DOCSLIB.ORG

SCOTTISH PHILOSOPHY in ITS NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PUBLISHED by JAMES MACLEHOSE and SONS, GLASGOW $Nbltshers to the Clmbersttti

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

V STUDIA IN / THE LIBRARY of VICTORIA UNIVERSITY Toronto SCOTTISH PHILOSOPHY IN ITS NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PUBLISHED BY JAMES MACLEHOSE AND SONS, GLASGOW $nbltshers to the clmbersttti. MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD., LONDON. New York, The Macmillan Co. London, Simpkin, Hamilton and Co. Cambridge, Macmillan and Bowes. Edinburgh, - Douglas and Faults. SCOTTISH PHILOSOPHY IN ITS NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT BY HENRY LAURIE, LL.D. PR9FES30R OF MENTAL AND MORAL PHILOSOPHY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE GLASGOW JAMES MACLEHOSE AND SONS publishers to the Smbersttg 1902 GREAT BRITAIN. L4- 9-11-35 GLASGOW: PRINTED AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS BY ROBERT MACLEHOSE AND CO. PREFACE. Tins work was originally intended to form one of a series, projected by Professor Knight of St. Andrews, on Philosophy in its National Developments. Though the idea of such a series has been abandoned, little excuse will, I hope, be required for the appearance of this volume. The philosophy of Scotland deserves, indeed, to be treated as a national development. Every philosophy is an expression of the spirit of its time and the mental life of Scotland is ; clearly mirrored in its intellectual and moral philosophy. The Scotland which gave birth to men so diverse as John Knox and Eobert Burns produced also David Sir Hume, and Thomas Eeid, and William Hamilton ; and its philosophies of scepticism and common sense, though influenced by the thought of other countries, have drawn their special sustenance from the national history and character. There is room, if I mistake not, for a concise and connected statement, in the light of recent thought, of the course of philosophy in Scotland. A philosophy often discloses its features more distinctly as we are borne from it and its from away ; history may require vi PREFACE time to time to be rewritten. The late Dr. M Cosh s work on The Scottish Philosophy, published in 1875, a critical is a valuable repository of facts, but as record it must now appear to be extremely unsatis attaches to factory. Far more importance separate have studies of the greater Scottish thinkers which references to appeared in intermediate years, and to in recent the philosophy of Scotland to be found works. While philosophy has entered on new phases, we are now, for this very reason, able to discern more of Scottish clearly the leading characteristics philo which it has sophy, and to estimate the heritage bequeathed to younger generations. No student of philosophy can afford to neglect the but he cannot be to the works past ; expected peruse of all who were famous in their time, or the discus sions to which they have given rise. And there are many who, without any pretence to be specialists in philosophy, take an intelligent interest in the history of thought. To such readers, it is hoped that this volume will be of service. UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE, 1901. CONTENTS. CHAP. PACK I. INTRODUCTORY, 1 II. FRANCIS HUTCHESON, 10 III. ANDREW BAXTER, 35 IV. DAVID HUME, - 42 V. LORD KAMES, - 95 VI. ADAM SMITH, - 108 VII. THOMAS EEID,- 123 VIII. GEORGE CAMPBELL, - 161 IX. OSWALD AND BEATTIE, - 167 X. LORD MONBODDO, 181 XL ADAM FERGUSON, - 202 XII. DUGALD STEWART, - 217 XIII. THOMAS BROWN, 233 XIV. THOMAS CHALMERS, 246 viii CONTENTS PAOE CHAP. XV. SIR WILLIAM HAMILTON, 249 XVI. JAMES FREDERICK FERRIER, 292 XVII. AESTHETIC THEORIES, 312 XVIII. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS, - 332 INDEX, - 338 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTORY. THE national development commonly known as Scottish Philosophy dates from the beginning of the eighteenth century. At a much earlier period, indeed, the name and fame of Scottish thinkers ran throughout Europe. The troubled condition of the realm was unfriendly to or but under the learning speculation ; yet, guidance of the Church, the sturdy races who contributed to the making of Scotland gradually found room for their energies in thought and study as well as in political turmoil and deeds of arms. From the fourteenth century onward Scotsmen were apt pupils and skilful teachers of the Scholastic Philosophy. While Bruce raised the standard of independence in Scotland, John Duns Scotus so called parce qu il ttait natif d Ecosse maintained at the University of Paris theses which gave rise to the long controversy between the Scotists and the Thornists. The subtle doctor was followed by other Scotsmen who maintained the credit of their country in the Universities of Europe, acquiring the reputation of paying special attention to philosophy. 2 SCOTTISH PHILOSOPHY According to Sir Thomas Urquhart, where there was one preceptor of languages among them, there were over of for forty professors philosophy ; and, allowing exaggeration, it cannot be doubted that the national genius was peculiarly favourable to philosophy and theology. The Universities of St. Andrews, Glasgow, and Aberdeen, founded in the fifteenth century, introduced into Scotland the systematic teaching of the scholastic logic, metaphysics, and ethics. The increase of Scottish scholars, for whom there was but a scanty demand in their native country, led to an increasing exodus to the wider field of the Continent. But the story of the Scottish philosopher abroad belongs to the history of the of letters and it would lead us European republic ; equally beyond our subject to follow the fortunes of the Scottish Universities from their origin to their temporary decay at the time of the Eeformation. In the brief career of activity and success which each of them experienced within this period, nothing was evolved which was distinctively national. These Universities, like all others founded by the Church of " Kome, belonged, as Burton has said, not to a province or nation, but to the Christian world." The Scottish Eeformation was essentially a popular movement under Knox and other Protestant leaders. The theological tenets of Calvinism became common property, and thoughtful minds were occupied with philosophical questions in theological disguise. But in the midst of conflicts with Eoman Catholicism and prelacy, there was little room for the growth of philosophy proper. In the reformed Universities, to INTROD UCTOR Y 3 which the University of Edinburgh was added towards the close of the sixteenth century, Aristotle was still dominant. The impulse of the Kenascence was chiefly manifest in the greater breadth and ardour of human istic studies Plato and Aristotle being read for the first time in Scotland in the original Greek and in an admixture of the dialectics of Ramus. The revival of this higher learning was due in no small measure to Andrew Melville, who had studied philosophy under Ramus and who became Principal of the University of Glasgow in 1574, and afterwards of St. Mary s College, St. Andrews. These institutions, which had been at their lowest ebb, acquired a high reputation, attracting students from various parts of the Continent. But the work thus begun was interrupted by troubles in church and state. It was not till the revolt against scholasticism was fully accomplished, and the violence of internal dissension had abated, that a national philosophy arose in Scotland. As the Universities expanded, the minds of men were opened to the scientific discoveries of England and the Continent, and in philosophy Grotius, Puffendorf, and Locke took the place of Aristotle. With the Revolution of 1688 peace was restored to Scotland, and with peace came the opportunity for material and intellectual progress. The Church was re-established and in Presbyterian ; its national church, in the traditions of the past, in separate laws, and in a system of education intended for poor as well as rich and connecting the Universities with every town and hamlet, Scotland preserved its distinctive character. In the new days of toleration, the Church could no longer interfere with every detail 4 SCOTTISH PHILOSOPHY of and life there was a reaction the thought ; against zeal which had been fanned into a blaze in the struggle the Stuarts and in Scotland against ; Presbyterianism shared in the milder mood of the reformed churches in other lands. Henceforth there was a division in the Church between the moderates and the evangelicals ; and the modus mvendi which was established, with a balance in favour of the moderate party, was at least not unfavourable to the freedom and independence of philosophy. The Union, which closed a period in the national history, was the signal for a new departure. Under its influence, agriculture and the arts began to flourish, science progressed, and literature and philo sophy entered on their Augustan age. While the philosophy of Scotland was a national development, it bore the impress of the methods which had been prescribed by Bacon, by Newton, and by Locke. It was the aim of Bacon to draw the minds of men from the authoritative teaching of the schools to the patient interrogation of nature, and to prescribe rules by which a transition may be made by due degrees from the observation of facts to the laws which they illustrate. The discoveries of Newton showed how much might be accomplished by a powerful in tellect, combining the resources of induction and deduction. And Locke, in seeking to ascertain the origin and extent of human knowledge, turned his attention to the facts and laws of mind. The seed which had been sown by these thinkers fell in Scotland on receptive soil. Scottish philosophy professed the method of careful observation which had been enjoined in the Novum Organum. It felt the impetus of INTRODUCTORY 5 the Newtonian physics, taught in the University of Edinburgh by David Gregory immediately
Recommended publications
  • Skepticism and Pluralism Ways of Living a Life Of

    Skepticism and Pluralism Ways of Living a Life Of

    SKEPTICISM AND PLURALISM WAYS OF LIVING A LIFE OF AWARENESS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ZHUANGZI #±r A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PHILOSOPHY AUGUST 2004 By John Trowbridge Dissertation Committee: Roger T. Ames, Chairperson Tamara Albertini Chung-ying Cheng James E. Tiles David R. McCraw © Copyright 2004 by John Trowbridge iii Dedicated to my wife, Jill iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In completing this research, I would like to express my appreciation first and foremost to my wife, Jill, and our three children, James, Holly, and Henry for their support during this process. I would also like to express my gratitude to my entire dissertation committee for their insight and understanding ofthe topics at hand. Studying under Roger Ames has been a transformative experience. In particular, his commitment to taking the Chinese tradition on its own terms and avoiding the tendency among Western interpreters to overwrite traditional Chinese thought with the preoccupations ofWestern philosophy has enabled me to broaden my conception ofphilosophy itself. Roger's seminars on Confucianism and Daoism, and especially a seminar on writing a philosophical translation ofthe Zhongyong r:pJm (Achieving Equilibrium in the Everyday), have greatly influenced my own initial attempts to translate and interpret the seminal philosophical texts ofancient China. Tamara Albertini's expertise in ancient Greek philosophy was indispensable to this project, and a seminar I audited with her, comparing early Greek and ancient Chinese philosophy, was part ofthe inspiration for my choice ofresearch topic. I particularly valued the opportunity to study Daoism and the Yijing ~*~ with Chung-ying Cheng g\Gr:p~ and benefited greatly from his theory ofonto-cosmology as a means of understanding classical Chinese philosophy.
  • What Literature Knows: Forays Into Literary Knowledge Production

    What Literature Knows: Forays Into Literary Knowledge Production

    Contributions to English 2 Contributions to English and American Literary Studies 2 and American Literary Studies 2 Antje Kley / Kai Merten (eds.) Antje Kley / Kai Merten (eds.) Kai Merten (eds.) Merten Kai / What Literature Knows This volume sheds light on the nexus between knowledge and literature. Arranged What Literature Knows historically, contributions address both popular and canonical English and Antje Kley US-American writing from the early modern period to the present. They focus on how historically specific texts engage with epistemological questions in relation to Forays into Literary Knowledge Production material and social forms as well as representation. The authors discuss literature as a culturally embedded form of knowledge production in its own right, which deploys narrative and poetic means of exploration to establish an independent and sometimes dissident archive. The worlds that imaginary texts project are shown to open up alternative perspectives to be reckoned with in the academic articulation and public discussion of issues in economics and the sciences, identity formation and wellbeing, legal rationale and political decision-making. What Literature Knows The Editors Antje Kley is professor of American Literary Studies at FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany. Her research interests focus on aesthetic forms and cultural functions of narrative, both autobiographical and fictional, in changing media environments between the eighteenth century and the present. Kai Merten is professor of British Literature at the University of Erfurt, Germany. His research focuses on contemporary poetry in English, Romantic culture in Britain as well as on questions of mediality in British literature and Postcolonial Studies. He is also the founder of the Erfurt Network on New Materialism.
  • How to Represent Human Behavior and Decision Making in Earth System Models?

    How to Represent Human Behavior and Decision Making in Earth System Models?

    Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., doi:10.5194/esd-2017-18, 2017 Manuscript under review for journal Earth Syst. Dynam. Discussion started: 2 March 2017 c Author(s) 2017. CC-BY 3.0 License. How to represent human behavior and decision making in Earth system models? A guide to techniques and approaches Finn Müller-Hansen1,2, Maja Schlüter3, Michael Mäs4, Rainer Hegselmann5, 6, Jonathan F. Donges1,3, Jakob J. Kolb1,2, Kirsten Thonicke1, and Jobst Heitzig1 1Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Telegrafenberg A31, 14473 Potsdam, Germany 2Department of Physics, Humboldt University Berlin, Newtonstraße 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany 3Stockholm Resilience Center, Stockholm University, Kräftriket 2B, 114 19 Stockholm, Sweden 4Department of Sociology and ICS, University of Groningen, Grote Rozenstraat 31, 9712 TG Groningen, The Netherlands 5Frankfurt School of Finance & Manangement, Sonnemannstraße 9-11 60314 Frankfurt am Main, Germany 6Bayreuth Research Center for Modeling and Simulation, Bayreuth University, Universitätsstrasse 30, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany Correspondence to: Finn Müller-Hansen ([email protected]) Abstract. In the Anthropocene, humans have a critical impact on the Earth system and vice versa, which can generate complex feedback processes between social and ecological dynamics. Integrating human behavior into formal Earth System Models (ESMs), however, requires crucial modeling assumptions about actors and their goals, behavioral options and decision rules, as well as modeling decisions regarding human social interactions and the aggregation of individuals’ behavior. In this tutorial 5 review, we compare existing modeling approaches and techniques from different disciplines and schools of thought dealing with human behavior at various levels of decision making. Providing an overview over social-scientific modeling approaches, we demonstrate modelers’ often vast degrees of freedom but also seek to make modelers aware of the often crucial consequences of seemingly innocent modeling assumptions.
  • Medium-Term Strategic Plan of the Institute of Philosophy (2020–2023) 1A) Analysis of the External Environment the Situation

    Medium-Term Strategic Plan of the Institute of Philosophy (2020–2023) 1A) Analysis of the External Environment the Situation

    Medium-term Strategic Plan of the Institute of Philosophy (2020–2023) 1a) Analysis of the external environment The situation of the Institute has been determined by the fundamental science policy reform in the course of which the Research Centre for the Humanities changed its operational form. Instead of being a budgetary entity of the Public Body of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (HAS), as of 1 September 2019, it continues to operate as a central budgetary entity directed by the Eötvös Loránd Research Network (ELRN). 1b) Review of the internal capacities The previous period (2016–2018) saw the creation of the first excellence research team within the Institute, which has had an important budget from funds, and which has studied the values underlying scientific research. We have published monographs about the philosophy of Kant, Hume, and Saint Augustine of Hippo, about quantum theory, logical empiricism, historical philosophy and other topics. In addition to the publication of Latin- and Hungarian-language sources, the Hungarian Philosophical Archives has also been launched, which contains documents and biographical data. The Institute is a founding member of the Artificial Intelligence Coalition. The Institute has increased its presence in international professional forums, as has been reflected – in addition to our publication activities – by the higher number of international conferences attended and organized in the recent period. In accordance with the broad interpretation of philosophy’s mission of usefulness for the community, the fellows of the Institute have been involved in public life extensively as well as in popular science and interdisciplinary activities, both through their lectures delivered in Hungary and abroad, and their media appearances and writings.
  • The Old Princeton Apologetics: Common Sense Or Reformed?

    The Old Princeton Apologetics: Common Sense Or Reformed?

    JETS 46/4 (December 2003) 647–72 THE OLD PRINCETON APOLOGETICS: COMMON SENSE OR REFORMED? tim mcconnel* At its founding, Princeton Theological Seminary was given the specific apologetical task of equipping its students to combat the deistic errors of the eighteenth-century Enlightenment. This played a significant role in the development of its apologetics, as it tended to take over the argumentation of previous apologists who had attempted the same task, without regard to whether they were Reformed or not. Thus, Bishop Butler’s eighteenth-century work, The Analogy of Religion Natural and Revealed, became a standard ref- erence work for apologetics classes, in spite of the fact that Butler had repu- diated his strict Calvinistic Presbyterian upbringing to embrace a moderate Anglicanism.1 While apologetics was a significant concern, it was certainly not the sole focus of the major Princetonian theologians. Archibald Alexander, the found- ing professor of Princeton, taught both didactic and polemical theology. Charles Hodge began his academic career as an exegete of Scripture, and later moved to systematic theology, for which he is better known.2 His son Archibald Alexander Hodge replaced him in the chair of didactic and polemic theology, and he in turn was replaced by Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield. None of these noted professors served explicitly in the chair of apologetics, which was only created in the later part of the nineteenth century. However, Warfield, a prolific writer, frequently addressed apologetical themes in his writings. A later, lesser known Princetonian, William Brenton Greene, Jr., occupied the Stuart Professorship of Apologetics and Christian Ethics from * Tim McConnel is assistant professor of theology at Dordt College, 498 4th Avenue NE, Sioux Center, IA 51250.
  • 2 Scottish Common Sense Realism

    2 Scottish Common Sense Realism

    2 Scottish Common Sense Realism The importance of Scottish Common Sense Realism (CSR) in the United States and particularly in the Christian Churches has long been recognized. Mark Noll has referred to the revolutionary period as the ‘triumph of Common Sense in American Intellectual life.’1 E. Brooks Holifield has traced the pervasive influence of Scottish CSR at least as far back as John Witherspoon of Princeton.2 The sheer number of stu- dents influenced by Witherspoon at Princeton virtually guaranteed a sig- nificant influence for quite some time.3 Others who were greatly influenced by CSR include Thomas Jefferson,4 Benjamin Franklin, Ben- jamin Rush and Thomas Paine.5 The importance of Scottish CSR in the American Church was made clear by Sidney Ahlstrom over fifty years ago.6 The influence of this philosophy has been studied in such im- portant movements as Fundamentalism7 and Dispensationalism.8 What has not been recognized is the important role of Scottish CSR exercised in providing the philosophical grounding for the rise and acceptance of the Pentecostal doctrine of speaking in tongues as the initial physical evidence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit. 1 Mark Noll, ‘Common Sense Traditions and American Evangelical Thought,’ Amer- ican Quarterly 37.2 (1985), p. 218. 2 E. Brooks Holifield, The Gentlemen Theologians: American Theology in Southern Culture 1795-1860 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1978), p. 116. 3 Mark Noll, The Princeton Theology 1812-1921 (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1983), p. 19. 4 Dale Tuggy, ‘Reid’s Philosophy of Religion,’ in The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid, ed.
  • Common Sense Philosophy and Politics in America: John Witherspoon, James Mccosh, and William James

    Common Sense Philosophy and Politics in America: John Witherspoon, James Mccosh, and William James

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2005 Common sense philosophy and politics in America: John Witherspoon, James McCosh, and William James Scott hiP lip Segrest Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Segrest, Scott hiP lip, "Common sense philosophy and politics in America: John Witherspoon, James McCosh, and William James" (2005). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1737. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1737 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. COMMON SENSE PHILOSOPHY AND POLITICS IN AMERICA: JOHN WITHERSPOON, JAMES MCCOSH, AND WILLIAM JAMES A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Political Science by Scott Philip Segrest B.A., Baylor University, 1992 M.A., University of Dallas, 1996 December 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The specific nature of this study keeps me mindful of what I owe to the scholarly and spiritual communities that have prepared, encouraged,
  • Philosophy: Third Edition Robert Audi & Paul Audi Frontmatter More Information

    Philosophy: Third Edition Robert Audi & Paul Audi Frontmatter More Information

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01505-0 - The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy: Third Edition Robert Audi & Paul Audi Frontmatter More information THE CAMBRIDGE DICTIONARY OF PHILOSOPHY THIRD EDITION This is the most comprehensive dictionary of philosophical terms and thinkers available in English. Previously acclaimed as the most author- itative and accessible dictionary of philosophy in any language, it has been widely translated and has served both professional philosophers and students of philosophy worldwide. Written by a team of more than 550 experts – including more than 100 new to this third edition – the dictionary contains approximately 5,000 entries ranging from short definitions to full-length articles. It concisely defines terms, concretely illustrates ideas, and informatively describes philosophers. It is designed to facilitate the understanding of philosophy at all levels and in all fields. Key features of this third edition: Some 500 new entries covering both Eastern and Western philosophy, as well as individual countries such as China, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain Increased coverage of such growing fields as ethics and philosophy of mind Scores of new intellectual portraits of leading contemporary thinkers Wider coverage of Continental philosophy Dozens of new concepts in cognitive science and other areas Enhanced cross-referencing to add context and to increase under- standing Expansions of both text and index to facilitate research and browsing Robert Audi is John A. O’Brien Professor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame. He is the author of numerous books and articles. His recent books include Moral Perception (2013); Democratic Authority and the Separation of Church and State (2011); Rationality and Religious Commitment (2011); Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge (2010); and Moral Value and Human Diversity (2007).
  • Durham E-Theses

    Durham E-Theses

    Durham E-Theses Destructive realism: Metaphysics as the foundation of natural science Rowbottom, Darrell Patrick How to cite: Rowbottom, Darrell Patrick (2004) Destructive realism: Metaphysics as the foundation of natural science, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/2824/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk DESTRUCTIVE REALISM: METAPHYSICS AS THE FOUNDATION OF NATURAL SCIENCE DARRELL PATRICK ROWBOTTOM THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF PHD IN PHILOSOPHY, OF THE UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM 2004 ABSTRACT This thesis has two philosophical positions as its targets. The first is 'scientific realism' of the form defended by Boyd, (the early) Putnam, and most recently Psillos. The second is empiricism in the vein of Mill, Mach, Ayer, Carnap, and Van Fraassen. My objections to both have a rather Popperian flavour. For I argue that 'confirmation' is a misnomer, that so-called 'ampliative inferences' are heuristics at best, and that naturalism and subjectivism are regressive doctrines.
  • Scottish Enlightenment Rhetoric and the New Aesthetic of Language

    Scottish Enlightenment Rhetoric and the New Aesthetic of Language

    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Open Access Dissertations 2016 “A Peculiar Power of Perception”: Scottish Enlightenment Rhetoric and the New Aesthetic of Language Rosaleen Greene-Smith Keefe University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/oa_diss Recommended Citation Greene-Smith Keefe, Rosaleen, "“A Peculiar Power of Perception”: Scottish Enlightenment Rhetoric and the New Aesthetic of Language" (2016). Open Access Dissertations. Paper 464. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/oa_diss/464 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “A PECULIAR POWER OF PERCEPTION”: SCOTTISH ENLIGHTENMENT RHETORIC AND THE NEW AESTHETIC OF LANGUAGE BY ROSALEEN GREENE-SMITH KEEFE A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ENGLISH LITERATURE UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2016 DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DISSERTATION OF ROSALEEN GREENE-SMITH KEEFE APPROVED: Dissertation Committee: J. Jennifer Jones Stephen J. Barber Cheryl Foster Nasser H. Zawia DEAN OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2016 ABSTRACT This dissertation is an inquiry into the ways rhetoric, as the study of the art of language use, and literature, as the art of written language, were coherently theorized in Enlightenment Scotland to articulate the complex nature of language and its inherent relationship to the human mind and its faculties. The chapters contained in this manuscript dissertation are previously published studies in eighteenth-century Scottish rhetorical theory, examining the multiple and sometimes contradictory legacies of this important body of work on language pedagogy, philosophy of mind and language, and political theory.
  • Scottish Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century : Volume I : Morals, Politics, Art, Religion Edited by Aaron Garrett and James A

    Scottish Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century : Volume I : Morals, Politics, Art, Religion Edited by Aaron Garrett and James A

    This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Scottish philosophy in the eighteenth century : Volume I : morals, politics, art, religion edited by Aaron Garrett and James A. Harris (Review) Spencer, Mark G. 2019 Spencer, M. G. (2019). Scottish philosophy in the eighteenth century : Volume I : morals, politics, art, religion edited by Aaron Garrett and James A. Harris (Review). Studies in Religion and the Enlightenment 1, no. 2 (fall 2019): 28‑32. doi: 10.32655/srej.2019.2.8 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/137555 https://doi.org/10.32655/srej.2019.2.8 © 2019 Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, & the Brigham Young University Faculty Publishing Service. Downloaded on 25 Sep 2021 04:10:57 SGT Scottish Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century: Volume I: Morals, Politics, Art, Religion (Review) MARK G. SPENCER Brock University Scottish Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century: Volume I: Morals, Politics, Art, Religion, edited by Aaron Garrett and James A. Harris. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015. Pp. 482. $100. ISBN: 978-0-19-956067-7. his is a volume in the Oxford series A History of Scottish Philosophy. Its scope is quite broad, as its subtitle’s reference to “morals, politics, art, [and] religion” T hints. The volume’s editors, Aaron Garrett (Boston University) and James Harris (University of St. Andrews), are recognized authorities in the field, and they have assembled an expert team of contributors who together have delivered a very useful volume, if one that is sometimes uneven in coverage. The contributors are notably interdisciplinary. In fact, while the book’s co-editors are philosophers, only a minority of the thirteen contributors (among whom the editors are counted) are from philosophy departments.
  • Illumination Despite the Enlightenment: Saving the History of Fundamentalist Inerrancy from the Historians

    Illumination Despite the Enlightenment: Saving the History of Fundamentalist Inerrancy from the Historians

    ILLUMINATION DESPITE THE ENLIGHTENMENT: SAVING THE HISTORY OF FUNDAMENTALIST INERRANCY FROM THE HISTORIANS ___________________ A Paper Presented to Dr. David Mappes Baptist Bible Seminary ___________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Course TH2: History of Christian Doctrine ___________________ by David J. Roseland May 2016 Illumination Despite the Enlightenment The titanic shifts in the cultural conversation from matters of ethics to politics in the last few decades have been surprising both in the speed with which change has occurred and the divergence of Western worldviews from Reformation and even Enlightenment moorings. The data sources are myriad, and the deluge of information seems to be so massive that we cannot keep up with all the pieces. Enter the very helpful historiographer. By giving shape to the many data points through theoretic conjectures, those who explain the flow of history provide needed clarity and assist their readers in making sense out of the cacophony. Historiographical theories, though, are only useful inasmuch as they serve to actually justify a belief in causation and derivation of the phenomena they seek to integrate into their system.1 The 1970 publication, The Roots of Fundamentalism by Ernest Sandeen, has provided just this kind of soothing historiography for the non-fundamentalist community of theological academia. According to Robert L. Thomas, this book’s impact on the academic community, including an increasing swath of self-avowed evangelicals, cannot likely be estimated.2 Sandeen’s thesis regarding the single most important unifying feature common to evangelicals—the doctrine of biblical inerrancy—is that the Enlightenment-tainted Princetonians invented the doctrine of biblical inerrancy out of their adherence to Scottish Common Sense realism.