DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Communications Commission § 90.103

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Communications Commission § 90.103 Federal Communications Commission § 90.103 for licensing, permissible communica- RADIOLOCATION SERVICE FREQUENCY TABLE— tions, frequency available, and any spe- Continued cial requirements are set forth in § 90.103. Provisions for the Location and Frequency or band Class of station(s) Limitation Monitoring Service (LMS) are con- 3100 to 3300 .............. ......do ......................... 12 tained in subpart M of this part. 3300 to 3500 .............. ......do ......................... 12, 13 3500 to 3650 .............. ......do ......................... 12 [60 FR 15252, Mar. 23, 1995] 5250 to 5350 .............. ......do ......................... 12 5350 to 5460 .............. ......do ......................... 10, 14 § 90.103 Radiolocation Service. 5460 to 5470 .............. ......do ......................... 10, 15 5470 to 5600 .............. ......do ......................... 10, 11 (a) Eligibility. The following persons 5600 to 5650 .............. ......do ......................... 10, 16 are eligible for authorizations in the 8500 to 9000 .............. ......do ......................... 12, 17 Radiolocation Service to operate sta- 9000 to 9200 .............. ......do ......................... 10, 14 9200 to 9300 .............. ......do ......................... 12 tions to determine distance, direction, 9300 to 9500 .............. ......do ......................... 10, 15, 18 speed, or position by means of radio- 9500 to 10,000 ........... ......do ......................... 12 location devices, for purposes other 10,000 to 10,500 ........ ......do ......................... 12, 13, 19 than navigation: 10,500 to 10,550 ........ ......do ......................... 20, 22, 24 13,400 to 13,750 ........ ......do ......................... 12 (1) Any person engaged in a commer- 13,750 to 14,000 ........ ......do ......................... 29 cial, industrial, scientific, educational, 15,700 to 17,300 ........ ......do ......................... or local government activity 24,050 to 24,250 ........ ......do ......................... 12, 22, 24 (2) A corporation or association that 33,400 to 36,000 ........ ......do ......................... 12 will furnish radiolocation service to (c) Explanation of assignment limita- other persons. tions appearing in the frequency table (3) A corporation that will furnish a of paragraph (b) of this section: nonprofit radio communication service (1) This frequency band is shared to its parent corporation, to another with and stations operating in this fre- subsidiary of the same parent, or to its quency band in this service are on a own subsidiary where the party to be secondary basis to stations licensed in served is regularly engaged in any of the Maritime Mobile Service. the eligibility activities set forth in (2) This frequency band is shared this paragraph. with and stations operating in this fre- (b) Frequencies available. The fol- quency band in this service are on a lowing table indicates frequencies secondary basis to the LORAN Naviga- available for assignment to stations in tion System; all operations are limited the Radiolocation Service, together to radiolocation land stations in ac- with the class of station(s) to which cordance with footnote US104, § 2.106 of they are normally assigned, and the this chapter. specific assignment limitations, which (3) [Reserved] are explained in paragraph (c) of this (4) The non-Federal Government section: radiolocation service in this band is on RADIOLOCATION SERVICE FREQUENCY TABLE a secondary basis to stations in the aeronautical radionavigation service Frequency or band Class of station(s) Limitation operating on 1708 kHz. (5) Station assignments on fre- Kilohertz quencies in this band will be made sub- 70 to 90 ...................... Radiolocation land or 1 ject to the conditions that the max- mobile. imum output power shall not exceed 90 to 110 .................... Radiolocation land ...... 2 110 to 130 .................. Radiolocation land or 1 375 watts and the maximum authorized mobile. bandwidth shall not exceed 2 kHz. 1705 to 1715 .............. ......do ......................... 4, 5, 6 (6) Because of the operation of sta- 1715 to 1750 .............. ......do ......................... 5, 6 1750 to 1800 .............. ......do ......................... 5, 6 tions having priority on the same or 1900 to 1950 .............. ......do ......................... 6, 25, 26, adjacent frequencies in this or in other 27 and 28 countries, frequency assignments in 1950 to 2000 .............. ......do ......................... 6, 25, 27 this band may either be unavailable or and 28 3230 to 3400 .............. ......do ......................... 6, 8 may be subject to certain technical or Megahertz operational limitations. Therefore, ap- plications for frequency assignments in 420 to 450 ............... ......do ......................... 21 2450 to 2500 .............. ......do ......................... 9, 22, 23 this band shall include information 2900 to 3100 .............. ......do ......................... 10, 11 concerning the transmitter output 317 VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:40 Dec 15, 2011 Jkt 223206 PO 00000 Frm 00327 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\47\47V5 ofr150 PsN: PC150 § 90.103 47 CFR Ch. I (10–1–11 Edition) power, the type and directional charac- 87) and the Government Radiolocation teristics of the antenna and the min- Service. imum hours of operation (GMT). (16) This frequency band is shared (7) [Reserved] with and is on a secondary basis to the (8) Frequencies in this band may only Maritime Radionavigation Stations be assigned to radiolocation stations (part 80) and the Government Meteoro- which are also assigned frequencies in logical Aids Service. the 1605–1800 kHz band, provided the (17) Operation in this frequency band use of frequencies in this band is nec- is on a secondary basis to airborne essary for the proper functioning of the Doppler radars at 8800 MHz. particular radiolocation system. Oper- (18) Radiolocation installations will ations in this band are on a secondary be coordinated with the Government basis to stations operating in accord- Meteorological Aids Service, and inso- ance with the Commission’s table of far as practicable, will be adjusted to frequency allocations contained in meet the needs of that service. § 2.106 of this chapter. (19) Operations in this band are on a (9) This band is allocated to the secondary basis to the Amateur Radio Radiolocation Service on a secondary Service (part 97). Pulsed emissions are basis to other fixed or mobile services prohibited. and must accept any harmful inter- (20) This band is restricted to radio- ference that may be experienced from location systems using type N0N emis- such services or from the industrial, sion with a power not to exceed 40 scientific, and medical (ISM) equip- watts into the antenna. ment operating in accordance with (21) Non-Government radiolocation part 18 of this chapter. In the 2483.5– stations in the band are secondary to 2500 MHz band, no applications for new the Government Radiolocation Service, or modification to existing stations to the Amateur Radio Service and the increase the number of transmitters Amateur-Satellite Service. Pulse-rang- will be accepted. Existing licensees as ing radiolocation stations in this band of July 25, 1985, or on a subsequent date may be authorized along the shorelines following as a result of submitting an of Alaska and the contiguous 48 states. application for license on or before Radiolocation stations using spread July 25, 1985, are grandfathered and spectrum techniques may be author- their operation is co-primary with the ized in the band 420–435 MHz for oper- Radiodetermination Satellite Service. ation within the contiguous 48 states (10) Speed measuring devices will not and Alaska. Also, stations using spread be authorized in this band. spectrum techniques shall be limited (11) This frequency band is shared to a maximum output power of 50 with and is on a secondary basis to the watts, shall be subject to the applica- Maritime Radionavigation Stations ble technical standards in § 90.209 until (part 80) and to the Government Radio- such time as more definitive standards location Service. are adopted by the Commission and (12) This frequency is shared with and shall identify in accordance with is on a secondary basis to the Govern- § 90.425(c)(2). Authorizations will be ment Radiolocation Service. granted on a case-by-case basis; how- (13) Operations in this band are lim- ever, operations proposed to be located ited to survey operations using trans- within the zones set forth in footnote mitters with a peak power not to ex- US217, § 2.106 of this chapter should not ceed 5 watts into the antenna. expect to be accommodated. (14) This frequency band is shared (22) For frequencies 2455 MHz, 10,525 with and is on a secondary basis to the MHz, and 24,125 MHz, only Aeronautical Radionavigation Service unmodulated, continuous wave (NON) (part 87) and to the Government Radio- emission shall be employed. The fre- location Service. quency 24.10 GHz, and frequencies in (15) The non-Government Radio- the 24.20–24.25 GHz band may use NON location Service in this band is sec- emission along with an ancillary FM ondary to the Maritime Radio- digital emission. The frequency 24.10 navigation Stations (part 80), the Aero- GHz will be used for the purpose of nautical Radionavigation Service (part alerting motorists of hazardous driving 318 VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:40 Dec 15, 2011 Jkt 223206 PO 00000 Frm 00328 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\47\47V5
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Accurate Location Detection 911 Help SMS App
    System and method that allows for cost effective location detection accuracy that exceeds current FCC standards. Accurate Location Detection 911 Help SMS App White Paper White Paper: 911 Help SMS App 1 Cost Effective Location Detection Techniques Used by the 911 Help SMS App to Overcome Smartphone Flaws and GPS Discrepancies Minh Tran, DMD Box 1089 Springfield, VA 22151 Phone: (267) 250-0594 Email: [email protected] Introduction As of April 2015, approximately 64% of Americans own smartphones. Although there has been progress with E911 and NG911, locating cell phone callers remains a major obstacle for 911 dispatchers. This white papers gives an overview of techniques used by the 911 Help SMS App to more accurately locate victims indoors and outdoors when using smartphones. Background Location information is not only transmitted to the call center for the purpose of sending emergency services to the scene of the incident, it is used by the wireless network operator to determine to which PSAP to route the call. With regards to E911 Phase 2, wireless network operators must provide the latitude and longitude of callers within 300 meters, within six minutes of a request by a PSAP. To locate a mobile telephone geographically, there are two general approaches. One is to use some form of radiolocation from the cellular network; the other is to use a Global Positioning System receiver built into the phone itself. Radiolocation in cell phones use base stations. Most often this is done through triangulation between radio towers. White Paper: 911 Help SMS App 2 Problem GPS accuracy varies and could incorrectly place the victim’s location at their neighbor’s home.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary of the ICAO Position for ITU WRC-15 Radio
    Executive Summary of the ICAO Position for ITU WRC-15 Radio frequency spectrum is a scarce natural resource with finite capacity for which demand is constantly increasing. The requirements of civil aviation as well as other spectrum users continue to grow at a fast pace, thus creating an ever-increasing pressure to an already stretched resource. International competition between radio services obliges all spectrum users, aeronautical and non- aeronautical alike, to continually defend and justify retention of existing or addition of new frequency bands. The ICAO Position aims at protecting aeronautical frequency spectrum for all radiocommunication and radionavigation systems used for ground facilities and on board aircraft. The ICAO Position addresses all radioregulatory aspects on aeronautical matters on the agenda for the WRC-15. The items of main concern to aviation include the following: identification of additional frequency bands for the International Mobile Telecommunications (IMT). Under this agenda item, the telecommunications industry is seeking up to 1200 MHz of additional spectrum in the 300 MHz to 6 GHz range for mobile and broadband applications. It is expected that a number of aeronautical frequency bands will come under pressure for potential repurposing, especially some of the Primary Surveillance Radar (PSR) bands. Existing frequency allocations which are vital for the operation of aeronautical very small aperture terminal (VSAT) ground-ground communication networks, especially in tropical regions, are also expected to come under pressure. Due to decisions made by a previous WRC, this has already become a problematic issue in Africa. WRC-15 agenda items 1.1 and 9.1.5 refer; potential radioregulatory means to facilitate the use of non-safety satellite service frequency bands for a very safety-critical application, the command and control link for remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) in non-segregated airspace.
    [Show full text]
  • CBRS Commercial Weather RADAR Comments WINNF-RC-1001-V1.0.0
    CBRS Commercial Weather RADAR Comments Document WINNF-RC-1001 Version V1.0.0 24 July 2017 Spectrum Sharing Committee Steering Group CBRS Commercial Weather RADAR Comments WINNF-RC-1001-V1.0.0 TERMS, CONDITIONS & NOTICES This document has been prepared by the Spectrum Sharing Committee Steering Group to assist The Software Defined Radio Forum Inc. (or its successors or assigns, hereafter “the Forum”). It may be amended or withdrawn at a later time and it is not binding on any member of the Forum or of the Spectrum Sharing Committee Steering Group. Contributors to this document that have submitted copyrighted materials (the Submission) to the Forum for use in this document retain copyright ownership of their original work, while at the same time granting the Forum a non-exclusive, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual, royalty-free license under the Submitter’s copyrights in the Submission to reproduce, distribute, publish, display, perform, and create derivative works of the Submission based on that original work for the purpose of developing this document under the Forum's own copyright. Permission is granted to the Forum’s participants to copy any portion of this document for legitimate purposes of the Forum. Copying for monetary gain or for other non-Forum related purposes is prohibited. THIS DOCUMENT IS BEING OFFERED WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY WHATSOEVER, AND IN PARTICULAR, ANY WARRANTY OF NON-INFRINGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. ANY USE OF THIS SPECIFICATION SHALL BE MADE ENTIRELY AT THE IMPLEMENTER'S OWN RISK, AND NEITHER THE FORUM, NOR ANY OF ITS MEMBERS OR SUBMITTERS, SHALL HAVE ANY LIABILITY WHATSOEVER TO ANY IMPLEMENTER OR THIRD PARTY FOR ANY DAMAGES OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, ARISING FROM THE USE OF THIS DOCUMENT.
    [Show full text]
  • DOC-370264A1.Pdf
    February 24, 2021 FACT SHEET* Facilitating Shared Use in the 3.1-3.55 GHz Band Second Report and Order, Order on Reconsideration, and Order of Proposed Modification, WT Docket No. 19-348 Background The Beat China by Harnessing Important, National Airwaves for 5G Act of 2020, which was included in the Fiscal Year 2021 omnibus spending bill, requires the Commission to work with its Federal partners to bring all of the 3.45 GHz band spectrum to market for next-generation wireless use through a system of competitive bidding by December 31, 2021. Beginning the implementation of this Congressional mandate, this item reallocates 100 megahertz in the 3.45 GHz band for flexible use wireless services and adopt rules to implement the new 3.45 GHz Service, The framework adopted for the 3.45 GHz band will enable full-power commercial use and provide flexibility to future licensees in deploying their networks in this band, while also ensuring that federal incumbents are still protected where and when they require continued access to the band. What the Second Report and Order Would Do: • Make 100 megahertz of spectrum in the 3.45 GHz band available for flexible use wireless services throughout the contiguous United States; • Add a co-primary, non-federal fixed and mobile (except aeronautical mobile) allocation to the band; • Create a regime to coordinate non-federal and federal use of spectrum by adopting Cooperative Planning Areas and Periodic Use Areas and establishing coordination procedures; • Adopt a band plan and technical, licensing, and competitive
    [Show full text]
  • Time of Arrival (TOA) Based Radiolocation Architecture in CDMA Systems and Its Performance Analysis
    International Journal of Computer and Communication Engineering Time of Arrival (TOA) Based Radiolocation Architecture in CDMA Systems and Its Performance Analysis Abir Ahmed1*, Tamim Hossain1, Kefayet Ullah2, Md. Humayun Kabir3 1 Telecommunication, American International University, Bangladesh. 2 Electrical and Electronic Engineering, American International University, Bangladesh. 3 Faculty of Engineering, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineer, American International University, Bangladesh. * Corresponding author. Tel.: +8801911195987; email: [email protected] Manuscript submitted January 10, 2018; accepted March 8, 2018. doi: 10.17706/ijcce.2018.7.3.85-97 Abstract: A popular approach, called as Radiolocation, measures parameters of radio signals that travel between a Mobile Station (MS) and a set of fixed transceivers, which are subsequently used to derive the location estimation of MS. The purpose of this research was to investigate the performance of Time of Arrival (TOA) based Radiolocation approach for finding the location of MS in the CDMA cellular networks. Another aim was to find out suitable location estimation algorithm using measured parameters by Radiolocation approach. Finally, the accuracy of the Radiolocation was examined by comparing two different location estimation algorithms. Two different algorithms for position estimation methods, named as Neural Networks and Least Square algorithms, were used to determine the location of MS. The simulation results suggested that the Neural Network algorithm provides better accuracy in position estimation which were depicted by supportive simulation results in the article. Key words: Time of arrival (TOA), radiolocation, neural networks, least square algorithms. 1. Introduction Time of arrival (TOA), the strength of a signal and Angle of arrival (AOA) techniques are among those techniques that can be utilized to approximate and evaluate the position of Primary users.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Systems in 3100-3550
    Technical Characteristics of Potential Commercial Systems Operating in Some or All of the U.S. 3100-3550 MHz Band Working Document WINNF-TR-1001 Version 0.0.0(IR1) – r5.1 26 July 2019 Advanced Technologies Committee 3100 to 3550 Task Group Commercial Systems in 3100 to 3550 MHz WINNF-TR-1001-V0.0.0(IR1) – r5.1 TERMS, CONDITIONS & NOTICES This document has been prepared by the Advanced Technology Committee’s 3100-3550 MHz Task Group to assist The Software Defined Radio Forum Inc. (or its successors or assigns, hereafter “the Forum”). It may be amended or withdrawn at a later time and it is not binding on any member of the Forum or of the Advanced Technology Committee. Contributors to this document that have submitted copyrighted materials (the Submission) to the Forum for use in this document retain copyright ownership of their original work, while at the same time granting the Forum a non-exclusive, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual, royalty-free license under the Submitter’s copyrights in the Submission to reproduce, distribute, publish, display, perform, and create derivative works of the Submission based on that original work for the purpose of developing this document under the Forum's own copyright. Permission is granted to the Forum’s participants to copy any portion of this document for legitimate purposes of the Forum. Copying for monetary gain or for other non-Forum related purposes is prohibited. THIS DOCUMENT IS BEING OFFERED WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY WHATSOEVER, AND IN PARTICULAR, ANY WARRANTY OF NON-INFRINGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. ANY USE OF THIS SPECIFICATION SHALL BE MADE ENTIRELY AT THE IMPLEMENTER'S OWN RISK, AND NEITHER THE FORUM, NOR ANY OF ITS MEMBERS OR SUBMITTERS, SHALL HAVE ANY LIABILITY WHATSOEVER TO ANY IMPLEMENTER OR THIRD PARTY FOR ANY DAMAGES OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, ARISING FROM THE USE OF THIS DOCUMENT.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission § 3.2
    Federal Communications Commission § 3.2 3.51 Cessation of operations. tion D.90 to whom maritime accounts 3.52 Complaint/inquiry resolution proce- in respect of mobile stations licensed dures. by that country may be sent. 3.53 FCC notification of refusal to provide telecommunications service to U.S. reg- (b) Accounting Authority Certification istered vessel(s). Officer. The official designated by the 3.54 Notification of change in address. Managing Director, Federal Commu- nications Commission, who is respon- REPORTING REQUIREMENTS sible, based on the coordination and re- 3.60 Reports. view of information related to appli- 3.61 Reporting address. cants, for granting certification as an 3.62 Request for confidentiality. accounting authority in the maritime ENFORCEMENT mobile and maritime mobile-satellite radio services. The Accounting Author- 3.70 Investigations. ity Certification Officer may initiate 3.71 Warnings. action to suspend or cancel an account- 3.72 Grounds for further enforcement ac- tion. ing authority certification if it is de- 3.73 Waiting period after cancellation. termined to be in the public’s best in- 3.74 Ship stations affected by suspension, terest. cancellation or relinquishment. (c) Accounting Authority Identification 3.75 Licensee’s failure to make timely pay- Codes (AAICs). The discrete identifica- ment. tion code of an accounting authority 3.76 Licensee’s liability for payment. responsible for the settlement of mari- AUTHORITY: 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j) and time accounts (Annex A to ITU-T Rec- 303(r). ommendation D.90). SOURCE: 61 FR 20165, May 6, 1996, unless (d) Administration. Any governmental otherwise noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Class of Stations
    CLASS OF STATION FOR FIXED AND MOBILE NOTIFICATION Service code Station Description/Definition Fixed FX Fixed Station Station in the Fixed Service Station in the mobile service not intended to be used while FL Land station Generic Mobile in motion Station in the mobile service intended to be used while in MO Mobile station motion or during halts at unspecified points FB Base station Land station in the land mobile service Land Mobile ML Land mobile station Mobile station in the land mobile service FC Coast station Land station in the maritime mobile service FP Port station Coast station in the port operations service Maritime Mobile MS Ship station Mobile station in the maritime mobile service OE Oceanographic data interrogation station Oceanographic data interrogation station OD Oceanographic data station Oceanographic data station Generic FA Aeronautical station Land station in the aeronautical mobile service Aeronautical mobile MA Aircraft station Mobile station in the aeronautical mobile service Aeronautical mobile Route FD Aeronautical station Land station in the aeronautical mobile (R) service Aeronautical mobile Off FG Aeronautical station Land station in the aeronautical mobile (OR) service Route RN Radionavigation land station Land station in the radionavigation service Generic Radionavigation NR Radionavigation mobile station Mobile station in the radionavigation service NL Maritime radionavigation land station Land station in the maritime radionavigation service Maritime Radionavigation RM Maritime radionavigation mobile station
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Verification of the Concept of Using LOFAR Radio
    sensors Article Experimental Verification of the Concept of Using LOFAR Radio-Telescopes as Receivers in Passive Radiolocation Systems † Julia Kłos 1, Konrad J˛edrzejewski 1,* , Aleksander Droszcz 1, Krzysztof Kulpa 1 , Mariusz Pozoga˙ 2 and Jacek Misiurewicz 1 1 Institute of Electronic Systems, Faculty of Electronics and Information Technology, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 15/19, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] (J.K.); [email protected] (A.D.); [email protected] (K.K.); [email protected] (J.M.) 2 Space Research Centre Polish Academy of Science, Bartycka 18A, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-22-234-5883 † This paper is an extended version of the paper published in the 2020 21st International Radar Symposium (IRS). Abstract: The paper presents a new idea of using a low-frequency radio-telescope belonging to the LO- FAR network as a receiver in a passive radar system. The structure of a LOFAR radio-telescope station is described in the context of applying this radio-telescope for detection of aerial (airplanes) and space (satellite) targets. The theoretical considerations and description of the proposed signal processing schema for the passive radar based on a LOFAR radio-telescope are outlined in the paper. The results of initial experiments verifying the concept of a LOFAR station use as a receiver and Citation: Kłos, J.; J˛edrzejewski,K.; a commercial digital radio broadcasting (DAB) transmitters as illuminators of opportunity for aerial Droszcz, A.; Kulpa, K.; Pozoga,˙ M.; object detection are presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Base Stations and Wireless Networks: the WHO Viewpoint
    Base Stations and Wireless Networks: T he WH O V iewpoint D r Colin R oy D irector NIR Branch A ustralian R adiation Protection and Nuclear Safety A gency WWHHOO WWoorrkksshhoopp oonn HHeeaalltthh EEffffeeccttss aanndd MMaannaaggeemmeenntt ooff RRFF FFiieellddss MMeellbboouurrnnee,, AAuussttrraalliiaa 1177--1188 NNoovveemmbbeerr 22000055 INTERNATIONAL EMF PROJECT Workshop on Base Stations and Wireless Networks Geneva, Switzerland, 15 - 16 June 2005 Scope and Objectives: Mike Repacholi Technology -The Mobile Revolution: Mike Walker -International standardization of wireless technologies & EMF: Kevin Hughes -Assessment of human exposure from wireless devices : Niels Kuster -Modulated RF: Mechanistic viewpoint & health implications: Peter Valberg Health Effects & Exposure Assessment -A review of non-thermal health effects: Bernard Veyret -Base stations and electromagnetic hypersensitivity symptoms: Elaine Fox -Studies on base stations & telecommunications towers: Anders Ahlbom -Dosimetric criteria for an epidemiological bs study: Georg Neubauer -Personal RF Exposure Assessment: Joe Wiart -Laboratory and Volunteer Trials of an RF Personal Dosimeter: Simon Mann -Occupational exposure to bs antennas on buildings: Kjell Hansson Mild -Policy options - a comparative study in 5 countries: O. Borraz/ D. Salomon Workshop on Base Stations & Wireless Networks Day 2 P2olicy options -Current national government responses in Russia: Youri Grigoriev -The Swiss regulation and its application: Jürg Baumann -Current Government responses in New Zealand and
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Proposals for Wrc-19 // Propuestas
    ORGANIZACION DE LOS ESTADOS AMERICANOS ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES Comisión Interamericana de Telecomunicaciones Inter-American Telecommunication Commission 30 MEETING OF PERMANENT OEA/Ser.L/XVII.4.2.30 CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE II: CCP.II-RADIO-30/doc. 4357/17 RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS 13 March 2018 November 27 to December 1, 2017 Original: Textual Barranquilla, Colombia PRELIMINARY PROPOSALS FOR WRC-19 Output document of the 30th Meeting of the PCC.II (Item on the Agenda: 3.1) (Documents submitted by the Coordinators) CITEL, 1889 F ST. NW., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006, U.S.A. TEL: +1 202 370 4713 FAX: +1 202 458 6854 e-mail: [email protected] Web page: http://www.citel.oas.org TABLE OF CONTENTS AGENDA ITEM 1.8 ..................................................................................................................................... 2 AGENDA ITEM 1.16 ................................................................................................................................. 16 AGENDA ITEM 7, ISSUE E ..................................................................................................................... 19 AGENDA ITEM 9.1, ISSUE 9.1.7 ............................................................................................................. 21 CCPII-2017-30-4357_i 15.03.18 1 30 MEETING OF PERMANENT OEA/Ser.L/XVII.4.2.30 CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE II: CCP.II-RADIO-30/doc. 30-4357-1-8/17 RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS 30 November 2017 November 27 to December 1, 2017 Original: English Barranquilla, Colombia PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL (PP) FOR
    [Show full text]
  • Radiolocation and Tracking of Automatic Identification System Signals for Maritime Situational Awareness
    Radiolocation and Tracking of Automatic Identification System Signals for Maritime Situational Awareness 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 F. Papi , D. Tarchi , M.Vespe , F. Oliveri , F. Borghese , G. Aulicino , A. Vollero 1 European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen (IPSC), Maritime Affairs Unit, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027, Ispra (VA), Italy. 2 Elman s.r.l., Via di valle Caia km 4.7, Pomezia (Rome), Italy. 3 Italian Coast Guard, Viale dell'Arte 16, Rome, Italy. Keywords: AIS, Radiolocation, TDOA, EKF Abstract The Automatic Identification System (AIS), a ship reporting system originally designed for collision avoidance, is becoming a cornerstone of maritime situational awareness. The recent increase of terrestrial networks and satellite constellations of receivers is providing global tracking data that enable a wide spectrum of applications beyond collision avoidance. Nevertheless, AIS suffers the lack of security measures that makes it prone to receiving positions that are unintentionally incorrect, jammed or deliberately falsified. In this work we analyse a solution to the problem of AIS data verification that can be implemented within a generic networks of ground AIS base stations with no need for additional sensors or technologies. The proposed approach combines a classic radio-localisation method based on Time Difference of Arrival (TDoA) with an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) designed to track vessels in geodetic coordinates. The approach is validated using anonymised real AIS data collected by multiple base stations that partly share coverage areas. The results show a deviation between the estimated origin of detected signals and the broadcast position data in the order of hundreds of meters, therefore demonstrating the operational potential of the methodology.
    [Show full text]