OF 15Th 2003 Rabbinic and Lay Communal Authority.Pdf (934.2Kb)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

OF 15Th 2003 Rabbinic and Lay Communal Authority.Pdf (934.2Kb) Rabbinic and Lay Communal Authority edited by Suzanne Last Stone Robert S. Hirt, Series Editor THE MICHAEL SCHARF PUBLICATION TRUST of the YESHIVA UNIVERSITY PRESs New York forum 15 r08 draft 7b balanced.iiii iii 31/12/2006 11:47:12 THE ORTHODOX FORUM The Orthodox Forum, initially convened by Dr. Norman Lamm, Chancellor of Yeshiva University, meets each year to consider major issues of concern to the Jewish community. Forum participants from throughout the world, including academicians in both Jewish and secular fields, rabbis,rashei yeshivah, Jewish educators, and Jewish communal professionals, gather in conference as a think tank to discuss and critique each other’s original papers, examining different aspects of a central theme. The purpose of the Forum is to create and disseminate a new and vibrant Torah literature addressing the critical issues facing Jewry today. The Orthodox Forum gratefully acknowledges the support of the Joseph J. and Bertha K. Green Memorial Fund at the Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary established by Morris L. Green, of blessed memory. The Orthodox Forum Series is a project of the Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary, an affiliate of Yeshiva University forum 15 r08 draft 7b balanced.iii ii 31/12/2006 11:47:12 Copyright © 2006 Yeshiva University Press Typeset by Jerusalem Typesetting, www.jerusalemtype.com * * * Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Orthodox Forum (15th : 2003 : New York, N.Y.) Rabbinic and lay communal authority / edited by Suzanne Last Stone. p. cm. – (Orthodox forum series) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-88125-953-7 1. Rabbis – Office – Congresses. 2. Authority – Religious aspects – Judaism – Congresses. 3. Jewish leadership – Congresses. 4. Leadership – Religious aspects – Judaism – Congresses. 5. Jewish law – Decision making – Congresses. 6. Tradition (Judaism) – Congresses. 7. Orthodox Judaism – Congresses. I. Stone, Suzanne Last. II. Title. BM652.O77 2003 296.6 – dc22 2006102351 forum 15 r08 draft 7b balanced.iiv iv 31/12/2006 11:47:13 Contents Contributors viii Series Editor’s Preface xi Robert S. Hirt Introduction xii Suzanne Last Stone 1 On Lay Legislation in Halakhah: The King as Instance 1 Gerald J. Blidstein 2 Communal Governance, Lay and Rabbinic: An Overview 19 Aharon Lichtenstein 3 Charismatic Leader, Charismatic Book: Rabbi Shneur Zalman’s Tanya and His Leadership 53 Nehemia Polen 4 Rav, Rosh Yeshivah, and Kahal 65 Shaul Stampfer 5 New Conditions and New Models of Authority: The Yoatzot Halakhah 85 Chana Henkin 6 The Role and Authority of the Rabbi in American Society 93 Chaim I. Waxman 7 New Conditions and Models of Authority: v forum 15 r08 draft 7b balanced.iv v 31/12/2006 11:47:13 Changing Patterns within Contemporary Orthodoxy 113 Steven Bayme 8 On Constructively Harnessing Tensions Between Laity and Clergy 129 Marc D. Stern The Orthodox Forum Fifteenth Conference List of Participants 161 References 165 Index 173 forum 15 r08 draft 7b balanced.ivi vi 31/12/2006 11:47:13 Other Volumes in the Orthodox Forum Series Rabbinic Authority and Personal Autonomy edited by Moshe Z. Sokol Jewish Tradition and the Non-Traditional Jew edited by Jacob J. Schacter Israel as a Religious Reality edited by Chaim I. Waxman Modern Scholarship in the Study of Torah: Contributions and Limitations edited by Shalom Carmy Tikkun Olam: Social Responsibility in Jewish Thought and Law edited by David Shatz, Chaim I. Waxman, and Nathan J. Diament Engaging Modernity: Rabbinic Leaders and the Challenge of the Twentieth Century edited by Moshe Z. Sokol Jewish Perspectives on the Experience of Suffering edited by Shalom Carmy Jewish Business Ethics: The Firm and Its Stakeholders edited by Aaron Levine and Moses Pava Tolerance, Dissent, and Democracy: Philosophical, Historical, and Halakhic Perspectives edited by Moshe Z. Sokol Jewish Spirituality and Divine Law edited by Adam Mintz and Lawrence Schiffman Formulating Responses in an Egalitarian Age edited by Marc D. Stern Judaism, Science, and Moral Responsibility edited by Yitzhak Berger and David Shatz Lomdus: The Conceptual Approach to Jewish Learning edited by Yosef Blau forum 15 r08 draft 7b balanced.ivii vii 31/12/2006 11:47:13 Contributors Professor Suzanne Last Stone (volume editor) is a professor of law and director of the Program in Jewish Law and Interdisciplinary Studies at Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University. Dr. Steven Bayme is Director of the American Jewish Committee’s Contemporary Jewish Life Department and the Koppelman Institute on American Jewish-Israeli Relations. He has authored Understand- ing Jewish History: Texts and Commentary, a widely-utilized Jewish history text, and a volume of essays on contemporary Jewish life, Jewish Arguments and Counterarguments, as well as numerous articles on mixed marriages, the Jewish family, American Judaism, and Israel-Diaspora relations. He has taught at Yeshiva University, the Jewish Theological Seminary, and Hebrew Union College. Professor Gerald J. Blidstein holds the Miriam Martha Hubert Chair in Jewish Law at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, where he has also served as dean of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sci- ences. Among his many publications are the Hebrew books Prayer in Maimonidean Halakhah and Political Concepts in Maimonidean Halakhah, the latter of which was awarded a Jerusalem Prize in 1985. In May of 2006, Professor Blidstein was awarded th Israel Prize in Jewish Thought. Rabbanit Chana Henkin is a founder of nishmat, an organization pioneering efforts to open the highest reaches of Jewish learning to women. She was the initiator of Yoatzot Halakhah, an organi- zation that addresses women’s halakhic issues, has done much to increase the contribution of women to religious life, and lectures frequently. Rabbi Robert S. Hirt (series editor) is the senior adviser to the president of Yeshiva University and vice president emeritus of its viii forum 15 r08 draft 7b balanced.iviii viii 31/12/2006 11:47:13 Rabbinic and Lay Communal Authority ix affiliated Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary. In 1991, he was named inaugural occupant of the Rabbi Sidney Shoham Chair of Community Leadership at riets. Rabbi Aharon Lichtenstein is rosh yeshivah of Har Etzion and of the Gruss Institute at riets. He is a frequent contributor to books and journals of contemporary Jewish thought. Dr. Nehemia Polen is professor of Jewish thought at Hebrew Col- lege in Newton Centre, Massachusetts. His annotated translation of Malkah Shapiro’s memoir of Hassidic life, The Rebbe’s Daughter (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 2002), was the recipient of a National Jewish Book Award. Dr. Shaul Stampfer is the Rabbi Sandrow Professor of Soviet and East European Jewish History at the Hebrew University and director of the Russian Program at the Melton Center of Jewish Education in the Diaspora, Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Mr. Marc D. Stern is the co-director of the Commission on Law and Social Action of the American Jewish Congress. Earlier in his career he was a law clerk for the United States Court of Appeals. He writes widely on religion and public policy. Professor Chaim I. Waxman is a professor emeritus of sociology and Jewish studies at Rutgers University. He is currently a senior fellow at the Jewish People Policy Planning Institute in Jerusalem. forum 15 r08 draft 7b balanced.iix ix 31/12/2006 11:47:13 forum 15 r08 draft 7b balanced.ix x 31/12/2006 11:47:13 Series Editor’s Preface The current generation, perhaps more than any other in the West- ern world, has experienced dramatic changes affecting its identity, stability, and continuity. Demographic shifts, egalitarianism, and instant access to information have resulted in new challenges to the authority of spiritual leaders and to the matter of decision-making in general. An ever increasing knowledgeable Orthodox laity, yeshivah educated and university trained, has become more self-reliant re- garding the religious choices they are called upon to make. In the open society, top-down leadership has been increasingly replaced by networking lay-professional partnerships and collaboration models. Consensus-driven processes focusing on what works and what doesn’t, what satisfies and what doesn’t, have substituted for the approaches that governmental and spiritual leaders utilized for centuries. At the same time, the rejection of authoritarianism is xi forum 15 r08 draft 7b balanced.ixi xi 31/12/2006 11:47:13 xii Series Editor’s Introduction accompanied by an increasing yearning for the emergence of au- thoritative, enlightened, and courageous communal leadership. The Modern Orthodox community is seeking to find paths that reflect fealty to Jewish law and tradition but at the same time maxi- mize opportunities for individual expression and a sense of personal ownership in the realm of religious, cultural, and intellectual life. In this volume, Rabbinic and Lay Communal Authority, capably edited by Professor Suzanne Last Stone, the reader will be guided through a range of historical, political, sociological, and Jewish legal (halakhic) perspectives that provide insights and perspectives that can help guide our community as it moves forward. We trust that this fourteenth volume in The Orthodox Forum Series will meaningfully enrich the discussion of the pressing issues of the day. Robert S. Hirt August 2006 forum 15 r08 draft 7b balanced.ixii xii 31/12/2006 11:47:13 Introduction Suzanne Last Stone Who, ideally, governs the Jewish community? The Jewish polity, as described in the Bible in Deuteronomy, consists of priests, judges, kings, prophets, and elders, each wielding distinct, although some- times overlapping powers. Today, we speak instead of rabbis and “lay leaders.” Although lay leadership is nowhere mentioned in the Torah, and only marginally in the Talmud, lay leaders, ordinary members of the community, have historically exercised authority over communal affairs in conjunction with rabbinic authority. Broadly speaking, lay leaders attended to social and economic matters, the classic category of mamona, while the rabbis exercised authority over religious mat- ters, the category of issura.
Recommended publications
  • Halachic and Hashkafic Issues in Contemporary Society 91 - Hand Shaking and Seat Switching Ou Israel Center - Summer 2018
    5778 - dbhbn ovrct [email protected] 1 sxc HALACHIC AND HASHKAFIC ISSUES IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY 91 - HAND SHAKING AND SEAT SWITCHING OU ISRAEL CENTER - SUMMER 2018 A] SHOMER NEGIAH - THE ISSUES • What is the status of the halacha of shemirat negiah - Deoraita or Derabbanan? • What kind of touching does it relate to? What about ‘professional’ touching - medical care, therapies, handshaking? • Which people does it relate to - family, children, same gender? • How does it inpact on sitting close to someone of the opposite gender. Is one required to switch seats? 1. THE WAY WE LIVE NOW: THE ETHICIST. Between the Sexes By RANDY COHEN. OCT. 27, 2002 The courteous and competent real-estate agent I'd just hired to rent my house shocked and offended me when, after we signed our contract, he refused to shake my hand, saying that as an Orthodox Jew he did not touch women. As a feminist, I oppose sex discrimination of all sorts. However, I also support freedom of religious expression. How do I balance these conflicting values? Should I tear up our contract? J.L., New York This culture clash may not allow you to reconcile the values you esteem. Though the agent dealt you only a petty slight, without ill intent, you're entitled to work with someone who will treat you with the dignity and respect he shows his male clients. If this involved only his own person -- adherence to laws concerning diet or dress, for example -- you should of course be tolerant. But his actions directly affect you. And sexism is sexism, even when motivated by religious convictions.
    [Show full text]
  • J Street Sides with Israel's Enemies & Works to Destroy Support for Israel
    ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA J Street Sides With Israel’s Enemies & Works to Destroy Support for Israel Special Report Including Executive Summary by The Zionist Organization of America by Morton A. Klein, Elizabeth Berney, Esq., and Daniel Mandel, PhD “J Street is one of the most virulent anti-Israel organizations in the history of Zionism and Judaism.” - Prof. Alan Dershowitz, Harvard Law School Copyright 2018, Zionist Organization of America CONTENTS Table of Contents . i Executive Summary . ES-00 - ES-13 Full Report . 1 Introduction . 1 I. J Street’s Anti-Israel, Foreign & Muslim Donors, and Its Lies About Them. 1 (1) For years, J Street Falsely Denied that Anti-Zionist Billionaire George Soros Was A Major J Street Funder . 1 (2) J Street’s Arab, Muslim and Foreign Donors . 4 II. J Street’s Interconnected Web Of Extremist Anti-Israel Organizations . 9 (1) J Street Is Part of a Soros-Funded Web of Anti-Israel Organizations . 9 (2) J Street Is Also Part of an Interconnected Web of Extremist Organizations Working to Delegitimize Israel, Founded by and/or Coordinated by J Street President Ben-Ami’s Consulting Firm . 11 III. J Street Persistently Even Opposes Israel’s Existence, Persistently Defames and Condemns Israel, And Has Even Encouraged Anti-Israel Violence. 12 (1) J Street Persistently Maligns and Blames Israel . 12 (2) J Street Speakers Have Called for the End of the Jewish State; and a J Street Official Letter to Congress Supported Those Calling for an End to Israel’s Existence . 15 (3) J Street’s Co-Founder Condemned Israel’s Creation As “Wrong” – A Repeated J Street Theme .
    [Show full text]
  • For the Sake of the Children: a Synagogue Guide to Public School Partnerships
    FOR THE SAKE OF THE CHILDREN: A SYNAGOGUE GUIDE TO PUBLIC SCHOOL PARTNERSHIPS אין העולם מתקיים אלא בשביל הבל תינוקות For the sake of the children, God sustains the world. Talmud, Shabbat 119b http://www.rac.org/pubs/partnership.html 1 INTRODUCTION At the 2001 UAHC Biennial, Rabbi Eric Yoffie called upon Reform Jews to make public education a priority for the Movement. We have done that in a variety of forums, from the public policy arena to the social service sector. See, for example, the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism web page “Protecting the Wall, Supporting Our Schools; The Reform Movement’s Campaign for Public Education.” (www.rac.org/pubs/schools.html) This manual is the latest of these initiatives designed to enable our synagogues to address the vital concerns faced by public schools in their communities. By creating partnerships with their local public schools, Reform congregations will embody both the ideals of our Jewish tradition and the civic values that have strengthened our nation. Through such projects congregations will build new bridges within communities and ensure local children a strong educational foundation. We must do it for the sake of the children. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Our appreciation extends to many members of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism (RAC) staff. Rabbi David Saperstein, Director of the (RAC), and Mark Pelavin, Associate Director of the RAC, reviewed this publication and offered their thoughtful suggestions for its improvement. RAC Legislative Assistants Randi Levine (2002-2003), Sheryl Shapiro (2003-2004) and Rob Levy (2003- 2004) provided research assistance and Machon Kaplan Interns Jill Cozen-Harel and Marisa Geer initiated the writing process under the supervision of RAC Program Director, Rabbi Michael Namath.
    [Show full text]
  • Directories Lists Obituaries National Jewish Organizations1
    Directories Lists Obituaries National Jewish Organizations1 UNITED STATES Organizations are listed according to functions as follows: Community Relations 495 Cultural 499 Israel-Related 507 Overseas Aid 518 Religious, Educational Organizations 520 Schools, Institutions 531 Social, Mutual Benefit 540 Social Welfare 542 Note also cross-references under these headings: Professional Associations 546 Women's Organizations 547 Youth and Student Organizations 547 COMMUNITY RELATIONS Gutman. Applies Jewish values of justice CUMMUIN1 1 Y KbLA 11UNS, amJ humanity tQ the Arab_Israel conflict in AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR JUDAISM (1943). the Middle East; rejects nationality attach- PO Box 9009, Alexandria, VA 22304. ment of Jews, particularly American Jews, (703)836-2546. Pres. Alan V. Stone; Exec. to the State of Israel as self-segregating, Dir. Allan C. Brownfeld. Seeks to advance inconsistent with American constitutional the universal principles of a Judaism free of concepts of individual citizenship and sep- nationalism, and the national, civic, cul- aration of church and state, and as being a tural, and social integration into American principal obstacle to Middle East peace, institutions of Americans of Jewish faith. Report. Issues of the American Council for Juda- AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE (1906). In- ism; Special Interest Report. stjtute of Human RdationS; ,65 E 56 St-> AMERICAN JEWISH ALTERNATIVES TO NYC 10022. (212)751^000. FAX: (212)- ZIONISM, INC. (1968). 347 Fifth Ave., 750-0326. Pres. Robert S. Rifkind; Exec. Suite 6O5A, NYC 10016. (212)213-9125. Dir. David A. Harris. Protects the rights Pres. Elmer Berger; V.-Pres. Mrs. Arthur and freedoms of Jews the world over; com- 'The information in this directory is based on replies to questionnaires circulated by the editors.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabbi Riskin Confronts Rav Soloveitchik in Makor Rishon: Jewish Israel Responds
    Rabbi Riskin Confronts Rav Soloveitchik in Makor Rishon: Jewish Israel Responds In May 2012 the Israeli newspaper Makor Rishon ran a seven-page feature article, penned by Chief Rabbi of Efrat Shlomo Riskin, in their "Shabbat HaGadol" supplement. The subject matter was whether or not Jewish-Christian theological dialogue is permissible. Rabbi Riskin, a maverick on interfaith issues, has on more than one occasion ventured out onto an extreme theological limb. This time around, Rabbi Riskin appears to have inverted the inherent intent of Rabbi Joseph Dov Ber Soloveitchik’s (J.B. Soloveitchik, "the Rav") major essay on the subject, "Confrontation". The treatise, which was formulated in 1964, is widely interpreted within Orthodox circles to be a halachic psak proscribing interfaith theological encounters. However Rabbi Riskin contends, in the Makor Rishon article, that the intention of the Rav's essay was to permit, rather than prohibit, such theological dialogue. Concurrently, Riskin opens his personal "postscript" to Soloveitchik's "Confrontation" by inferring that the timing and the history of the document limits its application, as it was written one and a half years before the ratification of Nostra Aetate, and in response to the Catholic-Jewish dialogue taking place at the time. Rabbi Riskin's premise is puzzling, because it is well documented in Rav Soloveitchik's personal letters, as well as noted in contemporary academic papers, that the Rav had already formulated his firm position on interfaith concerns as early as 1950 - many years before the Vatican ll initiative. In addition, “Confrontation” continued to guide the Rabbinical Council of America (RCA) on interfaith developments well into the 1980's, long after Nostra Aetate.
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of the Anusim (Crypto-Jews) in Contemporary Mexico
    Descendants of the Anusim (Crypto-Jews) in Contemporary Mexico Slightly updated version of a Thesis for the degree of “Doctor of Philosophy” by Schulamith Chava Halevy Hebrew University 2009 © Schulamith C. Halevy 2009-2011 This work was carried out under the supervision of Professor Yom Tov Assis and Professor Shalom Sabar To my beloved Berthas In Memoriam CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................7 1.1 THE PROBLEM.................................................................................................................7 1.2 NUEVO LEÓN ............................................................................................................ 11 1.2.1 The Original Settlement ...................................................................................12 1.2.2 A Sephardic Presence ........................................................................................14 1.2.3 Local Archives.......................................................................................................15 1.3 THE CARVAJAL TRAGEDY ....................................................................................... 15 1.4 THE MEXICAN INQUISITION ............................................................................. 17 1.4.1 José Toribio Medina and Alfonso Toro.......................................................17 1.4.2 Seymour Liebman ...............................................................................................18 1.5 CRYPTO‐JUDAISM
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Beginning the Conversation
    NOTES 1 Beginning the Conversation 1. Jacob Katz, Exclusiveness and Tolerance: Jewish-Gentile Relations in Medieval and Modern Times (New York: Schocken, 1969). 2. John Micklethwait, “In God’s Name: A Special Report on Religion and Public Life,” The Economist, London November 3–9, 2007. 3. Mark Lila, “Earthly Powers,” NYT, April 2, 2006. 4. When we mention the clash of civilizations, we think of either the Spengler battle, or a more benign interplay between cultures in individual lives. For the Spengler battle, see Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996). For a more benign interplay in individual lives, see Thomas L. Friedman, The Lexus and the Olive Tree (New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 1999). 5. Micklethwait, “In God’s Name.” 6. Robert Wuthnow, America and the Challenges of Religious Diversity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005). “Interview with Robert Wuthnow” Religion and Ethics Newsweekly April 26, 2002. Episode no. 534 http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/week534/ rwuthnow.html 7. Wuthnow, America and the Challenges of Religious Diversity, 291. 8. Eric Sharpe, “Dialogue,” in Mircea Eliade and Charles J. Adams, The Encyclopedia of Religion, first edition, volume 4 (New York: Macmillan, 1987), 345–8. 9. Archbishop Michael L. Fitzgerald and John Borelli, Interfaith Dialogue: A Catholic View (London: SPCK, 2006). 10. Lily Edelman, Face to Face: A Primer in Dialogue (Washington, DC: B’nai B’rith, Adult Jewish Education, 1967). 11. Ben Zion Bokser, Judaism and the Christian Predicament (New York: Knopf, 1967), 5, 11. 12. Ibid., 375.
    [Show full text]
  • Yeshiva University • Yom Ha'atzmaut To-Go • Iyar 5770
    1 YESHIVA UNIVERSITY • YOM HA’ATZMAUT TO-GO • IYAR 5770 Iyar 5770 Dear Friends, may serve to enhance your ספר It is my sincere hope that the Torah found in this virtual .(study) לימוד holiday) and your) יום טוב We have designed this project not only for the individual, studying alone, but perhaps even a pair studying together) that wish to work through the study matter) חברותא more for a together, or a group engaged in facilitated study. להגדיל תורה ,With this material, we invite you to join our Beit Midrash, wherever you may be to enjoy the splendor of Torah) and to engage in discussing issues that touch on a) ולהאדירה most contemporary matter, and are rooted in the timeless arguments of our great sages from throughout the generations. Bivracha, Rabbi Kenneth Brander Dean, Yeshiva University Center for the Jewish Future RICHARD M JOEL, President, Yeshiva University RABBI KENNETH BRANDER, David Mitzner Dean, Center for the Jewish Future RABBI ROBERT SHUR, General Editor RABBI MICHAEL DUBITSKY, Editor Copyright © 2010 All rights reserved by Yeshiva University Yeshiva University Center for the Jewish Future 500 West 185th Street, Suite 413, New York, NY 10033 [email protected] • 212.960.5400 x 5313 2 YESHIVA UNIVERSITY • YOM HA’ATZMAUT TO-GO • IYAR 5770 Table of Contents Yom Haatzmaut 2010/5770 Our Dependence Upon Israel's Independence Rabbi Norman Lamm. Page 4 The Religious Significance of Israel Rabbi Yosef Blau . Page 9 Maintaining a Connection to the Land of Israel from the Diaspora Rabbi Joshua Flug . Page 12 Establishing Yom Haatzmaut as a Yom Tov Rabbi Eli Ozarowski .
    [Show full text]
  • Handshaking Ages Unanimously Hold These Views
    8 : Hakirah,̣ The Flatbush Journal of Jewish Law and Thought LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Handshaking ages unanimously hold these views. The author’s opposition is not THIS LETTER is in response to “Is supported in halacha. He fails to Handshaking a Torah Violation?” demonstrate otherwise. published in the previous issue of It is troubling that an article so Hakiraḥ . halacha le-ma’aseh involving issurei At the outset, I must state what de’oraisa had no cautionary editorial the author does not: Most poskim, note. A review of editorial policy, current and past, have always ruled awareness and responsibility may that it is forbidden to shake a be in order. woman’s hand under any circum- - 1 - stances. Furthermore, the poskim see this as an issur gamur, not a The author begins with a well- mere chumra. known, universally accepted hala- cha: “No touching at all” between In his article the author husband and menstrual wife is a) seeks to prove that even affec- unique to marital nidda and is muttar tionate touching is essentially with other women. permitted in halacha because Without explaining exactly what there is a difference between de- behavior is muttar, he moves rech chiba which is muttar and de- quickly from describing it as “any rech ta’ava v’chibas biah which is touching at all” to “simple touch- not, and ing without intention of affect,” b) says that the reason some do then on to “extended touching not shake a woman’s hand is between men and a married because it is based on an opin- woman.” By the end of that sec- ion not accepted in halacha that tion, all casual touching is permit- even non-chiba touching is for- ted by halacha.
    [Show full text]
  • Halachic Minyan”
    Guide for the “Halachic Minyan” Elitzur A. and Michal Bar-Asher Siegal Shvat 5768 Intoduction 3 Minyan 8 Weekdays 8 Rosh Chodesh 9 Shabbat 10 The Three Major Festivals Pesach 12 Shavuot 14 Sukkot 15 Shemini Atzeret/Simchat Torah 16 Elul and the High Holy Days Selichot 17 High Holy Days 17 Rosh Hashanah 18 Yom Kippur 20 Days of Thanksgiving Hannukah 23 Arba Parshiot 23 Purim 23 Yom Ha’atzmaut 24 Yom Yerushalayim 24 Tisha B’Av and Other Fast Days 25 © Elitzur A. and Michal Bar-Asher Siegal [email protected] [email protected] Guide for the “Halachic Minyan” 2 Elitzur A. and Michal Bar-Asher Siegal Shevat 5768 “It is a positive commandment to pray every day, as it is said, You shall serve the Lord your God (Ex. 23:25). Tradition teaches that this “service” is prayer. It is written, serving Him with all you heart and soul (Deut. 2:13), about which the Sages said, “What is service of the heart? Prayer.” The number of prayers is not fixed in the Torah, nor is their format, and neither the Torah prescribes a fixed time for prayer. Women and slaves are therefore obligated to pray, since it is a positive commandment without a fixed time. Rather, this commandment obligates each person to pray, supplicate, and praise the Holy One, blessed be He, to the best of his ability every day; to then request and plead for what he needs; and after that praise and thank God for all the He has showered on him.1” According to Maimonides, both men and women are obligated in the Mitsva of prayer.
    [Show full text]
  • Sukkos, 5781 Dear Talmidim, the Recent Uptick in Covid-19 Prompts
    1 Sukkos, 5781 Dear Talmidim, The recent uptick in Covid-19 prompts this letter. The Torah requires that we avoid dangerous activity. The protection afforded to Mitzvah performance does not apply when danger is prevalent (Pesachim 8b). In all gatherings, masks covering everyone's mouth and nose must be worn. In addition, appropriate social distance between attendees (except for members of the same household) must be maintained. Hands must be washed with soap and water or with proper hand sanitizer. On Shabbos and Yom Tov liquid soap or sanitizer may and must be used. On Simchas Torah, the usual hakafos and dancing are prohibited. At the discretion of every local rav, hakafos may be limited or eliminated. Any dancing must be done while wearing masks and socially distanced. Upon advice from medical experts, we recommend that the sefer Torah not be passed from one person to another. Preferably, one person should circle the bima 7 times. After each hakafa the tzibur should join in an appropriate nigun and "dance" in place. The practice of everyone getting an aliya is a minhag, not a din, and may be adjusted or eliminated at the discretion of the local rav (see links here and here for similar horaos}. Similarly, at weddings the usual dancing is prohibited. Any dancing must be done while wearing masks and socially distanced. Chasanim and their families are urged to limit the size of weddings and to insist upon and enforce masking and appropriate distancing by all their guests. Adherence to all the above is required by the halacha which demands great caution to protect life and good health.
    [Show full text]
  • Limda Undergraduate Jewish Studies Journal ______
    3/7/2019 Limda Vol.1 2019/5779 Winter-Spring - Google Docs 2019/5779 Winter­Spring Vol.1 Issue I Limda Undergraduate Jewish Studies Journal __________________________ https://docs.google.com/document/d/1F_RR_AQ1hsI72cIVV9wNK2dCS7fXEXxHLB8mXe0B5Pw/edit 1/101 3/7/2019 Limda Vol.1 2019/5779 Winter-Spring - Google Docs Limda Vol.1 Issue I 2 Letter from the Editor Welcome to the first issue of Limda Undergraduate Jewish Studies Journal! We started this journal out of curiosity - curiosity over what our fellow undergraduate students are writing about and researching regarding Judaic topics. What new ideas are people proposing on Halakha and Tanakh, what observations are people making about Jewish history, what arguments are people having regarding Jewish philosophy? What is our generation thinking about Judaism? In publishing undergraduates’ Judaically related essays and providing people with a forum to share their research with a broader community, we want to get people talking. We want to empower students to share their ideas. We want to foster conversations between undergraduates with diverse perspectives with the hope of creating a broader understanding of Judaism as a whole. This 2019 Winter-Spring issue of Limda includes nine essays written on a variety of topics, ranging from Jewish history to language to philosophy to Halakha to Tanakh to Israel. We kick off with Pamela Brenner’s “K erakheym Ov Al Bonim : Tevye’s Quotations Revisited” in which we are taken on a journey of analysis through the character of Tevye the Dairyman and his improper - or proper? - use of Biblical quotations. We then feature Arielle Solomon’s “R ebecca: The Guardian of Bloodline and Covenant ,” which offers a refreshing and innovative commentary on the Biblical Rebecca’s role in the founding of the Jewish People.
    [Show full text]