DOCSLIB.ORG

The Foreign Born from Latin America and the Caribbean: 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Foreign Born from Latin America and the Caribbean: 2010 The Foreign Born From Latin America and the Caribbean: 2010 Issued September 2011 American Community Survey Briefs ACSBR/10-15 By INTRODUCTION Yesenia D. Acosta Defining Nativity Status: and During the last 50 years, the Who Is Foreign Born? G. Patricia de la Cruz number of foreign born from Latin Nativity status refers to whether a America and the Caribbean has person is native or foreign born. The increased rapidly, from less than native-born population includes anyone 1 million in 1960 to 21.2 million in who was a U.S. citizen at birth. 1 2010. Currently, the foreign born Respondents who were born in the from Latin America represent over United States, Puerto Rico, a U.S. Island half of the total foreign-born popu- Area (U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, lation. This brief will discuss the American Samoa, or the Commonwealth size, place of birth, citizenship sta- of the Northern Mariana Islands), or tus, and geographic distribution of abroad of a U.S. citizen parent or the foreign born from Latin America parents, are defined as native born. The in the United States. It presents foreign-born population includes anyone data on the foreign born from Latin who was not a U.S. citizen at birth, America at the national and state including those who have become U.S. levels based on the 2010 American citizens through naturalization. Community Survey (ACS). 1 The term Latin America and the In 2010, 309.3 million people lived in Caribbean includes countries in Central and South America and the Caribbean. Central the United States, including 40.0 mil- America includes Belize, Costa Rica, El lion foreign born (13 percent of the total Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, population). In 2000, 31.1 million of the Nicaragua, and Panama. South America includes Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, 281.4 million U.S. residents were foreign Colombia, Ecuador, Falkland Islands, French born—11 percent of the total population.2 Guiana, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, Uruguay, and Venezuela. Caribbean includes Over the decade, the foreign-born popu- Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, lation increased by 8.8 million. Bahamas, Barbados, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Grenada, the former Over half (53 percent) of all foreign-born country of Guadeloupe (including St. U.S. residents in 2010 were from Latin Barthélemy and Saint-Martin), Haiti, Jamaica, Martinique, Montserrat, the former coun- America (Table 1). Another 28 percent try of the Netherlands Antilles (including were from Asia. The next largest world Bonaire, Curaçao, Saba, Sint Eustatius, and Sint Maarten), St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, region-of-birth group, the foreign born St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Trinidad and Tobago, and Turks and Caicos Islands. Note that people born in Puerto Rico and 2 Gibson, Campbell and Kay Jung. 2006. “Histori- the U.S. Virgin Islands are native born to the cal Census Statistics on the Foreign-Born Population United States and are not included in the list in the United States: 1850 to 2000.” U.S. Census of countries in the Caribbean. Throughout Bureau: Population Division Working Paper, Num- the remainder of this report, the term Latin ber 81 available on the Census Bureau’s Web site at America refers to all of these areas. <www.census.gov/population/www/techpap.html>. U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU from Europe, represented 12 Table 1. percent of all foreign born—less Foreign-Born Population by Region of Birth: 2010 than half the size of the foreign (Numbers in thousands. Data based on sample. For information on confidentiality born from Asia. About 4 percent protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov of the foreign born were born /acs/www) in Africa and 3 percent were Number Percent from other regions, including Region of birth Margin of Margin of Estimate error (±)1 Estimate error (±)1 Oceania and Northern America. Total . 39,956 115 100.0 (X) The single largest country-of- Africa . 1,607 33 4 .0 0 .1 birth group was from Mexico (29 Asia . 11,284 47 28 .2 0 .1 percent of all foreign born). Europe . 4,817 44 12 .1 0 .1 Latin America and the Caribbean . 21,224 90 53 .1 0 .1 Caribbean . 3,731 42 9 .3 0 .1 FINDINGS Central America . 14,764 90 36 .9 0 .2 Mexico . 11,711 83 29 .3 0 .2 In 2000, 16.1 million foreign Other Central America 2 . 3,053 46 7 .6 0 .1 born from Latin America lived South America . 2,730 42 6 .8 0 .1 Other regions 3 . 1,024 19 2 .6 – in the United States. Over the last 10 years, the foreign-born – Represents or rounds to zero . (X) Not applicable . population from Latin America 1 Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability . A margin of error is a measure increased by 5.1 million, of an estimate’s variability . The larger the margin of error is in relation to the size of the estimate, the less reaching 21.2 million in 2010. reliable the estimate . This number when added to and subtracted from the estimate forms the 90 percent confidence interval . 2 The majority of the foreign born Other Central America includes Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama . from Latin America were from 3 Other regions includes Oceania and Northern America . Central America (70 percent), Source: U .S . Census Bureau, 2010 American Community Survey . followed by the Caribbean (18 percent), and South America (13 percent) (Table 2). Mexico accounted for more than half (55 percent) of the foreign born Figure 1. from Latin America. El Salvador Distribution of the Latin American and Caribbean and Cuba each represented Foreign Born by State: 2010 (Percent distribution. Data based on sample. For information on more than 5 percent. Among the confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and foreign born from the Caribbean, definitions, see www.census.gov/acs/www) those born in Cuba (30 percent) and the Dominican Republic (24 percent) represented the largest proportion of all foreign born. Over three-fourths of all foreign All other states born from Central America were California 28.9 25.8 born in Mexico (79 percent). Colombia represented the largest share of the foreign born from South America (23 percent). Although the foreign born Texas Illinois from Latin America were found 14.2 4.0 across the country, most were New York Florida concentrated in only a few states. New Jersey 4.0 10.2 13.0 In 2010, 26 percent (or 5.5 million) of the foreign born from Latin America lived in California, 14 percent (or 3.0 million) in Texas, 13 percent (or 2.8 million) Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 American Community Survey. 2 U.S. Census Bureau Table 2. Central America represented more Foreign-Born Population From Latin America and the than half of the Latin American Caribbean by Country of Birth: 2010 foreign born (Table 3). The foreign (Numbers in thousands. Data based on sample. For information on confidentiality born from Mexico represented protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov about 9 out of 10 foreign born /acs/www) from Latin America in New Number Percent of total Percent of region Mexico, Arizona, and Idaho. The Margin Margin Margin foreign born from the Caribbean Region and country of birth of of of error error error represented about one-third of Estimate (±)1 Estimate (±)1 Estimate (±)1 the Latin American foreign born Total ............... 21,224 90 100.0 (X) (X) (X) in seven states. Two of these Caribbean . 3,731 42 17 .6 0 .2 100 .0 (X) states—Florida (55 percent) and Cuba . 1,105 27 5 .2 0 .1 29 .6 0 .6 Dominican Republic . 879 24 4 .1 0 .1 23 .6 0 .6 New York (49 percent)—each Haiti . 587 21 2 .8 0 .1 15 .7 0 .6 have Latin American foreign-born Jamaica . 660 20 3 .1 0 .1 17 .7 0 .5 Other Caribbean 2 . 500 17 2 .4 0 .1 13 .4 0 .4 populations of 2 million or more. Central America . 14,764 90 69 .6 0 .2 100 .0 (X) Mexico . 11,711 83 55 .2 0 .3 79 .3 0 .3 In 2010, 32 percent of the foreign- El Salvador . 1,214 34 5 .7 0 .2 8 .2 0 .2 born population from Latin America Guatemala . 831 29 3 .9 0 .1 5 .6 0 .2 Honduras . 523 24 2 .5 0 .1 3 .5 0 .2 were naturalized citizens (Table 4). Other Central America 3 . 485 17 2 .3 0 .1 3 .3 0 .1 The foreign-born population from South America . 2,730 42 12 .9 0 .2 100 .0 (X) Central America had the lowest Brazil . 340 15 1 .6 0 .1 12 .4 0 .5 Colombia . 637 19 3 .0 0 .1 23 .3 0 .6 percent naturalized of all regions Ecuador . 443 20 2 .1 0 .1 16 .2 0 .6 of birth (24 percent). Of those born Peru . 429 18 2 .0 0 .1 15 .7 0 .6 Other South America 4 . 882 23 4 .2 0 .1 32 .3 0 .7 in the Caribbean, 54 percent were naturalized citizens. About 44 (X) Not applicable . percent of the foreign born from 1 Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability . A margin of error is a measure of an estimate’s variability . The larger the margin of error is in relation to the size of the estimate, the less South America were naturalized reliable the estimate .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ILO Monitor: COVID-19 and the World of Work. Sixth Edition Updated Estimates and Analysis
    � ILO Monitor: COVID-19 and the world of work. Sixth edition Updated estimates and analysis 23 September 2020 Key messages Latest labour market developments � The latest data confirm that working-hour losses are reflected in higher levels of unemployment and Workplace closures inactivity, with inactivity increasing to a greater � At 94 per cent, the overall share of workers residing extent than unemployment. Rising inactivity in countries with workplace closures of some sort is a notable feature of the current job crisis remains high. The share of workers in countries calling for strong policy attention. The decline in with required closures for all but essential employment numbers has generally been greater workplaces across the entire economy or in for women than for men. targeted areas is still significant, though there are large regional variations. Among upper- Labour income losses middle-income countries, around 70 per cent of � workers continue to live in countries with such These high working-hour losses have translated strict lockdown measures in place (whether into substantial losses in labour income. nationwide or in specific geographical areas), while Estimates of labour income losses (before taking in low-income countries, the earlier strict measures into account income support measures) suggest have been relaxed considerably, despite increasing a global decline of 10.7 per cent during the first numbers of COVID-19 cases. three quarters of 2020 (compared with the corresponding period in 2019), which amounts Working-hour losses: Again higher to US$3.5 trillion, or 5.5 per cent of global gross domestic product (GDP) for the first three quarters than previously estimated of 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Place of Birth for Foreign Born Population
    Place of Birth for the Foreign Born Population City of Houston City of Houston Estimate Total Population 2,298,628 Total Foreign Born Population 696,210 Europe: 26,793 Northern Europe: 7,572 United Kingdom (inc. Crown Dependencies): 6,120 United Kingdom, excluding England and Scotland 2,944 England 2,714 Scotland 462 Ireland 196 Denmark 371 Norway 637 Sweden 248 Other Northern Europe 0 Western Europe: 5,660 Austria 170 Belgium 490 France 1,539 Germany 2,160 Netherlands 760 Switzerland 541 Other Western Europe 0 Southern Europe: 4,228 Greece 784 Italy 1,191 Portugal 358 Azores Islands 0 Spain 1,852 Other Southern Europe 43 Eastern Europe: 9,230 Albania 137 Belarus 58 Bulgaria 1,665 Croatia 49 Czechoslovakia (includes Czech Republic and Slovakia) 168 Hungary 774 Latvia 54 Lithuania 0 Macedonia 0 Moldova 53 Poland 1,012 Romania 769 Russia 1,857 Ukraine 974 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1,052 Serbia 268 Other Eastern Europe 340 Europe, n.e.c. 103 Asia: 149,239 Eastern Asia: 32,600 China: 25,169 China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan 19,044 Hong Kong 1,666 Taiwan 4,459 Japan 2,974 Korea 4,457 Other Eastern Asia 0 South Central Asia: 52,626 Afghanistan 2,341 Bangladesh 2,234 India 26,059 Iran 8,830 Kazakhstan 432 Nepal 3,181 Pakistan 6,954 Sri Lanka 79 Uzbekistan 656 Other South Central Asia 1,860 South Eastern Asia: 47,298 Cambodia 951 Indonesia 1,414 Laos 237 Malaysia 1,597 Burma 1,451 Philippines 10,892 Singapore 1,009 Thailand 1,912 Vietnam 27,835 Other South Eastern Asia 0 Western Asia: 16,466 Iraq 5,773 Israel 841 Jordan 1,760 Kuwait 224 Lebanon 1,846 Saudi Arabia 2,007 Syria 1,191 Yemen 0 Turkey 1,330 Armenia 79 Other Western Asia 1,415 Asia,n.e.c.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Groupings
    THE ITC STYLE GUIDE workload workstation rldwide worthwhile Regional Groupings 49 THE ITC STYLE GUIDE Country groups by region ITC staff and external writers frequently have questions about the use of regional groupings, and which countries apply. In all cases, ITC writers should use the proper country names. These are listed separately in this guide. Key terminology to use For regional groupings by development level, the UN uses the following broad terminology: developing countries, developed countries and transition economies. There is no established convention to designate developed and developing countries. Least developed countries (which currently total 47) are a subset of developing countries. Transition economies are in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Economies is a term used in economic writing among international organizations that refers to national economies. It is often used as a synonym for country. If you are writing in business terms, use the word “country” and not “economy.” Managing differences in terminology As part of the UN system, ITC follows UN practice. However, discrepancies exist between lists provided by the UN Statistical Division and UNCTAD. For example, UNCTAD notes that UNIDO uses the term ‘emerging industrial economies’, which is not used by the UN Statistical Division or by UNCTAD. This edition of the ITC Style Guide recommends that the listing from the UN Statistical Division be used as the first reference source. The list of countries and territories is included in full. Please use the list with care. Countries are sensitive regarding their regional groupings. Consult with the Communications and Events team, or the regional country offices in the ITC Division of Country Programmes if the lists in this edition do not address your writing needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Link to Chapter
    1. THE BIG PICTURE This chapter provides a snapshot of intentional Fig. 1.1: Total number of homicides, homicide through an increasingly focused lens. by region (2012 or latest year) Beginning at the global level and ending at the sub- national level, it subsequently looks at homicide Americas from the perspective of age and sex before analysing 157,000 homicide trends from 1955 to the present. Whether Africa across regions, sub-regions and countries, age and 135,000 sex groups, and even over time, the picture of hom- icide it reveals is one of marked contrasts. Asia 122,000 The global and regional picture Europe UNODC estimates that deaths resulting from 22,000 intentional homicide amounted to a total of Oceania 437,0001 at the global level in 2012. The largest 1,100 share of those was registered in the Americas (36 per cent) and large shares were also recorded in 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 Africa and Asia (31 per cent and 28 per cent, Number of homicides respectively). Europe (5 per cent) and Oceania (0.3 per cent) accounted for the lowest shares of Source: UNODC Homicide Statistics (2013). The bars repre- sent total homicide counts based on the source selected at the homicide by region. country level, with low and high estimates derived from total counts based on additional sources existing at the country level. Between 2010 and 2012 the number of homicide victims decreased by 11-14 per cent in Oceania and Europe, and increased by 8.5 per cent in the of homicide victims in Africa and some countries Americas, yet the fact that UNODC’s 2012 global in Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • NHRI Infographic English
    Indicator 16.a.1 - Existence of national human rights institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles 2018: 39% OF COUNTRIES HAVE INTERNATIONALLY COMPLIANT NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS (NHRI) WHILE 60% HAVE SOUGHT TO ESTABLISH ONE A country with a category "A" NHRI complies with universal standards adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1993 (the "Paris Principles"), and guarantees its NHRI: A broad human rights monitoring mandate Adequate powers of investigation Autonomy from government A pluralist composition Sufficient resources to support operations countries have countries have an applied for review NHRI accredited 118 of compliance with under category the Paris Principles 77 "A" Global disparity: some regions are at risk of being left behind Proportion of Countries with Category A NHRI, by Region, as of 2018 100% 52% 41% 40% 39% 35% 29% 29% 8% AUSTRALIA NORTHERN LATIN SUB-SAHARAN WORLD EASTERN WESTERN CENTRAL OCEANIA AND NEW AMERICA AMERICA AFRICA AND ASIA AND AND ZEALAND AND AND THE SOUTH- NORTHERN SOUTHERN EUROPE CARIBBEAN EASTERN AFRICA ASIA ASIA Slow progress: At the current annual average rate of progress, only 54% of countries will have a category "A" NHRI by 2030 At this pace, the 100% target would only be achieved after 2060. Accelerating the Pace of Progress Target: All Countries with Internationally Compliant NHRI by 2030 250 197 200 187 177 167 157 147 150 137 127 117 107 103 106 97 96 99 101 89 92 94 100 87 84 87 77 80 82 70 72 75 50 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
    [Show full text]
  • The Size, Place of Birth, and Geographic Distribution of the Foreign-Born Population in the United States: 1960 to 2010
    The Size, Place of Birth, and Geographic Distribution of the Foreign-Born Population in the United States: 1960 to 2010 Elizabeth M. Grieco, Edward Trevelyan, Luke Larsen, Yesenia D. Acosta, Christine Gambino, Patricia de la Cruz, Tom Gryn, and Nathan Walters Population Division Population Division Working Paper No. 96 U.S. Census Bureau Washington, D.C. 20233 October 2012 This paper is released to inform interested parties of ongoing research and to encourage discussion of work in progress. Any views expressed on methodological, technical, or operational issues are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the U.S. Census Bureau. Abstract During the last 50 years, the foreign-born population of the United States has undergone dramatic changes, shifting from an older, predominantly European population settled in the Northeast and Midwest to a younger, predominantly Latin American and Asian population settled in the West and South. This paper uses data from the 1960 to 2000 decennial censuses and the 2010 American Community Survey to describe changes in the size, origins, and geographic distribution of the foreign-born population. First, the historic growth of the foreign- born population is reviewed. Next, changes in the distribution by place of birth are discussed, focusing on the simultaneous decline of the foreign born from Europe and increase from Latin America and Asia. The geographic distribution among the states and regions within the United States will then be reviewed. The median age and age distribution for the period will also be discussed. This paper will conclude with a brief analysis of how the foreign-born population has contributed to the growth of the total population over the last 50 years.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Appendix 1. United Nations Geoscheme the United Nations
    Appendix 1. United Nations Geoscheme The United Nations Geoscheme divides the world into regions and sub-regions. This assignment is for statistical convenience and does not imply any assumption regarding political or other affiliation of countries or territories. Table 1. United Nations Geoscheme (data from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/) Region Sub-region Countries and Territories Africa Northern Africa Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Sudan, Tunisia, Western Sahara Eastern Africa British Indian Ocean Territory, Burundi, Comoros, Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, French Southern Territories, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Mayotte, Mozambique, Réunion, Rwanda, Seychelles, Somalia, South Sudan, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe Middle Africa Angola, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Sao Tome and Principe Southern Africa Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho, Namibia, South Africa Western Africa Benin, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Côte d’Ivoire, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Saint Helena, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Togo Americas Latin America and the Caribbean: Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Bahamas, Barbados, Bonaire, Sint Caribbean Eustatius and Saba, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Cuba, Curaçao, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Haiti, Jamaica, Martinique, Montserrat, Puerto Rico, Saint Barthélemy, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Martin (French Part),
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign-Born Population in the United States
    The Foreign-Born Population in the United States Since 1970, the foreign-born population has continued to increase in size and as a percent of the total population. Today, the majority of foreign born are from Latin America and Asia. Considerable differences exist among the different country-of-birth groups in various characteristics. About 1 in 4 children under 18 in families have at least one foreign-born parent. 1 Defining Nativity Status: Foreign Born and Native Born Native born – Anyone who is a U.S. citizen at birth • Born in the United States • Born in Puerto Rico • Born in a U.S. Island Area (e.g., Guam) • Born abroad of U.S. citizen parent(s) Foreign born – Anyone who is not a U.S. citizen at birth • Naturalized U.S. citizens • Legal permanent residents • Temporary migrants • Humanitarian migrants • Unauthorized migrants 2 Foreign-Born Population and Percentage of Total Population, for the United States: 1850 to 2010 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census of Population, 1850 to 2000, and the American Community Survey, 2010. 3 Foreign-Born Population by Region of Birth: 1960 to 2010 (Numbers in millions) Other areas Asia Latin America and the Caribbean Europe Note: Other areas includes Africa, Northern America, Oceania, born at sea, and not reported. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census of Population, 1960 to 2000 and the American Community Survey, 2010. 4 Percentage of the Foreign-Born Population from Central America: 1960 to 2010 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census of Population, 1960 to 2000 and the American Community Survey, 2010. 5 Percentage of the Foreign-Born Population from Mexico and Other Central America: 1960 to 2010 Source: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • International Differences in Ethical Standards and in the Interpretation of Legal Frameworks
    International differences in ethical standards and in the interpretation of legal frameworks SATORI Deliverable D3.2 Authors: Philip Brey (University of Twente) (lead author) Part 1: Philip Brey & Wessel Reijers (University of Twente), Sudeep Rangi & Dino Toljan (UNESCO), Johanna Romare & Göran Collste (Centre for Applied Ethics, Linköping University) Part 2: Zuzanna Warso and Marcin Sczaniecki (Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights) on the basis of contributions from Agata Gurzawska (University of Twente), Johanna Romare (Centre for Applied Ethics, Linköping University), Sudeep Rangi & Dino Toljan (UNESCO), Leyre de Sola Perea, Concepcion Martin Arribas & Laura Herrero Olivera (Instituto de Salud Carlos III), Zuzanna Warso, Marcin Sczaniecki (Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights) September 2015 Contact details for corresponding author: Prof. dr. Philip Brey, University of Twente [email protected] This deliverable and the work described in it is part of the project Stakeholders Acting Together on the Ethical Impact Assessment of Research and Innovation - SATORI - which received funding from the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n° 612231. Contents Introduction to the report ..................................................................................................................... 4 PART 1: Differences between Value systems in Europe and the world ........................................... 6 1.1 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Place of Birth for the Foreign-Born Population 2005 American Community Survey New York City
    Place Of Birth For The Foreign-Born Population 2005 American Community Survey New York City New York City Margin Lower Upper Universe: Population in Households Estimate of Error Bound Bound Total foreign-born persons: 2,915,722 +/-30,485 2,885,237 2,946,207 Europe: 517,645 +/-18,555 499,090 536,200 Northern Europe: 51,957 +/-4,076 47,881 56,033 United Kingdom: 30,902 +/-3,578 27,324 34,480 United Kingdom, excl. England and Scotland 14,198 +/-3,045 11,153 17,243 England 14,999 +/-2,324 12,675 17,323 Scotland 1,705 +/-705 1,000 2,410 Ireland 16,267 +/-2,264 14,003 18,531 Other Northern Europe 4,788 +/-997 3,791 5,785 Western Europe: 46,241 +/-3,926 42,315 50,167 Austria 5,117 +/-1,321 3,796 6,438 France 12,822 +/-2,088 10,734 14,910 Germany 20,156 +/-2,673 17,483 22,829 Netherlands 2,419 +/-934 1,485 3,353 Other Western Europe 5,727 +/-1,366 4,361 7,093 Southern Europe: 94,219 +/-6,785 87,434 101,004 Greece 24,479 +/-3,615 20,864 28,094 Italy 56,532 +/-5,567 50,965 62,099 Portugal 3,514 +/-1,395 2,119 4,909 Spain 8,435 +/-2,005 6,430 10,440 Other Southern Europe 1,259 +/-551 708 1,810 Eastern Europe: 323,844 +/-15,998 307,846 339,842 Croatia 6,029 +/-3,021 3,008 9,050 Czechoslovakia (incl. Czech Republic and Slovakia) 9,414 +/-3,328 6,086 12,742 Hungary 9,961 +/-2,350 7,611 12,311 Poland 57,002 +/-5,929 51,073 62,931 Romania 22,203 +/-4,690 17,513 26,893 Russia 73,309 +/-5,556 67,753 78,865 Ukraine 73,436 +/-7,759 65,677 81,195 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1,702 +/-930 772 2,632 Yugoslavia 21,475 +/-4,241 17,234 25,716 Other Eastern Europe 49,313 +/-5,582 43,731 54,895 Europe, n.e.c.
    [Show full text]
  • An ITC Guide to Style and Other Publishing Matters
    THE ITC STYLE GUIDE workload workstation rldwide worthwhile Regional Groupings 59 THE ITC STYLE GUIDE Country groups by region ITC staff and external writers frequently have questions about the use of regional groupings, and which countries apply. In all cases, ITC writers should use the proper country names. These are listed separately in this guide. Key terminology to use For regional groupings by development level, the UN uses the following broad terminology: developing countries, developed countries and transition economies. There is no established convention to designate developed and developing countries. Least developed countries (which currently total 48) are a subset of developing countries. Transition economies are in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Economies is a term used in economic writing among international organizations that refers to national economies. It is often used as a synonym for country. If you are writing in business terms, use the word “country” and not “economy.” Managing differences in terminology As part of the UN system, ITC follows UN practice. However, discrepancies exist between lists provided by the UN Statistical Division and UNCTAD. For example, UNCTAD notes that UNIDO uses the term ‘emerging industrial economies’, which is not used by the UN Statistical Division or by UNCTAD. This edition of the ITC Style Guide recommends that the listing from the UN Statistical Division be used as the first reference source. The list of countries and territories is included in full. Please use the list with care. Countries are sensitive regarding their regional groupings. Consult with the Communications and Events team, or the regional country offices in the ITC Division of Country Programmes if the lists in this edition do not address your writing needs.
    [Show full text]
  • African Immigrants in America: a Demographic Overview
    African Immigrants in America: A Demographic Overview Immigrants from Africa constitute a highly diverse and rapidly growing group in the United States. As Census data demonstrate, the African foreign-born population doubled in size between 2000 and 2010. Nearly half of African immigrants are naturalized U.S. citizens, and seven-in-ten speak only English or speak it “very well.” Just under three-quarters of African immigrants are black, while roughly one-fifth are white. The largest numbers of African immigrants are found in California, New York, Texas, Maryland, and Virginia. The top countries of origin for African immigrants are Nigeria, Ethiopia, Egypt, Ghana, and Kenya.1 Two-fifths of African immigrants have at least a bachelor’s degree, and more than one-third work in professional jobs. Between 2000 and 2010, the African foreign-born population doubled in size. The number of African immigrants in the United States grew from 881,300 in 2000 to 1.6 million in 2010 {Figure 1}.2 Figure 1: African Foreign-Born Population in the U.S., 2000 & 2010 1,800,000 1,606,914 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 881,300 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 2000 2010 Source: Census 2000 Special Tabulations (STP-159), Table FBP-1; 2010 American Community Survey, Table S0504. African Immigrants in America: A Demographic Overview | American Immigration Council | June 2012 . The number of male African immigrants increased from 484,790 to 845,237 between 2000 and 2010, while the number of females increased from 396,510 to 761,677 {Figure 2}.3 Figure 2: African Foreign-Born Population in the U.S.
    [Show full text]