DOCSLIB.ORG

Reflections on the Reinman-Hirsch Exchange

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reflections on the Reinman-Hirsch Exchange Review Essay WILLIAM KOLBRENER Reflections on the Reinman-Hirsch Exchange AMMIEL HIRSCH AND YOSEF REINMAN One People, Two Worlds: A Reform Rabbi and an Orthodox Rabbi Explore the Issues that Divide Them. New York: Schocken, 2002, pp. xi+322. $26.00. riting in The Jewish Week to explain his reasons for discontin- uing the promotional tour with the Reform rabbi Ammiel W Hirsch for their jointly-authored One People, Two Worlds, the Orthodox rabbi Yosef Reinman lamented that he had not yet seen “one serious in-depth review” of the book.1 Indeed, media attention to the exchange between Reinman, the spokesman for Orthodoxy, and Ammiel Hirsch, the spokesman for Reform, was largely focused upon one issue— the acknowledgement of the Reform movement which Reinman’s co- authorship of the book had ostensibly implied. As Reinman himself would subsequently explain, he heeded the call of the Lakewood rashei yeshivah to abandon the tour because the book’s actual contents were only superficially addressed (most people did not, Reinman remarks, “bother to read the book”). Reinman himself became the focus in the ensuing media uproar, wrongly cast, in his own words, as “the Rosa Parks of interdenominational dialogue.”2 Reinman’s actual contributions to the exchange everywhere emphasize the distinction between Reform WILLIAM KOLBRENER, a senior lecturer of English Literature at Bar Ilan University, is the author of Milton’s Warring Angels (Cambridge, 1997), and writes widely on the literature, philosophy, and history of seventeenth-century England. He has also written on the interpretive methodologies of H. azal, as well as the philosoph- ical works of R. Joseph B. Soloveitchik. 208 The Torah u-Madda Journal (12/2004) William Kolbrener 209 and Orthodoxy, indeed the incommensurability of their respective posi- tions. Yet the very publication of the book—including the graphics on the book’s front cover—had asserted equivalence between the move- ments.3 Reinman’s assent to the rashei yeshivah was a gesture in which the incommensurability of Reform and Orthodoxy would be writ large, even for those who didn’t get past the cover of the book. Beyond the book’s front cover, Reinman’s responses to Hirsch on a variety of issues provide a current (and future) reference for those look- ing for a nuanced and compelling representation of an authentic Torah approach. Reinman was certainly right to claim, even as he bowed out of further dialogue with Hirsch, that the book stands as “convincing evi- dence that Orthodoxy is intellectually sophisticated and compelling.”4 If the rashei yeshivah acknowledged “the need in our time” to “clarify the Truth of the Torah to those who have never heard it,” then Reinman’s response, when read carefully, undoubtedly helps further that aim.5 Orthodoxy does emerge, from Reinman’s contributions to the exchange, as a phenomenon irreducible to the common characterizations informed by either prejudice or mere ignorance. Yet notwithstanding what Avi Shafran would describe as Reinman’s “masterful” response to Hirsch’s arguments on behalf of Reform, there may be some sense in which Reinman’s rhetorical strategies may actually serve to reinforce—rather than undermine—misconceptions about Orthodoxy. R. Samson Raphael Hirsch infamously claimed that the “trend of thought” of the Rambam of the Guide “was Arab-Greek.” Rambam, he continued, approached “Judaism from without,” and “brought to it views that he had gained elsewhere, and these he reconciled with Judaism.”6 R. Samson Raphael Hirsch had objected to the way in which the thought of the Guide was governed by paradigms and agendas that emerged from Greek philosophy—not the languages of H. azal. Reinman certainly evidences no philosophical pretensions, and would probably claim no philosophical expertise. Yet the argument between Reinman and Ammiel Hirsch about truth (which dominates the first section of the book, and appears throughout) is governed by a philosophical ter- minology with connotations more Greek than Jewish. To be sure, there is nothing radical in the suggestion that Hirsch’s arguments emerge from non-Jewish sources; he continually turns to enlightenment lan- guages—both ancient and modern—in his attempt to bolster argu- ments on behalf of Reform. The debate, however about “absolute truth” between Reinman and Hirsch—initiated in fact by the former—revolves around the dichotomy between relativism and absolute truth, a dichoto- my inherited from the Greeks, specifically from Plato and his Sophistic 210 The Torah u-Madda Journal antagonists. Shafran, in his defense of Reinman’s withdrawal from the promotional tour, provides just such a reading of the exchange. “In a world where relativity rules,” Shafran explains, “so unapologetically confident a stance on absolute truth is bound to ruffle feathers.”7 By Shafran’s lights, One People, Two Worlds emerges as a stand-off between the positions of “absolute truth” and “relativity.” Reinman’s appeal to “absolute truth” may, in a contemporary world dominated by “relativity,” resonate with many unaffiliated Jews. But it may, as Shafran puts it, also “ruffle feathers”—not only, as he intended, among those unapologetic advocates of contemporary ver- sions of relativism, but also among skeptical Jews for whom the specter of “absolute truth” brings up associations with theological visions of the world (call them, as Ammiel Hirsch does, fundamentalist) with which “Orthodoxy” itself has no real affiliation. Indeed, the term “absolute truth” has no equivalent in H. azal. R. Samson Raphael Hirsch found Rambam’s “speculative investiga- tions” foreign to Judaism. So Reinman’s appeal to “absolute truth” in his contributions to a contemporary “guide for the perplexed” may, because of his invocation of a set of terms with a provenance Greek than Jewish, with their inevitable (though unintended) connotations, partially obscure the very terms which he hopes to represent. That is to say, for all of the success of Reinman’s approach, there may be some sense that the representation of Judaism as a tradition proclaiming “absolute truth” unintentionally countenances critics like Ammiel Hirsch, who, in their attempts to discredit Orthodoxy, attempt to assimilate it to philosophi- cal and theological models of the West. Reinman’s approach may have been the one best suited to the literary mass-market (or to the very real constraints which his e-mail exchange with Hirsch imposed), but it may not discourage those like Hirsch whose strategy of rejectionism is informed by the attempt to place all avatars of “absolute truth” under one aegis—the aegis of religious fundamentalism. The current set of reflections upon One People, Two Worlds emerges not only out of a scholarly desire to demonstrate the intellectual provenance of the argu- ments of Reinman and Hirsch (and, in the process, to provide the out- line of a more philosophically rigorous response to Hirsch’s arguments), but also out of a more personal desire to reflect upon contemporary kiruv, and the potential role for Torah u-madda within that context. ••• William Kolbrener 211 One People, Two Worlds opens with Reinman initiating the discussion: “Let us begin at the beginning.” Let us,” he continues, “talk about truth.” “We believe,” he continues, that “without question that there is an absolute truth, and that it is contained in our holy Torah.” So Reinman asks Hirsch: “do you really believe that there is no absolute truth?” (5). Rather than retreat from the question, Hirsch registers Reinman’s asser- tion of “absolute truth,” and immediately takes the offensive. That Reinman has claimed to possess absolute truth (though he in fact does not employ the metaphor of possession) leaves him, Hirsch claims “alone at the pinnacle of piety” (6). Hirsch forwards an argument, the strategy of which remains consistent throughout: Reinman’s affirmation of “absolute truth” at the beginning of the exchange emerges, in Hirsch’s argument, as the center of a constellation of connotations—which he determinedly associates with the Orthodox position. Thus Hirsch moves from the attribution of pietism to the attribution of theological “immodesty.” “How audacious is the notion that I alone possess divine truth!” (8). Not only does the belief in the absolute evidence bad man- ners, but truly dangerous tendencies: “if you say that you are in posses- sion of absolute truth, I find this most troubling—and yes—it makes those who so believe dangerous.” For “great evil,” Hirsch continues, “has been perpetrated by people who are convinced that they possessed absolute truth.” “The implication of this belief is that all other beliefs are, by definition, not true,” which, Hirsch warns, “taken seriously . leads to terrible consequences” (6). While Hirsch paints himself in the garb of theological modesty, acknowledging that “we humans are falli- ble” and, therefore, can make no claim to “possess divine truth,” Reinman manifests “the need to take on. ‘absolute truth’” (15). Such a need, as Hirsch tries to represent it (in the knowing tones of the cultural anthro- pologist) represents a well-known psychological proclivity: “Your need for truth—certainty—is not unique,” he explains; “we all want certain- ty” (233). In his own estimation, Hirsch and Reform have overcome that proclivity, while Reinman’s enthusiasm for “absolute truth” shows both him and the position of Orthodoxy which he represents to be “infected” with “theological arrogance.” The external symptoms of arro- gance and immodesty have, Hirsch explains, a deeper root: “That’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Romm Press, Haggadah Art, Controversial Books, and Other Bibliographical Historica
    Romm Press, Haggadah Art, Controversial Books, and other Bibliographical Historica Legacy Auctions: Romm Press, Haggadah Art, Controversial Books, and other Bibliographical Historica Legacy Judaica’s fall auction is next week, September 13, and we wanted to highlight some bibliographical historica. Lot 95 is Elbona shel Torah, (Berlin, 1929), by R. Shmuel Shraga Feigneshon, known as Safan ha-Sofer. He helmed the operations of the Romm Press in Vilna. During his 55-year tenure, he oversaw the publication of the monumental Vilna Shas, among numerous other canonical works that became the model for all subsequent editions. He wrote a history of the press which first appeared in part in the journal HaSofer (vol. 1 27-33 and vol. 2-3 46-57, 1954-55). It was then published in its entirety in Yahadut Lita vol. 1. 1959. This biography was plagiarized in nearly every respect by the Yated Ne’eman. It was a near-perfect reproduction (albeit in English rather than the original Hebrew), except that certain names and select passages were omitted presumably because they reference Jewish academics or other materials deemed objectional to Haredi audiences. In Elbona shel Torah, (51-52), Shafan Ha-Sofer discusses the censorship of Jewish texts from non-Jewish authorities. There were not only omissions but also additions to the text. He identifies one of the angels mentioned in the supplications between the Shofar sets with Jesus. He claims that “Yeshu Sa’ar ha-Pinim” is in fact Jesus of Nazareth. Nonetheless, he notes that this passage was included in most mahzorim. Indeed, in the first Romm edition of the Mahzor this angel appears.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Religion in Samson Raphael Hirsch and Samuel Hirsch's Interpretation of Religious Symbolism
    Tbojo.rnal ofj<wisb Tho.gbt •• d Pbilosopby, Vol. 9, pp. 69-105 © 1999 Reprints available directly from the publisher Photocopying permitted by license only Public Religion in Samson Raphael Hirsch and Samuel Hirsch's Interpretation of Religious Symbolism Ken Koltun-Fromm* Department of Religion, Haverford College, 370 Lancaster Ave., Haverford, PA 19041, USA Scholars of jewish thought have emphasized how modern jewish thinkers reread, indeed reinvent, the public character of jewish religious activity in the modern world. This essay will explore how such rereading is a political activity, one that challenges prevailing models of community, political status, and public religion. To gain admittance into European culture, education, and society, many nineteenth-century German-jews adopted a religious rather than national inheritance. They recognized themselves within a narra- tive of religious history divorced from national ties. But the stark contrast between religion and nationality should not obscure the political nature of jewish religious identity. 1 Nationalism was but one form of political commitment. For two nineteenth century German-jewish thinkers, the romantic turn to symbol offered an interpretive guide to reconceptualize jewish religious politics. The influence of the romantic concept of language and religion on the Orthodox rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch (1808-1888) is * Tel.: (610)896-1485. E-mail: kkoltunf haverford.edu 1 For a recent discussion of how religious arguments justifY political commitments, see Ronald Thiemann, Religion in Public Life: A Dilemma for Democracy(Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1996). 69 70 Ken Koltun-Fromm well known.2 Less so the romantic impact on the Reform rabbi Samuel Hirsch (1815-1889), due in parr to the scholarly neglect of his Luxembourg writings.3 For both, however, reinterpret- ing commandment and religion symbolically helped them to reevaluate the interplay between politics and religion.
    [Show full text]
  • OF 15Th 2003 Rabbinic and Lay Communal Authority.Pdf (934.2Kb)
    Rabbinic and Lay Communal Authority edited by Suzanne Last Stone Robert S. Hirt, Series Editor THE MICHAEL SCHARF PUBLICATION TRUST of the YESHIVA UNIVERSITY PRESs New York forum 15 r08 draft 7b balanced.iiii iii 31/12/2006 11:47:12 THE ORTHODOX FORUM The Orthodox Forum, initially convened by Dr. Norman Lamm, Chancellor of Yeshiva University, meets each year to consider major issues of concern to the Jewish community. Forum participants from throughout the world, including academicians in both Jewish and secular fields, rabbis,rashei yeshivah, Jewish educators, and Jewish communal professionals, gather in conference as a think tank to discuss and critique each other’s original papers, examining different aspects of a central theme. The purpose of the Forum is to create and disseminate a new and vibrant Torah literature addressing the critical issues facing Jewry today. The Orthodox Forum gratefully acknowledges the support of the Joseph J. and Bertha K. Green Memorial Fund at the Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary established by Morris L. Green, of blessed memory. The Orthodox Forum Series is a project of the Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary, an affiliate of Yeshiva University forum 15 r08 draft 7b balanced.iii ii 31/12/2006 11:47:12 Copyright © 2006 Yeshiva University Press Typeset by Jerusalem Typesetting, www.jerusalemtype.com * * * Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Orthodox Forum (15th : 2003 : New York, N.Y.) Rabbinic and lay communal authority / edited by Suzanne Last Stone. p. cm. – (Orthodox forum series) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-88125-953-7 1. Rabbis – Office – Congresses.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Beginning the Conversation
    NOTES 1 Beginning the Conversation 1. Jacob Katz, Exclusiveness and Tolerance: Jewish-Gentile Relations in Medieval and Modern Times (New York: Schocken, 1969). 2. John Micklethwait, “In God’s Name: A Special Report on Religion and Public Life,” The Economist, London November 3–9, 2007. 3. Mark Lila, “Earthly Powers,” NYT, April 2, 2006. 4. When we mention the clash of civilizations, we think of either the Spengler battle, or a more benign interplay between cultures in individual lives. For the Spengler battle, see Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996). For a more benign interplay in individual lives, see Thomas L. Friedman, The Lexus and the Olive Tree (New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 1999). 5. Micklethwait, “In God’s Name.” 6. Robert Wuthnow, America and the Challenges of Religious Diversity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005). “Interview with Robert Wuthnow” Religion and Ethics Newsweekly April 26, 2002. Episode no. 534 http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/week534/ rwuthnow.html 7. Wuthnow, America and the Challenges of Religious Diversity, 291. 8. Eric Sharpe, “Dialogue,” in Mircea Eliade and Charles J. Adams, The Encyclopedia of Religion, first edition, volume 4 (New York: Macmillan, 1987), 345–8. 9. Archbishop Michael L. Fitzgerald and John Borelli, Interfaith Dialogue: A Catholic View (London: SPCK, 2006). 10. Lily Edelman, Face to Face: A Primer in Dialogue (Washington, DC: B’nai B’rith, Adult Jewish Education, 1967). 11. Ben Zion Bokser, Judaism and the Christian Predicament (New York: Knopf, 1967), 5, 11. 12. Ibid., 375.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Jewish Intermarriage in American Society Jewish Intermarriage in American Society: Literature Review Aviva Gordon, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA Abstract As of the 1960s, intermarriage has been the most researched, contentious, and discussed topic of American Jewish family life. Jews, like other ethnic groups, struggle and work hard to find a place in American life, while debating what level of their traditional Jewish heritage is to be maintained. As the tensions and pulls between assimilation and ethnic group loyalty ensue, the greatest debate is the context and impact of intermarriage amongst and between the Orthodox and Reform sections of the Jewish people. On one hand, Orthodox families argue Jewish intermarriage decimates the continuity of the Jewish people. On the other hand, the Reform movement views intermarriage as an opportunity to effectively assimilate within American culture while maintaining a sense of Jewishness. As American life continues to evolve, and as Jews continue to intermarry, the debate for optimal stability, functionality, consistency, and continuity for the American Jewish community will continue. As of the 1960s, intermarriage has been the most researched and discussed topic of sociologists interested in Jewish family life. When Jewish leaders and commentators declared there is an intermarriage crisis within the American Jewish community, they turned to sociologists for “expert testimony” (Morgan 1964:42-43). Since this declaration, there has been a plethora of opinions from the varying denominations of the Jewish community grappling with what is crucial for the social stability and democracy of the American Jewish family (Berman 2008). This has led to American Jewish organizations hiring sociologists as part of their staff.
    [Show full text]
  • (Yom Kippur 2018/5779) by Rabbi Ammiel Hirsch
    From the Ghetto (Yom Kippur 2018/5779) By Rabbi Ammiel Hirsch Quite the controversy has roileD the professional class of Reform Judaism these past four months. It shows no sign of abating. Rabbis still pen stinging op-eds in Jewish meDia. ReD-hot passions still singe our social networks. Attempts to Douse the fires have not succeeded. Every article, every editorial, every social media post seems to fan the flames anew. What a ruckus. Who knew that such low-key, easy-going, laid-back people as rabbis coulD be so intense? It all starteD in May. Every spring, the three states-siDe campuses of the Reform seminary – the Hebrew Union College – conDuct commencement exercises. Pulitzer prize-winning author, Michael Chabon, was the commencement speaker at the graDuation ceremony of the Los Angeles campus last spring. Talk about interesting commencement speakers! Picture this: In the presence of many hunDreDs of people, assembleD in a cavernous, reverent sanctuary. Before giDDy, wiDe-eyed. newly-minteD or soon-to-be Reform rabbis, cantors, educators anD other Jewish professionals – anD in the presence of their beaming parents, granDparents, chilDren, siblings anD frienDs. At this moment of their highest joy, on the cusp of being let loose to fulfill their lifelong dreams of serving the Reform movement anD the Jewish people – Mr. Chabon tolD these eager souls, the future leaDers of Reform JuDaism – who within weeks woulD be assuming their first full-time job in a synagogue – that he Doesn’t go to synagogue anymore. He harDly Does any Jewish ritual: “Since we put the last of the bnai mitzvah [of our kiDs] behinD us,” he saiD, “my retreat from religious practice has become near-total.” Why? Because for him, JuDaism, like every other religion, is a philosophy of separating people.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch's Commentary on the Torah
    RABBI SAMSON RAPHAEL HIRSCH'S COMMENTARY ON THE TORAH by RABBI DR. JOSEPH BREUER VOLUME I From the Creation to the Death of A vrohom PHILIPP FELDHEIM Publisher NEW YORK 1948 Copyright 19-48 by PHILIPP FELDHEIM -45 Essex Street, New York 2, N. Y. PrinteJ in U. S. A. by SHULSINGE& B&os. LINOTYPING AND PUBLISHING Co. 21 EAsT 4TH SnEET, NEW You. 3, N. Y. ~ Thi• volume is spomored by MR. AND MRS. HENRY E. WECHSLER in Memory o J their beloved Son MOSES t"t:m ,ncn '~ ,tQ£l.l M"::s:l'l PREFACE The following introductory remarks do not attempt to demonstrate the significance of Rabbi S. R. Hirsch ;"'Jl as an immortal leader and teacher of Torah Judaism. This is a fact which may be presumed to be commonly known. The more urgent is the necessity to make his (German language) writings accessible to a wide Jewish reading public. The present popularized adaptation of Hirsch's Com­ mentary on the Torah tends to develop the basic concepts and ideas of our Torah which characterize Torah Judaism in its ideological uniformity. From the extensive material the principal explanations to the individual chapters and verses were selected. As far as practicable, the topics are presented in concise and popular form, as they are in­ tended for a wide circle of readers and, above all, for the mature Jewish youth. They should also serve as a wel­ come addition to the material of the teacher in his prepara­ tion for Torah-instruction. The following parts of the Commentary will be pub­ lished in ensuing volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Communal Affairs T J
    Jewish Communal Affairs T J. AKING SERIOUSLY ITS ROLE as the world's largest and most powerful Jewish community, organized American Jewry concentrated its energies outward in 2002, focusing on the threats to Israel's security and the alarming rise of anti-Israel and anti-Semitic sentiment elsewhere in the world. Domestically, controversy swirled over the basic demographic facts of American Jewish life and their meaning, while the downturn of the American economy placed serious constraints on Jewish organiza- tions as they sought to carry on their work. FOCUS ON THE MIDDLE EAST Gauging the Administration The events of September 11, 2001, generated apprehension in the ranks of many pro-Israel organizations. That day's catastrophe, the theory went, would induce the U.S. to bolster relations with the world of main- stream Islam so as to isolate and attack Al Qaeda and other Islamic ex- tremists, and the most obvious way to accomplish this was pressure on Israel to offer new concessions to the Palestinians. But this anticipation also gave new life to the more dovish sectors of the American Jewish com- munity, which had never been comfortable with the hard-line policies of the Sharon government in Israel. As the year 2002 began, Michael Lerner, editor of Tikkun magazine and long-time supporter of the Israeli left, announced the founding of the Tikkun Community, "a new multi-issue national organization of lib- eral and progressive Jews" for which Israeli concessions were part of a far broader agenda. Its inaugural conference took place January 19-21 in New York.
    [Show full text]
  • TORAH TO-GO® Established by Rabbi Hyman and Ann Arbesfeld April 2015 • Pesach-Yom Haatzmaut 5775
    Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary Yeshiva University Center for the Jewish Future THE BENJAMIN AND ROSE BERGER TORAH TO-GO® Established by Rabbi Hyman and Ann Arbesfeld April 2015 • Pesach-Yom Haatzmaut 5775 Dedicated in memory of Cantor Jerome L. Simons Featuring Divrei Torah from Rabbi Kenneth Brander • Rabbi Assaf Bednarsh Rabbi Josh Blass • Rabbi Reuven Brand Rabbi Daniel Z. Feldman Rabbi Lawrence Hajioff • Rona Novick, PhD Rabbi Uri Orlian • Rabbi Ari Sytner Rabbi Mordechai Torczyner • Rabbi Ari Zahtz Insights on Yom Haatzmaut from Rabbi Naphtali Lavenda Rebbetzin Meira Davis Rabbi Kenny Schiowitz 1 Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary • The Benjamin and Rose Berger CJF Torah To-Go Series • Pesach 5775 We thank the following synagogues who have pledged to be Pillars of the Torah To-Go® project Congregation Kehillat Shaarei United Orthodox Beth Shalom Yonah Menachem Synagogues Rochester, NY Modiin, Israel Houston, TX Congregation The Jewish Center Young Israel of Shaarei Tefillah New York, NY New Hyde Park Newton Centre, MA New Hyde Park, NY For nearly a decade, the Benajmin and Rose Berger Torah To-Go® series has provided communities throughout North America and Israel with the highest quality Torah articles on topics relevant to Jewish holidays throughout the year. We are pleased to present a dramatic change in both layout and content that will further widen the appeal of the publication. You will notice that we have moved to a more magazine-like format that is both easier to read and more graphically engaging. In addition, you will discover that the articles project a greater range in both scholarly and popular interest, providing the highest level of Torah content, with inspiration and eloquence.
    [Show full text]
  • Chanukah Happenings Come Celebrate at TRS!
    December 2000 - Tishri/Cheshvan 5761 Number 11 Schedule of I)ecember Chanukah Happenings Shabbat Services Shabbat Toledot Come Celebrate at TRS! December 1 - 2 Genesis 25:19-28:9 Saturday, December 16 - Chanukah Sing-a-long Family Shabbat Service 7:30 pm 4:00 p.m. TRS Sanctuary Shabbat Parallel Morning Minyan All ages will enjoy this festive opportunity to sing old favorites and learn new melodies 10:15 am .2 Sunday, December 17 - Jr. Choir Performs at Tysons Corner! Morning Service 10:30 am 4:30 p.m. Our own Youth Choir will be performing at Tysons I mall near the LL Bean Bat Mitzvah of Julia Singer store on the Upper Level. Youre invited to this premier performance of our Jr. Choir, who will present a program of Chanukah music for our community. Shabbat Rocks & Junior Cong. Shabbat Vayetze • Tuesday, December 19 - Vatikim Chanukah Party at noon. December 8 - 9 (see page 23 for details) Genesis 28:10-32:3 . Friday, December 22 - Chanukah Shabbat Shabbat Service - 8:15 pm 8:15 p.m. Come light the 2nd Candle of Chanukah with the Jr. Choir as Morning Service 10:30 am they present Chanukah Music during Shabbat Services. Bat Mitzvah of Roseanne Raizen Saturday, December 23 - SIPPERS Chanukah Party Adult Bnai Mitzvah Services 4:00p.m This new group (Shabbat InterActivity for Parents and Shabbat Vayishlach Pre-Schoolers) will celebrate Chanukah with a variety of craft projects, December 15 - 16 stories, music, and snacks. (see page 8 for details) Genesis 32:4-36:43 Tot Shahbat 6:30 pm ARM Shabbat Evening Service - 8:15 pm ARM Morning Service 10:30 am Chanukah Shabbat Shabbat Vayeshev December 22 - 23 Genesis 37:1-40:23 Shabbat Evening Service - 8:15 pm Morning Service 10:30 am Bar Mitzvah of Matthew Jones Shabbat Miketz December 29 - 30 Genesis 41:1-44:17 Shabbat Evening Service - 8:15 pm Torah Study Saturdays, Library - 9 am Rabbis Message .
    [Show full text]
  • Pour Publication Immédiate : 20/08/2017 GOUVERNEUR ANDREW M. CUOMO EN RÉPONSE À LA VIOLENCE DE CHARLOTTESVILLE ET AUX PROTES
    Pour publication immédiate : 20/08/2017 GOUVERNEUR ANDREW M. CUOMO EN RÉPONSE À LA VIOLENCE DE CHARLOTTESVILLE ET AUX PROTESTATIONS QUI SE POURSUIVENT, LE GOUVERNEUR CUOMO ET PLUS DE 125 MEMBRES DU CLERGÉ ET LEADERS RELIGIEUX SIGNENT LA LETTRE CONDAMNANT LA HAINE ET L’INTOLÉRANCE Le Gouverneur Cuomo et les leaders religieux de New York : « Tandis que Washington hésite, New York s’affirme fermement. Face à la haine, nous ne resterons pas inertes. Ce week-end et chaque week-end, nous prêcherons et célébrerons la beauté de la diversité et le respect pour tous. » Le Gouverneur Andrew M. Cuomo et plus de 125 leaders religieux de l’ensemble de New York, dont l’Honorable révérend Dr Floyd H. Flake, Allen AME Cathedral ; le Révérend A.R. Bernard, Christian Cultural Center ; le Pasteur Darius Pridgen, True Bethel Baptist Church à Buffalo et Président du Buffalo Common Council ; le Rabbin Joseph Potasnik, New York Board of Rabbis ; le Rabbin Angela Buchdahl, Rabbin principal de Central Synagogue ; le Rabbin Michael Miller, Jewish Community Relations Council of New York ; Debbie Altmontaser, Muslim Community Network ; et Cheikh Ahmed, Islamic Leadership Council of Metro NY, ont aujourd’hui dans l’unité publié une lettre ouverte condamnant la suprématie blanche et la haine suite aux violences de Charlottesville le week-end dernier et aux protestations qui se poursuivent. Voici le texte intégral de la lettre : « Suite à la violence indicible de Charlottesville ce week-end dernier, perpétrée par des suprémacistes blancs épousant la haine, nous nous rassemblons, non dans la peur, mais dans l’espoir et la foi, plus forts et plus unis que jamais auparavant face au sectarisme et à la violence.
    [Show full text]
  • 5778 Rosh Hashanah Sermon Roundup
    5778 ROSH HASHANAH SERMON ROUNDUP Compiled by Mark J. Pelavin Chief Program Officer, Union for Reform Judaism Preface 1 Rabbi Julie Pelc Adler, Congregation Am Echod (Lindenhurst, IL) 4 Rabbi Ruth Adar, CoffeeShopRabbi.com (San Leandro, CA) 4 Rabbi Stephanie M. Alexander, Kahal Kadosh Beth Elohim (Charleston, SC) 4 Rabbi Mona Alfi, Congregation B’nai Israel (Sacramento, CA) 4 Rabbi Thomas M. Alpert, Temple Etz Chaim (Franklin, MA) 5 Rabbi Craig Axler, Temple Isaiah (Fulton, MD) 5 Rabbi Rachel Barenblat, Congregation Beth Israel (North Adams, MA) 5 Rabbi Lisa Sari Bellows, Congregation Beth Am (Buffalo Grove, IL) 5 Rabbi Marci Bellows, Congregation Beth Shalom Rodfe Zedek (Chester, CT) 6 Rabbi Allison Berry, Temple Shalom (Newton, MA) 6 Rabbi Joe Black, Temple Emanuel (Denver, CO) 6 Rabbi Jonathan Blake, Westchester Reform Temple (Scarsdale, NY) 7 Rabbi Richard A. Block, The Temple – Tifereth Israel (Cleveland OH) 7 Rabbi Gary M. Bretton-Granatoor, Congregation Shirat HaYam (Nantucket, MA) 7 Rabbi Shawna Brynjegard-Bialik, Temple Ahavat Shalom (Northridge, CA) 7 Rabbi Barry Block, Congregation B’nai Israel (Little Rock, AR) 8 Rabbi Sharon Brous, IKAR (Los Angeles, CA) 8 Rabbi Angela W. Buchdahl, Central Synagogue (New York, NY) 8 Rabbi Joshua Caruso, Anshe Chesed Fairmount Temple (Cleveland, OH) 9 Rabbi Don Cashman, B’nai Sholom Reform Congregation (Albany, NY) 9 Rabbi Ken Chasen, Leo Beck Temple (Los Angeles, CA) 9 Rabbi Michael S. Churgel, RJE, Temple Sinai (Sarasota, FL) 10 Rabbi Elliot J. Cosgrove, Park Avenue Synagogue (New York, NY) 10 Rabbi Joshua M. Davidson, Congregation Emanu-El (New York, NY) 11 Rabbi Denise L.
    [Show full text]