2

Figure 24. SEM section views of metal 3-to-metal 2 vias. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

METAL 3

ILD 2

METAL 2

Mag. 20,000x

TiN CAP ILD 2 DELINEATION ARTIFACT

ALUMINUM 2

ILD 1

Mag. 26,000x Figure 25. SEM section views of metal 2 line profiles. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

METAL 2

PLUG (M3-M2)

Mag. 7000x

METAL 2

VIA (M2-M1)

Mag. 8000x Figure 26. Topological SEM views of metal 2 patterning. 0°. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

Mag. 12,500x

METAL 2

Mag. 26,000x

M2 PLUGS

METAL 1

TiN CAP

ALUMINUM 2 Mag. 35,000x

W PLUG

METAL 1

Figure 27. SEM views of general metal 2 coverage. 55°. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

METAL 3

M3 PLUG

“STUB”

METAL 2

M2 PLUG

METAL 1 “STUB”

Mag. 22,000x

METAL 2

ILD 1

“STUB” METAL 1

Mag. 35,000x

Figure 28. SEM section views of metal 2-to-metal 1 vias. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

METAL 1 ILD 1

PRE-METAL DIELECTRIC

Mag. 26,000x

TiN CAP ILD 1

ALUMINUM 1

Mag. 52,000x Figure 29. SEM section views of metal 1 line profiles. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

METAL 1

PLUGS (M2-M1)

PLUG (M2-M1)

METAL 1

CONTACTS

Figure 30. Topological SEM views of metal 1 patterning. Mag. 7000x, 0°. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

METAL 1

Mag. 9000x

Mag. 13,500x

Figure 31. SEM views of general metal 1 coverage. 55°. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

M1 PLUG

POLY M1 PLUG

Mag. 25,000x

W PLUG

POLY

W PLUG

DIFFUSION

Mag. 40,000x Figure 32. SEM views of metal 1 plugs. 50°. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

M3 PLUG

M2 PLUG Mag. 13,000x

METAL 1 M1 PLUG

N+ POLY

M2 PLUG

METAL 1

Mag. 30,000x

M1 PLUG

POLY

TRENCH OXIDE

N+

ILD 1

METAL 1

Mag. 30,000x PRE-METAL M1 PLUG DIELECTRIC

POLY

TRENCH OXIDE

N+

Figure 33. SEM section views of metal 1 contacts. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

POLY GATES

Mag. 5000x P+ N+

POLY GATES

Mag. 6500x

N+ P+

Mag. 7000x

POLY

Figure 34. Topological SEM view of poly patterning. 0°. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

POLY

Mag. 8400x

TRENCH OXIDE DIFFUSION

POLY Mag. 10,000x

POLY GATE

Mag. 32,000x POLY GATE

DIFFUSION

Figure 35. Perspective SEM views of poly coverage. 55°. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

METAL 2

ILD 1

POLY GATES METAL 1 M1 PLUG Mag. 13,000x

N+ S/D

METAL 1

M1 PLUG

PRE-METAL DIELECTRIC Mag. 26,000x

POLY GATE N+ S/D

POLY GATE

M1 PLUG

Mag. 52,000x

N+ S/D

GATE OXIDE

Figure 36. SEM section views of N-channel transistors. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

POLY GATE

P+ S/D

GATE OXIDE

Ti SILICIDE

NITRIDE SIDEWALL SPACER

POLY

Ti SALICIDE

glass etch Figure 37. SEM section views of P-channel transistors. Mag. 52,000x. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

METAL 2

M1 PLUG

METAL 1 Mag. 13,000x

TRENCH OXIDE

N+ S/D

METAL 1

Mag. 26,000x M1 PLUG POLY

TRENCH OXIDE N+ S/D

M1 PLUG

POLY Mag. 52,000x

TRENCH OXIDE N+ S/D

GATE OXIDE

Figure 38. SEM section view of unique structure. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

SUBSTRATE (DIFFUSION)

TRENCH OXIDE Mag. 10,000x, 55°

Mag. 15,000x

TRENCH OXIDE DIFFUSIONS

Mag. 30,000x

N+ DIFFUSION TRENCH OXIDE

Figure 39. SEM views illustrating anti-dishing patterns. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

POLY Mag. 50,000x

TRENCH OXIDE

GATE OXIDE

POLY Mag. 50,000x

TRENCH OXIDE

GATE OXIDE

Mag. 800x

N-WELL P-EPI

P SUBSTRATE

Figure 40. Section views illustrating trench oxide and well structure. Intel Pentium

INTERLEVEL DIELECTRIC 2 INTERLEVEL DIELECTRIC 1 INTERLEVEL DIELECTRIC 3 PRE-METAL GLASS II Processor METAL 4 PASSIVATION

PLUG 4

METAL 3

PLUG 3

METAL 2

PLUG 2

METAL 1

N-WELL POLY PLUG 1 P-WELL Integrated CircuitEngineeringCorporation

P+ S/D N+ S/D SILICIDE SILICIDE TRENCH OXIDE P-EPI

P SUBSTRATE

 Orange = Nitride, Blue = Metal, Yellow = Oxide, Green = Poly, Red = Diffusion, and Gray = Substrate

Figure 41. Color cross section drawing illustrating device structure. “PIGGYBACK” WORD LINE Intel Pentium

“PIGGYBACK” CONNECTION

V II GND CC Processor

GND VCC BIT LINE

BIT LINE

metal 3 metal 2 VCC

POLY WORD “PIGGYBACK” WORD LINES GND LINES Integrated CircuitEngineeringCorporation BIT LINE CONTACTS

metal 1 poly Figure 42. Topological SEM views of Cache SRAM cells illustrating “piggyback” word line connections. Mag. 6000x, 0°. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

GND VCC

metal 1

P-WELL

N-WELL P-WELL 3 3 2 2 1 1 3 3 2 2 1 1 3 3 2 2 1 1

poly Figure 43. Topological SEM views of the Cache SRAM array. Mag. 5000x, 0°. “PIGGYBACK” WORD LINES Intel Pentium

GND II Processor GND

BIT LINE

BIT LINE VCC

metal 3 metal 2

POLY WORD LINES Integrated CircuitEngineeringCorporation

GND

VCC

metal 1 poly

Figure 44. Perspective SEM views of the Cache SRAM array. Mag. 7400x, 55°. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

BIT GND V CONTACTS CC

metal 1

POLY WORD LINE

N-CHANNEL P-CHANNEL DEVICES DEVICES

delayered Figure 45. Detail SEM views of Cache SRAM cells. Mag. 14,000x, 55°. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

BIT

GND VCC metal 1

BIT

BIT 1

5 3

delayered GND GND VCC

6 4

BIT 2

WORD

3 4

BIT 1 2 BIT

5 6

Figure 46. Topological SEM views and schematic of a Cache SRAM cell. Mag. 15,000x, 0°. Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

METAL 4

METAL 3

Mag. 9000x

POLY WORD LINES METAL 1

N+ S/D

BIT LINE CONTACT

METAL 1 Mag. 13,000x

P+

N+ S/D

POLY SELECT GATE

M1 PLUG

Mag. 52,000x

N+ S/D N+ S/D GATE OXIDE

Figure 47. SEM section views of a Cache SRAM cell (perpendicular to word lines). Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

METAL 4

METAL 3

Mag. 9000x

METAL 2 POLY WORD POLY LINES

METAL 2

Mag. 15,000x POLY WORD LINES

POLY

TRENCH OXIDE

TRENCH OXIDE

METAL 1

POLY WORD LINE Mag. 26,000x

TRENCH OXIDE

N-CHANNEL P-CHANNEL DEVICES DEVICES

Figure 48. SEM section views of a Cache SRAM cell (parallel to storage and pull-up transistors). Intel Pentium II Processor Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

Mag. 410x

NON-CONNECTED VIAS

Mag. 1015x Figure 49. Optical views of general circuit layout.