DOCSLIB.ORG

Transit Preferential Streets Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transit Preferential Streets Program TRANSIT PREFERENTIAL STREETS PROGRAM FINAL REPORT CITY of PORTLAND, OREGON OFFICE of TRANSPORTATION July 1997 As part of this project, a separate document with the title “Transit Preferential Streets Program Sourcebook” was prepared to complement the Transit Preferential Streets Program Final Report. Transit Preferential Streets Program June 1997 City of Portland Final Report Office of Transportation PORTLAND OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION CHARLIE HALES, COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC WORKS FELICIA TRADER, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION STEVE DOTTERRER, CHIEF TRANSPORTATION PLANNER LAUREL WENTWORTH, SENIOR PROJECT COORDINATOR PROJECT MANAGER GABE ONYEADOR PROJECT STAFF RICHARD BELLINGER, PORTLAND OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION DONNA BECK, PORTLAND OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION JANET HOPPER, TRI-MET NANCY JARIGESE, TRI-MET TOM JENSSEN, PORTLAND OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANT TEAM THOMAS BAUER, ACCESS ENGINEERING, PROJECT MANAGER SORIN GARBER, HDR ENGINEERING LEE LEIGHTON, SRI/SHAPIRO/AGCO JARRETT WALKER, NELSON\NYGAARD CAROL HANSEN, HANSEN DRAFTING & GRAPHICS Transit Preferential Streets Program June 1997 City of Portland Final Report Office of Transportation ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS STEVE IWATA, PORTLAND OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION JOHN GILLAM, PORTLAND OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION KEN ZATARAIN, TRI-MET JOE WALSH, TRI-MET JAMES HERGERT, TRI-MET ALAN DANAHER, KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES (FORMERLY TRI-MET) TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE JAMIE THROCKMORTIN, BUREAU OF TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT JACK MASON, BUREAU OF TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT JEAN HARRISON, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BILL HOFFMAN, BUREAU OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT DON COVILLE, BUREAU OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT DEBBIE BISCHOFF, BUREAU OF PLANNING YOUNG PARK, TRI-MET RICHARD LEDBETTER, METRO DAN LAYDEN, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GRANT ROBINSON, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DAVID ZAGEL, CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVE Transit Preferential Streets Program June 1997 City of Portland Final Report Office of Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................1 2. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................4 2.1 GENERAL.........................................................................................................................................................4 2.2 DESCRIPTION OF CORRIDOR TRANSIT OPERATIONS .......................................................................4 2.2.1 Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd./Grand Ave. Corridor, North Lombard Street to Hawthorne Bridge .........4 2.2.2 Sandy Blvd. Corridor, Burnside Bridge to SE 82nd Avenue .....................................................................4 2.2.3 Hawthorne Blvd./Foster Street Corridor, Hawthorne Bridge to I-205.......................................................5 2.2.4 Division Street Corridor, Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd. to SE 82nd Avenue ............................................5 2.2.5 Barbur Blvd./Beaverton-Hillsdale Hwy. Corridor, I-405 to Oleson Rd. ....................................................6 3. OPERATIONS ANALYSIS....................................................................................................7 3.1 DATA COLLECTION .....................................................................................................................................7 3.1.1 Critical Time Period Determination and Schedule.....................................................................................7 3.1.2 Methodology ...............................................................................................................................................8 3.2 TRANSIT DELAY IDENTIFICATION........................................................................................................10 3.2.1 Methodology .............................................................................................................................................10 3.2.2 Statistical Results .....................................................................................................................................11 3.2.2.1 Martin Luther King Boulevard (Route #6) ................................................................................................... 11 3.2.2.2 Sandy Boulevard (Route #12)......................................................................................................................... 12 3.2.2.3 Division Street (Route #4)............................................................................................................................... 13 3.2.2.4 Hawthorne Boulevard/50th Street/Foster Road (Route #14) ................................................................... 14 3.2.2.5 Barbur Boulevard/Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway (Route #54)................................................................. 15 3.2.2.6 System Wide Statistics..................................................................................................................................... 16 3.2.3 Summary ..................................................................................................................................................18 3.3 TRANSIT/TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INVESTIGATION..........................................................................19 4. INVENTORY OF APPLIED TREATMENT SOLUTIONS............................................24 4.1 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................24 4.2 TRANSIT PREFERENTIAL STREETS PROGRAM, SAN FRANCISCO................................................24 4.2.1 Background ...............................................................................................................................................24 4.2.2 Funding ....................................................................................................................................................24 4.2.3 TPS Projects .............................................................................................................................................25 4.2.3.1 Problem Analysis ............................................................................................................................................. 25 4.2.3.2 Signal Priority................................................................................................................................................... 25 4.2.3.3 Transit Lanes..................................................................................................................................................... 25 4.2.3.4 Curb Extensions ............................................................................................................................................... 25 4.2.3.5 Bus Stop Consolidation and Relocation........................................................................................................ 26 4.2.3.6 Boarding Islands............................................................................................................................................... 26 4.3 GUIDEBOOK ON TRANSIT PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT, GERMANY ........................................27 4.4 TRANSIT PRIORITY MEASURES IN THE PORTLAND AREA............................................................29 4.4.1 Background ...............................................................................................................................................29 4.4.2 Bus Transit Priority Measures.................................................................................................................29 4.4.2.1 Queue Bypass and Queue Jump .................................................................................................................... 29 4.4.2.2 Traffic Signal Priority ...................................................................................................................................... 30 4.4.2.3 Curb Extensions ............................................................................................................................................... 30 4.4.2.4 Fare Collection Change ................................................................................................................................... 31 Transit Preferential Streets Program June 1997 City of Portland Final Report Page i Office of Transportation 4.5 APPLICABILITY OF APPLIED TREATMENT SOLUTIONS..................................................................31 4.5.1 Signal Priority ..........................................................................................................................................31 4.5.2 Curb Extensions .......................................................................................................................................32 4.5.3 Bus Stop Consolidation.............................................................................................................................32 4.5.4 Boarding Islands .......................................................................................................................................32 4.5.5 Queue Bypass............................................................................................................................................32 4.5.6 Queue Jump ..............................................................................................................................................33
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marquam Hill Design Guidelines
    Marquam Hill Design Guidelines August 20, 2003 Bureau of Planning City of Portland, Oregon Originally Adopted July 10, 2002 Ordinance No. 176742 Readopted August 14, 2003 Ordinance No. 177796 Acknowledgements The Bureau of Planning is committed to providing equal access to information and hearings. If you need special accommodation, please call 503-823-7700 (TTY 503-823-6868). Portland City Council Portland Bureau of Planning Vera Katz, Mayor Vera Katz, Mayor, Commissioner-in-Charge Jim Francesconi, Commissioner Gil Kelley, Planning Director Randy Leonard, Commissioner Cary Pinard, Principal Planner Dan Saltzman, Commissioner Erik Sten, Commissioner Project Staff Portland Design Commission Susan Hartnett, Project Manager Christopher Kopca, Chair Troy Doss, City Planner Mark Raggett, City Planner Michael McCulloch, AIA, Vice-Chair Phil Goff, City Planner Brigid Flanigan Lloyd Lindley, ASLA Image Credits Nancy Merryman, AIA Phil Goff Loren Waxman Troy Doss Linda Wisner Mark Raggett Acknowledgements Marquam Hill Plan Community and Technical Advisory Group Debbie Murdock, Portland State University Larry Beck, Corbett-Terwilliger-Lair Hill resident/No Tram Robert Neuberger, Homestead resident to OHSU John Perry, Corbett-Terwilliger-Lair Hill resident Sean Brennan (alternate) Lynn Peterson, Tri-Met Glenn Bridger, Southwest Neighborhoods Incorporated Tony Mendoza (alternate) Don Baack (alternate) Young Park (alternate) Marty Slapikas (alternate) Pam Philpot, Veterans Affairs Medical Center Rob Burchfield, Portland Office of Transportation Carol
    [Show full text]
  • Marquam Hill Connection
    DECISION BRIEFING BOOK Marquam Hill Connection Version 1: August 30, 2017 What is the Southwest Corridor Decision Overview Light Rail Project? The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project includes a new connection to The project is a proposed 12-mile link the light rail line with the jobs and services at the medical facilities MAX line connecting downtown located on Marquam Hill, including Oregon Health & Science University Portland to Tigard and Tualatin. (OHSU), the Veterans Affairs (VA) Portland Health Care System and the After several years of early planning, Portland Shriners Hospital for Children. Metro models project that over the project is now undergoing 10,000 daily trips (including both directions) would use this connection environmental review. in 2035, including trips connecting to and from light rail, local buses and the Lair Hill neighborhood. Walking time along the proposed What is the purpose of the connection, which would link Barbur Boulevard with OHSU’s Kohler decision briefing books? Pavilion, is estimated to be about six minutes. Several project decisions remain, including options for alignments, stations, maintenance facilities and station access improvements. Through fall 2017, individual decision briefing books will be released to inform conversations about the key considerations for each major decision. Because the environmental impact analysis is ongoing, briefing books will be updated as new information becomes available. When will the decisions be made? The steering committee is anticipated to narrow down the remaining options to a “Preferred Alternative” in early 2018. Four connection options are under consideration, which include Further outreach, design and combinations of tunnels, elevators and bridges.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Constrained Project List Projects Are Listed Alphabetically by County and Nominating Agency
    2018 Regional Transportation Plan Constrained Project List - Public Review Draft Draft Constrained Project List Projects are listed alphabetically by County and nominating agency. Included in Financially Nominating 2018 RTP Estimated Cost Constrained RTP Investment County Agency Primary Facility Owner Time Period ID Project Name Start location End location Description (2016 dollars) project list Category Primary Purpose Clackamas County Clackamas County Clackamas County 2018-2027 11774 Johnson Creek Blvd and Bell Ave Johnson Creek NA Improve intersection of Johnson Creek Blvd and $ 1,500,000 Yes Active Reduce fatal and Intersection Safety Improvements Blvd/Bell Ave Bell Ave to improve intersection safety by Transportation severe injury crashes (TSAP) intersection implementing proven safety counter measures for bicyclist and pedestrians as identified in county Transportation Safety Action Plan and improve ADA accessibility. No change in intersection capacity. Clackamas County Clackamas County ODOT 2018-2027 10018 82nd Ave. Bike and Ped Safety Monterey Ave. Sunnybrook Blvd. Improve safety for bike and pedestrian system $ 1,745,000 Yes Active Reduce fatal and Improvements by completing gaps and implementing proven Transportation severe injury crashes safety counter measures at identified locations within the corridor. Improve ADA accessibility. Clackamas County Clackamas County ODOT 2018-2027 10024 McLoughlin Blvd. Improvement Milwaukie Gladstone Improve safety for bicyclist and pedestrians by $ 7,685,000 Yes Active Reduce fatal and adding bikeways, pedestrian facilities, fill Transportation severe injury crashes sidewalk gaps, add transit supportive elements, improve ADA accessibility, and implementing proven safety counter measures. Clackamas County Clackamas County NCPRD 2018-2027 10085 Lake Oswego Oak Grove Bike Ped Willamette Shoreline Trolley Trail Improve safety and mobility for bicyclists and $ 21,536,380 Yes Active Increase travel Bridge Over the Willamette River pedestrians by constructing a bike/pedestrian Transportation options/alt.
    [Show full text]
  • I-84 Multimodal ICM Regional Concept of Operations
    Federal Highway Administration Integrated Corridor Management Deployment Planning Grant I-84 Multimodal Corridor: A Regional Concept of Transportation Operations for Integrated Corridor Management Portland | Oregon | January 29, 2014 (Revised) 2 I-84 Multimodal ICM Regional Concept of Operations 1.0 Introduction The Portland, Oregon metropolitan area is pleased to present FHWA with our application for the Integrated Corridor Management Deployment Planning Grant. The partners that have collaborated to prepare this application share the belief that in selecting the Portland region, FHWA will wisely invest in a community that is ready to advance its efforts in collaborative transportation system management. The Portland region is a low risk, high reward “living laboratory” demonstration site for the ICM program. All the puzzle pieces are in place, the region just needs a plan and momentum around a collaborative integrated corridor management project to maximize the I-84 corridor, which includes Oregon’s busiest and most unreliable stretch of freeway. Portland I-84 Corridor Unique Assets: FHWA/Agency/Public Benefits: • Mature multimodal system with a built out • Corridor has a robust set of travel options that freeway/arterial network; multiple transit modes support vibrant, diverse communities. Offers a truly including light-rail transit, streetcar, and bus multimodal environment to pilot ICM practices. service; park & ride facilities; bicycle network • Active traffic management devices including • Much of the technology needed to support an ICM queue warning, variable speed limits, travel time approach is in place today. Agencies actively use signage on full color matrix VMS signs, and CCTV technology to improve the travel experience. • Adaptive signal control on several arterial • Agencies are experienced with advanced technologies corridors that smooth travel flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Notes 1987-09-14
    Portland State University PDXScholar Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation Oregon Sustainable Community Digital Library 9-14-1987 Meeting Notes 1987-09-14 Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_jpact Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation, "Meeting Notes 1987-09-14 " (1987). Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation. 98. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_jpact/98 This Minutes is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. MEETING REMINDER: SPECIAL JPACT WORK SESSIONS Meeting 1: Monday, September 14, 1987 Overview of Portland 3-6pm, Metro Council Chambers Transportation Issues Meeting 2: Monday, September 28, 1987 Regional LRT Corridors 3-6pm, Metro Council Chambers Meeting 3: Monday, October 12, 1987 Establish Regional 3-6pm, Metro Council Chambers Priorities Meeting 4: Monday, October 26, 1987 Establish Funding 3-6pm, Metro Council Chambers Priorities & Strategies NOTE: Overflow parking is available at City Center parking locations on attached map and may be validated at the meeting. Parking in Metro "Reserved" spaces will result in vehicle towing. metro metro location NUMBERS INDICATE BUS STOPS REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES JPACT Work Sessions Meeting 1 — Overview of Regional Transportation Issues 3:00 A. Introduction 1. Rena Cusma - Preface 2. Dick Waker - Overview of meeting schedules, format, agnedas 3. Andy Cotugno - Introduction of Policy Issues to be addressed 3:15 B.
    [Show full text]
  • July 28 – August 4, 2018
    Oregon Department of Transportation News Release Region 1 Washington, Multnomah, Clackamas and Hood River Counties July 27, 2018 18-30 For more information: Katelyn Jackson, 503-731-8503 [email protected] Weekly Construction Update: July 28 - August 4, 2018* *Schedules are subject to change due to weather and site conditions. The following highways have projects included in this week’s construction report. Scroll down to see traffic impacts in the following order (interstate, U.S., and state highways). For updated information on highway work and current travel information throughout Oregon, visit www.tripcheck.com or call the Oregon road report at 511 or 1-800-977-6368. For more information about Region 1 area road construction visit www.Oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/REGION1/Pages/WeeklyConstructionUpdate/WeeklyConstructionUpdate.aspx July 28 - August 4, 2018 Weekly Construction Update Page 2 of 7 Interstate 5 – Pacific Highway – at I-84 interchange (18T047365) Project Description: This project will repair and resurface the bridges that connect I-84 and I-5. Expect a two-week closure of each bridge in July and August. Traffic Impacts: The ramp connecting I-84 west to I-5 north is closed until August 6 at 5 a.m. Detour to I-5 southbound and I-405 northbound. On-ramps to I-84 westbound will close between 82nd Avenue and I-5. Off-ramps will remain open. July 27 at 10 p.m. the right lane of the ramp that connects I-84 westbound to I-5 southbound will close 24 hours a day through Saturday, Aug. 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Living in Portland
    Section III: Living in Portland “The law must be stable, but it must not stand still.” — Roscoe Pound Looking for Housing? Where to Look Portland is divided into four main areas: Northwest (NW), Southwest (SW), Northeast (NE), and Southeast (SE), though North Portland is sometimes referred to as the “fifth quadrant.” Burnside Street divides the northern and southern ends of Portland, while the Willamette (pronounced Will‐am‐it) River separates east from west. Lewis & Clark Law School is in SW Portland, meaning that it is west of the Willamette River and south of Burnside. If you are looking for a place to live that is close to school and easily accessible via public transportation or bicycle, your best bet is to look in SW or SE Portland. Most students live within three miles of the school. SW SW Portland’s most popular neighborhoods include Multnomah Village, Garden Home, Hillsdale and John’s Landing. Rental listings in these areas usually reference Burlingame, Terwilliger Boulevard or Barbur Boulevard. These neighborhoods are generally quiet, family‐ friendly areas with casual eateries and a few bars or brew pubs, though John’s Landing is a bit more lively. The law school is also close to Lake Oswego and Tigard, which are suburbs of Portland and within a short distance to the school by Boones Ferry Road. Both are quiet areas that tend to attract families. Lake Oswego is known for its excellent school system. You will most likely need a car to live out here; many areas lack sidewalks and public transit. However, one of the bus lines with stops by the school goes through Lake Oswego’s Mountain Park neighborhood.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Hills Resource Protection Plan
    SOUTHWEST HILLS RESOURCE PROTECTION PLAN INVENTORY, ANALYSIS AND REGULATIONS for the PROTECTION OF WETLANDS, WATER BODIES, FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITATS, OPEN SPACE AND NATURAL AREAS Adopted by City Council January 23, 1992 Effective January 23, 1992 Ordinance No. 165002 Bureau of Planning Portland, Oregon May 1992 Portland City Council J. E. Bud Clark, Mayor Earl Blumenauer, Commissioner Dick Bogle, Commissioner Gretchen Kafoury, Commissioner Michael Lindberg, Commissioner Portland Planning Commission Martha Peck Andrews, President W. Richard Cooley, Vice President Stan Amy Joan Brown-Kline Estill Deitz Margaret Kirkpatrick Richard Michaelson Chet Orloff Vivian Parker To obtain a large-print version of this document, please call 823-7700 Printed on recycled paper SOUTHWEST HILLS RESOURCE PROTECTION PLAN Adopted by City Council January 23, 1992 Effective January 23, 1992 Ordinance No. 165002 Bureau of Planning Gretchen Kafoury, Commissioner-In-Charge Robert E. Stacey, Jr., Planning Director Robert E. Clay, Chief Planner, Long Range Planning and Urban Design Project Staff Tim Brooks, Project Manager Gail Curtis, City Planner Damian Syrnyk, City Planner Esther Lev, Consulting Biologist Kria Lacher, Planning Assistant Dick Reynolds, Planning Assistant Project Assistance Duncan Brown, Senior Planner Cary Pinard, Senior Planner Chuck Beasley, Volunteer Jim Cronan, Volunteer Betty Woerner, Volunteer Geoff Sauncy, Graphic Illustrator May 1992 Table of Contents Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................page
    [Show full text]
  • How Disinvestment, Displacement and Segregation Created the Conditions for Eco- Gentrification in Orp Tland's Albina District, 1940-2015
    Portland State University PDXScholar University Honors Theses University Honors College 2016 Black and Green: How Disinvestment, Displacement and Segregation Created the Conditions For Eco- Gentrification in orP tland's Albina District, 1940-2015 Carter William Ause Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/honorstheses Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Ause, Carter William, "Black and Green: How Disinvestment, Displacement and Segregation Created the Conditions For Eco-Gentrification in orP tland's Albina District, 1940-2015" (2016). University Honors Theses. Paper 269. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.294 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Black and Green: How Disinvestment, Displacement and Segregation created the conditions for Eco-Gentrification in Portland’s Albina District, 1940-2015 By Carter William Ause An undergraduate honors thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in History Thesis Advisor: Catherine McNeur Portland State University 2016 Abstract The historically African American Albina District of Portland, Oregon holds a long track record of neighborhood neglect, devaluation and displacement of poor residents by private real estate companies and city government. Devaluation in the area was the direct result of discriminatory real estate policies and mid-twentieth century urban renewal projects. Starting in the 1990s, the City of Portland passed revitalization measures to increase private investment in the neighborhood.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Tuesday, January 28, 2020
    TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Tuesday, January 28, 2020 Thank you for taking the time to join us at a Transportation Committee meeting! We encourage our community’s participation. Meeting materials - including agendas and packets - are available at Hillsboro-Oregon.gov. If you have any questions, contact the Public Works Department at 503-681-6146. We are happy to be of assistance! Sign-language interpreters and Assisted Listening Devices (ALD) are available at no cost. Please call 503-681-6100 or TTY 503-681-6284, 72 hours prior to the meeting. Call to Order - Roll Call 1. Consider Minutes: 1.1. Transportation Committee Minutes 112619 Transportation Committee Minutes 112619 2. Public Comment: (Persons wishing to speak may be recognized at this time. Please fill out the card on the table in the back of the room. Presentations are limited to three minutes.) 3. Items for Recommendation to City Council: 3.1. Consider forwarding a recommendation to City Council to enter into an Intergovernmental Agreement with Washington County for improvements to NE 25th Avenue and NE Cornell Road. Staff Report - Brad Albert Staff Report 3.2. Consider forwarding a recommendation to City Council to authorize the award of a contract for final road construction design and engineering services for the interim extension of NE Huffman St and NE 30th Ave. Staff Report - Allison Bergseng Staff Report 3.3. NE Jackson School Road Improvement Project Construction Recommendation for Contract Award. Staff Report - Allison Bergseng Staff Report 4. Items for Transportation Committee Action: 4.1. Consider election of 2020 Transportation Committee Chair and Vice Chair. Verbal Update - Tina Bailey 4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • East Portland Historical Overview & Historic Preservation Study
    East Portland Historical Overview & Historic Preservation Study Revised March, 2009 City of Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability Commissioner-In-Charge Mayor Sam Adams Director Susan Anderson Historic Resources Program Steve Dotterer, Principal Planner Liza Mickle, City Planner Nicholas Starin, City Planner Project Staff Liza Mickle, City Planner Nicholas Starin, City Planner With Assistance from Carmen Piekarski, GIS Analyst Kevin Martin, GIS Analyst Ralph Sanders, Graphic Designer Dan Pauley, Community Service Aide Liza Mylott, Community Service Aide For more information, contact: City of Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability 1900 SW Fourth Ave, Ste. 7100 Portland, Oregon 97201-5380 Phone: (503) 823-7700 Fax: (503) 823-7800 www.portlandonline.com/bps/ The Bureau of Planning and Sustainability is committed to providing equal access to information and hearings. If you need special accommodation, call the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability at (503) 823-7700 (TTY 503-823-6868). East Portland Historical Overview & Historic Preservation Study Table of Contents I. Introduction................................................................................................................ 1 II. East Portland Historical Overview........................................................................... 4 Chinook Illahee: The Land of the Chinook ..........................................................................4 Settlement to 1914 ..............................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Hills Resource Protection Plan
    SOUTHWEST HILLS RESOURCE PROTECTION PLAN INVENTORY, ANALYSIS AND REGULATIONS for the PROTECTION OF WETLANDS, WATER BODIES, FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITATS, OPEN SPACE AND NATURAL AREAS Adopted by City Council January 23, 1992 Effective January 23, 1992 Ordinance No. 165002 Bureau of Planning Portland, Oregon May 1992 Portland City Council J. E. Bud Clark, Mayor Earl Blumenauer, Commissioner Dick Bogle, Commissioner Gretchen Kafoury, Commissioner Michael Lindberg, Commissioner Portland Planning Commission Martha Peck Andrews, President W. Richard Cooley, Vice President Stan Amy Joan Brown-Kline Estill Deitz Margaret Kirkpatrick Richard Michaelson Chet Orloff Vivian Parker To obtain a large-print version of this document, please call 823-7700 Printed on recycled paper SOUTHWEST HILLS RESOURCE PROTECTION PLAN Adopted by City Council January 23, 1992 Effective January 23, 1992 Ordinance No. 165002 Bureau of Planning Gretchen Kafoury, Commissioner-In-Charge Robert E. Stacey, Jr., Planning Director Robert E. Clay, Chief Planner, Long Range Planning and Urban Design Project Staff Tim Brooks, Project Manager Gail Curtis, City Planner Damian Syrnyk, City Planner Esther Lev, Consulting Biologist Kria Lacher, Planning Assistant Dick Reynolds, Planning Assistant Project Assistance Duncan Brown, Senior Planner Cary Pinard, Senior Planner Chuck Beasley, Volunteer Jim Cronan, Volunteer Betty Woerner, Volunteer Geoff Sauncy, Graphic Illustrator May 1992 Table of Contents Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................page
    [Show full text]