California Plant and Soil Conference

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

California Plant and Soil Conference CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS 2003 California Plant and Soil Conference Agriculture in the Environment: Land, Air & Water Issues California Chapter of the American Society of Agronomy Co-sponsored by the California Plant Health Association February 5 & 6, 2003 Doubletree Hotel 1150 9th St - Modesto, CA WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 2003 GENERAL SESSION AGRICULTURE IN THE ENVIRONMENT: LAND, AIR & WATER ISSUES Session Chair: David Zoldoske, CSU Fresno, Center for Irrigation Technology 10:00 Introduction – Session Chair 10:10 Air quality and its impact on agriculture – Bob Fletcher, Planning and Technical Support, California Air Resources Board 10:40 Irrigated agriculture in the Central Valley and water quality regulations - Dennis W. Westcot, Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board 11:10 Agricultural land in California: Does it have a future? - Henry Rodegerdts, Attorney at Law, California Farm Bureau Federation 11:40 Discussion 12:00 California Plant Health Association Luncheon Speaker: How can farmers make their case to a doubting public? Mark Grossi. Agricultural and Environmental Writer, The Fresno Bee CONCURRENT SESSIONS I. NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT: BASICS AND ADVANCES Session Chairs: Ben Nydam, Dellavalle Laboratory, Inc. & Sharon Benes, Dept. of Plant Sciences, CSU Fresno 1:30 Introduction – Session Chairs 1:40 Macronutrients: Changing strategies from not enough to too much – D. William Rains, UC Davis, Dept. Agronomy and Range Science 2:00 Micronutrients in California- Roland D. Meyer, UC Davis, Dept. Land, Air and Water Resources 2:20 Interpretation of soil and tissue analytical results- Keith M. Backman, Dellavalle Laboratory, Inc. 2:40 Discussion 3:00 BREAK 3:20 Soil test to predict nitrogen response in California crops - William Horwath, UC Davis, Dept. Land, Air and Water Resources 3:40 Efficient phosphorus management in coastal vegetable production - Timothy K. Hartz, UC Davis, Dept. of Vegetable Crops 4:00 Nutrient demand and fertilizer strategies: Lessons learned from boron - Patrick H. Brown, UC Davis, Dept. of Pomology 4:20 Discussion 4:30 ADJOURN II. PEST MANAGEMENT INNOVATIONS ii Session Chairs: Tom Babb, CA Dept. of Pesticide Regulation and Steve Kaffka, UC Davis 1:30 Introduction: Session Chairs 1:40 Mitigating orchard dormant spray runoff by alternative treatment timing; impact on target pest species and pesticide load - Frank Zalom, UC Davis, Dept. of Entomology 2:00 Toxicity of stormwater runoff after dormant spray application in a French prune orchard: temporal patterns and the effect of ground cover - Inge Werner, UC Davis, School of Veterinary Medicine 2:20 Run-off of pesticide from residential landscapes and mitigation practices – J. Gan, UC Riverside, Dept of Environmental Sciences 2:40 Discussion 3:00 BREAK 3:20 Aquatic weed control – Caulerpa - Lars Anderson, USDA-ARS 3:40 Seedling IPM in the Imperial Valley - Steve Kaffka, UC Davis, Dept. Agronomy and Range Science 4:00 Assessing dormant season OP use in almonds and prunes: Examples of using the Pesticide Use Report database - Minghua Zhang, California Dept. of Pesticide Regulation 4:20 Discussion 4:30 ADJOURN Poster Session and Wine and Cheese Reception will be held immediately following the afternoon session on Wednesday. A coupon for a free drink is included in your registration materials. iii THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 2003 CONCURRENT SESSIONS III. ORGANIC FARMING: TRANSITION AND PRODUCTION Session Chairs: William Horwath, UC Davis and Richard Smith, UCCE Monterey County 8:30 Introduction – Session Chairs 8:40 Impact of the new Federal rule on organic farmers - Jane Sooby, Organic Farming Research Foundation 9:00 Structure and development of California’s organic production - Sean Swezey, Director UC SAREP 9:20 Organic education: concepts and examples - Mark Van Horn, Plant Science Teaching Center & Student Farm, UC Davis 9:40 Discussion 10:00 BREAK 10:20 Cover crop cultivar and planting density impacts on productivity, weed biomass and seed production in an organic system … - Eric Brennan, USDA, Salinas 10:40 Transition to organic production in cool season vegetables in Salinas - Louise Jackson, UC Davis, Dept of Vegetable Crops 11:00 Overview of organic milk production and the organic milk industry - Tony Azevedo, Organic Valley Coop, Snelling 11:20 Discussion IV. WATER QUALITY AND AGRICULTURE Session Chairs: Sharon Benes, Dept of Plant Science, Fresno State and Larry Schwankl, UC Davis, Dept. Land, Air and Water Resources 8:30 Introduction – Session Chairs 8:40 Implementing a TMDL for salt and boron in the lower San Joaquin River - Eric Oppenheimer, Central Valley RWQCB 9:00 The San Joaquin River dissolved oxygen TMDL - Source analysis and implementation plan development - Mark Gowdy, Central Valley RWQCB 9:20 Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plan: Content and policy - Robert Fry, USDA-NRCS 9:40 Discussion 10:00 BREAK 10:20 Merced County regulations for dairy management - Jeff Palsgaard, Merced County 10:40 Use of wetlands to treat winery effluent - Heather Shepherd, Komex-H2O Science 11:00 Agricultural use of spent process water – Nat B.Dellavalle, Dellavalle Laboratory, Inc. iv 11:20 Discussion 12:00 CONFERENCE LUNCHEON: Presentation of Honorees, Scholarship awards, Election of new officers V. AIR QUALITY Session Chairs: John Beyer, USDA-NRCS and Charles Krauter, CSU Fresno, Dept of Plant Science 1:30 Introduction – Session Chairs 1:40 Air quality problems and regulations related to California agriculture - Past and present - John Beyer, USDA-NRCS 2:00 Air quality challenges for California agriculture – Present and future – Matt Summers, California Dept. of Food and Agriculture 2:20 PM10 emission factors for harvest and tillage of row crops - Teresa Cassel, UC Davis, Crocker Nuclear Lab 2:40 Atmospheric ammonia profiles over various crops in the San Joaquin Valley - Charles Krauter, CSU Fresno 3:00 Discussion 3:20 ADJOURN VI. APPLICATIONS OF AERIAL IMAGERY Session Chairs: Dan Munk, UCCE, Fresno County & Jim Gregory, Verdegaal Brothers 1:30 Introduction – Session Chairs 1:40 Limitations and benefits of remote sensing - John Ojala, USDA-ARS, Shafter 2:00 Aerial imagery that links soil variability to poor crop performance - Richard Plant, UC Davis & Dan Munk, UCCE Fresno Co. 2:20 Using aerial images to make precision applications of soil amendments - Jim Gregory, Verdegaal Brothers 2:40 Practical applications of aerial imagery for vineyard management - Ron Brase - California AgQuest Consulting 3:00 Discussion 3:20 ADJOURN v CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS 2003 California Plant and Soil Conference Agriculture in the Environment: Land, Air & Water Issues California Chapter of the American Society of Agronomy Co-sponsored by the California Plant Health Association February 5 & 6, 2003 Doubletree Hotel 1150 9th St - Modesto, CA vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Contents ................................................................................................... vii Past Presidents ..........................................................................................................x Past Honorees .......................................................................................................... xi 2002 Chapter Board Members ............................................................................... xiii 2003 Honorees Vashek Cervinka................................................................................................xiv Richard Rominger ..............................................................................................xv W.A. Williams ..................................................................................................xvi 2003 Scholarship Winners Essays Freeman Barsotti, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo ................................................... xvii Danilu Ramirez, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo .................................................... xviii CONFERENCE SESSION PAPERS I. GENERAL SESSION Irrigated agriculture in the Central Valley and water quality regulations ....................................................1 Dennis W. Westcot, Rudy J. Schnagl and Amanda E. Smith, Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board II. NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT: BASICS AND ADVANCES Macronutrients – Changing strategies from not enough to too much ........................................................11 D.W. Rains, Department of Agronomy and Range Science, UC Davis Micronutrients in California ........................................................................................................................14 Roland D. Meyer, Land, Air and Water Resources Department, UC Davis Interpretation of soil and tissue analytical results .......................................................................................18 Keith M. Backman, Dellavalle Laboratory, Inc. Soil test to predict nitrogen response in California crops ...........................................................................22 William R. Horwath, Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, UC Davis Efficient phosphorus management in coastal vegetable production ..........................................................25 Timothy K. Hartz, Department of Vegetable Crops, UC Davis Nutrient demand and fertilization strategies: Lessons learned from boron ..............................................30 Patrick H. Brown, Department of Pomology, UC Davis III. PEST MANAGEMENT INNOVATIONS Mitigating orchard dormant spray runoff by alternative treatment timing; impact on target pest species and pesticide load .........................................................................................39
Recommended publications
  • A Review of Sampling and Monitoring Methods for Beneficial Arthropods
    insects Review A Review of Sampling and Monitoring Methods for Beneficial Arthropods in Agroecosystems Kenneth W. McCravy Department of Biological Sciences, Western Illinois University, 1 University Circle, Macomb, IL 61455, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-309-298-2160 Received: 12 September 2018; Accepted: 19 November 2018; Published: 23 November 2018 Abstract: Beneficial arthropods provide many important ecosystem services. In agroecosystems, pollination and control of crop pests provide benefits worth billions of dollars annually. Effective sampling and monitoring of these beneficial arthropods is essential for ensuring their short- and long-term viability and effectiveness. There are numerous methods available for sampling beneficial arthropods in a variety of habitats, and these methods can vary in efficiency and effectiveness. In this paper I review active and passive sampling methods for non-Apis bees and arthropod natural enemies of agricultural pests, including methods for sampling flying insects, arthropods on vegetation and in soil and litter environments, and estimation of predation and parasitism rates. Sample sizes, lethal sampling, and the potential usefulness of bycatch are also discussed. Keywords: sampling methodology; bee monitoring; beneficial arthropods; natural enemy monitoring; vane traps; Malaise traps; bowl traps; pitfall traps; insect netting; epigeic arthropod sampling 1. Introduction To sustainably use the Earth’s resources for our benefit, it is essential that we understand the ecology of human-altered systems and the organisms that inhabit them. Agroecosystems include agricultural activities plus living and nonliving components that interact with these activities in a variety of ways. Beneficial arthropods, such as pollinators of crops and natural enemies of arthropod pests and weeds, play important roles in the economic and ecological success of agroecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • San Jose Scale and Its Natural Enemies: Investigating Natural Or Augmented Controls
    California Tree Fruit Agreement Research Report 2002 SAN JOSE SCALE AND ITS NATURAL ENEMIES: INVESTIGATING NATURAL OR AUGMENTED CONTROLS Project Leaders: Kent M. Daane Cooperators: Glenn Y. Yokota, Walter J. Bentley, Karen Sime, and Brian Hogg ABSTRACT San Jose scale (SJS) and its natural enemies were studied from 1999 through 2002. Natural populations were followed in stone fruit and almond blocks, with orchard management practices divided into “conventional” and “sustainable” practices, based on dormant and in-season insecticide use. Results generally show higher fruit damage at harvest-time in sustainably managed fields, although, these results are not consistent among orchards and exceptions to this pattern were found. In conventionally managed blocks, later harvest dates resulted in higher SJS fruit damage, although this did not hold true in sustainably managed orchards. Results from SJS pheromone-baited traps show a predominant seasonal pattern of SJS densities progressively increasing and parasitoid (Encarsia perniciosi) densities progressively decreasing. These data are discussed with respect to SJS fruit damage and parasitoid establishment and efficiency. SJS and parasitoid sampling methodology and distribution were investigated. Comparing SJS pheromone trap data to numbers of crawlers on double-sided sticky tape and SJS infested fruit at harvest show a significant correlation between pheromone trap counts of SJS males and numbers of SJS crawlers. Results suggest that there is a small window in the season (April-May) when sticky tape provides important information on crawler abundance and damage. Results show a negative correlation between the early season abundance of Encarsia (as measured by pheromone traps) and SJS damage at harvest. These results suggest that early-season ratios of parasitoid : SJS can not be used to predict fruit damage or biological control (these data require more analysis).
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) from Morocco and Comparison with North Africa Region Fauna 55 Khadija Kissayi, Souâd Benhalima and Moulay Chrif Smaili
    Journal of Entomology and Nematology Volume 9 Number 7, December 2017 ISSN 2006-9855 ABOUT JEN The Journal of Entomology and Nematology (JEN) (ISSN: 2006-9855) is published monthly (one volume per year) by Academic Journals. Journal of Entomology and Nematology (JEN) is an open access journal that provides rapid publication (monthly) of articles in all areas of the subject such as applications of entomology in solving crimes, taxonomy and control of insects and arachnids, changes in the spectrum of mosquito-borne diseases etc. The Journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts that meet the general criteria of significance and scientific excellence. Papers will be published shortly after acceptance. All articles published in JEN are peer-reviewed. Contact Us Editorial Office: [email protected] Help Desk: [email protected] Website: http://www.academicjournals.org/journal/JEN Submit manuscript online http://ms.academicjournals.me/ Associate Editors Editor Dr. Sam Manohar Das Dept. of PG studies and Research Centre in Zoology, Scott Christian College (Autonomous), Prof. Mukesh K. Dhillon Nagercoil – 629 003, ICRISAT Kanyakumari District,India GT-Biotechnology, ICRISAT, Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, Dr. Leonardo Gomes India UNESP Av. 24A, n 1515, Depto de Biologia, IB, Zip Code: Dr. Lotfalizadeh Hosseinali 13506-900, Department of Insect Taxonomy Rio Claro, SP, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection Brazil. Tehran, P. O. B. 19395-1454, Iran Dr. J. Stanley Vivekananda Institute of Hill Agriculture Prof. Liande Wang Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Almora– Faculty of Plant Protection, 263601, Uttarakhand, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University India Fuzhou, 350002, P.R. China Dr. Ramesh Kumar Jain Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalog of the Encarsia of the World (2007)
    Catalog of the Encarsia of the World (2007) John Heraty, James Woolley and Andrew Polaszek (a work in progress) Note: names in parentheses refer to species groups, not subgenera. Encarsia Foerster, 1878. Type species: Encarsia tricolor Foerster, by original designation. Aspidiotiphagus Howard, 1894a. Type species: Coccophagus citrinus Craw, by original designation. Synonymy by Viggiani & Mazzone, 1979[144]: 44. Aspidiotiphagus Howard, 1894a. Type species: Coccophagus citrinus Craw, by original designation. Synonymy by Viggiani & Mazzone, 1979[144]: 44. Prospalta Howard, 1894b. Type species: Coccophagus aurantii Howard. Subsequently designated by ICZN, Opinion 845, 1968: 12-13. Homonym; discovered by ??. Encarsia of the World 2 Prospalta Howard, 1894b. Type species: Coccophagus aurantii Howard. Homonym of Prospalta Howard; discovered by ??. Encarsia; Howard, 1895b. Subsequent description. Prospaltella Ashmead, 1904[238]. Replacement name; synonymy by Viggiani & Mazzone, 1979[144]: 44. Prospaltella Ashmead, 1904[238]. Replacement name for Prospalta Howard Viggiani & Mazzone, 1979[144]: 44. Mimatomus Cockerell, 1911. Type species: Mimatomus peltatus Cockerell, by monotypy. Synonymy by Girault, 1917[312]: 114. Doloresia Mercet, 1912. Type species: Prospaltella filicornis Mercet, by original designation. Synonymy by Mercet, 1930a: 191. Aspidiotiphagus; Mercet, 1912a. Subsequent description. Encarsia; Mercet, 1912a. Subsequent description. Prospaltella; Mercet, 1912a. Subsequent description. Prospaltoides Bréthes, 1914. Type species: Prospaltoides
    [Show full text]
  • The Occurrence of Encarsia Perniciosi in Areas of Northern Greece As Assessed by Sex Pheromone Traps of Its Host Quadraspidiotus Perniciosus'
    ENTOMOLOGIA HELLENICA S (1987): 7-12 The Occurrence of Encarsia perniciosi in Areas of Northern Greece as Assessed by Sex Pheromone Traps of its Host Quadraspidiotus perniciosus' D.S. KYPARISSOUDAS Plant Protection Service of Thessaloniki, GR-54626 Thessaloniki, Greece ABSTRACT During the 1982-1985 period the aphelinid endoparasite Encarsia perniciosi Tower was cap­ tured on synthetic pheromone traps of the San Jose scale (SJS), Quadraspidiotus pernicio­ sus Comstock, in scale-infested insecticide treated and untreated orchards of Central and Western Macedonia (Northern Greece). It has expanded especially near the sites where it had been released, but also in areas 50-100 km from the point of release. The parasite in untreated orchards generally appeared from April to October, while in orchards treated with insecticides it was not caught after mid June. Spring flights of the parasite occurred on almost the same dates as the first captures of the male scale. Subsequent flights of E. perni­ ciosi were not always synchronized with those of the male scale, and after the beginning of June the parasite showed a general decline throughout the remainder of each season. The pheromone of the scale insect acts as a kairomone to the parasite and it can be used in trapping systems in scale-infested orchards for the confirmation of the presence and the dis­ tribution of E. perniciosi. Introduction riou 1985). In 1982, in a study on the flight of the SJS males by means of synthetic sex pheromone Encarsia perniciosiTower (Hymenoptera: Aphe- traps (Zoëcon's type «tent») we observed that be­ linidae) is a monophagus, solitary endoparasite of sides SJS males, its parasite E.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Stages of California Red Scale and Its Parasitoids
    Life Stages of California Red Scale and Its Parasitoids Lisa D. Forster Robert F Luck and Elizabeth E. Grafton-Cardwe ll ALI F OR N IA RED SCALE, Aonidiella auranlii (Mask.) (fig. 1), is a major pest or citrus that C growers have traditionally controlled with insecticides. Populations or California reel scale devel­ oped resistance to organophosphate and carbamate insecticides in South Africa, Australia and lsrael in the 1970s and in California in the 1990s, and these broad Figure 1. Scale infes ted fruit spectrum insecticides are losing their effectiveness. An alternate appro ach Lo chemical control or California red suppress armored scale densities below economic injury scale is augmentative biological control as part or an levels. In years when biological control is less effective, integrated pest managemem-(IPM) approach. Growers can release the insectary-reared parasitoid wasp Aphy tis selective narrow _range petroleum oil sprays can be used to help reduce scal_e numbers.This leaflet gives some me/inus DeBach from February through November to background that will help growers evaluate the effective­ augment the native Aphy tis populations that attack and reduce armored scale populations. This approach can ness or natural enemies of California reel scale through knowledge or the scale life cycle, the stages of scale that are attacked by parasites and predators, and the signs of parasitism. California Red Scale­ General Phenology FEEDING AND DORMANT LIFE STAGES California red scale start out as mobile crawlers* (fig. 2). Crawlers remain mobile only long enough to find a suitable location on a !ear, fruit, or branch to seule on and begin reeding.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Biological Control Agents Widely Used in the Eppo Region
    EPPO Standards SAFE USE OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL LIST OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS WIDELY USED IN THE EPPO REGION PM 6/3 English 2021 VERSION oepp eppo European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization 21 Boulevard Richard Lenoir, 75011 Paris, France APPROVAL EPPO Standards are approved by EPPO Council. The date of approval appears in each individual standard. In the terms of Article II of the IPPC, EPPO Standards are Regional Standards for the members of EPPO. REVIEW EPPO Standards are subject to periodic review and amendment. The next review date for this set of EPPO Standards is decided by the EPPO Working Party on Phytosanitary Regulations. AMENDMENT RECORD Amendments will be issued as necessary, numbered and dated. The dates of amendment appear in each individual standard (as appropriate). DISTRIBUTION EPPO Standards are distributed by the EPPO Secretariat to all EPPO member governments. Copies are available to any interested person under particular conditions upon request to the EPPO Secretariat. SCOPE The EPPO Standards on the safe use of biological control are intended to be used by NPPOs or equivalent authorities, in their capacity as bodies responsible for overseeing and, if appropriate, regulating the introduction and use of biological control agents. OUTLINE OF REQUIREMENTS NPPOs of the EPPO region generally promote the use of biological control in plant protection because, like other aspects of integrated pest management, it reduces risks to human health and the environment. Use of biological control agents may, nevertheless, present some risks, in particular for the environment if exotic agents are introduced from other continents, and for the user if agents are formulated as plant protection products.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Characterization of Parasitoids from Armored Scales Infesting Citrus Orchards in Corsica, France
    BioControl (2016) 61:639–647 DOI 10.1007/s10526-016-9752-1 Molecular characterization of parasitoids from armored scales infesting citrus orchards in Corsica, France Margarita C. G. Correa . Ferran Palero . Noe´mie Dubreuil . Laure Etienne . Mathieu Hulak . Gilles Tison . Sylvie Warot . Didier Crochard . Nicolas Ris . Philippe Kreiter Received: 23 January 2016 / Accepted: 6 July 2016 / Published online: 14 July 2016 Ó International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) 2016 Abstract Armored scales (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) (including A. melinus), four Encarsia (including cryp- are important pests in citrus orchards worldwide. tic species) and one Ablerus (hyperparasitoid) species. Augmentative releases of Aphelinidae wasps (Hy- Host-specificity was found to be strong among menoptera) have been performed in Corsica, France to primary parasitoids, with Encarsia inquirenda Sil- control the California Red Scale (Aonidiella aurantii vestri, 1930 and an unidentified Encarsia being the (Maskell, 1879)) and the arrowhead scale (Unaspis sole taxa able to parasitize the two subfamilies yanonensis (Kuwana, 1923)), but biological control of (Aspidiotinae and Diaspidinae). armored scales requires the identification of their parasitoids to evaluate their potential as biological Keywords Diaspididae Á Armored scale Á control agents. In order to circumvent this issue, Parasitoid Á DNA barcoding Á Cryptic species parasitoids emerging from four armored scale species were characterized through DNA barcoding. All the parasitoids identified belong to the Aphelinidae (Hy- menoptera) and included a total of five Aphytis Introduction Handling Editor: Josep Anton Jaques Miret Armored scales (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) are arthro- pod pests found in fruit orchards worldwide, mostly Margarita C. G. Correa and Ferran Palero contributed equally affecting citrus crops including clementine, grape- to this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Encarsia Catalog of World Species
    Last updated: August 2020 Notes on catalog: This catalog was produced using Biological and Systematic Information System (BASIS 3.0a developed by Gary Gibson and Jennifer Read (ECORC, Agriculture Canada Ottawa). This catalog of Encarsia is in development and no information presented herein regarding name changes should be considered as valid until properly published. If errors are discovered, please contact the primary author at [email protected]. Production of this catalog has been supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant DEB 1257733 and 1555808, University of California, van den Bosch Scholarship, and hatch project funds. Catalog of the Encarsia Förster of the World Robert L. Kresslein, John Heraty, James Woolley and Andrew Polaszek * Other Hosts: Aphelinidae, Aphididae, Cicadellidae, Coccidae, Plataspidae, Platygastridae, Pseudococcidae, Pyralidae Encarsia of the World — Contents _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Contents Encarsia Förster ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Unplaced Species............................................................................................................................................ 2 Albiscutellum Species Group ...................................................................................................................... 18 Aurantii Species Group ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reevaluation of the Value of Autoparasitoids in Biological Control
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PubMed Central Reevaluation of the Value of Autoparasitoids in Biological Control Lian-Sheng Zang1,3, Tong-Xian Liu2*, Fang-Hao Wan3* 1 Institute of Biological Control, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China, 2 Key Laboratory of Applied Entomology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China, 3 Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Disease and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China Abstract Autoparasitoids with the capacity of consuming primary parasitoids that share the same hosts to produce males are analogous to intraguild predators. The use of autoparasitoids in biological control programs is a controversial matter because there is little evidence to support the view that autoparasitoids do not disrupt and at times may promote suppression of insect pests in combination with primary parasitoids. We found that Encarsia sophia, a facultative autoparasitoid, preferred to use heterospecific hosts as secondary hosts for producing males. The autoparasitoids mated with males originated from heterospecifics may parasitize more hosts than those mated with males from conspecifics. Provided with an adequate number of males, the autoparasitoids killed more hosts than En. formosa, a commonly used parasitoid for biological control of whiteflies. This study supports the view that autoparasitoids in combination with primary parasitoids do not disrupt pest management and may enhance such programs. The demonstrated preference of an autoparasitoid for heterospecifics and improved performance of males from heterospecifics observed in this study suggests these criteria should be considered in strategies that endeavor to mass-produce and utilize autoparasitoids in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Frank G. Zalom
    Award Category: Lifetime Achievement The Lifetime Achievement in IPM Award goes to an individual who has devoted his or her career to implementing IPM in a specific environment. The awardee must have devoted their career to enhancing integrated pest management in implementation, team building, and integration across pests, commodities, systems, and disciplines. New for the 9th International IPM Symposium The Lifetime Achievement winner will be invited to present his or other invited to present his or her own success story as the closing plenary speaker. At the same time, the winner will also be invited to publish one article on their success of their program in the Journal of IPM, with no fee for submission. Nominator Name: Steve Nadler Nominator Company/Affiliation: Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis Nominator Title: Professor and Chair Nominator Phone: 530-752-2121 Nominator Email: [email protected] Nominee Name of Individual: Frank Zalom Nominee Affiliation (if applicable): University of California, Davis Nominee Title (if applicable): Distinguished Professor and IPM specialist, Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis Nominee Phone: 530-752-3687 Nominee Email: [email protected] Attachments: Please include the Nominee's Vita (Nominator you can either provide a direct link to nominee's Vita or send email to Janet Hurley at [email protected] with subject line "IPM Lifetime Achievement Award Vita include nominee name".) Summary of nominee’s accomplishments (500 words or less): Describe the goals of the nominee’s program being nominated; why was the program conducted? What condition does this activity address? (250 words or less): Describe the level of integration across pests, commodities, systems and/or disciplines that were involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Displacement of Aphytis Chrysomphali by Aphytis Melinus, Parasitoids Of
    Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 2014 12(1): 244-251 Available online at www.inia.es/sjar ISSN: 1695-971-X http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2014121-5266 eISSN: 2171-9292 Displacement of Aphytis chrysomphali by Aphytis melinus, parasitoids of the California red scale, in the Iberian Peninsula Juan Ramon Boyero1, Jose Miguel Vela1, Eva Wong1, Carlos Garcia-Ripoll2, Maria Jesus Verdu2, Alberto Urbaneja2 and Pilar Vanaclocha2* 1 Unidad de Entomología. Centro IFAPA de Churriana. Cortijo de la Cruz. 29140 Málaga, Spain. 2 Unidad de Entomología. Centro de Protección Vegetal y Biotecnología. Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA). Ctra. Moncada-Náquera, km 4,5. 46113 Moncada (Valencia), Spain Abstract Parasitoids are the main natural enemies of the California red scale, Aonidiella aurantii (Maskell) and on occasion can regulate their populations. To increase their effectiveness, inoculative or augmentative releases of parasitoids are promoted. Previous to the implementation of any release strategy an important and necessary step is to acquire knowledge on the parasitoid fauna associated with this key phytophagous pest. Parasitoids were surveyed and quantified in Spanish citrus orchards between 2005 and 2009. Aphytis melinus DeBach (87.1%) resulted as the dominant species, followed by Aphytis chrysomphali (Mercet) (15.9%), Encarsia perniciosi (Tower) (2.4%) and Aphycus hederaceus (Westwood) (0.004%). Overall, higher levels of parasitism were recorded in fruit than in twigs. Scales in fruit were parasitized at similar levels by the different parasitoid species whereas E. perniciosi was more active in twigs. Data eventually reveal the recent displacement of A.
    [Show full text]