TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Tuesday, January 28, 2020
Thank you for taking the time to join us at a Transportation Committee meeting!
We encourage our community’s participation. Meeting materials - including agendas and packets - are available at Hillsboro-Oregon.gov. If you have any questions, contact the Public Works Department at 503-681-6146. We are happy to be of assistance!
Sign-language interpreters and Assisted Listening Devices (ALD) are available at no cost. Please call 503-681-6100 or TTY 503-681-6284, 72 hours prior to the meeting.
Call to Order - Roll Call
1. Consider Minutes:
1.1. Transportation Committee Minutes 112619 Transportation Committee Minutes 112619
2. Public Comment: (Persons wishing to speak may be recognized at this time. Please fill out the card on the table in the back of the room. Presentations are limited to three minutes.)
3. Items for Recommendation to City Council:
3.1. Consider forwarding a recommendation to City Council to enter into an Intergovernmental Agreement with Washington County for improvements to NE 25th Avenue and NE Cornell Road. Staff Report - Brad Albert Staff Report
3.2. Consider forwarding a recommendation to City Council to authorize the award of a contract for final road construction design and engineering services for the interim extension of NE Huffman St and NE 30th Ave. Staff Report - Allison Bergseng Staff Report
3.3. NE Jackson School Road Improvement Project Construction Recommendation for Contract Award. Staff Report - Allison Bergseng Staff Report
4. Items for Transportation Committee Action:
4.1. Consider election of 2020 Transportation Committee Chair and Vice Chair. Verbal Update - Tina Bailey
4.2. SE 67th Avenue Road Closure Request. Staff Report - Doug Gresham Staff Report
5. Items for Discussion (Items may result in action and/or recommendation to Council):
5.1. None.
6. Advice/Information Items
6.1. Washington County Coordinating Committee update. Staff Report - Don Odermott Staff Report
6.2. Update on the 229th Plan and Profile Study. Staff Report - Gregg Snyder Staff Report
6.3. T2020 Metro Transportation Funding Measure Update. Staff Report - Don Odermott and Gregg Snyder Page 2 of 79
Staff Report
6.4. Log of Special Event Permit Applications. Log Of Special Event Permits
6.5. Log of Citizen Requests received to transportation issues. Log Of Citizen Requests
Page 3 of 79 Page 4 of 79 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, November 26, 2019
Present: Councilor Anthony Martin, Councilor Beach Pace, and Citizen Advisor Kellen Shide Staff Present: Robby Hammond, Tom Arnold, Tina Bailey, Brad Albert, Don Odermott, Dan Dias, and Gregg Snyder Guests: Mike Morse, Michael Goff and Hal Ballard
Call to Order – Roll Call
1. Consider Minutes:
1. Transportation Committee Minutes 092419
Motion was made by Pace and seconded by Martin. The motion passed unanimously with Pace aye, and Martin aye.
2. Public Comment: (Persons wishing to speak may be recognized at this time. Please fill out the card on the table in the back of the room. Presentations are limited to three minutes.)
3. Items for Recommendation to City Council:
1. Consider forwarding a recommendation to City Council to authorize an Intergovernmental Agreement with Portland State University and $75,000 for an air quality study in the US 26 Corridor. Staff Report - Gregg Snyder
Motion was made by Pace and seconded by Martin. The motion passed unanimously with Pace aye, and Martin aye.
4. Items for Transportation Committee Action:
1. Consider approving a recommendation to negotiate amendments to the Bonded MSTIP Intergovernmental Agreement with Washington County in order to prioritize early construction of a Cornelius Pass Road bridge over Butternut Creek in south Hillsboro. Staff Report - Don Odermott
Motion was made by Pace and seconded by Martin. The motion passed unanimously with Pace aye, and Martin aye.
5. Items for Discussion (Items may result in action and/or recommendation to Council):
Page 1 of 2
Page 5 of 79 None
6. Advice/Information:
1. Washington County Coordinating Committee update. Staff Report - Gregg Snyder
2. Get Moving! Transportation Funding Measure update. Staff Report - Don Odermott
3. 2019 Pavement Management Program annual update. Staff Report - Brad Albert
4. 25th / Cornell project and future IGA. Plan Attached - Brad Albert
5. Tree Care planting requirement update. Verbal Update - Brad Albert
6. Tree care public outreach. Flier attached - Tina Bailey
7. Transportation Committee Chair and Vice Chair Election – January 2020 Meeting. Verbal Update - Tina Bailey
8. Log of Special Events Permit Applications.
9. Log of Citizen Requests received to transportation issues.
Page 2 of 2
Page 6 of 79 MEMORANDUM
To: Robby Hammond, City Manager
From: Brad Albert, Street Engineering Section Manager
Date: January 28, 2020
Subject: NE 25th Avenue and NE Cornell Road Intergovernmental Agreement with Washington County ______
Requested Transportation Committee Action: Consider forwarding a recommendation to the City Council to enter into an Intergovernmental Agreement with Washington County for improvements to NE 25th Avenue and NE Cornell Road.
Background: The NE 25th Avenue and NE Cornell Road project, as shown in the diagram below, is a Major Streets and Transportation Program (MSTIP 3d) project being delivered by Washington County. This is a capacity improvement needed to accommodate congestion during peak traffic hours and projected growth in Hillsboro. This project is funded through the MSTIP program, with Washington County funding the entire project costs.
The City is partnering with Washington County to acquire the additional right of way along NE 25th Avenue. The added right of way will accommodate additional turn lanes from southbound 25th Avenue onto Cornell Road, bicycle lanes, and improved street lights and traffic signals.
The main portion of the needed right of way will come from the Port of Portland property at the northeast corner of the 25th and Cornell intersection. The City, under the terms of the IGA, will be working on the County’s behalf to negotiate the terms of the right of way acquisition to advance the project. The City is currently working on various other projects that involves the Port of Portland.
The MSTIP agreement did not include costs for adjusting the City’s utilities as those costs are generally funded by the utility owner and are not shared with Washington County. The Water Department is concurrently requesting a recommendation to City Council for the waterline relocation work in the IGA at the February Utilties Commission meeting.
Page 1 of 2
3.1 (1)
Page 7 of 79
Project Location
Cost: The cost for construction and engineering services associated with the waterline relocation work is $145,100.00 (Pending Utilities Commission Approval).
3.1 (2)
Page 8 of 79
MAJOR STREETS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN WASHINGTON COUNTY AND THE CITY OF HILLBORO
NE 25TH AVENUE AND NE CORNELL ROAD INTERSECTION PROJECT
This Intergovernmental Agreement is entered into between Washington County, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, acting by and through its elected officials, hereinafter referred to as “COUNTY”; and the City of Hillsboro, a municipal corporation, acting by and through its City Council, hereinafter referred to as “CITY”.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, ORS 190.010 authorizes agencies to enter into intergovernmental agreements for the performance of any or all activities and functions that a party to the agreement has the authority to perform; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY Board of County Commissioners has approved and funded a Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program (3d) project to construct road improvements to NE 25th Avenue and NE Cornell Road Intersection, and
WHEREAS, NE Cornell Road is COUNTY facility and NE 25th Avenue is a City of Hillsboro roadway. The project is located entirely within Hillsboro city limits, and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of COUNTY and CITY to construct improvements on NE 25th Avenue and NE Cornell Road Intersection, as described below, hereinafter called the PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, COUNTY will perform the project management, the design and construction of PROJECT, and
WHEREAS, CITY will perform all needed Right of Way acquisitions for PROJECT, COUNTY will fund these acquisitions, and
WHEREAS, the CITY wishes to make Corresponding water infrastructure improvements include adjustments and relocations of existing fire hydrants, water and irrigation meters, and the installation of approximately 60 feet of 10-inch Ductile Iron waterline with the appropriate appurtenances to avoid a new signal pole, and agrees to pay for such requested work, hereinafter called the WATERLINE; and
WHEREAS, the original budget for PROJECT is $5,400,000, $900,000 of which is designated for Right of Way acquisitions, and
3.1 (3)
Page 9 of 79
WHEREAS, it is the mutual desire of the COUNTY and CITY to enter into this Agreement to allocate their responsibilities to complete the PROJECT; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the premise being in general as stated in the foregoing recitals, and in consideration of the terms, conditions and covenants set forth below, the parties hereto agree as follows:
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The PROJECT would increase the intersection capacity, improve operations and safety at the signalized intersection of NE 25th Avenue at NE Cornell Road. The PROJECT would include roadway widening, modifying the traffic signal, and corresponding water, sanitary, and storm infrastructure improvements.
B. COUNTY OBLIGATIONS
1. COUNTY shall perform, or cause to be performed, all actions necessary for the design and construction of the PROJECT including project management, design and construction engineering, land surveying, regulatory and land use permits and approvals, public involvements, contracts administration, advertise for, award, inspection and construction management.
2. COUNTY shall provide CITY with the opportunity for design review of final plans prior to bidding. COUNTY agrees to incorporate CITY comments that do not significantly impact project costs and/or schedule.
3. COUNTY shall provide legal descriptions for the PROJECT in a form that will enable CITY to obtain necessary right of way and easements for construction of the PROJECT.
4. COUNTY shall perform a pre-construction survey and a post construction survey in accordance with ORS 209.155. The surveys shall meet to the Oregon Department of Transportation Survey Filing Map Standards and be recorded in the County Surveyor’s office.
5. COUNTY delegates authority to CITY to act on its behalf to obtain the necessary right of way acquisitions on Cornell Road through negotiation or condemnation for PROJECT. Any acquisitions obtained on behalf of COUNTY by CITY for the PROJECT along Cornell Road shall name COUNTY as the grantee.
6. COUNTY shall make available to CITY up to $900,000 for the purpose of right-of- way acquisitions. COUNTY shall make payments within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of an invoice from CITY.
C. CITY OBLIGATIONS
3.1 (4)
Page 10 of 79
1. CITY shall, negotiate for and obtain the necessary right-of-way from the Port of Portland and other properties along NE 25th Avenue and NE Cornell Road.
2. CITY hereby designates the City of Hillsboro City Engineer or their designee, as the CITY’s project manager, and representative to administer this contract on behalf of CITY.
3. CITY shall establish a unique project number and compile accurate cost accounting records, which shall be available for examination by COUNTY upon reasonable notice.
4. CITY shall, in right of way acquisitions, complete all tasks and comply with all applicable laws, regulations and the State of Oregon’s Right-of-Way Manual, relating to the acquisition of property for a public project, together with the administration of contracts for such tasks. CITY shall co-sign Right-of-Way Certification for PROJECT.
5. CITY shall invoice COUNTY for right-of-way cost reimbursements for up to $900,000.
6. CITY shall contact COUNTY within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of appraisal(s) if the appraisal(s) indicate the right-of-way acquisition costs will exceed $900,000 to resolve the overage.
7. CITY shall provide inspection of the WATERLINE bid items including review and approval of shop drawings, submittals, and onsite inspections to determine compliance with the contract documents. CITY’s onsite inspector shall be onsite and responsible for enforcing all applicable CITY PROJECTS specifications during all CITY PROJECTS work. If CITY PROJECTS require night work, then the CITY PROJECTS inspector will perform the necessary onsite inspection work and coordinate the night work with the COUNTY lead inspector. CITY must approve the final acceptance of the WATERLINE work prior to top lift paving.
8. CITY shall assist the COUNTY lead inspector with the following construction documentation for the WATERLINE bid items,
a. General daily progress reports and erosion control reports,
b. Quantity documentation used for monthly estimates, and
c. Test Quality documentation and test results as specified in the construction contract.
9. CITY shall coordinate and financially participate with COUNTY on any disagreements, disputes, delays or claims related to or as a result of the
3.1 (5)
Page 11 of 79
WATERLINE work.
10. CITY shall perform all actions regarding compensation as set forth in Article E - Compensation.
11. CITY shall perform all necessary public involvement and notifications for water service shutdowns resulting from the WATERLINE work. CITY shall assign a 24- hour emergency contact for the duration of the WATERLINE work
E. COMPENSATION
1. COUNTY shall be responsible for all costs to design, right of way, and construct PROJECT as described above
2. The CITY shall pay an estimated total of $145,100 for the cost of design and construction of WATERLINE work, as described above. WATERLINE work costs are estimated as follows:
i. Waterline Design Costs $ 18,100 ii. Waterline Construction Costs $100,000 iii. Construction Administration and Management $ 15,000 (15% ii) iv. Mobilization & Traffic Control (12% of ii) $ 12,000 TOTAL $145,100
Items iii and iv shall be calculated and paid to COUNTY as a lump sum after COUNTY makes final payment to the construction contractor for the PROJECT and WATERLINE work.
3. CITY and COUNTY understand that the costs outlined above are estimates and are used to determine project budgets and estimated payments amount used within this Agreement. Final costs will be based on the actual contract amount realized. Final payments made by the CITY to the COUNTY for the CITY PROJECTS shall be based on actual bid prices, construction quantities and non- construction costs.
4. In the event the CITY and COUNTY agree to design and construction changes that will eliminate or reduce the scope and extent of the WATERLINE work, the CITY will pay for COUNTY’s cost for re-design and/or construction change orders.
F. GENERAL TERMS
1. Laws of Oregon: The parties shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations
3.1 (6)
Page 12 of 79
regarding the handling and expenditure of public funds. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Oregon. All relevant provisions required by ORS Chapter 279A and 279C to be included in public contracts are incorporated and made a part of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein.
2. Default: Either party shall be deemed to be in default if it fails to comply with any provision of this Agreement. CITY and COUNTY agree time is of the essence in the performance of any of the obligations within this Agreement as related to construction. Complaining party shall provide the defaulting party with written notice of default and allow thirty (30) days within which to cure the defect.
3. Indemnification: This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only. Each party agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the other party, and its directors, officers, employees, and agents, from and against all claims, demands and causes of actions and suits of any kind or nature for personal injury, death or damage to property on account of or arising out of services performed, the omissions of services or in any way resulting from the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of the indemnifying party and its officers, employees and agents. To the extent applicable, the above indemnification is subject to and shall not exceed the limits of liability of the Oregon Tort Claims Act (ORS 30.260 through 30.300). In addition, each party shall be solely responsible for any contract claims, delay damages or similar items arising from or caused by the action or inaction of the party under this Agreement.
4. Resolution of Disputes. The parties shall attempt to informally resolve any dispute concerning any party’s performance or decisions under this Agreement, or regarding the terms, conditions or meaning of this Agreement. A neutral third party may be used if the parties agree to facilitate these negotiations. In the event of an impasse in the resolution of any dispute, the issue shall be submitted to the governing bodies of both parties for a recommendation or resolution.
5. Remedies: Subject to the provisions in paragraph 4, any party may institute legal action to cure, correct or remedy any default, to enforce any covenant or agreement herein, or to enjoin any threatened or attempted violation of this Agreement. All legal actions shall be initiated in Washington County Circuit Court. The parties, by signature of their authorized representatives below, consent to the personal jurisdiction of that court.
6. Excused Performance: In addition to the specific provisions of this Agreement, performance by any Party shall not be in default where delay or default is due to war, insurrection, strikes, walkouts, riots, floods, drought, earthquakes, fires, casualties, acts of God, governmental restrictions imposed or mandated by governmental entities other than the parties, enactment of conflicting state or federal laws or regulations, new or supplementary environmental regulation, litigation or similar bases for excused performance that are not within the reasonable control to the Party to be excused.
3.1 (7)
Page 13 of 79
7. Severability: If any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement is invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions of the Agreement will not be affected or impaired in any way.
8. Integration: This Agreement is the entire agreement of the Parties on its subject and supersedes any prior discussions or agreements regarding the same subject.
9. Term: The term of the Agreement shall be from the date of execution until the completion of the work described herein, but not to exceed five (5) years.
10. Termination: Except for breach, this Agreement may be canceled or terminated only upon mutual consent. Should the PROJECT be canceled or terminated for any reason beyond the control of the parties, the parties shall in good faith agree to such reasonable provisions for winding up the PROJECT and paying for costs incurred as are necessary.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and affixed their seals as of the day and year hereinafter written.
DONE AND DATED this day of , 2019.
WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON CITY OF HILLSBORO, OREGON
CHAIR CITY MANAGER
DATE DATE
RECORDING SECRETARY CITY RECORDER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cortney Duke-Driessen Assistant County Counsel
DATE
3.1 (8)
Page 14 of 79 MEMORANDUM
To: Robby Hammond, City Manager
From: Allison Bergseng, Principal Engineer
Date: January 28, 2020
Subject: Recommendation to award the road construction final design and engineering services contract for the extension of NE Huffman St and NE 30th Ave in the Hillsboro Technology Park ______
Requested Transportation Committee Action: Consider forwarding a recommendation to City Council to authorize the award of a contract for final road construction design and engineering services for the interim extension of NE Huffman St and NE 30th Ave.
Background: A little over three years ago, the City Council established the North Hillsboro Industrial Renewal Area (IRA), which allows the use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) to pay for various projects within the IRA boundary, which includes the Hillsboro Technology Park. However, the funds collected to date are not enough to install the necessary core public infrastructure because of the district still being in early stages.
Typically, the City would require that new development pay for and deliver public infrastructure, such as new roads and sewer lines, with infrastructure delivery occurring incrementally as sites develop. In a continued effort to deliver critical core infrastructure ahead of development, and to provide equitable access for sites within the Tech Park to connect with needed infrastructure, the City continues to pursue early, and a more comprehensive, delivery of certain core pieces of infrastructure.
In January, the City Council approved the NE Huffman St/NE 30th Ave Reimbursement District, which allows the City to be reimbursed for improvement expenses that include right-of-way acquisition, installation of the gravity sewer line in the public right-of-way, and street improvements to NE Huffman Street and NE 30th Avenue. Users or developers of the properties will be assessed their share of the reimbursement fee when they obtain their building permit.
Page 1 of 2
3.2 (1)
Page 15 of 79 The next steps in the site development process is to prepare the final road and facility design (60%, 90%, and 100 % Construction Plans) and conduct engineering services for the extension of NE Huffman St. and NE 30th Ave.
Cost:
The estimated cost for the road and facility design and engineering is $662,108.40 and will be paid by the North Hillsboro Industrial Renewal Area Tax Increment Fund.
Page 2 of 2
3.2 (2)
Page 16 of 79 Page 17 of 79
3.2 (3) Page 18 of 79 MEMORANDUM
To: Robby Hammond, City Manager
From: Allison Bergseng, Principal Engineer
Date: January 28, 2020
Subject: NE Jackson School Road Improvement Project Construction Recommendation for Contract Award ______
Requested Transportation Committee Action: Consider forwarding a recommendation to City Council to approve a construction contract with Pacific Excavation, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder for the NE Jackson School Road Improvement project in the amount of $21,473,000.
Background: The NE Jackson School Road Improvement project has been identified in the Transportation System Plan for more than four decades. NE Jackson School Road is currently a two-lane roadway with intermittent center turn lanes and incomplete sidewalks. It lacks safe bicycle lanes and has limited roadway lighting. Improvements include continuous sidewalks, cycle track, center turn lane, street lighting, culvert replacement, storm system upgrades, underground utilities, and the addition of landscaped planter strips with street trees.
Cost: The results of the January 16, 2020 bid opening were as follows:
NE Jackson School Road Improvement Project Bidder Amount Pacific Excavation $21,473,000.00 Tapani Inc $21,479,000.00 Kerr Contractors $21,719,307.10 Emery & Sons $22,737,389.80 Moore Excavation Inc $23,332,722.50 Westech Construction $23,944,570.35 Goodfellow Bros $24,553,636.85 Engineer’s Estimate: $22,578,388.00
Page 1 of 2
3.3 (1)
Page 19 of 79
This is a budgeted project.
Page 2 of 2
3.3 (2)
Page 20 of 79 MEMORANDUM
To: Robby Hammond
From: Douglas Gresham, Traffic Engineering Section Manager
Date: January 28, 2020
Subject: SE 67th Avenue Road Closure Request ______
Requested Transportation Committee Action: Consider approving a road closure of SE 67th Avenue from SE Alexander Street to SE Genrosa Street for a road construction project from June 15, 2020 through September 2, 2020.
Background: SE 67th Avenue is the western most edge of the Reed’s Crossing development in South Hillsboro. As a condition of development, Newland Communities is required to make improvements to this street. This section of 67th Avenue includes the crossing of Gordon Creek. The road construction project will be replacing the culvert that carries Gordon Creek under the road and raising grade of the road at the crossing.
Typically, replacement of a culvert crossing requires the complete removal of the road at the creek crossing, bypass pumping the creek, and installing a large pipe with a crane or large excavator. These activies cannot be easily done with the road open to traffic.
When not actively replacing the culvert, the road will be required to have emergency vehicle access as much as practicable and at the end of each work day. Access to the existing business will be maintained throughout the duration of the project. Rosedale Elementary School is located just south of the closure. The dates of the closure are aligned with the school’s summer break.
The contractor will notify emergency services of the closure. Police, Fire, and the School District have already aware of the closure and are not objecting to it.
Cost: There is no cost for the closure. The City is contributing up to $750,000 to construct additional roadway above the half street improvements required to be constructed by the developer.
4.2 (1)
Page 21 of 79 January 9, 2020
Transportation Committee City of Hillsboro Public Works Department 4415 NE 30th Avenue Hillsboro, OR 97124
RE: Temporary Road Closure Request for SE 67th Avenue
This letter and accompanying exhibit provide details on the request for the temporary road closure of SE 67th Avenue south of SE Alexander/Blanton Street and north of SE Genrosa Street. The temporary road closure is necessary to replace the culvert at the Gordon Creek crossing and improve SE 67th Avenue. The planned improvements are a joint effort of the Reed’s Crossing developer (GLC South Hillsboro, LLC) and the City. Given the proximity of Rosedale Elementary School and the use of SE 67th Avenue for school access and bus routes, the road closure is planned in the summer months between June 15, 2020 and September 4, 2020, when school is not in session. Staged construction was considered; however, in order to efficiently complete the improvements in the summer, a complete road closure is preferred. Because SE 67th Avenue no longer connects north to SE Tualatin Valley Highway, the majority of north/south through traffic currently uses SE Cornelius Pass Road to the east or SE Century Boulevard to the west to access SE 67th Avenue. The planned detours will route traffic to these roadways and should have a minor impact on existing routes using this portion of SE 67th Avenue (see the attached detour exhibit). Local access between SE Alexander/Blanton Street and SE Genrosa Street will be maintained. Pedestrian facilities do not currently exist on SE 67th Avenue. However, at the time of construction pedestrian access will be available around the closure east of the site along the public streets and pedestrian accessways within Reed’s Crossing (see the attached detour exhibit). Once improvements are complete, SE 67th Avenue will have sidewalks on both sides of the right-of-way. Advance notice of the street closure will be provided to police, fire, the Hillsboro School District, and other service providers. Additional outreach can be provided to the adjacent neighborhood if needed. Thank you for reviewing this information and please let me know if you have further questions.
Sincerely, AKS ENGINEERING & FORESTRY, LLC
M. Trevor Synkelma, PE, LSIT - Project Engineer 112965 SW Herman Road, Suite 100 | Tualatin, OR 97062 P: 503.563.6151 | www.aks-eng.com | [email protected]
Enclosures SE 67th Avenue Road Closure Detour Exhibit
4.2 (2)
Page 22 of 79 SE TV HIGHWAY
SE ALEXANDER ST
SE BLANTON ST
SE CENTURY BLVD
SE CORNELIUS PASS RD
ROAD CLOSURE
SE 67TH AVE
SE GENROSA ST SE REED DR
SE BLANTON ST
SE GENROSA ST
SITE MAP LEGEND TEMPORARY SE 67TH ROAD CLOSURE A Page 23 of 79
4.2 (3) Page 24 of 79
MEETING AGENDA
DATE: Monday, January 13, 2020 TIME: 12:00 – 1:30 p.m. LOCATION: Beaverton Round Executive Suites, Training Center 12725 SW Millikan Way Suite 300, Beaverton
1. Visitors Comments (5 min) 2. Introductions (5 min)
3. Consideration of WCCC Minutes for December 16, 2019 Action (5 min)
4. Metro Regional Barometer Information (30 min) Purpose: Provide an overview of the website and data that will soon be available through Metro’s Regional Barometer project, which will provide data and performance measures to support Metro’s Six Desired Outcomes and inform Metro Council decision-making Presenter: Cary Stacey, Metro
5. HB 2001/HB 2003 Overview Information (30 min) Purpose: Provide overview of HB 2001 and HB 2003, which are both aimed at housing in Oregon—HB 2001 by increasing housing choice by enabling “missing middle” housing stock, and HB 2003 by analyzing future housing needs and requiring a housing production strategy Presenter: Gordon Howard, Oregon Department of Land Conservation & Development
* 6. MPAC Agenda Information (5 min) Presenter: Mayor Peter Truax, City of Forest Grove
* 7. JPACT Agenda Action (5 min) Presenter: Mayor Denny Doyle, City of Beaverton
8. Other Business and Agency Updates Information (5 min) • Regional Transportation Funding Measure Update
Material included in packet 155 N First Avenue, Suite 250, MS 16 * Material will be distributed at the meeting Hillsboro, OR 97124-3072 # Material available electronically and/or in advance of the meeting phone: 503-846-4530 email: [email protected]
Page 25 of 79 Page 2 WCCC Agenda Month Date, 2020
Washington County Coordinating Committee UPCOMING MEETING SCHEDULE 12:00 PM – 1:30 PM Monday, February 10* – Beaverton Round Executive Suites Training Center *schedule adjusted for observance of legal holiday Monday, March 16 – Beaverton Round Executive Suites Training Center Monday, April 13 – Beaverton Round Executive Suites Training Center Monday, May 18 – Beaverton Round Executive Suites Training Center Monday, June 15 – Beaverton Round Executive Suites Training Center Monday, July 13 – Beaverton Round Executive Suites Training Center Monday, August 17 – Beaverton Round Executive Suites Training Center Monday, September 14 – Beaverton Round Executive Suites Training Center Monday, October 12 – Beaverton Round Executive Suites Training Center Monday, November 16 – Beaverton Round Executive Suites Training Center Monday, December 14 – Beaverton Round Executive Suites Training Center
Page 26 of 79
POLICY GROUP MEETING SUMMARY December 16, 2019
Voting Members in attendance Denny Doyle, City of Beaverton Mark Ottenad, City of Wilsonville Frank Bubenik, City of Tualatin Peter Truax, City of Forest Grove Gery Schirado, City of Durham Roy Rogers, Washington County (WCCC Chair) Jason Snider, City of Tigard Tim Rosener, City of Sherwood Jef Dalin, City of Cornelius Ken Gibson, City of King City
Non-Voting Members in attendance Craig Dirkson, Metro Don Odermott, City of Hillsboro Matt Freitag, ODOT
Other Attendees Aquilla Hurd-Ravich, City of Tualatin Joe Younkins, Washington County Brenda Martin, TriMet Jonathan Plowman, Washington County Christina Deffebach, Washington County Julie Hajduk, City of Sherwood Dwight Brashear, SMART/City of Wilsonville Naomi Fast, Beaverton resident (member of Elizabeth Steiner Hayward, Oregon State public) Senator Paul Morrison, Tualatin City Councilor Erin Wardell, Washington County Scott Turnoy, ODOT Jean Senechal Biggs, City of Beaverton Stephen Roberts, Washington County (WCCC Jessica Pelz, Washington County Secretary) Jim McCauley, League of Oregon Cities Erin Doyle, Washington County
Chair Rogers called the Washington County Coordinating Committee (WCCC) meeting to order at 12:03 p.m.
1. Visitors Comments None. 2. Introductions Round the table introductions, including name and agency represented. 3. Consideration of WCCC Minutes for November 18, 2019 Motion made to approve the minutes as presented; motion seconded. Vote: With all present members voting in favor, the motion passed unanimously. 4. LOC NorthStar Award to Senator Steiner Hayward Jim McCauley, League of Oregon Cities Jim McCauley, League of Oregon Cities (LOC) Legislative Director, gave an overview of the LOC’s mission to connect city leaders and state legislators, advocating for cities’
155 N First Avenue, Suite 250, MS 16 Hillsboro, OR 97124-3072 phone: 503-846-4530 email: [email protected]
Page 27 of 79 Page 2 WCCC Meeting Summary December 16, 2019
needs at the state level. The League of Oregon Cities established an award to annually recognize legislators who best represented cities’ interests during the legislative session in 2019. LOC selected four legislators who truly went the extra mile on LOC’s behalf. The fourth award was presented to Senator Elizabeth Steiner Hayward. Jim presented the award to the Senator and brought the mayors together for a photo. 5. TIF and TDT Fund Requests Motion made to approve Transportation Development Tax fund requests for the City of Beaverton’s “175th Avenue between Alvord Lane and Scholls Ferry Road” and “Hall Boulevard Bike Lane” projects, and Washington County’s “Cornelius Pass Road/Germantown Road” project; motion seconded. With all those present voting in favor, the motion passed unanimously. 6. State Legislative update Erin Doyle, Washington County Erin Doyle presented a preview of potential state legislation in the 2020 session, including: a • cap and invest bill; • transportation project decisions and appropriations, including congestion pricing and other large projects; • recommendations from the Governor’s Council on Wildfire Response and the timber verdict appropriations; • public records requests; and • next steps with HB 2001 and other housing bills, including potential funding for implementation. Members asked whether Erin could provide a regular legislative synopsis to the WCCC during the session to keep the group updated. 7. ODOT Corridor Bottleneck Operations Study 2 Scott Turnoy, ODOT Scott Turnoy presented a description of ODOT’s second Corridor Bottleneck Operations Study (CBOS 2). CBOS studies are aimed at identifying smaller-scale, cost-effective solutions to affect positive change to congestion at the local level. Scott noted the CBOS 2 report would be finalized soon, and ODOT may have some funding available for project refinements in 2020 for analysis on operational and safety benefits, costs, and planning level project design. Members asked questions about specific bottleneck areas such as the Vista Ridge Tunnel and Hwy 217 from Canyon to Allen, report timeline, and project modeling and data. Scott clarified that larger investments, such as those that would be needed for the Vista Ridge Tunnel, were not evaluated and that the final report should be available by March 2020. 8. MPAC Agenda Mayor Truax Recent meeting topic was HB 2001 implementation. Upcoming topics include the 2020 Census, community partnerships strategy, and regional community development.
Page 28 of 79 Page 3 WCCC Meeting Summary December 16, 2019
Members discussed HB 2001 implementation and requested more information at a future WCCC meeting.
9. JPACT Agenda Mayor Doyle Upcoming agenda topics include MTIP amendments for the Boone Bridge, and CBOS 2, recommendations for the allocation of Regional Flexible Funds and information on the Metro Designing Livable Streets project. 10. Other Business and Agency Updates • RFFA Update – The members discussed TPAC’s recommendation to JPACT and expressed concerns with scoring criteria for the RFFA project prioritization process. Members recommended that a letter come from WCCC to JPACT outlining scoring criteria concerns and requesting revisions for future RFFA cycles. • I-5 Boone Bridge – During the 2019 legislative session, ODOT received direction to study widening and seismically retrofitting the I-5 Boone Bridge over the Willamette River (HB 5050, 2019). Over the next year, ODOT will study the I-5 Boone Bridge and associated interchanges and will provide an estimated cost range for project completion. ODOT will provide this report to the Legislature by February 2021.
There being no other business, Chair Rogers adjourned the meeting at 1:23p.m.
______Stephen Roberts, Secretary Washington County Coordinating Committee PG 12/16/2019
Page 29 of 79 Performance management project | Regional Barometer
The Regional Barometer is an online tool that publicly provides information on how the region is doing relative to Metro’s Six Desired Outcomes: transportation, economy, ecosystems, climate, communities and equity. It is part of a performance management system called By the Numbers, which will assess and communicate how Metro programs support those outcomes.
Regional Barometer users will be able to view easy-to-understand facts and figures with accompanying narratives; access links to supplemental information such as relevant strategies, research and reports; and download data for additional analysis.
Project purpose Improve Metro decision-making through accountability, transparency, and results.
The Regional Barometer will: • Promote accountability and transparency, not only for Metro and our programs, but also for regional partners and communities as we work towards Metro goals. • Provide a service to users who can access critical data that has until now been non-existent, scattered or technologically or financially inaccessible. • Serve as a policy and communications tool for Metro staff and elected officials through which to ground policy conversations, set the stage for key investments, and build shared understanding. • Support a coordinated data strategy to reduce duplicative efforts and investments, fill regional data gaps and solidify Metro’s role as a regional data hub.
The Regional Barometer makes progress towards Metro’s regional goals by: • Increasing capacity of Metro’s staff and supporting impactful work • Increasing capacity of community-based organizations and community leaders to advocate for and target investments and services towards shared regional goals • Building public trust and solidifying Metro’s mandate • Increasing data-driven policymaking region-wide • Expanding regional data capacity and accessibility
Success requires: • Relevant, up-to-date and trusted data • Usable and understandable tool • Users see their priorities and needs reflected • Effective program measurement tied to goals
Project phases • Phase 1, By March 2020: Tool is made public with existing datasets, strategic data plan • Phase 2, TBD: Develop composite indicators, performance targets and benchmarks; conduct robust community engagement; build out strategic data plan
Cary Stacey: [email protected], 503.797.1619 Oct. 30, 2019
Page 30 of 79
By the Numbers (sample metrics)
Page 31 of 79 Cary Stacey: [email protected], 503.797.1619 Oct. 30, 2019 Metro's Regional Barometer Phase 1 Measures
Safe and Reliable Transportation Outcome Indicator Measure Source Fatalities (# of people in most recent year) Fatal crashes involving alcohol Fatal crashes by mode ODOT Crash Data Annual with 1- Serious injury (# of people in most recent year) 1.5 year lag time (i.e. 2015 data Safety Traffic deaths and serious injuries (Map) available sometime in 2016 or Traffic deaths and injuries (total and per capita) early 2017) over time Non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries (people over time, by mode) Vehicle miles traveled ODOT and Research center Walking mode share (work commute) Biking mode share (work commute) American Community Survey Transit mode share (work commute) Shared ride mode share (work commute) Mobility and Number & share of jobs within 1/4-mile of bus access Number and share of jobs and households within ½ mile high capacity transit or frequent service InfoUSA points and RLIS Transit transit Data Number and share of jobs and households within Safe and reliable transportation reliable and Safe 1/4-mile of bus Ridership by service type (regionally) TriMet National Performance Vehicle hours of excessive delay per driver/rider Management Research Data Set (NPMRDS) Reliability Regional Integrated Travel time reliability Transportation Information System (RITIS) + INRIX Public transit reliability TriMet
November 2019 Page 1
Page 32 of 79 Metro's Regional Barometer Phase 1 Measures
Economic Competitiveness Outcome Indicator Measure Source Raw # of jobs InfoUSA High/middle/low wage jobs LEHD Census Goods-producing and tradable service jobs InfoUSA Job activity 10 year change in jobs LEHD/LODES Opportunity occupations (living-wage, low- LEHD jobs + workforce data barrier) High/mid and low wage jobs by county LEHD jobs + workforce data Unemployment by race Income by race Economic American Community Survey 5- Poverty level justice and year estimates Income inequality inclusion Change in median income by race Minority owned small business rate American Survey of
Economic competitiveness Economic RLIS and Clark Co Building Developability Industrial and commercial sq. ft. Footprints and Zoning Layers and Market activity Property value/unaffordability County Assessors Permit activity (residential) Construction Monitor
Clean air, Water and Healthy Ecosystems Outcome Indicator Measure Source Department of Environmental # of unhealthy air quality days Quality Asthma rates (Total and change in) Oregon health authority US EPA National Air Toxics NATA respiratory hazard index Assessment EPA, Office of Air and Radiation Air quality Particulate matter (OAR) fusion of model and monitor data. US EPA National Air Toxics NATA diesel PM Assessment US EPA Office of Air and Ozone Radiation fusion of model and Impervious surfaces LIDAR Built Radon indicator OHA environment Lead paint ACS data Department of Environmental Water quality index Quality Clean water Clean air, water and healthy ecosystems and healthy water air, Clean Parks and Protected land (as defined by ORCA) Metro Research Center and healthy ecosystems # of new acres of protected lands developed Metro Research Center Tree canopy LIDAR
November 2019 Page 2
Page 33 of 79 Metro's Regional Barometer Phase 1 Measures
Leadership on Climate Change Outcome Indicator Measure Source Sector-based GHG inventory DEQ Daily VMT Regional Transportation Plan Vehicle emissions Climate smart Walking mode share transportation Biking mode share American Community Survey Transit mode share Data on Journey to Work Shared ride mode share Heat Islands Flooding risk Community Environmental hazard potential Metro Research Center impact Carbon Sink
Leadership on climate change on climate Leadership Canopy cover Inefficient home heating American Community Survey
Vibrant Communities Outcome Indicator Measure Source Homelessness (rate per 10,000 people, one night Counties shelter and street counts) Change in % POC American Community Survey Housing cost burden (by race) National Equity Atlas Housing Homeownership by race National Equity Atlas Median home price Metro Research Center Median rental cost (two bedroom units, others) Metro Research Center Permit activity (residential) Construction Monitor Inventory of public affordable units Metro Research Center Life expectancy at birth Sexually transmitted infections (by gender, race, youth/adult)
Influenza hospitalization
Vibrant Communities Youth immunization rate by school Accessibility to tobacco Health 30-day substance use among 11th graders Oregon Health Authority Exposure to unhealthy food options Suicide contemplation (youth) and attempt rate (adult) Asthma rates Heart attacks Diabetes Uninsured rate Under-insurance rate
November 2019 Page 3
Page 34 of 79 Metro's Regional Barometer Phase 1 Measures
Vibrant Communities Outcome Indicator Measure Source SNAP usage American Community Survey Food # of fast food restaurants per 1,000 population Oregon health authority Vegetable acres harvested + Orchard acres USDA Regional supply/shortage of child care Pre-K assessment data (kindergarten preparedness) Standardized test scores Oregon Department of High school graduation rate Education Education Chronic absenteeism Diversity of teachers Staffing level per student High school discipline rates OR Department of Education Educational attainment ACS data Sidewalk Coverage Metro Research Center Urban density with light rail and frequent transit stop overlay Planned investment in transportation improvements in centers overall and as a percentage of overall transportation investments
Vibrant Communities Land Use Metro Research Center Number of new housing permits # of permits for missing middle-type housing % of new permits that are redevelopment or infill vs % of new permits located in UGB expansion areas Arts and culture establishments per 100,000 Recreation population and National Arts Index Cultural and ethnic awareness nonprofits per Community 100,000 population Engagement Voter registration and participation Counties Regional crime rates FBI Crime and Adult incarceration, probation and parole by Oregon Department of criminal race. Corrections justice Oregon Department of Juvenile and adult recidivism Corrections
November 2019 Page 4
Page 35 of 79 Metro's Regional Barometer Phase 1 Measures
Equity Baseline Indicator Measure Source Outcome Safe and Reliable Safety Fatalities (people) ODOT Transportation Income inequality American Community Survey Unemployment by race American Community Survey Economic Equity and Competitiveness Inclusivity Income by race American Community Survey
Poverty level American Community Survey
Air Quality NATA Diesel PM US EPA Clean Air, Water, and Buuilt Healthy Impervious Surface Metro Research Center Environment Ecosystems Clean Water and Healthy Tree canopy LIDAR Ecosystems Leadership on Community Environmental Hazard Potential Metro Research Center Climate Change Impact
Change in % people of color American Community Survey
Inventory of public affordable units Metro data set Housing
Homeownership by race National Equity Atlas Housing Cost Burden Sexually transmitted infections 30-day substance use among 11th graders Health Oregon Health Authority Vibrant Life expectancy at birth Communities Under-insured rates Food SNAP usage ACS Pre-K assessment data (kindergarten preparedness) High school graduation rate Oregon Department of Education Educational attainment Education Staffing-level per school Diversity of teachers and staff Crime and Oregon Department of High school discipline rates (by race/school) Criminal Corrections Justice Juvenile Recidivism Oregon Juvenile Justice
November 2019 Page 5
Page 36 of 79 Metro's Regional Barometer Phase 2 Potential Measures
Safe and Reliable Transportation Outcome Indicator Measure Source
Transportation cost burden Housing and Transportation Index Mobility and access Accessibility to Jobs map by different Metro Research Center
transportation transportation modes
Safe and reliable reliable and Safe Reliability Map of congestion ODOT
Economic Competitiveness Outcome Indicator Measure Source
Job Activity Target Growth Industries and Jobs Map Economic Value Atlas General employment map Local Jurisdictions Developability Freight Mobility ODOT and Market RLIS and Clark Co Building activity Zoned capacity Footprints and Zoning Layers Economic Justice Self-Sufficiency Standard Worksystems and Inclusion
Economic Competitiveness Economic
Clean Air, Water and Healthy Ecosystems Outcome Indicator Measure Source Calculated from 2014 U.S. Traffic proximity and volume Department of Transportation Air Quality (DOT) traffic data, retrieved 2016 US EPA National Air Toxics National-Scale Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) Assessmentair toxics cancer risk Bird population health Klamath Bird Observatory
Portland Bureau of Environmental Healthy Services + Department of ecosystems Aquatic invertebrate habitat health Environmental Quality Habitat Continuity LIDAR
Clean air, water, healthy ecosystems healthy water, air, Clean Fish population health US Fish and Wildlife; USGS
Leadership on Climate Change Outcome Indicator Measure Source Fuel consumption by type Oregon Department of Energy Utilities (unclear how to parse the Energy and Electricity generation by fuel source differences) urban form Walkability Regional Transportation Plan Infill development Regional Transportation Plan
Change Residential development Regional Transportation Plan Sq. ft. per resident RLIS
Leadership on Climate on Leadership November 2019 Page 1
Page 37 of 79 Metro'sChange Regional Barometer Phase 2 Potential Measures
Community Leadership on Climate on Leadership Access to parks and green space Metro Research Center Impact
November 2019 Page 2
Page 38 of 79 Metro's Regional Barometer Phase 2 Potential Measures
Vibrant Communities Outcome Indicator Measure Source Multimodal travel American Community Survey Frequent transit access RLIS Transit Data Transportation Transportation cost burden Metro Research Center Availability of multi-modal options RLIS Transit Data Unemployment Economic Jobs access ACS and InfoUSA competitiveness Poverty Residential vacancy rates Metro Research Center Housing Shortfall or surplus of 2 b apartments Metro Research Center Commercial food growers Not currently collected Food Community gardens Not currently collected Asset or needs assessment Not currently collected Access to health care OHA Health Proximity to marajuana retailers OLCC Education College going rate ODE % of permits that fall in designated centers and corridors Metro Research Center Land Use % of new permits located within .25 miles of frequent service transit Metro Research Center Use of non-fatal and fatal force by police Jurisdictions Re-entry services Unknown Victims services Unknown Hate crimes, location and rate FBI Crime and safety Oregonians by race and frequency of traffic stops, search following stops in the last 12 Law Enforcement Contacts Policy
Vibrant Communities Vibrant months Data and Review Committee, 2007 Mental health and addiction services Unknown Parity in representation of elected officials (by race and gender) Not currently collected Communities (of color, in particular) have good perceptions of (and trust in) government Not currently collected Communities of color are awarded resource opportunities by government entities Not currently collected Recreation and Community Attendance of large arts events by race RACC has some of this data Engagement Perceptions of access to arts and culture Not currently collected Inventory of affordable arts space Not currently collected Event permit data for festivals Not currently collected Arts and culture asset mapping Not currently collected Arts education Not currently collected % of public investments that go to culturally specific arts organizations Not currently collected
November 2019 Page 3
Page 39 of 79 Metro's Regional Barometer Phase 2 Potential Measures
Equity Baseline Indicator Measure Source Outcome
Job activity and High/mid and low wage job access in 30 Info USA access min car/transit (AM)
veness
Economic Economic
Competiti Number and share of jobs and households Regional Transportation Plan within 1/4-mile of bus
Safety Number and share of jobs and households within 1/2-mile of high capacity transit or Regional Transportation Plan
transportaiton
Safe and reliable reliable and Safe frequent service transit US EPA National Air Toxics Air toxics cancer risk Assessment Asthma rates Oregon health authority Air quality Calculated from 2014 U.S. Traffic proximity and volume Department of Transportation (DOT) traffic data, retrieved 2016
Clean water and Parks and Protected land (as defined by healthy Metro
Clean air, water, ecosystems water, air, Clean ORCA) ecosystems Income needed to afford rents (compare to income by race) American Community Survey Housing % change median rent vs % change in income of renters American Community Survey Health Accessibility to tobacco and alcohol OHA Early Intervention and Early Childhood Education Special Education ODE # of fast food restaurants per 1,000 Food population Oregon Health Authority Voter registration and participation by race Recreation and and ethnicity Community Counties Engagement Addiction and Crime Correlation Law Enforcement Agencies
Vibrant Communities Hate crimes, location and rate FBI Adult incarceration, probation and parole Oregon Department of Corrections by race. Crime and School discipline rate by race Criminal Justice Oregon Department of Education Oregonians by race and frequency of traffic Law Enforcement Contacts Policy stops, search following stops in the last 12 Data and Review Committee, 2007 months
November 2019 Page 4
Page 40 of 79 House Bill 2001: More Housing Choices for Oregonians In 2019, the Oregon Legislature passed House Bill 2001, a bipartisan bill to help provide Oregonians with more housing choices, especially housing choices more people can afford. The new law lets people build certain traditional housing types that already exist in most cities, instead of being limited to a single housing type. House Bill 2001 requires updates of local rules that have limited what sorts of housing people could build. These limitations have led to increased housing costs. The Need for More Diverse, Affordable Choices People need a variety of housing choices. Today, too many Oregonians are paying too much for the housing they have and are limited to renting or buying detached single-unit homes. Meanwhile, the composition of Oregon households is shifting; Before being outlawed, non-single-unit homes have more than a quarter of households today are a single person living long been built in our cities; this is a Salem triplex. alone. At different times in their lives, we have different needs. Imagine what sort of housing a young adult might want or be able to afford, or think of the needs of a retired person. The Bill: Traditional Housing Types Allowed in Most Neighborhoods Soon Under the bill, by June 30, 2021, Oregon’s medium-sized cities must allow Oregonians to build duplexes in areas zoned for single-family dwellings. Most cities already allowed duplexes in certain circumstances. By June 30, 2022, cities in the Portland Metro region and Oregon’s other largest dozen cities (those over 25,000 population), must allow people to build duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, cottage clusters, and townhouses in residential areas. These houses can be more affordable and meet the housing needs of many younger people, older people, and people who work hard but can’t afford a large detached house of their own. The bill also provided $3.5 million for technical assistance to cities, and has other details. Read the bill for details: olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2019R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/HB2001/Enrolled Siting and Design Flexibility; Transformation Expected to be Gradual While the bill re-legalizes certain housing types, the bill is about choices. People can still build detached single-family homes. We expect most homes in residential areas to be built as such. Cities can set reasonable siting and design requirements on the houses, including making sure there is adequate infrastructure. The bill directs the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) to help cities figure this out. While the law allows traditional housing types, DLCD expects the transformation of housing choices to be gradual. Cities have allowed some of these types in certain areas. Not many have been built. Local knowledge of how to build these housing types will grow over time. The building of them will depend on local housing markets.
Learn More and Sign Up to Stay Informed www.oregon.gov/lcd/UP/Pages/Housing-Choices.aspx Ethan Stuckmayer, Senior Housing Planner, [email protected] (503) 934-0619
Page 41 of 79 Updated Nov. 6, 2019 KEY ELEMENTS OF HOUSE BILL 2001 (Middle Housing)
House Bill 2001 (HB 2001) provides $3.5 million to DLCD for technical assistance to local governments to: 1) assist local governments with the development of regulations to allow duplexes and/or middle housing, as specified in the bill, and/or 2) assist local governments with the development of plans to improve water, sewer, storm drainage and transportation services in areas where duplexes and other middle housing types would not be feasible due to service constraints.
DLCD Infrastructure Deficiency Required Middle Housing Requirements Process Rulemaking: Who is Medium Cities Large Cities Medium & Large Cities affected: DLCD Rules and model code DLCD Rules and model code DLCD Rules adoption Significant adoption adoption [no date specified in bill] dates: December 31, 2020 December 31, 2020 Target: July 2020 Medium Cities Extension Requests due by Local Local Government Adoption of Local Government Adoption December 31, 2020 Government model code or alternative of model code or alternative Deadlines: June 30, 2021 June 30, 2022 Large Cities Extension Requests due by June 30, 2021 Effect of missed Model code applies directly Model code applies directly No extension granted deadline:
Medium Cities All Oregon cities outside the Portland Metro boundary with a population between 10,000 and 25,000.
Middle Duplexes to be allowed “on each lot or parcel zoned for residential use that allows for the Housing development of detached single family dwellings.” Requirement
Large Cities All Oregon cities with a population of more than 25,000, unincorporated areas within the Portland Metro boundary that are served by sufficient urban services, and all cities within the Portland Metro boundary with a population of more than 1,000. Middle Duplexes (as above) AND triplexes, quadplexes, cottage clusters, and townhouses “in areas Housing zoned for residential use that allow for the development of detached single family dwellings.” Requirement
Flexibility Medium and Large Cities “may regulate siting and design of middle housing required to be permitted under this section, provided that the regulations do not, individually or cumulatively, discourage the development of all middle housing types permitted in the area through unreasonable cost or delay.”
Page 42 of 79 Other Provisions in HB 2001
A local government may request an extension of time to adopt the required regulations based on an application identifying an infrastructure constraint (water, sewer, storm drainage, or transportation) to accommodating middle housing development, along with a plan of actions to remedy the deficiencies in those services.
The applications for time extensions based on infrastructure deficiency will be reviewed by DLCD and approved or denied.
Housing Needs Analyses, in conjunction with a UGB decision, may not assume more than a three percent increase in housing units produced as a result of the adoption of middle housing regulations unless the local government can show that higher increases have been achieved to date.
The bill amends requirements relating to accessory dwelling units (ADUs). The bill states, “’Reasonable local regulations relating to siting and design’ [for ADUs] does not include owner-occupancy requirements of either the primary or accessory structure or requirements to construct additional off- street parking.” However, such regulations may be applied if the ADU is used for vacation occupancy.
Changes the annual housing production survey required by passage of HB 4006 in 2018. Adds requirement to report on ADUs and units of middle housing, both for market rate housing and for regulated affordable units.
Directs the Building Codes Division to develop standards to facilitate conversions of single-family dwellings into no more than four residential dwelling units.
Prohibits the establishment of new Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions or similar instruments that would prohibit middle housing or ADUs in a residential neighborhood.
The bill also notes that the department shall prioritize technical assistance to cities or counties with limited planning staff, or that commit to implementation earlier than the date required by the act.
This fact sheet is intended to summarize key elements of HB 2001. It is not intended to replace a detailed review of the legislation. For specific bill language, please review the enrolled version of the HB 2001: https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2019R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/HB2001
“HB 2001 is focused on increasing the supply of ‘middle housing’ in Oregon cities – not by limiting construction of single family homes, but by allowing development of duplexes, triplexes, and quadplexes. Through technical assistance and resources for local governments, DLCD joins the effort to help create housing opportunities for all Oregonians.” - Jim Rue, DLCD Director
For more information visit our website at http://www.oregon.gov/lcd/UP/Pages/Housing-Choices.aspx
DLCD Staff Contacts: With questions about Ethan Stuckmayer Kevin Young local implementation – Senior Housing Planner Senior Urban Planner Contact your Regional [email protected] [email protected] Representative 503-934-0619 503-934-0030
Page 43 of 79 House Bill 2003: Requiring Cities to Update Housing Needs Studies and Create Housing Production Strategies In 2019, the Oregon Legislature passed House Bill 2003, a law to make sure communities meet the diverse housing needs of Oregonians. The law requires Oregon’s medium and large cities to study the future housing needs of their residents and to develop strategies to make sure the housing needed is produced.
Exploring Housing Needs, Developing Production Strategies Oregon cities have long had to study their community’s future housing needs when proposing to expand their urban growth boundary. House Bill 2003 requires cities over 10,000 people to analyze what housing is needed for current and future residents every six to eight years. The bill then requires each city to adopt a housing production strategy within a year of completing the analysis. The strategy must list specific actions the city will take to promote the development of all identified housing needs – such as revising regulations or providing financial incentives. The bill also directs the Oregon Housing and Community Services Department to conduct a pilot project to calculate housing needs for the next 20 years in each region, for all income levels. The Department of Land Conservation and Development must then report to the legislature on the method’s effectiveness.
Rules, Technical Assistance Forthcoming The bill requires the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) to conduct rulemaking on how housing needs analyses and production strategies shall be done, and timelines for completion. The bill funds DLCD to provide technical assistance to cities working to complete their required housing needs analysis and production We need to make sure all communities strategies. have the critical resources they need, like good homes people can afford. Allows Affordable Housing on Public Lands and in Conjunction with Places of Worship The bill also authorizes cities to allow affordable housing to be built on public land inside urban growth boundaries, and allows multiple buildings for affordable housing to be built next to places of workshop.
Learn More and Stay Up to Date Read the bill: olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2019R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/HB2003
More details: www.oregon.gov/lcd/UP/Pages/Housing-Needs.aspx Sign up to receive e-mail updates: www.oregon.gov/lcd
Ethan Stuckmayer Kate Srinivasan Senior Housing Planner, DLCD Research Analyst, OHCS [email protected] [email protected] (503) 934-0619 (503) 986-5468
Updated 11/13/19
Page 44 of 79 Updated Nov. 6, 2019 KEY ELEMENTS OF HOUSE BILL 2003 (Housing Needs)
House Bill 2003 (HB 2003) allocates $1 million to DLCD to provide technical assistance to local governments to implement provisions of HB 2003, including housing needs analyses.
Housing Needs Analyses Regional Housing Needs Housing Production Strategy Elements of bill: (HNA) Analysis (RNHA) (HPS) DLCD Required Adoption of Statewide Develop Methodology & Develop Methodology & Action: Schedule Conduct Analysis Adopt Rules State agencies: DLCD OHCS, DLCD, DAS DLCD Analysis completed by September 1, 2020 DLCD Rules adoption LCDC approval by Significant dates: [no date specified in bill] December 31, 2019 Reports to Legislature by Target: Sept. 2020 March 1, 2021 All cities with a population All cities with a population Affected cities: Statewide greater than 10,000 greater than 10,000 Earliest HPS deadlines for cities estimated: Sept. 2023 HNA update requirements to
begin ~2 years Local Government City submits HPS to DLCD following the adoption of none Deadlines: no more than 20 days after HPS rules local adoption (est. Sept. 2022)
DLCD has 120 days for review Establishes LCDC No change to current LCDC Enforcement: n/a enforcement authority to enforcement authority ensure HPS progress
Key Elements • Regional Housing Needs Analyses (RNHA): Requires multi-agency coordination, led by Oregon Housing and Community Services, in the development of a needs analysis by region to analyze and quantify the housing shortage in our state. The housing needs of a region will be determined for a 20 year period. Among other requirements, the RNHA will include analysis related to the equitable distribution of publicly supported housing within a region and a housing shortage analysis for each city and Metro.
• Housing Needs Analyses: Requires adoption of a statewide schedule for cities with a population greater than 10,000 to update a local Housing Needs Analysis (HNA). Cities within Metro will be required to update HNAs every six years, cities outside Metro must update every eight years.
• Housing Production Strategies: Requires cities with a population greater than 10,000 to prepare and adopt a housing production strategy, in accordance with rules adopted by DLCD, within one year of each city’s HNA update deadline. A housing production strategy (HPS) must include a list of specific actions that the city shall undertake to promote development within the city to address housing needs identified in their HNA.
“The legislative focus on housing options for Oregonians in the 2019 legislative session resulted in new opportunities for the Department of Land Conservation and Development to partner with and assist local governments. We look forward to our continued work together to remove barriers to the supply of housing options.” - Jim Rue, DLCD Director
Page 45 of 79 Other Provisions
Allows qualified affordable housing development on public land within an urban growth boundary, notwithstanding land use regulations, comprehensive plan, or statewide planning goals, subject to certain requirements.
Clarifies that affordable housing provided in conjunction with religious uses may be accommodated in multiple buildings under certain circumstances.
Clarifies limited circumstances in which height and density limitations beyond zoning limits may be applied to residential development.
Transfers responsibility for administration of the annual housing production survey required by HB 4006 (2018) of cities above 10,000 population to DLCD. Survey will continue to be administered online.
This fact sheet is intended to summarize key elements of HB 2003. It is not intended to replace a detailed review of the legislation. For specific bill language, please review the enrolled version of the HB 2003: https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2019R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/HB2003
For more information visit our website at www.oregon.gov/lcd/UP/Pages/Housing-Needs.aspx
DLCD Staff Contacts: With questions about Ethan Stuckmayer Kevin Young local implementation – Senior Housing Planner Senior Urban Planner Contact your Regional [email protected] [email protected] Representative 503-934-0619 503-934-0030
Page 46 of 79 STAFF REPORT
To: Daniel L. Dias, Economic and Community Development Director
From: Gregg Snyder, Transportation Planning Supervisor Don Odermott, Transportation Planning Engineer
Date: January 28, 2020
Subject: Update on the 229th Plan and Profile Study
Proposed Transportation Committee Action: None. Information Only.
Background: In June, 2019 staff provided an update on the SW 229th Avenue plan and profile study in South Hillsboro. The study, which covers the roadway alignment on SW 229th Avenue (and a portion of the renamed SE 67th Avenue) from the Rosedale Elementary School south past the Reserve Golf Course and over Butternut Creek to Rosa Road, is intended to recommend a locally preferred alternative for the final roadway alignment. The June presentation discussed the three (3) alternatives under review, the possible options to straighten out the dual ninety degree turns on the roadway near SE McInnis Street and the trade offs associated with each alternative alignment. Exhibit A attached to this staff report depicts the alternatives under consideration.
Since that time more work has been completed on the cost estimates for the construction of the SW 229th Avenue bridge over Butternut Creek and the potential benefits of transferring some or all of that funding to the Cornelius Pass Road bridge over Butternut Creek. This specific work led to a November 2019 Transportation Committee decision authorizing staff to begin negotiations with Washington County to shift Bonded MSTIP funding. In addition, the final design of the roundabout located at the intersection of SW 229th Avenue and SE Kinnaman Road is likely to proceed in the summer of 2020. As a result, there is a need to adopt a locally preferred alternative for the final roadway alignment and to set the project limits for the initial phase of construction.
Staff will present the latest work from the project and outline the steps to get public input on the alternatives presented. It is anticipated that this public involvement effort will get underway in February and culminate in a staff recommendation for a locally preferred alignment to be presented to the Transportation Committee tentatively in June of 2020.
Cost: None.
6.2 (1)
Page 47 of 79 SE CENTURY BLVD
FUTURE SE CENTURY BLVD AND SE KINNAMAN RD ROUNDABOUT
SE CENTURY BLVD (SW 229TH AVE)
SE NOBLE ST
SE CENTURY BLVD (SW 229TH AVE)
RESERVE GOLF
COURSE ENTRANCE
SE CENTURY BLVD (SW 229TH AVE) REALIGNMENT OPTION 1 - NORTH SE CENTURY BLVD PLAN AND PROFILE STUDY 1
Page 48 of 79 6.2 (2) SE CENTURY BLVD
FUTURE SE CENTURY BLVD AND SE KINNAMAN RD ROUNDABOUT
SE CENTURY BLVD (SW 229TH AVE)
SE NOBLE ST
SE CENTURY BLVD (SW 229TH AVE)
RESERVE GOLF
COURSE ENTRANCE
SE CENTURY BLVD (SW 229TH AVE) REALIGNMENT OPTION 2 - NORTH SE CENTURY BLVD PLAN AND PROFILE STUDY 2
Page 49 of 79 6.2 (3) SE CENTURY BLVD
FUTURE SE CENTURY BLVD AND SE KINNAMAN RD ROUNDABOUT
SE CENTURY BLVD (SW 229TH AVE)
SE NOBLE ST
SE CENTURY BLVD (SW 229TH AVE)
RESERVE GOLF
COURSE ENTRANCE
SE CENTURY BLVD (SW 229TH AVE) REALIGNMENT OPTION 3 - NORTH SE CENTURY BLVD PLAN AND PROFILE STUDY 3
Page 50 of 79 6.2 (4) SE CENTURY BLVD
BUTTERNUT
CREEK COMMUNITY PARK
CREEK PKWY
SE BUTTERNUT
SE CENTURY BLVD (SW 229TH AVE)
SW ROSA RD
SE CENTURY BLVD (SW 229TH AVE) REALIGNMENT OPTION 1/2/3 - SOUTH SE CENTURY BLVD PLAN AND PROFILE STUDY 1/2/3
Page 51 of 79 6.2 (5) Page 52 of 79
STAFF REPORT
To: Daniel L. Dias, Economic and Community Development Director
From: Gregg Snyder, Transportation Planning Supervisor Don Odermott, Transportation Planning Engineer
Date: January 28, 2020
Subject: Update on the Metro Transportation Task Force and Potential Regional Transportation Funding Measure
Proposed Transportation Committee Action: None. Information Only.
Background: Over the last year City staff and the Mayor have been participating in the Metro Transportation Task Force process and staff will brief the Transportation Committee on the status of the proposed programs and corridors at the January 2020 Transportation Committee meeting.
As it stands now the Task Force has transmitted its final Tier 1 recommendations to the Metro Council. Included in the final recommendations are many projects beneficial to the City, including the MAX Overcrossing of 185th Avenue with a $70M to $87M dollar budget as well as an upgrade to the Hillsboro Transit Center with a $10M to $12M dollar budget. However, the measure still contains limited vehicular capacity improvements and the Task Force will next discuss the Tier 2 and Programmatic recommendations in the February and March timeframe.
At the next Transportation Committee meeting staff will review the current status of the Task Force’s recommendations, attached as Exhibit A, and discuss next steps for the potential regional transportation funding measure.
Cost: None.
6.3 (1)
Page 53 of 79 Exhibit A
2020 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING MEASURE Task Force Recommendations for Tier 1 Corridor Investments
In early 2019 the Task Force identified several key values and desired outcomes for the measure. These provided a key guide for the staff recommendation. These values include the following. More details can be found at oregonmetro.gov/transportation.
• Improve safety • Prioritize investments that support communities of color • Make it easier to get around • Support resiliency • Support clean air, clean water, and healthy ecosystems • Support economic growth • Increase access to opportunity for low-income Oregonians • Leverage regional and local investments
82ND
185TH 122ND ALBINA VISION 162ND
TV HIGHWAY CENTRAL CITY BURNSIDE
POWELL
C2C/181ST SW CORRIDOR
SUNRISE/212
McLOUGHLIN
1 20061 6.3 (2)
Page 54 of 79 Memo
Date: January 3, 2020 To: Metro Council From: Commissioner Jessica Vega Pederson and Commissioner Pam Treece, Task Force Co-Chairs Subject: Tier 1 Corridor Investment Recommendations
Early in 2019, the Metro Council assembled a diverse group of community leaders from throughout greater Portland. You asked us to provide you with advice and recommendations on a potential 2020 transportation funding measure that could make much-needed regional investments in helping people go places reliably and safely in a growing, increasingly congested region. In your charge, you directed us to apply “honest, solutions- focused dialogue” in representing the needs of our constituencies and communities.
It has been an honor for us to serve as the co-chairs of this Task Force. Through sixteen meetings to date, this unique group has articulated shared values, considered community needs, and explored potential priorities for investment. We have thought big, sought consensus as much as possible, and respected the remarkably few places where our views diverge.
Developing our recommendations In June, with input from the Task Force, the Metro Council prioritized 13 of the region’s busiest and most dangerous travel routes as Tier 1 Corridors for the potential measure; an additional 16 corridors were identified as Tier 2.
Following a summer of engagement with community and jurisdictional partners, Metro staff submitted Tier 1 corridor investment recommendations to the Task Force in October. These recommendations were informed by Council and Task Force outcomes; input from Local Investment Teams and partner jurisdictions; and assessments of readiness, risk and benefits of potential investments. They proposed approximately $3.11 billion in investments from the measure, leveraging an expected $2.13 billion in expected federal and local funds.
On Nov. 6 and 20, the Task Force discussed the staff recommendations and amendments proposed by several Task Force members. At our Dec. 18 meeting in Clackamas, we took votes on several motions to formalize our own Tier 1 project recommendations to the Metro Council. We sought to achieve a 75% share of present members in order to advance formal Task Force recommendations. Additionally, as co-chairs we pledged to share the full discussion directly with you to inform your ongoing discussion and direction regarding the potential measure.
The attached packet summarize our Tier 1 project recommendations and key themes of discussion. In addition, staff will send to you the Dec. 18 meeting notes as soon as they are available.
Key themes of Task Force recommendations and discussions There are several key points we would like to highlight in these recommendations and the Task Force discussions that shaped them.
Remarkable consensus on almost all recommended projects in the Tier 1 corridors. These recommendations increase the total proposed for Tier 1 corridor investments by approximately $700 million beyond the Metro staff recommendations. Including potential leveraged funds of $2.2 billion, this increases the total to approximately $6 billion. Task Force members voting at the December 18 meeting were in unanimous consent about the overwhelming majority of these investments—approximately 99 percent of the total investment. This consensus is testament to both the scale of need and the considerable common ground the Task Force has found in our work together.
2020 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING MEASURE 2 20061 6.3 (3)
Page 55 of 79 One proposed investment, the 82nd Avenue and Airport Way intersection project, reached the 75% support threshold to be an official Task Force recommendation, but did not achieve unanimous consensus. Finally, just one proposed investment—the new connector road from SE 172nd to SE 190th Avenue in the Clackamas-to- Columbia corridor—failed to reach the 75% support threshold to be an official Task Force recommendation, though a majority on Dec. 18 did support this investment.
Prioritizing safer streets and better transit for everyone. The Task Force agreed unanimously on recommending approximately $650 million dollars in safety and transit investments beyond those included in the initial Tier 1 staff recommendation. These additional recommendations are a clear declaration of the Task Force’s priorities to make key arterials safer for people walking, bicycling, and getting to transit, and to make transit a more reliable, competitive and comfortable option for people throughout the region.
Thinking of a greater regional system. Hundreds of thousands of people in the greater Portland region travel across city and county lines on a daily basis—whether we’re commuting to work or school, running errands or going to appointments, our travel patterns stitch us together as one region with common interests and needs. So it’s no surprise that the Task Force recommendations reflect a truly regional funding measure, with investments across the metropolitan area will help create a more reliable, safer regional transportation system no matter where we live, work or travel—and no matter how we reach the places we need to go.
Contributing to the region’s racial equity, climate and safety goals. The Task Force wants to ensure a transportation investment measure helps advance the region’s ambitious goals for advancing racial equity, reducing carbon emissions, and reducing deaths and serious injuries from crashes. Staff have provided preliminary data on how the Task Force’s Tier 1 recommendations support these goals. Task Force members are eager for more information and contextualization of this data alongside other strategies and policies the region has undertaken in pursuit of its climate, racial equity and safety goals. The Task Force also wants to ensure the measure includes clear commitments and enough funding to implement effective, community- based anti-displacement strategies alongside transportation investments.
Maintaining and aligning with funding for regionwide programs. While these Task Force recommendations focus on Tier 1 corridor investments, Task Force members have voiced their desire to keep funding for the proposed regionwide programs at the scale previously discussed—at least $50 million per year. These programs would make vital investments in safety, reliability, racial equity and community beyond the identified corridors, extending the proposed measure’s benefits even further across the region.
Conclusion The Task Force has made these recommendations recognizing there is more work ahead to align Tier 1 investments with viable revenue mechanisms, potential Tier 2 corridor investments, and overall measure scale. The Task Force looks forward to supporting the Metro Council in this process of alignment. We are pleased to submit these recommendations and feedback on behalf of the Transportation Funding Task Force. We thank you for the opportunity to serve as co-chairs and look forward to continuing to support and advise the Metro Council in the months ahead.
Let’s get moving.
2020 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING MEASURE 3 20061 6.3 (4)
Page 56 of 79 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION Corridor Scenario Investment Summary
PROPOSED POTENTIAL TOTAL CORRIDOR CORRIDOR FUNDING + LEVERAGED FUNDS = INVESTMENT $3.81B $2.22B $6.03B
$630M $1.12B CLACKAMAS COUNTY MULTNOMAH COUNTY
$1.33B $730M REGIONAL PROJECTS WASHINGTON COUNTY +CONTINGENCY
EXPECTED IDENTIFIED PROPOSED REGIONAL LEVERAGED CORRIDOR CORRIDOR MEASURE FUNDING FUNDS NEED
Southwest Corridor $975M $1.4B $2.4B McLoughlin $280M $20M* $350M Clackamas to Columbia/181st $50M / $100M $280M Sunrise/Hwy 212 $180M $570M Tualatin Valley Highway $520M $50M $630M 185th Ave $200M $20M* $250M 82nd Ave $35M / $80M / $395M $160M $840M Burnside $150M / $??M / $120M $540M $890M Central City $50M / $170M $50M $390M 122nd Ave $90M $160M 162nd Ave $90M $10M $170M Albina Vision $55M $75M Powell $140M $230M * TO BE CONFIRMED REGIONAL PROJECTS | CLACKAMAS COUNTY | WASHINGTON COUNTY | MULTNOMAH COUNTY
DELIVERY AGENCIES Projects in black have been Projects in gray are recommended by the Task Force. a future need. Oregon Department ODOT PP Port of Portland of Transportation 9 Portland Ave Streetscape 3 Kellogg Creek Dam M Metro G City of Gresham Abernethy to Arlington (.5 miles) Remove Kellogg dam, drain lake, replace Redesign Gladstone main street to TM TriMet MW City of Milwaukie bridge, add multi-use underpass to improve walking, biking, and downtown address major fish passage barrier and Portland Bureau revitalization. GL City of Gladstone add pedestrian and bike facilities. of Transportation $5-8M ($10-30M) WC Washington County OC Oregon City MW ODOT
CC Clackamas County
2020 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING MEASURE 4 20061 6.3 (5)
Page 57 of 79 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION: TIER 1 CORRIDOR INVESTMENT PROFILE SW Corridor Southwest Corridor Light Rail will address congestion in the I-5 corridor and expand the MAX system to growing communities in SW Portland, Tigard and Tualatin, serving more people with fast, affordable high-capacity transit. It will increase access to living wage jobs in Tigard and Tualatin and connect to educational opportunities at PCC Sylvania, OHSU and PSU.
The project includes bicycle and pedestrian network improvements, like protected bike lanes and better sidewalks on Barbur Boulevard. Bus service improvements will complement light rail, including a two-mile shared trackway near Downtown Portland where buses can drive on the tracks to avoid traffic delays. The project will improve safety in a corridor where42 serious injuries and fatalities occurred between 2007-2017. 32% of this corridor is in an equity focus area.
The project is paralleled by the Southwest Corridor Equitable Development Strategy (SWEDS), a collaboration of public and private partners working to generate equitable economic opportunity, and preserve and expand affordable housing along the light rail route.
$975M $2.4B (WITH LEVERAGED FUNDS) SCENARIO INVESTMENT
$2.4B CORRIDOR NEED
[SEE PROJECT MAP NEXT PAGE]
2020 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING MEASURE 5 20061 6.3 (6)
Page 58 of 79 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION: TIER 1 CORRIDOR INVESTMENT PROFILE 26 DOWNTOWN PORTLAND
SW Corridor 405 Existing 5 MAX service Marquam Hill connector SW Corridor MAX Build a new connection between Portland to Tigard to Barbur and Marquam Hill to improve Bridgeport Village (11 miles) access to medical services, jobs and SOUTH Construct light rail line to improve MARQUAM WATERFRONT educational opportunities. HILL / OHSU transit in key regional corridor, including stations and multimodal Shared trackway for buses 5 roadway features. Allow buses from Hillsdale, $975M Multnomah Village and Beaverton [leverages $1.4B federal/other funds] to avoid traffic delays by driving on 2 miles of paved trackway. TM Barbur bridges Light rail route Rebuild the 85-year-old Newbury HILLSDALE Station and Vermont trestle bridges on Bertha Barbur to current seismic standards P Station with park and ride with sidewalks and bike facilities. Terwilliger 5 MULTNOMAH Multnomah VILLAGE
PCC-Sylvania access Improve 53rd Avenue to allow P people to safely walk and bike between light rail and the Portland Community College Sylvania Campus. P Capitol Walking and biking improvements Build continuous high quality sidewalks, bike P facilities and crossings on Barbur between 99 217 w I-405 and the Barbur Transit Center. Hall PCC TIGARD SYLVANIA TRIANGLE DOWNTOWN Tigard Triangle street improvements TIGARD Rebuild and add portions of 70th and Elmhurst to improve access and support anticipated development.
217
5
KRUSE Downtown Tigard WAY Improve access across Hall Boulevard to connect Bonita people to the Tigard Transit Center and WES. Carman
Terminus station Build parking garage and BRIDGEPORT P bus hub at Bridgeport VILLAGE terminus station. SW Corridor in the 5 TriMet rail system
TUALATIN
2020 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING MEASURE 6 20061 6.3 (7)
Page 59 of 79 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION: TIER 1 CORRIDOR INVESTMENT PROFILE McLoughlin Blvd
McLoughlin Boulevard connects communities in Clackamas and Multnomah counties to jobs, housing, and transit. The corridor serves as an alternative to I-205 and other routes between Portland and Clackamas County, and has been identified by TriMet as a key corridor to increase ridership. Locally, it is a main street for various communities, and provides local access and circulation. There were 133 serious injuries and fatalities on this corridor between 2007-2017. 59% of this corridor is in an equity focus area. $280M SCENARIO INVESTMENT
$350M CORRIDOR NEED
[SEE PROJECTS MAP NEXT PAGE]
2020 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING MEASURE 7 20061 6.3 (8)
Page 60 of 79 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION: TIER 1 CORRIDOR INVESTMENT PROFILE
McLoughlin Blvd not on map
6 Reedway Bike Overcrossing Create bike/ped bridge over McLoughlin to cross railroad barrier. $12-18M 8 Park Ave Park & Ride Expansion 224 Add two levels to existing park MILWAUKIE & ride facility at current Orange Line terminus. $16-19M 3 Kellogg Creek Dam
TM Remove Kellogg dam, drain lake, replace bridge, add multi-use underpass to address major fish passage barrier and add pedestrian and bike facilities. 1 Enhanced Transit ($10-30M) Milwaukie to Oregon City (6.5 miles) Courtney MW ODOT Bus enhancements for Lines Thiessen 33 and 99 (operations, LAKEstation OSWEGO enhancements, targeted bus lanes, signal priority) to improve 9 Portland Ave Streetscape speed and reliability, station Abernethy to Arlington (.5 miles) access and rider experience. Redesign Gladstone main street to improve walking, biking, and downtown $110-132M Concord Oatfield revitalization. TM ODOT $5-8M River GL
2 Safety Milwaukie to Oregon City (6.5 miles) Jennings Add/improve sidewalks, 5 Trolley Trail crossings and lighting to reduce GLADSTONE Design and construction to extend severe injury and fatal crashes. Trolley Trail over Clackamas River to $50-75M create a more direct trail connection between Gladstone and Oregon City. ODOT $10-14M
CC 205 10 Corridor Planning Milwaukie to Oregon City (6.5 miles) 43 4 I-205 Ramp Improvements Design for longer term WEST LINN OREGON Add dual left turn lanes to McLoughlin transportation improvements CITY including transit. at both I-205 ramps to ease congestion, and add bike/ped facilities. $5M $7-9M M ODOT
7 Willamette Falls Bike/Ped Plan 10th to Railroad Ave (.4 miles) Design to extend boulevard treatments along McLoughlin, including river side multi-use path, medians, and sidewalks to improve safety for people walking and biking. $1-2M
OC
2020 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING MEASURE 8 20061 6.3 (9)
Page 61 of 79 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION: TIER 1 CORRIDOR INVESTMENT PROFILE C2C/181st Ave C2C (Clackamas to Columbia) /181st Avenue is a major North-South connection between rapidly developing Happy Valley and the Columbia Corridor through Western Gresham. It connects I-84 and US 26 (Powell) and is a North-South alternative to I-205. This corridor also connects employment with low-income areas, affordable housing, schools, parks and other neighborhood amenities. There were 68 serious injuries and fatalities on this corridor between 2007-2017. 37% of this corridor is in an equity focus area.
$150M $280M CORRIDOR NEED SCENARIO INVESTMENT
Sandy
84 1 Enhanced Transit 190th/Highland Bridge Halsey Sandy to Powell (4 miles) 7 Bus enhancements for Line 87 (operations, Replacement station enhancements, targeted bus lanes, Over Johnson Creek and Glisan signal priority) to improve speed and Springwater Corridor Trail Burnside reliability, station access and amenities. Four-lane bridge replacement with $15-20M sidewalks and bike facilities, seismic Stark upgrade. G $9-12M
G Division 2 Safety 181st Sandy to Powell (4 miles) Add/improve sidewalks, crossings, Powell lighting to roadway to reduce severe injury and fatal crashes. 3 Roundabout 172nd/Foster $41-62M Convert intersection to roundabout G to improve safety and ease traffic congestion. $5-6M 4 190th/Highland Expansion Powell to county line (2 miles) MC Foster Widen 190th to 4-5 lanes with medians, sidewalks, and bike/ped facilities to develop continuous 4 lane corridor. ($35-54M) Tillstrom 6 172nd Expansion N of Hemrick Rd to Sunnyside G (1.2 miles) Widen 172nd to 4-5 lanes with bike/ped facilities to develop continuous corridor. 172nd 5 New Connector Road* ($35-54M) 172nd to 190th (1.25 miles)
CC Sunnyside Construct new roadway with sidewalks, bike facilities, and roundabouts to create a continuous Clackamas to Columbia corridor. $40-54M *RECEIVED MAJORITY SUPPORT IN CC Hwy 212 VOTE, BUT DID NOT REACH 75% SUPPORT THRESHOLD FOR FORMAL TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION
2020 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING MEASURE 9 20061 6.3 (10)
Page 62 of 79 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION: TIER 1 CORRIDOR INVESTMENT PROFILE Hwy 212/Sunrise Corridor Highway 212 and the Sunrise Corridor connect future residential and employment areas to existing job centers near I-205. The potential future connection is intended to provide access to jobs and affordable housing in Clackamas County and serve as an alternative connection from the future Clackamas-to-Columbia corridor to I-205. The corridor supports freight movement to US 26, provides connections to recreation areas, and is an important bicycle connector. There were 48 serious injuries and fatalities on this corridor between 2007-2017. 32% of this corridor is in an equity focus area.
$180M $570M CORRIDOR NEED SCENARIO INVESTMENT
1 Sunrise Corridor Phase 2 (2 lane) and Rock Creek Connections 122nd to 172nd (3 miles) Build limited access roadway with parallel multi-use path to increase capacity for future development. Create multimodal access to schools and employment lands (two roundabouts and a new local connection). ($347-416M)
3 Sunrise Planning and Design CC ODOT 122nd to 172nd (3 miles) Design for limited access roadway with parallel multi-use path to serve future 2 Sunrise Corridor Phase 2 (4 lane) development. 122nd to 172nd (3 miles) $50M Build limited access roadway with parallel multi-use CC path to increase capacity for future development. ($460-560M)
CC ODOT
205 Hwy 224
142nd 152nd
172nd
Hwy 212
Hwy 224
135th
4 Hwy 212 Complete Street & Right-of-Way Reconstruct roadway including sidewalks, bicycle facilities and crossings to improve access and safety. Grade-separate intersection with 142nd and realign 135th. Acquire right-of-way per revised corridor concept. $130M
CC ODOT
2020 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING MEASURE 10 20061 6.3 (11)
Page 63 of 79 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION: TIER 1 CORRIDOR INVESTMENT PROFILE TV Highway Tualatin Valley (TV) Highway connects multiple community centers, including Forest Grove, Cornelius, Hillsboro, Aloha, Beaverton and Portland. The corridor serves many communities of color, limited English proficiency speakers and lower income communities, and supports one of the highest ridership bus lines in the region. The corridor also supports significant freight movement. It has multiple regional trail crossings and serves several Urban Growth Boundary expansion areas. There were 204 serious injuries and fatalities on this corridor between 2007-2017. 85% of this corridor is in an equity focus area.
$520M $570M (WITH LEVERAGED FUNDS) SCENARIO INVESTMENT
$630M CORRIDOR NEED
[SEE PROJECTS MAP NEXT PAGE]
2020 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING MEASURE 11 20061 6.3 (12)
Page 64 of 79 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION: TIER 1 CORRIDOR INVESTMENT PROFILE TV Highway
1 Enhanced Transit Forest Grove to Beaverton Transit Center (16 miles) Bus enhancements for Line 57 (operations, station enhancements, targeted bus lanes, signal priority) to improve speed and reliability, station access and amenities throughout the corridor. $83M [could leverage federal funds]
WC TM
7 Canyon/West Slope 117th to Camelot 6 Council Creek Trail 8 Hillsboro Transit Center (2.9 miles) Hillsboro to Forest Add/improve walking and Convert transit center and Grove (5.5 miles) biking facilities including adjacent streets to 2-way to Regional trail connecting crossings. allow buses to circulate more Hillsboro, Cornelius and directly (traffic reconfiguration, $20-24M Forest Grove. signal replacements, platform ODOT $25-38M modifications). WC
HWY 47 WC $10-12M WC H TM FOREST CORNELIUS GROVE HILLSBORO
Glencoe 26
185th ALOHA 217
BEAVERTON Murray WASHINGTON SQUARE 2 3 4 5 Safety and Multimodal Improvements Forest Grove to 117th in Beaverton Comprehensive street upgrades to include: pedestrian facilities (sidewalks, lighting, transit improvements, railroad “quiet zone”), bicycle facilities, safety features (medians, crosswalks), stormwater facilities. $289-350M 9 Corridor Planning WC ODOT TM Forest Grove to Portland Union Station (26 miles) Planning work for longer-term corridor investments including transit enhancements to improve speed and reliability, station access and amenities. Alternatives analysis for transportation, transit, land use, railroad interface. $12-14M
M WC TM
2020 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING MEASURE 12 20061 6.3 (13)
Page 65 of 79 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION: TIER 1 CORRIDOR INVESTMENT PROFILE 185th Ave SW 185th Avenue carries up to 65,000 vehicles and over 3,900 people on transit a day. It serves a concentration of communities of color, lower-income communities and provides access to education centers and medical clinics. It has high transit ridership potential, a high safety need, and a concentration (90% of corridor) of equity focus areas. There were 45 serious injuries and fatalities on this corridor between 2007-2017.
$200M $220M (WITH LEVERAGED FUNDS) SCENARIO INVESTMENT
$250M CORRIDOR NEED
1 Enhanced Transit Rock Creek Blvd to Farmington (entire corridor, 5 miles) Bus enhancements for Line 52 (operations, station enhancements, TANASBOURNE/ 26 targeted bus lanes, signal priority) to AMBER GLEN improve speed and reliability, station access and rider experience throughout Cornell corridor. $50-60M WC TM 3 Mid-block Crossings Cascade to West Union Walker (4 miles) Add actuated pedestrian crossings at four locations to improve access for people 2 MAX Overcrossing 185th/Baseline walking. Build bridge for MAX Blue Line over $8-11M Baseline 185th to reduce traffic, and bus and WC train delays. $70-87M
TM
ALOHA 4 Intersection Improvements Alexander to Blanton (.25 miles) TV Hwy 5 “Complete Street” Fix intersections to improve safety and Kinnaman to Farmington efficiency for all users (intersection (.7 miles) alignment at Blanton, crossing signal at Widen to 3 lanes, add curbs, Alexander). sidewalks, crossings, lighting, $10-14M bike facilities, stormwater facilities. WC $24-32M
Farmington WC
2020 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING MEASURE 13 20061 6.3 (14)
Page 66 of 79 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION: TIER 1 CORRIDOR INVESTMENT PROFILE 82nd Ave 82nd Avenue connects Clackamas Town Center, the Jade District, Montavilla and Roseway neighborhoods, and the Portland International Airport. It is an alternative route to I-205 and serves one of the most diverse populations in the region. 82nd Avenue also has the highest bus line ridership in the region and provides access to the Blue, Red, and Green MAX lines. It serves as a main street for various communities, provides local access and circulation, and is a Civic Corridor within the City of Portland. There were 196 serious injuries and fatalities on this corridor between 2007-2017. 74% of this corridor is in an equity focus area.
$520M $680M (WITH LEVERAGED FUNDS) SCENARIO INVESTMENT
$840M CORRIDOR NEED
4 Alderwood-Killingsworth Airport Path Planning (1 mile) Design multi-use path to address complete Killingsworth lack of safe walking/biking facility. 205 $.5-.6M PP ODOT 2 Airport Way Intersection with 82nd Ave Sandy Partial grade separation to reduce auto 3 Safety (Portland) congestion and accommodate airport Killingsworth to Clatsop (7 miles) growth. Add/improve sidewalks, crossings, 84 $35M [leverages Port of Portland funds] lighting to reduce severe injury and fatal crashes. PP Burnside $140-168M
ODOT 5 MAX Station Access Planning 82nd Ave Station Design to improve station access to the State of Good Repair west side of 82nd to reduce the need for 7 dangerous pedestrian crossings. Killingsworth to Clatsop (7 miles) Powell Address maintenance issues (rebuild street $1-1.5M and signals, address ADA needs) to facilitate Foster TM jurisdictional transfer from ODOT to PBOT. $30M [additional investments needed]
ODOT 1 Enhanced Transit/ Bus Rapid Transit Killingsworth to Clackamas Transit Center (9 miles) 6 Safety (Clackamas) Clatsop to Sunnybrook (2 miles) Bus enhancements for Line 72 (operations, Add/improve sidewalks, crossings, station enhancements, targeted bus lanes, lighting to reduce severe injury and fatal signal priority) to improve speed and crashes. reliability, station access and amenities. $50-83M $200M [could leverage fed. funds] 205
ODOT TM M
Hwy 224
2020 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING MEASURE 14 20061 6.3 (15)
Page 67 of 79 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION: TIER 1 CORRIDOR INVESTMENT PROFILE Burnside Burnside Street connects Washington County (where it’s known as Barnes Rd) and East Multnomah County through downtown Portland. It is a designated “emergency lifeline” route and aids emergency vehicles during disaster recovery efforts. It is a critical Willamette River crossing for all users and a Main Street for numerous commercial centers. It also provides connections to MAX and Gresham Transit facilities. There were 141 serious injuries and fatalities on this corridor between 2007-2017. 71% of this corridor is in an equity focus area.
$270M $810M (WITH LEVERAGED FUNDS) SCENARIO INVESTMENT
$890M CORRIDOR NEED
6 W 95th Ave Trail Morrison to Sunset Transit Center Multimodal trail along W 95th. Earthquake Ready Safety (Portland) Safety (Gresham) ($10-13M) 2 3 4 Burnside Bridge E 12th to Gresham city Gresham city limit to limit (8 miles) Powell (5 miles) WC W 3rd to MLK Replacement or seismic Add sidewalks, crossings, Add sidewalks, crossings, lighting to reduce severe injury lighting to reduce severe 7 “Complete Streets” upgrade of Burnside Bridge 89th to Portland city to improve safety and lifeline and fatal crashes. injury and fatal crashes. limit route. $10-15M $10-15M Widen to 3-5 lanes and build $150M [leverages state/ G to urban standard (curbs, county/federal funds] sidewalks, lighting, bike and stormwater facilities). MC ($32-54M)
WC 5 205 405
84 122nd
181st CENTRAL Stark CITY
5 Transit Center Planning Sunset and Gresham Transit Centers 1 Enhanced Transit Design multimodal access Sunset Transit Center to NE Kane improvements (e.g., sidewalks, (entire corridor, 19 miles) crossings, bike facilities, plaza). Bus enhancements for Line 20 (operations, station $1M enhancements, targeted bus lanes, signal priority) to improve speed and reliability, station access TM WC G and amenities throughout the corridor. $88M [could leverage federal funds]
TM WC
2020 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING MEASURE 15 20061 6.3 (16)
Page 68 of 79 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION: TIER 1 CORRIDOR INVESTMENT PROFILE Central City The Central City is the center of the Metro region and a key engine of the state’s economy. It has the largest concentration of jobs and affordable housing in the state and is expected to receive over 30% of the city’s projected future growth. The corridor also has a multimodal transportation network with a wide variety of demands on the streets- walking, biking, MAX, streetcar, buses, scooters, freight delivery vehicles, cars and more. All MAX lines and 75% of the region’s frequent bus lines serve and pass through the Central City. There were 101 serious injuries and fatalities on this corridor between 2007-2017. 97% of this corridor is in an equity focus area.
$220M $270M (WITH LEVERAGED FUNDS) SCENARIO INVESTMENT
$390M CORRIDOR NEED
3 MAX Tunnel Planning Goose Hollow to Lloyd Center (3 miles) Plan and design downtown tunnel to improve speed and 1 Central City reliability of MAX service, and 5
in Motion NE MLK JR BLVD address the region’s most Across Central City NE BROADWAY significant transit bottleneck. Treatments to improve $50M walking, biking and transit to make it easier and safer M TM to take transit, walk and 84 bike in the Central City. NE GLISAN $80-96M 2 Green Loop Key TM E BURNSIDE ST Connections SE and SW quadrants Create bike/ped connections 405 across key barriers for future SE MORRISON ST 4 Ross Island Green Loop. Bridgehead ($10-40M) Harrison to EVA HT21 ES HT21 EVA SE HAWTHORNE Barbur/Naito (1 mile) Reconstruct streets at west SW BROADWAY end of Ross Island Bridge to improve access and reduce neighborhood barriers. SE DIVISION ST $50-75M
5
2020 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING MEASURE 16 20061 6.3 (17)
Page 69 of 79 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION: TIER 1 CORRIDOR INVESTMENT PROFILE 122nd Avenue 122nd Avenue connects Foster Road to Marine Drive. The corridor serves TriMet Line 73 and connects to various East-West transit lines, including the MAX Blue line. It is identified as a Civic Corridor by the City of Portland from NE Sandy to Foster, and provides access to trails, including the Marine Drive trail, I-84 trail, and Springwater Corridor. There were 75 serious injuries and fatalities on this corridor between 2007-2017. 88% of this corridor is in an equity focus area. $90M SCENARIO INVESTMENT
$160M CORRIDOR NEED
Marine Dr Airport Way
Sandy
1 Enhanced Transit Skidmore to Foster (5.5 miles) Bus enhancements for Line 73 (operations, station enhancements, targeted bus lanes, signal priority) to 84 improve speed and reliability, station access and rider experience. $15-18M 2 Safety TM Marine Dr to Foster Rd Add proven safety countermeasures (sidewalks, crossings, lighting) to roadway to reduce severe injury and fatal crashes. May include I-84 trail connection (add two- way buffered or curb-protected bikeway GATEWAY to extend I-84 trail toward I-205 path), and Sandy intersection reconfiguration Washington Stark (convert highway-style ramps at 122nd/ Sandy into an urban intersection with signals and crosswalks to improve access and safety). $50-68M
Division
Powell
Foster
2020 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING MEASURE 17 20061 6.3 (18)
Page 70 of 79 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION: TIER 1 CORRIDOR INVESTMENT PROFILE 162nd Ave 162nd Avenue connects NE Sandy Blvd and SE Powell Blvd on the border between Portland and Gresham. This corridor serves historically marginalized communities in the Rockwood neighborhood and provides access to schools, residential neighborhoods and commercial areas. It serves as a North-South bus connection to various East-West transit lines and provides access to Powell Butte trails and I-84 trail. There were34 serious injuries and fatalities on this corridor between 2007-2017. 92% of this corridor is in an equity focus area.
$90M $10M LEVERAGED SCENARIO INVESTMENT
$170M CORRIDOR NEED
Sandy
4 “Complete Street” Portland 84 I-84 to Sandy Add turn lanes, and add improved/ 5 Railroad Undercrossing continuous curbs, sidewalks, Add bicycle/pedestrian access at lighting, bike and stormwater existing railroad overcrossing. facilities. $5-9M $10-18M Halsey G MC
3 “Complete Street” Glisan Gresham Glisan to I-84 (1 mile) Widen to 3 lanes and add improved/ Burnside continuous curbs, sidewalks, lighting, bike and stormwater facilities. Enhanced Transit ROCKWOOD 1 $30-41M Sandy to Powell Stark (entire corridor, 4 miles) G Bus enhancements for Line 74 (operations, station enhancements, targeted bus lanes, signal priority) to improve speed and reliability, station access and amenities throughout the 2 Safety corridor. Stark to Powell (2 miles) $13-16M Add sidewalks, crosswalks, medians and lighting to reduce severe injury TM and fatal crashes. $5-7M Division
Powell
2020 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING MEASURE 18 20061 6.3 (19)
Page 71 of 79 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION: TIER 1 CORRIDOR INVESTMENT PROFILE Albina Vision The Albina Vision concept offers a bold image of a new neighborhood in the historic Lower Albina area of N/NE Portland. The concept includes a reconfigured street grid, large open spaces, and direct access to the Willamette River for all people, especially children. Achieving this long-term vision will require thorough study, extensive public engagement, coordination with existing land-owners, and major public investments. Plans and strategies would synthesize the Portland City Council-adopted Central City 2035 Plan with the Albina Vision concept to establish a groundwork for future investment and expand upon Metro-funded work around public engagement and early design concepts. These projects are intended to provide short-term improvements to the neighborhood as a larger restorative vision is developed. There were 38 serious injuries and fatalities on this corridor between 2007-2017. 100% of this corridor is in an equity focus area. $55M SCENARIO INVESTMENT
$75M CORRIDOR NEED
1 Broadway/Weidler Streetscape Broadway Bridge to NE 7th (.6 miles) NE KNOTTNE KNOTT ST ST Develop an Albina “main street” with street lighting, public art, and enhanced transit stations to improve access and safety for all. N RUSSELLN RUSSELL ST ST $8-10M Lillis-AlbinaLillis-Albina Park Park 2 Interstate/N. Portland Greenway Steel Bridge to NE Tillamook (.8 miles) Enhanced crossings and a multi-use path to + connect the Rose Quarter Transit Center to employment and housing areas further north.
N WILLIAMS AVE
N VANCOUVER AVE N VANCOUVER AVE $13-16M
NE MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD 4 NE MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD 3 Multnomah Blvd Streetscape NE Interstate to 7th Ave (.5 miles) Green street features, lighting and upgraded
NE BROADWAYNE BROADWAY transit stations to provideNE 15TH AVE NE 15TH AVE safe connections 1 between Lower Albina, Convention Center and NW NAITONW NAITOPKWY PKWY NE WEIDLERNE WEIDLER Lloyd neighborhoods. 1 $5-6M
4 Vancouver/Williams+ NE Russell to Multnomah (.8 miles) 4 Street lighting, better transit stops, and
D 2 NE MULTNOMAHNE MULTNOMAH ST ST improvements to existing bikeway. BroadwayBroadway Bridge Bridge
EVA DNARG EN DNARG EN EVA HT7 EVA EVA DNARG EN DNARG EN EVA HT7 EVA $7-8M N N INT INT E E 3 RST RST AVEATE AVEATE 5 Lloyd Blvd Steel Bridge to NE 7th Ave (.5 miles) CP.5 + Multi-use path to strengthen multimodal connection between Albina, Lloyd and SE Portland. $3-4M
NE MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD NE MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD
+ indicates an enhanced version of a project Albina Urban Design Strategy Steel BridgeSteel Bridge 6 CP.55 Areawide NE LLOYDNE LLOYD BLVD BLVD Develop plans and strategies to guide Albina Vision implementation. Key elements include: urban design strategy, Rose Quarter TC, bridgehead and river connections, multimodal connections.
$12M 12TH AVE
NE 12TH AVE NE
2020 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING MEASURE 19 20061 6.3 (20)
Page 72 of 79 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION: TIER 1 CORRIDOR INVESTMENT PROFILE Powell Blvd Powell Boulevard links Portland’s west side to East Multnomah County for all modes, including freight, and connects historically underserved communities. TriMet identifies Powell as a key corridor to increase ridership. This corridor serves as main street for numerous commercial centers. There were 159 serious injuries and fatalities on this corridor between 2007-2017. 84% of this corridor is in an equity focus area. $140M SCENARIO INVESTMENT $230M CORRIDOR NEED [ADDITIONAL NEED PENDING ODOT “STATE OF GOOD REPAIR” ANALYSIS]
1 Transit Planning Willamette River to I-205 (5 miles) Design for longer-term transit 3 Intersection enhancements such as Bus Rapid Transit or Capacity MAX. (Short-term bus enhancements have Hogan/Powell been studied and determined not to be a Add second northbound lane good opportunity for this corridor.) to Hogan at Powell to ease $20M traffic congestion. $6-8M M TM GATEWAY DOWNTOWN PORTLAND G ROCKWOOD
205
Hogan
82nd
Chavez
122nd
182nd GRESHAM 99e Foster
LENTS
5 Safety 6 Enhanced Transit 2 Intersection Entire corridor Entire corridor Improvements 4 Downtown Gresham Add sidewalks, crosswalks, Stop improvements and 182nd/Powell Bikeway medians and lighting to signal priority. Add dual left turn lanes to 182nd Cleveland to 1st (.5 miles) reduce severe injury and $20-30M in both directions at Powell to Add two-way curb-protected fatal crashes. ease traffic congestion. bikeway on north side of Powell to PBOT TM G $50-75M ($3-7M) connect Gresham to Powell Valley neighborhoods. PBOT ODOT G G $3-4M
G
2020 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING MEASURE 20 20061 6.3 (21)
Page 73 of 79 Page 74 of 79 Log of Special Event Permit Applications Received by the Public Works Department Item Status # Event Description Event Sponsor Event Date (Approved/Pending) Event Location 1 Hillsboro St Patrick's Parade Murphy's Furniture 3/14/2020 Pending Downtown Hillsboro 2 Hippie Chick 2020 Run with Paula 5/8/2020 Pending NW Hillsboro/Washington County 3 Helvetia Half Marathon 5 & 10k Run with Paula 6/13/2020 Pending NW Hillsboro/Washington County Page 75 of 79
6.4 (1) Page 76 of 79 Recent Community Member Requests Related to Transportation Issues Received by Public Works Department
Item # Class Description Requestor Letter/ Date Expected Date Assigned To Comments/Staff Action/Resolution Website/ Received Resolution Resolved Phone Call Date Parking Restriction Request to restrict parking around the McKinney Bus Loop exit Parking will be time restricted to provide buses more room to 1573 Alex Oh Phone 09/19/19 10/19/19 12/19/2019 Jose driveway to allow for better bus movement. safely and effectively make left turn out of bus loop. 1582 Parking Restriction Request for time restricted parking on NE 1st Ct due to a Informed community member that a neighborhood survey number of non residential vehicles parking from 7 am to 5 pm would need to be sent out to determine neighborhood support. Alma Tierney Email 10/09/19 11/09/19 12/9/2019 Jeannie Waiting for community member to confirm that she wants a survey to go out. As of 12/12/2019 - staff has not heard from community member 1588 Parking Restriction Request for No Parking signs at corners of SE Lone Oak and Sarah Parking restrictions signs were removed during the newest phase Kingswood Ave Sharemark Phone 10/21/19 11/21/19 12/9/2019 Jeannie of construction. Signage installed Community Mgmt 1590 Parking Restriction Request to repaint curbs or place signage to restrict parking on SE 3rd Avenue outside the Boys & Girls Club for Bus parking. Alex Oh Phone 10/28/19 11/28/19 Pending Jeannie Ops to install signage
1594 Parking Restriction Request to install No Parking signs on 30th/Main and Shawna Meigs Phone 10/28/19 11/28/19 12/12/2019 Jeannie Signage installed 30th/Lincoln to open sight clearance 1596 Parking Restriction Request for No Parking signage or curb painting on 7th near his Brett Gutzka Email 11/07/19 12/07/19 Pending Jeannie/Doug Investigating home 1598 Vegetation Request to trim tree causing vision obstruction at the Letter was sent to property owner/community member intersection of 60th/Oelrich. Kara Sundholm Email 11/25/19 12/25/19 1/23/2020 Jose requesting for them to trim the tree in the vision clearance zone. No response, forwarded to Code Compliance 1599 Crosswalk Request for RRFB at Amberglen Pkwy and Von Neumann Dr Marie Funseth Email 11/12/19 12/12/19 11/27/2019 Jeannie Crosswalk will be evaluated in future BPCIP 1600 Speeding Request for traffic calming on Rosebay in Orenco Station. As of Speed data collected showed speeds to be at or below posted 12/12/2019, Resident has requested an additional speed check 11/18/2019 12/18/2019 12/12/2019 speed limits. Recommend that community member consider Mary Fleming Phone Jeannie on NE 61st Avenue 1/17/2020 2/17/2020 Pending contacting HPD if she is observing speeding behavior. Investigating new request 1601 Sidewalks Request for sidewalks on SE Pine Street Tony Colomina Phone 11/26/19 12/26/19 11/26/2019 Jeannie Provided information on the TSP Update 1602 Speed Feedback Sign Request for speed feedback sign on E Main between 6th and Speeds are high for road. Signs cannot be place on that section Hal Ballard Email 12/02/19 01/02/20 12/11/2019 Jose Request 5th to address speeding issue. of road. Information forwarded to PD. 1603 No-Parking sign Request to investigate No-Parking signs in the alley between Community member was informed that the signs cannot be relocation Butternut Creek/Engelmann that are causing issues pulling in Jessica Kam Phone 12/02/19 01/02/20 12/30/2019 Jose moved because of sign spacing requirements. and out of driveways. 1604 Mailbox Signage Request to place No-Parking stickers on 2 sets of mailboxes on Tony Casker Email 12/04/19 01/04/20 12/4/2019 Jose No-Parking stickers were placed. SE White Oak Ave Code Compliance 1605 Vegetation Request to trim vegetation at the southwest corner of River Sight distance is sufficient for signalized intersection. Intersection Joseph Garcia Email 12/03/19 01/03/20 12/4/2019 Jose Rd/Minter Bridge that is causing vision obstruction is under Washington County jurisdiction. 1606 Signal Timing Request to look at the signal detection at the traffic signals at No detection or phase errors were noted. Upgrades to signal 28th/Main and 32nd/Main to relieve some of the traffic Russ Wilson Phone 11/26/19 12/26/19 1/14/2020 Jeannie/Dan timing will take place sometime in the future congestion during peak hours 1608 Parking Restriction Request to curb paint or install No Parking signs at entrance to The Maples Apartments at 1136 SE Maple Street due to Angie Zunk Email 12/01/19 01/01/20 Pending Jeannie/Doug Investigating community members blocking and/or parking too close to the Code Compliance driveway 1609 Parking Restriction Request for Illegal Dumping signage be placed on NE 21st to Erin Monahan City of Hillsboro does not provide or install Illegal Dumping signs. prevent community members from dumping trash and CA Partners - Phone 12/06/19 01/06/20 12/12/2019 Jeannie Recommended that HOA reach out to their tenants and provide unused/broken furniture on streets. CornerPlace HOA guidance on what to do with their unwanted property 1610 Crosswalk Request for a RRFB on Amberglen Pkwy Heidi Briones Email 12/09/19 01/09/20 12/12/2019 Jeannie Crosswalk will be evaluated in future BPCIP 1611 Parking Restriction Request to restrict parking along curve on the south side of SE Striping will be added to section of road to prevent cars from Carda Morrison Phone 12/12/19 01/12/20 Pending Jose Montego Dr between 48th and Brookwood. cutting across lanes. Parking restriction not recommended. Page 77 of 79
6.5 (1) 1612 Street Light Obstruction Request to cut down two trees blocking two street light at both Requestor was informed the trees are the responsibility of sides of the Sunpower driveway on Dawson Creek Dr south of Ben Grubb Email 12/16/16 01/16/20 12/17/2019 Jose Sunpower. They need to apply for a permit to cut down the Evergreen. trees. 1613 Blind Spot Request to look into a blind spot when pulling out of a Parking will be restricted from the driveway to the intersection. Bruce Querbach Email 12/23/19 01/23/20 Pending Jose driveway at 508 SE Walnut St near 5th Ave. The restriction will remove one parking space. 1614 All-Way Stop Request for an All Way Stop at 6th/Walnut. Matthew King Email 12/30/19 01/30/20 Pending Jose Investigating 1615 Parking Restriction Request to add more signs to the rest of Lone Oak St near Diane Thornton Two signs will be replaced to clear up which section of SE Lone Columbus Ave. Parking Email 12/30/19 01/30/20 1/9/2020 Jose Oak St has no parking. Enforcement 1616 Parking Restriction Request to install no parking signs on SE Karpstein Pl to address Requestor was informed that the private road is maintained by community members parking in a restricted area. Teresa Mahoney Phone 12/30/19 01/30/20 Pending Jose the HOA. They can install the signs themselves as long as it meets Fire Code. 1617 Parking Restriction Request to restrict parking on one side of SE 2nd Ave south of Joey Blanc Parking will not be restricted. Travel lane is sufficient for a garage Walnut. Garbage trucks are having difficulty retrieving garbage Email 12/31/19 01/31/20 1/22/2020 Jose Code Compliance truck to drive through. and getting in and out. 1618 Speed Humps Request for speed humps to address speeding on NW Hertel St. Investigating Kate Schaefer Email 01/06/20 02/06/20 Pending Jose 1619 Crosswalk Lighting Request to enhance crosswalk at 12th/Main with some kind of Investigating Heather Pedersen Email 12/31/19 01/31/20 Pending Jose lighting for better visibility of pedestrians crossing 1620 BPCIP Requesting update on BPCIP process. Originally requested Provided information on how the BPCIP prioritization process sidewalks on Rood Bridge Road Brandon was postponed until after the TSP update has been completed. Email 01/05/20 02/05/20 1/16/2020 Jeannie Oberkampf Additionally provided links to the TSP so that he can provide comment there as well. 1621 SRTS Inquiry into whether or not sidewalks will be installed on SE Investigating 67th as part of South Hillsboro development for students Chris Lukas Email 01/07/20 02/07/20 Pending Dan/Mike attending Rosedale Elementary who currently ride the bus 1622 Parking Restriction Request to restrict parking near the driveways at SE 8th/Alley. Investigating 9th/Alley due to vision obstruction caused by parked cars. Ken Perry Phone 01/14/20 02/14/20 Pending Jeanne Additionally requesting additional parking be removed from 6th/Grant. 1623 Traffic Calming Looking for update on results from studies and solutions Investigating provided to the Orenco Station neighborhood due to concerns Molly Hefeneider Email 01/14/20 02/14/20 Pending Jeannie with cut through traffic and speeding 1624 Sidewalks Request for missing sidewalks on sections of W Main Street Provided information on the TSP Update Dishanta Kim Email 01/14/20 02/14/20 1/14/2020 Jeannie from Baseline to Freeman. 1625 Parking Restriction Request to remove parking on one side of street on roadways The area around Pacific University is what we call a “Station around Pacific University. Consider opening the vacant "Hanks Community” and is developed at a higher density which provides parking lot" aka Block 67 for public parking less parking. We do see a higher utilization of on-street parking in these areas. All of our streets are designed so that there is at Julie Karlbon Email 12/10/19 02/10/20 1/10/2020 Doug least 20 feet of clear road width to meet the required clear width for emergency services. Due to the short term duration between the acquisition of Block 67 and planned development, its not likely that the City will be considering the use of this lot for temporary parking. 1626 Signage Request to provide solutions to drivers who do not comply with Investigating the Right Turn Only sign at the driveway at McDonalds Sara Adam Email 12/31/19 01/31/20 Pending Dan Driveway at NE 48th Avenue near Costco 1627 Signage Request for house number signage to help direct drivers to This request was forwarded to Planning Department for homes addressed as NE 2nd, a section of roadway north of Helen Callahan Email 01/13/20 02/13/20 1/15/2020 Doug response through their addressing process. Grant that is often known as Chandler Lane Page 78 of 79
6.5 (2) 1628 Signal Phasing Request to consider adding Leading Pedestrian Interval phasing Staff has one LPI at 1 intersection in Hillsboro where we have at intersections within Hillsboro heavy east-west pedestrian traffic, combined with other factors like the intersection’s geometry and signal equipment placement causing sight obstructions. Staff does consider adding LPI at locations when warranted. LPI can have a negative impact on the operational efficiency (During the pedestrian’s 5 second Jeremy Ward Email 01/16/20 02/16/20 1/16/2020 Doug head start, no cars or bicycles are moving.) It is important to provide all modes of transportation with the highest level of service possible, while maintaining a safe and efficient system.
1629 Signal Phasing Request to check the pedestrian signal at Minter Bridge Rd/TV This signal is owned and maintained by ODOT. We have Rigoberto Chavez Email 01/21/20 02/21/20 1/21/2020 Doug Hwy forwarded this request on to ODOT for follow-up. 1630 Street Lighting Request to install additional street lighting at the existing Wayne Phone 01/22/20 02/22/20 Pending Jeannie/Dan Investigating crosswalk at Adams/Main 1631 Street Lighting Request to remove street light on NE Copper Beech Dr to Pat Dunn Phone 01/22/20 02/22/20 Pending Jeannie Investigating prevent light from lighting a garden Page 79 of
6.5 (3)