DOCSLIB.ORG

Ottoman Sea Power………

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

KADIR HAS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES PROGRAM OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS CONTINENTAL POWERS AND QUEST FOR STATUS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SULTAN ABDÜLAZİZ’S FLEET (1861-1876) MEHMET ALİOĞLU SUPERVISOR: PROF. DR. SERHAT GÜVENÇ PHD THESIS ISTANBUL, JUNE 2020 Mehmet Alioğlu Doktora Tezi 2020 Student’s Full Name Ph.D. (or M.S. or M.A.) Thesis 2011 CONTINENTAL POWERS AND QUEST FOR STATUS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SULTAN ABDÜLAZİZ’S FLEET (1861-1876) MEHMET ALİOĞLU SUPERVISOR: PROF. DR. SERHAT GÜVENÇ PHD THESIS Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of Kadir Has University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of PhD in the Discipline Area of International Relations under the Program of International Relations. ISTANBUL, JUNE, 2020 I, MEHMET ALİOĞLU; Hereby declare that this PhD Thesis is my own original work and that due references have been appropriately provided on all supporting literature and resources. MEHMET ALİOĞLU __________________________ JUNE 2020 ACCEPTANCE AND APPROVAL This work entitled CONTINENTAL POWERS AND QUEST FOR STATUS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SULTAN ABDÜLAZIZ’S FLEET (1861-1876) prepared by MEHMET ALİOĞLU has been judged to be successful at the defense exam held on ... ... 2020 and accepted by our jury as PHD THESIS. Prof. Dr., Serhat Güvenç (Advisor) Kadir Has University Prof. Dr., Mitat Çelikpala Kadir Has University Doç. Dr., Gün Kut Boğaziçi University Prof. Dr., Gencer Özcan Bilgi University Doç. Dr., Ahmet Salih Bıçakçı Kadir Has University I certify that the above signatures belong to the faculty members named above. SIGNATURE Prof. Sinem Akgül Açıkmeşe Institute Director School of Graduate Studies DATE OF APPROVAL: …/…/…. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………….. i ÖZET………………………………………………………………………………. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………. v DEDICATION…………………………………………………………………...... vi 1. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………….. 1 1.1. The Purpose……………………………………………………………………2 1.2. The Scope………………………………………………………………………3 1.3. The Methodology………………………………………………………………3 1.4. Literature Review…………………………….……..…………………………4 2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK…………………………………….. ……..8 2.1. Realism…………………………………………………………………………8 2.2. Problems with Realism………………………………………………………..14 2.3. Constructivism………………………………………………………………...16 2.4. Identity and Security………………………………………………………….19 2.5. What is Security?...............................................................................................20 2.6. The Choice of Theory…………………………………………………………20 3. AN EVALUATION OF OTTOMAN SEA POWER………...........................22 3.1. What Is Sea Power?.......................................................................................... 22 3.2. Was the Ottoman Empire a Sea power State?............................................... 28 3.2.1. Presence of a battlefleet……………………………………………………… 29 3.2.2. Presence of a merchant fleet…………………………………………………. 33 3.2.3. Population……………………………………………………………………. 34 3.2.4. Strategic needs of the state…………………………………………………... 35 3.2.5. Sea-mindedness of the state………………………………………………….. 35 3.3. A Historical Evaluation of Ottoman Naval Power………………….............37 3.3.1. 1494-1654 pre ship-of-the-line era…………………………………………... 37 3.3.2. 1655-1860 ship-of-the-line era………………………………………………. 41 3.3.3. 1861-1945 battleship era……………………………………………………... 44 4. OTTOMAN STRATEGIC NEEDS IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY…………………………………………………………………….. 49 4.1. The Morea Revolt / The Greek War of Independence 1821-1832………... 49 4.2. The Rebellion of Mehmet Ali, 1833-1841…………………………………… 56 4.3. The Crimean War, 1853-1856……………………………………………….. 64 4.3.1. An evaluation of the Ottoman fighting capabilities in the Crimean War……. 69 4.3.2. The Paris Peace Congress……………………………………………………. 72 5. THE ERA OF SULTAN ABDÜLAZİZ……………………………………... 75 5.1. The Naval Situation Before the Reign of Sultan Abdülaziz………………...75 5.2. Sultan Abdülaziz’s Fleet…………………………………………………….. 79 5.3. Financial Burden of a Modern Fleet…………………………………………84 5.4. Threats to The Ottoman Empire……………………………………………. 86 5.4.1. An Assessment of Ottoman Power …………………………………………...87 5.4.2. Russian Threat………………………………………………………………...88 5.4.3. Greek Threat………………………………………………………………......93 5.4.4. Egyptian Threat……………………………………………………………….95 5.4.5. The Question of British friendship…………………………………………... 96 5.5. Sultan Abdülaziz’s Fleet in Action……………………………………. …….97 5.5.1. The Cretan Rebellion………………………………………………………… 98 5.5.2. The War of 1877-1878……………………………………………………….. 98 6. GERMANY AND THE HIGH SEAS FLEET………………………………. 109 6.1. Germany’s Rising Power in The Nineteenth and The Twentieth………… Centuries………………………………………………………………………109 6.2. Ideology and Weltpolitik…………………………………………………….. 110 6.3. The Imperial Navy Until 1897………………………………………………. 111 6.4. The Tirpitz Plan and The Risk Theory……………………………………... 113 6.5. Unsustainability of the Risk Theory…………………………………………116 6.6. The Failure of the Risk Theory……………………………………………… 125 6.7. A Struggle for Recognition with Battleships……………………………….. 128 7. THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS AND THE OCEAN- GOING FLEET……………...............................................................................135 7.1. Russian Geopolitics And The Navy…………………………………………..135 7.2. Development of Doctrine And Naval Plans In The USSR………………….160 7.3. Stalin’s Big Ship Program…………………………………………………… 167 8. CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………... 183 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………………… 189 CURRICULUM VITAE………………………...………………………………... 203 LIST OF TABLES Figure 3.1. Ottoman warships......................................................................................32 Figure 3.2. British, French, Russian, and Spanish warships.....................................33 Figure 5.1. Ironclads of the European Powers on 30 May 1876................................80 Figure 6.1. British, French, German, and Russian battleships………………… ...112 Figure 7.1. British, American, and Soviet battleships……………………………..170 Figure 7.2. British, American, and Soviet navies total tonnages in 1937……...…171 ABSTRACT ALİOĞLU, MEHMET. CONTINENTAL POWERS AND QUEST FOR STATUS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SULTAN ABDULAZIZ’S FLEET (1861-1876), PHD THESIS, Istanbul, 2020. In this study, the Ottoman Fleet during the reign of Sultan Abdülaziz is taken as a case that stands out as a Nineteenth Century precursor to subsequent efforts by continental powers, Kaiser Wilhelm II’s Germany and Stalin’s USSR, to build sub-optimal fleets in the Twentieth Century. Therefore, these two cases are added in order to answer the following question: why do continental powers establish or try to acquire naval power beyond levels needed for the physical security of the state? In the first chapter, the purpose, the scope, and the methodology are presented. In the second chapter, the theoretical framework of the study is established and why a Constructivist theoretical framework is preferred over a Realist one is explained. The third chapter is devoted to the study of Ottoman sea power from historical and theoretical perspectives. As a result, the Ottoman Empire is identified as a continental power. In the fourth chapter, the strategic needs of the Ottoman Empire are studied to identify physical threats to the state from a historical perspective. The fifth chapter covers the fleet of Sultan Abdülaziz and its evaluation against potential threats. The inquiry made shows that Sultan Abdülaziz’s Fleet was not commensurate with the threats it was supposed to counter. Therefore, it was an irrational arming decision. As a result, it is studied from a struggle for recognition perspective which fits in with the Ottoman naval expansion during the reign of Sultan Abdülaziz. In the sixth and seventh chapters, the German and the Soviet naval expansions are evaluated against the threats these states faced. As a result, the German and Soviet fleets during the reigns of Kaiser Wilhelm II and Joseph Stalin are identified as inappropriate tools against the physical threats they were supposed to counter. They instead fit better in a struggle for recognition perspective. Then Ottoman, German, and Soviet naval expansions are comparatively evaluated to answer the question of why i continental powers establish or try to acquire naval power beyond levels needed for the physical security of the state. In this context this study concludes that all three states tried to acquire status through naval power. Hence, Constructivism offers a better explanation of continental states’ over-investments in naval power. Keywords: Constructivism, Status seeking, Ottoman Empire, Continental Power, Seapower State ii ÖZET ALİOĞLU, MEHMET. KARA DEVLETLERI VE STATÜ ARAYIŞI: ABDÜLAZİZ DONANMASINA AİT KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR ÇALIŞMA (1861-1876), DOKTORA TEZİ, İstanbul, 2020. Bu çalışmada neden karasal devletler fiziksel güvenlik gereklerinin ötesinde bahriye kurmaya çalışırlar sorusu Sultan Abdülaziz Donanması örneği üzerinden incelenmiştir. Bu çaba 20. yüzyılda Wilhelm Almanyası ile Stalin dönemi Sovyetler Birliği’nin giriştiği büyük donanma kurma çabalarının bir öncüsüdür. Dolayısıyla bu iki örnek karşılaştırma amacıyla teze dahil edilmiştir. Bu doğrultuda 1. Bölümde tezin amaç, kapsam, ve yöntemi ayrıntılı olarak tanımlanmıştır. 2. Bölümde tezin kuramsal çerçevesi İnşaacı bir kuram tercih edilerek oluşturulmuş ve bunun gerekçeleri belirtilmiştir. 3. Bölümde Osmanlı deniz gücü tarihsel ve kuramsal bileşenler üzerinden incelenmiş ve Osmanlı Devleti’nin karasal bir devlet olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. 4. Bölümde Sultan Abdülaziz döneminde devletin karşı karşıya olduğu tehditler
Recommended publications
  • Warren Massachusetts Schooner

    Warren Massachusetts Schooner

    1 Warren (1) Commander William Coas Schooner 2 August 1776-[] October 1776 Massachusetts Privateer Schooner (2) Commander John Coulston 21 October 1776-[] 26 December 1776 (3) Commander Silas Howell 3 September 1777-9 September 1777 Commissioned/First Date: 2 August 1776 Out of Service/Cause: 9 September 1777/captured by HM Frigate Unicorn Owners: (1) Joseph Foster, Winthrop Sargent and Epes Sargent, all of Gloucester, Massachusetts and John Winthrop, Jr. of Boston, Massachusetts; (2) John Coffin Jones of Newburyport, Massachusetts and Stephen Bruce of Boston, Massachusetts et al Tonnage: 70 Battery: Date Reported: 2 August 1776 Number/Caliber Weight Broadside 4/4-pounder 16 pounds 8 pounds 4/3-pounder 12 pounds 6 pounds Total: 8 cannon/28 pounds Broadside: 4 cannon/14 pounds Swivels: twelve Date Reported: 21 October 1776 Number/Caliber Weight Broadside 8/ Total: 8 cannon/ Broadside: 4 cannon/ Swivels: Date Reported: 1 December 1776 Number/Caliber Weight Broadside 12/6-pounder 72 pounds 36 pounds Total: 12 cannon/72 pounds Broadside: 6 cannon/36 pounds ©awiatsea.com-posted August 2019 --1-- Swivels: twelve Date Reported: 3 September 1777 Number/Caliber Weight Broadside 10/ Total: 10 cannon/ Broadside: 5 cannon/ Swivels: Crew: (1) 2 August 1776: 53 [ total (2) 21 October 1776: 61 []total (3) 1 December 1776: 85 []total (4) 3 September 1777: 53 []total Description: Officers: (1) First Lieutenant Coas Gardner, 2 August 1776-; (2) First Lieutenant Benjamin Tucker, 3 September 1777-9 September 1777; (3) Second Lieutenant Moses Harris, 2 August1776-;
  • Christian-Muslim Relations a Bibliographical History History of Christian-Muslim Relations

    Christian-Muslim Relations a Bibliographical History History of Christian-Muslim Relations

    Christian-Muslim Relations A Bibliographical History History of Christian-Muslim Relations Editorial Board David Thomas, University of Birmingham Sandra Toenies Keating, Providence College Tarif Khalidi, American University of Beirut Suleiman Mourad, Smith College Gabriel Said Reynolds, University of Notre Dame Mark Swanson, Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago Volume 24 Christians and Muslims have been involved in exchanges over matters of faith and morality since the founding of Islam. Attitudes between the faiths today are deeply coloured by the legacy of past encounters, and often preserve centuries-old negative views. The History of Christian-Muslim Relations, Texts and Studies presents the surviving record of past encounters in authoritative, fully introduced text editions and annotated translations, and also monograph and collected studies. It illustrates the development in mutual perceptions as these are contained in surviving Christian and Muslim writings, and makes available the arguments and rhetorical strategies that, for good or for ill, have left their mark on attitudes today. The series casts light on a history marked by intellectual creativity and occasional breakthroughs in communication, although, on the whole beset by misunderstanding and misrepresentation. By making this history better known, the series seeks to contribute to improved recognition between Christians and Muslims in the future. The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/hcmr Christian-Muslim Relations A Bibliographical History Volume 7. Central and Eastern Europe, Asia, Africa and South America (1500-1600) Edited by David Thomas and John Chesworth with John Azumah, Stanisław Grodź, Andrew Newman, Douglas Pratt LEIDEN • BOstON 2015 Cover illustration: This shows the tuğra (monogram) of the Ottoman Sultan Murad III, affixed to a letter sent in 1591 to Sigismund III Vasa, king of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.
  • The Influence of the Introduction of Heavy Ordnance on the Development of the English Navy in the Early Tudor Period

    The Influence of the Introduction of Heavy Ordnance on the Development of the English Navy in the Early Tudor Period

    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-1980 The Influence of the Introduction of Heavy Ordnance on the Development of the English Navy in the Early Tudor Period Kristin MacLeod Tomlin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Tomlin, Kristin MacLeod, "The Influence of the Introduction of Heavy Ordnance on the Development of the English Navy in the Early Tudor Period" (1980). Master's Theses. 1921. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1921 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE INFLUENCE OF THE INTRODUCTION OF HEAVY ORDNANCE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENGLISH NAVY IN THE EARLY TUDOR PERIOD by K ristin MacLeod Tomlin A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of History Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 1980 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis grew out of a paper prepared for a seminar at the University of Warwick in 1976-77. Since then, many persons have been invaluable in helping me to complete the work. I would like to express my thanks specifically to the personnel of the National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, England, and of the Public Records Office, London, for their help in locating sources.
  • “A Translation and Historical Commentary of Book One and Book Two of the Historia of Geōrgios Pachymerēs” 2004

    “A Translation and Historical Commentary of Book One and Book Two of the Historia of Geōrgios Pachymerēs” 2004

    “A Translation and Historical Commentary of Book One and Book Two of the Historia of Geōrgios Pachymerēs” Nathan John Cassidy, BA(Hons) (Canterbury) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Western Australia. School of Humanities Classics and Ancient History 2004 ii iii Abstract A summary of what a historical commentary should aim to do is provided by Gomme and Walbank in the introductions to their famous and magisterial commentaries on Thoukydidēs and Polybios. From Gomme: A historical commentary on an historian must necessarily derive from two sources, a proper understanding of his own words, and what we can learn from other authorities . To see what gaps there are in his narrative [and to] examine the means of filling these gaps. (A. Gomme A Historical Commentary on Thucydides vol. 1 (London, 1959) 1) And from Walbank: I have tried to give full references to other relevant ancient authorities, and where the text raises problems, to define these, even if they could not always be solved. Primarily my concern has been with whatever might help elucidate what Polybius thought and said, and only secondarily with the language in which he said it, and the question whether others subsequently said something identical or similar. (F. Walbank A Historical Commentary on Polybius vol. 1 (London, 1957) vii) Both scholars go on to stress the need for the commentator to stick with the points raised by the text and to avoid the temptation to turn the commentary into a rival narrative. These are the principles which I have endeavoured to follow in my Historical Commentary on Books One and Two of Pachymerēs’ Historia.
  • Us Military Assistance to Saudi Arabia, 1942-1964

    Us Military Assistance to Saudi Arabia, 1942-1964

    DANCE OF SWORDS: U.S. MILITARY ASSISTANCE TO SAUDI ARABIA, 1942-1964 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Bruce R. Nardulli, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2002 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Allan R. Millett, Adviser Professor Peter L. Hahn _______________________ Adviser Professor David Stebenne History Graduate Program UMI Number: 3081949 ________________________________________________________ UMI Microform 3081949 Copyright 2003 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ____________________________________________________________ ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road PO Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 ABSTRACT The United States and Saudi Arabia have a long and complex history of security relations. These relations evolved under conditions in which both countries understood and valued the need for cooperation, but also were aware of its limits and the dangers of too close a partnership. U.S. security dealings with Saudi Arabia are an extreme, perhaps unique, case of how security ties unfolded under conditions in which sensitivities to those ties were always a central —oftentimes dominating—consideration. This was especially true in the most delicate area of military assistance. Distinct patterns of behavior by the two countries emerged as a result, patterns that continue to this day. This dissertation examines the first twenty years of the U.S.-Saudi military assistance relationship. It seeks to identify the principal factors responsible for how and why the military assistance process evolved as it did, focusing on the objectives and constraints of both U.S.
  • Phd 15.04.27 Versie 3

    Phd 15.04.27 Versie 3

    Promotor Prof. dr. Jan Dumolyn Vakgroep Geschiedenis Decaan Prof. dr. Marc Boone Rector Prof. dr. Anne De Paepe Nederlandse vertaling: Een Spiegel voor de Sultan. Staatsideologie in de Vroeg Osmaanse Kronieken, 1300-1453 Kaftinformatie: Miniature of Sultan Orhan Gazi in conversation with the scholar Molla Alâeddin. In: the Şakayıku’n-Nu’mâniyye, by Taşköprülüzâde. Source: Topkapı Palace Museum, H1263, folio 12b. Faculteit Letteren & Wijsbegeerte Hilmi Kaçar A Mirror for the Sultan State Ideology in the Early Ottoman Chronicles, 1300- 1453 Proefschrift voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de Geschiedenis 2015 Acknowledgements This PhD thesis is a dream come true for me. Ottoman history is not only the field of my research. It became a passion. I am indebted to Prof. Dr. Jan Dumolyn, my supervisor, who has given me the opportunity to take on this extremely interesting journey. And not only that. He has also given me moral support and methodological guidance throughout the whole process. The frequent meetings to discuss the thesis were at times somewhat like a wrestling match, but they have always been inspiring and stimulating. I also want to thank Prof. Dr. Suraiya Faroqhi and Prof. Dr. Jo Vansteenbergen, for their expert suggestions. My colleagues of the History Department have also been supportive by letting me share my ideas in development during research meetings at the department, lunches and visits to the pub. I would also like to sincerely thank the scholars who shared their ideas and expertise with me: Dimitris Kastritsis, Feridun Emecen, David Wrisley, Güneş Işıksel, Deborah Boucayannis, Kadir Dede, Kristof d’Hulster, Xavier Baecke and many others.
  • Volume 5 Fort Mchenry.Pdf

    Volume 5 Fort Mchenry.Pdf

    American Battlefield Trust Volume 5 BROADSIDE A Journal of the Wars for Independence for Students Fort McHenry and the Birth of an Anthem Of all the battles in American history none is more With a war being fought on the periphery of the Unit- connected with popular culture than the battle of Fort ed States the British, under the influence of Admiral McHenry fought during the War of 1812. The British George Cockburn, decided to bring the war more di- attack on Fort McHenry and the rectly to America by attacking the large garrison flag that could be Chesapeake Region. The British seen through the early morning Navy, with Marines and elements mist, inspired Washington, DC of their army wreaked havoc along lawyer Francis Scott Key to pen the Chesapeake burning numer- what in 1931 would be adopted ous town and settlements. Howev- by Congress as our National An- er, Cockburn had two prizes in them, the Star-Spangled Ban- mind – Washington, DC and Bal- ner. The anthem is played be- timore, Maryland. Retribution for fore countless sports events the burning of York was never far from high school through the from his mind and what a blow he ranks of professional games. thought, would it be to American The story of the creation of the morale if he could torch the still Star-Spangled Banner is as developing American capital. Af- compelling as the story of the ter pushing aside a motley assort- attack on Baltimore. ment of American defenders of the approach to Washington, DC In 1812, a reluctant President at the battle of Bladensburg, Mar- James Madison asked Congress yland, Cockburn and his forces for a Declaration of War against entered the city and put the torch Great Britain.
  • Istanbul Bids Final Farewell to Mesrob II

    Istanbul Bids Final Farewell to Mesrob II

    MARCH 23, 2019 Mirror-SpeTHE ARMENIAN ctator Volume LXXXIX, NO. 35, Issue 4579 $ 2.00 NEWS The First English Language Armenian Weekly in the United States Since 1932 INBRIEF Guns Used by New Zealand Terrorist Had Armenian, Georgian Writing YEREVAN (Armenpress) — Armenia’s Foreign Ministry was in contact with the authorities of New Zealand regarding the note in Armenian and other languages found on one of the weapons used for the attack on the two mosques in the city of Christchurch, on Friday, March 15, MFA spokesper- son Anna Naghdalyan noted. “We are in contact with New Zealand’s relevant authorities on all issues linked with the incident,” Naghdalyan said. Brenton Tarrant, a 28-year-old Australian, was charged with the deadly attacks on two mosques in the city, which killed 50 and injured as many. One of the weapons used for the attack on the two mosques in New Zealand was covered with notes in different languages, including Armenian and Georgian, the videos released from the incident show. The Georgian state security service has already The funeral of Armenian Patriarch Mesrob II reacted to these reports, stating that it is cooperat- ing with its partners. The gun covered in white lettering featured the names of King Davit Agmashenebeli and Prince Istanbul Bids Final Farewell to Mesrob II David Soslan, the second husband of Queen Tamar, in Georgian, the Battle of Kagul 1770 (Russian- ISTANBUL (Public Radio of Armenia) referred to the Sisli Armenian cemetery in Zeytinburnu district on March 8 where he Turkish war) and the Battle of Bulair 1913 were — Archbishop Mesrob II Mutafyan, the 84th an area designated for patriarchs for burial.
  • Gianna to Accept L100 Award at Conference Fox Films President

    Gianna to Accept L100 Award at Conference Fox Films President

    O C V ΓΡΑΦΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ Bringing the news ΤΟΥ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ to generations of ΑΠΟ ΤΟ 1915 The National Herald Greek Americans A WEEKLY GREEK AMERICAN PUBLICATION c v www.thenationalherald.com VOL. 11, ISSUE 529 December 1, 2007 $1.00 GREECE: 1.75 EURO Gianna To Convicted Greek American Spy to Complete his Parole in Greece Accept L100 After 14 Years of Federal Prison and House Award At Arrest, Steven Lalas Reunites with his Family By Evan C. Lambrou telligence officers whenever he Special to The National Herald traveled to northern Greece to see Conference his family in Kavala. He continued NEW YORK – Steven J. Lalas, a for- to disseminate information after be- mer United States embassy employ- ing transferred to the U.S. Embassy Behrakis Invites Greek ee turned Greek spy, returned to in Athens in 1990. Greece last Sunday, November 25, Mr. Lalas, a native of New Schools To Apply For to serve the remainder of his parole Hampshire, came under suspicion after spending almost 12 years in following a conversation between Leadership 100 Grants federal prison, ending a spectacular someone from the Greek Embassy espionage affair between the two in Washington and a State Depart- By Theodore Kalmoukos countries. ment official in February 1993. Special to the National Herald The issue is now referred to High-ranking Greek diplomats ap- Greek judicial authorities, which parently boasted of being well in- BOSTON, Mass. – The Archbishop will determine the terms of the ad- formed of U.S. plans for the Balkans Iakovos Leadership 100 Endow- justment to Mr.
  • Eugene Miakinkov

    Eugene Miakinkov

    Russian Military Culture during the Reigns of Catherine II and Paul I, 1762-1801 by Eugene Miakinkov A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Department of History and Classics University of Alberta ©Eugene Miakinkov, 2015 Abstract This study explores the shape and development of military culture during the reign of Catherine II. Next to the institutions of the autocracy and the Orthodox Church, the military occupied the most important position in imperial Russia, especially in the eighteenth century. Rather than analyzing the military as an institution or a fighting force, this dissertation uses the tools of cultural history to explore its attitudes, values, aspirations, tensions, and beliefs. Patronage and education served to introduce a generation of young nobles to the world of the military culture, and expose it to its values of respect, hierarchy, subordination, but also the importance of professional knowledge. Merit is a crucial component in any military, and Catherine’s military culture had to resolve the tensions between the idea of meritocracy and seniority. All of the above ideas and dilemmas were expressed in a number of military texts that began to appear during Catherine’s reign. It was during that time that the military culture acquired the cultural, political, and intellectual space to develop – a space I label the “military public sphere”. This development was most clearly evident in the publication, by Russian authors, of a range of military literature for the first time in this era. The military culture was also reflected in the symbolic means used by the senior commanders to convey and reinforce its values in the army.
  • Major-General Sir Christopher Charles Teesdale VC KCMG CB

    Major-General Sir Christopher Charles Teesdale VC KCMG CB

    | | HERO OF THE MONTH BY LORD ASHCROFT BY LORD ASHCROFT HERO OF THE MONTH LEFT 'The Defence of Kars', a lithograph showing Fenwick Williams and Lt Christopher Teesdale by William Simpson. (BROWN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY/HISTORIC MILITARY PRESS) BELOW 'Repulse of the Russians', an 1857 British engraving. (TOPFOTO) army, guarding against a Russian invasion Major-General Sir Christopher from Tiflis (now Tbilisi). The Russians had moved 35,000 troops into the area in early 1854, hoping to open up a second Charles Teesdale VC KCMG CB front against a weak and disorganised Turkish Army. On 3 and 6 August, the Russians twice routed the Turks on the battlefield. Smarting from two heavy defeats, the Turks fell back on the town of Kars, southwest of Tiflis. Realising the seriousness of the situation, the British decided in September 1854 to send a British Commissioner, accompanied hristopher Charles Teesdale will Christopher was just two years old when by a small staff, to join the Turkish force. forever be recorded in the history he returned to England with his family. For The man tasked with this key role was C books for two specific reasons: the rest of his childhood, he was raised in Colonel Sir Fenwick Williams of the Royal he received the only VC for the siege of England and Guernsey, where his mother’s Artillery, who was accompanied by an Kars – the last major action of the Crimean family lived. In 1848, Teesdale was accepted aide-de-camp, Lt Christopher Teesdale, War – and was the first South African-born as a gentleman cadet into the Royal Artillery and Dr Humphry Sandwith, who had been recipient of the VC.
  • Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 1

    Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 1

    Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 1 Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy The Project Gutenberg EBook of Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org Title: Artillery Through the Ages A Short Illustrated History of Cannon, Emphasizing Types Used in America Author: Albert Manucy Release Date: January 30, 2007 [EBook #20483] Language: English Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 2 Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ARTILLERY THROUGH THE AGES *** Produced by Juliet Sutherland, Christine P. Travers and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net ARTILLERY THROUGH THE AGES A Short Illustrated History of Cannon, Emphasizing Types Used in America UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fred A. Seaton, Secretary NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Conrad L. Wirth, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. -- Price 35 cents (Cover) FRENCH 12-POUNDER FIELD GUN (1700-1750) ARTILLERY THROUGH THE AGES A Short Illustrated History of Cannon, Emphasizing Types Used in America Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 3 by ALBERT MANUCY Historian Southeastern National Monuments Drawings by Author Technical Review by Harold L. Peterson National Park Service Interpretive Series History No. 3 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1949 (Reprint 1956) Many of the types of cannon described in this booklet may be seen in areas of the National Park System throughout the country.