DOCSLIB.ORG

Jet Airways 0.20 Spicejet 0.10 Go Air 0.09 Air Pegasus 0.00 Vistara 0.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 Cancellation Rate (%)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jet Airways 0.20 Spicejet 0.10 Go Air 0.09 Air Pegasus 0.00 Vistara 0.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 Cancellation Rate (%) Subject: Performance of domestic airlines for the year 2016. Traffic data submitted by various domestic airlines has been analysed for the month of August 2016. Following are the salient features: Passenger Growth Passengers carried by domestic airlines during Jan-Aug 2016 were 644.68 lakhs as against 523.55 lakhs during the corresponding period of previous year thereby registering a growth of 23.14 % (Ref Table 1). 700.00 644.68 Growth: YoY = + 23.14 % MoM = + 23.98% 600.00 8 % 523.55 500.00 400.00 2015 300.00 2016 200.00 Pax Carried (in Lakhs) Carried(in Pax 83.81 100.00 67.60 0.00 YoY MoM Passenger Load Factor The passenger load factors of various scheduled domestic airlines in Aug 2016 are as follows (Ref Table 2): 100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 Pax LoadFactorPax (%) 20.0 10.0 0.0 Air Jet JetLite Spicejet Go Air IndiGo Air Air Asia Vistara Air Trujet Air India Airways Costa Pegasus Carnival Jul-16 Aug-16 1 The passenger load factor in the month of Aug 2016 has almost remained constant compared to previous month primarily due to the end of tourist season. Cancellations The overall cancellation rate of scheduled domestic airlines for the month of Aug 2016 has been 0.90%. Airline-wise details of cancellations are as follows: Air Carnival 20.00 Trujet 13.06 Air Costa 6.85 IndiGo 1.19 Air India (Dom) 1.05 JetLite 0.44 Air Asia 0.32 Jet Airways 0.20 Spicejet 0.10 Go Air 0.09 Air Pegasus 0.00 Vistara 0.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 Cancellation Rate (%) Note:-Air Pegasus did not operated during the month of August 2016 Various reasons of cancellations are indicated below: Conse/Misc 8.5% Technical 32.8% Commercial 44.3% Operational 10.1% Weather 4.3% 2 Passenger Complaints during the month During August 2016, a total of 885 passenger related complaints had been received by the scheduled domestic airlines. The number of complaints per 10,000 passengers carried for the month of August 2016 has been 0.9. The airline-wise details are as follows: Air Carnival 2.5 Air India (Dom) 2.4 Jet Airways + JetLite 1.3 Trujet 1.0 Go Air 1.0 Air Costa 0.9 Spicejet 0.8 Air Asia 0.8 IndiGo 0.3 Vistara 0.2 Air Pegasus 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 No. of Complaints/10,000 Pax Various reasons of passenger complaints are indicated below: Catering Others Fare 0.2% 6.9% 1.7% Refund Staff Behaviour 4.7% 8.9% Disability 0.2% Flight Problem 32.0% Customer Service 28.2% Baggage 17.1% 3 The reason for complaint as percentage compared to the previous month is as follows: 40.0 34.2 35.0 31.3 30.3 30.0 27.4 24.5 24.2 25.0 19.7 19.2 20.0 17.5 15.0 10.5 10.1 7.7 7.7 10.0 7.4 6.4 6.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 1.9 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 Fare Refund Flight Baggage Customer Disability Staff Catering Others Problem Service Behaviour Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 Airline-wise status of redressal of complaints is given at Table – 4. Compliance of Route Dispersal Guidelines During the month of Aug 2016, all the scheduled domestic airlines complied with the mandatory capacity deployment requirements contained in the Route Dispersal Guidelines. Airline-wise details are given in the following Table: ASKM Deployment (%) of Category I Airline Cat III Cat IIA Cat II Air India + Alliance Air 116.9 1.80 21.5 Jet Airways + JetLite 71.0 1.10 12.7 Spicejet 103.0 1.03 25.9 Go Air 159.8 1.36 69.8 IndiGo 137.2 1.18 22.1 Vistara 58.8 1.60 15.2 Air Asia 303.4 5.48 42.8 Minimum Capacity Requirement in accordance with RDG (As % of Capacity Deployed in Category I) Category II - 10% Category IIA - 1% Category III - 50% 4 On-Time Performance (Scheduled Domestic Airlines) On-Time Performance (OTP) of scheduled domestic airlines has been computed for four metro airports viz. Bangalore, Delhi, Hyderabad and Mumbai. Airline-wise OTP at four metro airports for the month of Aug 2016 is as follows: OTP at Four Metro Airports IndiGo 83.8 Spicejet 83.1 Vistara 83.1 Jet Airways+JetLite 76.9 Go Air* 76.5 Air India (Dom) 71.8 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 OTP (%) *Note - Operations of Go Air only at BOM, BLR, DEL. Airport-wise On-Time Performance of scheduled domestic airlines complying with Route Dispersal Guidelines is as follows: 5 Air India (Domestic) BLR 84.0 HYD 83.3 DEL 75.8 BOM 57.7 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 OTP (%) Jet Airways + JetLite BLR 90.4 HYD 83.3 DEL 82.7 BOM 64.9 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 OTP (%) 6 Spicejet HYD 87.0 BLR 86.1 DEL 84.6 BOM 72.8 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 OTP (%) Go Air DEL 90.6 BLR 79.1 BOM 61.8 HYD 0.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 OTP (%) 7 IndiGo DEL 90.1 BLR 89.6 HYD 87.9 BOM 66.7 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 OTP (%) Vistara HYD 96.9 BLR 96.6 DEL 86.4 BOM 66.7 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 OTP (%) Reasons for delay have been analysed, which are presented below. It has been found that majority of delays have been attributed to ‘Reactionary’. 8 select bucket fareon in highestthe EarnedRevenue 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% The revenue earned 0.7% 0.6% 0.3% 0.1% 0.4% 0.3% Fare in Highest Bucket Sold & Seats 0.3% 0.2% bucket fare Highest Sold in Seats of % 0.5% Reactionary64% 0.3% and the number of seats sold 0.9% 1.0% 0.9% Airport 2% Airport 20 20 0.6% Jet Airways Jul 0.5% sectors - 16 0.3% 0.4% 0.2% Aug Wx 2% Wx 0.3% follows: is as - 16 0.0% 0.3% ATC 19% ATC 0.0% 0.3% 0.2% by 0.6% 0.3% 4% Ops scheduled Tech 5% Tech Ramp 1% Ramp 0.3% 0.3% 1% Misc Pax 2% Pax 0.9% 0.4% 1.2% 2.8% private airlines 0.4% 1.0% 0.8% 0.3% 9 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 1.91% 2.0% 0.78% 0.7% 1.34% 1.0% bucket fare Highest in Earned Revenue of % 0.85% 0.8% 1.26% 1.0% 2.76% 2.8% 2.63% 1.7% Jul 1.69% - 16 1.4% 1.16% Aug 0.6% 0.85% - 16 0.0% 1.14% 0.2% 1.15% 0.9% 1.97% 0.8% 0.97% 1.0% 3.13% 3.0% 3.95% 10.9% 2.51% 3.8% 2.58% 1.8% 10 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 0.48% 0.06% 0.13% 0.02% 0.01% 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% bucket fare Highest in Earned Revenue of % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% bucket fare Highest Sold in Seats of % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.28% 0.04% Jul 0.03% Jul 0.00% - - Indigo 16 0.00% 16 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Aug 0.02% Aug 0.00% 0.08% 0.01% - - 16 16 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.83% 0.17% 0.02% 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% 0.04% 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 0.78% 0.12% 0.00% 0.00% 11 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 0.11% 0.04% 4.07% 1.08% 0.00% 0.00% 0.52% 0.14% % of Revenue Earned in Highest fare bucket fare Highest in Earned Revenue of % 0.68% 0.21% 0.78% 0.17% bucket fare Highest Sold in Seats of % 0.00% 0.00% 2.98% 0.77% 0.17% 0.09% 0.00% 0.00% Jul 0.15% Jul 0.04% - - Go Go Air 16 0.29% 16 0.06% 0.20% 0.03% Aug Aug 0.00% 0.00% - - 16 16 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.38% 0.09% 0.00% 0.00% 0.51% 0.17% 0.00% 0.00% 0.39% 0.15% 2.87% 0.90% 0.00% 0.00% 0.32% 0.08% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 12 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 1.00% 0.15% 2.20% 0.33% 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% 0.04% 0.01% 0.10% bucket fare Highest in Earned Revenue of % 0.02% 0.10% 0.02% bucket fare Highest Sold in Seats of % 0.20% 0.03% 0.10% 0.02% 0.40% 0.06% 1.10% 0.15% 2.70% 0.40% 3.50% 0.69% Jul 4.60% Jul 0.96% Spicejet - - 16 0.50% 16 0.08% 0.40% 0.06% Aug 0.90% Aug 0.20% 0.00% 0.00% - - 16 0.10% 16 0.01% 0.03% 0.01% 0.10% 0.04% 0.00% 0.00% 1.70% 0.34% 0.00% 0.00% 1.60% 0.27% 1.10% 0.18% 1.80% 0.28% 2.20% 0.34% 1.70% 0.33% 0.00% 0.05% 4.90% 0.79% 5.70% 1.17% 0.10% 0.03% 0.80% 0.08% 13 Vistara % of Seats Sold in Highest fare bucket 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.45% 0.43% 0.42% 0.42% 0.21% 0.19% 0.06% 0.06% 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% 0.0% BLR-BOM BLR-DEL BOM-DEL DEL-CCU DEL-GAU DEL-HYD DEL-SXR Jul-16 Aug-16 % of Revenue Earned in Highest fare bucket 5.0% 4.0% 3.1% 3.1% 3.0% 2.0% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 1.0% 0.7% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% BLR-BOM BLR-DEL BOM-DEL DEL-CCU DEL-GAU DEL-HYD DEL-SXR Jul-16 Aug-16 14 Air Asia % of Seats Sold in Highest fare bucket 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.34% 1.0% 0.21% 0.07% 0.03% 0.0% BLR-DEL DEL-GAU Jul-16 Aug-16 % of Revenue Earned in Highest fare bucket 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.54% 1.40% 1.0% 0.67% 0.42% 0.0% BLR-DEL DEL-GAU Jul-16 Aug-16 15 Compliance of CAR Section 3, Series M, Part IV In accordance with the Civil Aviation Requirement Section 3, Series M, Part IV, airline are required to submit data on number of cases of denied boarding, cancellations and delays along with the status on a monthly basis.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 669419-1 EFFICIENCY of AIRLINES in INDIA ABSTRACT This Paper Measures the Technical Efficiency of Various Airlines Operating In
    Natarajan and Jain Efficiency of Airlines in India EFFICIENCY OF AIRLINES IN INDIA Ramachandran Natarajan, College of Business, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville TN, 38505, U.S.A. E-Mail: [email protected] , Tel: 931-372-3001 and Ravi Kumar Jain, Icfai Business School, IFHE University, Hyderabad-501203 (AP) India. E-Mail: [email protected] , Mobile: 91+94405-71846 ABSTRACT This paper measures the technical efficiency of various airlines operating in India over a ten-year period, 2001-2010. For this, the Input Efficiency Profiling model of DEA along with the standard Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is used to gain additional insights. The study period is divided into two sub-periods, 2001-2005 and 2006-2010, to assess if there is any impact on the efficiency of airlines due to the significant entry of private operators. The study includes all airlines, private and publicly owned, both budget and full service, operating in the country offering scheduled services on domestic and international routes. While several studies on efficiency of airlines have been conducted globally, a research gap exists as to similar studies concerning airlines in India. This paper addresses that gap and thus contributes to the literature. Key Words: Airlines in India, DEA analysis, Input efficiency profiling, Productivity analysis, Technical efficiency. Introduction The civil aviation industry in India has come a long way since the Air Corporation Act was repealed in the year 1994 allowing private players to operate in scheduled services category. Several private players showed interest and were granted the status of scheduled carriers in the year 1995. However, many of those private airlines soon shut down.
    [Show full text]
  • CFA Institute Research Challenge CFA Society India
    CFA Institute Research Challenge hosted by CFA Society India submitted by Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad (India) The CFA Institute Research Challenge is a global competition that tests the equity research and valuation, investment report writing, and presentation skills of university students. The following report was submitted by a team of university students as part of this annual educational initiati ve and should not be considered a professional report. Disclosures: Ownership and material conflicts of interest The author(s), or a member of their household, of this report does not hold a financial interest in the securities of this company. The author(s), or a member of their household, of this report does not know of the existence of any conflicts of interest that might bias the content or publication of this report. Receipt of compensation Compensation of the author(s) of this report is not based on investment banking revenue. Position as an officer or a director The author(s), or a member of their household, does not serve as an officer, director, or advisory board member of the subject company. Market making The author(s) does not act as a market maker in the subject company’s securities. Disclaimer The information set forth herein has been obtained or derived from sources generally available to the public and believed by the author(s) to be reliable, but the author(s) does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy or completeness. The information is not intended to be used as the basis of any investment decisions by any person or entity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Performance of Domestic Airlines for the Year 2016
    Subject: Performance of domestic airlines for the year 2016. Traffic data submitted by various domestic airlines has been analysed for the month of September 2016. Following are the salient features: Passenger Growth Passengers carried by domestic airlines during Jan-Sept 2016 were 726.98 lakhs as against 590.21 lakhs during the corresponding period of previous year thereby registering a growth of 23.17 % (Ref Table 1). 800.00 726.98 Growth: YoY = + 23.17 % MoM = + 23.46% 700.00 8 % 590.21 600.00 500.00 400.00 2015 2016 300.00 200.00 Pax Lakhs) Carried(in Pax 82.30 100.00 66.66 0.00 YoY MoM Passenger Load Factor The passenger load factors of various scheduled domestic airlines in Sept 2016 are as follows (Ref Table 2): 100.0 93.2 93.5 89.4 90.0 86.0 83.3 82.8 82.1 82.1 81.7 79.9 79.0 78.9 77.7 77.7 77.5 75.6 80.0 73.72 72.7 70.8 69.2 65.57 70.0 64.48 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 Pax Pax FactorLoad (%) 20.0 10.0 0 0.0 0.0 Air Jet JetLite Spicejet Go Air IndiGo Air Air Asia Vistara Air Trujet Air India Airways Costa Pegasus Carnival Aug-16 Sep-16 1 The passenger load factor in the month of Sept 2016 has almost remained constant compared to previous month primarily due to the end of tourist season. Cancellations The overall cancellation rate of scheduled domestic airlines for the month of Sept 2016 has been 0.42 %.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition Issues in the Air Transport Sector in India
    2009 StudyStudy on on ImpactCompetition of Trade Issues in Liberalisationthe Domestic in the Information Technology SectorSegment on Development of the Air Draft ReportTransport Sector in Administrative Staff College of India HyderabadIndia Revised Final Report 2007 Administrative Staff College of India, Hyderabad Competition Issues in the Air Transport Sector in India Table of Contents Sl.No Chapter Page No. 1. Introduction 1 2. ToR I 4 3. ToR II & III 15 4. ToR IV 29 5. ToR V 30 6. ToR VI & VII 43 7. ToR VIII 91 8. ToR IX 99 9. ToR X 120 10. ToR XI 121 11. Conclusions and Recommendations 126 12. References 129 ____________________________________________________asci research and consultancy ii Competition Issues in the Air Transport Sector in India List of Tables Table Title Page No. No. I.1 Calculation of HHI 12 I.2 Fleet Size of All Scheduled Airlines 12 I.3 Order for Airplanes 13 I.4 Net Profit/Loss incurred by Different Airlines 16 II.1 City Pair-wise Herfindahl index of Pax. Carried in 2006-07 28 17 II.2 Passenger Load Factor for Indian 22 II.3 Passenger Load Factor for Indian 25 II.4 Slots on Delhi-Mumbai Route 28 II.5 Average Age of Fleet 28 II.6 Fleet Size of All Scheduled Airlines 29 IV.1 Descriptive Statistics for Price Data: Delhi – Mumbai 30 IV.2 Taxes and Surcharges on Route : Delhi – Mumbai 32 IV.3 Taxes and Surcharges on Route : Mumbai – Delhi 32 IV.4 Pre merger (2006/07)-Delhi-Mumbai (passenger wise) 36 IV.5 Post Merger(2008) -Delhi Mumbai (slot wise) 36 IV.6 Pre merger (2006/07)-Delhi-Chennai (passenger wise) 37 IV.7 Post Merger(2008) -Delhi Chennai(slot wise) 37 IV.8 Pre merger (2006/07)-Bangalore-Chennai (passenger wise) 37 IV.9 Post Merger(2008) -Bangalore- Chennai(slot wise) 38 ____________________________________________________asci research and consultancy iii Competition Issues in the Air Transport Sector in India List of Figures Figure Title Page No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shut Down of Jet Airways
    Global Journal of Economics and Finance; Vol. 3 No. 3; October 2019 ISSN 2578-8809 (Print), ISSN 2578-8795 (Online) Published by Research Institute for Progression of Knowledge The Shut Down of Jet Airways Ashmita Tikku LIM College New York, USA Herbert Sherman, Ph.D. Professor of Management Department of Business Administration School of Business, Public Admin., and Info Sciences LIU-Brooklyn, H-700 1 University Plaza, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA Abstract The challenges of running a profitable, sustainable business are many, especially in the airline industry where profit margins are historically low. This case will examine the failure of Jet Airways, India’s second largest aviation company, to address allegations of financial misconduct and equipment failure that resulted in 30 passengers in one flight therein experiencing nose and ear bleeding. The question is, how did management address the sudden business downfall that resulted from these negative incidents? More specifically, what were the recovery plans that were developed to combat the adverse effects of these incidents on the company’s reputation, relationship with customers? More specifically, what was the impact of the firm’s decision to ask employees to leave without prior notice given its economic downturn. This failure will be analyzed through the lens of three organizational change models: Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model, the Organizational Life Cycle Model and Kurt Lewin’s Change Management Model. This analysis will include the question, how could the leaders and management team have acted as a support system for the consumers and the employees in the company. Behind the Scenes: About Jet Airways and its Origin Jet Airways (India) Private Limited was a highly reputed private airline in India with an average fleet age of 4.45 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook on Civil Aviation Statistics
    HHAANNDDBBOOOOKK OONN CCIIVVIILL 2017-18 AAVVIIAATTIIOONN SSTTAATTIISSTTIICCSS a glimpse of aviation statistics….. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION OVERVIEW Directorate General of Civil Aviation is the regulatory body governing the safety aspects of civil aviation in India. It is responsible for regulation of air transport services to/from/within India and for enforcement of civil air regulations, air safety and airworthiness standards. It also interfaces with all the regulatory functions of International Civil Aviation Organization. DGCA’s Vision Statement: “Endeavour to promote safe and efficient Air Transportation through regulation and proactive safety oversight system.” REGIONAL AND SUB-REGIONAL OFFICES OF DGCA. DGCA Head Quarters Western Region Northern Region Eastern Region Sothern Region Bengaluru Mumbai Delhi Kolkata Chennai RO RO RO RO RO Bhopal Lucknow Patna Hyderabad Kochi SRO SRO SRO SRO SRO Kanpur Bhubaneswar SRO SRO Patiala Guwahati SRO SRO RO: Regional office SRO: Sub-Regional office S DGCA has several directorates and divisions under its purview to carry out its functions. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION AIR TRANSPORT LEGAL AFFAIRS STATE SAFETY PERSONNEL LICENSING PROGRAMME FLIGHT TRAINING AND INTERNATIONAL SPORTS COOPERATION INVESTIGATION AND AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION PREVENTION CONTINUING SURVEILLANCE AND AIRWORTHINESS ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY AERODROMES AND ADMINISTRATION GROUND AIDS AIR NAVIGATION TRAINING SERVICES Sl. No. CONTENTS PAGE No. 1. PASSENGER TRAFFIC STATISTICS 1-5 2. CARGO TRAFFIC STATISTICS 6-7 3. AIRCRAFT STATISTICS 8-10 4. NSOP STATISTICS 11-12 5. OPERATING ECONOMICS STATISTICS 13-15 6. HUMAN RESOURCE STATISTICS 16-19 7. AIR SAFETY STATISTICS 20 8. OTHER AVIATION RELATED STATISTICS 21-24 PASSENGER TRAFFIC Air Passenger Traffic in India, both domestic and international witnessed a positive growth in the year 2017-18 compared to the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingfisher Airlines—King of Good Times Trapped in Bad Weather
    CASE STUDY Kingfisher Airlines—King of Good Times Trapped in Bad Weather Dr. J.N Mukhopadhay Prof. Subhendu Dey Prof. Prithviraj Bannerjee Ms. Soumali Dutta Sr. V.P. (Ex) SREI, Dean, Associate Dean and Assistant Professor, Research Associate, Globsyn Business School, Head - Knowledge Cell, Globsyn Business School, Globsyn Business School, Kolkata Globsyn Business School, Kolkata Kolkata Kolkata Th is case is not intended to show eff ective or ineff ective handling of decision or business processes © 2012 by Knowledge Cell, Globsyn Business School, Kolkata. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise (including the internet)—without the permission of Globsyn Business School n October 4th, 2012, Mrs. Sushmita Chakarborti, subsidiary. Vittal Mallya’s son Vijay Mallya, who previously, wife of Mr. Manas Chakraborti, a Store Manager managed the Brewery and Spirits division of UBL, was Owith Kingfi sher Airlines, committed suicide elected by the shareholders as the Chairman of UB Group, at their South-West Delhi residence. She was battling in 1983. Mallya expanded the UB groups’ business into depression and wrote a suicide note stating that her pharmaceuticals, paints, petrochemicals, plastic, electro- husband works with Kingfi sher Airlines, where they have mechanical batteries, food products, carbonated beverages, not paid him salary for the last six months and due to acute Pizza chains, soft ware, TV channels, and IPL, transforming fi nancial crisis of the family, she committed suicide11. UB Group as one of the largest business conglomerates Kingfi sher Airlines, launched in 2003 by UB Group with defi ned corporate structure and corporate governance Chairman Vijay Mallya as a premium full-service carrier policy 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Jet Airways: What to Concern?
    Case Study IIMK/CS/140/FIN/2020/15 March 2020 Jet Airways: What to Concern? Sudershan Kuntluru1 & Sanjeeth Baliga2 1Sudershan Kuntluru, Associate Professor, Finance, Accounting and Control, Indian Institute of Management, Kozhikode, IIMK Campus, Kunnamangalam, Kozhikode, Kerala 673570, India; Email: [email protected], Phone Number (+91) 495 – 2809250 2Sanjeeth Baliga, PGP 22 Student, Indian Institute of Management, Kozhikode, IIMK Campus, Kunnamangalam, Kozhikode, Kerala 673570, India; Email: [email protected] It was a monsoon month of August 2018, Naresh Goyal, the promoter of Jet Airways, is on his way to corporate office at Mumbai to attend an important meeting scheduled with senior management team. Driving through rains, he found himself in an uncertain condition over the future of his company. Jet Airways, then the second largest domestic airline by market share in India, was facing serious cash-crunchi and regulatory probe over alleged lapses in timely disclosure of default risk of loans worth rupees 11,000 croreii. The aviation sector itself was stressed facing a double whammy of increase in crude oil prices and a falling rupee in the highly competitive industry. Further, Jet Airways had in the previous week deferred announcement of its earnings for the June quarter and was yet to announce a date for the same. Amidst all the frenzy, the media brought to light that the audit firm BSR & Co declined to sign the airline’s first quarter earnings over differences with the management with regard to the ability of Jet Airways to continue as a going concerniii. Naresh Goyal had to work with the senior management team to bail Jet Airways out of the audit fiasco and also evaluate various funding options to meet liquidity requirements on priority.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigo Airlines Indigo Airlines Is Based in Delhi and Flies to Around 15 Destinations All Over India
    INTRODUCTION Brief Introduction It is a very well known fact that aviation sector not only brings immense benefits to communities and economies around the globe, but also is a key catalyst of economic growth, social development and tourism. It facilitates connectivity and access to international markets. Air transport currently supports 56.6 million jobs and accounts for over US$ 2.2 trillion of the global gross domestic product (GDP). Air passenger traffic in India is increasing on a tremendous pace. The sub-continent’s airport infrastructure is undergoing modernisation with the induction of most advanced facilities. It includes setting up of new Greenfield airports and installation of security, surveillance and air traffic navigation systems. A country‘s transportation sector plays an integral role in the growth and development of an economy. According to the ―Indian Aerospace Industry Analysis‖ report,2 in terms of passenger traffic, India is currently the ninth largest aviation market in the world. With regards to air cargo tonnage, India leads the South Asian region -consisting of Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, the Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.3 Currently, India has 128 airports – including 15 international airports. India is currently the 9th largest aviation market handling 121 million domestic and 41 million international passengers. Today, more than 85 international airlines operate to India and 5 Indian carriers connect over 40 countries. Market Size Total domestic passengers carried by the scheduled domestic airlines between January and May 2013 were 25.998 million, as against 25.808 million during the corresponding period of previous year thereby registering a growth of 0.74 per cent, revealed the statistics from Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA).
    [Show full text]
  • Jet Airways 2008 Kingfisher Acquired 49% Stake in Deccan Aviation Regregulaulattooryry Aauutthhoorriitiesties
    JEJETT AAIRIRWWAAYSYS AirAirlinlinee IIndndustustryry iinn InIndiadia 454 airports and airstrips (includes Operational, Non Operational, Abandoned and Disused Airports) 127 are owned & operated by AAI 16 - international, 7 custom airports, 28 civil enclaves Scheduled domestic air services - available from 82 airports May 2007- May 2008 25.5 million domestic & 22.4 million international passengers 20% growth – highest in the world Growth Rate Projections (for next 5 yrs) 15% p.a (Passenger Traffic) 11.4% p.a (Cargo Traffic) HisHistorytory 1911 First commercial flight Airmails from Allahabad to Naini(10 km) 1932 The Aviation Department of Tata Sons Ltd. Established 1938 Tata Airlines (successor to aviation division of Tata Sons) 1946 Tata Air Lines converted into a public Company and renamed Air India Limited Air India International incorporated 1948 Nationalization of Aircraft Industry 1953 Air India (serving the international sectors) Indian Airlines (serving domestic sectors) Deccan Airways, Airways India, Bharat Airways, Himalayan Aviation, Kalinga Airlines, Indian National Airways and Air Services of India HisHistorytory 1986 Private Sector Players permitted as Air taxi operators Players including Jet, Air Sahara, NEPC, East West, Modiluft,etcstarted service 1990 Open Sky Policy 1994 Private Carriers permitted to operate scheduled services 2003 Entry of low-cost carriers 2007 Merger of Indian Airlines into Air India Acquisition of Air Sahara by Jet Airways 2008 Kingfisher acquired 49% stake in Deccan Aviation RegRegulaulattooryry
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Buddha
    CORPORATE BUDDHA This case study is prepared by Team Think Tank Flight of the Phoenix The Indian Aviation Industry “Indian aviation market is the 9th largest in the world with size of US$ 16 Billion and has a potential to become the third largest by 2020 and largest by 2030.” Nobody would have predicted this in 1912, when the first air route between Delhi and Karachi was established. The first major development in the sector happened in 1953, when nationalization of Indian Airlines (IA) brought the domestic civil aviation sector under the purview of Indian Government. But government took the first major step in 1990, with its Open Sky policy and various other liberalization policies. In the year 2000, many private players started entering the Indian Aviation Industry, and it still is an attractive sector with great market potential and drivers, like: Foreign Direct Investments in domestic airlines Low Cost Carriers (LCC) Modern airports and a growing emphasis on No-Frills Airports (NFA) Cutting edge Information Technology (IT) interventions Despite all these initiatives most of the airlines operating in India are incurring losses. These losses are due to high operational cost, High cost of aviation turbine fuel, High service tax and other charges and Shortage of maintenance facilities. Present Scenario In the second quarter of 2015, domestic air passenger traffic surged by 19.2 per cent to 20.3 million from 17 million in the corresponding period a year ago. Total passenger carried in June 2015 increased at a rate of 13 per cent Y-o-Y to 8.8 million from 7.8 million in June 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Q400 Aircraft O 01 Freighter O 460 ~Flights Per Day O 51 Domestic Destinations O 8 International Destinations
    1 Disclaimer Information contained in our presentation is intended solely for your personal reference and is strictly confidential. Such information is subject to change without prior notice, its accuracy is not guaranteed and it may not contain all material information concerning the Company. Neither we nor our advisors make any representation regarding, and assumes no responsibility or liability for, the accuracy or completeness of, or any errors or omissions in, any information contained herein. In addition, certain statements contains our future growth prospects are forward-looking statements, which involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in such forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties relating to these statements include, but are not limited to, risks and uncertainties regarding fluctuations in earnings, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, our ability to manage growth, intense competition in aviation sector including those factors which may affect our cost advantage, wage fluctuations, our ability to attract and retain highly skilled professionals, time and cost overruns on various parameters, our ability to manage international operations, reduced demand for air travel, liability for damages, withdrawal or expiration of governmental fiscal incentives, political instability, legal restrictions on raising capital or general economic conditions affecting our industry. The words "anticipate", "believe", "estimate", "expect", "intend" and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify certain of such forward-looking statements. The Company may, from time to time, make additional written and oral forward-looking statements, including statements contained in our reports to shareholders. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company unless it is required by law.
    [Show full text]