West Field, Tinian, Marianas Islands Xxi Bomber

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

West Field, Tinian, Marianas Islands Xxi Bomber The Story of The “Billy Mitchell Group” 468 H-Bomb Group – From the C.B.I. to the Marianas 276 WEST FIELD, TINIAN, MARIANAS ISLANDS XXIST BOMBER COMMAND JUNE 1945 THE BIG PUSH IS ON THE WAY © 2008 New England Air Museum. All rights reserved. The Story of The “Billy Mitchell Group” 468 H-Bomb Group – From the C.B.I. to the Marianas 277 468TH BOMBARDMENT GROUP (VH) - JUNE 1945 June was the anniversary month for the 468th Bomb Group. On 5 June 1944 the first B-29 mission flown was directed at Bangkok, Thailand. June 15th of that year, the Group took part in another, more important “first” – the first land based mission against the Japanese home islands. Amongst those of us that are still here with the Group, the twelve succeeding months have been long, hard, and eventful. Thousands of words have been written during the year. The story of America’s new weapon, the B-29 Superfortress, the beginning of the assault on Japan, the longest bombing raids in history, and the new “Global Air Force.” One could go on forever, yet not capture the true meaning behind all of these. Underneath the pretty word picture was the blood and guts spilled, making the project a huge success. Further there was sweat, labor and red tape. Also to be found were good men and bad, efficient and inefficient. Somehow this heterogeneous mass congealed, and in so doing, brought forth the finished product – the most potent striking force in the Air Force today. The finest illustration can be found in the records of the Group’s June operations, which follow. The 468th Bomb Group flew 359 effective long-range bombing sorties against the Japanese homeland. Taking part in 10 missions, the Group averaged 35.9 aircraft per mission and led all other Groups in the Wing in operational performance. All records were shattered as the aerial “Blitz” of Japan went into high gear. The previous highs registered in the months of January and May were totally eclipsed by the figures amassed in June. In nearly every form of comparison the results are more than double the best performance figures of previous months. The box score for the individual missions flown is as follows: The first mission of the month was a daylight incendiary strike on 1 June against Osaka (58th Bomb Wing Field Order #10). The 468th Bomb Group had 35 aircraft airborne of which 32 hit the Primary Target, 1 a Target of Opportunity, with 2 aircraft failing to bomb because of mechanical difficulties. Bombing results were excellent with nearly all aircraft dropping visually from an altitude of 20,500 feet. Air opposition was slight. Sightings by Crew Members identified Jacks, Franks, Nicks, and Irvings - enemy fighter aircraft. Twenty-one attacks and three claims were reported. Flak was encountered at or near the Departure Point on Awaji, from Kobe, and from the target area. At the Primary Target it was meager to intense, accurate to inaccurate, with four of our aircraft reporting minor damage. It was believed that flak accuracy was affected by the heavy smoke spouting up to 25,000 feet from the burned city. A/C 542, Lady Hamilton II, Lt. Johnson, Pilot, 794th Bomb Squadron, was lost with cause unknown. Four days later a “3 Squadron” strike was flown against Kobe. This was Mission #11, another daylight incendiary attack. Thirty-three aircraft were scheduled and airborne. Of this number 32 aircraft bombed the Primary Target and 1 aircraft a Target of Opportunity. Bombing was excellent with the majority of aircraft getting good visual runs at 17,200 feet. Casualties were 1 aircraft lost to enemy action over the target (A/C 665, Capt. Arnold) and A/C 703, Major Mills, which crash landed at Iwo Jima. All members of A/C 703 were unharmed except the Bombardier who received a severe head injury. Air opposition was considered moderate. © 2008 New England Air Museum. All rights reserved. The Story of The “Billy Mitchell Group” 468 H-Bomb Group – From the C.B.I. to the Marianas 278 Approximately 95 enemy aircraft were sighted and 51 attacks reported. Enemy aircraft attacks were not aggressive, with only 2 coordinated attacks noted. A/C 665 was a victim of the fighters. Hit at the Primary Target, it made a valiant effort to reach the sea, but was unsuccessful. Many of the Crew were seen to bail out and it is believed that there was a good chance for all, unless injured by enemy action. The anti-aircraft fire encountered at Kobe was classed as moderate, accurate concentration with a few phosphorous bursts observed. Field Order No. 12, 7 June 1945. The third mission for the month was our first daylight precision attack. 31 aircraft were airborne each carrying twelve 1,000 lb. general-purpose bombs with a destination of the Osaka Arsenal. 27 aircraft bombed the Primary Target, 3 aircraft bombed Targets of Opportunity, with 1 aircraft failing to bomb any target due to mechanical failure. The execution of the mission was greatly hampered by poor weather. All aircraft had to bomb by radar due to a solid front from the Assembly Point over the target area and return. Fighter escort was furnished by P-51s from Iwo Jima. All 3 of our formations described it as excellent with cover furnished from the Assembly Point to the Initial Point, and the Primary Target. There was no enemy air opposition. The first two formations over the target reported flak as meager and inaccurate. The last formation received none. RCM “jamming” and the solid undercast were probably the chief cause of the enemy’s ineffectiveness. There were no personnel casualties, nor damage sustained by our aircraft. Field Order No. 14, 10 June 1945. Tomioka was the next target to face the weight of our bombs. On 10 June 33 aircraft were airborne with all but one bombing the Primary Target. Again weather upset our plans for precision bombing. The undercast over the Japanese mainland was 10/10 causing all aircraft to bomb by radar. Results ranged from poor to good. Some Crews reported their formation’s course onto the target as perfect followed by a glimpse of a few bombs hitting water, with the majority on land. One Crew reported smoke extending to a height of 11,000 feet. Again enemy air opposition was nil with only 7 sightings of enemy aircraft reported. Flak was meager and inaccurate. One Gunner reported seeing two yellow balloons flying at 5,000 feet north of the Primary Target area. There were no losses from the mission. A/C 424 sustained minor flak damage while bombing a Target of Opportunity. Field Order No. 15, 15 June 1945. Weather again plagued the next mission flown by the Group. On 15 June 40 aircraft were airborne for an incendiary strike against the urban area of Osaka. All of the aircraft bombing encountered solid 10/10 “soup” over the Empire. 33 aircraft hit the Primary Target by radar, 4 aircraft bombed Targets of Opportunity, while 3 aircraft failed to bomb for mechanical reasons. Results were unobserved. No opposition from the enemy was reported. No flak, no fighters, no losses! Field Order No. 16, 18 June 1945. Omuta was the next target. With the advent of this mission on 18 June came the new policy designed to knock out the secondary cities of Japan. This city with a population of approximately 200,000 was typical in all respects of many targets to follow. The attack was at night with all aircraft carrying incendiary bombs. 37 aircraft were airborne of which number 34 bombed Omuta, 1 aircraft hit a Target of Opportunity, and 2 aircraft were Early Returns having jettisoned their bombs because of mechanical failure. Again the Group came through unscathed with no losses and no aircraft damage. Crews reported sightings on 12 enemy night fighters, but no © 2008 New England Air Museum. All rights reserved. The Story of The “Billy Mitchell Group” 468 H-Bomb Group – From the C.B.I. to the Marianas 279 attacks were made. Flak at the Primary Target was very meager and inaccurate. Two searchlights were seen on left of course at the Initial Point and one in the target area. A barrage balloon was spotted at the first turning point. Most Crews reported excellent bomb runs and there were visual observations of general conflagration. Weather was from 6/10 to 10/10 undercast at the target. This forced most of the aircraft to bomb by radar, although 6 aircraft managed to drop visually. Field Order No. 17, 20 June 1945. The seventh mission of the 468th Bomb Group during the month was another night incendiary attack against Toyohashi. The mission was unique in that the greatest dangers encountered by the Crews came from the tremendous fires created by their own bombing. Aircraft reported severe turbulence coming from the thermal updrafts. Two aircraft had several Crew Members injured in the violent shake-up. Others reported debris hitting the bottom of the aircraft, smoke and fumes penetrating cabins, damage to bomb bay doors, etc. For totals on this mission, the Group had 38 aircraft airborne of which 35 bombed the Primary Target. Three aircraft were Early Returns. Casualties were confined to the 4 Crew Members injured by the thermal bouncing. None of these were serious, merely minor cuts and contusions. Two aircraft received minor damage. Enemy opposition was slight. There were 15 sightings reported on night fighters with 3 non-aggressive attacks. Flak over the target was of automatic weapons and medium type with the anti-aircraft fire throwing up meager to moderate, inaccurate fire, while the medium was meager and inaccurate.
Recommended publications
  • Reflections and 1Rememb Irancees
    DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A Approved for Public Release Distribution IJnlimiter' The U.S. Army Air Forces in World War II REFLECTIONS AND 1REMEMB IRANCEES Veterans of die United States Army Air Forces Reminisce about World War II Edited by William T. Y'Blood, Jacob Neufeld, and Mary Lee Jefferson •9.RCEAIR ueulm PROGRAM 2000 20050429 011 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved I OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of Information Is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) 2000 na/ 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER Reflections and Rememberances: Veterans of the US Army Air Forces n/a Reminisce about WWII 5b. GRANT NUMBER n/a 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER n/a 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER Y'Blood, William T.; Neufeld, Jacob; and Jefferson, Mary Lee, editors.
    [Show full text]
  • Bendheim Senior Thesis Department of History, Columbia University
    INCENDIARY WARS: The Transformation of United States Air Force Bombing Policy in the WWII Pacific Theater Gilad Bendheim Senior Thesis Department of History, Columbia University Faculty Advisor: Professor Mark Mazower Second Reader: Professor Alan Brinkley INCENDIARY WARS 1 Note to the Reader: For the purposes of this essay, I have tried to adhere to a few conventions to make the reading easier. When referring specifically to a country’s aerial military organization, I capitalize the name Air Force. Otherwise, when simply discussing the concept in the abstract, I write it as the lower case air force. In accordance with military standards, I also capitalize the entire name of all code names for operations (OPERATION MATTERHORN or MATTERHORN). Air Force’s names are written out (Twentieth Air Force), the bomber commands are written in Roman numerals (XX Bomber Command, or simply XX), while combat groups are given Arabic numerals (305th Bomber Group). As the story shifts to the Mariana Islands, Twentieth Air Force and XXI Bomber Command are used interchangeably. Throughout, the acronyms USAAF and AAF are used to refer to the United States Army Air Force, while the abbreviation of Air Force as “AF” is used only in relation to a numbered Air Force (e.g. Eighth AF). Table of Contents: Introduction 3 Part I: The (Practical) Prophets 15 Part II: Early Operations Against Japan 43 Part III: The Road to MEETINGHOUSE 70 Appendix 107 Bibliography 108 INCENDIARY WARS 2 Introduction Curtis LeMay sat awake with his trademark cigar hanging loosely from his pursed ever-scowling lips (a symptom of his Bell’s Palsy, not his demeanor), with two things on his mind.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE AIRCRAFT Into Flames and Plummeted out of Control Toward the Ground
    activation, training, and deployment to the Pacific Theater of Operation (PTO). Chapter Three emphasizes the combat operations of the 315th during the months it was based in the PTO. Finally, Chapter Four summarizes the significance of the strategic air campaign against Japan and the 315th's contribution to that effort. The history of the 315th BombWing is closely linked to the story of the B-29 aircraft Make them the biggest, gun them the flown by the unit and to the mission of the Twentieth Air heaviest, and fly them the farthest! Force, the parent unit of the 315th in the PTO. A brief General H. H. Arnold discussion follows to highlight these relationships. The B-29, struck by the intense flak, suddenly burst THE AIRCRAFT into flames and plummeted out of control toward the ground. The Japanese searchlights had found the B-29 hidden in the night sky, and the antiaircraft batteries quickly inflicted their General Henry H. Arnold spearheaded the develop­ mortal wound on the American heavy bomber. Captain ment of the B-29 aircraft. As early as 1939, Gen Arnold Kenneth Dougherty, an aircraft commander in another B-29 pursued the development of a very long-range, very heavy that night, gave his account of the incident. bomber in anticipation of future air power requirements. At landfall there were four or five planes together. One Our B-29 idea come to birth in those days when it appeared stayed right with us all the way in. He was slightly ahead atthat England would go down to defeat, and there'd be no 1 o'clock.
    [Show full text]
  • 87Th AIR SERVICE GROUP
    87th AIR SERVICE GROUP MISSION LINEAGE 87th Air Base Group Redesignated 87th Service Group Inactivated, Aug 43 Redesignated 87th Air Service Group Activated Inactivated Disbanded, 8 Oct 1948 STATIONS Ft. Dix AAB, NJ, 15 Dec 1942-6 Aug 1943 ChakuLia DudhKundi, India Tinian IsLand, 4 Apr 1945 West FieLd, Tinian, Apr 1945-Dec 1945 Fort Worth, TX, Jan 1946 RosweLL, NM, 9 Jan 1946 Charra, India West FieLd, Tinian ASSIGNMENTS XX Bomber Command Fourth Air Force Second Air Force COMMANDERS HONORS Service Streamers Campaign Streamers Armed Forces Expeditionary Streamers Decorations EMBLEM EMBLEM SIGNIFICANCE MOTTO NICKNAME OPERATIONS 87th was charged with duties that were more invoLved & required specific technical training. This incLuded servicing radio & radar equipment, as weLL as base utiLity systems. The 87th also tooK care of procurement, storage, and issue of suppLies and ordnance in support of their two B-29 combat units. ALso incLuded in the 87th were the 58th BW Signal units. The B-29 was a very sophisticated and compLicated aircraft that had not yet been combat tested. This tasK, although very difficuLt, was performed with the up-most sKiLL by the members of the 58th BW. Prone to crashes at takeoff, and coupLed with severe engine probLems, the aircrews came to understand that the ground support units often Loved and cared for their "Birds" as much as they did. They also understood that without proper maintenance, the majestic yet always overLoaded B-29’s, wouLd never get off the ground. The 444th’s Group Liaison Officer, Scotty McCalL, had this to say about the 87th: "We who fLew the oLd ‘29s can never thanK our mechanics enough for their efforts (to) Keep us fLying under the most difficuLt times and conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Sgoth Quartermaster Company (Cam
    SGOth Quartermaster Company (Cam. 174th Replacement Company, Army Alr posite). Forces (Provisional) . 3BOth Station Hospital. 374th Service Squadron. 36lst Coast Artlllery Transport Detach. 374th Trwp Carrier Group, Headqllar- ment. ters. 36lst Station Hospital. 375th Troop Carrier Omup, Headquar- 3626 Coast Artillery Transport De ter& tachxnent 376th Serviee Squabon. 362d Quartermaster Service Company. 377th Quartermaster Truck Company. 3E2d Station Hospital. 378th Medical Service Detachment. 3636 Coast Artillery Transport Detach 380th Bombardment Group (Heavy), ment Headquarters. 3638 Station Hospital. B82d Antiaircraft Artillery Automatic 364th Coast Artillery Transport Detach Weapons Battalion. ment. 383d Antiaircraft Artillery Automatic 364th Station Hospital. Weapons Battalion. 365th Coast Artillery Transport Detach 383d Avintion-Squadron. ment. 3&?d Medical Service @ompany. 365th Harbor Craft Company, Trans 383d Quartermaster Truck Company. portation Coma 384th Quartermaster Truck Company. 366th Coast Artillery Transport Detach 385th Medical Servlce Detachment. ment 380th Service Squadron. mth Harbor Craft Company. Trans 387th Port Battalion, Transportation portation Corps. Corps. Headqunrters and Headquar- 367th Coast Artillery Transport Detach ters Detachment. ment 388th Service squadron. 367th Harbor Craft Company, Trans 389th Antiaircrnft Artlllery Automatic portation Cams. Weapons Battalion. 868th Harbor Craft Company, Trans 380th Quartermaster Truck Company. portation Corps. 389th Servlce Squadron. 36Qth Harbor Crnft Company,
    [Show full text]
  • Fifty Years on Nato's Southern Flank
    FIFTY YEARS ON NATO’S SOUTHERN FLANK A HISTORY OF SIXTEENTH AIR FORCE 1954 – 2004 By WILLIAM M. BUTLER Sixteenth Air Force Historian Office of History Headquarters, Sixteenth Air Force United States Air Forces in Europe Aviano Air Base, Italy 1 May 2004 ii FOREWORD The past fifty years have seen tremendous changes in the world and in our Air Force. Since its inception as the Joint U.S Military Group, Air Administration (Spain) responsible for the establishment of a forward presence for strategic and tactical forces, Sixteenth Air Force has stood guard on the southern flank of our NATO partners ensuring final success in the Cold War and fostering the ability to deploy expeditionary forces to crises around our theater. This history then is dedicated to all of the men and women who met the challenges of the past 50 years and continue to meet each new challenge with energy, courage, and devoted service to the nation. GLEN W. MOORHEAD III Lieutenant General, USAF Commander iii PREFACE A similar commemorative history of Sixteenth Air Force was last published in 1989 with the title On NATO’s Southern Flank by previous Sixteenth Air Force Historian, Dr. Robert L. Swetzer. This 50th Anniversary edition contains much of the same structure of the earlier history, but the narrative has been edited, revised, and expanded to encompass events from the end of the Cold War to the emergence of today’s Global War on Terrorism. However, certain sections in the earlier edition dealing with each of the countries in the theater and minor bases have been omitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Revelld Lockheed PV-1 VENTURA
    Revell D Lockheed PV-1 VENTURA 04662-0389 ©2012 by REVELL GmbH & Co. KG. PRINTED IN GERMANY Lockheed PV-1 VENTURA Lockheed PV-1 VENTURA Der Beginn des 2. Weltkrieges machte der britischen Luftwaffe schnell klar, das ein Teil der vor Ihnen At the beginning of the Second World War, the Roya! Air Force quickly realized that it would not be liegenden Aufgaben mit dem vorhandenen Material nicht zu schaffen war Besonders die possible to fulfil some of the future missions with the resources then available. In particular long-range Langstreckenpatrouillen und die Bekampfung von U-Booten mit der inzwischen veralteten Lockheed maritime patrols and anti submarine missions using the now-obsoiete Lockheed Hudson were Hudson waren ein grol3es Problem. Man beauftragte daher Lockheed mit der Konstruktion einer becoming a big problem. Lockheed was therefore commissioned to design a similar aircraft, using ahnlichen Maschine, unter Verwendung bereits vorhandener Bauteile der Hudson, um die existing parts from the Hudson in order to reduce the time required in construction. The result was the Konstruktionsarbeiten zu beschleunigen. Das Ergebnis war die Ventura G.R.I die am 31. Juli 1941 ihren Ventura G.R.I which completed its first flight on 31 July 1941. After 188 Ventura I's had been built for ' Erstf lug absolvierte. Nach dem Bau von 188 Ventura I fur die RAF erfolgten umfangreiche Anderungen the RAF, extensive modifications were made and the aircraft re-designated Ventura II. The U.S. Navy die zur Ventura II fuhrten, die sehr schnell auch als PV-1 das Interesse der US Navy fand.
    [Show full text]
  • Tech Memo Cultural Resources
    CJMT EIS/OEIS Appendix N April 2015 Draft Cultural Resources APPENDIX N CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL MEMO Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 CULTURAL RESOURCES REGULATIONS, STANDARDS, AND GUIDELINES .....................................................1 2.0 CULTURAL RESOURCES AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT .................................................................. 2 2.1 TINIAN ....................................................................................................................................3 2.1.1 Historical Overview ............................................................................................................. 3 2.1.2 Previous Studies and Recorded Cultural Resources ........................................................... 7 2.2 PAGAN .................................................................................................................................. 13 2.2.1 Historical Overview ........................................................................................................... 13 2.2.2 Previous Studies and Recorded Cultural Resources ......................................................... 16 3.0 CULTURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ................................................... 19 3.1 METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................... 20 3.1.1 Approach to Analysis .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Of Records of the US Strategic Bombing Survey
    INDEX of Records of the U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey, Entry 54: Land-Based Navy and Marine Corps Aircraft Action Reports, 1944-1945 (1) MAG(Marine Air Group)-22, Charlie Strip, Ie Shima, Okinawa.(伊江島・Charlie Strip) Aircraft Action Report (Unit Reporting: MAG-22) : 1945/06/27 Aircraft Action Report (Unit Reporting: VMTB-131, etc.) : 1945/06/29 Aircraft Action Report (Unit Reporting: MAG-22) : 1945/07/01 Aircraft Action Report (Unit Reporting: MAG-22) : 1945/07/02 Aircraft Action Report (Unit Reporting: MAG-22) : 1945/07/03 (2) MAG(Marine Air Group)-32, Mangaldan, Luzon; Moret Field, Zamboanga.(ルソン島・マン ガルダン/ザンボアンガ・モレット飛行場) Aircraft Action Report (Unit Reporting: MAG-32) : 1945/02/09 Aircraft Action Report (Unit Reporting: MAG-32) : 1945/02/09 Aircraft Action Report (Unit Reporting: MAG-32) : 1945/02/09 Aircraft Action Report (Unit Reporting: MAG-32) : 1945/02/10 Aircraft Action Report (Unit Reporting: MAG-32) : 1945/02/10 Aircraft Action Report (Unit Reporting: MAG-32) : 1945/02/11 Aircraft Action Report (Unit Reporting: MAG-32) : 1945/02/11 Aircraft Action Report (Unit Reporting: MAG-32) : 1945/02/14 Aircraft Action Report (Unit Reporting: MAG-32) : 1945/02/19 Aircraft Action Report (Unit Reporting: MAG-32) : 1945/02/23 Aircraft Action Report (Unit Reporting: MAG-32) : 1945/02/23 (?) Aircraft Action Report (Unit Reporting: MAG-32) : 1945/02/25 Aircraft Action Report (Unit Reporting: MAG-32) : 1945/02/26 Aircraft Action Report (Unit Reporting: MAG-32) : 1945/04/07 Aircraft Action Report (Unit Reporting: MAG-32) : 1945/04/26 Aircraft Action
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Tinian Island During World War II OUTLINE
    The Use of Tinian Island During World War II OUTLINE • Background • Assault on Tinian Island • Seabee Construction and North Field • Tinian and the Atomic Bombs • Tinian Today Background • Tinian and Saipan Islands had been Japanese stronghold since the end of WW I • Ability to reach Japan with long-range B-29 bombers • Saipan was attacked on 15 June 1944 and captured by mid-August 1944 Background Assault on Tinian "An Amtrac loaded with Marines, churns through the sea bound for beaches of Tinian Island" July 1944. Two tiny landing beaches, White 1 and White 2, were used at Tinian to land two entire divisions. Each beach was slightly less than 200 feet wide! One of 10 “doodlebug” landing ramps built by the Seabees mounted on an Amtrac The SeaBees fashioned these ramps from scrap steel taken out of a Japanese Sugar Mill on Saipan. They allowed Marine Amtracs to scale the 8-foot high cliffs along the White Beach landing zone The Americans employed a deception landing off the coast of Tinian Town, holding Japanese forces there while the main landings occurred at White Beaches on the northwest side of Tinian. The deception force then proceeded north and landed at White Beach. Construction of the World’s Largest Air Bases on Tinian Four 8,500 foot runways were eventually constructed by the SeaBees at North Field on Tinian, in addition to two similar runways constructed at West Feld, a few miles southwest. The four runways at North Field on Tinian comprised the largest single airport in world in mid-summer 1945.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-1
    APPENDIX D NHPA Section 106 Consultation Supporting Documentation Section 106 Consultation Request Letter February 1, 2012 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-1 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-2 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-3 Conceptual Project Plans for Section 106 Consultation, February 28, 2012 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-4 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-5 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-6 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-7 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-8 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-9 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-10 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-11 Request for HPO and NPS Review of Draft Phase I Cultural Resources Report April 16, 2012 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-12 Request for Review of Phase I Cultural Resources Survey, May 25, 2012 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-13 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-14 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-15 Section 106 Review and Comments Letter from CNMI HPO May 31, 2012 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-16 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-17 Response to Request for Review of Phase I Cultural Resources Survey Letter, June 25, 2012 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-18 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-19 USAF News Release regarding historical sites at GSN and TNI September 2, 2012 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-20 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-21 Section 106 Consultation Initiation Letter September 11, 2012 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-22 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-23 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-24 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-25 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-26 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix D D-27 Note: Culturally sensitive information has been redacted from this page.
    [Show full text]