DOCSLIB.ORG

Mishnah's Rhetoric and the Social Formation of the Early Guild

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mishnah's Rhetoric and the Social Formation of the Early Guild Mishnah’s Rhetoric and the Social Formation of the Early Guild Jack N. Lightstone The Formation Early Rabbinic Guild— Why does it Matter? • Almost all forms of Judaism from the Middles Ages until today find their foundation in the early rabbis’ transformation of Judaism, effected between the late 2nd C CE and the late 6th C CE. • Before modernity, only one other (previous) party’s reformation of Judaism– that party associated with the late From ancient synagogue, biblical figures, Ezra and Sepphoris Nehemiah—attained www.hum.huji.ac.il/archae equally normative and ology/zippori/mosaic.htm# The%20Orpheus%20Mosa authoritative position.. ic The Formation Early Rabbinic Guild— Why does it Matter? • The “Ezra-Nehemiah Party”—one God, one Torah and one Temple altar (both under the authority of a priestly caste), one people, one agent of God’s revelation, Moses • The early rabbinic guild enshrined rabbinic (as opposed to priestly) authority and rabbinic halakah (the “way,” i.e., rabbinic law pertaining to all aspects of the religious, social, family, economic life), grounded in the notion of an oral Torah (which is the complement and completion of the written Torah of Moses) of which early rabbinic literature (Mishnah and Talmud) are an authoritative but only partial representation; every rabbi the embodiment of oral Torah Questions which have occupied me for 30 years. • “WHAT” QUESTIONS ABOUT THE EARLY RABBIS • What were the earliest rabbis? • What can we know of the formation of the early rabbinic guild? • How, when and where did the earliest rabbis and/or their guild come to “Mona Lisa” of Sepphoris exercise authority? (early 3rd C CE), Floor of Private Villa www.hum.huji.ac.il/archaeolo gy/zippori/mosaic.htm#The% 20Orpheus%20Mosaic Questions which have occupied me for 30 years. • “HOW” QUESTIONS ABOUT AMASSING AND USING EVIDENCE • What is the available reliable evidence to answer any of the above? • How do we make that evidence speak to us in a Panel from mosaic floor, manner which is Roman basilica at Sepphoris www.geocities.com/Athens/Olympus/95 methodologically and 54/images.html theoretically sound? The Problem of Evidence • We are “awash” in early rabbinic literature dating from near 200 to 600 CE…, but … • Rabbinic literature contains no sustained biographies/ hagiographies of its founders, only some relatively late, hagiographic and anachronistic “aggadot” (morally edifying stories) of those remembered as the rabbinic guilds’ founding figures …compare Gospels and Hellenistic aretalogies, such as, Philotratus’ Life of Apollonius of Tyana. • The early rabbis have not produced any (even apologetic) “histories” of the early rabbinic guild … until 10th C Iggeret Rav Sherira Gaon, … compare NT’s Book of Acts or Eusebius’ Historia Ecclesia • Nor does the early rabbinic guild get any press from Roman historians. How can early rabbinic literature shed light on the formation of the rabbinic guild? • The Questions of Socio- Rhetorical Analysis… • What (professional) values/expertise are “modeled” in the way in which a rabbinic text goes about its business? • In the social, political, economic context of the texts authors and intended users, where would such an expertise fit? Who would buy and pay for such professional expertise? Floor, Bet-Alpha Synagogue, 6th C CE Where would it most likely have come from? www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/go- visual.asp?MFAJ091t0 Socio-rhetorical study of Mishnah, Why? • Earliest text of the nascent rabbinic guild, c. 200 CE. • Promulgated as the text the study and mastery of which marked one as a rabbi. • Study of M. remained central to becoming a rabbi until promulgation of the Babylonian Talmud (6th C). • Authorship of M. almost immediately attributed by the rabbis to (Rabbi) Judah the Patriarch, the head of Roman-authorized Mishnah, standard printed edition Jewish self-government in www.acs.ucalgary.ca/elsegal/ the Roman “Palestina.” TalmudMap/Mishnah.html What is Mishnah, on the surface? • A legal “study” of Jewish Temple-centred state of which Jerusalem is the religious, political and judicial capital. • Sub-divided into 6 major “orders” (themes of orders: Agriculture, Holy days, Women and family, Damages and judicial proceedings, Sacrifices, Purity/uncleanness). • “Orders” comprise 62 thematic tractates (excluding Abot), each comprised of topically-defined “chapters.” • Consistent style/rhetoric, using a limited array of literary techniques, throughout (Abot aside) Jerusalem in Madaba mosaic (565CE) • Not a commentary on http://www.israel- Pentateuchal law; does not mfa.gov.il/mfa/go.asp?MFAH00zf0 routinely cite scriptural law, although assumes the authority of scriptural law. A glance at Mishnah’s rhetorical style Mishnah Gittin 1:1. One who brings a writ from a Mediterranean province–it is required that he should say: In my presence it was written and in my presence it was signed [by the witnesses]. R. Gamaliel says: Also one who brings [a writ] from Rekem and from Heger [must be able to so declare]. R. Eliezer says: Even [one who brings a writ] from Kefar Luddim to Lud [must be able to so declare]. And sages say: It is not required that he should say: In my presence it was written, and in my presence it was signed [by the witnesses]-- except him who brings [a writ] from a Mediterranean province and him who takes [a writ to a Mediterranean province]. And one who brings [a writ] from province to province in the Mediterranean provinces--it is required that he should say: In my presence it was written and in my presence it was signed [by the witnesses]. R. Simeon b. Gamaliel says: Even from district to district [within a single Mediteranean province must make such a declaration]. A glance at Mishnah’s rhetorical style Mishnah Gittin 2:1 One who brings a writ from Mediterranean province, and one said: In my presence it was written, however not in my presence was it signed [by the witnesses]; in my presence it was signed [by the witnesses], however not in my presence was it written; in my presence it was written in its entirety, and in my presence it was signed in part; in my presence it was written in part, and in my presence it was signed in its entirety --[the writ] is unfit. One says:In my presence it was written, and one [i.e., another] says: In my presence it was signed--[the writ] is unfit. Two [bring writ and] say: In our presence it was written, and one says: In my presence it was signed--[the writ] is unfit. And R. Judah declares fit. One says: In my presence it was written, and two [i.e., both] say: In our presence it was signed--[the writ] is fit. A glance at Mishnah’s rhetorical style Mishnah Gittin 2:2 It [the writ] was written in the daytime and was signed in the daytime, [or was written] in the night time and was signed in the night time, [or was written] in the night time and was signed in the day time]-[the writ] is fit. [The writ was written] in the daytime and was signed in the night time--[the writ] is unfit. R. Simeon declares [such a writ] fit, for R. Simeon used to say: All writs that were written in the daytime and were signed in the night time are Mishnah with Maimonides’ Commentary, unfit, editio princeps, Naples 1492, Jacob M. except for writs [of divorce] of Lowy Collection, National Library of women. Canada A glance at Mishnah’s rhetorical style is required to say: in my presence it was written; in my presence it was signed. cannot say: in my presence it was written; in my presence it was signed. said: in my presence it was written; not in my presence it was signed. said: in my presence it was signed; not in my presence it was written. in its entirety, in part; in part,in its entirety one, one; two, one; one, two Mishnah, seder qodashim, title page, Lemberg, 1875. Jacob M. Lowy Collection, day, day; night, night; night, day; National Library of Canada. day, night A glance at Mishnah’s rhetorical style Mishnah Bekhorot 1:2 a cow which gave birth [to an offspring] like [one] from an ass: an ass which gave birth [to an offspring] like [one] from a horse: which gives birth is an ass and that which is born is an ass; a clean animal which gave birth [to an offspring] like [one] from an unclean animal; an unclean animal which gave birth [to an offspring] like [one] from a clean animal an unclean fish which swallowed a clean fish; a clean fish which swallowed an unclean fish; 1:3a an ass which had not given birth to any offspring and it gave birth to two males; Mishnah Bekhorot (with Maimonides’ a male and a female; commentary) from Babylonian Talmud, editio princeps, Venice 1522. Jacob M. Lowy Collection, National Library of Canada A glance at Mishnah’s rhetorical style 1:3b two asses which had not given birth to any offspring , and they gave birth to two males; a male and a female; or two males and a female; two females and one male; or two males and two females; 1:4a one [ass] had given birth to offspring, and one [i.e., another ass] which had Rambam’s commentary on Avot, not given birth to any offspring, printed Soncino, Italy, 1485 and they gave birth to two males; U. of Penn., Ctr. For Jewish Studies a male and female (http://165.123.252.47/Archive/1/Law& Lore.htm) Literary/Rhetorical Mishnah’s Features – Mishnah Tractates: • a series of coherent mini-”studies”of topics (“chapters”) on a given legal subject area (“tractates” e.g., writs of divorce) – Tractates’ chapters: • Appear to be a fairly exhaustive, logically autonomous treatment of a unified topic in which • the treatment of the subject matter is done in a literary unit displaying a tight, coherent set of literary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Humanity of the Talmud: Reading for Ethics in Bavli ʿavoda Zara By
    The Humanity of the Talmud: Reading for Ethics in Bavli ʿAvoda Zara By Mira Beth Wasserman A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Joint Doctor of Philosophy with Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley in Jewish Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Daniel Boyarin, chair Professor Chana Kronfeld Professor Naomi Seidman Professor Kenneth Bamberger Spring 2014 Abstract The Humanity of the Talmud: Reading for Ethics in Bavli ʿAvoda Zara by Mira Beth Wasserman Joint Doctor of Philosophy with Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley University of California, Berkeley Professor Daniel Boyarin, chair In this dissertation, I argue that there is an ethical dimension to the Babylonian Talmud, and that literary analysis is the approach best suited to uncover it. Paying special attention to the discursive forms of the Talmud, I show how juxtapositions of narrative and legal dialectics cooperate in generating the Talmud's distinctive ethics, which I characterize as an attentiveness to the “exceptional particulars” of life. To demonstrate the features and rewards of a literary approach, I offer a sustained reading of a single tractate from the Babylonian Talmud, ʿAvoda Zara (AZ). AZ and other talmudic discussions about non-Jews offer a rich resource for considerations of ethics because they are centrally concerned with constituting social relationships and with examining aspects of human experience that exceed the domain of Jewish law. AZ investigates what distinguishes Jews from non-Jews, what Jews and non- Jews share in common, and what it means to be a human being. I read AZ as a cohesive literary work unified by the overarching project of examining the place of humanity in the cosmos.
    [Show full text]
  • “Cliff Notes” 2021-2022 5781-5782
    Jewish Day School “Cliff Notes” 2021-2022 5781-5782 A quick run-down with need-to-know info on: • Jewish holidays • Jewish language • Jewish terms related to prayer service SOURCES WE ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE INFORMATION FOR THIS BOOKLET WAS TAKEN FROM: • www.interfaithfamily.com • Living a Jewish Life by Anita Diamant with Howard Cooper FOR MORE LEARNING, YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN THE FOLLOWING RESOURCES: • www.reformjudaism.org • www.myjewishlearning.com • Jewish Literacy by Rabbi Joseph Telushkin • The Jewish Book of Why by Alfred J. Kolatch • The Jewish Home by Daniel B. Syme • Judaism for Dummies by Rabbi Ted Falcon and David Blatner Table of Contents ABOUT THE CALENDAR 5 JEWISH HOLIDAYS Rosh haShanah 6 Yom Kippur 7 Sukkot 8 Simchat Torah 9 Chanukah 10 Tu B’Shevat 11 Purim 12 Pesach (Passover) 13 Yom haShoah 14 Yom haAtzmaut 15 Shavuot 16 Tisha B’Av 17 Shabbat 18 TERMS TO KNOW A TO Z 20 About the calendar... JEWISH TIME- For over 2,000 years, Jews have juggled two calendars. According to the secular calendar, the date changes at midnight, the week begins on Sunday, and the year starts in the winter. According to the Hebrew calendar, the day begins at sunset, the week begins on Saturday night, and the new year is celebrated in the fall. The secular, or Gregorian calendar is a solar calendar, based on the fact that it takes 365.25 days for the earth to circle the sun. With only 365 days in a year, after four years an extra day is added to February and there is a leap year.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION Hanne Trautner-Kromann n this introduction I want to give the necessary background information for understanding the nine articles in this volume. II start with some comments on the Hebrew or Jewish Bible and the literature of the rabbis, based on the Bible, and then present the articles and the background information for these articles. In Jewish tradition the Bible consists of three main parts: 1. Torah – Teaching: The Five Books of Moses: Genesis (Bereshit in Hebrew), Exodus (Shemot), Leviticus (Vajikra), Numbers (Bemidbar), Deuteronomy (Devarim); 2. Nevi’im – Prophets: (The Former Prophets:) Joshua, Judges, Samuel I–II, Kings I–II; (The Latter Prophets:) Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezek- iel; (The Twelve Small Prophets:) Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephania, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi; 3. Khetuvim – Writings: Psalms, Proverbs, Job, The Song of Songs, Ruth, Lamentations, Ecclesiastes, Esther, Daniel, Ezra, Nehemiah, Chronicles I–II1. The Hebrew Bible is often called Tanakh after these three main parts: Torah, Nevi’im and Khetuvim. The Hebrew Bible has been interpreted and reinterpreted by rab- bis and scholars up through the ages – and still is2. Already in the Bible itself there are examples of interpretation (midrash). The books of Chronicles, for example, can be seen as a kind of midrash on the 10 | From Bible to Midrash books of Samuel and Kings, repeating but also changing many tradi- tions found in these books. In talmudic times,3 dating from the 1st to the 6th century C.E.(Common Era), the rabbis developed and refined the systems of interpretation which can be found in their literature, often referred to as The Writings of the Sages.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomos and Narrative Before Nomos and Narrative
    Nomos and Narrative Before Nomos and Narrative Steven D. Fraade* I imagine that when Robert Cover's Nomos and Narrative essay' first reached the editors of the Harvard Law Review, their befuddlement derived not so much from Cover's framing of his review of the 1982 Supreme Court term with a philosophically opaque discussion of the interdependence of law and narrative, but from the illustrations that he drew from biblical and rabbinic texts of ancient and medieval times. For Cover, both intellectually and as a matter of personal commitment, these ancient texts evoke a "nomian world," rooted more in communally shared stories of legal origins and utopian ends than in the brutalities of institutional enforcement, one from which modem legal theory and practice have much to learn and to emulate. Since my own head is buried most often in such ancient texts, rather than in modem courts, I thought it appropriate to reflect, by way of offering more such texts for our consideration, on the long-standing preoccupation with the intersection and interdependency of the discursive modes of law and narrative in Hebrew biblical and rabbinic literature, without, I hope, romanticizing them. Indeed, I wish to demonstrate that what we might think of as a particularly modem tendency to separate law from narrative, has itself an ancient history, and to show how that tendency, while recurrent, was as recurrently resisted from within Jewish tradition. In particular, at those cultural turning points in which laws are extracted or codified from previous narrative settings, I hope to show that they are also renarrativized (or remythologized) so as to address, both ideologically and rhetorically, changed socio-historical settings.2 I will do so through admittedly * Steven D.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Foundations I Hebrew Literacy I Jewish Foundations II Hebrew
    Grade JUDAIC STUDIES HEBREW K Jewish Foundations I Hebrew Literacy I Prayer, Shabbat & Holidays, and the Introduction to Conversational Weekly Torah Portion Hebrew ● Students utilize Hebrew conversation, ● Students begin to speak in music, art, visuals, and manipulatives to conversational Hebrew learn prayers, explore Shabbat and the through immersion; Jewish holidays, and begin to learn ● acquire a working vocabulary about the weekly Torah portion. of everyday Hebrew words; ● These create experiential learning and opportunities that foster deep emotional ● learn the letters of the Hebrew connections between children and their alphabet. Jewish heritage and practices. ● Students draw connections between each subject area and the Land of Israel. 1 Jewish Foundations II Hebrew Literacy II Prayer, Shabbat & Holidays, and the Conversational Hebrew, Reading, Weekly Torah Portion and Writing ● In addition to extending their knowledge ● Students learn to read and of prayer, Shabbat and holidays, and write fluently in Hebrew, and weekly Torah portion, students: ● significantly expand their ● contextualize the holidays against the working Hebrew vocabularies backdrop of the Jewish calendar, and and level of conversational ● become familiar with the wider narrative fluency. arc of the Torah portions. 2 Jewish Foundations III Hebrew Literacy III Prayer, Shabbat & Holidays, and the Advanced Hebrew Literacy; Weekly Torah Portion Fundamentals of Hebrew Grammar ● Students continue to deepen their ● Students achieve increased knowledge of the prayers, holidays, and mastery of reading, writing, weekly Torah portion; and speaking Hebrew; ● learn about key stories from the rabbinic ● further extend their Midrash; and vocabularies; and ● memorize key concepts, including the ● gain their first exposure to the dates of the Jewish holidays and names fundamentals of Hebrew of the Torah portions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Psalms As Hymns in the Temple of Jerusalem Gary A
    4 The Psalms as Hymns in the Temple of Jerusalem Gary A. Rendsburg From as far back as our sources allow, hymns were part of Near Eastern temple ritual, with their performers an essential component of the temple functionaries. 1 These sources include Sumerian, Akkadian, and Egyptian texts 2 from as early as the third millennium BCE. From the second millennium BCE, we gain further examples of hymns from the Hittite realm, even if most (if not all) of the poems are based on Mesopotamian precursors.3 Ugarit, our main source of information on ancient Canaan, has not yielded songs of this sort in 1. For the performers, see Richard Henshaw, Female and Male: The Cu/tic Personnel: The Bible and Rest ~(the Ancient Near East (Allison Park, PA: Pickwick, 1994) esp. ch. 2, "Singers, Musicians, and Dancers," 84-134. Note, however, that this volume does not treat the Egyptian cultic personnel. 2. As the reader can imagine, the literature is ~xtensive, and hence I offer here but a sampling of bibliographic items. For Sumerian hymns, which include compositions directed both to specific deities and to the temples themselves, see Thorkild Jacobsen, The Harps that Once ... : Sumerian Poetry in Translation (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987), esp. 99-142, 375--444. Notwithstanding the much larger corpus of Akkadian literarure, hymn~ are less well represented; see the discussion in Alan Lenzi, ed., Reading Akkadian Prayers and Hymns: An Introduction, Ancient Near East Monographs (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2011), 56-60, with the most important texts included in said volume. For Egyptian hymns, see Jan A%mann, Agyptische Hymnen und Gebete, Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis (Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999); Andre Barucq and Frarn;:ois Daumas, Hymnes et prieres de /'Egypte ancienne, Litteratures anciennes du Proche-Orient (Paris: Cerf, 1980); and John L.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewishness, Birth and Giyyur
    1 Zvi Zohar All Jews are Jews by Birth Biblical and Rabbinic Judaism agree, that anyone born to the appropriate Jewish parent – is Jewish. To most Jews, it sounds quite reasonable for Jewishness to derive from birth. However, such a determination is far from self-evident. Consider a counter-example: if a person was born on a kibbutz, and her two parents are members of the kibbutz, she is not automatically a member. Rather, upon reaching a certain age, she must decide if she wishes to apply for membership. If she applies, her application comes up for discussion by the kibbutz assembly, who then decide the matter by a vote. While it is reasonable to assume that a child born and grown on the kibbutz will be accepted for membership if she applies, it is not automatic. The important point (in the current context) is, that her membership is contingent upon at least two decisions: her decision to apply, and the assembly’s decision to accept her. In contrast, Jewishness is not contingent upon any person’s decision, but is regarded by tradition as a ‘fact of birth’. The sources of this self-understanding are very ancient: in the Bible, the Israelites are the “Children of Israel”, i.e., the lineal descendents of the Patriarch Jacob and his twelve sons. In the bible, then, the People of Israel are made up of persons born into a (very) extended family. Some notions accepted in Biblical times were abrogated or modified by the Oral Torah (Torah she- b’al peh); significantly, the concept of the familial nature of Jewishness was not only retained, but also even reinforced.
    [Show full text]
  • KS 3 Talmud Page Layout Copy
    Page Chapter name Tractate name Chapter number Ein mishpat, Ner mitzvah Rashi’s commentary –Rashi (an acronym for Rabbi (Hebrew: Well of justice, Lamp of Shlomo Yitchaki) was a major Jewish scholar active in the commandment) Compiled in 11th century France. Rashi compiled the first the 16th century this provides the complete commentary on the Talmud. The Mishnah source references to the laws are written in in a brief, terse style without being discussed on the page. punctuation and Rashi’s commentary is directed towards helping readers work through the text and understand its basic form and content. Tosafot (Hebrew: additions) These Mishnah and Gemara The central column of the page contains medieval commentaries were written in verses of the Mishnah followed by verses from the Gemara. the 12th and 13th centuries. They are the The Mishnah is the primary record of the teaching, decisions work of various Talmudic scholars and disputes of a group of Jewish religious and judicial scholars primarily living in France and Germany. known as Tannaim, active from about 10 to 220 CE. Originally transmitted orally, it was edited into its current form and written down in 200 CE by Rabbi Yehuda Hanasi. Written primarily in Hebrew, it is divided into 63 tractates and organized into six sections or ‘orders’. The Gemara is an analysis and expansion on the Mishnah. There are two versions - the Other commentaries Various other Babylonian Talmud (the most commonly studied) and the commentaries appear in the margins Jerusalem Talmud. The Gemara is written primarily in Aramaic of a printed Talmud page.
    [Show full text]
  • Synagogue Emanu-El Scroll Shabbat Schedule Passover Service Schedule
    Synagogue1 Emanu-El Scroll April 1-30, 2019 25 Adar II-25 Nisan 5779 Passover Service Schedule Erev Pesach: Pesach Day 5: Friday, April 19th Wednesday, April 24th 7:00AM – Minyan & Siyum 7:00AM – Minyan Shabbat Schedule Bekhorot (First-born “fast”) 5:30PM – Minyan 6:00PM – Kabbalat Shabbat Pesach Day 6: Shabbat Tazria/HaHodesh/ Rosh Hodesh Pesach Day 1: Thursday, April 25th Saturday, April 20th 7:00AM – Minyan Friday, April 5th 9:00AM – Macaroons & D’rash 5:30PM – Healing Service Candle-Lighting: 5:59PM Kabbalat Shabbat: 6:00PM (Men’s Club 9:30AM – Services Pesach Day 7: Shabbat & Dinner, Chagigat Siddur) Pesach Day 2: Friday, April 26th Saturday, April 6th Sunday, April 21st 9:30AM – Yom Tov Service Danish & D’rash: 9:00AM 9:30AM – Services 6:00PM – Kabbalat Shabbat Services: 9:30AM (JNF Shabbat) Pesach Day 3: Pesach Day 8: Shabbat Ends: 7:08PM Shabbat Metzora/HaGadol Monday, April 22nd Saturday, April 27th 7:00AM – Minyan 9:00AM – Macaroons & D’rash Friday, April 12th 5:30PM – Minyan 9:30AM – Yom Tov service Kabbalat Shabbat: 7:00PM, at The Village at Summerville, 201 W. 9th N St. (no Pesach Day 4: WITH YIZKOR services at Emanu-El) Tuesday, April 23rd (MEMORIAL PRAYERS) Candle-Lighting: 6:04PM 7:00AM – Minyan Saturday, April 13th 5:30PM – Minyan Danish & D’rash: 9:00AM Services: 9:30AM (Samuel Steinberg 2nd Bar Mitzvah, Anniversary Shabbat) Shabbat Ends: 7:13PM Shabbat Pesach Day 1 Friday, April 19th Kabbalat Shabbat, 6:00PM Candle-Lighting: 7:10PM Saturday, April 20th Macaroons & D’rash: 9:00AM Services: 9:30AM Shabbat Ends: 8:18PM Shabbat Pesach Day 8 Friday, April 26th Kabbalat Shabbat, 6:00PM Candle-Lighting: 7:15PM Saturday, April 27th Macaroons & D’rash: 9:00AM Services WITH YIZKOR: 9:30AM (Holocaust Torah Rededication, Chagigat Shema, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Video Games, but It Does Indicate What Happens When Children Make Media the Center of Their Lives
    1 Violent and Defamatory Video Games Rabbi Elliot Dorff and Rabbi Joshua Hearshen February 4, 2010 EH 21:1.2010 This paper was approved on February 4, 2010, by a vote of twelve in favor (12-0-1). Voting in favor: Rabbis Kassel Abelson, Miriam Berkowitz, Elliot Dorff, Robert Fine, Susan Grossman, Josh Heller, Jane Kanarek, Daniel Nevins, Avram Reisner, Jay Stein, Steven Wernick and David Wise. Abstaining: Rabbi Adam Kligfeld. The Committee on Jewish Law and Standards of the Rabbinical Assembly provides guidance in matters of halakhah for the Conservative movement. The individual rabbi, however, is the authority for the interpretation and application of all matters of halakhah. She’elah: May Jews play violent or defamatory video games? Te’shuvah: The video game industry accounts for an enormous percentage of the entertainment industry today. 1 According to a September 2008 survey by the Pew Research Center, 97% of all teenagers play video games in some format. 2 While First Amendment rights to free speech assure that the content of these games is legal in American law, their ethical status varies widely. The variety of games available today is great, and the good to be gained from many of them may also be great. They stimulate the minds of the elderly, and they raise preparedness scores of those about to enter the Israeli army, and they help youngsters learn everything from music to mathematics. In a portion of the games, however, the material is morally questionable and may even be harmful or immoral on other grounds. These include what we are calling “violent and defamatory games.” By “violent” we mean gratuitous brute force intended 1 http://www.mediafamily.org the Mediawise Video Game Report Card is published periodically by the National Institute on Media and the Family.
    [Show full text]
  • Delay of Pidyon Haben
    YD 305:ll.l995 DELAY OF PIDYON HABEN Rabbi Vernon H. Kurtz TI1is paper was approved by the ens on March 27, 799,5, by a vote of' twenty in favor (20-0-0), Voting· infiwor: Rabbis Kassel Abelson, Tlen Zion Tlergman, Stephanie Dickstein, F:Zliot ;Y Dorff, Jerome ;l;f F:pstein, Myron S. Geller, Arnold wr Goodman, Su,l(lfl. Crossman, Judah Kogen, Ti?mon H. Kurtz, 4lan Tl. Lucas, Aaron T,. Machlet; Lionel F:. Moses, Paul Plothin, .:'Hu:)WT HabinotDitz, Arram Israel Hei.sne1", Joel f~·. Hembaum, Joel Hoth, Gerald Sholnili, and Gendd Xehzer. 17w Committee on Jm:ish T,aw and StandarcLs rijthe Rabbinical 1ssembly provides guidance in matters rijhalahhahfor the Conservative movement. 1he individual rabbi, hou,ever, is the authori('yJOr the interpretation and application of all malters of'lwluhhnh. May Pi111'i!:l be postponed beyond the thirty-first day'? One of my tasln; in my current congregation is to teach a life cycle class to students of m:.:~ n:::l/i:::l age and their parents. One of the topics discussed is T:::li1 P'i!:l, the redemp­ tion of the first-born son. Most students and many parents are unfamiliar with the con­ cept and the ritual. Over the course of six y<:ars teaching the class, two families have approached me and recognized that their son should have been redeemed, but was not. In each case, since the m~m remained the re;;ponsibility of the parent;; until their son became am:.:~ i:::l, we arranged for the ritual to take place.
    [Show full text]
  • Judaism: a Supplemental Resource for Grade 12 World of Religions: A
    Change and Evolution Stages in the Development of Judaism: A Historical Perspective As the timeline chart presented earlier demonstrates, the development of the Jewish faith and tradition which occurred over thousands of years was affected by a number of developments and events that took place over that period. As with other faiths, the scriptures or oral historical records of the development of the religion may not be supported by the contemporary archaeological, historical, or scientific theories and available data or artifacts. The historical development of the Jewish religion and beliefs is subject to debate between archeologists, historians, and biblical scholars. Scholars have developed ideas and theories about the development of Jewish history and religion. The reason for this diversity of opinion and perspectives is rooted in the lack of historical materials, and the illusive nature, ambiguity, and ambivalence of the relevant data. Generally, there is limited information about Jewish history before the time of King David (1010–970 BCE) and almost no reliable biblical evidence regarding what religious beliefs and behaviour were before those reflected in the Torah. As the Torah was only finalized in the early Persian period (late 6th–5th centuries BCE), the evidence of the Torah is most relevant to early Second Temple Judaism. As well, the Judaism reflected in the Torah would seem to be generally similar to that later practiced by the Sadducees and Samaritans. By drawing on archeological information and the analysis of Jewish Scriptures, scholars have developed theories about the origins and development of Judaism. Over time, there have been many different views regarding the key periods of the development of Judaism.
    [Show full text]