Vaccines: Essential Weapons in the Fight Against Disease

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vaccines: Essential Weapons in the Fight Against Disease Developed by the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB) to educate the general public about the benefits of fundamental biomedical research. INSIDEthis issue Vaccines: Essential Weapons in the Fight Against Disease The safer should be chosen 1 Germ theory and rabies averted 2 Magic bullets and devouring cells 3 In pursuit of polio 4 Subunit and conjugate vaccines 5 Vaccine safety 7 Recombinant vaccines 8 Taking its toll 9 The future of vaccines 10 Acknowledgments Vaccines: Essential Weapons in the Fight Against Disease Author, Margie Patlak Scientific Advisor, Nilabh Shastri, PhD, University of California Berkley BREAKTHROUGHS IN BIOSCIENCE COMMITTEE Paula H. Stern, PhD, Chair, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Aditi Bhargava, PhD, University of California San Francisco David L. Brautigan, PhD, University of Virginia School of Medicine Blanche Capel, PhD, Duke University Medical Center Rao L. Divi, PhD, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Marnie Halpern, PhD, Carnegie Institution for Science Edward R. B. McCabe, MD, PhD, March of Dimes Foundation Loraine Oman-Ganes, MD, FRCP(C), CCMG, FACMG, Sun Life Financial Sharma S. Prabhakar, MD, MBA, FACP, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center R. Brooks Robey, MD, FASN, FAHA, White River Junction VA Medical Center and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth Scott I. Simon, PhD, University of California Davis ad hoc Committee Member, Herman Staats, PhD, COVER: Vaccines are powerful weapons in the fight Duke University Medical Center against disease. They have averted more than 100 million cases of disease in the United States and continue to prevent 2.5 million deaths globally every year. By BREAKTHROUGHS IN BIOSCIENCE answering some very basic questions, such as what PRODUCTION STAFF enables a guinea pig to defend itself against a toxin, how do starfish and other animals without stomachs Managing Editor, Anne M. Deschamps, PhD, Senior Science process their foods, and what protects fruit flies from Policy Analyst, FASEB Office of Public Affairs fungal infections, researchers laid the foundation for an impressive vaccine armory to fight infectious diseases and cancers. Cover illustration: © Michael Linkinhoker, Link Studio, LLC This article was developed in collaboration with The American Association of Immunologists. VACCINESVaccines: Essential Weapons in the Fight Against Disease An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. − Benjamin Franklin Imagine a world in which playgrounds and pools are closed because of polio BENJAMIN FRANKLIN epidemics, and elementary school playmates are dying from diphtheria Perhaps the most poignant or whooping cough, while others are advocate for variolation permanently left deaf, blind, or sterile (inoculation with the live due to measles, mumps, or meningitis. smallpox virus) was Benjamin Only a generation or two ago that Franklin. Franklin writes in his world was a frightening reality that autobiography, “I lost one of my contributed to one out of five children sons, a fine boy of four years old, never reaching adulthood in the United by the small-pox, taken in the common way. I long regretted States. Repeated epidemics swept bitterly, and still regret that I had through the world, killing as many as not given it to him by inoculation. one-quarter of the population, many This I mention for the sake of of whom were healthy and vibrant parents who omit that operation, before an infectious disease led them on the supposition that they to their graves. should never forgive themselves if a child died under it; my Fortunately, that world no longer example showing that the regret exists because of tremendous progress may be the same either way, and made in vaccine development and Image credit: Joseph-Siffrein Duplessis that, therefore, the safer should application. There are now more than (Public domain), via Wikimedia Commons be chosen.” two dozen vaccines that can prevent death or disability from infectious diseases such as influenza, polio, meningitis, and measles. Vaccines Although the first vaccines stemmed are showing promise in clinical tests. have prevented more than 100 million from observations made centuries In an age when global travel facilitates cases of disease in this country alone ago that survivors of epidemics were the rapid spread of deadly epidemics and continue to prevent 2.5 million naturally immune to the same disease, and antibiotic-resistant infections are deaths worldwide each year—the current vaccine successes come from becoming more and more common, equivalent of averting about 7,000 the efforts of hundreds of researchers vaccines are increasingly important deaths each day. With the exception over the last century and a half. By as powerful weapons against of safe drinking water, no other pursuing basic research, they uncovered infectious disease. single health measure has saved so what causes disease, how our immune many lives as vaccines. Vaccines system fights such illnesses, and ways also are highly cost effective. Routine The safer to harness and enhance our natural vaccinations administered to US should be chosen ability to combat infection. children between 1994 and 2013 are It is May of 1796 and, along with the estimated to save $295 billion in direct Basic research also fuels advances blooms of flowers, a deadly smallpox health care costs and an additional $1.3 in vaccines and underlies recent epidemic is sweeping across England. trillion in indirect costs ranging from breakthroughs, including innovative The disease is called the “speckled missed work to permanent disability. HIV, malaria, and Ebola vaccines that monster” because of the disfiguring 1 Figure 1 – Portrait of Edward Jenner inoculating boy: Jenner’s smallpox Figure 2 – Louis Pasteur vaccine slashed the incidence of smallpox in half throughout the world by the supervising rabies inoculation: time he died in 1823. Image credit: Wellcome Images/Science Source Pasteur’s discovery that injections of weakened viruses or bacteria protected people from the disease led to his successful creation of vaccines scars it leaves behind. It is killing more Four years after Jenner’s success, for rabies and other diseases. than three-quarters of infants, and one- physicians are using the revolutionary Image credit: National Library third of its survivors end up blind. smallpox vaccine throughout England of Medicine Hearing tales that milkmaids are and much of Europe, as well as in naturally immune to the disease after the nascent US. By the time Jenner suffering a milder cow pox rash, the dies in 1823, his vaccine has slashed animalcules” under his microscope English country physician Edward the incidence of smallpox in half a century before Jenner began Jenner hopes to offer similar natural throughout the world. By 1979, vaccinating. No one made the link protection to his patients. He finds a smallpox is eradicated worldwide, between Leeuwenhoek’s microbes young dairymaid with cowpox blisters such that smallpox vaccinations are and disease, but that changed in the and uses a lancet to insert the pus no longer deemed necessary for the 1870s when an epidemic began killing from her blisters under the skin of an general public. silkworms. The French chemist Louis eight-year old boy. The boy develops Jenner was unaware that microbes Pasteur had previously discovered a fever and loses his appetite, but he triggered disease and was acting that certain bacteria spoiled the broth fully recovers ten days later. That merely on the anecdotal observation of the fermenting grains and grapes summer Jenner gives the boy a similar that milkmaids were protected from used to make beer and wine. So the inoculation, but this time with pus smallpox. Further progress in vaccines silk industry in southern France asked taken from a fresh smallpox blister. wouldn’t come until nearly a century Pasteur if he could also figure out the As Jenner expected, the boy stays later when researchers began solving source of the epidemic in silkworms healthy and is one of the first to be an ancient puzzle: what causes that was destroying their operations. successfully vaccinated for smallpox. infectious diseases and how do our Pasteur’s microscopic observations of Jenner’s vaccine works because, bodies naturally fight them? the diseased worms and eggs revealed unknown to anyone at the time, the telltale spores of a parasitic fungus virus that causes smallpox is so closely and led him to the correct hypothesis related to the cowpox virus that the Germ theory and rabies averted that the disease could be prevented by experimental vaccine triggers an selecting silkworm eggs not infected immune response offering protection As late as the mid-nineteenth by the spores. from both. The term vaccination was century, infectious disorders were initially used to describe inoculation attributed to poisonous vapors, Shortly thereafter, Pasteur proposed his against smallpox using the cowpox planetary influences, or bad smells. germ theory, which postulated that all virus, but the term today signifies Anton van Leeuwenhoek gleefully infectious diseases were caused by tiny inoculation against any disease. reported seeing what he called “living organisms invisible to the naked eye Breakthroughs in Bioscience 2 called germs. The German physician Robert Koch made further refinements to the germ theory, set forth methods to determine whether a particular agent is responsible for disease, and triggered a worldwide hunt for disease-causing germs. Twenty years later, Pasteur, Koch, and other researchers had uncovered the origin of many common deadly diseases, such as leprosy, tuberculosis, cholera, and the plague. It was while trying to uncover the cause of an epidemic of cholera in chickens that Pasteur made one of the most important discoveries in the history of vaccines. He noticed by chance that old, weakened cultures of the causative bacteria he had isolated from infected chickens lost the capacity to cause major disease in poultry; however, chickens inoculated with the weakened bacteria no longer succumbed to more virulent strains in Figure 3 – Phagocytosis: Metchnikoff discovered that cells called phagocytes the wild.
Recommended publications
  • Meduni Wien Imagebroschuere
    We shape the future Key numbers IN THE TOP 100 worldwide in the medicine category of leading university rankings 8,000 students outpatient treatments annually at Vienna General Hospital 5,750 employees operations annually, including 750 transplants Doing everything to support health Founded in 1365 as the medical faculty of the University of Vienna and made an independent university in 2004, today MedUni Vienna is among Europe’s most highly respected centres of medical training and research. 2 Focused programmes of study MedUni Vienna has an educational offering that ranges from undergraduate degrees to continuing education courses and PhD programmes. MEDICINE DEGREE DENTISTRY DEGREE PROGRAMME PROGRAMME MEDICAL INFORMATICS PHD PROGRAMMES MASTER’S PROGRAMME POSTGRADUATE APPLIED MEDICAL CONTINUING SCIENCE DOCTORAL EDUCATION COURSES PROGRAMME AND CERTIFICATE COURSES Measurable success Since its establishment as an independent university in 2004, research output has grown at MedUni Vienna. This can be seen in the university’s consistent upward progress in significant rankings including the US News Best Global Universities Rankings and the QS World University Rankings. 3 Gerard van Swieten Carl von Rokitansky Josef Skoda Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis Karl Landsteiner Róbert Bárány 4 City of Medicine Medical pioneers: the Vienna School of Medicine Modern medicine was born in the theories of Ignaz Philipp Jewish heritage or dissident Vienna. Gerard van Swieten, Semmelweis in clinical practice thinkers, and were murdered, personal physician to Empress for the first time anywhere in expelled or forced to flee by Maria Theresa, introduced bed- the world. In the 20th century, the National Socialist regime side teaching into medical edu- Karl Landsteiner and Róbert – among them Sigmund Freud, cation in the 18th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicine Merit Badge Requirements
    Columbia-Montour Council MEDICINE NOTES FOR SCOUTS: LIMITED TO 20 SCOUTS 1. Scouts are required to obtain the Medicine merit badge book, study its contents and be prepared to discuss all requirements with the counselor. 2. All items listed in bold type are prerequisites that MUST be completed prior to the event and emailed to your counselor at least 2 weeks before MBC. 3. Scouts are required to download and use the Workbook, and have all requirements filled out before they arrive the day of the event, which may be downloaded at http://www.MeritBadge.org . 4. Counselor: Ralph Baker 570-271-1049, [email protected] Medicine merit badge requirements 1. Discuss with your counselor the influence that EIGHT of the following people or events had on the history of medicine: a. Hippocrates b. William Harvey c. Antoine van Leeuwenhoek d. Edward Jenner e. Florence Nightingale f. Louis Pasteur g. Gregor Mendel h. Joseph Lister i. Robert Koch j. Daniel Hale Williams k. Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen l. Marie and Pierre Curie m. Walter Reed n. Karl Landsteiner o. Alexander Fleming p. Charles Richard Drew q. Helen Taussig r. James Watson and Francis Crick s. Jonas Salk 2. Explain the Hippocratic Oath to your counselor, and compare to the original version to a more modern one. Discuss to whom those subscribing to the original version of the oath owe the greatest allegiance. 3. Discuss the health-care provider-patient relationship with your counselor, and the importance of such a relationship in the delivery of quality care to the patient. Describe the role of confidentiality in this relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Diphtheria Serum and Serotherapy. Development, Production and Regulation in Fin De Siècle Germany
    Diphtheria serum and serotherapy. Development, Production and regulation in fin de siècle Germany Axel C. Hüntelmann Institute for the History of Medicine, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg. [email protected] Dynamis Fecha de recepción: 3 de enero de 2007 [0211-9536] 2007; 27: 107-131 Fecha de aceptación: 8 de marzo de 2007 SUMMARY: 1.—Introduction. 2.—The socio-cultural context of science in fin de siècle Germany. 3.— The development of diphtheria serum in Germany. 4.—The production of diphtheria serum in the German Empire. 5.—State control of diphtheria serum. 6.—Serum networks and indirect state regulation. ABSTRACT: The development, production and state regulation of diphtheria serum is outlined against the background of industrialisation, standardization, falling standards of living and rising social conflict in fin de siècle Germany. On one hand, diphtheria serum offered a cure for an infectious disease and was a major therapeutic innovation in modern medicine. On the other hand, the new serum was a remedy of biological origin and nothing was known about its side effects or long-term impact. Moreover, serum therapy promised high profits for manufacturers who succeeded in stabilizing the production process and producing large quantities of serum in so-called industrial production plants. To minimize public health risks, a broad system of state regulation was installed, including the supervision of serum production and distribution. The case of diphtheria serum illustrates the indirect forms of government supervision and influence adopted in the German Empire and the cooperation and networking among science, state and industry. PALABRAS CLAVE: suero antidiftérico, Alemania, regulacion estatal, seroterapia, redes entre ciencia, estado e industria, Emil Behring.
    [Show full text]
  • DMJ.1936.2.1.A02.Young.Pdf (3.644Mb)
    DALHOUSIE MEDICAL JOURNAL 5 A Memorable Conference THE HARVARD TERCENTENARY 1636 - 1936 E. GORDON YOUNG, B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D., F.R.S.C. OMEONE has said that the most valuable and rarest thing in the world S is a new idea. It is the verdict or the intellectual world of science, of art and of music that progress centres largely about the thoughts ex­ pressed by the few great minds of the centuries. The work of the scientists of the world has been likened to a great canvas, the subject of which has been chosen by the few and the first bold lines inserted, but the great mass of colour and detail has been supplied by the many faithful apprentices. It was most fitting that the oldest and greatest of American Universities should celebrate its three hundredth birthday in an intellec­ tual feast and that it should invite to its table as leaders of conversation the greatest minds of the world in those subjects which were proposed for discussion. Harvard.!J.as a magnificent record of intellectual tolerance and its hospitality was open to individuals of all nationalities and all re- ligious and political creeds. To Cambridge thus in the early days of September, 1936, there came, by invitation, a group of about two thousand five hundred American and Canadian scholars to participate in a memorable series of symposia led by a special group of sixty-seven eminent scientists and men of letters from fifteen different countries. These included no fewer than eleven men who had the greatest single distinction in the realms of science and of letters, the Nobel Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • Commencement1991.Pdf (8.927Mb)
    TheJohns Hopkins University Conferring of Degrees At the Close of the 1 1 5th Academic Year MAY 23, 1991 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from LYRASIS Members and Sloan Foundation http://archive.org/details/commencement1991 Contents Order of Procession 1 Order of Events 2 Johns Hopkins Society of Scholars 10 Honorary Degree Citations 12 Academic Regalia 15 Awards 17 Honor Societies 21 Student Honors 23 Degree Candidates 25 As final action cannot always be taken by the time the program is printed, the lists of candidates, recipients of awards and prizes, and designees for honors are tentative only. The University reserves the right to withdraw or add names. Order ofProcession MARSHALS Sara Castro-Klaren Peter B. Petersen Eliot A. Cohen Martin R. Ramirez Bernard Guyer Trina Schroer Lynn Taylor Hebden Stella M. Shiber Franklin H. Herlong Dianne H. Tobin Jean Eichelberger Ivey James W. Wagner Joseph L. Katz Steven Yantis THE GRADUATES * MARSHALS Grace S. Brush Warner E. Love THE FACULTIES **- MARSHALS Lucien M. Brush, Jr. Stewart Hulse, Jr. THE DEANS MEMBERS OF THE SOCIETY OF SCHOLARS OFFICERS OF THE UNIVERSITY THE TRUSTEES CHDZF MARSHAL Noel R. Rose THE VICE PRESIDENT OF THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNDTERSLTY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION THE CHAPLAINS THE PRESENTERS OF THE HONORARY DEGREE CANDIDATES THE HONORARY DEGREE CANDIDATES THE INTERIM PROVOST OF THE UNIVERSITY THE CHADIMAN OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNDTERSLTY 1 Order ofEvents William (.. Richardson President of the University, presiding * * « PRELUDE Suite from the American Brass Band Journal G.W.E. Friederich (1821-1885) Suite from Funff— stimmigte blasenda Music JohannPezel (1639-1694) » PROCESSIONAL The audience is requested to stand as the Academic Procession moves into the area and to remain standing after the Invocation.
    [Show full text]
  • Metchnikoff and the Phagocytosis Theory
    PERSPECTIVES TIMELINE Metchnikoff and the phagocytosis theory Alfred I. Tauber Metchnikoff’s phagocytosis theory was less century. Indeed, the clonal selection theory and an explanation of host defence than a the elucidation of the molecular biology of the proposal that might account for establishing immune response count among the great and maintaining organismal ‘harmony’. By advances in biology during our own era5. tracing the phagocyte’s various functions Metchnikoff has been assigned to the wine cel- Figure 1 | Ilya Metchnikoff, at ~45 years of through phylogeny, he recognized that eating lar of history, to be pulled out on occasion and age. This figure is reproduced from REF. 14. the tadpole’s tail and killing bacteria was the celebrated as an old hero. same fundamental process: preserving the However, to cite Metchnikoff only as a con- integrity, and, in some cases, defining the tributor to early immunology distorts his sem- launched him into the turbulent waters of evo- identity of the organism. inal contributions to a much wider domain. lutionary biology. He wrote his dissertation on He recognized that the development and func- the development of invertebrate germ layers, I first encountered the work of Ilya tion of the individual organism required an for which he shared the prestigious van Baer Metchnikoff (1845–1916; FIG. 1) in Paul de understanding of physiology in an evolution- Prize with Alexander Kovalevski. By the age of Kruif’s classic, The Microbe Hunters 1.Who ary context. The crucial precept: the organism 22 years, he was appointed to the position of would not be struck by the description of this was composed of various elements, each vying docent at the new University of Odessa, where, fiery Russian championing his theory of for dominance.
    [Show full text]
  • Balcomk41251.Pdf (558.9Kb)
    Copyright by Karen Suzanne Balcom 2005 The Dissertation Committee for Karen Suzanne Balcom Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Discovery and Information Use Patterns of Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine Committee: E. Glynn Harmon, Supervisor Julie Hallmark Billie Grace Herring James D. Legler Brooke E. Sheldon Discovery and Information Use Patterns of Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine by Karen Suzanne Balcom, B.A., M.L.S. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August, 2005 Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my first teachers: my father, George Sheldon Balcom, who passed away before this task was begun, and to my mother, Marian Dyer Balcom, who passed away before it was completed. I also dedicate it to my dissertation committee members: Drs. Billie Grace Herring, Brooke Sheldon, Julie Hallmark and to my supervisor, Dr. Glynn Harmon. They were all teachers, mentors, and friends who lifted me up when I was down. Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my committee: Julie Hallmark, Billie Grace Herring, Jim Legler, M.D., Brooke E. Sheldon, and Glynn Harmon for their encouragement, patience and support during the nine years that this investigation was a work in progress. I could not have had a better committee. They are my enduring friends and I hope I prove worthy of the faith they have always showed in me. I am grateful to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Health and the People Part Four: Modern Medicine
    TURTON SCHOOL HISTORY DEPARTMENT – KNOWLEDGE ORGANISER – GCSE Modern treatment of disease The impact of war and technology on surgery Modern public health Modern treatment of disease: the development of The impact of war and technology on surgery: plastic surgery; blood transfusions; X‐rays; transplant surgery; modern surgical methods, including lasers, radiation therapy During the Boer War of 1899 to 1902, the government discovered that half the pharmaceutical industry; penicillin, its discovery and keyhole surgery. the volunteers for the army were unfit for service. In the 1900s, therefore, by Fleming, its development; new diseases and the Liberal government passed a string of welfare reforms based on 'the treatments, antibiotic resistance; alternative Surgeons in WW1 had the opportunity to experiment with new techniques. Surgeons developed techniques to repair broken bones, and perform skin grafts – plastic personal principle' – the belief that the government had a responsibility to treatments. surgery. Surgery of the eye, ear, nose and throat all improved rapidly. care for the individual citizen: X‐rays were first discovered 20 years before the war. Hospitals installed X‐ray machines, but it was the First World War which confirmed their importance. X‐rays 1906, local authorities were given the right to provide free school The key discovery in the twentieth century was the immediately improved the success rate of surgeons in removing deeply lodged bullets and shrapnel which would otherwise have caused fatal infections. During WW1 the meals for poor children development of Penicillin; following advances occurred: 1907, the School Medical Service gave free health checks Alexander Fleming 1908, the government introduced pensions for old people Penicillin was discovered by Alexander Fleming when Scientists didn’t know about different blood groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of Immunology
    TIMELINE OF IMMUNOLOGY 1549 – The earliest account of inoculation of smallpox (variolation) occurs in Wan Quan's (1499–1582) 1718 – Smallpox inoculation in Ottoman Empire realized by West. Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, the wife of the British ambassador to Constantinople, observed the positive effects of variolation on the native population and had the technique performed on her own children. 1796 – First demonstration of smallpox vaccination (Edward Jenner) 1837 – Description of the role of microbes in putrefaction and fermentation (Theodore Schwann) 1838 – Confirmation of the role of yeast in fermentation of sugar to alcohol (Charles Cagniard-Latour) 1840 – Proposal of the germ theory of disease (Jakob Henle) 1850 – Demonstration of the contagious nature of puerperal fever (childbed fever) (Ignaz Semmelweis) 1857–1870 – Confirmation of the role of microbes in fermentation (Louis Pasteur) 1862 – Phagocytosis (Ernst Haeckel) 1867 – Aseptic practice in surgery using carbolic acid (Joseph Lister) 1876 – Demonstration that microbes can cause disease-anthrax (Robert Koch) 1877 – Mast cells (Paul Ehrlich) 1878 – Confirmation and popularization of the germ theory of disease (Louis Pasteur) 1880 – 1881 -Theory that bacterial virulence could be attenuated by culture in vitro and used as vaccines. Proposed that live attenuated microbes produced immunity by depleting host of vital trace nutrients. Used to make chicken cholera and anthrax "vaccines" (Louis Pasteur) 1883 – 1905 – Cellular theory of immunity via phagocytosis by macrophages and microphages (polymorhonuclear leukocytes) (Elie Metchnikoff) 1885 – Introduction of concept of a "therapeutic vaccination". Report of a live "attenuated" vaccine for rabies (Louis Pasteur and Pierre Paul Émile Roux). 1888 – Identification of bacterial toxins (diphtheria bacillus) (Pierre Roux and Alexandre Yersin) 1888 – Bactericidal action of blood (George Nuttall) 1890 – Demonstration of antibody activity against diphtheria and tetanus toxins.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Rabbits and Men: the Tale of Paul Ehrlich in Our Modern World Of
    Of Rabbits and Men: The Tale of Paul Ehrlich In our modern world of chemotherapy, antibiotics and antivirals, it might come as a surprise to find that the origin of all these treatments can be traced back to rabbits; the cute and fluffy kind. To understand why, we need to go all the way back to 1882 Berlin. A talented, if aimless, young German doctor, Paul Ehrlich, had just met the great microbiologist Robert Koch. Koch was giving a lecture in which he identified the pathogen responsible for tuberculosis. Ehrlich was instantly fascinated by Koch and microbiology. Unknown to himself, he had just taken the first step on a path that would help change the way disease is tackled forever1. The late 1800’s were a time of dynamic change in the sciences. Charles Darwin had proposed his Theory of Natural Selection and Thomas Edison had given us the light bulb. Amongst the many fashionable topics of the time, some biologists were fascinated by dyes; specifically the staining of living tissue. Spending all day bent over a microscope looking at the pretty colours might not seem like worthwhile science by modern standards, but these dyes had interesting properties. Dyes displayed a high level of specificity; they would only stain certain structures and pass through others. Ehrlich noticed this and soon started to think of applications for these properties. These were times when catching a chill could kill. Many well-known individuals of the time were killed in their prime due to infectious disease. Emily Brontë died from tuberculosis2, René Descartes from pneumonia3 and Pyotr Tchaikovsky died from cholera4.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Organizations and Major Discoveries in Twentieth-Century Science: a Case Study of Excellence in Biomedical Research
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Hollingsworth, Joseph Rogers Working Paper Research organizations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: A case study of excellence in biomedical research WZB Discussion Paper, No. P 02-003 Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Hollingsworth, Joseph Rogers (2002) : Research organizations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: A case study of excellence in biomedical research, WZB Discussion Paper, No. P 02-003, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/50229 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu P 02 – 003 RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS AND MAJOR DISCOVERIES IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY SCIENCE: A CASE STUDY OF EXCELLENCE IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH J.
    [Show full text]
  • Karl Landsteiner (1868–1943): Originator of ABO Blood Classification Siang Yong Tan1, MD, JD, Connor Graham2, MD
    Singapore Med J 2013; 54(5): 243-244 M edicine in S tamps doi: 10.11622/smedj.2013099 Karl Landsteiner (1868–1943): Originator of ABO blood classification Siang Yong Tan1, MD, JD, Connor Graham2, MD magine practising medicine without access to blood but frequently upon blood cells from other individuals as well”. transfusions. It was Karl Landsteiner, a 1930 Nobel laureate, Although it was well recognised at the time that clumping would who classified human blood into groups based on the occur when blood from different animals was mixed, the idea presence of naturally occurring agglutinating antibodies, that blood from two humans would cause the same reaction was Iand whose findings eventually established safe transfusion novel. Landsteiner experimented with his own blood and that procedures. Prior to his discovery, patients in need of blood of five coworkers, first noting that none of the serum samples received transfusions from animals such as sheep or randomly reacted with each individual’s own red blood cells. However, selected human donors – usually with disastrous consequences. coworker A’s serum reacted with coworker B’s red blood cells. Landsteiner’s discovery literally saved millions of human lives. This was due to the presence of B antigen on coworker B’s red blood cells, which reacted with the naturally occurring antibody in EARLY LIFE AND CAREER Karl Landsteiner was coworker A’s serum that was directed against the B antigen. born on June 14, 1868 in a Jewish quarter referred to as Baden bei Likewise, coworker B’s serum reacted with coworker A’s red Wien, just south of Vienna, Austria.
    [Show full text]