Denied Assistance Closing the Front Door on Welfare in Bc
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
DENIED ASSISTANCE CLOSING THE FRONT DOOR ON WELFARE IN BC By Bruce Wallace Seth Klein and Marge Reitsma-Street MARCH 2006 AN ECONOMIC SECURITY PROJECT REPORT DENIED ASSISTANCE: Closing the Front Door on Welfare in BC By Bruce Wallace, Seth Klein and Marge Reitsma-Street with Tim Richards Student Research Assistants: Kristin Atwood, Alyshia Gardner and Jewelles Smith Co-published by the Vancouver Island Public Interest Research Group and the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives March 2006 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks to all those individuals who agreed to be interviewed. Thanks to the staff and volunteers at VIPIRG and the CCPA, especially Brant Cheetham, Alicia Johnston, Thi Vu, Shannon Daub, Avi Goldberg, Steve Carley, Stuart Murray, Greg Awai, Stacy Chappel and Jane Worton. Our thanks to Shannon Daub, David Green, Tom McGregor, Lesley Moore, Jane Pulkingham and Ginger Richards for their feedback on earlier drafts of this paper. This study is part of the Economic Security Project, a research alliance led by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (BC Office) and Simon Fraser University. The Economic Security Project is a five-year research initiative studying how public policy changes in BC are affecting the economic security of vulnerable populations. The Economic Security Project is funded primarily by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) through its Community-University Research Alliance Program. Thanks also to VanCity for its financial support of this project. Any errors and the opinions contained in the paper are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the CCPA, VIPIRG, VanCity, Simon Fraser University, or other ESP partners. Denied Assistance is available under limited copyright protection. You may download, distribute, photocopy, cite or excerpt this document provided it is properly and fully credited and not used for commercial purposes. The permission of the CCPA and VIPIRG is required for all other uses. For more information, visit www.creativecommons.org. Copyedit and layout: Nadene Rehnby www.handsonpublications.com Cover photos: Joshua Berson, Anna Bryukhanova and Tomaz Levstek Printed copies: $10 | Download free from the CCPA and VIPIRG websites ISBN: 0-88627-459-1 CCPA BC Office 1400 – 207 West Hastings St PO BOX 3035 Stn CSC Vancouver, BC V6B 1H7 Victoria, BC V8W 3P3 604.801.5121 250.721.8629 | [email protected] www.policyalternatives.ca [email protected] www.vipirg.ca Contents Summary . .5 Introduction . .11 BOX: Key Changes to BC’s Welfare Eligibility . .12 Study Methodology . .15 Reducing the Welfare Caseload in BC . .17 BOX: The Categories That Make up the Caseload . .18 Caseload Decline Driven by Restricting Entry . .21 Comparing Enquiry, Entry and Exit Rates . .22 BOX: The BC Welfare Application Process . .25 How Policies Restrict Entry . .27 The Two-Year Independence Test . .30 The Three-Week Wait . .34 The Wait Exceeds 21 Days . .37 How Administrative Practices Restrict Entry . .39 Increased Use of Technology Increases Barriers to Assistance . .41 Diversion Through Degradation . .43 How Emergency Needs Assessments are Being Restricted . .45 “Diversions” to Increased Hardship . .50 The Impacts on the Most Vulnerable . .50 Diversion to Homelessness . .53 Women Leaving Abuse Remain at Risk . .55 Conclusion . .60 A Call for Accountability . .61 Next Steps . .62 Notes . .63 References . .66 ABOUT THE AUTHORS BRUCE WALLACE is the Research Coordinator at the Vancouver Island Public Interest Research Group (VIPIRG). As a community-based researcher he has focused on poverty issues including homelessness, harm reduction, access to dental care, and supporting the role of consumers in service planning and delivery. He has an MSW from Carleton University, a BA in Sociology from the University of Calgary, and is a sessional instructor with the School of Social Work at the University of Victoria. SETH KLEIN is the BC Director of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, and Co-director of the Economic Security Project. He has a BA in international relations and a BEd from the University of Toronto, and an MA in political science from Simon Fraser University. His primary area of research is welfare and social policy. A frequent media commentator on public policy issues, Seth is the author and co-author of numerous CCPA studies and articles, including Depressing Wages: How Welfare Cuts Hurt Both the Welfare and Working Poor, and A Bad Time to be Poor: An Analysis of British Columbia’s New Welfare Policies. MARGE REITSMA-STREET is Professor in Studies in Policy and Practice, an interdisciplinary graduate program at the University of Victoria (www.uvic.ca/spp). Her research and community work are in the areas of poverty, inequality, housing, social justice, women’s work, and alternative organization. Marge has an MSW from McGill University and a PhD in social policy from the University of Toronto. She is author of numerous academic publications and popular presentations in Canada and internationally. Recent writings include Housing Thousands of Women, Poverty and Inequality in the Capital Region of BC, Housing Policy Options for Women Living in Urban Poverty, and journal articles on community action research and women’s work. Currently, she is the principal investigator of a research project that examines the relationships between women, community and provisioning for survival and well-being in six sites across Canada. 4 Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives – BC Office and the Vancouver Island Public Interest Research Group Summary The number of people receiving welfare in BC has been on the decline since 1995. Despite this, in 2002, the provincial government introduced dramatic policy changes designed to further shrink the welfare “caseload.” Some of these changes were unprecedented in Canada. Many of them dealt with how people access welfare—the eligibility rules and application processes that people must navigate in order to receive assistance. The government has declared its policies a success. According to the Ministry of Employment and Income Assistance, the reduced caseload is a result of moving people from “dependency” on welfare to jobs and self-sufficiency. This study set out to test the government’s claim. It is the first evaluation of its kind. It sought to find out why the number of people receiving welfare has dropped so steeply, what the experiences have been of those seeking assistance, and what has happened to some of those denied help. The study draws on previously undisclosed data obtained through Freedom of Information (FOI) requests. This statistical evidence was combined with 42 in-depth interviews conducted in Vancouver and Victoria with individuals seeking welfare, community workers and advocates, and Ministry workers. Their compelling stories are told throughout this report. Key Findings • British Columbia’s welfare application system is not working—it discourages, delays and denies people who need help. The process of seeking income assistance has become so restrictive, and so complicated to navigate, that it is systematically excluding from assistance many of the very people most in need of help. This has harmful consequences for some of the province’s most vulnerable residents. DENIED ASSISTANCE: Closing the Front Door on Welfare in BC 5 • The government’s narrative about more people leaving welfare for work is not supported by the evidence. Data obtained through Freedom of Information requests shows that the recent drop in the caseload is not the result of more people leaving welfare (i.e. an increase in what the government calls “exits”). Rather, fewer people are entering the system and accessing assistance. Simply put, the caseload reduction is mainly a front-door story. • According to FOI data, in the first year after the new welfare legislation was introduced in April 2002, the number of applicants who began to receive welfare benefits dropped by 40 per cent, from an average of 8,234 entries (or “starts”) per month to just 4,914 starts per month. The number of welfare “exits” also fell, but only slightly, from 8,388 to 7,631 per month (see figure on page 8). • The acceptance rate for those who apply for welfare has dropped dramatically. According to FOI data, in June 2001, 90 per cent of people who began an application for welfare were successful in gaining income assistance. By September 2004, only 51 per cent of those who sought welfare were granted assistance. • The application system is now so complicated that many people need help from an advocate to successfully navigate the process. The study found a number of incidents where people were initially denied welfare, but were able to get assistance once they had the help of an advocate— even though there was no change in their circumstances and they were actually eligible the whole time. Yet funding for advocates has been cut. In addition, those most vulnerable and in need—such as people with mental health issues, addictions or language barriers—are often least likely to be able to navigate the system on their own, and less likely to connect with an advocate. • Many people are being “diverted” to homelessness, charities and increased hardship. The Ministry claims that people are being “diverted to employment”; however, the evidence shows that many are not. While some of the people who have been denied or discouraged from assistance have landed on their feet and found alternate sources of income, others are instead being left to fend for themselves,