Vulnerability Studies and Transportation Resilience Planning for a Cascadia Event

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vulnerability Studies and Transportation Resilience Planning for a Cascadia Event Vulnerability Studies and Transportation Resilience Planning for a Cascadia Event Pacific Northwest Waterway’s Association - October 10, 2018 Bruce Johnson, Oregon DOT State Bridge Engineer Forces of Nature – Crustal Earthquakes in OR Scotts Mills, March 25, 1993 Klamath Falls, September 20, 1993 Seismic Event Sources ► Crustal: 15-20 earthquakes each year with less than 3.0 magnitude. Potential for 5.0 to 6.0 magnitude. •Example: 1993 Scotts Mills and Klamath Falls - 5.6 to 6.0 magnitude. ► Intraplate: Deep earthquake within a Tectonic plate with up to 6.0 or 7.0 magnitude. •Example: 2009 Grants Pass - 4.1 magnitude ► Interplate or Subduction Zone: At eastern edge of the Juan de Fuca Plate, 8.0 to 9.0 magnitude. •Example: 1700 Oregon Coast - 8.3 magnitude. 3 Cascadia Subduction Earthquake Magnitude 9.0 Paradigm Shift Can we learn from other similar events or do we have to learn the hard way? Cascadia Subduction Earthquake . Strong Ground Shaking (M9 w/ 2 - 4 min shaking) . Tsunami within 15 to 25 minutes Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquakes Recurrence Mw Mw Mw Mw ~9 8.5-8.8 8.5-8.3 7.6-8.4 500 430 yrs 320 yrs 240 yrs yrs (Modified from Goldfinger et al. (in press) by adding magnitude estimates and some labels) What actually happens during a large earthquake? Synchronous turbidity currents are triggered within a few minutes of each other along the length of the margin ASCE, 2012 Chris Goldfinger, OSU he Rogue Apron site is a typical margin site, fed by the Rogue Canyon with heads near the shelf dge. ASCE, 2012 Turbidite In Cascadia, onshore and offshore paleoseismology Paleoseismology: have revealed a long history of great earthquakes. Extending the earthquake record We set out in 1999 to prove the turbidite story wrong, and failed. Cascadia Core Sites: Cascadia Turbidite 1999 = gray Paleoseismology based on event correlation along 2002 = yellow strike. 2009 = green 1) Aerial extent Selected older 2) Synchroneity, and existing cores = 3) Sedimentology. white Stratigraphic correlation, tests of synchronous triggering, and 14C ages have led to a credible (we think) record of 43 events of variable size and strike length during the Holocene. ASCE, 2012 Northern Margin For the northern margin, probabilities are relatively low, many intervals longer than 360 years are in the paleoseismic record. The failure analysis suggests at 360 years, 25% of repeat times will have been exceeded. Conditional probability in 50 years is 12% (7-15%). Southern Margin For the southern margin, 70-93% of repeat times will have been exceeded. Conditional probability in 50 years is 37% (32-42%). ASCE, 2012 Damage in the tsunami zone will be nearly complete. PHOTO CREDIT: US PHOTO US CREDIT: NAVY M9 Tohoku earthquake & tsunami Modeled M9 tsunami at Rockaway Beach Severe ground movement in Western Oregon will cause widespread damage to lifelines and infrastructure. The Oregon Resilience Plan 50-year Comprehensive Plan Save Lives Protect our Economy Preserve our Communities 169 Expert Volunteers $ Millions in donation of professional services One-year Schedule Oregon Resilience Study - Four Study Zones The Oregon Resilience Plan Required by the legislature, Transportation is supported by critical Governor Comprehensive plan, developing a strategic approach Transportation Group . Led by ODOT Bridge Section . The Transportation Task Group addressed these systems: Bridges (owned by ODOT, Counties or Cities) Airports and Seaports Railroads Mass Transit (Trimet) Columbia River Ports Transportation Component – Broad Participation • Ports: Portland, Astoria, Coos Bay • Federal Agency: USCG (Astoria) • Universities: OSU, PSU • Consultants: Ch2M Hill, HDR, KPFF, Quincy, OBEC • Local Governments: AOC, LOC, Western Cities and Counties • State Agencies: Transportation, Aviation, Forestry Concepts Retrofit increases Strategic planning resiliency if is critical to success and will done require widespread incrementally & consensus strategically Secondary loss of life and long term economic losses can be significantly reduced Bridge Span Collapse Bridge Bent Failure The solution RETROFIT Methods/Phases For serviceability For life safety to to keep the bridge prevent collapse functional New & Retrofit Highway Bridge Seismic Design Criteria “Life Safety” (no collapse) connects beams to the columns. “Serviceability ” strengthens the substructure for use within 72 hours after an event. (Immediate occupancy, building code) Hazard Level - Recurrence Interval for Highway Bridges National Code (AASHTO) - Design for Life Safety (no collapse) at a 1000-year recurrence interval using USGS 2002 Hazard Maps. Oregon Code – Design for “no collapse” at a 1000-year recurrence interval using 2014 USGS Hazard Maps and “Serviceability” Design for usability within 72 hours after a CSZ 2014 (USGS) Scenario event. (2-level design criteria) Phase 1 & 2 Retrofit (no collapse) Phase 1 Retrofit The goal of seismic retrofit is “life safety” under the design earthquake Phase 1 & 2 Retrofit Cost 2 Retrofit & 1 Phase Phase 1 Retrofit 1 Cost Phase Retrofit Landslide Railroads 2012 Operational Airports After EQ-Tsunami – Valley Columbia River Ports & Dredged Nav. Channel Columbia River Ports Port of Portland Facilities Coastal Ports Damage to lifelines and interdependency will slow restoration of services and rebuilding of the economy. Key Finding – Liquid Fuel Dependency • Liquid Fuel vulnerability is a key issue for transportation ODOT Resiliency Planning 1. Assess Vulnerability of Assets • Bridges and landslides (rockfall) damage states 2. Estimate cost of mitigation (retrofit) 3. Establish priority of Lifelines (ETR’s for rescue, recovery) 4. Estimate impact to rescue efforts and economy 5. Prioritize plan for mitigation, considering condition of assets 6. Establish Investment options 7. Develop triage approach for reduced level of mobility 8. Coordinate investment plan statewide with other modes/sectors FOCUS ON HIGHWAY BRIDGES Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquake (Magnitude 9.0) Estimates Loss: 6 complete collapses . $1,080 million for bridge repair and extensive 64 replacement 106 major Damage States . Significant Economic losses (travel time Route 164 slight related losses) Slight Moderate Extensive Complete I-5 (MWC) 4 1 0 0 I-5 (MLL) 16 3 1 0 I-5 (DJJ) 27 0 0 0 I-84 13 1 0 0 US-101 7 14 36 5 US-26 7 5 0 0 I-205 8 2 0 0 I-405 7 0 0 0 US-30 4 2 2 0 US-20 5 3 5 0 OR-38 3 2 1 0 OR-42 4 13 13 1 Others 59 60 6 0 Total 164 106 64 6 I-5 BooneSlight Bridge IModerate-5 Marquam Bridge I-205Moderate Abernathy Bridge USExtensive 30 Bypass St. Johns Bridge I-405Moderate Fremont Bridge USCollapse 26 Ross Island Bridge Columbia River bridges USCollapse 30 Longview-Rainier Bridge ICollapse-5 Interstate Bridge Slight to I-205Moderate Glenn Jackson Bridge Retrofitting progress First 16 years since vulnerability was identified Years Actions 1994/1997 Prioritized total bridge needs 1155 1985-2012 Phase 1 retrofit added to projects 355 (STIP & OTIA III program) bridges addressed Bridges still needing retrofitting Future 800 (Over 200 years at current funding) Seismic Bridge Design in Oregon adopt FHWA 2009 LRFD Seismic Design Guide Specs adopt USGS 2002 seismic hazard maps seismic hazard maps and adoption of FHWA ‘83 seismic design specs. seismic force up to 12%g seismic force up to 6%g Seismic loads typ. not considered Available on the ODOT Bridge Engineering Section website at: http://egov.oregon.gov /ODOT/HWY/BRIDGE/ November 2009 • Identify strategic lifeline routes • Minimize long term economic damage • Estimate Cost to address overall bridge condition -Oregon Highway Seismic Options Report Route selection Survivability • Emergency responders • Critical care facilities Life Support • Critical care facilities • Life support resources • Evacuation routes Economic Recovery • Critical freight corridors • Mobility into and out of the region • Routes between large metro areas Total Seismic PLUS Program Cost Program Total Bridge Cost Landslides/Rockfalls Cost Total Seismic PLUS Phases Program Costs 1 $738 Million $197 Million $935 Million 2 $632 Million $272 Million $904 Million 3 $612 Million $483 Million $1,095 Million 4 $640 Million $126 Million $766 Million 5 $1,432 Million $0 $1,432 Million Total $4.1 Billion $1.0 Billion $5.1 Billion Major Seismic Event: Isolated Areas Total economic loss: $350 B Isolated Zones: Full Seismic Program Reduce economic loss by: $84 B Cost = $5.1 Billion Economic Loss Avoided = $84 Billion Take Home Learnings… Next Steps Engage local Bridge communities condition – Bridge funding for Triage include seismic Approach 58 ODOT Seismic Expenditures In HB2017 Example: $500 million/yr from HB2017 State funds: $250 million Seismic: $61 million/yr (bridges, unstable slopes and facilities) • Goal is to complete Phase 1 in 25 years • Study Triage Approach using lower cost alternative local routes for Phases 2-5 • Earmarked funding for Southern Oregon Triage and Center Street Bridge in Salem ODOT Resiliency Planning 1. Assess Vulnerability of Assets • Bridges and landslides (rockfall) damage states 2. Estimate cost of mitigation (retrofit) 3. Establish priority of Lifelines (ETR’s for rescue, recovery) 4. Estimate impact to rescue efforts and economy 5. Prioritize plan for mitigation, considering condition of assets 6. Establish Investment options 7. Develop triage approach for reduced level of mobility 8. Coordinate investment plan statewide with other modes/sectors Thank you! Bruce Johnson, State Bridge Engineer ODOT Bridge Engineering Section Seismic Retrofit Methods Older overpasses are Footings are New columns have vulnerable at their joints enlarged and continuous and columns, they need pilings driven ¾” steel to be retrofitted deep into spirals on to help them ground for 3” centers stand up to structures support a quake. built in vertical soft soil. rods. Older concrete Old columns have columns are vertical rods and ½” Cable fitted with a steel hoops on 12” supports steel casing. centers. During a keep road quake the columns beds from A thin layer of collapse concrete grout separating at under joints and hold fills in gaps. lateral motion. bridge decks to columns.
Recommended publications
  • Julie Fitzgerald on HB 3065-8
    Follow-up Testimony by City of Wilsonville Mayor Julie Fitzgerald on HB 3065-8: If Metro-Area Highway Tolling Is Implemented, then Legislation Should Establish Key Principles for Use of Revenues and Increase Public Transit Responses to Questions Posed by Rep. Boshart Davis for Local Governments regarding HB 3065-8 on May 13, 2021, before the Joint Committee on Transportation Co-Chairs Beyer and McLain, Vice-Chairs Boquist and Noble, and Members of the Committee: On behalf of the City of Wilsonville, I am providing follow-up testimony responding to questions posed by Representative Boshart Davis to local governments regarding HB 3065-8. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this follow-up testimony, and welcome the opportunity to dialogue further with members of the Joint Transportation Committee and legislative leadership. Q1 HB2017 committed to funding the Rose Quarter Project, and the intent of this bill is to continue to fulfill that commitment. How does this bill affect your position on the project? The City of Wilsonville recognizes in developing the transportation-funding bill HB 2017 of 2017, the Oregon legislature worked with many interests to develop the priority highway traffic “bottleneck” projects list that included I-205/Abernathy Bridge and I-5/I-84 Rose Quarter projects. The -8 amendment adds the crucial I-5/Boone Bridge and Seismic Improvement Project as a priority facility for the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) to advance in conjunction with other HB 2017 priority projects. Given the various community and organizational dynamics associated with each of these projects, the City would expect that the projects might proceed on timelines that may be difficult to specifically program for implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities and Constraints Report
    OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS REPORT April 5, 2017 Prepared for the City of Wilsonville Prepared By OBEC Consulting Engineers 5000 Meadows Road, Suite 420 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 503.620.6103 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 Project Setting and Constraints .................................................................. 1 Topography ........................................................................................... 1 Transportation Network ........................................................................ 3 Public Roads ..................................................................................... 3 Bicycle and Pedestrian Paths ............................................................... 3 Railways ........................................................................................... 4 Boating ............................................................................................ 4 Aviation ............................................................................................ 5 Hydraulics, Floodplain, and Floodway .................................................... 5 Utilities ................................................................................................ 5 NWN Gas Line ................................................................................... 5 BPA Transmission Lines ...................................................................... 6 Power and Communications ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Canby Ferry Alternatives Feasibility Study Open House Feedback And
    Canby Ferry Alternatives Feasibility Study Open House June 13, 2018 Feedback and Comments On June 13, 2018, Clackamas County held a public open house in the Canby Public Library share information about the process being used in the feasibility study and to gather input from the public on what factors they think we should consider during the study. The open house was publicized by a mailing of more than 6,000 postcards to area addresses, a news release, website information, social media, and contacts with government and community organizations. More than 250 people attended the meeting, including 161 who signed in at the county’s welcome table and 122 who turned in completed comment forms. The responses from those comment forms, compiled by subject and in raw form, are shown below. The numbers in parentheses before many items represents the total number comments received that reflected that response. Please note that most people made more than one comment, so the total number of comments is greater than the number of comment forms received. On average, how often do you ride the Canby Ferry? (40) A few times a year (20) 2 times a week or more (16) Once a month (13) Once a year (12) Once a week (5) Never (24) Other o (3) Only when friends/family visit for tourist attraction; to proudly show off o (3) I live near the Ferry and stopped/limited using it once price >$2.50/trip o (2) 5 years o (2) Seasonal use / County Fair o (2) Once in a few years o (2) 3 times a month o (2) Varies depending on schedule and traffic – mine; ferry’s o
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION STATEWIDE ROAD, WEATHER and INCIDENT CONDITIONS 8/8/2021 1:43:05 PM Incidents/Construction
    OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATEWIDE ROAD, WEATHER AND INCIDENT CONDITIONS 9/29/2021 11:51:07 PM Incidents/Construction: ROUTE START END COMMON NAME DELAY CATEGORY AFFECTED COMMENTS MP MP LANES US30BY 3 5 2 Mi W of @ Hwy I-5 No to Minimum Delay Construction Turn lane closures at some intersections 24/7. Periodic daytime lane Work closures. Pedestrian detours. 46 47 Estimated delay under 20 Maintenance Bridge work is occurring. Use caution. Day Work; Expect Delays. minutes Work Intermittent flagging between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. I-5 0 11 Oregon - California Estimated delay under 20 Construction Southbound 1 Lane(s); Road construction is occurring. Use caution. Ramps Affected. Border minutes Work Northbound 1 Lane(s) I-5 4 7 Siskiyou Summit No to Minimum Delay Maintenance Northbound 1 Lane(s) Road maintenance operations are occurring causing no to minimum Work delays. Use caution. I-5 8 2 7 Mi S of Ashland No to Minimum Delay Maintenance Southbound (Right Shoulder) Road maintenance operations are occurring causing no to minimum Work 1 Lane(s) delays. Use caution. I-5 10 11 5 Mi S of Ashland No to Minimum Delay Maintenance Northbound 1 Lane(s) Road maintenance operations are occurring causing no to minimum Work delays. Use caution. I-5 29 29 Medford No to Minimum Delay Crash/Hazard Hazardous debris is causing no to minimum delays. Use caution. I-5 38 38 5 Mi N of Central No to Minimum Delay Crash/Hazard Hazardous debris is causing no to minimum delays. Use caution. Point I-5 45 45 @ Hwy OR99 No to Minimum Delay Crash/Hazard Hazardous debris is causing no to minimum delays.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-21 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program Amended As of March 31, 2018
    2018-21 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program Amended as of March 31, 2018 oregonmetro.gov Metro 600 NE Grand Ave. Portland, OR 97232-2736 503-797-1700 As the metropolitan planning organization for the Portland region, Metro is required to prepare the MTIP, documenting funded projects scheduled for the next four years. The MTIP is incorporated without change into the State Transportation Improvement Program, Oregon's statewide four-year transportation capital improvement program. Like the MTIP, Oregon's STIP covers a four-year construction period, and is updated every two to three years. The MTIP (and STIP) are “living” documents, subject to updates through an amendment process. The project programming tables in this report have been updated to include the MTIP amendments approved and processsed prior to the date of this report. The adopted version of the 2018-21 MTIP can be found in its entirety here: 2018-21 MTIP MTIP Content and Timeline The 201 MTIP represents an overall capital expenditure program for the regional transportation system in a four-year timeframe. The transportation investments identified in the MTIP ser8ve-2s1 as a snapshot of the transportation expenditures for the Portland urbanized area during the four-year period beginning October 1, 201 and ending September 30, 20 (federal fiscal years 201 through 20 ). Context within the MTIP includes: the amount and type of federal funding being allocated to a specific transport7ation project, the amount of loc21al dollars provided as mat8c h, and how 2m1uch is estimated to be spent in each year. All transportation investments (i.e. projects) in the MTIP must address federally funded highway, public transit, and state or locally funded projects which have measurable affects to the region's air quality.
    [Show full text]
  • I-5 Wilsonville Facility Plan with Appendices
    I-5 WILSONVILLE FACILITY PLAN ADOPTED JULY 2018 I-5 WILSONVILLE FACILITY PLAN Prepared by Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 1 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97214 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ODOT Region 1 DKS Associates Talia Jacobson, ODOT Project Manager Ray Delahanty, Project Manager Jon Makler, Long Range Planning Manager Maggie Lin, Transportation Engineering Associate Jeff Buckland, Senior NEPA Project Manager Carl Springer, Principal Simon Eng, Traffic Analysis Team Leader Kate Freitag, Region Traffic Operations Engineer Angelo Planning Group Katelyn Jackson, Community Affairs Coordinator Canh Lam, Senior Roadway Designer Joe Dills, Senior Project Manager Chi Mai, Transportation Modeler/Analysis Matt Hastie, Project Manager Tim Wilson, Senior Major Projects Planner City of Wilsonville Nancy Kraushaar, Community Development Director Steve Adams, Development Engineering Manager Candi Garrett, Engineering Administrative Assistant Bill Evans, Communications and Marketing Manager Mark Ottenad, Public/Government Affairs Director Clackamas County Stephen Williams, Principal Transportation Planner Washington County Erin Wardell, Principal Transportation Planner I-5 Wilsonville Facility Plan | July 2018 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 7 Policy context 9 Purpose statement 13 Existing conditions, needs, and deficiencies 14 Future conditions 25 Plan alternatives and comparison of long-term operations 28 Public involvement and local government participation 35 Planned improvements 37 Implementation recommendations 39 APPENDICES A — Technical memoranda B — Synthesis of public input C — Consistency with adopted state, regional, and local plans I-5 Wilsonville Facility Plan | July 2018 3 LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES Figure 1. Study area map. 5 Figure 2. Vicinity map. 6 Figure 3. Aerial photo of the study area, as viewed from above the I-5: Wilsonville Road interchange look- 8 ing south along I-5.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Trails Accomplishments Report 2013 May
    April 2013 Portland metropolitan area Regional trail accomplishments 2006 and beyond | On the road to 1,200 miles of trail wo decades ago, the Metropolitan T Greenspaces Master Plan outlined a vision for 1,200 miles of regional trails and greenways – a connected network that makes it easier to explore, relax, exercise and commute. Approved by the Metro Council in 1992, the plan brought together two dozen cities, three counties, two park districts, state and federal agencies and many nonprofit organizations, such as the 40-Mile Loop Land Trust and the Audubon Society of Portland. Everyday citizens, too, helped envision the next generation of natural areas, parks and trails. As trails advocates celebrate the 20th anniversary of “To develop a sense of community, you the Greenspaces Master Plan, there is much to be have to feel connected proud of. Some 300 miles of regional trails have been – and connectivity built, spanning the region’s communities and natural is what these trails features. That work has accelerated since 2006, when are about. The value voters passed a second natural areas bond measure that really goes beyond makes it possible to fill in trail gaps. Local advocates have the very important become more vocal and strategic during the past seven transportation, health years, helping increase federal funding for trail design and recreation aspects. and construction. Most local jurisdictions are planning, It gets down to the designing, building and maintaining trails in their fundamental principles communities. And, as the Intertwine Alliance blossoms, it of what we are about is reaching out to thousands of new trail and park users.
    [Show full text]
  • French Prairie Bridge
    Table of Contents 1. Summary of Key Attributes: Emergency Link for I-5 Historical Context & Topography Regional TTrail Connections 2. Media Coverage: French Prairie Articles Opinion Editorials Bike-Ped Emergency 3. Supporters: Governments Bridge Organizations 4. Master Plan Excerpts: Briefing Booklet 1993 Bicycle and Pedestrian 1994 Parks & Recreation ______________________ 2007 Bicycle, Pedestrian and Transit March 2012 5. Public Involvement: Master Planning Efforts History of Public Input Planning Commission Metro MTIP Award Process 1. Summary of Key Attributes: Emergency Link for I-5 Historical Context & Topography Regional Trail Connections WILSONVILLE, OREGON French Prairie Bridge Regional Significance PORTLAND Reconnecting the missing, historic Willamette River link of the Portland see inset map WILSONVILLE area with the Willamette Valley k Champoeg State Park Key Attributes of the Proposed French Prairie Bridge at Wilsonville • Historic route reestablished at Boones Ferry crossing, linking the French Prairie region of the north Willamette SALEM Valley to the greater Portland metro area. • Safe bicycle and pedestrian access across the Willamette River without the hazards of using I-5. • Improved connectivity between the Willamette Valley Scenic Bikeway and new Portland area Tonquin Trail. ALBANY • Emergency access to highway accidents for police, fire and CORVALLIS safety vehicles responding to incidents occurring on I-5. • Tourism development opportunities featuring French Prairie, the Willamette River Greenway,
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Department of Transportation Statewide Road, Weather and Incident Conditions
    OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATEWIDE ROAD, WEATHER AND INCIDENT CONDITIONS 9/28/2021 3:53:09 AM Incidents/Construction: ROUTE START END COMMON NAME DELAY CATEGORY AFFECTED COMMENTS MP MP LANES US30BY 3 5 2 Mi W of @ Hwy I-5 No to Minimum Delay Construction Turn lane closures at some intersections 24/7. Periodic daytime lane Work closures. Pedestrian detours. 46 47 Estimated delay under 20 Maintenance Bridge work is occurring. Use caution. Day Work; Expect Delays. minutes Work Intermittent flagging between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. I-5 0 11 Oregon - California Estimated delay under 20 Construction Southbound 1 Lane(s); Road construction is occurring. Use caution. Ramps Affected. Border minutes Work Northbound 1 Lane(s) I-5 4 7 Siskiyou Summit No to Minimum Delay Maintenance Northbound 1 Lane(s) Road maintenance operations are occurring causing no to minimum Work delays. Use caution. I-5 8 2 7 Mi S of Ashland No to Minimum Delay Maintenance Southbound (Right Shoulder) Road maintenance operations are occurring causing no to minimum Work 1 Lane(s) delays. Use caution. I-5 10 11 5 Mi S of Ashland No to Minimum Delay Construction Northbound 1 Lane(s) Road construction is occurring causing no to minimum delays. Use Work caution. I-5 28 28 Medford No to Minimum Delay Crash/Hazard High water is causing no to minimum delays. Use caution. I-5 29 29 Medford No to Minimum Delay Crash/Hazard Hazardous debris is causing no to minimum delays. Use caution. I-5 38 38 5 Mi N of Central No to Minimum Delay Crash/Hazard Hazardous debris is causing no to minimum delays.
    [Show full text]
  • French Prairie Bridge Project
    FRENCH PRAIRIE BRIDGE PROJECT JANUARY 2017 • UPDATE NO. 1 WWW.FRENCHPRAIRIEBRIDGEPROJECT.ORG Project to address key its regional partners will have bridge would serve local residents questions about proposed the information needed to decide and fill a missing link in a cycling bridge whether to pursue final bridge route connecting the Portland design and construction. metro area with the French Prairie The City of Wilsonville is beginning region of the Willamette Valley a planning and design project Crossing the Willamette and communities as far south as for the proposed French Prairie Currently, the only bridge over Eugene. Bridge—a bicycle/pedestrian/ the Willamette River in the 30- emergency responder crossing over The new bridge is also proposed mile stretch between Newberg and the Willamette River. The project to address emergency response Oregon City is the heavily trafficked aims to address the following needs. When I-5 traffic is blocked Interstate 5 (I-5) Boone Bridge. questions: on the Boone Bridge, first • Where are the preferred landing Pedestrians and cyclists wanting responders could use the French points for the bridge? to cross the river in the Wilsonville Prairie Bridge for emergency access area must use the I-5 road to incidents on the freeway and to • What is the preferred bridge shoulder next to cars and trucks populations south of the river. type? traveling at high speeds. With • What is the estimated cost narrow shoulders that offer no Two decades in the making of the preferred bridge and separation from traffic, walking The French Prairie Bridge Project how might its construction be or biking on the Boone Bridge is the continuation of Wilsonville funded? is an unpleasant and potentially community planning efforts that The project will result in dangerous experience.
    [Show full text]
  • I-5 Boone Bridge and Seismic Improvement Project
    I-5 Boone Bridge and Seismic Improvement Project Summary Report to the Oregon State Legislature January 2021 I-5 Boone Bridge and Seismic Improvement Project: Summary Report ii Acknowledgements Oregon Department of Transportation Rian Windsheimer, Region 1 Manager Tova Peltz, Region 1 Project Delivery Manager Matt Freitag, Area Manager - West Mandy Putney, Project Director – I-205 Improvements: Stafford Rd to OR 213 (former Policy and Development Manager) Kristen Stallman, Major Projects Manager Glen Bolen, Interim Planning Manager Scott Turnoy, Principal Planner Brian Davis, Structural Design Engineer Canh Lam, Senior Roadway Engineer Max Gummer, Geotechnical Design Engineer Susan Ortiz, Senior Geotechnical Engineer Paul Langdale, Region Environmental Coordinator Tobin Bottman, Archaeologist Justin Brandon, Utilities Specialist Bert Hartman, State Bridge Program and Standards Manager Albert Nako, Senior Bridge Standards Engineer Hope Estes, Community Affairs Coordinator Karyn Criswell, Public Transportation Division Manager Maria Sipin, Active Transportation Liaison Jessica Horning, Pedestrian and Bicycle Program Manager Alex Bettinardi, Senior Integrated Analysis Engineer Rebecca Knudson, Senior Transportation Economist Kayla Hootsmans, Legislative Coordinator Consultant Team Quincy Engineering, Inc. Karen Tatman, Project Manager Jeff Olson, Principal Engineer, Structural Lead Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants Jan Six, Geotechnical Engineer Per Onsager, Engineer HDR, Inc. Brian Bauman, Environmental Lead Willamette
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2018 Bridge Type Public Involvement Summary
    Fall 2018 Bridge Type Public Involvement Summary November 19, 2018 Prepared for the City of Wilsonville Prepared By EnviroIssues 1515 SW 5th Avenue Portland, OR 97201 503.248.9500 FALL 2018 BRIDGE TYPE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUMMARY FRENCH PRAIRIE BRIDGE PROJECT 1 Introduction The City of Wilsonville, in partnership with Clackamas County, Metro and the Oregon Department of Transportation, is planning and developing preliminary designs for a proposed bicycle/pedestrian/emergency-access bridge across the Willamette River. The bridge would be located at the approximate site of the historic Boones Ferry, located between the I-5 Boone Bridge and the railroad bridge to the west. Regional and community leaders have worked since 2016 to deliver on a 20-year vision to better connect the region’s trail system and close a gap for safe bicycle and pedestrian travel across the Willamette River. In 2018, the Wilsonville City Council and Clackamas County Board of County Commissioners selected an alignment for the new bridge that would connect the City’s Boones Ferry Park on the north side of the river to Northeast Butteville Road, opposite the Boones Ferry Boat Launch on the south side. The project team is currently assessing five bridge types for this preferred bridge location. This report summarizes public input received during October 2018, which will inform discussions of a community task force in December 2018. The task force will make a recommendation to the Wilsonville City Council and Clackamas County Board of County Commissioners, which will narrow the bridge type options to two in early 2019. Public input opportunities In October 2018, the project team sought to: Continue ongoing education of stakeholders, future bridge users and others about project benefits Share information from the technical analysis of each bridge type with the public (including environmental impacts, effects to existing structures, costs, constructability, compatibility with Figure 1: Project staff and attendees at Oct.
    [Show full text]