DOCSLIB.ORG

Southwest Hills Resource Protection Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southwest Hills Resource Protection Plan SOUTHWEST HILLS RESOURCE PROTECTION PLAN INVENTORY, ANALYSIS AND REGULATIONS for the PROTECTION OF WETLANDS, WATER BODIES, FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITATS, OPEN SPACE AND NATURAL AREAS Adopted by City Council January 23, 1992 Effective January 23, 1992 Ordinance No. 165002 Bureau of Planning Portland, Oregon May 1992 Portland City Council J. E. Bud Clark, Mayor Earl Blumenauer, Commissioner Dick Bogle, Commissioner Gretchen Kafoury, Commissioner Michael Lindberg, Commissioner Portland Planning Commission Martha Peck Andrews, President W. Richard Cooley, Vice President Stan Amy Joan Brown-Kline Estill Deitz Margaret Kirkpatrick Richard Michaelson Chet Orloff Vivian Parker To obtain a large-print version of this document, please call 823-7700 Printed on recycled paper SOUTHWEST HILLS RESOURCE PROTECTION PLAN Adopted by City Council January 23, 1992 Effective January 23, 1992 Ordinance No. 165002 Bureau of Planning Gretchen Kafoury, Commissioner-In-Charge Robert E. Stacey, Jr., Planning Director Robert E. Clay, Chief Planner, Long Range Planning and Urban Design Project Staff Tim Brooks, Project Manager Gail Curtis, City Planner Damian Syrnyk, City Planner Esther Lev, Consulting Biologist Kria Lacher, Planning Assistant Dick Reynolds, Planning Assistant Project Assistance Duncan Brown, Senior Planner Cary Pinard, Senior Planner Chuck Beasley, Volunteer Jim Cronan, Volunteer Betty Woerner, Volunteer Geoff Sauncy, Graphic Illustrator May 1992 Table of Contents Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................page 1 Purpose................................................................................................................. 3 Relation to Other Natural Resource Projects .................................................. 3 Organization of the Plan.................................................................................... 4 How to Use this Document ............................................................................... 4 Vicinity Map ........................................................................................................ 5 Chapter 2 SUMMARY OF CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS ............................................... 7 Chapter 3 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................. 11 Introduction....................................................................................................... 13 Area History ...................................................................................................... 13 Past Planning Efforts ........................................................................................ 14 Public Facilities and Improvements............................................................... 22 Summary............................................................................................................ 24 Chapter 4 POLICY FRAMEWORK ................................................................................. 25 Introduction....................................................................................................... 27 State..................................................................................................................... 27 Local.................................................................................................................... 29 Regional.............................................................................................................. 33 Federal................................................................................................................ 34 Summary............................................................................................................ 35 Chapter 5 AREAWIDE INVENTORY OF NATURAL RESOURCES....................... 37 Introduction....................................................................................................... 39 Resource Functions and Values...................................................................... 39 Geology .............................................................................................................. 40 Soils..................................................................................................................... 41 Topography and Slopes ................................................................................... 42 Groundwater ..................................................................................................... 43 Vegetation.......................................................................................................... 47 Wildlife............................................................................................................... 50 Mineral and Aggregate Resources ................................................................. 51 Summary............................................................................................................ 51 Chapter 6 GENERAL ANALYSIS OF ESEE CONSEQUENCES............................... 53 Introduction....................................................................................................... 55 Compatible/Conflicting Uses .......................................................................... 56 Economic Consequences.................................................................................. 56 Social Consequences......................................................................................... 62 Environmental Consequences......................................................................... 65 Energy Consequences ...................................................................................... 74 Applicable Statewide Planning Goals............................................................ 76 Summary............................................................................................................ 79 Chapter 7 SITE-SPECIFIC INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS...................................... 81 Introduction....................................................................................................... 83 Site Selection...................................................................................................... 83 Method of Determining Location, Quantity and Quality ........................... 84 Method of Conflicting Use Analysis.............................................................. 85 Site Summary Overview.................................................................................. 85 Resource Site Summaries ................................................................................ 87 Sites Map............................................................................................................ 89 Site No. 110 Johnson Creek ................................................................. 91 Site No. 111 Canyon Headwaters....................................................... 98 Site No. 112 Canyon Road East.........................................................104 Site No. 113 Marquam Hill Ravine...................................................109 Site No. 114 Terwilliger Parkway, Central......................................117 Site No. 115 George Himes Park.......................................................128 Site No. 116 Capitol Hill/Burlingame ..............................................134 Site No. 117 Stephens Creek/River View Cemetery ......................139 Site No. 118 Multnomah ....................................................................145 Site No. 119 Falling Creek .................................................................149 Site No. 120 Marshall Park/Capitol Hill .........................................154 Site No. 121 Arnold Creek Headwaters ..........................................159 Site No. 122 Arnold Creek................................................................. 164 Site No. 123 Tryon Creek State Park ................................................169 Chapter 8 PLAN PROTECTION MEASURES............................................................175 Introduction.....................................................................................................177 General Summary...........................................................................................177 Amendments to Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies........................178 Southwest Hills Protection Plan Policies and Objectives..........................179 Amendments to Title 33, Planning and Zoning .........................................187 Amendments to the Official Zoning Maps .................................................196 Adoption of a resolution on the concept of establishing a land bank for parks and natural areas acquisition..................................197 Appendix A ADOPTING ORDINANCE...................................................................199 Appendix B GLOSSARY ..............................................................................................213 Appendix C BIBLIOGRAPHY.....................................................................................221 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE • RELATION TO OTHER NATURAL RESOURCE PROJECTS • ORGANIZATION OF THE PLAN • HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT • Purpose The Southwest Hills Resource Protection Plan provides the inventory, analysis and recommendations for protection of significant natural resources located in southwest Portland. The project study area covers 7,000 acres south of the Balch Creek basin and downtown
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marquam Hill Design Guidelines
    Marquam Hill Design Guidelines August 20, 2003 Bureau of Planning City of Portland, Oregon Originally Adopted July 10, 2002 Ordinance No. 176742 Readopted August 14, 2003 Ordinance No. 177796 Acknowledgements The Bureau of Planning is committed to providing equal access to information and hearings. If you need special accommodation, please call 503-823-7700 (TTY 503-823-6868). Portland City Council Portland Bureau of Planning Vera Katz, Mayor Vera Katz, Mayor, Commissioner-in-Charge Jim Francesconi, Commissioner Gil Kelley, Planning Director Randy Leonard, Commissioner Cary Pinard, Principal Planner Dan Saltzman, Commissioner Erik Sten, Commissioner Project Staff Portland Design Commission Susan Hartnett, Project Manager Christopher Kopca, Chair Troy Doss, City Planner Mark Raggett, City Planner Michael McCulloch, AIA, Vice-Chair Phil Goff, City Planner Brigid Flanigan Lloyd Lindley, ASLA Image Credits Nancy Merryman, AIA Phil Goff Loren Waxman Troy Doss Linda Wisner Mark Raggett Acknowledgements Marquam Hill Plan Community and Technical Advisory Group Debbie Murdock, Portland State University Larry Beck, Corbett-Terwilliger-Lair Hill resident/No Tram Robert Neuberger, Homestead resident to OHSU John Perry, Corbett-Terwilliger-Lair Hill resident Sean Brennan (alternate) Lynn Peterson, Tri-Met Glenn Bridger, Southwest Neighborhoods Incorporated Tony Mendoza (alternate) Don Baack (alternate) Young Park (alternate) Marty Slapikas (alternate) Pam Philpot, Veterans Affairs Medical Center Rob Burchfield, Portland Office of Transportation Carol
    [Show full text]
  • Marquam Hill Connection
    DECISION BRIEFING BOOK Marquam Hill Connection Version 1: August 30, 2017 What is the Southwest Corridor Decision Overview Light Rail Project? The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project includes a new connection to The project is a proposed 12-mile link the light rail line with the jobs and services at the medical facilities MAX line connecting downtown located on Marquam Hill, including Oregon Health & Science University Portland to Tigard and Tualatin. (OHSU), the Veterans Affairs (VA) Portland Health Care System and the After several years of early planning, Portland Shriners Hospital for Children. Metro models project that over the project is now undergoing 10,000 daily trips (including both directions) would use this connection environmental review. in 2035, including trips connecting to and from light rail, local buses and the Lair Hill neighborhood. Walking time along the proposed What is the purpose of the connection, which would link Barbur Boulevard with OHSU’s Kohler decision briefing books? Pavilion, is estimated to be about six minutes. Several project decisions remain, including options for alignments, stations, maintenance facilities and station access improvements. Through fall 2017, individual decision briefing books will be released to inform conversations about the key considerations for each major decision. Because the environmental impact analysis is ongoing, briefing books will be updated as new information becomes available. When will the decisions be made? The steering committee is anticipated to narrow down the remaining options to a “Preferred Alternative” in early 2018. Four connection options are under consideration, which include Further outreach, design and combinations of tunnels, elevators and bridges.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Notes 1987-09-14
    Portland State University PDXScholar Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation Oregon Sustainable Community Digital Library 9-14-1987 Meeting Notes 1987-09-14 Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_jpact Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation, "Meeting Notes 1987-09-14 " (1987). Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation. 98. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_jpact/98 This Minutes is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. MEETING REMINDER: SPECIAL JPACT WORK SESSIONS Meeting 1: Monday, September 14, 1987 Overview of Portland 3-6pm, Metro Council Chambers Transportation Issues Meeting 2: Monday, September 28, 1987 Regional LRT Corridors 3-6pm, Metro Council Chambers Meeting 3: Monday, October 12, 1987 Establish Regional 3-6pm, Metro Council Chambers Priorities Meeting 4: Monday, October 26, 1987 Establish Funding 3-6pm, Metro Council Chambers Priorities & Strategies NOTE: Overflow parking is available at City Center parking locations on attached map and may be validated at the meeting. Parking in Metro "Reserved" spaces will result in vehicle towing. metro metro location NUMBERS INDICATE BUS STOPS REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES JPACT Work Sessions Meeting 1 — Overview of Regional Transportation Issues 3:00 A. Introduction 1. Rena Cusma - Preface 2. Dick Waker - Overview of meeting schedules, format, agnedas 3. Andy Cotugno - Introduction of Policy Issues to be addressed 3:15 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Living in Portland
    Section III: Living in Portland “The law must be stable, but it must not stand still.” — Roscoe Pound Looking for Housing? Where to Look Portland is divided into four main areas: Northwest (NW), Southwest (SW), Northeast (NE), and Southeast (SE), though North Portland is sometimes referred to as the “fifth quadrant.” Burnside Street divides the northern and southern ends of Portland, while the Willamette (pronounced Will‐am‐it) River separates east from west. Lewis & Clark Law School is in SW Portland, meaning that it is west of the Willamette River and south of Burnside. If you are looking for a place to live that is close to school and easily accessible via public transportation or bicycle, your best bet is to look in SW or SE Portland. Most students live within three miles of the school. SW SW Portland’s most popular neighborhoods include Multnomah Village, Garden Home, Hillsdale and John’s Landing. Rental listings in these areas usually reference Burlingame, Terwilliger Boulevard or Barbur Boulevard. These neighborhoods are generally quiet, family‐ friendly areas with casual eateries and a few bars or brew pubs, though John’s Landing is a bit more lively. The law school is also close to Lake Oswego and Tigard, which are suburbs of Portland and within a short distance to the school by Boones Ferry Road. Both are quiet areas that tend to attract families. Lake Oswego is known for its excellent school system. You will most likely need a car to live out here; many areas lack sidewalks and public transit. However, one of the bus lines with stops by the school goes through Lake Oswego’s Mountain Park neighborhood.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Hills Resource Protection Plan
    SOUTHWEST HILLS RESOURCE PROTECTION PLAN INVENTORY, ANALYSIS AND REGULATIONS for the PROTECTION OF WETLANDS, WATER BODIES, FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITATS, OPEN SPACE AND NATURAL AREAS Adopted by City Council January 23, 1992 Effective January 23, 1992 Ordinance No. 165002 Bureau of Planning Portland, Oregon May 1992 Portland City Council J. E. Bud Clark, Mayor Earl Blumenauer, Commissioner Dick Bogle, Commissioner Gretchen Kafoury, Commissioner Michael Lindberg, Commissioner Portland Planning Commission Martha Peck Andrews, President W. Richard Cooley, Vice President Stan Amy Joan Brown-Kline Estill Deitz Margaret Kirkpatrick Richard Michaelson Chet Orloff Vivian Parker To obtain a large-print version of this document, please call 823-7700 Printed on recycled paper SOUTHWEST HILLS RESOURCE PROTECTION PLAN Adopted by City Council January 23, 1992 Effective January 23, 1992 Ordinance No. 165002 Bureau of Planning Gretchen Kafoury, Commissioner-In-Charge Robert E. Stacey, Jr., Planning Director Robert E. Clay, Chief Planner, Long Range Planning and Urban Design Project Staff Tim Brooks, Project Manager Gail Curtis, City Planner Damian Syrnyk, City Planner Esther Lev, Consulting Biologist Kria Lacher, Planning Assistant Dick Reynolds, Planning Assistant Project Assistance Duncan Brown, Senior Planner Cary Pinard, Senior Planner Chuck Beasley, Volunteer Jim Cronan, Volunteer Betty Woerner, Volunteer Geoff Sauncy, Graphic Illustrator May 1992 Table of Contents Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................page
    [Show full text]
  • BARBUR BOULEVARD ROAD SAFETY AUDIT SW Capitol Highway to SW Naito Parkway October 2015
    Oregon Department of Transportation BARBUR BOULEVARD ROAD SAFETY AUDIT SW Capitol Highway to SW Naito Parkway October 2015 Prepared for: Prepared by: ODOT Region 1 Traffic Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 123 NW Flanders 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Portland, OR 97209 Portland, OR 97205 503.731.8220 503.228.5230 MOVINGFORWARDTHINKINGTM Road Safety Audit Report Barbur Boulevard Road Safety Audit (RSA): SW Capitol Highway to SW Naito Parkway Mile Point (MP) 6.30 to MP 1.95 Prepared For: Oregon Department of Transportation ODOT Region 1 Traffic 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209 (503) 731-8220 Prepared By: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Portland, OR 97205 (503) 228-5230 Project Manager: Hermanus J. Steyn, Pr. Eng., P.E. Project Engineer: Kelly M. Laustsen Project Principal: Brian L. Ray, P.E. KAI Project Number: 19026.0 October 2015 Road Safety Audit (RSA) Report October 2015 Barbur Blvd: Capitol Hwy to Naito Pkwy, MP 6.30 to 1.95 THIS DOCUMENT IS PROTECTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 23 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 409 AS FOLLOWS: Title 23 U.S.C. §409 Discovery and admission as evidence of certain reports and surveys Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any highway safety construction improvement project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Transportation Recovery Plan Version 1.0 July 2018
    Portland Transportation Recovery Plan Version 1.0 July 2018 PORTLAND TRANSPORTATION RECOVERY PLAN VERSION 1.0 JULY 2018 Prepared by: SORIN GARBER & ASSOCIATES at This plan was developed as part of the project, “Smart, Shared and Social: Enhancing All-Hazards Recovery Plans with Demand Management Technologies” prepared under a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. The preparers are solely responsible for its content and the views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. PORTLAND TRANSPORTATION RECOVERY PLAN | VERSION 1.0 PAGE | i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The contributions of the following individuals and their respective agencies was crucial to the development of the Portland Transportation Recovery Plan. The authors wish to thank them for their guidance, input, and participation. CITY OF PORTLAND REGIONAL DISASTER PREPAREDNESS ORGANIZATION Bureau of Emergency Management Denise Barrett John Brody Laura Hanson Jonna Papaefthimiou* Courtney Patterson METRO Katy Wolf Kim Ellis Daniel Kaempff* Bureau of Transportation Lake McTighe Margi Bradway Cameron Glasgow OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Richard Grant Geoffrey Bowyer* Mauricio Leclerc* Greg Ek-Collins Corey Maciulewicz* Jon Makler Lisa Perry Dylan Rivera OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY Millicent Williams Brett Dobson Sherrie Forslof MULTNOMAH COUNTY Christine Giatti Christopher Blanchard* Lisa Corbly GO
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Materials for Draft EIS Analysis
    APPENDIX B4.2 – LAND USE BACKGROUND INFORMATION Existing Land Uses Existing land uses are shown on Figures B4.2‐1 to B4.2‐3, which include the ½‐mile study areas surrounding the potential stations as well as the ¼‐mile study areas on each side of the alignment alternatives. Segment A begins in the southern end of downtown Portland, the central city of the region, includes the South Waterfront District and extends south to the Hillsdale neighborhood. Existing land use here has been historically influenced and constrained by the presence of SW Barbur Boulevard (formerly a rail line) and the Willamette River, and more recently by the development of Interstates 5 and 205 (I‐5 and I‐205) as well as SW Naito Parkway. The northern portion of this segment is an extension of the central city (downtown) in its more densely developed blocks, and is similar in feel to other neighborhoods in the southern downtown area. The southern section of Segment A is dominated by auto‐oriented uses separated by parking lots and driveways. Properties on SW Barbur Boulevard are predominantly zoned for general commercial uses, and are developed with many auto‐oriented uses separated by parking lots and driveways. The zoning along SW Barbur Boulevard includes a mixture of commercial, open space and residential uses on the northern edge, transitioning to primarily multifamily and single‐family housing through the steep and wooded area, and then mostly low‐density commercial for the remainder of the corridor heading south to Tigard. Along SW Barbur Boulevard, existing land uses include auto‐oriented low‐ density commercial uses involving offices, personal services, and retail, followed by restaurants, apartments, auto‐specific uses (mechanics, tire and oil centers, body shops) and hotels.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION This Appendix Provides Draft Analysis and Information to Support Determinations Required to Comply with Section 4(F) of the U.S
    APPENDIX D – DRAFT SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION This appendix provides draft analysis and information to support determinations required to comply with Section 4(f) of the U.S. Department of Transportation Act (49 United States Code [USC] 303). A Final Section 4(f) Evaluation will be prepared with the Final Environmental Impact Statement that focuses on the Preferred Alternative with the final supporting documentation and analysis to support FTA’s decisions and determinations. Introduction The U.S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966, Section 4(f), generally prohibits U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) agencies (including the Federal Transit Administration [FTA]) from approving projects that would use land from: … a significant publicly‐owned park, recreation area or wildlife and waterfowl refuge or any significant historic site, unless there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of land from the property and the action includes all possible planning to minimize harm to the property resulting from the use. A use is generally defined as a transportation activity that permanently or temporarily acquires land from a Section 4(f) property, or that substantially impairs the important activities, features or attributes that qualify the property as a Section 4(f) resource. Section 4(f) applies to significant publicly owned parks and recreation areas that are open to the public; publicly owned wildlife and waterfowl refuges; and historic sites of national, state or local significance. The USDOT regulations for Section 4(f) define historic properties as those listed in or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The Section 4(f) study area for the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project is based on the analysis for cultural, archaeological and historic resources (see Section 3.6, Historic and Archaeological Resources) and the parks and recreational resources (see Section 3.7, Parks and Recreation Resources).
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Supplies Sanitation
    WARNING AND INFORMATION • Leave at least a 1/8" • Leave 3/8" copy safety 12 PANEL zone around placement copy safety zone @PortlandBEM | - www.publicalerts.org Emergency around the inside of of BOTH outer cards on the card On the attached map, find the closest Basic Earthquake Emergency CREDIT CARD SIZE side B Communication Node (BEECN) to your home and talk about it with your family. Make sure the location is known to everyone in your home: Supplies • Bleed any insert art or (9 1/4" x 23 1/4") screens under the outer A disaster kit shopping list can card areas on side B (at Take the time with your household least 1/8") to fill in the information you EMERGENCY CONTACTS be downloaded from • Do not put outer card on • Leave willat least need a in an emergency. IN AN EMERGENCY everyone in our household will text: SIDE B 1/8" bleed around PublicAlerts.org this template. The outer the outside of 1. Out-of-town Phone cards are run separately with Outer Card Placement Area and Design Notes on a different stock. the trim lines 2. Local Phone All marks and copy indicated in magenta on this template are for your reference only and should be deleted before proceeding with actual mechanical. PERSONAL INFORMATION DEPENDENTS AREA FOR CARD Full Name: We have talked to our school about plans Store in case of an emergency ........................................... * 14 gallons Address: of water per person in We have provided the school with names of three Phone: people approved to pick up our children ............................
    [Show full text]
  • The City of Portland Bicycle Master Plan
    BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Making Bicycling an Integral Part of Daily Life in Portland Bicycle Master Plan City of Portland Office of Transportation BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Making Bicycling an Integral Part of Daily Life in Portland Bicycle Master Plan City of Portland Office of Transportation 1120 SW 5th Avenue, Room 730 Portland, OR 97204 Adopted May 1, 1996 Updated July 1, 1998 Resolution No. 35515 City of Portland, Earl Blumenauer, Commissioner Office of Transportation Felicia Trader, Director Bureau of Traffic Goran Sparrman, Director Management Rob Burchfield, Principal Engineer Project Staff Mia Birk, Bicycle Program Coordinator Todd Burkholder, Program Assistant Roger Geller, Bicycle Program Specialist Doug McCollum, Senior Traffic Engineer Barbara Plummer, Assistant Bicycle Program Specialist Jeff Smith, Bicycle Program Specialist Jamie Throckmorton, Senior Planner Monique Wahba, Associate Planner Lewis Wardrip, Senior Traffic Engineer Bicycle Master Plan Lois Achenbach (Reclaiming Our Streets Implementation Team, Steering Committee Hollywood Development Corporation) Bob Akers (40 Mile Loop Land Trust) Bill Barber (Metro) Rick Browning (Portland Bicycle Advisory Committee) Rex Burkholder (Bicycle Transportation Alliance, Oregon Bicycle Advisory Committee) Sharon Fekety (Portland Wheelmen Touring Club, Portland Bicycle Advisory Committee) Karen Frost-Mecey (Bicycle Transportation Alliance) Peter F. Fry, AICP Elizabeth Humphrey (Tri-Met) Keith Liden (Portland Bicycle Advisory Committee) Lidwien Rahman (Oregon Department of Transportation) Barbara Sochaka and Preston Beck (Port of Portland) Eric Stachon Additional Assistance Graham Clark Mary Edin Linda Ginenthal Dan Hansen Barbara Head Dan Layden Carl Rilling Geoff Sanders Niki Todd Foreword BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Bicycle Master Plan The Bicycle Master Plan was created over a two and a half year period by Process Bicycle Program staff with input from over 2,000 residents.
    [Show full text]
  • EXHIBIT a 18 9 1 1 17.92.020 Prefixes for Street Designations
    EXHIBIT A 18 9 1 1 17.92.020 Prefixes for Street Designations. A. Burnside Street east of the Willamette River shall be designated as East and the prefix "E" shall be added to the street name. B. Burnside Street west of the Willamette River shall be designated as West and the prefix "W" shall be added to the street name. C. All streets east of the Willamette River, north of the centerline of Oregon Street and west of the centerline of Williams Avenue shall be designated as North and the prefix "N" shall be added to the street name. Williams A venue and the portion of Oregon Street west of the centerline of Williams Avenue shall be designated as North and the prefix "N" shall be added to the street name. D. All streets east of the Willamette River between the centerline of Burnside Street and centerline of Oregon Street shall be designated as Northeast and the prefix "NE" shall be added to the street name excluding Burnside Street and excluding the portion of Oregon Street west of Williams A venue. Oregon Street east of the centerline of Williams Avenue shall be designated as Northeast and the prefix "NE" shall be added to the street name. · E. All streets east of the Willamette River north of the centerline of Oregon Street and east of the centerline of Williams Avenue shall be designated as Northeast and the prefix "NE" shall be added to the street name excluding Williams A venue. Oregon Street east of the centerline of Williams A venue shall be designated as Northeast and the prefix "NE" shall be added to the street name.
    [Show full text]